Sec. 76.1302 Adjudicatory proceedings.
Any video programming vendor or multichannel video programming
distributor aggrieved by conduct that it alleges to constitute a
violation of the regulations set forth in this subpart may commence an
adjudicatory proceeding at the Commission.
(a) Notice required. Any aggrieved video programming vendor or
multichannel video programming distributor intending to file a complaint
under this section must first notify the defendant multichannel video
programming distributor that it intends to file a complaint with the
Commission based on actions alleged to violate one or more of the
provisions contained in Sec. 76.1301. The notice must be sufficiently
detailed so that its recipient(s) can determine the specific nature of
the potential complaint. The potential complainant must allow a minimum
of ten (10) days for the potential defendant(s) to respond before filing
a complaint with the Commission.
(b) General pleading requirements. Carriage agreement complaint
proceedings are generally resolved on a written record consisting of a
complaint, answer and reply, but may also include other written
submissions such as briefs and written interrogatories. All written
submissions, both substantive and procedural, must conform to the
following standards:
(1) Pleadings must be clear, concise, and explicit. All matters
concerning a claim, defense or requested remedy should be pleaded fully
and with specificity.
(2) Pleadings must contain facts which, if true, are sufficient to
constitute a violation of the Act or Commission order or regulation, or
a defense to such alleged violation.
(3) Facts must be supported by relevant documentation or affidavit.
(4) Legal arguments must be supported by appropriate judicial,
Commission, or statutory authority.
(5) Opposing authorities must be distinguished.
(6) Copies must be provided of all non-Commission authorities relied
upon which are not routinely available in national reporting systems,
such as unpublished decisions or slip opinions of courts or
administrative agencies.
(7) Parties are responsible for the continuing accuracy and
completeness of all information and supporting authority furnished in a
pending complaint proceeding. Information submitted, as well as relevant
legal authorities, must be current and updated as necessary and in a
timely manner at any time before a decision is rendered on the merits of
the complaint.
(c) Complaint.
[[Page 632]]
(1) A carriage agreement complaint shall contain:
(i) The name of the complainant and defendant;
(ii) The address and telephone number of the complainant, the type
of multichannel video programming distributor that describes the
defendant, and the address and telephone number of the defendant;
(iii) The name, address and telephone number of complainant's
attorney, if represented by counsel;
(iv) Citation to the section of the Communications Act and/or
Commission regulation or order alleged to have been violated;
(v) A complete statement of facts, which, if proven true, would
constitute such a violation;
(vi) Any evidence that supports the truth or accuracy of the alleged
facts, including, when relevant, any written carriage agreement between
the complainant and the defendant, with proprietary information
redacted;
(vii) Evidence that supports complainant's belief that the
defendant, where necessary, meets the attribution standards for
application of the carriage agreement regulations;
(viii) For complaints alleging a violation of Sec. 76.1301(c),
evidence that supports complainant's claim that the effect of the
conduct complained of is to unreasonably restrain the ability of the
complainant to compete fairly;
(ix) The specific relief sought, and the rationale and any evidence
in support of the relief sought.
(2) Every complaint alleging a violation of the carriage agreement
requirements shall be accompanied by a sworn affidavit signed by an
authorized officer or agent of the complainant. This affidavit shall
contain a statement that the affiant has read the complaint and that to
the best of the affiant's knowledge, information and belief formed after
reasonable inquiry it is well grounded in fact and is warranted under
Commission regulations and policies or is a good faith argument for the
extension, modification or reversal of such regulations or policies, and
it is not interposed for any improper purpose. If the complaint is
signed in violation of this rule, the Commission upon motion or its own
initiative shall impose upon the complainant an appropriate sanction.
(3) The following format may be used in cases to which it is
applicable, with such modifications as the circumstances may render
necessary:
Before the Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554
In the matter of Complainant, v. Defendant.
File No. (To be inserted by the Commission) [Insert Subject/Nature
of Violation]
Carriage Agreement Complaint
To: The Commission.
The complainant (here insert full name of complainant, and if a
corporation, the corporate title of such complainant).
1. (Here state the complainant's post office address and telephone
number.)
2. (Here insert the name, defendant's method of multichannel video
distribution, address and telephone number of defendant.)
3. (Here insert fully and clearly the specific act or thing
complained of, together with such facts as are necessary to give full
understanding of the matter, including relevant legal and documentary
support.)
Wherefore, complainant asks (here state specifically the relief
desired, including rationale and relevant legal and documentary support
for such relief).
(Date)
(Name of complainant)
(Name, address, and telephone number of attorney, if any)
(4) The complaint must be accompanied by appropriate evidence
demonstrating that the required notification pursuant to paragraph (a)
of this section has been made.
(d) Answer.
(1) Any multichannel video programming distributor upon which a
carriage agreement complaint is served under this section shall answer
within thirty (30) days of service of the complaint, unless otherwise
directed by the Commission.
(2) The answer shall advise the parties and the Commission fully and
completely of the nature of any and all defenses, and shall respond
specifically to all material allegations of the complaint. Collateral or
immaterial issues shall be avoided in answers and every effort should be
made to narrow the issues. Any defendant failing to file and serve an
answer within the time and in the manner prescribed by these rules may
be deemed in default and an order
[[Page 633]]
may be entered against defendant in accordance with the allegations
contained in the complaint.
(3) The answer shall state concisely any and all defenses to each
claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments on which the
adverse party relies. If the defendant is without knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment,
the defendant shall so state and this has the effect of a denial. When a
defendant intends in good faith to deny only part of an averment, the
answer shall specify so much of it as is true and shall deny only the
remainder. The defendant may make its denials as specific denials of
designated averments or paragraphs, or may generally deny all the
averments except such designated averments or paragraphs as the
defendant expressly admits. When the defendant intends to controvert all
averments, the defendant may do so by general denial.
(4) Averments in a complaint are deemed to be admitted when not
denied in the answer.
(5) The answer shall also address the relief requested in the
complaint, including legal and documentary support for such response,
and may include an alternative relief proposal without prejudice to any
denials or defenses raised.
(e) Reply. Within twenty (20) days after service of an answer, the
complainant may file and serve a reply which shall be responsive to
matters contained in the answer and shall not contain new matters.
Failure to reply will not be deemed an admission of any allegations
contained in the answer, except with respect to any affirmative defenses
set forth therein.
(f) Motions. Except as provided in this section, or upon a showing
of extraordinary circumstances, additional motions or pleadings by any
party will not be accepted.
(g) Discovery.
(1) The Commission staff may in its discretion order discovery
limited to the issues specified by the Commission. Such discovery may
include answers to written interrogatories or document production.
(2) The Commission staff may in its discretion hold a status
conference with the parties, pursuant to paragraph (j) of this section,
to determine the scope of discovery.
(3) If the Commission staff determines that extensive discovery is
required or that resolution of the complaint will require resolution of
disputed facts, the staff will advise the parties that the proceeding
will be referred to an administrative law judge in accordance with
paragraph (m) of this section.
(h) Confidentiality of proprietary information.
(1) Any materials generated or provided by a party in the course of
adjudicating a carriage agreement complaint under this subpart may be
designated as proprietary by that party if the party believes in good
faith that the materials fall within an exemption to disclosure
contained in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(b). Any
party asserting confidentiality for such materials shall so indicate by
clearly marking each page, or portion thereof, for which a proprietary
designation is claimed. If a proprietary designation is challenged, the
party claiming confidentiality will have the burden of demonstrating, by
a preponderance of the evidence, that the material designated as
proprietary falls under the standards for nondisclosure enunciated in
the FOIA.
(2) Materials marked as proprietary may be disclosed solely to the
following persons, only for use in prosecuting or defending a party to
the complaint action, and only to the extent necessary to assist in the
prosecution or defense of the case:
(i) Counsel of record representing the parties in the complaint
action and any support personnel employed by such attorneys;
(ii) Officers or employees of the opposing party who are named by
the opposing party as being directly involved in the prosecution or
defense of the case;
(iii) Consultants or expert witnesses retained by the parties;
(iv) The Commission and its staff; and
[[Page 634]]
(v) Court reporters and stenographers in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this section. These individuals shall not disclose
information designated as proprietary to any person who is not
authorized under this section to receive such information, and shall not
use the information in any activity or function other than the
prosecution or defense in the case before the Commission. Each
individual who is provided access to the information by the opposing
party shall sign a notarized statement affirmatively stating, or shall
certify under penalty of perjury, that the individual has personally
reviewed the Commission's rules and understands the limitations they
impose on the signing party.
(3) No copies of materials marked proprietary may be made except
copies to be used by persons designated in paragraph (h)(2) of this
section. Each party shall maintain a log recording the number of copies
made of all proprietary material and the persons to whom the copies have
been provided.
(4) Upon termination of the complaint proceeding, including all
appeals and petitions, all originals and reproductions of any
proprietary materials, along with the log recording persons who received
copies of such materials, shall be provided to the producing party. In
addition, upon final termination of the complaint proceeding, any notes
or other work product derived in whole or in part from the proprietary
materials of an opposing or third party shall be destroyed
(i) Other required written submissions.
(1) The Commission may, in its discretion, require the parties to
file briefs summarizing the facts and issues presented in the pleadings
and other record evidence. These briefs shall contain the findings of
fact and conclusions of law which that party is urging the Commission to
adopt, with specific citations to the record, and supported by relevant
authority and analysis.
(2) The Commission may require the parties to submit any additional
information it deems appropriate for a full, fair, and expeditious
resolution of the proceeding, including copies of all contracts and
documents reflecting arrangements and understandings alleged to violate
the carriage agreement requirements set forth in the Communications Act
and Sec. 76.1301, as well as affidavits and exhibits.
(3) Any briefs submitted shall be filed concurrently by both the
complainant and defendant at such time as is designated by the staff.
Such briefs shall not exceed fifty (50) pages.
(4) Reply briefs may be submitted by either party within twenty (20)
days from the date initial briefs are due. Reply briefs shall not exceed
thirty (30) pages.
(5) Briefs containing information which is claimed by an opposing or
third party to be proprietary under paragraph (h) of this section shall
be submitted to the Commission in confidence pursuant to the
requirements of Sec. 0.459 of this chapter, and shall be clearly marked
``Not for Public Inspection.'' An edited version removing all
proprietary data shall be filed with the Commission for inclusion in the
public file within five (5) days from the date the unedited version is
submitted and served on opposing parties.
(j) Status conference.
(1) In any carriage agreement complaint proceeding, the Commission
staff may in its discretion direct the attorneys and/or the parties to
appear for a conference to consider:
(i) Simplification or narrowing of the issues;
(ii) The necessity for or desirability of amendments to the
pleadings, additional pleadings, or other evidentiary submissions;
(iii) Obtaining admissions of fact or stipulations between the
parties as to any or all of the matters in controversy;
(iv) Settlement of the matters in controversy by agreement of the
parties;
(v) The necessity for and extent of discovery, including objections
to interrogatories or requests for written documents;
(vi) The need and schedule for filing briefs, and the date for any
further conferences; and
(vii) Such other matters that may aid in the disposition of the
complaint.
(2) Any party may request that a conference be held at any time
after the complaint has been filed.
[[Page 635]]
(3) Conferences will be scheduled by the Commission at such time and
place as it may designate, to be conducted in person or by telephone
conference call.
(4) The failure of any attorney or party, following reasonable
notice, to appear at a scheduled conference will be deemed a waiver and
will not preclude the Commission from conferring with those parties or
counsel present.
(5) During a status conference, the Commission staff may issue oral
rulings pertaining to a variety of interlocutory matters relevant to the
conduct of a carriage agreement complaint proceeding including, inter
alia, procedural matters, discovery, and the submission of briefs or
other evidentiary materials. These rulings will be promptly memorialized
in writing and served on the parties. When such rulings require a party
to take affirmative action not subject to deadlines established by
another provision of this subpart, such action will be required within
ten (10) days from the date of the written memorialization unless
otherwise directed by the staff.
(k) Specifications as to pleadings, briefs, and other documents;
subscriptions.
(1) All papers filed in a carriage agreement complaint proceeding
must be drawn in conformity with the requirements of Secs. 1.49 and 1.50
of this chapter.
(2) All averments of claims or defenses in complaints and answers
shall be made in numbered paragraphs. The contents of each paragraph
shall be limited as far as practicable to a statement of a single set of
circumstances. Each claim founded on a separate transaction or
occurrence and each affirmative defense shall be separately stated to
facilitate the clear presentation of the matters set forth.
(3) The original of all pleadings and submissions by any party shall
be signed by that party, or by the party's attorney. Complaints must be
signed by the complainant. The signing party shall state his or her
address and telephone number and the date on which the document was
signed. Copies should be conformed to the original. Except when
otherwise specifically provided by rule or statute, pleadings need not
be verified. The signature of an attorney or party shall be a
certification that the attorney or party has read the pleading, motion,
or other paper; that to the best of his or her knowledge, information
and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, it is well grounded in fact
and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the
extension, modification or reversal of existing law; and that it is not
interposed for any improper purpose. If any pleading or other submission
is signed in violation of this provision, the Commission shall upon
motion or upon its own initiative impose upon the party an appropriate
sanction. Where the pleading or submission is signed by counsel, the
provisions of Secs. 1.52 and 1.24 of this chapter shall also apply
(l) Copies; service.
(1) The complainant shall file an original plus three copies of the
complaint with the Commission.
(2) An original plus two copies shall be filed of all pleadings and
documents other than the complaint.
(3) The complainant shall serve the complaint on each defendant at
the same time that it is filed at the Commission.
(4) All subsequent pleadings and briefs, as well as all letters,
documents or other written submissions, shall be served by the filing
party on all other parties to the proceeding, together with proof of
such service in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 1.47 of this
chapter.
(5) The parties to any carriage agreement complaint proceeding
brought pursuant to this section may be required to file additional
copies of any or all papers filed in the proceeding.
(m) Referral to administrative law judge.
(1) After reviewing the complaint, answer and reply, and at any
stage of the proceeding thereafter, the Commission staff may, in its
discretion, designate any carriage agreement complaint proceeding for an
adjudicatory hearing before an administrative law judge.
(2) Before designation for hearing, the staff shall notify, either
orally or in writing, the parties to the proceeding of its intent to so
designate, and the parties shall be given a period of
[[Page 636]]
ten (10) days to elect to resolve the dispute resolution procedures, or
to proceed with an adjudicatory hearing. Such election shall be
submitted in writing to the Commission.
(3) Unless otherwise directed by the Commission, or upon motion by
the Mass Media Bureau Chief, the Mass Media Bureau Chief shall not be
deemed to be a party to a carriage agreement complaint proceeding
designated for a hearing before an administrative law judge pursuant to
this paragraph (m).
(n) Petitions for reconsideration. Petitions for reconsideration of
interlocutory actions by the Commission's staff or by an administrative
law judge will not be entertained. Petitions for reconsideration of a
decision on the merits made by the Commission's staff should be filed in
accordance with Secs. 1.104 through 1.106 of this chapter.
(o) Interlocutory review.
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (o)(2) of this section, no party
may seek review of interlocutory rulings until a decision on the merits
has been issued by the staff or administrative law judge.
(2) Rulings listed in this paragraph are reviewable as a matter of
right. An application for review of such ruling may not be deferred and
raised as an exception to a decision on the merits.
(i) If the staff's ruling denies or terminates the right of any
person to participate as a party to the proceeding, such person, as a
matter of right, may file an application for review of that ruling.
(ii) If the staff's ruling requires production of documents or other
written evidence, over objection based on a claim of privilege, the
ruling on the claim of privilege is reviewable as a matter of right.
(iii) If the staff's ruling denies a motion to disqualify a staff
person from participating in the proceeding, the ruling is reviewable as
a matter of right.
(p) Expedited review.
(1) Any party to a carriage agreement complaint proceeding aggrieved
by any decision on the merits issued by the staff pursuant to delegated
authority may file an application for review by the Commission in
accordance with Sec. 1.115 of this chapter.
(2) Any party to a carriage agreement complaint proceeding aggrieved
by any decision on the merits by an administrative judge may file an
appeal of the decision directly with the Commission in accordance with
Sec. 1.276(a) and Secs. 1.277 (a) through (c) of this chapter, except
that unless a stay is granted by the Commission, the decision by the
administrative law judge will become effective upon release and will
remain in effect pending appeal.
(q) Frivolous complaints. It shall be unlawful for any party to file
a frivolous complaint with the Commission alleging any violation of this
subpart. Any violation of this paragraph shall constitute an abuse of
process subject to appropriate sanctions.
(r) Statute of limitations. Any complaint filed pursuant to this
paragraph must be filed within one year of the date on which one of the
following events occurs:
(1) The multichannel video programming distributor enters into a
contract with a video programming vendor that a party alleges to violate
one or more of the rules contained in this section; or
(2) The multichannel video programming distributor offers to carry
the video programming vendor's programming pursuant to terms that a
party alleges to violate one or more of the rules contained in this
section; or
(3) A party has notified a multichannel video programming
distributor that it intends to file a complaint with the Commission
based on violations of one or more of the rules contained in this
section.
(s) Remedies for violations.
(1) Remedies authorized. Upon completion of such adjudicatory
proceeding, the Commission shall order appropriate remedies, including,
if necessary, mandatory carriage of a video programming vendor's
programming on defendant's video distribution system, or the
establishment of prices, terms, and conditions for the carriage of a
video programming vendor's programming. Such order shall set forth a
timetable for compliance, and shall become effective upon release,
unless any order of mandatory carriage would require the
[[Page 637]]
defendant multichannel video programming distributor to delete existing
programming from its system to accommodate carriage of a video
programming vendor's programming. In such instances, if the defendant
seeks review of the staff or administrative law judge decision, the
order for carriage of a video programming vendor's programming will not
become effective unless and until the decision of the staff or
administrative law judge is upheld by the Commission. If the Commission
upholds the remedy ordered by the staff or administrative law judge in
its entirety, the defendant will be required to carry the video
programming vendor's programming for an additional period of time equal
to the time elapsed between the staff or administrative law judge
decision and the Commission's ruling, on the terms and conditions
approved by the Commission.
(2) Additional sanctions. The remedies provided in paragraph (s)(1)
of this section are in addition to and not in lieu of the sanctions
available under title V or any other provision of the Communications
Act.
[ 58 FR 60395 , Nov. 16, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 43777 , Aug. 25, 1994]
Secs. 76.1303--76.1305 [Reserved]
Subpart R--Telecommunications Act Implementation
Source: 61 FR 18980 , Apr. 30, 1996, unless otherwise noted.
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.