FCC Web Documents citing 0.251

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.pdf
  • to a proceeding for purposes of the ex parte rules) and 1.1208 (stating that proceedings not otherwise designated are restricted). Ex parte presentations to and from Commission decision-makers are prohibited in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. The resolution of this issue was made in consultation with the Commission's Office of General Counsel, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 0.251(g). See Letter from David Senzel, Attorney-Advisor, Office of General Counsel, FCC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, File No. EB-06-MD-007 (filed Mar. 6, 2009) (``Senzel Letter''), attaching Letter from Joel Kaufman, Associate General Counsel to the Honorable Bob Filner (Feb. 5, 2009) (concluding the Congressman Filner's letter is a prohibited ex parte presentation). A presentation is a communication directed to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-802A1.txt
  • necessary before the FCBA's Executive Committee will be able to approve the comments. The FCBA also notes that the National Association of Broadcasters Convention is scheduled to start April 7, 2002. The FCBA asserts that a two-week extension will not unduly delay resolution of this proceeding. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, Pursuant to the authority delegated under 47 C.F.R. § 0.251(b)(1), that good cause having been shown, the Federal Communications Bar Association's Request for an Extension of Time to File Comments, filed April 4, 2002, IS GRANTED and the deadline for filing comments IS EXTENDED until April 22, 2002 and the deadline for filing reply comments IS EXTENDED until May 7, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION John I. Riffer Assistant General Counsel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1613A1.txt
  • that granting an exemption to the TA will serve the public interest by expediting implementation of the reconfiguration of the 800 MHz band; that the exemption is consistent with long-standing precedent; and that it will not prejudice interested parties, such as Petitioners. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 13. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated under 47 C.F.R. § 0.251, the Petition for Reconsideration, filed January 24, 2005, by the City and County of Denver, Colorado, and Aeronautical Radio, Inc., IS DENIED. Austin C. Schlick Acting General Counsel Also before us is an opposition, filed February 3, 2005, by the 800 MHz Transition Administrator. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-16. This means that presentations (communications on the merits) to the Commission may
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2292A1.txt
  • did not violate section 1.1210, and because Northeast did not itself make a presentation to the Commission, it did not violate section 1.1208. In the absence of any violation of the ex parte rules by Northeast there is no basis to impose a sanction against it. 10. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, Pursuant to the authority delegated under 47 C.F.R. § 0.251(g), that the Complaint and Request for Sanctions, filed June 17, 2005, by Saga Communications of New England, LLC, IS DENIED. Joel Kaufman Deputy Associate General Counsel Administrative Law Division Northeast filed an opposition on June 28, 2005, which argues that because Northeast specifically advised the Senator to serve Saga, it did not violate the ex parte rules. Saga filed a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3186A1.txt
  • requests a brief extension of time in which to file its consolidated response. We concur with Millikin's assertion that a brief extension of time to file a consolidated response to RBS' pleadings will not unduly delay this proceeding and will in fact facilitate an orderly disposition. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under 47 C.F.R. § 0.251(b)(1), that good cause having been shown, the Motion for Extension of Time, filed November 30, 2005, by Millikin University, IS GRANTED, and Millikin University MAY FILE a consolidated response, as described above, by December 22, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joel Kaufman Associate General Counsel Administrative Law Division b q x µ · ­
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-92A1.txt
  • ex parte letter to the Commission's OLA was permissible, the record is not clear as to whether Stu-Comm acted pursuant to a good faith misreading of our rules. In view of the factors noted above, we do not believe that further proceedings are warranted. Ordering Clause 14. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, Pursuant to the authority delegated under 47 C.F.R. § 0.251(g), that the Petition for Relief and Sanctions, filed June 18, 2004, by Columbia Union College Broadcasting, Inc. IS GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Joel Kaufman Associate General Counsel Administrative Law Division Office of General Counsel 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-16. Stu-Comm filed an opposition (the ``Opposition'') on June 28, 2004 to which CUCB replied (the ``Reply'')
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A10.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A10.txt
  • (0.390) Vertically Integrated x DBS% 0.002 (0.008) DBS% -0.015* (0.007) Fiber Share of Total Plant 0.140** (0.051) Analog System -1.156** (0.247) System Two-Way Capable 0.508+ (0.265) Population Density -0.014 (0.016) Population Growth Rate 0.002 (0.003) Hispanic% -0.005 (0.008) Age <18 % -0.004 (0.037) Age 65+ % -0.020 (0.013) Black % -0.012 (0.008) Population per HH -0.040 (0.451) Ln (Income) -0.315 (0.251) Homeowner % -0.009 (0.008) Observations DBS Share for VI Neutrality 1407 -- ** Significant at 1% level * Significant at 5% level + Significant at 10% level Notes: These are the results from a probit regression of the carriage decision for the cable systems in the sample as described in the text. Standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • Digital Subscriber Shares (1) Digital Price (2) Weighted Average Cable Price (3) N Digital to Basic Digital to Expanded Basic N Mean Std. Error N Mean Std. Error Sample groups overall 1/1/06 747 41.8% 47.7% 727 $13.83 0.187 720 $52.26 0.223 1/1/05 764 37.3% 42.9% 724 $13.59 0.176 $48.44 Noncompetitive communities 1/1/06 429 41.6% 47.5% 416 $13.94 0.211 411 $52.58 0.251 1/1/05 484 37.1% 42.6% 413 $13.70 0.199 Communities relieved from rate regulation 1/1/06 318 43.5% 49.3% 311 $13.05 0.232 309 $50.03 0.312 1/1/05 280 39.9% 45.3% 311 $12.85 0.234 Second cable operator subgroup (overall) 1/1/06 106 43.3% 47.5% 103 $13.91 0.354 101 $44.86 0.643 1/1/05 111 39.8% 44.3% 103 $13.52 0.374 Second cable operator (incumbents) 1/1/06 54 46.8% 51.6% 53
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-719A1.txt
  • to a proceeding for purposes of the ex parte rules) and 1.1208 (stating that proceedings not otherwise designated are restricted). Ex parte presentations to and from Commission decision-makers are prohibited in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. The resolution of this issue was made in consultation with the Commission's Office of General Counsel, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 0.251(g). See Letter from David Senzel, Attorney-Advisor, Office of General Counsel, FCC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, File No. EB-06-MD-007 (filed Mar. 6, 2009) (``Senzel Letter''), attaching Letter from Joel Kaufman, Associate General Counsel to the Honorable Bob Filner (Feb. 5, 2009) (concluding the Congressman Filner's letter is a prohibited ex parte presentation). A presentation is a communication directed to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1296A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1296A1.txt
  • that extensions of time shall not be routinely granted. In this instance, Mr. Anderson has not shown good cause for an extension of the deadline for filing comments and reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 154(j), 155(c) and sections 0.41, 0.251, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.41, 0.251, 1.46, Mr. Anderson's motion for extension of the comment and reply periods IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Austin C. Schlick General Counsel Framework for Broadband Internet Service, GN Docket No. 10-127, FCC 10-114, Notice of Inquiry (rel. June 17, 2010). Motion of James W. Anderson for Extension of Time,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.txt
  • will be coordinated efficiently and comprehensively with all the Commission's regulatory activities. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155b, 155(c) and 303(r). Section Number and Title: 0.185(e) Responsibilities of the bureaus and staff offices. SUBPART B-DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY Brief Description: These rules prescribe the duties that the Commission authorizes to be performed by its various Bureaus and Offices. Section 0.251 delegates authority to the Office of General Counsel. Section 0.251(i) states that the General Counsel may perform all administrative determinations provided for by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996. Need: This rule allows the efficient resolution of monetary claims of the United States Government that arise from the activities of the Commission. Legal Basis: 31 U.S.C. 3711; 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-703A1.txt
  • rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.10(c)(2), 76.1301-1302, the Initial Decision IS STAYED until the effective date of a Commission order on the Petition to Compel Comcast's Compliance with Initial Decision filed by The Tennis Channel, Inc. and the Conditional Petition for Stay filed by Comcast Cable Communications, LLC in this proceeding. This action is taken pursuant to authority delegated by Section 0.251(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.251(c). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Austin C. Schlick General Counsel Office of General Counsel The Tennis Channel, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Commc'ns, LLC, Initial Decision of Chief Administrative Law Judge Richard L. Sippel, MB Docket No. 10-204, File No. CSR 8258-P, 26 FCC Rcd 17160 (2011) (Initial Decision). The Tennis Channel, Inc., Petition to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • CO-OP Five Area Telephone Co-op. Inc. 3,224,838 6,913 466.49 449,071 0.040 442072 C R CONSOLIDATED FT BEND Consolidated Communications, Inc. 19,717,386 43,786 450.31 2,383,857 0.212 442073 C R BORDER TO BORDER 850,405 107 7,947.71 607,194 0.054 442076 C R GANADO TELEPHONE CO 3,475,213 3,209 1,082.96 1,688,418 0.150 442080 C N GTE SW VERIZON-TX Verizon Communications Inc. 523,689,010 1,430,992 365.96 2,818,339 0.251 442083 C R GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL 24,970,152 40,817 611.76 7,051,171 0.628 442084 C R UTC OF TEXAS INC United Telephone System Inc. 79,187,102 155,469 509.34 14,915,051 1.328 442086 C R HILL COUNTRY CO-OP 9,216,432 17,709 520.44 1,846,355 0.164 442090 C R ALENCO COMMUNICATION 3,801,632 2,141 1,775.63 2,238,744 0.199 442091 C R ETS TEL. CO., INC. Jefferson Intermediate, Inc. 6,416,078 8,507
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • CO-OP Five Area Telephone Co-op. Inc. 3,224,838 6,913 466.49 449,071 0.040 442072 C R CONSOLIDATED FT BEND Consolidated Communications, Inc. 19,717,386 43,786 450.31 2,383,857 0.212 442073 C R BORDER TO BORDER 850,405 107 7,947.71 607,194 0.054 442076 C R GANADO TELEPHONE CO 3,475,213 3,209 1,082.96 1,688,418 0.150 442080 C N GTE SW VERIZON-TX Verizon Communications Inc. 523,689,010 1,430,992 365.96 2,818,339 0.251 442083 C R GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL 24,970,152 40,817 611.76 7,051,171 0.628 442084 C R UTC OF TEXAS INC United Telephone System Inc. 79,187,102 155,469 509.34 14,915,051 1.328 442086 C R HILL COUNTRY CO-OP 9,216,432 17,709 520.44 1,846,355 0.164 442090 C R ALENCO COMMUNICATION 3,801,632 2,141 1,775.63 2,238,744 0.199 442091 C R ETS TEL. CO., INC. Jefferson Intermediate, Inc. 6,416,078 8,507
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • 6,153 1,712.59 5,788,293 0.543 270426 C R CAMPTI-PLEASANT HILL 2,424,174 2,386 1,016.00 998,027 0.094 270427 C R CENTURYTEL-CHATHAM CenturyTel, Inc. 2,117,856 1,827 1,159.20 960,425 0.090 270428 A R DELCAMBRE TEL CO 584,935 1,246 469.45 23,515 0.002 270429 C R EAST ASCENSION TEL 38,266,185 35,202 1,087.05 16,600,275 1.558 270430 C R ELIZABETH TEL CO Cameron Telephone Company 4,914,659 2,951 1,665.42 2,671,686 0.251 270431 C R CENTURYTEL-NW LA CenturyTel, Inc. 5,547,533 8,380 662.00 1,280,333 0.120 270432 C R KAPLAN TEL CO 3,892,767 4,685 830.90 1,309,267 0.123 270433 C R LAFOURCHE TEL CO 7,178,971 12,676 566.34 1,037,542 0.097 270434 C R CENTURYTEL-EVANGELIN CenturyTel, Inc. 26,417,690 31,347 842.75 9,038,811 0.848 270435 C R NORTHEAST LOUISIANA 1,138,382 829 1,373.20 568,847 0.053 270436 C R CENTURY NORTH
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 6,153 1,712.59 5,788,293 0.543 270426 C R CAMPTI-PLEASANT HILL 2,424,174 2,386 1,016.00 998,027 0.094 270427 C R CENTURYTEL-CHATHAM CenturyTel, Inc. 2,117,856 1,827 1,159.20 960,425 0.090 270428 A R DELCAMBRE TEL CO 584,935 1,246 469.45 23,515 0.002 270429 C R EAST ASCENSION TEL 38,266,185 35,202 1,087.05 16,600,275 1.558 270430 C R ELIZABETH TEL CO Cameron Telephone Company 4,914,659 2,951 1,665.42 2,671,686 0.251 270431 C R CENTURYTEL-NW LA CenturyTel, Inc. 5,547,533 8,380 662.00 1,280,333 0.120 270432 C R KAPLAN TEL CO 3,892,767 4,685 830.90 1,309,267 0.123 270433 C R LAFOURCHE TEL CO 7,178,971 12,676 566.34 1,037,542 0.097 270434 C R CENTURYTEL-EVANGELIN CenturyTel, Inc. 26,417,690 31,347 842.75 9,038,811 0.848 270435 C R NORTHEAST LOUISIANA 1,138,382 829 1,373.20 568,847 0.053 270436 C R CENTURY NORTH
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 1,560.82 449,468 0.047 411807 C R MOKAN DIAL INC-KS Townes Telecommunications 2,614,105 3,362 777.54 577,514 0.060 411808 C R MOUNDRIDGE TEL CO 2,201,111 2,488 884.69 627,323 0.066 411809 C R MUTUAL TEL CO 1,423,962 452 3,150.36 882,029 0.092 411814 C R PEOPLES TELECOM LLC 2,509,398 1,425 1,760.98 1,295,834 0.135 411817 C R PIONEER TEL ASSN INC 10,103,637 12,591 802.45 2,398,074 0.251 411818 C R CRAW-KAN TEL COOP 10,271,772 11,622 883.82 2,922,781 0.305 411820 C R RAINBOW TELECOM 4,291,937 1,730 2,480.89 2,507,271 0.262 411826 C R RURAL TEL SERVICE CO 21,488,045 8,667 2,479.29 12,550,656 1.311 411826A C R RURAL TEL SERVICE CO 10,955,707 4,830 2,268.26 6,229,816 0.651 411827 C R S & T TEL COOP ASSN 5,938,526 2,489 2,385.91 3,429,977 0.358 411829
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 1,560.82 449,468 0.047 411807 C R MOKAN DIAL INC-KS Townes Telecommunications 2,614,105 3,362 777.54 577,514 0.060 411808 C R MOUNDRIDGE TEL CO 2,201,111 2,488 884.69 627,323 0.066 411809 C R MUTUAL TEL CO 1,423,962 452 3,150.36 882,029 0.092 411814 C R PEOPLES TELECOM LLC 2,509,398 1,425 1,760.98 1,295,834 0.135 411817 C R PIONEER TEL ASSN INC 10,103,637 12,591 802.45 2,398,074 0.251 411818 C R CRAW-KAN TEL COOP 10,271,772 11,622 883.82 2,922,781 0.305 411820 C R RAINBOW TELECOM 4,291,937 1,730 2,480.89 2,507,271 0.262 411826 C R RURAL TEL SERVICE CO 21,488,045 8,667 2,479.29 12,550,656 1.311 411826A C R RURAL TEL SERVICE CO 10,955,707 4,830 2,268.26 6,229,816 0.651 411827 C R S & T TEL COOP ASSN 5,938,526 2,489 2,385.91 3,429,977 0.358 411829
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-91A1.txt
  • their authorizations, and repeatedly violated various Commission rules, some of which are designed to promote public safety. There are no genuine issues of material fact as to Family's repeated lack of candor, demonstrated disregard for public safety and continued violation of a myriad of rules, during Mr. Luz James's tenure as president, and summary decision is warranted, pursuant to section 0.251, on Issues A through F. The record on these issues is substantial and, as the ALJ found, the licensee does not dispute the validity of the charges underlying their specification. Summary decision is not warranted, however, based on the record before us, on whether the licenses for WSTX(AM) and WSTX-FM should be revoked. The ALJ is correct, and Family concedes,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-154A1.txt
  • 17 FCC Rcd at 6119-6120. 11 FCC Rcd 6372 (MMB 1996) (``MO&O I''). 12 FCC Rcd 4987 (MMB 1997) (``MO&O II''). 17 FCC Rcd at 6125. 345 F. 2d 730, 733 (D.C. Cir. 1965). 8 FCC Rcd 3537 (MMB 1993). 3 FCC Rcd 5824 (MMB 1988). 47 FCC 2d 1067 (1974). 47 C.F.R. § 1.115(g)(1) and (2). Amendment of Sections 0.251, 0.281, 0.371, 1.104, 1.106, and 1.115 of the Commission's Rules of Practices and Procedures, 46 R.R. 2d 524, 526 (1979). See 17 FCC Rcd at 6122-23. Id. at 6123-24. Although Twenty-One Sound continues to rely upon Scottsboro, AL, 4 FCC Rcd 6473 (MMB 1989) to support its position, MO&O III acknowledged that a non-verified proposal had been granted by mistake
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-72A1.txt
  • a significant amount of the claim or the cost of collections the claim is likely to be more than the amount recovered. This delegation does not include waiver authority provided by 31 U.S.C. 3720B. (2) the Chief Financial Officer, or the Deputy Chief Financial Officer, is delegated authority to perform all administrative determinations provided for by 31 U.S.C. 3720B. Section 0.251 is amended by adding a new paragraph (i) to read as follows: § 0.251 Authority Delegated * * * * * The General Counsel is delegated authority to perform all administrative determinations provided for by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, 1358 (1996) (DCIA), including, but not limited to the provisions of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • -0.434 -1.103 0.299 -0.244 0.808 1.731* 0.577 -0.821 - 0.246 -0.0843 (3.31) (-0.19) (-0.36) (-0.91) (0.38) (-0.54) (0.86) (2.53) (1.03) (-1. 37) (-0.31) (-0.05) Census_Blocs_nu 0.134* 0.200* 0.228 0.297 0.0559 0.113 -0.129 0.135 0.17 6 0.0630 0.0840 -0.259 (2.44) (2.37) (1.27) (1.53) (0.58) (1.05) (-0.77) (0.87) (1.69) (0.53) (0.91) (-1.01) Census_Blocs_nu -0.252** -0.318** -0.341 -0.388 0.0386 -0.0340 -0.0735 - 0.325 -0.251 -0.246 -0.297 -0.0890 (-2.72) (-2.89) (-0.84) (-0.90) (0.22) (-0.22) (-0.30) (-1.38) (-1.29) (-1.46) (-1.58) (-0.22) Census_Blocs_nu 0.160 -0.123 -0.492 -0.0194 -0.0713 0.303 0.000850 0.228 0.0383 -0.454 0.563*** 1.037 (1.48) (-0.50) (-0.66) (-0.02) (-0.19) (1.64) (0.00) (0.48) (0.18) (-1. 35) (3.42) (1.34) Constant 10.38*** 8.933*** 4.261*** 2.419*** 7.263*** 7.263*** 6.055*** 6.929*** 7.269*** 6.547*** 5.822*** 7.220*** (50.38) (36.72) (6.26) (3.56) (19.34) (21.60)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-719A1.html
  • to a proceeding for purposes of the ex parte rules) and 1.1208 (stating that proceedings not otherwise designated are restricted). Ex parte presentations to and from Commission decision-makers are prohibited in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1208. The resolution of this issue was made in consultation with the Commission's Office of General Counsel, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. S: 0.251(g). See Letter from David Senzel, Attorney-Advisor, Office of General Counsel, FCC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, File No. EB-06-MD-007 (filed Mar. 6, 2009) ("Senzel Letter"), attaching Letter from Joel Kaufman, Associate General Counsel to the Honorable Bob Filner (Feb. 5, 2009) (concluding the Congressman Filner's letter is a prohibited ex parte presentation). A presentation is a communication directed to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-5.pdf
  • 0.000 Georgia 0 2,520 0.000 Guam 0 155 0.000 Hawaii 221 335 0.660 Idaho 54 862 0.063 Illinois 75 1,878 0.040 Indiana 0 1,691 0.000 Iowa 141 1,615 0.087 Kansas 165 1,227 0.135 Kentucky 14 2,069 0.007 Louisiana 8 1,220 0.007 Maine 0 1,275 0.000 Maryland 0 389 0.000 Massachusetts 0 2,502 0.000 Michigan 362 1,769 0.205 Minnesota 457 1,821 0.251 Mississippi 25 1,894 0.013 Missouri 53 1,800 0.029 Montana 355 1,034 0.343 Nebraska 413 811 0.509 Nevada 5 2,007 0.002 New Hampshire 22 1,240 0.018 New Jersey 0 0 NA New Mexico 137 1,244 0.110 New York 1 1,679 0.001 North Carolina 145 2,612 0.055 North Dakota 255 519 0.491 Northern Mariana Islands 0 69 0.000 Ohio 5 2,139 0.002
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00149.doc
  • For this reason, we believe that the public interest considerations reflected in this order are relevant and may be given weight in conjunction with the handling of the television translator applications. Attached to the Motion are letters from Members of Congress and numerous citizens supporting Shenandoah's opposition to the grant of a construction permit for channel 19. Pursuant to Sections 0.251(c) and (h), 1.41, and 1.47(g) of the Rules, Shenandoah requests that the citizens' letters be placed in the record. No party to this adjudicatory proceeding will be harmed by entry of the attached letters into the record in MM Docket No. 86-440. With one exception, each of the letters was mailed to the parties in this proceeding at the time
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1997/dd970411.html
  • at Jal, to show cause by June 2 why his CP should not be modified to specify operation on Channel 279C1 as proposed. Dkt No.: MM- 96-77. Action by Chief, Allocations Branch. Adopted: April 2, 1997. by Order to Show Cause. (DA No. 97-670). MMB Internet URL: [22]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1997/da970670.txt RULES GOVERNING COMMISSION ORGANIZATION. Issued order in the matter of amending Part 0.251(a) of the Commission's rules governing Commission organization. Action by Managing Director. Adopted: April 9, 1997. by Order. (DA No. 97-721). OMD ADDENDA: The following items, released April 10, 1997, did not appear in Digest No. 69: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- PUBLIC NOTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Released: April 10, 1997. COMMON CARRIER BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON ENHANCED 911 WIRELINE CONSENSUS AGREEMENT.Comments are due April
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1999/dd990716.html
  • Parts 2 and 95 of the rules to allocate spectrum and to establish rules for a Wireless Medical Telemetry Service. Action by the Commission. Adopted: July 14, 1999. by NPRM. (FCC No. 99-182). OET Internet URL: [12]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1999/fcc9 9182.wp REGARDING THE INTERCEPTION AND RECORDING OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS BY COMMISSION PERSONNEL. Amended Part 0 of the Commission's Rules of Sections 0.41 and 0.251 of the Commission's Rules Regarding the Interception and Recording of Telephone Conversations by Commission Personnel. Action by the Commission. Adopted: July 13, 1999. by Order. (FCC No. 99-176). OMD Internet URL: [13]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1999/fcc99176.wp MOBILE RELAY ASSOCIATES. Denied the application for review on Request for Fee Waiver (FOIA CONTROL NO. 99-8). Action by the Commission. Adopted: July 13, 1999. by MO&O. (FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2009/DA-09-719A1.html
  • to a proceeding for purposes of the ex parte rules) and 1.1208 (stating that proceedings not otherwise designated are restricted). Ex parte presentations to and from Commission decision-makers are prohibited in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. S: 1.1208. The resolution of this issue was made in consultation with the Commission's Office of General Counsel, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. S: 0.251(g). See Letter from David Senzel, Attorney-Advisor, Office of General Counsel, FCC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, File No. EB-06-MD-007 (filed Mar. 6, 2009) ("Senzel Letter"), attaching Letter from Joel Kaufman, Associate General Counsel to the Honorable Bob Filner (Feb. 5, 2009) (concluding the Congressman Filner's letter is a prohibited ex parte presentation). A presentation is a communication directed to
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/ATT-Authorization-Memo-120806.pdf
  • the fact that he had previously represented a party in that same proceeding. I find any appearance concerns in that case to be greater than the potential appearance concerns here: Chairman Kennard previously participated as an advocate in the very same proceeding, while you never participated in any way in this proceeding on behalf of 1 See 47 C.F.R. § 0.251(a). 2 CompTel. And I find the Government's interest in your participation here to be at least as strong as the Government's interest in Chairman Kennard's case. Regardless of this precedent, however, you are free as an FCC Commissioner to abstain from participating in and voting on any proceeding. This authorization thus allows you to make your own decision. If you