Goto Section: 90.676 | 90.681 | Table of Contents
FCC 90.677
Revised as of October 1, 2009
Goto Year:2008 |
2010
§ 90.677 Reconfiguration of the 806–824/851–869 MHz band in order to
separate cellular systems from non-cellular systems.
In order to facilitate reconfiguration of the 806–824/851–869 MHz band
(“800 MHz band”) to separate high-density cellular systems from
non-cellular systems, Nextel Communications, Inc. (Nextel) may relocate
incumbents within the 800 MHz band by providing “comparable
facilities.” For the limited purpose of band reconfiguration, the
provisions of § 90.157 shall not apply and inter-category sharing will
be permitted under all circumstances. Such relocation is subject to the
following provisions:
(a) Within thirty days of Commission approval of the Transition
Administrator, the Transition Administrator described in § 90.676 will
provide the Commission with a schedule detailing when band
reconfiguration shall commence for each NPSPAC Region. The plan should
also detail—by NPSPAC Region—which relocation option each non-Nextel
ESMR licensees has chosen. The Chief, Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau will finalize and approve such a plan. The schedule
shall provide for completion of band reconfiguration in no more than
thirty-six months following release of a public notice announcing the
start date of reconfiguration in the first NPSPAC region. Relocation
will commence according to the schedule set by the Transition
Administrator but all systems must have commenced reconfiguration
within thirty months of release of a public notice announcing the start
date of reconfiguration in the first NPSPAC region.
(b) Voluntary negotiations . Thirty days before the start date for each
NPSPAC region, the Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
will issue a public notice initiating a three-month voluntary
negotiation period. During this voluntary negotiation period, Nextel
and all incumbents may negotiate any mutually agreeable relocation
agreement. Nextel and relocating incumbents may agree to conduct
face-to-face negotiations or either party may elect to communicate with
the other party through the Transition Administrator.
(c) Mandatory negotiations . If no agreement is reached by the end of
the voluntary period, a three-month mandatory negotiation period will
begin during which both Nextel and the incumbents must negotiate in
“good faith.” Nextel and relocating incumbents may agree to conduct
face-to-face negotiations or either party may elect to communicate with
the other party through the Transition Administrator. All parties are
charged with the obligation of utmost “good faith” in the negotiation
process. Among the factors relevant to a “good-faith” determination
are:
(1) Whether the party responsible for paying the cost of band
reconfiguration has made a bona fide offer to relocate the incumbent to
comparable facilities;
(2) The steps the parties have taken to determine the actual cost of
relocation to comparable facilities; and
(3) Whether either party has unreasonably withheld information,
essential to the accurate estimation of relocation costs and
procedures, requested by the other party. The Transition Administrator
may schedule mandatory settlement negotiations and mediation sessions
and the parties must conform to such schedules.
(d) Transition Administrator. (1) The Transition Administrator, or
other mediator, shall attempt to resolve disputes referred to it before
the conclusion of the mandatory negotiation period as described in
§ 90.677(c) within thirty working days after the Transition
Administrator has received a submission by one party and a response
from the other party. Any party thereafter may seek expedited
non-binding arbitration which must be completed within thirty days of
the Transition Administrator's, or other mediator's recommended
decision or advice. Should issues still remain unresolved after
mediation or arbitration they shall be referred to the Chief, Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau within ten days of the Transition
Administrator's or other mediator's advice, or if arbitration has
occurred, within ten days of the completion of arbitration. When
referring an unresolved matter to the Chief, Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau, the Transition Administrator shall forward the entire
record on any disputed issues, including such dispositions thereof that
the Transition Administrator has considered. Upon receipt of such
record and advice, the Commission will decide the disputed issues based
on the record submitted. The authority to make such decisions is
delegated to the Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau who
may decide the disputed issue or designate it for an evidentiary
hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. If the Chief, Public Safety
and Homeland Security Bureau decides an issue, any party to the dispute
wishing to appeal the decision may do so by filing with the Commission,
within ten days of the effective date of the initial decision, a
Petition for de novo review; whereupon the matter will be set for an
evidentiary hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. Any disputes
submitted to the Transition Administrator after the conclusion of the
mandatory negotiation period as described in § 90.677(c) shall be
resolved as described in § 90.677(d)(2).
(2) If no agreement is reached during either the voluntary or mandatory
negotiating periods, all disputed issues shall be referred to the
Transition Administrator, or other mediator, who shall attempt to
resolve them. If disputed issues remain thirty working days after the
end of the mandatory negotiation period, the Transition Administrator
shall forward the record to the Chief, Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau, together with advice on how the matter(s) may be
resolved. The Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau is
hereby delegated the authority to rule on disputed issues, de novo. If
the Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau decides an issue,
any party to the dispute wishing to appeal the decision may do so by
filing with the Commission, within ten days of the effective date of
the initial decision, a Petition for de novo review; whereupon the
matter will be set for an evidentiary hearing before an Administrative
Law Judge.
(e) Waiver Requests . Incumbents who wish not to relocate according to
the schedule may petition the Commission for a waiver of the relocation
obligation. Such a waiver would only be granted on a strict
non-interference basis.
(f) Comparable Facilities . The replacement system provided to an
incumbent must be at least equivalent to the existing 800 MHz system
with respect to the four factors described in § 90.699(d) part.
(g) Information Exchange . Absent agreement between parties, the
Transition Administrator will be responsible for determining the
information that relocating incumbents must supply in support of a
relocation agreement.
(h) The relevant Regional Planning Committee shall be informed of any
proposed changes to any NPSPAC channel.
[ 69 FR 67849 , Nov. 22, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 76711 , Dec. 28, 2005;
71 FR 52751 , Sept. 7, 2006; 71 FR 69038 , Nov. 29, 2006]
Policies Governing the Licensing and Use of EA-Based SMR Systems in the
809–824/851–869 MHz Band
Goto Section: 90.676 | 90.681
Goto Year: 2008 |
2010
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.
hallikainen.com
Helping make public information public