Goto Section: 24.15 | 24.50 | Table of Contents
FCC 24.16
Revised as of October 1, 2011
Goto Year:2010 |
2012
§ 24.16 Criteria for comparative renewal proceedings.
A renewal applicant involved in a comparative renewal proceeding shall
receive a preference, commonly referred to as a renewal expectancy,
which is the most important comparative factor to be considered in the
proceeding, if its past record for the relevant license period
demonstrates that the renewal applicant:
(a) Has provided "substantial" service during its past license term.
"Substantial" service is defined as service which is sound, favorable,
and substantially above a level of mediocre service which might just
minimally warrant renewal; and
(b) Has substantially complied with applicable Commission rules,
policies and the Communications Act.
Subpart C--Technical Standards
Goto Section: 24.15 | 24.50
Goto Year: 2010 |
2012
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.
hallikainen.com
Helping make public information public