FCC Web Documents citing 0.551
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A10.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A10.txt
- Integrated 2.043** (0.689) Vertically Integrated x DBS% -0.156** (0.028) DBS% -0.015 (0.020) Fiber Share of Total Plant 0.380* (0.190) Analog System -0.602 (0.560) System Two-Way Capable Population Density -0.035 (0.033) Population Growth Rate 0.016** (0.005) Hispanic% -0.035 (0.018) Age <18 % -0.015 (0.054) Age 65+ % 0.078* (0.033) Black % -0.025* (0.011) Population per HH 0.897 (0.979) Ln (Income) 0.969+ (0.551) Homeowner % -0.049* (0.020) Observations DBS Share for VI Neutrality 1339 13.2% ** Significant at 1% level * Significant at 5% level + Significant at 10% level Notes: These are the results from a probit regression of the carriage decision for the cable systems in the sample as described in the text. Standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
- Average Number of Channels Sample Group Programming Service Tier January 1, 2007 January 1, 2006 N Mean Std. Error N Mean Std. Error Sample groups overall Basic cable service 669 26.3 0.470 618 25.6 0.479 Cable programming service 669 46.3 0.553 618 45.9 0.523 Expanded basic service 669 72.6 0.517 618 71.5 0.335 Noncompetitive Communities Basic cable service 383 26.3 0.551 355 25.7 0.562 Cable programming service 383 46.1 0.648 355 45.4 0.607 Expanded basic service 383 72.5 0.614 355 71.1 0.371 Communities relieved from rate regulation Basic cable service 286 25.9 0.722 263 24.9 0.691 Cable programming service 286 47.2 0.883 263 48.6 0.853 Expanded basic service 286 73.0 0.674 263 73.4 0.783 Second cable operator subgroup (overall) Basic cable
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A2.txt
- 9.457 9.813 0.33 0.25 0.282 24.315 28.99 31.552 0.586 0.589 0.604 1.662 1.605 1.727 2,496.062,470.442,547.18 1.505 1.523 1.573 23.304 23.681 24.228 1.901 1.952 1.959 0.702 0.696 0.7 3.445 2.79 3.131 1.893 1.953 2.021 18.127 18.317 20.015 238.305 261.998 269.53 1.348 1.467 1.45 8,920.6710,408.7911,790.44 3.053 2.373 2.671 270.39 265.398 266.293 34.135 36.102 37.968 4.623 5.603 5.502 1,361.831,420.911,609.49 1.062 1.056 1.04 0.563 0.551 0.548 0.625 0.639 0.637 3.264 3.496 3.529 4.469 4.745 4.991 0.779 0.776 0.776 47.794 49.912 52.729 2.041 2.065 2.096 1.482 1.466 1.479 1.428 1.412 1.416 1.376 1.362 1.625 1.958 1.997 2.146 4.06 4.241 4.422 9.194 9.278 9.262 1.719 1.708 1.683 25.387 24.447 25.723 17.005 16.987 16.567 1.346 1.504 1.676 452.951 487.456 518.809 16.598 16.767 17.215 0.178 0.195 0.206 257.871 260.458
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-153A1.txt
- a number of months and considerable staff resources in order to provide the over 11,000 documents covered by the request. See Letter from K. Dane Snowden, FCC, to Ronnie London, Counsel to ATA, November 14, 2002. See 5 U.S.C. § 552. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6); see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441 et seq. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a); 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.551 et seq. We explained that informal complaints often contain personally identifiable information such as addresses, phone numbers, social security numbers, and personal financial information. The ATA subsequently filed an Application for Review of the Freedom of Information Action, requesting that the Commission ``overturn the staff's classification of the telemarketing complaints and predictive dialing inquiries as `not routinely available' documents'' and
- http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.txt
- Baseline (Rain Only) Rain plus MVDDS (using regional EPFD) Rain plus MVDDS (assuming 10% limit) Increase in Outage (using regional EPFD) Difference Between Rain plus MVDDS and Baseline (rain only) Rain plus MVDDS Difference between Regional EPFD and assumed 10% limit Increase in Outage Over Baseline (using regional EPFD) Availability Outage Availability Outage Availability Outage (%) Miami 99.503 0.497 99.449 0.551 99.453 0.547 0.054 0.004 10.905 Orlando 99.571 0.429 99.522 0.478 99.528 0.472 0.050 0.006 11.567 Tampa 99.593 0.407 99.546 0.454 99.552 0.448 0.047 0.006 11.564 Atlanta 99.747 0.253 99.713 0.287 99.721 0.279 0.034 0.008 13.389 Greenville 99.761 0.239 99.731 0.269 99.737 0.263 0.031 0.007 12.825 Philadelphia 99.834 0.166 99.807 0.193 99.817 0.183 0.027 0.010 15.986 Charlotte 99.811 0.189 99.784 0.216
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
- 724.92 202,109 0.019 542323 C R WINTERHAVEN TEL. CO. TDS Telecom 955,235 1,702 561.24 308,339 0.029 542324 C R KERMAN TELEPHONE CO 2,618,469 6,384 410.16 433,173 0.041 542332 C R THE PONDEROSA TEL CO 9,524,992 10,147 938.70 4,710,825 0.447 542334 C N ROSEVILLE TEL CO 47,276,459 132,728 356.19 50,406 0.005 542338 C R SIERRA TELEPHONE CO 15,153,635 23,197 653.26 5,803,376 0.551 542339 C R THE SISKIYOU TEL CO 4,344,538 5,032 863.38 2,051,888 0.195 542343 C R THE VOLCANO TEL CO 5,533,555 11,374 486.51 1,423,062 0.135 3 - 158 Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support 2001 Data by Study Area Study Area Code TypeStatusStudy Area Name Holding Company Name Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement Number of Loops Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop High-Cost
- http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
- 46.7 199.5 64.8 37.2 90.4 192.4 7.139IA Kansas 314.5 314.5 47.5 267.0 98.6 34.2 134.2 267.0 KS Kentucky 456.1 6.17 449.9 76.2 373.7 180.6 55.4 129.9 365.9 7.839KY Louisiana 461.6 10.97 450.7 60.7 390.0 190.1 54.9 132.7 377.7 12.279LA Maine 180.7 2.72 178.0 29.5 148.6 58.4 24.7 65.5 148.6 ME Maryland 773.8 12.72 761.1 143.9 617.2 277.1 75.8 263.8 616.7 0.551MD Massachusetts 962.8 13.51 949.3 108.3 840.9 364.6 105.8 370.4 840.9 MA Michigan 1,278.1 3.75 1,274.3 373.4 901.0 417.1 109.6 373.4 900.1 0.828MI Minnesota 522.4 12.90 509.5 82.8 426.6 129.5 63.5 217.4 410.4 16.202MN Mississippi 247.1 4.73 242.4 15.0 227.4 110.4 44.0 66.0 220.5 6.883MS Missouri 879.1 4.13 875.0 247.8 627.2 260.8 75.2 290.9 626.9 0.306MO Montana 110.1 6.27 103.8 26.3