Goto Section: 1.93 | 1.95 | Table of Contents
FCC 1.94
Revised as of October 2, 2015
Goto Year:2014 |
2016
§ 1.94 Consent order procedures.
(a) Negotiations leading to a consent order may be initiated by the
operating Bureau or by a party whose possible violations are issues in the
proceeding. Negotiations may be initiated at any time after designation of a
proceeding for hearing. If negotiations are initiated the presiding officer
shall be notified. Parties shall be prepared at the initial prehearing
conference to state whether they are at that time willing to enter
negotiations. See § 1.248(c)(7). If either party is unwilling to enter
negotiations, the hearing proceeding shall proceed. If the parties agree to
enter negotiations, they will be afforded an appropriate opportunity to
negotiate before the hearing is commenced.
(b) Other parties to the proceeding are entitled, but are not required, to
participate in the negotiations, and may join in any agreement which is
reached.
(c) Every agreement shall contain the following:
(1) An admission of all jurisdictional facts;
(2) A waiver of the usual procedures for preparation and review of an
initial decision;
(3) A waiver of the right of judicial review or otherwise to challenge or
contest the validity of the consent order;
(4) A statement that the designation order may be used in construing the
consent order;
(5) A statement that the agreement shall become a part of the record of the
proceeding only if the consent order is signed by the presiding officer and
the time for review has passed without rejection of the order by the
Commission;
(6) A statement that the agreement is for purposes of settlement only and
that its signing does not constitute an admission by any party of any
violation of law, rules or policy (see 18 U.S.C. 6002); and
(7) A draft order for signature of the presiding officer resolving by
consent, and for the future, all issues specified in the designation order.
(d) If agreement is reached, it shall be submitted to the presiding officer
or Chief Administrative Law Judge, as the case may be, who shall either sign
the order, reject the agreement, or suggest to the parties that negotiations
continue on such portion of the agreement as he considers unsatisfactory or
on matters not reached in the agreement. If he rejects the agreement, the
hearing shall proceed. If he suggests further negotiations, the hearing will
proceed or negotiations will continue, depending on the wishes of parties to
the agreement. If he signs the consent order, he shall close the record.
(e) Any party to the proceeding who has not joined in any agreement which is
reached may appeal the consent order under § 1.302, and the Commission may
review the agreement on its own motion under the provisions of that section.
If the Commission rejects the consent order, the proceeding will be remanded
for further proceedings. If the Commission does not reject the consent
order, it shall be entered in the record as a final order and is subject to
judicial review on the initiative only of parties to the proceeding who did
not join in the agreement. The Commission may revise the agreement and
consent order. In that event, private parties to the agreement may either
accept the revision or withdraw from the agreement. If the party whose
possible violations are issues in the proceeding withdraws from the
agreement, the consent order will not be issued or made a part of the
record, and the proceeding will be remanded for further proceedings.
(f) The provisions of this section shall not alter any existing procedure
for informal settlement of any matter prior to designation for hearing (see,
e.g., 47 U.S.C. 208) or for summary decision after designation for hearing.
(g) Consent orders, pleadings relating thereto, and Commission orders with
respect thereto shall be served on parties to the proceeding. Public notice
will be given of orders issued by an administrative law judge, the Chief
Administrative Law Judge, or the Commission. Negotiating papers constitute
work product, are available to parties participating in negotiations, but
are not routinely available for public inspection.
[ 41 FR 14871 , Apr. 8, 1976]
return arrow Back to Top
Goto Section: 1.93 | 1.95
Goto Year: 2014 |
2016
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.
hallikainen.com
Helping make public information public