FCC Web Documents citing 0.271

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-445A1.txt
  • Fishel Managing Director APPENDIX For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 0 as follows: PART 0 - COMMISSION ORGANIZATION 1. The authority citation for part 0 continues to read as follows: Authority: Secs. 5, 48 Stat. 1068, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 155, 225, unless otherwise noted. §§ 0.5, 0.21, 0.31, and 0.271 [Amended] 2. In part 0 remove the words ``Office of Plans and Policy'' and add, in their place, the words ``Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis'' in the following places: a. Center heading before §§0.21 and 0.271; b. Section 0.5(a)(4); c. Section 0.21 introductory text; d. Section 0.31(g); and e. Section 0.271(a). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • $8.21 0.326 76 $1.71 0.127 2006 38 $5.35 0.389 65 $5.54 0.189 60 $7.89 0.348 62 $1.56 0.133 Wireless MVPD subgroup 2007 28 $5.01 0.283 17 $6.47 0.392 32 $6.20 0.224 33 $1.09 0.182 2006 28 $5.33 0.253 17 $6.47 0.392 32 $6.20 0.224 31 $1.02 0.183 Low penetration test subgroup 2007 23 $3.81 0.455 66 $5.20 0.186 57 $7.99 0.271 61 $1.26 0.118 2006 21 $3.89 0.494 65 $5.41 0.195 53 $7.96 0.276 60 $1.24 0.120 Source: 2007/2008 survey. (1) Except for the CableCARD column, monthly price is to lease an addressable converter box and remote control. Attachment 11-b Prices for Subscriber Equipment (1) Sample Group Jan. 1 Analog Digital High Definition CableCARD N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. N
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • where full-service commercial FM stations tend to have higher or lower ratings for reasons unrelated to the presence of the LPFM stations. Table 5 Average Rating of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations by Size of Arbitron Metro and Presence of LPFM Stations Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM Market Rank 1 - 100 Market Measure 2005 0.341 0.342 0.271 * (714) (395) (706) 2007 0.331 0.314 0.280 * (454) (402) (861) Contour Measure 2005 0.273 0.335 * 0.362 * (843) (444) (528) 2007 0.258 0.312 * 0.337 * (629) (417) (671) Contour/Market Measure 2005 0.288 0.349 * 0.359 * (1081) (453) (281) 2007 0.263 0.329 * 0.345 * (824) (438) (455) Market Rank 101 - 200 Market Measure 2005
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • 18,857,272 32,018 588.96 4,507,183 0.403 442069 C R ELECTRA TELEPHONE CO Townes Telecommunications 1,550,973 1,713 905.41 647,699 0.058 442070 C R ETEX TEL COOP INC 11,404,193 14,647 778.60 4,145,105 0.371 442071 C R FIVE AREA TEL CO-OP Five Area Telephone Co-op. Inc. 3,292,900 6,664 494.13 470,031 0.042 442072 C R CONSOLIDATED FT BEND Consolidated Communications, Inc. 21,051,309 42,484 495.51 3,034,624 0.271 442073 C R BORDER TO BORDER 1,321,565 112 11,799.69 957,468 0.086 442076 C R GANADO TELEPHONE CO 3,389,742 3,104 1,092.06 1,608,168 0.144 442080 C N GTE SW VERIZON-TX Verizon Communications Inc. 564,992,921 1,345,476 419.92 7,001,184 0.626 442083 C R GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL 25,490,783 41,023 621.38 6,772,294 0.605 442084 C R UTC OF TEXAS INC Embarq Corporation 78,904,140 153,375 514.45 13,019,666
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 18,857,272 32,018 588.96 4,507,183 0.403 442069 C R ELECTRA TELEPHONE CO Townes Telecommunications 1,550,973 1,713 905.41 647,699 0.058 442070 C R ETEX TEL COOP INC 11,404,193 14,647 778.60 4,145,105 0.371 442071 C R FIVE AREA TEL CO-OP Five Area Telephone Co-op. Inc. 3,292,900 6,664 494.13 470,031 0.042 442072 C R CONSOLIDATED FT BEND Consolidated Communications, Inc. 21,051,309 42,484 495.51 3,034,624 0.271 442073 C R BORDER TO BORDER 1,321,565 112 11,799.69 957,468 0.086 442076 C R GANADO TELEPHONE CO 3,389,742 3,104 1,092.06 1,608,168 0.144 442080 C N GTE SW VERIZON-TX Verizon Communications Inc. 564,992,921 1,345,476 419.92 7,001,184 0.626 442083 C R GUADALUPE VALLEY TEL 25,490,783 41,023 621.38 6,772,294 0.605 442084 C R UTC OF TEXAS INC Embarq Corporation 78,904,140 153,375 514.45 13,019,666
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.txt
  • 99.804 0.196 0.032 0.014 18.034 Orlando 99.683 0.317 99.651 0.349 99.651 0.349 0.032 0.000 10.057 Milwaukee 99.829 0.171 99.798 0.202 99.812 0.188 0.031 0.014 18.139 Minneapolis 99.838 0.162 99.808 0.192 99.821 0.179 0.029 0.013 18.176 Indianapolis 99.751 0.249 99.722 0.278 99.726 0.274 0.029 0.004 11.807 Tampa 99.696 0.304 99.668 0.332 99.666 0.334 0.029 (0.002) 9.414 St. Louis 99.751 0.249 99.729 0.271 99.726 0.274 0.022 (0.003) 8.963 Atlanta 99.814 0.186 99.794 0.206 99.796 0.204 0.020 0.001 10.830 Greenville 99.829 0.171 99.810 0.190 99.812 0.188 0.019 0.002 11.040 Charlotte 99.868 0.132 99.852 0.148 99.855 0.145 0.017 0.003 12.614 Phoenix 99.874 0.126 99.858 0.142 99.861 0.139 0.016 0.003 12.560 Seattle 99.869 0.131 99.855 0.145 99.856 0.144 0.014 0.001 11.069 Sacramento 99.863 0.138 99.848 0.152
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • 0.167 -0.260 0.654 1.685* 0.375 -0.762 -0 .166 0.131 (3.00) (-0.21) (-0.73) (-0.94) (0.20) (-0.59) (0.84) (2.08) (0.76) (-1. 19) (-0.21) (0.07) Census_Blocs_nu 0.178** 0.192* 0.301 0.232 0.0850 0.126 -0.107 0.192 0.1 40 0.0200 0.0809 -0.352 (2.95) (1.99) (1.71) (0.98) (0.82) (1.17) (-0.75) (1.02) (1.63) (0.16) (0.85) (-1.06) Census_Blocs_uc -0.215* -0.279* -0.319 -0.406 0.0452 -0.0284 0.00157 -0. 247 -0.162 -0.164 -0.271 -0.241 (-2.23) (-2.29) (-0.83) (-0.80) (0.28) (-0.19) (0.01) (-0.90) (-1.01) ( -0.94) (-1.39) (-0.50) Census_Blocs_ua 0.163 -0.0922 -0.701 -0.0939 -0.173 0.344 0.0371 0.314 - 0.0927 -0.276 0.539** 0.930 (1.45) (-0.34) (-1.24) (-0.10) (-0.47) (1.91) (0.19) (0.57) (-0.58) (-0 .84) (3.22) (1.03) Constant 10.58*** 9.068*** 4.426*** 2.460* 7.735*** 7.748*** 4.921*** 7.261*** 7 .234*** 6.602*** 5.275*** 5.705*** (37.30) (23.73) (5.48) (2.26) (14.24)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • 0.000 0.002 0.014 0.081 0.481 Hispanic Fraction 11,763 0.055 0.000 0.004 0.012 0.041 0.265 Asian Fraction 11,763 0.016 0.000 0.001 0.005 0.015 0.062 Total Households 11,763 5,071 183 940 2,974 8,028 15,593 Hybrid Zips Total Population 7,397 18,130 695 3,975 11,805 25,333 54,296 Black Fraction 7,397 0.093 0.000 0.003 0.020 0.096 0.486 Hispanic Fraction 7,397 0.056 0.000 0.005 0.013 0.045 0.271 Asian Fraction 7,397 0.017 0.000 0.001 0.005 0.016 0.064 Total Households 7,397 6,773 241 1,392 4,332 9,607 20,127 MSA's Total Population (Millions) 269 0.574 0.086 0.131 0.239 0.513 2.444 Black Population (Millions) 269 0.072 0.000 0.004 0.019 0.054 0.395 Black Fraction 269 0.100 0.004 0.022 0.066 0.145 0.310 Hispanic Population (Millions) 269 0.046 0.000 0.002 0.006 0.023 0.214 Hispanic Fraction
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • of group-targeted stations include group populations. See table 6 for first-stage regressions. 45 Table 10: Do Listeners Value Age-Targeted Programming? Young Middle Aged Older coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.730 1.00015.212 0.89110.890 1.270 Young-Targeted Stations -0.054 0.050-0.062 0.044-0.119 0.063 Middle-Aged-Targeted 0.025 0.025 0.022 0.023 0.107 0.032 Older-Targeted Stations 0.084 0.051 0.167 0.045 0.236 0.064 Northeast 0.485 0.304 0.975 0.271 2.058 0.387 North Central -0.306 0.311 0.754 0.277 1.788 0.396 South 0.316 0.295 0.568 0.263 0.057 0.375 Percent Driving 4.570 2.258 0.454 2.007 0.751 2.862 Percent Black 4.431 0.997 3.102 0.890 4.756 1.269 Percent Hispanic 3.950 0.835 2.597 0.745 2.342 1.062 N 162 163 163 R-squared .3497 .2892 .4595 Note: Youth-targeted formats include Top 40, Black/Top 40, Album Oriented Rock,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-f00.pdf
  • 7.5 Iceland $7,004,23949.532.4 0.117.6 0.4 $1,202,92046.418.6 0.034.9 0.1 $302,63967.332.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 24,958,89838.322.8 0.037.8 1.1 Ireland $83,126,93656.832.3 0.2 9.4 1.3 $3,211,04645.333.8 0.016.8 4.0 $1,437,07976.022.9 0.0 1.0 0.1 218,960,11748.431.2 0.315.3 4.8 Italy $273,177,71327.662.6 0.4 8.2 1.4 $8,419,06138.832.9 0.012.815.4 $2,418,93280.4 8.7 0.010.9 0.0 626,689,38023.753.1 0.312.110.8 Liechtenstein $25,99224.7 0.0 1.147.626.5 $553 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $1,582100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 345,078 8.0 0.0 0.271.820.0 Luxembourg $6,034,03052.634.8 0.311.8 0.4 $648,92557.820.3 0.021.4 0.5 $1,657,10099.1 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 18,901,54050.627.0 0.219.7 2.5 Malta $3,277,74840.857.0 0.6 0.0 1.6 $173,44162.435.8 0.0 0.0 1.8 $58,96099.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,072,69844.839.5 0.7 0.015.1 Netherlands $111,274,43446.238.0 0.510.4 4.9 $8,518,90133.840.7 0.013.512.0 $1,972,67782.816.1 0.0 1.0 0.2 376,437,26934.833.7 0.316.115.1 Norway $31,139,00950.428.9 0.5 9.011.2 $2,616,73655.525.9 0.0 5.413.2 $1,346,78799.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 115,209,00237.129.4 0.212.121.2 Portugal $44,232,46947.643.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 23.8 16.0 3.0 4.6 23.6 0.219LA Maine 36.4 25.9 10.5 0.3 12.2 5.8 2.4 3.9 12.1 0.079ME Maryland 25.8 177.5 (151.8) (199.1) 75.9 32.8 12.5 30.2 75.5 0.362MD Massachusetts 776.9 382.1 394.7 301.3 111.7 35.4 20.0 55.6 111.0 0.667MA Michigan (674.9) 177.0 (851.9) (877.6) 175.2 113.5 31.2 28.6 173.3 1.872MI Minnesota 461.3 409.8 51.5 10.1 59.0 28.8 9.4 20.5 58.7 0.271MN Mississippi 109.7 170.6 (60.9) (68.9) 13.2 9.1 1.8 2.3 13.1 0.128MS Missouri 171.3 114.3 57.1 30.6 28.6 20.0 5.2 3.2 28.4 0.217MO Montana 294.1 254.7 39.4 34.5 7.2 3.5 1.6 2.1 7.2 0.021MT Nebraska 271.6 223.5 48.1 31.2 22.3 9.5 6.2 6.4 22.1 0.167NE Nevada 112.6 51.6 60.9 48.3 20.4 10.7 6.9 2.7 20.3 0.170NV New Hampshire 64.6 23.9 40.8
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 18.3 8.2 3.2 6.5 17.9 0.361ME Maryland (128.8) 71.6 (200.5) (256.4) 110.7 46.3 18.3 45.7 110.2 0.439MD Massachusetts 329.5 14.8 314.7 202.4 114.3 31.9 18.6 62.6 113.0 1.295MA Michigan (1,324.8) (292.0) (1,032.8) (1,068.3) 135.9 90.9 24.4 19.7 135.0 0.912MI Minnesota 552.9 579.1 (26.2) (62.0) 56.2 26.7 8.5 20.7 56.0 0.249MN Mississippi 106.4 154.1 (47.7) (56.8) 25.1 16.9 3.3 4.7 24.9 0.271MS Missouri 97.0 117.1 (20.0) (52.0) 8.3 3.2 1.8 3.0 8.0 0.365MO Montana 344.2 297.6 46.6 41.6 7.4 3.6 1.6 2.2 7.4 0.020MT Nebraska 311.3 276.2 35.0 19.0 21.9 9.2 5.7 6.8 21.7 0.146NE Nevada 70.2 (4.5) 74.7 58.1 25.1 13.5 8.5 3.0 25.0 0.148NV New Hampshire 43.0 (13.1) 56.1 32.2 25.0 10.4 4.9 9.3 24.6 0.457NH New Jersey (1,178.1) 19.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • where full-service commercial FM stations tend to have higher or lower ratings for reasons unrelated to the presence of the LPFM stations. Table 5 Average Rating of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations by Size of Arbitron Metro and Presence of LPFM Stations Year No LPFM One LPFM Two or More LPFM Market Rank 1 - 100 Market Measure 2005 0.341 0.342 0.271 * (714) (395) (706) 2007 0.331 0.314 0.280 * (454) (402) (861) Contour Measure 2005 0.273 0.335 * 0.362 * (843) (444) (528) 2007 0.258 0.312 * 0.337 * (629) (417) (671) Contour/Market Measure 2005 0.288 0.349 * 0.359 * (1081) (453) (281) 2007 0.263 0.329 * 0.345 * (824) (438) (455) Market Rank 101 - 200 Market Measure 2005
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • stations tend to have higher or lower ratings for reasons unrelated to the presence of the LPFM stations. Federal Communications Commission DA 12-2 76 Table 5 Average Rating of Full-Service Commercial FM Stations by Size of Arbitron Metro and Presence of LPFM Stations Year No LPFMOne LPFM Two or More LPFM Market Rank 1 -100 Market Measure 2005 0.341 0.342 0.271 * (714) (395) (706) 2007 0.331 0.314 0.280 * (454) (402) (861) Contour Measure 2005 0.273 0.335 * 0.362 * (843) (444) (528) 2007 0.258 0.312 * 0.337 * (629) (417) (671) Contour/Market Measure2005 0.288 0.349 * 0.359 * (1081) (453) (281) 2007 0.263 0.329 * 0.345 * (824) (438) (455) Market Rank 101 -200 Market Measure 2005 0.463 0.396
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • 0.000 0.002 0.014 0.081 0.481 Hispanic Fraction 11,763 0.055 0.000 0.004 0.012 0.041 0.265 Asian Fraction 11,763 0.016 0.000 0.001 0.005 0.015 0.062 Total Households 11,763 5,071 183 940 2,974 8,028 15,593 Hybrid Zips Total Population 7,397 18,130 695 3,975 11,805 25,333 54,296 Black Fraction 7,397 0.093 0.000 0.003 0.020 0.096 0.486 Hispanic Fraction 7,397 0.056 0.000 0.005 0.013 0.045 0.271 Asian Fraction 7,397 0.017 0.000 0.001 0.005 0.016 0.064 Total Households 7,397 6,773 241 1,392 4,332 9,607 20,127 MSA's Total Population (Millions) 269 0.574 0.086 0.131 0.239 0.513 2.444 Black Population (Millions) 269 0.072 0.000 0.004 0.019 0.054 0.395 Black Fraction 269 0.100 0.004 0.022 0.066 0.145 0.310 Hispanic Population (Millions) 269 0.046 0.000 0.002 0.006 0.023 0.214 Hispanic Fraction
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-b.pdf
  • of group-targeted stations include group populations. See table 6 for first-stage regressions. 45 Table 10: Do Listeners Value Age-Targeted Programming? Young Middle Aged Older coef s.e. coef s.e. coef s.e. Constant 10.730 1.00015.212 0.89110.890 1.270 Young-Targeted Stations -0.054 0.050-0.062 0.044-0.119 0.063 Middle-Aged-Targeted 0.025 0.025 0.022 0.023 0.107 0.032 Older-Targeted Stations 0.084 0.051 0.167 0.045 0.236 0.064 Northeast 0.485 0.304 0.975 0.271 2.058 0.387 North Central -0.306 0.311 0.754 0.277 1.788 0.396 South 0.316 0.295 0.568 0.263 0.057 0.375 Percent Driving 4.570 2.258 0.454 2.007 0.751 2.862 Percent Black 4.431 0.997 3.102 0.890 4.756 1.269 Percent Hispanic 3.950 0.835 2.597 0.745 2.342 1.062 N 162 163 163 R-squared .3497 .2892 .4595 Note: Youth-targeted formats include Top 40, Black/Top 40, Album Oriented Rock,