Goto Section: 90.673 | 90.675 | Table of Contents
FCC 90.674
Revised as of October 2, 2015
Goto Year:2014 |
2016
§ 90.674 Interference resolution procedures before, during and after band
reconfiguration.
(a) Initial Notification. Any non-cellular licensee operating in the
806-824/851-869 MHz band who reasonably believes it is receiving
unacceptable interference, as described in § 90.672, shall provide an initial
notification of the interference incident. This initial notification of an
interference incident shall be sent to all part 22 of this chapter Cellular
Radiotelephone licensees and ESMR licensees who operate cellular base
stations (“cell sites”) within 1,524 meters (5,000 feet) of the interference
incident.
(1) The initial notification of interference shall include the following
information on interference:
(i) The specific geographical location where the interference occurs, and
the time or times at which the interference occurred or is occurring;
(ii) A description of its scope and severity, including its source, if
known;
(iii) The relevant Commission licensing information of the party suffering
the interference; and
(iv) A single point of contact for the party suffering the interference.
(2) ESMR licensees, in conjunction with part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone
licensees, shall establish an electronic means of receiving the initial
notification described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. The electronic
system must be designed so that all appropriate 800 MHz ESMR and part 22
Cellular Radiotelephone licensees can be contacted about the interference
incident with a single notification. The electronic system for receipt of
initial notification of interference complaints must be operating no later
than February 22, 2005.
(3) ESMR licensees must respond to the initial notification described in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, as soon as possible and no later than 24
hours of receipt of notification from a public safety/CII licensee. This
response time may be extended to 48 hours after receipt from other
non-cellular licensees provided affected communications on these systems are
not safety related.
(b) Interference analysis. ESMR licensees—who receive an initial
notification described in paragraph (a) of this section—shall perform a
timely analysis of the interference to identify the possible source.
Immediate on-site visits may be conducted when necessary to complete timely
analysis. Interference analysis must be completed and corrective action
initiated within 48 hours of the initial complaint from a public safety/CII
licensee. This response time may be extended to 96 hours after the initial
complaint from other non-cellular licensees provided affected communications
on these systems are not safety related. Corrective action may be delayed if
the affected licensee agrees in writing (which may be, but is not required
to be, recorded via e-mail or other electronic means) to a longer period.
(c) Mitigation Steps. (1) All 800 MHz cellular system licensees and part 22
of this chapter Cellular Radiotelephone licensees who are responsible for
causing unacceptable interference shall take all affirmative measures to
resolve such interference. 800 MHz cellular system licensees found to
contribute to harmful interference, as defined in § 90.672, shall resolve
such interference in the shortest time practicable. 800 MHz cellular system
licensees and part 22 of this chapter Cellular Radiotelephone licensees must
provide all necessary test apparatus and technical personnel skilled in the
operation of such equipment as may be necessary to determine the most
appropriate means of timely eliminating the interference. However, the means
whereby interference is abated or the cell parameters that may need to be
adjusted is left to the discretion of involved 800 MHz cellular system
licensees and/or part 22 of this chapter Cellular Radiotelephone licensees,
whose affirmative measures may include, but not be limited to, the following
techniques:
(i) Increasing the desired power of the public safety signal;
(ii) Decreasing the power of the ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone
signal;
(iii) Modifying the ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone systems
antenna height;
(iv) Modifying the ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone system
antenna characteristics;
(v) Incorporating filters into ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone
system transmission equipment;
(vi) Permanently changing ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone system
frequencies; and
(vii) Supplying interference-resistant receivers to the affected public
safety licensee(s). If this technique is used, in all circumstances, the
ESMR and/or part 22 Cellular Radiotelephone licensees shall be responsible
for all costs thereof.
(2) Whenever short-term interference abatement measures prove inadequate,
the affected licensee shall, consistent with but not compromising safety,
make all necessary concessions to accepting interference until a longer-term
remedy can be implemented.
(3) Discontinuing operations when clear and imminent danger exists. When a
public safety licensee determines that a continuing presence of interference
constitutes a clear and imminent danger to life or property, the licensee
causing the interference must discontinue the associated operation
immediately, until a remedy can be identified and applied. The determination
that a continuing presence exists that constitutes a clear and imminent
danger to life or property, must be made by written statement that:
(i) Is in the form of a declaration, notarized affidavit, or statement under
penalty or perjury, from an officer or executive of the affected public
safety licensee;
(ii) Thoroughly describes the basis of the claim of clear and imminent
danger;
(iii) Was formulated on the basis of either personal knowledge or belief
after due diligence;
(iv) Is not proffered by a contractor or other third party; and
(v) Has been approved by the Chief of the Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau or other designated Commission official. Prior to the
authorized official making a determination that a clear and imminent danger
exists, the associated written statement must be served by hand-delivery or
receipted fax on the applicable offending licensee, with a copy transmitted
by the fastest available means to the Washington, DC office of the
Commission's Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.
[ 69 FR 67849 , Nov. 22, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 76711 , Dec. 28, 2005; 71 FR 69038 , Nov. 29, 2006]
return arrow Back to Top
Goto Section: 90.673 | 90.675
Goto Year: 2014 |
2016
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.
hallikainen.com
Helping make public information public