Goto Section: 24.15 | 24.50 | Table of Contents

FCC 24.16
Revised as of October 1, 2005
Goto Year:2004 | 2006
Sec.  24.16   Criteria for comparative renewal proceedings.

   A renewal applicant involved in a comparative renewal proceeding shall
   receive a preference, commonly referred to as a renewal expectancy, which is
   the most important comparative factor to be considered in the proceeding, if
   its  past record for the relevant license period demonstrates that the
   renewal applicant:

   (a)  Has  provided “substantial” service during its past license term.
   “Substantial” service is defined as service which is sound, favorable, and
   substantially above a level of mediocre service which might just minimally
   warrant renewal; and

   (b) Has substantially complied with applicable Commission rules, policies
   and the Communications Act.

Subpart C—Technical Standards


Goto Section: 24.15 | 24.50

Goto Year: 2004 | 2006
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that cite this rule

Want to support this service?
Thanks!

Report errors in this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.
hallikainen.com
Helping make public information public