FCC Web Documents citing 0.91

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-553A1.pdf
  • Carrier Bureau Reorganized Along Functional Lines, News Release (Mar. 8, 2002) available at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220644A1.pdf. 3RAO 21 Reconsideration Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10067, para. 12. 4Nakahata Oct. 10 Letter at 2. 5See47 C.F.R. § 32.17 (providing that questions involving interpretation of accounts "shall be submitted to the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau for explanation, interpretation, or resolution"). See also47 C.F.R. § 0.91(e) (stating that the Bureau has the powerto "develop and administer rules and policies relating to incumbent local exchange carrier accounting"); 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(e) (requiring the Bureau to "act on requests for interpretation or waiver of rules"). Furthermore, the Commission has held that the Bureau had full authority to issue RAO 21. RAO 21 Reconsideration Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-154A1.pdf
  • failure to act.51 17. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201, 202, 217, 254, 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§151, 152, 154(i), 201, 202, 217, 254, 255 and section 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.2, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, this Declaratory Ruling in WC Docket No. 07-135and CC Docket No. 01-92IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 49See47 U.S.C. §§ 312, 503. 5047 U.S.C. §503(b)(1)(B); see also47 C.F.R. § 1.80(a)(2). 5147 U.S.C. § 503(b)(2)(B); see also47 C.F.R. § 1.80(b)(2). The Commission has amended Section
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.pdf
  • Security Bureau on all matters affecting public safety, homeland security, national security, emergency management, disaster management, and related issues. Section 0.61 is amended by adding the paragraph 0.61(l) to read as follows: To coordinate with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau on all matters affecting public safety, homeland security, national security, emergency management, disaster management, and related issues. Section 0.91 is amended by adding the paragraph 0.91(o) to read as follows: (o) Coordinate with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau on all matters affecting public safety, homeland security, national security, emergency management, disaster management, and related issues. Section 0.111 is amended by removing paragraphs (c), (f) and (h) and by redesignating paragraphs (a)(22), (d), (e), (g), and (i)-(l) as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1277A1.txt
  • Blessed Sacrament has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Blessed Sacrament's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Blessed Sacrament's appeal, Blessed Sacrament may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed April 17, 2000, by Blessed Sacrament School, Washington, DC, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17, 2000 (Letter of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1278A1.txt
  • for the SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Brevard County's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on February 8, 2000, by Brevard County School District, Viera, Florida, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1279A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on February 29, 2000, by Calallen Independent School District, Corpus Christi, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1280A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed February 23, 2000, by Casa Grande Union High School District, Casa Grande, Arizona, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Steven R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1281A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed March 27, 2000, by Covina-Valley Unified School District, Covina, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Ray Harder, Covina-Valley Unified
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1282A1.txt
  • must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on February 28, 2000, by the Enlarged City School District of Troy, Troy, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1283A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 1, 2000, by Kerkhoven-Murdock-Sunburg Independent School District No. 775, Kerkhoven, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Kim Hippen,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1284A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 14, 1999, by Milwaukee Jewish Day School, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Jenny Ettenheim, Milwaukee Jewish Day
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1285A1.txt
  • Chicago has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss North Chicago's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on North Chicago's initial appeal, North Chicago may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by North Chicago Community Unit School District #187, Chicago, Illinois, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tyrone Pipkin, North Chicago Community Unit School District #187, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1433A1.pdf
  • will be due July 26, 2000. Carriers with contribution requirements in excess of $1,200 may opt to pay in equal monthly installments. A minimum contribution requirement of $25 applies to all telecommunications carriers that have end-user revenues. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 52.16 and 52.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.16 and 52.17, that NBANC apply the contribution factor of 0.000043 to the end-user revenue of each telecommunications carrier in the United States for NANP administration cost recovery. Payments will be due July 26, 2000. Carriers with contribution requirements in excess of $1,600 for the full
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1453A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Inc. for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-47, ARE APPROVED. These LATA boundaries are modified solely for the purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2264A1.pdf
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Carl Schurz failed to file an appeal of the August 17, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Carl Schurz's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Carl Schurz High School, Chicago, Illinois on April 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan M. Harris, Carl Schurz High School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2265A1.pdf
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 23, 2000, by Central Agency for Jewish Education, Miami, Florida, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2266A1.pdf
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 5, 2000, by Clifton Independent School District, Clifton, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Brenda
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2267A1.pdf
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Colonial failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Colonial's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Colonial School District, East Concord, New York on June 1, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from R. F. Thompson, Thompson Communications Company, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2268A1.pdf
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Eastern Plains failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Eastern Plains' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Eastern Plains Instructional Television Consortium, Logan, New Mexico on July 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Becky Rowley, Clovis community College, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2269A1.pdf
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Garden Grove failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Garden Grove's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Garden Grove Unified School District, Garden Grove, California on June 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cung Nguyen, Garden Grove Unified School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2270A1.pdf
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed April 13, 2000, by Judge Memorial Catholic High School, Salt Lake City, Utah, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2271A1.pdf
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Kanawha County failed to file an appeal of the April 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Kanawha County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Kanawha County School District, Charleston, West Virginia on June 27, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from J. Patrick Law, Kanawha County School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2272A1.pdf
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 18, 2000, by Marion School District 54, Marion, Montana, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Ron
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2273A1.pdf
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Newburgh failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Newburgh's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Newburgh Enlarged City School District, Newburgh, New York on July 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Laval S. Wilson, Newburgh Enlarged City School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2274A1.pdf
  • issued by the Administrator. Because New Castle cannot show that it filed a timely appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss New Castle's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by New Castle Community Schools, New Castle, Indiana on June 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Larry Koby, New Castle Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2275A1.pdf
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because Oscoda failed to file an appeal of the December 1, 1998 and February 18, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Oscoda's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Oscoda Area Schools, Oscoda, Michigan on May 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from W.C. Bill Martin, Oscoda Area Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2276A1.pdf
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 2, 2000, by Pace School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Kai S. Hoke,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2277A1.txt
  • ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 6, 2000 Released: October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 20, 1999, by Pinckneyville District #50, Pinckneyville, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Tim O'Leary,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2278A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 28, 2000, by Racine Unified School District of Racine, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2279A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Saint Andrew failed to file an appeal of the April 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Saint Andrew's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint Andrew School, Chicago, Illinois on June 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jack Percival, Saint Andrew School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 28,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2280A1.pdf
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because San Juan failed to file an appeal of the October 19, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss San Juan's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by San Juan Unified School District, Carmichael, California on May 25, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tim McCarty, San Juan Unified School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2281A1.pdf
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Scotch Plains failed to file appeals of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decisions dismissing Scotch Plains' appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letters of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letters of Appeal filed by Scotch Plains-Farnwood Public Schools, Scotch Plains, New Jersey on May 30, 2000, and May 31, 2000, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Donald L. Williams, Scotch Plains-Farnwood
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2321A1.txt
  • not disadvantage NECA. Therefore, we will allow carriers until March 1, 2001 to notify NECA of any changes in their July 1, 2001 tariff participation. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), (j), and 201-205, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition by NECA for interim waiver of section 69.3 of the Commission's rules IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mary Beth Richards Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. §§ 69.3(e)(6); (e)(9); (i)(1); and (j). National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Petition for Rulemaking, RM 9486
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2418A1.txt
  • ratepayer interests, we find that it is fully consistent with the public interest and the underlying policy goals. Accordingly, we grant BellSouth's waiver request at this time. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by BellSouth IS HEREBY GRANTED. Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division ATTACHMENT 1 1. In its waiver petition, BellSouth proposes to apply the term ``less than fully distributed cost'' to the following services that BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2428A1.txt
  • customer notification and, if necessary, customer refunds, and upon the handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by RCN Telecom Services of Illinois, Inc., f/k/a 21st Century Telecom Group, Inc., 21st Century Telecom Group, Inc., 21st Century Telecom of Illinois, Inc., OnePoint Communications Corp., and OnePoint Communications-Illinois, L.L.C. on August 30, 2000, and supplemented on October 17, 2000, IS GRANTED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2430A1.txt
  • this waiver is conditioned upon Time Warner's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the emergency waiver request filed by Time Warner Telecom Inc. on September 27, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2444A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2444A1.txt
  • Concurrent with the release of this Order, we shall seek emergency approval of the certification requirement from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for implementation of non-recurring services under each funding commitment letter issued by the Administrator on or after April 4, 2000, IS EXTENDED to September 30, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for implementation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2465A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Inc. for a LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-121, IS APPROVED. These LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS between
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2466A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Inc. for a LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-120, IS APPROVED. This LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS between
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2473A1.txt
  • previously granted waivers of section 69.605(c) to similarly-sized carriers. We, therefore, find that Jordan-Soldier's request waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules should be granted. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Jordan-Soldier Valley Telephone Company and Alpine Communications, L.C. on June 15, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2492A1.txt
  • waiver is conditioned upon First Communications' provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by First Communications, LLC, on September 28, 2000, and supplemented on October 26, 2000, and November 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2496A1.txt
  • Brown has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Arvin Brown's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Arvin Brown's initial appeal, Arvin Brown may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on August 8, 2000 by Arvin A. Brown Library, Richford, Vermont, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2497A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Ballinger failed to file an appeal of the May 19, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Ballinger's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Ballinger I.S.D., Ballinger, Texas on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Laura Strube, Ballinger I.S.D., to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 15, 2000 (Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2498A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Big Rapids failed to file an appeal of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Big Rapids' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Big Rapids Public Schools, Big Rapids, Michigan on July 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joseph A. Bouman, Big Rapids Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2499A1.txt
  • a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Caledonia North failed to file an appeal of the Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Caledonia North's appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Caledonia North Supervisory Union, Lyndonville, Vermont on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary Ann Riggie, Caledonia North Supervisory Union, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2500A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Douglas failed to file an appeal of the February 24, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Douglas' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Douglas Public Library, Douglas, Arizona on July 21, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Glenda Bavier, Douglas Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 21,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2501A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2501A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2501A1.txt
  • ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: November 7, 2000 Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 19, 2000, by Egg Harbor City Public Schools, Egg Harbor City, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2502A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2502A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Elgin failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Elgin's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Elgin Independent School District 16, Elgin, Oklahoma on August 22, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Doris Wilson, Elgin Independent School District 16, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2503A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Holy Family failed to file an appeal of the June 6, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Holy Family's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Holy Family School, Sioux City, Iowa on August 4, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cindy Spenner, Holy Family School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2504A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Jefferson failed to file an appeal of the April 7, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Jefferson's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Jefferson County School District, Fayette, Mississippi on July 3, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John E. Dickey, Jefferson County School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2505A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Jefferson failed to file an appeal of the September 14, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Jefferson's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by The Jefferson School, Jefferson, Maryland on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Paul Thewsuvat, The Jefferson School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 15,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2506A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Granite failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Granite's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Granite School District, Salt Lake City, Utah on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. James Henderson, Granite School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2507A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed August 10, 2000, by Lexington Public Schools, Lexington, Nebraska, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Larry Steinberger,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2508A1.txt
  • period after the issuance of the June 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on June 25, 2000, a weekend, Mt. Diablo's June 26, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Mt. Diablo's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Mt. Diablo's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Concord, California on July 31, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Perry W. Polk, Mt. Diablo Unified School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2509A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed August 15, 2000, by Oregon Trail School District, Sandy, Oregon, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Miriam
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2510A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Southeastern failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Southeastern's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Southeastern Ohio Voluntary Education Cooperative, Athens, Ohio on August 11, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert L. Lindsey, Southeastern Ohio Voluntary Education Cooperative, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2511A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Southwick-Tolland failed to file an appeal of the June 2, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Southwick-Tolland's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Southwick-Tolland Regional School District, Southwick, Massachusetts on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Paul R. Petit, Southwick-Tolland Regional School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2512A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Anthony failed to file an appeal of the May 19, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Anthony's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by St. Anthony School, New York, New York on August 21, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tess A. Alviar, St. Anthony School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2513A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Rita failed to file an appeal of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Rita's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by St. Rita School, New Orleans, Louisiana on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sr. Annette Baxley, St. Rita School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2514A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed August 30, 2000, by Yeshiva Schools, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Rabbi Green, Yeshiva
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2528A1.txt
  • extent the state commission affirmatively specifies other application processing or provisioning intervals for a particular type of collocation arrangement. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that this Memorandum Opinion and Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, 303(r), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2531A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Austin failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Austin's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Austin Public School 492, Austin, Minnesota on July 27, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lori Volz, Austin Public School 492, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2532A1.txt
  • of the 30-day period after the issuance of the May 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on June 25, 2000, a holiday, Bloomfield's June 26, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Bloomfield's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Bloomfield's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Bloomfield Public Library, Bloomfield, Iowa on July 18, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Regina Gooden, Bloomfield Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 18,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2533A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Cumberland failed to file an appeal of the April 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Cumberland's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Cumberland County School District, Burkesville, Kentucky on July 10, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robin Sharp, Cumberland County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2534A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed April 13, 2000, by Eastern Plains Instructional Television Consortium, Logan, New Mexico, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2535A1.txt
  • by the Administrator. Because Florence Carlton failed to file an appeal of the April 28, 2000 and May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Florence Carlton's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Florence Carlton School District 15-6, Florence, Montana on July 19, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Elaine Huseby, Florence Carlton School District 15-6, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2536A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Florence failed to file an appeal of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Florence's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Florence City School District, Florence, Alabama on July 19, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Edison D. Barney, Florence City School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2537A1.txt
  • this case, because Lincoln has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Lincoln's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Lincoln's initial appeal, Lincoln may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 8, 2000 by Lincoln School District 156, Calumet City, Illinois, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2538A1.txt
  • period after the issuance of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on July 9, 2000, a holiday, Moon Area's July 10, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Moon Area's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Moon Area's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Moon Area School District, Moon Township, Pennsylvania on July 31, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Daniel H. Vogel, Moon Area School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2539A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because North Attleborough failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss North Attleborough's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by North Attleborough School District, North Attleborough, Massachusetts on July 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Roland Denault, North Attleborough School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2540A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Gildford failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Gildford's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by North Gildford School, Gildford, Montana on June 19, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from George Stahl, North Gildford School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 19,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2541A1.txt
  • 30-day period after the issuance of the June 30, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on July 30, 2000, a weekend, Roosevelt Elementary's July 31, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Roosevelt Elementary's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Roosevelt's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Roosevelt Elementary School District 66, Phoenix, Arizona on August 22, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John Harris, Roosevelt Elementary School District 66, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2542A1.txt
  • County has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Simpson County's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Simpson County's initial appeal, Simpson County may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on June 23, 2000 by Simpson County School District, Mendenhall, Mississippi, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kay Berry, Simpson County School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2543A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because South Heart failed to file an appeal of the May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss South Heart's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by South Heart School, South Heart, North Dakota on July 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Paula Lengowski, South Heart School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2544A1.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because Peter & Paul failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Peter & Paul's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by SS. Peter & Paul School, Cary, Illinois on July 25, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sr. Katrina Lamkin, SS. Peter & Paul School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2545A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Patrick failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Patrick's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by St. Patrick's School, Dickinson, North Dakota on July 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Brenda L. Selinger, St. Patrick's School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2546A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Swift River failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Swift River's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Swift River Elementary School, New Salem, Massachusetts on July 12, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol S. Holzberg, Swift River Elementary School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2547A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Vacaville failed to file an appeal of the May 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Vacaville's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Vacaville Unified School District, Vacaville, California on July 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Terry D. Beckham, Vacaville Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2548A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because AECSD failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss AECSD's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Auburn Enlarged City School District, Fairport, New York on July 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Matthew Crider, ECC Technologies, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2549A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Chisago Lakes failed to file an appeal of the May 16, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Chisago Lakes' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Chisago Lakes School District #2144, Lindstrom, Minnesota on July 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cathryn E. Kolkind, Chisago Lakes School District #2144, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2550A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Colton failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Colton's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Colton Joint Unified School District, Upland, California on September 1, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gary Kendrick, Colton Joint Unified School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2551A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2551A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2551A1.txt
  • of the 30-day period after the issuance of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on June 11, 2000, a holiday, Durham's May 12, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Durham's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Durham's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Durham Unified School District, Durham, California on July 11, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Christy R. Patterson, Durham Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2552A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2552A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed July 17, 2000, by Elko County School District, Elko, Nevada, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2553A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Girard failed to file an appeal of the May 19, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Girard's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Girard City School District, Girard, Ohio on July 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Anthony D. Ambrosio, Girard City School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2554A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because McIntosh failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss McIntosh's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by McIntosh County Schools, Darien, Georgia on July 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Debby Richardson, McIntosh County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 28,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2555A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed July 17, 2000, by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative, Hayti, South Dakota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2556A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Ryan failed to file an appeal of the June 16, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Ryan's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Ryan Public School, Ryan, Oklahoma on August 23, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Don A. Bogard, Ryan Public School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2557A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed July 11, 2000, by Traverse City Area Public Schools, Traverse City, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2558A1.txt
  • of the 30-day period after the issuance of the July 7, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on August 6, 2000, a holiday, Xavier's August 7, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Xavier's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Xavier's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Xavier High School, Cedar Rapids, Iowa on August 29, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeff Henderson, Xavier High School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2559A1.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because ESU No. 6 failed to file an appeal of the October 26, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss ESU No. 6's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Educational Service Unit No. 06, Omaha, Nebraska on August 30, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Don Ferneding, Educational Service Unit No. 06, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2561A1.txt
  • College include long distance telephone service and other services that are characterized as ``telecommunications services'' in the service agreement between West Texas and Texas State Technical College. Given the prohibition on funding of telecommunications services provided by a non-telecommunications provider under program rules, we conclude that SLD properly denied funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by the West Texas Telecommunications Consortium, Abilene, Texas, May 3, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Steve Simoneau, West Texas Telecommunications Consortium, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 3, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2574A1.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Eatonville's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Eatonville School District, Eatonville, Washington, on May 9, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Raymond F. Arment, III, Eatonville School District, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2575A1.pdf
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Delta/Greely failed to file an appeal of the February 28, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Delta/Greely's appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Delta/Greely School District, Delta Junction, Alaska on July 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kim Johnson, Delta/Greely School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2576A1.txt
  • with routers deemed eligible for support by SLD. Consistent with Terral School District 3, and in the absence of an explanation by SLD of the basis for its decision, we conclude that the record does not support SLD's finding of ineligibility. Accordingly, we shall remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the Mississippi Department of Education, Jackson, Mississippi on April 14, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Mississippi's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2586A1.txt
  • for which the customer and carrier do not have an underlying contractual relationship because of the unique technological concerns with dial-around services that are not conducive to the establishment of a written contract. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority specifically delegated to the Common Carrier Bureau in the Second Report and Order, and under Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the deadline for detariffing mass-market consumer services IS EXTENDED from January 31, 2001 to April 30, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the authority delegated under Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Econobill Corporation's Motion to Accept Late-Filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2618A1.doc
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Pacific Bell Telephone Company Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-23 ) ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2619A1.doc
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-24 ) ) ) I, ________________________________________________________________________ __________,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2623A1.doc
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-25 ) ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2624A1.doc
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of The Ameritech Operating Companies Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-26 ) ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2628A1.txt
  • of Citizens Telecommunications Companies Revisions to Tariff F.C.C. No.1. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Citizens' Tariff F.C.C. No. 1 applicable to Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal No. 88, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket No. 97-240. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2630A1.txt
  • understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. The program's rules state repeatedly that universal service funds support only eligible services. Anderson should have been aware that it was seeking discounts for ineligible internal connections. We conclude SLD appropriately applied its 30 percent policy based upon the facts of this case. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed May 30, 2000, by Anderson School, Staatsburg, New York, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau In the Matter of Request for Review by Anderson School, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2631A1.txt
  • letter from Interstate stated that the lesser quotes were for ``the remaining schools,'' implying that these were separate quotes. Because SLD incorrectly determined that the funding request from Winterset was for ineligible services or products, Winterset's request for review is granted, and SLD is directed to reconsider Winterset's funding request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed April 13, 2000, by Winterset Community School District, Winterset, Iowa, IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ivan T. Webber, on behalf of Winterset School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2634A1.txt
  • No. 1349 which pertains to Virtual Collocation is suspended for one day and will be subject to the investigation initiated in the Investigation of NYNEX Telephone Companies' New Virtual Expanded Interconnection Offerings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Bell Atlantic's Tariff F.C.C. No. 11 pertaining to Virtual Collocation , filed under Transmittal No. 1349, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket No. 98-240. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2640A1.txt
  • cap carriers to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Idaho, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on July 11, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2641A1.txt
  • transfers of control of licenses and lines from CTC and IWL to McLeodUSA, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Petition Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc., on October 6, 2000, and supplemented on November 21, 2000, IS GRANTED subject to the conditions, and to the extent, indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2642A1.txt
  • styled the letter an ``inquiry,'' rather than an appeal. Because Houston Independent filed the letter within 30 days of SLD's June 16, 2000, Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it was timely filed. Accordingly, we grant in part Houston Independent's Letters of Appeal and direct SLD to review Houston Independent's initial appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letters of Appeal filed by Houston Independent School District, Houston, Texas on August 18, 2000 and August 21, 2000, ARE GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Daryl Ann
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2650A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Bryn Athyn failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Bryn Athyn's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Bryn Athyn Church School, Bryn Athyn, Pennsylvania on September 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melodie Greer, Bryn Athyn Church School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2651A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because EDmin failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss EDmin's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by EDmin Open Systems, Inc., San Diego, California on September 26, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Greg Shorts, EDmin Open Systems, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2652A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 8, 2000, by James Ward Elementary School, Chicago, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Larry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2653A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Madera failed to file an appeal of the July 7, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Madera's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Madera Unified School District, Madera, California on September 25, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Steve Imrie, Madera Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2654A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 11, 2000, by Norwell Public Schools, Norwell, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Richard F.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2655A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Richland Colfax failed to file an appeal of the May 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Richland Colfax's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Richland Colfax No. 1, Richland, Nebraska on September 6, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Judith Kabourek, Richland Colfax No. 1, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2656A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Santa Rosa failed to file an appeal of the June 30, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Santa Rosa's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Santa Rosa Consolidated Schools, Santa Rosa, New Mexico on September 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Daniel Flores, Santa Rosa Consolidated Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2657A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Santa Ynez failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Santa Ynez's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District, Santa Ynez, California on September 12, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Fred Van Leuven, Santa Ynez Valley Union
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2658A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 28, 2000, by Saint John Bosco High School, Bellflower, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2659A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 23, 2000, by South Brunswick Township School District, Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2660A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2660A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 2, 2000, by Westbrook High School, Westbrook, Connecticut, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Robert Vale,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2662A1.txt
  • to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require the Verizon companies to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Illinois, GTE North Incorporated and GTE South Incorporated on September 8, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2699A1.txt
  • appropriate for the SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Northwestern's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on September 15, 2000, by Northwestern School District 56-3, Mellette, South Dakota, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2700A1.txt
  • the 30-day period after the issuance of the July 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters fell on August 27, 2000, a holiday, Western Heights' August 28, 2000 appeals should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Western Heights' appeals and direct SLD to review Western Heights' appeals to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Western Heights School District I-41, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on September 28, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review by Western Heights School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2701A1.txt
  • Philadelphia Library's request contravenes the Commission's policy that applicants shall not be permitted to amend completed FCC Forms 471 to remove ineligible service requests after the closure of the filing window deadline. If applicants were permitted to make such corrections, SLD and the Commission would face significant additional administrative burdens. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 28, 2000 by Free Library of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from H.E. Broadbent, Free Library of Philadelphia, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed, March 28,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2722A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2722A1.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies YCS' Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Youth Consultation Services, Newark, New Jersey, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kathleen M. Bravo, Youth Consultation Service, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 10, 2000 (Letter of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2729A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2729A1.txt
  • Protective Order previously adopted in this proceeding. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 303(r), 403, and 410 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 303(r), 403, and 410, and section 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(f), this ORDER IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket 96-45, Ninth Report and Order and Eighteenth Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 20432 (1999) (Ninth Report and Order); Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Forward-Looking Mechanism for High Cost Support for Non-Rural LECs, Tenth Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2735A1.txt
  • above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon United-KUC's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by United-KUC, Inc. on September 19, 2000, and supplemented on December 1, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2770A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2770A1.txt
  • information collections contained herein are contingent upon approval of the Office of Management and Budget. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that FCC Report 43-01, the Annual Summary Report, FCC Report 43-02, the USOA Report, FCC Report 43-03, the Joint Cost Report, FCC Report 43-04, the Access Report, FCC Report 43-05, the Service Quality Report, FCC Report 43-07, the Infrastructure Report, FCC 43-08, the Operating Data Report, FCC Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2784A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2784A1.txt
  • subsequently granted Chichester's appeal concerning the other application, stating that ``[y]our appeal has been granted because it is not clear who was contacted initially for the missing documentation. . . .'' Because these two decisions based on the same circumstances are inconsistent, we shall remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Chichester School District, Boothwyn, Pennsylvania on May 10, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Chichester's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2789A1.txt
  • waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by WORLDCOM, Inc. on October 16, 2000, and October 17, 2000, and supplemented on December 4, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2793A1.txt
  • the relevant state authority that has jurisdiction over such matters. In addition, our grant of pricing flexibility in no way prejudges whether BellSouth complies with the requirements of section 271 of the Communications Act. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES. 25. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Access Reform Fifth Report and Order, that the petition filed by BellSouth IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999), petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2806A1.txt
  • with routers deemed eligible for support by SLD. Consistent with Terral School District 3, and in the absence of an explanation by SLD of the basis for its decision, we conclude that the record does not support SLD's finding of ineligibility. Accordingly, we shall remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the Caddo Independent School District 5, Caddo, Oklahoma, on May 1, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Caddo's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2807A1.txt
  • with routers deemed eligible for support by SLD. Consistent with Terral School District 3, and in the absence of an explanation by SLD of the basis for its decision, we conclude that the record does not support SLD's finding of ineligibility. Accordingly, we shall remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the Canute Independent School District 11, Canute, Oklahoma, on May 1, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Canute's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2808A1.txt
  • after the issuance of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on August 20, 2000, a holiday, Soille San Diego's August 21, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Soille San Diego's appeal and direct SLD to review Soille San Diego's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Soille San Diego Hebrew Day School, San Diego, California on September 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rabbi Simcha Weiser, Soille San
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.txt
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Actiontec Electronics, Inc., Cisco Systems, Zoom Telephonics, GVC Corporation, Askey Computer Corp., Efficient Networks, Inc., Polycom, Inc., Ambit Microsystems Corporation, Linksys
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2816A1.txt
  • Petition at 2; Notification Letters. Notices provided to certain business customers will state that the customer's option to choose a different carrier is subject to the terms and conditions of its plan. 17 Waiver Petition at 2; Notification Letters. 18 Waiver Petition at 2; Notification Letters. 19 Waiver Petition at 2. Federal Communications Commission DA 00-2816 5 delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed on October 27, 2000 by Bell Atlantic Communciations, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Long Distance, and NYNEX Long Distance, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Enterprise Solutions, IS GRANTED subject to the conditions, and to the extent, indicated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2818A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2818A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 6, 2000, by Lyman School District No. 42-1, Presho, South Dakota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2827A1.txt
  • this waiver is conditioned upon Primus' provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Primus Telecommunications, Inc. on November 17, 2000, and supplemented on December 8, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2839A1.txt
  • grant of this waiver is conditioned upon PaeTec's provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by PaeTec Communications, Inc., on November 27, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2841A1.txt
  • the 28-day posting requirement. The critical issue is when Sackets Harbor signed a contract with the service provider, not when it mailed the Form 471. Based on the record before us, Sackets Harbor signed a contract before anyone ever had an opportunity to submit a competitive bid for the project. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Sackets Harbor Central School District, Sackets Harbor, New York on May 5, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Anne B. Spaziani, Sackets Harbor Central School District 56, to Office of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2851A1.txt
  • this docket withdrawing its application. As such, we hereby terminate this docket. Verizon further expressed its intention to ``shortly file to initiate a new application'' and to incorporate the existing record in this docket into the new application. We will consider such a request once Verizon files a new application. Accordingly IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the proceeding in CC Docket 00-176 IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Michael E. Glover, Senior Vice President & Deputy General Counsel, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 00-176 (filed Dec. 18, 2000).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2857A1.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 00-28 ) ) ) I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2867A1.txt
  • upon the provision by AT&T of customer notification and upon the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by AT&T Corporation on November 30, 2000, and supplemented on December 14, 2000, and on December 19, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2876A1.txt
  • 43-03 Joint Cost Report until October 1, 2001. Unless we extend the time period for the attestation, the auditor will not have the results from the ARMIS 43-03 Report to review. Therefore, on our own motion, we grant Roseville an extension of time until January 15, 2002 to file its initial attestation report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that Roseville Telephone Company has an extension of time until January 15, 2002, to file its initial rule 64.904 CAM attestation report. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division ARMIS is an automated reporting system developed by the Commission for collecting financial, operating,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2877A1.txt
  • to prepare the ARMIS Reports, we conclude that an extension of six months, until October 1, 2001, is sufficient. The attestation engagement cannot, under our current guidelines, take place until the ARMIS Reports are prepared; therefore, we are also granting an extension of time, until January 15, 2002, for filing the attestation report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that the CenturyTel, Inc. and CenturyTel of Washington, Inc. request for an extension of time to file its initial ARMIS reports and file a CAM attestation report is GRANTED, as described above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division Century is a mid-sized
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2891A1.txt
  • necessary to ensure that individual companies serving the smallest exchanges will not experience unreasonable reductions in per loop support in 2001 compared with their 2000 amounts. The requested submission does not preclude NECA from beginning payments to average schedule companies, under the modified formula, at the next regular payment cycle. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formula proposed by the National Exchange Carriers Association, Inc. on October 2, 2000, for local switching support is adopted and SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE January 1, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2892A1.txt
  • this waiver is conditioned upon Qwest's and the Acquiring Carriers' provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by Qwest Corporation and All West Communications, Inc., All West World Connect, Carbon/Emery Telcom, Inc., Central Telcom Services, Central Utah Telephone, Inc., Emery Telcom, Hanksville Telcom, Inc., Manti Long Distance, Manti Telephone Company, Skyline Telecom, UBET Telecom, Inc., and Uintah Basin Long Distance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2893A1.txt
  • cap carriers to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Colorado, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on August 7, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2895A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Cellco has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Bell Atlantic Mobile IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for a service area in the state of Delaware, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the Common Carrier Bureau to the Universal Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2896A1.txt
  • the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Western Wireless has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Western Wireless Corporation IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for designated service areas in Wyoming, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the Common Carrier Bureau to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2899A1.txt
  • only speed the verification process, but it will also diminish the burden on Bell Atlantic and Lifeline customers without imposing any significant costs. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania on December 22, 1999 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2900A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2900A1.txt
  • the Year 2 deadline to September 30, 2001. Applicants eligible for the extension, therefore, may extend their existing contracts for non-recurring services voluntarily until September 30, 2001, without having to comply with the Commission's competitive bidding process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, this Order is ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, DA 00-2444 (Common Carrier Bur., rel. November 1, 2000) (November 2000 Extension Order). The Commission's rules require schools and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2908A1.txt
  • a review of a decision by the Universal Service Administrator to withhold funds allegedly due and payable to Ames under the schools and libraries support mechanisms. On July 31, 2000, Ames filed a Motion to Withdraw its appeal. The Division grants Ames' Motion to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismisses Ames' appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion to Withdraw filed by the Ames Business & Learning Environments, Inc., Chandler, Arizona on July 31, 2000 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2909A1.txt
  • the Year One funding implementation deadline for the schools and libraries support mechanism so that it can receive the full amount of funding that it requested. Our review of the record, however, finds that Franklin has received all funds requested. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Franklin's Letter of Appeal as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the Franklin County School District, Carnesville, Georgia on December 30, 1999 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Alicia A. Frey, Franklin County Schools, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2920A1.txt
  • for one day and will be subject to investigation. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Sprint Local Telephone Companies, Tariff F.C.C. No. 3, applicable to Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal No. 132, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket Nos. 94-97 and 96-234.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-42A1.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 28, 1999 by the Denison Independent School District IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 99-#### -42 8¨È
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • n/a 4.15 1.60 n/a 5.18 2.26 Luxembourg n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 n/a 2.01 2.25 Netherlands 2.00 1.17 1.00 2.00 1.60 1.41 2.52 2.06 1.70 Portugal n/a 1.20 0.99 n/a 2.37 1.63 n/a 18.00 2.58 Spain 1.51 1.49 0.99 1.51 1.49 1.59 4.22 4.17 3.07 Sweden 1.68 1.14 0.86 2.15 1.77 1.16 2.98 2.41 1.59 U.K. 0.64 0.61 0.62 0.91 0.87 0.90 1.74 1.69 1.27 Attachment 4 EU interconnection rates U.S. Cents per minute at peak rates Local Single Transit Double Transit 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Country Austria 8.36 2.00 1.91 8.36 2.00 1.91 9.24 2.63 2.52 Belgium 3.05 1.23 1.12 3.05 2.33 1.89 3.98 3.26 2.69 Denmark 1.08 1.09 0.98 2.00 2.02 1.75 2.44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-101A1.txt
  • these representations, and the statements of the Alaska Commission, we conclude that the Petitioners have demonstrated that grant of this waiver request serves the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by ATEAC, Inc., Alaska Telephone Company, Arctic Slope Telephone Association Cooperative, Inc., Interior Telephone Company, Inc., Mukluk Telephone Company, Inc., and United-KUC, Inc., on September 22, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1034A1.txt
  • Marion was not provided with an effective ``opportunity to make corrections'' to its FCC Form 471. In an effort to provide applicants with an effective opportunity to make such corrections after the issuance of RALs, SLD now includes both the monthly and annual pre-discount cost of funding requests in RALs. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 18, 2000 by Marion County Public Schools, Ocala, Florida, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Marion's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1035A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1035A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1035A1.txt
  • Commission's rule before signing its contracts and submitting its FCC Form 471. SLD should have been able to determine that Joliet complied with the 28-day posting rule. Accordingly, we remand Joliet's application and direct SLD to reconsider Joliet's application and, if warranted, to issue a new funding commitment decision letter. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Joliet Grade School, Springfield, Illinois on June 8, 2000 IS GRANTED, to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Danielle Gustafson, Joliet Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1036A1.txt
  • it had a qualified existing contract, using other information provided, SLD could have reasonably determined the exact nature of the telecommunication services requested. We, therefore, remand Tomahawk's application and direct SLD to issue a new funding commitment decision letter based on the originally submitted FCC Form 471 and its attachments. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Tomahawk School District, Tomahawk, Wisconsin filed on June 26, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lin Kautza, Tomahawk School District, Tomahawk, Wisconsin, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 26,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1037A1.txt
  • answer to Item 17 would not have been reasonably apparent to SLD. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding and complying with all the relevant programs and procedures. 19 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Olympia, Washington, on June 2, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Clare Donahue, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.txt
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by BroadMax Technology Limited, Ambit Microsystems Corporation, Delta Networks, Inc., Efficient Networks, Inc., Comtrend Corporation, Allied Data Technologies, 3Com Corporation, Eicon Networks, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1045A1.txt
  • waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by ComTech21, LLC on March 22, 2001, and supplemented on April 20, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1046A1.txt
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the emergency waiver request filed by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation d/b/a Metropolitan Telecommunications a/k/a MetTel on April 16, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1048A1.txt
  • telecommunications services held by NorthPoint to Verizon. On January 12, 2001, Verizon filed a letter with the Commission's Secretary withdrawing its August 24, 2000, joint application, and on March 23, 2001, NorthPoint filed a letter with the Commission requesting permanent emergency discontinuance of service, pursuant to section 63.63 of the Commission's rules. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that this proceeding, CC Docket No. 00-157, IS HEREBY TERMINATED and CC Docket No. 00-157 IS CLOSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey, Chief Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau See Joint Application of NorthPoint Communications, Inc. and Verizon Communications for Authority Pursuant to Section 214
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1050A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 7, 2001, by Amherst Independent School District, Amherst, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Michael
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1051A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 3, 2001, by Harlandale Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1052A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Jefferson failed to file an appeal of the July 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Jefferson's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jefferson Independent School District, Jefferson, Texas on March 26, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mike Wood, Jefferson Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1053A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Montgomery County failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Montgomery County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Montgomery County School District, Montgomery, Alabama on January 29, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol A. Doucet, Ed.D, Montgomery County School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1055A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1055A1.txt
  • affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because District 4 failed to file an appeal of the June 16, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss its appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Superintendent of Schools School Administrative District #4, Guilford, Maine on February 6, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael P. Cyr, Superintendent of Schools School Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1056A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1056A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1056A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 30, 2001, by Tyrone Area School District, Tyrone, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Victoria
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1070A1.txt
  • service were excluded from the ratebase. Therefore, we conclude that PRTC has failed to substantiate its claim and PRTC's petition for clarification must be denied. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201- 205, and 218-220, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18 and 32.27 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18 and 32.27, that the Petition for Reconsideration or Clarification filed by Puerto Rico Telephone Company is HEREBY DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc., Petition for Waiver of Section 32.27 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1077A1.txt
  • See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the remaining tariff revisions filed by the Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies under Transmittal Nos. 1373 and 1374 and the corresponding tariff revisions filed by the Verizon Telephone Companies under Transmittal Nos. 23 and 24 ARE SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1090A1.txt
  • completed their applications and accurately described their funding requests. Moreover, permitting applicants to amend their requests after the window closed could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. We therefore deny Old Town's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 2, 2000, by Old Town School District, Old Town Maine, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Richard M. Beaudoin, Old Town School Department, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1091A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1091A1.txt
  • SLD. The Bureau remanded SLD's decision, finding no support in the record for SLD's conclusion in light of the integration of eligible services with the rejected components. Here, SLD has not adequately justified its conclusion that this equipment should be deemed eligible. We therefore remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Philadelphia School District, on August 25, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Philadelphia's application, and if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1111A1.txt
  • of Citizens Telecommunications Companies Revisions to Tariff F.C.C. No.1. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Citizens' Tariff F.C.C. No.1 Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal No. 99 and deferred under Transmittal No. 100 ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the May 1, 2001 effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1117A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Calhan failed to file an appeal of the October 26, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Calhan's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Calhan School District RJ-1, Calhan, Colorado on April 12, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sharon A. Olyejar, Calhan School District RJ-1, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1118A1.txt
  • submitted its FCC Form 471 on April 26, 1999, only 18 days after posting its FCC Form 470, demonstrates conclusively that it did not wait at least 28 days from the date of posting its service needs before entering into a service agreement and thus violated the competitive bidding requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the July 25, 2000 Request for Review filed by Cynthiana-Harrison County Public Library, Cynthiana, Kentucky, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from E. Susan Ellis, Cynthiana-Harrison County Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1119A1.txt
  • and, thus, Homer is subject to the funding priorities set forth in Section 54.507(c). We conclude that the particular facts of this case do rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Homer Community Consolidated School District 33C, Lockport, Illinois, on July 6, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from John Lavelle, Homer Community Consolidated School District 33C, Lockport, Illinois, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1120A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, ICS fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Immaculate Conception School, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York, on July 24, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Louise Frangella, Immaculate Conception School, Irvington-on-Hudson, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1121A1.txt
  • supply it, our view of the merits of Wetzel's Request for Review might be different. Instead, SLD re-construed the request without giving Wetzel notice and opportunity to support its claim. This was an error which warrants granting Wetzel's Request for Review and remanding this matter to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 15, 2000, by Wetzel County School District, New Martinsville, West Virginia, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and that Wetzel's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1132A1.txt
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Choice One Communications of New York, Inc. on April 26, 2001, and supplemented on April 27, 2001 and May 3, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1160A1.txt
  • the eight conditions specified in the Reconsideration Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.312(i), by Uniden Engineering Services, Kyushu Matsushita Electric Co., Ltd., RadioShack Corporation, and ShenZhen Huaneng Communication Co. LTD. ARE GRANTED to the extent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1165A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because North Babylon failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss North Babylon's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by North Babylon Union Free School District, North Babylon, New York on April 30, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rosanne Sweeney, North Babylon Union Free School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1179A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 24, 2001, by Beth Chana Elementary and High School for Girls, Beth Chana, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1180A1.txt
  • a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for waiver of our rules. Moreover, because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 12, 2001, by Ellenville Central School District, Ellenville, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1181A1.txt
  • Berkshire has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Northern Berkshire's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Northern Berkshire's initial request, Northern Berkshire may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, North Adams, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1182A1.txt
  • this case, because Sayreville has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Sayreville's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Sayreville's initial request, Sayreville may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sayreville District Schools, Sayreville, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1202A1.txt
  • 30, 2000. Richland requests that the Commission order SLD to process its FCC Form 471. Based on the information before us, the USCN provided to SLD on Richland's FCC Form 471 matches the USCN indicated on Richland's FCC Form 470. Accordingly, we remand Richland's application to SLD for further determination. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Appeal filed August 17, 2000, by the Richland School District, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and we REMAND this matter to the Administrator for further processing consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1234A1.txt
  • longer able to provide service. Despite the loss of service that some customers may experience, we believe that most customers are likely to be able to obtain substitute service and we expect that the resulting harm should be reduced. We therefore authorize NorthPoint to discontinue service permanently. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that NorthPoint's application to discontinue service IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Diane Griffin Harmon Acting Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.63. Section 214(a) requires a carrier to obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity either to construct, acquire, operate,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.txt
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Lucent Technologies, XAVi Technologies Corporation, Delta Networks Inc., Turbocomm Tech. Inc., Archtek Telecom Corporation, TelGen Corporation, Intel Corporation, Kye Systems Corporation, Tailyn
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1248A1.txt
  • Street has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Bank Street's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Bank Street's initial request, Bank Street may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bank Street School for Children, New York, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1249A1.txt
  • Olmstead filed a timely appeal with the Administrator. Consistent with this analysis we therefore remand this matter to SLD. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Olmstead's timely May 8, 2000 appeal, Olmstead may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 5, 2001, by Olmstead Falls City Schools, Olmstead Falls, Ohio, is GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the Administrator for further consideration consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1251A1.txt
  • for the actions of those employees to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Danbury fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Danbury Public Schools, Danbury, Connecticut, on July 25, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melanie C. Schroeder, Danbury Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1252A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Dummerston fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Dummerston Elementary School, Dummerston, Vermont, on August 24, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Betsy Whittaker, Dummerston Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1253A1.txt
  • 30, 2001, SLD reconsidered its earlier denial and granted Weskan's request, mailing the decision to both Weskan and the service provider. Because the Division finds that the errors asserted by Weskan in its Request for Review have been corrected by SLD, the Division dismisses the Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Weskan Unified School District #242, Weskan, Kansas, on July 17, 2000 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Greg Robinson, Weskan Unified School District #242, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1270A1.txt
  • for Interstate Access Service, expanded interconnection service offering. Therefore, those portions of Transmittal No. 36 which pertain to collocation are suspended for one day and will be subject to the ongoing investigations. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.091, 0.291, the revisions to Verizon's Tariff F.C.C. No. 14, pertaining to collocation, filed under Transmittal No. 36, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket Nos. 96-234 and 94-97. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that VERIZON
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1279A1.doc
  • the public and confidential versions of its petitions, we conclude that Sprint has met its burden of demonstrating that it has satisfied the applicable triggers for the services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by the Sprint Telephone Companies IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Trunking Basket Voice Grade DS1 DS3 OptiPoint CCS/SS7 Interconnection Special
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1294A1.txt
  • SLD. Moreover, Ocean Beach acknowledges that it received its April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter at the Long Beach, Washington address. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 30, 2001, by Ocean Beach School District No. 101, Long Beach, Washington, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1295A1.txt
  • Further, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on April 16, 2001 approving NJ State Library's appeal which requested corrections to the billed entity information on its SLD application 169943. Because SLD has approved NJ State Library appeal, we dismiss NJ State Library's Request for Review because it is moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New Jersey State Library, Trenton, New Jersey on June 30, 2000, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Linda Kay, New Jersey State Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-129A1.txt
  • loop support amounts are necessary. Payments for periods subsequent to December 2002 shall be based on the conventional historic data in accordance with the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Mescalero Apache Telecom, Inc., GTE Southwest Incorporated, and Valor Telecommunications of New Mexico, LLC on June 30, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-130A1.txt
  • Separate Stipulation and Order referred to herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that AT&T's ``Petition to Deny,'' filed in this proceeding IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.103. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau James D. Schlichting, Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See In re Applications of Intermedia Communications, Inc., and WorldCom, Inc., Transferee, for Consent to Transfer Control of Corporations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1327A1.txt
  • that the public interest would be served by such a waiver. Accordingly, we grant South Slope's request for waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, Amana Colonies Telephone Company, d/b/a HickoryTech and Heartland Telecommunications Company of Iowa on December 13, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1328A1.txt
  • requested, or that seek services not initially requested. This administrative practice enables SLD to apply our funding priority rules properly in situations where demand exceeds the annual funding cap. Thus, we do not believe the application should be modified to include a funding request for Internet connections from Merit Network. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Request for Review filed by Genesee Intermediate School District on July 31, 2000 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Beverly Knox-Pipes, Genesee Intermediate School District, Flint, Michigan, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1329A1.txt
  • in the library's files, HAFPL demonstrates that it failed to comply with a program mandate. By filing late, HAFPL ran the risk of not receiving any funding. Because we find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline, HAFPL is subject to the funding priorities set forth in section 54.507(c). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Holland-Alexandria Free Public Library, Milford, New Jersey, on August 16, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sylvia Gidwani, Holland-Alexandria Free Public Library, Milford New Jersey, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1330A1.txt
  • In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. We find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline, we therefore, deny Powhatan's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Powhatan School, Boyce, Virginia, on July 25, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sister Elizabeth, Powhatan School, Boyce, Virginia, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 25, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1333A1.txt
  • of its local knowledge and presence. Based on these representations, we conclude that Madison has demonstrated that grant of this waiver request serves the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Madison Telephone Company and Gallatin River Communications, LLC on February 23, 2001, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Madison Telephone Company and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1362A1.txt
  • statute or rule. Redondo Beach's misunderstanding of program rules provides no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and procedures. Here, we find no grounds for relieving Redondo Beach from having to comply with our policies regarding competitive bidding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Redondo Beach Unified School District, Redondo Beach, California, on September 7, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patricia Hosken, Redondo Beach Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1374A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1374A1.txt
  • 1, 2001, and remain in effect through June 30, 2002. 2. We have reviewed NECA's filing and find that its proposed modifications to the above-mentioned formulas are reasonable. Therefore, pursuant to Section 69.606(a) of the Commission rules, we approve the proposed modifications to these average schedule formulas as submitted in NECA's filing. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. on December 28, 2000, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2001, and remain in effect through June 30, 2002. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1378A1.txt
  • adversely affect any interest. Therefore, we waive for one year the requirement of section 69.602 that NECA hold annual elections for its Board of Directors. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), (j), and 201-205, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 69.602 filed by the National Exchange Carriers Association, IS GRANTED to the extent herein discussed. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey, Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Biennial Regulatory Review 2000 Staff Report, National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1397A1.txt
  • connections pursuant to the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. On April 27, 2001, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter granting discounts that are-with respect to all eligible services-identical to those requested in the application at issue here. Therefore, we dismiss as moot Fort Osage's Request for Review. Accordingly, it is ordered pursuant to authority delegated under section 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Fort Osage R-1 School District, Independence, Missouri, on March 1, 2000, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator By
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1398A1.txt
  • In this case, because Missoula has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Missoula's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Missoula's request, Missoula may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on January 31, 2001 by Missoula Public Library, Missoula, Montana, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1399A1.txt
  • by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because ONC failed to file an appeal of the July 5, 2000 Administrator Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss ONC's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Otsego Northern Catskills BOCES, Stamford, New York on May 3, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rodger Oesterle, Otsego Northern Catskills BOCES, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1404A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Bnos Zion failed to file an appeal of the September 1, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Bnos Zion's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bnos Zion of Bobov School, Brooklyn, New York on May 15, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rabbi Jacov Zucker, Bnos Zion of Bobov School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1407A1.txt
  • that it is in the public interest to encourage such actions. We also anticipate that further waivers will be unnecessary, as the parties are committed to completing the transactions by the next annual filing. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 201 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 201, sections 1.3, 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 0.91 and 0.291, that the relief requested by Citizens Communications Company, Qwest Corporation and Verizon Telephone Companies IS GRANTED to the extent set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Glenn T. Reynolds Acting Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 61.48(o)(2). Section 61.48(o)(2) states that ``[f]or sale of properties for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1408A1.txt
  • regulation for one additional year. In so doing, we extend the deadline to July 1, 2002, by which ALLTEL/Aliant is required to convert the exchanges it acquired from Aliant to rate-of-return regulation. 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i)-(j), and 201 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i)-(j), and 201, and sections 0.291, 0.91 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.291, 0.91 and 1.3, that section 61.41 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41, SHALL BE WAIVED to the extent necessary to permit ALLTEL/Aliant to file a price cap annual access tariff that will be effective July 3, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau For
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1412A1.txt
  • established deadline if the applicant wishes to be considered with other in-window applicants. Thus, by filing late, Flint ran the risk of not receiving any funding. Because we find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline, Flint is subject to the funding priorities set forth in Section 54.507(g). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Flint Memorial Library, North Reading, Massachusetts, on August 16, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nancy Sheehan, Flint Memorial Library, North Reading, Massachusetts, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1417A1.txt
  • service offering, and GTE System Telephone Companies GSTC) expanded interconnection service offering. Therefore, Transmittal Nos. 44, 45, and 46 are suspended for one day and will be subject to the ongoing investigations. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.091, 0.291, the revisions to Verizon's Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 1, 11, 14 and 16, pertaining to collocation, filed under Transmittal Nos. 44, 45, and 46, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and investigations of the referenced transmittals ARE INSTITUTED and incorporated within CC Docket Nos. 96-165, 96-234, 94-97,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1428A1.txt
  • See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the remaining tariff revisions filed by the Bell Operating Companies under Transmittal No. 18 ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 204(a) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1429A1.txt
  • single petition for waiver, without time to solicit comment from affected parties. Therefore, we take a cautious approach that will allow the affected carriers to recover their universal service contributions only through the same type of end-user charges that are already paid by the vast majority of telephone consumers. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291, that sections 69.3(a) and 69.4(d)(2) ARE WAIVED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that non-price cap local exchange carriers electing to take advantage of the waivers granted herein shall cite the ``DA'' number of this Order as the authority for the filing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1431A1.txt
  • is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplementary Filing. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Pacific Lightnet, Inc., on May 22, 2001, and supplemented on June 11, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1432A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 01-1432 Released: June 14, 2001 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR CORBAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. TO ACQUIRE DOMESTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINES HELD BY WESTERN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. CC Docket No. 01-98 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application requesting Commission consent for Corban Communications, Inc. (Corban) to acquire and operate the domestic transmission lines held by Western Telecommunications, Inc. (WTCI), a non-dominant facilities-based carrier providing interstate telecommunications services. WTCI operates a common carrier optical fiber transmission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1450A1.txt
  • is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplemental Filing. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by SWBT, Inc., on May 22, 2001, and supplemented on June 11, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-145A1.txt
  • this case, because Colchester has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Colchester's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Colchester's initial appeal, Colchester may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Colchester School District, Colchester, Vermont, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-146A1.txt
  • staffing difficulties and other priorities. These arguments do not rise to the level of good cause necessary to justify waiving our rules. Accordingly, we conclude that Newburgh has not presented the special circumstances necessary to warrant relief from the filing deadline. We therefore deny Newburgh's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on July 10, 2000, by Newburgh Enlarged City School District, Newburgh, New York, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-147A1.txt
  • signed on Sept. 10, 1997 and June 5, 1998. None of these requests were subject to existing, binding agreements as defined by the Commission's rules for Year 2 and were thus subject to the competitive bidding requirement. Accordingly, consistent with prior Bureau decisions, SLD correctly denied Raytown's requests for support. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the April 14, 2000, Letter of Appeal filed by Raytown Quality Schools, Raytown, Missouri, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from R.G. Kirby, Raytown Quality Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 14, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-148A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 9, 2000, by Sutton School, CNSU, Lyndonville, Vermont, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Mary Ann
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1504A1.txt
  • the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Fair Lawn has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 22, 2000 by Fair Lawn Board of Education, Fair Lawn, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey, Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bruce Watson, Fair Lawn Board of Education, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1506A1.txt
  • filed its Forms 471 after the filing window closed. Altoona's exemption from the 28-day posting requirement did not relieve it of its obligation under program rules to file its Forms 471 prior to the close of the application window, and we uphold SLD's denial of funding on that grounds. 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Altoona Area School District, Altoona, Pennsylvania, on February 7, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dean G. Wilt, Altoona Area School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1507A1.txt
  • it administratively appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Chabad has failed to demonstrate good cause for waiving the filing deadline. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Chabad's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on April 9, 2001, by Chabad Hebrew School, Wayne, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Rabbi Michel Gurkov, Chabad Hebrew School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1508A1.txt
  • Commission. Connect2 then filed the instant Request for Review. The record shows that on September 15, 2000 and November 17, 2000, SLD issued Funding Commitment Decision Letters regarding requests for discounted services to Epiphany Lutheran School and Clara Muhammad School, respectively. Therefore, we dismiss Connect2's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Connect2 Internet Networks, Inc., Staten Island, New York on January 24, 2000 and March 16, 2000, ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letters from John Angelides, Connect2 Internet Networks,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1509A1.txt
  • The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies the Commission's policies as well as program rules. Under the circumstances in this case, we find no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the August 31, 2000, Request for Review filed by Evesham Township Public Schools, Marlton, New Jersey, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Frank Summers, Evesham Township Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1510A1.txt
  • established deadline if the applicant wishes to be considered with other in-window applicants. Thus, by filing late, Marshall ran the risk of not receiving any funding. Because we find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline, Marshall is subject to the funding priorities set forth in Section 54.507(c). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Marshall County Board of Education, Guntersville, Alabama, July 3, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan Noel, Marshall County Board of Education, Guntersville, Alabama, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1512A1.txt
  • by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Petoskey failed to file an appeal of the January 30, 2001 Rejection Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Petoskey's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Petosky High School, Petoskey, Michigan on May 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gregory Czarnecki, Petosky High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 17,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1513A1.txt
  • the importance of competitive bidding in all situations except where an applicant has a pre-existing contract. Given that SLD had no evidence of such a contract, we find that on the record before it, SLD correctly denied funding to Rib Lake for failure to comply with the competitive bidding rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the June 2, 2000 Request for Review filed by Rib Lake School District, Rib Lake, Wisconsin, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Anderson and Dan Boxx, Rib Lake School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1514A1.txt
  • to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form. Furthermore, if applicants were permitted to amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Santa Ana Unified School District, Santa Ana, California on March 13, 2001 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Karen Aeppli, Santa Ana Unified School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1515A1.txt
  • light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. Because we find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline, we deny St. Marys' Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Marys Public Library, St. Marys, Pennsylvania, on July 6, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joseph Petrick, St. Marys Public Library, St. Marys, Pennsylvania, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1522A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply.25 Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Verizon-Massachusetts for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing one-way, non-optional, traditional local service ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-01-20, IS APPROVED. These LATA boundaries are modified solely for the purpose of providing one-way, non-optional, traditional local service ELCS between points
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1524A1.txt
  • a monthly basis.'' We have reviewed the NBANC filing and find that its methodology and computations are correct and consistent with our rules. We thus approve the proposed fund size estimate and contribution factor. Conclusion and ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(e) and sections 0.91, 0.291, 52.16, and 52.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.16, and 52.17, that NBANC apply the contribution factor of 0.000043 to the end-user revenue of each telecommunications carrier in the United States for NANP administration cost recovery. Payments will be due on July 12, 2001. Carriers with contribution requirements in excess of $1,200 may opt to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.txt
  • contingent upon approval by the Office of Management and Budget, in accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506 et seq. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Verizon Telephone Companies SHALL INCLUDE, intheir direct case(s), a response to each request for information that they are required to answer in this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1536A1.txt
  • to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest and Citizens to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Utilities Rural Company, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on December 20, 2000, IS DENIED AS FILED AND GRANTED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1542A1.txt
  • extent the state commission affirmatively specifies other application processing or provisioning intervals for a particular type of collocation arrangement. ORDERING CLAUSES 14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, 303(r), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Petition for Conditional Waiver filed February 9, 2001 by Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company IS GRANTED, subject to the conditions stated in Part III of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Cincinnati Bell must implement the application processing and provisioning intervals for physical collocation described in Attachment C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1558A1.txt
  • request was owned by the consortium. Further, there is nothing in the record, including the copy of the agreement with DDS submitted to SLD by SEOVEC, that indicates to the contrary. Thus, the maintenance and support of this equipment were properly characterized as internal connections, and funding was correctly denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 16, 2001 by Southeastern Ohio Voluntary Education Cooperative, Athens, Ohio is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and this application is remanded to SLD for further consideration of FRN 381223 consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1559A1.txt
  • must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 31, 2000, by St. Mary School, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Gary Campione,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1560A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 20, 2000, by West Shore Community College, Scottville, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Remittance Statement from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., dated May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1563A1.txt
  • or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b), as well. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the traffic sensitive rates of Moultrie Independent Telephone Company, ARE SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1571A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1571A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 19, 2001, by New Kensington-Arnold School District, New Kensington, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Jim
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1572A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 27, 2001, by Sampson-Clinton Public Library, Clinton, North Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Robin Hollingsworth,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1573A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Arizona Agribusiness failed to file an appeal of the June 30, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Arizona Agribusiness's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Arizona Agribusiness and Equine Center, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona on April 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Linda Proctor Downing, Arizona Agribusiness and Equine Center, Inc., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1579A1.txt
  • and terms and conditions of collocation services as those that are currently subject to investigation in Bell Atlantic Operating Companies reissued as Verizon Access Service (Tariff F.C.C. No. 1) collocated interconnection service. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.091, 0.291, the revisions to Verizon's Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, pertaining to collocation, filed under Transmittal No. 60, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal IS INSTITUED and incorporated within CC Docket Nos. 96-165 and 94-97. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that VERIZON
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.txt
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Korea One Telecommunication Technology, Inc., DirecTV Broadband, Inc., GoDot Technology Inc., Arescom Inc., Delta Networks Inc., Actiontec Electronics, Inc., and Celsian Technologies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1620A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1620A1.txt
  • applications to SLD for further review. In doing so, we make no determination as to whether the remaining members of the consortium are ultimately entitled to discounts, beyond our finding that they should not be denied on grounds that Project Interconnect lacks authority to make the applications on their behalf. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Project Interconnect on October 16, 2000, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and these applications are remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1625A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 5, 2000, by Saint Thomas Aquinas School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Stephanie
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1646A1.txt
  • a six-month extension will provide ACS with enough time to file an accurate CAM. The January CAM filing date will not affect other related reporting requirements, and thus causes no harm to the public interest. We, therefore, grant ACS an extension of time until January 16, 2002 to file its initial CAM. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that ACS's request for an extension of time until January 16, 2002, to file its initial cost allocation manual IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. § 64.903(a). See 47 C.F.R. §1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1646 Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1653A1.txt
  • requirement, have reduced their contribution amount, and have employed a more rigorous demand forecasting method. In addition, Transmittal No. 20 reduces both the main rate element and other rates. The new rates expire on June 16, 2002. Accordingly, we decline to investigate Transmittal No. 18 and terminate this proceeding. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F. R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.108, we reconsider on our own motion our decision in the SMS/800 Suspension Order to suspend and investigate the tariff revisions filed by the Bell Operating Companies under Transmittal No. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108 of the Commission's rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1661A1.txt
  • of revenue data at the wire center level is not a concern here. Apart from AT&T's generalized assertions, moreover, no party filed comments that call Frontier's data into question. Thus, we reject AT&T's argument. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by Frontier IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX A Services Qualifying for Pricing Flexibility Special Access Services Basket* Metallic Service Telegraph Grade Service Voice Grade Service (including
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.txt
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by NEC America Inc., Infinilink Corporation, Virtual Access (UK) Ltd., D-Link Corporation, Xavi Technologies Corporation, mPhase Technologies, Inc., 3Com Corporation, Dataquest Technology
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-168A1.txt
  • the eight conditions specified in the Reconsideration Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.312(i), by Kyushu Matsushita Electric Co., Ltd., Uniden Engineering Services, Atlinks USA, Inc., and Vtech Telecommunications Limited ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1697A1.txt
  • that the applicant's appeal to SLD should be considered as timely. The record shows that SLD received the SLD Appeal Letter on September 13, 2000, 29 days after the Minimum Processing Standards Letter was mailed. Therefore, Praxis' appeal should be considered as timely and we remand this matter to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 9, 2001 by the Praxis Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, IS GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the Administrator for further consideration consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Jasper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1698A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 1, 2001, by Rice Independent School District, Rice, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Larry
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1699A1.txt
  • must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 30, 2001, by Scott County School District, Forest, Mississippi, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Tim
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1700A1.txt
  • Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Company (Administrator), pursuant to which SLD denied Torah's request for telecommunication services. On June 20, 2001, Torah filed a Motion to Withdraw its Request for Review. The Division grants Torah's Motion to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismisses Torah's Request for Review. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion to Withdraw filed by Torah High School of Long Beach, Long Beach, New York, on June 20, 2001, IS GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1701A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Yeshivas Boyan failed to file an appeal of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Yeshivas Boyan's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Yeshivas Boyan Tiferes Mordechai Shlomo, Brooklyn, New York on January 25, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rabbi David Endzweig, Yeshivas Boyan Tiferes Mordechai Shlomo, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.txt
  • to the effect of terminal equipment on the PSTN. Based on the foregoing analyses, we conclude that granting this waiver request, subject to the conditions set forth in this Order, will serve the public interest by providing greater consumer choice and value without increasing the likelihood of harm to the PSTN. ORDERiNG CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 68.308(e)(1), by Elastic Networks for its Etherloop/Stormport 400 Modem is GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1718A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Pomona failed to file its appeals of the April 27, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Pomona's appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Pomona Unified School District, Pomona, California on July 2, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Jaramillo, Pomona Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1725A1.txt
  • Because the delay in posting Saint Jo's FCC Form 470 was solely attributable to USAC, we believe that a waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding requirement is warranted in this case. Therefore, we remand Saint Jo's application to SLD for reprocessing and the issuance of an appropriate Funding Commitment Letter. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Jo Independent School District, Saint Jo, Texas IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and that Saint Jo Independent School District's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1751A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1751A1.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order Declaration In the Matter of Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies Revisions in Tariff FCC Nos. 1 and 11 Verizon Telephone Companies Tariff FCC Nos. 1 and 11 ) ) ) ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-175A1.txt
  • Side Union bears the burden of carefully reviewing all documents sent to and received from SLD for accuracy. Accordingly, we conclude that East Side Union has not presented the special circumstances necessary to warrant relief from the filing deadline. We therefore deny East Side Union's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on April 11, 2000, by East Side Union High School District, San Jose, California, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.txt
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Efficient Networks Inc., Comtrend Corporation, Chung Fu Chen Yeh Enterprise Corp., DirecTV Broadband, Inc., Kinpo Electronics, Inc., and Apache Micro Peripheral, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1802A1.txt
  • the eight conditions specified in the Reconsideration Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.312(i), by Cidco Communication, LLC., Vtech Telecommunications Limited, Head Strong International Limited, TMC Corporation, Atlinks USA, Inc., and Kyushu Matsushita Electric Co., Ltd.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1806A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 6, 2001, by Bristol Bay Borough School District, Naknek, Alaska, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1808A1.txt
  • with its FCC Form 471. Based on this record, we affirm SLD's conclusion that the request was for a tariff service unsupported by a multi-year written contract, and that Goshen's failure to file a new FCC Form 470 in Funding Year 3 supporting the request warranted denial of the request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Goshen Community Schools, Goshen, Indiana, on March 26, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Steven Clason, Goshen Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, dated March 26, 2001 (Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1819A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1819A1.txt
  • regulations, which clearly state that ``the level of poverty [by which discounts are determined] shall be measured by the percentage of their student enrollment that is eligible for a free or reduced price lunch . . . .'' Thus, assuming BJA's allegations are accurate, they do not warrant granting relief. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Baltimore Junior Academy, Baltimore, Maryland, on April 9, 2001 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Paul Jean-Pierre, Baltimore Junior Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 9, 2001 (Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1820A1.txt
  • because the shared discount percentage for their application was below the funded discount percentage for Internal connections. Because Egg Harbor's appeal is appropriately denied on these grounds, we need not address the question of whether SLD's application of the 30% policy to Egg Harbor's application was consistent with program rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 20, 2001, by Egg Harbor City Public Schools, Egg Harbor City, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr., Egg Harbor City Public Schools, Egg Harbor City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1821A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1821A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1821A1.txt
  • to modify the SPIN for the remaining items of FRN 179922. Therefore, it was inappropriate for SLD to modify the SPIN to Extel for a funding commitment decision that did not contain ``Cat 5/6 wiring, long run portion.'' We find that the SPIN for FRN 179922 should remain Edumedia, Inc. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under section 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by LEAP Academy Charter Schools on August 7, 2000 is GRANTED and is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Clinton J. Boyd,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1822A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Salem failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Salem's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Salem School District, Salem, New Hampshire on June 18, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Linda L. MacDonald, Salem School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1823A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 26, 2001, by the Washington Parish School District, Franklinton, Louisiana, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1824A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 20, 2001, by Zeeland Public Schools, Zeeland, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Stephen Braunius,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1825A1.txt
  • obtaining appropriate assistance. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 7, 1999, by ACCEPT Educational Collaborative, Framingham, Massachusetts, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael J. Palladino, Accept Educational Collaborative, to Federal Communications Commission, dated April 7, 1999 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1826A1.txt
  • as SLD calculated. However, we also note that FRN 368140 includes a $4.00 charge for an Unpublished Number, which is also an ineligible service. The total ineligible service cost is thus at least $147.50, or 30.5 percent of the $483.00 per month request. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bloomfield Community Schools, Bloomfield, Nebraska on February 26, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gary Marks, Bloomfield Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 26, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1827A1.txt
  • we have learned that on May 29, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that [South Carolina OIR's] appeal has brought forward persuasive information that [South Carolina OIR's] application should be data entered and considered for funding. Therefore, we dismiss South Carolina OIR's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, Columbia, South Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from R. Brian Johnson, South Carolina Budget
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1834A1.txt
  • good cause for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules. Consequently, San Carlos's request for accelerated high-cost loop support is denied. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition of San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, Inc. for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Petition of San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, Inc., for Waiver of Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1841A1.txt
  • of Rochester's proposed MLB SLC rate and the other LECs' revised MLB SLC rates are in compliance with our rules. We therefore decline to investigate Ameritech Transmittal Number 1270, Frontier of Rochester Transmittal Number 48, PacBell Transmittal Number 37, Qwest Transmittal Numbers 76 and 80, and Sprint Transmittal Number 153. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.108, we reconsider on our own motion our decision in the 2001 Annual Access Tariff Filings Suspension Order to suspend and investigate the revised tariff rates for the multi-line business subscriber line charge of Ameritech Operating Companies, Transmittal Number 1270; Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc., Transmittal Number 48;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1877A1.txt
  • that constitute internal connections. Because Fort Wayne commingled its requests for discounts for telecommunications services and internal connections within a single funding request, SLD correctly placed the application into the internal connections category for Funding Year 3 funding in order to avoid treating Priority Two services as Priority One services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Fort Wayne Community School District on July 1, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Fort Wayne Community School District to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1878A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Gallatin failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Gallatin's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Gallatin R-V School District, Gallatin, Missouri on November 7, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeanette Sprague, Gallatin R-V School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1879A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Mamaroneck failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Mamaroneck's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mamaroneck Union Free District, Mamaroneck, New York on December 6, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sarah Tate, Mamaroneck Union Free District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1881A1.txt
  • the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Chapel Hill has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver, filed June 22, 2000 by Chapel Hill Independent School District, Tyler, Texas IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rita Simpson, Chapel Hill Independent School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1883A1.txt
  • service substitution request, SLD should have construed it as a service substitution request notwithstanding how the applicant captioned the pleading. As such, SLD should have reviewed the service substitution request on its merits. The Division's reversal of SLD's decision and remanding for further consideration of the request was therefore appropriate. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.113 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.113, 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mercer County Area Vocational - Technical School, Mercer, Pennsylvania, on June 1, 2000 is GRANTED for the reasons discussed herein, and REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division for further consideration consisted with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1897A1.txt
  • bear a date-stamp, we cannot determine its exact filing date. Due to this administrative error, we look at the date of the Petition, which is June 6, 2001. Even using this date as the filing date, the Petition was still filed 41 days after public notice and hence is untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Amherst Independent School District, Amherst, Texas, dated June 6, 2001 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joe Rackley, Amherst Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, dated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1898A1.txt
  • to the close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that Henry-Senachwine has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 23, 2000 by Henry-Senachwine Community Unit District #5, Henry, Illinois IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Beverly Privratsky, Henry-Senachwine Community Unit District 5, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1899A1.txt
  • for a request made on behalf of Knox County Public Library, funding request number (FRN) 454127. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved funding for FRN 454127 and such funds were not revoked or suspended. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Intelenet's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 9, 2001 by Indiana Intelenet Commission, Indianapolis, Indiana, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bob G. Carnel, Indiana Intelenet Commission, Indianapolis, Indiana, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1900A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1900A1.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because Monessen failed to file an appeal of the June 21, 2000 and June 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Monessen's appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by School District of the City of Monessen, Monessen, Pennsylvania on January 22, 2001, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Richard Fantauzzi, School District of the City of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1911A1.txt
  • consistent with our mandate to ensure that consumers in all regions of the Nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, have access to telecommunications and information services. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.809(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.809(c), filed by Smith Bagley, Inc. on July 16, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Smith Bagley, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1914A1.txt
  • transaction(s) contemplated in the Joint Applications will not violate 47 C.F.R. §§ 24.709 or 24.839. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the grant of these applications is subject to the condition that Applicants seek further approval before making material revisions to their Trust Agreement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 0.131, and 0.331. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.103. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ATTACHMENT DIVESTITURE TRUST AGREEMENT See Chorus Communications, Ltd. and Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Application to Transfer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1936A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1936A1.pdf
  • specifically noted as an example of an improper request the case of an eligible file server which is also ``built to provide storage functions to supplement personal computers on the network.'' That is precisely the case here, and accordingly, under the Universal Service Order, the entire request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 13, 2000 by Cleveland Municipal School District, seeking review of FRN 421840, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Esq., on behalf of Cleveland Municipal School District, Cleveland Ohio,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1939A1.txt
  • confidential treatment. We grant an extension of time until October 22, 2001 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. An extension of time will afford the Bureau an opportunity to evaluate and consider the issues raised, while preserving the public's ability to comment on the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to October 22, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1939 K L N O T U [ \ ] ^ ` � � ˜ R S T \ ]
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1943A1.txt
  • this case, because Novell has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Novell's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Novell's initial request, Novell may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Novell, Inc., Provo, Utah, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2001. Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1944A1.txt
  • amply demonstrates that Mater Dei's FCC Form 471 was filed outside the filing window. The only relief that Mater Dei could have sought was a waiver of the Commission's rules. Having reviewed the merits of Mater Dei's Waiver Request, we find no basis for waiver of our filing window rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Mater Dei High School, New Monmouth, New Jersey on March 8, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nancy Giotta, Mater Dei High School, New Monmouth, New Jersey,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1968A1.txt
  • apportionment table changes by account. We emphasize, however, that our granting of this limited waiver of Section 64.903(b) applies only to SBC's September 2001 CAM filing that incorporates Ameritech into SBC's consolidated CAM. 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 155(c) and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that Section 64.903(b) is waived to permit SBC to quantify revisions to its cost apportionment table by account rather than by cost pool in its September 2001 CAM filing. Further, in the transmittal letter associated with this CAM filing, SBC need only list the substantive changes.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1972A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 15, 2001, by Fairland Public School District I-31, Fairland, Oklahoma, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1973A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 20, 2001, by New Plymouth School District No. 372, New Plymouth, Idaho, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1974A1.txt
  • light of our decision in White Sulphur Springs and the revised eligible services list, we conclude that it is appropriate to remand Pinellas' application to SLD for further review. We direct SLD to review Pinellas' use of its remote access routers to determine whether such use is eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Pinellas County Schools on June 1, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Administrator to review Pinellas' funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance with the above-stated decision.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1975A1.txt
  • FCC Form 471 before the allowable contract date. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for carefully following program rules. The Division, therefore, denies Preston's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Preston Town County Library, on April 6, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jean Patton, Preston Town County Library, Hot Springs, Montana, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1976A1.txt
  • Bede has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Saint Bede's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Saint Bede's initial request, Saint Bede may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Bede The Venerable, Holland, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1977A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1977A1.txt
  • of the filing window deadline is warranted. We therefore grant WASD's Waiver Request. We direct SLD to process WASD's FCC Form 471 as timely filed, and if otherwise appropriate, to issue an appropriate Funding Commitment Letter. However, we make no determination as to whether WASD is ultimately entitled to discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Allegheny School District, Imperial, Pennsylvania on June 30, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and WASD's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1980A1.txt
  • internal connections, because it is not ``necessary to transport information all the way to individual classrooms.'' In sum, network monitoring is not an eligible service under program rules. Thus, SLD properly applied the 30% rule in denying Little River's funding request. We, therefore, deny Little River's Request for Review. 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Little River Unified School District 444, Little River, Kansas, on January 29, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Milt Dougherty, Little River Unified School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1981A1.txt
  • correct information, SLD will grant the appeal so long as the applicant points out the mistake, and demonstrates how SLD could have reasonably ascertained the true nature of the information. Because those facts are evident here, we find it appropriate to reverse SLD and remand Brockton's application for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the May 22, 2000, Request for Review filed by Brockton Public Schools, Brockton, Massachusetts, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Brockton's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-200A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Atlantic County failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Atlantic County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Atlantic County Library System, Mays Landing, New Jersey on December 4, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Alyce J. Bowers, Atlantic County Library System, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2013A1.txt
  • necessary to continue to provide service to their prospective customers. We are encouraged by the state commissions' willingness to work with the FCC and the Bureau to achieve national numbering resource optimization goals. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control Expedited Petition for Additional Authority is GRANTED to the extent described herein; the Michigan Public Service Commission Petition for Additional Delegated Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2016A1.txt
  • the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, New Paltz fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by New Paltz Central School District, New Paltz, New York, on February 29, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Deborah Brush, New Paltz Central School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2017A1.txt
  • actions of those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Painesville fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Painesville City Schools, Painesville, Ohio, on February 28, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James R. Fodor, Painesville City Local Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2018A1.txt
  • portion may be funded so long as the ineligible portion is less than 30% of the total. We therefore remand to SLD to determine, in light of Richland Parish's information on appeal and consistent with this decision, what portion of the request is ineligible and to process the request appropriately. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Richland Parish School District, Rayville, Louisiana, on May 10, 2000 is GRANTED and this application is remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2019A1.txt
  • those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, St. Ignatius Loyola fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Ignatius Loyola Academy, Baltimore, Maryland, on September 27, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeffrey R. Sindler, Saint Ignatius Loyola Academy, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-201A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Clearview failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Clearview's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Clearview Local School District, Lorain, Ohio on December 8, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kent R. Zeman, Clearview Local School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2020A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Stephen/Argyle fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Stephen/Argyle Central School District, Stephen, Minnesota, on February 26, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melanie K. Stark, Stephen/Argyle Central School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2021A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2021A1.txt
  • and fraud. Furthermore, if applicants were permitted to amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. Therefore, we conclude that SLD properly denied Wishek's request for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91., 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wishek Public School, Wishek, North Dakota, on March 16, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Brian Duchscherer, Wishek Public School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2022A1.txt
  • window on January 19, 2000. Yet it is incumbent upon applicants to allow sufficient time to submit their FCC Forms 470, complete the 28-day competitive bidding period, and then submit their FCC Forms 471 within the filing window. For these reasons, the Division denies Yeshiva of Brooklyn's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Yeshiva of Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York, on April 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Heshy Arem, Yeshiva of Brooklyn, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2023A1.txt
  • actions of those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Winchendon fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Winchendon School, Winchendon, Massachusetts, on June 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from C. Jackson Blair, the Winchendon School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2024A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Ballard fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Ballard Community School District, Huxley, Iowa, on February 20, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Connie Marker, Ballard Community School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2025A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Elgin fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Elgin Independent School District, Elgin, Texas, on November 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Allbright, Elgin Independent School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2026A1.txt
  • supports the FRN and cites that correct Form 470 in its appeal to SLD. Because this procedure is applicable here, we find that SLD should have granted the appeal. We therefore reverse and remand Service Co-op's application for further consideration of FRN 171379 in light of Form 470 USCN 390330000120972. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 14, 2000 by Reg 6 & 8 Sw/Ctrl/W Srvc Co-op, Marshall, Minnesota, is GRANTED and this application is remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2027A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Renaissance fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Renaissance Charter School, Moscow, Idaho on March 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol Kampenhout, Renaissance Charter School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2028A1.txt
  • Number (SPIN) change request. We are informed by SLD personnel that on March 28, 2001, SLD made the SPIN-change which Cleveland Municipal is seeking here. Because the Division finds that Cleveland Municipal has already received the relief that it is requesting, Cleveland Municipal's Request for Review is dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Cleveland Municipal School District on November 13, 2000, seeking review of FRN 418921, is DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Esq., on behalf of Cleveland Municipal School District, Cleveland
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-202A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 12, 2000, by Granville Public Schools, Granville, North Dakota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Judith
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2033A1.doc
  • Reduction Act This Order Designating Issues for Investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Moultrie Independent Telephone Company, Inc. and ALLTEL Telephone Systems SHALL BE parties to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each local exchange carrier that is a party to this proceeding SHALL INCLUDE,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2037A1.txt
  • response to the RAL on August 23, 1999. Therefore, SLD received the request for corrections 10 days after Hysham received the RAL. As a result, we find that Hysham's request for corrections to the RAL was timely because the corrections were received within two weeks of receipt of the RAL. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Hysham Public Schools on August 3, 2000, IS GRANTED and that its application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2038A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 15, 2001, by East Greenbush Central Schools, East Greenbush, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-203A1.txt
  • ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: January 26, 2001 Released: January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 20, 2000, by Leon County Schools, Tallahassee, Florida, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William D.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-204A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 28, 2000, by Levittown Union Free School District, Levittown, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-205A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 13, 2000, by Pluralistic School, Santa Monica, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Kathleen Lenihan,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2063A1.txt
  • 471 considered an "in window" application. On February 2, 2001, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter to SEED School regarding the requests for discounts at issue in this Request for Review. Thus, upon review of the record, we find it is appropriate to dismiss SEED School's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by SEED School, Washington, DC on April 21, 2000, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Thomas J. Downey, SEED School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 21, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2065A1.txt
  • and demonstrates how SLD could have reasonably ascertained the true nature of the information. Because those facts are evident here, we remand to SLD for a determination of whether DeKalb had a pre-existing contract governing the FRNs at issue, and is eligible for discounts for those FRNs under program rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 22, 2000, by DeKalb County School System, Decatur, Georgia, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review DeKalb's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-206A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Solon failed to file an appeal of the September 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Solon's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Solon City Schools, Solon, Ohio on December 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kirk B. Miller, Solon City Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2074A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2074A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2074A1.txt
  • is consistent with paragraphs 56(g) and 57 of the Merger Conditions and should facilitate an adequate and orderly review of the independent auditor's working papers and supporting materials by the Pennsylvania Commission. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the parties' joint request for approval and adoption of the Protective Agreement appended hereto IS GRANTED. Nothing in this Order, or the Protective Agreement appended hereto, shall restrict the Commission's authority to use the information or materials obtained in the course of these proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-207A1.txt
  • affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because neither Scanlon or MetroCon filed an appeal of the February 18, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss MetroCon's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by MetroCon Communications, New York, New York on June 22, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Al Garcia, MetroCon Communications, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 22,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2085A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2085A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2085A1.txt
  • Funding Commitment Decision Letter, whether because of SLD's error or the applicant's, SLD will correct the SPIN upon written request and verification. Here, a written request was made, and we therefore remand this application to SLD to obtain verification and process the SPIN correction in accordance with its procedures. 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Trussville Public Library, Birmingham, Alabama, on December 14, 1999, IS GRANTED, and this application is remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2086A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2086A1.txt
  • this case, because Chimes has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Chimes' Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Chimes' initial appeal, Chimes may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chimes School, Baltimore, Marlyand, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 25, 2000. See Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2087A1.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, St. Jean Vianney fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Jean Vianney School, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on October 31, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patrice A. Robinson, St. Jean Vianney School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2097A1.txt
  • satisfies the Commission's policies as well as program rules. Here, the necessity of replacing a sick employee skilled in the application process for the schools and libraries program provides no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New Orleans Public Schools, New Orleans, Louisiana, on May 25, 2001, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Alonzo R. Luce, New Orleans Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division, Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2098A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2098A1.txt
  • Berkshire has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Northern Berkshire's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Northern Berkshire's initial request, Northern Berkshire may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, North Adams, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2129A1.txt
  • at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Because the record demonstrates that Bnos Yaakov received mail from SLD at the same address listed in the more detailed letter, we find no reason to deviate from this standard. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 28, 2000, by Congregation Bnos Yaakov, Lakewood, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Rabbi
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-212A1.txt
  • priority two services (internal connections) being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand NAFC's application to SLD, and direct SLD to reconsider NAFC's FCC Form 471 and, if warranted, to issue a new funding commitment decision letter providing discounts for all appropriate priority one services requested by NAFC. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corporation on November 1, 1999 to reconsider the dismissal of the Appeal it filed on April 26, 2000 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that the Appeal filed by New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2130A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because DeKalb failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss DeKalb's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by DeKalb Independent School District, DeKalb, Texas on September 4, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Timothy Williams, DeKalb Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2131A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Estelline failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Estelline's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Estelline School District 28-2, Estelline, South Dakota on August 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kristina Atyeo, Estelline School District 28-2, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2137A1.txt
  • grant E-Rate Central's request for a retroactive waiver of the 30-day appeal deadline for Funding Year 1 applicants who filed untimely appeals, E-Rate Central's request that we also authorize new appeal funding procedures for these applicants is moot. We therefore dismiss this part of the Request for Waiver as well. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed E-Rate Central, Plandome, New York, on August 12, 1999, is DENIED-IN-PART AND DISMISSED-IN-PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Winston E. Himsworth, E-Rate Central, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 12,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2139A1.txt
  • rules, effective July 1, 2001, OT&T will be permitted to include an increased amount of corporate operations expenses in the high-cost loop support mechanism. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201-205, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201-205, and 254, and sections 1.3, 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§1.3, 0.91, and 0.291, that the request of Oklahoma Telephone & Telegraph, Inc. for waiver of section 36.621(a)(4) of the Commission's rules IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Toney Prather, OT&T, to Dorothy Attwood, Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, dated April 11, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-213A1.txt
  • Soille, we conclude that the SLD correctly determined that only 72 of Soille's students were eligible for the national school lunch program under the federal income eligibility guidelines. Thus, SLD properly found Soille eligible for a 50 percent discount for internal connections, and we find no merit in Solle's appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on June 9, 2000 by Soille San Diego Hebrew Day School, San Diego, California, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rabbi Simcha Weiser, Soille San Diego Hebrew Day School, to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2147A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of BellSouth Corporation for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-01-77, IS APPROVED. These LATA boundaries are modified solely for the purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points in the specific
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2166A1.txt
  • any of the non-compliant telephones. EMS shall, however, as a condition of this waiver, replace with a comparable compliant telephone, at no charge to its customers, any telephone returned to EMS containing the TVS component that is shown by the customers' telephone company to have caused harm to the PSTN. ORDERiNG CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint filed by Rath Microtech is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request filed by Electronic Microsystems, Inc. for waiver of sections 68.2, 68.102, and 68.312 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2169A1.txt
  • petition because its inclusion of measured-rate service is inconsistent with a finding that a sufficient community of interest exists to grant an ELCS LATA boundary modification. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 12. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the petition of Ameritech, on behalf of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing measured-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-99-72, IS DENIED. 13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to section 416(a) of the Act,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2185A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Watonwan fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Watonwan County Library, St. James, Minnesota, on July 11, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cheryl Bjoin, Watonwan County Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2186A1.txt
  • on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon warrant this limited extension. Verizon has shown compelling good cause for the requested extension. We therefore grant Verizon's waiver request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, 201, 251, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 251, 303(r), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Petition for Waiver filed September 17, 2001 by Verizon IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, CC Docket No. 98-147, Fourth Report and Order, FCC 01-204 (rel. Aug.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2188A1.txt
  • Upon review of the filed comments in this docket, we find that providing the movant and others an additional month to respond provides a necessary and sufficient amount of time to formulate meaningful responses. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, USTA's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED IN PART to establish a new reply comments deadline of November 5, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau In the Matter of Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, CC Docket No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2192A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the petition of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Inc. for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-01-103, IS GRANTED. This LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2203A1.txt
  • the action outlined in its ex parte and will ensure that there is no customer disruption. Finally, Verizon shall immediately inform the Commission, in writing, when it completes its reintegration work for each state. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to sections 1-4, 201-205, 214, 251, 303(r), and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, 214, 251, 303(r), and 309, and 47 C.F.R §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that Verizon's May 1, 2001, request to accelerate the sunset of its advanced services affiliate IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 408,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2219A1.txt
  • Year 3, SLD received over 36,000 applications. It is impractical, if not impossible, for SLD to review each application and notify applicants of errors prior to the close of the filing window. The Division, therefore, finds that the applicant violated the 28-day waiting period and denies Washington's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Washington Local Schools, Toledo, Ohio, on April 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David L. Bringman, Washington Local Schools, Toledo, Ohio, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2220A1.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order Declaration In the Matter of 2001 Annual Access Tariff Filings ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 01-206 I, , hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2223A1.txt
  • transaction will not be approved, and that service to some affected customers will be discontinued over their objection. Therefore, we have not relied on this commitment in reaching the result expressed in this order. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Rhythms Links to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED, effective September 24, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Bureau Chief Common Carrier Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. A number of parties have filed objections to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2226A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 11, 2001, by City of Cameron, Cameron, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Janet Sheguit,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2227A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Sealy failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Sealy's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sealy Independent School District, Sealy, Texas on September 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rosa Ojeda, Sealy Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2228A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 7, 2001, by Shelby City Schools, Shelby, Ohio, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Keith Rittenhouse,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2229A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Cecelia failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Cecelia's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Cecelia School, Clearwater, Florida on September 12, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary Ellen Patrick, St. Cecelia School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2230A1.txt
  • determine whether Clackamus, through the Tech Centers, had actual authority to act on behalf of the school districts listed in the consortium. We, therefore, remand Clackamas' application to SLD for further fact-finding. However, we make no determination has to whether any members of the consortium are ultimately entitled to discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Clackamas Education Service District, Marylhurst, Oregon, on October 13, 2000, IS REMANDED to SLD for further review consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Clackamas Education Service District, Marylhurst,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2233A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2233A1.txt
  • 5, 2000, two weeks before the filing window deadline. Furthermore, SLD provides alternative means for applicants to obtain forms, including having forms mailed to the applicants. Based on these facts, South Barber has failed to demonstrate special circumstances that would warrant treating South Barber differently by granting it a waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 23, 2000 by South Barber Unified School District 255, Kiowa, Kansas IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Bailey, South Barber Unified School District 255, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2241A1.txt
  • amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. Therefore, we conclude that SLD properly denied Haslett's request for funding and we therefore deny Haslett's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Haslett Public Schools, Haslett, Michigan, on February 28, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Martell, Haslett Public Schools, Haslett, Michigan, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2267A1.txt
  • the Matter of Sprint Local Telephone Companies. Any expanded interconnection rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Sprint Local Telephone Companies, Tariff F.C.C. No. 3, applicable to Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal No. 167, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket Nos. 94-97 and 96-234.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2275A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Sacred Heart failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Sacred Heart's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sacred Heart Elementary School, San Francisco, California on September 11, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Savita Sahi, Sacred Heart Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2276A1.txt
  • regard to application number 127047 because the record shows that Sperry failed to complete this application. Because there is no completed FCC Form 471 for application number 127045, and because Sperry has failed to demonstrate special circumstances that would so necessitate, a waiver of the filing window is not warranted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Sperry Public Schools, Sperry, Oklahoma, on October 7, 1999 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Jobe, Sperry Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2290A1.txt
  • code, we conclude that SLD could have determined the city name of the billed entity. As a result, in these particular circumstances, we do not believe that the omission of the city of the billed entity in Block 1, item 4a should have prevented SLD from data entering AEPPR's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 9, 2001 by Asociacion de Educacion Privada de Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2292A1.txt
  • the filing requirements, including the 28-day competitive bidding requirements. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. The Division, therefore, denies NYMA's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New York Military Academy, Hudson, New York, on April 30, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX A FUNDING YEAR 2 DATE EVENT January 7, 1999 File FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2293A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2293A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2293A1.txt
  • by the Administrator. Because St. Francis de Sales failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Francis de Sales' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Francis de Sales School, Houston, Texas on September 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cathy Minar, St. Francis de Sales School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2328A1.txt
  • the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Bear Lake fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bear Lake County Library District, Montpelier, Idaho, on November 3, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary Nate, Bear Lake County Library District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2329A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Mississippi DOE failed to file an appeal of the July 8, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Mississippi DOE's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mississippi Department of Education, Mississippi DOE, Mississippi on April 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Amory School District, Greenwood Springs, MS; Coahoma County School District, Clarksdale, MS;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2330A1.txt
  • posted on the SLD website was incorrect. Thus, we find that SLD's posting of an incorrect zip code contributed to the untimely filing by West Las Vegas of its FCC Form 471. We therefore conclude that West Las Vegas has demonstrated special circumstances upon which to grant its waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Las Vegas Schools, Las Vegas, New Mexico, on June 26, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein. We direct SLD to process West Las Vegas's FCC Form 471 as timely filed within the filing window. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2331A1.txt
  • of all of the requests in Henry County's FCC Form 471 only posted a request for telecommunications services. The FRN at issue, FRN 276939, requests discounted internal connections. Because Henry County failed to post the service for which it seeks discounts, it did not satisfy the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Henry County Board of Education, Abbeville, Alabama, on October 25, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Neil Dodson, Henry County Board of Education, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2332A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Midland fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Midland School District, Pleasant Plains, Arkansas, on February 15, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jim LaRue, Midland School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2333A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Montville fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Montville Township Public Schools, Montville, New Jersey, on March 23, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dominic J. Butler, Montville Township Public Schools, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2341A1.txt
  • however, that our granting of this limited waiver of Section 64.903(b) applies only to Verizon's November 2001 CAM filing that incorporates Verizon East's CAM and Verizon West's CAM into a single consolidated CAM. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 155(c) and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that Section 64.903(b) is waived to permit Verizon to quantify revisions to its cost apportionment table by account rather than by cost pool in its November 2001 CAM filing. Further, in the transmittal letter associated with this CAM filing, Verizon need only list the substantive changes.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2351A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. for a LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing one-way ELCS at the specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-01-76, IS APPROVED. The LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing ELCS between the points in the specific exchanges
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2362A1.txt
  • Center SD has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Center SD's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Center SD's initial appeal, it may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Center School District, Kansas City, Missouri, on July 31, 2000 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2366A1.txt
  • request. We grant a limited extension of time until November 20, 2001 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. An extension of time will afford the Bureau an opportunity to evaluate and consider the issues raised, while preserving the public's ability to comment on the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to November 20, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2366 F „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2372A1.txt
  • of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Elkhart has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed July 10, 2000 by Elkhart Community Schools, Elkhart, Indiana IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Woods, Elkhart Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2373A1.txt
  • of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Powell has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 3, 2000 by Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, Montana IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joseph A. Brott, Powell County High School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2382A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard Lerner Deputy Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Qwest Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 01-18 ) ) ) I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2395A1.txt
  • merit in Century's argument. Century should receive an extension until after the Commission rules on the broader issues raised in CC Docket No. 00-199. We therefore conclude that an additional extension of three months, until January 1, 2002 for the ARMIS Reports and April 15, 2002 for the CAM attestation report, is sufficient. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that the CenturyTel, Inc. and CenturyTel of Washington, Inc. request for additional extension of time is GRANTED and CenturyTel, Inc. and CenturyTel of Washington, Inc. has an extension of time until January 1, 2002, to file its initial ARMIS Reports and until April 15, 2002 to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2396A1.txt
  • merit in Roseville's argument. Roseville should receive an extension until after the Commission rules on the broader issues raised in CC Docket No. 00-199. We therefore conclude that an additional extension of three months, until January 1, 2002 for the ARMIS Reports and April 15, 2002 for the CAM attestation report, is sufficient. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that the Roseville Telephone Company request for additional extension of time is GRANTED and Roseville Telephone Company has an extension of time until January 1, 2002, to file its initial ARMIS Reports and until April 15, 2002 to file its initial rule 64.904 CAM attestation report.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2397A1.txt
  • 32.27(c) filed by SBC. This waiver is limited to those corporate services provided under contract between SBC and the affiliates listed in the waiver request. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by SBC IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 5. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division Common Carrier Bureau Petition for Waiver Southwestern Bell Communications, Inc., filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2398A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Belt Schools failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Belt Schools' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Belt Schools, Great Falls, Montana on September 25, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tom Glover, Belt Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 25, 2001.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2399A1.txt
  • close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Garfield has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Waiver Request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed April 17, 2000 by Garfield School District, Garfield, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Raymond Hryczyk, Garfield School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2400A1.txt
  • filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 28, 2001, by Hazelwood School District, Florissant, Missouri, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Robert J.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2401A1.txt
  • Jensen's FCC Form 470, SLD should have notified Lettie Jensen of the signature deficiency in the form in time for Lettie Jensen to submit an in-window FCC Form 471 that complied with the competitive bidding rules. We therefore further find that good cause exists to grant Lettie Jensen's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lettie W. Jensen Library, Amherst, Wisconsin, on February 26, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and Lettie Jensen's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2422A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Elizabeth failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Elizabeth's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Elizabeth Board of Education, Elizabeth, New Jersey on September 27, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joseph Pellegrino, Elizabeth Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2423A1.txt
  • County has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Leon County's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Leon County's initial request, Leon County may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Leon County Schools, Tallahassee, Florida, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from William D. Piotrowski, Leon County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2424A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Mid-Peninsula failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Mid-Peninsula's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mid-Peninsula Library Cooperative, Kingsford, Michigan on September 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Brewer, Mid-Peninsula Library Cooperative, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 17,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2453A1.txt
  • filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed October 9, 2001, by Deep River-Millersburg Community School District, Millersburg, Iowa, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2454A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because McClave failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss McClave's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by McClave School District RE-2, McClave, Colorado on September 25, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Terry M. Weber, McClave School District RE-2, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2455A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Saint Patrick failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Saint Patrick's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Patrick School, Stoneham, Massachusetts on October 9, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cecilia Phelan, Saint Patrick School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 9,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2456A1.txt
  • Two internal connections. Finally, SLD correctly determined that MHT was not eligible for internal connections. In Funding Year 3, internal connections were funded for schools and libraries with at least an 82% discount rate. MHT was entitled to only an 80% discount rate. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 29, 2001, by the Most Holy Trinity School, Brooklyn, New York is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Philip McHugh, Most Holy Trinity School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2457A1.txt
  • affected funding requests for cellular phone service should be granted. Aside from finding that cellular phone service requests are requests for basic voice telephone service, entitled to a separate necessary resources review, we offer no opinion as to whether the particular cellular requests at issue here are entitled to funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by United Talmudical Academy is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Eugene
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2479A1.txt
  • carriers receive smaller blocks of numbers than they receive now. We are encouraged by the state commissions' willingness to work with the FCC and the Bureau to achieve national numbering resource optimization goals. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Florida Public Service Commission Petition for Expedited Decision for Authority to Implement Thousands-Block Number Pooling in the 941 NPA, CC Docket No. 96-98 is GRANTED to the extent described herein; the Iowa Utilities Board Petition for Delegation of Additional
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2496A1.txt
  • Commission's policy goal of using numbering resources efficiently. Therefore, we direct the NANPA to assign and release to ALLTEL a new growth NXX code in the 501 NPA to meet this specific customer request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 4(i), 10, and 251(e) of the Communications act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commissions regulations, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the petition filed by ALLTEL Communications, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent herein described. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 52.15 (g)(3). See ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Emergency Request for Waiver of MTE Rules (filed October 2, 2001) (ALLTEL Petition).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-24A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Columbia failed to file an appeal of the June 2, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Columbia's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Columbia Public Library, Columbia, Pennsylvania on October 4, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert V. McCarthy, Columbia Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2516A1.txt
  • interLATA information services, SBC need not obtain forbearance from application of section 272 in order to provide those services on an integrated basis. We therefore deny SBC's request for forbearance. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 10, 201-205, 271-272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154, 160, 201-205, 271-272, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that Qwest's petition for a waiver of the Computer III CEI requirements for the provision of operator-assisted reverse directory services by Qwest IS GRANTED to the extent stated and subject to the conditions and requirements established herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 10,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2518A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 17, 2001, by Rochester Public Schools, Rochester, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Daniel Cincoski,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2519A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2519A1.txt
  • Year 1 of the schools and libraries universal service mechanism. Specifically, Bibb requests that the invoices be considered as timely filed. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Bibb's request to waive the invoice deadline. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Bibb's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 15, 2000, by Bibb County Public Schools, Macon, Georgia IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Julie K. Christopher, Bibb County Public Schools, Macon, Georgia, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2520A1.txt
  • actions of those employees to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts in its name. Here, East Brunswick fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find an insufficient basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by East Brunswick Public Schools, East Brunswick, New Jersey, on March 28, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jamie Savedoff, East Brunswick Public Schools, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2521A1.txt
  • filed two Requests for Reviews with the Administrator. The Commission's rules regarding appeals of SLD decisions do not contemplate simultaneous requests to the Commission and the Administrator. In this case, because St. Mary Magdalen filed concurrent appeals, we dismiss St. Mary Magdalen's Requests for Review to the Commission without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by St. Mary Magdalen, Brentwood, Missouri, on May 19, 1999, ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Chris Rosenthal, St. Mary Magdalen, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2522A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Bellevue fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bellevue Public Library, Bellevue, Iowa, on February 22, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Marian L. Meyer, Bellevue Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2523A1.txt
  • discounts for Internet access service and internal connections within a single funding request, SLD correctly placed the entire funding request into the internal connections category for Funding Year 3 funding. Because Elmont is not entitled to internal connections discounts in Funding Year 3, we must deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Elmont Public Library, Elmont, New York, on February 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Frank Marino, Elmont Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2524A1.txt
  • on the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was August 7, 2001 and because Grandview filed an appeal of the SLD decision on August 27, 2001, we find that SLD incorrectly denied Grandview's appeal as untimely. Accordingly, we grant Grandview's Request for Review and direct SLD to review Grandview's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Grandview Independent School District, Grandview, Texas on September 4, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lynn Whitaker, Grandview Independent School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2525A1.txt
  • percentage for Funding Year 3 was only 58% based on the National School Lunch Program discount matrix. Due to demand in Funding Year 3, only schools eligible for an 82% discount or higher received discounts for internal connections. We therefore conclude that SLD correctly denied funding for the entire request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mankato Area Public Schools, Mankato, Minnesota, on March 12, 2001 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Douglas Johnson, Mankato Area Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2526A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2526A1.txt
  • within FRN 408532. Therefore, we conclude that, under SLD's applicable Funding Year 3 review procedures, it correctly placed FRN 408532 in the internal connections category for Funding Year 3 funding. Because North East is not eligible for internal connections discounts in Funding Year 3, we affirm SLD's denial of funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by North East Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas, on April 26, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Steve Emilienburg, North East Independent School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2527A1.txt
  • the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Forest District fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Forest Municipal School District, Forest, Mississippi, on August 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Ed Leonard, Forest Municipal School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2528A1.txt
  • the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Lake Eola fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lake Eola Charter School, Orlando, Florida, on November 8, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sharon Morell, Lake Eola Charter School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2529A1.txt
  • notice is the release date. The release date of the decision Newburgh seeks to have reviewed was January 23, 2001. Newburgh's Petition bears a date-stamp of March 26, 2001, the date of its receipt by the Commission. The Petition was filed 58 days after public notice and hence is untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Newburgh Enlarged City School District, Newburgh, New York, on March 26, 2001 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Roger George, Newburgh Enlarged City School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2530A1.txt
  • the release date. The release date of the decision North Babylon seeks to have reviewed was May 9, 2001. North Babylon's Petition bears a date-stamp of June 11, 2001, the date of its receipt by the Commission. The Petition was filed 33 days after public notice and hence is untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by North Babylon Union Free School District, North Babylon, New York, on June 11, 2001 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rosanne Sweeney, A+ Technology Solutions, Inc., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2531A1.txt
  • Robles has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Paso Robles' Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Paso Robles' initial request, Paso Robles may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Paso Robles Public Schools, Paso Robles, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Laurie Crowe, Paso Robles Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2532A1.txt
  • announced a new filing location for paper documents. We find that providing TCI and others an additional ten days to respond provides a necessary and sufficient amount of time to formulate meaningful responses. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, Thrifty Call, Inc.'s Request for an Extension of Time IS GRANTED to establish a new reply comments deadline of November 8, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Public Notice, Thrifty Call Files Petition for Declaratory Ruling Pleading Cycle Established,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2534A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. IV. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for a LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at the specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-01-30, IS APPROVED. The LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing ELCS between the points in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2535A1.txt
  • we conclude that a rubber stamp signature is a binding act that signifies the intent of the party to be bound by the program rules. Based on this analysis, an original stamped signature meets the minimum processing standard for an original ink signature. We therefore grant its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 31, 2000 by Caribou Regional Technology Center, Caribou, Maine IS GRANTED and this matter is remanded to USAC for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lynn McNeal, Caribou Regional Technology
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2536A1.txt
  • in the applicant's failure to timely file its FCC Form 471 within the filing window. The record demonstrates that SLD's actions led New Hartford to file an out of window FCC Form 471. We find it appropriate to waive the filing window deadline for Funding Year 1 for New Hartford. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 10, 2000 by New Hartford Central School District, New Hartford, New York IS GRANTED and this matter is remanded to USAC for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James Dieso,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2537A1.txt
  • fail to properly complete the required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that Trico has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 30, 2000 by Trico Community Unit District #176, Campbell Hill, Illinois IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dennis Smith, Trico Community Unit School District #176,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2555A1.txt
  • federal law and agency regulations. To the extent either ICC or ICC Speed Cell have taken any action intended to initiate a discontinuance of service, they are hereby ordered to immediately reverse those actions. ORDERING CLAUSE In accordance with sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that ICC and ICC Speed Cell refrain from discontinuing service without first complying with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in accordance with sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2575A1.txt
  • schools and libraries support application process in an efficient and effective manner, including procedures for the review of applications and the implementation of the Commission's rules of priority. We find that, for the reasons discussed above, SLD's operating procedure for mixed priority requests was a reasonable exercise of its authority. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by East Grand School - SAD #14, Danforth, Maine, on March 16, 2001 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from William T. Dobbins, East Grand School - SAD #14,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2576A1.txt
  • asserts that FRN 338410 should therefore be fully funded. However, the fact that it has a technology plan now, does not satisfy the program requirement that Franklin have a technology plan in place at the time of its application. Therefore, we find no basis for granting Franklin's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Franklin Public Schools, Franklin, Wisconsin, on May 7, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kaye Hernon, Franklin Public School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2577A1.txt
  • as an internal connections request. As noted above, in Funding Year 3, funding of discounted internal connections was available only for schools with discount rates of 82% or higher. Because Karval had a discount rate of only 70%, it was not eligible for internal connections discounts in Funding Year 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Karval School District RE 23, Karval, Colorado, on March 2, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ashley A. Anderson, Karval School District RE 23, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2578A1.txt
  • purchase of a router and CSU/DSU, SLD correctly classified the funding request as internal connections. In Funding Year 3, only applicants with an 82% discount or higher received internal connections. Merrimack was entitled to a 44% discount under the discount matrix. We therefore conclude that FRN 338072 was correctly denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Merrimack Valley Library Consortium, Andover, Massachusetts, on February 22, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bill B. Manson, Merrimack Valley Library Consortium, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-25A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 10, 2000, by Lake Havasu Unified School District, Lake Havasu City, Arizona, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2603A1.txt
  • resources it has designated for its post-pay services. Finally, we emphasize that TeleCorp must meet both the utilization threshold and MTE requirements in the Commission's rules to receive growth numbering resources in the future. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 4(i), 10, and 251(e) of the Communications act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commissions regulations, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the petition filed by TeleCorp PCS, Inc. IS GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, to the extent herein described. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 52.15 (g)(3)(iv). Pre-pay service is mobile telephony service operating off of a debit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2604A1.txt
  • and release a new growth NXX code to Guam Cellular for the 671 NPA. We also direct Guam Cellular to return a paging NXX code to the NANPA as soon as one is vacated. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 4(i), 10, and 251(e) of the Communications act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commissions regulations, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the petition filed by Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent herein described. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 52.15 (g)(3)(i)(A). Guam Cellular also requested a waiver of the industry guideline regarding the six months to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2638A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Tariff Affiliates failed to file an appeal of the October 13, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Tariff Affiliates' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Tariff Affiliates, Inc., Fairport, New York on June 11, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kim Fish, Tariff Affiliates, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2639A1.txt
  • request was filed. It is well established law that the absence of official record of an event is the evidence of the non-occurrence of the event. The proffered copy of the April 30, 2001 letter, without more, is insufficient to demonstrate that an appeal was timely filed with the Commission. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Whitehall District Schools, Whitehall, Michigan on August 16, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James Decker, Whitehall District Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 16,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2640A1.txt
  • with the way that SLD processed applications with 14 or more digits. Our decision today does not prohibit SLD from establishing minimum processing standards relating to FCC Form 470 Application Numbers in the future. Our decision is directed only at the consistent treatment of applications under the minimum processing standards. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Pediatric Library, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital Ballard Community School District, Cleveland, Ohio, on June 21, 2000 IS GRANTED, and this application is REMANDED for further processing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Review filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2641A1.txt
  • original documentation and should therefore have been considered. Accordingly, we remand the application to SLD to address the eligibility of FRN 437000 in light of the information submitted on appeal. In doing so, we make no determination as to whether FRN 437000 seeks support for an eligible product or service. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Pope Blanche Elementary School, Waimanalo, Hawaii, filed on April 25, 2001, IS GRANTED, and the application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2642A1.txt
  • In this case, Lakeshore has failed to demonstrate that it took reasonable steps to cover for the administrative facilitator's absence to minimize or avoid the late filing. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Lakeshore's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lakeshore Public Academy, Hart, Michigan on October 9, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2643A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Mary O'Brien failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Mary O'Brien's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mary C. O'Brien Accomodation School District, Florence, Arizona on September 13, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jack W. Harmon, Mary C. O'Brien Accomodation School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2644A1.txt
  • this case, because Wapanucka has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Wapanucka's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Wapanucka's initial request, Wapanucka may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wapanucka Public Schools, Wapanucka, Oklahoma, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Max Rowland, Wapanucka Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 24, 2001 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2645A1.txt
  • recaptured. As there is no longer any funding award, it follows that Folsom Cordova cannot be granted a change in the terms of that award, and that its SPIN-Change request must therefore be denied. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Request for Review filed on March 2, 2000 by Folsom Cordova Unified School District, Folsom, California, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this application be remanded to the Administrator for an adjustment of the funding commitment made to Folsom Cordova Unified School District in connection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2646A1.txt
  • appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Bais Yaakov's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bais Yaakov High School of St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri on September 17, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2647A1.txt
  • a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Louisville failed to file an appeal of the July 26, 2001 Funding Rejection Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Louisville's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Louisville Public Library, Louisville, Nebraska on October 9, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ruth Ann Hlavac, Louisville Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2648A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2648A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Northeastern failed to file an appeal of the July 7, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Northeastern's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Northeastern Educational Intermediate Unit 19, Archbald, Pennsylvania on January 16, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Brian R. Dolan, Northeastern Educational Intermediate Unit 19, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2649A1.txt
  • 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 3, 2000, by St. Raymond Regional School, Villas, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Harry J. Rock, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 3,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2664A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 01-22 ) ) ) I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2670A1.txt
  • request. We grant a limited extension of time until January 24, 2002 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. An extension of time will afford the Bureau an opportunity to evaluate and consider the issues raised, while preserving the public's ability to comment on the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to January 24, 2001. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2670 F „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2692A1.txt
  • Area has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Bethlehem Area's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Bethlehem Area's initial request, Bethlehem Area may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bethlehem Area School District, Bethlehem Area, Pennsylvania, on October 15, 2001, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Scott Garrigan, Bethlehem Area School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2693A1.txt
  • in favor of correcting the error committed by the Administrator so that Keya Paha's application may be processed without further delay and considered on the merits. Therefore, we grant the Administrator's request and direct the Administrator to process Keya Paha's Funding Year 4 FCC Forms 471 consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) that the Request for Guidance filed by the Administrator with respect to Keya Paha County School District, Springview, Nebraska IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to take further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2694A1.txt
  • appropriate for the SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Lincoln's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review and Request for Waiver filed on September 20, 2001, by Lincoln Elementary School District No. 27, Lincoln, Illinois ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol Ann Gleason and Dr.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2695A1.txt
  • in favor of correcting the error committed by the Administrator so that North Carolina's application may be processed without further delay and considered on the merits. Therefore, we grant the Administrator's request and direct the Administrator to process North Carolina's Funding Year 3 FCC Form 471 consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) that the Request for Guidance filed by the Administrator with respect to the North Carolina Department of Commerce, ITS, Raleigh, North Carolina IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SLD IS DIRECTED to take further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2696A1.txt
  • appropriate for the SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Pinellas's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review and the Request for Waiver filed on September 19, 2000, by Pinellas County Schools, Largo, Florida ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Shannon Eddinger, Pinellas County Schools, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2697A1.txt
  • appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Potter Valley's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review and the Request for Waiver filed on October 9, 2001, by Potter Valley Community Unified School District, Potter Valley, California ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gail Albin, Potter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2698A1.txt
  • SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 22, 2000, by Somerton School District No. 11, Somerton, Arizona, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER CONSIDERATION. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert W. Cassidy, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2699A1.txt
  • SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 12, 2000, by Somerton School District No. 11, Somerton, Arizona, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER CONSIDERATION. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert W. Cassidy, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-26A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Lakeview failed to file an appeal of the May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Lakeview's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Lakeview Community Schools, Columbus, Nebraska on December 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kurt Harrison, Lakeview Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 5,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2700A1.txt
  • it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. Here, Trinity fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Trinity Area School District, Washington, Pennsylvania, on February 22, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James R. Shargots, Trinity Area School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2701A1.txt
  • respect to SLD application numbers 244469 and 244568, Washington Community may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. For these reasons, with respect to SLD application numbers 244469 and 244568, we dismiss Washington Community's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Washington Community School District, Washington, Iowa, on September 24, 2001, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER CONSIDERATION IN PART and IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2706A1.txt
  • FRN and cites that correct FCC Form 470 in its appeal to SLD. Because this procedure is applicable here, we find that SLD should have reviewed the funding requests in light of the new FCC Form 470 USCN numbers. We therefore reverse and remand the pending applications for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 9, 2000 by Wayland Free Library, Wayland, New York, IS GRANTED and this application IS REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Review filed on July 12,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2727A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ÿ d DA 01-2727 Released: November 20, 2001 COMMON CARRIER, INTERNATIONAL, AND WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAUS MODIFY WORLDCOM-INTERMEDIA MERGER CONDITIONS CC Docket No. 00-206 Pursuant to sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 214 and 310(d), and sections 63.01, 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.01, 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331, the Common Carrier, Wireless Telecommunications, and International Bureaus (the Bureaus) grant WorldCom, Inc.'s (WorldCom's) request to modify a condition imposed in a January 17, 2001, Bureau-level Memorandum Opinion and Order (WorldCom-Intermedia Merger Order), which approved the transfer of control of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2731A1.txt
  • those rules, and to see that customers may receive service during the notice period. Speed Cell's commitment to provide this cooperation relieves us from deciding the extent of its obligation to do so. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, in accordance with sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, the November 2, 2001 order is hereby modified as set forth above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Bureau Chief Common Carrier Bureau See In the Matter of Complaint Against Internet Commerce & Communications, Inc. f/k/a RMI.NET, Inc. and ICC Speed Cell, LLC for Failure
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2749A1.txt
  • administratively appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Prospect's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 2, 2000, by Prospect School District 59, Prospect, Oregon and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2750A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Winnebago fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its applications. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Winnebago Public Schools, Winnebago, Nebraska on June 16, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Raymond Girard, Winnebago Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 16, 2000 (Waiver
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2752A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2752A1.txt
  • Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(c). The Idaho Commission further requested that the Commission initiate a rulemaking to treat all similarly situated LECs as incumbent LECs. 1 On September 11, 2001, the Idaho Commission filed a request to withdraw its November 1998 petition without prejudice.2 We hereby grant that request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the request of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission to withdraw its petition for declaratory ruling without prejudice, IS GRANTED and the above-captioned proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau 1 Petition of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-275A1.txt
  • is conditioned upon the provision by RSL of customer notification and upon the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by RSL COM U.S.A., Inc. on December 7, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2761A1.txt
  • provide intrastate interexchange services in the State of Alaska. On November 13, 2001, GCI filed a request to withdraw its January 1998 petition. GCI states that since that petition's filing, the Regulatory Commission of Alaska has repealed section 52.355, and the repeal has become final. We grant GCI's request to withdraw its petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the request of General Communication, Inc. to withdraw its petition for preemption IS GRANTED and the above-captioned proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau Petition for Preemption Pursuant to Section 253 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2766A1.txt
  • SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 27, 2001, by Blessed Sacrament - St. Gabriel High School, New Rochelle, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Edward Sullivan, Blessed Sacrament - St.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2767A1.txt
  • In this case, because Washington has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Washington's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Washington's request, it may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 9, 2001 by Washington County Public Schools, Abingdon, Virginia, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jean Luker, Washington County Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2768A1.txt
  • SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 20, 2001, by Waukegan Public Schools, Waukegan, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Judith M. Green, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 20, 2001 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2769A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2769A1.txt
  • of those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, West Jasper fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Jasper School District, Bay Springs, Mississippi, on May 22, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Mary Walters and George Duke, West Jasper School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2770A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2770A1.txt
  • was not eligible for internal connections. In Funding Year 3, internal connections were funded for schools and libraries with at least an 82% discount rate. The record demonstrates that Boone was entitled to only a 75% discount rate based on the discount matrix. We therefore deny Boone's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 19, 2000, by Boone County School District, Madison, West Virginia is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gary D. Sumpter, Boone County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2771A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2771A1.txt
  • real-time or near real-time voice or video over IP (VoIP), if otherwise eligible, are eligible for discount.'' Because this eligibility standard was not in place at the time of SLD's prior decision, we remand the application to SLD for review of FRN 221270 consistent with the revised eligible services list. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Everett School District #2 on May 22, 2000 is GRANTED, and the application is REMANDED to SLD for further action. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ken Toyn, Everett School District No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2777A1.txt
  • will it result in any disadvantage to other tariff participants." We therefore conclude that there is good cause to grant Saddleback a waiver of section 69.3(e)(11). ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Saddleback Communications and Qwest Corporation on June 12, 2001, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2778A1.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order Declaration In the Matter of Cost Review Proceeding for Residential and Single-Line Business Subscriber Line Charge (SLC) Caps Access Charge Reform Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers ) ) ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2789A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 01-27 ) ) I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2795A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2795A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2795A1.txt
  • specifications provided with Children's Home's Appeal to SLD state that the software is ``required'' for the servers, and that it consists of operational software including ``NT Server'' and ``Web Server.'' Based on this documentation, we find that the software is eligible for discounts. We therefore grant the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Children's Home Society, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, on March 21, 2001, IS GRANTED, and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2796A1.txt
  • does not meet the standards articulated in Naperville. Although Item 22, Block 5, was a new information request in Funding Year 3, Item 1 of Block 1, the Billed Entity, was not new. Thus, the first requirement of Naperville is not satisfied. Accordingly, we affirm SLD's rejection of the application. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Crawford County Public Library, English, Indiana, on August 9, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lloyd A. Hamlin, King and Queen County Public Schools, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2797A1.txt
  • of funding for the entire request could have been avoided by submitting two separate funding requests, one for the Priority One services, and the second for the Priority Two services. Through that method, Worcester can, in the future, obtain virtually all of the benefit of choosing the more economical solution. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Worcester Public Schools, Worcester, New York, on March 15, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John F. Burke, Worcester Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2798A1.txt
  • and processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures."). 21242 Federal Communications Commission DA 01-2798 within the window. Here, Peru Central fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Peru Central School, Peru, New York, on June 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert 0 Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau 21243
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2799A1.txt
  • not establish the special circumstances necessary to allow waiver of the Commission's rules. As a result, this argument does not rise to the level of good cause necessary to justify waiving our rules. Therefore, to the extent that Solon requests that the Commission waive section 54.720(a) of its rules, we deny that request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(j) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(j) that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Solon City Schools, Solon, Ohio, on February 8, 2001 IS DISMISSED. IF IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 that the request to waive the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-27A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Matawan-Aberdeen failed to file an appeal of the May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Matawan-Aberdeen's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Matawan-Aberdeen Regional School District, Matawan, New Jersey on November 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Roland R. Pare, Ed.D, Matawan-Aberdeen Regional School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2800A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Bnos Zion fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bnos Zion of Bobov, Inc., Brooklyn, New York October 31, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2801A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Buffalo fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Buffalo Public Library, Buffalo, Oklahoma on October 10, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2802A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Colusa fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Colusa Unified School District, Colusa, California September 24, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2803A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Edgerton fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Edgerton Public School, Edgerton, Minnesota, on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from LeRoy Domagala, Edgerton Public School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2804A1.txt
  • adherence to the general rule. Because Helena provides documentation indicating that SLD would have received the application before the end of the filing window for Funding Year 2 if the postal service had delivered it to the correct address, we find that good cause exists to grant Helena's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Helena Township Public Library, Alden, Michigan on July 31, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and Helena's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2805A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Johnson fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Johnson Elementary School, Johnson, Vermont on October 15, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2806A1.txt
  • applicants did wait the 28 days required by the Commission's rule before signing contracts and submitting FCC Form 471s. Because there was evidence within the applications to support the pending Requests for Review, we find it appropriate to reverse SLD and remand the two pending applications for further consideration. 10. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 22 Nashua Request for Review at 2; Hudson Request for Review at 2. 23 Nashua Request for Review at 2, attach. 3b. 24 FCC Form 470, Nashua Public Library, filed December 21, 1999, at 1 (indicating allowable contract date of December 18, 2000). 25 Hudson Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2807A1.txt
  • if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Because Sacramento provides evidence that it postmarked its application within the filing window, we find that good cause exists to grant Sacramento's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Sacramento City Unified School District, Sacramento, California on August 3, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Sacramento's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2808A1.txt
  • errors and fraud. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sargent School District RE-33J, Monte Vista, Colorado, on March 20, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ronna Cochran, Sargent School District RE-33J, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2809A1.txt
  • all relevant rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, South Kingstown fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by South Kingstown Public Library, Peace Dale, Rhode Island, on July 3, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Connie Lachowicz, South Kingstown Public Library, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2810A1.txt
  • appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Starr King-Edison has failed to demonstrate good cause for waiving the filing deadline. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief, and therefore, we deny Starr King-Edison's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Starr King-Edison Academy, Long Beach, California on October 18, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2828A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2828A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2828A1.txt
  • Line Count Information would be released publicly by the Commission upon a proper request under the Freedom of Information Act or other applicable law or regulation, including section 0.442 of the Commission's rules. ordering clause Accordingly, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, IT IS ORDERED that the Request of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates for a Limited Modification of Interim Protective Order IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief Common Carrier Bureau ATTACHMENT A DECLARATION In the Matter of Cost Review
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2842A1.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order Declaration In the Matters of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Service, North American Numbering
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2854A1.txt
  • information collections contained herein are contingent upon approval of the Office of Management and Budget. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that FCC Report 43-01, the Annual Summary Report, FCC Report 43-02, the USOA Report, FCC Report 43-03, the Joint Cost Report, FCC Report 43-04, the Access Report, FCC Report 43-05, the Service Quality Report, FCC Report 495A , the Forecast of Investment Usage Report, and FCC Report 495B,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2859A1.txt
  • with input from both carriers and state public utility commissions, and the impending holiday season, a 21-day extension is granted for both comments and reply comments from the dates those comments were due initially. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, USTA's Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED to the extent described herein to establish a new comments deadline of January 22, 2002 and reply comments deadline of February 12, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau Performance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-285A1.txt
  • SLD failed to specify what additional information was required for the application. We have reviewed the record, and we conclude that the record does not show that SLD adequately communicated the nature of the requested information to St. Stanislaus. Accordingly, we remand St. Stanislaus' application to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the St. Stanislaus Kostka School, Chicago, Illinois on May 15, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review St. Stanislaus' funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2864A1.txt
  • waiver for a period of forty-five (45) days. This will allow us to consider any timely filed comments before permanent authority is granted pursuant to section 51.333. Ordering CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, Verizon's petition is GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffery J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 51.333. Letter from Richard T. Ellis, Director - Federal Affairs for Verizon, to Jeff Carlisle, Senior Deputy Bureau Chief, Common Carrier Bureau,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2870A1.txt
  • currently exists. KMC states that excessive termination penalties imposed by an incumbent LEC during a time in which the incumbent LEC maintains market dominance are unreasonable and should be declared unlawful. 2. On November 19, 2001, KMC filed a letter with the Commission stating its intention to withdraw its April 1999 petition. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission'rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the above-captioned proceeding IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMMISSION Michelle M. Carey, Chief Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau Petition of KMC Telecom, Inc. for Declaratory Ruling Concerning the Establishment of Rules to Prohibit the Imposition of Unjust, Onerous Termination Penalties on Customers Choosing to Partake of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2871A1.txt
  • should reallocate the costs recovered by any interconnection charge included in a carrier's tariff, subject to the limitation contained in section 69.415(b), and should not contain a negative transport rate. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and (j) and 201 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j) and 201, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.2, that this declaratory ruling IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan for Regulation of Interstate Services of Non-Price Cap Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 00-256, Second Report and Order and Further Notice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2875A1.txt
  • is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. Here, Netherlands Christian fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Netherlands Reformed Christian School, Pompton Plains, New Jersey, on September 4, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John W. Van Der Brink, Netherlands Reformed Christian
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2876A1.txt
  • establish the special circumstances necessary to allow waiver of the Commission's rules. As a result, these arguments do not rise to the level of good cause necessary to justify waiving our rules. Therefore, to the extent that Grand Isle requests that the Commission waive section 54.720(b), we deny that request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.106(j) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.106(j) that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Grand Isle Supervisory Union, North Hero, Vermont, dated November 24, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2877A1.txt
  • this case, because Saranac has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Saranac's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Saranac's initial request, Saranac may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saranac Central School, Saranac, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Larry Garrow, Saranac Central School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 26, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2892A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of BellSouth Corporation for a LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-01-150, IS APPROVED. The LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS between points in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2893A1.txt
  • petition because its inclusion of measured-rate service is inconsistent with a finding that a sufficient community of interest exists to grant an ELCS LATA boundary modification. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the petition of Ameritech, on behalf of The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, for a LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing measured-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-78, IS DENIED. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to section 416(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2894A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Verizon-West Virginia for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional ELCS at the specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-232, IS APPROVED. The LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-28A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 17, 2000, by Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Concord, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2911A1.txt
  • comments to the Special Access Measurements and Standards Notice by 13 days, so that comments in this proceeding are now due by January 22, 2002, and reply comments are due by February 12, 2002. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the deadline for in this proceeding shall be January 22, 2002 and the deadline for reply comments shall be February 12, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau Performance Measurements and Standards for Interstate Special Access Services, et
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2912A1.txt
  • ceiling discussed above does not apply to transactions with section 272 affiliates. For these reasons, we deny BellSouth's petition for waiver with respect to transactions with BSLD. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. IS HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Expedited Petition for Waiver, filed Aug. 9, 2001 (Petition). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2913A1.txt
  • adopted in the Phase 2 Report and Order. Therefore, we are waiving the ARMIS reporting requirements and the CAM attestation requirement, for the years 2000 and 2001, for ACS of Anchorage, Inc. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the ARMIS reporting requirements and the CAM attestation requirement, for the years 2000 and 2001, are hereby waived for ACS of Anchorage, Inc. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review - Comprehensive Review of the Accounting Requirements and ARMIS Reporting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-291A1.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Glenn T. Reynolds, Acting Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 01-04 ) ) ) I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2921A1.txt
  • of the 10-digit dialing requirement for an additional 8 months beyond the period granted by the U.S. Court of Appeals. Accordingly, Petitioners will now be required to implement 10-digit dialing by March 28, 2003. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 4(i), 10, and 251(e) of the Communications act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commissions regulations, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the petition filed by New York State Public Service Commission, New York State Consumer Protection Board and City of New York IS GRANTED to the extent herein described. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See People of the State of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2928A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2928A1.txt
  • to the model inputs and model platform. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 303(r), 403, and 410 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 303(r), 403, and 410, and section 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(f), this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4, 201-205, 218-220, 303(r), and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154, 201-205, 218-220, 303(r), and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 1.106 and 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.106, 1.429, that the petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2930A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2930A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 01-2930 Released: December 18, 2001 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION FOR SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY TO ENGAGE IN PRO FORMA TRANSFER OF CORPORATE CONTROL CC Docket No. 01-312 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application requesting consent for Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (``SBTC'') to engage in a pro forma transfer of corporate control. The requested authorization is related to a corporate reorganization by which SBC Communications, Inc. will create the wholly owned subsidiary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2953A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2953A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2953A1.txt
  • SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Algonquin Regional High School, Northborough, Massachusetts, on October 3, 2001, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Melican, Algonquin Regional High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2954A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2954A1.txt
  • SLD's decision to deny Taylor County's applications for funding requested by SLD application numbers 241393, 241462, 245426 and 245519, we dismiss that request without further consideration because Taylor County failed to seek review of the Administrator's decisions from the Commission within the 30 day period set forth in our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Taylor County Board of Education, Campbellsville, Kentucky on September 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Linda E. Beal, Taylor County Board of Education, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2955A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2955A1.txt
  • as internal connections. Only applicants with a discount rate of 82% or higher were eligible for internal connections discounts in Funding Year 3. BECPL had a discount rate of only 60%. Because BECPL is not eligible for internal connections discounts in Funding Year 3, we affirm SLD's denial of funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Buffalo and Erie County Public Library, Buffalo, New York, on March 27, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2956A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2956A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2956A1.txt
  • to the close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that Finley-Sharon has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 7, 2000 by Finley-Sharon Public School, Finley, North Dakota IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lee E. Kelm, Finley-Sharon Public School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2957A1.txt
  • that their Funding Year 3 FCC Form 471 be considered as timely filed. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved funding for Hayti's Funding Year 3 application, and such funds were not revoked or suspended. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Hayti's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 29, 2000 by Hayti School District, Hayti, Missouri, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sue Reynolds, Hayti School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2958A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2958A1.txt
  • Bureau's determination that the policy adopted in Funding Year 3 was reasonable. Further, because Kansas filed the pending application in Funding Year 3, it is properly subject to the procedures in place for Funding Year 3. We therefore decline to reverse SLD based on its adoption of a new procedure. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Kansas Public Schools, Kansas, Oklahoma, on March 2, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary Ingersoll, Kansas Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 2,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2959A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2959A1.txt
  • do not merit deviation from Commission rules regarding the discount level received by participants in the universal service mechanism for schools and libraries. Thus, to the extent Lake County seeks a waiver of our rules, Lake County has failed to meet its burden, and thus such request is also denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Lake County School District, Tavares, Florida, February 9, 2001, February 23, 2001, March 20, 2001 and April 14, 2001, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Coggshall,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2960A1.txt
  • warrant relief. Evidence is inadmissible on appeal to correct data included in the original application. Here, as noted above, FRN 322733 specified that it was seeking tariffed services not supported by a contract. Thus, evidence to demonstrate that the service is supported by a contract is not admissible on appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Newton Community School District, Newton, Iowa, on March 6, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James Pederson, Newton Community School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2961A1.txt
  • filing window with respect to its Funding Year 2 FCC Form 471. However, the record reflects that the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company provided discounts to Nogales/Santa Cruz for its Funding Year 2 FCC Form 471. We therefore dismiss Nogales/Santa Cruz's Waiver Request as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Nogales/Santa Cruz County Public Library, Nogales, Arizona, on July 25, 2000, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Suzanne Haddock, Nogales/Santa Cruz County Public Library,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2962A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2962A1.txt
  • gives responsibility for submitting timely and complete requests for discounts on its behalf. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline in these circumstances and, therefore, we deny Parrottsville's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Parrottsville Community Library, Parrottsville, Tennessee, June 16, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Judy Myers, Parrottsville Community Library, Parrottsville, Tennessee, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2963A1.txt
  • with all relevant rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Smackover fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Smackover Public Schools, Smackover, Arkansas, on July 18, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Leland Watts, Smackover Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2964A1.txt
  • 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 11, 2001, by Fairhill School, Dallas, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Wade Mercer, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 11, 2001 (Request for Review).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2966A1.txt
  • Park has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Island Park's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Island Park's initial request, Island Park may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Island Park Library Friends, Inc., Macks Inn, Idaho, on August 13, 2001, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Genevieve Prahasto, Island Park Library Friends, Inc.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2967A1.txt
  • SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it must be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Orange City Christian School, Orange City, Iowa, on May 7, 2001, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Paula Ribbens, Orange City Christian School to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2968A1.txt
  • this case, because Knowlton has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Knowlton's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Knowlton's initial request, Knowlton may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Knowlton Township Board of Education, Delaware, New Jersey, on July 30, 2001, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Eva Kunz, Knowlton Township Board of Education,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2969A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2969A1.txt
  • before we can determine whether NECA's proposals are appropriate. Safety net and safety valve support should not be distributed to average schedule companies until we have completed our review. As with NECA's proposed 2002 expense adjustment formula modifications, our review of NECA's safety net and safety valve proposals will proceed expeditiously. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formula proposed by the National Exchange Carriers Association, Inc., on October 1, 2001, for local switching support SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE January 1, 2002. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the current
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2970A1.txt
  • BUREAU GRANTS SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION FOR VARTEC TELECOM HOLDING COMPANY TO ACQUIRE CONTROL OF EXCEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND ITS WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES, EXCEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., EMERITUS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. D/B/A DIAL & SAVE CORPORATION, AND LONG DISTANCE WHOLESALE CLUB, INC. CC Docket No. 01-300 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application requesting consent for VarTec Telecom Holding Company (``VarTec'') to acquire control of Excel Communications, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Excel Telecommunications, Inc., Emeritus Communications, Inc. d/b/a Dial & Save Corporation, and Long Distance Wholesale Club, Inc., which provide
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2978A1.txt
  • Waiver Requests, that they had postmarked their FCC Forms 471 at least three days before the filing window deadline, or that they mailed the forms via guaranteed overnight courier at least one day before the deadline, will be deemed to have filed their FCC Forms 471 within the filing window. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the following Waiver Requests ARE REMANDED TO SLD for further review consistent with this opinion: Hardee County School Board, Wauchula, Florida, filed August 28, 2000; Goldennet Educational Technology Alliance, Bakersfield, California, filed June 2, 2000; St. Michael Elementary School, Hastings, Nebraska, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2979A1.txt
  • not yet in effect, before the party has complied under old rules, is a special circumstance that warrants a deviation of the general rule and the deviation will serve the public interest. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the annual CAM filing requirement, due December 31, 2001, is hereby waived for all mid-sized incumbent LECs. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. § 64.903. 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review - Comprehensive Review of the Accounting Requirements and ARMIS Reporting Requirements for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2980A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 01-2980 Released: December 20, 2001 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR VANTAGEPOINT VENTURE PARTNERS TO ACQUIRE CONTROL OF DSLnet COMMUNICATIONS, LLC CC Docket No. 01-329 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the joint application of DSLnet Communications, LLC (``DSLnet'') and VantagePoint Venture Partners (``VPVP'') for an indirect transfer of control of DSLnet's domestic section 214 authority to VantagePoint Venture Partners (``VPVP''). The indirect transfer of control will occur as a result
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2982A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2982A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2982A1.txt
  • will ensure that Tariff 11 customers will be able to receive refunds of any amounts improperly charged should the Commission ultimately determine that Alascom's tariff is unlawful. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Alascom, Inc., Tariff F.C.C. No. 11, contained in Transmittal No. 1260 ARE SUSPENDED for one day from its effective date and an investigation of that tariff transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket No. 95-182. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Alascom, Inc., SHALL FILE tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2991A1.txt
  • docket withdrawing its application. As such, we hereby terminate this docket. BellSouth further expressed its intention to ``shortly file to initiate a new application'' and to incorporate the existing record in this docket into the new application. We will consider such a request once BellSouth files a new application. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the proceeding in CC Docket No. 01-277 IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James G. Harralson, Vice President and Associate General Counsel, BellSouth Corporation, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 01-277 (filed December 20,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-29A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 16, 2000, by New Brighton Area School District, New Brighton, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3009A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Petitions for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services for Ameritech Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern New England Telephone Company, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3023A1.txt
  • ACS). This procedure must be followed because GCI v. ACS Holdings is a restricted proceeding in which ex parte presentations are prohibited under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the tariffs of the carriers identified in Appendix A, ARE SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 204(a), and pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3025A1.txt
  • carriers receive smaller blocks of numbers than they receive now. We are encouraged by the state commissions' willingness to work with the FCC and the Bureau to achieve national numbering resource optimization goals. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Petition of Representative Keith R. McCall and Members of the Northeast Delegation of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives Requesting that Additional Authority be Delegated to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to Implement Additional Number Conservation Measures is GRANTED to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3026A1.txt
  • 1, 2002, and until September 1, 2002 in the 954/754-561 EAS routes, as outlined in the 954 Planning Letter. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.2, 1.3, and 52.19 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.2, 1.3, and 52.19 and section 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, IT IS ORDERED that the Florida Public Service Commission Petition for Expedited Declaratory Statement and/or Expedited Petition for Temporary Waiver of 47 C.F.R. Section 52.19(c)(3)(ii) in the 954 NPA is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3029A1.doc
  • that a two-year temporary waiver of the requirement to be capable of handling pay-per-call service is appropriate at this time. Because the demand for pay-per-call VRS services is expected to be low, we see no reason to burden VRS providers with this costly requirement at this time. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the request of the Hamilton Telephone Company for waiver of section 64.604(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.604(a)(3), IS GRANTED, for a period of two years, beginning on the release date of this order, and is extended to all VRS providers, current or prospective, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-302A1.txt
  • above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon Mescalero's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the expedited waiver request filed by Mescalero Apache Telecom, Inc. on December 4, 2000, and supplemented on February 1, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-303A1.txt
  • the eight conditions specified in the Reconsideration Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.312(i), by Atlinks USA, Inc., and Vtech Telecommunications Limited ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.txt
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Ambit Microsystems Corporation, and Alcatel Canada Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-30A1.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because New Hampshire School failed to file an appeal of the July 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss New Hampshire School's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by New Hampshire School Administrative Unit No. 53, Pembroke, New Hampshire on June 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary I. Rubega, New Hampshire School Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-314A1.txt
  • the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. Given Yeshiva's failure to certify the Form 471 subsequent to the required posting period, SLD properly denied the application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Yeshiva Ahavas Torah, Brooklyn, New York, filed April 11, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Alter Obermeister, Yeshiva Ahavas Torah, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-315A1.txt
  • with Bell Atlantic was for tariffed services, such services must be re-bid every year because they do not fall under the limited exemptions from competitive bidding. Therefore, because Thomas Crane did not seek competitive bids for Funding Year 2, we find that SLD correctly denied Thomas Crane's request for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the April 10, 2000 Request for Review filed by Thomas Crane Public Library, Quincy, Massachusetts, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jody Parsley, Thomas Crane Public Library, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-316A1.txt
  • administratively appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Ashby's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on January 4, 2001, by Ashby Public Schools, Ashby, Minnesota IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Renee Melby, Ashby Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-317A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss California Youth Authority's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on California Youth Authority's initial request, California Youth Authority may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 1, 2001, by California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, Sacramento, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-318A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed October 13, 2000, by Daingerfield-Lone Star Independent School District, Daingerfield, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-319A1.txt
  • of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because Hawthorn failed to timely appeal the April 14, 2000 decision to either the Commission or SLD, the Requests for Review will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed November 17, 2000, and December 4, 2000, by Hawthorn School District 73 District, Hawthorn, Illinois, ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-31A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 30, 2000, by Newport Public School District, Newport, Rhode Island, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-320A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 7, 1999, by Peach Public Libraries, Fort Valley, Georgia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Billy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-321A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Windham failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Windham's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Windham Public Schools, Windham, Connecticut on January 3, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Millie C. Wheeler, Windham Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-324A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 22, 2000, by Half Hollow Hills School District, Dix Hills, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-32A1.txt
  • this case, because Sanger has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Sanger's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Sanger's initial appeal, Sanger may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Sanger Unified School District, Sanger, California, on October 23, 2000, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-33A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Santa Ana failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Santa Ana's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Santa Ana Unified School District, Santa Ana, California on October 6, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Karen Aeppli, Santa Ana Unified School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-34A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Tuckahoe Union failed to file an appeal of the September 15, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Tuckahoe Union's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Tuckahoe Union Free School District, Eastchester, New York on October 31, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael V. Yazurlo, Ed.D, Tuckahoe Union Free School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-350A1.txt
  • request were ineligible. In other instances where SLD has failed to provide an explanation for its determination of ineligibility, the Bureau has remanded the application to SLD for further consideration. We believe that such action is also appropriate here and shall remand Adams Twelve's application to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Adams Twelve Five Star Schools, Northglenn, Colorado, on April 26, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Adams Twelve's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-351A1.txt
  • them, it would eliminate any incentive to avoid including ineligible expenses in their funding requests. This would significantly increase the administrative burden SLD would face while carrying out its obligation to guard against the occurrence of errors and fraud. Therefore, we cannot permit Cheney to amend its FCC Form 471. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 16, 2000, by Cheney Public Schools, Cheney, Washington, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review by Cheney School District No. 360, filed May 16, 2000 (Request for Review). See Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-352A1.txt
  • application on appeal. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Flour Bluff Independent School District, Corpus Christi, Texas, April 13, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Darrell Earwood, Flour Bluff Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-353A1.txt
  • with priority one and priority two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand Pioneerland's application to SLD, and direct SLD to reconsider Pioneerland's FCC Form 471 and, if warranted, to issue a new funding commitment decision letter providing discounts for all appropriate priority one services requested by Pioneerland. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), section 1.113 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.113, IS WAIVED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by Pioneerland Library System, Willmar, Minnesota, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-354A1.txt
  • King has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Crown King's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Crown King's initial request, Crown King may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Crown King Public Library, Crown King, Arizona, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Susan Hite, Crown King Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-355A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Dietrich failed to file an appeal of the May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Dietrich's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Dietrich School District No. 314, Dietrich, Idaho on January 11, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Peter M. Bolz, Sr., Dietrich School District No. 314, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-356A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Grant County failed to file an appeal of the August 31, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Grant County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Grant County Education Service District, Canyon City, Oregon on May 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Don Coffey, Grant County Education Service District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-357A1.txt
  • Christian has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Highway Christian's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Highway Christian's initial request, Highway Christian may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Highway Christian Academy, New York City, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-358A1.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Pius V failed to file an appeal of the October 5, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Pius V's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Pius V Parish School, Jacksonville, Florida on January 26, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sister Elise Kennedy, St. Pius V Parish School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-373A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because USD failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss USD's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Unified School District #214, Ulysses, Kansas on February 5, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joe Breeden, Unified School District #214, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-386A1.txt
  • numbering resources necessary to continue to provide service to their prospective customers. We are encouraged by these states' willingness to work in conjunction with the FCC to achieve our numbering resource optimization goals. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Petition of the Louisiana Public Service Commission for Expedited Decision for Delegated Authority to Implement Numbering Conservation Measures is GRANTED IN PART to the extent described herein; Petition of the Maryland Public Service Commission for Additional Delegated Authority to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-397A1.txt
  • upon Commission approval of the transfers of control of licenses and lines from TruCom to BridgeCom, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by TruCom Corporation and BridgeCom International, Inc. on January 12, 2001, IS GRANTED subject to the conditions, and to the extent, indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-410A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-410A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-410A1.txt
  • cap carriers to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Wyoming and Qwest Corporation on August 21, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-411A1.txt
  • provide remote access. In light of our decision in White Sulphur Springs, we conclude that it is appropriate to remand Acadia Parish's application to SLD for further review. We direct SLD to review Acadia Parish's use of its remote access router to determine whether such use is eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Acadia Parish School Board 5, Crowley, Louisiana, on May 26, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Acadia Parish's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-412A1.txt
  • the limited exceptions for existing, binding contracts permitted by the Commission's rules. Antioch seeks support for tariffed services and for contracts entered into in April and July of 1999. Accordingly, consistent with prior Bureau decisions, SLD correctly denied Antioch's requests for support. The Division, therefore, denies Antioch's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Antioch Unified School District, Antioch, California, on August 21, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael Gudjohnsen, Director of Purchasing, Antioch Unified School District Purchasing Department, to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-41A1.txt
  • deadline. Finally, we conclude that it is in the public interest to grant USAC's waiver. USAC expects that shifting their meeting dates will decrease administrative costs. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on December 14, 2000 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 54.709(a)(3). Universal Service Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-420A1.txt
  • appropriate to remand Buffalo and Erie's application to SLD for further review. We direct SLD to review Buffalo and Erie's use of its remote access routers to determine whether such use is eligible for discounts, and consequently, whether maintenance and memory upgrades of such routers are also eligible for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Buffalo and Erie County Public Library on May 19, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Administrator to review Buffalo's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-422A1.txt
  • 32.27(c) filed by GTE. This waiver is limited to those corporate services provided under contract between GTE and the affiliates listed in the waiver request. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by GTE Services Corporation IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 8. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division Common Carrier Bureau Petition for Waiver GTE Corporation., filed March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-433A1.txt
  • of agreement; it only asserts that service will commence on or after the date of the letter. Consequently, we find Livingston Parish's argument unpersuasive and in the absence of other evidence in the record we find that the Applicant violated the 28-day waiting period with regard to the Com-Net vendor. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Livingston Parish School District, Livingston Louisiana, on May 26, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from J. Rogers Pope, Livingston Parish School District, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-434A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Los Angeles Unified's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Los Angeles Unified's initial request, Los Angeles Unified may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-435A1.txt
  • multiple instructional buildings that comprise a single school would generally be considered internal connections rather than part of a WAN. Nothing in the record before us indicates whether the other building is an instructional building comprising part of the same school. Accordingly, we shall remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the Solomon Schechter School of Greater Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, on May 4, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Solomon Schechter's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-438A1.txt
  • purposes described above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Indiana Bell Telephone Company d/b/a Ameritech Indiana, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company on January 5, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-44A1.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Austin's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Austin Independent School District, Austin, Texas, on May 12, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Pascal D. Forgione, Austin Independent School District, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-450A1.txt
  • above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company on February 5, 2001, and supplemented on February 14, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-45A1.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Baldwin's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Baldwin Public Library, Baldwin, New York, on May 31, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Hopkins, Baldwin Public Library, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 31,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-463A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Los Angeles Unified's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Los Angeles Unified's initial request, Los Angeles Unified may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-464A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 19, 2000, by Salem County Vocational Technical Schools, Woodstown, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-46A1.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Lakeside's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Lakeside Youth Services, Ft. Washington, Pennsylvania, on June 22, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ronald K. MacClay, Educational Consortium for Telecommunications Savings (on behalf Lakeside Youth Services),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.txt
  • the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that the Petitioner has shown good cause for granting the requested waiver. An application to register this device under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the request for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by U.S. Robotics Corporation IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver IS GRANTED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-475A1.txt
  • the extent the state commission affirmatively specifies other application processing or provisioning intervals for a particular type of collocation arrangement. Ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, 303(r), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Petition for Conditional Waiver filed December 1, 2000 by BellSouth Corporation and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT STATED HEREIN AND OTHERWISE DENIED, subject to the conditions stated in part III.A of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. BellSouth must implement the application processing and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-47A1.txt
  • not post Oak Harbor's request for services to SLD's website. The contracts for which Oak Harbor seeks support, however, do not meet either of the limited exceptions for existing, binding contracts permitted by the Commission's rules. Accordingly, consistent with prior Bureau decisions, SLD correctly denied Oak Harbor's requests for support. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the July 13, 2000, Letter of Appeal filed by Oak Harbor School District No. 201, Oak Harbor, Washington, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bruce E. Worley, Oak Harbor School District No. 201,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-480A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-480A1.txt
  • encourage commenters to discuss this issue in response to the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154, 201-205, 251, 252, 256, 271, 303(r), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Commission clarifies the Line Sharing Reconsideration Order as set out above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability and Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Third Report and Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-482A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit „ Released: February 22, 2000 DA 01-482 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR STET INTERNATIONAL NETHERLANDS N.V. TO ACQUIRE DOMESTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINES HELD BY AMERICATEL CORPORATION Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau approves the application requesting Commission consent for STET International Netherlands N.V. to acquire and operate domestic transmission lines held by Americatel Corporation, a subsidiary of ENTEL-Chile. The proposed acquisition of lines is related to an acquisition of corporate control by which STET,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-48A1.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Wells' Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Wells Public Library, Wells, Maine, on June 9, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sandra Broomfield, Wells Public Library, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed June 9, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-506A1.txt
  • responsible for clearly and accurately describing its funding request and for understanding all applicable program rules. The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies program rules, which limit universal service mechanism funds to eligible services only. For that reason, Petersburg's Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Petersburg City Public Schools, dated June 6, 2000, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Herbert H. Morris, Petersburg Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 6, 2000 (Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.txt
  • in any disadvantage to other tariff participants." We, therefore, conclude that good cause exists to grant a waiver of section 69.3(e)(11) to the Acquiring Companies. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by All West Communications, Inc., Carbon/Emery Telecom, Inc., Central Utah Telephone, Inc., Hanksville Telecom, Inc., Manti Telephone Company, Skyline Telecom, UBET Telecom, Inc., and the Qwest Corporation on October 18, 2000, IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-509A1.txt
  • waste, and abuse. By extending this deadline, we provide the independent auditor with more time to complete its work, thereby ensuring a complete and accurate draft audit report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254 and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on July 26, 2000 is GRANTED to the extent indicated herein to allow submission of the draft audit report for the year 2000 on or before April 15, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-511A1.doc
  • to the high-frequency portion of a loop on which a competitor is providing resold voice service. Interested parties filed comments in this proceeding on April 26, 2000, and reply comments on May 11, 2000. On January 29, 2001, NewPath filed a letter with the Commission's Secretary, withdrawing its March 14, 2000 petition. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that this proceeding, CC Docket No. 00-50, IS HEREBY TERMINATED and CC Docket No. 00-50 IS CLOSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle Carey, Chief Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau In the Matter of Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability and Implementation of the Local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-516A1.txt
  • application is otherwise substantially complete.'' Upon review of the record in each of the Requests for Review, we conclude that each presents circumstances factually similar to those in Naperville and meets the standards articulated in Naperville. Accordingly, we remand the applications to SLD for processing pursuant to the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by the named parties to this Order ARE REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division for further consideration as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Paul A. Mulder, Allendale Public Schools,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-523A1.txt
  • applicable statute or rule. Caribou's misunderstanding of program rules provides no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and procedures. Here, we find no grounds for relieving Caribou from having to comply with our policies regarding ineligible services. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 18, 2000 by Caribou School District, Caribou, Maine, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lynn McNeal, Caribou Regional School District, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 18, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-524A1.txt
  • can properly be funded. Given the volume of applications that SLD reviews every year, it is critical that applicants follow instructions and seek support only for eligible services, so that the program can effectively target funds to those services that can be supported. Ultimately, this benefits deserving schools and libraries. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the April 7, 2000, Request for Review filed by Maine School Administrative District #49, Fairfield, Maine, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review by Maine School Administrative District #49 of the Decision of the Universal Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-525A1.txt
  • for ineligible services. Because ineligible equipment constituted more than thirty percent of St. Landry's original funding request, and in light of the prohibition against allowing applicants to amend their applications once the filing window has closed, we affirm SLD's decision to reject St. Landry's funding request in its entirety. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 28, 2000, by St. Landry Parish School District, Opelousas, Louisiana IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lanny Moreau, St. Landry Parish School District, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-545A1.txt
  • Virtual Hipster's original arbitration petition was procedurally defective. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we deny Virtual Hipster's petition for the Commission to assume jurisdiction over an interconnection arbitration between Virtual Hipster and CCC in Nevada. Ordering Clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and sections 0.91, 0.291, 51.801(a), 51.803 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.801(a) and 51.803, the petition for preemption of jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada filed by Virtual Hipster Corporation on December 1, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Petition of Virtual Hipster Corporation Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-578A1.txt
  • or officer responsible for its truthfulness. If the request is in order and if no other issues are present that preclude a grant, the Division will issue an order granting the waiver request. The party receiving such a waiver grant may then pursue equipment certification under the applicable Part 68 rules. ORDERiNG CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the requests for waiver of section 68.317(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 68.317(f), by Tandy Corporation, Walker Equipment Company, Ameriphone, Inc., and Ultratec, Inc., ARE GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-585A1.txt
  • rules. The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies program rules, which limit universal service mechanism funds to eligible services only. Allowing applicants who fail to follow program rules to amend their applications prejudices other applicants who properly completed their applications and sought only eligible services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 12, 1999, by Caddo Parish School Board, Shreveport, Louisiana, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-586A1.txt
  • Team, computer center employees, grounds/maintenance workers, and food service/warehouse workers, which are clearly ineligible for funding under the program rules because they fail to serve an educational purpose. We decline to overturn SLD's decision when the applicant effectively revises its application on appeal. We, therefore, deny Rockwood's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 12, 2000, by Rockwood School District R 6, Eureka, Missouri, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Steve Wester, Rockwood School District R 6, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 12,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-587A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-587A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-587A1.txt
  • where SLD has failed to provide an explanation for its determination of ineligibility, the Bureau has remanded the application to SLD for further consideration. We believe that such action is also appropriate here and shall remand Springfield's application to SLD for further consideration under applicable program rules and policies. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 18, 2000 by Springfield Public Schools, Springfield, Massachusetts, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Springfield's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-588A1.txt
  • find that Western Heights' Request for Review seeking to use this method must be denied. In addition, we reject Western Heights' assertion that this appeal raises a novel issue of policy which must be considered by the full Commission, because as noted above, the Commission has already addressed the issue. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Western Heights School District, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on July 31, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Request For Review by John D. Harrington, Funds for Learning, on behalf of Western Heights
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-648A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-648A1.txt
  • ineligible maintenance costs in its application, we find that the ineligible services requested in FRN 264664 totals less than 30 percent of the total request. We therefore remand Boston Public Library's application to SLD for further consideration and to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter consistent with this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Boston Public Library, Boston, Massachusetts, on June 5, 2000 IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described herein, and is otherwise DENIED. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Boston Public Library's funding application and to issue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-649A1.txt
  • is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing sufficient information in its FCC Form 471 to enable SLD to determine whether the requested services are eligible. In the absence of such information, we believe that SLD was justified in concluding that this request should be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Boston Public Library on May 30, 2000 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as discussed herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Boston Public Library's funding application and to issue a revised Funding Commitment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-650A1.txt
  • our decision in Buffalo and Erie I directly applies and on remand, SLD should review the capabilities and actual use of the Cisco 2501 routers in question to determine whether these routers are discount eligible and consequently, whether the requested operating system and memory upgrades are also eligible for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Buffalo and Erie Public Library on July 11, 2000 is GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and this application is remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-651A1.txt
  • AND ORDERING CLAUSES 14. Based on the foregoing, we direct the NANPA to release an area code for the purpose of relieving the 716 NPA in accordance with the area code relief plan adopted by the NYDPS. 15. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 251, and section 0.91 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, IT IS ORDERED, that the request of the State of New York Department of Public Service for the release of a new area code is granted. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Lawrence G. Malone, General Counsel, NYDPS, to Lawrence E. Strickling, Chief, Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-652A1.txt
  • for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies program rules, which limit universal service mechanism funds to eligible services only. We therefore deny Paducah's Request for Review. 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 7, 2000, by Paducah Public Schools, Paducah, Kentucky, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeff Nelson, Paducah Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 7, 2000 (Request for Review).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-653A1.txt
  • each funding year, administrative necessity requires that each applicant be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. The applicant must ensure that its request for discounts satisfies program rules, which limit universal service funds to eligible services only. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the May 12, 2000 Request for Review filed by Pike County School District, Troy, Alabama, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sherry A. Key and Dr. John R. Key, Pike County School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-654A1.txt
  • year, administrative necessity requires that each applicant be responsible for clearly and accurately describing its funding request and for understanding all applicable program rules. We decline to overturn SLD's decision when the applicant effectively revises its application on appeal. We, therefore, affirm SLD's decision to deny Portland's request for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Portland Public Schools, Portland, Oregon, on February 22, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Chris Bronsema, Portland Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 22, 2000 (Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-655A1.txt
  • it may have otherwise been entitled, and because there is no evidence in SLD's records that Visitation attempted to correct this error at any time prior to approval, we conclude that SLD correctly affirmed its funding commitment based on the total pre-discount cost reported in the applicant's FCC Form 471. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Visitation Academy, dated May 24, 2000, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John H. Leaman, Visitation Academy, Bay City, Michigan, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 24, 2000 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-656A1.txt
  • resources necessary to continue to provide service to their prospective customers. We are encouraged by these states' willingness to work with the FCC and the Bureau to achieve national numbering resource optimization goals. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's Petition for Additional Delegated Authority to Implement Number Optimization Measures and Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's Request for Expedited Ruling and Second Supplement to Petition for Additional Delegated Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures are GRANTED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-659A1.txt
  • representations and the findings of the Oklahoma Commission, we conclude that the petitioners have demonstrated that grant of this waiver request will serve the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Pioneer Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Panhandle Telephone Cooperative, Inc., and EagleNet, Inc., on January 24, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Pioneer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-65A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-65A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-65A1.txt
  • the program that applicants provide accurate information regarding funding requests. The Administrator must be able to reasonably estimate the total demand for support submitted by applicants during each filing period in order to make determinations regarding the availability of funding. We therefore conclude that SLD correctly denied Carl Schurz's appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Carl Schurz High School on May 23, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan M. Harris, Carl Schurz High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 23, 2000 (Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-663A1.txt
  • party other than a LEC. As Verizon made clear in its reply, ``the only collocators that were counted [as using transport owned by a party other than a LEC] used a non-Verizon transport provider.'' IV. ORDERING CLAUSES. 25. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Access Reform Fifth Report and Order, that the two (2) petitions filed by Verizon ARE GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Verizon-East Special Access Basket Metallic Telegraph Voice Grade
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-667A1.txt
  • and 11, Access Service, expanded interconnection service offering. Therefore, those portions of Transmittal No. 1369 which pertain to collocation are suspended for one day and will be subject to the ongoing investigations. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.091, 0.291, the revisions to Bell Atlantic's Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 1 and 11 pertaining to collocation, filed under Transmittal No. 1369, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket Nos. 98-240, 96-165 and 94-97. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-670A1.txt
  • submitted, we conclude that Ameritech, Pacific Bell, and SWBT have satisfied their burdens of demonstrating that they have met the applicable triggers for each of the various services and MSAs for which they request relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by the Ameritech Operating Companies IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.txt
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Samsung Electronics Co., Inc., GVC Corporation, Netopia Inc., Westell Technologies Inc., CastleNet Technology Inc., Korea One Telecommunication Technology, Inc., Archtek Telecom
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-710A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-710A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-710A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ž DA 01-710 Released: March 20, 2001 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR BRIDGECOM INTERNATIONAL, INC. TO ACQUIRE DOMESTIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINES HELD BY TRUCOM CORPORATION Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application requesting Federal Communications Commission (Commission) consent for BridgeCom International, Inc. (BridgeCom), to acquire and operate the domestic transmission lines held by TruCom Corporation (TruCom). The proposed acquisition of lines is related to an acquisition of corporate control by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-735A1.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy Atwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Frontier Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 01-07 ) ) ) I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-736A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-736A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-736A1.txt
  • representative of a service provider taking part in the bidding process, SLD reasonably determined that the Commission's competitive bidding rules were violated under the precedent established in Mastermind. Therefore, SLD properly removed the relevant Forms 470 off its web-site and denied the funding requests in the associated Form 471 applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by A. R. Carethers SDA School on August 25, 2000 IS DENIED, the Request for Review filed by Applegate Adventist Academy on August 25, 2000 IS DENIED, the Request for Review filed by Berean SDA School on August 25, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-747A1.txt
  • Order, we also grant a limited waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding rules. Baldwin may extend their existing contracts for non-recurring services voluntarily until September 30, 2001, without having to comply with the Commission's competitive bidding process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Request for Waiver filed by Baldwin County Board of Education IS GRANTED, and Baldwin's deadline for implementation of non-recurring services IS EXTENDED to September 30, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Baldwin may extend its existing contracts for non-recurring services voluntarily until September 30, 2001,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-756A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-756A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Æ Æ Æ Æ Æ Æ Docket Number 01- 756 Released: March 26, 2001 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION FOR TLA SPECTRUM, LLC. TO ACQUIRE CONTROL OF COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN, INC. Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application requesting consent for TLA Spectrum, LLC (TLA) to acquire control of Communications Design, Inc. (CDI), which provides domestic interstate services pursuant to section 214 authority. The requested authorization is related to an acquisition of corporate control by which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-762A1.txt
  • is consistent with paragraphs 27(c)(7) and 28(a)(7) of the Merger Conditions and should facilitate an adequate and orderly review of the independent auditor's working papers and supporting materials by the Pennsylvania Commission. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the parties' joint request for approval and adoption of the Protective Agreement appended hereto IS GRANTED. Nothing in this Order, or the Protective Agreement appended hereto, shall restrict the Commission's authority to use the information or materials obtained in the course of these proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-773A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-773A1.txt
  • to the FCC Form 471 filing deadline. The record shows that Audrey Pack complied with the program's requirements in providing additional information to SLD on December 13, 2000. Thus, the untimely posting of the FCC Form 470 is not attributable to Audrey Pack. We therefore grant Audrey Pack's waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Audrey Pack Memorial Library, Spring City, Tennessee on July 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein. We direct SLD to process Audrey Pack's FCC Form 471 as timely filed within the filing window. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-774A1.txt
  • Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Company (Administrator), pursuant to which SLD denied Bibb's request to change service providers. On March 12, 2001, Bibb filed a Motion to Withdraw its Request for Review. The Division grants Bibb's Motion to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismisses Bibb's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion to Withdraw filed by Bibb County Board of Education, Centreville, Alabama, on March 12, 2001 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-775A1.txt
  • for a contract that includes both eligible and ineligible products. Given Commission rules and precedent, SLD properly denied Fairfax's entire funding request. Therefore, SLD clearly has authority, under these limited circumstances, to deny funding requests that include both eligible and ineligible services, and we reject Fairfax's claims to the contrary. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 22, 2000 by Fairfax County Public Schools, Fairfax, Virginia, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review by Fairfax County Public Library, of Decision of Universal Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-776A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-776A1.txt
  • purchased.'' The letter also emphasized that ``your response on [the Item 22 Review] worksheets should represent the total of all of the resources available in all of the eligible entities covered by your request.'' Because CMCC failed to comply with these clear directives, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Central Minnesota Computing Center, filed October 13, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael T. Bauer, Central Minnesota Computer Center, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-777A1.txt
  • would face significant additional administrative burdens. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, administrative necessity requires that each applicant be responsible for clearly and accurately describing its funding request and for understanding all applicable program rules. We therefore deny St. John's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. John the Baptist School, Petersburg, Nebraska on May 23, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jean Reicks, St. John the Baptist School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-778A1.txt
  • that as a general matter, an applicant who submits an FCC Form 471 funding request prior to entering into a legally binding agreement with a service provider will be denied funding on that request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Request for Review filed on March 24, 2000 is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that SLD adjust its funding commitment in accordance with this order and the procedures established in the Commitment Adjustment Order II. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-787A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ¨ DA 01-787 Released: March 29, 2001 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR WCAS ENTITIES TO ACQUIRE CONTROL OF BUSINESSS TELECOM, INC. Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau approves the joint application of Business Telecom, Inc. (BTI) and Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe VIII, L.P. and WCAS Capital Partners III, L.P. (collectively, WCAS) for WCAS to acquire control of BTI, which provides domestic interstate services pursuant to section 214 authority.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-793A1.txt
  • under program rules. Therefore, we disagree with SLD's assessment that well over 30 % of the funding request is ineligible under program rules. Accordingly, we grant Chelmsford's request for review and remand its application to SLD, and direct SLD to reconsider this FRN consistent with program rules. V. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 22, 2000, by Chelmsford Public School District, North Chelmsford, Massachusetts, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and remanded to the Schools and Libraries Division. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Chelmsford's funding application and to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-794A1.txt
  • a budget of only $18,000. The information provided by CVA indicates that CVA's available technological and budgetary resources were inadequate, thus CVA failed to demonstrate that it possessed the necessary resources to make effective use of the services for which it requested support. We, therefore, deny CVA's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 26, 2000, by the Children's Village Academy, Kinston, North Carolina, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Monte Nardy, Children's Village Academy, Kinston, North Carolina, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-795A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-795A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-795A1.txt
  • but SLD failed to post them to its web site in a timely manner causing the waiting period to extend past the filing window deadline. In this instance, however, Henderson's defective Form 470, not SLD, caused the posting delay. Therefore, a waiver of the Commission's rules is not warranted. 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by North Country Library System, Watertown, New York, on behalf of Henderson Free Library, Henderson, New York, on June 9, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Yvonne
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-796A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Little Miami failed to file an appeal of the August 10, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Little Miami's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Little Miami Local School District, Morrow, Ohio on May 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from George Long, Little Miami Local School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-797A1.txt
  • public address system, it assigned a ``$0'' amount to the ``[i]nstallation of telephone wiring'' identified in an attachment to its FCC Form 471. Manhasset's application supports SLD's determination that wiring costs included in Manhattan's FCC Form 471 are attributable to an ineligible product rather than to eligible telephone wiring. 11. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 3, 2000, by Manhasset Union Free School District, Westbury, New York IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Winston E. Himsworth, E-Rate Central, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-798A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-798A1.txt
  • rules. The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies the Commission's policies as well as program rules. Here, New Albany's misunderstanding of program rules provides no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corporation, New Albany, Indiana, on May 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dennis A. Cahill, New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-802A1.txt
  • grant of this waiver is conditioned upon PNG's provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by PowerNet Global Communications on March 28, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-803A1.txt
  • upon the provision by Petitioners of customer notification and upon the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Talk.com Inc., Talk.com Holding Corp., Access One Communications Corp., The Other Phone Company, Inc. d/b/a Access One, and OmniCall, Inc. on March 13, 2001 and supplemented on March 28, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-833A1.txt
  • remote access functions. In light of our decision in White Sulphur Springs, we conclude that it is appropriate to remand Hood River's application to SLD for further review. We direct SLD to review Hood River's use of its remote access routers to determine whether such use is eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hood River County School District on May 25, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Administrator to review Hood River's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-834A1.txt
  • for services provided pursuant to existing, binding contracts. Accordingly, SLD posted those services on its website for competitive bidding. Mobile did not wait 28 days before renewing an agreement with a service provider, and did not satisfy the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. The Division, therefore, denies Mobile's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mobile County Public School System, Mobile, Alabama, on August 3, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Margaret Blake, Mobile County Public School System, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-839A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Inc. for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-233, ARE APPROVED. These LATA boundaries are modified solely for the purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-840A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Qwest Corporation for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-01-31, IS APPROVED. These LATA boundaries are modified solely for the purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points in the specific
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-852A1.txt
  • BTCS with more than five times as many computer ports as available computers. We find that neither BTCS nor Total Communications USA demonstrated to SLD that BTCS possessed the necessary resources to make effective use of the services for which it requested support. We, therefore, deny BTCS's request for review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bethlehem Temple Christian School, Duquesne, Pennsylvania, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Benjamin J. Aron, Schwaninger & Associates, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 8, 1999 (Request for Review). 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-854A1.txt
  • have presented these contracts for bidding, we must reject Mercer County's argument that this form has satisfied its competitive bidding obligations on the relevant requests. Instead, we find that on the record before it, SLD correctly denied funding to Mercer County for failure to comply with the competitive bidding rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mercer County School District on June 7, 2000 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Esq., on behalf of Mercer County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 7,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-855A1.txt
  • cannot be construed as a waiver of the 30-day rule, because SLD has no authority to make such a waiver. Since Mass. DOE is not entitled to relief even when the merits are considered, we need not decide whether it would be appropriate to grant a waiver of section 54.720. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 5, 2000 by Massachusetts Department of Education, Malden, Massachusetts, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John Fuller, Massachusetts Department of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 5, 2000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-872A1.txt
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Gallatin River Communications, LLC, Madison River Long Distance Solutions d/b/a Gallatin River Long Distance, Madison Telephone Company, and Madison Network Systems, Inc. on March 8, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-873A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules governing the calculation of discount rates. As in Hamilton County School Board, SLD has properly applied the Commission's rules and the program's procedures. These applicants' challenge to the fairness of the rules is properly initiated by filing a petition for rulemaking, rather than a Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Calhoun County School District on August 10, 2000; by Craig City School District on May 17, 2000; by Holmes County School District on May 8, 2000; by Jackson County School Board on May 12, 2000; by Lake County Schools
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-874A1.txt
  • defining certain incumbent local exchange carrier affiliates as successors, assigns, or comparable carriers under section 251(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. On April 2, 2001, the Competitive Telecommunications Association, on behalf of itself and the Florida Competitive Carriers Association and Southeastern Competitive Carriers Association, filed a letter withdrawing their petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that this proceeding, CC Docket No. 98-39, IS HEREBY TERMINATED and CC Docket No. 98-39 IS CLOSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau See Petition of Competitive Telecommunications Association, Florida Competitive Carriers Association, and Southeastern Competitive Carriers Association Petition on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-876A1.txt
  • use the weighted average discount method described in Hamilton's Request for Review for those discounts. The method described in Hamilton's Request for Review applies only for services shared by multiple schools and only those schools sharing the services-as opposed to all schools in the school district-are included in that calculation. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Hamilton County School Board, Jasper, Florida, on May 9, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patricia Parks, Hamilton County School Board, filed May 9, 2000 (Request for Review).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-877A1.txt
  • properly evaluate Kerman's funding request. Given the phrasing of SLD's request for information on individual hardware costs, we conclude that it was reasonable for Kerman to interpret SLD's inquiry as not requesting information relating to other costs, such as labor. Accordingly, we remand Kerman's application to SLD for further review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 12, 2000, by Kerman Unified School District, Kerman, California, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Library Division to review Kerman's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-891A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss California Youth Authority's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on California Youth Authority's initial request, California Youth Authority may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on January 29, 2001, by California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, Sacramento, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-892A1.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 14, 2001, by Rome City School District, Rome, Georgia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to David
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-908A1.doc
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon the provision of customer notification and the handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the emergency waiver request filed by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation d/b/a Metropolitan Telecommunications a/k/a MetTel on April 4, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-918A1.txt
  • unable to determine which components of the Dukane SmartSystem were deemed ineligible for funding by SLD. Accordingly, we cannot ascertain whether the 30 percent policy was correctly applied in this case. For that reason, we remand Delano Union's application and direct SLD to review the eligibility of the requested services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 9, 2000, by Delano Union, Delano, California, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. We direct SLD to review Delano Union's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance with the above-stated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-920A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Lemoore failed to file an appeal of the April 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Lemoore's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lemoore Union High School District, Hanford, California on February 26, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ellen Kimbriel, Lemoore Union High School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-921A1.txt
  • Christopher-Ottilie has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss St. Christopher-Ottilie's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on St. Christopher-Ottilie's initial request, St. Christopher-Ottilie may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 12, 2001, by St. Christopher-Ottilie, Glen Cove, New York, on behalf of Theresa Paplin School, Glen Cove, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-961A1.txt
  • transaction IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition to Impose Conditions of the Communications Workers of America IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.103. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 0.101, 0.321, 0.51, 0.261, 0.331 and 0.131. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Deborah Lathen Chief, Cable Services Bureau Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See Global Crossing Ltd. Seeks FCC Consent for Transfer of Control of Frontier to Citizens Communications Company, Public Notice, DA 00-2366 (rel. Oct. 19,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1027A1.txt
  • Line Count Information would be released publicly by the Commission upon a proper request under the Freedom of Information Act or other applicable law or regulation, including section 0.442 of the Commission's rules. ordering clause Accordingly, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, IT IS ORDERED that the Request of the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates for a Second Limited Modification of Interim Protective Order GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART to the extent stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A DECLARATION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1066A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1066A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On February 15, 2002, the Idaho Public Utilities Commission filed the above-captioned Petition for Declaratory Ruling for the Release of New Area Codes to Provide Relief for the 208 Numbering Plan Area. On April 29, 2002, it submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Declaratory Ruling IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Declaratory Ruling for the Release of New Area Codes to Provide Relief
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1067A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1067A1.txt
  • May 8, 2002 Released: May 9, 2002 By the Assistant Division Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On April 5, 2002, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio filed the above-captioned Request for Modification of Pooling Rollout Schedule. On May 1, 2002, it submitted a motion to withdraw the above-captioned request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Request for Modification IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Request for Modification of Pooling Rollout Schedule of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1071A1.txt
  • 8, 2002 Released: May 9, 2002 By the Assistant Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On April 4, 2002, the Leap Wireless International, Inc. filed the above-captioned Request for Emergency Assignment of NXX Codes. On April 26, 2002, Leap Wireless International, Inc. submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Emergency Assignment of NXX Codes IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Emergency Assignment of NXX Codes IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-107A1.txt
  • to January 22nd. Notwithstanding this extension for the Bureau to consider comments and to issue its substantive order, Telergy is authorized to discontinue services to any customers who have successfully migrated to other carriers. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Telergy to discontinue domestic telecommunications as it relates to its customers who have failed to migrate their services to other carriers IS DENIED until at least midnight, January 22, 2002, pending further order by the Bureau. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1089A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1089A1.txt
  • for the students in New York City's public schools, the provision of discounted services for administrative entities such as professional development centers is beyond the scope of our statutory authority and would divert support from the program's intended beneficiaries. We therefore affirm SLD's decision to deny discounts to the UFTTC. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New York City Board of Education, Brooklyn, New York, on behalf of applicant United Federation of Teachers Teachers Centers, New York, New York, on May 21, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1090A1.txt
  • of WNYE with NYC BOE does not create eligibility if WYNE is otherwise ineligible. Eligibility is based on the function of the site, not the association with eligible entities. Because WNYE is not eligible to receive discounted local, long distance, and cellular service, we affirm SLD's denial of WNYE's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New York City Board of Education, Brooklyn, New York, on behalf of applicant, NYC BOE/WYNE, New York, New York, on May 21, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1100A1.txt
  • a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b). V. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the revisions filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., under Transmittal No. 629, IS SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date of this order reflecting the suspension. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1101A1.txt
  • window on January 18, 2001. Therefore, we dismiss Amity Regional's Request for Review as moot. Nothing in this Order prevents Amity Regional from appealing the Administrator's Decision on Appeal to the Commission within the 60-day time period allowed for such appeals from the date of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Amity Regional High School, Woodbridge, Connecticut, on August 20, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joseph Campbell, Amity Regional High School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1102A1.txt
  • the July deadline for filing that was given to applicants that met the Year 3 Server Failure Order criteria. Therefore, Bennett has demonstrated that it satisfied the criteria of the Year 3 Server Failure Order and its FCC Form 471 should be considered as timely filed within the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bennett County School District 3-1, Martin, South Dakota on May 30, 2001, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ken Luckert, Bennett County School District 3-1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1103A1.txt
  • Region has failed to demonstrate that it submitted the correct Funding Year 4 FCC Form 471 application in compliance with the required minimum processing standards for Funding Year 4. We further, conclude that, Capitol Region has failed to make a showing warranting relief and we deny its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 2, 2001 by Capitol Region Library Council, Windsor, Connecticut IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kenneth Sutton, Capitol Region Library Council, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1104A1.txt
  • reducing funds available for other applicants. In light of the enormous demand for discounts under the support mechanism, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Charles Gibson Public Library, Buckhannon, West Virginia, on September 20, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Denise Weese, Charles Gibson Public Library, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1105A1.txt
  • signature for purposes of certifying an FCC Form 471. We see no reason in the record before us to deviate from this precedent. Thus, we find that the photocopied signature on Dodge's Funding Year 2 FCC Form 471 meets minimum processing standards, and direct the Administrator to process Dodge's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 25, 2000 by Dodge Memorial Public Library, Tamms, Illinois, IS GRANTED and this matter is remanded to SLD for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1106A1.txt
  • serve the public interest. Freeman has not offered an additional explanation of why it was late in submitting the applications, other than its unsubstantiated claim that it was affected by the server failure. We therefore conclude that Freeman has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which to grant its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Freeman School District No. 358, Rockford, Washington, on June 15, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jan Davis, Freeman School District No. 358, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1107A1.txt
  • the Bureau has held that applicants are not permitted to amend their applications after the close of the filing window to correct errors. We see no reason to depart from this precedent here. Accordingly, we find that the new evidence submitted with the Request for Review does not support relief. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Granger School District No. 204 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Timothy Dunn, Granger School District No. 204, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 17, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1108A1.txt
  • Common Carrier Bureau held that a photocopied signature constitutes a valid signature for purposes of certifying an FCC Form 471. Thus, we find that the photocopied signature on Kanawha's initially submitted Funding Year 4 FCC Form 471 application meets minimum processing standards, and direct the Administrator to process Kanawha's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 24, 2001 by Kanawha Christian School, Kanawha, Iowa IS GRANTED and this matter is remanded to SLD for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Vicki Hillenga,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1109A1.txt
  • post appeals to its website. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under section 1.106(j) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(j), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by E-Rate Central on behalf of Levittown Union Free School District, Levittown, New York, on February 15, 2001, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver filed by E-Rate Central on behalf of Levittown Union Free School District, Levittown, New York, and other unspecified applicants, on February 15, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1110A1.txt
  • this was the only evidence supporting a breakdown of eligible and ineligible maintenance costs, we find that SLD properly attributed the percentage of ineligibility of the LAN hardware to the LAN maintenance contract. We therefore conclude that SLD correctly found 30% or more of the LAN maintenance contract ineligible. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Massillon City School District, Massillon, Ohio, on September 4, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1111A1.txt
  • school to correct the application. We find no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and procedures. Accordingly, we find that SLD appropriately denied Mettawee's request to provide funding for services provided by OneStar and the State of Vermont. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed January 18, 2002 by Mettawee Community School IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy M. Mark, Mettawee Community School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 12, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1112A1.txt
  • and libraries universal service support mechanism. Specifically, Mid Peninsula requests that SLD consider invoices requesting payment for funding request numbers (FRN) 218261 and 218262. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Mid Peninsula's request. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Mid Peninsula's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 4, 2001 by Mid Peninsula School, Rock, Michigan, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tammy Winters, Mid Peninsula School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1113A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Perth Amboy fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Perth Amboy Public Schools, Perth Amboy, New Jersey on October 5, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file the appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1114A1.txt
  • SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Pleasantville has failed to demonstrate the merits of its Request for Review, or good cause for waiving the filing deadline. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Pleasantville's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on July 11, 2001, by Pleasantville Public Schools, Pleasantville, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Addison Williams, Pleasantville Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1116A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ropes Independent School District, Ropesville, Texas, on April 1, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Elbert Wuthrich, Ropes Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1117A1.txt
  • ports, because it is also consistent with the conclusion that the cost of maintaining telephones will be calculated on a per-port basis. Because we find that Rochester sought discounts on ineligible telephone maintenance costs, we affirm SLD's determination that 30% or more of FRN 304074 sought discounts on ineligible services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Rochester Public Library, Rochester, New York, on May 2, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Richard Panz, Rochester Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1118A1.txt
  • that the Funding Commitment Decision Letter was issued and 35 days after the September Request was faxed. Because Yeshiva did not provide SLD with information that supported of the amounts requested in the four FRNs at issue in this appeal in a timely fashion, we deny its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Yeshiva Avir Yakov, Sprint Valley, New York, on May 15, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Charles Bludman, Yeshiva Avir Yakov, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1119A1.txt
  • a timely manner. Here, the record reflects that Arugath did not file its FCC Form 471 within the filing window and Arugath fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find an insufficient basis for waiving the filing window deadline. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Yeshivah and Mesivta Arugath Habosem, Brooklyn, New York, on August 2, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Israel Engelman, Yeshivah and Mesivta Arugath Habosem,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1120A1.txt
  • deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Walker-Hackensack failed to file the instant Request for Review within the requisite 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 2, 2001, by Walker-Hackensack-Akeley Public Schools, Independent School District 113, Walker, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Daniel A. Falk, Walker-Hackensack-Akeley Public Schools, Independent School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1121A1.txt
  • that the relevant information was not ``easily discernable.'' Even if SLD were to consider the contract here, the reference to ``circuits to the [district]'' would not qualify as the sort of unambiguous evidence from which the entities receiving service may be easily discernable. Therefore, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by East Meadow Union Free School District, East Meadow, New York, on July 16, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Winston E. Himsworth, E-Rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1122A1.txt
  • this certification is also put in question where an applicant certifies before the end of the 28-day period. We therefore find that SLD appropriately requires applicants to wait 28 days before signing the certifications. Because New Albany concededly did not comply with this requirement, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corporation, New Albany, Indiana, on October 22, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator By New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1123A1.txt
  • the service provider it had contracted with was indeed a designated telecommunications provider whose status could be appropriately substantiated. Therefore, we find based on the record before us that Autotote is not eligible to receive direct support under the universal service support mechanism for providing telecommunications services to Virginia DOE. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Request for Review filed by the Virginia State Department of Education, Richmond, Virginia, on April 16, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Virginia
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1124A1.txt
  • funding year, we generally find it administratively appropriate to require applicants to strictly adhere to minimum processing standards. Further, the Wireline Competition Bureau has specifically upheld the category of service minimum processing standard. We therefore find that SLD appropriately rejected Coffeeville's application for failure to satisfy this minimum processing standard. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Coffeeville School District, Coffeeville, Missouri, on June 25, 2001 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Aubrey Ray, Coffeeville School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1125A1.txt
  • appeal process. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. We therefore affirm SLD's decision and deny Kimball's Request for Review. III. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 2, 2001 by the Kimball School District 7-2, Kimball, South Dakota, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Patricia Booth, Dakota State University Business and Education
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1126A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Forestburg fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Forestburg Independent School District, Forestburg, Texas on January 11, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1166A1.txt
  • We have reviewed the NECA filing and find that its methodology and computations are consistent with section 64.604(C)(5)(iii) of our rules. We thus approve the proposed modifications of the reimbursement rates for traditional TRS, STS and VRS. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 225 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §225, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 64.604 (c)(5)(iii)(H) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 64.604 (c)(5)(iii)(H), this ORDER is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NECA modify the reimbursement rates for traditional Telecommunications Relay Service providers at the rate of $1.395 per completed interstate conversation minute for the period August 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002, for Speech-to-Speech relay
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1176A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. and BellSouth Corporation for a LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-02-02, IS APPROVED. The LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1183A1.txt
  • to have discounted services for Funding Year 2. SLD denied Blackduck's request because its FCC Form 471 did not meet SLD's minimum processing standards. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has granted the relief that Blackduck is seeking. Blackduck's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Blackduck Public Schools, Blackduck, Minnesota, on August 8, 2000 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tom Mathews, Blackduck Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1184A1.txt
  • connections service that it provided under the schools and libraries universal service mechanism. We have determined, however, that, on April 18, 2002, SLD provided full funding of this invoice. Because SLD has granted the relief that Contra Costa Electric, Inc. is seeking, the Request for Review is dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Contra Costa Electric, Inc. on January 10, 2002 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tracey McDaniel, Contra Costa Electric, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1187A1.txt
  • � � � � h � � � \ DA 02-1187 Released: May 17, 2002 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF MID-HUDSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND TECH VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. TO TVC ALBANY, INC. WC Docket No. 02-47 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the applications to transfer control of the domestic 214 authorizations of Mid-Hudson Communications, Inc. (``Mid-Hudson'') and Tech Valley Communications, Inc. (``Tech Valley'') to TVC Albany, Inc. d/b/a Tech Valley Communications (``TVC''). These transfers are related to a transaction in which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1188A1.txt
  • � � � � h � � � \ DA 02-1188 Released: May 17, 2002 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC. TO TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. WC Docket No. 02-59 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application filed by Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (``TDS'' or Transferee'') to transfer control of the blanket domestic 214 authorizations held by Telecommunications System of New Hampshire, Inc. (``TSNH'') and its subsidiaries, which include Hollis Telephone Company, Inc., and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1189A1.txt
  • p p ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ p ˜ ˜ ˜ d DA 02-1189 Released: May 17, 2002 WIRELINE COMPETITON BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF COUNTRY ROAD COMMUNICATIONS, INC. TO ABRY PARTNERS IV, L.P. WC Docket No. 02-71 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the applications to transfer control of the domestic 214 authorization of Country Road Communications, Inc. (``Country Road'') to ABRY Partners IV, L.P. (``ABRY'') (collectively, ``Applicants''). No comments or petitions to deny were received in response to the public notice announcing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1199A1.txt
  • subject to the investigation initiated in the NYNEX New Virtual Expanded Interconnection Suspension Order. This transmittal will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate refunds that may later prove necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the revisions to Verizon's Virtual Collocated Expanded Interconnection Service filed in Tariff FCC No. 11 under Transmittal No. 192 ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the May 21, 2002 effective date, and investigation of the referenced transmittal IS INSTITUTED and incorporated into CC Docket No. 98-240. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1202A1.txt
  • demonstrate that it submitted a complete Funding Year 4 FCC Form 471 application in compliance with the required minimum processing standards for Funding Year 4. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, CESA has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 22, 2001 by Cooperative Educational Service Agency #2, Milton, Wisconsin IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sharon Webb, Cooperative Educational Service Agency #2, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1203A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on students and staff does not create the special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Macon has not demonstrated the existence of special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we must deny its Waiver Request ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Macon County R-I School District, Macon, Missouri, on January 2, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Harold Brown, Macon County R-I School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1204A1.txt
  • the service provider information number or the service provider name in items 13 or 14 of Block 5. Accordingly, we find that by not providing information in items 13 or 14, Merrimack did not meet minimum processing standards for this request. As a result, we deny Merrimack's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 6, 2001 by Merrimack Valley Library Consortium IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lawrence R. Rungren, Merrimack Valley Library Consortium, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1205A1.txt
  • greater than 30 percent of the cost of the FRN, and therefore properly denied the entire FRN. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New York Military Academy, Cornwall-on-Hudson, on October 18, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Donald Schwegler, New York Military Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1206A1.txt
  • the public interest mandate can be efficiently and effectively fulfilled. Queen of Peace provides no evidence of special circumstances warranting deviation from our rule establishing the filing window deadline. We therefore conclude that Queen of Peace has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) that the Waiver Request filed by Queen of Peace Elementary School, North Arlington, New Jersey, on August 16, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from George Schlitt, Queen of Peace Church,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1207A1.txt
  • cost for the fiber optic build-out is therefore an eligible telecommunications cost. Accordingly, we grant the Request for Review, and remand to SLD for further review of FRN 452541 consistent with this decision. In so doing, we make no final determination as to whether the one-time cost should be funded. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Southwest Virginia Education and Training Network, Abingdon, Virginia, on June 8, 2001, IS GRANTED, and this application IS REMANDED for further review consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1208A1.txt
  • the denial of funding would have a detrimental impact on the school or library in question and that such impact is a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Tuxedo has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Tuxedo Park School, Tuxedo Park, New York, on December 13, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Pearson and Ann Doherty Cooke, Tuxedo Park
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1209A1.txt
  • was Union's responsibility to carefully review its application before submission to SLD and ensure that it complied with program rules and regulations. We therefore find that Union fails to present good cause as to why the Commission's rules should be waived. As a result, we deny Union's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 23, 2001 by Union County School District IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Wayne Goforth, Union County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 23,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1210A1.txt
  • Service Administrative Company (Administrator). Winnisquam seeks review and reversal of SLD's denial of Winnisquam's request to split a funding request between two service providers. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has granted the relief that Winnisquam is seeking. The Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Winnisquam Regional School District, Northfield, New Hampshire, on February 26, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kevin B. Sousa, Winnisquam Regional School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1211A1.txt
  • of the ongoing proceeding. If it were, then the requirement that the proceeding be ``ongoing'' would be meaningless. Therefore, we find that Chawanakee is not entitled to raise a PRA challenge to the application decision, and the Request for Review must be dismissed as untimely in accordance with Commission regulations. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chawanakee Joint Elementary School District, North Fork, California, on September 6, 2001 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Chawanakee Joint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1212A1.txt
  • to an FCC Form 470 posted in a previous year. As a result, Dickenson could not, in any case, support its Funding Year 4 request for month-to-month service by reliance on the Funding Year 1 DIT Form 470. We therefore deny Dickenson's request to substitute a new FCC Form 470. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Dickenson County Public Schools, Clintwood, Virginia, on March 5, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from David C. Yates, Dickenson County Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1224A1.txt
  • is not relevant because the deadline had already passed. Albany County offers no additional reason why it did not meet the deadline. We find that Albany County has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from the general rule, and, therefore, we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Albany County Public Schools, Albany County, Minnesota on August 7, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rocky Tyler, Albany County School District 1, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1225A1.txt
  • relief should be granted because the error was unintentional. It is well established, however, that applicants are responsible for ensuring that their applications are made on the correct forms. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD for substantially the reasons stated in the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by B. F. Jones Memorial Library, Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, on January 28, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Colombo, B.F. Jones Memorial Library, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1226A1.txt
  • and libraries does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we cannot give a waiver based on the premise that the library is small and well-used. We conclude that Central City has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Central City Public Library, Central City, Nebraska, on December 28, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lynn Manhart, Central City Public Library, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1227A1.txt
  • to provide clear evidence that the material was sent by January 18, 2001. If the applicant can submit proof, then the application should be considered within the filing window. If the applicant cannot submit such proof, SLD should treat this application in accordance with its standard procedures for illegible postmarks. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jaffrey-Rindge Cooperative School District, Jaffrey, New Hampshire, on September 4, 2001, IS REMANDED to SLD for further processing consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1228A1.txt
  • is visible, we have accepted receipts from couriers as evidence of when material was sent to SLD. Therefore, we find that Karnes filed its FCC Form 471 application, including the Block 6 certification page and the Item 21 attachments, by the close of the filing window in Funding Year 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Karnes City Independent School District, on August 29, 2001, IS GRANTED, and the matter is remanded to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1229A1.txt
  • is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of its application. We have denied waiver requests based upon an applicant's claim that it misunderstood the program rules. For these reasons, Molalla's contention that it misunderstood the rules does not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Molalla's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Molalla River School District, Molalla, Oregon, on July 2, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Nickless, Molalla River School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1230A1.txt
  • was filed outside the filing window, it has treated this as a request for waiver of the filing deadline and directed Mora to make this request to the Commission. Because we find that this material was timely filed, we need not address Mora's request for a waiver of the deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Mora Public Schools, Mora, Minnesota on August 7, 2001 IS REMANDED to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1231A1.txt
  • have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Lane has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a waiver of the filing deadline, and we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lane Education Service District, Eugene Oregon, on August 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Randy Trummer, Lane Education Service District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1232A1.txt
  • midnight January 20, 2000. If SLD determines that Halifax did attempt to contact SLD directly or through its state coordinator about its inability to electronically file, then Halifax's application should be treated as timely. If SLD determines the applicant did not attempt to do so, then no waiver is appropriate. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services on behalf of North Carolina Department of Commerce - SIPS, Halifax County School District, on May 18, 2001, IS REMANDED to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1233A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1233A1.txt
  • provide during the application review process or during an SLD appeal review, it would eliminate any incentive to comply with the SLD's document demands in a timely fashion. This would significantly increase the administrative burden SLD would face. We, therefore, deny Petitioner's Request for Review and uphold SLD's funding decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 31, 2001, by North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, on behalf of the North Carolina Department of Commerce - SIPS, Wright School, Durham, North Carolina, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1234A1.txt
  • place on the applicant responsibility for complying with our rules and procedures. Ridgefield does not offer any explanation of why its FCC Form 471 application was filed after the filing deadline. Therefore, we conclude that Ridgefield has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Ridgefield Public Schools, Ridgefield, Connecticut, on August 24, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Division Wireline Competition Bureau On August 24, 2001, Ridgefield filed copies of its appeal letter to SLD
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1235A1.txt
  • in the record to indicate that Schechter used the mail to submit a copy of the main portion of its application. Therefore, we find that Schechter did not submit that portion of the application either electronically or by mail within the filing window, and we deny Schechter's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 27, 2001, by Solomon Schechter School of Queens, Flushing, New York, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susanne Felder, Solomon Schechter School of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1236A1.txt
  • SLD's determination that it missed the Funding Year 4 filing deadline for seven applications for discounts under the schools and libraries universal service mechanism. However, since TSBVI filed its Request for Review, SLD has granted the relief that TSBVI was seeking. Therefore, TSBVI's Request for Review is dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Austin, Texas on September 4, 2001, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Craig Abbe, Texas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1237A1.txt
  • responsibility to understand and comply with the program. The circumstances described by Tuscarora do not constitute special circumstances for purposes of our waiver standard. Therefore, we conclude that Tuscarora has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Tuscarora Intermediate Unit 11, McVeytown, Pennsylvania, on September 14, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tony Payne, Tuscarora Intermediate Unit 11, to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1245A1.txt
  • Attn: Andrew Mulitz. Parties shall also serve with one copy: Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 863-2893. V. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, 403, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Qwest Corporation SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Qwest Corporation, a party to this proceeding, SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1253A1.txt
  • without unduly delaying the proceeding. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, at 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by NTELOS, Inc. IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as discussed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Virginia Cellular LLC Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1262A1.txt
  • is no evidence in the official record supporting Bloomingdale's assertion that it did not receive the Funding Commitment Decision Letter. Moreover, Bloomingdale fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review as well as the request for waiver of the appeal filing period, filed on March 18, 2002, by Bloomingdale Elementary Schools, Bloomingdale, Illinois ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1263A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Easton Area failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Easton Area's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Easton Area School District, Easton, Pennsylvania on April 1, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Thomas G. Drago, Easton Area School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1264A1.txt
  • window on January 18, 2001. Therefore, we dismiss Golden Ridge's Request for Review as moot. Nothing in this Order prevents Golden Ridge from appealing the Administrator's Decision on Appeal to the Commission within the 60-day time period allowed for such appeals from the date of the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Golden Ridge School, Fairfield, Montana, on August 20, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Caroline Forseth, Golden Ridge School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1265A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on January 28, 2002, by Wheeling Catholic Elementary School, Wheeling, West Virginia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dr. Judith A. Stechly, Wheeling Catholic Elementary School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1267A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On February 10, 2000, Silver Star Communications filed the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.307(b) of the Commission's rules. On January 23, 2001, Silver Star Communications submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.307(b) of the Commission's rules and regulations IS DISMISSED WITHOUT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1299A1.txt
  • of control of the domestic 214 authorization filed by Conectiv and New RC, Inc., in the above captioned proceeding IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.103. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Application for Authority to Transfer Control of Conectiv Communications, Inc. from Conectiv to New RC, Inc., CC Docket No. 02-2 (filed Dec. 28, 2001). New RC, a holding company, was incorporated under the laws of Delaware on February 9, 2001. PEPCO, an electric utility, provides services to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1301A1.txt
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > R z z ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ z ¢ ¢ ¢ n }ºæc DA 02-1301 Released May 31, 2002 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF MPOWER COMMUNICATIONS CORP. WC Docket No. 02-88 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the domestic section 214 application to transfer control of Mpower Communications Corp. to new shareholders of Mpower Holdings. No comments or petitions to deny were received in response to the public notice announcing that the application had been accepted for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1317A1.txt
  • the program rules, and therefore meets the Minimum Processing Standard for an original ink signature. Thus, we find that Panhandle's application should be processed in accordance with the precedent established in the New Hartford Order. Therefore, we remand Panhandle's application to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Panhandle Public Library Cooperative System on August 15, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Panhandle's application is REMANDED to SLD for further processing in accordance with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1318A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that IT&E has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, IT&E Overseas, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for the territory of Guam, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1323A1.txt
  • the waiver on the specific facts of this case. Where customers would actually lose service if a discontinuance were allowed to go into effect, we would not necessarily reach the same conclusion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i) and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 63.71, section 63.71(c) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED to the extent that ATG may discontinue providing service on June 7, 2002, absent any further comments from affected customers, or further action by the Commission. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1335A1.txt
  • filed the above-captioned Petition for Partial Reconsideration, for Partial Stay, and, in the Alternative, for Partial Waiver of sections 52.20, 52.23, 52.26 and 52.27 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. On March 14, 2002, New York State Telecommunications Association, Inc. submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Partial Reconsideration, for Partial Stay, and, in the Alternate, for Partial Waiver IS GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Partial
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1355A1.txt
  • does not raise issues that warrant investigation. We therefore reconsider, on our own motion, our decision to suspend for five months and investigate BellSouth's Transmittal No. 629 and hereby terminate our investigation of that transmittal. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108, we reconsider, on our own motion, our decision in the Suspension Order to suspend for five months and investigate the revisions filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., under Transmittal No. 629. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-136A1.txt
  • that Saint Mary could easily confirm by searching the posted FCC Form 470s in the Funding Year 2 group, Saint Mary should have understood that its FCC Form 470 would not be valid for Funding Year 3. We conclude that a waiver of the competitive bidding requirements is not appropriate. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Mary School, Putnam, Connecticut, on March 22, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Phyllis A. Hickey, Saint Mary School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1370A1.txt
  • NECA requested that these modifications take effect on July 1, 2002, and remain in effect through June 30, 2003. We have reviewed NECA's filing and find that its proposed formulas are reasonable. Therefore, pursuant to section 69.606(a) of the Commission's rules, we approve the proposed average schedule formulas as submitted in NECA's filing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. on December 28, 2001, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2002, and remain in effect through June 30, 2003. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1377A1.txt
  • our rules that would obviate the need to include advanced services within the price cap indexes and rates, constitutes special circumstances, and such circumstances outweigh any harm to competition. Ordering Clauses 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for services transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2002 Annual Access Tariff Filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Policy Pricing Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-137A1.txt
  • a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because South San Antonio failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 FCDL until August 17, 2000, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss South San Antonio's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 14, 2000, by South San Antonio Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Frank Harmier, South San Antonio Independent School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-138A1.txt
  • we find it inappropriate to take further action unless and until a specific applicant comes before us seeking review. We therefore deny Virginia DOE's Request for Review in its entirety. In doing so, we offer no opinion as to the merits of any other Request for Review pending before us. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Virginia Department of Education, Warsaw, Virginia, on March 14, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lan Neugent, Virginia Department of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1403A1.txt
  • commitment. Accordingly, we find cause to waive section 54.501(c)(2) for the ineligible entities within Shawnee System's Year 1 request in the same manner and for the same reasons as the regulations waived in the Commitment Adjustment Waiver Order. Thus, Shawnee System's Year 1 commitment will not be subject to adjustment. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Shawnee Library System on June 7, 2000, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and the application IS REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1404A1.txt
  • the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Company (Administrator), denying their request for discounted services. On April 22, 2002, the above-captioned entities filed Requests to Withdraw their Requests for Review. The Division grants the above-captioned entities' Withdrawal Requests and, accordingly, dismisses the above-captioned entities' Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Withdrawal Requests submitted by Lee County School District, Bishopville, South Carolina, filed April 22, 2002; and Marlboro County School District, Bennettsville, South Carolina, filed April 22, 2002, ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1405A1.txt
  • employees, consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Fairfield fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review as well as the request for waiver of the appeal filing period, filed on March 13, 2002, by Fairfield Public Schools, Fairfield, Connecticut ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1406A1.txt
  • responsibility for timely submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. Here, Plymouth fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Plymouth School District, Terryville, Connecticut, on November 15, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1407A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Bangor fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Professional Information Networks, Bangor, Maine, on April 24, 2002, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1408A1.txt
  • at least an 82% discount rate. The record demonstrates that for the FRNs at issue, SWCS was entitled to only 60% and 70% discount rates based on the discount matrix. We therefore deny SWCS's Request for Review based on arguments that the services sought were incorrectly classified as internal connections. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 19, 2001, by Southeast Webster Community Schools, Burnside, Iowa, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mike Jorgensen, Southeast Webster Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-141A1.txt
  • review of a decision by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) to cancel a funding award in Funding Year 1 of the schools and libraries universal service mechanism. By letter filed January 10, 2002, NSCI requested that its Request for Review be withdrawn. ACCORDINGLY, IT HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by National School Conference Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, on March 27, 2001 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jerry George, National School Conference Institute, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-142A1.txt
  • we find that Notre Dame's Application 2 should be processed in accordance with New Hartford. The record demonstrates that Notre Dame's Application 2 complied with the program's requirements in all other respects. Under the circumstances, we remand Notre Dame's application to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Notre Dame High School, Riverside, California on August 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Notre Dame's application is REMANDED to SLD for further processing in accordance with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1439A1.txt
  • revenues from non-common carrier video distribution services provided by its Broadcast Services unit are not subject to universal service contribution or reporting requirements. On May 30, 2002, BT North America, Inc. submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Expedited Petition for Clarification IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Expedited Petition for Clarification IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-143A1.txt
  • seeks review of a decision of the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Company (Administrator), denying Arrowhead's request for discounted services. On December 12, 2001, Arrowhead submitted a facsimile withdrawing its Request for Review. The Division grants Arrowhead's Withdrawal Request and, accordingly, dismisses Arrowhead's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Withdrawal Request submitted by Arrowhead Library System, Virginia, Minnesota, on December 12, 2001 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-144A1.txt
  • Horseheads seeks review of SLD's denial of Horseheads' request to have one of its Funding Year 3 funding requests split into two separate requests. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has granted the relief that Horseheads is seeking. Horseheads' Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Horseheads Central School District, Syracuse, New York, on March 23, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Shari Dwyer, Horseheads Central School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1457A1.txt
  • this case, because Brentwood has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Brentwood's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Brentwood's initial request, Brentwood may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Brentwood High School, Brentwood, Missouri, on March 15, 2002, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeanne Buschart, Brentwood High School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1458A1.txt
  • rules and procedures. The applicant ultimately bears the responsibility of completing the relevant forms and submitting them within the established deadline if the applicant wishes to be considered with other in-window applicants. We therefore conclude that Duncanville has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Duncanville ISD, Duncanville, Texas, on May 15, 2001, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Andrew W. Berning, Duncanville Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1459A1.txt
  • school buildings as separate schools was accurate or not. Colonial Beach's assertion that it is listed by the state as a ``school district'' is not persuasive evidence on this point. Under the Commission's rules, school districts are not necessarily equivalent to a single school for purposes of discount rate calculation. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Colonial Beach Schools, Colonial Beach, Virginia, on February 22, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kathleen F. Beane, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 22,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-145A1.txt
  • Block 4. Additionally, as was the case in Naperville, the record reflects that Hudson's application, after corrections performed by SLD during its initial review, is otherwise substantially complete. Therefore, we grant a waiver of the filing window and remand the application to SLD for processing pursuant to the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hudson Falls Central School, Hudson Falls, New York, on June 29, 2000 IS GRANTED and this application is REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division for further consideration as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1460A1.txt
  • Client Service Bureau at 888-203-0733. Lack of Internet access therefore also provides no grounds for relief. Finally, Gladwin pleads that the library is poor and deserving of funding. However, the assertion of need does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Gladwin County Library (Gladwin), Gladwin, Michigan, on September 10, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from David Volk, Gladwin County Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1461A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 7, 2002, by The New School for Enterprise and Development Public Charter School, Washington, DC, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from JoEtta Patterson, The New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1462A1.txt
  • responsibility of adhering strictly to its filing deadlines. In order for the program to work efficiently, applicants must assume responsibility for timely submission of their appeals to SLD if they wish their appeals to be considered on the merits. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Reavis Math/Science Specialty School, Chicago, Illinois, on May 13, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1463A1.txt
  • public interest weighs in favor of correcting the error committed by the Administrator so that Sandhill's applications may be processed without further delay and considered on the merits. Therefore, we direct the Administrator to process both of the Funding Year 2 FCC Forms 471 at issue consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) that the Request for Guidance filed by the Administrator with respect to Sandhill Regional Library System, Rockingham, North Carolina, on May 21, 2001, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to take further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1464A1.txt
  • impractical and unreasonable, as well as the Commission's and the Bureau's long-standing policy of ensuring that applicants for non-recurring services are not penalized for delays that are not within their control. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.507(d), filed by the Buffalo City School District with the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company on May 16, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-146A1.txt
  • requests that the Administrator apportion one of its funding requests, because the service provider no longer provides part of the requested service. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Nelson's request to adjust the funding request. Accordingly, we dismiss Nelson's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 26, 2001, by Nelson County Public Library, Bardstown, Kentucky IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Irene H. Underwood, Nelson County Public Library, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-147A1.txt
  • and reversal of SLD's rejection of Orange County's Funding Year 4 application for discounts under the schools and libraries universal service mechanism. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has granted the relief that Orange County is seeking. Orange County's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Orange County Public Schools, Orlando, Florida, on March 2, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Anne H. Atherton, Orange County Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-148A1.txt
  • Administrator issued a decision on July 13, 2001, denying Prairie Home's appeal to SLD. Because the Administrator's decision was not addressed in the instant Request for Review to the Commission, Prairie Home may request review of the July 13, 2001 decision within 30 days of the release of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Prairie Home Public Schools R-V, Prairie Home, Missouri, on February 13, 2001 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Larry L. Davis, Prairie Home Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-149A1.txt
  • with all relevant rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of correct application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Bonesteel-Fairfax fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bonesteel-Fairfax High School, Bonesteel, South Dakota, on August 3, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Loris J. Lindskov, Bonesteel-Fairfax High School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1500A1.doc
  • NBANC Board of Directors' request to hold a minimum of two face-to-face meetings in Washington, D.C., and a minimum of two telephone conference call meetings each year in lieu of in person quarterly meetings. Conclusion and ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(e) and sections 0.91, 0.291, 52.16, and 52.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.16, and 52.17, this ORDER is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NBANC apply the contribution factor of 0.000043 to the end-user revenue of each telecommunications carrier in the United States for NANP administration cost recovery, and that NBANC's Board of Directors hold a minimum of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1500A1.txt
  • of Directors' request to hold a minimum of two face-to-face meetings in Washington, D.C., and a minimum of two telephone conference call meetings each year in lieu of in person quarterly meetings. IV. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(e) and sections 0.91, 0.291, 52.16, and 52.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.16, and 52.17, this ORDER is hereby ADOPTED. 3 On May 17, 2002, the Telecommunications Access Policy Division released a Public Notice inviting comment on NBANC's proposed contribution factor and fund size estimate, and NBANC's request of a waiver from the requirement that it hold in-person meetings
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-150A1.txt
  • this case, because Shenandoah has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Shenandoah's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Shenandoah's initial request, Shenandoah may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Shenandoah Valley School District, Shenandoah, Pennsylvania, on September 6, 2001, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Annmarie Carter, Shenandoah Valley School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1511A1.txt
  • certified mail envelope, addressed to the correct address for FCC Form 471 submission, and postmarked February 15, 2001. Based on this clear evidence that Baxter submitted its FCC Form 471 after January, we conclude that Baxter did not mail its FCC Form 471 by the close of the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Baxter County Library, Mountain Home, Arkansas, on August 20, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gwen Khayat, Baxter County Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1512A1.txt
  • complete with certification and attachments, was posted by the last day of the window. As noted above, the Block 6 certification page and Item 21 attachments were postmarked on January 22, 2001, and were therefore ineligible to be considered within the filing window. Therefore, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Desert Sands Unified School District, La Quinta, California, on August 22, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from George Araya, Desert Sands Unified School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1513A1.txt
  • assertion that a denial of an application may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we find that Jennings has failed to demonstrate good cause necessary to justify waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jennings City Library, Jennings, Kansas, on August 14, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sonya A. Gillespie, Jennings City Library, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1514A1.txt
  • if it wishes to be considered within the window. An applicant must further take responsibility for the actions of those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Minneapolis Public Schools on behalf of Minneapolis Special School District No. 1, Minneapolis, Minnesota, on September 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1515A1.txt
  • However, Mount Carmel does not address whether it mailed its certification and attachments by the filing deadline. The evidence in the record demonstrates that the Mount Carmel did not file its certification and attachments within the filing window for Funding Year 4. Therefore, Mount Carmel's Request for Review is denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mount Carmel School, Saipan, Northern Marianas Islands, on September 4, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Linze McGilvrey, Mount Carmel School, to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1516A1.txt
  • the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Randolph School District, Randolph, Vermont, on September 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Stephen Metcalf, Randolph School District, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1517A1.txt
  • for Funding Year 4 is whether the entire application, complete with certification and attachments, was posted by the last day of the window. St. Mary's Block 6 certification page and Item 21 attachments were postmarked on January 19, 2001, and was therefore ineligible to be considered within the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Mary's School-Rosebank, Staten Island, New York, on September 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Virginia Savarese, St. Mary's School-Rosebank, to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1518A1.txt
  • the past, the assertion that a denial of an application may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, San Benito has failed to demonstrate good cause to justify waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by San Benito Literacy Center, San Benito, Texas, on September 19, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ron Rogers, San Benito Literacy Center, to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1519A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1519A1.txt
  • to understand and comply with the program's rules and procedures. Sangerville does not offer any reasons why a waiver of the Commission's rules should be granted. Therefore, we conclude that Sangerville has failed to demonstrate a sufficient basis for a waiver of the deadline, and we deny its waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sangerville Public Library, Sangerville, Maine, on September 12, 2001, and its request for waiver of the Funding Year 4 filing deadline ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1520A1.txt
  • for FCC Forms 471 must be postmarked no later than the close of the filing window. The particular facts of this case do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School Administration District 53, Pittsfield, Maine, on August 15, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Richard K. Woodbury, School Administration District 53 (Pittsfield),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1521A1.txt
  • for FCC Forms 471 must be postmarked no later than the close of the filing window. The particular facts of this case do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wayzata Public Schools, Plymouth, Minnesota, on September 12, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mark Manning, Wayzata Public Schools, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1522A1.txt
  • past, the assertion that a denial of an application may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we find that Wilmington has not demonstrated special circumstances warranting a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wilmington Public Schools, Wilmington, Massachusetts, on February 27, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Louise Leland, Wilmington Public Schools, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1530A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ¹ > R z z ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ z ¢ ¢ ¢ n DA 02-1530 Released: June 28, 2002 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF TELIGENT, INC. WC Docket No. 02-103 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the domestic section 214 application to transfer control of Teligent Services, Inc. (``TSI''), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Teligent DIP that holds domestic section 214 authority, from Teligent DIP to New Teligent. No comments or petitions to deny were received in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1535A1.txt
  • Erie has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Lake Erie's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Lake Erie's initial request, Lake Erie may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 23, 2002, by Lake Erie Educational Computer Association, Elyria, Ohio, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lloyd Wright, Lake Erie Educational Computer Association,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.txt
  • a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the 2002 annual access tariffs of ACS of Anchorage, Inc., the National Exchange Carrier Association, VALOR Telecommunications Enterprises, LLC, and Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation ARE SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each local exchange carrier required to suspend its tariff
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1563A1.txt
  • burdens on NECA, its directors, and member companies while the Commission continues to review how it should modify the election processes for NECA's Board of Directors. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), (j), and 201-205, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the annual election requirements in section 69.602 filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review-Requirements Governing the NECA Board of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1588A1.txt
  • not provide grounds for relief, since any potential applicant can obtain forms and opening and closing dates for the application window by calling SLD's Client Service Bureau at 888-203-0733. The assertion of financial need does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Deer Lodge, Holy Ghost, and Seton on April 10, February 28, and March 6, 2002, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.502, 54.503.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1610A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Escuela Moises Melendez's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Escuela Moises Melendez's initial request, Escuela Moises Melendez may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 29, 2002, by Escuela Moises Melendez, San Juan, Puerto Rico, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Electronic mail from Ramonita Vazquez Diaz, Escuela Moises Melendez,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1611A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1611A1.txt
  • of the applications may have a detrimental impact on schools and libraries does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD for substantially the reasons stated in the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Atchison Public Schools, Atchison, Kansas, on July 23, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dr. Corbin Witt, Atchison Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1612A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1612A1.txt
  • for purposes of certifying a FCC Form 471. We find no reason in the record before us to deviate from this precedent. Thus, we find that the photocopied signature on Fayetteville's Funding Year 2001 FCC Form 471 meets minimum processing standards, and direct the Administrator to process Fayetteville's application. 5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 12, 2001 by Fayetteville Public Library, Fayetteville, Arkansas, IS GRANTED and this matter is remanded to the Administrator for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Steven Thomas,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1613A1.txt
  • of adhering strictly to its filing deadlines. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Messmer Catholic Schools, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on April 23, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1614A1.txt
  • Attachment, but denied the application again for lack of a response. The only issue before us is SLD's initial denial of St. Mary's application based on the absence of the Item 21 attachments. Because SLD reversed that decision, we must dismiss St. Mary's School's Request for Review as moot. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Mary's School, Manchester, Iowa, on August 6, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joe Bearns, St. Mary's School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1615A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1615A1.txt
  • meet the filing window resulting from the need to file a corrected version after a minimum processing standards rejection is not a special circumstance warranting waiver of the window. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD for substantially the reasons stated in the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Mary's School, East Dubuque, Illinois, on July 16, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Nauman, St. Mary's School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1616A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1616A1.txt
  • meet the filing window resulting from the need to file a corrected version after a minimum processing standards rejection is not a special circumstance warranting waiver of the window. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD for substantially the reasons stated in the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Town of North Providence School Department, North Providence, Rhode Island, on July 31, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Wayne Riendeau, Town
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1617A1.txt
  • ``part of the same application,'' were not also granted. However, the reason for the difference in outcomes is clear. In FCC Form 471 App. No. 152152, the signature date was April 5, 1999, not March 6, 1999, and thus, it did not indicate that a competitive bidding violation had occurred. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Onondaga Cortland Madison BOCES, Syracuse, New York, on August 18, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lawrence Dismore, Onondaga Cortland Madison BOCES, to Federal Communications Commission. filed August 18,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-166A1.txt
  • Commission's order. We grant an extension of time until March 21, 2002 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. An extension of time will afford the Bureau an opportunity to evaluate and consider the issues raised, while preserving the public's ability to comment on the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to March 21, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Section 272(d) Biennial Audit Procedures, CC Docket No. 96-150, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 02-1 (rel. Jan. 10, 2002). (...continued from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1672A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, ERIE 2 BOCES fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by ERIE 2 - Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Fredonia, New York, on May 24, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1673A1.txt
  • of an application may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library does not create the special circumstances that warrant waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Lineville-Clio has not demonstrated a sufficient basis for a waiver of the deadline, and we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lineville-Clio Community School District, Lineville, Iowa, on January 30, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert McCurdy, Lineville-Clio Community School District, to the Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1674A1.txt
  • decisions on its behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, St. Patrick fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 5, 2002, by St. Patrick School, White Lake, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Daniel Marsh and Linda Meese, St. Patrick School,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1675A1.txt
  • inaction of those employees, consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely applications on its behalf. Here, Weyauwega-Fremont fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed May 22, 2002, by Weyauwega-Fremont High School, Weyauwega, Wisconsin, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gerald Pardun, Weyauwega-Fremont High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1676A1.txt
  • Item 11 of the Form 470, that a competitive bidding violation had occurred, and that the Academia Form 470 was therefore invalid under Mastermind. Because all six of the funding requests in the Academia Form 471 relied on this invalid Form 470, SLD correctly denied funding for the entire application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Consorcio de Escuelas y Bibliotecas de Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Academia Adventista del Oeste, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, on November 29, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1732A1.txt
  • a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Tariff FCC No. 1, Transmittal No. 22 of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. IS SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date of this order reflecting the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1741A1.txt
  • matter shall continue to be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements previously established in this proceeding remain in effect. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(j) and 155(c), and authority delegated thereunder pursuant to §§ 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding is extended until August 5, 2002, and the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding is extended until August 26, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). Review of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1747A1.txt
  • the LATA in which the caller is situated. BellSouth and Verizon may thus offer the services notwithstanding the general ban on BOC provision of interLATA services contained in section 271(a). ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 10, 201-205, 271-272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154, 160, 201-205, 271-272, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that BellSouth's petition for a waiver of the Computer III CEI requirements for the provision of nonlocal operator-assisted reverse directory services and nonlocal electronic reverse directory services, and for the provision of the expanded reverse search capabilities described herein in connection with its direct access to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-174A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Guamcell has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. d/b/a Guamcell Communications IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for the territory of Guam, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the Common Carrier Bureau to the Universal Service Administrative Company.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1769A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1769A1.txt
  • the incumbent average schedule company and the CETC based on the voluntary revision. We find that NECA's proposal regarding the reporting of quarterly line counts and loop cost data upon the entry of a CETC into average schedule company's study area is consistent with section 36.612 of the Commission's rules. ordering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule cost-per-loop formula proposed by NECA on October 1, 2001, for high-cost loop support IS ADOPTED, effective January 1, 2002. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that NECA's proposed methodologies for calculating safety
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1781A1.txt
  • manner do not generally justify waiver of filing deadlines. Applicants that wait until the last minute before submitting their appeals risk untimely filing. Because Alameda failed to file a timely appeal, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Alameda's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Alameda County Office of Education, Hayward, California on June 21, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Alan Arjo, Alameda County Office of Education, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1782A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1782A1.txt
  • program. Accordingly, if there are unused Funding Year 2000 funds remaining after the second quarter 2003, such funds will be used in subsequent funding years, not Funding Year 2000. Thus, additional funds will not be made available to Funding Year 2000 applicants and we therefore deny Houston's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Houston Independent School District on April 18, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1783A1.txt
  • while carrying out its obligation to guard against the occurrence of errors and fraud. If applicants are permitted to amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 18, 2001 by Indiana Intelenet Commission, Indianapolis, Indiana, IS DENIED. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Schools and Libraries Division review its treatment of Block 5, pages 2, 3, and 14 from Intelenet's Application Number 201666 and, if
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1784A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1784A1.txt
  • one of the groups of entities listed in Block 4 of the application. Therefore, SLD could easily determine from the application what entity or entities would be receiving the requested services. Accordingly, we find that the totality of the circumstances warrant relief and grant in part Marmot's Request for Review. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Marmot Library Network, Inc., Grand Junction, Colorado, on July 23, 2001 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and we REMAND this matter to the Administrator for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1785A1.txt
  • applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and procedures. Accordingly, the burden of supporting the requested discount level falls on the applicant, School for Language has failed to meet that burden for the funding requests at issue in the instant appeal. Thus, we deny School for Language's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the School for Language and Communication Development on October 18, 2001 IS DENIED. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Schools and Libraries Division review the School for Language and Communication Development's funding commitments for prior funding years and,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1787A1.txt
  • this case, because Closter has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Closter's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Closter's initial request, Closter may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 21, 2002 by Closter Board of Education, Closter, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Barbara Mulholland, Closter Board of Education, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1789A1.txt
  • applicants. Instead, the Commission ordered the filing window deadline waived ``for the applicants that meet the standards set forth in this Order.'' We conclude that the Administrator's request to grant waivers for Franklin and Henry is consistent with the principle and scope of the Year 3 Server Failure Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.702(c) that the Request for Waiver by the Universal Service Administrative Company concerning Franklin Township Community School Corporation and Henry County Schools filed on November 27, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to take further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1790A1.txt
  • record, however, we find that SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Invoice Deadline Extension Request, approving Lincoln's request for a 60-day extension of the deadline for submission of its invoice number 289253 from the date of the issuance of this decision. Therefore, we dismiss Lincoln's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lincoln School, Dumont, New Jersey, on April 17, 2002, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dennis Tarantino, Lincoln School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1791A1.txt
  • service support mechanism. Specifically, SLD denied Bartlett Elementary's request for discounts for telecommunications services, Funding Request Number (FRN) 810358. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD reconsidered its denial and approved in full its request for discounted services. Therefore, we dismiss Bartlett Elementary's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School Administrative Unit #19, School Administrative, New Hampshire on behalf of Bartlett Elementary School, on May 10, 2002 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1792A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1792A1.txt
  • support mechanism. Specifically, SLD denied School Administrative's request for discounts for telecommunications services, Funding Request Number (FRN) 810121. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD reconsidered its denial and approved in full its request for discounted services. Therefore, we dismiss Maple Avenue Elementary's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School Administrative Unit #19, Goffstown, New Hampshire, on behalf of Maple Avenue Elementary, on May 10, 2002 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1793A1.txt
  • this case, because Sheldon has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Sheldon's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Sheldon's initial request, Sheldon may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sheldon Independent School District, Houston, Texas, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Paul Hill, Sheldon Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1794A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Tennessee School Board's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Tennessee School Board's initial request, Tennessee School Board may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 11, 2002 by Tennessee School Boards Association, Nashville, Tennessee, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tammy Grissom, Tennessee School Boards Association, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-180A1.txt
  • Union's initial request with respect to SLD application number 234939, Alisal Union may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. For these reasons, with respect to SLD application number 234939, we dismiss Alisal Union's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Alisal Union School District, Salinas, California October 12, 2001, IS DENIED IN PART and IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Glenn
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-181A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, All Saints' fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by All Saints' Elementary School, Brooklyn, New York on December 28, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-182A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Dixon fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Dixon Public Library, Dixon, Illinois November 30, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1833A1.txt
  • in accordance with our rules. Additionally, Vitelco has revised its allocation of GSF investment in order to assign a portion to the billing and collection category, and has filed a revised tariff to reflect this modification. In light of this revision, we find no reason for further investigation of Vitelco's annual access tariff rates. ordering clauses Accordingly, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.113 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.113, WE RECONSIDER ON OUR OWN MOTION our decision in the Suspension Order, WCB/Pricing 02-12, DA 02-1555, to suspend and investigate the 2002 annual access tariff rates of ACS of Anchorage, Inc., the National Exchange Carrier Association, VALOR Telecommunications Enterprises, LLC, and Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-183A1.txt
  • has been extended by an additional 30 days for requests for review, such as the September 14, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter, East Central's October 15, 2001 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant East Central's appeal and direct SLD to review East Central's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by East Central Board of Cooperative Services, Berthoud, Colorado on December 7, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Terry Parrish, East Central Board of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-184A1.txt
  • the error did not occur until SLD acted on Marysville's appeal in its November 28th decision. Because Marysville failed to file an appeal of the October 13, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Marysville's Appeal to SLD as untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Marysville Public Schools, Marysville, Michigan on December 6, 2000 and June 29, 2001 ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patricia L. Speilburg, Marysville Public Schools, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-185A1.txt
  • Lady has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Our Lady's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Our Lady's initial appeal, Our Lady may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Our Lady Queen of Peace School, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on April 20, 2001, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Laurence Mala, Our Lady Queen of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-186A1.txt
  • request with respect to SLD application numbers 248651 and 248803, Strathmore may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. For these reasons, with respect to SLD application numbers 248651 and 248803, we dismiss Strathmore's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Strathmore Union High School, Strathmore, California on September 20, 2001, IS DENIED IN PART and IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1885A1.txt
  • II Designation Order, Bell Atlantic New Expanded Interconnection Suspension Order, and NYNEX New Virtual Expanded Interconnection Suspension Order. This transmittal will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate refunds that may later prove necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, the revisions to Verizon's IBT Service relating to Collocated Interconnection Service filed in Tariff FCC Nos. 1 and 11 under Transmittal No. 224 ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the August 3, 2002 effective date, and investigations of the referenced transmittal are instituted and incorporated with CC Docket Nos. 94-97, 96-165, and 98-240. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1886A1.txt
  • a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Tariff FCC No. 1, Transmittal No. 657 of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. IS SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date of this order reflecting the suspension. BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-188A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Westport Edison fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Westport Edison Academy, Kansas City, Missouri on January 3, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-189A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Wheeler fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wheeler Independent School District, Wheeler, Texas on December 10, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1911A1.txt
  • note that nothing in this Order relieves e.spire from any obligations that it may have under relevant state law or regulation regarding the discontinuation of service to its customers. III ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, that the application of e.spire to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, consistent with its obligation to continue providing service to the customers identified in the body of this order and to facilitate the migration of those customers to other carriers. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1926A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of BellSouth Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 02-24 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1961A1.txt
  • 4 „ ˜ 4 È È ð ð ð ð ð È ð ð ð ¼ 4 4 DA 02-1961 Released: August 8, 2002 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF U.S. TELEPACIFIC CORPORATION WC Docket No. 02-140 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the domestic section 214 application of U.S. Telepacific Corp. d/b/a TelePacific Communications (``TelePacific'') for authorization to undergo a transfer of control. No comments or petitions to deny were received in response to the public notice announcing that the application had
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1970A1.txt
  • the deadline be extended for Funding Request Numbers (FRN) 478205, 478207, 478210, and 481289. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Peru's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRNs 478205, 478207, 478210, and 481289. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Peru's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 20, 2002, by Peru Central School District, Peru, New York, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bonnie L. Berry, Peru Central School District, Peru,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1971A1.txt
  • be open and fair is still present in this circumstance, deviation from Mastermind would not better serve the public interest. Finally, Dickenson's argument that Mastermind's benefits do not justify its costs is a disagreement with the basic rule of Mastermind, not a special circumstance warranting a deviation from that rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Dickenson County Public Schools, Clintwood, Virginia, on June 3, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Petition for Reconsideration of Request for Review of the Decision of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1972A1.txt
  • The FCC Form 471 signed on December 19, 2000 that accompanied East Washington's Request for Review has no bearing because it was never properly filed with SLD. We affirm SLD's decision to reject both of East Washington's FCC Form 471 applications, and, therefore, deny East Washington's Request for Review. 13. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by East Washington School Corporation, Pekin, Indiana, on April 16, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gregory Powell, East Washington School Corporation, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1973A1.txt
  • for timely submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. Here, Inland Lakes fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Inland Lakes Schools, Indian River, Michigan, on June 28, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1974A1.txt
  • enough information. SLD reviews and processes thousands of applications each year, and therefore it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant responsibility for complying with the program's rules and procedures. We therefore find that Quincy has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Quincy School District 172, Bloomingdale, Illinois, on August 13, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jerry Steinberg, Telesolutions Consultants, on behalf of Quincy School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1975A1.txt
  • impractical and unreasonable, as well as the Commission's and the Bureau's long-standing policy of ensuring that applicants for non-recurring services are not penalized for delays that are not within their control. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.507(d), filed by the Chicago Public Schools on June 10, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Funding Year 2001 deadline for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1976A1.txt
  • the Correction Request. SOCA expresses concern that SLD intends now to deny the FRN completely. However, SLD has already issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter that, inter alia, awarded funding for FRN 633750 in the amount stated in the RAL. This part of the Request for Review is therefore moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by SouthWest Ohio Computer Association, Hamilton, Ohio, on August 13, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by SouthWest Ohio Computer Association,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1977A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1977A1.txt
  • pre-discount amount requested in FRN 406031, $7,200 of the cost (or 37.5% of the total request) was for ineligible services. SLD therefore properly denied Eureka's funding request because more than 30% of the request was for ineligible services. We thus uphold SLD's funding decision and deny Eureka's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Eureka Unified School District 389, Eureka Kansas, on February 16, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Leo Davis, Eureka Unified School District 389, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1978A1.txt
  • School has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Illinois School's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Illinois School's initial request, Illinois School may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Illinois School for the Deaf, Jacksonville, Illinois, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Heinemann, Illinois School for the Deaf, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1979A1.txt
  • the requirement that applicants submit a signed Block 6 Certification. We find no reason to depart from that standard, and in so doing, we reemphasize that the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided properly rests with the applicants themselves. We therefore deny Watervliet's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 23, 2000, Watervliet School District, Watervliet, New York, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from John Heid, Watervliet School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 23,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1980A1.txt
  • days before entering an agreement with the service provider. By completing and signing the application before the waiting period expired, Wexford-Missaukee effectively indicated that it had ceased consideration of competitive bids, thereby undermining the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. We therefore uphold the Administrator's decision and deny Wexford-Missaukee's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wexford-Missaukee Independent School District, Cadillac, Michigan, on October 9, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lynn Bollman, Wexford-Missaukee Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1981A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Jumoke Charter fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jumoke Charter School, Hartford, Connecticut, on June 21, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1982A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1982A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1982A1.txt
  • 22, 2001, was incomplete and ineffective, for lack of a certifying signature. Patton Elementary's error was not remedied by the resubmission of a signed application on March 19, 2001, because the deadline for the Funding Year 2001 FCC Form 471 was that it must be postmarked by January 18, 2001. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by General George Patton Elementary School, Riverdale, Illinois, on September 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert Charnot, General George Patton School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1983A1.txt
  • Because West Oso filed outside the filing window, it does not have priority status over any requests filed within the filing window. Therefore, we conclude that West Oso has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we deny its Waiver Request ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Oso Independent School District, Corpus Christi, Texas, on January 18, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ruben Corkill, West Oso ISD, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1984A1.txt
  • requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Numbers (FRN) 392767 and 338888. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Pan United's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRNs 392767 and 338888. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Pan United's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 18, 2002, by Pan United Corporation, Edison, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from David Lin, Pan United Corporation, Edison, New Jersey, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1985A1.txt
  • libraries universal service mechanism. Specifically, Riverdale requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 421251. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Riverdale's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 421251. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Riverdale's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 20, 2002, by Riverdale School District, Muscoda, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Thomas N. Yager, Riverdale School District, Muscoda, Wisconsin, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1986A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1986A1.txt
  • strict adherence to the general rule. A rule, therefore, may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. In the instant case, we conclude that Ellensburg fails to demonstrate special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed January 3, 2002, by Ellensburg School District No. 401, Ellensburg, Washington, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Baker, Ellensburg School District No. 401, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1991A1.txt
  • 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 6, 2001, by International Telcom Ltd., IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Anita Cheng Assistant Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review by International Telcom Ltd. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, filed November 6,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-19A1.txt
  • to better meet those obligations. We believe that the likelihood that CPN information will be unlawfully disclosed is minimized, and hence that Metrocare's concerns, as well as callers' legitimate expectations of privacy, are adequately addressed. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that INSIGHT 100, Inc.'s petition for waiver of section 64.1601(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 64.1601(b), IS GRANTED to the extent described in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective thirty (30) days from the date of its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2007A1.txt
  • is readily apparent. Unlike Arlington, the school system did post a new FCC Form 470 bidding those services. Because we find that Arlington did not post its new contracts for bidding in Funding Year 2001, we find that SLD correctly determined that Arlington had not satisfied the competitive bidding requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Arlington County Department of Libraries, Arlington, Virginia, on September 5, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Ann Friedman, Arlington County Department of Libraries, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2008A1.txt
  • before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Wireline Competition Bureau (previously the Common Carrier Bureau) has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. We, therefore, deny Beulah's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Beulah Public Schools, Beulah, North Dakota, on October 9, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Wilfred Volesky, Beulah Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2009A1.txt
  • the first instance and determine what amount of funding, if any, is supported by the new bills and spreadsheets, we remand the application to SLD for consideration of FRN 594956 in light of Carrollton's additional evidence. We affirm, however, that the ultimate burden of proving eligibility remains with the applicant. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District, Farmers Branch, Texas, on March 11, 2002 IS GRANTED and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Bureau Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dr.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2010A1.txt
  • in a timely manner. We also have held that the assertion of financial need does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. We conclude that the circumstances presented by Overton and Chrisman are insufficient to warrant a deviation from the general rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Chrisman Public Library, Chrisman, Illinois, and Overton Public School District, Omaha, Nebraska, on January 16, and April 16, 2002, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2011A1.txt
  • Appeal) still contained the incorrect OMB-approved form. Fair Lawn then filed the instant Request for Review. Fair Lawn again challenges SLD's decision to deny File Number NEC.471.11-19-99.01100003. Because the June 27, 2001 decision disposed of the factual and legal issue, we dismiss Fair Lawn's Request for Review without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Fair Lawn Board of Education, Fair Lawn, New Jersey, on January 11, 2002, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joanne Wilson, Fair Lawn Board of Education, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2012A1.txt
  • have we found any such evidence in the record. As noted above, the two award dates that are supported by the record are both prior to the Kenedy Form 470's allowable contract date. Therefore, we find that SLD correctly concluded that Kenedy did not satisfy the Commission's competitive bidding rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Kenedy Public Library, Kenedy, Texas, on February 28, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sylvia Peña, Kenedy Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2013A1.txt
  • file its initial appeal of the July 24, 2001 Postcard in the appropriate manner and because its subsequent appeal of the postcard was filed outside the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Elizabeth's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Elizabeth Elementary School, Wilmington, Delaware on January 9, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan Stuchlik, Office of Senator Thomas R. Carper on behalf
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2014A1.txt
  • processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. In particular, failure to comply with the competitive bidding requirements must result in a denial of support by SLD. The Division, therefore, denies Thomasville's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Thomasville City Schools, Thomasville, Georgia, on January 2, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James S. Cable, Thomasville City Schools, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2015A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2015A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2015A1.txt
  • first two pages of Wynot's form, as noted, had the date of September 1999. In addition, as we have stated before, the assertion that denial of its application may have a detrimental impact on schools and libraries does not provide grounds for relief from a failure to satisfy program rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wynot Public School, Wynot, Nevada, on February 14, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau See Letter from Carol Tramp, Wynot Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2016A1.txt
  • unavailable, Yeshiva could still have submitted one of the alternative means of documenting its ability to pay, and obtained copies of its service contracts from Smart Telecom, its service provider. Because Yeshiva did not comply with or even respond to SLD's follow-up documentation requests, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Yeshiva Chasdei Torah, Brooklyn, New York, on April 3, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Aaron Katz, Yeshiva Chasdei Torah, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2025A1.txt
  • amount, assuming a payment date of August 30, 2002. If the payment date should slip beyond August 30, ACS must calculate interest on the overcharges until the date the refunds are issued. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the rate refund plan filed by ACS of Anchorage, Inc., subject to the application of interest as delineated at paragraph 3 of this order, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief Pricing Policy Division Investigation of Tariffs Filed by ACS of Anchorage, Inc., and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2039A1.txt
  • a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Transmittal Nos. 1312, 20, 77, 772, and 2906, respectively, Tariffs FCC Nos. 2, 1, 1, 39, and 73 of the Ameritech Operating Companies, the Nevada Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Bell Telephone Company, the Southern New England Telephone Companies, and the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ARE SUSPENDED for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2055A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2055A1.txt
  • subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, Tariff FCC Nos. 1, 11, 14 and 16, Transmittal No. 226 of the Verizon Telephone Companies IS SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Verizon Telephone Companies SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date of this order reflecting the suspension. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2140A1.txt
  • a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Transmittal No. 232, Tariff FCC Nos. 1 and 11 of the Verizon Telephone Companies ARE SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Verizon Telephone Companies SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date of this order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2141A1.txt
  • subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, Tariff FCC No. 5, Transmittal No. 951 of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. IS SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date of this order reflecting the suspension. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-215A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Petitions for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services for Pacific Bell Telephone Company ) ) ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 02-03
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-218A1.txt
  • for Review by Alpine County Unified School District, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., File No. NEC.471.01-24-00.5400004, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, Order, DA 02-75 (Acc. Pol. Div. rel. January 14, 2002) and vacates that order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the following applicants SHALL SUBMIT to SLD, postmarked within 60 days of the date of the release of this Order, any such evidence as required by the terms of this Order concerning the date of the filing of their applications: Alpine County Unified School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2203A1.txt
  • us to issue an order deferring action in this case. Moreover, approval of the preliminary Settlement Agreement by the judge in the state court proceedings would resolve the issues involved to the satisfaction of all parties to the litigation. In conjunction with this, we suspend the filing of reply comments until further notice. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 & 0.291, that further proceedings in this Docket ARE HELD IN ABEYANCE pending the outcome of the Illinois court's fairness hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the date for filing reply comments is suspended until further notice.. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard D. Lerner Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Public Notice, Comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2214A1.txt
  • two-week extension. Accordingly we grant CUSC's request. Parties may file responses by September 23, 2002 and replies by October 7, 2002. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the Competitive Universal Service Coalition IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn, Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division See National Telecommunications Cooperative Association, Petition for Rulemaking to Define ``Captured'' and ``New'' Subscriber Lines for Purposes of Receiving Universal Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2230A1.txt
  • hereby terminate these two dockets. Qwest further expressed its intention to ``file a new application soon'' with respect to these states, and to request that the Commission incorporate the existing records in these dockets into the new application. We will consider such a request once Qwest files its new application. Accordingly IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the proceedings in WC Dockets 02-148 and 02-189 ARE TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Peter A. Rohrbach, Counsel for Qwest Communications International Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Dockets No. 02-148 and 02-189 (filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-223A1.txt
  • be allowed to substitute a new provider for NTS in their applications. However, changing the service provider from whom they are seeking services will not alter the invalidity of their Forms 470, and thus provide no basis for granting applications based on those Forms 470. We therefore deny the request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on behalf of the above-captioned Petitioners on October 6, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John L. Hampton, Lawrence Kansas, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 6, 2000 (Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2240A1.txt
  • of adhering strictly to its filing deadlines. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its appeals to SLD if it wishes its appeals to be considered on the merits. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by The Baltimore Academy, Baltimore, Maryland, on June 26, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2241A1.txt
  • a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. Thus, Brandon fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Brandon School, Natick, Massachusetts, on June 13, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2242A1.txt
  • notice is the release date. The release date of the decision Chichester seeks to have reviewed was April 11, 2002. Chichester's Petition bears a date-stamp of July 8, 2002, the date of its receipt by the Commission. The Petition was filed 88 days after public notice and hence is untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Chichester School District, Boothwyn, Pennsylvania, on July 8, 2002 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joyce Voshell, Chichester School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2243A1.txt
  • manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. Thus, Graydon Manor fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Graydon Manor Day School, Sterling, Virginia, on June 25, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2244A1.txt
  • County has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Hardee County's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Hardee County's initial request, Hardee County may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on July 22, 2002, by Hardee County School District, Wauchula, Florida, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from C.W. Caligan, Hardee County School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2245A1.txt
  • issue a Funding Commitment Decision Letter on July 23, 2001. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for granting relief. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review as well as the request for waiver of the appeal filing period, filed on October 15, 2001, by Round Lake Area Schools District #116, Round Lake, Illinois ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2246A1.txt
  • schools and libraries universal service mechanism. Specifically, Salem requests that its Form 486 be considered as timely filed. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Salem's request to waive the Form 486 and invoicing deadline. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Salem's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed October 18, 2001, by Salem City School District, Salem, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gary Goldberg, Salem City School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2247A1.txt
  • service mechanism. Specifically, St. John's requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 439209. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved St. John's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 439209. Accordingly, we dismiss St. John's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 7, 2002, by St. John's County School District, St. Augustine, Florida, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Frank Clark, St. John's County
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2248A1.txt
  • extended for Funding Request Numbers (FRNs) 407384, 408001, 408250, 408342, and 408648. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved St. Theresa's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRNs 407384, 408001, 408250, 408342, and 408648. Accordingly, we dismiss St. Theresa's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 5, 2002, by St. Theresa of Avila Regional School, Gonzales, Louisiana, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bonita Picou and Jay Sullivan,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2249A1.txt
  • that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. Thus, West Ottawa fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to the Commission. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on July 1, 2002, by West Ottawa Public Schools, Holland, Michigan, IS DIMISSED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal with the Commission IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-224A1.txt
  • 471 supports the claim that Georgetown did wait the 28 days required by the Commission's rule before submitting its FCC Form 471. Because there was evidence within the application to support the pending Request for Review, we find it appropriate to reverse SLD and remand Georgetown's application for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed October 9, 2001, by the Georgetown Public Library, Georgetown Illinois, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Georgetown's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2250A1.txt
  • deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Wilcox failed to file the instant Request for Review within the requisite 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wilcox County Board of Education, on September 18, 2001, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Malcolm Cain, Wilcox County Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2251A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 22, 2002, by A+ Technology Solutions, Inc. on behalf of Deer Park Union Free School District, Deer Park, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2252A1.txt
  • deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Hastings failed to file the instant Request for Review within the requisite 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 30, 2002, by Hastings-On-Hudson UFSD, Hastings-On-Hudson, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan Guiney, Hastings-On-Hudson UFSD, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 30, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2253A1.txt
  • it wishes to be considered within the window. Applicants that wait until the last minute before submitting their applications risk untimely filing. Here, Scottsdale fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Scottsdale Horizons School, Scottsdale, Arizona, on March 6, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Judy White, Scottsdale Horizons School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-225A1.txt
  • requests that USAC apportion one of its funding requests, because the service provider no longer provides part of the requested service. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Kingman's request to adjust the funding request. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Kingman's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 24, 2001, by Kingman Unified School District 20, Kingman, Arizona IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Alison Mecom, Kingman Unified School District No. 20, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2260A1.txt
  • otherwise be utilized on tariff filings. We, therefore, conclude that good cause exists to grant a waiver of section 69.3(e)(11) to the Acquiring Companies. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254 and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Dickey Rural Telephone Cooperative and Dickey Rural Access, Inc., Polar Telecommunications, Inc., Red River Rural Telephone Association and Red River Telecom, Inc. and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2263A1.txt
  • subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, Tariff FCC No. 5, Transmittal No. 952 of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., excluding the deletion of outdated DSL material, IS SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-226A1.txt
  • Request Numbers (FRN) 592979 and 573899. Mercer County has subsequently withdrawn its appeal of FRN 592979. Further, after reviewing the Funding Commitment Decision Letter issued by SLD, however, we find that SLD has already granted FRN 573899 in the amount requested. We therefore dismiss the pending Request for Review ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mercer County School District, Princeton, West Virginia, on September 5, 2001 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, on behalf of Mercer County School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-227A1.txt
  • simple assertion that the failure of NWLS to receive its requested discounts for internal connections would cause it hardship. Thus, we find that NWLS has not demonstrated the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules of priority. Therefore, we deny NWLS's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Northern Waters Library Service on April 12, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jay Moynihan, Northern Waters Library Service, Ashland, Wisconsin, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-228A1.txt
  • to break its request for service into two separate FRNs, as it was receiving service from a single provider. It was appropriate for SLD to deny a request for funding for telecommunications services to be provided by a non-telecommunications carrier. We therefore deny Cotulla's Request for Review of FRN 289404. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review of Funding Request Number 289404 filed by the Cotulla Independent School District, Cotulla, Texas on June 14, 2000, IS DENIED. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2300A1.txt
  • the exclusive remedies available to the parties. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we grant in part Global NAPs's petition and preempt jurisdiction of the Virginia Commission over the arbitration of unresolved interconnection agreement issues with Verizon in Virginia. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b), the Petition for Commission preemption of jurisdiction filed by Global NAPs South, Inc. on June 19, 2002, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Global NAPs South,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2317A1.txt
  • for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403, and pursuant to authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each request for information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2318A1.txt
  • Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each request for information that it
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2341A1.txt
  • due on August 1, 2002. On September 17, 2002, BellSouth submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned request. Given that BellSouth has now submitted all of the data for its NRUF report, its Waiver Petition is moot. We, therefore, grant BellSouth's request to withdraw and dismiss its Waiver Petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Waiver Petition is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Waiver Petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division Chief Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2342A1.txt
  • without prejudice. Should it determine at or near the time of the deadline that they will be unable to satisfy the deadline, Danbury may file for an extension at which time Danbury should offer evidence as to how and why it will not be able to comply with the deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 27, 2002, by Danbury Public Schools, Danbury, Connecticut, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Timothy P. Connors, Danbury Public Schools, Danbury, Connecticut, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2343A1.txt
  • that it chose BEI to prepare and file the application, and it is well established that an applicant bears the ultimate responsibility for any errors in an application made by those to whom it has delegated responsibility for the preparation of the application. We therefore deny the Petition for Reconsideration. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.106, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.106, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed on July 8, 2002 by the Kimball School District 7-2, Kimball, South Dakota, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from George Wieland, Kimball School District No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2344A1.txt
  • it would be allowed to submit the corrections after receiving an RAL. However, where a party has received erroneous advice, the government is not estopped from enforcing its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly when relief is contrary to a rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lake Station Community Schools, Lake Station, Indiana, on April 9, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Dan DeHaven, Lake Station Community Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2345A1.txt
  • provide SLD a chance to elaborate on its reasoning and to review and address the new assertions made by applicant. This in turn will aid both the applicant and the Commission should Lone Wolf find it necessary, following SLD's decision on its appeal, to seek further review from the Commission. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lone Wolf Public Schools, Lone Wolf, Oklahoma, on March 4, 2002, is DENIED with respect to FRN 593359, and REMANDED with respect to FRN 593334, and SLD is directed to address and resolve the Request for Review with respect
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2346A1.txt
  • will provide SLD a chance to elaborate on its reasoning and to review and address the new assertions made by applicant. This in turn will aid both the applicant and the Commission should Picher find it necessary, following SLD's decision on its appeal, to seek further review from the Commission. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Picher-Cardin Independent School District 15, Picher, Oklahoma, on March 7, 2002 is REMANDED and SLD is directed to address and resolve the Request for Review. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2347A1.txt
  • each application and notify applicants of errors prior to the close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. Therefore, we uphold the Administrator's Decisions on Appeal and deny Bienville's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 5, 2001, by Bienville Parish School Board, Arcadia, Louisiana, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Britt, Bienville Parish School Board, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2348A1.txt
  • exempt from competitive bidding. Further, we find that, for the reasons discussed above, the Funding Year 2 funding request also violated our competitive bidding requirements and that funding was granted in error. We therefore direct SLD to adjust this funding commitment in accordance with its established funding commitment adjustment procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Kalamazoo Public Schools, Kalamazoo, Michigan, on April 9, 2001, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SLD pursue funding commitment adjustment in accordance with the terms of this Order and the established commitment adjustment procedures. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2349A1.txt
  • FCC Form 471 was not a first-time information request in Funding Year 2001. Indeed, Block 4 has been part of the FCC Form 471 for all previous funding years. As a result, because the application was not a first-time request, Wayne is not entitled to relief under the Naperville standard. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency, Wayne, Michigan, on August 6, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Letter from Bruce Barrett, Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-234A1.txt
  • Thus, section 61.38 carriers shall apply the thirty percent proxy to their projected local switching revenue requirement, while section 61.39 carriers shall apply the thirty percent proxy to their historical local switching revenue requirement. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108, we reconsider, on our own motion, our decision in the Suspension Order to suspend and investigate the rates for interstate access services filed by the carriers listed in Appendix B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2352A1.txt
  • Funding Year 2001 Form 471 filing requirements. In light of these facts, we find that the four applicants failed to complete their applications. The Request for Review on behalf of Powhatan School, Botetourt County School District, Isle of Wight County School District, and Newport News Public Schools is therefore denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Department of Education of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on September 5, 2001, IS DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Applicant: Application Number:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2353A1.txt
  • Express receipt), the signature date on the Airborne Express receipt, the January 18, 2001 signature date on the certifications, and a January 18, 2001 date stamp present on the print-out of certain pages of Good Shepherd's attachments. We therefore find that Good Shepherd did not violate the 28-day bidding period. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Good Shepherd School, Baltimore, Maryland, on February 27, 2002 IS GRANTED and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further review. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Maggie
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2354A1.txt
  • application would clearly be an improper method of seeking a change of service provider, because it is contrary to the express instructions of SLD on how to make such changes, and because it needlessly places on SLD the full burden and administrative expense of processing and reviewing an entire application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Henryetta Public Schools, Henryetta, Oklahoma, on February 25, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Dan Edwards, Henryetta Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2363A1.txt
  • of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each funding year, we believe it administratively appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines and requirements. Weathersfield has failed to demonstrate the merits of its Request for Review. We therefore deny Weathersfield's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 19, 2002 by Weathersfield Local Schools, Mineral Ridge, Ohio IS DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Weathersfield Local Schools,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-236A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ê DA 02-236 Released: January 31, 2002 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT TO GRANDE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, INC. FOR A PRO FORMA TRANSFER OF CORPORATE CONTROL TO GRANDE COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. CC Docket No. 01-336 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application requesting Commission consent to complete a pro forma transfer of corporate control whereby Grande Communications, Inc. (``GCI'') will transfer one hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding stock of Grande Communications Networks, Inc. (``Networks'') to Grande Communications Holdings, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2412A1.txt
  • 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on August 31, 2002, by Arcata Elementary School District, Arcata, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Matt Malkus, Arcata Elementary School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2413A1.txt
  • 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 9, 2002, by Chatham Area Public Library, Chatham, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from John M. Shimkus, Member of Congress, 20th District, Illinois, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2414A1.txt
  • 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 3, 2002, by Kent County Public Schools, Chestertown, Maryland, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Stephen J. Wilson, Kent County Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2415A1.txt
  • service mechanism. Specifically, Lone Wolf requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 340337. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Lone Wolf's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 340337. Accordingly, we dismiss Lone Wolf's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 9, 2002, by Lone Wolf Public Schools, Lone Wolf, Oklahoma, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Sutherland, Lone Wolf Public Schools, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2416A1.txt
  • service mechanism. Specifically, Red Clay requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 430711. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Red Clay's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 430711. Accordingly, we dismiss Red Clay's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed May 20, 2002, by Red Clay School District, Dover, Delaware, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kay R. Buck, Red Clay School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2417A1.txt
  • that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Numbers (FRNs) 359426, 359488, and 359560. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved South Lane's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRNs 359426, 359488, and 359560. Accordingly, we dismiss South Lane's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 25, 2002, by South Lane School District, Cottage Grove, Oregon, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Scott Baker, South Lane School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2418A1.txt
  • Twin Rivers District requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 353235. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Twin Rivers District's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 353235. Accordingly, we dismiss Twin Rivers District's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed May 10, 2002, by Twin Rivers District Public Library, Colona, Illinois, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Christine Rugh, Twin Rivers District Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2419A1.txt
  • deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 394147 because of difficulties with its selected service provider. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Middle Country's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 394147. Accordingly, we dismiss Middle Country's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 8, 2002, by Middle Country Public Library, Centereach, New York, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sandra Feinberg, Middle Country Public Library, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2420A1.txt
  • from its Funding Year 2000 application, FRNs 418862, 419213, 420532, and 419110. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Nelson County's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRNs 418862, 419213, 420532, and 419110. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Nelson County's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Nelson County Public Schools, on April 9, 2002, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from W. Ernest Worley, Nelson County Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2437A1.txt
  • affected by discontinuance. Finally, we note that nothing in this Order relieves Corban from any obligations that it may have under relevant state law or regulation regarding the discontinuation of service to its customers. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Corban Communications, Inc. to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, consistent with the discussion and conclusions in this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Bureau Chief Appendix - List of Affected Customers KUSM
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2459A1.txt
  • 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission and SLD only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 31, 2002, by Bullitt County School District, Shepherdsville, Kentucky, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Electronic mail from Jay Swigart, Bullitt County School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2460A1.txt
  • up to ninety days, and that the Commission may also extend the time period. Additional time is needed to review the issues presented. Accordingly, we extend by ninety days the deadline by which the Bureau or Commission must take action regarding the above-captioned Request for Review to December 30, 2002. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.724 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.724, that the time period for taking action on the Request for Review filed by GE Business Productivity Solutions, Inc. on July 3, 2002 IS EXTENDED BY ninety days. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Anita Cheng Assistant Chief,Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review by GE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2461A1.txt
  • up to ninety days, and that the Commission may also extend the time period. Additional time is needed to review the issues presented. Accordingly, we extend by ninety days the deadline by which the Bureau or Commission must take action regarding the above-captioned Request for Review to December 30, 2002. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.724 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.724, that the time period for taking action on the Request for Review filed by New Hope Telephone Company on July 3, 2002 IS EXTENDED BY ninety days. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Anita Cheng Assistant Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Contributor Appeal of New Hope
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2472A1.txt
  • a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b). V. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the revisions filed by Verizon Telephone Companies, Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 1, 11, 14, and 16, under Transmittal No. 243, and certain rates for Ameritech Operating Companies Tariff F.C.C. No. 2, Transmittal No. 1318, as identified at paragraph 5, supra, ARE SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2516A1.txt
  • regarding whether forbearance from dominant carrier regulation of SBC's provision of advance services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by SBC Communications Inc. shall be deemed granted in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance is extended to December 31, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2520A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 22. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Implementation of Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-128 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2521A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2521A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 22. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Implementation of Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-128 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2522A1.pdf
  • Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Verizon Telephone Companies SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Verizon Telephone Companies SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each request for information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2529A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Chicago Public Schools fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chicago Public Schools, Chicago, Illinois, on August 27, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2531A1.txt
  • complete the required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Des Moines has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Waiver Request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed April 2, 2002 by Des Moines Public Schools, Des Moines, Iowa, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Greg Davis, Des Moines Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2532A1.txt
  • therefore remand East Baton Rouge's application to SLD for further processing consistent with this Order, and instruct SLD to issue an appropriate Funding Commitment Decision Letter, if otherwise appropriate. However, we make no determination as to whether East Baton Rouge is ultimately entitled to the discounts requested in its application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by East Baton Rouge Parish Library on August 10, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and East Baton Rouge's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consistent with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2533A1.txt
  • party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Jewish Educational Center's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the Administrator's Decision on Appeal and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jewish Educational Center, Elizabeth, New Jersey, on August 6, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Evelyn C. Wolgin, Jewish Educational Center, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2534A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Johnson fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Johnson Elementary School, Johnson, Vermont on October 15, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2535A1.txt
  • not relevant to our analysis. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with our rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that Hancock County has not demonstrated the existence of special circumstances sufficient to warrant a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we deny its Waiver Request ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Hancock County Public Library, Sneedville, Tennessee, on July 30, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Floyd W. Rhea, Hancock County Public Library, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2536A1.txt
  • funding decisions on its behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, Homer-Center fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Homer-Center School District, Homer City, Pennsylvania, on August 9, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2537A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 19, 2002, by Indianapolis Marion County Public Library, Indianapolis, Indiana, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Edward M. Szynaka, Indianapolis Marion County Public Library, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2538A1.txt
  • ultimate responsibility for the timely submission of its application. Neither staffing problems nor misunderstanding relieves applicants of their responsibility to understand the program and comply with its rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that Lincoln County has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 30, 2002, by Lincoln County Board of Education, Hamlin, West Virginia, IS DISMISSED and the Request for Waiver is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Electronic mail
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2539A1.txt
  • its filing deadlines. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. We therefore find no basis for waiving the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Maria L. Varisco-Rogers Charter School, Inc., Newark, New Jersey, on August 26, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2540A1.txt
  • all such requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Paloma and Sentinel failed to file an appeal of their July 26, 2001 Funding Year 2001 Form 471 Rejection Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we deny their Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on December 20, 2001 by Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, on behalf of Mobile Elementary School District 86, Maricopa, Arizona, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2541A1.txt
  • in our building with a new superintendent and a new person handling the E-Rate application process.'' However, we have consistently held that personnel disruptions, employee medical conditions, or employee confusion or misunderstanding about SLD rules and deadlines do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Nederland Independent School District, Nederland, Texas, and Wells Central School District, Wells, New York, on March 1 and March 15, 2002, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2543A1.txt
  • for timely submission of its appeals if it wishes them to be considered on the merits. Here, Pajaro Valley fails to present good cause why it could not timely file its appeals. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the deadline for the filing of Pajaro Valley's appeal with SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and Waiver filed on February 28 and May 6, 2002, by Pajaro Valley Unified School District, Watsonville, California, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2545A1.txt
  • Thus, the record evidence supports Salina's claim that it did wait the 28 days required by the Commission's rule before submitting its FCC Form 471. Therefore, based on the evidence in the record, we find it appropriate to reverse SLD's decision and remand Salina's application to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 11, 2001, by Salina Independent School District 16, Salina, Oklahoma, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Salina's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2546A1.txt
  • the funding process is not a defense to failing to submit the Item 21 Attachment. Applicants cannot tailor-make their own version of FCC Form 471 by failing to include a copy of a bill or other documentation setting forth a description of the services for which discounts are requested. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Scott County Public Library, Georgetown Kentucky, on March 4, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Smith, Scott County Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2549A1.txt
  • that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Yeshivat's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the Administrator's Decision on Appeal and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Yeshivat Ohel Torah, Brooklyn, New York, on August 1, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Chana Bandman and Rabbi Cohen, Yeshivat Ohel Torah, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2553A1.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order Declaration In the Matter of Verizon Telephone Companies Section 63.71 Application to Discontinue Expanded Interconnection Service Through Physical Collocation ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 02-237
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2565A1.txt
  • page for Forsyth's TEL application with Forsyth's NET application. We find that SLD's error resulted in the denial of Forsyth's TEL application. We therefore remand Forsyth's application to SLD for further processing consistent with this Order. However, we make no determination as to whether Forsyth is ultimately entitled to discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 18, 2001, by Forsyth County Library, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Forsyth's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration consistent with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2566A1.txt
  • service mechanism. An extension also is consistent with the Commission's finding in the Non-Recurring Services Order that external circumstances, such as delayed funding decisions, can create situations where deadlines are both impractical and unreasonable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.507(d), filed by the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company, on behalf of the Lynwood Unified School District, Lynwood, California, on April 19, 2002 IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2576A1.pdf
  • are necessary before AT&T may use non-Verizon tools, nor does either party's proposed language address this issue. We expect that this fact-intensive issue of necessity will be handled, in the first instance, on a case-by-case basis in New York. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.807 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 51.807, the Interconnection Agreement submitted jointly by Cox and Verizon IS APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.807 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.txt
  • Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ameritech Operating Companies, Nevada Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern New England Telephone Companies, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company SHALL BE parties to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ameritech
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2583A1.pdf
  • subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, Tariff FCC No. 1, Transmittal No. 9 of Madison River Telephone Company, LLC., IS SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Madison River Telephone Company, LLC. SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date of this order reflecting the suspension. The Madison River
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2619A1.txt
  • be utilized on tariff filings. We therefore conclude that good cause exists to grant Norway a waiver of section 69.3(e)(11) of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Norway Rural Telephone Company and Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. d/b/a Iowa Telecom on January 28, 2002, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-263A1.txt
  • comments are due on or before 75 days after publication of the Notice in the Federal Register. We believe that this additional time will enable commenters to prepare comprehensive comments and replies. This, in turn, will help the Commission in its decision making and in resolving the complex issues raised in this proceeding. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties shall file comments on or before forty-five (45) days from the date of publication of the Notice in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before seventy-five (75) days from the date of publication of the Notice in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2668A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Dygert Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 02-29 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2692A1.txt
  • will not be automatically granted on October 18, 2002. At a later date, an order will issue addressing the merits of the application. Until then, Verizon is not authorized to discontinue providing federally-tariffed physical collocation services. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Verizon to discontinue expanded interconnection services through physical collocation WILL NOT BE AUTOMATICALLY EFFECTIVE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214. 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. Verizon Telephone Companies Section 63.71 Application, WC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2731A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Escuela Manuel Corchado's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Escuela Manuel Corchado's initial request, Escuela Manuel Corchado may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 11, 2002, by Escuela Manuel Corchado, Isabela, Puerto Rico, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Aura Alfaro, Escuela Manuel Corchado, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-281A1.txt
  • of only 53%, it was not eligible for discounted internal connections in Funding Year 3. Thus, whether SLD treated Columbia's missing FCC Form 470 number properly is immaterial in the instant case because Columbia would not have qualified for internal connections. As a result, we deny Columbia's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 26, 2001 by Columbia Heights Public Schools, Columbia Heights, Minnesota, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Denise Mergens, Columbia Heights Public Schools, Columbia Heights, Minnesota, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2829A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 2, 2002, by Akron-Fairgrove Schools, Fairgrove, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Brelsford, Akron-Fairgrove Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 2, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-282A1.txt
  • We need not determine whether Flagler has received discounted telecommunications service from TFC in the past, as it alleges. Assuming that this is true, it is not grounds for relief, as the relevant question is whether Flagler is currently seeking discounts on telecommunications services that are provided by telecommunications carriers. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Flagler County School District, Bunnell, Florida, on May 1, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Louise Hurd, Flagler County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 1, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2830A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2830A1.txt
  • 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with SLD or the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 18, 2002, by Alexandria City Public Schools, Alexandria, Virginia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from John D. Johnson, III, Alexandria City Public Schools, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2831A1.txt
  • the discounted services when it filed its FCC Form 471. Nothing in this Order prevents Aurora Weier from appealing the August 30, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter to SLD within the 60-day time period allowed for such appeals from the date of the August 30, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Aurora Weier Educational Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on March 18, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Emilio Lopez, Aurora Weier Educational Center, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2832A1.txt
  • of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because Bayliss's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the Administrator's Decision on Appeal and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bayliss Public Library, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, on September 3, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Janus Storey, Bayliss Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2834A1.txt
  • Goose Creek has requests pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Goose Creek's Requests for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Goose Creek's initial requests, Goose Creek may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District, Bayton, Texas, on July 3, 2002 in connection with SLD Application No. 316961, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Review filed by Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2835A1.txt
  • 2001-2002 Schools and Libraries filing window. However, since the Request for Waiver was filed, SLD reconsidered its denial and issued a Form 471 Receipt Acknowledgement Letter stating that Winans Academy FCC Form 471 was received and was successfully data entered. Therefore, we dismiss Winans Academy's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Marvin L. Winans Academy, Detroit, Michigan, on August 19, 2002 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tony Mottley, Marvin L. Winans Academy, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2836A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2836A1.txt
  • Cook has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss South Cook's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on South Cook's initial request, South Cook may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 11, 2002, by South Cook Educational Consortium, Riverdale, Illinois, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tobin A. Mitchell, South Cook Educational Consortium, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2837A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2837A1.txt
  • 2000, Petitioners did not file an FCC Form 470 to request funding for month-to-month service. Thus, Petitioners failed to comply with our competitive bidding requirements and SLD properly denied funding beyond the period specified in Petitioners' service agreement. We therefore, affirm SLD's funding decision, and deny Petitioners' Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, on behalf of Craven County Public School System on June 1, 2001, and Nash County-Rocky Mount Public School System on May 31, 2001, and the Request for Review filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2838A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 27, 2002, by Sweetwater Union High School District, Chula Vista, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jim Clark, Sweetwater Union High School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2839A1.txt
  • and processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. In particular, failure to comply with the competitive bidding requirements must result in a denial of support by SLD. We, therefore, deny Timbuktu's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Timbuktu Academy of Science and Technology, on December 13, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gloria House, Timbuktu Academy of Science and Technology, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-283A1.txt
  • changed circumstance or new facts. Moreover, a party may not base a petition for reconsideration on new facts that were available to it at the time of its original request for review. As a result, Houghton Lake's petition for reconsideration is subject to dismissal as repetitious pursuant to Section 1.106(b)(3). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Houghton Lake Public Library, Houghton Lake, Michigan on August 18, 1999 is DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Donna J. Alward, Houghton Lake Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 18,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2854A1.txt
  • of the Verizon tariff changes included in its Transmittal No. 243. Therefore, on our own motion, we reconsider our decision to suspend and investigate Verizon's Transmittal No. 243, and we terminate the investigation of those tariff provisions. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108, we reconsider, on our own motion, our decision in the Suspension Order to suspend for five months and investigate the revisions filed by Verizon Telephone Companies, under Transmittal No. 243. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2855A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Corr has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Corr Wireless Communications, LLC IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for the designated service area in Alabama, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2898A1.txt
  • 73, Transmittal No. 2913, Nevada's Tariff F.C.C. No., 1, Transmittal No. 22, Pacific's Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, Transmittal No. 82, and SNET's Tariff F.C.C. No. 39, Transmittal No. 774, and we terminate the accounting orders and investigations of those tariff provisions. ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to section 204 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108, WE RECONSIDER, on our own motion, our decision in the Suspension Order to investigate the revisions filed by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Tariff F.C.C. No. 73, Transmittal No. 2913, Nevada Bell Telephone Company Tariff F.C.C. No., 1, Transmittal No. 22, Pacific Bell Telephone Company Tariff F.C.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2948A1.txt
  • Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2949A1.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order Declaration In the Matter of VerizonTelephone Companies Tariff FCC Nos. 1, 11, 14 and 16 Transmittal No. 226 ) ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 02-317 I, , hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2970A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 16, 2002, by U.S.D. 468 - Healy Public Schools, Healy, Kansas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jim Reece, U.S.D. 468 - Healy Public Schools,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2971A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Holy Redeemer failed to file an appeal of the June 3, 2002 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 60-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Holy Redeemer's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Holy Redeemer Catholic School, Alpharetta, Georgia on October 2, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Laura Burell, Holy Redeemer Catholic School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2972A1.txt
  • for timely submission of its appeals if it wishes them to be considered on the merits. Here, Blessed Sacrament fails to present good cause why it could not timely file its appeals. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the deadline for the filing of Blessed Sacrament's appeal with SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Blessed Sacrament Catholic School, Newark, New Jersey on October 8, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Scott DeCarolis, Blessed Sacrament Catholic School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2973A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 16, 2002, by Portsmouth School Department, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Edward Stokel, Portsmouth School Department, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2974A1.txt
  • this case, because Gentry has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Gentry's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Gentry's initial request, Gentry may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 4, 2002 by Gentry Public Schools, Gentry, Arkansas, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joni Wilson, Gentry Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2981A1.txt
  • from any confidential materials to seek disclosure in any separate proceedings; and (c) agree that accidental disclosure of information derived from the Data Sets shall not be deemed a waiver of the privilege. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), (j), and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 0.457(d). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION W. Kenneth Ferree Chief, Media Bureau ATTACHMENT A: DECLARATION In the Matter of 2002 Biennial Regulatory Review - Review of the Commission's Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (MB Docket No. 02-277 and MM Docket Nos. 01-235, 01-317, and 00-244) I, ____________________, hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Qwest Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) CCB/CPD File No. 02-01 ) ) ) I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-302A1.txt
  • the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Company (Administrator), denying their request for discounted services. On January 11, 2002, the above-captioned entities filed Requests to Withdraw their Requests for Review. The Division grants the above-captioned entities' Withdrawal Requests and, accordingly, dismisses the above-captioned entities' Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Withdrawal Request submitted by Barbour County School District, Philippi, West Virginia, filed January 11, 2002; Berkeley County School District, Martinsburg, West Virginia, filed January 11, 2002; Fayette County School District, Fayetteville, West Virginia, filed January 11, 2002; Lewis County School District, Weston, West Virginia,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3034A1.txt
  • Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA) to assign it a carrier identification code (CIC) as a switchless reseller without requiring it to purchase Feature Group D access. On October 24, 2002, Bureau 21 notified the Commission that it had received a CIC and submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition IS GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-303A1.txt
  • by SLD that their applications were not filed with SLD by the deadline for priority funding in Funding Year 4. However, since their Requests for Review were filed, SLD has granted the relief that each of the above-captioned entities sought. Accordingly, we dismiss the above-captioned Requests for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review by Bethel School District #52, Eugene, Oregon, filed August 24, 2001; Heartland Community Schools, Henderson, Nebraska, filed August 21, 2001; Henderson County Public Library, Henderson, Kentucky, filed August 31, 2001; Teays Valley Local School District, Ashville, Ohio, filed September 4, 2001;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3041A1.txt
  • 28-day competitive bidding period to run before filing the FCC Form 471. Additional information on the web site clearly indicated that FCC Form 471 must be filed within a certain filing window. We conclude that CCS has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Center City School, Salt Lake City, Utah on May 15, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Ramsay, Center City School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3042A1.txt
  • assertion that the certification was mailed. The mere fact that it submitted certifications in previous years does not support the conclusion that it did so in Funding Year 2001. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD for substantially the reasons stated in the Administrator's Decision on Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the City School District of New Rochelle, New Rochelle, New York on February 28, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Liz D'Amico, City School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3043A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3043A1.txt
  • person who did not know the Commission's rules and procedures, and that the funding is needed. As noted above, we have not found either need of the funds or employee misunderstanding as sufficient grounds for a waiver of the Commission rules in the past. We therefore deny Pottsgrove's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Duncan Public Library, Duncan, Arizona, on April 16, 2002; Mid Peninsula School, Rock, Michigan, on April 23, 2002; Neches Independent School District, Neches, Texas, on April 22, 2002; and Pottsgrove School District, Pottstown, Pennsylvania, on April 24, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3044A1.txt
  • comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. Furthermore, we have rejected arguments based upon claims that SLD staff provided the incorrect information to applicants. After reviewing the material before us, we conclude that High Bridge has failed to demonstrate the special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by High Bridge Board of Education, High Bridge, New Jersey, on May 20, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from, Anthony Juskiewicz, High Bridge Board of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3045A1.txt
  • frame that best suits them for the application process. Instead, the program has one main filing window, and all who would apply for discounts through this program must apply within that time-frame. We conclude that Kearney has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Kearney Public Schools, Kearney, Nebraska, on June 13, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Karl Yeutter, Kearney Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3046A1.txt
  • inability to meet the filing window resulting from the need to file a corrected application after a minimum processing standards rejection is not a special circumstance warranting waiver of the window. We conclude that the circumstances presented by Marin County are insufficient to warrant a deviation from the general rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Marin County Office of Education, San Rafael, California, on June 3, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Jane Burke, Mari County Office of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3047A1.txt
  • date on the other pages, we find that the form should not be rejected for failure to satisfy the minimum processing standard requirement of submission on the correct OMB-approved form. We therefore grant the Request for Review and remand the application to SLD for further review consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Seattle School District 1, Seattle, Washington, on August 24, 2001 IS GRANTED and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further review. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3048A1.txt
  • within the filing window. Furthermore, a special pop-up notice appeared for online filers at the start of the online application process, and again after the applicant clicked on the ``Submit'' button. We conclude that South Side has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by South Side Area School District, Hookstown, Pennsylvania, on April 29, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lori P. Byron, South Side Area School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3049A1.txt
  • until January 25, 2002. Thus, the Appeal to SLD, filed on March 22, 2002, was filed within 60 days of the decision, and is timely under the Commission's rules. As a result, we reverse the dismissal for untimeliness, and remand to SLD for consideration Talmud Torah's appeal on the merits. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Talmud Torah of Lakewood, Lakewood, New Jersey, on April 23, 2002, IS GRANTED, and the Appeal to SLD is REMANDED for further consideration on the merits. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-304A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Peach Public Libraries' Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Peach Public Libraries' initial request, Peach Public Libraries may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Peach Public Libraries, Fort Valley, Georgia, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gilda E. Stanbery-Cotney, Peach Public Libraries, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 24,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3050A1.txt
  • bidding period to run before filing the FCC Form 471. Additional information on the website clearly indicated that FCC Form 471 must be filed within a certain filing window. Windham has failed to support its contention that it followed the proper directions for filing the material within the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Windham Public Library, Windham, New York, on June 12, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Donna Pidgeon, Windham Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3051A1.txt
  • and the Commission should Randolph County find it necessary, following SLD's decision on its appeal, to seek further review from the Commission. We emphasize that, in remanding the appeal of FRNs 555797 and 555870 for SLD's review and adjudication, we make no conclusions as to the merits of these appeals. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 4, 2001 by the Randolph County School District, Elkins, West Virginia, IS REMANDED as to FRNs 555797 and 555870 for SLD to resolve in the first instance. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3052A1.txt
  • way, and it is clear from the documents submitted with its Request for Review that they were responsive. We find further that the ``completed'' notation on the faxed copy from SLD does not excuse Webster County for its failure to respond. Under SLD's seven-day procedure, it correctly denied FRN 592113. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Braxton County School District, Sutton, West Virginia, on September 5, 2001, the Request for Review filed by Summers County School District, Hinton, West Virginia, on September 17, 2001, and the Request for Review filed by Webster County School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3053A1.txt
  • will aid both the applicant and the Commission should Boone County find it necessary, following SLD's decision on its appeal, to seek further review from the Commission. We emphasize that, in remanding the appeal of FRN 543275 for SLD's review and adjudication, we make no conclusions as to its merits. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Boone County School District, Madison, County IS DENIED as to FRN 590131 and REMANDED as to FRN 543275 for SLD to resolve in the first instance. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3054A1.txt
  • the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of complete and accurate application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Because Brooke County provides no evidence that it supplied the requested information during the initial seven-day filing period, we affirm SLD's decision. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 5, 2001 by the Brooke County School District, Wellsburg, West Virginia, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne on behalf of the Brooke County
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3055A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3055A1.txt
  • the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of complete and accurate application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Because Greenbrier County provides no evidence that it supplied the requested information, we affirm SLD's decision and deny the Request for Review. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 4, 2001 by the Greenbrier County School District, Lewisburg, West Virginia, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne on behalf of the Greenbrier County
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3056A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3056A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3056A1.txt
  • did not consider the late information, and therefore correctly denied the funding requests. Finally, the fact that SLD did not seek specific information regarding Jefferson County in its July 16, 2001 correspondence is irrelevant, because the seven-day time frame for providing additional documentation had long since expired at that point. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 5, 2001 by the Jefferson County School District, Charles Town, West Virginia, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne on behalf of the Jefferson
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3057A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3057A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3057A1.txt
  • rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of complete and accurate application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Because Monroe County provides no evidence that it supplied the requested information, we affirm SLD's decision. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 5, 2001 by the Monroe County School District, Union, West Virginia, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne on behalf of the Monroe County
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3058A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3058A1.txt
  • will aid both the applicant and the Commission should Boone County find it necessary, following SLD's decision on its appeal, to seek further review from the Commission. We emphasize that, in remanding the appeal of FRN 562918 for SLD's review and adjudication, we make no conclusions as to its merits. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 5, 2001 by the Nicholas County School District, Summersville, West Virginia, IS DENIED as to FRN 592051 and REMANDED as to FRN 543275 for SLD to resolve in the first instance. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3059A1.txt
  • Commission's priority rules and therefore was or should have been aware of "the need to carefully segregate its service requests'' for Priority One and Priority Two services. The lack of discussion in the FCC Form 471 Instructions of the Priority review procedure does not, therefore, warrant relief from that procedure. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Shepherd Independent School District, Shepherd, Texas, on January 29, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Shepherd Independent School District to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-305A1.txt
  • Clair has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss St. Clair's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on St. Clair's initial request, St. Clair may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Clair County Board of Education, Ashville, Alabama, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Darren W. Anglin, St. Clair County Board of Education, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3060A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3060A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3060A1.txt
  • its application and during application review, it asserted that there was no such contract. St. Joseph may not submit new evidence in an application for review to correct that error. Therefore, substantially for the reasons stated by SLD in the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Joseph High School, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, on January 17, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Roy D. Roberts, St. Joseph High School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3061A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3061A1.txt
  • patrons who make use of the services does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we conclude that Tripp has not demonstrated the existence of special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we must deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Tripp County Library, Winner, South Dakota, on March 6, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sandra Hansen, Tripp County Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-306A1.txt
  • applicant's claim of its own error or misunderstanding of the rules. Subiaco has not offered any reason other than misunderstanding of the rules for why the deadline should be waived in this case. We therefore conclude that Subiaco has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which to grant its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Timmie Geels, Subiaco Academy, Subiaco, Arkansas, on January 23, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Timmie Geels, Subiaco Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3075A1.txt
  • up to ninety days, and that the Commission may also extend the time period. Additional time is needed to review the issues presented. Accordingly, we extend by ninety days the deadline by which the Bureau or Commission must take action regarding the above-captioned Request for Review to January 20, 2003. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.724 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.724, that the time period for taking action on the Request for Review filed by Crown Communication, Inc. on July 23, 2002 IS EXTENDED BY ninety days. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Anita Cheng Assistant Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter of Appeal from Marjorie G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3076A1.txt
  • up to ninety days, and that the Commission may also extend the time period. Additional time is needed to review the issues presented. Accordingly, we extend by ninety days the deadline by which the Bureau or Commission must take action regarding the above-captioned Request for Review to January 8, 2003. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.724 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.724, that the time period for taking action on the Request for Review filed by Morris Communications, Inc. on July 12, 2002 IS EXTENDED BY ninety days. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Anita Cheng Assistant Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of Decision of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3077A1.txt
  • period for sua sponte review did not apply to the SLD decision, the relevant administrative proceeding was not ongoing when Chawanakee filed its appeal of that decision after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period, and the request for review was thus correctly dismissed as untimely under the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106, that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Chawanakee Joint Elementary School District, North Fork, California, on June 20, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition for Reconsideration by Chawanakee Joint Elementary School District, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3078A1.txt
  • state abbreviation should not have prevented SLD from data entering Litchfield's application. We note that, under current minimum processing standards for Block 1, applicants are required only to include (1) the name of the Billed Entity or the Entity Number; (2) the Funding Year; and (3) the Contact Person Name. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Litchfield Public Schools Independent School District No. 465, Litchfield, Minnesota, on July 11, 2001 IS GRANTED and this application is REMANDED for further review consistent with this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3100A1.txt
  • Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3151A1.txt
  • the Act. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we deny Supra's petition for preemption of the jurisdiction of the Florida Public Service Commission with respect to its arbitration of an interconnection agreement between BellSouth and Supra. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47. U.S.C. § 252, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 51.801(b), the petition filed by Supra Telecommunications & Information Systems, Inc., on August 16, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Supra Telecommunications & Information Systems, Inc., (``Supra'') Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3157A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 17, 2002, by Grand Valley Public Library, Orwell, Ohio, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Evans, Grand Valley Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3158A1.txt
  • Norwood submitted with its appeal to the Commission, provide information for three of the required items, Norwood failed to provide the fourth item-a detailed description as noted above. Therefore, Norwood did not submit a proper Item 21 Attachment, and did not complete its FCC Form 471 by the application deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Norwood R-I School District Norwood, Missouri, on March 26, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jimmie Lee Marler, Norwood R-I School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3159A1.txt
  • here. Even assuming that this SLD procedure is applicable to the general case, it is not the standard of review that SLD applies to the specific context of requests for corrections that increase funding. Rather, SLD flatly prohibits such corrections, and as noted, the Bureau has repeatedly upheld this prohibition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Oklahoma City Public Schools, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on September 5, 2001 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Review filed by Oklahoma City Public Schools, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on December 5, 2001 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3160A1.txt
  • the Commission only upon receipt. SLD misapplied the rule in its Administrator's Decision on Appeal Letters. We find the applicant complied with the 60 day time period for filing its appeals with SLD. Therefore, we grant Winnebago's Request for Review and remand the above-captioned applications to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Winnebago Public Schools, Winnebago, Nebraska, on December 12, 2001, IS GRANTED and the above-captioned applications ARE REMANDED to SLD for further consideration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3161A1.txt
  • that Rand Memorial's inability to complete an on-line application is not a circumstance excusing the omission in its manually-filed application. Further, we have repeatedly found that the financial need of applicants is not a circumstance warranting waiver of the window. We therefore deny the Request for Review and affirm SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wm. H. & Lucy F. Rand Memorial Library, Troy, Vermont, on April 8, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Allen, Wm. H.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3162A1.txt
  • as in 2001, in violation of the Commission's rules. Roanoke states that it was nevertheless awarded funds for this service in Funding Year 1999 (though not in Funding Year 2000). We therefore direct SLD to initiate commitment adjustment procedures in connection with the appropriate Funding Year 1999 Internet access requests. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Roanoke Rapids Graded School District, Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, on January 2, 2002 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SLD pursue funding commitment adjustment in accordance with the terms of this Order and the established commitment adjustment procedures.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3163A1.txt
  • Commission has authority to waive regulatory requirements, it does not have authority to waive a requirement imposed by statute. The October 28, 2001 deadline for CIPA certifications in Funding Year 2001 is statutory. Because the October 28, 2001 deadline is established by statute, we are without authority to waive it. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by St. Helen School, Howard Beach, New York on April 12, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Anne Badalamenti, St. Helen School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3181A1.txt
  • the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that RCC Holdings has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, RCC Holdings, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER throughout its licensed service area in the state of Alabama to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(5) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(5), and sections 0.91, 0.291
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-318A1.txt
  • the public and confidential versions of its petitions, we conclude that Sprint has met its burden of demonstrating that it has satisfied the applicable triggers for the services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291(j) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291(j), and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by the Sprint local telephone companies IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Trunking Basket Voice Grade DS1 DS3 OptiPoint CCS/SS7 Interconnection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3196A1.txt
  • Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Verizon Telephone Companies SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Verizon Telephone Companies SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each request for information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-319A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. and BellSouth Corporation for a LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-01-162, IS APPROVED. The LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3204A1.txt
  • September 27 Order while we work with the DCA to determine the extent and nature of the national security related services at issue and the time frame for transitioning these services to alternative providers. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.106, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.106, and 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the petitions for reconsideration filed by AT&T Corp., Grande Communications Networks, Inc., MCI WorldCom Communications and KIFI-TV ARE GRANTED in a manner consistent with this order and that the relief requested by the United States Coast Guard is GRANTED to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-320A1.txt
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Qwest Corporation for a LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing one-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-01-154, IS APPROVED. The LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS between points in the specific
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3211A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Waiver was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on October 29, 2002, by Buffalo School District 877, Buffalo, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert Berry, Buffalo School District 877, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3212A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Waiver was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on October 24, 2002, by Petersburg Public Library, Petersburg, Virginia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rachel Cole, Petersburg Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3228A1.txt
  • of the information submitted, we conclude that BellSouth has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable triggers for each of the various services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, the petition filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Special Access Services Basket BellSouth SPA Metallic BellSouth SPA Telegraph BellSouth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3249A1.txt
  • a well established body of law that holds that, in the absence of a statute to the contrary, ``a signature may be made for a person by the hand of another,'' and that signature is as valid as it would be if it were written by the authorizing person. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Charleston County School District, Charleston, South Carolina, on August 29, 2001, IS GRANTED, and this matter is remanded to the Administrator for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jon Ostendorf,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3250A1.txt
  • and fraud. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information to SLD in its FCC Form 471 and during the subsequent review process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Colorado City Public Library, Colorado City, Arizona, on March 29, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Facsimile from Dennis Darger, Colorado City Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 29,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3253A1.txt
  • the Universal Service Administrative Company. Since the Petition for Reconsideration was filed, however, the Bureau issued an Order reversing its prior Order. Kalamazoo then filed a Motion for Withdrawal of its Petition for Reconsideration. Kalamazoo's Petition for Reconsideration is therefore dismissed as moot and its Motion for Withdrawal is granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Kalamazoo Public Schools, Kalamazoo, Michigan, on November 4, 2002 IS DISMISSED as moot and its Motion for Withdrawal filed on November 7, 2002, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3254A1.txt
  • its behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, St. Mary High School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on September 16, 2002, by St. Mary High School, Jersey City, New Jersey, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3255A1.txt
  • manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. Thus, Sullins fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to the FCC. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sullins Academy, Bristol, Virginia, on October 3, 2002, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3256A1.txt
  • to correct it. It is well established, however, that an applicant is not entitled to relief merely because an application is rejected after the period for submitting a new application has passed. The burden of ensuring that an application is complete and accurate properly rests with the applicants themselves. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED , pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by City of Newport News, Newport News, Virginia, on January 23, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ed Maroney, City of Newport News, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3257A1.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Davidson County failed to file an appeal of the July 17, 2001 Pink Postcard within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Davidson County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Davidson County Schools, Lexington, North Carolina on October 10, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sue Whitman, Davidson County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3258A1.txt
  • address the assertions made by applicant will enhance and benefit the record and thus aid both Grant and the Commission in the event that Grant's appeal is denied and Grant finds it appropriate to seek further review from the Commission. Therefore, we remand the appeal to SLD for its consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Grant Joint Union High School District, Sacramento, California, on January 11, 2002 is REMANDED and SLD is directed to address and resolve the Request for Review as if it were an appeal to SLD. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3259A1.txt
  • adhere to applicable program rules and application requirements. Because applications may change from year to year, we find that applicants bear the responsibility of determining whether or not the complete and correct form is being used. We conclude that Foyil should have determined that it was using the wrong application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Foyil Public Schools, Foyil, Oklahoma, on January 28, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael McGregor, Foyil Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 28,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3284A1.txt
  • Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Madison River Telephone Company, LLC., SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Madison River Telephone Company, LLC., SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3289A1.txt
  • For the foregoing reasons, we grant MCImetro's petition for Commission preemption of jurisdiction over its dispute with Verizon and invite MCImetro to file for resolution of this dispute under 47 C.F.R. § 1.720 et seq. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b), the petition for Commission preemption of jurisdiction filed by MCImetro on September 6, 2002, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Expedited Preemption of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3291A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 26, 2002, by Wayne County Public School, Goldsboro, North Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sprunt Hill, Wayne County Public School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3316A1.txt
  • set forth above. These waivers will allow RFB Cellular to begin receiving support as of November 20, 2001, the date RFB Cellular received its ETC designation. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(1) of the Commission's rules, filed by RFB Cellular, Inc. on January 10, 2002, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3317A1.txt
  • the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Cellular South has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Cellular South License, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER throughout its licensed service area in the state of Alabama to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(5) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(5), and sections 0.91,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3366A1.txt
  • this case. Finally, East Carroll asserts that the CIPA deadline should not be imposed on applicants seeking only discounts on telecommunications services. To the extent that East Carroll seeks a waiver on this basis, we reject the argument because, as noted above, East Carroll also received discounts on Internet access. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by East Carroll Parish School Board, Lake Providence, Louisiana on January 28, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Facsimile from Helen Millikin, East Carol Parish School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3367A1.txt
  • year following the effective date of the statute. Because Republic County was receiving discounts on Internet access, and was therefore subject to the October 28, 2001 deadline imposed by the CIPA statute, we are without authority to waive that deadline in this case, and the Waiver Request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Republic County Unified School District No. 427, Belleville, Kansas, on May 20, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Letter from Larry Lysell, Republic Unified School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3368A1.txt
  • the amount of support for which the acquired access lines currently are eligible, and will prevent it from making needed upgrades to the acquired access lines. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Blackduck Telephone Company and Arvig Telephone Company on February 6, 2001, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3392A1.txt
  • Mass Migration Guidelines. Accordingly, if ACC fails to abide by its commitments to the New York Commission, the Commission may reverse this approval and commence an appropriate action against ACC. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, that the joint application of ACC Telecommunications, LLC and ACC Telecommunications of Virginia, LLC to discontinue domestic telecommunications services in Albany, New York and Rochester, New York IS GRANTED consistent with the terms of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Bureau Chief Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-341A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Addison fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Addison Northeast Supervisory Union, Bristol, Vermont, on January 23, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-342A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Granger fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeals to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadlines. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Granger School District No. 204, Granger, Washington on December 11, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file these appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-343A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Mulberry fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mulberry Elementary School District, Brawley, California, on January 9, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-344A1.txt
  • the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Newtown fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore must deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Newtown Public Schools, Newtown, Connecticut, on March 30, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John R. Reed, Newtown Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-345A1.txt
  • failed to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. For these reasons, we deny Pend Oreille's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Pend Oreille County Library District, Newport, Washington, on May 21, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Pend Oreille County Library District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-346A1.txt
  • and arguments supporting its position that cache servers should be eligible as internal connections. However, the 30 day period of time for seeking reconsideration of the Tennessee Order has expired. Therefore, we find that, under the Tennessee Order, SLD correctly denied funding for cache servers requested in the pending application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Prince George's County Public Schools, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, on October 2, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Siefert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Orin R. Heend, Funds for Learning, L.L.C., on behalf
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3471A1.txt
  • is no evidence in the official record supporting Horizon's assertion that it did not receive the Funding Commitment Decision Letters. Moreover, Horizon fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeals to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review as well as the request for waiver of the appeal filing period, filed on October 25, 2002, by Horizon Science Academy, Cleveland, Ohio ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3472A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 18, 2002, by St. Bernadette School, Seattle, Washington, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Marie Colarossi, St. Bernadette School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3473A1.txt
  • demonstrated that the description of services in FRN 419287 was so ambiguous that it should have prompted SLD to seek further information on the proper breakdown of costs pursuant to its policy, we must affirm SLD's determination that the amount of ineligible services is 30% or more of the request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Atlantic City School District, Atlantic City, New Jersey, on April 25, 2001 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jonathan Jones, Atlantic City Public School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3474A1.txt
  • properly relied on the Form 499-Q and Form 499-A Instructions in reaching its conclusion and did not require guidance from the Commission. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by ABC Cellular on June 17, 2002 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3476A1.txt
  • All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information please contact Katie King, Jennifer Schneider, or Narda Jones, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Verizon IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Comment Sought on the Recommended Decision of the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Regarding the Non-Rural High-Cost Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 96-45, Public Notice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3477A1.doc
  • Act governing intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Verizon for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in WC Docket. No. 96-159, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division See 47 U.S.C. § 153(25). See Comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3477A1.txt
  • Act governing intraLATA service will apply.16 Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Verizon for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non- optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in WC Docket. No. 96-159, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division 16 The BOC may provide ELCS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-347A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, St. Francis Xavier fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Francis Xavier School, Acushnet, Massachusetts, on December 11, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-348A1.txt
  • are eligible for NSLP, or 74.038%, and is therefore entitled under the discount matrix to a discount rate of only 80 percent. Because schools with less than an 85% discount rate were ineligible for internal connections discounts in Funding Year 4, we find that SLD correctly denied the two FRNs. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Upshur County School District, Buckhannon, West Virginia, on September 4, 2001 IS DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne on behalf
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-349A1.txt
  • requests to a different service provider, because the original service provider no longer provides part of the requested service. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Shawnee Mission's request to adjust the funding request. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Shawnee Mission's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 30, 2001, by Shawnee Mission, Overland Park, Kansas IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rich Cavallaro, Shawnee Mission Public Schools, Overland Park, Kansas, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3500A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey H. Dygert Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 02-33 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3508A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 26, 2002, by Kanawha County School District, Cleveland, Ohio, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Kanawha County School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3509A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Mescalero fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mescalero Apache School, Mescalero, New Mexico, on October 30, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-350A1.txt
  • and Libraries filing window. However, since the Requests for Review were filed, SLD has issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal informing Chester that its appeal has brought forward persuasive information and that its request will be reviewed and considered for funding. Chester's Requests for Review are therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Chester Community Charter School, Media, Pennsylvania, on August 21 and 27, 2001 ARE DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Pete Idstein, Chester Community Charter School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3510A1.txt
  • the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Midlothian Independent's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the Administrator's Decision on Appeal and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on November 12, 2002, by Midlothian Independent School District, Midlothian, Texas, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kirk Paschall, Midlothian Independent School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-351A1.txt
  • the FCC Form 471 before the allowable contract date. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for carefully following program rules. Genesis' Request for Review is therefore denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Genesis Catholic Elementary School, on April 13, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol A. Smith, Genesis Catholic Elementary School, Detroit, Michigan, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3527A1.txt
  • information collections contained herein are contingent upon approval of the Office of Management and Budget. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that FCC Report 43-01, the Annual Summary Report, FCC Report 43-02, the USOA Report, FCC Report 43-03, the Joint Cost Report, FCC Report 43-04, the Access Report, FCC Report 43-05, the Service Quality Report, FCC Report 43-07, the Infrastructure Report, and FCC Report 43-08, the Operating Data Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-352A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Melrose Area fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Melrose Area High School, Melrose, Minnesota on January 17, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-353A1.txt
  • the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator). Rockdale seeks review of SLD's denial of Rockdale's request to have discounted internet access for Funding Year 4. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has granted the relief that Rockdale is seeking. Rockdale's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Rockdale Independent School District, Rockdale, Texas, on August 22, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Marcia J. Proctor, Rockdale Independent School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-354A1.txt
  • program to work efficiently, the Commission has found that it cannot accept unsupported arguments that mailed letters were never received. Here, Telfair fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Telfair County School District, McRae, Georgia on December 3, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3551A1.doc
  • Act governing intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. and BellSouth Corporation for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in WC Docket No. 02-134, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3551A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3551A1.txt
  • Act governing intraLATA service will apply.13 Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. and BellSouth Corporation for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in WC Docket No. 02-134, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division 11 See supra n.9. In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3552A1.doc
  • Act governing intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in WC Docket No. 02-133, ARE APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division See 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3552A1.txt
  • Act governing intraLATA service will apply.14 Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of 10 SWBT Possum Kingdom Petition at Attach. A, p. 2. 11 SWBT Martins Mill Petition at 6. 12 See supra n.9. In assessing the number of lines affected we note that in the case of the Possum Kingdom request, the great majority of calls will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3553A1.txt
  • find that the public interest will be served by allowing Kerrville to remain under rate-of-return regulation until the Commission completes its review of the ``all-or-nothing'' rule. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.41, filed by Valor Telecommunications, LLC IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau See 47 C.F.R. § 61.41; Valor Telecommunications, LLC Petition for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3562A1.txt
  • Part 32 federal accounting purposes unless the Commission specifically requires the adoption of SFAS 143 accounting in the future. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i), 4(j), and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154 (i), 154(j), and 220, section32.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §32.16, and the authority delegated pursuant to 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that all subject carriers are notified that they shall not adopt SFAS 143 for federal accounting purposes. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau The Financial Accounting Standards Board is the authoritative standard setting body responsible for accounting and disclosure practices to be used for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3587A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3587A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3587A1.txt
  • the absence of a properly designed formula, it was reasonable for the Bureau to ensure that the interim solution would not result in reduced payments. Here, the Bureau finds that the CPL methodology provides an accurate basis for the provision of support. We therefore conclude that supplemental payments are not warranted. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formula proposed by the National Exchange Carriers Association, Inc., on October 1, 2002, for local switching support SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE January 1, 2003. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3603A1.txt
  • discontinue voice telecommunications services to its dedicated access customers on January 18, 2003. The Bureau will monitor the progress of the transitioning of current Cable & Wireless customers as January 18, 2003 approaches. II. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Cable & Wireless USA, Inc., to discontinue domestic voice telecommunications services on January 18, 2003, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. 47 C.F.R. § 63.71(c).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-371A1.txt
  • Reduction Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ACS of Anchorage, Inc., and the National Exchange Carrier Association SHALL BE parties to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ACS of Anchorage and the National Exchange Carrier Association SHALL each INCLUDE,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-372A1.txt
  • report and supplemental report consistent with the Commission's denial of Verizon's request. We grant an extension of time until April 8, 2002 for submitting comments on Verizon's section 272(d) biennial audit report. This extension will afford parties 60 days to review and comment on the totality of the audit report. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.201-0.204, 1.3, 53.209-53.213, the comment period for the Verizon section 272(d) biennial audit report IS EXTENDED to April 8, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Timothy A. Peterson Acting Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, CCB Accounting Safeguards Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Section 272(d) Biennial Audit Procedures, CC Docket No. 96-150, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 02-1 (rel. Jan. 10, 2002). (...continued
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-387A1.txt
  • apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. This policy imposes upon applicants the responsibility of preparing its applications carefully. For that reason, we deny Centerville's request to amend its FCC Form 471 subsequent to the filing window for Funding Year 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 9, 2001, by Centerville School District, Centerville, South Dakota, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Doug Voss, Centerville School District, Centerville, South Dakota, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-388A1.txt
  • for timely submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. Here, East Alton fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by East Alton-Wood River Community High School, Wood River, Illinois on January 2, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-389A1.txt
  • 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed November 27, 2001, by Huntington Union Free School District, Huntington, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rosanne Sweeney, A+ Technology Solutions, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-390A1.txt
  • school buses. Similarly, under program rules, cellular telephone service is not eligible for discounts to facilitate the transportation of students to and from schools. Therefore, we affirm the Administrator's finding that more than thirty percent of NESC's funding request is for ineligible uses and we deny NESC's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 17, 2000, by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative, Hayti, South Dakota, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lawrence L. Furney, Northeast Educational Services Cooperative, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-391A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-391A1.txt
  • we note that it is not necessary for us to determine whether the application bore an original, ink signature because even if the signature was a photocopy or stamp, Preston's application should not have been rejected. Therefore, we grant Preston's Request for Review and instruct SLD to process Preston's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Preston County Schools, Kingwood, West Virginia, on March 26, 2001, IS GRANTED and that Preston's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-392A1.txt
  • indicate that the Block 6 certification was postmarked on January 18, 2001, and was therefore eligible to be considered within the filing window. As a result, we find that Taft's Block 6 certification page was timely filed and remand this application to SLD for further processing consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Taft Independent School District, Taft, Texas, on July 6, 2001 IS GRANTED and REMANDED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Don Madden, Taft Independent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-393A1.txt
  • each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures, including the procedures governing the use of the state replacement contract SPIN. Therefore, we decline to grant relief on the grounds that Ursuline Academy received incorrect information from SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ursuline Academy, New Orleans, Louisiana, on May 4, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sr. Elizabeth S. Hatzenbuehler, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 4, 2001
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-394A1.txt
  • it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately predict the total amount of Priority One services requested in a year as required to apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. Therefore, we conclude that SLD properly denied Grand Island's request for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the School District of Grand Island, Grand Island, Nebraska, on March 14, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sue Burch, School District of Grand Island, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-395A1.txt
  • warrant a deviation from the standards established in the Permanent Extension Order. Because we deny Cleveland's Waiver Request, we do not reach the issue of whether to grant a limited waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Request for Waiver and Extension of Time filed by Cleveland Municipal School District, Cleveland, Ohio, on September 28, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne on behalf of Cleveland Municipal School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-396A1.txt
  • to SLD regarding the terms of its financing agreement with Ameritech Credit. Accordingly, we direct SLD to reconsider Schaumburg's Year 2 funding request and determine to what extent Schaumburg is entitled to universal service funding in Program Year 2 for services obtained pursuant to its multi-year contract with Ameritech Credit. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Schaumburg Community Consolidated School District 54 (Schaumburg) of Schaumburg, Illinois, on April 20, 2000, IS REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company for further processing pursuant to this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-412A1.txt
  • this case, the rationale for providing customer notification is inapplicable. Therefore, the Division finds that a grant of Alma's request to waive the customer notification rules in section 63.71 is in the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i) and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 63.71, Alma's request for waiver filed January 10, 2002 IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Diane L. Griffin Acting Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau Alma filed the subject waiver request in conjunction with its Section 63.71 Application for Authority to Discontinue Domestic Services. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-427A1.txt
  • diligence, have been learned prior to such opportunity. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.106(c)(1), 1.106(b)(2). The Commission may also determine that consideration of the facts relied upon is required in the public interest. 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(c)(2). See Bureau Order, para. 8, n.26. See Pennsylvania PUC Petition for Reconsideration, at 17; see also 47 U.S.C. § 254 (h)(1). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 8776, 9002, 9054-62, 9139-45 (1997) (Universal Service Order), as corrected by Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Errata, FCC 97-157 (rel. June 4, 1997), affirmed in part, Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. FCC, 183 F.3d 393 (5th
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-428A1.txt
  • services for Funding Year 2. SLD denied Laurel School's request because its FCC Form 471 did not meet SLD's minimum processing standards. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has granted the relief that Laurel School is seeking. Laurel School's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Laurel School, Cleveland, Ohio, on August 15, 2000 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, on behalf of Laurel School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-429A1.txt
  • to connect individual schools in the school district to the Internet, and are thus eligible under the Fourth Order on Reconsideration. We therefore vacate SLD's denial of FRN 356779 and remand for a new determination, consistent with this opinion, of the percentage of FRN 356779 that is ineligible for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bassett Unified School District, La Puente, California, on May 30, 2001, IS GRANTED, and the application IS REMANDED to SLD for further review consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-430A1.txt
  • of the information. By opening the door to additional evidence relating to the technology plan, SLD was obligated to wait until the agreed upon deadline to complete their review of the appeal. As a result, we find that it is appropriate to remand FRN 430758 to SLD for further review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Milford School District on March 28, 2001 IS GRANTED and that its application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-431A1.txt
  • routers. Thus, SLD properly categorized the request as internal connections. In Funding Year 3, only applicants with a discount rate of at least 82% were entitled to discounted internal connections. Because Ohio PLIN was entitled to a discount of only 53%, we conclude that SLD correctly denied FRN 399128. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ohio Public Library Information Network, Columbus, Ohio, on April 18, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol Lynne Roddy, Ohio Public Library Information Network, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-432A1.txt
  • in advance, we see no inequity in requiring applicants to include sufficient time in their application process to accommodate the rules of both state and federal authorities. In addition, we find that New York schools have generally not been prevented from obtaining discounts by the requirements of New York regulations. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Pearl River School District, Pearl River, New York IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ben Carosi, Pearl River Public School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-433A1.txt
  • for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window, and must assume responsibility for the actions of those to whom it delegates authority for program filings. Here, Springdale fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Springdale Public Schools, Springdale, Arkansas, on May 14, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jim Rollins, Springdale Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-434A1.txt
  • or contained fewer than 14 digits. We find that SLD rejected St. Edward's application because no FCC Form 470 Application number was listed. Thus, in accordance with our decision in the Pediatric Library Order, we remand St. Edward's application to SLD for further processing in accordance with this order. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the St. Edward on the Lake School, on April 2, 2001, IS GRANTED, and its application is REMANDED to SLD for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-436A1.txt
  • a rulemaking proceeding to examine its rules governing the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism in order to ensure its continued efficient and effective operation. E-Rate Central is free to raise this proposal in the context of the rulemaking. We therefore deny this part of the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by E-Rate Central, Plandome, New York, on behalf of St. Patrick's Academy, Catskill, New York, on March 26, 2001, IS DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-437A1.txt
  • Block 4 is not present. Further, Laguna has failed to submit contrary evidence sufficient to persuade us that the missing page is due to the fault of SLD. We therefore find that Laguna did not submit a complete application and affirm SLD's rejection of the application on that basis. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Laguna Salada Union Elementary School District, Pacifica, California, on July 30, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Josephine Peterson, Laguna Salada Union School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-438A1.txt
  • was attributed to the PC Cards, raising the total cost of ineligible services to 33% of the total service. Lunenburg has presented no information that would suggest that the attribution of 33% of the installation costs to the PC Cards was incorrect. Accordingly, as explained above, we affirm SLD's decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lunenburg County Public Schools, Victoria, Virginia, on May 17, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Marie Gee, Lunenburg County Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-439A1.txt
  • in an arbitrary and capricious manner. Indeed, SLD merely determined an independent basis for its denial, which is not necessarily exclusive from other, equally valid grounds for denial, such as the use of the wrong OMB-approved FCC Form 471. We therefore conclude that Tallulah's Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Tallulah Academy-Delta Christian School on August 13, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John Beach, Tallulah Academy-Delta Christian School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 13,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-440A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-440A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-440A1.txt
  • to accept an incorrect form and then return to the applicant to collect missing information required in the Year 4 FCC Form 471 and obtain certifications using the correct language. Therefore, applicants properly have the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct OMB-approved forms. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Southwest Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas, on July 25, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James E. McNamara, Southwest Independent School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-462A1.txt
  • specific circumstances presented here, that KMC has shown good cause for a waiver of the Commission's discontinuance notice requirements, and that a grant of KMC's request to waive 63.71(c) is in the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i) and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 63.71, KMC's request for waiver of section 63.71(c) of the Commission's rules IS GRANTED, and KMC may discontinue providing service on February 28, 2002. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Diane L. Griffin Acting Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau KMC Telecom, Inc. Request for Waiver of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-464A1.txt
  • will be subject to the investigation initiated in the above proceeding. This transmittal will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later be necessary. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the revisions to NECA's Tariff F.C.C. No. 5, Access Service, filed under Transmittal No. 926 ARE SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated into the investigation in CC Docket No. 02-36. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i)and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-477A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, West Harrison fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by West Harrison Community School District, Mondamin, Iowa on January 8, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-478A1.txt
  • for the 2001-2002 Schools and Libraries filing window. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal, informing Winchester that its appeal has brought forward persuasive information that its funding requests should be reviewed. Winchester's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Winchester Public Schools, Winchester, Virginia, on September 5, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Steven R. Muller, Winchester Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-479A1.txt
  • 471, we would then have to grant similar relief to other entities that made similar mistakes, which would in turn increase administrative burdens for SLD. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Edgewood has failed to make a showing warranting relief and that its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed by Edgewood Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas, on July 24, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Ochoa, Edgewood Independent School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-480A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-480A1.txt
  • the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Green Bay has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 2, 2001 by Green Bay Area Public Schools, Green Bay, Wisconsin IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Danielle A. Nerad, Green Bay Area Public Schools, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-481A1.txt
  • from Qwest Corporation's Montana and North Dakota study areas and to establish a new study area for Citizens Telecommunication Company of Montana consisting of these exchanges. On August 9, 2001, Qwest Corporation submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Joint Petition for Expedited Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Joint Petition for Expedited Waiver IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-482A1.txt
  • waste, and abuse. By extending this deadline, we provide the independent auditor with more time to complete its work, thereby ensuring a complete and accurate draft audit report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254 and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on February 19, 2002, is GRANTED to allow submission of the draft audit report for the year 2001 on or before April 15, 2002. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-496A1.txt
  • letter dated November 5, 2001, Western Union filed a motion requesting dismissal of its reconsideration petition as moot. According to Western Union, it has resolved its differences with several of the LECs whose tariffs were investigated and no longer wishes to pursue its reconsideration petition with respect to the remaining LECs. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106 that this reconsideration petition of Western Union IS HEREBY DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Investigation of Special Access Tariffs of Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket No. 85-166, Phase I, Order, 12 FCC Rcd 13677 (1997) (Western Union Remand Order), aff'd sub nom. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. FCC, 138 F.3d 746
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-505A1.txt
  • on or before March 28, 2002. Any oppositions to the direct cases will be due on or before April 4, 2002. Rebuttals may be filed on or before April 9, 2002. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 204(a), and 205 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 204(a), and 205, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request for an extension of time to file its direct case filed by ACS of Anchorage, Inc., IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT INDICATED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the time for NECA to file its direct case, as well as the dates for opposition and rebuttal comments,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-513A1.txt
  • apply to BOCs only. This limitation is one of federal jurisdiction, not discretion, although the CCO may certainly choose to apply the new services test to all incumbent LECs, whether BOC or not. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 4(i), 205, and 276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 205, and 276, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.2, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions for declaratory ruling filed by the North Carolina Payphone Association and the Michigan Pay Telephone Association are GRANTED for further state commission proceedings consistent with the Commission's Wisconsin Order and that the petition for declaratory ruling filed by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-559A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ) DA 02-559 Released: March 7, 2002 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF ALMA LONG DISTANCE, LLC TO ALMA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. CC Docket No. 01-351 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Alma Long Distance, LLC (``ALD'') and Alma Telephone Company (``ATC''), to complete a transfer of control. ALD is wholly owned by ATC. As part of a corporate restructuring and spin off of unrelated ATC assets, a new
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-560A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 02-560 Released: March 7, 2002 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A PRO FORMA TRANSFER OF CORPORATE CONTROL OF INTELLICAL OPERATOR SERVICES, INC. TO ILD HOLDINGS, INC. CC Docket No. 01-350 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Intellical Operator Services, Inc. (``IOS''), and ILD Holdings, Inc. (``Holdings''), to complete a pro forma transfer of corporate control. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, the shareholders of IOS's parent, ILD Telecommunications, Inc. (``ILD''), which will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-581A1.txt
  • confident that any confusion will be minimal and short-lived. We therefore conclude that CUB has not shown good cause for granting a permanent waiver of the ten-digit dialing requirement, nor has CUB demonstrated that a permanent waiver would be in the public interest. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 52.19 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Amended Citizens Utility Board Petition for Expedited Permanent Waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 52.19(c)(3)(ii) is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Amended Citizens Utility Board Petition for Expedited Permanent Waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 52.19(c)(3)(ii), filed October 4, 2001 (CUB Petition). See also 47 C.F.R. § 52.19(c)(3)(ii). 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-610A1.txt
  • request to preempt the rates originally set by the Board in 1997. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, we deny the Ratepayer Advocate's petition, and thus do not preempt the Board's Generic Proceeding pursuant to section 253 of the Act. Ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 253 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 253 and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Petition for Commission preemption of jurisdiction filed by the New Jersey Division of the Ratepayer Advocate on March 3, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau LIST OF COMMENTERS Comments National ALEC Association/Prepaid Communications Association New
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-615A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-615A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 02-615 Released: March 15, 2002 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF NORTHERN IOWA TELEPHONE COMPANY TO MUTUAL TELEPHONE COMPANY CC Docket No. 02-1 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Mutual Telephone Company (``Mutual'') and Northern Iowa Telephone Company (``Northern Iowa''), as amended, to complete a transfer of control. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Mutual and Northern Iowa filed for consent to transfer control to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-642A1.txt
  • 470 that it must be filed with enough time to achieve the 28-day period before filing of the FCC Form 471, ``which must be postmarked no later than January 18... .'' We therefore find that AIC has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by art in context, New York, New York, on August 30, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Charles SanClementi, Jr., art in context, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-643A1.txt
  • the applicant wishes to be considered with other in-window applicants. How the applicant delegates responsibility for the applications is not relevant to our analysis. We conclude that Wilcox has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Dermott Special School District, Dermott, Arkansas, on August 17, 2001; Hoven School District No. 53-2, Hoven, South Dakota, on August 24, 2001; Mastics-Moriches-Shirley Community Library, Shirley, New York, on August 16, 2001; Mounds Public Schools, Mounds, Oklahoma, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-644A1.txt
  • Form 470 that it must be filed with enough time to achieve the 28-day period before filing of the FCC Form 471, ``which must be postmarked no later than January 18... .'' We conclude that Loutit has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Loutit District Library, Grand Haven, Michigan on August 29, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gail Skruch, Loutit District Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-64A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 02-64 Released: January 11, 2002 COMMON CARRIER BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL FROM NEVD HOLDINGS, LLC TO CONVERSENT HOLDINGS, INC. CC Docket No. 01-314 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of NEVD Holdings, LLC (``NEVD'') and M/C Venture Partners V, L.P., as amended, to complete a transfer of corporate control. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, NEVD would undergo a corporate reorganization by contributing the ownership of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.txt
  • this case, because Hanna has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Hanna's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Hanna's initial request, Hanna may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hanna Public Schools, Hanna, Oklahoma, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Moody, Hanna Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 20, 2002 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-672A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Municipal Telephone Exchange's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Municipal Telephone Exchange's initial request, Municipal Telephone Exchange may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Municipal Telephone Exchange, Baltimore, Maryland, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kim Gray, Municipal Telephone Exchange, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 22, 2002 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-673A1.txt
  • Valley has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Twin Valley's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Twin Valley's initial request, Twin Valley may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Twin Valley School District, Reading, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-674A1.txt
  • Union has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Somis Union's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Somis Union's initial request, Somis Union may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Somis Union School District, Somis, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Richard J. Malfatti, Somis Union School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-68A1.txt
  • than strict adherence to the general rule. A rule, therefore, may be waived where the particular facts make strict compliance inconsistent with the public interest. In the instant case, we conclude that Schuyler fails to demonstrate special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 7, 2000 by Schuyler R-1 School District, Queen City, Missouri and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-697A1.txt
  • Lady's Request for Review, seeking full funding of FRN 371468, must be denied. Further, because SLD has already improperly awarded discounts on this contract for both Funding Year 2 and Funding Year 3, we direct SLD to adjust these funding commitments in accordance with its established funding commitment adjustment procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Our Lady of Refuge School, Bronx, New York, on February 14, 2001, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SLD pursue funding commitment adjustment in accordance with the terms of this Order and the established commitment adjustment procedures. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-699A1.txt
  • County's lack of awareness that a new form was being used in Funding Year 4 and SLD's failure to notify Floyd County of the new form are not circumstances that warrant a deviation from program requirements. We therefore find that Floyd County has failed to demonstrate grounds for a waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Floyd County Board of Education, Rome, Georgia, on April 3, 2001 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Review filed by Floyd County Board of Education, Rome, Georgia, on July 24, 2001 IS DENIED.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-69A1.txt
  • the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Cotton Center fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Cotton Center ISD, Cotton Center, Texas, on June 13, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Keith E. Gast, Cotton Center ISD, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-700A1.txt
  • Schools and Libraries filing window. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has issued Administrator's Decisions on Appeal, informing Wathena that its appeal has brought forward persuasive information and that its request will be reviewed and considered for funding. Wathena's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wathena Unified School District, Wathena, Kansas, on August 21, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Leslie Pullman, Wathena Unified School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-701A1.txt
  • modified to increase the amount awarded for FRN 552512. In addition, we also note that Zeeland made its request over four months after the RAL was issued, well beyond the two-week RAL correction deadline. Accordingly, we find that SLD appropriately denied Zeeland's request to make certain revisions to its application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Zeeland Public School District No. 4, Zeeland, North Dakota on October 9, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Corbley Ogren, Zeeland Public School District No. 4, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-706A1.txt
  • or in part. Although Verizon here aggregated its data at the MSA level, it had the opportunity through notice and comment to recalculate its data to meet its evidentiary requirements. Accordingly, its petition is granted. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by Verizon IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Verizon-East: Special Access Basket Metallic Telegraph Voice Grade WATS Access Line Program
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-70A1.txt
  • on March 28, 2000, three days before the filing window closed on March 31, 2000. Because Frazier demonstrates that it mailed its forms at least three days before the filing window closed, in accordance with Hardee County, we direct SLD to consider its application as filed within the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Frazier School District, Perryopolis, Pennsylvania on August 17, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Frazier's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-71A1.txt
  • the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Pottsville fails to present sufficient good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Pottsville Area School District, Pottsville, Pennsylvania on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Diane Hutchinson, Pottsville Area School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-725A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 22. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Implementation of Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-128 I, ________________________________________________________________________
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-726A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-726A1.txt
  • the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 22. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Implementation of Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-128 I, ________________________________________________________________________
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-727A1.txt
  • tariff for 2000, which GCI has previously challenged. Thus, GCI is already familiar with the issues here and maintaining the existing pleading cycle should not place any unreasonable burdens on GCI. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 204(a), and 205 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 204(a), and 205, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request for an extension of time to file its opposition filed by General Communication, Inc., IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division General Communication, Inc., Request for an Extension of Time, CC Docket No. 02-36 (filed Mar. 22, 2002). Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-72A1.txt
  • is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. Here, Scottsdale Horizons fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Scottsdale Horizons School, Scottsdale, Arizona, on July 12, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Harry Stelling, Jr., Scottsdale Horizons School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-73A1.txt
  • of complying with all relevant rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of correct application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Given SDAS's failure to substantiate its claim, we deny its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Seventh Day Adventist School, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on November 17, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Brandy Sand, on behalf of Seventh Day Adventist School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-741A1.txt
  • fail to properly complete the required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that ACCEPT has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 31, 2001 by ACCEPT Education Collaborative IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Pallidino, ACCEPT Education Collaborative to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-742A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-742A1.txt
  • on review was correctly characterized as internal connections. Further, our review of the attachments reveal nothing that indicated any error in the discount calculations of the entities listed in Block 4 or anything that would have apprised SLD that any of the FRNs were wrongly classified as shared service requests. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Gary Community School Corporation, Gary, Indiana, on May 16, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Yamilette Williams, Gary Community School Corporation, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-743A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-743A1.txt
  • to properly complete the required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that Saint Martin has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 30, 2001 by Saint Martin of Tours School, Bronx, New York IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sister Nora McArt, Saint Martin of Tours
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-745A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-745A1.txt
  • fail to properly complete the required application or otherwise fail to follow program rules, run the risk that their applications may not be considered within the filing window. We therefore conclude that Adirondack has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed November 5, 2001 by Southern Adirondack Library System, Saratoga Springs, New York IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-747A1.txt
  • a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b). V. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the revisions filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. under Transmittal No. 623 and by Qwest Corporation under Transmittal No. 120, ARE SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each local exchange carrier required to suspend its tariff revisions pursuant to this order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-74A1.txt
  • on each FCC Form 471 when it receives it. The bar code on Waikiki's application indicates that SLD received it on February 17, 2000. In the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we conclude that SLD did receive it on that date. We therefore deny Waikiki's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Waikiki Elementary School, Honolulu, Hawaii, on July 6, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Les Goto, Waikiki Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 6,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-750A1.txt
  • Administrator's Decision on Appeal was issued, SLD could not possibly have considered it. Moreover, because we do not, in general, consider material not in the record before SLD, we find that it is not properly part of the record before us for review. We therefore do not address its significance. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Oakland Unified School District, Oakland, California, on November 21, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from David L. Wilner, Oakland Unified School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-75A1.txt
  • 2000, St. Athanasius provides no evidence of when it mailed its application. In keeping with this Order, St. Athanasius may provide evidence to substantiate its claim that it mailed its application on January 14, 2000. Upon timely submission, the Commission will determine whether the evidence supports a grant of waiver. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the following applicants SHALL SUBMIT, within 60 days of the date of the release of this Order, any such evidence as required by the terms of this Order concerning the date of the filing of their applications: Alpine County Unified School District, Markleeville,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-766A1.txt
  • of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), 47 U.S.C. § 214, requesting Federal Communications Commission (``Commission'') approval to transfer control to Forstmann Little of a Commission authorization held by McLeod DIP and its subsidiaries to provide domestic communications services pursuant to part 63 of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, the Wireline Competition Bureau approves the application requesting Commission consent to complete a transfer of control. No comments or petitions to deny were received in response to the Public Notice announcing that the application had been accepted for filing. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will serve
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-76A1.txt
  • one day before the filing window closed, and it was received by SLD on January 24, 2000. Stanley offers no other extenuating circumstances in support of its Waiver Request. We conclude that Stanley fails to demonstrate special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore deny its Waiver Request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the following Waiver Requests ARE DENIED: Anna Stowell Sunderland Bingham Memorial School, Cornwall, Vermont, filed June 6, 2000; Capitol Region Education Council, Hartford, Connecticut, filed June 26, 2000; Dickinson Public Schools, Dickinson, North Dakota, filed June 26, 2000; Ekalaka Public Schools, Ekalaka, Montana,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-774A1.txt
  • April 5, 2002 Released: April 8, 2002 By the Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On November 13, 2000, Roseville Telephone Company (Roseville) filed the above-captioned Petition for Limited Waiver of section 54.309 of the Commission's rules. On November 7, 2001, Roseville submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Limited Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Limited Waiver of section 54.309 of the Commission's rules and regulations IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-775A1.txt
  • Adopted: April 5, 2002 Released: April 8, 2002 By the Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On April 27, 1999, WJG MariTEL Corporation (MariTEL) filed the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.706 of the Commission's rules. On April 24, 2000, MariTEL submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.706 of the Commission's rules and regulations IS DISMISSED WITHOUT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-776A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-776A1.txt
  • 2002 Released: April 8, 2002 By the Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On January 9, 2002, Cellular South License, Inc. (Cellular South) filed the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.313 of the Commission's rules. On March 22, 2002, Cellular South submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.313 of the Commission's rules and regulations IS DISMISSED WITHOUT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-77A1.txt
  • SLD will grant the appeal unless SLD had requested the clarifying information during review and failed to receive it. These conditions are satisfied and, therefore, we vacate the denial of funding and remand to SLD for further consideration, consistent with this decision, of whether funding of FRN 227825 is appropriate. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chickasaw Regional Library System, Ardmore, Oklahoma, on July 18, 2000 is GRANTED, and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lynn
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-783A1.txt
  • ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Further Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Verizon IS GRANTED as modified herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Service,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-787A1.txt
  • Commission must proceed expeditiously in closing the record. Accordingly, USTA has not shown good cause for an extension of time. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by United States Telecom Association IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Notice Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 2999 (2002)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-788A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 02-788 Released: April 8, 2002 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF DOMESTIC 214 AUTHORIZATION FROM ALASKA FIBER STAR, L.L.C. AND WCI CABLE, INC. TO NEPTUNE COMMMUNICATIONS CC Docket No. 02-51 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the joint application of Neptune Communications, L.L.C. (``Neptune Communications''), Alaska Fiber Star License Corporation, and Northstar License Corporation requesting permanent authority to transfer control over Alaska Fiber Star, L.L.C. (``AFS'') and WCI Cable, Inc. (``WCI Cable'') from AMP Life to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-78A1.txt
  • not determine, based on the discount rate, what entity or entities would be receiving the requested services. We find that the information was not easily discernable from information in the application, and that the totality of the circumstances do not warrant relief. Accordingly, we affirm SLD's rejection of the application. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Crawford County Public Library, English, Indiana, on August 9, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Janet LaBreche, Crawford County Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-79A1.txt
  • materials submitted originally by Enoch Pratt appear to establish that each of the two applications relate to different Bell Atlantic accounts. In light of this possible incorrect cancellation, we remand Application Control No. E004736 (File No. SLD-109061) to SLD to determine whether discounts should have been granted for that application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Enoch Pratt Free Library, Baltimore, Maryland, on March 15, 2000 IS DENIED IN PART, and REMANDED IN PART, to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-7A1.txt
  • and 224 NPAs. The second request for waiver filed by the Illinois Commission will expire on January 7, 2002. Accordingly, ten-digit dialing must be implemented in these NPAs no later than January 8, 2002. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3, and 52.19 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 52.19, and the authority delegated in to sections 0.91 and 0.291, of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, IT IS ORDERED that the Illinois Citizens Utility Board Motion for Stay of 47 C.F.R. Section 52.19(c)(3)(ii) in the 847 and 224 NPAs is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See 47 C.F.R. § 52.19(c)(3)(ii). See Illinois Citizens Utility Board Amended Motion
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-80A1.txt
  • circumstances, Escondido's application was appropriately returned for failure to satisfy minimum processing standards. We find that the information requested in Item 11 of Block 5, the category of service, was not a new information request in Funding Year 3 and that the totality of the circumstances do not warrant relief. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Escondido Union High School District, Escondido, California, on July 10, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Terri Stafford, Escondido Union High School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-814A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-814A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 02-814 Released: April 9, 2002 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF INTEROUTE-WHOLESALE, INC. TO VENTURE TELECOM, LLC CC Docket No. 01-328 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Common Carrier Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Venture Telecom, LLC (``Venture'') and Interoute Telecommunications, Inc. (``Interoute'') for transfer of control of Interoute-Wholesale, Inc. (``IWI'') from Interoute to Venture. No comments or petitions to deny were received in response to the public notice announcing that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-815A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-815A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-815A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 02-815 Released: April 9, 2002 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR A TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF COAST TO COAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. FROM RIVIEN USA, L.L.C. TO ALLEGIANCE TELECOM CC Docket No. 01-299 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.01, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for transfer of control of Coast to Coast Telecommunications, Inc. (``Coast to Coast'') from Rivien USA, L.L.C. to Allegiance Telecom. Coast to Coast is a common carrier authorized to provide domestic telecommunications services pursuant to blanket section 214
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-81A1.txt
  • to satisfy minimum processing standards. We find that the information requested in Item 11 of Block 5, the category of service, was not a new information request in Funding Year 3 and that the totality of the circumstances do not warrant relief. Accordingly, we affirm SLD's rejection of the application. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hanover County Public Schools, Ashland, Virginia, on February 21, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Marilyn M. Walls, Hanover County Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-821A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-821A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-821A1.txt
  • sell any or all of these exchanges, it will file a new application under section 63.71 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, Verizon's application is withdrawn, and the discontinuance authority associated with the application is revoked. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), and 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.748 and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.748, and 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that Verizon's request to withdraw its application to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Comments Invited on GTE California Incorporated and GTE West Coast Incorporated's Application to Discontinue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-823A1.txt
  • we conclude that Ameritech, Pacific Bell, SNET, and SWBT have satisfied their burdens of demonstrating that they have met the applicable triggers for each of the various services and MSAs for which they request relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by the Ameritech Operating Companies IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-828A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-828A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-828A1.txt
  • only the ``[d]iscount for shared services ordered by billed entity.'' As noted, Chichester requested a site-specific service, not a shared service, and further specified the site as CSHS. We therefore find that SLD correctly funded FRN 190250 at the 40% rate of CSHS rather than the district's overall 49% rate. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chichester School District, Boothwyn, Pennsylvania, on June 4, 2001 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joyce Voshell, Chichester School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-829A1.txt
  • The record demonstrates that more than 30% of FRNs 393119 and 393807 sought discounts for services provided to Area Vocational Center. Under SLD procedures, if 30% or more of a request is ineligible, the request is denied in its entirety. SLD therefore correctly denied these two FRNs in their entirety. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Crenshaw County Public Schools, Luverne, Alabama, on April 16, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Reba Mason, Crenshaw County Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-82A1.txt
  • the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Governor's School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Governor's School for Global Economics and Technology, Keysville, Virginia, on July 17, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nancy R. Carwile, Governor's School for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-830A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-830A1.txt
  • the risk that their applications may not be considered for funding. The burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided properly rests with the applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that Davis has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 20, 2001, by Davis School District, Farmington, Utah, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Richard Lemon, Davis School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-831A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-831A1.txt
  • 30-day deadline contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed October 2, 2001, by Elgin Public Library, Elgin, Iowa, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Beverly Strong, Elgin Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 2,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-832A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Lancaster Area fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lancaster Area Library, Lancaster, Pennsylvania on October 19, 2001, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-833A1.txt
  • after the January 18, 2001 filing window had closed. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has determined that Lewis County's Form 471 application for discounted services was timely filed and has issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter. Lewis County's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lewis County School District, Weston, West Virginia, on August 28, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Lewis County School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-834A1.txt
  • did not postmark its FCC Form 471, Block 6 certifications, and/or Item 21 attachments by the deadline for the Funding Year 4 filing window. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has granted the relief that Putnam is seeking. Putnam's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Putnam County School District, Putnam, West Virginia, on September 4, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, on behalf of Putnam County
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-835A1.txt
  • rejected Volusia's application because the listed FCC Form 470 Application number contained less than 14 digits. Thus, in accordance with the Bureau's decision in the Pediatric Library Order, we remand Volusia's application to SLD for further processing consistent with the way the SLD processed applications with 14 or more digits. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the School District of Volusia County, on April 16, 2001, IS GRANTED, and this application is REMANDED for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-836A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-836A1.txt
  • for services for which discounts are requested in FCC Form 471.'' Because Thomas did not list its request as one for Internet access on its FCC Form 470 and 471 consistently, we conclude that Thomas failed to satisfy the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. Accordingly, we deny Thomas' Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed January 29, 2001, by Thomas Communications & Technologies, Syracuse, New York, on behalf of John A. Coleman Catholic High School, Hurley, New York, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-837A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-837A1.txt
  • its FCC Form 471 application, Block 6 Certifications, and/or Item 21 attachments were postmarked after the 2001-2002 filing window closed on January 18, 2001. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has granted the relief that Webermeier is seeking. Webermeier's Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Webermeier Memorial Library, Milford, Nebraska, on September 4, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Edna A. Riedl, Webermeier Memorial Library, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-838A1.txt
  • County has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Berks County's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Berks County's initial request, Berks County may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Berks County Intermediate Unit, Reading, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert B. Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-839A1.txt
  • Spinka has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Bnois Spinka's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Bnois Spinka's initial request, Bnois Spinka may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bnois Spinka, Brooklyn, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gitty Horowitz, Bnois Spinka, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January 24, 2002 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-83A1.txt
  • contracts, not the subsequent years of a pre-existing multi-year contract. We conclude that, because Henrico relied on an FCC Form 470 seeking services in Funding Year 3 to support an application for services in Funding Year 2, SLD correctly rejected the application. Henrico's Request for Review must therefore be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Henrico County Public Schools, Richmond, Virginia, on August 16, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Charles Stallard, Henrico County Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-840A1.txt
  • contained in section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules applies to all such requests for review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Floyd County failed to file the instant Request for Review within the requisite 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 26, 2002, by Floyd County Board of Education, Rome, Georgia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jerry Gatlin, Floyd County Board of Education, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-841A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Haywood fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Haywood County Schools, Clyde, North Carolina on February 20, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-842A1.txt
  • this case, because Rochester has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Rochester's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Rochester's initial request, Rochester may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Rochester Public Library, Rochester, Pennsylvania, on January 4, 2002, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jody Bell, Rochester Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-843A1.txt
  • within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be remanded to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Michael School, Brooklyn, New York on January 2, 2002, IS REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-844A1.txt
  • Dells has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Wisconsin Dells's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Wisconsin Dells's initial request, Wisconsin Dells may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School District of Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ann Gissal, School District of Wisconsin Dells, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-845A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss St. Jude School's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on St. Jude School's initial request, St. Jude School may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Jude School, New York, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Deegan, St. Jude School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-846A1.txt
  • 21 Attachment, but denied the application again for lack of a response. Therefore, we dismiss Rushford-Peterson's Request for Review as moot. Nothing in this Order prevents Rushford-Peterson from appealing the Rejection Letter to SLD within the 60-day time period allowed for such appeals from the date of the Rejection Letter. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Rushford-Peterson Secondary School, Rushford, Minnesota, on September 11, 2001 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Valerie Hasleiet, Rushford-Peterson Secondary School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-84A1.txt
  • easily determine from the application that the services in each funding request were site-specific with the same BEN. Additionally, as was the case in Naperville, the record reflects that Koko Head's application is otherwise substantially complete. Therefore, we remand the application to SLD for processing pursuant to the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Koko Head Elementary School, Honolulu, Hawaii, on July 3, 2000 IS REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division for further consideration as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-85A1.txt
  • this case, Penn Hills does not dispute that Mon-Wal is not an eligible telecommunications carrier. Thus, we find that FRN 348764 was correctly denied based on its ineligible SPIN. Because the SPIN led to a funding denial, we conclude that Penn Hill was not thereafter entitled to a SPIN correction. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Penn Hills School District, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on February 28, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Louis Treleani, Penn Hills School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-860A1.txt
  • for waiver of section 32.27(c) filed by Verizon. This waiver is limited to services provided to Verizon by the affiliates listed in the waiver request. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by Verizon IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 5. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Verizon Telephone Companies Petition for Waiver, filed March 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-862A1.txt
  • sell any or all of these exchanges, it will file a new application under section 63.71 of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, Verizon's application is withdrawn, and the discontinuance authority associated with the application is revoked. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), and 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.748 and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.748, and 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that Verizon's request to withdraw its application to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Comments Invited on GTE California Incorporated's Application to Discontinue Local Exchange and Exchange Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-869A1.txt
  • Policy Division: On April 27, 2001, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. filed the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.711(a) of the Commission's rules. On April 8, 2002, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.711(a) of the Commission's rules and regulations IS DISMISSED WITHOUT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-86A1.txt
  • agreement for service prior to filing the FCC Form 471 is itself a violation of the competitive bidding rules. However, we find that the new information cannot be accepted. The FCC Form 471s specified contract award dates for the services requested, and Richmond may not submit contrary information on appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Richmond County Public Schools, Warsaw, Virginia, on May 9, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Karl G. O'Dell, Richmond County Public Schools, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-87A1.txt
  • differently than Ringwood. Under program rules, not every application error is treated under the minimum processing standards procedures. Rather, only those problems specified by SLD in the Minimum Processing Standards will cause SLD to return the application without further review. We conclude that this allegation provides no basis for relief. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ringwood Board of Education, Ringwood, New Jersey, on August 9, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Diane DeBlock, Ringwood Board of Education, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-884A1.txt
  • April 16, 2002 Released: April 18, 2002 By the Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division: On January 15, 2002, Circle Telephone Company filed the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.314 of the Commission's rules. On March 27, 2002, Circle Telephone Company submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Waiver of section 54.314 of the Commission's rules and regulations IS DISMISSED WITHOUT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-888A1.txt
  • review of the merits of Puerto Rico Telephone's petition in light of all the information filed in this proceeding, and in light of other related proceedings. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.41, filed by: ALLTEL Corporation on December 3, 2001, and February 22, 2002; CenturyTel, Inc., and CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC on November 28, 2001; CenturyTel, Inc., and CenturyTel of Missouri, LLC on December 13,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-88A1.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Tuxedo fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Tuxedo Park School, Tuxedo Park, New York, on January 30, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James T. Burger, Tuxedo Park School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-890A1.txt
  • in the Education Act. We leave all other issues for SLD to address as needed on further review. In so doing, we encourage SLD to proceed with caution in this novel context to ensure that universal service funds are distributed in compliance with all statutory and regulatory requirements and restrictions. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Arkansas Department of Correction School District, Pine Bluff, Arkansas, on March 1, 2001 IS GRANTED, and the application IS REMANDED to SLD for further review consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-891A1.txt
  • evidence in the official record supporting Kings Local's assertion that it did not receive the Funding Commitment Decision Letters. Moreover, Kings Local fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeals to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review as well as the request for waiver of the appeal filing period, filed on February 21, 2002, by Kings Local School District, Kings Mills, Ohio ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-892A1.txt
  • in October 1998. Therefore, based on the information in the record that was before SLD during application review, we find that the services requested in the 47 Funding Requests at issue in this appeal were not subjected to competitive bidding in compliance with Commission rules, and were therefore correctly denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Montgomery County School District, Montgomery, Alabama on July 13, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from Carol A. Doucet, Montgomery Public Schools, to Schools and Libraries Division of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-898A1.txt
  • description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. V. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the revisions filed by Sprint Local Telephone Companies under Transmittal No. 192, ARE SUSPENDED for five months and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Sprint Local Telephone Companies SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date of this order reflecting the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-89A1.txt
  • day waiting period would have ended on January 18, 2000, and Alton would have been able to sign contracts and file its FCC Form 471 before the close of the filing window on January 19, 2000. We therefore find that Alton should be granted a waiver of the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Alton Elementary School - Maine School Union No. 90 (Alton), Milford, Maine, on October 4, 2000 IS GRANTED, and this application is remanded to SLD for further processing consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-90A1.txt
  • for further review in accordance with this decision. If, under the substantive standard that SLD develops for permissible site corrections, the pending requests are denied on the merits, Forth Worth ISD may seek further review from the Commission at that time, subject to the deadlines for appeal of SLD action. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Forth Worth Independent School District, Forth Worth, Texas on September 14, 2000 IS GRANTED, and the site correction requests are REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-911A1.txt
  • the customers affected by this application in a manner consistent with its filed representations in this proceeding. Winstar also must notify the Commission when it has fully migrated the customers affected by this notice. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Winstar to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED, consistent with its filed representations in this proceeding, and its obligation to affirmatively report when all customers have been successfully migrated to other carriers. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-91A1.txt
  • the decision. Next to ``Funding Commitment Decision,'' SLD provided: ``Insufficient documentation.'' Next to ``Funding Commitment Decision Explanation,'' SLD stated, as noted above, ``Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation to determine the eligibility of this item.'' Because Goodrich provides no evidence that it supplied the requested information, we affirm SLD's decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Goodrich Independent School District, Goodrich, Texas, on May 15, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Keith McCallum, Goodrich Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-92A1.txt
  • October 11, 2000 Request for Review was filed more than 30 days after the issuance of both the July 14, 2000 First Rejection Letter and the July 21, 2000 Second Rejection Letter. Thus, it is not a timely challenge to either decision, and must be dismissed on those grounds. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Morrisville-Eaton Central School System, Morrisville, New York, on October 11, 2000 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gregory M. Beall, Morrisville-Eaton Central School System, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-934A1.txt
  • II Designation Order, Bell Atlantic New Expanded Interconnection Suspension Order, and NYNEX New Virtual Expanded Interconnection Suspension Order. This transmittal will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate refunds that may later prove necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, the revisions to Verizon's Collocated Interconnection Service filed in Tariff FCC Nos. 1 and 11 under Transmittal No. 175 ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the April 24, 2002 effective date, and investigations of the referenced transmittal ARE INSTITUTED and incorporated into CC Docket Nos. 94-97, 96-165, and 98-240. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-93A1.txt
  • not permitted to amend their FCC Form 471s to remove ineligible services, including Priority Two services to which an entity is not entitled, after the closure of the FCC Form 471 filing window deadline. Because none of La Crosse's arguments provide grounds for relief, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 20, 2001, by the School District of La Crosse, La Crosse, Wisconsin, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tom Ward, School District of La Crosse, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-940A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-940A1.txt
  • standards. Upon review of the record, we find that Deer Park did not satisfy minimum processing standards in Funding Year 4, because the Street Address, P.O. Box or Route Number in Block 1, Item 4a was left blank. Therefore, we must affirm SLD's decision and deny the Request for Review. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Deer Park Community Consolidated Elementary School District No. 82, Ottawa, Illinois, on June 28, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dr. Conrad Spirrison, Deer Park
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-941A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-941A1.txt
  • for filing outside the 30-day filing period for Funding Year 2. By e-mail dated March 27, 2002, Doolittle confirmed that it had applied for and received the same funding in a separate application and requested that its Request for Review be withdrawn because such application duplicated the present application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Doolittle West School, Chicago, Illinois, on November 16, 2000 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Eugene Dumas, Chicago Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-942A1.txt
  • official record of the submitted application, a copy of which is in the record before us, Worksheet C is not present. We therefore find that Intelenet did not submit Worksheet C along with its application and that SLD correctly rejected Intelenet's application for failure to satisfy minimum processing standards. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Intelenet Commission, Indianapolis, Indiana, on July 17, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bob G. Carnal, Intelenet Commission, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 17,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-943A1.txt
  • without consideration those applications that fail minimum processing standards has already been affirmed by the Commission. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the ultimate responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by North Chicago Community Unit School District 187, North Chicago, Illinois, on July 13, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tyrone Pipkin, North Chicago Community Unit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-944A1.txt
  • to pass minimum processing standards is submitted. As SLD noted, both the corrections to OLL's original application form and the new application using the correct form were submitted after the close of the filing window. Thus, SLD correctly found that OLL's application had not been submitted within the filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed by Our Lady of Loretto, Redford, Mississippi, on July 11, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lynne Wendt, Our Lady of Loretto, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-945A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-945A1.txt
  • SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. Therefore, we conclude that SLD properly denied Springfield's request for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed by Springfield Public Schools, Springfield, New Jersey, on May 23, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Daniela Tattoli, Spingfield Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-948A1.txt
  • to add voluntary trials to the rollout schedule. These issues were addressed in the Third Report and Order and the Third Order on Reconsideration. We, therefore, do not address them here. ordering clause Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that National Thousands-Block Number Pooling Schedule is established to the extent described herein. Carol E. Mattey Deputy Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Appendix A National Thousands-Block Number Pooling Rollout Schedule - Quarters 2-7 2nd Quarter - June 15, 2002 - September
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-94A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-94A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-94A1.txt
  • closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately predict the total amount of priority one services requested in a year as required to apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. Therefore, we conclude that SLD properly denied Valliant's request for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Valliant Independent School District 11, Ada, Oklahoma, on April 20, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Debi Sovereign, Kellogg Consulting, L.L.C., on behalf of Valliant Independent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-952A1.txt
  • petition was served with notice pursuant to the pricing flexibility rules. We received no comments or oppositions in response to Qwest's petition. Based on our determination that Qwest's evidence is sufficient, we grant its petition. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, that the petition filed by Qwest IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for Qwest Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services, CCB/CPD File No. 02-01, Public Notice, DA 02-2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-956A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-956A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-956A1.txt
  • if it wishes to be considered within the window. An applicant must further take responsibility for the actions of those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Information Technology Department, State of North Dakota, Bismarck, North Dakota, on October 17, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Curtis Wolfe, Information Technology
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-95A1.txt
  • break-down of the cost of the eligible and ineligible components. Thus, where SLD has requested but not received a specific breakdown of ineligible and eligible costs in a funding request, SLD is warranted and, indeed, obligated to construe the entire request as ineligible so as to avoid funding ineligible services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chelmsford Public Schools, North Chelmsford, Massachusetts, on June 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bernard DiNatale, Chelmsford Public School District, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1009A1.txt
  • requirements discussed in the Universal Service Contribution Methodology Second Further Notice and Staff Study Public Notice shall remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by AT&T Corp. and WorldCom, Inc., IS GRANTED. 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1018A1.txt
  • Utilities Commission (California Commission) filed the above-captioned Petition for Authority to Implement Technology-Specific Overlay Area Codes in the 310 and 909 area codes. On March 14, 2003, the California Commission submitted a motion to withdraw its petition. We grant the California Commission's request to withdraw and dismiss its Petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division Chief Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-101A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom the applicant gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Mirrer Yeshiva fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mirrer Yeshiva Educational Institute, Brooklyn, New York on February 20, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1024A1.txt
  • of the information submitted, we conclude that Verizon has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, the petition filed by Verizon Telephone Companies IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Verizon-East Verizon-West Special Access Basket Special Access Basket Metallic Metallic Enterprise Service Telegraph Telegraph Voice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1025A1.txt
  • a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. La Salle's reasons of misunderstanding and need for the funding are not a special circumstance warranting a waiver. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by La Salle Institute, Troy, New York on March 15, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William P. Maloney III, La Salle Institute, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1026A1.txt
  • 470 that did not necessitate conflict resolution, or excessively delayed before notifying an applicant of problems with an FCC Form 470, such circumstances are not present here. Thus, the circumstances described by Lauderdale are not special circumstances warranting a waiver. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny Lauderdale's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lauderdale County Board of Education, Florence, Alabama, on August 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jerry Fulmer, Lauderdale County Board of Education,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1027A1.txt
  • to the general rule. Misunderstanding of the rules is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. Neither is the threat that denial of funding may have a detrimental impact on a particular school or library. Therefore, we affirm the Administrator and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Ridgemont Public Library, Mt. Victory, Ohio, on January 29, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy J. Terrill, Ridgemont Public Library, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-102A1.txt
  • periodically checking SLD's website (as one of its staff personnel eventually did) or contacting SLD directly. Either method would have apprised it of the funding decision in time to meet all applicable deadlines. Thus, we find that Port Angeles has not demonstrated circumstances warranting a deviation from the general rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Port Angeles School District 121, Port Angeles, Washington, on July 2, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau Facsimile from Jim Bennett, Olympic Peninsula Consultants, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-103A1.txt
  • Thus, we have consistently held that, absent special circumstances, applicants who request waiver of the FCC Form 471 deadline will be denied. Here, Gunter fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its applications. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Gunter Independent School District, Gunter, Texas, on March 1 and 28, 2002 ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.502, 54.503; Letters from Dwana Uselton,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1043A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1043A1.txt
  • submit information on the lines they serve and the date on which support begins to be disbursed, pursuant to Section 54.307(b) the Commissions rules. On March 19, 2003, Western Wireless Corporation submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Clarification or Rulemaking IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Clarification or Rulemaking of the Commission's rules and regulations IS DISMISSED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1047A1.txt
  • the pubic convenience and necessity. Accordingly, Cable & Wireless may discontinue service on March 31, 2003, to the customers affected by this application in a manner consistent with its filed representations in this proceeding. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Cable & Wireless USA, Inc. to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED, consistent with its filed representations in this proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-104A1.txt
  • MDHS may not correct the allowable contract date, contract award date, and contract numbers in its FRNs. Because the new FCC Form 470 was inconsistent with that information in its FRNs, and because the old FCC Form 470 did not support the FRNs, we conclude that SLD properly denied funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mississippi Department of Human Services, Division of Youth Services, Jackson, Mississippi on February 27, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Willie Blackmon, Mississippi Department of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-105A1.txt
  • error nor SLD's failure to mention the problem warrants relief from the failure to submit a complete application. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on applicants the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Locust Valley Library, Locust Valley, New York, on January 11, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Salvatore Marino, Locust Valley Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-106A1.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because Paso Robles failed to file an appeal of the July 26, 2001 FCC Form 471 Certification Rejection Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Paso Robles's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Paso Robles Public Schools, Paso Robles, California, on February 20, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Laurie Crowe, Paso Robles Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-107A1.txt
  • by the Administrator. Because Our Lady of Lourdes failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Our Lady of Lourdes's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Our Lady of Lourdes School, Melbourne, Florida, on January 15, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeanette B. Colburn, Our Lady of Lourdes School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-108A1.txt
  • filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the 30-day period has been extended by an additional 30 days for requests for review, Ubly's October 15, 2001 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Ubly's Request for Review and direct SLD to review Ubly's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Ubly Community Schools, Ubly, Michigan on March 4, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Evelyn Smaglinski, Ubly Community Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-109A1.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because West Branch failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss West Branch's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by West Branch Community Schools, West Branch, Iowa, on March 4, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Craig Artist, West Branch Community Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1103A1.txt
  • description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 204(a) and 205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 204(a) and 205, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Tariff FCC No. 1, Transmittal No. 31 of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. IS SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. SHALL FILE a supplement within five business days from the release date of this order reflecting the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1104A1.txt
  • our rules that would obviate the need to include advanced services within the price cap indexes and rates, constitutes special circumstances, and such circumstances outweigh any harm to competition. Ordering Clauses 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for services transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2003 Annual Access Tariff Filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-110A1.txt
  • Berks County acknowledges in a letter to SLD that the signature was missing on the Form 471. Thus, consistent with our precedent in the South Barber Order, we conclude that SLD's decision is supported by precedent and the underlying record. We therefore affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Berks County Intermediate Unit, Alsace School on March 25, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert Lipton, Berks County Intermediate Unit, Alsace School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-111A1.txt
  • is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of its appeals. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that Gloversville has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Gloversville Enlarged School District, Gloversville, New York, on February 15, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1129A1.txt
  • Act governing intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in WC Docket No. 02-373, ARE APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division See 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-112A1.txt
  • other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, S.C. Governor's School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by S.C. Governor's School for Science and Mathematics, Hartsville, South Carolina, on January 8, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1138A1.txt
  • rule. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District, Downieville, California on February 12, 2003, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1139A1.txt
  • October 2001 to submit its FCC Form 471, ten months after it learned that Comcast had agreed to continue the contract and the filing window had closed. In light of these considerations, we find that Hatboro-Horsham's argument does not justify a waiver of our rules and deny Hatboro-Horsham's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Hatboro-Horsham School District, Horsham, Pennsylvania on February 20, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan Casagrand, Hatboro-Horsham School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-113A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on December 31, 2001, by Northland Community Schools, Remer, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Doro, Northland Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-114A1.txt
  • 17, 2001, it fails to establish conclusively that Albany signed its application on that same date. As a result, we find that Albany has failed to provide the Commission with persuasive evidence that demonstrates that it complied with the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. We, therefore, deny Albany's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Albany Public Library, Albany, New York, on January 31, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Patricia M. Hollman, Albany Public Library, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1159A1.txt
  • Commission. However, given the circumstances cited by Fibertech, and the importance of the issues raised in this proceeding, we will grant Fibertech's request to extend the deadline to file reply comments. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(j) and 155(c), and authority delegated under §§ 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Fiber Technologies, L.L.C. IS GRANTED and that the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding is extended until April 29, 2003. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division See Order, WC Docket No. 03-37, DA 03-670
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-115A1.txt
  • students. Although it is unfortunate that WestCEL's error in following the competitive bidding rules resulted in denial of its Funding Year 2001 request, as stated above, it is administratively necessary for the applicant to bear the burden of understanding program rules and procedures. We, therefore, deny WestCEL's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by WestCEL, Rangley, Colorado, on March 4, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Chris Brubaker, WestCEL, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed March 4, 2002 (Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1163A1.txt
  • IXC POPs and, after the Commission detariffed inside wiring in 1986, the majority of such costs were treated as non-regulated costs. Under this regime, the record does not provide an adequate basis for a finding that the challenged changes in demarcation practices will result in a material double recovery of costs. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the petition filed by AT&T Corp. IS DENIED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau The parties use the terms ``point of interface'' and ``point of termination'' interchangeably. Both terms refer to the specific point where a LEC's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1168A1.txt
  • parte letter in this docket withdrawing its application. As such, we hereby terminate this docket. Michigan Bell further stated that, when it re-files its application for Michigan, it will provide ``additional information, as well as updated information necessary to demonstrate [Michigan Bell's] continued compliance with the requirements of section 271.'' Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the proceeding in WC Docket No. 03-16 IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James C. Smith, Senior Vice President, SBC Telecommunications, Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 03-16 (filed Apr. 16, 2003).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1169A1.txt
  • allow Guamcell to begin receiving high-cost support as of February 1, 2002, the date it filed its high-cost certification under section 54.314 of the Commission's rules. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, filed by Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. on February 6, 2002, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 254(e).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-116A1.txt
  • and processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. In particular, failure to comply with the competitive bidding requirements must result in a denial of support by SLD. We, therefore, deny Albuquerque's Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Library System, Albuquerque, New Mexico, on December 20, 2001, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from John Godfrey, Albuquerque/Bernalillo Library System, to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-117A1.txt
  • the applicant who is ultimately responsible for the timely submission of its appeals. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that St. Norbert has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Norbert School, Northbrook, Illinois on March 21, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-118A1.txt
  • of adhering strictly to its filing deadlines. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its appeal to SLD if it wishes its appeal to be considered on the merits. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. John's Preparatory School, Astoria, New York on March 21, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-119A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Chelsea School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chelsea School, Chelsea, Maine on March 11, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-120A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Apostles School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Queen of Apostles School, Alexandria, Virginia on March 5, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-121A1.txt
  • Appeal, filed on November 16, 2001, was timely. Therefore, we reverse the Administrator's Decision on Appeal, and remand to SLD for it to address Calhoun's SLD Appeal on the merits. In doing so, we emphasize that we make no determination as to whether Calhoun is ultimately entitled to any relief. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Calhoun School, New York, New York on December 7, 2001, IS GRANTED, and this matter is REMANDED to SLD for consideration of the Calhoun School's appeal on the merits. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-122A1.txt
  • find that Apostles School's ability to appeal was prejudiced by SLD's unreasonable delay in responding to Apostles School's request for a copy of the missing page from the Funding Commitment Decision Letter. Therefore, we grant Queen of Apostles' Request for Review and remand its application to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Queen of Apostles School, Alexandria, Virginia on March 5, 2002, IS GRANTED and its application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-123A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Washington County fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Washington County Educational Service Center, Marietta, Ohio on March 4, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-124A1.txt
  • the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of its appeals. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. Therefore, we conclude that Granger School has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Granger School District No. 204, Granger School, Washington, on February 27, 2002, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1253A1.txt
  • other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. VI. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the petitions filed by Verizon proposing LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in WC Docket No. 02-336, ARE APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division See 47 U.S.C. § 153(25). Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1285A1.txt
  • of nonlocal directory assistance service in Nevada. Accordingly, we allow SBC to provide nonlocal directory assistance service in Nevada on an integrated basis, subject to these nondiscrimination requirements. V. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 10, 272, 303(r), 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, 272, and 303(r), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that SBC's petition for forbearance with respect to its nonlocal directory assistance services in Nevada IS GRANTED to the extent set forth herein. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-128A1.txt
  • find that the PowerVault servers comprise more than 30% of the funding request. Specifically, the PowerVault servers cost $375,118, or 69% of the total request of $539,888. Because more than 30% of FRN 429028 was properly found to be ineligible, we affirm SLD's decision denying funding for the entire request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Western Heights School District I-41, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on May 10, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator By Western Heights
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1365A1.txt
  • On April 6, 1998, ITCs, Inc. (ITCs) filed the above-captioned Application for Review of the Accounting and Audits Division's denial of ITCs' petition for waiver of sections 36.611(a) and 36.612 of the Commission's rules. On September 27, 2001, ITCs submitted a Request to Withdraw the above-captioned Application for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Request to Withdraw the above-captioned Petition for Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Application for Review IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric Einhorn, Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1379A1.txt
  • any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Ameritech for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing one and two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in NSD-L-01-151, ARE APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division Appendix Exchanges and Access Lines Ameritech's Albion (7,324
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1456A1.txt
  • reversed because such items were determined to be eligible under the Internet access category of service in the Commission's Universal Service Order. We agree. Because we find that granting the Request is warranted based on these grounds, we need not address the other arguments raised in the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on behalf of Barberton City School District, Barberton, Ohio on August 1, 2002 IS GRANTED and the application is REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1528A1.txt
  • preemption of the New York Commission over the disputes between Verizon and MFS and Verizon and Brooks Fiber and invite Petitioners to file for resolution of these disputes under 47 C.F.R. § 1.720 et seq. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b), the joint petition for Commission preemption of jurisdiction filed by Petitioners on March 20, 2003, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Joint Petition of MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc., Brooks Fiber Communications of New York, Inc. and Verizon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1569A1.txt
  • note that SLD has modified the instructions for Funding Year 2003, and the instructions now state ``if the application type is consortium, a completed Block 4 Worksheet C must be submitted.'' We therefore reverse SLD's decision and remand Petitioner's application to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Western New York Regional Information Center, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and the applications of Erie 1 Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Erie 2 - Chautauqua/Cattaraugus Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Cattaraugus/Allegany Board of Cooperative Education
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1570A1.txt
  • rule. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School District of Durand, Durand, Wisconsin on January 22, 2003, IS DISMISSED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1573A1.txt
  • decision by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator). On October 2, 2002, Christian County appealed the decision to the Federal Communications Commission. Since the Request for Review was filed, SLD reconsidered its denial. Therefore, we dismiss Christian County's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Christian County Public School District, Hopkinsville, Kentucky, on October 2, 2002 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bruce Lindsey, Christian County Public School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1574A1.txt
  • by SLD issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Clifton filed its appeal on March 25, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 25, 2003, by Clifton High School, Clifton, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sheila Musselman, Clifton High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1575A1.txt
  • burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Gardner Unified School District 231, Gardner, Kansas on December 12, 2002, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1576A1.txt
  • appropriate only if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the rule. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 26, 2003, by Genoa-Kingston School District 424, Kingston, Illinois, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1577A1.txt
  • rule. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lucia Mar Unified School District, Arroyo Grande, California on April 16, 2003 IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1578A1.txt
  • SLD issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Riverside County filed its appeal on March 3, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 3, 2003, by Riverside County Office of Education, Riverside, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Spires, Riverside County Office of Education, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1579A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss Woodbridge Township's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Woodbridge Township may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 17, 2003, by Woodbridge Township School District, Woodbridge, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Esolda, Woodbridge Township School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1580A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1580A1.txt
  • SLD issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Yeshiva Rav filed its appeal on March 26, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 26, 2003, by Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn, Los Angeles, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nechama Green, Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1651A1.txt
  • unless the Commission specifically requires the adoption of SFAS 144 accounting in the future. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § § 154 (i), 154 (j), and 220, section 32.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 32.16, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that all subject carriers are notified that they shall not adopt SFAS 144 for federal accounting purposes. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau The Financial Accounting Standards Board is the authoritative standard setting body responsible for accounting and disclosure practices to be used for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1652A1.txt
  • same time and in the same manner that carriers implement the Statements in their published financial statements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 220, section 32.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 32.16, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the notifications of intent to adopt SFAS 123, SFAS 148, SFAS 145, and SFAS 146 submitted by SBC and Verizon ARE HEREBY GRANTED and that all subject carriers shall implement these Statements for federal accounting purposes at the same time and in the same manner that they implement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-169A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-169A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-169A2.txt
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey H. Dygert Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Alascom Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Rules Regarding its Annual Tariff F.C.C. No. 11 ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket 03-18 I,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1721A1.txt
  • of the information submitted, we conclude that SBC has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, the petitions filed by SBC are hereby GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY I. TRUNKING BASKET Ameritech Operating Companies Nevada Bell Voice Grade LT-1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1747A1.txt
  • had ample opportunity to contact its customers and the Commission prior to discontinuing service, and thus cannot show that the conditions causing discontinuance could not have been foreseen or forestalled. Therefore, Texcom has failed to satisfy the requirements of sections 63.63(a)(3) and (7), and its application for emergency discontinuance is accordingly denied. ordering clause IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.63(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.63(b), that NACS Communications, Inc. d/b/a Texcom USA's application for emergency discontinuance IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.63. Letter from Cristián Gálvez, NACS Communications, Inc. d/b/a Texcom USA, to Federal Communications Commission, dated May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-181A1.txt
  • if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Boardman's reason is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Boardman Local Schools, Youngstown, Ohio, on July 31, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robert J. Wright, Boardman Local Schools, Youngstown, Ohio, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-182A1.txt
  • than a ``stand alone'' automated catalogue or an internal system. We find that SLD erred in denying Rochester's request. Frame Relay 56K connections are eligible for discounts as telecommunications services, irrespective of the fact that they may link to a Library Automated Catalogue, which is not itself eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Rochester Public Library, Rochester, Pennsylvania on April 22, 2002 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the application for discounts filed by Rochester Public Library IS REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-186A1.txt
  • by Qwest Services. This waiver is limited to services provided by Qwest Services to its affiliated entities and the purchaser listed in this waiver request. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by Qwest Services IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 5. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Qwest Services Corporation Petition for Waiver, filed November
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1870A1.txt
  • effect on the public convenience and necessity. Accordingly, LDMI may discontinue service on May 31, 2003, to the customers affected by this application in a manner consistent with its filed representations in this proceeding. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of LDMI Telecommunications, Inc. to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED, consistent with its filed representations in this proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. The application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1872A1.txt
  • Corr Wireless sought designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier in several rural telephone carrier service areas in state of Alabama. On May 22, 2003, Corr Wireless submitted a request to withdraw the petition it filed on February 21, 2003. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric Einhorn, Chief
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1876A1.txt
  • March 7, 2003, Advantage Cellular Systems, Inc. (Advantage) filed the above-captioned petition for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier in the state of Tennessee pursuant to section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. On April 25, 2003, Advantage submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier IS DISMISSED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1885A1.txt
  • not contemplate simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss Grainfield's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Grainfield may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 18, 2003, by Grainfield City Library, Grainfield, Kansas, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Anna Whiteman, Grainfield City Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1889A1.txt
  • the necessary revenue to meet the applicable threshold. Accordingly, by aggregating their data above the wire center level, incumbent LECs run the risk that their petitions may be denied in whole or in part. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, the petition filed by the Verizon Telephone Companies IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Special Access Services Basket Metallic Telegraph Voice Grade WATS Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1906A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1906A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 03-1906 Released: June 6, 2003 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF BLOUNTSVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY, AND BTC LONG DISTANCE, FROM PAGE & KISER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., TO OTELCO HOLDINGS WC Docket No. 03-101 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for consent to transfer control of the wholly-owned affiliates of Pager & Kiser, Blountsville Telephone Company, Inc. and BTC Long Distance, Inc., to Otelco Holdings, LLC. No comments or petitions to deny were received in response to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1907A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1907A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ð DA 03-1907 Released: June 6, 2003 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN ASSETS OF ADELPHIA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS BY BELLSOUTH WC Docket No. 02-181 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Adelphia Business Solutions (``Applicant'') requesting authority to transfer control to BellSouth of certain of its resale customer base (approximately 10,000 lines) existing in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1908A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 03-1908 Released: June 6, 2003 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF ASSETS OF DIGITAL TELEPORT, INC. BY CENTURYTEL FIBER COMPANY II, LLC WC Docket No. 03-99 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of CenturyTel Fiber Company II, LLC (``CTF II) to acquire all the operating assets of Digital Teleport, Inc. (``DTI''), as approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. CTF II will acquire the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1919A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1919A1.txt
  • Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Iowa Telecommunications Service, Inc. SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Iowa Telecommunications Service, Inc. SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each request for information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1921A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss Northside Center's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Northside Center may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 31, 2003, by Northside Center for Child Development, Inc., New York, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Paula Magnus, Northside Center
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1922A1.txt
  • Service Administrative Company (Administrator) to deny funding because of competitive bidding issues related to Orleans Parish's FCC Form 470 and Requests for Proposal. On May 22, 2003, Orleans Parish requested that its Requests for Review be withdrawn because it has appealed to SLD and is waiting for SLD's decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Orleans Parish School District, New Orleans, Louisiana, on March 21, 2003 ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letters from George Watts, Orleans Parish School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1923A1.txt
  • when Springfield received notice of the late-filed application, it was the Springfield's responsibility to file a timely and complete application before the close of the filing window. As a result, we do not agree that this is sufficient justification for waiver. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Springfield School District on December 4, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joseph Silver, Springfield School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 4,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1937A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1937A1.txt
  • Petition in abeyance ``pending potential developments relating to negotiations between the Republic of Palau and the United States and possible relevant actions by other branches of government.'' PNCC also indicated that it would notify the Commission when it is prepared to ask the Commission to resume processing the Petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to hold the above-captioned petition in abeyance IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Palau National Communications Corporation, Petition for Declaratory Ruling and Related Waivers to Enable Palau National Communications Corporation to Participate in Universal Service Programs
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1945A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1945A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1945A1.txt
  • decision in the Federal Register, providing legal notice to all parties. Therefore, SLD was not required to re-announce this policy in each affected Funding Year 1998 funding decision. In sum, we conclude that SLD correctly found the SLD Appeal to be untimely, and uphold SLD's dismissal of the GCI's appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by General Communication, Inc., Anchorage, Alaska, on March 29, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey APPENDIX A Applicant Name: File No: Funding Request Nos.: Alaska Gateway School District 102570 117391, 117411, 117460 Aleutian East Borough School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1946A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Ahead Communications' Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Ahead Communications may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 14, 2003, by Ahead Communications Systems, Middlebury, Connecticut, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Theresa DeNuzzo, Ahead Communications Systems, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1947A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Federal Way's Requests for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Federal Way may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on May 13, 2003, by Federal Way Public Schools, Federal Way, Washington, ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sandy Nelson, Federal Way Public Schools, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1951A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1951A1.txt
  • necessary to meet the needs of local subscribers while maintaining SBC's incentives to fulfill its section 271 obligations. Accordingly, we approve the SBC Petition for limited LATA modification. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of SBC Ameritech Wisconsin for LATA modification at a specific location, identified in WC Docket No.02-337, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division See Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56, codified at 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1953A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1953A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1953A1.txt
  • Effect of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Iowa Telecommunications, Service, Inc. Tariff FCC No. 1, Transmittal No. 31 ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 03-135 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ___, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1958A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1958A1.txt
  • sought designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier on the Crow Reservation in Montana pursuant to section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. On June 9, 2003, Western Wireless submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier and for related waivers IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for designation as an eligible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-203A1.txt
  • proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Second Further Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Consumers Union, Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel, Consumer Federation of America, Appalachian People's Action Coalition, Center for Digital Democracy, Edgemont Neighborhood Coalition, and Migrant Legal Action Program IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Acting Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2062A1.txt
  • be due on July 12, 2003. Carriers with contribution requirements in excess of $1,200 may opt to pay in equal monthly installments. A minimum contribution requirement of $25 applies to all telecommunications carriers that have end-user revenues. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(e) and sections 0.91, 0.291, 52.16, and 52.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.16, and 52.17, that this Order is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NBANC shall apply the contribution factor of 0.000036 to the end-user revenue of each telecommunications carrier in the United States for NANP administration cost recovery. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-206A1.txt
  • March 31, 2003. Corban or its customers may file a request for modification of this extended period to the extent that its customers find alternative service or in the event that circumstances otherwise require. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that petitions filed by the Post Company and the Montana Broadcasters Association ARE GRANTED to the extent described herein, and that Corban Communications, Inc. SHALL maintain service to these parties through March 31, 2003 in a manner consistent with this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2096A1.txt
  • NECA requests that these modifications take effect on July 1, 2003, and remain in effect through June 30, 2004. We have reviewed NECA's filing and find that its proposed formulas are reasonable. Therefore, pursuant to section 69.606(a) of the Commission's rules, we approve the proposed average schedule formulas as submitted in NECA's filing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. on December 31, 2002, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2003, and remain in effect through June 30, 2004. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2118A1.txt
  • substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the 2003 annual access tariff of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., IS SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-216A1.txt
  • paid by interexchange carriers nationwide. Accordingly, there should be no discernible negative impact on the petitioners' subscribers from our denial of the requested waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254 and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, by Nemont Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Missouri Valley Communications, Inc., Reservation Telephone Cooperative, and Citizens Telecommunications Company of North Dakota dated September 24, 2002, IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2188A1.txt
  • ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Paul Moon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by CompTel IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for AT&T Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Enhanced Prepaid Calling Card Services, WC Docket No. 03-133, Public Notice, DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2194A1.txt
  • ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the public notices remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by ALLTEL Communications, Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric Einhorn, Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Alabama, filed April 14, 2003; ALLTEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2195A1.txt
  • 746700, and 748073. Therefore, we dismiss as moot Wray's Waiver Request for FRNs 746217, 746370, 746485, 746562, 746582, 746700, and 748073. On June 26, 2003, Wray filed a Request to Withdraw its Waiver Request for FRN 746497. We grant Wray's Request to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismiss the Request for Waiver. Accordingly, it is ordered pursuant to authority delegated under section 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Wray School District RD2, Wray, Colorado on September 13, 2002, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Robyn Custer, Wray School District RD-2, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2278A1.txt
  • between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 20. Authority. This Protective Order supersedes the protective order issued April 10, 2003 in connection with GCI's FOIA Request, and is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of General Communication, Inc. On Request for Inspection of Documents Alascom Petition for Waiver from the Commission Rule and Orders Requiring an Annual Tariff Filing ) ) ) ) ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2279A1.txt
  • affiliate requirements for the service proposed by Verizon for 1+ calls from payphones meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to October 22, 2003. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2280A1.txt
  • regarding whether forbearance from the prohibition of sharing operating, installation, and maintenance functions meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to November 3, 2003. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2286A1.txt
  • SLD issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Anderson County filed its appeal on June 10, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 10, 2003, by Anderson County School District, Clinton, Tennessee, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Georgia Morrow, E-Rate Consulting, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2288A1.txt
  • SLD issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Blount County filed its appeal on May 29, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 29, 2003, by Blount County Schools, Maryville, Tennessee, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Alvin Hord, Blount County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2289A1.txt
  • on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Colorado Springs SD 11 filed its appeal on June 25, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 25, 2003, by Colorado Springs School District 11, Colorado Springs, Colorado, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Raymond Caplinger, Colorado Springs School District 11, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2290A1.txt
  • not contemplate simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss Linden's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Linden may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 29, 2003, by Linden Public Schools, Linden, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Frank Taranto, Linden Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2291A1.txt
  • SLD issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, New Haven filed its appeal on February 20, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 20, 2003, by New Haven Public Schools, New Haven, Connecticut, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dr. Reginald Mayo, New Haven Public Schools, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2292A1.txt
  • period of time. 4. Therefore, we grant the request for review and remand Kohl's application to SLD for consideration. However, by remanding we do not suggest an outcome for Kohl's application. Furthermore, because we have granted Kohl's request for review, we find it unnecessary to consider its waiver request. 5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Rachel Kohl Community Library, Glenn Mills, Pennsylvania, on October 30, 2002 IS GRANTED AND REMANDED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kathleen Pileggi, Rachel Kohl Community Library,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2333A1.txt
  • proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Jeremy D. Marcus, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the CLECs and by NARUC IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for Verizon Petition for Expedited Forbearance From the Commission's Current Pricing Rules for the Unbundled
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2411A2.txt
  • 128.02 18 27 58.1N 67 4 3.6W AGUADILLA PR 21.34 128.02 18 27 57.6N 67 4 4W AGUADILLA PR 13.72 128.02 18 27 59N 67 4 10.2W AGUADILLA PR 30.48 106.68 18 28 31.5N 67 7 14.6W AGUADILLA PR 30.48 106.68 18 28 30.5N 67 7 12.2W AGUADILLA PR 30.48 106.68 18 28 28.1N 67 7 13.4W AGUADILLA PR 14.63 0.91 18 25 55.9N 66 0 39.5W SAN JUAN PR 8.84 2.13 18 25 55.7N 66 0 38.7W SAN JUAN PR 12.19 3.05 18 25 58.2N 66 0 40.7W SAN JUAN PR 33.53 53.04 18 15 46.9N 65 38 50.5W FAJARDO PR 33.53 53.04 18 15 46.9N 65 38 50.5W ROOSEVELT ROADS PR 30.48 3.05 18 26 13.2N 66 0 22.9W
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2433A1.txt
  • of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Bliss School District' Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Bliss School District may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 5, 2003, by Bliss School District 234, Bliss, Idaho, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kevin Lancaster, Bliss School District 234, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2434A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Iditarod Area's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Iditarod Area may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 12, 2003, by Iditarod Area School District, McGrath, Alaska, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Isabelle Harrington, Iditarod Area School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2435A1.txt
  • issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, USD No. 507 filed its appeal on June 10, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 10, 2003, by Unified School District No. 507, Satanta, Kansas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Monty Brown, Unified School District No. 507, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-243A1.txt
  • and comply with the program's rules and procedures. The circumstances described by Glover do not constitute special circumstances for purposes of our waiver standard. Therefore, we conclude that Glover has not demonstrated the existence of any special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Glover Elementary School, Broken Bow, Oklahoma, on January 18, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jon Tuck, Glover Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-244A1.txt
  • SLD is insufficient to merit a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, Union Township's claims that its applications were late due to incorrect advice from SLD is insufficient to justify a waiver. We conclude that Union Township has not demonstrated special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Union Township School, Hampton, New Jersey, on January 16, 2002, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michelle Burton, Union Township School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-245A1.txt
  • demonstrating that it is cutting expenses in the budget unconnected to its discounted service obligations to cover the shortfall. Similarly, Yeshiva should be permitted to demonstrate that it can cover the entire $18,175.36 amount of its share of the costs, including the $175.36 amount not covered in its original budget. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Beginning with Children Charter School, Brooklyn, New York, on May 14, 2002 IS GRANTED, and its application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Review filed by Yeshiva Karlin-Stolin, Brooklyn,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2482A1.txt
  • request to withdraw the portion of its petition seeking waiver of section 54.313 of the Commission's rules. We grant N.E. Colorado Cellular's request for partial withdrawal. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, filed by N.E. Colorado Cellular, Inc., on February 8, 2002, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2496A1.txt
  • from items four through six and ten of the section 271 competitive checklist meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to October 27, 2003. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2552A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2552A1.txt
  • conclude that the facts of this case warrant granting BellSouth's amendment. Accordingly, we grant BellSouth's amendment in part, permitting it to remove ZipConnect from its ONA plan for Florida. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, and 218 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, 218, and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, BellSouth's Open Network Architecture Plan amendment IS GRANTED in part, to the extent described above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Filing and Review of Open Network Architecture Plans, BellSouth Open
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2562A1.txt
  • mechanism. Specifically, Andrews County requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 331196. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Andrews County's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 331196. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Andrews County's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed September 9, 2002, by Andrews County Library, Andrews, Texas, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Elizabeth Stottlemyre, Andrews County Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2563A1.txt
  • strict adherence to the general rule. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on applicants. We conclude that Baldwin Park fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Baldwin Park Unified School District, Baldwin Park, California, on July 12, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2564A1.txt
  • libraries universal service mechanism. Specifically, DeLeon requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 338009. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved DeLeon's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 338009. Accordingly, the Division dismisses DeLeon's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed August 26, 2002, by DeLeon Independent School District, DeLeon, Texas, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dennis Otwell, DeLeon Independent School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2565A1.txt
  • mechanism. Specifically, Grant County requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Numbers (FRN) 332461. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Grant County's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 332461. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Grant County's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed October 16, 2002, by Grant County Board of Education, Williamstown, Kentucky, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Becky Epperson, Grant County Board of Education, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2566A1.txt
  • burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 2, 2003, by Holly School District, Holly, Colorado, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2567A1.txt
  • libraries universal service mechanism. Specifically, Tunbridge requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 337012. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Tunbridge's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 337012. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Tunbridge's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed October 31, 2002, by Tunbridge Public Library, Tunbridge, Vermont, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jean Wolfe, Tunbridge Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2568A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2568A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2568A1.txt
  • Specifically, Wareham requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Numbers (FRNs) 345831 and 345658. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Wareham's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRNs 345831 and 345658. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Wareham's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed September 11, 2002, by Wareham School District, Wareham, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeff Hathaway, Wareham School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2569A1.txt
  • exceeds the industry standard of 15 days. On July 25, Chillicothe withdrew tariff transmittal No. 74, thereby mooting the investigation of the rates in that transmittal. On the same day, Chillicothe filed Transmittal No. 76 revising its rates to reflect changes to its estimated revenue requirements and its cash working capital study. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.108, we reconsider on our own motion our decision in the Suspension Order to suspend and investigate the revised tariff rates of Chillicothe Telephone Company filed in Transmittal No. 74. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2576A1.txt
  • (Indiana Commission) would not respond to its request. Choice One seeks to withdraw the Petition because the Indiana Commission has indicated that it will address Choice One's Petition. Given that Choice One intends to seek relief from the Indiana Commission, we grant Choice One's motion to withdraw its Petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division Chief Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2577A1.txt
  • also note that any decision we make regarding AlternaTel's discontinuance application would have no affect upon and is without prejudice to the enforcement proceeding currently pending against AlternaTel. Accordingly, we grant AlternaTel's application. III. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(1), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(1), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of ASC Telecom, Inc. d/b/a AlternaTel to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. Comments Invited on ASC Telecom, Inc. d/b/a AlternaTel Application to Discontinue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2582A1.txt
  • rules. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 7, 2003, by School District of Somerset, Somerset, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED as it relates to the August 6, 2002 decision, IS DENIED as it relates to the February 13, 2003 decision, and the request to waive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2583A1.txt
  • incorrectly advised Mifflin County not to file an appeal, Commission precedent establishes that where a party has received erroneous advice, the government is not estopped from enforcing its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 20, 2002, by Mifflin County Library, Lewistown, Pennsylvania, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2584A1.txt
  • on July 24, 2002. Saint Michael School fails to provide evidence that it did not receive the July 24, 2002 notice. The mere assertion that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Michael School, Chicago, Illinois on March 25, 2003, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2585A1.txt
  • the public interest than strict adherence to the rule. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. Staffing problems do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 20, 2002, by Bemus Point Central School District, Bemus Point, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan G. Gauch, Bemus Point
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2586A1.txt
  • Texas (Galena Park). Galena Park seeks a waiver of the deadline for requests for review of decisions by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company. Since Galena Park timely filed their appeal and offered evidence thereof, we dismiss as moot Galena Park's Request for Waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Galena Park Independent School District is DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeffrey Lorentz, Galena Park Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2587A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2587A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2587A1.txt
  • it had a misunderstanding of program rules is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. Further, we have consistently held in the past that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Saint Katherine Drexel School on July 3, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rev. Kevin P. Murray, Saint Katherine Drexel School, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2588A1.txt
  • warrant a deviation from the general rule and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Here, Twin Hills fails to present good cause as to why it should receive a waiver of the filing requirements. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Twin Hills School, Okmulgee, Oklahoma, on August 19, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Donna Martin, Twin Hills School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2596A1.txt
  • ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the public notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd, Wireline Competition Bureau, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, 202-418-7400. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Corr Wireless Communications, LLC IS GRANTED as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric Einhorn, Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Corr Wireless is seeking designation as an ETC to receive federal universal service support for rural study areas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2680A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2680A1.txt
  • will be no adverse effect on the pubic convenience and necessity. Accordingly, ATG may discontinue service to the customers affected by this application in a manner consistent with its filed representations in this proceeding. Ordering clause Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Advanced TelCom, Inc. d/b/a Advanced TelCom Group and Shared Communications Services, Inc. to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED, consistent with its filed representations in this proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2765A1.txt
  • a switchless reseller to obtain a CIC. In particular, a waiver is not required for American Telnet to apply for the 0307 CIC. Once the FGD requirement was eliminated for switchless resellers, American Telnet had the opportunity to apply for the 0307 CIC, or any other CIC. ORdering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.2, that American Telnet's Petition is DIMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See American Telnet's Request for Declaratory Ruling and/or Rule Waiver, filed August 2, 2001 (Petition); American Telnet's Amendment to Emergency Request for Declaratory Ruling and or Rule
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-27A1.txt
  • that interest will be computed on a daily compounded basis at the appropriate interest rate established by the Internal Revenue Service, in accordance with paragraph 177 of the Access Reform Implementation Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the refund plan filed by SBC on behalf of Pacific Bell IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief Pricing Policy Division See Revised Refund Plan of Pacific Bell, filed by SBC Communications Inc., CC Docket No. 97-250 (filed Nov. 20, 1998). Tariffs Implementing Access Charge
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2834A1.txt
  • and USAC on October 1, 2003. We also direct USAC to true up support amounts as necessary when Qwest files its loop cost data for 2002. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 36.611 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 36.611, filed by Qwest Communications on July 29, 2003, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from R. William Johnston,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2898A1.txt
  • (RHCD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company. In its request, Unicom seeks review of funding commitments made by RHCD to Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation. On June 5, 2003, Unicom submitted a request that the Request for Review, along with all related Supplements and Petitions for Leave to File, be dismissed with prejudice. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Request for Review filed by Unicom, Inc., on October 9, 2001, along with all related Supplements and Petitions for Leave to File, IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2902A1.txt
  • of these blocks, we direct Qwest to only activate them for the customer for whom the application for numbering resources was made. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 52.9(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.9(b), the petition filed by Qwest Corporation is GRANTED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Initially, Qwest's petition sought permission to obtain five sequential thousands-blocks. See Qwest Corporation Request for Assignment of Five Sequential One Thousand-Blocks, filed October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2917A1.txt
  • deadlines are both impractical and unreasonable, as well as the Commission's and the Bureau's long-standing policy of ensuring that applicants for non-recurring services are not penalized for delays that are not within their control. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.507(d), filed by Chicago Public Schools, Chicago, Illinois on May 15, 2003, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2918A1.txt
  • deadlines are both impractical and unreasonable, as well as the Commission's and the Bureau's long-standing policy of ensuring that applicants for non-recurring services are not penalized for delays that are not within their control. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.507(d), filed by the Edcouch-Elsa Independent School District, Edcouch, Texas on November 1, 2002, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Funding Year
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2919A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2919A1.txt
  • entities operating pursuant to the authority of the tribal governments qualify as local health departments. We find it appropriate to leave this determination for RHCD to make in the first instance, and therefore remand the pending applications to RHCD for such a determination, and for all appropriate further review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 23, 2001 by Kawerak, Inc. on behalf of Health Care Providers No. 10687, 10690, 10692, 10694, 10695, 10697, 10698, 10699, 10701, 10702, 10703, and 10745, IS GRANTED, and these applications are REMANDED to RHCD for further review. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2964A1.txt
  • place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Brady ISD has not presented special circumstances that would justify a waiver in this instance. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 27, 2003, by Brady Independent School District, Brady, Texas, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2965A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2965A1.txt
  • of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss City of Boston's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, City of Boston may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 8, 2003, by W. T. Rich Company, Inc., Allston, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ralph Rich, W. T. Rich Company, Inc.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2966A1.txt
  • Company (Administrator). For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Paramus filed its appeal on September 3, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 3, 2003, by Thomas Communications & Technology, on behalf of Paramus School District, Syracuse, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michelle
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2967A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Santa Maria's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Santa Maria may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 5, 2003, by Santa Maria Addolorata, Chicago, Illinois, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kermit Lattimore, Educational Computing Solutions, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2968A1.txt
  • burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 19, 2003, by CenturyTel, Inc., Monroe, Louisiana, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2969A1.txt
  • (Administrator). For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Edwin Gould filed its appeal on June 17, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 17, 2003, by Edwin Gould Academy, Chestnut Ridge, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Ann Dowling, Edwin Gould Academy, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2972A1.txt
  • other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Qwest for LATA boundary modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS at specific locations in Minnesota, identified in WC Docket No. 03-59, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division See 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3004A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3004A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3004A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 03-3004 Released: September 30, 2003 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF CERTAIN AFFILIATES OF MJD SERVICES CORP. TO GOLDEN WEST TELEPHONE PROPERTIES, INC. WC Docket No. 03-186 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for consent to transfer control of certain wholly-owned affiliates of MJD Services Corp., Union Telephone Company of Hartford, Armour Independent Telephone Co., Bridgewater-Canistota Independent Telephone Co. and Kadoka Telephone Co., to Golden West Telephone Properties, Inc. No comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3007A1.txt
  • days for Joint Petitioners to file their reply comments. Therefore, we use our discretion to rule ex parte, and grant the Joint Petitioners' request for extension of time to file reply comments. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.45 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.45, and 1.46, the joint petition for extension of time filed by Qwest Corporation, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., and SBC Communications Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for Joint Petition of Qwest, BellSouth, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3029A1.txt
  • to October 14, 2003. This matter shall continue to be treated as a restricted proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Virginia Arbitration Cost Order remain in effect. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by the AT&T and WorldCom IS GRANTED. By Order of the Bureau, _____________________________ Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Petition of WorldCom, Inc., Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of the Jurisdiction of the Virginia
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3034A1.txt
  • 2003 deadline for submitting a numbering forecast and utilization report (Number Resources Utilization/Forecast ``NRUF'' Report) as mandated by Section 52.15(f)(6)(i) of the Commission's rules. On September 30, 2003, Xspedius notified the Commission that it had submitted its NRUF Report and submitted a request to withdraw the above captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3047A1.txt
  • applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, NCOCC failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on NCOCC misunderstanding of the timing deadline does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 21, 2003, by North Central Ohio Computer Cooperative, Mansfield, Ohio, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3048A1.txt
  • allow SLD to review this evidence in the first instance and determine what amount of funding, if any, is supported by new bills, we remand the application to SLD for consideration of FRN 509548. We affirm SLD's conclusion, however, that the ultimate burden of proving eligibility remains with the applicant. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request filed by DeLeon Independent School District, DeLeon, Texas, on March 13, 2002, is GRANTED and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3049A1.txt
  • but did not wait 28-days prior to signing and submitting its FCC Form 471 from the date its FCC Form 470 was posted. Unlike in the Cochrane-Fountain City School District Order, we therefore find that Harrisonburg failed to adhere to applicable requirements with respect to the Commission's competitive bidding policy. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Harrisonburg City School District, Harrisonburg City, Virginia, on January 16, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review from Denise Dawson, Harrisonburg City Schools, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3050A1.txt
  • even without the Funding Commitment Decision Letter by periodically checking SLD's website or contacting SLD directly. Either method would have apprised it of the funding decision in time to meet all applicable deadlines. Therefore, we conclude that Smithton has failed to demonstrate circumstances that would warrant waiver of the deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School District, Smithton, Missouri, on November 5, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bill Hadlow, Smithton School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3051A1.txt
  • ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Finally, Kansas's assertion that denial of its application may have a detrimental impact on schools within its borders does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Southwest Kansas Educational Consortium on July 11, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Carol J. Swinney, Southwest Kansas Educational Consortium, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3052A1.txt
  • ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Finally, Warren's assertion that denial of its application may have a detrimental impact on schools within its borders does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Warren County School District on October 4, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Amy Stewart, Warren County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3053A1.txt
  • on telecommunications services and Internet access, stating that the Commission may not waive a statutory deadline such as the October 28, 2001 deadline. Similarly, Gowanda seeks discounts for telecommunications services and Internet access. We conclude that our determination in the East Carroll Order applies to the instant Request for Waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Western New York Regional Information Center on behalf of Gowanda Central School District, West Seneca, New York on December 16, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3054A1.txt
  • the funding year and by filing the corrected version shortly after being apprised of the mistake. Moreover, the deadline involved a first-time information request. Woodburn also sought discounts only for telecommunications services, and the Commission has authority to waive the deadline with respect to requests that involve only telecommunications services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Woodburn School District, Woodburn, Oregon on November 27, 2002 IS GRANTED and REMANDED TO SLD to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3104A1.txt
  • its assertion, Maine attaches a copy of its Priority Overnight Receipt from FedEx, dated January 17, 2002. Based on the underlying record, we conclude that Maine's application was postmarked by the filing window deadline. We therefore grant Maine's Request for Review and remand Maine's application to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Maine State Library, Augusta, Maine on January 17, 2003 IS GRANTED, and Maine's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3108A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 03-3108 Released: October 7, 2003 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF ASSETS OF 3 RIVERS FIBER OPTIC, INC. BY ONEEIGHTY COMMUNICATIONS OF MONTANA, INC. WC Docket No. 03-134 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for acquisition of assets (approximately 500 access lines) of 3 Rivers Fiber Optic, Inc. by OneEighty Communications of Montana, Inc. No comments or petitions to deny were received in response to the public notice announcing that the application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-31A1.txt
  • decisions on its behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, Blessed Sacrament fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 16, 2002, by Blessed Sacrament Catholic School, Newark, New Jersey, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3277A1.txt
  • current telecommunications industry conditions, the proposal in its Petition will not promote more flexible and open negotiations between incumbent LECs and competitive LECs under existing ``pick and choose'' interconnection rules. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c)(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 155(c)(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that CC Docket No. 01-117 IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Douglas G. Bonner, Counsel for Mpower Communications Corp., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (filed Oct. 14, 2003). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-32A1.txt
  • Municipal has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Clovis Municipal's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Clovis Municipal's initial request, Clovis Municipal may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 27, 2002, by Clovis Municipal Schools, Clovis, New Mexico, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Lamb, Clovis Municipal Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-33A1.txt
  • Yermo has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Father Yermo's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Father Yermo's initial request, Father Yermo may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on December 4, 2002, by Father Yermo High School, El Paso, Texas, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Elia Hernandez, Father Yermo High School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3430A1.txt
  • related to issues that the Commission has been considering for more than a year. Thus, ALTS is already familiar with the issues here and maintaining the existing pleading cycle should not place any unreasonable burdens on ALTS. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j), of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the ALTS motion for extension of the comment period regarding petitions for reconsideration IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Review of the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (CC Docket No. 01-338), Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3454A1.txt
  • description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 204(a) and 205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 204(a) and 205, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the revisions to Alascom Inc.'s Tariff FCC No. 11 contained in Transmittal No. 1278 ARE SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation of Transmittal No. 1278 IS INSTITUTED and incorporated with the investigation instituted in CC Docket No. 95-182. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Alascom, Inc. SHALL FILE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3463A1.txt
  • the public interest than strict adherence to the rule. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of filing properly on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Dickey LaMoure Multidistrict Special Education, LaMoure, North Dakota, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from Rhoda Young, Dickey LaMoure Multidistrict Special Education, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3464A1.txt
  • entity name should not have prevented SLD from data entering ESC's application. We note that, under current minimum processing standards for Block 1, applicants are required only to include (1) the name of the Billed Entity or the Entity Number; (2) the Funding Year; and (3) the Contact Person Name. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Education Service Center Region 12, Waco, Texas, on August 10, 2001 ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to SLD for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rob Scott,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3465A1.txt
  • argued that its FCC Form 471 was received outside of the 28-day waiting period. As a result, we find that Grain Valley has failed to provide the Commission with persuasive evidence that demonstrates that it complied with the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. We, therefore, deny Grain Valley's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Request for Review filed by Grain Valley R-5 School District, Grain Valley, Missouri, on March 11, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Alan Welch, Grain Valley R-5 School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3466A1.txt
  • tract information; instead, SLD's website provides urban/rural information for use by the applicant to determine its discount percentage. In addition, the Wireline Competition Bureau has previously held that the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided rests with applicants. Therefore, we deny Highland Valley's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Highland School District No. 305, Craigmont, Idaho, on August 1, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ivy Breen, Highland School District No. 305, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3467A1.txt
  • on the only day that the president was available for a two week time period. Hughesville also states that it had only 21 days to review and decide on its contract. We find that SLD's decision is consistent with our precedent and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hughesville Public Library, Hughesville, Pennsylvania on August 9, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lena K. Carichner, Hughesville Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3468A1.txt
  • is appropriate if special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Magen David fails to demonstrate special circumstances warranting a waiver our rules. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Magen David Yeshiva, Brooklyn, New York on October 24, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sheila Rubin, Magen David Yeshiva, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3469A1.txt
  • this is consistent with our review of the record. Under our review of the record, and in light of the Hardee County Order, we find that Northwest complied with the deadline. We emphasize that, in remanding the applications for SLD's review, we make no conclusions as to their merits. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 19, 2002 by Northwest Tri-County Intermediate, Edinboro, Pennsylvania, IS GRANTED, and we REMAND to the Administrator for further processing consistent with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3470A1.txt
  • its conclusion that the FCC Form 470 at issue in the instant Request for Review was intended for requests in Funding Year 2000, rather than for the previous funding year. Therefore, consistent with the Commission's precedent established in the Henrico Order, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Oklahoma City School District I-89, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on October 12, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3471A1.txt
  • waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding rules. Pittsylvania may extend their existing contracts for non-recurring services for FRN 260055 voluntarily until September 30, 2004, without having to comply with the Commission's competitive bidding process. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the request for waiver of section 54.507(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.507(d), filed by Pittsylvania County Schools, Chatham, Virginia on December 20, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3472A1.txt
  • deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Prospect Sierra has not presented any arguments or unique circumstances that would warrant granting a waiver of this rule. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Prospect Sierra School, El Cerrito, California, on July 2, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dena Watson-Lamprey, Prospect Sierra School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3473A1.txt
  • the deadline and making a good faith effort, they do not demonstrate sufficient grounds to justify waiver of the Commission's rules. The Bureau has consistently declined to waive the Commission's rules based on an applicant's misunderstanding of the rules. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Roselle Catholic High School, Roselle, New Jersey, on August 6, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Alan MacDonell, Roselle Catholic High School, to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3474A1.txt
  • sent by postage meter. We find that in this particular situation, however, given there is precedent for considering evidence from licensed postage meters, it is appropriate that St. John's application be considered as timely filed. Thus, we grant St. John's Request for Review and we remand their application to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review from St. John Vianney High School, Holmdel, New Jersey, filed on August 28, 2001, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3475A1.txt
  • program from fraud and waste, serves as an additional means of holding applicants accountable for their representations, and assists in the efficient administration of the program. By failing to submit a signature certification, Syracuse-Dunbar omitted the legally binding act that signifies compliance with program rules. We therefore deny Syracuse-Dunbar's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Syracuse-Dunbar-Avoca School District on March 26, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rod Powell, Syracuse-Dunbar-Avoca School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 26, 2002
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3476A1.txt
  • clear that even where a party has received erroneous advice, the government is not estopped from enforcing its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly when relief is contrary to a rule. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Utica City School District, Utica, New York on August 14, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William J. Thomas, Utica City School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3477A1.txt
  • filing window. St. John's FCC Form 471 therefore was untimely because the Item 21 attachment was not submitted within the filing window. Finding no merit to St. John's legal arguments, we affirm the decision of SLD to treat St. John's application as filed outside the Funding Year 2001 filing window. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. John Central School, Marietta, Ohio, on August 9, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by St. John Central School,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-348A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Petitions for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services Filed by the Ameritech Operating Companies, Nevada Bell, Pacific Bell, Southern New England, and Southwestern Bell Telephone Companies. ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-34A1.txt
  • Community has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss HLV Community's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on HLV Community's initial request, HLV Community may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 25, 2002, by HLV Community School District, Victor, Iowa, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lori McClenathan, HLV Community School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3522A1.txt
  • on a Sunday, and that applicants should ensure that if they could not obtain a postmark on that date, they should postmark their application on Saturday, October 27, 2001 at the latest. Because Barre has failed to demonstrate circumstances that would warrant waiver of the deadline, we affirm SLD's decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Barre Supervisory Union District No. 61, Barre, Vermont, on November 12, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Stephen T. Bartlett, Barre Supervisory Union District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3523A1.txt
  • all relevant rules and procedures. In order for the program to work efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of correct application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Crispus Attucks fails to demonstrate a sufficient basis for waiving the Commission's filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Crispus Attucks YouthBuild Charter School, York, Pennsylvania, on June 14, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Chris Ginder, Crispus Attucks YouthBuild Charter School, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3524A1.txt
  • to SLD a paper copy of the Block 6 Certification, completed and signed. The record shows that Lynn failed to submit a Block 6 Certification. Thus, Lynn's arguments relating to a server error fail to address the problem of the missing Block 6 Certification. Therefore, we deny Lynn's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lynn Public Library, Mt. Victory, Ohio, on January 29, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gerard Fallon, Lynn Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3525A1.txt
  • SLD issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Memphis City filed its appeal on May 27, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Memphis City School District, Memphis, Tennessee on May 27, 2003, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Hazelton, Memphis City School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3526A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3526A1.txt
  • between Waldwick and the service provider listed on the FCC Form 471 application. It was Waldwick's responsibility to provide SLD with accurate information regarding its agreement with the relevant service provider on the FCC Form 471 application, and such information was not provided. Therefore, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bergen County Technical Schools on behalf of Waldwick School District, Waldwick, New Jersey, on January 28, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ` Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from, John A.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3527A1.txt
  • their responsibility to comply with our rules and procedures. As for White Plains contention that the flow of information regarding deadlines was interrupted, the FCC has found that confusion about the program's requirements is not grounds for a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by White Plains City School District, White Plains, New York, on January 6, 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Richard C. Lasselle, White Plains City
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3557A1.txt
  • Commission's policy that applicants should not be permitted to amend completed FCC Forms 471 to revise its application after closure of the filing window deadline. Accordingly, we grant in part and deny in part Gasconade's Request for Review and remand this matter to SLD for processing consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Gasconade County R-1 School District, Hermann, Missouri, on January 16, 2002, is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and REMANDED to SLD for further processing. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-357A1.txt
  • findings, shall be the exclusive remedies available to the parties. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we grant Cavalier's petition and preempt jurisdiction of the Virginia Commission over the arbitration of unresolved interconnection agreement issues with Verizon in Virginia. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b), the Petition for Commission preemption of jurisdiction filed by Cavalier Telephone, LLC, on November 7, 2002, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Cavalier Telephone, LLC. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-35A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on December 6, 2002, by Kershaw County School District, Camden, South Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Linda Shaylor, Kershaw County School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3625A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 03-3625 Released: November 12, 2003 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF ASSETS OF LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC BY CENTURYTEL FIBER COMPANY II, LLC D/B/A LIGHTCORE WC Docket No. 03-209 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of CenturyTel Fiber Company II, LLC d/b/a LightCore (LightCore) to acquire certain regional, long-haul, wholesale telecommunications network assets and the associated customer base of Level 3 Communications, LLC (Level 3). No comments or petitions to deny were received
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3630A1.txt
  • 2003. For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Atchison PS filed its appeal on September 22, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 22, 2003, by Atchison Public Schools, Atchison, Kansas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Corbin Witt, Atchison Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3631A1.txt
  • rule. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 25, 2003, by Cedar County Library District, Stockton, Missouri, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3632A1.txt
  • applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Merely stating that a letter was not received in a timely manner at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 19, 2003, by Monmouth Ocean Educational Services Commission, Tinton Falls, New Jersey, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3634A1.txt
  • internal connections set forth in the Commission's rules and orders. Specifically, the relevant issue is whether this equipment is ``necessary to transmit information within one or more instructional buildings of a single school campus.'' The type of technology employed to provide this functionality is not relevant to the eligibility determination. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lower Yukon School District, Mountain Village, Alaska, on April 18, 2001 is GRANTED and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3635A1.txt
  • should have considered the additional documentation that Quillayute provided on appeal. The documentation provided by Quillayute clarifies that the nine cellular phones included in the funding request were for eligible purposes. Accordingly, we grant Quillayute's Request for Review and remand FRN 531822 to SLD for action consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed October 18, 2001, by Olympic Peninsula Consultants on behalf of Quillayute Valley School District, Forks, Washington IS GRANTED and REMANDED to SLD for action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3636A1.txt
  • internal wiring, and therefore categorized as Priority Two internal connections, maintenance on this equipment would also be classified as such. We therefore conclude the SLD appropriately reclassified the funding request as Priority Two internal connections, and that FRN 814245 was correctly denied. Accordingly, we deny Des Moines's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Des Moines Municipal School District No. 22, Des Moines, New Mexico on June 20, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from Karen Doherty, Des Moines
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3637A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3637A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3637A1.txt
  • information in the application that would have allowed SLD to easily discern the appropriate funding year. Specifically, Sayville failed to indicate the service start or end dates for the funding requests in Block 5 of the application. Therefore, we conclude that the totality of the circumstances do not warrant relief. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sayville Library, Sayville, New York, on July 8, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Marsha Greenspan, Sayville Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 8,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3647A1.txt
  • filed a request to withdraw its petition for declaratory ruling, explaining that it raised many of the same issues in response to the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket Nos. 01-338, 96-98, and 98-147. In this Order, we grant MCI's request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that MCI's request to withdraw the above-captioned petition IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for declaratory ruling IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the proceeding initiated by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3657A1.txt
  • maintenance functions with the BOC or another BOC affiliate. On November 13, 2003, Qwest filed a request to withdraw its petition for forbearance in light of the Commission's decision denying a similar petition filed by Verizon. In this Order, we grant Qwest's request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Qwest's request to withdraw the above-captioned petition IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for forbearance IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3681A1.txt
  • SLD's decision. For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to SLD must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, West Harvey-Dixmoor filed its appeal to SLD after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 6, 2003, by West Harvey-Dixmoor Public School District #147, Harvey, Illinois, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Garvin Burton, West Harvey-Dixmoor Public School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-36A1.txt
  • on its behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Here, St. Patrick School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on September 26, 2002, by St. Patrick School, Jersey City, New Jersey, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3740A1.txt
  • procedures, the procedures will be directed to the subcontractor that receives funding from the Good Samaritan under the terms of the Tennessee Order. Further, to the extent that the Good Samaritan receives funding as a subcontractor to ENA, COMAD procedures will be directed to the Good Samaritan. ordering clause ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Clarification filed by BellSouth Corporation on September 30, 2003, is GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Immediate Relief filed by the State of Tennessee, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3743A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3743A1.txt
  • not cause undue customer harm and will serve the public interest, and we conclude that, with these conditions, AT&T may discontinue providing MultiQuest 900 Services, consistent with its filed representations. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, AT&T's Application to Discontinue Service IS GRANTED IN PART, in a manner consistent with the findings in this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. Application to Discontinue Domestic Telecommunications Services, Comp. Pol. File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3744A1.txt
  • in all currently-pooled rate centers in which it operates and comply with the LNP requirements in the top 100 MSAs. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, 332, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 52.9(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.9(b), the petition filed by Western Wireless is DENIED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Western filed its initial petition on November 27, 2002. See Western Wireless' Limited, Conditional Petition for Waiver of Number Pooling Obligations in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3778A1.txt
  • 1934, as amended, to its international directory assistance service. On November 21, 2003, BellSouth filed a request to withdraw its petition for forbearance in light of the Commission's decision denying a forbearance petition filed by Verizon. We grant BellSouth's request to withdraw and dismiss its forbearance petition without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that BellSouth's request to withdraw the above-captioned petition IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for forbearance IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3786A1.txt
  • above-captioned petition for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier in the state of Arkansas pursuant to section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. On November 10, 2003, Nextel submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition for designation as en eligible telecommunications carrier IS GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-379A1.txt
  • hours stated on the form merely serves as a general guide for average completion, and some applications may take longer. In light of these considerations, we conclude that Lacey has not demonstrated the existence of special circumstances warranting a deviation from our rules, and therefore, we deny its Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lacey Township School District, Lanoka Harbor, New Jersey, on January 24, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William R. Lake, Lacey Township School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-380A1.txt
  • that in the competitive process, Siskiyou should have been able to turn to other bidders for better service if its choice of provider was not satisfactory. After reviewing the material before us, we conclude that Siskiyou has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Siskiyou Count Library, Yreka, California, on April 26, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Pat Harper and Kathy Fueston, Siskiyou County Library, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-382A1.txt
  • SLD. Permitting applicants to correct their applications during the appeals process would result in undue confusion, delay, and administrative burden. In conclusion, we find that CSF did not timely comply with SLD's request for validation of its discount rate, and therefore affirm SLD's decision and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Children's Store Front School, New York, New York, on May 14, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bruno Navasky, Children's Store Front, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-383A1.txt
  • to the general rule. We conclude that the particular facts of this case do not rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. Craig County's inadvertent omission of necessary information from its October Form 486 does not constitute good cause for a waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Craig County Public Schools, New Castle, Virginia on July 22, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Adele Morris, Craig County Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3910A1.txt
  • above-referenced matter. On November 5, 2003, APCC filed a motion to withdraw its petition for reconsideration, explaining that APCC believes that the issue raised is now moot as a result of subsequent rulings and other developments. In this Order, we grant APCC's motion to withdraw and dismiss its petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that APCC's motion to withdraw its Petition for Reconsideration in the above-captioned docket IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that APCC's Petition for Reconsideration filed in the above-captioned docket on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3912A1.txt
  • information collections contained herein are contingent upon approval of the Office of Management and Budget. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that FCC Report 43-01, the Annual Summary Report, FCC Report 43-02, the USOA Report, FCC Report 43-03, the Joint Cost Report, FCC Report 43-04, the Access Report, FCC Report 43-05, the Service Quality Report, and FCC Report 43-07, the Infrastructure Report ARE REVISED, as set forth above and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3915A1.txt
  • Telephone Company, LLC (Inter-Community) to withdraw their petitions for waiver. In the petitions, Franklin and Inter-Community requested limited relief from their number portability obligations as mandated by Section 52.23(c) of the Commission's rules. On December 8, 2003, Franklin and Inter-Community submitted requests to withdraw the above captioned petitions. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the requests to withdraw the above-captioned petitions ARE GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petitions ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division Chief Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3940A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3940A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 03-3940 Released: December 11, 2003 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF ASSETS OF TOUCH AMERICA, INC. BY 360 NETWORKS (USA) INC. WC Docket No. 03-227 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of 360networks (USA) inc. to acquire certain private line and dedicated Internet business service assets of Touch America, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) (Touch America). Only one commenter, Northrop Grumman, opposed grant of the application. Northrop Grumman contends that without provision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.txt
  • A for analogous Verizon operation support systems functions VII. All Other Cavalier Services Available to Verizon for Purposes of Effectuating Local Exchange Competition Available at rates comparable to Verizon charges or at Cavalier's tariffed rates or generally available rates. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.807 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.807, the issues presented for arbitration are determined as set forth in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Cavalier Telephone, LLC and Verizon Virginia, Inc. SHALL INCORPORATE the above determinations into a final interconnection agreement, setting forth both the negotiated and arbitrated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-394A1.txt
  • rules. We find that SLD erred in denying Norristown's request. Cellular Digital Packet Data service, which is a digital transmission service, is eligible for discounts. It is a telecommunications service, irrespective of the fact that it may link to a Library Automated Catalogue, which is not itself eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Montgomery County-Norristown Public Library, Norristown, Pennsylvania on July 18, 2002 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the application for discounts filed by Montgomery County-Norristown Public Library IS REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-395A1.txt
  • burden of adhering strictly to its filing deadlines. As we have consistently held in the past, it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of its appeals. Therefore, we conclude that Columbus Unified has failed to demonstrate special circumstances upon which its request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on December 2, 2002, by Columbus Unified School District 493, Lawrence, Kansas, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-396A1.txt
  • a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. Thus, Eastchester fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Eastchester Union Free School District, Eastchester, New York, on December 19, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-397A1.txt
  • its appeals. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the program's rules and procedures. Here, Huron ISD fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Huron Intermediate School District, Bad Axe, Michigan, on December 19, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-398A1.txt
  • employees, consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Thus, Immaculate Heart fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on September 17, 2002, by Immaculate Heart of Mary-St. Casimir School, Lansing, Michigan, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3996A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 03-3996 Released: December 16, 2003 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF ASSETS OF ONE CALL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. BY OCMC, INC. WC Docket No. 02-231 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of OCMC, Inc. (OCMC) to acquire certain telecommunications assets of One Call Internet, Inc. (formerly One Call Communications, Inc.) (One Call) and assume the operation, management and provision of One Call's telecommunications services. No comments were filed opposing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-399A1.txt
  • consultants and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD decisions on its behalf. Thus, St. Joseph fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on October 28, 2002, by St. Joseph University Heights, Buffalo, New York, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-39A1.txt
  • general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Petitioner has not submitted adequate proof that the facts relating to its application present special circumstances warranting a waiver of program rules. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by The Bridge Academy, Bridgeport, Connecticut on September 13, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Timothy Dutton, The Bridge Academy, Bridgeport, Connecticut, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-400A1.txt
  • on its behalf, even when such persons are away from the office on medical leave or otherwise incapacitated. Thus, St. Lucy School fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal with SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on October 30, 2002, by St. Lucy School, Newark, New Jersey, as well as the request to waive the deadline for filing its appeal with SLD ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-401A1.txt
  • not generally justify waiver of filing deadlines. Applicants that wait until the last minute before submitting their appeals risk untimely filing. Because Stafford Municipal failed to file a timely appeal, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Stafford Municipal's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Stafford Municipal School District, Stafford, Texas on October 4, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Charlotte Holden, Stafford Municipal School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4028A1.txt
  • Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information please contact Theodore Burmeister, Attorney, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the motion for extension of time filed by CenturyTel, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Motion for Extension of Time (December 12, 2003) (``Motion''). The current comment and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-402A1.txt
  • and other representatives to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely appeals of SLD funding decisions on its behalf. Here, Stanfield Elementary fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its appeal to SLD. We therefore find no basis for waiving the appeal filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 22, 2002, by Stanfield Elementary School District No. 24, Stanfield, Arizona, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-403A1.txt
  • that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because the Welch's Request for Administrator Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, we affirm the Administrator's Decision on Appeal and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Welch Public Schools, Welch, Oklahoma, on December 26, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from R. C. McKeon, Welch Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4059A1.txt
  • Commission will likely benefit from comments that include the commenters' reactions to the anticipated NANC recommendation on the porting interval. Accordingly, we extend the period in which comments may be filed in response to the Further Notice. Comments must now be filed by January 20, 2004, and reply comments by February 4, 2004. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 20, 2004, and reply comments on or before February 4, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4063A1.txt
  • Because the CPL formula provided by NECA in its filing better estimates the cost per loop of sample average schedule companies than the proposed EAPL formula, the Bureau concludes, as in its 2003 Order, that the CPL formula is a more appropriate means of calculating USF support for average schedule companies. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formula proposed by the National Exchange Carriers Association, Inc., on October 1, 2003, for local switching support SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE January 1, 2004. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4070A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4070A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4070A2.txt
  • Counts Public Notice on September 11, 2001. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 303(r), 403, and 410 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 303(r), 403, and 410, and section 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(f), this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4, 201-205, 218-220, 303(r), and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154, 201-205, 218-220, 303(r), and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 1.106 and 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.106, 1.429, that the petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4081A1.txt
  • period of time in order to allow them to migrate. In balancing these factors, we find that Cable & Wireless should be allowed to discontinue its services in accordance with its filed representations. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Cable & Wireless USA, Inc. to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED to the extent declared herein, consistent with its filed representations in this proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4083A1.txt
  • the Expanded Interconnection Tariff Order and the New Expanded Interconnection Service Suspension Order. These transmittals will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Ameritech's Tariff F.C.C. No. 2 and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Tariff F.C.C. No. 73 Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal Nos. 1374 and 2975, respectively, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the December 26, 2003 effective date, and investigations of the referenced transmittals are instituted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-40A1.txt
  • circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Petitioner's excuse of employee inexperience is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of program rules. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Harris County School District, Hamilton Georgia on July 30, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Susan Andrews, Harris County Board of Education, Hamilton
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4111A1.txt
  • parties may file comments on or before January 30, 2004 and reply comments on or before February 20, 2004. This matter shall continue to be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that NARUC's Motion for Extension of Time in the above-captioned proceeding IS GRANTED to the extent set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on BellSouth's Request for Declaratory Ruling that State Commissions May Not Regulate Broadband Internet Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-41A1.txt
  • likely that it was omitted from the application. We conclude, however, that SLD's decision is supported by precedent and the underlying record. The record indicates that a completed Block 4 worksheet was not included in Jefferson County's originally filed application. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jefferson County School District, Madras, Oregon on August 19, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kathryn Beebee, Jefferson County School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-42A1.txt
  • special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Santa Ana has not presented any special circumstances warranting a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Santa Ana Unified School District, Santa Ana, California on July 10, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Karen Aeppli, Santa Ana Unified School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-438A1.txt
  • replace the services it had previously received from IP. Accordingly, we direct Centex, to the extent it wishes to respond to IP's comments, to do so by February 20, 2003. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, that the application of IP Communications to discontinue domestic telecommunications services in Texas IS GRANTED consistent with the terms of this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). IP states that it provides
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-453A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on July 30, 2002, by Dubuque Community Schools, Dubuque, Iowa, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Charles Ellis, Dubuque Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-454A1.txt
  • ISD has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Huron ISD's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Huron ISD's initial request, Huron ISD may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Huron Intermediate School District, Bad Axe, Michigan, on December 19, 2002, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Mayes, Huron Intermediate School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-455A1.txt
  • SLD within 60 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the requisite 60-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 5, 2002, by the Spurwink School, Portland, Maine, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Philene Berry, The Spurwink School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-457A1.txt
  • decisions of the Rural Health Care Division of the Univeral Service Administrative Company regarding RWHC's requests for universal service support for funding years 2001 and 2002. On January 14, 2003, RWHC submitted a Request to Withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the Request to Withdraw and dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request to Withdraw submitted by Rural Wisconsin Health Cooperative, filed January 14, 2003, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review by Rural
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-601A1.txt
  • within 60 days of judgment along with the appropriate court documents demonstrating resolution. In the event that ECOT ultimately refiles its Request for Review, it should address the impact of the Ohio State Court litigation on ECOT's entitlement to discounts under the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow on January 3, 2001 is DISMISSED without prejudice to renew within 60 days of judgment in the Ohio State Court litigation. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-605A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 03-10 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-614A1.txt
  • is intended to assist the Commission in determining, among other things, whether the Administrator is properly administering the universal service support mechanism to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254 and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on January 8, 2003, is GRANTED to allow submission of the draft audit report for the year 2002 on or before April 15, 2003. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-635A1.txt
  • ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Judith Nitsche, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1540. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by Mr. Al Inga IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Further Comment Requested on the Joint Petition for Declaratory Ruling on the Assignment of Accounts (Traffic) Without the Associated CSTP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-670A1.txt
  • importance of these issues to local governments, we will grant, on our own motion, a two-week extension of time for parties to file comments and reply comments in this proceeding. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(j) and 155(c), and authority delegated there under §§ 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding is extended until March 31, 2003, and the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding is extended until April 15, 2003. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division NATOA Petition for Extension of Deadline To File
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-754A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Farmers has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Farmers Cellular Telephone, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for the designated service area in Alabama, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-755A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-755A1.txt
  • to be applied to eligible services. With respect to SLD contacting applicants concerning errors in the applications, the Wireline Competition Bureau has previously held that the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided rests with applicants, not with SLD. Therefore, we deny South Valley's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by South Valley Academy, Albuquerque, New Mexico, on August 12, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Alan Marks, South Valley Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-756A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-756A1.txt
  • deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. An applicant's failure to submit all the required Blocks of the FCC Form 471 does not create special circumstances warranting a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Center for Russian Jewry, on behalf of Be'er Hagolah Institute, Brooklyn, New York, on July 16, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Pearl
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-757A1.txt
  • web site, and through its toll-free number. In addition, lack of Internet access does not provide grounds for relief because information is alternately available through a toll-free telephone number. Finally, continued financial need does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Hasbrouck Heights School District, Hasbrouck Heights, New Jersey, on February 19, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joseph Bellino, Hasbrouck Heights School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-758A1.txt
  • filing deadlines. Finally, New Carlisle Olive's argument that SLD took approximately 10 weeks to notify the library that it had missed the deadline is irrelevant to the waiver analysis. Therefore, we conclude that New Carlisle Olive has failed to demonstrated special circumstances upon which its Waiver Request can be granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by New Carlisle Olive, New Carlisle, Indiana, on April 12, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Electronic mail from Stephen Boggs, New Carlisle Olive Township Public Library,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-761A1.txt
  • Play has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Fair Play's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Fair Play's initial request, Fair Play may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Fair Play R-2 School District, Fair Play, Missouri, on February 20, 2003, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Greg Whaley and Brian Mitchell, Fair
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-762A1.txt
  • County has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Glades County's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Glades County's initial request, Glades County may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Glades County School Board, Moore Haven, Florida, on January 29, 2003, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Norman Hughes, Glades County School Board, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-763A1.txt
  • Specifically, Mitel requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Numbers (FRN) 145268 and 145295. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Mitel's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRNs 145268 and 145295. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Mitel's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed January 29, 2002, by Mitel Communications Solutions, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Correen Oestreich, Mitel Communications Solutions, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-764A1.txt
  • will aid both the applicant and the Commission should Marshall County find it necessary, following SLD's decision on its appeal, to seek further review from the Commission. We emphasize that, in remanding the appeal of FRN 582629 for SLD's review and adjudication, we make no conclusions as to its merits. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 4, 2001 by the Marshall County School District, Moundsville, West Virginia, IS DENIED as to FRN 592758 and REMANDED as to FRN 582629 for SLD to resolve in the first instance. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-790A1.txt
  • other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Verizon for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in WC Docket No. 02-327, ARE APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Division Appendix A Description of Petitions and Exchanges
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-844A1.txt
  • than strict adherence to the general rule. We therefore grant a waiver of the October 28, 2001 deadline to the Applicants, and remand to SLD for further processing of their corrected FCC Forms 486. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) that the Waiver Request filed by Eastern Lebanon County School District, Myerstown, Pennsylvania, on February 20, 2002 IS GRANTED, and these applications are REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Waiver Request filed by Newport
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-849A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-849A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-849A1.txt
  • BellSouth's amendment. conclusion Consistent with the foregoing, we grant BellSouth's amendment in part, permitting it to remove DataReach, ISDN Single Number Routing Option, and UNI-Serve from its ONA plan. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, and 218 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, 218, and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 0.291, 1.3, 63.71, BellSouth's Open Network Architecture Plan amendment IS GRANTED in part. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Filing and Review of Open Network Architecture Plans, BellSouth Open Network
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-852A1.txt
  • relief on the basis of incorrect advice from SLD. Commission precedent establishes that where a party has received erroneous advice, the government is not estopped from enforcing its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, Talladega, Alabama on January 13, 2003, IS DISMISSED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-853A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-853A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-853A1.txt
  • Mills has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Glen Mills' Request for Waiver to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Glen Mills' initial request, Glen Mills may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Glen Mills Schools, Concordville, Pennsylvania, on February 24, 2003, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary McNeal, Glen Mills Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-854A1.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Norfolk Public Schools' Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Norfolk Public Schools' initial request, Norfolk Public Schools may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Norfolk Public Schools, Norfolk, Virginia, on December 24, 2002, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dennis Futty, Julie Keesling, and Frederick Schmitt, Norfolk Public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-855A1.txt
  • relief on the basis of incorrect advice from SLD. Commission precedent establishes that where a party has received erroneous advice, the government is not estopped from enforcing its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ventnor Educational Community Complex, Ventnor City, New Jersey on January 30, 2003, IS DISMISSED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-856A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-856A1.txt
  • the above-captioned Emergency Petition for Clarification. In its petition, AMSC requested clarification of two rules applicable to rural health care universal service support mechanism. On February 26, 2003, Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC, the successor-in-interest to Motient Services Inc. (formerly AMSC) submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Emergency Petition for Clarification IS GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the above-captioned Emergency Petition for Clarification IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-943A1.txt
  • ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. For further information, please contact Judith Nitsche, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1540. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the extension of time requested by AT&T and Mr. Al Inga IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Further Comment Requested on the Joint Petition for Declaratory Ruling on the Assignment of Accounts (Traffic) Without the Associated CSTP
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-944A1.txt
  • BellSouth requested an extension of the February 1, 2003 deadline for submitting a Numbering Resource Utilization/Forecast (NRUF) as mandated by Section 52.15(f)(6)(i) of the Commission's rules. On March 3, 2003, BellSouth submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Request for Emergency Petition and Extension of Time IS GRANTED. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition for Emergency Petition for Waiver and Extension of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1014A1.txt
  • and Correction. This matter shall continue to be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Wright Public Notice remain in effect. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Motion for Acceptance of Late-Filed Pleading filed by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition for Rulemaking Filed Regarding Issues related to Inmate Calling Services, Pleading
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1033A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of SBC for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing one and two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in WC Docket No. 04-27, ARE APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Appendix Exchanges and Access Lines
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1059A1.txt
  • was approved in a Funding Commitment Decision Letter that was dated October 20, 2000. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that the Schools and Libraries Division received and accepted Catholic Memorial's FCC Form 486 for FRN 395982. Accordingly, Catholic Memorial's Request for Waiver is dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed February 26, 2002, by Catholic Memorial School, West Roxbury, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Peter Burleigh, Catholic Memorial, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1062A1.txt
  • request. Accordingly, we grant Verizon an extension of the limited waiver of section 61.42(g) for services transferred from VADI to Verizon only for purposes of the 2004 Annual Access Tariff Filing. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for services transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2004 Annual Access Tariff Filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1081A1.txt
  • their current service, without any disruption. While we do not favor ONA amendments that remove previously-approved services, we conclude that the facts of this case warrant granting Qwest's petition. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, and 218 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201, 202, 203, 205, 214, 218, and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 0.291, 1.3, 63.71, Qwest's petition for permission to withdraw ONA services Dataphone Select-a-Station, DDS2-Wire, and ScanAlert, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Qwest Corporation Petition for Permission to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-108A1.txt
  • of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice City of Espanola's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, City of Espanola may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 7, 2003, by City of Espanola Finance Department, Espanola, New Mexico, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lillian Brooks, City of Espanola Finance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-109A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Hampton County's Request for Waiver to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Hampton County may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on October 21, 2003, by Hampton County School District 2, Estill, South Carolina, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dennis Thompson, Hampton County School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-110A1.txt
  • libraries universal service mechanism. Specifically, Monessen requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 602799. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Monessen's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 602799. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Monessen's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed March 10, 2003, by Monessen Public Library, Monessen, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from S. Fred Natale, Monessen Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-111A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Murrieta Valley's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Murrieta Valley may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 12, 2003, by Murrieta Valley Unified School District, Murrieta, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Julie April, Murrieta Valley Unified School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1128A1.txt
  • its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly where relief is contrary to a rule. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Four County and North Penn have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 26, 2003, by Four County Library System, Vestal, New York, IS DISMISSED, and the Requests for Review filed on March 22, 2004, by Gloucester City Library, Gloucester City, New Jersey and on May 13, 2003, by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-112A1.txt
  • applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, NAFI failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on NAFI misunderstanding of the timing deadline does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on April 21, 2003, by North American Family Institute, Danvers, Massachusetts, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Daniel Nakamoto, North American Family Institute, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-113A1.txt
  • applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, Alachua failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on Alachua misunderstanding of the program rules does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on June 24, 2003, by School Board of Alachua County, Gainesville, Florida, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-114A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss St. Catherine's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, St. Catherine may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 17, 2003, by Saint Catherine of Genoa School, New York, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Collins, Saint Catherine of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-115A1.txt
  • not contemplate simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Tunkhannock's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Tunkhannock may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 31, 2003, by Tunkhannock Area School District, Tunkhannock, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Barb Landon, Tunkhannock Area School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1169A1.txt
  • other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Verizon Virginia Inc. for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS at specific locations in Virginia, identified in CC Docket No. 96-159, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1170A1.txt
  • other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Qwest for LATA boundary modifications for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS at specific locations in Minnesota, identified in WC Docket No. 04-26, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1252A1.txt
  • months in service areas where the monthly LNP end-user charge of 41 cents is currently in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201, 202, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201, 202, 251(e), section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the five-year recovery rule set forth in section 52.33(a)(1)(iv) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.33(a)(1)(iv), IS WAIVED to allow Citizens to shorten the recovery period of its monthly LNP end-user charge in exchanges where its 41-cent charge has already been implemented. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1253A1.txt
  • only where special circumstances warrant a deviation from the general rule, and where strict compliance with the rule would be inconsistent with the public interest. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the applicants here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the referenced Requests for Review filed by Bedford Area School District, Bedford, Pennsylvania, on May 12, 2003; Glenwood Community School District, Glenwood, Iowa, on May 22, 2003; Hunterdon Central Regional High School, Flemington, New Jersey, on May 12, 2003; Immaculate Conception School, Everett, Washington,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1276A1.txt
  • Act, nor do we agree that the Bureau was required to so conclude. AT&T presents no other argument to support its petition, other than to reiterate the arguments it made before the Bureau issued the Arbitration Order. Therefore, we deny AT&T's petition, and reaffirm the conclusion the Bureau reached in the Arbitration Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.106, and 51.807 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.106, and 51.807, that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by AT&T Communications of Virginia, Inc. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of AT&T Communications of Virginia, Inc., Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1287A1.txt
  • rules by merely alleging that they do not have prior experience with the line-count filing procedures. We therefore deny FiberNet's request for waiver of section 54.307(c)(3). ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c)(3) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c) filed by FiberNet, LLC on February 12, 2002, IS DENIED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau FiberNet, LLC, Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1291A1.txt
  • request to extend the pooling requirement would be inconsistent with the Commission's policy to promote competition and efficient number use. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, 332, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 52.9(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.9(b), the petitions filed by Advantage Cellular Systems, Inc., Corr Wireless Telecommunications, LLC, and Plateau Communications are DENIED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition of Advantage Cellular Systems, Inc. for Clarification, or in the Alternative, Limited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1295A1.txt
  • this proceeding to understand and evaluate their proposed costing methodologies and how these proposals would be implemented. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201, 251-254, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 251-254, and 303(r), and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, AT&T's Motion to Require Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers to Respond to Data Requests IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau AT&T Motion to Require Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers to Respond to Data Requests, WC Docket No. 03-173 (filed March 16, 2004) (Motion).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1312A1.txt
  • LNP, and ensure that customers' requests for services will not be delayed due to carriers' difficulty in obtaining numbering resources. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, 332, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 52.9(b), and 52.23(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 52.9(b), 52.23(e), the petition filed by The North-Eastern Pennsylvania Telephone Company is DENIED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition of The North-Eastern Pennsylvania Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 52.23(b) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1338A1.txt
  • of the information submitted, we conclude that Verizon has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services and MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, the petition filed by Verizon Telephone Companies, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Verizon-East Verizon-West Special Access Basket Special Access Basket Metallic Metallic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1393A1.txt
  • cause exists to warrant a waiver of section 54.301(b) of the Commission's rules. This waiver will allow Smithville to receive LSS for the 2004 calendar year. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(b) of the Commission's rules, filed by Smithville Telephone Company, Inc., on February 26, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Smithville Telephone Company, Inc., Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1394A1.txt
  • doubt that the existence of New Haven results in an improved educational experience for adult students in New Haven, Connecticut. However, the provision of discounted services for entities such as adult education centers is beyond the scope of our statutory authority and would divert support from the program's intended beneficiaries. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New Haven Adult Education Center on August 29, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Vincent Del Prete, New Haven Adult Education Center, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1395A1.txt
  • users were eligible under program rules in effect for Funding Year 2001. We emphasize that the ultimate burden of proving eligibility remains with the applicant. Accordingly, we grant in part Fairfax's Request for Review of FRN 673750 and remand in part to SLD for action consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review of Funding Request Number 673756 filed by Funds for Learning on behalf of Fairfax County Public Schools, Fairfax, Virginia on September 6, 2001, IS DENIED. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1396A1.txt
  • Commission's requirements. Mistaken information from an SLD employee does not absolve an applicant from following the program requirements. The mere assertion that a letter was not received is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Consistent with existing precedent as described above, the Telecommunications Access Policy Division denies the above-captioned Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests filed by Austin Independent School District, Austin, Texas, on November 19, 2002; Avon Local Board of Education, Avon, Ohio, on November 6, 2002; Navajo Evangelical Lutheran Mission, Rock Point, Arizona, on June 13, 2003; and Vermont Academy, Saxtons River, Vermont, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1397A1.txt
  • mechanism. Specifically, Castro Valley requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 849626. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Castro Valley's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 849626. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Castro Valley's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed January 13, 2004, by Castro Valley Unified School District, Castro Valley, California, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Steve Mei, Castro Valley Unified School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1398A1.txt
  • applicant who fails to meet the October 28, 2001 deadline for Funding Year 2001 discounts could obtain discounts for services received on or after the date that its FCC Form 486 was postmarked. Consistent with our precedent in Craig County, we affirm SLD's decision and deny LPSD's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request filed by Lake and Peninsula School District, King Salmon, Alaska, on September 16, 2002 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dennis Niedermeyer, Lake and Peninsula School District, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1399A1.txt
  • libraries universal service mechanism. Specifically, Ridgewood requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 644434. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Ridgewood's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 644434. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Ridgewood's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed February 6, 2003, by Ridgewood Public Schools, Ridgewood, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Carole K. Casey, Ridgewood Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-139A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-01 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1400A1.txt
  • mechanism. Specifically, Miller District requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 761447. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Miller District's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 761447. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Miller District's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 6, 2003, by Miller District #210, Marseilles, Illinois, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jane M. Bauer, Miller District #210, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1409A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1409A1.txt
  • the specific areas described above. The relief granted by this Order also does not affect any services offered by SBC where it operates as an incumbent LEC in Ohio. iv. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of SBC Telecom, Inc. for a LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing ELCS at specific locations in Ohio, identified in WC Docket No. 04-46, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau We refer to the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-140A1.txt
  • new growth central office (CO) or NXX codes on a one-time basis. Central Office Code Administration as mandated by Section 52.15(g)(3)(i)(A)(B) of the Commission's rules. On January 14, 2004, Mid-Tex Cellular submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1449A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 04-1449 Released: May 21, 2004 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF LOCAL EXCHANGE ASSETS OF IOWA TELECOM BY HEART OF IOWA WC Docket No. 03-249 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for transfer of control of the Conrad, Eldora, and Steamboat Rock exchanges in Iowa from Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (Iowa Telecom) to Heart of Iowa Communications Cooperative (Heart of Iowa). No comments were filed in this proceeding. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1456A1.txt
  • is May 24, 2004. UPTC's petition is dated April 16, 2004, which is less than 60 days in advance of the implementation deadline. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, 332, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 52.9(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.9(b), the request filed by Upper Peninsula Telephone Company is dismissed. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Upper Peninsula Telephone Company, Petition for an Extension of Time (dated April 16, 2004). See 47 C.F.R. § 52.23(e). Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1503A1.txt
  • an application may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests filed by Lucia Mar Unified School District, Arroyo Grande, California, on May 24, 2002; Ontario Local Schools, Mansfield, Ohio, on October 9, 2002; School Administrative District 04, Guilford, Maine, on December 19, 2002; and Traverse City Area Public Schools, Traverse City,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-161A1.txt
  • is preempted to the extent it conflicts with 47 C.F.R. § 68.105(d)(2). On December 16, 2003, the Petitioners filed a letter requesting that their petition and amended petition be withdrawn and the proceeding be terminated. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and authority delegated under section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the motion to withdraw the petitions filed by ClickQuick II, San Marino at Laguna Lakes, L.L.C., and Villa Del Sol on December 16, 2003 IS GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that WC Docket No. 03-112 IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1634A1.txt
  • sought ETC designation for portions of its licensed service area in Alabama, pursuant to section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. On May 21, 2004, Louisiana Unwired submitted a request to withdraw its petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw Louisiana Unwired's Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the above-captioned proceeding IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Louisiana Unwired's Petition for Designation as an Eligible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1643A1.txt
  • NBTC, PBTC, SNET, and SWBT each has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services and MSAs and non-MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, the petitions filed by Ameritech, NBTC, PBTC, SNET, and SWBT are GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Ameritech Special Access Basket Metallic Telegraph Grade Direct
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1688A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules. This waiver will allow Midwest to begin receiving high-cost support as of July 12, 2002, the date Midwest received its ETC designation. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(3) of the Commission's rules, filed by Midwest Iowa Wireless, L.L.C., on March 20, 2003, IS GRANTED, as described herein, and that the petition for waiver of section 54.313(d)(3)(iii) of the Commission's rules, filed by Midwest Iowa Wireless, L.L.C.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1695A1.txt
  • under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Accordingly, the motion of Verizon seeking a protective order to facilitate the filing of confidential or proprietary information is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 251, and authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the protective order contained in Appendix A to this order IS ADOPTED, and IS EFFECTIVE upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A PROTECTIVE ORDER WC DOCKET NOS. 03-157 and 03-189 1. Introduction. Documents submitted to the Commission in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1702A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1702A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1702A1.txt
  • NECA requests that these modifications take effect on July 1, 2004, and remain in effect through June 30, 2005. We have reviewed NECA's filing and find that its proposed formulas are reasonable. Therefore, pursuant to section 69.606(a) of the Commission's rules, we approve the proposed average schedule formulas as submitted in NECA's filing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. on December 29, 2003, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2004, and remain in effect through June 30, 2005. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1713A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1713A1.txt
  • recover in providing this extension of service to its remaining customers. In balancing these factors, we therefore find that Winstar should be allowed to discontinue its services in accordance with its filed representations. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Winstar Communications, LLC, Winstar Communications of Arizona, LLC, Winstar of Delaware, LLC, Winstar of Georgia, LLC, Winstar of Hawaii, LLC, Winstar of Indiana, LLC, Winstar of Louisiana, LLC, Winstar of Pennsylvania, LLC, Winstar of Virginia, LLC, and Winstar of West
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1726A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1726A1.txt
  • other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. d/b/a SBC Texas for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS at specific locations in Texas, identified in WC Docket No. 04-77, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1762A1.txt
  • other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Qwest Corporation for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS between specific locations in Oregon, identified in WC Docket No. 04-152, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1764A1.txt
  • raises significant questions regarding whether forbearance from application of the ISP Remand Order meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). Thus, the Bureau finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Core shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to October 11, 2004. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1765A1.txt
  • collect per-minute access charges or to apply TELRIC pricing to the UNE platform meet the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to September 28, 2004. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-181A1.txt
  • between the parties as to the amount of any such true-up or to the appropriate true-up procedures, such disagreement shall be subject to the dispute resolution provisions of the respective interconnection agreement.102 IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 44. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.807 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.807, the issues presented for arbitration are determined as set forth in this Order. 45. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AT&T Communications of Virginia, Inc. and Verizon Virginia, Inc. SHALL INCORPORATE the above determinations into an amendment to their interconnection agreement, setting forth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1842A1.txt
  • not contemplate simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Holyoke's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Holyoke may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on December 18, 2003, by Holyoke School District Re-1J, Holyoke, Colorado IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Carla Porter, Holyoke School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.txt
  • substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the 2004 annual access tariffs for NECA, VITELCO, Concord, Chillicothe, TXU Communications, Fort Bend Telco/TXU, Horry, Coastal Utilities, Blair, ACS of Anchorage, Fort Mill, Lancaster, and Rock Hill ARE SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NECA, VITELCO, Concord, Chillicothe, TXU
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2045A1.txt
  • delegated to them by the Commission to make impairment decisions, pursuant to section 251(d)(2) of the Act. Therefore, we find the ACS request regarding state commission determinations of impairment to be moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 155(c), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request for stay of order for the July 2, 2004 deadline for state commission determinations of impairment, filed by Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. on March 16, 2004, is DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Review of the Section 251
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2047A1.txt
  • the decision the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. NPP should have filed its Request for Review by April 8, 2002 in order for it to be timely filed. NPP filed its Request for Review on October 9, 2003. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 9, 2003, by National Public Phone Company IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Anita Cheng Assistant Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Craig D. Joyce, Counsel for National Public Phone Company to the Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2076A1.txt
  • 54.307 of the Commission's rules to allow it to receive high-cost universal service support for the first and second quarters of 2002. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201 and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201 and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 54.307(c) filed by United States Cellular Corporation on March 20, 2002, IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Submission of Supplementary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2150A1.txt
  • select Time Warner ResCom's new service before July 15, 2004. In balancing the above-mentioned factors, we find that Time Warner ResCom should be allowed to discontinue its services in accordance with its filed representations. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Time Warner ResCom of New York, LLC to discontinue domestic telecommunications services IS GRANTED to the extent declared herein, consistent with Time Warner ResCom's filed representations in this proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2258A1.txt
  • waiver of section 69.605(c). We therefore find that Killduff Telephone's requested waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules is in the public interest and should be granted. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254 and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, by Searsboro Telephone Company, Inc. and Killduff Telephone Company dated October 24, 2003, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2268A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Saipancell has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. d/b/a Saipancell IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER throughout its licensed service area on the islands of Saipan, Tinian, and Rota in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.txt
  • Parties shall also serve with one copy: Best Copy and Printing, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, email www.bcipweb.com. . ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Alascom, Inc. SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Alascom, Inc. SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each request for information that it is required
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2395A1.txt
  • to suspend and investigate Blair's tariff. We hereby provide reasonable time for Blair to conduct new cost studies for the purpose of revising its annual access tariff filing to become effective no later than November 2, 2004. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.113 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.113, we reconsider on our own motion our decision in the Suspension Order to suspend and investigate the revised tariff rates of Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation (VITELCO), Concord, Chillicothe, TXU Communications, Fort Bend Telco/TXU, Horry, Coastal Utilities, Blair, ACS of Anchorage, Fort Mill, Lancaster, and Rock Hill. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2485A1.txt
  • affirm SLD's decision. For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to SLD must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Allendale filed its appeal to SLD after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 15, 2004 by Allendale County Schools, Allendale, South Carolina IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Renee Sanders, Allendale County Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2534A1.txt
  • to be eligible to receive any high-cost support and ICLS that it qualifies for as of May 22, 2003, the date Grande received its ETC designation. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d), filed by Grande Communications, Inc. on June 30, 2003, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2535A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules. This waiver will allow Centennial to begin receiving high-cost support as of September 24, 2003, the date Centennial received its ETC designation. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.313(d)(3) of the Commission's rules, filed by Centennial Cellular Tri-State Operating Partnership and Centennial Claiborne Cellular Corp., on November 4, 2003, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Acting Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-254A1.txt
  • filers are on an equal footing. Further, filing an application without the certification page does not constitute substantial compliance, because signature certification is fundamental to the administration of the SLD program. Finally, financial need does not meet the requirement of special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Requests filed by Blessed Sacrament, Crutcho, Freedom Area and Milwaukee on July 10, June 11, July 5, and July 8, 2002, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-255A1.txt
  • on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, Dunellen failed to comply with the deadline and Dunellen's assertions do not justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 17, 2003, by Educational Consortium for Telecommunications Savings, on behalf of Dunellen School District, Newtown, Pennsylvania, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-256A1.txt
  • the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Parsippany-Troy's reasons are not special circumstances warranting a waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. We find that SLD's decision is consistent with our precedent and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by SLD. Therefore, we deny Parsippany-Troy's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Parsippany-Troy Hills Township District, Parsippany, New Jersey on November 5, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Charles V. Mole, Parsippany-Troy Hills Township District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-257A1.txt
  • waiver of the Commission's rules. We have consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the accurate and timely submission of the application. Further, we have concluded that detrimental impact alone does not create special circumstances that warrant a waiver. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Winans Academy of Performing Arts on October 30, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tony Mottley, Winans Academy of Performing Arts, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2604A1.txt
  • Administrative Company (Administrator). Dutchess County BOCES seeks review of SLD's denial of Dutchess County BOCES' request to receive discounted services. However, since the Request for Review was filed, SLD has granted the relief that Dutchess County BOCES is seeking. Dutchess County BOCES' Request for Review is therefore dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Dutchess County Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Poughkeepsie, New York, on March 29, 2004 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Acting Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Laura Zylberberg, Dutchess County Board
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2667A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Nextel has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, NCPR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New York, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Virginia to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2679A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2679A1.txt
  • require oppositions to the direct case to be filed by October 5, 2004, and replies to the oppositions to be filed by October 15, 2004. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the pleading cycle established by the order designating issues for investigation in this matter shall be modified as follows: Computer Models, Data Inputs and Outputs Responsive to Paragraph 13 of the Designation Order Due: August 30, 2004 Remainder of Direct Case Due: September 17, 2004 Oppositions to Direct Case
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-268A1.txt
  • so that parties may file comments by March 10, 2004, and reply comments by March 31, 2004. This matter shall continue to be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Wright Public Notice remain in effect. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Joint Motion to Extend Time For Filing Public Comments filed by Evercom Systems, Inc. T-NETIX, Inc., and Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition for Rulemaking Filed Regarding Issues
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-273A1.txt
  • parties may file comments on or before February 23, 2004 and reply comments on or before March 1, 2004. This matter shall continue to be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Public Notice remain in effect. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Eschelon's Motion To Extend or Postpone Comment Period in the above-captioned proceeding IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Commission Seeks Comment on Application for Acquisition of Assets of Allegiance Telecom, Inc. By Qwest Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2825A1.txt
  • find Winstar's request to discontinue service reasonable subject to its representations. After balancing the relevant factors, we therefore conclude that Winstar be permitted to discontinue its services in accordance with its filed representations. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Winstar Communications, LLC, Winstar Communications of Arizona, LLC; Winstar of Delaware, LLC; Winstar of Georgia, LLC; Winstar of Hawaii, LLC; Winstar of Indiana, LLC; Winstar of Louisiana, LLC; Winstar of New Jersey, LLC; Winstar of New York, LLC; Winstar of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2878A1.txt
  • Slope three months of ICLS when it missed the deadline due to its own error. We therefore deny South Slope's request for waiver of section 54.307(c). ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c), filed by South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company on September 22, 2003 IS DENIED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Acting Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2898A1.txt
  • is consistent with precedent, and thus deny MRP's Petition for Waiver. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Request for Waiver from the Universal Service Contribution Requirement filed by Inteleca Communications Corporation, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and section 1.3
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2905A1.txt
  • assistance for Funding Year 2000 of the schools and libraries universal service mechanism. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved OCM BOCES's request for BEAR payment assistance for Funding Request Numbers 471531, 471623, 480855. Accordingly, the Division dismisses OCM BOCES's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 15, 2004, by Mackenzie Hughes LLP, on behalf of, Onondaga-Cortland-Madison BOCES, Syracuse, New York, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Anthony Hanley, Mackenzie Hughes LLP,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-291A1.txt
  • to the Bureau's December 12, 2003 Order in the above-captioned matter. The motion states that a brief delay should neither unduly prejudice either party or unduly prolong these proceedings. 2. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 154(j), and authority delegated under section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the joint motion by Cavalier and Verizon for extension of the filing date to February 5, 2004 is GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Richard Lerner Associate Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Cavalier Telephone, LLC Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of the Jurisdiction
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-294A1.txt
  • Information Center Order, the Bureau determined that an applicant in Funding Year 2002 filing a consortium application could have reasonably determined that a completed Worksheet A satisfied the relevant worksheet requirement. We therefore reverse SLD's decision and remand ESC's application to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Educational Service Unit #1, Wakefield, Nebraska on July 18, 2002 IS GRANTED and its application is remanded to SLD for further consideration in accordance with this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-295A1.txt
  • not be warranted, which would eviscerate the benefits of having a filing window at all. In light of this, we do not believe that the denial of Fennville's request creates the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Fennville Public Schools on December 9, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jody Osbon/M. Klosner, Fennville Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-296A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-296A1.txt
  • require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information. Further, we have consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Applicants must comply with program rules, including the application deadline, in order to be eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Freeman School District No. 358 on July 29, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jan Davis, Freeman School District No. 358, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-297A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-297A1.txt
  • a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Griswold's misunderstanding of the Commission's rules is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny Griswold's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Griswold Community Schools, Griswold, Iowa, on May 10, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Rich Mortensen, Griswold Community School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-298A1.txt
  • Information Center Order, the Bureau determined that an applicant in Funding Year 2002 filing a consortium application could have reasonably determined that a completed Worksheet A satisfied the relevant worksheet requirement. We therefore reverse SLD's decision and remand Hartford's application to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hartford Public Schools, Hartford, Connecticut on December 16, 2002 IS GRANTED and its application is remanded to SLD for further consideration in accordance with this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2999A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice the Appellants' Requests for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, the Appellants may then appeal to the Commission, if they believe such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on May 19, 2004, by Al-Hikmah Elementary School, Prospect Park, New Jersey, on August 12, 2004, by Genesis School, Kansas City, Missouri, and on June 7, 2004, by Lutheran High School of St. Charles County, St. Peters, Missouri ARE DISMISSED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-299A1.txt
  • a deviation from the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the general rule. Lafayette's misunderstanding of the Commission's rules is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. Therefore, we affirm SLD and deny Lafayette's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lafayette Township School, Lafayette, New Jersey on November 21, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Carol J. Calella, Lafayette Township School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-300A1.txt
  • telecommunications services and Internet access, stating that the Commission may not waive a statutory deadline such as the October 28, 2001 deadline. We conclude that our determination in the East Carroll Order applies to Lake Erie's Request for Review. Therefore, we affirm SLD's decision and deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Lake Erie Educational Computer Association on May 29, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lloyd Wright, Lake Erie Educational Computer Association, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-301A1.txt
  • not be warranted, which would eviscerate the benefits of having a filing window at all. In light of this, we do not believe that the denial of Maine's request creates the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Maine School Administrative District No. 20 on September 19, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeannette Condon, Maine School Administrative District No. 20, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3020A1.txt
  • business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). . ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NECA SHALL BE a party to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NECA SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each request for information that it is required to answer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-302A1.txt
  • such matters; or (2) facts unknown to petitioner until after the Request for Review was filed. Each of the arguments raised by Marin County in its Petition for Reconsideration was raised in its prior Request for Review, and addressed in the Marin County Order. Therefore, we deny Marin County's Petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Marin County Office of Education, San Rafael, California, on December 9, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireless Competition Bureau The Petition was filed December 9, 2002, seeking reconsideration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3033A1.txt
  • Effect of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Investigation of Alascom, Inc. Interstate Transport and Switching Services Tariff FCC No. 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 95-182 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-303A1.txt
  • the timely submission of the application. Moreover, Meade's assertion that denial of its application may have a detrimental impact on the service it provides to its patrons does not create the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Meade County Public Library on December 10, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Mitchell, Meade County Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3046A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that ALLTEL has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, ALLTEL Communications, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER throughout its licensed non-rural service area in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-304A1.txt
  • thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information. Further, the Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Olathe Public Library on January 17, 2003 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Linse, Olathe Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3052A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3052A1.txt
  • in light of events occurring since the petition was filed. Specifically, Verizon's request to withdraw points to the Commission's rulemaking to establish alternative unbundling rules and the Commission's rulemaking regarding the TELRIC pricing methodology. In this Order, we grant Verizon's request to withdraw and dismiss its petition without prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that Verizon's request to withdraw the above-captioned petition for forbearance IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for forbearance IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-305A1.txt
  • staff contributed to the filing of the application out of window is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of the filing window. The Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Pratt Unified School District No. 382 on December 10, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Bob Lee, Pratt Unified School District No. 382, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-306A1.txt
  • that Saint Vincent's provides documentation indicating that its Form 471 application package was postmarked prior to the close of the filing window deadline. We therefore grant Saint Vincent's request for review and remand the matter to SLD, so that Saint Vincent's Form 471 may be processed as a timely application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Vincent's on August 5, 2002 IS GRANTED and Saint Vincent's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Paul Michael, Saint
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-307A1.txt
  • unavailability of staff contributed to the late submission of FCC Form 470 is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver of our rules. The Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by St. Boniface School on January 15, 2003 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Marylou Pawlowski, St. Boniface School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-308A1.txt
  • file.'' Here, some of the language on the face of SMU Invoice No. 1 led SLD to the erroneous assumption that Shawano-Gresham had submitted an invoice for electrical utility charges. The new information offered on appeal, in SMU Invoice No. 2, provided SLD the opportunity to correct this assumption. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Shawano-Gresham School District, Shawano, Wisconsin, on October 3, 2002, IS GRANTED, and the application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-309A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-309A1.txt
  • be warranted, which would eviscerate the benefits of having a filing window at all. In light of this, we do not believe that the denial of South Dakota's application creates the special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by South Dakota Department of Education and Cultural Affairs on January 21, 2003 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tammy Bauck, South Dakota Department of Education
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-310A1.pdf
  • require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information. Further, we have consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Applicants must comply with program rules, including the application deadline, in order to be eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Waterville-Elysian-Morristown Public School on November 14, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joel Whitehurst, Waterville-Elysian-Morristown Public School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3181A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 04-3181 Released: October 1, 2004 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF LOCAL EXCHANGE ASSETS OF IOWA TELECOM BY PARTNER WC Docket No. 04-231 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for transfer of control of the Baxter, Melbourne, Rhodes, and State Center exchanges in Iowa from Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (Iowa Telecom) to Partner Communications Cooperative (Partner). No comments were filed in this proceeding. The Bureau finds, upon consideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3182A1.txt
  • Therefore, to allow parties filing replies the full amount of time originally granted, we will extend the deadline for filing replies until October 22, 2004. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Oppositions to Direct Case Due: October 13, 2004 Replies Due: October 22, 2004 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request for extension of time of GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC. is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3193A1.txt
  • funding year and by filing the corrected version shortly after being apprised of any mistake. Moreover, the deadline involved a first-time information request. The Petitioners sought discounts only for telecommunications services, and the Commission has authority to waive the deadline with respect to requests that involve only telecommunications services. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 , and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by the Chesterfield County Public Schools, Chesterfield, Virginia, on July 23, 2003; Georgia Technology Authority, Atlanta, Georgia, on December 16, 2002; Columbus School District, Columbus, Wisconsin, on January 30, 2003; and School District of Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3194A1.txt
  • of Information Technology Services supports our determination in the Whiteville Order that the underlying contract expired in December 2000. Because Petitioners failed to submit an FCC Form 470 for the services rendered after December 2000, in contravention of the Commission's competitive bidding requirements, we must deny their Petitions for Reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petitions for Reconsideration filed on November 27, 2002 by Craven County Public School System, New Bern, North Carolina; on November 29, 2002 by Henderson, Baxter, Taylor & Gatchel, P.A. on behalf of Craven County Public School System, New Bern, North Carolina; and on November
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3202A1.txt
  • with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the NPRM remain in effect. For further information, please contact Jeremy D. Marcus, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the Joint Motion for Extension of Time filed by BellSouth, SBC, and Verizon IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau National Exchange Carrier Association Petition to Amend Section 69.104 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 04-259, RM-10603, Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3217A1.txt
  • and (6) to the BellSouth facilities used exclusively to serve New-Build, Multi-Premise Developments meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by BellSouth shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to January 5, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3225A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 04-3225 Released: October 8, 2004 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF HARTMAN TELEPHONE EXCHANGES, INC., TO RANDALL J. RAILE AND KACEY L. RAILE WC Docket No. 04-320 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of the Leo G. Hartman Revocable Trust (the ``Hartman Trust''), Randall J. Raile, and Kacey L. Raile (``Transferees'') to transfer control of Hartman Telephone Exchanges, Inc. (``Hartman Telephone'') from the Hartman Trust to Randall J. Raile and Kacey
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-324A1.txt
  • of time, ``[t]he parties will . . . submit the resulting amendments . . . by March 10, 2004.'' Finally, because neither AT&T nor WorldCom opposes the Motion, granting the extension will not prejudice any party. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for an extension of time filed by Verizon Virginia, Inc. IS GRANTED. By Order of the Pricing Policy Division, __________________________ Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of WorldCom, Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3261A1.txt
  • Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party executing the attached Declaration and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A DECLARATION In the Matter of July 1, 2004 Annual Access Charge Tariff Filings ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 04-372 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ___, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3278A1.txt
  • of the proceeding by January 4, 2005. Accordingly, given the importance of adopting final rules as quickly as possible, the Bureau cannot countenance the delay that would attend any extension of the reply comment filing deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by NASUCA IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Unbundled Access to Network Elements, CC Docket No. 01-338, WC Docket No. 04-313, Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (rel. Aug. 20, 2004) (Interim Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3280A1.txt
  • a thorough record in this complex investigation. Therefore, we grant Alascom's request to extend until November 1, 2004, the deadline for filing replies to oppositions. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Replies Due: November 1, 2004 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Partial Opposition to Request for Extension of ALASCOM, INC. is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3303A1.txt
  • applying the Total Element Long Run Incremental Cost (TELRIC) pricing methodology to the UNE-Platform, and to apply the resale pricing standard instead. On October 18, 2004, Petitioners filed a request to withdraw their petition. In this Order, we grant Petitioners' request to withdraw and dismiss their petition without prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the request of QWEST CORPORATION, BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., and SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC. to withdraw the above-captioned petition for forbearance IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3323A1.txt
  • section 69.5(b) of the Commission's rules, as those provisions relate to IP traffic, meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). Thus, the Bureau finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Level 3 shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to March 22, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3324A1.txt
  • significant questions regarding whether forbearance from application of section 204(a)(3) of the Act meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). Thus, the Bureau finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by AT&T shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to March 2, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3339A1.txt
  • as in this case, a state commission has acted on a timely basis to arbitrate an interconnection dispute, section 252(e)(6) provides the basis for federal court review; section 252(e)(5) provides no alternative forum for appeal. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 252, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.801(b), the petition filed by Autotel on July 30, 2004 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(5). Petition of Autotel Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of the Jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-344A1.txt
  • the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Merely stating that a letter or notice was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on July 31, 2003, by Education Legislative Service, Inc., El Cajon, California and Oakland Unified School District, Oakland, California, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-345A1.txt
  • thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information. Further, the Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Our Lady of Victory Academy, Dobbs Ferry, New York on February 20, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joanne Kouzan, Our Lady of Victory Academy,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-346A1.txt
  • 2003, Verizon Wireless filed a motion to withdraw its Petition. According to Verizon Wireless, the Numbering Resource Optimization Fourth Report and Order, released on June 18, 2003, exempted Tier III wireless carriers from pooling until they received a request for local number portability, thereby rendering Verizon Wireless' petition moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned Petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division Chief Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3532A1.txt
  • section 271 to network elements that need not be unbundled under section 251(c)(3) meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by SBC shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to February 3, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-354A1.txt
  • Northland's petition for preemption of the New York Commission over the dispute between Verizon and Northland, and invite Verizon and Northland to file for resolution of this dispute under 47 C.F.R. § 1.720 et seq. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b), the petition for preemption filed by Northland Networks, Ltd. on November 14, 2003 IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Northland Networks, Ltd. Pursuant to § 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Expedited
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3560A1.txt
  • Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator). For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Petitioners filed appeals after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore deny their Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on August 30, 2004 by Approach Learning and Assessment Centers, Santa Ana, California; April 8, 2004 by Fremont County Library System, Lander, Wyoming; July 19, 2004 by South Baltimore Learning Center, Baltimore, Maryland; and June 22, 2004 by Yeshivath Vinitz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3561A1.txt
  • SLD's decision. For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to SLD must be filed within 60 days of the issuance date of the SLD decision. Here, the Petitioners filed their appeals to SLD after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore deny the Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on March 17, 2004 by Bayshore School District, Daly City, California; May 18, 2004 by Clarkdale-Jerome School, Clarkdale, Arizona; and May 26, 2004 by Mandaree Public School District 36, Mandaree, North Dakota ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3562A1.txt
  • after SLD's decision was rendered. Appeals seeking review of decisions by SLD issued before August 13, 2001 must be filed with SLD within 30 days of the issuance of the decision. Coarsegold's appeal was filed June 5, 2000, in contravention of this rule. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Coarsegold Union School District, Coarsegold, California on June 19, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunication Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jon Corippo, Coarsegold Union School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3563A1.txt
  • Administrative Company (Administrator). For a review of a decision by SLD, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Alvarado filed its appeal after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on September 3, 2004 by Alvarado Independent School, Alvarado, Texas IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kyle Berger, Alvarado Independent School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3564A1.txt
  • application may have a detrimental impact on a request does not create special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed July 6, 2004, by Grace Lutheran Day School, Queens Village, New York; August 30, 2004, by Messenger Public Library of North Aurora, North Aurora, Illinois; July 2, 2004, by Mosaica Education, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; June 17, 2004, by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3565A1.txt
  • of decisions by SLD issued before August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Moscow filed its appeal on May 17, 1999, after the 30-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requestfor Review filed by Moscow Unified School District, Satanta, Kansas on May 17, 1999 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Larry Philippi, Moscow Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3566A1.txt
  • not contemplate simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Baraga's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Baraga may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 24, 2004, by Baraga Area Schools, Baraga, Michigan IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lynn Ketola, Baraga Area Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3567A1.txt
  • not contemplate simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Decatur's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Decatur may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 21, 2004, by Decatur Public Schools, Decatur, Arkansas IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Melissa Erks, Decatur Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3568A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3568A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3568A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Guamani School's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Guamani School may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 23, 2004, by Guamani School, Guayama, Puerto Rico IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Eduardo Delgado, Guamani School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3576A1.txt
  • sufficient evidence to prove its claimed backbilling amount. The North Carolina commission found that BellSouth met this burden and the state court affirmed the decision. Accordingly, we deny Thrifty Call's petition with respect to this issue. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.2, and the authority delegated in section 0.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 0.91, that the Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed by Thrifty Call, Inc., is denied to the extent discussed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Thrifty Call Files Petition for Declaratory Ruling, Pleading Cycle Established, CCB-CPD File No. 01-17, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 17617 (Com. Car. Bur. 2001). The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3662A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional EAS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. Ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. and BellSouth Corporation for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional EAS between specific locations in Louisiana, as identified in WC Docket No. 04-321, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas Navin Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3669A1.txt
  • ``ATTN: Form 499-A Revision Order'' and sent to the Universal Service Administrative Company, 2000 L Street, N.W., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.711 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.711, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE thirty days after publication in the Federal Register. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254, and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-367A1.txt
  • affirm SLD's decision. For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to SLD must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Blackstone filed its appeal to SLD after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 8, 2003, by Nottoway County Library, on behalf of Blackstone Public Library, Crewe, Virginia, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Pierce, Blackstone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3686A1.txt
  • of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. Because Aberdeen did not list its request as one for Internet access on its FCC Forms 470 and 471 consistently, it failed to satisfy the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. Consequently, we must deny its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Aberdeen School District No. 5, on July 10, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael R. Williams, Aberdeen School District No. 5, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-368A1.txt
  • a Request for Review filed by the Milwaukee Public Schools (Milwaukee PS), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, seeking review of decisions by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) to deny funding. On January 12, 2004, Milwaukee PS requested that its Request for Review be withdrawn. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Milwaukee Public Schools, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on December 16, 2003 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Davis, Milwaukee Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-369A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Monroe Township's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Monroe Township may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on December 15, 2003, by Monroe Township Board of Education, Williamstown, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from John Armano, Monroe Township Board of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-370A1.txt
  • Concepts) relating to an application filed by Chicago Public Schools, Chicago, Illinois. Specifically, Systems Concepts seeks waiver of the Commission's rules for FRN 712607. Upon review of the record, however, we find that Chicago Public Schools cancelled FRN 712607. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Systems Concepts' Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Systems Concepts, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, on October 18, 2002, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Cynthia Nielsen-Morgan, Systems Concepts, Inc., to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-371A1.txt
  • mechanism. Specifically, Terra World requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 630532. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved Terra World's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 630532. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Terra World's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed May 30, 2003, by Terra World, Inc., Independence, Kansas, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mike Hughey, Terra World, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-372A1.txt
  • when the applicant has cited the wrong Form 470 in an FRN but did have a Form 470 that supports the FRN and cites that correct Form 470 in its appeal to SLD. We therefore reverse and remand Prattsburgh's application for further consideration in light of Form 470 USCN 653700000151778. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 12, 2000, by Erie 1 BOCES Western New York Regional Information Center filed on behalf of Prattsburgh Central School District, is GRANTED and this application is remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3792A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3792A1.txt
  • abide by the terms of this order may result in dismissal of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 160, and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 04-416 I have received a copy of the Protective Order in WC Docket No. 04-416. I have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3843A1.txt
  • information collections contained herein are contingent upon approval of the Office of Management and Budget. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that FCC Report 43-01, the Annual Summary Report, FCC Report 43-02, the USOA Report, FCC Report 43-03, the Joint Cost Report, FCC Report 43-04, the Access Report, FCC Report 43-05, the Service Quality Report, FCC Report 43-06, the Customer Satisfaction Report, FCC Report 43-07, the Infrastructure Report, FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3844A1.txt
  • forbearance from application of Title II common carrier regulation to IP platform services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by SBC shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to May 5, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3845A1.txt
  • section 271 to network elements that need not be unbundled under section 251(c)(3) meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Qwest shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to March 17, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3881A1.txt
  • expiration of its current 47-cent charge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201-205, 215, 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 201-205, 215, 251, 332, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, we GRANT a waiver of the requirements established in paragraph 18 of the BellSouth Waiver Order to the extent necessary to allow Sprint to extend its intermodal LNP end-user charge recovery period for one month at a rate of 30 cents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Sprint may file
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3894A1.txt
  • have violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules by signing the FCC Form 471 or service provider agreement before the allowable contract date. The Bureau has also concluded that it is administratively necessary to require applicants to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information on their FCC Form 471 applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Center Area School District, on April 4, 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Scott A. Antoline, Center Area School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3895A1.txt
  • fact that there is only one provider in Raymond-Knowles's service area does not relieve Raymond-Knowles of the responsibility to comply with program rules. The Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Therefore, we deny the Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Raymond-Knowles Elementary School, on July 23, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Linda Lamont, Raymond-Knowles Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3896A1.txt
  • bidding process for services in Funding Years 1999, 2000, and 2001, in violation of the Commission's rules. Terrebonne states that it was nevertheless awarded funds for this service since Funding Year 1999. We therefore direct SLD to initiate commitment adjustment procedures in connection with the appropriate funding year service requests. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Terrebonne Parish School District, on August 6, 2002, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SLD pursue funding commitment adjustments in accordance with the terms of this Order and the established commitment adjustment procedures. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3897A1.txt
  • have violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules by signing the FCC Form 471 or service provider agreement before the allowable contract date. The Bureau has also concluded that it is administratively necessary to require applicants to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information on their FCC Form 471 applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ticonderoga Central School District, Ticonderoga, New York, on April 9, 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from William Dodd, Ticonderoga Central School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3898A1.txt
  • process as early as possible in order to deal with any problems that may arise. In this case, we find that SLD should have notified Totowa of the deficiency in the Form 470 in time for Totowa to submit an in-window Form 471 that complied with the competitive bidding rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Totowa Borough Public Schools, on March 28, 2002, IS GRANTED, and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3899A1.txt
  • must review and process each year, it is administratively necessary to require applicants to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information. Further, we have consistently held that it is the applicant who bears ultimate responsibility for the timely submission of its application. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Thomas Communications & Technology, on behalf of Paramus School District, on October 15, 2003, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3903A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3903A1.txt
  • appropriate contribution as that set forth in the True-Up Order. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5, 254 and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155, 254, and 405, and sections 1.3, 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 1.429, and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Petitions for Waiver filed by ALLTEL Corporation, Inc., Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC, Cingular Wireless LLC, Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. and American Cellular Corporation, Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation and Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding Company, Nex-Tech, Inc., Nextel Communications, Inc., and T-Mobile USA, Inc. ARE GRANTED, as set forth herein. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3909A1.txt
  • Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party executing the attached Declaration and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A DECLARATION In the Matter of Access Charge Reform Reform of Access Charges Imposed by Competitive Local Exchange Carriers ) ) ) ) ) CC Docket No. 96-262 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ___, hereby declare under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4007A1.txt
  • manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly when relief is contrary to a rule. Each of the petitioners in the Requests for Review violated one or more of the above-cited competitive bidding requirements. In keeping with our prior decisions, we deny the Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests filed by Adel-Desoto-Minburn Community School, Adel, Iowa, on November 15, 2002; Baltimore County Public Schools, Towson, Maryland, on August 30, 2002; Derby Public Schools, Derby, Connecticut, on December 16, 2002; Madison School District 321, Rexburg, Indiana, on November 21, 2002, are DENIED. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4008A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional EAS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. Ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. and BellSouth Corporation for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional EAS between specific locations in North Carolina, as identified in WC Docket No. 04-412, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Competition Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4030A1.txt
  • scope of the proceeding and the bases for the extension request. Therefore, we will extend the deadline for filing comments in this proceeding until January 7, 2005, and for filing reply comments until January 18, 2005. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: January 7, 2005 Reply Comments Due: January 18, 2005 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time of COMPTEL/ASCENT ALLIANCE is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4048A1.txt
  • a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Transmittal Nos. 1430, 84, 187, 843, and 3022, respectively, Tariffs FCC Nos. 2, 1, 1, 39, and 73, respectively, of the Ameritech Operating Companies, the Nevada Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Bell Telephone Company, the Southern New England Telephone Company, and the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ARE SUSPENDED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4060A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4060A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4060A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 04-4060 Released: December 28, 2004 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF TRI-COUNTY TELCOM, INC. TO HANSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. WC Docket No. 04-394 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of , James O. Ekstrand (Mr. Ekstrand) and Hanson Communications, Inc. (Hanson) to transfer control of Tri-County Telcom, Inc. (``Tri-County'') and its domestic blanket section 214 authorizations from Mr. Ekstrand to Hanson. No commenters opposed grant of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-406A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-406A1.txt
  • not contemplate simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Heritage's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Heritage may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 5, 2004, by Heritage Public Library, McDonald, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Connie Bongiorni, Heritage Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4070A1.txt
  • annual high-cost loop support filings. Finally, we require NECA to submit its universal service average schedule filing for 2006, including unadjusted accounting and loop data for each average schedule company, no later than September 1, 2005 in order to provide the Bureau additional time to review its more detailed data submission. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formula proposed by the National Exchange Carriers Association, Inc., on September 29, 2004, for local switching support SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE January 1, 2005. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-407A1.txt
  • evidence of its assertion, Jackson PS attaches a copy of the UPS tracking information. Based on the underlying record, we conclude that Jackson PS's application was postmarked by the filing window deadline. We therefore grant Jackson PS's Request for Review and remand Jackson PS's application to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jackson Public School District, Jackson, Mississippi on August 4, 2003 IS GRANTED, and Jackson PS's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-408A1.txt
  • SLD. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on September 29, 2003, by Maricopa County School Superintendent's Office, Phoenix, Arizona, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-422A1.txt
  • Massachusetts 271 Order - WorldCom through its offering of ``The Neighborhood'' and AT&T through its offering of ``One Rate U.S.A.'' Because appellants have failed to establish a price squeeze in Massachusetts, they also have failed to establish a public interest violation based upon a price squeeze. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 10, 201-205, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 160, 201-205, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r), this Order on Remand IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-423A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Ameritech Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-09 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-424A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Nevada Bell Telephone Company Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-10 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-425A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Pacific Bell Telephone Company Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-11 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-426A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Southern New England Telephone Company Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-12 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-427A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing 04-13 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare under penalty of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-428A1.txt
  • SLD issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Beth Jacob filed its appeal on December 26, 2002, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on December 26, 2002, by Beth Jacob High School, Brooklyn, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Yitzchok Kaplan, Beth Jacob High School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-429A1.txt
  • dates. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. As we have consistently held in the past, applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 21, 2003, by Sunnyside School District, Sunnyside, Washington, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-42A1.txt
  • cause for an extension of the deadline for filing a waiver petition. We are not persuaded that the delay caused by the need for a new protective order is, by itself, sufficient to extend the 90-day deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j), of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 154(j), and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request of the Public Utility Commission of Oregon for an Extension of the Deadline for Filing a Petition Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 51.319(d)(5)(i) IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Review of the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-432A1.txt
  • each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for carefully following program rules. Further, the Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Coleman's Request for Waiver is therefore denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Coleman Community Schools on January 23, 2003 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones, Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Allen Spalding, Coleman Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-433A1.txt
  • an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information. Further, the Commission has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Applicants must comply with program rules, including the application deadline, in order to be eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Winnebago Public Schools, Winnebago, Nebraska, on February 23, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Richard B. Peterson, Meritide, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-446A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-446A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-446A1.txt
  • Midwest Wireless Wisconsin L.L.C. (Midwest) filed the above-captioned petition seeking Commission agreement with the decision of the Wisconsin Public Service Commission to redefine the service areas of certain rural telephone companies in the state of Wisconsin. On February 18, 2004, Midwest submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition filed by Midwest Wireless Wisconsin L.L.C for Commission agreement in redefining the service areas of rural telephone companies in the state of Wisconsin IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-459A1.txt
  • (CMS) to withdraw their petition for waiver. In the petition, CMS requests an extension until May 24, 2004 to implement wireless local number portability obligations as mandated by Section 52.23(c) of the Commission's rules. On February 13, 2004, CMS submitted a request to withdraw the above captioned petitions. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the requests to withdraw the above-captioned petition ARE GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Cheryl L. Callahan Assistant Division Chief Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-460A1.txt
  • of the start of the first funding year following the effective date of the statute. Because Aleutians East was receiving discounts on Internet access, and was therefore subject to the October 28, 2001 deadline imposed by the CIPA statute, we are without authority to waive that deadline in this case. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Aleutians East Borough School District on February 12, 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Wesley L. Knapp, Ph.D, Aleutians East Borough School District, to Schools
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-461A1.txt
  • its Form 470 and/or Form 470 RNL; or (2) checked the website to make certain that its Form 470 had been posted. The Bureau has consistently held that it is the applicant who has responsibility ultimately for the timely submission of the application. Fredonia's Request for Waiver is therefore denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Fredonia-Moccasin Unified School District No. 6 on December 5, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Steven L. Winward, Fredonia-Moccasin Unified School District No. 6,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-462A1.txt
  • not justify a waiver of our rules. We therefore deny Tallulah Falls' waiver request. Unified Niobrara-Lynch Schools Niobrara-Lynch stated that it missed the deadline because of staffing problems. Staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with our rules and procedures. Accordingly, Niobrara-Lynch's waiver request is denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Freehold Regional High School District, Englishtown, New Jersey, on September 12, 2002; Giltner Public Schools, Giltner, Nebraska, on July 10, 2002; Gold Oak Union Elementary School, Placerville, California, on March 11, 2002; Pine Castle Christian Academy, Orlando,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-463A1.txt
  • the funding year and by filing the corrected version shortly after being apprised of the mistake. Moreover, the deadline involved a first-time information request. Stafford also sought discounts only for telecommunications services, and the Commission has authority to waive the deadline with respect to requests that involve only telecommunications services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Stafford Public Schools, Stafford Springs, Connecticut on November 5, 2002 IS GRANTED and REMANDED TO SLD to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-566A1.txt
  • their progress toward transitioning customers to alternative service. In this regard, we will retain jurisdiction over this matter until we have received confirmation that Touch America DIP's customers have successfully completed this process. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Touch America, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED to the extent declared herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. See Application of Touch
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-569A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 04-569 Released: February 26, 2004 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN ASSETS OF TOUCH AMERICA, INC. (DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION) BY QWEST COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND QWEST LD CORPORATION WC Docket No. 03-265 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Qwest Communications Corporation (QCC) and Qwest Corporation (QC) (together, Qwest) to acquire certain ATM/frame relay switching equipment from Touch America, Inc. (Debtor-in-Possession) (Touch America). No commenters opposed grant of the application. We note that on December 8,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-572A1.txt
  • has responsibility for the timely submission of its application. As a result, neither employee illness nor misunderstanding relieves applicants of their responsibility to understand and comply with the program rules or procedures. Consistent with existing precedent as described above, the Telecommunications Access Policy Division denies the above-captioned Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests filed by Jackson Public School District, Jackson, Mississippi, on December 5, 2002; Stafford Public Schools, Stafford Springs, Connecticut, on October 23, 2002; Syosset Central School District, Syosset, New York, on November 14, 2002; Villa Park School District 45, Villa Park, Illinois,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-581A1.txt
  • February 19, 2004, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York confirmed XO as the winning bidder. Consequently, on February 20, 2004, Applicants filed a letter with the Commission's Secretary stating their intent to terminate the Allegiance/Qwest transaction and requested that the Commission dismiss the application without prejudice. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.51, 0.91, 0.261 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.51, 0.91, 0.261 and 0.291, that the joint application of Allegiance Telecom, Inc., Debtor-in-Possession and Qwest Communications International Inc. IS DISMISSED without prejudice and WC Docket No. 04-13 IS HEREBY TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau James Ball Chief, Policy Division International
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-589A1.txt
  • applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, Albuquerque failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on Albuquerque misunderstanding of the program rules does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on August 7, 2003, by Albuquerque Public Schools, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-590A1.txt
  • City requests that the deadline be extended for Funding Request Number (FRN) 876693. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that the Schools and Libraries Division approved Anaheim City's request to extend the invoicing deadline for FRN 876693. Accordingly, Anaheim City's Request for Waiver id dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed November 11, 2002, by Anaheim City School District, Anaheim, California, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Barry Bettger, Anaheim City School District, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-596A1.txt
  • is a Request for Review filed by the Heavener Public Schools, Heavener, Oklahoma, seeking review of decisions by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) to deny funding. On May 30, 2001, Heavener Public Schools requested that its Request for Review be withdrawn. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Heavener Public Schools, Heavener, Oklahoma, on November 3, 1999 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lance Ford, Heavener Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-597A1.txt
  • issued on or after August 13, 2001, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Jesse Jackson Academy filed its appeal on December 29, 2003, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jesse Jackson Academy, Houston, Texas on December 29, 2003, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jesse W. Jackson, Jesse Jackson Academy, Houston, Texas, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-598A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-598A1.txt
  • Request for Review filed by the Ralls Independent School District (Ralls ISD), Ralls, Texas, seeking review of decisions by the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) to deny funding. On May 9, 2001, Ralls ISD requested that its Request for Review be withdrawn. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ralls Independent School District, Ralls, Texas, on February 11, 2000 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Holly Lee and Dagobert Azam, Ralls Independent School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-599A1.txt
  • (Administrator). For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, St. Bartholomew filed its appeal on October 7, 2002, after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Bartholomew Consolidated School, Cincinnati, Ohio on October 7, 2002 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Theresa Mangold, St. Batholomew Consolidated School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-600A1.txt
  • FCC Form 470 and waited the 28-day competitive bidding period, it carefully considered all bids before choosing to continue service under its existing contract. Because the record does not address or resolve this question, we remand Merrimac's application to SLD to consider this issue and for all necessary further review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Middle Peninsula Juvenile Detention Commission, Merrimac Center, on December 6, 2002, IS GRANTED, and this application is REMANDED to SLD for further review consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-604A1.txt
  • Merger Order to accommodate Verizon's implementation of OSS uniformity in Pennsylvania is consistent with the prior Commission order, and therefore, we grant Verizon's request. ordering clause IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, 201-205, 214, 251, 303(r), and 309, 416(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, 214, 251, 303(r), and 309, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that Verizon's October 17, 2003 request IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 408, that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-617A1.txt
  • converting an existing line sharing arrangement to a line splitting arrangement. On March 1, 2004, BellSouth filed a Letter requesting that its petition for reconsideration be withdrawn because it no longer wishes to pursue its petition. In this Order, we grant BellSouth's request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that BellSouth's request to withdraw the above-captioned petition IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition Policy Division In the Matter of Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability and Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket Nos. 98-147
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-626A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-626A1.txt
  • the Commission within five days of the date of this order. In compliance with section 252(h) of the Act, we likewise require the Parties to file a copy of the executed interconnection agreement with the Virginia State Corporation Commission. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.807 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 51.807, the Interconnection Agreement submitted jointly by Cavalier and Verizon, as modified herein, IS APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Cavalier Telephone, LLC and Verizon Virginia, Inc. SHALL INCORPORATE the above determinations into an executed interconnection agreement, setting forth both the negotiated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-669A1.txt
  • their amendments. In granting the parties the full extension of time they request (for a second time), we fully expect them to complete their negotiations and to submit the required interconnection agreements by March 24, 2004. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for an extension of time filed by Verizon Virginia Inc., AT&T Communications of Virginia Inc., and WorldCom, Inc. IS GRANTED. By Order of the Pricing Policy Division, __________________________ Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of WorldCom, Inc. Pursuant to Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-678A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-678A1.txt
  • revisions to its projections of first and second quarter 2003 collected end-user telecommunications revenues reported on the FCC Form 499-Q after the 45-day revision filing deadline. On March 9, 2004, Genuity submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition for waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for waiver IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Eric N. Einhorn, Chief Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-69A1.txt
  • waiver of section 52.23(c) of the Commission rules. Specifically, Bentleyville seeks waiver of the November 24, 2003 implementation date requiring Bentleyville to support wireline-to-wireless number portability. On January 8, 2004, Bentleyville submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition for waiver of section 52.23(c) of the Commission's rules IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for waiver of section 52.23(c) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-774A1.txt
  • 21, 2004. This matter shall continue to be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. All other requirements discussed in the Wright Public Notice remain in effect. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Martha Wright et al. IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition for Rulemaking Filed Regarding Issues related to Inmate Calling Services, Pleading Cycle Established, CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-885A1.txt
  • this request involves a future residential housing development that would include only a small number of access lines. Accordingly, we grant Verizon NJ's request for a LATA boundary modification. iv. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Verizon New Jersey Inc.'s request for a limited modification to the LATA boundary between the North Jersey and Delaware LATAs to provide local exchange service to The Meadows of Brunswick residential housing development, as specified in this order, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-978A1.txt
  • Petition for Clarification and Reconsideration (Petition) in the above-captioned proceeding. In its petition, SBC sought clarification and reconsideration of the Commission's Fifth Universal Service Report and Order. On April 7, 2004, SBC submitted a request to withdraw the Petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the Petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the SBC's Petition for Clarification and Reconsideration in the above-captioned proceeding IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that SBC's Petition for Clarification and Reconsideration in the above-captioned proceeding IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-980A1.txt
  • carrying out its obligation to guard against the occurrence of errors and fraud. Furthermore, if applicants were permitted to amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Donna Public Library, Donna, Texas, on October 18, 2002, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal regarding SLD application numbers 320003 and 324627, ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-981A1.txt
  • the general rule, and such deviation would better serve the public interest than strict adherence to the rule. We find no such special circumstances in this case. Given the thousands of applications SLD processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place the burden of meeting deadlines on the applicants. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 3, 2003, by Grant Joint Union High School District, McClellan, California, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-982A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-982A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-982A1.txt
  • District (Memphis CSD), Memphis, Tennessee, seeking reconsideration of decisions by the Telecommunications Access Policy Division and the Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator) to deny funding to Memphis CSD. On March 17, 2004, Memphis CSD requested that its Petition for Reconsideration be withdrawn. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Memphis City School District, Memphis, Tennessee, on December 2, 2003 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition for Reconsideration of the Request for Review of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-983A1.txt
  • applicants are responsible for submitting their appeals in a timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. In this instance, Murchison ISD failed to comply with the deadline. This failure based on misunderstanding of the program rules does not constitute special circumstance to justify a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 21, 2003, by Murchison Independent School District, Murchison, Texas, and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-984A1.txt
  • application may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the applicants here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Sacred Heart School, Danbury, Connecticut on May 28, 2003; GEMS Academy, Humble, Texas on June 16, 2003; Pawnee Independent School District, Pawnee, Texas on June 4, 2003; Adel Elementary Lake County School District #21, Adel, Oregon on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-985A1.txt
  • not contemplate simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Waterville's Request for Waiver to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Waterville may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on December 24, 2003, by Waterville Public Schools, Waterville, Maine IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from James Reny, Waterville Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-986A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-986A1.txt
  • support mechanism because it omitted certain information required under SLD's minimum processing standards. Specifically, Wood-Ridge did not provide the Funding Year in Block 1. Consistent with existing precedent, we conclude that Wood-Ridge's application was appropriately returned for failure to satisfy minimum processing standards. We therefore deny its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wood-Ridge Board of Education, Wood-Ridge, New Jersey on June 28, 2003 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael D. Leary, Wood-Ridge Board of Education, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1008A1.txt
  • matter over which it assumes responsibility under section 252(e)(5). Similarly, any findings made by the Commission after it assumes responsibility over a proceeding, and any judicial review of such findings, shall be the exclusive remedies available to the parties. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b), the Petition for Commission preemption of jurisdiction filed by KMC Telecom of Virginia, Inc., KMC Telecom V of Virginia, Inc., and KMC Data LLC, on January 4, 2005, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle Carey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1012A1.pdf
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. Ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS between specific locations in Texas, as identified in WC Docket No. 05-2, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1045A1.txt
  • rather than in a piecemeal fashion, which could create customer confusion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1-4, 201, 203, 205, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 203, 205, and 403, sections 1.3 and 1.41 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 1.41, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the informal request of the incumbent LECs for a limited waiver of the date for filing tariff revisions related to the PIC Change Charge Order IS GRANTED, to the extent discussed above. Incumbent LECs SHALL FILE REVISED RATES, to include one rate for PIC changes that are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1062A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Carrizozo Municipal Schools, Carrizozo, New Mexico, on November 22, 2004; Florence Unified School District #1, Florence, Arizona, on May 14, 2004; Glen Carbon Centennial Library, Glen Carbon, Illinois, on August 26, 2004; Glenn County Office of Education,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1063A1.txt
  • application may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Cold Spring has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Cold Spring School District 750, Cold Spring, Texas, on November 22, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Kurt Langer, Cold Spring School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1064A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Concord School District, Concord, New Hampshire, on April 16, 2003; Floyd County Board of Education, Prestonsburg, Kentucky, on August 26, 2003; Fordland R-III School District, Fordland, Missouri, on February 23, 2004; Hull Christian School, Hull, Iowa, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1065A1.txt
  • all relevant rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. Hence, staffing problems do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Corpus Christi has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Corpus Christi Church and School, New York, New York, on March 2, 2005, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Brother Larry Lavallee, Corpus Christi
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1066A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1066A1.txt
  • FCC Form 471 or service provider agreement before the allowable contract date. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to follow program rules. We therefore deny Custer County's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Custer County C-1 School District, Westcliffe, Colorado, on December 6, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Joy L. Butts, Custer County C-1 School District, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1067A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1067A1.txt
  • of matters properly before it within ninety (90) days unless the time period is extended. The Bureau requires additional time to review the issues presented. Accordingly, we extend by an additional ninety (90) days the deadline by which the Bureau must take action regarding the instant Request for Review. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.724(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.724(a), that the time period for taking action in the above-captioned Request for Review IS EXTENDED BY an additional ninety (90) days to June 5, 2005, for the Request for Review filed by Dunmore School District, Dunmore, Pennsylvania. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1068A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1068A1.txt
  • are denying the Request for Waiver of the FCC Form 471 filing window deadline, there will be no need for Greenport Public Schools to file FCC Form 486 for Funding Year 2002. Therefore, we dismiss the Request for Waiver of the filing deadline for the FCC Form 486 as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Greenport Public Schools, Greenport, New York, on October 29, 2003, IS DENIED in part and DISMISSED as moot in part. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1069A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1069A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1069A1.txt
  • the installation of non-recurring services for Funding Year 2003 of the schools and libraries universal service support program. Upon review of the record, we find that SLD has approved Orleans Parish's request for an extension of the non-recurring services deadline. Accordingly, we dismiss Orleans Parish's Request for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Orleans Parish School District, New Orleans, Louisiana, on October 12, 2004, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau The Request for Waiver was referred to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1070A1.txt
  • an application may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Owensboro has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Owensboro Public Schools, Owensboro, Kentucky, on June 11, 2003, IS DENIED and the request to waive the filing deadline for filing a FCC Form 471 application IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1071A1.txt
  • Petitioners offer no explanation for why they should be excused from observing the appeals deadline when hundreds of other applicants were able to appeal on time. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine here that Petitioners have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Joint Petition for Waiver and Relief, filed by Pennsylvania Department of Education and South Dakota Department of Education, on January 24, 2005, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Joint Petition of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1072A1.txt
  • we deny the Request for Review. It is well established law that the absence of an official record of an event is evidence of the non-occurrence of the event. Because we find that the Ponca City's Block 6 certification was not filed at all, we deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ponca City Public Schools, Ponca City, Oklahoma, on April 21, 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jerry Jantz, Ponca City Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1073A1.txt
  • 415327, and 431237 were filed. On February 15, 2005, Saint Paul filed a Request to Withdraw its Request for Review for FCC Form 471 application number 431237. We grant Saint Paul's Request to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismiss Saint Paul's Request for Review for FCC Form 471 application number 431237. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request to Withdraw filed by Saint Paul Public Schools, Saint Paul, Minnesota, on February 15, 2005, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1074A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1074A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1074A1.txt
  • processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures, including filing deadlines. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Worth School District has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Worth School District 127, Worth, Illinois, on February 24, 2005, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Miller, Worth School District 127, to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1077A1.txt
  • before the allowable contract date. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require applicants to provide complete and accurate information on their applications and follow program rules. We therefore deny Butte's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Butte High School of the West Boyd Unified School District, Butte, Nebraska, on October 21, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from D. Russell Lechtenberg, Butte
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1078A1.txt
  • We do not doubt that the existence of Florida College results in an improved educational experience for students in Jacksonville, Florida. However, the provision of discounted services for entities such as community colleges is beyond the scope of our statutory authority and would divert support from the program's intended beneficiaries. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Florida Community College at Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, on December 6, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Dr. Steven Wallace, Florida Community College at Jacksonville, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1079A1.txt
  • file its application on January 19, 2000, and that it took steps to inform SLD that it was unable to complete its application on January 19, 2000 due to problems with SLD's Internet site. We therefore grant Gainesville's Request for Waiver and remand its application to SLD for further processing. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Gainesville Independent School District, Gainesville, Texas, on June 30, 2000, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1080A1.txt
  • perform a job properly, inclement weather, or misunderstanding of the rules does not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Galloway Township has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Galloway Township Board of Education, Galloway Township, New Jersey, on June 7, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gil Chapman, Galloway Township Board
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-108A1.txt
  • recovery of funds. Because USAC did not consider which party was responsible for the statutory or rule violation at issue, we find it appropriate to remand the above-captioned Requests for Review of commitment adjustment decisions to USAC for further consideration consistent with the Commission's decision in the Schools Fourth Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Ameritech Advanced Data Services, Inc. - St. Lorenz Lutheran School, Frankenmuth, Michigan, on July 14, 2004; BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. - Orleans Parish School District, New Orleans, Louisiana, on May 10, 2004; DeltaNet, Inc. - Calvery Chapel Academy, Lawrence, Kansas,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1095A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1095A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1095 Released: April 15, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF BERKSHIRE TELEPHONE COMPANY TO FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. WC Docket No. 03-184 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application to transfer control of Berkshire Telephone Company (``Berkshire'') to Fairpoint Communications, Inc. (``Fairpoint''). On August 25, 2003, the New York Public Service Commission filed comments requesting that the Bureau delay action until after the NYPSC issued its final
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1121A1.txt
  • Administrative Company (Administrator). For review of decisions by SLD, requests to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Arlington School District filed its request after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review by Battenkill Valley Supervisory Union, on behalf of Arlington School District, Arlington, Vermont, dated February 03, 2005, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Michael Finch, Battenkill Valley Supervisory
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1122A1.txt
  • allowable contract date. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require applicants to provide accurate information on their applications and comply with program rules and procedures. We therefore deny Brunswick County's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Brunswick County Schools, Bolivia, North Carolina, on November 8, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Leonard Jenkins, Brunswick County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1123A1.txt
  • are submitted in amounts that go beyond what they can substantiate, their funding requests will be reduced to the amount that is substantiated. Accordingly, we remand these Requests for Review and direct SLD to grant the commitment requests in accordance with this Order, unless SLD identifies other grounds for denial. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Greenbrier County School District, Cleveland, Ohio on December 22, 2003; Mason County School District, Cleveland, Ohio on March 18, 2004; Preston County School District, Cleveland, Ohio on March 18, 2004; and Raleigh County School District, Beckley, West Virginia on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1124A1.txt
  • and procedures. Hence, neither staffing changes nor misunderstanding of the rules relieves applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Information Transport has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of the Commission's rules. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review by Information Transport Solutions, Inc., Wetumpka, Alabama, dated November 5, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Tomi J. Selby, Information Transport Solutions, Inc., to Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1125A1.txt
  • that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly when relief is contrary to a rule. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corporation on August 19, 2002, IS DENIED IN PART, AND GRANTED IN PART and REMANDED to SLD for further review consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1126A1.txt
  • inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly when relief is contrary to a rule. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the ultimate responsibility of complying with all relevant rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sacred Heart School, Mount Holly, New Jersey, on February 5, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Ronald J. Maniglia, Sacred Heart School, to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1127A1.txt
  • their Forms 470. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require applicants to provide accurate information on their applications and comply with program rules and procedures. We therefore deny St. Margaret's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Margaret's School, Middle Village, New York, on October 28, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Donna Menna, St. Margaret's School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1128A1.txt
  • of decisions by SLD, appeals to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, School Administrative Unit #6 filed an appeal to the Commission after the 60-day period, in contravention of Commission rules. We therefore dismiss the Request for Review. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review by School Administrative Unit #6, Claremont, New Hampshire, dated November 26, 2004, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Allen Damren, School Administrative Unit #6, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1129A1.txt
  • to file incomplete or late applications, and have those applications considered timely, would be unfair to the applicants who diligently filed their complete applications in a timely fashion. Because we find that St. John's FCC Form 471 application was filed outside of the window, we deny its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. John's School, Wahpeton, North Dakota on March 5, 2002, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Wilfred Sauer, St. John's School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-11A1.txt
  • is denied, comments need not be filed until two business days after the Commission acts on the motion. Thus, any party's comments that are filed on or before January 6, 2005 will be considered timely filed. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by WBIA IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Public Notice, Comments Invited on Petition for Forbearance Filed by Qwest Corporation Regarding Qwest's DSL Service, WC Docket No. 04-416, DA 04-3602 (Nov. 16, 2004).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1259A1.txt
  • the Expanded Interconnection Tariff Order and the New Expanded Interconnection Service Suspension Order. These transmittals will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Ameritech's Tariff F.C.C. No. 2 and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Tariff F.C.C. No. 73 Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal Nos. 1460 and 3057, respectively, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the May 4, 2005 effective date, and investigations of the referenced transmittals are instituted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1297A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1297A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05 -1297 Released: May 5, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF SULLY TELEPHONE'S REASNOR EXCHANGE TO REASNOR TELEPHONE WC Docket No. 04-425 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Sully Telephone Association, Inc. (``Sully Telephone'') and Reasnor Telephone Company, LLC (``Reasnor Telephone'') to transfer control of Sully Telephone's Reasnor, Iowa exchange to Reasnor Telephone. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1313A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1313 Released: May 6, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF THE ASSETS OF NOONAN FARMERS TELEPHONE COMPANY TO NORTHWEST COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE WC Docket No. 05-60 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for transfer of control of Noonan Farmers Telephone Company's (NFTC) assets and facilities relating to the provision of local exchange telecommunications service, exchange access and other telecommunications in the Noonan exchange to Northwest Communications Cooperative (NCC). No comments were
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1335A1.txt
  • an extension of the limited waiver of section 61.42(g) to exclude advanced services under Tariff FCC No. 20 from price caps only for purposes of the 2005 annual access tariff filing. ordering clauses IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for advanced services in Tariff FCC No. 20, including those transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2005 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1355A1.txt
  • Sandwich Isles to participate in NECA pools and tariffs and to receive any high-cost universal service support that it may be eligible to receive. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. on December 27, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1432A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1432 Released: May 19, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF PYMATUNING INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE COMPANY T0 PYMATUNING HOLDING COMPANY, INC. WC Docket No. 05-160 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Pymatuning Holding Company, Inc., PITC Acquisition Sub Inc. (together ``Pymatuning Holdings'' or ``Transferee'') and The Pymatuning Independent Telephone Company (``Pymatuning Telco'' or ``Transferor'')(collectively the ``Applicants'') to transfer control of Pymatuning Telco to Pymatuning Holdings. On April 8,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1505A1.txt
  • Verizon has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for Phase II pricing flexibility for the services set forth in the Appendix in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas MSA. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 17. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, the petition filed by Verizon Telephone Company, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Verizon-West Tariff FCC 14 Special Access Basket Voiceband - Section 5.2.1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1525A1.txt
  • Ameritech, SNET, and SWBT each has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs and non-MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Pricing Flexibility Order, the petitions filed by Ameritech, SNET, and SWBT are GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Ameritech Special Access Basket (Includes channel terminations between the serving
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1553A1.txt
  • the piecemeal submission of arguments and analysis in the form of ex parte submissions after the reply comment deadline. All other filing requirements set forth in the FNPRM remain in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 4(i) and 303(r) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 303(r), and sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.45, and 1.415 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.45, and 1.415, the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the FNPRM IS EXTENDED to July 20, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, CC Docket No. 01-92, Further Notice of Proposed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1564A1.txt
  • No party opposed the proposed revisions. We have reviewed NECA's filing and find that its proposed formulas are reasonable for use in developing NECA's rates for its 2005 annual access tariff filing. Therefore, pursuant to section 69.606(a) of the Commission's rules, we approve the proposed average schedule formulas as submitted in NECA's filing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., on December 23, 2004, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2005, and remain in effect through June 30, 2006. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1584A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1584 Released: June 2, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF MIDWEST INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. TO ARVIG ENTERPRISES, INC. WC Docket No. 05-172 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Midwest Information Systems, Inc. (``MIS''), its wholly owned subsidiaries Midwest Telephone Co. and The Peoples Telephone Co. of Bigfork (``Peoples''), Midwest Telephone Co.'s wholly owned subsidiary Osakis Telephone Company (``Osakis''), and MIS' parent Varistar Corporation (collectively ``Midwest''),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1602A1.txt
  • on their petitions in a timely fashion prior to the June 22 implementation date. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254, and section 1.3 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that CPUC's petition for waiver of the deadline for state implementation of Lifeline/Link-Up certification and verification procedures set out in the Lifeline Order and an extension until March 1, 2006, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau In the Matter of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1607A1.txt
  • excluding TIPToP from the 2005 annual filing will not affect SBC's rates for the TIPToP service or the rates it charges for other services that are subject to price caps. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP services offered by SBC, with respect to SBC's 2005 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-161A1.txt
  • were rendered. For a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to SLD must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, Athens and Novacon filed appeals to SLD after the 60-day period, in contravention of Commission rules. We therefore deny their Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on November 12, 2004 by Athens Independent School District, Athens, Texas; and November 2, 2004 by Novacon, Rolling Meadows, Illinois ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Lawrence
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-162A1.txt
  • Information Technology, rather than the California DoE, to verify that Mariposa had an approved technology plan was in error. Consequently, we conclude that SLD improperly denied Mariposa's funding request. We therefore grant Mariposa's Request for Review and remand Mariposa's application to SLD for further processing in accordance with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mariposa County Unified School District, Mariposa, California on October 31, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and Mariposa's application is REMANDED to SLD for further processing in accordance with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1640A1.txt
  • ETC. On May 17, 2005, the Hawaii Commission submitted a request to amend its August 27 filing and withdraw the request for waiver. We grant the request to amend the August 27 certification filing. We further grant the request to withdraw and dismiss its October 25, 2004 waiver petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned petition for waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for waiver IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas A. Buckley Acting Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1663A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that NTELOS's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. and Richmond 20 MHz, LLC (d/b/a NTELOS) IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER throughout its licensed non-rural service area in the state of Virginia to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. and Richmond 20 MHz, LLC (d/b/a NTELOS)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1700A1.txt
  • Pennsylvania (Petition). The Petition requested that, pursuant to section 253(a) of the Communications Act, as amended, the Commission preempt a rights-of-way ordinance enacted by the Borough of Blawnox, Pennsylvania (Blawnox). On April 12, 2005, Fibertech filed a request to withdraw its Petition without prejudice to any of its arguments. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Fibertech's request to withdraw the above-captioned petition IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for preemption IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the proceeding initiated by that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1725A1.txt
  • the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), which suspended payments from USAC to Miami-Dade. On June 7, 2005, Miami-Dade filed a Motion to Withdraw the Motion to Compel and the Request for Review. We grant Miami-Dade's Motion to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismiss Miami-Dade's Motion to Compel and its Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion to Withdraw the Motion to Compel Service by Sprint-Florida, Inc., and the Appeal of the School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida from USAC Suspension Letter, filed by Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Miami, Florida, on June 7, 2005, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1726A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1726A1.txt
  • the Commission to direct the Universal Service Administrative Company to release funds to Tennessee schools based on the Commission's July 2003 Tennessee Order. On June 6, 2005, Tennessee filed a Motion to Withdraw its Petition for Clarification. We grant Tennessee's Motion to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismiss Tennessee's Petition for Clarification. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion to Withdraw filed by the Department of Education, State of Tennessee, on June 6, 2005, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1745A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1745A1.txt
  • 14, 2005, Order GRANTING the petition for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier filed by Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. and Richmond 20 MHz, LLC (d/b/a NTELOS), on November 10, 2003, as explained herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. and Richmond 20 MHz, LLC (d/b/a NTELOS) IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER throughout its licensed non-rural service areas in the state of Virginia to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Virginia PCS Alliance, L.C. and Richmond 20 MHz, LLC (d/b/a NTELOS)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-177A1.txt
  • the requested extension of time from January 25, 2005 to February 1, 2005 for filing reply comments is reasonable. Therefore, we will extend the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding until February 1, 2005. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the time for filing reply comments in this matter is extended to February 1, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for the Independent Payphone Association of New York's Petition For Pre-emption and Declaratory Ruling Concerning Refund
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1870A1.txt
  • This extension should allow parties adequate time to review and respond to the record in this proceeding. All other filing requirements set forth in the NPRM remain in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 4(i), 4(j), and 303(r) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 303(r), and sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.45, and 1.415 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.45, and 1.415, the deadline for filing reply comments in response to the NPRM IS EXTENDED to July 29, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Special Access Rates for Price Cap Local Exchange Carriers; AT&T Corp. Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1915A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-1915 July 1, 2005 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTALS ACTION TAKEN Report No. WCB/Pricing 05-28 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. We conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented compelling arguments that these
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2029A1.txt
  • Investigation Order. We note that this approval of these refund plans is subject to compliance with all of the requirements set forth in the Add-Back Refund Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F. R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the refund filing of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2176A1.txt
  • consistent with this Order. We instruct SLD to provide Fayette with a detailed inquiry of the documents and information necessary for SLD to determine the eligibility of Fayette's request for funding. In remanding this matter to SLD, we make no findings as to the ultimate eligibility of the requested services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Fayette County School District, Fayetteville, West Virginia, on October 7, 2003, IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein, and REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2177A1.txt
  • the start date for the services at issue. The new information provided by NextiraOne resolves this ambiguity by clarifying that the services for FRN 606794 were installed in June 2003, after the FCC Form 486 adjusted service start date of April 23, 2003. Accordingly, we grant NextiraOne's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by NextiraOne, LLC, on behalf of Roosevelt Elementary School District No. 66, Phoenix, Arizona, on April 8, 2005, IS GRANTED, and the application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2178A1.txt
  • October 26, 2001. When SLD determined that the Avista SPIN in SLD's database differed from the Avista SPIN on Spokane's FCC Form 486, SLD should have adjusted the information on Spokane's FCC Form 486 accordingly. We therefore grant the Request for Review and remand it to SLD for further processing. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Spokane Public Schools, Spokane, Washington, on March 20, 2003, is GRANTED and REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company, for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2179A1.txt
  • so that West Virginia schools will have the ability to obtain services from state master contracts as well as the opportunity to receive support under the schools and libraries support mechanism, provided all other E-rate application requirements are satisfied. We therefore grant the instant request for waiver. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Waiver Petition filed by the West Virginia Department of Education, on February 25, 2005, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request of West Virginia Department of Education for Waiver of Form 471 Line
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2231A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-2231 Released: August 1, 2004 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF BE MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, AND BENTLEYVILLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, TO FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., AND MJD VENTURES, INC. WC Docket No. 05-215 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of the shareholders of Bentleyville Communications Corporation (Bentleyville) and FairPoint Communications, Inc. (FairPoint) and Fairpoint's wholly-owned subsidiary, MJD Ventures, Inc. (MJD) to transfer control of Bentleyville and its wholly-owned subsidiary BE Mobile Communications, Incorporated to FairPoint and MJD.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2249A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-2249 August 4, 2005 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTALS ACTION TAKEN Report No. WCB/Pricing 05-29 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petition to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittal listed in this Report. We conclude that the party filing the petition against the tariff transmittal listed in this Report has not presented compelling arguments that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2268A1.txt
  • to categorize its telecommunications plant and expenses and develop separations factors in accordance with the separations procedures in effect as of December 31, 2000. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 69.2(hh), 69.601, filed by Allband Communications Cooperative on April 7, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2269A1.txt
  • to categorize the telecommunications plant and expenses and develop separations factors in accordance with the separations procedures in effect as of December 31, 2000. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver of sections 69.2(hh) and 69.601 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 69.2(hh), 69.601, filed by Westgate Communications LLC d/b/a WeavTel on August 18, 2004 and by Beaver Creek Telephone Company on December 8, 2004 ARE GRANTED, as described herein. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2315A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2315A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2315A1.txt
  • filed a request for waiver of the October 1, 2003 certification filing deadline set forth in section 54.314 of the Commission's rules for high-cost universal service support. We grant WUTC's request to amend its September 3 Certification. We further dismiss Inland Cellular's March 30, 2005 waiver petition as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that WUTC's request to amend its September 3 Certification IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for waiver IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2320A1.txt
  • contributions, as well as the Commission's Lifeline program for low-income consumers. These rule changes became effective on a prospective basis, beginning November 1, 1999. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.106, 54.706, 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.106, 54.706, and 54.722, that BellSouth Corporation's Petition for Reconsideration and Clarification of the Commission's Fifth Circuit Remand Order IS GRANTED, IN PART, to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. FCC, 183
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2403A1.txt
  • do not extend the relief granted in this public notice to entities operating in the state of Florida, because the telecommunications infrastructure in Florida was not subject to the same level of destruction as was the infrastructure in parts of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.3. We grant these extensions pursuant to our delegated authority under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 See Form 477 Instructions § III.F (Explanations and Comments); Form 477 Part IV (Explanations and Comments), available at http://www.fcc.gov/formpage.html. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 ² s ‹ Œ ° ± ² hä
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2439A1.txt
  • our numbering rules continue to apply in the underlying NPAs as well as in the SOs (e.g. pooling, porting, sequential number assignments). ORDERing ClauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 3, 4, 201-205, 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154, 201-205, and 251, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 52.19(c)(4) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 52.19(c)(4), this ORDER is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 3, 4, 201-205, 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154, 201-205, and 251, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 52.19(c)(4) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2451A1.txt
  • the Noonan exchange to Northwest's existing study area and the discontinued operation of the separate of Noonan study area will serve the public interest. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Northwest Communications Cooperative and Noonan Farmers Telephone Company, on January 3, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2463A1.txt
  • appropriate contribution as that set forth in the True-Up Order. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5, 254 and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155, 254, and 405, and sections 1.3, 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 1.429, and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Petition for Waiver filed by BellSouth Long Distance, Inc. IS GRANTED and the Petition for Waiver filed by Southern Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a SouthernLINC Wireless IS GRANTED, IN PART, as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau BellSouth Long Distance, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2475A1.txt
  • expect that incumbent LEC to request such authority accompanied by a status report addressing its progress and indicating when it expects to resume compliance with these requirements. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5, and 251(c)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155, and 251(c)(5) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, BellSouth and other affected incumbent local exchange carriers ARE GRANTED a limited waiver of sections 51.325-51.335 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-51.335, as described above, for network changes related to the repair and restoration of facilities affected by Hurricane Katrina. This authority expires 180
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2484A1.txt
  • four universal service mechanisms. Accordingly, we waive the recordkeeping requirements pertaining to those entities and such missing records will not be considered a violation of our recordkeeping requirements. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 10, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 160, and 251(e), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 that the Commission's procedural rules relating to universal service fund submissions are waived to the extent herein described. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Thus, carriers may make their USF contribution payments for September 2005 through January 2006 no later than January 26, 2006. 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2508A1.txt
  • same time and in the same manner that carriers implement the statements in their published financial statements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 220, section 32.16 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 32.16, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the notifications of intent to adopt SFAS 123r, SFAS 149, SFAS 150, SFAS 151, SFAS 152, SFAS 153, and SFAS 154 submitted by BellSouth on behalf of the coalition consisting of BellSouth, Qwest, SBC, and Verizon ARE HEREBY APPROVED and that all subject carriers shall implement these Statements
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-260A1.txt
  • 32 rules, the Commission can also determine at that time how much time it will allow SBC-ASI to make the necessary changes in its accounting system. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.11, and 32.18 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.11, and 32.18, that the Petition for Waiver filed by SBC-ASI IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 8 herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau References to SBC-ASI also include a number of Ameritech advanced services
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2673A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that RCC's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, RCC Minnesota, Inc. and RCC Atlantic, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for portions if its licensed service are in the state of New Hampshire, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(5) of the Communications Act, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2713A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2713A1.txt
  • compliance with the PIC Change Charge Order to be effective no later than January 1, 2006. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, 201, 203, and 205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 203, and 205, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that Verizon's and SBC's petitions for waiver of the date for filing tariff revisions related to the requirements of the PIC Change Charge Order ARE GRANTED, to the extent discussed above. Incumbent LECs SHALL FILE REVISED RATES, in compliance with the PIC Change Charge Order, TO BE EFFECTIVE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2829A1.txt
  • in Frontier's service areas. Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by Citizens Communications and Frontier Communications IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Citizens Communications and Frontier Communications, Request for Review of a Decision
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2833A1.txt
  • deadlines are both impractical and unreasonable, as well as the Commission's and the Bureau's long-standing policy of ensuring that applicants for non-recurring services are not penalized for delays that are not within their control. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by the Houston Independent School District, Houston, Texas, on November 8, 2004 is GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Funding Year 2003 deadline for installation of non-recurring services pursuant to FRN 1000282 is extended for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2834A1.txt
  • as well as Internet connectivity, would not be possible for the Houston area schools at issue without the Phonoscope modulating equipment. Thus, we find that the fiber optic WAN provided by Phonoscope is ``lit'' and is therefore eligible for E-rate support. As a result, we grant Houston's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Houston Independent School District, Houston, Texas, on March 18, 2005, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-283A1.txt
  • the accidental nature of the omission is not a special circumstance warranting a waiver. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, administrative necessity requires that each applicant be responsible for providing complete and accurate information and meeting all of the program deadlines. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Esko Public Schools, Esko, Minnesota, on November 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jim Schwartz & Richard Singpiel, Esko Public Schools, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-284A1.txt
  • timely manner and complying with program rules and procedures. Hence, staffing changes does not relieve applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that ONEC has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 2, 2004, by ONEC, Manderson, South Dakota, IS DENIED and the request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-285A1.txt
  • whether an application was approved or due to personnel changes do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to understand and comply with the program rules or procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Petitioners have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed on March 8, 2004, by School Administrative Unit 41, Hollis, New Hampshire; on April 12, 2004, by River Trails School District 26, Mt. Prospect, Illinois; on May 4, 2004, by Hyde Leadership Public Charter School, Washington, DC; and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3002A1.txt
  • services for FRN 780744. This action should ensure that Shiprock, a school eligible to receive a 90-percent discount, will obtain the funding that USAC already approved for the installation of internal connections. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-152 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the Request for Waiver filed by Removable Media Solutions, Inc., on behalf of Shiprock Alternative High School, Flagstaff, Arizona, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda Jones Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Mary Lusi, Removable Media Solutions, Inc., to Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3009A1.txt
  • in the hurricane-affected areas. This waiver has no affect on BellSouth's obligations to comply with those portions of section 51.323(c) that are not addressed in this Order. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5, and 251(c)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155, and 251(c)(6) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, BellSouth IS GRANTED a limited conditional waiver of section 51.323(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 51.323(c), as described above, to deploy non-NEBS Level 1 compliant equipment in its central offices for service restoration in hurricane-affected areas. This authority expires 18 months from the release
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3024A1.txt
  • year to these small LECs would undermine this goal. Thus, we conclude that waiver of Section 54.301 of the Commission's rules is in the public interest. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver of section 54.301 of the Commission's rules, filed by Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc. and its subsidiary, Hills Telephone Company, Inc., East Ascension Telephone Company, LLC, and Columbus Telephone Company, ARE GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-306A1.txt
  • appropriate contribution as that set forth in the True-Up Order. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5, 254 and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155, 254, and 405, and sections 1.3, 1.429 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 1.429, and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Petition for Waiver filed by New Edge Network, Inc. d/b/a New Edge Networks IS GRANTED, as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau New Edge Network, Inc. d/b/a New Edge Networks Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 96-45, filed August 23,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3103A1.txt
  • frozen separations factors. Accordingly, Blue Valley is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by United Telephone Company of Kansas and Blue Valley Telecommunications, Inc., on January 10, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3104A1.txt
  • frozen separations factors. Accordingly, Madison River is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Madison River Telephone Company, LLC, MebTel, Inc. d/b/a MebTel Communications and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., on January 27, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3105A1.txt
  • we therefore find that Direct Communications' requested waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules is in the public interest and should be granted. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, .291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC and Qwest Corporation on November 2, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3106A1.txt
  • status. Accordingly, we find that Reasnor's requested waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules is in the public interest and should be granted. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Sully Telephone Association, Inc. and Reasnor Telephone Company, LLC on December 15, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3108A1.txt
  • until after the filing deadlines. In these instances, these special circumstances outweigh any processing difficulties that USAC may face as a result of the late-filed certification. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.313 of the Commission's rules, filed by Qwest Corporation (Nebraska) on March 23, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3111A1.txt
  • are now available for filing, we doubt circumstances as described by these petitioners will be considered ``special circumstances'' in the future. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c), 54.802(a) and 54.809(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.307(c), 54.802(a) and 54.809(c), filed by Highland Cellular, Inc., IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3157A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-3157 Released: December 8, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF OXFORD JUNCTION, IOWA EXCHANGE FROM IOWA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. TO LOST NATION - ELWOOD TELEPHONE COMPANY WC Docket No. 05-307 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for transfer of control of the Oxford Junction, Iowa exchange from Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (``Iowa Telecom'') to Lost Nation - Elwood Telephone Company (``Lost Nation''). No comments were filed in this proceeding. The Bureau finds, upon consideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3162A1.txt
  • invited to comment on the new or modified information collection requirements contained in this proceeding. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that FCC Report 43-01, the Annual Summary Report, FCC Report 43-03, the Joint Cost Report, FCC Report 43-05, the Service Quality Report, FCC Report 43-07, the Infrastructure Report, and FCC Report 43-08, the Operating Data Report ARE REVISED, as set forth above and in the Appendix to this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3188A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services (filed Dec. 7, 2005) (Sprint Petition); Pleading Cycle Established for Sprint Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services, WCB/Pricing 05-35, Public Notice, DA 05-3179
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3217A1.txt
  • and Computer Inquiry requirements to all broadband services that Verizon may offer meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to March 19, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-325A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access Services (filed Jan. 28, 2005) (Verizon Petition); Pleading Cycle Established for Verizon Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access Services, WCB/Pricing 05-11, Public Notice, DA 05-307 (rel. Feb. 3, 2005). In the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-326A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-326A1.txt
  • are submitted in amounts that go beyond what they can substantiate, their funding requests will be reduced to the amount that is substantiated. Accordingly, we remand these Requests for Review and direct SLD to grant the commitment requests in accordance with this order, unless SLD identifies other grounds for denial. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Berkeley County School District, Martinsburg, West Virginia, on February 23, 2004; Braxton County School District, Sutton, West Virginia, on August 7, 2003; Brooke County School District, Wellsburg, West Virginia, on January 12, 2004; Cambria Heights School District, Patton, Pennsylvania,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3290A1.txt
  • services in its rural, insular, and high-cost areas. Therefore, we conclude that deviation from the general rule under these special circumstances will serve the public interest. Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Waiver of FCC Rule Section 54.307 filed by FiberNet, LLC, on April 11, 2005, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau FiberNet, LLC, Petition for Waiver of FCC Rule Section 54.307(c)(4), CC Docket No. 96-45, filed Apr.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3333A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 05-3333 Released: December 28, 2005 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN ASSETS OF TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (TEXAS), L.P., BY GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED D/B/A VERIZON SOUTHWEST WC Docket No. 05-327 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for acquisition of certain local exchange assets of Time Warner Cable Information Services (Texas), L.P. by GTE Southwest Incorporated d/b/a Verizon Southwest. No comments were filed in this proceeding. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3334A1.txt
  • for an additional period until January 2, 2006. After balancing all of the relevant factors, we therefore conclude that KMC shall be permitted to discontinue its services in accordance with its filed representations. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of KMC Telecom V, Inc. and KMC Telecom of Virginia, Inc. to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED to the extent declared herein, consistent with KMC's filed representations in this proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3352A1.txt
  • to categorize the telecommunications plant and expenses and develop separations factors in accordance with the separations procedures in effect as of December 31, 2000. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 36.611 and 36.612, filed by Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility, on February 9, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-358A1.txt
  • filed the above-captioned Petition for FCC Approval and Agreement of Redefinition of the Service Area of United Telephone Company of Indiana, Inc. d/b/a Sprint. On January 26, 2005, Hancock Communications, Inc. submitted a request to withdraw the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition IS GRANTED and Hancock Communications, Inc.'s petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Wireline Competition Bureau Hancock Communications, Inc. Petition for FCC Approval and Agreement of Redefinition of the Service Area of United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-391A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-391A1.txt
  • petition raises significant questions regarding whether forbearance from section 252 for Non-251 Agreements meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by BellSouth shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to August 24, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-394A1.txt
  • forbearance from the Title II regulatory framework for broadband service provided via FTTP meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to September 23, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-395A1.txt
  • and incumbent LECs, regarding Qwest's provision of telecommunications services in the Omaha MSA meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to September 16, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-419A1.txt
  • Qualcomm's request include numerous local broadcasters nationwide. We find that granting the Movant and others an additional 21 days to comment provides a necessary and sufficient amount of time to build a meaningful record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.331 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.331, 1.46, the joint Motion for Extension of Time IS GRANTED to establish a new comments deadline of March 10, 2005, and a new reply comments deadline of March 25, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Roger Noel Chief, Mobility Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Pleading Cycle Established for Qualcomm Incorporated Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-427A1.txt
  • the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), to the extent it provides that ``streamlined'' local exchange carrier tariff filings are ``deemed lawful.'' On February 15, 2005, AT&T filed a request to withdraw its petition. In this order, we grant AT&T's withdrawal request and dismiss its petition without prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that AT&T's request to withdraw the above-captioned petition for forbearance IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for forbearance IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-430A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Atlanta Public Schools, Atlanta, Georgia, on May 7, 2003; Kings Local School District, Kings Mills, Ohio, on March 31, 2003; Ross-Hill Academy, Detroit, Michigan, on July 9, 2003; St. Agatha School, Brooklyn, New York, on June 10,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-431A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by El Dorado County Office of Education, Placerville, California, on March 12, 2003; GEMS Academy, Humble, Texas, on July 21, 2003; Lafayette School Corporation, Lafayette, Indiana, on January 20, 2002; and Sts. Leo-Seton Catholic School, Lafayette, Louisiana, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-432A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by E-Rate Central, Seaford, New York, on November 18, 2003; Gerrish-Higgins School District, Roscommon, Michigan, on July 10, 2003; Haverhill Public Schools, Haverhill, Massachusetts, on August 7, 2003; Ringwood School District, Ringwood, New Jersey, on July 15, 2003;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-434A1.txt
  • 69.729 of the Commission's rules and paragraph 173 of the Pricing Flexibility Order meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to September 22, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-441A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-441A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-441A1.txt
  • 214 of the Act and section 54.201 of our rules meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act. The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by TracFone shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to September 6, 2005. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-446A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-446A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-446A1.txt
  • 1. On September 4, 2003, Sprint Corporation (Sprint) filed the above-captioned Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. On February 11, 20005, Sprint submitted a request to withdraw, without prejudice, the above-captioned petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the above-captioned Petition IS GRANTED and Sprint's petition IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-462A1.txt
  • Service Administrative Company (Administrator). For review of decisions by SLD, requests to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, the Petitioner filed its request after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review by Tiospa Zina Tribal School, Agency Village, South Dakota, filed December 7, 2004, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Greg S. Paulson, Tiospa Zina Tribal School,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-465A1.txt
  • the Universal Service Administrative Company (Administrator). For review of decisions by SLD, requests to the Commission must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of the SLD decision date. Here, the Applicants filed their requests after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We therefore dismiss their requests. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review by the Board of Education - Unified School District 402, Augusta, Kansas, on July 16, 2003; Brookline Elementary School, Brookline, Vermont, on July 15, 2003; Townshend Elementary School, Townshend, Vermont, on July 21, 2003; and Woodbridge Board of Education,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-466A1.txt
  • a review of decisions by SLD, appeals to SLD must be filed within 60 days of the issuance date of the SLD decision. Here, Killdeer filed its appeal to SLD after the 60-day period, in contravention of our rules. We affirm SLD's decision and therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Killdeer Public School District No. 16, Killdeer, North Dakota, on December 15, 2004, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Gary Wilz, Killdeer Public School District No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-467A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Northwest Passage School has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Northwest Passage School, Webster, Wisconsin, on July 5, 2000, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Steve Ammend, Northwest Passage School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-481A1.txt
  • decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Beaver Dam's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision in this matter, Beaver Dam may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by Beaver Dam Community Hospital, Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, on January 21, 2005, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Narda M. Jones Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sandra Tiedt, Beaver Dam Community Hospital, to the Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-496A1.txt
  • simultaneous appeals of SLD's decisions to the Administrator and the Commission. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Bristow School's Request for Review to the Commission. Once the Administrator has issued its decision, Bristow Schools may then appeal to the Commission, if it believes such an appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on December 20, 2004, by Bristow Public Schools, Bristow, Oklahoma IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Jeanene Barnett, Bristow Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-497A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver filed by Aubrey Independent School District, Aubrey, Texas, on June 3, 2004; Barrow County Schools, Winder, Georgia, on August 16, 2004; Bicentennial Union High School District #76, Salome, Arizona, on May 10, 2004; Campbell County Public Library, Cold Spring,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-498A1.txt
  • USAC did not consider which party was responsible for the statutory or rule violation at issue, we find it appropriate to remand the above-captioned Requests for Review of commitment adjustment decisions to USAC for further consideration consistent with the Commission's decision in the Schools and Libraries Fourth Report and Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by ATEK Construction, Inc. - Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles, California, on July 12, 2004; Riverside County Office of Education, Riverside, California, on October 1, 2004; SBC-Illinois and Ameritech Advanced Data Services, Inc. - Harvey Public School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-499A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Ameritech Petition for Pricing Flexibility (filed Feb. 18, 2005) (Ameritech Petition); Southern New England Telephone Company Petition for Pricing Flexibility (filed Feb. 18, 2005) (SNET Petition); Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Petition for Pricing Flexibility (filed Feb. 18, 2005) (SWBT Petition);
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-504A1.txt
  • access charges for interexchange traffic that passes from commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) providers to interexchange carriers via the network of the LEC. On August 2, 2004, US LEC filed a request to withdraw its petition. In this order, we grant US LEC's withdrawal request and dismiss the petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291 that US LEC's request to withdraw the above-captioned petition for declaratory ruling IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for declaratory ruling IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-520A1.txt
  • Order pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because the adopted rules are rules of particular applicability. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 USC §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j) and 254, and authority delegated by section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the appeal filed by Atlantic Digital, Inc., is hereby DENIED. By Order of the Bureau, Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from Indira Rabindranatham, Controller, Atlantic Digital, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission (filed May 6, 2003) (Atlantic Digital Appeal). See id. (attaching letter from Universal Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-54A1.txt
  • what they can substantiate, their funding requests will be reduced to the amount that is substantiated. Accordingly, we remand this case and direct SLD to grant the commitment request for FRN 924840 in the amount of $232.90 monthly in accordance with this order, unless SLD identifies other grounds for denial. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Iroquois West School District 10, Gilman, Illinois IS GRANTED to the extent described herein and REMANDED to SLD for further action consistent with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-602A1.txt
  • request to discontinue service reasonable subject to its representations. After balancing the relevant factors, we therefore conclude that Choice One shall be permitted to discontinue its services in accordance with its filed representations. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Choice One Communications Inc.; Choice One Communications of Connecticut Inc.; Choice One Communications of Massachusetts Inc.; Choice One Communications of New York Inc.; and Choice One Communications of Pennsylvania Inc. to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED to the extent declared
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-616A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-616A1.txt
  • as amended. On March 7, 2005, CompTel/ALTS filed a request seeking to withdraw the ASCENT Petition, explaining that it had determined that pursuing relief under this petition is no longer a priority of the Association. In this Order, we grant CompTel/ALTS' request to withdraw, and we dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that CompTel/ALTS' request to withdraw the above-captioned petition IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the above-captioned petition for preemption and declaratory ruling IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the proceeding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-622A1.txt
  • to implement those requirements. In addition, the Commission noted that there was congressional action on the same subject as the relevant rules. Neither situation is applicable to the Form 499-A Order. Therefore, we decline to apply a standard of review other than that established by Virginia Petroleum. IV. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Stay Pending Action on Application for Review of Qwest Communications International Inc. is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Qwest Communications International Inc. for Stay Pending Action on Application for Review, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 97-21 (filed Jan.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-630A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Camden Catholic High School, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, on March 17, 2003; Carlisle Area School District, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, on April 8, 2003; and Yeshivat Ateret Torah, Brooklyn, New York, on August 7, 2003, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-658A1.txt
  • in this Order, the Bureau determines that the Verizon-WorldCom interconnection agreement amendment negotiated subsequent to the arbitration does not fall within the confines of this proceeding and therefore grants the Verizon Motion to Strike. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.807 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.807, the issues presented for arbitration ARE DETERMINED as set forth in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252(e)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(1), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-675A1.txt
  • of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154 (i), 154(j), and sections 1.43 and 1.44 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.43, 1.44, that the Petition for Stay Pending Judicial Review submitted by Verizon in the above-captioned proceeding on February 25, 2005, IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Verizon, Petition for Stay Pending Judicial Review, CC Docket No. 01-338, WC Docket No. 04-313 (filed Feb. 25, 2005) (Petition). Unbundled Access to Network Elements; Review of the Section 251 Unbundling Obligations of Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-696A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by American Falls School District No. 1381, American Falls, Idaho, on June 30, 2003; Berlin-Milan Local Schools, Milan, Ohio, on May 27, 2003; and Humble Independent School District, Humble, Texas, on June 18, 2003, respectively, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-697A1.txt
  • may have a detrimental impact on an applicant does not create special circumstances or suggest particular facts that warrant a waiver of the Commission's rules. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that the Petitioners here have not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Hereford Independent School District, Hereford, Texas, on May 5, 2003; John A. Coleman Catholic High School, Hurley, New York, on June 4, 2003; Pima Vocational High School, Tucson, Arizona, on April 16, 2003; and Rock Falls Elementary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-698A1.txt
  • of Information Technology Services supports our determination in the Whiteville Order that the underlying contract expired in December 2000. Because Petitioners failed to submit an FCC Form 470 for the services rendered after December 2000, in contravention of the Commission's competitive bidding requirements, we must deny their Petitions for Reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petitions for Reconsideration filed by Craven County Public School System, New Bern, North Carolina, on November 27, 2002, Henderson, Baxter, Taylor & Gatchel, P.A. on behalf of Craven County Public School System, New Bern, North Carolina, on November 29, 2002, and Valentine, Adams &
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-719A1.txt
  • of our Public Notice regarding potential refunds. If any LEC encounters unforeseen complications in processing refunds, it may seek an extension of this 120-day deadline. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F. R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the refund filing of Qwest Corporation is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-730A1.txt
  • previously by the Bureau or concerned issues not previously raised by the parties. In light of this procedural history, we do not find good cause to grant an additional extension of time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the Motion of MCI, Inc. for Extension of Time to File Amendments to Interconnection Agreement IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252(e)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(1), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-741A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 25. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven F. Morris Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Petition for Phase I Pricing Flexibility for Switched Services (filed Mar. 17, 2005) (BellSouth Petition); Pleading Cycle Established for BellSouth Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Switched Access Services, WC Docket No. 05-148, Public Notice, DA 05-740
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-84A1.txt
  • the March 31, 2004 and July 31, 2004 data filing deadlines set forth in section 54.903(a) of the Commission's rules for ICLS in areas served by Skyline Telephone. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that waiver of sections 54.301(b), 54.903(a), and 54.914(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.301(b), 54.903(a), and 54.914(d) IS GRANTED, as described herein, to M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Skyline Telephone Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Chief Wireline Competition Bureau . ` M&L Enterprises, Inc.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-90A1.txt
  • program rules and procedures. Employee misunderstandings about program rules do not relieve applicants of their responsibility to understand and comply with the program rules or procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we find that Community Consolidated has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on June 2, 2004, by Community Consolidated School District 168, Sauk Village, Illinois, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from George Kunkel, Community Consolidated School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-91A1.txt
  • with program rules and procedures. Hence, neither staffing changes nor misunderstanding of the rules relieves applicants of their responsibility to comply with the Commission's rules and procedures. In keeping with our prior decisions, we determine that Harmony has not demonstrated the special circumstances necessary for a waiver of our rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 22, 2004, by Harmony Science Academy, Houston, Texas IS DISMISSED and request to waive the 60-day time limit in which to file an appeal IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-93A1.txt
  • days after SLD's decision was rendered. Appeals seeking review of decisions by SLD issued before August 13, 2001 must have been filed with SLD within 30 days of the decision. White Hall's appeal was filed June 23, 2000, in contravention of this rule. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by White Hall School District No. 27, White Hall, Arkansas on July 10, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy Chief, Telecommunication Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Danny Young, White Hall School District No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1017A1.txt
  • AT&T has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs and non-MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, the Pricing Flexibility Order, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petitions filed by AT&T ARE GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald K. Stockdale, Jr. Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Ameritech Trunking Basket* Voice Grade LT-1 LT-3 Switched SONET Signaling SS7 Telecom Relay Service Special Access Basket**
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1030A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1030A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1030A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of AT&T for a limited modification of LATA boundaries for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS between the specific locations in Texas, as identified in WC Docket No. 06-69, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renee R. Crittendon Division Chief Competition Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1038A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit �ë DA 06-1038 Released: May 15, 2006 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 06-76 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Montezuma Mutual Telephone Company (``Montezuma'') and Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (``Iowa Telecom'') to transfer control of Montezuma to Iowa Telecom. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1083A1.txt
  • the Expanded Interconnection Tariff Order and the New Expanded Interconnection Service Suspension Order. These transmittals will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Ameritech's Tariff F.C.C. No. 2 and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Tariff F.C.C. No. 73 Expanded Interconnection Service Cross Connect offerings filed under Transmittal Nos. 1550 and 3130, respectively, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the May 26, 2006 effective date, and investigations of the referenced transmittals
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1101A1.txt
  • address the concerns raised by Sprint Nextel, until the Commission determines the appropriate treatment of this service under price caps. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP services offered by AT&T, with respect to AT&T's 2006 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1106A1.txt
  • disbursed through the E-rate mechanism and to determine on a case-by-case basis whether waste, fraud, or abuse of program funds occurred and whether recovery is warranted. III. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the South Carolina Division of the Chief Information Officer Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator and/or in the Alternative, Petition for Waiver IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1172A1.txt
  • circumstances do justify a transition plan for average schedule companies to allow those companies sufficient time to adjust to the decrease in interstate settlements resulting from the structural changes in the common line and special access formulas. We believe that the transition plan will prevent undue short-term hardships in adjusting to reduced settlements. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., on December 29, 2005, including the April 4, 2006, supplement, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2006, and remain in effect through June 30, 2007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1185A1.txt
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 06-1185 Released: June 1, 2006 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF ASSETS OF UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF KANSAS AND UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF EASTERN KANSAS BY RURAL TELEPHONE SERVICE COMPANY, INC. WC Docket No. 06-80 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for the sale of the Burr Oak, Courtland, Esbon, Ionia, Lebanon, Republic, and Webber exchanges from United Telephone Company of Eastern Kansas, and the Downs, Luray, Osborne, Paradise, and Russell exchanges in Kansas (``United Exchanges'') from United Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1216A1.txt
  • Ohio, FiberTower could not use a 1.22 meter antenna because the towers in question failed structural analyses. In other examples, such as in Boston and Westford, Massachusetts, Dallas, Arlington, Plano, Grand Prairie, and Southlake, Texas, and Queens, Brooklyn, and Bronx, New York, FiberTower encountered zoning and aesthetic restrictions varying from the categorical prohibition of the use of any antennas exceeding 0.91 meter (thirty-six inches) in diameter to having to submit to a lengthy and uncertain zoning process in an attempt to obtain a variance for the use of an antenna exceeding 0.91 meter (thirty-six inches) in diameter. In each instance, FiberTower opted to redesign the network to use a 0.61 meter antenna in another microwave band, such as the 10 GHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1238A1.txt
  • advanced services under Tariff FCC No. 20 from price caps only for purposes of the 2006 annual access tariff filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for advanced services in Verizon's Tariff FCC No. 20, including those transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2006 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1240A1.txt
  • raises significant questions regarding whether forbearance from applying the relevant network unbundling rules meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Fones4All shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to September 28, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1251A1.txt
  • by a status report addressing their progress and indicating when they expect to resume compliance with these requirements. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5, 201, 214(a), 251(c)(5), 271, 272, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 155, 201, 214(a), 251(c)(5), 271, 272, and 303(r) and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 32.27, 51.325-335, Part 61, 64.1120(e), and 64.1901-1903 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 32.27, 51.325-335, Part 61, 64.1120(e), and 64.1901-1903 BellSouth's Petition IS GRANTED and the Verizon and Qwest Petitions ARE GRANTED to the extent set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of BellSouth Corporation for Special
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1260A1.txt
  • to support a waiver of sections 61.38 and 61.49. Accordingly, we deny Hawaiian's request for a waiver of these rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian's FCC Tariff No. 2, only with respect to Hawaiian's 2006 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hawaiian Telcom Inc.'s request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1265A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Richmond County School District ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1266A1.txt
  • had reasonably anticipated had come through and no additional, unbudgeted priority expenditures had arisen. If USAC finds that Anson County would have been able to finance that entire amount, and if its application is otherwise consistent with program rules, then USAC should grant the two funding requests at issue here. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Anson County School District on March 28, 2006 IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Maxter E. Allen, Anson County School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1277A1.txt
  • the matters at issue in these proceedings were resolved between the two parties in their interconnection agreement. Therefore, no further action by the Commission is required in this docket, and it is hereby deemed terminated. 4. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i) and (j), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, IT IS ORDERED that the docketed proceeding set forth above IS TERMINATED, effective upon issuance of this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of KMC Telecom of Virginia, Inc., KMC Telecom V of Virginia, Inc., and KMC Data LLC Pursuant to Section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1278A1.txt
  • May 2, 2006, TLD filed a motion seeking voluntary dismissal of its Petition without prejudice, explaining that even though TLD still has concerns regarding similar future action by PRTC, the principal matter in controversy in this proceeding, PRTC's Single Zone Plan tariff, has been withdrawn from consideration before the Puerto Rico Board. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, IT IS ORDERED that Telefónica Larga Distancia de Puerto Rico, Inc.'s motion for voluntary dismissal of the above-captioned petition without prejudice IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i) and (j), and authority delegated by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1287A1.txt
  • remand these applications to USAC. We direct USAC to give Hickory City 15 days to submit the relevant data so that USAC can complete its selective review. If USAC finds that the five Hickory City applications at issue here were filed consistent with E-rate program rules, it should grant them. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hickory City School District on August 17, 2004 IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-128A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of ) ) Ameritech Operating Companies ) WCB/Pricing 06-08 And Southwestern Bell ) WCB/Pricing 06-09 Telephone Company's ) Petitions for Pricing Flexibility for ) Special Access and Dedicated ) Transport Services )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1351A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 06-1351 June 30, 2006 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTALS ACTION TAKEN Report No. WCB/Pricing 06-20 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. We conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented compelling arguments that these
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1462A1.txt
  • USAC can continue its selective review of Jennings County. We expect Jennings County to provide USAC, in a timely manner, with the information that USAC may request. If USAC finds that the three Jennings County applications at issue here were filed consistent with E-rate program rules, it should grant them. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jennings County Schools on March 23, 2006 IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1463A1.txt
  • that waste, fraud, or abuse of program funds occurred and that recovery is warranted. We remain committed to ensuring the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Henkels & McCoy, Inc., on October 3, 2005, IS GRANTED AND REMANDED to USAC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-146A1.txt
  • Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Erica H. McMahon Acting Chief, Consumer Policy Division Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005 ) ) ) ) )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1489A1.txt
  • and NECA of the payment of $5,219,156 as discussed supra in paragraph 7.a. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority granted by sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5, 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 214, and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the CassTel and CassTel LD, and FairPoint Missouri and FairPoint LD, Application for Authorization Pursuant to Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, for Transfer of Control of Blanket Domestic Section 214 Authority and Certain Telecommunications Assets IS GRANTED subject to the conditions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1509A1.txt
  • support the conclusion that the procurement process at issue did not violate our competitive bidding requirements. We therefore grant Wyoming's Requests for Review. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Wyoming Department of Education on December 13, 2005, and December 15, 2005 are GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1544A1.txt
  • comments and replies appropriate to the issues raised in the petitions. We therefore deny COMPTEL's and Embarq's motions to the extent they seek extensions beyond August 17, 2006 for comments and August 31, 2006 for replies. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the Motion for Extension of Time filed by COMPTEL and the Motion for Consolidation and Extension of Time filed by Embarq are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renée R. Crittendon Chief, Competition Policy Division Qwest Petition for Forbearance Under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-154A1.txt
  • FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF VALOR COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES FROM VALOR COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. TO NEW VALOR, AND THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF ALLTEL HOLDING CORP. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES FROM ALLTEL CORPORATION TO NEW VALOR WC Docket No. 05-354 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (``Bureau'') approves the applications for: (1) the transfer of control of Valor Communications Group, Inc. (``Valor'') and its subsidiaries from Valor, as presently owned, to New Valor, as it will be owned following a merger between Valor and ALLTEL Holding Corp. (``AHC''),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1574A1.txt
  • the ultimate eligibility of the requested services. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 54.722(a), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Request for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. §54.504(b) filed by Utica City School District, Utica, New York IS GRANTED and IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1575A1.txt
  • We remain committed to ensuring the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority under 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.722(a), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that Hickory Public Schools District Request for Review IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1602A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 06-1602 Released: August 8, 2006 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF TEKSTAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S AUTHORIZATION AND OTHER ASSETS SERVING NISSWA, MINNESOTA TO CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY WC Docket No. 06-126 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for transfer of control of Tekstar Communications, Inc.'s (``Tekstar'') authorization and other assets serving Nisswa, Minnesota to Consolidated Telephone Company (``Consolidated''). No comments were filed in this proceeding. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1616A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1616A1.txt
  • the Expanded Interconnection Tariff Order and the New Expanded Interconnection Service Suspension Order. These transmittals will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Ameritech's Tariff F.C.C. No. 2 and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Tariff F.C.C. No. 73 Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal Nos. 1568 and 3152, respectively, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the August 12, 2006 effective date, and investigations of the referenced transmittals are instituted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1628A1.txt
  • the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Carolina West has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, North Carolina RSA 3 Cellular Telephone Company d/b/a Carolina West Wireless IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for portions of its licensed service area in the State of North Carolina to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Carolina West WILL SUBMIT additional information pursuant to sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1629A1.txt
  • options that are now available for filing, we doubt that circumstances such as those described by this petitioner will be considered ``special circumstances'' in the future. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by Cellular South Licenses, Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Cellular South Licenses, Inc., Petition for Waiver of Section 54.802 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1630A1.txt
  • waiver of the January 1, 2005 certification deadline will allow Southern to be eligible for universal service at the beginning of the second quarter of 2005. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the April 1, 2004 and October 1, 2004 certification deadlines in section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d), filed by Centennial Cellular Tri-State Operating Partnership and Centennial Claiborne Cellular Corp. on January 21, 2005, IS GRANTED, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1631A1.txt
  • it needs to make funding calculations. Accordingly, any administrative burdens resulting from the delay are outweighed by the public interest benefits of granting the requested waiver. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.313 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.313, filed by Pine Belt Cellular, Inc., IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Pine Belt Cellular, Inc., Petition for Waiver of Section 54.313 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1632A1.txt
  • deadline. Therefore, we find that in this case the late filing did not impair the administration of the USF. Furthermore, GVNW has taken steps to ensure that it will not file late in the future. As such, we grant the Partnerships' petition for waiver of section 54.307(c). . ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307 of the Commission's Rules filed by Northwest Dakota Cellular of North Dakota Limited Partnership; North Central RSA 2 of North Dakota Limited Partnership; North Dakota RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership; Badlands Cellular of North Dakota Limited Partnership; North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1633A1.txt
  • As such, in accordance with Commission rules, USAC should have deemed the certifications of Buggs Island and Pembroke filed on Monday, October 3, 2005, as timely filed. We direct USAC to implement the conclusions in this Order by disbursing first quarter 2005 funds to Buggs Island and Pembroke. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Petition for Waiver of Deadline in 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.313, 54.314 filed by Buggs Island Telephone Cooperative on October 18, 2005, and the Petition for Waiver of Section 54.314(d)(1) of the Commission's Rules filed by Pembroke Telephone Cooperative on October 31, 2005, ARE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1642A1.txt
  • waste, fraud, or abuse of program funds occurred and whether recovery is warranted. We remain committed to ensuring the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), this Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that section 54.720(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.720(b), is WAIVED with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1643A1.txt
  • 90 days from the release of this Order and issue an award or denial based on a complete review and analysis. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by Providence Public School District IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1645A1.txt
  • to categorize the telecommunications plant and expenses and develop separations factors in accordance with the separations procedures in effect as of December 31, 2000. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on March 30, 2006, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1653A1.txt
  • the District to provide the information within 15 calendar days of receiving notice in writing from USAC that additional information is required. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by School Administrative District 67 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1655A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1655A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1655A1.txt
  • the agreement. According, we find that good cause exists to grant Gayville-Volin's appeal and remand to USAC for further processing consistent with our decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Gayville-Volin School District 63-1, Gayville, South Dakota IS GRANTED and IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1656A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Douglas-Omaha Technology Commission, Omaha, Nebraska, IS GRANTED, and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1657A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1657A1.txt
  • We remain committed to ensuring the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority under 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.722(a), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that Zapata County Independent School District, Zapata, Texas, Request for Review IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1719A1.txt
  • questions regarding whether forbearance from the application of sections 251(c)(3) and 252(d)(1) meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which ACS's petition seeking forbearance shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to December 28, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1730A1.txt
  • we appreciate the importance of the issues raised in the Missoula Plan to NARUC and its member state commissions, and we agree that the additional time we grant here will help ensure their ``continued full participation.'' ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: October 25, 2006 Reply Comments Due: December 11, 2006 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners for Extension of Time is GRANTED, as set forth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-174A1.txt
  • commenters sufficient time to prepare their comments. Accordingly, we find that USTelecom has shown good cause for an extension of time. Comments are due March 27, 2006, and reply comments are due May 26, 2006. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, the request for extension of time filed by United States Telecom Association, IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, High-Cost Universal Service Support, CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1750A1.txt
  • database administrator, Database Service Management, Inc., to permanently assign the toll free numbers 1-800-RED-CROSS (1-800-733-2767) and 1-888-RED-CROSS (1-888-733-2767) to the American National Red Cross. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the requests of the American National Red Cross ARE GRANTED and the toll free numbers 1-800-RED-CROSS (1-800-733-2767) and 1-888-RED-CROSS (1-888-733-2767) are permanently assigned to the American National Red Cross. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 251(e) and 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1770A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1770A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Owensboro Public Schools, Owensboro, Kentucky, IS GRANTED, and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1806A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Scott County School System, Huntsville, Tennessee, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1859A1.txt
  • in accordance with the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 251, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 251, and 332, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Verizon's Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Rules to Treat Unrecovered Local Number Portability Costs as Exogenous Costs under Section 61.45(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.45(d), IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and IS OTHERWISE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1860A1.txt
  • by facsimile or email. We therefore grant Pine Belt a waiver of sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(c) of the Commission's rules. . ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the SouthEast Telephone, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Deadlines in Sections 54.307(c)(2) and 54.802(a) of the Commission's Rules, the Cellular Network Partnership d/b/a Pioneer Cellular Petition for Waiver of Deadline in 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c)(2) and the Pine Belt Cellular, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1861A1.txt
  • with these commitments. Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. . ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by Verizon Communications Inc. IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Verizon Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.802(a) of the FCC's Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1870A1.txt
  • a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 06-172 I have received a copy of the Protective Order in WC Docket No. 06-172. I have read the order and agree to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1871A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1907A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1907A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1907A1.txt
  • and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 54.722(a), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Requests for Review as listed in Appendices A, B, C, and D of this Order ARE GRANTED and ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1916A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Verizon South Inc. for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS between the specific locations in Virginia, as identified in WC Docket No. 06-144, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renee C. Crittendon Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1976A1.txt
  • the Act - enhancing access to advanced telecommunications and information services for health care providers - and therefore serves the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSEs ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, and 0.291, that the Request for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 54.611 of the Commission's rules filed by Unicom, Inc., Anchorage, Alaska, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1997A1.txt
  • in these cases, a state commission has acted on a timely basis to resolve an interconnection dispute, section 252(e)(6) provides the basis for federal court review; section 252(e)(5) provides no alternative forum for appeal. V. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 252, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.801(b), the petition filed by Autotel on July 10, 2006 for the preemption of the jurisdiction of the Arizona Corporation Commission IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 252, as amended, and sections 0.91, 0.291,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2000A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 06-2000 Released: October 6, 2006 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 06-166 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (``Bureau'') approves the application of Hector Communications Corporation (``Hector'') and Blue Earth Valley Communications, Inc. (``Blue Earth''), Arvig Enterprises, Inc. (``Arvig'') and New Ulm Telecom, Inc. (``New Ulm'') to transfer control of Hector to Blue Earth, Arvig and New Ulm. No commenters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2108A1.txt
  • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. III. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Berrien County Intermediate School District Appeal IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2111A1.txt
  • its frozen separations factors. Accordingly, RuralTel is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., Nex-Tech, Inc., United Telephone Company of Kansas, and United Telephone of Eastern Kansas on April 12, 2006, IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2112A1.txt
  • its frozen separations factors. Accordingly, Gorham is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Gorham Telephone Company, Inc., and Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., on June 15, 2006, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2235A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. III. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Benavides Independent School District, Benavides, Texas IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2236A1.txt
  • correct a ministerial error. We continue to require E-rate applicants to submit complete and accurate information to USAC as part of the application review process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Minnesota River Valley Education District, Montevideo, Minnesota, IS GRANTED, and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2269A1.txt
  • resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to reinstate the funding commitment no later than 60 days from the release of this Order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Paterson School District, Paterson, New Jersey IS GRANTED and IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2299A1.txt
  • authority to implement mandatory thousands-block number pooling in the 360 and 509 NPAs; and the New Mexico PRC the authority to implement mandatory thousands-block number pooling in the 505 NPA. ordering clauseS ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that: the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission's Petition for Delegated Authority to Implement Additional Number Conservation Measures IS GRANTED; and the Petition for Delegated Authority of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, the Petition of the New York State Department of Public Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2304A1.txt
  • whether forbearance from application of certain of the Commission's ``cost assignment rules'' meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by BellSouth shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to March 6, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2306A1.txt
  • the District to provide the information within 15 calendar days of receiving notice in writing from USAC that additional information is required. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Abington School District IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2307A1.txt
  • on an integrated basis, of in-region, interstate and international, interLATA interexchange services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Qwest shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to February 20, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2318A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 06-2318 Released: November 16, 2006 WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU GRANTS CONSENT FOR THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF THE ASSETS OF NORTH DAKOTA TELEPHONE COMPANY TO SRT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. WC Docket No. 06-185 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for the transfer of control of certain assets in the Velva exchange in North Dakota from North Dakota Telephone Company to SRT Communications, Inc. No comments were filed in opposition to the grant of this transaction. The Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2339A1.txt
  • we appreciate the importance of the issues raised in the Missoula Plan to NARUC and its member state commissions, and we agree that the additional time we grant here will help ensure their continued full participation. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: January 11, 2007 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2355A1.txt
  • no difference that Thumb Cellular had notice of a deadline that was different than the one established by the Commission's rules, which provide specific guidance on calculating deadlines. We direct USAC to implement the conclusions in this Order by disbursing third quarter 2003 ICLS funds to Thumb Cellular. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Appeal of USAC's Denial of Funding filed by Thumb Cellular Limited Partnership on June 2, 2004 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Appeal of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2370A1.txt
  • 2007 high-cost loop support amounts are necessary. Payments for periods subsequent to December 2007 will be based on historic data in accordance with the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 36.611 and 36.612, IS GRANTED, as described herein, to Adak Eagle Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Adak Telephone Utility. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-240A1.txt
  • and to allow it to retain its current regulatory status until the Commission concludes its review of the all-or-nothing rule in the MAG Second Further Notice. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.41, filed by New Valor on December 22, 2005, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Valor Communications Group, Inc., Petition for Waiver (filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-244A1.txt
  • 486. We therefore grant a waiver to Glendale and remand its application to USAC for further action consistent with this order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review and/or Waiver filed by Glendale Unified School District, Glendale, California, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2459A1.txt
  • that the public interest and the goals of section 254(h) of the Communications Act are best served by requiring USAC to reconsider Quinter's application, including the revised diagram filed with Quinter's Second USAC Appeal, and to work with Quinter to determine if indeed its request should be considered eligible telecommunications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Quinter Public Schools Unified School District No. 293, Quinter, Kansas, on October 3, 2005, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this decision. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2460A1.txt
  • and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 C.F.R. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Coahoma County School District, Clarksdale, Mississippi, IS GRANTED, and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 1-4 and 254 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2462A1.txt
  • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, waiver of section 54.720(b) IS GRANTED to Friendship House. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-246A1.txt
  • City Board of Education's (ACBE) Funding Year 2003 and 2004 applications for discounted services. On October 20, 2005, RelComm filed a Request to Withdraw its Requests for Review of ACBE's Funding Year 2003 and 2004 applications. We grant RelComm's Request to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismiss RelComm's Requests for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request to Withdraw filed RelComm, Inc., West Berlin, New Jersey, on October 20, 2005, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2500A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Dallas Independent School District IS GRANTED, and the application is REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2548A1.txt
  • the phantom traffic issue to the industry, we find that good cause exists to provide parties a brief extension of time, from December 22, 2006 to January 5, 2007 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: January 5, 2007 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of the Supporters of the Missoula Plan for an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2550A1.txt
  • personnel. We require Petitioners to comply with these commitments. Thus, we conclude that waiver of Section 36.612 of the Commission's rules is in the public interest. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Petition of CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC and Telephone USA of Wisconsin, LLC for Waiver of Section 36.601(a)(3) of the Commission's Rules, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kirk S. Burgee Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC and Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2577A1.txt
  • Commissions and other state commissions, and we agree that the additional time we grant here will give parties the time necessary to more accurately estimate the effects of the Missoula Plan and proposed modifications under consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: February 1, 2007 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of the Early Adopter Regulatory Commissions for Extension of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2581A1.txt
  • service areas. Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.802(a) and 54.809(c) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by MCI, Inc., on January 7, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2582A1.txt
  • 23, 2005, it is eligible to receive support for the nine-month period beginning April 1, 2006, and ending December 31, 2006. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Mid-Tex Cellular, Ltd. Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Universal Service Rules IS GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Mid-Tex Cellular, Ltd. Petition for Waiver of the FCC's Universal Service Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2584A1.txt
  • North River's service areas. Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Waiver of the Deadline in 47 C.F.R. § 54.904(d) filed by North River Telephone Cooperative on November 17, 2005, IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau North River Telephone Cooperative Petition for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2585A1.txt
  • 2003, loop count filings. We therefore deny San Isabel's request for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the September 30, 2003 and December 30, 2003, filing deadlines. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the October 1, 2002, certification deadline in section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d), filed by San Isabel Telecom, Inc. on January 26, 2004, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-277A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional EAS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Qwest Corporation for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional EAS between the specific locations in Nebraska, as identified in WC Docket No. 05-315, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renee C. Crittendon Acting Division Chief Competition Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-286A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Corr's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Corr Wireless Communications, LLC IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for portions if its licensed service area in the state of Alabama, to the extent described and subject to the conditions stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Corr Wireless Communications, LLC will submit additional information in support of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-287A1.txt
  • requests for funding at issue followed USAC and the Commission's competitive bidding rules and regulations, as well as applicable state laws, as required by program rules, we conclude that Petitioners were in compliance with section 54.504(a) of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, we grant Petitioners' Requests for Review. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Petitioners on August 23, 2004, August 17, 2004, and July 27, 2004, ARE GRANTED, and the applications are REMANDED to SLD for further consideration consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-418A1.txt
  • year to these small LECs would undermine this goal. Thus, we conclude that waiver of Section 54.301 of the Commission's rules is in the public interest. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver of section 54.301 of the Commission's rules, filed by Dixon Telephone Company, Lexcom Telephone Company, and Citizens Telephone Company of Higginsville, Missouri, ARE GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Dixon Telephone Company, Petition for Waiver of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-42A1.txt
  • time to prepare its reply. We therefore extend the length of both the comment and reply periods by fifteen days. Thus, under our counting rules, parties have until January 30, 2006 to file comments on Fibertech's petition for rulemaking RM-11303, and until March 1, 2006 to file reply comments. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 that UTC's Motion for Extension of Time to File Comments in the above-captioned proceeding IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renee R. Crittendon Acting Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau UTC Motion for Extension of Time to File Comments (filed Jan.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-475A1.txt
  • whether forbearance from applying the relevant unbundling requirements, circuit caps, and eligibility requirements meet the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by the CLEC Coalition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to June 25, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kirk S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-484A1.txt
  • Wyoming schools have the opportunity to receive support under the schools and libraries support mechanism, provided that all other E-rate application requirements are satisfied. We therefore grant a waiver to the State of Wyoming and remand the applications to USAC for further action consistent with this order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by the State of Wyoming, Cheyenne, Wyoming, on December 20, 2002 and February 12, 2003, ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-485A1.txt
  • only received the highest number of points in the bid evaluation, but it also represented the lowest cost of the proposals submitted. These factors support the conclusion that the procurement process at issue did not violate our competitive bidding requirements. We therefore grant Wyoming's Request for Review. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wyoming Department of Education on April 18, 2005 is GRANTED and remanded to USAC for further consideration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Clementina Jimenez, Wyoming Department of Education, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-486A1.txt
  • stated above, we grant Pasadena's Requests for Review and remand its applications to USAC for further action consistent with this order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Pasadena Unified School District, Pasadena, California, ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-487A1.txt
  • the Waiver Request and remand the underlying applications to the Administrator. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 54.722(a) and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Greenfield Public School District, Shutesbury, Massachusetts, on October 12, 2005, IS GRANTED, and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to the Administrator for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-55A1.txt
  • schedule companies by more than five percent of the previous year's universal service support. Similarly, we require USAC to disclose when a Commission order or rule change causes a change in aggregate local switching universal service support to average schedule companies by more than five percent of the previous year's support. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formula proposed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on September 30, 2005, for local switching support IS ADOPTED, effective retroactively as of January 1, 2006. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-593A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional EAS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Qwest Corporation for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional EAS between the specific locations in Minnesota, as identified in WC Docket No. 05-321, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renee C. Crittendon Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-594A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-594A1.txt
  • other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of AT&T Inc., on behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. d/b/a SBC Texas, for a LATA boundary modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS at specific locations in Texas, as identified in WC Docket No. 06-2, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-61A1.txt
  • significant questions regarding whether forbearance from enforcing section 52.33(a)(1) of the Commission's rules meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by SBC shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to May 9, 2006. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald K. Stockdale Associate Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-643A1.txt
  • their April 1, 2006 filing, while allowing the Commission to consider the Companies' request for a non-substantive amendment to section 64.904 on a less time-sensitive basis. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 220, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that section 64.904 of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald K. Stockdale, Jr. Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau We note that the April 1 deadline falls on a Saturday this year. Accordingly, carriers must file the biennial audit report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-73A1.txt
  • in Valor's service areas. Accordingly, we find that waiving section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules will serve the public interest by preserving and advancing universal service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by Valor Telecommunications of Texas, L.P., on December 23, 2004 IS GRANTED, as described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Valor Telecommunications of Texas,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-753A1.txt
  • Sprint has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs and non-MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, the Pricing Flexibility Order, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petition filed by Sprint is GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Trunking Services Basket (Includes entrance facilities, direct trunked transport, flat-rated portion of tandem-switched transport, and the optional features and functions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-785A1.txt
  • appeal addressed here, we reserve the right to conduct audits and investigations to determine compliance with the program rules and requirements. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Illinois School for the Visually Impaired IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-88A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 06-88 Released: January 19, 2006 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 05-335 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Stockholm-Strandburg Telephone Co., (``SSTC''), Harold Nowick and Majorie Nowick (``Transferors''), and Interstate Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. (``ITC'' or ``Transferee'') to transfer control of Stockholm-Strandburg Telephone Co., from Harold Nowick, and Majorie Nowick to Interstate Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. No
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-914A1.txt
  • a status report addressing its progress and indicating when it expects to resume compliance with these requirements. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5, 201, 214(a), 251(c)(5), 271, 272, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155, 201, 214(a), 251(c)(5), 271, 272, and 303(r) and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 51.325-51.335 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 51.325-51.335 AT&T's Petition IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau In response to Hurricane Katrina, the Commission established an independent panel to review the impact of Hurricane Katrina on the telecommunications and media infrastructure and make recommendations to the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-944A1.txt
  • Partner, upon conversion to cost-based status, is required to calculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Partner Communications Cooperative and Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. on June 14, 2004, IS CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-946A1.txt
  • frozen separations factors. Accordingly, Lost Nation is required to recalculate its jurisdictional separations factors pursuant to the Separations Freeze Order and the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Lost Nation-Elwood Telephone Company and Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. on October 24, 2006, IS CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-953A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-953A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-953A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 06-953 Released: April 28, 2006 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 06-62 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Electric Lightwave, LLC (``ELI'') and Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc. (``Integra'') to transfer control of ELI to Integra. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1053A1.txt
  • and Trademark Office never granted the Jeman and Toll-Free trademark registration requests and the applications show a status of ``abandoned.'' Therefore, the issue raised in the above-referenced petition for declaratory ruling is moot. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 251(e), and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the petition for declaratory ruling filed by Ameritech Corporation, AT&T Corp., Bell Atlantic Corporation, Cincinnati Bell Inc., and SBC Communications, Inc. filed on September 22, 1998 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Christi Shewman Acting Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Certain Applications Filed by Jeman Holdings, Inc.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1063A1.txt
  • Commission staff directed DSMI to postpone the release of the 855 code until further notice. At this time, the 855 toll-free code has not been released. Therefore, the petitions of TFNC and TTFCC are moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 251(e), and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the petitions of TFNC and TTFCC ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Christi Shewman Acting Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Toll-Free Service Access Codes, CC Docket No. 95-155, Petition for Emergency Relief and Expedited Action, Toll Free Number Coalition (filed Nov. 9, 2000); Toll-Free Service Access Codes,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-110A1.txt
  • by preserving and advancing universal service. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by NPCR Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1174A1.txt
  • its initial petition dated April 16, 2004, to include its Amble, Michigan exchange. Because the Amble exchange is beyond the scope of the Dismissal Order, we may not consider it on reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Upper Peninsula Telephone Company IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Christi Shewman Acting Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Upper Peninsula Telephone Company, Petition for Reconsideration (July 26, 2004) (Petition for Reconsideration). Upper Peninsula Telephone Company, Petition for Extension of Time (dated April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1177A1.txt
  • receive support under the schools and libraries support mechanism, provided all other E-rate application requirements are satisfied. We therefore grant the instant request for waiver. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Waiver Petition filed by the Kentucky Department of Education, on April 22, 2005, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1180A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. §54.507 filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1182A1.txt
  • Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, USAC SHALL COMPLETE its review of the underlying application of Tri-Rivers Education Computer Association and ISSUE an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 60 days from release of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renée R. Crittendon Acting Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Request for Review of the Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company by Tri-Rivers Educational Computer Association (TRECA), Request for Review, CC Docket No. 02-6, filed Aug. 16,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1184A1.txt
  • the Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative Company has approved Kress's request. Accordingly, we dismiss Kress's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 3, 2004, by Kress Independent School District, Kress, Texas, IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renée R. Crittendon Acting Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Leah Zeigler, Kress Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed Feb.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1185A1.txt
  • not establish ``special circumstances'' that would justify a waiver of the Commission's general rule. Accordingly, we deny Otsego's Request for Waiver. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Request for Waiver filed by the Otsego Local School District IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1187A1.txt
  • have until September 30, 2008, to complete installation of the non-recurring services for the funding years at issue in their Extension Requests. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Extension Requests listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renée R. Crittendon Acting Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Extension Requests Applicant Application Number Funding Year California
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1227A1.txt
  • as the petitioner argues, that customers will avoid the effects associated with the proposed SOs by porting their wireline numbers to a wireless service provider and continue to use the underlying area codes. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251(e), and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that CTIA's Petition for Clarification IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Christi Shewman Acting Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 18 FCC Rcd 10946 (2003) (Connecticut SO Order). See Numbering Resource Optimization, CC Docket No. 99-200, Third Report
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1235A1.txt
  • it chose not to do so. Accordingly, the Puerto Rico Board's request for clarification or, in the alternative, waiver is moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and pursuant to delegated authority under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 254, and pursuant to delegated authority under sections 0.91, 0.291,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1236A1.txt
  • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Long Beach Unified School District on May 25, 2004; Smoky Hill Education Service Center on August 25, 2004; and Asociacion de Educacion Privada de Puerto Rico, on behalf of Advance Bilingual School, on February 10, 2005, are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1238A1.txt
  • access, and were therefore subject to the October 28, 2001 deadline imposed by the CIPA statute, we are thus without authority to waive that deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeals filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1263A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules and the Instructions. We therefore conclude that Petitioners' Forms 499-A for 2001 should be rejected. V. ORDERING CLAUSEs ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 USC §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j) and 254 and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petitions for Review filed by American Cyber Corp., Coleman Enterprises, Inc., Inmark, Inc., d/b/a Preferred Billing, Lotel, Inc., d/b/a Coordinated Billing, Protel Advantage, Inc. ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1269A1.txt
  • good cause to justify grant of a rule waiver. We therefore, deny the Petitioner's requests for waiver of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c), 54.802(a), and 54.903 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.307(c), 54.802(a), 54.903, filed by NPI-Omnipoint Wireless, LLC, the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by SEI Data, Inc.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1270A1.txt
  • public interest. For the foregoing reasons, we deny the Request for Review and remand the relevant applications to USAC to continue the commitment adjustment recovery actions. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Send Technologies, L.L.C., on January 19, 2004 and March 22, 2004 ARE DENIED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further processing consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1272A1.txt
  • provider's bill upon receipt and must await reimbursement from USAC have an alternative method by which to pay the non-discounted portion. III. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Waiver filed by AT&T Corp. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1277A1.txt
  • properly billed Big River during 2001 for the universal service obligations resulting from Big River's end-user telecommunications revenues. V. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 USC §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j) and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Big River Telephone Company, LLC IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1282A1.txt
  • special access services by satisfying the applicable competitive triggers. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Flexibility Order requirement that a service must be in price caps before it is eligible for pricing flexibility IS WAIVED with respect to the advanced services offered under AT&T Inc.'s local exchange carrier tariffs, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1302A1.txt
  • of that broader proceeding, and we conclude that granting Union a waiver of section 64.1903(a)(2) and 64.1903(b) of the Commission's rules would not serve the public interest. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i)-(j), 201, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i)-(j), 201, and 303(r), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the above-referenced petition for waiver is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Union Telephone Company; Petition for Waiver of Sections 64.1903(a)(2) and 64.1903(b) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-61, Petition for Waiver of Union Telephone Company (filed Aug. 30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1303A1.txt
  • Corr's petition for waiver of the December 30, 2002, line count filing deadline established in section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.313(d) and 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, filed by Corr Wireless Communications, LCC, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1305A1.txt
  • amended. On October 3, 2006, Pulse Mobile, LLC, formerly GTA, submitted a request to withdraw the Petition. We grant the GTA request for withdrawal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 214, and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw GTA's Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Guam IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 214, and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1306A1.txt
  • claims arising out of private contractual agreements. The appropriate forum for private litigation is the courts. For these reasons, the petitions are denied. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Petitions filed by American Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Equivoice, Inc., Eureka Broadband Corporation, TON Services, Inc. and Value-Added Communications, Inc., are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all outstanding payments, including late fees, penalties, or other monies owed to the USF by American Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Equivoice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-130A1.txt
  • SAMHSA and deny the request with respect to those numbers. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. port the toll-free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE), to the Responsible Organization chosen by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a component of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, as described herein and that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1332A1.txt
  • the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by Calhoun School, New York, New York, on November 23, 2004; North American Family Institute, Danvers, Massachusetts, on August 24, 2004; North Sacramento School District, Sacramento, California, on December 7, 2005; Harrisonburg City School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1338A1.txt
  • the Bureau adopt NECA's preferred formula. On March 9, 2007, NECA submitted a request to withdraw the Applications and Petitions. We grant NECA's request for withdrawal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw NECA's Applications for Review and Petitions for Reconsideration related to NECA's Proposed 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 Modifications of Average Schedule Formulas IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1354A1.txt
  • year-to-year basis and, thus, an applicant has no guarantee that a multi-year contract will continue to be funded for the duration of the contract. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 that the Petition for Waiver filed by Sprint Corporation on February 3, 2004, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1365A1.txt
  • February 4, 2002. On March 19, 2007, the Paging Coalition submitted a request to dismiss the petition. We grant the Paging Coalition's request to dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority in sections 1-4, 201, 251 and 332, of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 251, 332, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request to dismiss the Paging Coalition's Petition for Declaratory Ruling IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority in sections 1-4, 201, 251 and 332 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 251, 332, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1366A1.txt
  • all parties an extension of time from April 2, 2007 to May 2, 2007 for filing comments in this proceeding and from April 17, 2007 to May 23, 2007 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: May 2, 2007 Reply Comments Due: May 23, 2007 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend Time to File Public Comments is GRANTED, as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1367A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert Lewis Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of ) ) Petition of Indiana Bell Telephone ) Company, Incorporated (Ameritech Indiana) ) WCB/Pricing 07-07 and The Ohio Bell Telephone Company ) (Ameritech Ohio) for Pricing Flexibility ) Under §69.727 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1387A1.txt
  • result in dismissal of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Acting Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 02-112 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 02-112. I have read the order and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1469A1.txt
  • 21, 2006, DataNet filed a motion in support of the Frontier Motion. We grant VarTec's request to withdraw its petition, and Frontier's motion to withdraw its petition without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority in sections 1-4, 201, and 251 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 251, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request to withdraw the VarTec Petition for Declaratory Ruling IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority in sections 1-4, 201, and 251 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 251, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1483A1.txt
  • and replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with the requirements stated in this paragraph. III. ORDERING CLAUSEs 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i) and (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, section 61.49(k) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.49(k), IS WAIVED for the purpose specified in paragraph 4 supra. 15. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1504A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1504A1.txt
  • USF, if iBasis's stay request is granted. We do not agree with iBasis, therefore, that grant of its stay request is in the public interest. As such, we deny iBasis's stay petition. IV. CONCLUSION Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that iBasis's Petition for Stay Pending Judicial Review of the Prepaid Calling Card Order IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Regulation of Prepaid Calling Card Services, WC Docket No. 05-68, iBasis Petition for Stay Pending Judicial Review (filed Aug. 23, 2006) (Stay Petition).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1532A1.txt
  • with previous waiver grants and the Commission's decision to allow newly designated ETCs to receive support of the carrier's designation date. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.904(d), filed by Cellular South Licenses, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -1.32 -1.25 -1.61 -0.73 -1.85 -0.87 -1.76 -3.72 -1.34 0.43 N-4 -1.31 -1.43 -0.92 -1.07 -1.66 -1.07 -0.87 -1.94 -1.19 0.29 N-3 -0.79 -1.85 -2.23 -1.73 -1.50 -2.38 -1.47 -0.26 -1.71 0.53 N-2 -0.76 -1.94 -2.31 -0.53 -1.31 -0.91 -0.71 -0.89 -1.21 0.68 N+2 0.02 -2.99 -1.94 -0.48 -0.04 -0.67 -0.40 0.50 -0.93 1.12 Mean -0.83 -1.89 -1.80 -0.91 -1.27 -1.18 -1.04 -1.26 -1.28 Std Dev 0.55 0.68 0.56 0.51 0.72 0.69 0.56 1.64 0.68 Note: The overall means and standard deviations (lower right corner of the chart) omitted data for receiver G4 for reasons discussed in the section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1573A1.txt
  • the benefits of the E-rate, rural health care, and low-income programs established by the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the Request filed November 1, 2005, by the State of Louisiana, Governor's Office, the Request filed November 1, 2005, by the Texas Education Agency, and the Request filed April 10, 2006, by the Louisiana Public Service Commission ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1600A1.txt
  • grant SRT a waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules so that it may remain under average schedule status. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by SRT Communications, Inc. and North Dakota Telephone Company on October 2, 2006, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1624A1.txt
  • of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald K. Stockdale Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 06-56 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 06-56. I have read the order and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1649A1.txt
  • receive high-cost universal service support under the non-rural mechanism meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c) of the Act. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the Iowa Telecom petition seeking forbearance shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to August 6, 2007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1666A1.txt
  • to issue its decision based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from the release of this Order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(j) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(j), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Virginia State Department of Education, Richmond, Virginia, on May 22, 2002 IS GRANTED and REMANDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1693A1.txt
  • time for filing in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the request of the Communications Workers of America and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers for an Extension of Time is GRANTED, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments/Petitions to Deny Due: April 27, 2007 Responses/Oppositions Due: May 7, 2007 Replies Due: May 14, 2007 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Acting Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Applications filed for the Transfer of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1761A1.txt
  • Title II regulation of ACS's broadband services in the Anchorage study area meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by ACS shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to August 20, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1800A1.txt
  • for advanced services by satisfying the applicable competitive triggers. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), and 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Flexibility Order requirement that a service must be in price caps before it is eligible for pricing flexibility IS WAIVED with respect to the advanced services offered through Section 8 of Qwest's FCC Tariff No. 1, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-189A1.txt
  • rules. WRAL-TV states that WDBJ-TV's share of total viewing hours in over-the-air homes in Roxboro falls far short of the required significantly viewed minimums, within one standard error, as shown in the table below: TABLE 1 - WDBJ-TV VIEWING IN WACO, TX Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Nov. 2003/ 23 1.33 0.91 7.92 5.15 Feb. 2004/ May 2004 Nov. 2004/ 15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Feb. 2005/ May 2005 As a result, WRAL-TV requests that the Commission grant its petition so that it can assert its exclusivity rights in Roxboro, North Carolina. We find that WRAL-TV made the requisite showing to support its petition. As required by the rules, WRAL-TV has provided
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2043A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2043A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2043A1.txt
  • Additionally, AT&T notes that, given the nature of the service, it is unclear whether it could fully incorporate TIPToP into either the trunking or traffic sensitive basket and any reasonable allocation between the two baskets could be quite difficult. Under these circumstances, a limited waiver of the Commission's rules is appropriate and well within the Bureau's delegated authority under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. Further, continued regulatory oversight over TIPToP service will allow the Bureau to address any discriminatory or anti-competitive pricing that might occur. AT&T's TIPToP rates are subject to Part 61, subparts E and F of the Commission's rules, which provide protection against unreasonable rate increases. In particular, these rules require AT&T to justify any rate
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2082A1.txt
  • the Petition does not contain sufficient facts or circumstances for us to conclude that Hawaiian Telcom will not be able to comply with its 2007 ARMIS filing requirements. Therefore, we take no action in this Order on the waiver of Hawaiian Telcom's 2007 ARMIS 43-05 and 43-08 Reports. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 43.21(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 43.21(g), due April 1, 2007, filed by Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2096A1.txt
  • of the issues that are raised, however, we find that good cause exists to provide all parties an extension of time from May 23, 2007 to June 13, 2007 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: June 13, 2007 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED, as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Implementation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2109A1.txt
  • conclude that Ameritech has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, the Pricing Flexibility Order, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petition filed by Ameritech is GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald K. Stockdale Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Trunking Services Basket (Includes entrance facilities, direct trunked transport, flat-rated portion of tandem-switched transport, and the optional features and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2111A1.txt
  • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2190A1.txt
  • comments on the Alenco Petition is extended from May 25, 2007 to June 22, 2007, and the deadline for filing reply comments is extended from June 11, 2007 to July 9, 2007. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: June 22, 2007 Reply Comments Due: July 9, 2007 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renée R. Crittendon Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Alenco Communications, Inc., Big Bend Telephone Company, Dell Telephone Cooperative, Inc.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2198A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules. On April 26, 2006, Twin Valley filed a request to withdraw the Petition for Clarification. We grant Twin Valley's request for withdrawal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Twin Valley's request to withdraw its Petition for Clarification IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2233A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2233A1.txt
  • Commission's dominant carrier regulations, separate affiliate regulations, and inbound call ``scripting'' obligations meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by AT&T shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to August 31, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2258A1.txt
  • authorized under the Communications Act, the Commission's rules, the common law or other source of law, any failure to abide by the terms of this order may result in dismissal of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 06-120 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 06-120. I have read the order and agree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2259A1.txt
  • of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Second Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality WC Docket No. 06-120 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Second Protective Order in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2280A1.txt
  • use resources that otherwise would be stranded. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, we hereby grant the Kentucky Commission authority to implement mandatory thousands-block number pooling in the 270 NPA. ordering clauseS ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Kentucky Public Service Commission's Petition for Additional Delegated Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures filed on October 10, 2006 IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau See Kentucky Public Service Commission Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2292A1.txt
  • dismissal of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 07-97 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 07-97. I have read the order and agree to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2293A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2293A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2293A1.txt
  • provisions of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Second Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality WC Docket No. 07-97 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Second Protective Order in the above-captioned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-22A1.txt
  • of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renée R. Crittendon Division Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 05-333 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 05-333. I have read
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2331A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 07-2331 Released: June 5, 2007 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 07-90 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (``Bureau'') approves the application of Yates City Telephone Company (``Yates City''), C-R Long Distance, Inc. (``C-R''), Mid Century Telephone Cooperative (``Mid Century''), and Century Enterprises, Inc. (``CEI'') to transfer control of Yates City to Mid Century and C-R to CEI. No commenters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-234A1.txt
  • by preserving and advancing universal service. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF NY AND AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2366A1.txt
  • converting the demand data from multiple sources (VADI, Verizon Hawaii, and Hawaiian Tariff FCC No. 2) for price cap calculations. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian's Tariff FCC No. 2, only with respect to Hawaiian's 2007 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2367A1.txt
  • exclude advanced services under Tariff FCC No. 20 from price caps for purposes of the 2007 annual access tariff filing. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for advanced services in Verizon's Tariff FCC No. 20, including those transferred from VADI to Verizon, only with respect to Verizon's 2007 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-236A1.txt
  • public interest by advancing universal service. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 54.313(d) and 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.313(d); 54.314(d), filed by the Kansas Corporation Commission IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-238A1.txt
  • therefore, conclude that waiver of this rule is in the public interest and is consistent with the Commission's amendment to section 54.317(d)(6) and previous waiver grants. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d), filed by MTA Wireless Communications, Inc. d/b/a MTA IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2399A1.txt
  • the Act and the Commission's Computer Inquiry rules to Qwest's broadband services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which Qwest's forbearance petition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to September 11, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-239A1.txt
  • petition for waiver of section 54.307. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.307 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307, filed by Pine Cellular Phones Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2400A1.txt
  • is thus a targeted approach to assist companies that will be particularly impacted by the reduced settlements, consistent with other situations in which the Commission has used transition plans. Moreover, when considering the overall revenue requirements of the average schedule companies, the transition amount is quite small-approximately 0.8% of NECA's overall revenue requirements. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., on December 21, 2006, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2007, and remain in effect through June 30, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2465A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional EAS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of AT&T for a limited modification of LATA boundaries for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional EAS between the specific locations in Louisiana, as identified in WC Docket No. 07-85, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Christi Shewman Chief Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2509A1.txt
  • are raised, however, we find that good cause exists to waive section 1.46(b) and provide all parties an extension of time from June 13, 2007 to June 20, 2007 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: June 20, 2007 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Waiver and the Motion for Extension of Time are GRANTED as set forth herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2565A1.txt
  • reply comment deadline in this proceeding is appropriate under the circumstances. The deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Notice is extended from June 13, 2007 to June 21, 2007. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: June 21, 2007 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Renée R. Crittendon Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2694A1.txt
  • and issue an award or denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from the release of this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hickory Public Schools, Hickory, North Carolina, on June 9, 2006 IS GRANTED, and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2695A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Long Beach Unified School District on May 27, 2004, is GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2697A1.txt
  • the requests of AT&T, Qwest, and Verizon to withdraw their petitions, and therefore terminate this proceeding in CC Docket No. 02-53. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority in sections 1-4, 201, 203, 205, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 203, 205, 403, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request by AT&T Inc. to withdraw its Petition for Reconsideration IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority in sections 1-4, 201, 203, 205, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, 203, 205, 403, and the authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-274A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 07-274 Released: January 26, 2007 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 06-184 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (``Bureau'') approves the application of Commonwealth Telephone Enterprises, Inc. (``Commonwealth'') and Citizens Communications Company (``Citizens'') to transfer control of Commonwealth to Citizens. Two commenters filed comments opposing the grant of the application but later withdrew their opposition. The Bureau finds, upon consideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2793A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 07-2793 Released: June 25, 2007 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 07-106 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (``Bureau'') approves the application of RBJ Corp., Holway Telephone Company, Holway Long Distance Company, KLM Telephone Company, KLM Long Distance Company (collectively, ``Transferors''), and RBJ Holdings, Inc. (``Holdings'') to transfer control of Transferors to Holdings. No commenters opposed grant of the application.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.txt
  • substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the switched access rates contained in the 2007 annual access tariffs of the carriers listed in Appendices B and C are SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the carriers listed in Appendices B and C MAY FILE a supplement advancing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2863A1.txt
  • the Commission, except in rare circumstances not found here, does not allow carriers to engage in call blocking. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERERD that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 201, and 202, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, this Declaratory Ruling in WC Docket No. 07-135 IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.2 (``The Commission may, in accordance with section 5(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act, on motion or on its own motion issue a declaratory ruling terminating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2922A1.txt
  • USF based on revenues earned from its telecommunications offerings and reasonable costs, including interest and administrative costs caused by Radiant's overdue contributions. Ordering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the appeal filed by Radiant Telecom, Inc., is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Radiant Telecom, Inc. is to file FCC Form 499-A for years 2002 to the present with the Universal Service Administrative Company in accordance with the terms of this Order, and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2968A1.txt
  • reform of the access charge regime, and the fact that no other notices to pursue the petition were received, we hereby dismiss the remaining petition as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant sections 1-4, 201-209, 218-222, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-209, 218-222, 254, and 403, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petition for reconsideration filed by Pathfinder Communications, Inc. IS DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kirk S. Burgee Chief of Staff, Wireline Competition Bureau See Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-29A1.txt
  • that, while high-cost loop support for 2007 is estimated to increase by 23.8% over 2006 payments, the 2007 rate of increase is significantly less than the rate of increases for 2005 and 2006. We expect NECA to take precautions to avoid unreasonable growth in high-cost loop support for average schedule companies. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the universal service support formula proposed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on September 22, 2006, for local switching support IS ADOPTED, effective retroactively as of January 1, 2007. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3048A1.txt
  • Inquiry rules to AT&T's and other BOCs' non-TDM based broadband transmission services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which AT&T's forbearance petition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to October 11, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3049A1.txt
  • Computer Inquiry rules to BellSouth's and other similarly situated carriers' broadband services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which BellSouth's forbearance petition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to October 18, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3341A1.txt
  • rules to Embarq's and other similarly situated independent incumbent LECs' broadband services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which Embarq's forbearance petition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to October 24, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3342A1.txt
  • Computer Inquiry rules to Frontier's and other similarly situated carriers' broadband services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which Frontier's forbearance petition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to November 2, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A4.txt
  • 0.09 0.34 0.00 Spanish-LanguageProgramming 0.06 0.25 0.00 NetworksTargetingOtherDiverseAudiences 0.00 - 0.00 Children'sProgramming "Children'sProgramming" 0.16 0.01 0.17 GMoviesorTV-Y/TV-Y7TV 0.25 0.12 0.26 Eitheroftheabove 0.22 0.07 0.22 FamilyProgramming NetworksTargetingFamilies 0.28 - 0.28 TY-GProgramming 0.20 0.31 0.17 Arts,Educational,orDocumentaryProgramming 0.13 0.02 0.14 Eitherofthetwoabove 0.17 0.23 0.16 AdultProgramming NetworksShowingAdultProgramming 0.00 - 0.00 NC-17MoviesorTV-MA-S/TV-MA-LTV 0.04 0.02 0.04 ViolentProgramming "ViolentProgramming" 0.14 0.97 0.11 TV-PG-VTelevision 0.75 2.29 0.34 TV-14-VTelevision 0.91 3.70 0.26 TV-MA-VTelevision 0.04 0.00 0.04 Anyofthethreeabove 0.78 2.88 0.28 Anyofthelasttwoabove 0.81 3.51 0.23 ReligiousProgramming NetworksShowingPrimarilyReligiousProgramming 0.09 0.14 0.00 "ReligiousProgramming" 0.02 0.01 0.04 OverallTargeting AverageTVContentRating(wherenotedforTV) AverageMPAARating(wherenotedformovies) Observations 265,388 35,448 229,940 Notes:Reportedinthetableistheaveragerating(i.e.shareofU.S.householdsthatwatchaprogram) acrossprogramtypes.AverageisoverthesamenetworksandtimeperiodsdescribedinthenotestoTable 6.Itiscalculatedbyweightingprogrammingofeachtypebythenumberofhouseholdsthatviewedthe program.SeeSection5.1formoredetails.Source:Authorcalculations. 37 Table9: ProgramRatingsasaShareofHouseholdswithAccess(ProgramQuality) 6:00p.m.-12:00a.m.EST(orequivalent),2weeks/year,2003-2005 AllBroadcast Cable Variable Networks NetworksNetworks NewsProgramming AnyNews 1.73 3.03 0.29 NetworkNews 3.56 3.59 0.00 LocalNews 1.44 2.84 0.29 PublicAffairsProgramming 0.48 0.17 0.54
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • years. I - 37 Table I.6 Analysis of News Minutes Provided - Three-Way Group Fixed Effects Model N1: Controlled for Market & Network Variable Coefficient Std. Error p-value TotPop1000s 2.06 *** 0.25 0.000 PopPercentBlack 916.06 *** 90.08 0.000 PopPercentHisp -31.55 45.11 0.484 DMAPerCapitaIncome -0.07 *** 0.02 0.000 UnrelatedStationsinDMACount 394.74 *** 33.00 0.000 UnrelatedStationsinDMANewsMin -0.37 *** 0.01 0.000 ParentStationsCount -3.72 *** 0.91 0.000 ParentRevenueMillions 0.27 *** 0.04 0.000 OtherCoOwnedStationsinDMACount 338.43 *** 37.56 0.000 OtherCoOwnStationsinDMANewsMin -0.34 *** 0.01 0.000 Local Marketing Agreement 10.67 40.28 0.791 MultiNetworkAffil -123.64 ** 62.03 0.046 Locally Owned -88.03 *** 25.56 0.001 O and O Big Four 307.00 *** 64.88 0.000 TV-Radio Crossowned 29.52 25.84 0.253 TV-Newspaper Crossowned 247.43 *** 68.38 0.000 NonCommercial -177.94 * 97.63 0.068 VHF Channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • of Ownership Structure on Format Summary of the Marginal Effect of Same Owner Indicator Marginal Effect Z-Stat Pseudo R-Squared N Marginal Effect Z-Stat Pseudo R-Squared N Marginal Effect Z-Stat Pseudo R-Squared N # Mkts Same Format 11 0.05* (9.79) 0.0009163,853 0.01 (0.27) 0.0001 739 0.12 (1.56) 0.0788 493 47 Same Format 20 0.04* (8.77) 0.0010163,853 0.005 (0.16) 0.0001 739 0.06 (0.91) 0.0934 425 34 Same Format 101 0.03* (8.44) 0.0012163,853 0.02 (0.65) 0.0016 739 0.13 (1.55) 0.1345 335 25 Marginal Effect Z-Stat Pseudo R-Squared N Marginal Effect Z-Stat Pseudo R-Squared N Marginal Effect Z-Stat Pseudo R-Squared N # Mkts Same Format 11 0.06* (6.13) 0.0012 42,175 -0.06 (-0.95) 0.0057 156 -0.01 (-0.06) 0.1055 50 11 Same Format 20 0.07* (7.59) 0.0023
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .10 .17 .24 .65 .86 Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 36 Table 4: Local News Coverage Including Sports and Weather (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 46.9 (0.91) 77.2 (1.13) 50.5 (0.89) 91.6 (1.63) 78.8** (1.98) Cross-owned radio station -307.8** (2.56) -255.0** (2.16) -167.1* (1.89) -76.5 (1.20) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 124.2 (0.80) 190.1 (1.38) 143.4 (1.23) 23.0 (0.26) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 17.3*** (3.70) 14.4*** (3.28) 3.4 (1.02) Network owned and operated -185.5* (1.70) -231.4* (1.94) -17.0 (0.18) Network affiliation (omitted category is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 WI 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 2 Total 10513822 94 11120 12991 34 11174 24 21 Table11:OwnershipbyRaceandGender(FCCData) YearPlatformNumberofFemaleMinority%Female%Minority stations owned owned owned owned 2002Radio 13,662 407 377 2.98 2.76 TV 1,739 27 20 1.55 1.15 2003Radio 13,696 382 391 2.79 2.85 TV 1,749 28 16 1.60 0.91 2004Radio 13,696 393 372 2.87 2.72 TV 1,758 27 17 1.54 0.97 2005Radio 14,015 384 379 2.74 2.70 TV 1,778 27 17 1.52 0.96 22
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3484A1.txt
  • comment deadline in this proceeding is appropriate under the circumstances. The deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Public Notice is extended from August 13, 2007 to August 31, 2007. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: August 31, 2007 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Comment Sought on Centennial Communications Corp.'s Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3572A1.txt
  • and all ETCs to familiarize themselves with any applicable regulations so that they can ensure that their submissions are filed in a timely and complete manner. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the Petition for Waiver of section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.904(d), filed by Sagebrush Cellular, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3580A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3580A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 07-3580 Released: August 10, 2007 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 07-127 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (``Bureau'') approves the application to transfer control of CT Communications, Inc. (``CTC'') to Windstream Corporation (Windstream). No comments were filed in opposition to grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will serve the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3608A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3608A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3608A1.txt
  • in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Virginia Beach MSAs meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which the petitions seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petitions for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to December 5, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3610A1.txt
  • of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 06-147 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 06-147. I have read the order and agree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3611A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3611A1.txt
  • of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 06-125 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 06-125. I have read the order and agree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3627A1.txt
  • of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3628A1.txt
  • of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Chief Telecommunications Access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3629A1.txt
  • of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3728A1.txt
  • we expect that rural carriers that are not LNP-capable will not be required to implement pooling solely as a result of the delegation of authority set forth in this Order. ordering clauseS ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the following petitions ARE GRANTED to the extent discussed herein: Petition of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission for Delegated Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures; Petition of the Alabama Public Service Commission for Delegated Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures; and Petition of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.txt
  • well. Paperwork Reduction Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), and 403, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the carriers listed in the Appendix SHALL BE parties to this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each carrier listed in the Appendix SHALL INCLUDE, in its direct case, a response to each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3741A1.txt
  • from any confidential materials to seek disclosure in any separate proceedings; and (c) agree that accidental disclosure of information derived from the Data Sets shall not be deemed a waiver of the privilege. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), (j), and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 0.457(d). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Monica Shah Desai Chief, Media Bureau ATTACHMENT A DECLARATION In the Matter of 2006 Quadrennial Regulatory Review - Review of the Commission's Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (MB Dockets No. 06-121, 02-277 and MM Docket Nos. 01-235, 01-317, and 00-244) I, ____________________,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3840A1.txt
  • conclude that Embarq has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, the Pricing Flexibility Order, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petition filed by Embarq IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald K. Stockdale Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Trunking Services Basket (Includes entrance facilities, direct trunked transport, flat-rated portion of tandem-switched transport, and the optional features and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3866A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3866A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3866A1.txt
  • Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of GVN Services d/b/a Global Valley Long Distance, and Global Valley Networks, Inc. from Country Road Communications, LLC to Citizens Communications Company WC Docket No. 07-161 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (``Bureau'') approves the application of Citizens Communications Company (``Citizens'') and Country Road Communications, LLC (``Country Road'') (collectively, the ``Applicants''), requesting authority to transfer control of Evans Telephone Holdings, Inc. (Evans), and thereby GVN Services d/b/a Global Valley Long Distance (``GVS'') and Global
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3978A1.txt
  • of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality CC Docket No. 96-45 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Protective Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3979A1.txt
  • of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality CC Docket No. 96-45 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Protective Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4094A1.txt
  • authorized under the Communications Act, the Commission's rules, the common law or other source of law, any failure to abide by the terms of this order may result in dismissal of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 07-215 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 07-215. I have read the order and agree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4157A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of AT&T for a limited modification of LATA boundaries for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS between the specific locations in Texas, as identified in WC Docket No. 07-168, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William A. Dever Deputy Chief Competition Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4161A1.txt
  • 6 DVDs shall return all such copies to the Commission upon request or no later than six (6) months from the date of release of this Second Protective Order, whichever comes first. Authority. This Second Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), (j), and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 0.457(d). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Monica Shah Desai Chief, Media Bureau ATTACHMENT A DECLARATION In the Matter of 2006 Quadrennial Regulatory Review - Review of the Commission's Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (MB Dockets No. 06-121, 02-277 and MM Docket Nos. 01-235, 01-317, and 00-244) I, ____________________,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4329A1.txt
  • this proceeding to WUTC and other state commissions, and we agree that the public interest would be served by allowing additional time for parties to prepare and provide detailed comments regarding the merits of Qwest's petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: December 6, 2007 Reply Comments Due: December 21, 2007 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission for Extension of Time is GRANTED, as set forth herein.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4370A1.txt
  • the Expanded Interconnection Tariff Order, and the New Expanded Interconnection Service Suspension Order. These transmittals will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Ameritech's Tariff F.C.C. No. 2 and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Tariff F.C.C. No. 73 Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal Nos. 1651 and 3240, respectively, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the October 27, 2007 effective date, and investigations of the referenced transmittals are instituted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4471A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4518A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 07-4518 Released: November 5, 2007 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 07-219 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Cannon Valley Communications, Inc. (Cannon Valley) and Rural Communications Holding Corporation (RCHC) to transfer control of Cannon Valley and its wholly owned subsidiary, Cannon Valley Telecom, Inc., from the current shareholders of Cannon Valley to RCHC. No
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4520A1.txt
  • DA 07-4520 Released: November 5, 2007 DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. to Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. WC Docket No. 07-151 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (NPSI) and Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCH) (together, Applicants) requesting approval to transfer control of NPSI and its subsidiaries to CCH. The Bureau has determined that grant of this application serves the public interest,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4549A1.txt
  • resolve the matters related to the Oblio Petition. Oblio further requests that the Oblio Petition be withdrawn with prejudice. We therefore grant Oblio's request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the Oblio Petition IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Oblio Telecom, Inc. for a Declaratory Ruling that AT&T's Refusal to Honor Oblio Telecom, Inc.'s Proof of Exemption From Pass-Through USF Charges and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-459A1.txt
  • Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Hopi's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), Hopi Telecommunications, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER, effective as of June 1, 2006, for portions of its licensed service area on the Hopi and Navajo Nation Reservations in Arizona, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4602A1.txt
  • the rate base until the timing difference is resolved. On October 17, 2007, GVNW submitted a request to withdraw its petition. We grant GVNW's request to withdraw its petition without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority in sections 1-4 and 201 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the GVNW request to withdraw the Petition for Declaratory Ruling IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority in sections 1-4 and 201 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4620A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4620A1.txt
  • of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald K. Stockdale Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 07-258 I have received a copy of the Protective Order in WC Docket No. 07-258. I have read the order and agree to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4685A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 07-4685 Released: November 20, 2007 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATIONS GRANTED WC Docket Nos. 07-232 and 07-234 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Rural Communications Holding Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Shell Rock Telephone Company (SRTC), to transfer assets of SRTC to Shell Rock Communications, Inc., and the application of Bayland Telephone, Inc. (Bayland) to transfer control of Bayland and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4691A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4691A1.txt
  • to the Commission's consideration of the questions raised in the Embarq Petition, we find that good cause exists to provide parties the requested brief extension of time for filing comments and reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: December 14, 2007 Reply Comments Due: January 10, 2008 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request of COMPTEL for an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4965A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4965A1.txt
  • to rely on the service area where its customers exclusively or primarily use their wireless service for purpose of reporting lines to receive universal service support. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the Petition for Waiver of section 54.307(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(b), filed by Bristol Bay Cellular Partnership, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4971A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the request for refund of late filing fees for filers listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4973A1.txt
  • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5003A1.txt
  • by 90 days the assignment to SAMHSA of the three toll-free numbers at issue. This extension will allow us to review thoroughly the record filed in response to that public notice. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151 and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 251(e), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the temporary assignment of the three toll-free numbers at issue is extended to April 21, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief Wireline Competition Bureau SAMHSA is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. See Toll Free Service Access Codes, CC Docket No. 95-155,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5021A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5021A1.txt
  • of the FCC Form 471. On February 12, 2007, Troup County filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal after learning that it received funding for the same products and services in Funding Year 2005. We grant Troup County's Motion to Dismiss Appeal and, accordingly, dismiss Troup County's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion to Dismiss Appeal filed by Troup County School System, LaGrange, Georgia, on February 12, 2007, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5031A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Petition of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC (CBT) for Phase I Pricing Flexibility for Special Access, Dedicated Transport Services and End-User Channel Terminations, and Phase II Pricing Flexibility for POP Channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5077A1.txt
  • NECA's 2007 Modification of Average Schedules and find that the methodology used to develop this year's proposed formula is the same methodology used to develop the formula we approved during the last payment period. Consistent with the Bureau's prior orders, we approve USAC's proposed 2008 average schedule local switching support formula. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule cost per loop formula proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. on August 28, 2007, for high-cost loop support IS ADOPTED, effective as of January 1, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5078A1.txt
  • of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A CC DOCKET NO. 96-115 WC DOCKET NO. 04-36 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in CC Docket No. 96-115 and WC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5082A1.txt
  • were filed, and the intervening holidays, however, we find that good cause exists to provide all parties an extension of time from December 31, 2007 to January 16, 2008 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, reply comments in this matter shall be filed on or before January 16, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions of FUTUREPHONE.COM, LLC., the National Telephone Cooperative Association and the Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance, and CTIA - the Wireless Association for Extension of Time ARE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5114A1.txt
  • a proceeding and relevant Commission precedent when initiating proceedings before the Commission. We reserve our option to refer violations of this rule for enforcement proceedings and possible sanctions, including for violations in the instant proceeding. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.801(b), the petition filed by Autotel on October 18, 2007 for the preemption of the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition of Autotel Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-600A1.txt
  • of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality CC Docket No. 96-45 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Protective Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-605A1.txt
  • Abuse Act of 1988. We find that SBI's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauseS ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Smith Bagley, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for its licensed service area on the Navajo Nation Reservation in Utah, to the extent described and subject to the conditions stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Smith Bagley, Inc. SHALL SUBMIT additional information pursuant to section 54.209 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-609A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-609A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-609A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 07-609 Released: February 8, 2007 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 06-230 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (``Bureau'') approves the application of Curtis Telephone Company (``Curtis''), Total Communications, Inc. (``Total'') and Consolidated Companies, Inc. (``CCI'') (collectively the ``Applicants'') to transfer control of Curtis and Total to CCI. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-620A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-620A1.txt
  • regulations to Verizon's provision, on an integrated basis, of in-region, interexchange services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to May 29, 2007. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-636A1.txt
  • within which to prepare responsive comments, however, we find that good cause exists to provide all parties an extension of time, from February 12, 2007 to February 19, 2007 for filing reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: February 19, 2007 All other filing procedures remain unchanged from those previously established in this proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion of the Payphone Association of Ohio for Extension of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-69A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-69A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-69A1.txt
  • ... or [have] no plausible basis for relief.'' Thus, we urge all parties to consider fully the record of a proceeding and relevant Commission precedent when initiating or participating in proceedings before the Commission. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.801(b), the petition filed by Autotel on October 20, 2006 for the preemption of the jurisdiction of the Arizona Corporation Commission IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(5). See Petition of Autotel Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-709A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-709A1.txt
  • we do not make any determination about whether to preempt any specific state decisions. As such, there is no notice requirement at issue. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 3, 4, 201-205, 251, and 252 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154, 201-205, 251, and 252, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the petition for declaratory ruling filed by Time Warner Cable in WC Docket No. 06-55 IS GRANTED to the extent described by this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-73A1.txt
  • to the parties to file reply comments, which should be informed by this reminder as to the scope of the matter presented here. Specifically, we extend the deadline for filing reply comments until January 31, 2007. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1, 1.2, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: January 31, 2007 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time of One Stop Financial, Inc., Group Discounts, Inc., 800 Discounts, Inc. and Winback &
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-927A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-927A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-927A1.txt
  • meet the requirements of section 10(a). As the Commission previously has found, extensions of time pursuant to section 10(c) of the Act involve routine and well-adjudicated procedural questions and do not address the substance of the forbearance petitions or any other novel questions. Such extensions, therefore, fall within the authority delegated to the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) pursuant to section 0.91(m) of the Commission's rules. The petition under review raises significant questions regarding whether forbearance from sections 251(g) and 254(g) and their implementing rules for all telecommunications carriers meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c) of the Act. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1026A1.txt
  • the timing of this decision, we extend that date to May 20, 2008 for PRT, Consolidated and Frontier (for its Global Valley study area). ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc., petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1029A1.txt
  • Commission's rules. If any broadcaster licensed to CNMI now or in the future switches to digital-only service on or before March 31, 2009, this waiver will no longer be effective. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the request for waiver filed by Petitioners Micronesian Telecommunications Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary PTI Pacifica, Inc., of section 54.418 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.418, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Micronesian Telecommunications Corporation Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1147A1.txt
  • Hawaiian has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the Hawaii Non-MSA area for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, the Pricing Flexibility Order, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petition filed by Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Services Qualifying For Pricing Flexibility Trunking Services Basket Metallic Voice Grade Fractional T1 (FT1) DS1 DS3 Optical Networking Service Special Access Basket Metallic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1168A1.txt
  • weeks is sufficient time for commenters to complete their reply comments. The deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Notices is extended from May 19, 2008 to June 2, 2008. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: June 2, 2008 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Acting Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1171A1.txt
  • conclude that BellSouth has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, the Pricing Flexibility Order, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petition filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Services Qualifying for Pricing Flexibility Trunking Services Basket (Includes entrance facilities, direct trunked transport, flat-rated portion of tandem-switched transport, and the optional features
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1184A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-1184 Released: May 19, 2008 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WT Docket No. 07-274 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of United Companies, Inc. (UCI) and General Communication, Inc. (GCI) to transfer control of the domestic common carrier transmission lines of UCI's subsidiaries, Unicom, Inc., United Utilities, Inc., and United-KUC, Inc., to GCI. No commenters opposed grant of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1192A1.txt
  • modify its rules regarding the composition of the USAC Board of Directors to better ensure ``the effective, efficient, and competitively neutral management of the [universal service fund].'' ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that sections 54.703(b)(1) and 54.703(c), 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.703(b)(1), (c) ARE WAIVED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1210A1.txt
  • sufficient to address any potential issues that may arise concerning the effects of the waiver on the 2008 annual filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP service offered by AT&T with respect to AT&T's 2008 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1211A1.txt
  • changes to the rates of other less competitive services, and such an outcome would not be in the public interest. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian Telcom, Inc.'s Tariff FCC No. 2, with respect to Hawaiian's 2008 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena M. Shetler Deputy Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1249A1.txt
  • agree with NECA that the average schedule formulas will not create an incentive for any average schedule company to stimulate access traffic because the formulas will operate to cap that carrier's settlements as traffic volumes increase. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 69.606(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., on December 21, 2007, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2008, and remain in effect through June 30, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1318A1.txt
  • of the Cox's revenue allocation methodology. Nor do we limit the ability of USAC or the Commission to review the allocation methodology. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that Cox Communications, Inc.'s Request for Review IS GRANTED, to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-132A1.txt
  • comment deadline in this proceeding is appropriate under the circumstances. The deadline for filing reply comments in response to the Public Notice is extended from January 18, 2008, to February 1, 2008. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Reply Comments Due: February 1, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Acting Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Comment Sought on the Petition of Osirus Communications, Inc. to Waive Certain Sections of the Commission's Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1330A1.txt
  • which it assumes responsibility under section 252(e)(5). Similarly, after the Commission assumes responsibility over a proceeding, the Commission's actions and any judicial review of those actions shall be the exclusive remedies available to the parties. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.801(b), the petition filed by Intrado on March 6, 2008 for the preemption of the jurisdiction of the Virginia State Corporation Commission IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition of Intrado Communications of Virginia Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1418A1.txt
  • and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Arkansas requests for review and waiver filed on behalf of itself and the applicants as listed in Appendices A and B ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further processing consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1514A1.txt
  • request for waiver of the 45-day revision window is warranted in this instance. We therefore reverse USAC's decision to reject Aventure's January 15, 2008, FCC Form 499-Q filing, and direct USAC to treat it as timely for purposes of adjusting Aventure's USF contribution obligations on a going-forward basis. ordering clause ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Aventure Communications Technology, LLC on March 6, 2008, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1535A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-1535 Released: June 30, 2008 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 08-77 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Western Telephone Company, Inc. (Western) and Venture Communications Cooperative, Inc. (Venture) to transfer control of Western from the current shareholders of Western to Venture. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1549A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of ) ) Petition of Windstream Kentucky East, LLC ) for Pricing Flexibility ) WCB/Pricing No. 08-17 as Specified in Section 69.627 ) of the Commission's Rules for the ) Lexington, Kentucky
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.txt
  • substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Common Line, Traffic-sensitive, and Trunking Basket access rates, terms, and conditions contained in the 2008 annual access tariffs of Puerto Rico and the Traffic-sensitive and Trunking Basket access rates, terms and conditions contained in the 2008 annual access tariffs of Consolidated are SUSPENDED for one day and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1640A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-1640 Released: July 11, 2008 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 08-83 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Blackduck Telephone Company (Blackduck) and Paul Bunyan Rural Telephone Cooperative (Paul Bunyan) to transfer control of Blackduck from the current shareholders to Paul Bunyan. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1678A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1678A1.txt
  • In this Order, we extend the temporary assignment for an additional 120 days. This extension will allow the Commission time to review recent ex parte submissions made by KBHC and SAMHSA. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151 and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 251(e), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the temporary assignment of the three toll free numbers at issue IS EXTENDED to November 14, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 251(e)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 151. SAMHSA is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-169A1.txt
  • the all-or-nothing rule in the MAG Second Further Notice. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291 that the petition for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 (b) and (c) filed by FairPoint IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of FairPoint Communications, Inc., for Waiver of Sections 61.41(b) and (c)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-177A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-177 Released: January 28, 2008 DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED Application for the Acquisition of Assets of HBC Telecom, Inc. by Hiawatha Broadband Communications, Inc. WC Docket No. 07-262 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Hiawatha Broadband Communications, Inc. (HBC) and TDS Metrocom, LLC, the successor in interest to HBC Telecom, Inc. (Telecom) (together, Applicants), requesting approval for the acquisition of assets, consummated in October 2003, of Telecom by HBC. The Bureau has
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1824A1.txt
  • universal service program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the petitions for waiver filed by Saddleback Communications, Pine Belt Cellular, Inc., and IT&E Overseas, Inc., and the petition for waiver of the 2006 annual ETC report filing deadline filed by Gila River Telecommunications, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent described herein, and that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1869A1.txt
  • deadline for filing comments and reply comments in response to the Public Notice is extended from July 31, 2008 and August 15, 2008 to August 21, 2008 and September 5, 2008, respectively. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: August 21, 2008 Reply Comments Due: September 5, 2008 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Comment Sought on a Petition Filed By Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. for Limited Designation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1890A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Savannah request for review IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further processing consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1898A1.txt
  • the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106, that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Inter-Tel, Inc. on April 23, 2007, IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order and the Civil Settlement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1943A1.txt
  • offer any other type of service, including calls that originate or terminate outside the specified areas. Thus, two-way, non-optional ELCS between the specified exchanges will be treated as intraLATA service. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of AT&T for a limited modification of LATA boundaries for the limited purpose of providing two-way, traditional, non-optional ELCS between the specific locations in Texas, as identified in WC Docket No. 08-93, IS APPROVED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tim A. Stelzig Acting Chief Competition Policy Division Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1957A1.txt
  • will later ``true-up'' with actual data. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.903(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.903(a) filed by Westgate Communications LLC d/b/a WeavTel IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 0.291(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.291(b)(1) this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1971A1.txt
  • use.'' We find, therefore, that AMTS providers are not exempt from USF contribution obligations. For the foregoing reasons, we deny the request for review. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722, that the request for review filed by Maritime Communications/Land Mobile, LLC on behalf of Waterway Communication System, LLC and Mobex Network Services, LLC IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1990A1.txt
  • loop support amounts are necessary. High-cost loop support payments to Sacred Wind for periods subsequent to December 2008 will be based on historic data in accordance with the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 36.611 and 36.612, IS GRANTED, as described herein, to Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2096A1.txt
  • application of certain of the Commission's ARMIS rules meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension for the petition is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Qwest Corporation shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to December 12, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-20A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Petition of Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. for Phase I Pricing Flexibility Pursuant to Section 69.709 of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WCB/Pricing File No. 08-01
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2119A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-2119 Released: September 19, 2008 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 08-164 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Telephone Acquisition Company, LLC (TAC) and South Slope Communications Company (South Slope) to transfer control of Swisher Telephone Company from TAC to South Slope. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2162A1.txt
  • tariff filing and pricing flexibility rules meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Wireline Competition Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension of the Petition is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which the Petition seeking forbearance filed by the Embarq Local Operating Companies shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the Petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to January 17, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2224A1.txt
  • rules for all telecommunications carriers meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c) of the Act. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Feature Group IP shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to January 21, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2231A1.txt
  • conclude that Windstream has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, the Pricing Flexibility Order, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Petition filed by Windstream Kentucky East, LLC IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Services Qualifying For Pricing Flexibility Trunking Services Basket* Voice Grade DS1 DS3 Synchronous Optical Channel Service *Includes dedicated transport services (entrance facilities,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2242A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the requests for refund of late filing fees for filers listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2307A1.txt
  • which it assumes responsibility under section 252(e)(5). Similarly, after the Commission assumes responsibility over a proceeding, the Commission's actions and any judicial review of those actions shall be the exclusive remedies available to the parties. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.801(b), the petition filed by Intrado on July 18, 2008 for the preemption of the jurisdiction of the Virginia State Corporation Commission IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition of Intrado Communications of Virginia Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2336A1.txt
  • to the procedures the petitioners have enacted in response to these late filings, we do not expect these petitioners to seek similar waivers in the future. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307, filed by Vantage Point for Advanced Communications Technology, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2337A1.txt
  • deadlines can be found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.802 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802, filed by HTC Services, Inc., IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2362A1.txt
  • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Delano Joint Union High School District, Delano, California on December 28, 2006 and the Request for Review filed by Cityroots, Inc., Bakersfield, California on March 20, 2007 ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2363A1.txt
  • integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2364A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Grand Rapids Public Schools on June 8, 2007, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2365A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Harvey Public Library District IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2366A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by Hillsboro Independent School District IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2367A1.txt
  • for review filed by Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network on December 13, 2004, IS GRANTED and Aguadilla's application is REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Universal Service Administrative Company SHALL COMPLETE its review of the remanded application and ISSUE a decision based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from release of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2368A1.txt
  • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Liberal Unified School District 480, Liberal, Kansas, on May 5, 2004, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2370A1.txt
  • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New Haven Free Public Library, New Haven Connecticut, on January 31, 2005 IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2371A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by Radford City Schools IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2372A1.txt
  • program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Tekoa Academy of Accelerated Studies, Port Arthur, Texas, on March 5, 2004, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2373A1.txt
  • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that Trenton City School District's Request for Review IS GRANTED and its application REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2374A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2374A1.txt
  • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that United Talmudical Academy's Request for Review IS GRANTED and its application REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2375A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2375A1.txt
  • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that West Branch-Rose City Area School's Request for Review IS GRANTED and its application REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2376A1.txt
  • the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for waiver of 47 C.F.R. §54.507(c) filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2377A1.txt
  • and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Adams County Public Library, West Union, Ohio; Albemarle County Public Schools, Charlottesville, Virginia; Austin School District 492, Austin, Minnesota; Onondaga-Cortland-Madison Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Syracuse, New York; Roddenberry Memorial Library, Cairo, Georgia; Stokes County School District, Danbury, North
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2378A1.txt
  • of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2379A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and or Waiver of 47 C.F.R. §54.507 filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2380A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Approach Learning and Assessment Centers on August 13, 2007, Brevard County School District on February 15, 2007, Charleston County School District on October 29, 2007, Hoboken School District on September 25, 2006, Division of Juvenile Justice California Education Authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2381A1.txt
  • 254, and sections 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 54.722(a), section 54.504(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.504(c) IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Universal Service Administrative Company SHALL COMPLETE its review of each remanded application referenced in this order and ISSUE an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2382A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and Requests for Waiver filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2383A1.txt
  • integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2384A1.txt
  • to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) the Requests for Review as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2385A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2386A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Chester Upland School District, Lake Grove - Durham School, Lower Yukon School District, and Santa Ana Unified School District ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further action consisted with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2387A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Colegio Nuestra Senora del Carmen on June 8, 2005, Long Branch Free Public Library on April 23, 2007, The Mill School on April 26, 2005, Pinon Unified School District on November 18, 2005, Thornton Township High School District 205 on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2388A1.txt
  • and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by the Hispanic Information and Telecommunications Network, Inc., Brooklyn, New York, on August 25, 2006, and Consorcio de Escuelas y Bibliotecas de Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, on August 25, 2006, and October 2, 2006, respectively, ARE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2389A1.txt
  • and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Achieve Telecom Network of MA, LLC and E-Rate Elite Services, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent described herein, and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further processing in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2517A1.txt
  • toll free numbers as public resources. On July 17, 2008, the Commission further extended its prior reassignment. In this Order, we extend the current temporary assignment for an additional six months. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151 and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 251(e), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the temporary assignment of the three toll free numbers at issue IS EXTENDED to May 14, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 251(e)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 151. SAMHSA is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2548A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-2548 Released: November 21, 2008 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 08-212 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of State Long Distance Telcom, Ltd. (SLD) and its wholly owned subsidiary, State Long Distance Telephone Company (State LD), and TDS Telecommunications Corporation (TDS Telecom) to transfer control of State LD to TDS Telecom. The Bureau finds, upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2557A1.txt
  • Bureau will take steps to help facilitate the transfer of all blocks of 10,000 numbers within relevant 900-NPA code(s) from Sprint to any qualified alternative 900 service provider that the remaining customers request. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Sprint Communications Company L.P. to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED to the extent declared herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. Sprint Application (filed May 8, 2008).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2611A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2611A1.txt
  • from application of certain of the Commission's rules meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension for the petition is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to February 24, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2631A1.txt
  • the intervening holidays, we find that good cause exists to provide all parties an extension of time from December 3, 2008 to December 22, 2008 for filing reply comments in these proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c) and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, reply comments in these proceedings shall be filed on or before December 22, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time for Reply Comments by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates and the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2649A1.txt
  • in response to comments filed by the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Cable, submitted a request to withdraw its petition. We grant Virgin Mobile's request to withdraw its petition without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1-4 and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 214, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Virgin Mobile USA, L.P.'s request to withdraw the petition for limited designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1-4 and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 214,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2664A1.txt
  • addition, if funds are not distributed or used in accordance with the 2007 RHC PP Selection Order, the Commission will recover such funds. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request filed by Holzer Consolidated Health Systems and Southern Ohio Health Care Network IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2665A1.txt
  • addition, if funds are not distributed or used in accordance with the 2007 RHC PP Selection Order, the Commission will recover such funds. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request filed by As One Together for Health and the University of Mississippi Medical Center IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2670A1.txt
  • regarding whether forbearance from applying section 214(e)(1)(A) of the Act meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act. A 90-day extension is therefore warranted under section 10(c) of the Act. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to March 5, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2682A1.txt
  • arbitration of the interconnection disputes with Verizon that were the subject of the Virginia Commission proceeding. We set forth procedures and a pleading schedule for that arbitration petition in a Public Notice released on December 9, 2008. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 51.805, 51.807 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.805, 51.807, the above-captioned proceedings are hereby consolidated. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition of Intrado Communications of Virginia Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act for Preemption of the Jurisdiction of the Virginia State Corporation Commission Regarding Arbitration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2686A1.txt
  • 2008 modification of average schedules filing and find that the methodology used to develop this year's proposed formula is the same methodology used to develop the formula we approved during the last payment period. Consistent with the Bureau's prior orders, we approve USAC's proposed 2009 average schedule local switching support formula. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule cost per loop formula proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. on August 29, 2008, for high-cost loop support IS ADOPTED, effective as of January 1, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2695A1.txt
  • penalties when these important filing deadlines are not met, as a means to ensure that FCC Forms 499-Q are timely filed. Ordering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the requests for waiver of the FCC Form 499-Q revision deadline for filers listed in the Appendix ARE DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2704A1.txt
  • New York ETC designation, and, therefore, Dobson has not and will not receive any federal high-cost support for this designated area. Therefore, AT&T is permitted to relinquish Dobson's ETC designation in New York. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the ETC designation of New York RSA 2 Cellular Partnership in the state of New York IS AMENDED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-270A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of ) ) Petition of BellSouth Telecommunications, ) WCB/Pricing No. 08-02 Inc. (BellSouth) for Pricing Flexibility ) Under § 69.727 of the Commission's ) Rules for the Specific MSAs ) I, ________________________________________________________________________
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-284A1.txt
  • their respective rate bases beginning with the date the prepayments were made. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 218, 220, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i)-(j), 201-205, 218, 220, and 403, Part 65 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Part 65, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.92 and 0.291, that the requests by Duo County Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Riviera Telephone Company, Inc., Central Texas Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Big Bend Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Brazos Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Wes-Tex Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Five Area Telephone Cooperative, Inc., North Central Telephone Cooperative, Cap Rock Telephone Cooperative, and Cumby Telephone Cooperative,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-310A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-310 Released: February 7, 2008 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 07-301 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of West Point Telephone Company, Inc. (West Point) and Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (TDS) to transfer control of West Point from the current shareholders of West Point to TDS. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-319A1.txt
  • to grant a limited waiver of section 54.504 of our rules and remand Franklin-McKinley's appeal to USAC for further processing consistent with our decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Franklin-McKinley School District IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-35A1.txt
  • the Act and the Commission's Computer Inquiry rules to Lightpath's broadband services meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which Lightpath's forbearance petition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to April 15, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-36A1.txt
  • otherwise regulating Qwest as an incumbent LEC in the Terry, Montana exchange meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which Qwest's forbearance petition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to April 21, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-37A1.txt
  • of certain of the Commission's ``cost assignment rules'' meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension for both petitions is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by AT&T Inc. shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to April 24, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-41A1.txt
  • sufficient to demonstrate the good cause required for us to grant a rule waiver. Accordingly, we deny Cedar Valley's request for waiver of the Commission's rules. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the Petition of Cedar Valley Communications, Inc. for Waiver of Sections 54.307(d), 54.314(a) and 54.904(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c)(3), IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-43A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-43 Released: January 8, 2008 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 07-282 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application to transfer control of LH Telecom, Inc. from LightEdge Solutions, Inc. to Anschutz Company. No comments were filed in opposition to grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-449A1.txt
  • program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by SEND Technologies, L.L.C., on November 20, 2006 and April 9, 2007 ARE GRANTED as they relate to Morehouse Parish School District, Richland Parish School District, Webster Parish School District, Franklin Academy, Caldwell Parish School District, Lincoln Parish School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-470A1.txt
  • a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 08-24 I have received a copy of the Protective Order in WC Docket No. 08-24. I have read the order and agree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-471A1.txt
  • of this paragraph 19 regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Second Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality WC Docket No. 08-24 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Second Protective Order in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-475A1.txt
  • of telecommunications services in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix, and Seattle MSAs meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which the petitions seeking forbearance filed by Qwest shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petitions for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to July 26, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-519A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-519A1.txt
  • to NFTC, NFTC must first pay in full any outstanding balance of high-cost support that NFTC may owe as a result of Commission true-up rules or otherwise. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, the Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that USAC SHALL DISTRIBUTE high-cost support payments to NFTC as discussed above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NFTC SHALL PAY in full the amount it owes to USAC, as discussed above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that NFTC SHALL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-567A1.txt
  • that Cincinnati Bell has satisfied its burden of demonstrating that it has met the applicable requirements for each of the various services in the MSAs for which it requests relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, the Pricing Flexibility Order, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petition filed by Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dana R. Shaffer Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY Trunking Services Basket (Includes entrance facilities, direct trunked transport, flat-rated portion of tandem-switched transport, and the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-582A1.txt
  • file reply comments without significant loss of momentum in addressing the issues, and is therefore reasonable and in the public interest. Thus, reply comments in this matter shall be filed on or before April 22, 2008. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the Motions for Extension of Time to file comments and replies in the above-captioned proceeding ARE GRANTED to the extent indicated in this Order and are otherwise DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Implementation of Section 224 of the Act; Amendment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-586A1.txt
  • an additional period until April 7, 2008. After balancing all of the relevant factors, we therefore conclude that Verizon shall be permitted to discontinue its telex service in accordance with its filed representations. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of MCI Communications Services Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services to discontinue domestic telecommunications IS GRANTED to the extent declared herein, consistent with Verizon's filed representations in this proceeding. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-674A1.txt
  • deadlines for filing comments and reply comments in response to the Notices are extended from April 3, 2008, to April 17, 2008, and from May 5, 2008, to May 19, 2008, respectively. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the pleading cycle established in this matter shall be modified as follows: Comments Due: April 17, 2008 Reply Comments Due: May 19, 2008 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeremy D. Marcus Acting Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-758A1.txt
  • and replies electronically are reminded that they are still required to serve copies in accordance with the requirements stated in this paragraph. III. ORDERING CLAUses 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i) and (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, this order IS HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, section 61.49(k)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-75A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-75 Released: January 11, 2008 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 07-275 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Capital Telecommunications, Inc. (CTI) and Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation d/b/a Metropolitan Telecommunications (MetTel) (together, Applicants) to transfer certain assets of CTI to MetTel. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-805A1.txt
  • approve SureWest's request to change its method of determining cash working capital to the standard allowance method beginning with its 2008 annual access tariff filings and for as long as it remains a Class B carrier. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 65.820(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 65.820(d), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the SureWest petition for approval to change its method of determining cash working capital IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau SureWest Telephone Petition for Approval to Change Method of Determining Cash Working Capital Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-873A1.txt
  • of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, this Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WT DOCKET NO. 06-113 I have received a copy of the Protective Order in WT Docket No. 06-113. I have read the order and agree to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-879A1.txt
  • a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 08-49 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 08-49. I have read the order and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-880A1.txt
  • of this paragraph 19 regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Second Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality WC Docket No. 08-49 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Second Protective Order in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-915A1.txt
  • This extension will allow the Commission time to review a recent ex parte submission made by KBHC regarding its financial position and its ability to support the three Suicide Prevention Hotlines. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151 and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 251(e), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the temporary assignment of the three toll free numbers at issue IS EXTENDED to July 17, 2008. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 251(e)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 151. SAMHSA is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-925A1.txt
  • public interest by advancing universal service. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(6) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d)(6), filed by the Illinois Commerce Commission, the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d), filed by Farmers Mutual Telephone Company, and the petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-93A1.txt
  • of time from January 17, 2008 to February 19, 2008 to file comments in this proceeding and an extension of time from February 6, 2008 to March 14, 2008 to file reply comments in this proceeding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, comments in this matter shall be filed on or before February 19, 2008 and reply comments shall be filed on or before March 14, 2008. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of United States Telecom Association IS GRANTED, to the extent set forth herein, and is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-942A1.txt
  • illegible FCC Form 499-Q. USAC has advised the Commission, however, that since 360networks' appeal was filed, USAC has ``revised 360networks' second quarter 2004 billings and has reversed all applicable late payment fees.'' Based on this information, we find that 360networks' concerns have been addressed and the appeal is moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by 360networks (USA) Inc. on May 3, 2005, IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.102, this Order SHALL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-975A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 08-975 Released: April 28, 2008 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 08-39 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Mosinee Telephone Company (Mosinee) and TDS Telecommunications Corporation (TDS Telecom) to transfer control from the voting trust of Mosinee to TDS Telecom. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.txt
  • Order and Authorization adopted in IB Docket No. 03-115, 18 FCC Rcd 23140, Appendix B (IB, WCB, WTB 2003). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 214, and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.51, 0.261, grant of the applications is conditioned upon Applicants' compliance with the commitment that PTI Pacifica will not raise its 1+ presubscribed wireline rates for three years from the date of this Order.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Order and Authorization adopted in IB Docket No. 03-115, 18 FCC Rcd 23140, Appendix B (IB, WCB, WTB 2003).224 72. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 214, and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, and sections 0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.§§ 0.51, 0.261, grant of the applications is conditioned upon Applicants' compliance with the commitment that PTI Pacifica will not raise its 1+ presubscribed wireline rates for three years from the date of this Order.225 73.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1072A1.txt
  • period. To avoid having such time constraints in the future, we request that the parties file any further information they wish us to consider in this matter by June 15, 2009. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151 and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 251(e), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the temporary assignment of the three toll free numbers at issue IS EXTENDED to August 14, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Acting Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 251(e)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 151. SAMHSA is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1204A1.txt
  • on NECA's filing. No comments were filed. We have reviewed NECA's filing and find that its proposed formula revisions are reasonable. NECA revised the average schedule formulas using procedures consistent with those used in previous filings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 69.606(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., on December 23, 2008, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2009, and remain in effect through June 30, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1205A1.txt
  • a pro-rated basis over a one-year period beginning with the first full month after the release of this order (i.e., beginning in June 2009). ordering clausEs ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the petition for waiver of sections 32.2000(g)(2)(ii) and 36.621 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 32.2000(g)(2)(ii) and 36.621, filed by the Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation on November 19, 2008, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1215A1.txt
  • that granting USAC a limited waiver of the draft audit report deadline set forth in section 54.717(f) of the Commission's rules is justified under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the request for waiver filed by USAC of section 54.717(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.717(f), IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1223A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit h h h ¸ h 2 h Œ DA 09-1223 Released: June 1, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-39 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of USD CLEC, Inc., Debtor-in-Possession (USD CLEC), and Warwick Valley Mobile Telephone Company d/b/a WVT Business Communications (Warwick) for authority for Warwick to acquire certain assets of USD CLEC. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1223A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12thSt., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 09-1223 Released: June 1, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-39 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of theCommission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of USD CLEC, Inc., Debtor-in- Possession (USD CLEC), and Warwick Valley Mobile Telephone Company d/b/a WVT Business Communications (Warwick) for authority for Warwick to acquire certain assets of USD CLEC.1 No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1251A1.txt
  • review. Should USAC find, based on the revised filing, that Cook would have qualified for the de minimis exception to contribution obligations, USAC is directed to cancel all associated debt attributed to Cook due to its original 1997 FCC Form 457 filing, including late fees, penalties, and interest. ordering clause ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Cook Telecom, Inc. on February 6, 2006, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K. McKee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1259A1.txt
  • sufficient to address any potential issues that may arise concerning the effects of the waiver on the 2009 annual filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP service offered by AT&T with respect to AT&T's 2009 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1260A1.txt
  • changes to the rates of other less competitive services, and such an outcome would not be in the public interest. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for Advanced Services in Hawaiian Telcom, Inc.'s Tariff FCC No. 2, with respect to Hawaiian's 2009 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1262A1.txt
  • call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). For further information about this Public Notice, please contact Stephanie Weiner at 202-418-1553. - FCC - See Procedures for Arbitrations Conducted Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 6231 (2001) (Arbitration Procedures Order); see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.805, 51.807. The Commission delegated to the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau (now the Wireline Competition Bureau), authority to serve as the Arbitrator in section 252(e)(5) arbitration proceedings, with the assistance of the staff of the Wireline Competition and Enforcement Bureaus. 47 C.F.R. § 51.807(g). See Petition of Intrado Communications of Virginia Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1288A1.txt
  • no other wire centers are affected by its ETC relinquishment in the Williamsville wire center. Virginia Cellular, therefore, is permitted to relinquish its ETC designation in the Williamsville wire center in Virginia. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(4) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(4), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the ETC designation of Virginia Cellular, LLC. IS RELINQUISHED in the Williamsville wire center in Virginia. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. IT IS FURTHER ODERED that Virginia Cellular SHALL TRANSMIT a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1296A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1296A1.txt
  • deadlines can be found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.809 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.809, filed by CENTENNIAL COMMUNICATIONS CORP., IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1308A1.txt
  • February 1, 2005. Once USAC became aware that it had improperly disbursed funds to Centennial in the area affected by the redefinition prior to that date, it acted properly within its authority to seek recovery of the improperly disbursed funds. We therefore deny Centennial's request for review. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the request for review filed by Centennial Michigan RSA 6 Cellular Group and Centennial Michigan RSA 7 Cellular Group on September 29, 2005, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1356A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ª ª ª ú ª t ª Î â DA 09-1356 Released: June 18, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-60 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Ayrshire Telecom Inc., Northwest Communications, Inc., River Valley Telecommunications Cooperative, Ter-Tel Enterprises, Inc., Lone Rock Communications Company, Webb-Dickens Telephone Corporation, and Iowa Lakes Electric Cooperative (collectively, Transferors) and Ringsted Communications Company, Inc. (Ringsted) for the transfer of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1420A1.txt
  • the next section 706 inquiry, to comment on the broadband issues pending before the Commission. We therefore do not expect to grant any further extensions with regard to the development of the Plan absent extraordinary circumstances. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), l54(j), 155(c) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the due date for filing reply comments in response to the National Broadband Plan NOI in this docket IS EXTENDED to July 21, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the NASUCA et al. Motion for Extension of Time and the CTIA et al. Motion for Extension of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1480A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1480A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-1480 Released: June 29, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-76 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Delavan Telephone Company (Delavan) and Rural Communications Holding Corporation (RCHC) to transfer control of Delavan from the current shareholders of Delavan to RCHC. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1493A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-1493 Released: July 1, 2009 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTALS ACTION TAKEN Report No. WCB/Pricing File No. 09-02 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report, as well as subsequent tariff revisions to two of the challenged tariffs. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1498A1.txt
  • the all-or-nothing rule in the MAG Second Further Notice. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Amended Petition for waiver of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41 filed by Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the order IS EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Acting Chief Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1565A1.txt
  • remedies available to the Submitting Party at law or in equity against any person using Highly Confidential Information in a manner not authorized by this protective order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that this protective order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K. McKee Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality WC Docket No. 05-337 CC Docket No. 96-45 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1567A1.txt
  • the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver of 47 C.F.R. §54.507(c) filed by Minford Local Schools IS GRANTED and its application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1667A1.txt
  • a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j) and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the First Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Acting Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT A WC DOCKET NO. 09-135 I have received a copy of the First Protective Order in WC Docket No. 09-135. I have read the order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1670A1.txt
  • this Second Protective Order. regarding retention of Stamped Highly Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Second Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Acting Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality WC Docket No. 09-135 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Second Protective Order in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1696A1.txt
  • addition, if funds are not distributed or used in accordance with the 2007 RHC PP Selection Order, the Commission will recover such funds. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-54, 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request filed by the North Carolina TeleHealth Network, Albemarle Health, Western Carolina University, and University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-170A1.txt
  • find that given the specific circumstances found here, good cause exists for a limited waiver of the Commission's discontinuance requirements, and that waiving section 63.71(c) is in the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, the application of Enhanced Communications of Northern New England Inc. d/b/a FairPoint Long Distance - NNE (in Maine and New Hampshire) and FairPoint Long Distance (in Vermont) to discontinue domestic telecommunications services IS GRANTED to the extent declared herein, consistent with FairPoint's filed representations in this proceeding.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1729A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1729A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 09-1729 Released: July 31, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-79 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of D&E Communications, Inc. (D&E) and Windstream Corporation (Windstream) to transfer control of D&E and its wholly owned subsidiaries, to Windstream. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1734A1.txt
  • public interest in funding Priority Two requests in funding year 2009, we find that good cause warrants a waiver of the second quarter deadline in this instance. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.507(a)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.507(a)(2), that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1754A1.txt
  • proceeding. This additional time will facilitate the development of a more complete record in this proceeding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, comments in this proceeding shall be filed on or before August 31, 2009 and reply comments in this proceeding shall be filed on or before September 10, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association IS GRANTED, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1782A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1782A1.txt
  • addition, if funds are not distributed or used in accordance with the 2007 RHC PP Selection Order, the Commission will recover such funds. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-54, 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request filed by the Juniata Valley Network and Pennsylvania Mountains Healthcare Alliance IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-178A1.txt
  • for Verizon's provision of telecommunications services in the state of Rhode Island meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to May 15, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1792A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1792A1.txt
  • 8bit DA 09-1792 Released: August 11, 2009 DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Certain Assets of True LD, LLC to STi Prepaid, LLC WC Docket No. 08-92 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of True LD, LLC (True LD) and STi Prepaid, LLC (STi Prepaid) (together, Applicants) requesting approval to transfer True LD's assets related to the provision of prepaid calling card services to STi Prepaid. The Bureau has determined that grant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1797A1.txt
  • lead agent, violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules and requirements. Accordingly, we affirm USAC's decision to deny payment of Petitioners' outstanding invoices and we deny Petitioners' request for review. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Lazo Technologies, Inc., Hill Professional Services, and Advanced Technology Solutions South IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1804A1.txt
  • give the full Commission sufficient time to review the record to date and to render a decision in this matter, we extend the current temporary assignment for an additional two months. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151 and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 251(e), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the temporary assignment of the three toll free numbers at issue IS EXTENDED to October 14, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 251(e)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 151. SAMHSA is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1807A1.txt
  • service contributions that TeleQuality may owe. USAC shall remit to TeleQuality any additional subsequent rural health care payments on a bi-monthly basis. ORDERING CLAUSEs ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, and 0.291, the request for waiver of section 54.611 of the Commission's rules filed by TeleQuality Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-181A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-181 Released: February 2, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 08-224 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Midcontinent Communications (Midcontinent) and BEK Communications Cooperative (BEK) to transfer certain assets from Midcontinent to BEK. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1821A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1821A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1821A1.txt
  • the ``pay and dispute'' policy; Global Crossing should therefore have paid the disputed invoices while its appeal was pending with the Commission. Ordering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the request for review and appeal of invoices filed by Global Crossing Bandwidth, Inc. are hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1822A1.txt
  • Accordingly, we deny Howe ISD's request for review and direct USAC to continue any commitment adjustment recovery actions regarding this matter. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the request for review filed by Howe Independent School District 67, Howe, Oklahoma IS DENIED and REMANDED to USAC for further processing consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1862A1.txt
  • we must ascertain whether Harbinger is properly viewed as the beneficial owner of the escrowed shares of SkyTerra Communications, and whether it has the right to vote the shares, for purposes of attributing the escrowed shares under section 310(b) of the Act. According to the Petitioners, shares of SkyTerra Communications held in escrow consist of: (1) voting shares amounting to 0.91 percent of its voting stock and 0.41 percent of its total capital stock placed in escrow (``Akin Gump Escrow Agreement'') in connection with an April 2008 transaction in which Harbinger acquired shares of SkyTerra Communications from various Apollo funds (the ``Apollo Funds Transaction''); (2) non-voting shares amounting to 7.27 percent of SkyTerra's total capital stock that were transferred to, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1862A1_Rcd.pdf
  • must ascertain whether Harbinger is properly viewed as the beneficial owner of the escrowed shares of SkyTerra Communications, and whether it has the right to vote the shares, for purposes of attributing the escrowed shares under section 310(b) of the Act.46 15. According to the Petitioners, shares of SkyTerra Communications held in escrow consist of: (1) voting shares amounting to 0.91 percent of its voting stock and 0.41 percent of its total capital stock placed in escrow ("Akin Gump Escrow Agreement") in connection with an April 2008 transaction in which Harbinger acquired shares of SkyTerra Communications from various Apollo funds47(the "Apollo Funds Transaction"); (2) non-voting shares amounting to 7.27 percent of SkyTerra's total capital stock that were transferred to, and placed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1880A1.txt
  • dismissal of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. 18. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 154(j), and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau ATTACHMENT DECLARATION In the Matter of Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling ) ) ) ) ) WC Docket No. 09-133 I, ________________________________________________________________________ ____, hereby declare
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1946A1.txt
  • halt funding to other schools using Integrity as their service provider without first taking steps to determine whether similar contractual provisions exist between those schools and Integrity. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Expedited Review filed by Integrity Communications, Ltd., on December 26, 2007, IS DENIED as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-19A1.txt
  • ESP exemption to IP-to-PSTN voice traffic meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Wireline Competition Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c) of the Act. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Embarq shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to April 11, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie Veach Deputy Chief, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2046A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-2046 Released: September 14, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-148 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of the shareholders of Ardmore Telephone Company, Inc. (Ardmore), Ardmore Communications LLC (Ardmore Communications), and Synergy Technology Partners, Inc. (Synergy) to transfer control of Ardmore from the current shareholders to Synergy. As part of this transaction, Ardmore Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2047A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-2047 Released: September 14, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-145 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Utel, Inc., the ultimate owner of Union Telephone Company (Union) and Freedom Ring Communications, LLC d/b/a Union Long Distance (Freedom Ring), and TDS Telecommunications Corporation (TDS Telecom) to transfer control of Union to TDS Telecom and to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2081A1.txt
  • filing requirements set forth in the Public Notice establishing the original pleading cycle remain in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, comments in this proceeding shall be filed on or before October 15, 2009 and reply comments shall be filed on or before November 5, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request for Extension of Time filed by NYSTA IS GRANTED, as set forth above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2082A1.txt
  • filing requirements set forth in the Public Notice establishing the initial pleading cycle remain in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, reply comments in this proceeding shall be filed on or before October 21, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Qwest Corporation IS GRANTED, as set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2083A1.txt
  • filing requirements set forth in the Public Notice establishing the initial pleading cycle remain in effect. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, reply comments in this proceeding shall be filed on or before October 21, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Bureau Chief Wireline Competition Bureau See Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Remands of Verizon 6 MSA Forbearance Order and Qwest 4 MSA Forbearance Order, WC Docket Nos.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2121A1.txt
  • it will modify its formal network disclosure to reflect this change. All of Qwest's other planned network changes under Qwest Disclosure Number 698 shall proceed as usual. Ordering CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, Qwest's petition is GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Qwest Corporation Petition for Emergency Waiver of Section 51.333(b)(2) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 09-171 (September 24, 2009) (Qwest Petition). See 47 C.F.R. § 51.333.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2125A1.txt
  • set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Stratos Government Services, Inc., Petition for Clarification or Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Sept. 15, 2009) (Petition). See Petition at 2; see also 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, and 1.2. See Petition at 3. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2150A1.txt
  • revisions filed by Centennial. Therefore, Centennial's concerns regarding inclusion of this data in the competitive ETC capped amounts for these states are moot as well. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the petition to extend the deadline for submitting changes to the March 2008 data used to cap high-cost universal service support for competitive ETCs, filed by Centennial Communications Corp., IS DISMISSED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2151A1.txt
  • the telecommunications marketplace in Puerto Rico from 2004 going forward despite the recovery of a portion of its ICLS for 2004 and 2005. ordering clausES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Centennial Communications Corp. on September 8, 2008, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2187A1.txt
  • paragraph regarding retention of Confidential Information and Highly Confidential Information and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 403, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, this Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality for Confidential Documents and Information GN Docket No. 09-51 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Protective Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2205A1.txt
  • the parties to re-file a request for preemption at that time, based on those new facts. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. § 51.801(b), and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petition filed by UTEX COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION on July 13, 2009 for the preemption of the Public Utilities Commission of Texas IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition of UTEX Communications Corporation, Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2240A1.txt
  • integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that Hazelwood's Request for Review IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2241A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Keyport School District on October 26, 2006, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2242A1.txt
  • Amy Biehl and Weld remain eligible to apply for support from the schools and libraries mechanism in future funding years. III. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for waivers filed by Amy Biehl Charter High School, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Weld Library District, Greely, Colorado, ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2243A1.txt
  • after funding year 2003, the petitioners were required to follow the specified procedures to convert their dark fiber to lit fiber services. Therefore, we deny these appeals. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Clark County School District, Letcher County School District and Tahoma School District No. 409 ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2244A1.txt
  • not define elementary education to include Head Start programs. Therefore, we affirm USAC's decision to deny E-rate program funding to Rural Alaska. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Eagle Hill School, Italian Home for Children, and Rural Alaska Community Action Program, Inc. ARE DENIED. (b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K. McKee Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2245A1.txt
  • actions. Accordingly, we deny the Request for Waiver or Review and we uphold USAC's decision to recover all funds disbursed to Exigent in E-rate funding year 2001. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver or review filed by Exigent Technologies on August 31, 2004, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2246A1.txt
  • program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Hemet Unified School District, Hemet, California, on July 23, 2008 IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2247A1.txt
  • before us, we affirm USAC's decisions that the petitioners' service providers were not telecommunications carriers, as required by program rules. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the requests for review listed in the Appendix ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K. McKee Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2248A1.txt
  • its requests for review. Therefore, we affirm USAC's decision to seek recovery of the E-rate funds disbursed to Iosco for the relevant funding requests for funding year 1999. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Iosco Regional Educational Service Agency on March 19, 2004, ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2251A1.txt
  • request for review, and that all universal service contribution collection actions be held in abeyance pending final action on Heller's request for review by the Commission. On September 4, 2009, Heller filed a request for withdrawal of its pleadings. We grant Heller's withdrawal request and, accordingly, dismiss the above-captioned pleadings. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for withdrawal submitted by Heller Information Services, Inc., filed September 4, 2009, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-22A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit h h h ¸ h 2 h Œ DA 09-22 Released: January 12, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 08-240 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Lancaster Telephone Company d/b/a Comporium (Lancaster) and Rock Hill Telephone Company d/b/a Comporium (RHTC) to transfer control of the domestic section 214 authorization held by Lancaster to RHTC. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2344A1.txt
  • Virgin Mobile ETC Designation Order after it begins receiving Lifeline support, the Commission may revoke Virgin Mobile's limited ETC designation or even assess forfeitures as permitted under the Act and the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Virgin Mobile USA, L.P.'s compliance plan submitted as a condition of its designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier eligible only for Lifeline support in its licensed service areas in New York, Virginia, North Carolina, and Tennessee IS APPROVED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2389A1.txt
  • and has been available to Internet-based TRS providers for several months, we find that neither Hamilton nor Purple has demonstrated good cause to waive this requirement. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Declaratory Ruling or Limited Waiver of the Commission's Rules filed by Sorenson Communications, Inc. on April 13, 2009, is granted to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2394A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 09-2394 Released: November 6, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-172 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Lexcom, Inc. (Lexcom) and Windstream Corporation to transfer control of Lexcom and its subsidiaries to Windstream. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will serve
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-23A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-23A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-23A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit h h h ¸ h 2 h Œ DA 09-23 Released: January 12, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 08-241 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Fort Mill Telephone Company d/b/a Comporium (Fort Mill) and Rock Hill Telephone Company d/b/a Comporium (RHTC) to transfer control of the domestic section 214 authorization held by Fort Mill to RHTC. No commenters opposed grant of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2401A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 09-2401 Released: November 9, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-174 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Miller Telephone Company (Miller) and Winnebago Cooperative Telecom Association (WCTA) to transfer control of Miller to WCTA. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2415A1.txt
  • paragraph regarding retention of Confidential Information and Highly Confidential Information and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 403, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, this Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality for Confidential Documents and Information GN Docket Nos. 09-47, 09-51, 09-137 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2450A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 09-2450 Released: November 19, 2009 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-188 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of North Holdings, Inc. (North Holdings) and Runestone Telephone Association (Runestone) to transfer control of Lowry Telephone Company, LLC from North Holdings and Runestone to Runestone alone. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2543A1.txt
  • that effectively provides the relief sought by the TDI Coalition in its Petition for Emergency Stay, that petition is dismissed as moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, 251(e), and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, 251(e), and 255, and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Emergency Stay, filed by the TDI Coalition on October 27, 2009, is dismissed as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request to Return to the Status Quo Ante, filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2548A1_Rcd.pdf
  • ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 310(d)of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 310(d), that the Petition of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. to Deny or, Alternatively, to Grant with Conditions, and the Petition to Deny of Jeffrey B.C. Moorhead ARE DENIED. 28. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority under Sections 0.51, 0.61, 0.91, 0.131, 0.204, 0.261, 0.283, 0.291, and 0.331, of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.51, 0.61, 0.91, 0.131, 204, 0.261, 0.283, 0.291, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau William T. Lake Chief Media Bureau Ruth Milkman Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Mindel De La Torre Chief International Bureau 14373 Federal Communications Commission DA 09-2548 APPENDIX A Applications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2634A1.txt
  • minimum standards regardless of the type of CPE. We extend this waiver until July 1, 2010, or until the Commission addresses pending petitions regarding CPE portability, whichever comes first. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2640A1.txt
  • 2009 modification of average schedules filing and find that the methodology used to develop this year's proposed formula is the same methodology used to develop the formula we approved during the last payment period. Consistent with the Bureau's prior orders, we approve USAC's proposed 2010 average schedule local switching support formula. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule cost per loop formula proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. on August 27, 2009, for high-cost loop support IS ADOPTED, effective as of January 1, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-430A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-430A1.txt
  • 23, 2009 and, accordingly, this new deadline will give filers almost three weeks to file their data. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the March 1, 2009 FCC Form 477 filing deadline is EXTENDED to March 16, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that sections 1.7002 and 43.01(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.7002, 43.01(d), are WAIVED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Requests for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-494A1.txt
  • discounts as an ETC and that Lifeline discounts may be obtained form one of the remaining ETCs in the area. Therefore, RCC is permitted to relinquish its ETC designation in New Hampshire. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(4) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(4), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the ETC designation of RCC Minnesota, Inc, and RCC Atlantic, Inc. IS RELINQUISHED in the state of New Hampshire. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. IT IS FURTHER ODERED that RCC SHALL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-533A1.txt
  • provision of telecommunications services in Cox's territory in the Virginia Beach MSA meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Verizon shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to June 29, 2009. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-53A1.txt
  • 1.229 Expanded basic service 68 70.8 0.919 66 70.8 0.910 Source: 2007/2008 cable price survey. Attachment 10 Other Programming Channels January 1, 2006 Sample Group Local Broadcast Stations in HD Format (1) Most Highly Subscribed Digital Tier (2) N Mean S.E. N Mean S.E. Sample groups overall 754 4.3 0.08 725 40.6 0.81 Noncompetitive Communities 434 4.3 0.08 416 41.0 0.91 Communities relieved from rate regulation 320 4.1 0.13 309 37.7 0.91 Second cable operator subgroup (overall) 108 4.6 0.22 103 38.4 1.15 Second cable operator subgroup (incumbents) 54 4.6 0.27 53 37.0 1.44 Second cable operator subgroup (rivals) 54 4.6 0.30 50 42.6 1.55 DBS subgroup 125 3.5 0.19 123 39.7 1.45 Wireless MVPD subgroup 31 5.2 0.28 31 29.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-553A1.txt
  • Reorganized Along Functional Lines, News Release (Mar. 8, 2002) available at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220644A1.pdf. RAO 21 Reconsideration Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 10067, para. 12. Nakahata Oct. 10 Letter at 2. See 47 C.F.R. § 32.17 (providing that questions involving interpretation of accounts ``shall be submitted to the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau for explanation, interpretation, or resolution''). See also 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(e) (stating that the Bureau has the power to ``develop and administer rules and policies relating to incumbent local exchange carrier accounting''); 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(e) (requiring the Bureau to ``act on requests for interpretation or waiver of rules''). Furthermore, the Commission has held that the Bureau had full authority to issue RAO 21. RAO 21 Reconsideration Order, 12 FCC Rcd.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-683A1.txt
  • and replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with the requirements stated in this paragraph. III. ORDERING CLAUSEs 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i) and (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, section 61.49(k)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-743A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-743A1.txt
  • Commission's rules on an interim basis, while we review whether this information collection is still necessary, will reduce the paperwork burden on filers without harming the public interest. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that section 43.21(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 43.21(b), IS WAIVED to the extent indicated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Julie A. Veach Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 43.21(b). The Commission requested discontinuance of OMB approval of the information collection under OMB
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-746A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-746A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 09-746 Released: April 1, 2009 DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of Corona Holdings, Inc. WC Docket No. 08-254 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Corona Holdings, Inc. to transfer control of the majority shareholder of the ultimate parent company of Corona from DB Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund, L.P. (DBZ-SOF) to ZM Private Equity Fund II, L.P. (ZM). The Bureau has determined that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-804A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules. On February 24, 2009, Twin Valley filed a request to withdraw the Application for Review. We grant Twin Valley's request for withdrawal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Twin Valley's request to withdraw its application for review IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-806A1.txt
  • section 54.418 of the Commission's rules is justified under section 1.3 of the Commission's rules. This waiver is conditioned upon TracFone adhering to the alternative DTV notification methods discussed above. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the request for conditional waiver filed by TracFone Wireless, Inc. of section 54.418 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.418, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-825A1.txt
  • D have not demonstrated that special circumstances warrant deviation from the general rule. Consistent with the Commission's Aberdeen School District Order, we therefore deny these petitioners' appeals. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that waivers of sections 54.504(b) and (c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.504(b) and (c), ARE GRANTED to the petitioners listed in Appendices A and B and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-838A1.txt
  • addition, if funds are not distributed or used in accordance with the 2007 RHC PP Selection Order, the Commission will recover such funds. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-54, 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the request filed by the Texas Healthcare Network and the Texas Health Information Network Collaborative IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-854A1.txt
  • Interim Cap Order. Thus, if GCI opts into the exception, it will receive uncapped high-cost support, i.e., the same per-line support amount ACS receives. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc., petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-855A1.txt
  • undue hardship on NECA because it has been aware of CenturyTel's request for the waivers necessary to make this conversion to price cap regulation. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the CenturyTel, Inc., petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-883A1.txt
  • to the procedures the petitioners have enacted in response to these late filings, we do not expect these petitioners to seek similar waivers in the future. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that USAC SHALL ACCEPT the line count data submitted by Grande Communications Networks, Inc. as timely filed by the September 30, 2007 deadline. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c)(2) and 54.802(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-884A1.txt
  • deadlines can be found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by LBH, L.L.C, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(a) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-885A1.txt
  • addition, due to the procedures Xfone has enacted in response to these late filings, we do not expect Xfone to seek similar waivers in the future. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.307(c) and 54.802(a), filed by Xfone USA, Inc., IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as discussed herein. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-886A1.txt
  • and deadlines can be found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.301(b), filed by ICORE, Inc. on behalf of Northeast Iowa Telephone Company IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-887A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-887A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-887A1.txt
  • deadlines can be found at http://www.usac.org/hc/tools/filing-tool/default.aspx. We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(d) and 54.314(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.307(d), 54.314(d), filed by Centennial USVI Operations Corp., IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that USAC SHALL PROVIDE high-cost universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-937A1.txt
  • described in the petition, will serve the public interest by providing access to telecommunications services to an area that was previously without such services. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Qwest Corporation, Pine Telephone Systems, Inc., and Oregon Telephone Corporation on May 4, 2006, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-992A1.txt
  • discussed above, Verizon Wireless asserts that it will have completed integration of Alltel and RCC customers by December 31, 2009. We therefore grant these waivers through that date. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that Verizon Wireless's petition for waiver of section 54.711(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.711(a) IS GRANTED, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§1.102(b), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1007A1.txt
  • that the ACS LECs have satisfied their burden of demonstrating that they have met the applicable requirements for each of the services in the MSAs for which they request relief. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.774 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, the Pricing Flexibility Order, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Petition filed by the ACS LECs IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Qualifying Services Special Access Basket Metallic Voice Grade Program Audio Video Digital Data Service DS1 DS3 DSL Synchronous Optical Channel Service Transparent LAN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1014A1.txt
  • required to fully examine whether the forbearance requested by Consumer Cellular meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act. A 90-day extension is therefore necessary under section 10(c) of the Act. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Consumer Cellular, Inc. shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to September 28, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1018A1.txt
  • the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by The Bronx Charter School for Better Learning, Bronx, New York, on December 6, 2006 and April 13, 2007, ARE GRANTED and the application is REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1019A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-54 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Illinois State Board of Education, Chicago, Illinois, IS GRANTED and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1025A1.txt
  • are filed in a timely manner. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(6) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d)(6), filed by CTC Telecom, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1026A1.txt
  • requested waivers of the study area freeze rule to permit Verizon California and Verizon South to transfer the subject areas to Frontier as described. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Verizon California Inc., Verizon South Inc., and Frontier Communications Corporation on January 20, 2010, IS GRANTED as set forth herein. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1027A1.txt
  • studies solely because of the addition of one access line. We, therefore, grant Wellman's request for waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. and Wellman Cooperative Telephone Association, Incorporated on October 16, 2009, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1050A1.txt
  • timely based upon USAC's receipt of the form and not the postmark date. Finally, we stress the need for USAC to impose late fees when these important filing deadlines are not met, as a means to ensure that FCC Forms 499-Q are timely filed. IV. Ordering Clauses 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the requests for waiver of the FCC Form 499-Q revision deadline by ComScape Telecommunications of Raleigh-Durham, Inc. and Millennium Telecom, LLC ARE DENIED. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-107A1.txt
  • to the procedures the petitioners have enacted in response to these late filings, we do not expect these petitioners to seek similar waivers in the future. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.904(d), filed by Western New Mexico Telephone Company, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1110A1.txt
  • is required to fully examine whether the forbearance requested by Conexions meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act. A 90-day extension is therefore necessary under section 10(c) of the Act. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Conexions, LLC shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to October 6, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1121A1.txt
  • funding year 2008 and future funding years. USAC shall remit to Action any subsequent rural health care payments on a monthly basis. ORDERING CLAUSEs ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291, of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, and 0.291, that the request for waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 54.611 of the Commission's rules filed by Action Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1122A1.txt
  • the company's FCC Form 499-A filings. Accordingly, we uphold USAC's decision to correct and reverse the erroneous credits applied to TMI's account. Ordering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review of the decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company filed by Telecom Management Inc., d/b/a Pioneer Telephone IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1232A1.txt
  • result of the action we take today for any time period prior to the effective date of this order. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Qwest Corporation and Iowa Telecommunications, Inc. d/b/a Iowa Telecom on December 5, 2007, IS GRANTED, as described herein. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1235A1.txt
  • type of CPE used to access their services. We extend this waiver until July 1, 2011, or until the Commission addresses pending petitions regarding CPE portability, whichever comes first. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1236A1.txt
  • the service to be discontinued. After balancing all of the relevant factors, we therefore conclude that Verizon shall be permitted to discontinue its SmartTouch long distance service on or after July 1, 2010. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Verizon Long Distance LLC to discontinue domestic telecommunications service IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. Specifically, Verizon seeks authority to discontinue the service in Arizona, California,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1237A1.txt
  • Verizon's request to discontinue service reasonable. We therefore conclude that Verizon shall be permitted to discontinue its Personal Toll-Free, Post-Paid Calling Card, and Away From Home services on or after July 1, 2010. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.71 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.71, IT IS ORDERED that the application of Verizon Long Distance LLC to discontinue domestic telecommunications service IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. Verizon asserts that it is non-dominant with respect to the services
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1252A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-1252 Released: July 1, 2010 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTALS ACTION TAKEN Report No. WCB/Pricing File No. 10-03 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1265A1.txt
  • to ensure that no waste, fraud or abuse of E-rate funds exist. In addition, we grant DRC's request to withdraw its petition for reconsideration. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Amended Petition for Order Directing Universal Service Administrative Company to Process Puerto Rico Department of Education's Funding Request for Services Provided by Data Research Corporation Under the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism for Years 2001 and 2002 filed by Data Research Corporation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1439A1.txt
  • for simple wireline and simple intermodal ports. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 251 and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i)-(j), 251, 303(r) and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 the request of CenturyLink for a waiver of the deadline for compliance with the one-business day porting requirement until February 2, 2011 IS GRANTED IN PART and otherwise IS DENIED as described above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau CenturyLink Petition for Waiver of Deadline,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1445A1.txt
  • into issues involving VRS. Accordingly, we extend the waiver regarding treatment of toll free numbers in the iTRS Directory for an additional six months. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED, and that the Commission's requirement that toll free numbers and ten-digit geographic numbers not be directed to the same URI in the iTRS Directory is waived until February 4, 2011. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1447A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1447A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1447A1.txt
  • applications, months after their original FCC Form 471 filings. In such cases, applicants must file new FCC Form 471 applications for support. Accordingly, we deny their appeals. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Beth Rivka School, Buffalo City School District, Chicago Public Schools, Dale County School District, and Edison School Consortium ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief In this order, we use the term ``appeals'' to refer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-144A1.txt
  • decision. On November 1, 2006, the Commission's Office of the Managing Director sent a letter to Equant accepting its offer of alternative relief and stating that Equant would receive a refund of $20,063.87 for overpayment of regulatory fees for fiscal year 2000. Accordingly, we dismiss as moot the above-captioned request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 0.204(b), and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 0.204(b), and 54.722(a), that the request for review or alternative relief submitted by Equant, Inc., filed June 7, 2006, IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102, that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-145A1.txt
  • reject TracFone Wireless, Inc's (TracFone) self-certification that it is in full compliance with applicable Pennsylvania 911 and enhanced 911 (E-911) obligations. On December 7, 2009, PEMA filed a request for withdrawal of its petition to reject TracFone's self-certification. We grant PEMA's withdrawal request and, accordingly, we dismiss PEMA's pending petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, that the request for withdrawal submitted by the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, filed December 7, 2009, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, that the petition to reject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1470A1.txt
  • time, there is no evidence of waste, fraud and abuse. Therefore, to the extent that Dodge County violated section 54.504(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, we find that good cause exists to waive this rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that a waiver of section 54.504(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.504(b), IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1513A1.txt
  • Forms 499 are considered filed upon their receipt at the location designated by the Commission and that filings, including revisions, can be made electronically through USAC's website. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by AT&T Inc. on June 26, 2006 IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1514A1.txt
  • of USAC decisions must be postmarked to the Commission or filed electronically in WC Docket No. 06-122 within 60 days of the issuance of the USAC decision. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for review and waiver filed by Airband Communications, Inc. on July 23, 2008 and the petition filed by Airband Communications, Inc. on July 23, 2008 ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1601A1.txt
  • Act of 1988. We find that Standing Rock's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for portions of its licensed service area on the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota and South Dakota, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. SHALL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1647A1.txt
  • the resolution of those issues result in the need for the PA to cease providing to, or reclaim numbering resources from, Level 3, the Bureau will direct the administrator accordingly. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 251(e) and section 0.91 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, Level 3's Request for Special Temporary Authorization to obtain numbering resources in numbering plan area 603 IS GRANTED, to the extent set forth herein, and otherwise IS DENIED. We direct the National Thousands-Block Pooling Administrator to assign numbering resources to Level 3 as set forth in this Order. 10. IT IS ALSO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1652A1.txt
  • of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that AWCC has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 AWCC Wireless Communications Corporation IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER in North Carolina to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AWCC Wireless Communications Corporation WILL SUBMIT additional information pursuant to sections 54.209(a) and (b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.209(a) and (b), no later
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1672A1.txt
  • consider their interests and refine their positions, and that seven weeks following the comment date is ample opportunity to convey their legal and policy arguments to the Commission and its staff, including responding to opposing arguments. Accordingly, reply comments in this proceeding will be due on October 4, 2010. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 that EEI's Motion for Extension of Time to File Comments in the above-captioned proceeding IS GRANTED IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Catherine W. Seidel Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Edison Electric Institute et al. Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments, WC Docket No. 07-245, GN Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1675A1.txt
  • Accipiter's request to add the subject territory to its existing study area, Accipiter's requested waiver of section 69.3(e)(11) is dismissed without prejudice as moot. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Accipiter Communications, Inc., and Qwest Corporation on June 20, 2006, IS DENIED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1730A1.txt
  • to its revised filing procedures. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c), filed by Syringa Wireless, LLC IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1731A1.txt
  • the administrative burden or that it would provide relief from reporting requirements to the industry as a whole. For these reasons, we deny Alexicon's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.711 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.711, that the petition of Alexicon Telecommunications Consulting IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Alexicon Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1733A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1733A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1733A1.txt
  • moot. We grant Intrado's motion to withdraw and dismiss this proceeding without prejudice. We further terminate the Commission's jurisdiction under section 252(e)(5) of the Act over the Intrado/Verizon arbitration upon release of this Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(j) and 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(j), 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 51.805, and 51.807 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.805, and 51.807, Intrado's Motion to Withdraw IS GRANTED, and this proceeding IS DISMISSED without prejudice. WC Docket No. 08-185 is closed. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 252(e)(5). See Petition of Intrado Communications of Virginia Inc., WC Docket No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1746A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1746A1.txt
  • 10-1746 Released: September 15, 2010 DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc., Debtors-In-Possession. WC Docket No. 10-41 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. (HTI) and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc. (HT Services) (together, Applicants), both debtors-in-possession before the United States Bankruptcy Court (Court), requesting approval for various assignments and transfers of control of licenses and authorizations. The Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1749A1.txt
  • of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Authority. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 403, and pursuant to authority delegated under Section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, this Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality CC Docket No. 01-92, WC Docket Nos. 05-337, 07-135, 10-90, GN Docket No. 09-51 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1783A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-1783 Released: September 20, 2010 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTAL ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 10-08 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1795A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1795A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1795A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-1795 Released: October 6, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 10-151 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Community Telephone Company, Inc. (Community) and Hilliary Communications, LLC (Hilliary) to transfer control of Community to Hilliary. Charles D. Mattingly, Jr., on behalf of PP Capital, a minority interest holder in Community, filed a comment seeking dismissal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-187A1.txt
  • deny Level 3's request for reversal of late fees, penalties and interest assessed based on its non-payment of its billed contribution assessment. Ordering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review of the decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company filed by Level 3 Communications, LLC, ICG Telecom Group, Inc., Looking Glass Networks, Inc., Looking Glass Networks of Virginia, Inc., Progress Telecom, LLC, and Wiltel Communications, LLC IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1885A1.txt
  • 866 codes. For all these reasons, we deny the Toll Free Coalition Petition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that DSMI, upon release of the 855 toll free code, shall limit the number of 855 toll free numbers each Responsible Organization may reserve to one hundred per day for the first 30 days of the 855 code opening. We also direct DSMI to notify each Responsible Organization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1917A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-1917 Released: October 6, 2010 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTALS ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 10-09 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1920A1.txt
  • timely arbitration. We remain of the opinion that the PUCT is best-suited to resolve this matter. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. § 252 and 47 C.F.R. § 51.801(b), and pursuant to the authority delegated in section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the petition filed by UTEX Communications Corporation on July 13, 2010 for the preemption of the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission of Texas IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See UTEX Communications Corporation, Renewed Petition for Preemption, WC Docket No. 09-134
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1956A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1956A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1956A1.txt
  • the Communications Act. Of course, as the Commission also previously explained, this exception to section 222 applies only to the extent disclosure of CPNI is ``required'' and therefore would not cover voluntary disclosures. ORdering Clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 222 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 222 and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.2, that this Declaratory Ruling IS ADOPTED effective immediately. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 222. CPNI is defined as ``(A) information that relates to the quantity, technical configuration, type, destination, location, and amount of use of a telecommunications service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1970A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-1970 Released: October 14, 2010 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTAL ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 10-10 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1997A1.txt
  • the amount of support based on the new schools' discounts rates, as long as the amount of funding committed is the same or lower than in the original request. 5. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the petitions of Abbeville County School District, Union County School District, and Williamsburg County School District ARE GRANTED and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order to the extent provided herein. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2005A1.txt
  • its detailed findings that form the basis for its conclusions with respect to the reclassification of any revenues associated with NetworkIP's non-contributing customers. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Enhanced Network Telecom, LLP is hereby GRANTED in part and otherwise REMANDED to USAC for further action and consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 0.204(b),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2071A1.txt
  • integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the requests for review listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2075A1.txt
  • of this paragraph regarding retention of Stamped Confidential Documents and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Authority. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 403, and pursuant to authority delegated under Section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, this Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality WC Docket No. 05-25, RM 10593 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Protective Order in the above-captioned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2095A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2095A1.txt
  • that additional time is necessary to fully examine whether the forbearance requested by Partner Communications meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act, and therefore extend the deadline by 90 days. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Partner Communications shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to March 2, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2149A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 10-2149 Released: November 5, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATIONS GRANTED WC Docket Nos. 10-201 and 10-202 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the applications of Redwood County Telephone Company (Redwood), and its wholly owned subsidiary, Redwood Long Distance Company (Redwood LD), Clements Telephone Company (Clements), and Arvig Enterprises, Inc. (Arvig) to transfer the assets of Redwood and Redwood LD to Arvig and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-214A1.pdf
  • and have a single point of contact, insofar as the requirement applies to the to-be-divested properties, until such time as the Commission acts on the pending divestiture applications. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that Verizon Wireless's request to extend its previously granted waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§1.102(b), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2169A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 10-2169 Released: November 09, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 10-195 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Villisca Farmers Telephone Company (Villisca) and The Farmers Mutual Telephone Company of Stanton, Iowa (FMTC) to transfer control of Villisca to FMTC. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2184A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 10-2184 Released: November 15, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 10-203 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for the transfer of control of diversiCom, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Melrose Telephone Company and Mainstreet Communications, LLC, from the L.H. Arvig Trust to Arvig Enterprises, Inc. No commenter opposed grant of the application. The Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2186A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-2186 Released: November 16, 2010 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTALS ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 10-11 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2215A1.txt
  • Form 471 filing window deadline for various funding years because we find that the petitioners failed to present special circumstances justifying a waiver of section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendix A ARE GRANTED and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2217A1.txt
  • the public interest to waive the Commission's rule to enable DTS to continue operating under its existing Statewide Master Contract, which provides for two one-year extensions beyond January 29, 2012. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the request for waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 54.504(b) filed by the California State Department of Technology Services IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2256A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ` 4 H DA 10-2256 Released: November 30, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 10-219 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Piedmont Telephone Membership Corporation (Piedmont) and Surry Telephone Membership Corporation (Surry) to transfer control of Piedmont as the result of a merger of Piedmont into Surry. No commenter opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2258A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 10-2258 Released: November 30, 2010 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTALS ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 10-12 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-228A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 10-228 Released: February 3, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-211 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for the transfer of control of NuVox, Inc. to Windstream Corporation. No commenter opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2299A1.txt
  • with terms of more than one year. We therefore grant the request for review and remand the underlying application to USAC for processing consistent with this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Achieve Telecom Network of MA, LLC IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2300A1.txt
  • have reviewed was November 27, 2002. Davidson's petition for reconsideration was filed with the Commission July 6, 2006. We therefore dismiss the petition for reconsideration because it is untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the petition for reconsideration filed by Davidson County Schools, Lexington, North Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Sue Whitman, Davidson County Schools, to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2301A1.txt
  • the E-rate program to comply with the Commission's rules. We continue to require E-rate applicants to submit complete and accurate information to USAC as part of the application review process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Explore Knowledge Academy Charter School, Las Vegas, Nevada; Heart and Health Academys, St. Claire Shores, Michigan; and Saint John School, Orange, New Jersey, ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2304A1.txt
  • with a 15-day opportunity to amend its funding requests to eliminate all ineligible services or provide additional documentation to USAC supporting the eligibility of the services in their funding requests. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2305A1.txt
  • Bay's appeal, our action here does not eliminate or mitigate any of our competitive bidding requirements or the obligations of participants in the E-rate program to comply with the Commission's rules. II. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), the appeal filed by Green Bay Area Public School District on May 24, 2010 IS GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2350A1.txt
  • 2010 modification of average schedules filing and find that the methodology used to develop this year's proposed formula is the same methodology used to develop the formula we approved during the last payment period. Consistent with the Bureau's prior orders, we approve USAC's proposed 2011 average schedule local switching support formula. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule cost per loop formula proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. on August 24, 2010, for high-cost loop support IS ADOPTED, effective as of January 1, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2352A1.txt
  • to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision, or because of circumstances beyond the applicants' control. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendices ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2354A1.txt
  • in the appendix and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 120 calendar days from the release date of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2370A1.txt
  • order. In addition, we also find good cause to waive section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, which establishes deadlines for affected parties to seek review of decisions issued by USAC. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and Request for Waiver ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2383A1.doc
  • December 21, 2010 DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED Domestic Section 214 Applications of FairPoint Communications, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession, and FairPoint Communications, Inc. for Transfer of Control and Assignment of Section 214 Authority WC Docket No. 10-126 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (FairPoint), Debtor-in-Possession before the United States Bankruptcy Court (Court), requesting Commission approval for various assignments and transfers of control of licenses and authorizations. The Bureau has determined that grant of this application serves the public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2424A1.txt
  • requests for review. We waive the E-rate technology plan requirements for these petitioners and remand the applications listed in the appendix to USAC for further action consistent with this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendix ARE GRANTED and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this order no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2425A1.txt
  • to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decisions, or because of circumstances beyond the applicants' control. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2433A1.txt
  • Act of 1988. We find that Virgin Mobile's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER eligible only for Lifeline support for portions of its licensed service areas in Alabama, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, and New Hampshire, to the extent described in this order and subject to the conditions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-244A1.txt
  • of the deadline for filing reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding, originally February 17, 2010, to February 24, 2010. Parties must comply with all other procedures and filing requirements announced in the Analytical Framework PN. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2017 or marvin.sacks@fcc.gov. -- FCC -- 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46. Parties Asked to Comment on Analytical Framework Necessary to Resolve Issues in the Special Access NPRM, WC Docket No. 05-25, RM 10593, Public Notice, DA 09-2388 (rel. Nov. 5, 2009) (``Analytical Framework PN''), 74 Fed. Reg. 63,702 (Dec. 4, 2009). (continued from previous page ...) (continued on next page...) PUBLIC NOTICE DA 10-244 Released: February 12, 2010 Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-248A1.txt
  • and an extension of the deadline for filing reply comments from March 5, 2010 to March 12, 2010. Parties must comply with all other procedures and filing requirements announced in the CIPA PN. For further information, please contact Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46. Comment Sought on Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding the E-rate Program and Compliance with the Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act, CC Docket No. 02-6, Public Notice, DA 10-102 (rel. Jan. 20, 2010) (``CIPA PN''). Id. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-251A1.txt
  • deadline for filing reply comments in the above-captioned proceeding from February 16, 2010 to February 23, 2010. Parties must comply with all other procedures and filing requirements announced in the Alltel Audit PN. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46. Comment Sought on Verizon/Alltel Management Trust Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company Against Alltel Corporation Concerning Audit Findings Relating to the Low-Income Program, WC Docket No. 03-109, Public Notice, DA 09-2639 (rel. Dec. 30, 2009) (``Alltel Audit PN''). Id. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-255A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of Petition of ACS of Anchorage, Inc., ACS of Alaska, Inc., and ACS of Fairbanks, Inc. for Phase II Pricing Flexibility Pursuant to Sections 69.709 and 69.711 of the Commission's Rules )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-263A1.txt
  • the Bureau may recommend that the Commission set milestones to determine whether projects are no longer capable of continuing in the Pilot Program. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-54, 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 54.623 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54. 623, IS WAIVED for the second and third funding years of the Pilot Program to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-270A1.txt
  • Provider Identification Number and Contact Information Form, OMB 3060-0824 (November 2009). Requests for Review of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Alton Community Unit School District 11, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, File Nos. SLD-518052, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6, Order, DA No. 10-999 (rel. June 2, 2010) (Alton Community Order). 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46. See Alton Community Order at paras. 10-12; Universal Service for Schools and Libraries, FCC Form 472, Billed Entity Applicant Reimbursement Form, OMB 3060- 0856, at 4 (April 2007); Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Second Report and Order, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 9202, 9216 at para. 42 (2003). Alton
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-28A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 10-28 Released: January 7, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 09-212 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Prairie Telephone Co., Inc. d/b/a Western Iowa Networks (Prairie) and Panora Communications Cooperative (PCC) to transfer a portion of Prairie's Yale, Iowa local telephone exchange to PCC. No commenter opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-306A1.txt
  • a shorter extension than the petitioners request will suffice; we therefore grant parties an extension until April 8, 2010 to file reply comments. We expect that this extension will help parties develop complete and useful replies. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), l54(j), 155(c) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the due date for filing reply comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in GN Docket No. 09-191 and WC Docket No. 07-52 IS EXTENDED to April 8, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the MPAA Motion for Extension of Time and the Entertainment Guilds
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-358A1.txt
  • whether forbearance from application of enforcement of the Commission's unjust enrichment rule meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which Denali's forbearance petition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the Petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to June 10, 2010. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Associate Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Petition for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-358A1_Rcd.pdf
  • whether forbearance from application of enforcement of the Commission's unjust enrichment rule meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). 5.Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291,7the date on which Denali's forbearance petition shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the Petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to June 10, 2010. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Associate Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 7See47 U.S.C. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-361A1.txt
  • regulatory requirements for Qwest's provision of telecommunications services in the Phoenix MSA meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Qwest shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to June 22, 2010. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marcus Maher Associate Bureau Chief Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-389A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit h h h ¸ h 2 h Œ DA 10-389 Released: March 8, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 10-15 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Global Capacity Group, Inc. (GCG), its affiliate, Global Capacity Direct, LLC f/k/a Vanco Direct USA, LLC (Vanco), and Global Telecom & Technology Americas, Inc. (GTT Americas) to transfer certain assets from GCG and Vanco to GTT Americas.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-471A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 10-471 Released: March 19, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 10-37 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of The Randall J. Raile Revocable Trust and The Kacey L. Raile Revocable Trust to transfer control of Hartman Telephone Exchanges, Inc. from The Randall J. Raile Revocable Trust to The Kacey L. Raile Revocable Trust. No commenter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-47A1.txt
  • to the Submitting Party at law or in equity against any person using Highly Confidential Information in a manner not authorized by this protective order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 5(c), and 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), 160, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, this protective order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K. McKee Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Acknowledgment of Confidentiality WC Docket No. 05-337 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing protective order in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-484A1.txt
  • examine whether the forbearance requested by i-wireless in its petition meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act. A 90-day extension is therefore necessary under section 10(c) of the Act. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by i-wireless, LLC shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to June 30, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-486A1.txt
  • Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) based on USAC's determination that the petitioners untimely submitted their respective 2006 FCC Form 499-A filings. Because USAC erred in assessing the late fees and has since provided a credit to both LTS and South Miami, we dismiss their requests as moot. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.204(b),, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a), the requests for review by LTS of Rocky Mount, LLC and South Miami Wash Bowl, Inc. ARE DISMISSED as moot. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated in section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-503A1.txt
  • NECA's filing. No comments were filed. We have reviewed the unopposed NECA filing and find that its proposed formulas are reasonable. NECA revised the average schedule formulas using procedures consistent with those used in previous filings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 69.606(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., on December 23, 2009, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2010, and remain in effect through June 30, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-505A1.txt
  • and replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with the requirements stated in this paragraph. III. ORDERING CLAUSEs 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i) and (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, this order is HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, section 61.49(k)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-51A1.txt
  • emphasize that, although we deny Allband's petition, Allband will receive high-cost loop support pursuant to sections 36.611 and 36.12 for costs incurred since commencement of its customer operations. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of sections 69.611 and 69.612 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 69.611 and 69.612, filed by Direct Communications Cedar Valley, LLC on August 29, 2006, IS DENIED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-52A1.txt
  • Company Administrative Company (USAC), in which USAC determined that NextGen should report subscriber line charges as interstate revenue subject to federal universal service fund contributions. On December 8, 2009, NextGen filed a letter requesting withdrawal of its request for review. We grant NextGen's withdrawal request and dismiss the above-captioned pleading. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for withdrawal submitted by NextGen Telephone, filed December 8, 2009, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-55A1.txt
  • the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and that the redefinition of its service area was not in the public interest. On October 20, 2009, CenturyTel filed a request for withdrawal of its application for review. We grant CenturyTel's withdrawal request and, accordingly, we dismiss CenturyTel's pending application for review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, that the request for withdrawal submitted by CenturyTel of Eagle, Inc., filed October 20, 2009, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, that the application for review submitted
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-569A1.txt
  • the Transfer of Control of Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc., Debtors-in-Possession, WC Docket No. 10-41, Public Notice, DA 10-409 (rel. March 10, 2010). Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc. Request for Extension, WC Docket No. 10-41 (filed Mar. 30, 2010), at 1-2. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 (describing bureau functions and delegated authority). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 9 : E J Œ Ž ¤ ª º " ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö ƒA·Û "ƒõ¹\Îív`` � 6› ·Û @
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-56A1.txt
  • 2003 because USAC determined that Thumb Cellular's FCC Form 507 was not timely filed. The Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) granted Thumb Cellular's appeal on November 22, 2006. Because the motion seeks a ruling on an appeal that has been granted by the Bureau, we dismiss Thumb Cellular's motion as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the motion for a ruling on appeal filed by Thumb Cellular, LLC on September 15, 2006, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer K. McKee Acting Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Motion for a Ruling on Appeal of USAC's Denial of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-582A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 10-582 Released: March 31, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 10-35 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Piedmont Communications Services, Inc. (PCS), Piedmont Telephone Membership Corporation (PTMC), and Surry Telephone Membership Corporation (STMC), for the transfer of control of PCS from PTMC to STMC. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-593A1.txt
  • At this time, we do not think that such a lengthy extension will be necessary, and so grant a second four-month extension. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, 251(e), and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, 251(e), and 255, and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order is ADOPTED, and that the Commission's requirement that toll free numbers and ten-digit geographic numbers not be directed to the same URI in the iTRS Directory is waived until August 4, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Request to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-607A1.txt
  • this extension will help parties develop complete and useful replies. We also remind interested parties of the upcoming staff workshop in this proceeding, which will take place as scheduled on April 28, 2010, in Seattle, Washington. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), l54(j), 155(c) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.46, the due date for filing reply comments in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in GN Docket No. 09-191 and WC Docket No. 07-52 IS EXTENDED to April 26, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Requests for Extension of Time filed by CTIA, the United
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-648A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-648A1.txt
  • is considered timely based upon USAC's receipt of the form and not the postmark date. Finally, we stress the need for USAC to impose penalties when these important filing deadlines are not met, as a means to ensure that FCC Forms 499-Q are timely filed. Ordering Clauses 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, and 54.722(a), the requests for waiver of the FCC Form 499-Q revision deadline for filers listed in the Appendix ARE DISMISSED as moot. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated in section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-652A1.txt
  • and the 12.9 percent contribution factor became final 14 days later, on June 26, 2009. Accordingly, the NASUCA request is moot. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and 403, and pursuant to authority in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.709 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.709, that the request filed by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates on June 9, 2009 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jennifer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-653A1.txt
  • of creamskimming, and is therefore in the public interest. We, therefore, amend U.S. Cellular's ETC designation in Tennessee to include the additional wire centers listed in the appendix of this order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the ETC designation of United States Cellular Corporation in the state of Tennessee IS AMENDED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. IT IS FURTHER ODERED that a copy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-654A1.txt
  • Telecom of Texas, L.P., (collectively, Sage Telecom) filed a petition for waiver of certain requirements related to the annual universal service contribution true-up methodology. On March 18, 2010, Sage filed a letter requesting withdrawal of its waiver petition. We grant Sage Telecom's withdrawal request and, accordingly, dismiss the above-captioned pleading. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291, that the request for withdrawal submitted by Sage Telecom, Inc. and Sage Telecom of Texas, L.P., filed March 18, 2010, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-700A1.txt
  • court. We therefore conclude that USAC properly billed Alliance during 2000 for the universal service obligations resulting from Alliance's end-user revenues. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Alliance Group Services, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 1.102(b(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-724A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-724A1.txt
  • find that USAC properly denied Tuba City's funding request. We therefore uphold USAC's decision and deny Tuba City's request for review. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a), the appeal filed by Tuba City Regional Health Care Corporation, Tuba City, Arizona, on January 23, 2006, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated in section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-727A1.txt
  • public interest, and grant NEP's request to amend its ETC designation in Pennsylvania to include the additional wire centers listed in the appendix of this order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of the 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the ETC designation of NEP Cellcorp, Inc. in Pennsylvania IS AMENDED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. IT IS FURTHER ODERED that a copy of this order SHALL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-72A1.txt
  • petition is denied. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 3, 4(i), 201-205, 251, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154(i), 201-205, 251, 303(r), and sections 1.3 and 61.26 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 61.26, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the petition for waiver by Northern Telephone & Data Corp. IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See 47 C.F.R. § 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972) (WAIT Radio). Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-746A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-746A1.txt
  • whether the forbearance requested by Head Start in its petition meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act. A 90-day extension is therefore necessary under section 10(c) of the Act. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by Head Start Telecom, Inc. shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to August 13, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-747A1.txt
  • affected areas and because SunCom does not currently serve any customers as an ETC in these states, we find that SunCom is permitted to relinquish its ETC designations in Tennessee and Virginia. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(4) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(4), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the ETC designation of Pine Belt PCS IS RELINQUISHED in the state in Alabama. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on behalf of its former affiliate Pine Belt PCS, Pine Belt Cellular SHALL TRANSMIT a copy of this order to the Alabama Public Service Commission and the Universal Service Administrative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-748A1.txt
  • and received curtailed IAS support. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by Nebraska Technology & Telecommunications, Inc., IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-749A1.txt
  • conclusion is consistent with Commission precedent. . We encourage filers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.314(d)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d)(1), filed by the Georgia Public Service Commission, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-750A1.txt
  • adhere to their revised filing procedures. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(e)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.301(e)(1), filed by Flat Rock Telephone Co-Op, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(e)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.301(e)(1), filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-751A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-751A1.txt
  • submission of the form is considered timely based upon the date on which USAC receives the form and not on the date of the postmark. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the requests for refund of late filing fees for filers listed in the Appendix IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-752A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-752A1.txt
  • transmission services within 60 days of this order, so that USAC can assure that all contributions to universal service are promptly paid. Ordering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by U.S. TelePacific Corp. is hereby GRANTED IN PART to the extent discussed herein and the Universal Service Administrative Company SHALL ACCEPT U.S. TelePacific Corp.'s re-filed 2008 FCC Form 499-A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-753A1.txt
  • Limited Purpose of Offering Lifeline Service to Qualified Households, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 23 FCC Rcd 6206 (2008) (TracFone ETC Designation Order). Because TracFone's petition does not present novel questions of fact, law, or policy that cannot be resolved under existing precedents and guidelines, the Wireline Competition Bureau has authority to act on the petition. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91(m), 0.291(a)(2). See TracFone ETC Designation Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 6207, para. 1. Id. at 6213, para. 16. 47 U.S.C. § 254(b)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 54.401(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 54.407(b)-(c). 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). Section 214(e)(2) of the Act gives state commissions the primary responsibility for performing ETC designations. 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(2). See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-767A1.txt
  • and inconsistent with the public interest. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure their filings are timely received. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.301(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.301(b), filed by Etex Telephone Cooperative IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-779A1.txt
  • appeal with USAC before coming to the Commission. Pursuant to the Commission's rules, parties may seek review of USAC decisions with either USAC or the Commission, but there is no requirement that parties first go to USAC before requesting review from the Commission. As such, we deny as moot inContact's request for waiver. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 54.720, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.720, and 54.722(a), that the request for review of the decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company filed by inContact, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, 1.3, 54.720, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-802A1.txt
  • waiver will not impose an undue hardship on NECA in developing its annual access tariff filing given the limited number of study areas involved. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 201-203, and 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-864A1.txt
  • May 14, 2010 DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Acquisition of Assets of Comtel Telcom Assets L.P. and Comtel Virginia LLC by Matrix Telecom, Inc. and Matrix Telecom of Virginia, Inc. WC Docket No. 10-82 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Federal Communication Commission's (Commission) rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Matrix Telecom, Inc. (Matrix), Matrix Telecom of Virginia, Inc. (Matrix-VA), Comtel Telcom Assets LP (Comtel), and Comtel Virginia LLC (Comtel-VA) (collectively, Applicants) requesting approval to transfer assets from Comtel and Comtel-VA to Matrix and Matrix-VA.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-870A1.txt
  • preclude competitive carriers from obtaining universal service support in the manner described by Alltel. Further, given that the universal service provisions challenged in the Arkansas Preemption Order are no longer the law in the state of Arkansas, we dismiss as moot all associated petitions filed in the above-captioned pleadings. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, that the petition for expedited declaratory ruling filed by Alltel Communications, Inc. IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, that the petitions for declaratory ruling
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-877A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 10-877 Released: May 17, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 10-17 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for the transfer of control of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. to Windstream Corporation. No commenter opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will serve the public interest, convenience,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-883A1.txt
  • the Pennsylvania PUC authority to implement mandatory pooling in the 215/267, 570, 610/484, 717, and 814 NPAs; and the Alaska Commission authority to implement mandatory pooling in the 907 NPA. ordering clauseS ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the following petitions ARE GRANTED to the extent discussed herein: Petition for Delegated Authority by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission; Mississippi Public Service Commission's Petition for Delegated Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures; Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's Petition for Delegated Authority to Implement
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-885A1.txt
  • will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and/or Waiver of 47 C.F.R. §54.507 filed by the Petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-886A1.txt
  • the integrity of the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver filed by Harvest Preparatory School on July 11, 2007, IS GRANTED and the funding requests (FRNs 1348538, 1349281, 1349304, 1349341, and 1349381) ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-887A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-887A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-887A1.txt
  • the program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and authority under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Expanets of North America, Englewood, Colorado, on December 24, 2002, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-888A1.txt
  • program and will continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under the Commission's procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Idaho Falls School District 91, Idaho Falls, Idaho on July 12, 2002, IS GRANTED and the application is REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-895A1.txt
  • public interest by, among other things, providing access to telecommunications services to areas that were previously without such services. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Dubois Telephone Exchange, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on March 12, 2008, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-896A1.txt
  • the area. Based on the totality of these circumstances, we conclude that the transfer of the Conner Creek area will serve the public interest. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Eagle Telephone System, Inc. and Midvale Telephone Exchange, Incorporated on October 29, 2008, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-897A1.txt
  • Panora's receipt of safety valve support. The timing of Panora's eligibility for safety valve support is addressed in section 54.305(d)(1) of the Commission' rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Panora Communications Cooperative and Prairie Telephone Co., Inc. on July 15, 2009, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-898A1.txt
  • respective development, will be able to provide telecommunications services more efficiently than if their services were provided to smaller geographic areas within each development. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by El Paso Telephone and Qwest Corporation on March 21, 2007, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-899A1.txt
  • area will eliminate the potential for confusion among the residents if telecommunications services to the area were to be bifurcated between two incumbent LECs. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Qwest Corporation on May 21, 2007, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-900A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-900A1.txt
  • 54.305, 54.309, 54.313, and 54.314 of the Commission's rules to the extent necessary to permit Iowa Telecom to be eligible for high-cost universal service support under the non-rural mechanism. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i) and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, the petition for waiver filed by Iowa Telecommunication Services, Inc. on May 8, 2006, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-920A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit @ @ @ � @ @ d x DA 10-920 Released: May 21, 2010 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 10-79 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for the transfer of control of RCN Corporation and its subsidiaries to Yankee Cable Acquisition, LLC and Yankee Metro Parent, Inc. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-922A1.txt
  • the tariff revisions as filed are unlawful. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), and 203(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), and 203(a), and sections 61.2 and 61.25 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.2, 61.25, and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the revisions to All American Telephone Company Tariff F.C.C. No. 3 contained in Transmittal No. 4 ARE HEREBY REJECTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 61.69 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.69, All American SHALL FILE tariff revisions on one day's notice within five
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-929A1.txt
  • are warranted in these cases. As a result, we deny the petitioners' appeals as listed in Appendices A, B, and C. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the appeals filed by petitioners as listed in Appendices A, B, and C ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-941A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-941A1.txt
  • sufficient to address any potential issues that may arise concerning the effects of the waiver on the 2010 annual filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP service offered by AT&T with respect to AT&T's 2010 annual access tariff filing requirements under section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-992A1.txt
  • of this order. In the service areas where state commission approval is still pending, the pro forma amendments shall be effective on the date that the state commission concurs with the Commission's redefinition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the petitions of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless for pro forma amendment to the eligible telecommunications carrier designations held by ALLTEL Communications, Inc. and its affiliated legal entities in Alabama Virginia, and North Carolina, and RCC Holdings, Inc. and its affiliated legal entities in Alabama, ARE GRANTED. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-999A1.txt
  • and reporting of relevant financial, management, and similar information, USAC must also comply with the DCIA, which requires the use of EFT. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in Appendices A-C ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1018A1.txt
  • 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 384.95 693.649 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 407 693.899 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to authority in) Tj 1 0 0 1 62.6 680.95 Tm 100 Tz (sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules,) Tj 1 0 0 1 390.95 681.2 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (47) Tj 1 0 0 1 405.1 681.149 Tm 104 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,) Tj 1 0 0 1 63.35 668.2 Tm 99 Tz (1.106, and 54.722\(a\), that the petitions for reconsideration filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1038A1.txt
  • is required to fully examine whether the forbearance requested by PlatinumTel meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act. A 90-day extension is therefore necessary under section 10(c) of the Act. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by PlatinumTel Communications, LLC shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to September 30, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1039A1.txt
  • Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 54.722(a), section 54.503 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.503 IS WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Ramirez Common School District on May 14, 2009, IS GRANTED and the funding requests, FRNs 1668486, 1668490, 1668503, 1668528, and 1668550, ARE REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1049A1.txt
  • to address issues raised by the D.C. Circuit's decision in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the current extension of the assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS EXTENDED to September 12, 2011. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau U.S. Department of Health and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1056A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1056A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1056A1.txt
  • from any confidential materials to seek disclosure in any separate proceedings; and (c) agree that accidental disclosure of information derived from the Data Sets shall not be deemed a waiver of the privilege. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), (j), and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 0.457(d). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William T. Lake Chief, Media Bureau ATTACHMENT A DECLARATION In the Matter of 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review - Review of the Commission's Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (MB Docket No. 09-182) I, ____________________, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1087A1.txt
  • 1 134.599 409.75 Tm 99 Tz (ACCORDiNGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 397 Tm 100 Tz (and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and 254, and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 384.549 Tm (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 371.799 Tm 99 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 54.722\(a\), that the request for review filed by the Free Public Library of Philadelphia IS) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 359.349 Tm 98 Tz (GRANTED.) Tj 1 0 0 1 108 335.799 Tm 92 Tz (24.) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1088A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1088A1.txt
  • Tf (151-154) Tj 1 0 0 1 412.55 340.399 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 431.25 340.349 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 453.6 340.349 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 327.649 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 300 327.649 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 344.6 327.649 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 314.699 Tm 100 Tz (0.91, 0.291, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 145.9 314.949 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1119A1.txt
  • under section 10\(c\) of the Act.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 107 256.35 Tm 96 Tz (4.) Tj 1 0 0 1 142.8 256.35 Tm 99 Tz (ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 243.899 Tm (of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.29 1 of the) Tj 1 0 0 1 71 231.149 Tm 101 Tz (Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance) Tj 1 0 0 1 71 218.449 Tm 99 Tz (filed by CAL Communications, Inc. shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1132A1.txt
  • carrier-customers to resolve their concerns before filing a new tariff. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), and 201(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), and 201(b), and section 61.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.2, and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the revisions to Northern Valley Communications, LLC FCC Tariff No. 3 contained in Transmittal No. 5 ARE HEREBY REJECTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 61.69 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 61.69, Northern Valley SHALL FILE tariff revisions on one day's notice within five
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1156A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 11-1156 Released: July 1, 2011 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTALS ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 11-04 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petition to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the party filing a petition against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report has not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1159A1.txt
  • type of CPE used to access their services. We extend this waiver until July 1, 2012, or until the Commission addresses pending petitions regarding CPE portability, whichever comes first. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1172A1.txt
  • Tf (15 1-154) Tj 1 0 0 1 430.05 594.75 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 448.8 595 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 470.85 594.75 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and the) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.25 582.049 Tm 101 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291,) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 569.35 Tm 100 Tz (that the petition for waiver of sections 36.392 the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 36.392, filed by the) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 556.85 Tm 99 Tz (National Telecommunications Cooperative Association on October 9, 2008, IS DENIED.) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1181A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 118.05 632 Tm 94 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 140.15 631.5 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (303\(r\), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154,) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 618.75 Tm 100 Tz (254, 303\(r\), and 403, and pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the commission's rules, 47 c.F.R. §) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 606.5 Tm (0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, this order IS ADOPTED.) Tj 1 0 0 1 285.8 558.75 Tm 99 Tz (FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION) Tj 1 0 0 1 286.3 509.8 Tm 98 Tz (Sharon Gillett) Tj 1 0 0 1 286.05 497.349
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1190A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit d d d ´ d . d ˆ œ DA 11-1190 Released: July 12, 2011 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 11-97 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the domestic section 214 application of SAVVIS, Inc. (SAVVIS) and CenturyLink, Inc. (CenturyLink) to transfer control of SAVVIS to CenturyLink. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1199A1.txt
  • was entitled to interconnection under section 251(c) of the Act for the service at issue in the arbitration. The Commission will no longer have jurisdiction over the Intrado/CenturyLink arbitration upon release of this Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 51.805, and 51.807 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 51.805, and 51.807, the parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Agreement IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the proceeding in WC Docket No. 08-33 IS TERMINATED, and the docket is closed.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1201A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 11-1201 Released: July 18, 2011 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTAL ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 11-08 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1208A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 136.3 630.799 Tm 99 Tz (ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 618.5 Tm 100 Tz (and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 605.799 Tm 101 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 593.1 Tm 99 Tz (that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendix A ARE) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 580.399 Tm (GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1223A1.txt
  • 471 application filing window deadline for funding years 2010-2011 because we find that the petitioners failed to present special circumstances justifying a waiver of section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A and B ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1239A1.txt
  • appeals because we find they submitted their appeals to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1240A1.txt
  • 1-154) Tj 1 0 0 1 432.7 544.85 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 451.65 544.85 Tm 104 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 473.75 544.6 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 532.849 Tm 110 Tz (the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.9 518.2 Tm 76 Tz (§) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.35 519.899 Tm 108 Tz (0.91, 0.29 1 and 54.722\(a\), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver by the petitioners) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 507.649 Tm 109 Tz (as listed in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1241A1.txt
  • because we find that they submitted their appeals to the Commission within a reasonable period of time after receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decisions. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by Burlington Township School District, Holy Name of Jesus, Lakewood Cheder School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1242A1.txt
  • that the parties shall comply with the Protective Order and NECA and JSI shall provide the confidential data to LB3 pursuant to its terms. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 403, and pursuant to authority delegated under Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, this Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, CC Docket No. 01-92; WC Docket Nos. 07-135, 10-90, 05-337; GN Docket No. 09-51, Protective Order, 25 FCC Rcd 13160 (WCB 2010) (Protective Order). See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1246A1.txt
  • (7.) Tj 1 0 0 1 137 647.6 Tm 99 Tz (ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4) Tj 1 0 0 1 78.45 635.1 Tm 100 Tz (and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 78.45 622.85 Tm (0.91, 0.291, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 152.599 622.85 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 197.75 622.6 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 365 620.2 Tm 86 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (§') Tj 1 0 0 1 378.2 622.149 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1257A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 11-1257 Released: July 28, 2011 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTAL ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 11-09 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1332A1.txt
  • and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from release of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendices ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1336A1.txt
  • self-certification submitted pursuant to the TracFone Forbearance Modification Order is only relevant in the context of an ETC designation proceeding. We therefore conclude that any Commission review of TracFone's self-certification is not appropriate at this time and dismiss without prejudice the petition filed by the Colorado 911 Authorities. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.204(b), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.204(b), 0.291, the request filed by the Adams County E-911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority, the Arapahoe County E-911 Emergency Communication Service Authority, and the Jefferson County Emergency Communications Authority IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Request for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1337A1.txt
  • with the high-cost mechanism. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. IV. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.904(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.904(d), filed by Cedar-Wapsie Communications, Inc., IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1347A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 11-1347 Released: August 3, 2011 DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Acquisition of Assets of IXC Holdings, Inc. by TelePacific Managed Services WC Docket No. 11-85 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Federal Communication Commission's (Commission) rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of IXC Holdings, Inc. (IXCH) and TelePacific Managed Services (TMS) (together, Applicants) to transfer assets from IXCH to TMS. The Bureau has determined that grant of this application serves the public interest, and accordingly the application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1354A1.txt
  • above, we find good cause exists to warrant a waiver of section 54.507(a)(3) of our rules to allow the unused funds to be used during FY 2011. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.507(a)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.507(a)(2), that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1366A1.txt
  • and unavoidable. We conclude that Totah has provided no evidence of special circumstances to demonstrate good cause to grant a waiver of the Commission's rules and we deny its petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 4(i) and 254(d) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 4(i), 254(d), and the authority delegated by sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722, the petition for waiver of section 36.621(a)(4) of the Commission's rules filed by Totah Communications, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Amy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1368A1.txt
  • 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.45 635.6 Tm 94 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 472.55 635.35 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 623.35 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 320.15 623.1 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 365.5 622.85 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.9 608.45 Tm 74 Tz (§) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.6 610.35 Tm 99 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1369A1.txt
  • /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 450 668.95 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 472.55 668.7 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.4 656.45 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules,) Tj 1 0 0 1 486 656.2 Tm 93 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (47) Tj 1 0 0 1 500.15 655.95 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.85 641.799 Tm 65 Tz (§) Tj 1 0 0 1 88.05 644 Tm 98 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3,)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1370A1.txt
  • Tz (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 92.4 560.399 Tm 105 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 111.8 560.2 Tm 110 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.65 547.5 Tm 109 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.15 532.799 Tm 76 Tz (§) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.6 535 Tm 108 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3,) Tj 1 0 0 1 162 535 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 210 534.799 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1371A1.txt
  • 0 1 108.45 499.949 Tm 96 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (9.) Tj 1 0 0 1 144.7 500 Tm 109 Tz (ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 487.25 Tm 110 Tz (1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91,) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.45 474.75 Tm 111 Tz (0.291, 1.3 and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722, the request) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.45 462.299 Tm 109 Tz (for review and waiver filed by IP Telcom, Inc. IS DENIED.) Tj 1 0 0 1 109.2 443.349 Tm 96 Tz (10.)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1374A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1374A1.txt
  • be routinely granted. We do not find that the circumstances presented here warrant granting an extension. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the motions for extension of time filed by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates and the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, and by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Rick Kaplan Chief, Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1374A1_Rcd.pdf
  • not be routinely granted. We do not find that the circumstances presented here warrant granting an extension. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, the motions for extension of time filed by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates and the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, and by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners are DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Rick Kaplan Chief, Wireless Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1393A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 11-1393 Released: August 12, 2011 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTAL ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 11-10 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1415A1.txt
  • However, we decline to grant the National Associations the full amount of extra time they requested. We find that an additional 31 days will provide a sufficient opportunity for parties to review and respond to comments. Accordingly, reply comments in this proceeding will be due on September 30, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 that the National Associations' Motion for Extension of Time in the above-captioned proceeding IS GRANTED IN PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau National League of Cities et al., Motion for Extension of Time, WC Docket No. 11-59 (filed Aug. 5, 2011) (Motion). Acceleration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1471A1.txt
  • of six days to file reply comments, which shall now be due on September 6, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the motions for extension of time filed by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates and the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, the Rural Telecommunications Group, and RCA - The Competitive Carriers Association are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as discussed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1476A1.txt
  • Funding Commitment Decision Letter to Maricopa County that approved the funding at issue in its appeal. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Maricopa County's request for review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed on April 9, 2009, by Maricopa County Regional School District, Phoenix, Arizona, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Eric Freed, Maricopa County Regional School District,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1477A1.txt
  • 0 0 1 127.4 314.949 Tm 109 Tz (ACCORDiNGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 302.199 Tm 110 Tz (and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 289.75 Tm 111 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 483.1 289.25 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 277.25 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (the Requests for Review filed by Cornwall-Lebanon School District, Lebanon, Pennsylvania IS) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1507A1.txt
  • did not violate a Commission rule. Therefore, we find good cause to grant the appeal and remand the underlying application to USAC for further action consistent with this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Petition for Reconsideration filed by the State of Arkansas Department of Information Systems, Little Rock, Arkansas, IS GRANTED and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1512A1.txt
  • help address issues raised by the D.C. Circuit's decision in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the current extension of the assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS EXTENDED to November 14, 2011. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau U.S. Department of Health and Human
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1525A1.txt
  • and copies of same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Authority. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 403, Section 4 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and is effective upon its adoption. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality CC Docket No. 01-92, WC Docket Nos. 05-337, 07-135, 10-90, GN Docket No. 09-51 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1553A1.txt
  • contained in sections 1-4 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 71 646.149 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 90.45 646.35 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority in) Tj 1 0 0 1 71 633.399 Tm 101 Tz (sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 620.95 Tm 99 Tz (1.106, and 54.722\(a\), that the petitions for reconsideration filed by Rockwood School District, Eureka,) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 608.2 Tm (Missouri, and Yakutat School District, Yakutat, Alaska are DISMISSED.) Tj 1 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1554A1.txt
  • /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 450 497.8 Tm 95 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 472.05 497.8 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 485.349 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 470.649 Tm 73 Tz (§) Tj 1 0 0 1 86.6 472.599 Tm 99 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722\(a\), that the request for review filed by Tulsa Technology Center on July 26,) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.7 460.149 Tm (2008, IS GRANTED.) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1575A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit j > R DA 11-1575 Released: September 19, 2011 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 11-138 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Andrew Telephone Company, Inc. (Andrew) and LaMotte Telephone Company, Incorporated (LaMotte) to transfer control of Andrew to LaMotte. No commenter opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1588A1.txt
  • 471 application filing window deadline for funding year 2011 because we find that the petitioners failed to present special circumstances justifying a waiver of section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A, B, and C ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1593A1.txt
  • Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd. 8776, 8971, para. 36 (1997) (1997 Universal Service Order) (subsequent history omitted); see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.407(a) (Lifeline support shall be provided under administrative procedures determined by the Administrator); 54.407(b) (Link Up support records for reimbursement shall be provided to the Administrator at intervals directed by the Administrator); 0.91 and 0.291 (functions and delegated authority of the Wireline Competition Bureau). 47 C.F.R. § 54.407, 54.413. 47 C.F.R. § 54.403(c). See FCC Form 497 Instructions, July 2008 Edition, at 1. For example, the disbursement made to a monthly filer in October 2011 will represent a projection for September 2011 and a true-up of the prior month or months for which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1656A1.txt
  • Inc., America Online, CDW Computer Centers, Inc., Dell Marketing, LP, Nextel Communications of Mid-Atlantic, Inc., Starpower Communications, LLC, and Infosys Services, Inc. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by SEED Charter School of Washington, D.C. on April 1, 2003, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1682A1.txt
  • 0 1 133.65 634.35 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 621.899 Tm 101 Tz (4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 609.149 Tm (0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 596.45 Tm 100 Tz (54.722\(a\), waiver of section 54.720 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.720, IS GRANTED to) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 584 Tm 99 Tz (Franklin County School District, Louisburg, North Carolina.)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1698A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 135.8 563.799 Tm 109 Tz (ACCORDiNGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 551.35 Tm 111 Tz (and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 538.35 Tm 110 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 163.65 538.6 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 209 538.6 Tm 112 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 479.25 538.6 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1699A1.txt
  • /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 466.55 694.149 Tm 93 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 488.15 694.149 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 681.399 Tm 99 Tz (pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.45 668.7 Tm 100 Tz (C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\), that the request for review filed by Coordinated Construction,) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 656 Tm 99 Tz (Inc., Los Angeles, California on June 14, 2004 IS GRANTED.) Tj 1 0 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1728A1.txt
  • 87 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (5.) Tj 1 0 0 1 143.25 676.85 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 21 4\(e\)\(4\) of the) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 664.1 Tm 98 Tz (Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S .C. § 21 4\(e\)\(4\), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 651.399 Tm 101 Tz (0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, the ETC designations of NPCR, Inc. d!b/a) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 638.7 Tm 100 Tz (Nextel Partners in the states of Alabama, Georgia, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia ARE) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 625.75 Tm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1747A1.txt
  • € ô ô ô ô ô ¸ Ü ô ô ô DA 11-1747 October 20, 2011 DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED Application for the Transfer of Control of Tel West Network Services Corporation to U.S. TelePacific Corp. WC Docket No. 11-112 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Federal Communication Commission's (Commission) rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Tel West Network Services Corporation (Tel West) and U.S. TelePacific Corp. (TelePacific) (together, Applicants) to transfer control of Tel West to TelePacific. The Bureau has determined that grant of this application serves the public interest,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1763A1.txt
  • Tz (Commission's rules.18) Tj 1 0 0 1 108 628.799 Tm 87 Tz (6.) Tj 1 0 0 1 143.75 628.35 Tm 99 Tz (ACCORDiNGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in 2 14\(e\) of the) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 615.649 Tm 100 Tz (Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214\(e\), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.25 603.149 Tm 101 Tz (the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, that the i-wireless, LLC Revised Compliance Plan) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 590.45 Tm 99 Tz (submitted as a condition of forbearance eligible only for Lifeline support in its licensed service areas IS) Tj 1 0 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1791A1.txt
  • and procedures. We also direct USAC to waive any associated invoice filing deadlines and any other procedural deadlines that were missed while these issues were on appeal with the Commission. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Covert Public School District, Covert, Michigan, IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1835A1.txt
  • 142.3 561.899 Tm 100 Tz (Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 549.149 Tm (and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and 254, and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 536.45 Tm 101 Tz (authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91,) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 523.95 Tm 99 Tz (0.291, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 119.25 523.95 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 167.5 523.95 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (that the requests for review filed by Lower Merion School
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1840A1.txt
  • authority contained in sections 1-4 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 67.9 662.45 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.35 662.2 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority in) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.15 649.95 Tm (sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 230.15 649.75 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 275.75 649.7 Tm 102 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 637 Tm 99 Tz (1.106, and 54.722\(a\), that the petition for reconsideration filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1841A1.txt
  • 0 1 72.45 679.75 Tm 97 Tz (1-4 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 108 679.75 Tm /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 127.4 679.25 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.5 666.75 Tm (delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.5 654.299 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (54.722,) Tj 1 0 0 1 107.5 654.049 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (the request for review filed by MeetingOne, Inc. IS DENIED.) Tj 1 0 0 1 108.7 635.549 Tm 87 Tz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1854A1.txt
  • Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 62.6 432.75 Tm 101 Tz (254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and the authority) Tj 1 0 0 1 62.6 420.299 Tm 100 Tz (delegated pursuant to authority in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 346.3 419.799 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 391.4 419.549 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47) Tj 1 0 0 1 62.6 407.549 Tm 98 Tz (C.F.R. § § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 202.05 407.349 Tm
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1875A1.txt
  • good cause exists to extend the current assignment until December 30, 2011. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the current assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS EXTENDED to December 30, 2011. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1886A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit d d d ´ d . d ˆ œ DA 11-1886 Released: November 14, 2011 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 11-162 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the domestic section 214 application of SJI Holdings, LLC (SJI Holdings), SJI, L.L.C. (SJI), Lafourche Telephone Company, L.L.C. (Latelco), and EATEL Acquisition, L.L.C. (EATEL) to transfer control of SJI and its subsidiary, Latelco, from SJI Holdings to EATEL. No commenters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1957A1.txt
  • and we deny its petition. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c) and §54.802(a), filed by Washington RSA No. 8 Limited Partnership; Eastern Sub-RSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Inland Cellular, IS DENIED.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1974A1.txt
  • 72 672.049 Tm 99 Tz (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 90.95 672.049 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 110.4 671.549 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and 254, and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 659.1 Tm 102 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 c.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.5 646.6 Tm 100 Tz (that waivers of section) Tj 1 0 0 1 174.7 646.35 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (54.503\(c\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 220.05 646.35 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1979A1.txt
  • disbursed under this funding request to Katy or its service provider, Phonoscope, USAC shall institute or continue recovery actions against them. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 10. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Katy Independent School District on July 23, 2009, IS DENIED. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1991A1.txt
  • to implement the guidance provided herein beginning with FCC Forms 470 or requests for proposals that are posted for Funding Year 2013. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by the Queen of Peace High School on July 19, 2010, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2027A1.txt
  • its petition for forbearance and requested that the Commission dismiss its petition without prejudice. We grant the request to dismiss the petition and do not address the merits of Telispire's forbearance request or the comments filed in opposition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.59(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.59(b), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the petition of Zefcom, LLC d/b/a Telispire PCS IS GRANTED and that the petition for forbearance filed on January 13, 2011 IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2040A1.txt
  • receiving actual notice of USAC's adverse decision, or the late-filed appeal would never have been necessary absent an error on the part of USAC. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2063A1.txt
  • limit applicable to all parties filing oppositions to petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's USF/ICC Transformation Order IS HEREBY EXTENDED to 40 pages; and the limit applicable to all parties filing replies to oppositions to petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's USF/ICC Transformation Order IS HEREBY EXTENDED to 15 pages. These actions are taken under designated authority pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.131, 0.291, 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.131, 0.291, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Rick Kaplan Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau National Exchange Carrier Association, National Telecommunications Cooperative Association, Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of Small Telecommunications Companies, and the Western Telecommunications Alliance, Joint Motion for Waiver of Page Limit,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2063A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the limit applicable to all parties filing oppositions to petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's USF/ICC Transformation OrderIS HEREBY EXTENDED to 40 pages; and the limit applicable to all parties filing replies to oppositions to petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's USF/ICC Transformation OrderIS HEREBY EXTENDED to 15 pages. 8. These actions are taken under designated authority pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.131, 0.291, 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.131, 0.291, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Rick Kaplan Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 17000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2070A1.txt
  • assignment until the Commission can review the detailed information from the parties. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the current assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS EXTENDED to February 28, 2012. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-211A1.txt
  • in the public interest. Specifically, a six-month extension will allow the Commission to consider the record in response to our iTRS Toll Free NPRM. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order IS ADOPTED, and that the Commission's requirement that toll free numbers and ten-digit geographic numbers not be directed to the same URI in the iTRS Directory is waived until August 4, 2011. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-214A1.txt
  • 8, 2011 By the Deputy Chief, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau: On November 1, 2010, Cintex Wireless, LLC (Cintex) filed the above-captioned petition for forbearance. On January 5, 2011, Cintex submitted a request to withdraw that petition. We grant the request to withdraw and dismiss the petition. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the petition of Cintex Wireless, LLC IS GRANTED and that petition IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Vickie S. Robinson Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-215A1.txt
  • a result of the action we take today for any period prior to the effective date of this order. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the joint petition for waiver of the study area boundary freeze as codified in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Company and Qwest Corporation on June 29, 2007, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-21A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 11-21 Released: January 6, 2011 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTAL ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 11-01 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-22A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 11-22 Released: January 6, 2011 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTAL ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 11-02 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-253A1.txt
  • is required to fully examine whether the forbearance requested by NTCH meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act. A 90-day extension is therefore necessary under section 10(c) of the Act. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by NTCH, Inc. shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to June 3, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-269A1.txt
  • and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Order IS ADOPTED, and that comments in this proceeding are now due on February 28, 2011, and replies are due on March 7, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • 1.10 $34.77 1.08 2008 70 $45.87 0.61 $36.27 0.75 $33.54 0.98 70 $34.34 1.25 $38.07 1.13 Second operator subgroup (rivals) 2009 70 $45.84 2.37 $19.69 2.41 $15.97 1.59 67 $40.25 4.06 $9.36 1.54 2008 70 $46.76 2.33 $20.18 2.38 $15.63 1.55 67 $30.68 2.75 $11.36 2.19 DBS subgroup 2009 207 $44.47 1.01 $33.79 0.89 $32.28 0.90 207 $23.21 0.85 $29.27 0.91 2008 207 $43.74 0.62 $31.04 0.52 $29.05 0.51 207 $22.86 0.80 $28.78 0.83 Wireless MVPD subgroup 2009 31 $54.25 0.92 $33.87 0.48 $29.16 0.52 31 $35.54 1.59 $40.56 1.31 2008 31 $53.21 0.77 $33.08 0.39 $29.11 0.50 31 $34.92 1.50 $39.82 1.24 Low penetration test subgroup 2009 34 $48.74 2.55 $43.23 2.53 $32.44 1.20 33 $16.24 2.59 $19.02 2.95 2008
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-291A1.txt
  • discount rate below 86 percent, Barberton cannot receive funding for internal connections as part of its funding year 2006 application. Accordingly, Barberton's request for review is denied. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Barberton City School District, Barberton, Ohio, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-301A1.txt
  • in the appendix and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by the Bridgeport School District, the Chester Upland School District, and the Hartford Public Schools, ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-355A1.txt
  • the toll free spare pool where they will become available on a first-come, first-served basis to any subscriber, including EPS, via a RespOrg request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Declaratory Ruling IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau Transaction Network Services, Inc., TSYS Acquiring Solutions, LLC, and Electronic Payment Systems, LLC, Regarding FCC Jurisdiction and RespOrg Responsibilities to Comply with Part 52 of the FCC's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-42A1.txt
  • Net promptly remedied the problem. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c), filed by Dixie Net Communications, Inc. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-42A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Order, 22 FCC Rcd 560 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2007) (NPCR Order) (waiving filing deadline when the filing was submitted one business day after the deadline); Benton/LinnWireless, LLC, Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c)of the Commission's Rules, et al.,, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 19212, 19220, para. 10 (Wireline Comp. Bur. 2005). 186 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-42 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. 10.ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c), filed by Dixie Net Communications, Inc. IS GRANTED. 11.ITIS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission'srules, 47 C.F.R. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.txt
  • and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that authority is delegated to the North American Numbering Council as set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 251(e) and 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 251(e), and 408, section 1.103 of the Commission's rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-486A1.txt
  • have been filed within 60 days of that date, or by July 2010. Dorial did not file the instant request for review until December 2010, well after the 60-day deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 4(i) and 254(d) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 4(i), 254(d), and the authority delegated by sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722, the request for review filed by Dorial Telecom, LLC on December 15, 2010 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-490A1.txt
  • to supplement the 470-posting process with additional efforts to seek bids, it is not free to ignore the E-rate competitive bidding rules. Therefore, we deny Challis's appeal. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Challis Joint School District #181, Challis, Idaho, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-533A1.txt
  • Although Greater Albany's appeal was filed late, the district filed the appeal as soon they received actual notice of the denial. Lincoln County's appeal was only two days late. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the Requests for Review and/or Request for Waiver filed by the petitioners as listed in the appendices ARE GRANTED and the applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-540A1.txt
  • seeks designation as such, we expect that Airvoice will notify the relevant commission of its decision here to withdraw its petition for forbearance and explain with specificity the change of circumstances that warrant any such request by Airvoice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.59(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.59(b), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the petition of Airvoice Wireless, LLC IS GRANTED and that the petition for forbearance filed on December 1, 2010 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-54A1.txt
  • plan condition that it require each of its Lifeline customers to annually self-certify that they are the head of their household and receive Lifeline-supported service only from TracFone. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 1.3, that the petition for modification filed by TracFone Wireless, Inc. IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 408, this Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon Gillett Chief Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-560A1.txt
  • to its revised filing procedures. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.802(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a), filed by F&B Communications, Inc. f/k/a Farmers' and Business Men's Telephone Company IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-561A1.txt
  • to its revised filing procedures. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c), filed by Ringsted Communications Company IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-566A1.txt
  • that Manitowoc has failed to show good cause to waive the deadline associated with the FCC Form 499-A, and accordingly we deny its requested waiver, consistent with precedent. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request filed by Manitowoc on October 1, 2010 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-569A1.txt
  • petitions and replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with the requirements stated in this paragraph. III. ORDERING CLAUSEs 13. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, this order IS HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.49(k) of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-570A1.txt
  • of the TRP that have not proved useful, and carriers need not file historical data that have been filed in previous years. V. ORDERING CLAUSE 33. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, this order IS HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Tariff Review Plans Approved by OMB 3060-0400 Expires March 31, 2012 See below for information regarding public burden estimate. NOTICE: These Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) contain summary support
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-578A1.txt
  • the E-rate program to comply with the Commission's rules. We continue to require E-rate applicants to submit complete and accurate information to USAC as part of the application review process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Little Flower School, Cincinnati, Ohio, IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-599A1.txt
  • County nor ACS has presented any special circumstances justifying a waiver of the Commission's rules. Therefore, we deny Twiggs County's and ACS's requests for review and affirm USAC's decision. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Twiggs County School District on September 13, 2004, and by American Control Systems, Inc. on November 11, 2004, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from Carol Brown,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-59A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-59A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-59A1.txt
  • of the underlying application and issue a decision based on a complete review and analysis no later than 60 calendar days from the release date of this order. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Warren Village School on March 18, 2004, IS GRANTED and the application is REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-605A1.txt
  • filing window deadline for funding years 2009 and 2010 because we find that the petitioners failed to present special circumstances justifying a waiver of section 54.507(c) of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-606A1.txt
  • waive section 54.504(c) of the Commission's rules, which requires that applications must be complete when filed, to enable these petitioners to correct any SPIN errors on their FCC Forms 471. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by Alpine Union School District, Ashland School District 5, The Lake Grove School, IVCI on behalf of The Lake Grove School, Mt. Lebanon School District, and Three Rivers Community Schools ARE GRANTED and their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-607A1.txt
  • 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. We also direct USAC to discontinue its efforts to recover funds from Southwest Plains for the telecommunications services discussed here. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by the Clare-Gladwin Regional Education Service Center and the Southwest Plains Regional Service Center, ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-656A1.txt
  • periods prior to that date. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the petition for waiver of sections 54.307(d), 54.313, and 54.314 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-672A1.txt
  • appendices A, B and C, and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from release of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that waivers of sections 54.504(b) and (c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.504(b) and (c), ARE GRANTED to the petitioners listed in Appendices A and B and their applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration consistent with this order. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-707A1.txt
  • be routinely granted. We do not find that the circumstances presented here warrant granting an extension. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 155(c), section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.46, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the motion for extension of time filed by COMPTEL is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol Mattey Deputy Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Motion for Extension of Time, WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 07-135, 05-337, 03-109; GN Docket No. 09-51; CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 03-109 (filed April 13, 2011). 47 C.F.R. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-715A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-715A1.txt
  • its request for review and waiver; and did not indicate it had served USAC with a copy of the request. We, therefore, dismiss without prejudice Alternative Phone's request as procedurally defective. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 4(i) and 254(d) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 4(i), 254(d), and the authority delegated by sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722, the request filed by Alternative Phone, Inc. on March 17, 2011, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-723A1.txt
  • to conclude that Whittier carefully considered ASA's submission. Moreover, there is no evidence of waste, fraud or abuse, or misuse of funds. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the requests for review for those petitioners listed in Appendices A and C ARE GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-737A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-737A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-737A1.txt
  • its detailed findings that form the basis for its conclusions with respect to the reclassification of any revenues associated with NetworkIP's non-contributing customers.'' Ordering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the petition for reconsideration filed by Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order on reconsideration SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-738A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-738A1.txt
  • was within the 60 day deadline established by section 54.307(d) of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, NewComm is eligible for high-cost support as of March 1, 2006. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(d), filed by NewComm Wireless Services, Inc. d/b/a MoviStar IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that USAC SHALL CONSIDER, for the purposes
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-739A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-739A1.txt
  • filings are timely received. We conclude that no carrier has demonstrated that good cause exists to grant its petition. Therefore, we deny all of the petitions. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules filed by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-740A1.txt
  • Advantage, Decatur, and Range. . We encourage carriers to use any and all methods they deem necessary to ensure that their filings are timely received. IV. ORDERING CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 214, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 214, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that this order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for waiver of section 54.307(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c), filed by Grande Communications Networks, Inc., IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the high-cost loop support filing for the first
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-747A1.txt
  • to satisfy section 54.202(a)(1)(ii) of the Commission's rules. We therefore dismiss without prejudice Worldcall's ETC petition for failure to comply with the Commission's requirements for ETC designation. Ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the petition of Worldcall Interconnect, Inc. for designation as an eligible telecommunications carrier in the state of New York IS DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-752A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-752A1.txt
  • conclude that USAC erred in directing Clear World to remit to USAC any amount of excessive line-item charges that Clear World does not refund to its customers. ordering Clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), the request for review filed by Clear World is hereby DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-80A1.txt
  • and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the toll-free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) are temporarily assigned to the Responsible Organization chosen by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a component of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, until June 1, 2011. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-811A1.txt
  • NECA's filing. No comments were filed. We have reviewed the unopposed NECA filing and find that its proposed formulas are reasonable. NECA revised the average schedule formulas using procedures consistent with those used in previous filings. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 69.606(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., on December 23, 2010, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2011, and remain in effect through June 30, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-819A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-819A1.txt
  • year extension of the five-year invoicing deadline. Participants must submit all invoices to USAC within six years of the date of their initial funding commitment letter. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-54, 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and 54.623 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.623, the June 31, 2011 funding request deadline, IS WAIVED as set forth above for the second and third funding years of the Pilot Program to the extent described herein. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-820A1.txt
  • eight days outside of the filing window. In addition, we find no evidence of waste, fraud or abuse in the record at this time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated pursuant to authority in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that sections 54.507(c) and 54.720(c) of the Commission's rules ARE WAIVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and the authority delegated pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-835A1.txt
  • believe that a waiver of section 54.503 of the Commission's rules in this instance is in the public interest and deny Juvenile Service's request for waiver. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), that the request for waiver of section 54.503 of the Commission's rules filed by the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services on January 3, 2006, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-83A1.txt
  • to complete its review of the documentation and discontinue its recovery action against Youthbuild, if so warranted, no later than 60 calendar days from the release date of this order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Youthbuild Columbus Community School IS GRANTED and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-848A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-848A1.txt
  • but it cannot gather the needed information within the time frame of its current forbearance petition.'' Given the particular circumstances surrounding NTCH's petition and its request to withdraw, we grant the request and dismiss the petition without prejudice. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.59(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.59(b), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request to withdraw the petition of NTCH, Inc. and NTCH-West Tenn, Inc. IS GRANTED and that the petition for forbearance filed on March 5, 2010 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), that this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-858A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-858A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-858A1.txt
  • Tj 1 0 0 1 109.65 562.1 Tm 87 Tz (6.) Tj 1 0 0 1 145.65 562.35 Tm 98 Tz (IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 21 4\(e\)\(4\) of the) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 549.649 Tm 100 Tz (Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 2l4\(e\)\(4\), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 536.95 Tm 101 Tz (0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, the ETC designation of Western Wireless) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 524.45 Tm 98 Tz (Corporation cl/b/a Verizon Wireless IS RELII\\TQUISHED in the state in Wyoming and on the Pine Ridge) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 511.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-859A1.txt
  • Act of 1988. We find that AT&T Mobility's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 54.722(a), AT&T Mobility LLC IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER to serve Tribal members residing on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AT&T Mobility LLC SHALL SUBMIT additional information pursuant to section 54.209 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-85A1.txt
  • is resolved expeditiously, we direct USAC to issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 60 calendar days from the release date of this order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bryan Independent School District IS GRANTED and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-864A1.txt
  • 1 0 0 1 106.8 516.75 Tm 84 Tz (8.) Tj 1 0 0 1 142.55 516.75 Tm 99 Tz (ACCORDiNGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.25 504.05 Tm 100 Tz (1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and 254, and pursuant to sections 0.91,) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 491.55 Tm 101 Tz (0.291, 1.3 and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722, the request) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 478.849 Tm 99 Tz (filed by BCG, Inc. IS DENIED.) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.8 453.399 Tm 87 Tz (9.) Tj 1 0 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-86A1.txt
  • we direct USAC to issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 60 calendar days from the release date of this order. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Bayless Intermediate School on March 28, 2006 IS GRANTED and the application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-878A1.txt
  • therefore necessary under section 10\(c\) of the Act.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 107 267.399 Tm 99 Tz (4.) Tj 1 0 0 1 143.25 266.699 Tm (ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 254.399 Tm (of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.29 1 of the) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 241.699 Tm 100 Tz (Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.29 1, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 228.75 Tm 99 Tz (filed by Cricket Communications, Inc. shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-879A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit d d d ´ d . d ˆ œ DA 11-879 Released: May 16, 2011 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 11-52 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.04, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of Great Lakes Comnet, Inc. (GLC), Clinton County Telephone Company (CCTC), Westphalia Telephone Company, Westphalia Broadband, Inc. and Westphalia Communications Incorporated to transfer control of CCTC and its subsidiaries to GLC. No commenters opposed grant of the application.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-87A1.txt
  • recalculate the amount of support based on the new schools' discounts rates, as long as the amount of funding committed is the same or lower than in the original requests. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the requests for waiver filed by the Camden City Public Schools, the School District of Greenville County, and the Lenoir County Public Schools ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications are REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with this order no later than
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-883A1.txt
  • will also decide at a later date who should manage the LNPA contract(s). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that authority is delegated to the North American Numbering Council, with assistance from the North American Portability Management LLC, as set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 251(e) and 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-88A1.txt
  • to USAC requests for omitted item 21 attachments, USAC should treat the associated applications as out of window for the purposes of meeting the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and 403, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that this report and order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.103(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.103(a), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Federal-State
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-895A1.txt
  • Tm (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 89.5 608.2 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 108.95 608 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 595.5 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 582.75 Tm (0.91, 0.291, 54.722\(a\), that the request for review filed by Cascade School District #422 on October 10,) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 570.299 Tm 98 Tz (2006, IS DENIED.) Tj 1 0 0 1 108 546.549 Tm 85 Tz (10.) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-896A1.txt
  • (and) Tj 1 0 0 1 88.3 595.75 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 108 595.25 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and 254, and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 582.75 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 297.6 582.549 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 342.95 582.299 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 569.799 Tm (0.91, 0.291, 54.722\(a\), that the requests for review filed by the Gila Bend Unified School District
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-897A1.txt
  • authority contained in sections 1-4 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 567.399 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254) Tj 1 0 0 1 89.75 567.149 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and 254, and authority delegated) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 554.45 Tm 101 Tz (under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0,291, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 541.75 Tm 99 Tz (54.722\(a\), that the Request for Review filed by Odyssey Charter School, Las Vegas, Nevada, IS) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 529.25 Tm (GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in) Tj
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-89A1.txt
  • the company will discontinue providing Lifeline service, Lifeline discounts may be obtained from another ETC. Based on these circumstances, we find it appropriate to grant Sprint Nextel's request to relinquish its designations. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(4) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(4), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the ETC designations of NPCR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners in the states of Florida and Tennessee and the ETC designations of Sprint Corporation in the states of Florida, North Carolina, and Tennessee ARE RELINQUISHED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on behalf of its affiliates, Sprint Nextel Corporation SHALL TRANSMIT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-966A1.txt
  • this waiver will not impose an undue hardship on NECA in developing its annual access tariff filing given the limited number of study areas involved. ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 201-203, and 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 201-203, 254(g), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Windstream Corporation petition for waiver IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Petition of Windstream for Limited Waiver Relief, WC Docket No. 11-36 (filed February
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-974A1.txt
  • Confidential Information shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. Authority. This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j) and 403, Section 4 of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4), and pursuant to authority delegated under section 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and is effective upon its adoption. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality WC Docket No. 11-95 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Protective Order in the above-captioned proceeding, and I understand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-97A1.txt
  • in dismissal of a party's pleadings, or censure, suspension, or disbarment of the attorneys involved, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.24, or possible referral to the relevant local bar. 17. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.61, the Protective Order IS ADOPTED, effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION _________________________________ Barbara A. Kreisman Chief, Video Division ATTACHMENT A MB DOCKET NO. 10-104 I have received a copy of the protective order in MB Docket No. 10-104 (the ``Protective Order''). I have read the Protective Order and agree
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-980A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-980A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-980A1.txt
  • of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.43, the Emergency Motion for Stay of American Electric Power Service Corporation, Duke Energy Corporation, Entergy Services, Inc., Florida Power & Light Company, Florida Public Utilities Company, Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC, Progress Energy, Inc., Southern Company, and Tampa Electric Company IS DENIED. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See generally Emergency Motion for Stay of American Electric Power Service Corporation, Duke Energy Corporation, Entergy Services, Inc., Florida Power & Light Company, Florida Public Utilities Company, Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC, Progress Energy, Inc., Southern Company, and Tampa
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-981A1.txt
  • sufficient to address any potential issues that may arise concerning the effects of the waiver on the 2011 annual filing. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, section 61.42(g) of the Commission's rules IS WAIVED for TIPToP service offered by AT&T with respect to AT&T's 2011 annual access tariff filing, required by section 61.43 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.43. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Albert M. Lewis Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-101A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 12-101 Released: January 27, 2012 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTAL ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 12-03 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1037A1.txt
  • of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Iv. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the ARC rates contained in the 2012 annual access tariffs of all issuing carriers that are charging an ARC are SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all issuing carriers charging an ARC rate MUST FILE a supplement advancing the currently
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-106A1.txt
  • a petition for declaratory ruling if it is unable to resolve its dispute with NECA. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 201-205, sections 1.43 and 1.44 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.43, 1.44, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc.'s Motion for Stay is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Motion for Stay, WC Docket No. 09-133 at 3 (filed January 25, 2012)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-11A1.txt
  • USAC will freeze LSS payments to average schedule companies at 2011 levels for the first six months of 2012 and eliminate LSS for average schedule companies effective July 1, 2012. Average schedule companies will instead recover such costs pursuant to the revised intercarrier compensation regime adopted in the USF/ICC Transformation Order. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule cost per loop formula proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. on August 30, 2011and revised on December 15, 2011 for high-cost loop support IS ADOPTED, as described herein, effective retroactively as of January 1, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-142A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Victoria S. Goldberg Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of ) ) Petition of Pacific Bell Telephone Company ) for Pricing Flexibility ) WCB/Pricing No. 12-04 under Section 69.727 of the ) Commission's Rules for the ) San Francisco/Oakland California
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-143A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Victoria S. Goldberg Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of ) ) Petition of Southwestern Bell ) Telephone Company ) for Pricing Flexibility ) WCB/Pricing File No. 12-05 under Section 69.727 of the ) Commission's Rules for the ) San
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-147A1.txt
  • Competition Bureau and the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureaus) the authority to revise and clarify rules as necessary to ensure that the reforms adopted in the Order are properly reflected in the rules. In this Order, the Bureaus act pursuant to this delegated authority to revise and clarify certain rules, and act pursuant to authority delegated to the Bureaus in sections 0.91, 0.131, 0.201(d), 0.291, and 0.331 of the Commission's rules to clarify certain rules. This Order also modifies certain initial filing deadlines required by section 54.313 of the Commission's rules as necessary to comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requirements, and finds good cause to delete certain rules that are now obsolete. The Bureaus note that petitions for reconsideration of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-150A1.txt
  • of Protective Order. This Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. 24. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Victoria S. Goldberg Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of ) ) Petition of Windstream Nebraska, Inc., ) Windstream Sugarland, Inc., ) Valor Telecommunications of Texas, LP ) d/b/a Windstream Communications Southwest ) for Pricing Flexibility ) WCB/Pricing File No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-151A1.txt
  • the 22 appeals listed in the appendix because the petitioners have failed to show special circumstances necessary for the Commission to waive the deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver by the petitioners as listed in the Appendix ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), that this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-154A1.txt
  • failure to act. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201, 202, 217, 254, 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 201, 202, 217, 254, 255 and section 1.2 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.2, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, this Declaratory Ruling in WC Docket No. 07-135 and CC Docket No. 01-92 IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Letter from the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners to Hon. Julius Genachowski, Chairman, FCC, WC Docket Nos. 10-90, 07-135, 05-337, 03-109, CC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-158A1.txt
  • it begins receiving Lifeline support, the Commission may revoke Cricket's forbearance and/or limited ETC designations, should they be granted, or assess forfeitures as permitted under the Act and the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 10 and 214(e) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 160, 214(e), and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Cricket Communications, Inc. Compliance Plan submitted as a condition of forbearance eligible only for Lifeline support in its licensed service areas IS APPROVED as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-189A1.txt
  • of the services or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions based on the denials reviewed in this order against the parties whose requests are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-193A1.txt
  • paragraph regarding retention of Protected Materials and copies of the same shall not be construed to apply to the Commission or its staff. 20.Authority.This Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i),154(j)and 403, Section 4 of the Freedom of Information Act,5U.S.C. §552(b)(4),and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.29 1 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91 and 0.291, and is effective upon its adoption. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau 8 Federal Communications Commission DA 12-193 APPENDIX A Acknowledgment of Confidentiality-WC Docket Nos. 05-337, 10-90 I hereby acknowledge that I have received and read a copy of the foregoing Second Supplemental
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-196A1.txt
  • we deny Marana's and Trillion's appeals and affirm USAC's decisions. We direct USAC to continue its recovery actions against Marana and Trillion. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Marana Unified School District as listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-200A1.txt
  • what already was requested and committed. We thus deny in part e-BI's request for waiver seeking an expansion of the pilot participants' funding commitments. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and 403, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that this order IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-21A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 12-21 Released: January 6, 2012 PROTESTED TARIFF TRANSMITTAL ACTION TAKEN WCB/Pricing File No. 12-01 Pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Pricing Policy Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau has reviewed the petitions to reject or to suspend and investigate the tariff transmittals listed in this Report. Based on this review, we conclude that the parties filing petitions against the tariff transmittals listed in this Report have not presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-240A1.txt
  • days from the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-241A1.txt
  • portion of the purchase price. We find that these 16 petitioners also did not demonstrate that good cause exists to justify a waiver of section 54.523 of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review or request for waiver filed by Fairfield County School District IS GRANTED and its underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-247A1.txt
  • process, or they did not conduct a fair and open competitive bidding process. We further find that the petitioners have not demonstrated that good cause exists to waive the requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-248A1.txt
  • as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against those parties based on the denials that are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendices ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-250A1.txt
  • our review of the record, we affirm USAC's decisions and deny these requests. We also find that petitioners have not demonstrated good cause justifying a waiver of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-259A1.txt
  • of the services or the Petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against the Petitioners for those applications listed in Appendix A from which it is seeking recovery. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the Petitioners for the applications listed in Appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-260A1.txt
  • petitioners violated the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. In addition, we find that petitioners have not demonstrated that good cause exists to justify a waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-261A1.txt
  • that good cause exists to grant a limited waiver of section 54.504(c) of our rules and remand Oakland's appeal to USAC for further processing consistent with our decision. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review and waiver filed by Oakland Unified School District IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-26A1.txt
  • an additional 28 days in which to file comments is unnecessarily long. Instead, we grant to all parties a 14-day extension of the current comment deadline, which will establish January 25, 2012 as the new comment deadline. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, the motion for extension of time filed by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners IS GRANTED in part, and otherwise IS DENIED. Also, IT IS ORDERED that the deadline to file comments in this proceeding is extended to January 25, 2012. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-278A1.txt
  • the services or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions based on the denials we reviewed in this order for those parties whose requests are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-27A1.txt
  • 592.399 Tm 111 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 450 592.149 Tm 104 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 472.05 592.149 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont1 10 Tf (and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 579.649 Tm 111 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722\(a\), the) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 566.95 Tm 110 Tz (requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A and B ARE) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 554.45 Tm (GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-28A1.txt
  • Tf (and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 449.5 706.35 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 471.8 706.35 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and pursuant to) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 693.649 Tm 99 Tz (authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.29 1, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 299 693.649 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 344.4 693.649 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the commission's rules, 47 c.F.R.) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 678.75 Tm 69 Tz (§) Tj 1 0 0 1 84.2 680.95 Tm 100 Tz (0.91, 0.291,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-291A1.txt
  • extend the current assignment so the Commission can fully review this submission. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the current assignment of toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration IS EXTENDED to April 16, 2012. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Steven A. Augustino, Counsel for KBHC, to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-298A1.txt
  • Commission delegated to the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) the authority to revise and clarify rules as necessary to ensure that the reforms adopted in the Order are properly reflected in the rules. In this Order, the Bureau acts pursuant to this delegated authority to revise and clarify certain rules, and acts pursuant to authority delegated to the Bureau in sections 0.91, 0.201(d), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules to clarify certain rules. Discussion Intercarrier Compensation In the USF/ICC Transformation Order, the Commission adopted a prospective transitional intercarrier compensation framework for VoIP-PSTN traffic. This transitional framework included default compensation rates and addressed a number of implementation issues, including explaining the scope of charges that local exchange carrier (LEC) partners of affiliated or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-29A1.txt
  • 1 107.5 287.099 Tm 101 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 15 1-154 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 448.3 286.849 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (254,) Tj 1 0 0 1 470.85 286.849 Tm /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (and sections) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 274.6 Tm 100 Tz (0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and) Tj 1 0 0 1 162.95 274.6 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\)) Tj 1 0 0 1 208.05 274.35 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and) Tj 1 0 0 1 480.95 274.149 Tm 97 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (54.722\(a\),) Tj 1 0 0 1
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • of similar format AM stations in market 0.001 (0.32) 0.001 (0.38) 0.001 (0.36) Number of similar format FM stations in market -0.001 (0.75) -0.001 (0.89) -0.001 (0.78) Number of similar format non-commercial stations in market -0.002 (0.40) -0.001 (0.26) -0.002 (0.36) Number of commercial TV stations in market -0.003 (0.27) -0.005 (0.49) -0.004 (0.37) Digital radio stations in market 0.001 (0.91) 0.001 (0.59) 0.001 (0.78) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.44) -0.000 (0.62) -0.000 (0.52) Population density of market 0.000 (0.53) 0.000 (0.50) 0.000 (0.48) Constant -0.035 (7.99)** -0.036 (8.32)** -0.035 (8.17)** * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-300A1.txt
  • recovery. Upon completion of its review of the applications listed in appendix B, USAC shall discontinue recovery actions against those applicants that provide sufficient documentation to support their discount calculation. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A and B ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-323A1.txt
  • from its receipt of the submitted invoices. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services requested or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-334A1.txt
  • calendar days from the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or NATIVE's applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review filed by Northeast Arizona Technological Institute of Vocational Education IS GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-335A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-335A1.txt
  • days from the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by Mary Queen of Martyrs and Norwalk La Mirada Unified School District ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-369A1.txt
  • eligible discount calculation for each application and deny these requests. We also find that petitioners have not demonstrated good cause justifying a waiver of section 54.505 of the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-370A1.txt
  • for each application is urban pursuant to E-rate program rules. We also find that petitioners have not demonstrated good cause justifying a waiver of section 505(b)(3) the Commission's E-rate rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A Appeals Denied on the Merits Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-372A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ð DA 12-372 Released: March 9, 2012 DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATION GRANTED Domestic Section 214 Application Filed for the Transfer of Control of Stanacard, LLC WC Docket No. 12-18 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Federal Communication Commission's (Commission) rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 63.03, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application (Application) to transfer control of Stanacard, LLC (Stanacard) from Michael Choupak (Choupak) to Anastasia Koroleva (Koroleva) (together, Applicants). The Bureau has determined that grant of this Application serves the public interest, and accordingly the Application is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-389A1.txt
  • This extension is subject to the same conditions imposed in the Puerto Rico Telephone Waiver Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the current deadline applicable to Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. for compliance with section 64.1903 or dominant carrier regulation for these services IS EXTENDED to February 16, 2013. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon E. Gillett Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau See Petition for Forbearance of the United States Telecom Association
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-403A1.txt
  • entity that will negotiate with prospective bidders.'' We thus direct USAC to continue recovery actions against the party or parties responsible for the rule violation. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the appeals listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioners Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Appeal Filed Networks and More! Inc. 229937 2001 January 3, 2007 251684 2001 319633 2002 297874
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-413A1.txt
  • the services or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions based on the denials we reviewed in this order for those parties whose requests are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-433A1.txt
  • filed after the 30-day period ``except upon leave granted upon a separate pleading for leave to file.'' Because no such separate pleading has been submitted, we dismiss the petition as untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 54.722(a), the petition for reconsideration filed by the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Letter from Nancy Seidman, Maryland Department of Juvenile Services, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-451A1.txt
  • which will establish April 20, 2012 as the new comment deadline. We extend the reply comment deadline to 15 days after the comments are due, which will establish May 7, 2012 as the new reply comment deadline. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, the Motions for Extension of Time filed by COMPTEL and the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates and the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel ARE GRANTED in part, and otherwise ARE DENIED. Also, IT IS ORDERED that the deadline to file comments in this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-460A1.txt
  • from the release date of this order. In remanding the application to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services requested or Approach Learning's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review filed by the Approach Learning and Assessment Center IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Requests
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-476A1.txt
  • the toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) to SAMHSA. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), and section 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the Joint Petition of SAMHSA and KBHC IS GRANTED and the toll free numbers 1-800-784-2433 (1-800-SUICIDE), 1-877-784-2432 (1-877-SUICIDA), and 1-888-784-2433 (1-888-SUICIDE) ARE ASSIGNED to SAMHSA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 251(e) and 408 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-482A1.txt
  • petitions and replies electronically are reminded they are still required to serve copies in accordance with the requirements stated in this paragraph. III. ORDERING CLAUSEs 14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, this order IS HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, sections 69.3(a), 51.907(b), and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-489A1.txt
  • the discount calculation consistent with this order. We direct USAC, in light of the foregoing, to take into consideration the revised discount calculation in its recovery action related to Friendship. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review filed by the petitioners listed in the Appendix A ARE DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-569A1.txt
  • days from the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-575A1.txt
  • sections of the TRP that have not proved useful, and carriers need not file historical data that have been filed in previous years. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4 (i) and (j), 201-209, of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), (j), 201-209, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, this order IS HEREBY ADOPTED as described above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.3 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, sections 69.104 and 69.152 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-596A1.txt
  • LLC and deny Nuestros Valores's request. We also find that Nuestros Valores has not demonstrated good cause justifying a waiver of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Nuestros Valores Charter School regarding equipment that was not installed in funding year 2003, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina Spade Deputy Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 54.507(d) (requiring that the implementation of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-598A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-598A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit d d d ´ d . d ˆ œ DA 12-598 Released: April 16, 2012 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 12-65 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.03 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.04, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application for the transfer of control of One World Telecom LLC. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity and,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-599A1.txt
  • Form 471 in violation of section 54.504 of the Commission's rules. We further find that Portales has not demonstrated that good cause exists to waive the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Portales Municipal School District ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 8776,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-604A1.txt
  • as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the underlying applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against those parties based on the denials that are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-605A1.txt
  • as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the underlying applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against those parties based on the denials that are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review filed by Trillion Partners, Inc. ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-629A1.txt
  • the equipment as Priority Two services for those funding years when South Bay's discount was lower than the threshold for funding Priority Two requests. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), the Petition for Waiver filed by South Bay Union School District on March 30, 2004 IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.102 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.102, this Order
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-646A1.txt
  • 07-52. Ordering CLauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201-206, 214, 218-220, 251, 254, and 303(r), and of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 201-206, 214, 218-220, 251, 254, 303(r), 1302, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.131, 0.201(d), 0.291, 0.331, 1.3, and 1.427 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.131, 0.201(d), 0.291, 0.331, 1.3, 1.427 and pursuant to the delegations of authority in paragraphs 210, 217, 226 and 1404 of USF/ICC Transformation Order, 26 FCC Rcd 17663 (2011), that this Order IS ADOPTED, effective thirty (30) days after publication of the text or summary
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-689A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-689A1.txt
  • with the exception of section 54.410(a)-(f), and except as described herein with regard to phasing in the $9.25 support amount, are effective May 1, 2012. Section 54.410(a) through (f) will be effective on June 1, 2012. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the Wireline Competition Bureau hereby WAIVES paragraph 58 of FCC 12-11 and section 54.403(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, as amended in FCC 12-11, to the extent described above. Action by the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau For further information, please contact Kimberly Scardino, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-691A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-691A1.txt
  • A from which it is seeking recovery, and from Fayetteville or Cumberland County Library, except with respect to the support for the latter's purchase of telecommunications, which USAC should recover. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in Appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-693A1.txt
  • On our own motion, we also direct USAC to extend any procedural deadlines, such as the FCC Form 486 or invoicing deadlines, that might be necessary to effectuate our ruling. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for review and waiver filed by Onslow County School District and the supplement to the request for review and waiver filed by North Carolina Office of Information Technology Services ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-708A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-708A1.txt
  • of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioner's applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Saint Raphael Academy as listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-711A1.txt
  • rules. Based on our review of the record, we deny the 10 requests because the petitioners have failed to show special circumstances necessary for the Commission to waive the deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed Alex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-716A1.txt
  • days from the release date of this order. In remanding this application to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioner's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Billings School District 2, Billings, Montana, IS GRANTED and the underlying application is REMANDED consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-720A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-720A1.txt
  • award FY 2008 support to each of the relevant health care facilities as of the beginning on the circuit acceptance (start) date. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722, that the requests for review filed by YKHC and GCI on August 23, 2010, ARE GRANTED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-72A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit d d d ´ d . d ˆ œ DA 12-72 Released: January 20, 2012 NOTICE OF NON-STREAMLINED DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION GRANTED WC Docket No. 11-198 Pursuant to section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 214, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 63.04 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 63.04, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) approves the application of HyperCube Telecom, LLC, HyperCube, LLC and Rubik Acquisition Company, LLC. No commenters opposed grant of the application. The Bureau finds, upon consideration of the record, that the proposed transfer will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-732A1.txt
  • ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against those parties listed in Appendix A-C based on our findings in this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in appendices A, B and C ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-747A1.txt
  • of this order. In remanding this application to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioner's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Birmingham City Schools on February 25, 2004 is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART and REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-749A1.txt
  • will cause no harm. For the reasons stated above, we grant USAC a limited waiver of the draft audit report deadline set forth in section 54.717(f) of the Commission's rules. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the request for waiver filed by USAC of section 54.717(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.717(f), IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-753A1.txt
  • the services or the petitioners' applications. We direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions based on the denials we reviewed in this order for those parties whose requests are addressed herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-754A1.txt
  • complete its review and issue an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request filed by Diversified Computer Solutions, Inc. on December 24, 2002 IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-771A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-771A1.txt
  • submitted invoices related to the Florence, Marlboro and Orangeburg school districts were funded. Therefore, we dismiss the appeals Diversified filed on behalf of Fairfield, Florence, Marlboro and Orangeburg as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Diversified Computer Solutions, Inc., Columbia, South Carolina, on behalf of Fairfield County School District, Florence County School District 3, Marlboro County School District and Orangeburg County School District 3, on April 22, 2002 and on March 14, 2002, ARE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-796A1.txt
  • USAC for further action consistent with this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in Appendices A and B ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-797A1.txt
  • eligible for E-rate support. Based on our review of the record, we find that the five petitioners failed to show that the entities denied funding are eligible for E-rate support. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the Appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-812A1.txt
  • make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioner's application. At this time, there is no evidence of waste, fraud or abuse in the record. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Sprint Nextel Corporation, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-844A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-844A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-844A1.txt
  • questions regarding whether forbearance from the application of section 652(b) or 652(d)(6)(B) meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a). The Bureau thus finds that a 90-day extension is warranted under section 10(c). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by the National Cable & Telecommunications Association shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, is extended to September 19, 2012. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-84A1.txt
  • from its receipt of the submitted invoices. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services requested or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Gina M. Spade Deputy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-855A1.txt
  • days from its receipt of the submitted documentation. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review and for waiver and review filed by the petitioners listed in Appendix A ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications listed in Appendices A and B ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-85A1.txt
  • make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or of Loneman's application. At this time, there is no evidence of waste, fraud and abuse in the record. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the request for review or waiver filed by Loneman Day School, Ogala, South Dakota, IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-863A1.txt
  • their state statutes and are not required to use the eligibility criteria for the Lifeline program provided for in section 54.409(a) and (b) of the Commission's rules until April 1, 2013. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that the request for waiver filed by USTelecom are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.txt
  • reforms. B. Legal Basis The legal basis for any action that may be taken pursuant to the Public Notice is contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 256, 303(r), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 201-205, 214, 218-220, 251, 252, 254, 256, 303(r), and 403, and sections 0.91, 0l.201(d), 0.291, 1.3 and 1.427 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0l.201(d), 0.291, 1.3 and 1.4271. C. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be affected by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-86A1.txt
  • process. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the requests for review listed in appendix A ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated under
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-870A1.txt
  • to the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) the authority to revise and clarify rules as necessary to ensure that the reforms adopted in the USF/ICC Transformation Order are properly reflected in the rules. In this Order, the Bureau acts pursuant to this delegated authority to revise and clarify certain rules, and acts pursuant to authority delegated to the Bureau in sections 0.91, 0.201(d), and 0.291 of the Commission's rules to clarify certain rules. Below, the Bureau clarifies several intercarrier compensation issues relating to the transition of intrastate switched access rates and operation of the transitional recovery mechanism adopted in the USF/ICC Transformation Order. The Bureau also grants limited waivers of the Commission's rules to address administrative concerns and rule inconsistencies. DISCUSSION In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-894A1.txt
  • days from the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), the requests for review or requests for waiver listed in the appendix ARE GRANTED and those applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-895A1.txt
  • 471 application. We direct USAC to continue its recovery actions against Milburn and its service provider, Lewis, for FRNs 1274644, 1274673, 1387671, 1387637, and 1387642 to the extent provided herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Milburn Public Schools on June 24, 2010 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART to the extent provided herein, and the underlying funding request numbers 1274660 and 1274682 ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-914A1.txt
  • in erroneously disbursed funds. Consistent with this order, we direct USAC to issue a revised COMAD letter to Kearney within 60 calendar days from the release date of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Kearney Public Schools, Kearney, Nebraska, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-915A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-915A1.txt
  • rules. We therefore direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against Marconi and to instead seek recovery against HCS, if it is feasible to do so. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the request for waiver filed by Marconi Communications, Inc., on December 14, 2004 IS GRANTED and the underlying application IS REMANDED to USAC for further action consistent with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-918A1.txt
  • the contract. Tying the waiver to the duration of the contract with RLSA will ensure an appropriate limitation on the duration of the waiver. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that section 64.613(a)(4) of the Commission's rules is WAIVED as provided herein. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau . FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kris Anne Monteith Acting Chief Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Sharon E. Gillett Chief Wireline Competition Bureau 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-919A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-919A1.txt
  • from the average schedule baseline revenue requirement in its 2012 switched access rates, and that such revised rates will become the new cap on its switched access rates under section 51.909 (a) of the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 69.606(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b), and pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., on May 25, 2012, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE July 1, 2012, and remain in effect through June 30, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the interim 2011 average schedule formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-934A1.txt
  • universal service support, the Commission may exercise its authority to revoke such petitioner's ETC designation. The Commission also may assess forfeitures for violations of Commission rules and orders. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), i-WIRELESS, LLC. IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER eligible only for Lifeline support for those portions of its licensed service areas in Alabama, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Delaware, Florida, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia, listed in Appendix B to the extent described
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-957A1.txt
  • days from its receipt of the submitted invoices. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the petitioners' applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for waiver and review filed by Annunciation Elementary School and Hamilton County School District ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-95A1.txt
  • required to fully examine whether the forbearance requested by American Broadband meets the statutory requirements set forth in section 10(a) of the Act. A 90-day extension is therefore necessary under section 10(c) of the Act. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 160, and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by American Broadband & Telecommunications shall be deemed granted, in the absence of a Commission denial of the petition for failure to meet the statutory standards for forbearance, IS EXTENDED to May 25, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-962A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-962A1.txt
  • days from the release date of this order. In remanding these applications to USAC, we make no finding as to the ultimate eligibility of the services or the underlying applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the requests for review filed by Colorado Springs School District ARE GRANTED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-975A1.txt
  • still provide notice to the wireline ETC, Verizon Washington, DC Inc., that new subscribers meet the income or program-based eligibility requirements of the Lifeline program and have executed a certification form. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, that section 54.410(d) is WAIVED to the limited extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon Gillett Chief See Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization et al., Report and Order and Further Notice of Rulemaking, WC Dkt. Nos. 11-42 et al., CC Dkt. No. 96-45,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-985A1.txt
  • rules. Based on our review of the record, we deny the eight requests because the petitioners have failed to show special circumstances necessary for the Commission to waive the deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the requests for review or requests for waiver filed by the petitioners listed in the appendix ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Trent B. Harkrader Chief Telecommunications Access Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX Petitioner Application Number(s) Funding Year Date Request for Review/Waiver Filed Churchill County
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-988A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-988A1.txt
  • type of CPE used to access their services. We extend this waiver until July 1, 2013, or until the Commission addresses pending petitions regarding CPE portability, whichever comes first. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 151, 225, and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3, this ORDER IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for VRS, the waivers of the one-line VCO, VCO-to-TTY, and VCO-to-VCO; one-line HCO, HCO-to-TTY, and HCO-to-HCO; call release; pay-per-call (900) calls, types of calls, and equal access to interexchange carrier requirements are hereby
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-995A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-995A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-995A1.txt
  • $872 $1,487 $1,386 No Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 201-206, 214, 218-220, 251, 254, and 303(r), and of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 201-206, 214, 218-220, 251, 254, 303(r), 1302, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.131,0.201(d), 0.291, 0.331, 1.3, and 1.427 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.131, 0.201(d), 0.291, 0.331, 1.3, 1.427 and pursuant to the delegations of authority in paragraphs 210, 217, 226 and 1404 of USF/ICC Transformation Order, 26 FCC Rcd 17663 (2011), that the petitions for expedited waiver to correct their study area boundaries filed by West River Cooperative
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-997A1.txt
  • operate more efficiently lost support to their peers that increased costs. Staying implementation of this rule would perpetuate these problematic incentives and inequities and delay reforms intended to benefit consumers. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and pursuant to the delegations of authority in paragraphs 210, 217, 226, and 1404 of the USF/ICC Transformation Order, 26 FCC Rcd 17663 (2011), that Silver Star's Petition for Stay is DENIED. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218325A1.txt
  • text: The first sentence of Paragraph 5 of the released text should read as follows: ``Upon review of the record in the Request for Review, we conclude that King and Queen's application does not meet the standards articulated in Naperville.'' Paragraph 6 of the released text should read as follows: ``Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by King and Queen County Public Schools, King and Queen Courthouse, Virginia, on July 12, 2000 IS DENIED.'' FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lloyd A. Hamlin, King and Queen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219046A1.txt
  • Expanded Interconnection Tariff Order, and the New Expanded Interconnection Service Suspension Order. These transmittals will also be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Ameritech's Tariff F.C.C. No.2 and Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Tariff F.C.C. No. 73 Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal Nos. 1285 and 2874, respectively, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the January 11, 2002 effective date, and investigations of the referenced transmittals are instituted and incorporated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • (5) (6) (7) (8) Chg. HUT Viewing '95-'00 Chg. Daily Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 Chg. Weekly Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 Chg. AQH List '94-'98 Chg. AQH News List '93-'97 Chg. Cable Use '94-'00 Int Use '00 Int News Use '00 Chg. TV Stns. '94-'00 0.6104 -0.0157 0.1023 0.0779 -0.0259 -0.3002 -0.7365 -0.6838 (1.84) (0.07) (0.14) (1.33) (0.78) (1.06) (0.91) (1.49) Chg. Inside Radio Stns '93-'97 -0.0898 -0.1078 -0.1958 0.0091 -0.1842 -0.1856 (1.01) (1.67) (1.02) (0.56) (2.43)* (0.85) Chg. Daily Papers '93-'99 -0.2157 1.4125 -0.1983 -0.0929 0.0028 -0.2911 1.3533 0.8029 (0.63) (5.72)** (0.27) (1.56) (0.08) (1.00) (1.62) (1.70) Chg. Weekly Papers '93-'99 0.0075 0.0203 0.0444 -0.0033 0.0024 0.0180 0.0504 0.0198 (0.39) (1.48) (1.09) (1.01) (1.24) (1.11) (1.08) (0.75) Chg. Inside
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227628A1.txt
  • CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we deny ACS's petition for preemption of the jurisdiction of the Regulatory Commission of Alaska with respect to the determination of rates for unbundled network elements in Anchorage and Fairbanks. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 252, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b) of the Commission's rules and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 51.801(b), the petition filed by ACS of Anchorage, Inc., and ACS of Fairbanks, Inc. on July 24, 2002 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION William F. Maher, Jr. Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau Emergency Petition for Declaratory Ruling and Other Relief of ACS of Anchorage, Inc. and ACS
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232850A1.txt
  • special access and dedicated transport services in various geographic markets. 2. By this Erratum, the Memorandum Opinion and Order's ordering clause is corrected to state that this pricing flexibility petition was filed by Verizon Telephone Companies, instead of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. 3. This Erratum is issued pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and the authority delegated by 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey H. Dygert Deputy Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission Æ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233116A1.txt
  • a later date. Commissioner Martin's statement was released December 3, 2001, but the statement was erroneously not published in the FCC Record. Attached is Commissioner Martin's statement. 2. By this Erratum, the Declaratory Ruling is corrected to add Commissioner Martin's statement. 3. This Erratum is issued pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and the authority delegated by 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey J. Carlisle Senior Deputy Chief Wireline Competition Bureau CONCURRING STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER KEVIN J. MARTIN Re: AT&T and Sprint Petitions for Declaratory Ruling on CLEC Access Charge Issues, Declaratory Ruling, CCB/CPD No. 01-02 In this Order, the Commission rules that, for a period of time before the CLEC Access Reform Order went into effect,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234816A1.txt
  • Bureau corrects this error and publishes a revised Appendix A, which is hereby amended to insert the phrase ``Multi-Service Optical Network (MON)'' in the listings under the Special Access Basket for the Ameritech Operating Companies. The revised Appendix A is attached hereto. This Erratum is issued pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and the authority delegated by 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena Shetler Deputy Chief APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY I. TRUNKING BASKET Ameritech Operating Companies Nevada Bell Voice Grade LT-1 LT-3 Switched Sonet Signaling SS7 Telecom Relay Service Voice Grade DS1 DS3 SS7 Pacific Bell Southern New England Bell Voice Grade DS1 DS3 Fiber Advantage SS7 Voice Grade DS1 DS3 SS7 SNET Sonet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234829A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234829A1.txt
  • Bureau corrects this error and publishes a revised Appendix A, which is hereby amended to insert the phrase ``Multi-Service Optical Network (MON)'' in the listings under the Special Access Basket for the Ameritech Operating Companies. The revised Appendix A is attached hereto. This Erratum is issued pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and the authority delegated by 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deena Shetler Deputy Chief APPENDIX A SERVICES QUALIFYING FOR PRICING FLEXIBILITY I. TRUNKING BASKET Ameritech Operating Companies Nevada Bell Voice Grade LT-1 LT-3 Switched Sonet Signaling SS7 Telecom Relay Service Voice Grade DS1 DS3 SS7 Pacific Bell Southern New England Bell Voice Grade DS1 DS3 Fiber Advantage SS7 Voice Grade DS1 DS3 SS7 SNET Sonet
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235312A1.txt
  • in various geographic markets. 2. By this Erratum, Appendix B of the Memorandum Opinion and Order is corrected to state that Verizon did not seek pricing flexibility for channel terminations to end users. Attached is a corrected copy of Appendix B. 3. This Erratum is issued pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and the authority delegated by 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX B PRICING FLEXIBILITY RELIEF FOR DEDICATED TRANSPORT AND SPECIAL ACCESS SERVICES * MSA Type of Relief Requested Honolulu, Hawaii, MSA Phase II * Verizon did not seek pricing flexibility relief for channel terminations to end users. Federal Communications Commission ! O a - ^
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238477A1.txt
  • Grant Date: 08/14/2003 Licensee Name: WTVG, INC. Requested Facility: Ch No:19 N Latitude: 41-41-0; W Longitude: 83-24-49 ERP (Average): 795 kW; HAAT: 221.5 meters; Antenna: DA Facility ID: 55031 Call Sign: KJTV-DT File No: BDSTA-20030805ARJ City: LUBBOCK State: TX Grant Date: 08/20/2003 Licensee Name: RAMAR COMMUNICATIONS II, LTD. Requested Facility: Ch No:35 N Latitude: 33-30-8; W Longitude: 101-52-20 ERP (Average): 0.91 kW; HAAT: 83.4 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 27431 Call Sign: KHFT-DT File No: BDSTA-20030805ARK City: HOBBS State: NM Grant Date: 08/20/2003 Licensee Name: RAMAR COMMUNICATIONS II, LTD. Requested Facility: Ch No:16 N Latitude: 32-43-28; W Longitude: 103-5-46 ERP (Average): 0.263 kW; HAAT: 83.4 meters; Antenna: ND Facility ID: 74137 Call Sign: WTTE-DT File No: BMDSTA-20030805ARL City: COLUMBUS State: OH
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243550A1.txt
  • rate appendix in its entirety. This Erratum, complete with the corrected rate appendix, will be posted on the web site of the Federal Communications Commission, Wireline Competition Bureau's Pricing Policy Division (http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/ppd/). 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the January 29, 2004 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-281 2 Memorandum Opinion and Order in the above-captioned proceedings IS AMENDED as set forth herein. By Order of the Pricing Policy Division, _____________________________ Tamara L. Preiss Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 04-281 APPENDIX A
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246075A1.txt
  • A of that Order listed the rules to be amended. The Commission inadvertently omitted to indicate that section 61.38(b)(4) of the Commission's rules was to be deleted as part of the rulemaking proceeding. In addition, we have made several editorial changes to reflect Federal Register publication guidelines. A revised Appendix A is attached. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that Appendix A to the Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking IS AMENDED AS SET FORTH IN THE REVISED APPENDIX A ATTACHED HERETO. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A FINAL RULES Part 54, Part 61, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248349A1.txt
  • transport interconnection charge revenue requirement among the access categories. Rather than correct this, we eliminate this work sheet along with the related MAG-2 work sheet because they are not needed in this filing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 201-205 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 201-205, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Tariff Review Plan IS AMENDED as described above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Material to be Filed in Support of 2004 Annual Access Tariff Filings, WCB/Pricing 04-15, Tariff Review Plans, DA 04-1048 (WCB/Pricing, rel. April 19, 2004). See 47
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08 1977 341.3 744.3 374.9 369.3 253.0 259.6 2.18 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.06 1978 455.6 954.4 496.2 458.2 346.0 314.8 2.09 1.09 1.01 0.91 0.96 1979 646.4 1,138.2 692.7 445.4 409.8 475.1 1.76 1.07 0.69 1.16 0.87 1980 1,569.2 2,097.2 1,063.1 1,034.1 1,162.4 715.9 1.34 0.68 0.66 0.62 0.64 1981 1,857.2 2,239.4 1,329.6 909.8 1,436.6 798.6 1.21 0.72 0.49 0.56 0.52 1982 2,186.6 2,382.1 1,673.6 708.5 1,612.7 961.4 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60 0.44 1983 2,649.7 2,876.1 2,035.5 840.5 1,808.3 1,085.9 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252074A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252074A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252074A1.txt
  • listed in Appendix C. As explained above, Nextel's service area for each rural telephone company encompasses the entire study area of each rural telephone company. Paragraph 27 is replaced with the following text: Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, NCPR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Virginia to the extent described herein and Nextel Partners of Upstate New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER in New York to the extent described herein.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255741A1.txt
  • for the 2003-04 monitoring period would not be available until January 2007. This revision eliminates uncertainty about the timing of the filing of a complaint. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 403, and the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the order terminating the tariff investigation in the above captioned proceeding IS AMENDED as described above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau July 1, 2004, Annual Access Charge Tariff Filings, WC Docket No. 04-372, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 04-277 (Nov.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.txt
  • For this specification, the Shea partial R-Squared equals the standard partial R-Squared, because the estimation includes only one endogenous variable. See Baum, Schaeffer, and Stillman (2003). 17 TABLE 2 SECOND SPECIFICATION: DBS PENETRATION AND STRATIFIED QUALITY-ADJUSTED CABLE PRICE THE FULL MODEL REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS (t-statistics in parentheses) Variable Estimated Coefficient t Statistic PLUSTENDROP -1.12 (0.32) NEG10TO10 0.91 (0.58) PLUS10RISE 14.21** (2.10) LPREM 0.06 (0.30) CABINT 0.15 (0.51) CABREGSPORT -0.36 (1.37) CABFOREIGN 0.19 (0.75) CABHIDEF -0.51* (1.82) LNOVERAIR -0.19 (0.83) LNLAT -1.54** (2.29) LPOVERTY -0.22** (2.15) LMULTDWELL -0.15 (1.30) DBSOVERAIR 0.41* (1.74) Constant 4.89* (1.88) Observations 525 F-Statistic 2.05** Hansen J Statistic 6.97* ** - significant at 95% confidence level, * - significant at 90% confidence level First
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08 1977 341.3 744.3 374.9 369.3 253.0 259.6 2.18 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.06 1978 455.6 954.4 496.2 458.2 346.0 314.8 2.09 1.09 1.01 0.91 0.96 1979 646.4 1,138.2 692.7 445.4 409.8 475.1 1.76 1.07 0.69 1.16 0.87 19801,569.2 2,097.2 1,063.1 1,034.1 1,162.4 715.9 1.34 0.68 0.66 0.62 0.64 19811,857.2 2,239.4 1,329.6 909.8 1,436.6 798.6 1.21 0.72 0.49 0.56 0.52 19822,186.6 2,382.1 1,673.6 708.5 1,612.7 961.4 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60 0.44 19832,649.7 2,876.1 2,035.5 840.5 1,808.3 1,085.9 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60 0.43 19843,037.0 3,197.0 2,268.8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262861A1.txt
  • paragraph 1 is corrected so that it refers to section 64.1300(d), rather than section 64.1300(c). 3. Appendix A of the Report and Order is replaced by the Appendix A attached to this Erratum. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 276, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the Report and Order in the above-captioned proceeding IS AMENDED as set forth above. WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU Thomas J. Navin Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau APPENDIX A The Federal Communications Commission amends 47 C.F.R. Part 64 to read as follows: § 64.1300 Payphone compensation obligation. (a) For purposes of this
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 793 1,029 Georgia 4,371,379 2.07 1.75 1.99 264 343 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 337,463 0.16 0.42 0.22 30 39 Idaho 416,870 0.20 0.41 0.25 33 43 Illinois 4,959,073 2.34 3.60 2.66 353 459 Indiana 3,927,153 1.86 2.18 1.94 258 334 Iowa 1,965,442 0.93 1.50 1.07 143 185 Kansas 1,489,937 0.70 0.43 0.64 84 110 Kentucky 1,922,862 0.91 0.48 0.80 107 138 Louisiana 2,684,779 1.27 0.81 1.15 153 199 Maine 1,698,869 0.80 0.24 0.66 88 114 Maryland 4,864,029 2.30 1.24 2.03 271 351 Massachusetts 7,892,158 3.73 0.78 2.99 398 517 Michigan 5,075,422 2.40 4.27 2.87 381 495 Minnesota 1,939,714 0.92 1.43 1.05 139 181 Mississippi 1,580,988 0.75 0.28 0.63 84 109 Missouri 3,429,638 1.62 2.82 1.92 256 332
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 793 1,029 Georgia 4,371,379 2.07 1.75 1.99 264 343 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 337,463 0.16 0.42 0.22 30 39 Idaho 416,870 0.20 0.41 0.25 33 43 Illinois 4,959,073 2.34 3.60 2.66 353 459 Indiana 3,927,153 1.86 2.18 1.94 258 334 Iowa 1,965,442 0.93 1.50 1.07 143 185 Kansas 1,489,937 0.70 0.43 0.64 84 110 Kentucky 1,922,862 0.91 0.48 0.80 107 138 Louisiana 2,684,779 1.27 0.81 1.15 153 199 Maine 1,698,869 0.80 0.24 0.66 88 114 Maryland 4,864,029 2.30 1.24 2.03 271 351 Massachusetts 7,892,158 3.73 0.78 2.99 398 517 Michigan 5,075,422 2.40 4.27 2.87 381 495 Minnesota 1,939,714 0.92 1.43 1.05 139 181 Mississippi 1,580,988 0.75 0.28 0.63 84 109 Missouri 3,429,638 1.62 2.82 1.92 256 332
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • A COMMUNITY SERVICE TEL. CO. 10.42 -2.84 13.65 INFINITE 100019 A OXFORD COUNTY TEL. & TELE. CO. 15.88 2.57 12.98 89.19 100020 A PINE TREE TEL. & TELE. CO. 7.47 -0.43 7.94 0.00 100022 A SACO RIVER TEL. & TELE. CO. 1.59 -3.00 4.73 0.00 100024 C SOMERSET TEL. CO. -1.61 -0.72 -0.89 -23.35 100025 C STANDISH TEL. CO. 14.66 -0.91 15.72 209.39 100027 C UNION RIVER TEL. CO. -6.25 1.35 -7.50 -15.26 100029 C UNITY TEL. CO., INC. 4.66 -0.85 5.56 8.35 3 - 262 Table 3.32 High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2002 to 2003 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • ServicesSwitched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.20 0.07 NA - Not available. Note: Data for some prior years have been revised. Sources: AT&T information provided by AT&T.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264539A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264539A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264539A1.txt
  • disaster planning and response without observing the structural separation requirements of section 272, and the Commission's network disclosure rules (47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-51.335). This Erratum corrects the Public Notice by establishing a revised pleading cycle: Reply Comment Date: April 10, 2006 The original comment date of April 3, 2006 remains. This action is taken pursuant to authority contained in sections 0.91(b) and 0.291 of the Commission's regulations, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91(b) and 0.291. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Heather Hendrickson, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-7295. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov [ X
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • -0.29 -3.54 3.37 -16.21 CALIFORNIA TOTAL -1.16 -2.79 1.67 13.02 542301 C CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.36 -2.58 13.29 18.97 542302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-CA (CONTEL) -4.07 -0.21 -3.86 0.00 542308 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF CA INC. DBA FRONTIER COMM 14.77 0.49 14.22 51.16 542311 C CAL-ORE TELEPHONE CO. 9.54 0.00 9.54 12.37 542313 C DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.32 0.40 0.91 0.18 542315 C GLOBAL VALLEY NETWORKS 12.82 3.20 9.32 0.00 542318 C FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.04 -0.03 14.08 41.80 542319 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-CA (GTE) -5.99 -2.27 -3.80 0.00 542321 C HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY -4.94 -1.26 -3.72 -19.73 542322 C HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.54 -0.76 -0.79 -7.20 542323 C WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.55 -8.64 13.35 17.99 542324 C KERMAN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • -0.29 -3.54 3.37 -16.21 CALIFORNIA TOTAL -1.16 -2.79 1.67 13.02 542301 C CALAVERAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 10.36 -2.58 13.29 18.97 542302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-CA (CONTEL) -4.07 -0.21 -3.86 0.00 542308 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF CA INC. DBA FRONTIER COMM 14.77 0.49 14.22 51.16 542311 C CAL-ORE TELEPHONE CO. 9.54 0.00 9.54 12.37 542313 C DUCOR TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.32 0.40 0.91 0.18 542315 C GLOBAL VALLEY NETWORKS 12.82 3.20 9.32 0.00 542318 C FORESTHILL TELEPHONE COMPANY 14.04 -0.03 14.08 41.80 542319 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.-CA (GTE) -5.99 -2.27 -3.80 0.00 542321 C HAPPY VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY -4.94 -1.26 -3.72 -19.73 542322 C HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY -1.54 -0.76 -0.79 -7.20 542323 C WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.55 -8.64 13.35 17.99 542324 C KERMAN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • ServicesSwitched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.20 0.07 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 NA - Not available. Note: Data for some prior years have been revised. Sources:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Total InterstateIntrastate Total of Total Alabama $1,218 $2,434 $3,651 $521 $415 $935 $1,738 $2,848 $4,587 1.54% Alaska 266 382 648 115 68 183 380 450 831 0.28 American Samoa 3 11 14 1 2 3 4 13 17 0.01 Arizona 1,542 2,526 4,069 628 430 1,059 2,171 2,957 5,127 1.72 Arkansas 735 1,406 2,142 323 245 568 1,058 1,651 2,709 0.91 California 8,834 18,812 27,645 3,703 3,694 7,397 12,537 22,505 35,042 11.76 Colorado 1,473 2,442 3,915 676 422 1,098 2,149 2,864 5,013 1.68 Connecticut 1,241 1,897 3,138 531 260 791 1,772 2,157 3,929 1.32 Delaware 311 504 815 132 67 198 443 571 1,014 0.34 Dist. of Columbia 395 685 1,080 218 99 317 613 784 1,397 0.47 Florida 5,680 9,952
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • Reporting Local Exchange Companies (10,101) (7,290) (2,798) 27.70 CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC - Northern Alabama AL (493) (383) (110) 22.31 CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC - Southern Alabama AL 48 36 12 25.00 AT&T - BellSouth - Alabama AL (51,461) (51,790) 329 (0.64) Verizon California - Contel - Arizona AZ 149 151 (2) (1.34) Qwest - Arizona AZ 44,814 45,222 (407) (0.91) AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 34,756 34,805 (50) (0.14) Verizon California - Contel - California CA (8,623) (8,589) (34) 0.39 Citizens Telecom. of California - Shasta - California CA 152 117 35 23.03 Verizon - Northwest - West Coast California CA 36 40 (4) (11.11) Verizon California - GTE - California CA 4,847 5,531 (684) (14.11) AT&T -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • Total InterstateIntrastate Total of Total Alabama $1,218 $2,434 $3,651 $521 $415 $935 $1,738 $2,848 $4,587 1.54% Alaska 266 382 648 115 68 183 380 450 831 0.28 American Samoa 3 11 14 1 2 3 4 13 17 0.01 Arizona 1,542 2,526 4,069 628 430 1,059 2,171 2,957 5,127 1.72 Arkansas 735 1,406 2,142 323 245 568 1,058 1,651 2,709 0.91 California 8,834 18,812 27,645 3,703 3,694 7,397 12,537 22,505 35,042 11.76 Colorado 1,473 2,442 3,915 676 422 1,098 2,149 2,864 5,013 1.68 Connecticut 1,241 1,897 3,138 531 260 791 1,772 2,157 3,929 1.32 Delaware 311 504 815 132 67 198 443 571 1,014 0.34 Dist. of Columbia 395 685 1,080 218 99 317 613 784 1,397 0.47 Florida 5,680 9,952
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • 1.06 1.82 0.76 6.02 Illinois 0.19 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.13 0.12 0.77 Indiana 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.59 0.25 1.51 Iowa 0.95 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.43 0.22 1.01 3.73 Kansas 4.37 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.35 0.27 0.80 7.93 Kentucky 1.03 0.02 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.95 0.68 0.24 3.55 Louisiana 2.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.35 0.18 3.45 Maine 0.80 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.00 1.44 0.01 0.81 3.26 Maryland 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.02 0.11 Massachusetts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.06 Michigan 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.01 0.14 0.82 Minnesota 1.14 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.27 0.10 0.59 3.13 Mississippi 0.90 0.01 0.00 5.88 0.00 0.49
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A7.txt
  • 0.14 Illinois 542 1,878 0.29 Indiana 135 1,691 0.08 Iowa 205 1,600 0.13 Kansas 492 1,193 0.41 Kentucky 840 2,069 0.41 Louisiana 8 1,111 0.01 Maine 38 854 0.04 Maryland 0 385 0.00 Massachusetts 2 335 0.00 Michigan 661 1,769 0.37 Minnesota 983 1,594 0.62 Mississippi 164 1,821 0.09 Missouri 86 1,799 0.05 Montana 506 705 0.72 Nebraska 740 811 0.91 Nevada 35 305 0.12 New Hampshire 5 380 0.01 New Jersey 0 0 NA New Mexico 206 856 0.24 New York 7 1,537 0.00 North Carolina 190 2,612 0.07 North Dakota 551 367 1.50 Northern Mariana Islands 0 69 0.00 Ohio 178 2,139 0.08 Oklahoma 157 1,378 0.11 Oregon 38 977 0.04 Pennsylvania 58 1,893 0.03 Puerto Rico 0 3,859
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • ServicesSwitched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.20 0.07 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 2005 NA 0.07 0.13 0.06 NA - Not available. Note: Data for some prior
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • and related support activities 97,788.0 538.1 0.55 0.08 324 Petroleum and coal products 525,795.7 198.9 0.04 0.03 325 Chemical products 625,910.8 1,284.3 0.21 0.20 326 Plastics and rubber products 206,629.9 608.3 0.29 0.09 327 Nonmetallic mineral products 124,838.5 406.1 0.33 0.06 331 Primary metals 232,681.3 226.4 0.10 0.04 332 Fabricated metal products 310,886.2 1,151.0 0.37 0.18 333 Machinery 311,667.9 2,821.6 0.91 0.44 334 Computer and electronic products 378,161.0 2,621.1 0.69 0.41 335 Electrical equipment, appliances, and components 115,657.6 271.6 0.23 0.04 3361MV Motor vehicles, bodies and trailers, and parts 491,854.5 1,710.2 0.35 0.27 3364OT Other transportation equipment 197,611.2 425.5 0.22 0.07 337 Furniture and related products 83,416.1 370.0 0.44 0.06 339 Miscellaneous manufacturing 151,730.9 1,019.0 0.67 0.16 42 Wholesale trade 1,147,749.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287377A1.pdf
  • to invoke the lim- ited statutory extension provision. We agree. [7] Under the Act, the FCC may delegate its functions to its subdivisions. See47 U.S.C. §155(c)(1) (allowing the FCC, "by published rule or by order, [to] delegate any of its func- tions"). By regulation, the FCC has delegated many of its functions to the Chief of the WCB. See47 C.F.R. §0.91. In particular, Section0.91(m) authorizes the WCB to "[c]arry out the functions of the Commission under the Communica- tions Act of 1934, as amended, except as reserved to the Commission . . . ."Id. Pursuant to the regulations, however, the WCB may not decide issues of first impression, described as"any applications or requests which present novel questions of fact, law or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • 9 17 26 43 0.01 Ohio 2,743 5,766 8,508 1,157 967 2,124 3,899 6,733 10,632 3.58 Oklahoma 878 1,703 2,581 416 244 659 1,294 1,946 3,240 1.09 Oregon 971 1,688 2,658 443 265 707 1,413 1,953 3,366 1.13 Pennsylvania 3,326 6,191 9,517 1,482 1,036 2,518 4,808 7,227 12,035 4.05 Puerto Rico 712 1,529 2,241 273 183 456 986 1,712 2,698 0.91 Rhode Island 266 562 828 107 77 184 373 639 1,012 0.34 South Carolina 1,156 2,294 3,451 460 365 825 1,617 2,659 4,276 1.44 South Dakota 208 366 574 94 74 168 302 440 743 0.25 Tennessee 1,629 3,322 4,951 612 432 1,044 2,241 3,754 5,995 2.02 Texas 5,495 12,653 18,148 2,530 2,140 4,670 8,025 14,793 22,817 7.68 Utah 619
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • 9 17 26 43 0.01 Ohio 2,743 5,766 8,508 1,157 967 2,124 3,899 6,733 10,632 3.58 Oklahoma 878 1,703 2,581 416 244 659 1,294 1,946 3,240 1.09 Oregon 971 1,688 2,658 443 265 707 1,413 1,953 3,366 1.13 Pennsylvania 3,326 6,191 9,517 1,482 1,036 2,518 4,808 7,227 12,035 4.05 Puerto Rico 712 1,529 2,241 273 183 456 986 1,712 2,698 0.91 Rhode Island 266 562 828 107 77 184 373 639 1,012 0.34 South Carolina 1,156 2,294 3,451 460 365 825 1,617 2,659 4,276 1.44 South Dakota 208 366 574 94 74 168 302 440 743 0.25 Tennessee 1,629 3,322 4,951 612 432 1,044 2,241 3,754 5,995 2.02 Texas 5,495 12,653 18,148 2,530 2,140 4,670 8,025 14,793 22,817 7.68 Utah 619
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • -5.47 8.01 11.61 250283 A BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN TEL. CO. 5.24 -2.48 7.91 0.00 250284 C BUTLER TEL. CO., INC. 0.79 -2.53 3.40 2.23 250285 A CASTLEBERRY TEL. CO., INC. -6.27 -7.47 1.30 -16.84 250286 C NATIONAL TEL. CO. OF AL -2.36 -5.35 3.16 -2.17 250290 C FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE, INC. -1.37 -2.17 0.82 -8.69 250295 C GRACEBA TOTAL COMM. -3.95 -0.91 -3.07 -14.59 250298 C GULF TEL. CO.-AL -12.16 -1.61 -10.73 -100.00 250299 C HAYNEVILLE TEL. CO., INC. -6.75 -2.42 -4.43 -30.48 250300 C HOPPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., INC. 16.05 -2.36 18.86 23.87 250301 A FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF LAMAR COUNTY, LLC -2.53 -3.59 1.10 -15.31 250302 C WINDSTREAM ALABAMA, INC 4.72 -0.79 5.54 18.84 250304 C MILLRY TEL. CO., INC. 2.45 -2.51
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • Switched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.20 0.07 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 2005 NA 0.07 0.13 0.06 2006 NA 0.07 NA NA NA - Not available.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Total Jun 07 1/ Revenues Revenues Revenues Revenues Alabama 297,649 1.04% $59 $86 $116 $139 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 1,042,689 3.65 206 301 405 487 Arkansas 178,090 0.62 35 51 69 83 California 2,898,469 10.14 572 837 1,126 1,352 Colorado 425,205 1.49 84 123 165 198 Connecticut 260,817 0.91 51 75 101 122 Delaware 99,237 0.35 20 29 39 46 District of Columbia 137,088 0.48 27 40 53 64 Florida 1,298,169 4.54 256 375 504 606 Georgia 729,770 2.55 144 211 284 341 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 87,551 0.31 17 25 34 41 Idaho 78,053 0.27 15 23 30 36 Illinois 949,607 3.32 187 274
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • Total Jun 07 1/ Revenues Revenues Revenues Revenues Alabama 297,649 1.04% $59 $86 $116 $139 Alaska NA NA NA NA NA NA American Samoa NA NA NA NA NA NA Arizona 1,042,689 3.65 206 301 405 487 Arkansas 178,090 0.62 35 51 69 83 California 2,898,469 10.14 572 837 1,126 1,352 Colorado 425,205 1.49 84 123 165 198 Connecticut 260,817 0.91 51 75 101 122 Delaware 99,237 0.35 20 29 39 46 District of Columbia 137,088 0.48 27 40 53 64 Florida 1,298,169 4.54 256 375 504 606 Georgia 729,770 2.55 144 211 284 341 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 87,551 0.31 17 25 34 41 Idaho 78,053 0.27 15 23 30 36 Illinois 949,607 3.32 187 274
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 361479 A SCOTT RICE TEL. CO. DBA INTEGRA TELECOM 4.37 -7.32 12.62 0.00 361482 C SHERBURNE COUNTY RURAL TEL. CO. 1.20 -2.95 4.28 -2.28 361483 C SLEEPY EYE TEL. CO. 2.37 -3.96 6.59 87.21 361485 A SPRING GROVE COMMUNICATIONS -1.10 -0.99 -0.12 -31.54 361487 A STARBUCK TEL. CO. 0.95 -6.13 7.55 73.12 361491 C TWIN VALLEY-ULEN TEL CO INC. -8.22 -0.91 -7.37 -25.84 361494 A UPSALA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE ASSN. -0.25 -4.17 4.10 -15.20 361495 A VALLEY TEL. CO.-MN -11.55 1.58 -12.92 -48.36 361499 A CROSSLAKE TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.56 -1.44 11.16 INFINITE 361500 A NORTHERN TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MN -14.89 8.33 -21.43 -45.46 361501 C WEST CENTRAL TELEPHONE ASSN. 18.48 -1.79 20.64 30.52 361502 A WESTERN TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.96 -3.26 4.36 -12.07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A9.txt
  • Switched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.21 0.06 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 2005 NA 0.07 0.10 0.07 2006 NA 0.07 0.10 0.06 2007 NA 0.08 0.09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • Table 1.16 Interstate and International End-User Telecommunications Revenues by Provider: 200 8 (Dollar Amounts Shown in Millions) % of Total Alabama $215 $72 $0 $486 $523 $1,297 1.60% Alaska 39 17 0 60 96 213 0.26 American Samoa 1 0 0 2 2 6 0.01 Arizona 216 191 1 618 570 1,595 1.97 Arkansas 110 35 0 306 291 742 0.91 California 1,300 713 3 3,998 2,957 8,970 11.05 Colorado 234 132 0 509 575 1,450 1.79 Connecticut 160 98 0 370 451 1,080 1.33 Delaware 44 26 0 97 131 298 0.37 District of Columbia 53 29 0 131 162 374 0.46 Florida 914 423 1 1,978 2,091 5,407 6.66 Georgia 423 182 1 1,019 1,034 2,658 3.27 Guam 8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • Table 1.16 Interstate and International End-User Telecommunications Revenues by Provider: 200 8 (Dollar Amounts Shown in Millions) % of Total Alabama $215 $72 $0 $486 $523 $1,297 1.60% Alaska 39 17 0 60 96 213 0.26 American Samoa 1 0 0 2 2 6 0.01 Arizona 216 191 1 618 570 1,595 1.97 Arkansas 110 35 0 306 291 742 0.91 California 1,300 713 3 3,998 2,957 8,970 11.05 Colorado 234 132 0 509 575 1,450 1.79 Connecticut 160 98 0 370 451 1,080 1.33 Delaware 44 26 0 97 131 298 0.37 District of Columbia 53 29 0 131 162 374 0.46 Florida 914 423 1 1,978 2,091 5,407 6.66 Georgia 423 182 1 1,019 1,034 2,658 3.27 Guam 8
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • 1.86 13.67 TENNESSEE 0.38 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.23 0.13 1.52 TEXAS 0.73 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.25 0.11 1.59 UTAH 0.41 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.16 0.27 1.48 VERMONT 0.67 0.09 0.00 1.54 0.00 1.50 0.42 0.66 4.87 VIRGIN ISLANDS 5.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.26 0.00 0.00 19.24 VIRGINIA 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.91 0.06 1.18 WASHINGTON 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 0.13 1.79 WEST VIRGINIA 0.20 0.01 0.00 1.61 0.00 0.17 1.47 0.19 3.64 WISCONSIN 0.71 0.06 (0.00) 0.00 0.00 1.62 0.00 0.41 2.80 WYOMING 3.49 0.04 0.00 2.80 0.00 3.22 1.45 1.05 12.06 INDUSTRY $0.69 $0.03 $0.00 $0.16 $0.00 $0.76 $0.30 $0.18 $2.12 Based on 2009 support payments and reported
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A9.txt
  • Switched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 2003 NA 0.08 0.21 0.06 2004 NA 0.08 0.14 0.06 2005 NA 0.07 0.10 0.07 2006 NA 0.07 0.10 0.06 2007 NA 0.08 0.09
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305999A1.txt
  • in this order, we direct USAC to discontinue recovery actions against these petitioners and to process any outstanding invoices.'' Paragraph 9 on page 4 is corrected to read as follows: ``IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that USAC SHALL DISCONTINUE its recovery actions against Albuquerque School District, Albuquerque, NM, and Hope Lutheran School, Inc., Waukesha, WI.'' Appendix A of the Order is amended by correcting the Application Number and the Funding Year for Albuquerque School District to read as follows: Applicant Application Number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308928A1.txt
  • Township School District, Holy Name of Jesus School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School.'' Paragraph 3 is corrected to read as follows: ``ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review and/or Requests for Waiver filed by Burlington Township School District, Holy Name of Jesus, Lakewood Cheder School, The Center for Life Enrichment, and The Potomac School ARE GRANTED and their underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further consideration
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-221A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-221A1.txt
  • conclusions in this order. 340. The independent auditor will conduct its examination in accordance with the standards of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA").792 Specifically, 787 See MCI WorldCom Mar. 1, 2000 Supplemental Comments at 19 (noting that audits do not guarantee immediate detection of noncompliance); CompTel Mar. 1, 2000 Comments at 4. 788 See 47 C.F.R. § 0.91; Amendment of Parts 0, 1 and 64 of the Commission's Rules with Respect to Delegation of Authority to the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, and Technical Corrections and Deletions, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 4601 (1990). 789 See Contel Telephone Operating Companies, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, 6 FCC Rcd 1880 (1991) (initiating an enforcement action based on the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-143A1.txt
  • commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. V. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, 254, 303(r), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, 254, 303(r), 403, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.411 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.411, this FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING and ORDER IS ADOPTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the implementation of non-recurring services in Funding Year 3 of the schools and libraries universal support mechanism for all applicants is extended from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 0.15 8.33 0.17 50.00 0.38 0.00 0.14 1.54 1b,2a,3a,4n PR-6-01 % Install. Troubles Reported within 30 Days 4.28 9.40 1.63 12.84 1.95 12.57 1.90 11.01 PR-8-01 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 1.01 9.09 1.07 10.10 1.09 15.48 1.33 7.32 PR-8-02 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90 Days 0.60 0.76 0.69 0.96 0.77 1.19 0.83 0.91 1n,2n,3n,4n UNE xDSL Loops PR-2-01 Av. Interval Completed - Total No Dispatch 13.60 10.75 17.81 12.08 1b,2a PR-2-02 Av. Interval Completed - Total Dispatch 9.67 9.46 6.69 5.58 PR-4-02 Average Delay Days - Total 3.29 6.65 9.55 7.72 5.08 14.19 9.00 8.24 4x PR-4-04 % Missed Appointment - Verizon - Dispatch 8.80 4.33 2.96 0.66 PR-4-05 % Missed Appointment -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.txt
  • 78 Mexico NY Fox, Craig 1996 Jul-96 250 0 0 A WSIV AM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 E. Syracuse NY Fox, Craig 1955 Sep-96 100 0 0 B WOLF FM Children Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Fox, Craig 1990 Sep-97 0 0.4 0 A WKRL FM Modern Rock Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1972 Feb-94 1600 4.4 0.91 A WTLA AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1959 Feb-94 200 1 0.36 B WTKW FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78 Bridgeport NY Galaxy Communications 1992 Aug-94 1800 3.5 1.23 A WSGO AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Galaxy Communications 1960 Dec-95 0 0 0 B WTKV FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-49A1.txt
  • 0.61 0.48 1998 Very Large ----- $31.89 ----- ----- Standard Error ----- 0.24 Other Large ----- $31.43 ----- ----- Standard Error ----- 0.29 Overall Large $30.01 $31.61 $1.60 5.3%* Standard Error 0.21 0.27 Medium $30.21 $30.67 $0.46 1.5% Standard Error 0.37 0.33 Small ----- $29.24 ----- ----- Standard Error ----- 0.39 Very Small ----- $24.58 ----- ----- Standard Error ----- 0.91 Overall Small $26.31 $28.43 $2.12 8.1%* Standard Error 0.57 0.48 †Average monthly rates include BST, CPST, and equipment (i.e., converter and remote control). ATTACHMENT B-3 COMPARISON OF COMPETITIVE AND NONCOMPETITIVE GROUPS, BY SIZE CATEGORY NUMBER OF CHANNELS OFFERED AND PER CHANNEL RATES Number Of Channels Per Channel Rates SIZE COMPETITIVE NONCOMPETITIVE COMPETITIVE NONCOMPETITIVE 2000 Very Large ----- 62.9 ----- $0.58
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.txt
  • particular topic listed in the outline of this Second Further Notice, such comments must be included in a clearly labelled section at the beginning or end of the filing. For further information contact: Pam Slipakoff at (202) 418-7705 (voice), (202) 418-0484 (TTY), or pslipako@fcc.gov (e-mail). ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91(a), 0.204, 0.291 and 1.3, that enforcement of the requirement that Telecommunications Relay Services must be capable of handling coin sent-paid calls, as required by 47 C.F.R. § 64.604(a)(3), IS SUSPENDED pending the publication in the Federal Register of final rules adopted in this proceeding. This Order is effective upon release. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that common carriers providing telephone voice
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-104A1.txt
  • Commission's Recent Reorganization ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Adopted: March 28, 2002 Released: April 10, 2002 By the Commission: By this Order, the Federal Communications Commission amends Parts 0 and 68 of its rules. Specifically, we eliminate section 0.303 to reflect the transfer of authority for Part 68 terminal equipment certification to private industry. In addition, we amend section 0.91 to acknowledge the changed role of the Commission in the equipment certification process. Finally, we amend certain additional rules to reflect the Commission's recent transfer of responsibility for enforcement regarding terminal equipment to the Enforcement Bureau. In the Part 68 Report and Order, the Commission eliminated significant portions of the rules governing the connection of customer premises equipment (or terminal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • No. of satellite channels 48.91 47.15 46.05 36.19 26.88 Standard error 0.68 0.77 0.73 1.37 1.79 Rate per satellite channel $0.726 $0.739 $0.764 $1.026 $1.192 Standard error 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.07 July 1, 2000 BST $11.12 $10.54 $12.57 $16.23 $21.48 Standard error 0.33 0.27 0.47 0.93 1.26 Major CPST $21.50 $21.04 $18.89 $15.00 $5.68 Standard error 0.35 0.33 0.48 0.91 1.47 Programming total $32.62 $31.58 $31.46 $31.23 $27.16 Standard error 0.28 0.31 0.27 0.33 0.87 Equipment $3.45 $3.39 $3.05 $1.88 $1.00 Standard error 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.21 0.21 Programming and equipment $36.07 $34.97 $34.51 $33.11 $28.16 Standard error 0.29 0.33 0.29 0.38 0.93 Number of channels 63.81 60.37 56.41 43.22 32.56 Standard error 0.83 0.97 0.84 1.29 1.80 Rate per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • other records deemed relevant to the investigation of matters within the jurisdiction of the Media Bureau. Before issuing a subpoena, the Media Bureau shall obtain the approval of the Office of General Counsel. (k) Carry out the functions of the Commission under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, except as reserved to the Commission under section 0.283. 9. Section 0.91 is amended by revising the Bureau name and by revising the text to read as follows: WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU The Wireline Competition Bureau advises and makes recommendations to the Commission, or acts for the Commission under delegated authority, in all matters pertaining to the regulation and licensing of communications common carriers and ancillary operations (other than matters pertaining exclusively to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-114A1.txt
  • payment trigger as well. See Bell Atlantic/GTE Merger Order at Appendix D, Attachment A, ¶ 9. See Verizon January 10th Letter at 2. See Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on Verizon's Request for a Temporary Suspension of Two Merger Conditions, CC Docket No. 98-184, Public Notice, DA 02-419 (rel. Feb. 22, 2002). See 47 U.S.C. § 416(b); 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3; Applications of GTE Corporation, Transferor, and Bell Atlantic Corporation, Transferee, For Consent to Transfer Control of Domestic and International Sections 214 and 310 Authorizations and Application to Transfer Control of a Submarine Cable Landing License, CC Docket No. 98-184, Order, DA 01-2203, at ¶ 7 (Com. Car. Bur. rel. Sept. 26, 2001) (finding in the public interest Verizon's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.txt
  • Allentown, PA Year January August January August 2001 0.18 0.00 2.37 2.50 Denver 1.58 30.29 50.0 2000 2.14 0.79 1.99 5.22 San Francisco 0.03 33.63 225.3 1999 0.76 0.82 5.44 3.81 Miami 0.00 95.76 550.4 1998 1.10 0.00 3.42 3.12 * Rain rate exceeded 0.01% of time in an average year. 1997 3.32 0.00 3.38 5.12 1996 1.33 0.16 7.32 0.91 ** For the satellite at 101o W longitude. 1995 3.31 0.00 3.49 0.76 1994 0.06 0.00 5.69 6.18 1993 2.42 0.00 1.98 5.39 1992 0.13 0.28 1.73 4.08 1991 0.01 0.24 2.77 2.54 1990 0.62 0.21 4.57 6.47 See MITRE Report at 3-12 to 3-13. The minimum signal level for GSO satellite to maintain communications is defined by an operational
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 8.23 0.6237.92 0.6112.53 11 Resale Business POTS field work 4.65 4.74 4.30 5.18 2.60 4.54 0.95 4.06 3.80 4.35 11 Resale Business POTS no field work 0.10 0.22 0.34 0.80 0.17 0.36 0.12 0.46 0.00 0.44 11 Resale Centrex field work 0.00 4.11 1.03 3.37 1.64 2.85 1.96 3.61 0.00 3.59 11 Resale Centrex no field work 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.91 1.02 0.56 2.00 0.64 0.00 1.02 11 Resale ISDN BRI field work 0.00 6.09 4.1711.53 0.00 6.23 0.00 4.20 0.00 5.21a cde 11 Resale Residential POTS field work 1.55 5.01 1.83 5.38 1.08 5.03 1.63 4.41 1.07 4.57 11 - Percent of Due Dates Missed 9 - Coordinated Customer Conversion 10 - LNP Network Provisioning B - 12 CLEC Result
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 4.11 0.51 3.97 1.26 6.97 0.48 6.23 0.29 5.25 0.04 A.2.14.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.94 0.79 1.10 0.86 1.27 0.78 1.02 0.72 0.92 0.73 A.2.14.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.51 0.27 2.57 2.03 4.42 1.75 4.10 0.14 1.74 0.02 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.14.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.00 1.07 5.32 0.76 5.18 0.43 3.97 0.40 3.92 0.03 A.2.14.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.35 0.78 2.54 0.91 1.67 0.83 1.37 0.79 1.27 0.78 B - 11 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.14.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 10.13 0.40 16.62 4.07 7.39 0.43 4.31 0.03 4.27 0.02 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.14.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-63A1.txt
  • 10.35 5.39 5.77 5.44 6.64 5.04 6.75 4.99 5.95 3 MR-4-04-3200 % Cleared (all troubles) within 24 Hours 98.2 90 100 100 99.1 100 98.64 100 100 100 3 MR-4-06-3200 % Out of Service > 4 Hours 43.6 77.78 55.28 63.64 47.27 83.33 46.58 66.67 50 50 3 MR-4-08-3200 % Out of Service > 24 Hours 1.84 11.11 0 0 0.91 0 1.37 0 0 0 3 MR-5 - Repeat Trouble Reports MR-5-01-3200 % Repeat Reports within 30 Days 23.8 20 18.52 31.82 24.32 16.67 22.45 10 20.77 30 3 TRUNKING Ordering OR 1 - Order Confirmation Timeliness OR-1-12-5020 % On Time FOC (<= 192 Forecasted Trunks) 100 100 NA 100 100 1,2,4,5 OR-1-12-5030 % On Time FOC (> 192 and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-89A1.txt
  • 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 1-4, 10, 201-202, and 254, and sections 1.3 and 1.103 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3 and 1.103, this ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that THIS ORDER IS EFFECTIVE UPON PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER. Good cause exists to make this effective immediately upon publication in the Federal Register. The actions we take in this Order on Reconsideration, including the extension of time to file data, are intended to reduce administrative burdens on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-8A1.txt
  • and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, (202) 418-7365 TTY, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. VII. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, 254, 303(r), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, 254, 303(r), 403, and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.411 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.411, this NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING IS ADOPTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rule Making, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-114A1.txt
  • is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED AS MODIFIED HEREIN upon the submission of additional information by the Connecticut Department and the approval of such information by the Wireline Competition Bureau, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1.3 and 52.19(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 52.19(c), and the delegated authority in sections 0.91 and 0.291, of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 that the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control's Request for Temporary Waiver of 47 C.F.R. Section 52.19(c)(3)(ii) is GRANTED for a period of six months from the date of implementation of the SO code. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary SEPARATE STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. COPPS Re:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-220A1.txt
  • Tube & Conduct Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc., 486 U.S. 492 (1988) (Supreme Court upheld the Sherman Act section 1 liability of a member of a fire safety association for influencing the association to adopt a biased safety code to benefit its product and disfavor competing products). See Section 273 Dispute Resolution Order, 11 FCC Rcd 12955. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91(b); 1.401; 1.429. See 47 U.S.C. § 601, 604. The Regulatory Flexibility Act has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). BOC Manufacturing NPRM, Appendix A, 11 FCC Rcd at 21828, para. 5. See 5 U.S.C. § 601, 603 (as amended by SBREFA ). (...continued
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-295A1.txt
  • rates in Transmittal No. 31, we conclude that there are no remaining issues relating to Transmittal No. 35 that warrant further investigation. We therefore reconsider the decision to set for investigation certain issues concerning the revised rates contained in Transmittal No. 35 and terminate the investigation into that tariff filing. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.108, we reconsider on our own motion our decision in the Suspension Order to suspend and investigate the revised tariff rates of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., filed in Transmittal No. 35. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.txt
  • from the previously stated 22.5 minutes/year. This difference can be attributed to rounding as various calculations have been made. ). Rain (inches/month) Reno, NV Allentown, PA Year January August January August 2001 0.18 0.00 2.37 2.50 2000 2.14 0.79 1.99 5.22 1999 0.76 0.82 5.44 3.81 1998 1.10 0.00 3.42 3.12 1997 3.32 0.00 3.38 5.12 1996 1.33 0.16 7.32 0.91 1995 3.31 0.00 3.49 0.76 1994 0.06 0.00 5.69 6.18 1993 2.42 0.00 1.98 5.39 1992 0.13 0.28 1.73 4.08 1991 0.01 0.24 2.77 2.54 1990 0.62 0.21 4.57 6.47 dish10-q.html for more details. For technical details of the new satellite see also Application of EchoStar Satellite Corporation for Authority to Launch and Operate EchoStar VIII, File No. SAT-LOA-20020329-00042; Application
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-13A1.txt
  • have been in had the error not been made.'' IV. CONCLUSION For the reasons discussed above, Verizon's petition for reconsideration is denied. Accordingly, we will proceed toward a resolution of the tariff investigation. V. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.106 that the petition for reconsideration filed by Verizon IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary DISSENTING STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER KEVIN J. MARTIN Two years ago, I expressed concern regarding the Commission's process and decision to terminate summarily over 100 docketed proceedings. In that decision, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-190A1.txt
  • that framework. To the extent audits in the future raise issues not addressed herein, we provide a limited delegation to the Wireline Competition Bureau to address such matters. In particular, we direct the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau to address audit findings and to act on requests for waiver of rules warranting recovery of funds. We hereby amend sections 0.91 and 0.291 to reflect such delegation of authority in this limited instance. We emphasize the limited nature of this delegation which we adopt because of the importance of providing rapid responses to audit findings and requests for waiver of rules warranting recovery of funds. We also emphasize that any party aggrieved by any action by the Bureau is, of course,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-145A1.txt
  • on delegated authority], the Commission may grant, in whole or in part, or deny such applications without specifying any reasons therefore.''). Fones4All argues that the Bureau had no authority to issue the Bureau Extension Order and that even if it did, it did not adequately explain the rationale for its action. Fones4All Application at 4-5. Fones4All's argument falls short. Section 0.91(m) of the Commission's rules authorizes the Bureau to ``[c]arry out the functions of the Commission under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, except as reserved to the Commission.'' 47 C.F.R. § 0.91. Section 0.291 of the Commission's rules lists the powers reserved to the Commission and it does not reserve the right to grant extensions of time. 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-35A1.txt
  • Security Bureau on all matters affecting public safety, homeland security, national security, emergency management, disaster management, and related issues. Section 0.61 is amended by adding the paragraph 0.61(l) to read as follows: To coordinate with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau on all matters affecting public safety, homeland security, national security, emergency management, disaster management, and related issues. Section 0.91 is amended by adding the paragraph 0.91(o) to read as follows: (o) Coordinate with the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau on all matters affecting public safety, homeland security, national security, emergency management, disaster management, and related issues. Section 0.111 is amended by removing paragraphs (c), (f) and (h) and by redesignating paragraphs (a)(22), (d), (e), (g), and (i)-(l) as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-129A1.txt
  • Unbundled Local Switching to Provide Single Line Residential Service to End Users Eligible for State or Federal Lifeline Service, WC Docket No. 05-261, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 21 FCC Rcd 11125, 11128, para 6 (2006) (Fones4All Forbearance Order). Core Application at 1, 3. Fones4All Forbearance Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 11128, para. 6. Id. at 11128, para. 6, n.17. Section 0.91(m) of the Commission's rules authorizes the Bureau to ``[c]arry out the functions of the Commission under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, except as reserved to the Commission.'' 47 C.F.R. § 0.91. Section 0.291 of the Commission's rules lists the powers reserved to the Commission and it does not reserve the right to grant extensions of time. 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
  • RSN Access Independent Variables Dependent Variable: LN DBS PENETRATION Coefficient z-statistic LN CABLE PRICE 1.06 1.22 LN CABLE CHANNELS -0.72* -1.96 PHILLY -0.51* -6.59 SANDIEGO -0.87* -9.37 CHARLOTTE -0.22 -1.64 KEYDMA 0.23* 4.13 TEAM COUNT -0.04* -3.03 DBSOVERAIR -0.09 -1.59 CABLECOMP 0.04 0.18 HDTV -0.11 -1.57 INTERNET -0.02 -0.21 LN INCOME -0.21 -1.89 LN MULTIDWELL -0.39* -11.53 LN LATITUDE 0.38 0.91 LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION 1.01* 2.59 LN STANDARD DEVIATION ELEVATION*LATITUDE -0.25* -2.31 CONSTANT -1.08 -0.34 Observations 674 Centered R-Squared 0.42 F-Statistic (16, 657) 81.41 Hansen J Statistic 30.65 * - significant at 95% confidence level This model also does not change the conclusions in the Adelphia Order and, if anything, strengthens them. The magnitude of the PHILLY and CHARLOTTE coefficients
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-64A1.txt
  • continue to aggressively pursue instances of waste, fraud, or abuse under our own procedures and in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Macomb Intermediate School District Technology Consortium, Clinton Township, Michigan, IS DENIED in part and GRANTED in part and IS REMANDED to USAC for further consideration in accordance with the terms of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-120A1.txt
  • But see Ad Hoc Apr. 22 Ex Parte Letter at 2. Upon approval, the Bureau will release a public notice notifying the public of approval of the plan. See 47 C.F.R. § 64.903(b). More generally, the Chief of the Bureau has delegated authority to ``[d]evelop and administer rules and policies relating to incumbent local exchange carrier accounting.'' 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(e); see also 47 C.F.R. § 0.291. Compare AT&T Petition at 25; BellSouth Petition at 22-23, 51, 60, App. 2; US Telecom Comments at 5-7; AT&T Reply at 13, 16-17; AT&T Apr. 18 Ex Parte Letter at 8-9, with Nebraska Companies Comments at 1-4; Sprint Nextel Comments at 12-14; State Members Comments at 6-7; TOPC Comments at 3-4; TWTC Comments at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-77A1.txt
  • of the equity investment in Apollo Overseas Partners, 2.12 percent of the equity investment in AIF IV, 5.09 percent of the equity investment in AP/RM Acquisition LLC, 0.07 percent of the equity investment in AIF IV/RRR LLC, and 0.22 percent of the equity investment in ST/RRRR LLC. We calculate that these foreign investors hold indirectly, on an aggregate basis, a 0.91 percent equity interest and a 1.77 percent voting interest in SkyTerra through the Apollo Funds, which amounts to an aggregate 0.91 percent indirect foreign equity interest and 1.77 percent indirect foreign voting interest held in MSV LP through the Apollo Funds. Accordingly, we attribute to these foreign investors of the Apollo Funds an aggregate 0.91 percent indirect equity interest and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-91A1.txt
  • agreed to pay the telephone service provider on behalf of KBHC.''); see also SAMHSA 2006 Supplement, Broderick Decl. at 1 (stating that the grant period under which KBHC received federal funds expired in March 2005). KBHC Application for Review at 9. Id. at 10. See 47 U.S.C. § 251(e)(1). See 47 C.F.R. § 0.291(a)(2); see also 47 C.F.R §§ 1.115, 0.91(m). See Red Cross Temporary Reassignment Order, 20 FCC Rcd 15089. See Red Cross Permanent Reassignment Order, 21 FCC Rcd 9925. See 800-SUICIDE Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 651, para. 1. See KBHC Application for Review at 12-14. ``No person shall be. . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-161A1.txt
  • 20554. The documents may also be purchased from BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, 251(e), and 255 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, 251(e), and 255, and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking IS ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Notice, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-175A1.txt
  • AMENDED as set forth in Appendix A, effective thirty (30) days after the publication of this report and order in the Federal Register. 119. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to the authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.723(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Clarification or Waiver filed by E-rate Central, as identified in paragraph 84 herein, IS DISMISSED. 120. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-27A1.txt
  • the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 54.722(a), sections 54.504(c), 54.504(f), 54.507(c), and 54.507(g) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.504(c), 54.504(f), 54.507(c), 54.507(g), ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Universal Service Administrative Company SHALL COMPLETE its review of each remanded application referenced in this order and ISSUE an award or a denial based on a complete review and analysis no later than 90 calendar days from the release date of this order. IT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-33A1.txt
  • 488-5563. ; phone: (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). For further information, contact Regina Brown at (202) 418-7400 in the Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that sections 54.504(b)(2)(v) and 54.504(c)(1)(vii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.504(b)(2)(v) and 54.504(c)(1)(vii) ARE WAIVED to the extent provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 1.102(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.102(b)(1), this order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-139A1.txt
  • No. 96-45, 25 FCC Rcd 13866 (2010) (Conexions Forbearance Order). After PlatinumTel, CAL Communications and ReCellular submit their compliance plans, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) will review those compliance plans for conformance with this order. The Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau has general delegated authority to ``[d]evelop and administer recordkeeping and reporting requirements for telecommunications carriers.'' 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(e). Neither PlatinumTel, CAL Communications nor ReCellular may be designated as non-facilities based ETC or receive any Lifeline universal service support until the Bureau approves the respective compliance plan. The conditions adopted herein are consistent with conditions adopted in previous decisions. See, e.g., Petition of TracFone Wireless, Inc. for Forbearance from 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A) and 47 C.F.R. § 54.201(i), CC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR parts 0, 1, 20, 36, 51, 54, 61, 64, 69 to read as follows: PART 0 - COMMISSION ORGANIZATION The authority citation for part 0 continues to read as follows: Authority: Sec. 5, 48 Stat. 1068, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 155, 225, unless otherwise noted. Amend § 0.91 by adding paragraph (p) as follows: § 0.91 Functions of the Bureau. * * * * * (p) In coordination with the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, serves as the Commission's principal policy and administrative staff resource with respect to the use of market-based mechanisms, including competitive bidding, to distribute universal service support. Develops, recommends and administers policies, programs, rules and procedures
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-279A1.txt
  • competence, ethical values, oversight by the board of directors, assignment of authority, and human resources practices work together to provide the discipline and structure necessary for ensuring compliance with the conditions. See American Inst. of Certified Pub. Accountants, ATTESTATION ENGAGEMENTS, AT § 100.11-.12, .33-40; CONSIDERATION OF INTERNAL CONTROL IN A FINANCIAL STATEMENT, AU § 319. 765 See 47 C.F.R. § 0.91; Amendment of Parts 0, 1 and 64 of the Commission's Rules with Respect to Delegation of Authority to the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, and Technical Corrections and Deletions, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 4601 (1990). See also Letter from Robert C. Atkinson, Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, to Charles E. Foster, Group President, SBC Communications Inc. (Aug. 24,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971433.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971433.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971433.wp
  • to Sheryl Todd, Universal Service Branch, Accounting and Audits Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 2100 M Street, NW, Room 8611, Washington, DC 20554. 14. Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 5(c), 201-205, 213, 215, 218, 220(c), 254 and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 155(c), 201-205, 213, 215, 218, 220(c), 254, and 403, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91 and 0.291, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Regional Holding Companies, GTE, Sprint Corporation, Anchorage Telephone Utility, and Puerto Rico Telephone Company shall complete the attached Universal Service Fund Data Request in the prescribed formats, and file their responses to the data request with the Commission by August 15, 1997. FEDERAL
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.wp
  • and 18 (except ATU regarding 11(b)). On or before November 15, 1997, PRTC and ATU must submit complete responses to question 2. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 17. Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, 218-220, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, 218-220, 254, and 403, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, IT IS ORDERED that the United States Telephone Association's Request for Extension of Time to File Data, on behalf of the RHCs, GTE, and Sprint, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein and otherwise IS DENIED. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 5(c),
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
  • e.g., East River Electric Cooperative, DA 97-205 (Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 44 released Jan. 28, 1997); Application of Comsat Corp., DA 96-1972 (International Bureau, released Nov. 23, 1996); United Artists Cable of Baltimore, DA 95-1366 (Cable Services Bureau, released June 19, 1995); Telephone Electronics Corp., 11 FCC Rcd 4457 (Wireless Tel. Bur. and Office of General Counsel, 1995). 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(a), (f); 47 C.F.R. § 0.291. 45 8 A. Did Commission Staff Have Authority to Modify the Ex Parte Rules? 1. Staff Authority to Modify the Rules. 13. In its Application, Beehive challenges the Bureau's authority to issue a public notice setting forth modified ex parte procedures. Beehive argues that because the ex parte rules were 38 properly promulgated, Commission staff
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980971.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980971.wp
  • the order directs carriers to ensure only that these corporate certifications be made publicly available. Federal Communications Commission DA 98-971 11 VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 14. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 222 and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151, 154(i), 222 and 303(r), and authority delegated thereunder pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § § 0.91, 0.291, this Order is hereby adopted. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION A. Richard Metzger, Jr. Chief Common Carrier Bureau
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.wp
  • relief for non-rural communities in their states that have rural characteristics. We conclude that granting the seven petitions for waiver would undermine the Commission's method for ensuring that universal service support mechanisms are "specific, predictable and sufficient."37 16. It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that each of the above-listed requests for waiver ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Federal Communications Commission DA 98-2333 8 Lisa M. Zaina Acting Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 98-2333 9 APPENDIX A UNIVERSAL SERVICE DISCOUNT MATRIX FOR SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES 12 FCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982558.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982558.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982558.wp
  • immediate hearing to address whether it serves the public convenience and necessity for MRP, its principals, successors, or assigns, to operate as common carriers or provide future service without Commission authorization. Federal Communications Commission DA-98-2558 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and the authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § § 0.91 and 0.291, that the attached Consent Decree is hereby ADOPTED and that the above-captioned proceeding is thereby terminated consistent with the terms of the Consent Decree. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Division Chief, Enforcement Division SHALL SIGN the Consent Decree on behalf of the Common Carrier Bureau
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.txt
  • M M H meas ATTACHMENT A-5b SBC/AMERITECH MEASUREMENT LIST (CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA) ATTACHMENT A-6 YEAR 1 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 4.16 $ 0.35 California $ 79.01 $ 6.58 Connecticut $ 9.56 $ 0.80 Illinois $ 30.41 $ 2.53 Indiana $ 9.71 $ 0.81 Kansas $ 5.89 $ 0.49 Michigan $ 23.55 $ 1.96 Missouri $ 10.87 $ 0.91 Nevada $ 1.54 $ 0.13 Ohio $ 17.81 $ 1.48 Oklahoma $ 7.05 $ 0.59 Texas $ 40.99 $ 3.41 Wisconsin $ 9.45 $ 0.79 $250.00 $ 20.83 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 2 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 6.24 $ 0.52 California $ 118.51 $ 9.88 Connecticut $ 14.34 $ 1.20 Illinois $ 45.62 $ 3.80 Indiana $
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.txt
  • employee competence, ethical values, oversight by the board of directors, assignment of authority, and human resources practices work together to provide the discipline and structure necessary for ensuring compliance with the conditions. See American Inst. of Certified Pub. Accountants, Attestation Engagements, AT § 100.11-.12, .33-40; Consideration of Internal Control in a Financial Statement, AU § 319. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.91; Amendment of Parts 0, 1 and 64 of the Commission's Rules with Respect to Delegation of Authority to the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, and Technical Corrections and Deletions, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 4601 (1990). See also Letter from Robert C. Atkinson, Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, to Charles E. Foster, Group President, SBC Communications Inc. (Aug. 24,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • 78 Mexico NY Fox, Craig 1996 Jul-96 250 0 0 A WSIV AM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 E. Syracuse NY Fox, Craig 1955 Sep-96 100 0 0 B WOLF FM Children Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Fox, Craig 1990 Sep-97 0 0.4 0 A WKRL FM Modern Rock Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1972 Feb-94 1600 4.4 0.91 A WTLA AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1959 Feb-94 200 1 0.36 B WTKW FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78 Bridgeport NY Galaxy Communications 1992 Aug-94 1800 3.5 1.23 A WSGO AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Galaxy Communications 1960 Dec-95 0 0 0 B WTKV FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.txt
  • M H meas ATTACHMENT A-5b SBC/AMERITECH MEASUREMENT LIST (CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA) ATTACHMENT A-6 YEAR 1 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 4.16 $ 0.35 California $ 79.01 $ 6.58 Connecticut $ 9.56 $ 0.80 Illinois $ 30.41 $ 2.53 Indiana $ 9.71 $ 0.81 Kansas $ 5.89 $ 0.49 Michigan $ 23.55 $ 1.96 Missouri $ 10.87 $ 0.91 Nevada $ 1.54 $ 0.13 Ohio $ 17.81 $ 1.48 Oklahoma $ 7.05 $ 0.59 Texas $ 40.99 $ 3.41 Wisconsin $ 9.45 $ 0.79 $250.00 $ 20.83 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 2 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 6.24 $ 0.52 California $ 118.51 $ 9.88 Connecticut $ 14.34 $ 1.20 Illinois $ 45.62 $ 3.80 Indiana
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • NA NA NA 89 NA 30 NA 6 NA PR-4-03-2200 % Missed Appointment ­ Customer 8.33 0 44.44 0 42.5 50 0 0 PR-4-08-2200 % Missed Appt. ­ Customer ­ Due to Late Order Conf. 0 0 0 0 0 a,b,c,d,e PR-6- Installation Quality PR-6-01-2200 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days 0.59 0 0.36 0 2.09 0 12 0 0.91 0 a,b,c,d PR-6-03-2200 % Inst. Troubles reported w/ in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 2.35 0 0.24 0 0.52 0 0 9.09 a,b,c,d PR-8 - Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2200 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 12.5 0 11.11 0 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 a,b,c,d,e PR-8-02-2200 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • (8) Chg. HUT Viewing '95- '00 Chg. Daily Paper Circ. per cap '93- '99 Chg. Weekly Paper Circ. per cap '93- '99 Chg. AQH List '94-'98 Chg. AQH News List '93-'97 Chg. Cable Use '94-'00 Int Use '00 Int News Use '00 Chg. TV Stns. '94-'00 0.6104 -0.0157 0.1023 0.0779 -0.0259 -0.3002 -0.7365 -0.6838 (1.84) (0.07) (0.14) (1.33) (0.78) (1.06) (0.91) (1.49) Chg. Inside Radio Stns '93-'97 -0.0898 -0.1078 -0.1958 0.0091 -0.1842 -0.1856 (1.01) (1.67) (1.02) (0.56) (2.43)* (0.85) Chg. Daily Papers '93-'99 -0.2157 1.4125 -0.1983 -0.0929 0.0028 -0.2911 1.3533 0.8029 (0.63) (5.72)** (0.27) (1.56) (0.08) (1.00) (1.62) (1.70) Chg. Weekly Papers '93-'99 0.0075 0.0203 0.0444 -0.0033 0.0024 0.0180 0.0504 0.0198 (0.39) (1.48) (1.09) (1.01) (1.24) (1.11) (1.08) (0.75) Chg. Inside
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • MSA White Pop ( 1) 0.0086 0.0085 0.0116 0.0085 0.0136 0.0095 0.0059 0.0093 (5.68)** (5.06)** (2.57)* (4.91)** (3.63)** (2.44)* (3.30)** (2.26)* MSA Black Pop ( 2) 0.0025 -0.0004 0.0156 -0.0005 0.0133 0.0264 0.0106 0.0259 (0.32) (0.05) (0.74) (0.06) (0.71) (1.32) (1.18) (1.22) Zip Black Fr. -0.1367 -0.1120 -0.0931 -0.1990 -0.1556 -0.0942 -0.1068 -0.1014 (19.45)** (15.44)** (5.91)** (6.16)** (9.82)** (6.00)** (15.11)** (0.91) Zip Black Fr.* White Pop ( 1- 1) -0.0426 -0.0419 -0.0712 -0.0397 -0.0687 -0.0726 -0.0397 -0.0665 (6.11)** (5.95)** (3.58)** (4.54)** (3.17)** (3.44)** (5.81)** (2.34)* Zip Black Fr.* Black Pop ( 2- 2) 0.1505 0.1221 0.1724 0.1172 0.2258 0.1791 0.1075 0.1755 (4.99)** (4.05)** (1.84) (3.18)** (2.21)* (1.80) (3.70)** (1.24) MSA Median Inc. (000) 0.002 -0.0009 (2.04)* (1.97)* MSA Fr. College Degree
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/charts/20press3.pdf
  • 31 3 3 $6,715,000.00 $6,414,000.00 5 1.02 2 8.38 32 2 2 $6,874,000.00 $6,238,400.00 5 1.02 2 6.95 33 2 2 $7,065,000.00 $6,764,000.00 5 1.02 2 6.95 34 2 2 $7,294,000.00 $6,511,400.00 5 1.02 3 6.95 35 2 2 $7,569,000.00 $7,268,000.00 5 0.92 3 6.95 36 3 3 $7,618,000.00 $7,299,850.00 5 0.92 3 7.41 37 4 4 $7,613,000.00 $7,296,600.00 5 0.91 3 10.96 38 3 3 $7,663,000.00 $7,329,100.00 5 0.88 3 7.41 39 3 3 $7,727,000.00 $7,370,700.00 5 0.88 3 7.41 40 0 0 $7,727,000.00 $7,370,700.00 5 0.88 3 0.00 41 2 2 $7,717,000.00 $7,364,200.00 5 0.82 3 2.86 42 1 1 $7,753,000.00 $7,264,050.00 5 0.82 3 1.57 43 1 1 $7,812,000.00 $7,459,200.00 5 0.82 3 1.57 44 0 0 $7,812,000.00
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • (km) Rain Rate* (mm/hr) Baseline Outage** (min) YearJanuaryAugustJanuaryAugust 2001 0.18 0.00 2.37 2.50 Denver 1.58 30.29 50.0 2000 2.14 0.79 1.99 5.22 San Francisco 0.03 33.63 225.3 1999 0.76 0.82 5.44 3.81 Miami 0.00 95.76 550.4 1998 1.10 0.00 3.42 3.12 1997 3.32 0.00 3.38 5.12 *Rain rate exceeded 0.01% of time in an average year. 1996 1.33 0.16 7.32 0.91 **For the satellite at 101o W longitude. 1995 3.31 0.00 3.49 0.76 1994 0.06 0.00 5.69 6.18 1993 2.42 0.00 1.98 5.39 1992 0.13 0.28 1.73 4.08 1991 0.01 0.24 2.77 2.54 1990 0.62 0.21 4.57 6.47 180 See MITRE Report at 3-12 to 3-13. 181 The minimum signal level for GSO satellite to maintain communications is defined by an
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540193.pdf
  • the treatments in the additive value environment. 4.3.1Superadditive Environment In the superadditive environment analysis, we redefine "revenue" as the ratio of the maximum total value assignment for the participating agents divided by the revenue actually collected. Table 4.3.1a shows these (mean, median) normalized revenue ratios: Table 4.3.1a Normalized Revenue (Mean, Median): Superadditive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 0.92, 0.89 0.98, 0.91 Unequal 0.72, 0.78 0.84, 0.86 The ANOVA below substantiates the following result: Result 5: All variables have a significant effect on revenue except for the existence of competitive equilibrium prices. 25 Table 4.3.1b ANOVA Normalized Revenue: Superadditive Environment Variable F-Statistic P-Value Flexible 3.267 0.0736 Unequal 10.255 0.0018 Environment (H, M, L) 4.99 0.0086 Number of Bidders 3.368 0.038 Overlap 4.83
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2001/papers/vsmith.pdf
  • 0.51 Number of Bidders -1.69 0.48 Overlap 3.31 0.05 CE Exists -3.25 0.11 Table 10: Normalized (Mean, Median) Revenue: Additive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 1.41, 1.31 1.45, 1.45 Unequal 1.39, 1.39 1.31, 1.29 Table 11: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Normalized Revenue: Additive Environment Variable Estimate p-value Intercept 1.46 0.0 Flexible -0.01 0.84 Unequal 0.04 0.21 Environment Pairing -0.01 0.91 Number of Bidders -0.03 0.44 Table 12: Normalized Revenue (Mean, Median): Superadditive Environment Treatments Nonflexible Flexible Equal 0.92, 0.89 0.98, 0.91 Unequal 0.72, 0.78 0.84, 0.86 Table 13: Linear Model Parameter Estimates for Normalized Revenue: Superadditive Environment Variable Estimate P-Value Intercept 1.01 0.00 Flexible 0.05 0.07 Unequal 0.09 0.001 Level of Synergy (Medium) -0.05 0.18 Level of Synergy (High) 0.02
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
  • 21.82 21 218.18 26 21.55 21 General Wireless 20.38 20.38 22 509.38 18 20.38 22 Comcast (6) 8.26 9.91 18.17 23 305.53 21 11.56 28 Rivgam Comm. 17.32 17.32 24 173.22 29 17.32 23 Telecorp PCS (8) 9.89 4.94 14.83 25 247.15 23 14.83 24 Cook Inlet/WW (SEC) (7) 2.98 9.83 12.81 26 142.95 32 12.81 25 Triton PCS (8) 0.91 11.01 11.92 27 242.90 24 11.92 26 Mercury PCS (PK) 2.50 9.16 11.65 28 129.03 34 11.65 27 Centennial Cellular 7.00 3.77 10.77 29 288.06 22 10.77 29 Dobson Comm. (SEC) 5.58 4.20 9.78 30 181.39 28 9.78 30 Devon Mobile (PK) 0.95 8.54 9.49 31 99.70 40 9.49 31 Urban Comm. PCS (PK) 3.47 4.42 7.89 32 148.28 31
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=79
  • 53 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79M on, 14 Sep 2009 14:35:01 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 38 Bidding Days: 9 Results for Round 38 Gross Revenue: $6,088,800.00 - Dollar Change: $12,000.00 - % Change: 0.20 Net Revenue: $5,149,050.00 - Dollar Change: $46,600.00 - % Change: 0.91 New Bids: 4 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Permits with PWBs*: 85 FCC Held Permits: 37 Eligible Bidders: 53 (of 77 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=79M on, 14 Sep 2009 15:50:02 GMT Summary Permits: 122 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 77 Rounds Completed: 39 Bidding Days: 9 Results
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=91
  • 6 Permits with PWBs*: 106 FCC Held Permits: 38 Eligible Bidders: 73 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91W ed, 04 May 2011 15:50:01 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 117 Rounds Completed: 25 Bidding Days: 6 Results for Round 25 Gross Revenue: $10,062,500.00 - Dollar Change: $90,800.00 - % Change: 0.91 Net Revenue: $8,068,570.00 - Dollar Change: $36,905.00 - % Change: 0.46 New Bids: 21 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 1 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 1 Permits with PWBs*: 106 FCC Held Permits: 38 Eligible Bidders: 73 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91W ed, 04 May 2011 17:05:02 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc00214.doc
  • not equal that shown in Tables 5 and 6 because rates shown there are based on a larger set of responses. ATTACHMENT C-1 AVERAGE NUMBER OF CHANNELS DEVOTED TO EACH CATEGORY OF PROGRAMMING COMPETITIVE GROUP NONCOMPETITIVE GROUP Category of Programming 1998 1999 %Change 1998 1999 %Change Total Number of Channels 53.3 55.6 4.3% 51.1 53.7 5.1% Standard Error 0 0 0.91 0.84 Public Access 2.7 3.1 14.8% 3.3 3.5 6.1% Standard Error 0 0 0.13 0.11 Broadcast 11.0 10.8 -1.8% 10.7 10.9 1.9% Standard Error 0 0 0.21 0.23 Children's Programming 2.7 3.3 22.2% 2.7 3.1 14.8% Standard Error 0 0 0.09 0.08 News Programming 5.6 5.8 3.6% 5.5 5.8 5.5% Standard Error 0 0 0.14 0.13 Sports Programming 3.7 4.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971433.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971433.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971433.wp
  • to Sheryl Todd, Universal Service Branch, Accounting and Audits Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 2100 M Street, NW, Room 8611, Washington, DC 20554. 14. Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 5(c), 201-205, 213, 215, 218, 220(c), 254 and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 155(c), 201-205, 213, 215, 218, 220(c), 254, and 403, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91 and 0.291, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Regional Holding Companies, GTE, Sprint Corporation, Anchorage Telephone Utility, and Puerto Rico Telephone Company shall complete the attached Universal Service Fund Data Request in the prescribed formats, and file their responses to the data request with the Commission by August 15, 1997. FEDERAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971728.wp
  • and 18 (except ATU regarding 11(b)). On or before November 15, 1997, PRTC and ATU must submit complete responses to question 2. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 17. Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, 218-220, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, 218-220, 254, and 403, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, IT IS ORDERED that the United States Telephone Association's Request for Extension of Time to File Data, on behalf of the RHCs, GTE, and Sprint, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein and otherwise IS DENIED. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 5(c),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971847.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971847.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da971847.wp
  • Worksheet good faith estimates of these figures.[4]^(2) In addition, the new universal service support mechanisms will be implemented starting January 1, 1998. In order to meet the tight implementation schedule, Worksheets must be filed in a timely manner. 3. It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46(a), that Metrocall's motion for an extension of time IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting and Audits Division, Common Carrier Bureau _____________________ 1. See 47 C.F.R. 1.46(a). 2. Changes to the Board of Directors of the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. and Federal-State Joint
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da972538.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da972538.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/da972538.wp
  • this extension applies to all state commissions. To facilitate our review of state cost studies, however, we strongly encourage state commissions to file their cost studies as soon as possible. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that the deadline for states to file cost studies for determining the forward-looking cost of providing the services supported by federal universal service support mechanism IS EXTENDED to and including April 24, 1998. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97159.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97159.txt
  • price levels rather than growth in input prices.221 BellSouth and Bell Atlantic assert that AT&T's hedonic adjustment results in overstating capital input growth, which in turn understates capital input price increases, and so artificially inflates the input price differential.222 According to Bell Atlantic, adjusting for the effects of AT&T's hedonic adjustment reduces its input price differential from 2.54 percent to 0.91 percent.223 USTA asserts that 2.54 percent is not statistically significant.224 When Sprint compared its price indexes for capital, labor, and materials to its economy-wide input price index, it found that the five-year moving averages for the period from 1985 to 1993 ranged from 1.64 percent to 0.84 percent.225 51. Most of the LECs argue that the long-run input price differential
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
  • e.g., East River Electric Cooperative, DA 97-205 (Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 44 released Jan. 28, 1997); Application of Comsat Corp., DA 96-1972 (International Bureau, released Nov. 23, 1996); United Artists Cable of Baltimore, DA 95-1366 (Cable Services Bureau, released June 19, 1995); Telephone Electronics Corp., 11 FCC Rcd 4457 (Wireless Tel. Bur. and Office of General Counsel, 1995). 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(a), (f); 47 C.F.R. § 0.291. 45 8 A. Did Commission Staff Have Authority to Modify the Ex Parte Rules? 1. Staff Authority to Modify the Rules. 13. In its Application, Beehive challenges the Bureau's authority to issue a public notice setting forth modified ex parte procedures. Beehive argues that because the ex parte rules were 38 properly promulgated, Commission staff
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980392.pdf
  • that they are not subject to the jurisdiction of a state commission. Based on the record before us, we conclude that the petitioners are not subject to the jurisdiction of a state commission for purposes of section 214(e)(6), and therefore, we Federal Communications Commission DA 98-392 16 See 214(e)(6) Public Notice and 47 C.F.R. §0.291. See also 47 C.F.R. § 0.91. 17 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1). 18 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(5). Rural telephone company is defined in section 3(37) of the Act, which provides that: The term "rural telephone company" means a local exchange carrier operating entity to the extent that such entity -- (A) provides common carrier service to any local exchange carrier study area that does not include either
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980719.pdf
  • oppositions to the ISIS Objection until April 20, 1998. We further conclude that ISIS will not be prejudiced by this brief extension of time for the filing of responsive pleadings. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that the deadline for parties to submit objections to the ISIS Objection IS EXTENDED to and including April 20, 1998, and the deadline for parties to submit replies to those objections IS EXTENDED to and including April 27, 1998. Federal Communications Commission DA 98-719 4 8.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980788.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980788.wp
  • providing the supported services in that state.17 Thus, states cost study filings that utilize a cost model must include both a platform design selection as well as all input values. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that the deadline for states to file cost studies for determining the forward-looking cost of providing the services supported by federal universal service support mechanism IS EXTENDED to and including May 26, 1998. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980971.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980971.wp
  • the order directs carriers to ensure only that these corporate certifications be made publicly available. Federal Communications Commission DA 98-971 11 VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 14. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 222 and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 151, 154(i), 222 and 303(r), and authority delegated thereunder pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § § 0.91, 0.291, this Order is hereby adopted. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION A. Richard Metzger, Jr. Chief Common Carrier Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da981576.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da981576.wp
  • copy of information in the prescribed electronic format shall be transmitted to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, N.W., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20036. ORDERING CLAUSE 13. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 5(c), 201-205, 220(c), 254 and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 155(c), 201-205, 220(c), 254, and 403, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Aliant Communications Company, ALLTEL, Ameritech, Anchorage Telephone Utility, Bell Atlantic, BellSouth, Cincinnati Bell, Frontier Corporation, GTE, North State Telephone Company, Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Roseville Telephone Company, Southern New England, Southwestern Bell, U S West, and United Telephone System shall Federal Communications Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982014.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982014.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982014.wp
  • only to the petitioners that requested the respective extensions or waivers. With the exception of the limited extensions granted herein, all respondents remain bound by the October 6, 1998 deadline. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46, that GTE's request for extension of time is GRANTED to the extent described herein. 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982050.wp
  • only to the petitioners that requested the respective extensions or waivers. With the exception of the limited extensions granted herein, all respondents remain bound by the October 6, 1998 deadline. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section 154(i), and sections 0.91, Federal Communications Commission DA 98-2050 3 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 1.46, that Sprint's request for extension of time is GRANTED to the extent described herein. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. section
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982333.wp
  • relief for non-rural communities in their states that have rural characteristics. We conclude that granting the seven petitions for waiver would undermine the Commission's method for ensuring that universal service support mechanisms are "specific, predictable and sufficient."37 16. It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that each of the above-listed requests for waiver ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Federal Communications Commission DA 98-2333 8 Lisa M. Zaina Acting Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 98-2333 9 APPENDIX A UNIVERSAL SERVICE DISCOUNT MATRIX FOR SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES 12 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982558.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982558.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da982558.wp
  • immediate hearing to address whether it serves the public convenience and necessity for MRP, its principals, successors, or assigns, to operate as common carriers or provide future service without Commission authorization. Federal Communications Commission DA-98-2558 ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i), and the authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § § 0.91 and 0.291, that the attached Consent Decree is hereby ADOPTED and that the above-captioned proceeding is thereby terminated consistent with the terms of the Consent Decree. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Division Chief, Enforcement Division SHALL SIGN the Consent Decree on behalf of the Common Carrier Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da991863.doc
  • for the final resolution of the CPUC proceeding and the Tenth Circuit decision and, therefore, limit expenditures of additional time and resources by the parties and the Commission. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the parties' Joint Motion IS GRANTED and the above-captioned proceeding shall be HELD IN ABEYANCE until: 1) the CPUC makes a determination regarding the CPNI issue as framed in the CPUC Order; and 2) the final disposition of the CPNI Order pending further activity in the U.S.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da991878.doc
  • our rules, assess a forfeiture against any person found to have willfully or repeatedly violated any provision of the Act or any Commission rule, regulation, or order. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j) and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.717, and 1.718 et seq. of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.717, and 1.718 et seq., that the informal request from JMJ Associates, Inc. for reconsideration of the February 6, 1998 letter ruling of the Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Acting Assistant Chief, Enforcement Division Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da991890.doc
  • promoting the private resolution of disputes and eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and the Commission. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the parties' Joint Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, with Prejudice, IS GRANTED. . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and 208, and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da991904.doc
  • this complaint will serve the public interest by eliminating the need for further litigation and the expenditure of further time and resources of the parties and the Commission. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 208 and the authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91,0.291, that the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss IS GRANTED. INATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigation Branch Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau See Implementation of Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 11 FCC Rcd 20541 (1996); Order on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992036.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992036.txt
  • non-recurring services. We conclude that, on the facts presented, granting SMBSD's petition for waiver would undermine the Commission's method for ensuring that universal service support mechanisms are ``specific, predictable and sufficient'' and, therefore, SMBSD's petition is denied. conclusion It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Santa Maria-Bonita School District's petition for waiver IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa M. Zaina Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Gail M. Tisser, Ph.D., Santa Maria-Bonita School District (SMBSD), to Magalie R. Salas, FCC, dated March 2, 1999 (SMBSD Petition). See
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992037.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992037.txt
  • MVCSD's petition for waiver of the September 30, 1999, deadline for implementation of non-recurring services is, therefore, granted. Furthermore, MVCSD's petition to extend the deadline for MVCSD by 30 days to October 30, 1999, is also granted. conclusion It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the Mesa Vista Consolidated School District's petition for waiver IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa M. Zaina Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bruce Peterson, Mesa Vista Consolidated Schools District (MVCSD), to Kathy Dole and Irene M. Flannery, FCC, dated September 15, 1999
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992044.doc
  • Motion and has found good cause to grant the Joint Motion because it will serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and conserving the Commission's scarce resources. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and the above-referenced proceedings are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, in accordance with the terms agreed to in the Joint Motion to Dismiss. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992045.doc
  • Motion and has found good cause to grant the Joint Motion because it will serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and conserving the Commission's scarce resources. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), and authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and the above-referenced proceedings are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, in accordance with the terms agreed to in the Joint Motion to Dismiss. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Radhika V. Karmarkar Deputy Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992144.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992144.txt
  • go into effect on January 1, 1998. Because the Eighth Reconsideration Order's rules were not in effect at the time USD 217 received the funding commitment decision for which it sought review by USAC, its appeal to USAC is not governed by the filing deadline set forth in those rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 12, 1999, by the United School District 217 of Rolla, Kansas, is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that USD 217's application IS REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division of USAC for further consideration in light of this decision.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992202.txt
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Therefore, Methacton was required to file its appeal of Audubon's November 20, 1998 Funding Commitment Decision Letter no later than December 21, 1998. Thus, we dismiss the Audubon portion of the appeal for Methacton's failure to satisfy the ÁACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under À 0.91, 9.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 18, 1999 by the Methacton School District IS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992219.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992219.txt
  • 1, 1999. Therefore, notice of the rules was provided long before St. Margaret's-McTernan was required to file its appeal with the Administrator. Moreover, St. Margaret's-McTernan has failed to show why it should not be held to the same standard of notice as all parties potentially affected by this rule. 5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed July 20, 1999 by St. Margaret's-McTernan School IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 254 (h)(1)(B). 47 C.F.R. § 54.720. See Letter from Henry A. Cirpiano, Jr. to Federal Communications Commission, Office of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992239.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992239.txt
  • 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 4, 1999 by the Bremerton School District 100-C IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa M. Zaina Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### 99-2239
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992242.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992242.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed August 9, 1999 by the Monrovia Consortium IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lisa M. Zaina Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### 99-2242 \ \ þÿÿÿ
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992365.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992365.txt
  • must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed August 2, 1999 by the Lancaster County Public Schools of Kilmarnock, Virginia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. 99-2365
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992366.txt
  • must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed August 2, 1999 by the Norfolk Public Schools of Norfolk, Virginia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. ##-#### 99-2366
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992368.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992368.txt
  • one and priority two services being considered separately on their own merits. Therefore, we remand Sparta's application to SLD and we direct SLD to issue a new funding commitment decision letter based on the originally submitted FCC Form 471 and any further consultations with the applicant that may be necessary. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Sparta Area School District, Sparta, Wisconsin on June 3, 1999 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992379.doc
  • public interest. Therefore, we suspend pending completion of the investigation the revisions that propose to increase the Universal Connectivity Charge for residential end users. III. Ordering Clauses IT IS ORDERED that, upon adoption of this order, pursuant to sections 4(i), 201(b), and 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 201(b) and 204(a), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.773 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.773, the revisions to the residential Universal Connectivity Charge described in AT&T Transmittal No. 11460 ARE SUSPENDED for five months from the effective date and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that AT&T SHALL FILE a supplement reflecting the suspension no later than 5 business
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992396.doc
  • motion and the dismissal of this complaint with prejudice will serve the public interest by promoting the private resolution of disputes and conserving the Commission's and Petitioners' resources. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 208 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 208, and the authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the joint motion to dismiss the above-captioned complaint with prejudice IS GRANTED and the above-captioned complaint proceeding IS TERMINATED with prejudice. 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective immediately upon release thereof. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Alexander P. Starr Chief, Formal Complaints and Investigations Branch Enforcement
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992418.doc
  • lower than they might have been against refunds owed for rates that were too high. Accordingly, U S WEST's petition is denied. 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(I), 4(j), 201 and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 201 and 202, and authority delegated by sections 0.91 and 0291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the petition for waiver filed by U S WEST IS HEREBY DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 1997 Annual Access Tariff Filings, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 3815 (1997) (1997 Annual Access Tariff Refund Order). 1997 Annual Access Tariff Refund
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992466.doc
  • circumstances, applications should be remanded to SLD for reprocessing, with priority one and priority two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand Prairie City's application to SLD and direct SLD to issue a new funding commitment decision letter based on the originally submitted FCC Form 471 ÁACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under À 0.91, 0.291, and Á IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992486.doc
  • has an appeal pending before the Administrator. Therefore, the Common Carrier Bureau dismisses HCUSD's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on HCUSD's initial appeal, HCUSD may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by the Havana Community Unit School District 126 of Havana, Illinois, on August 11, 1999, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Kristina J. Lewis, Havana Community
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992487.doc
  • reprocessing, with priority one and priority two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand Hewlett-Woodmere's application and direct SLD to issue a new funding commitment decision letter based on the originally submitted FCC Form 471 and any further consultations with the applicant that may be necessary. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Hewlett-Woodmere UFSD, Woodmere, New York, on June 9, 1999 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992488.doc
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 14, 1999 by the Independence Unified School District 446 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### 99-2488 \
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992489.doc
  • one and priority two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand North Middlesex's application to SLD and direct SLD to issue a new funding commitment decision letter based on the originally submitted FCC Form 471 and any further consultations with the applicant that may be necessary. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by North Middlesex Regional School District, Townsend, Massachusetts, on May 11, 1999, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992490.doc
  • for reprocessing, with priority one and priority two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand Olton's application and direct SLD to issue a new funding commitment decision letter based on the originally submitted Form 471 and any further consultations with the applicant that may be necessary. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Olton Branch Library, Olton, Texas, on June 21, 1999 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992534.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992534.txt
  • staff requested that Gustine submit one. Had the March 16, 1998 copy of the contract existed then, Gustine had the opportunity to provide it at that time. In light of this circumstance, the record in this proceeding demonstrates that SLD's funding decision was fully in accord with the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Gustine Independent School District, Gustine, Texas, filed June 21, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 254 (h)(1)(B); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.502, 504.503. 47 C.F.R. § 54.504. 47 C.F.R. § 54.504(b)(1)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992537.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992537.txt
  • conclude that White Sulphur Springs is entitled to discounts for this service. To the extent necessary to effectuate the decision above, we grant a waiver of section 54.507(b)(2) of the Commission's rules. This rule provides that schools and libraries may receive discounts on nonrecurring services only through September 30, 1999. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by White Sulphur Springs School District on April 22, 1999, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Administrator to review White Sulphur Springs' funding application and to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter consistent with the decision above.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992588.doc
  • MAISD's responsibility to ensure that the service provider it had contracted with was indeed a telecommunications provider whose status as a telecommunications provider would be appropriately reflected in the Form 498. In light of these findings, we conclude that SLD correctly denied funding for MAISD's request for telecommunications discounts. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Bresnan Communications on June 24, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992590.doc
  • this matter, however, indicate that the Administrator never received that letter of appeal. The proffered copy of the January 26, 1999 letter, without more, is insufficient to demonstrate that the letter was filed with the Administrator within the thirty-day appeal window. We, therefore, dismiss Rainbow's appeal as untimely filed. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by the Pediatric Library of Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, on June 24, 1999, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R.Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Thomas W. Hayes, Director, Pediatric Learning Center of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992591.doc
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it is dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Peoria Public Schools on June 25, 1999 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 47 C.F.R. § 54.720. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2591 Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2591
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992604.doc
  • support for services or equipment that do not qualify as telecommunications services, Internet access, or internal connections. While video service is an eligible telecommunications service, Western Heights' internal connections hardware used to support this service is not eligible for discounts because it does not provide a necessary transmission function. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by the Western Heights School District on June 24, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992611.doc
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 28, 1999 by the Brighton New York School District IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2611 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992612.doc
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 28, 1999 by Cotulla Independent School District IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2612 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q a q �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992613.doc
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 28, 1999 by the Forsyth County Schools IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2613 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q a q � ` ¡ ± Á Ñ
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992614.doc
  • with priority one and priority two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand Greenfield's application and direct SLD to issue a new funding commitment decision letter based on the originally submitted FCC Form 471 and any further consultations with the applicant that may be necessary. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by the Greenfield School District on July 2, 1999 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992615.doc
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 25, 1999 by the Pioneerland Library System IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R.Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2615 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q a q � `
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992616.doc
  • installation of these products. Additionally, it indicated that it would not provide funding for possible change orders. The record evidence in this case indicates that the amount of ineligible products and services total $137,000, representing 62 percent of the requested amount. Under these circumstances, SLD properly denied Redwood's request. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by the Redwood City School District on June 25, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992617.doc
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 28, 1999 by the Spencer East Brookfield Regional School District IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2617 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992633.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992633.txt
  • that LNP-capable carriers receive smaller blocks of numbers than they now do. The authority to reclaim unused and reserved NXX codes has the potential to add significant numbering resources in Connecticut. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control's Petition for Delegation of Additional Authority to Implement Area Code Conservation Measures is GRANTED to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Petition for Declaratory
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992634.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992634.txt
  • address the demand side of the number assignment regime by requiring that carriers not request more numbering resources until they have used a certain percentage of those already in their inventory. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission's Petition for Additional Delegated Authority to Implement Number Optimization Measures in the 603 Are Code is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992635.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992635.txt
  • Ohio Commission to address the demand side of the number assignment regime by requiring that carriers not request more numbering resources until they have efficiently used numbers already in their inventory. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that Petition of the Public Utility Commission of Ohio for Expedited Decision for Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992636.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992636.txt
  • Texas Commission to address the demand side of the number assignment regime by requiring that carriers not request more numbering resources until they have efficiently used numbers already in their inventory. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that Petition of the Public Utility Commission of Texas for Expedited Decision for Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992637.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992637.txt
  • Wisconsin Commission to address the demand side of the number assignment regime by requiring that carriers not request more numbering resources until they have efficiently used numbers already in their inventory. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that Petition of the Public Utility Commission of Wisconsin for Expedited Decision for Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent described herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992638.doc
  • expenses associated with implementation of the 1996 Act, are reasonable and that it supports approval of a request for waiver by Bristol Bay. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201-205, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201-205, and 254, and sections 1.3, 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 0.91 and 0.291, that the Petition of Bristol Bay Telephone Cooperative, Inc. for Waiver of Section 36.621(a)(4) of the Commission's Rules IS GRANTED to the extent discussed in this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Robert C. Atkinson Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996 Act).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992722.doc
  • that the grant of Roseville's request is warranted. We find merit in Roseville's request. The June CAM filing date will not affect other related reporting requirements, and thus causes no harm to the public interest. We, therefore, grant Roseville an extension of time until June 9, 2000 to file its initial CAM. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that Roseville's request for an extension of time until June 9, 2000, to file its initial cost allocation manual IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. § 64.903(a). See 47 C.F.R. §1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2722 Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992723.doc
  • than one-year, extension will provide Century with enough time to file an accurate CAM. The June CAM filing date will not affect other related reporting requirements, and thus causes no harm to the public interest. We, therefore, grant Century an extension of time until June 9, 2000 to file its initial CAM. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that Century's request for an extension of time until June 9, 2000, to file its initial cost allocation manual IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. § 64.903(a). See 47 C.F.R. §1.46(a). Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2723 Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992727.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992727.txt
  • above, Chadron has an appeal pending before the Administrator. Therefore, we dismiss Chadron's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Chadron's initial appeal, Chadron may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Chadron Public Library, Chadron, Nebraska on September 7, 1999 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Imogene Horse, Director, and Dana Crews, Technical Services Librarian, Chadron Public
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992728.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992728.txt
  • require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Horton's request to waive the rule and to reopen its case. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Horton Free Public Library, Horton, Kansas, on September 7, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Universal Service Administrative Co. to Horton Free Public Library, dated July 8, 1999 (Funding Commitment Decision
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992729.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992729.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 10, 1999 by the Logandale Middle School, Chicago, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### 99-2729
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992730.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992730.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letters of Appeal were not filed within the specified 30-day period, they will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letters of Appeal filed September 13, 1999 and September 21, 1999 by the Yeshiva of Central Queens ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### 99-2730 \
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992763.doc
  • to the public interest. We, therefore, waive the year-end 1999 CAM filing date until March 15, 2000, for mid-sized ILECs planning to file CAMs at the Class B level for the 1999 reporting year. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 5(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 155(c) and Sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3, that the filing date for year-end cost allocation manual revisions in Section 64.903(b) is waived until March 15, 2000, for mid-sized ILECs planning to file their cost allocation manuals at the Class B account level effective for the 1999 reporting year. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992772.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992772.txt
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 13, 1999 by the Regional Educational Media Center IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2772 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q a q
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992784.doc
  • to seek a SPIN change was not necessitated by any default on the part of the original vendor. Rather, it resulted from the school's own voluntary action. Thus, because Delaplaine's SPIN change request did not fall within the enumerated exceptions, we find that the Administrator correctly denied the request. 5. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Delaplaine Public Schools on September 14, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992785.doc
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 15, 1999 by the Sacred Heart Parish School IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99-xxxx Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2785 Îÿÿÿ Ïÿÿÿ Âÿÿÿ Íÿÿÿ Îÿÿÿ Ïÿÿÿ Ñÿÿÿ Òÿÿÿ
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992796.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992796.txt
  • FCD Letter similarly fail to present any special circumstances warranting a waiver. Carolina's explanation for failing to file its appeal within the 30-day deadline does not provide a basis for treating it differently from other applicants that are required to appeal SLD's decision in accordance with specified filing deadlines. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 20, 1999 by Carolina Friends School IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See 47 C.F.R. § 54.720(b); see also "SLD Procedure for Post-Commitment Appeals" at http://www.sl.universalservice/org/reference/appeals.asp. ("To submit a letter of appeal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992797.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992797.txt
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 20, 1999 by Foxcroft Academy IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R.Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2797 Îÿÿÿ Ïÿÿÿ Ñÿÿÿ Òÿÿÿ Çÿÿÿ Óÿÿÿ Ôÿÿÿ Öÿÿÿ @& „|ü ! 1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992798.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992798.txt
  • during the period of time that corresponds to Joplin's instant funding request. 8. To the extent necessary to effectuate the decision above, we waive section 54.507(b)(2) of the Commission's rules. This rule section provides that schools and libraries may receive discounts on nonrecurring services only through September 30, 1999. 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Joplin R8 School District on June 16, 1999 IS GRANTED and REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of the ruling in this order. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992799.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992799.txt
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 24, 1999 by the Lincoln Intermediate Unit IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2799 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q a q �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992800.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992800.txt
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 19, 1999 by Putnam City Schools IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R.Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2800 Îÿÿÿ Ïÿÿÿ Ñÿÿÿ Òÿÿÿ Çÿÿÿ Òÿÿÿ Óÿÿÿ Ôÿÿÿ Öÿÿÿ @& „|ü
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992801.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992801.txt
  • record and any further consultations with the applicant that may be necessary. To the extent necessary to effectuate the decision above, we grant a waiver of section 54.507(b) of the Commission's rules. This rule provides that schools and libraries may receive discounts on nonrecurring services only through September 30, 1999. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Simpson County School District, Mendenhall, Mississippi, filed June 29, 1999, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and that Simpson County's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that section 54.507(b)(2),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992802.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992802.txt
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 21, 1999 by White Oak Public School District IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2802 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q a q
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992803.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992803.txt
  • issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 17, 1999 by St. John - St. James Lutheran School, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R.Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2803 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992807.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992807.txt
  • information collections contained herein are contingent upon approval of the Office of Management and Budget. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 215, 218, 219, and 220, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that FCC Report 43-01, the Annual Summary Report, FCC Report 43-02, the USOA Report, FCC Report 43-03, the Joint Cost Report, FCC Report 43-04, the Access Report, FCC Report 43-05, the Service Quality Report, FCC Report 43-06, the Customer Satisfaction Report, and FCC 43-08, the Operating Data Report,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992831.doc
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 17, 1999 by John Curtis Christian Schools IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau YY-#### -2831
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992832.doc
  • the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. §1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 17, 1999 by the Morton Memorial Schools IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission DA 99- Federal Communications Commission DA 99-2832 @& „|ü ! 1 A Q a q �
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992833.doc
  • must be brought within 30 days of the date of the decision. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period and Wilkinsburg has not made a showing warranting the acceptance of its late-filed appeal, the Request for Review will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 8, 1999 by the School District of the Borough of Wilkinsburg, Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Wilkinsburg Request for Review at 2. -2833 -2833 ! H r s
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992954.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992954.txt
  • under its renewed contract for services delivered from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999. We, therefore, remand Chatham's application and direct SLD to issue a new funding commitment decision letter based on the originally submitted FCC Form 471 and any further consultations with the applicant that may be necessary. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Chatham County Schools, Pittsboro, North Carolina, on April 19, 1999, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992955.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992955.txt
  • to be true, it does not provide a basis for granting Crookston's appeal. Crookston bears the responsibility for reviewing the forms it files with SLD for any discrepancies or errors. Its failure to rectify its error in a timely manner provides an insufficient basis for granting the requested relief. 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Crookston Public Schools on August 30, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R.Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the Administrator may
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992956.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992956.txt
  • failed to provide such clarifying information. Instead, New Kensington has submitted entirely new information to the Commission, omitting mention of ineligible services previously requested, and requesting for the first time funding for certain additional services. Under these circumstances, we must affirm SLD's denial of New Kensington's application for discounted services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by New Kensington-Arnold School District on May 24, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992957.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992957.txt
  • reprocessing and the issuance of an appropriate Funding Commitment Letter. To effectuate the decision above, we recognize that it may be necessary also to waive section 54.507 of the Commission's rules. This rule section provides that schools and libraries may receive discounts on nonrecurring services only through September 30, 1999. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Runnemede Public Schools, Runnemede, New Jersey on September 10, 1999 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and that Runnemede's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 0.91
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992966.doc
  • See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the tariff revisions filed by GTE Telephone Operating Companies under Transmittal No. 1234 and GTE Systems Telephone Companies under Transmittal No. 304 ARE SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. 7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 204(a) and 4(i) of the Communications Act
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992974.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. V. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Ameritech for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing message rate, two-way, ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-99-86, IS APPROVED. This LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing message-rate, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points in the specific exchanges
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992982.doc
  • this Commission waiver should consumers desire further information. 15. In summary, we conclude that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting this Petition, and that grant of this petition will not result in harm to the PSTN. We emphasize the conditions for grant of this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSE 16. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.3, that Lucent Technologies, Inc.'s Petition for Waiver of Section 68.6 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.6 IS GRANTED subject to the conditions stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION L. Charles Keller Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau Lucent
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992983.doc
  • not contain the signature of a representative of the carrier, it does not meet the definition of an existing contract, and USAC properly refused to provide support to Sidney Health Center, Glendive Medical Center, Colstrip Medical Center, and the Eastern Montana Community Mental Health Center based upon an existing contract. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed on August 23, 1999 by Eastern Montana Telemedicine Network on behalf of the Sidney Health Center, Glendive Medical Center, Colstrip Medical Center, and the Eastern Montana Community Mental Health Center IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da993013.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da993013.txt
  • 1999, implementation deadline has been extended by this Order. This waiver will allow Year One discounts to continue to flow to service providers as services are implemented under the extended deadlines created in this Order. ordering clauses ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Order is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for implementation of non-recurring services under each funding commitment letter issued pursuant to a successful request for review by the Administrator on or after April 4, 1999, is extended to 180 days after the date
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da993021.doc
  • in USF expense adjustment payments to average schedule companies while we complete our review, we direct NECA to retain the current USF expense adjustment formula as set forth in the March 1999 Order. Our review will proceed expeditiously so that any revised formula, if appropriate, will be implemented promptly. III. Ordering Clause 5. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 9.291, that the average schedule formula proposed by the National Exchange Carriers Association, Inc. on October 1, 1999, for local switching support SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE January, 1 2000. 6. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 9.291, that the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da993035.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da993035.txt
  • total funding amount projected for Fiscal Year 2000, in light of anticipated Commission decisions with respect to implementation of thousands-block number pooling. Should such a recalculation prove necessary, the Commission may direct that refunds be made to carriers. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 52.16 and 52.17 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 52.16 and 52.17, that NBANC apply the contribution factor of 0.0000577 to the end-user revenue of each telecommunications carrier in the United States. Payments will be due March 12, 2000. Carriers with contribution requirements in excess of $1,600 may opt to pay in sixteen equal monthly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fc99279c.txt
  • M M H meas ATTACHMENT A-5b SBC/AMERITECH MEASUREMENT LIST (CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA) ATTACHMENT A-6 YEAR 1 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 4.16 $ 0.35 California $ 79.01 $ 6.58 Connecticut $ 9.56 $ 0.80 Illinois $ 30.41 $ 2.53 Indiana $ 9.71 $ 0.81 Kansas $ 5.89 $ 0.49 Michigan $ 23.55 $ 1.96 Missouri $ 10.87 $ 0.91 Nevada $ 1.54 $ 0.13 Ohio $ 17.81 $ 1.48 Oklahoma $ 7.05 $ 0.59 Texas $ 40.99 $ 3.41 Wisconsin $ 9.45 $ 0.79 $250.00 $ 20.83 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 2 CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 6.24 $ 0.52 California $ 118.51 $ 9.88 Connecticut $ 14.34 $ 1.20 Illinois $ 45.62 $ 3.80 Indiana $
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99279.txt
  • employee competence, ethical values, oversight by the board of directors, assignment of authority, and human resources practices work together to provide the discipline and structure necessary for ensuring compliance with the conditions. See American Inst. of Certified Pub. Accountants, Attestation Engagements, AT § 100.11-.12, .33-40; Consideration of Internal Control in a Financial Statement, AU § 319. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.91; Amendment of Parts 0, 1 and 64 of the Commission's Rules with Respect to Delegation of Authority to the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, and Technical Corrections and Deletions, Report and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 4601 (1990). See also Letter from Robert C. Atkinson, Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, to Charles E. Foster, Group President, SBC Communications Inc. (Aug. 24,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000015.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000015.txt
  • entering into contracts between July 10, 1997 and January 30, 1998, Brimfield was required to seek competitive bids for all services eligible for support for Funding Year 2. Because Brimfield did not seek competitive bids for Funding Year 2, we find that the SLD correctly denied Brimfield's request for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the September 24, 1999 Letter of Appeal filed by Brimfield School District #309, Brimfield, Illinois, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R.Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by a division
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000016.doc
  • issuance of that decision. In order to timely appeal the August 3, 1999 decision letter, Madison was required to have filed its appeal by September 2, 1999. Because Madison filed its Letter of Appeal with the Administrator outside of the specified 30-day period, we deny its request for review here. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed October 1, 1999, by Madison School District No. 321, Rexburg, Idaho, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Services Administrative Company, to Brent W. Orr, Madison School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000017.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000017.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 27, 1999 by the Mark Twain Union Elementary School District on September 27, 1999 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau YY-#### -17
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000018.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000018.txt
  • Without this information, SLD cannot determine the appropriate level of discount funding to which Ozarks may be entitled. Because Ozarks has failed to provide the requested information, no portion of its request for discounts on teleconferencing services may be funded. Therefore, we find that the Administrator correctly denied Ozarks' request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Ozarks Unlimited Resources Cooperative on behalf of the Greenbrier School District on April 12, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R.Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000019.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000019.txt
  • has made no showing that it was timely filed. In light of these circumstances, we conclude that the Letter of Appeal filed by Ozarks must be denied, since there is no evidence that the FCC Form 471 in question was, in fact, filed with SLD within the filing window. 4. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Ozarks Unlimited Resources Cooperative on behalf of Yellville-Summit School District, dated September 29, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000020.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000020.txt
  • pre-discount costs in completing its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. We, therefore, conclude that SLD correctly calculated the funding commitment decision for funding request number 151098 based on the $557.76 estimated monthly pre-discount cost as reported by Intermediate Unit #19 on its FCC Form 471. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal by Scranton School District, Scranton, Pennsylvania on behalf of Intermediate Unit #19 Consortium, Archbald, Pennsylvania IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000033.doc
  • Petitioners have certified that the devices they have designed using stutter dial tone detection will conform to the conditions specified in that order, we conclude that the devices should be submitted for Part 68 conformance testing to prove that they will pose no harm to the PSTN. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.312(i), by Nor Pac Group, Inc., RadioShack, CIDCO Incorporated, and UNICO Pacific Group ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 8. IT IS FURTHER
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000041.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000041.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 28, 1999 by Butts County Schools IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau YY-#### -41
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000042.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000042.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 28, 1999 by the Denison Independent School District IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau 99-#### -42 8¨È
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000056.doc
  • the forward-looking high-cost support mechanism in the first quarter of 2000. We therefore deny AT&T's request to revise the universal service contribution factor for the first quarter of 2000. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106, the Petition for Reconsideration of the Proposed First Quarter 2000 Universal Service Contribution Factor filed by AT&T on December 22, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patrick Merrick, AT&T, to Magalie Roman Salas, FCC (filed Dec.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000084.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000084.txt
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 4, 1999 by the North Central Area Schools IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000085.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000085.txt
  • appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss River Road ISD's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on River Road ISD's initial appeal, River Road ISD may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by River Road Independent School District of Amarillo, Texas, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Kathy Hicks, Technology Coordinator, River Road Independent School District, to Office
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000105.doc
  • 1997 but prior to January 30, 1998, the date upon which the SLD web site became operational. Thus, the tariffed services in question were not subject to ``pre-existing contracts,'' and SLD properly denied Ruidoso's funding requests for those tariffed services for failure to comply with the 28-day competitive bidding requirement. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Ruidoso Municipal School District, Ruidoso, New Mexico on May 6, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lawrence E. Strickling Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, from Paul Wirth, Director of Instructional Support, Ruidoso
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000106.doc
  • the underlying policy goals. Accordingly, we grant its waiver request at this time. This waiver applies only to those services specified in BellSouth's waiver petition and supplement. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 218-220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, and 218-220, and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by BellSouth IS HEREBY GRANTED. Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division See 47 CFR § 32.27. On August 9, 1995, BellSouth filed a supplement to its petition in which it identified additional affiliate transactions to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000140.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Inc. for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-99-85, ARE APPROVED. These LATA boundaries are modified solely for the purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000174.doc
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 22, 1999 by Bradford Community Unit School District #1 on October 22, 1999 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau YY-#### -174
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000175.doc
  • above, Frazier has an appeal pending before the Administrator. Therefore, we dismiss Frazier's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Frazier's initial appeal, Frazier may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Frazier School District, Perryopolis, Pennsylvania, on October 26, 1999, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Frederick Smeigh, Frazier School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000176.doc
  • Appellants have individual appeals pending before the Administrator. Therefore, we dismiss Appellants' Joint Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Appellants' individual appeals, Appellants may then appeal to the Commission if they believe such appeal is warranted at that time. 3. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Joint Letter of Appeal filed by Hartshorne Independent School District 1, Hartshorne, Oklahoma, Swink School District 21, Swink, Oklahoma, and Tyrone Independent School District 53, Tyrone, Oklahoma, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000177.doc
  • its contract, this is not a basis to grant relief that would be contrary to our rules. Applicants themselves have the burden of complying with applicable statutes and rules. Here, it was incumbent upon McAllen to be aware of and comply with the Commission's rules regarding the competitive bidding requirement. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by McAllen Independent School District, McAllen, Texas on October 12, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Section 54.719(c) of the Commission's rules provides that any person aggrieved by an action taken by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000200.doc
  • it has submitted to date, Providence will receive the benefit of an estimated $53,000 from the universal service support mechanism for rural health care providers. Because RHCD, as indicated above, has taken steps to favorably resolve the matter that is at issue before us, we dismiss Providence's appeal as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by the Providence Seward Medical Center IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jim Sefton, Supervisor, Providence Seward Medical Center to Federal Communications Commission, dated September 27, 1999 (Providence Letter).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000264.doc
  • request. This will also avoid the potential disruption to NECA pool rates that might occur if PRTC were required to withdraw from the NECA pool in the middle of the tariff year. 6. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 201 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 201, and sections 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291, that section 61.41(c)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41(c)(2), SHALL BE WAIVED to the extent necessary to permit Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. to file its initial price cap tariff and convert to price cap regulation no later than July 1, 2000. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000287.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000287.txt
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified thirty (30) day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 17, 1999 by Binas Yisaschor IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -287 JI
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000288.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000288.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 23, 1999, by Reedsville School District, Reedsville, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -288 JI JI
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000289.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000289.txt
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 16, 1999 by Stanton Public Library IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -289 JI JI
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000329.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000329.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 22, 1999, by McMinnville SDA Elementary School, McMinnville, Oregon, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -329
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000330.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000330.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 12, 1999, by LaSalle Academy, New York, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -330
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000331.doc
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 16, 1999, by Rio Grande School, Santa Fe, New Mexico, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -331
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000332.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000332.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 1, 1999, by Southwest Dubois County School Corporation, Huntingburg, Indiana, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -332
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000345.doc
  • investigation initiated in the Virtual Collocation Phase I Order. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Tariff F.C.C. No. 73, filed under Transmittal Nos. 2807 and 2810, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittals is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket No. 94-97. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000347.doc
  • § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in ``permit but disclose'' proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 16. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 205, 276 and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 276, and through authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Ameritech, GTE, Century and TDS shall file by May 12, 2000, tariffs as described above for intrastate payphone service offerings in Wisconsin with the Commission, together with all supporting documentation described above necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of section 276 and the Commission's implementing rules. FEDERAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000382.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000382.txt
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 26, 1999, by the Alamo Heights Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -382 þÿÿÿ
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • should the customer feel that the carrier has acted improperly. Second, we encourage parties to monitor the performance of these ADSL modems and the networks that serve them, and to gather and share with us information that might be relevant to general harm to the PSTN or cross-talk problems. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 28. Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. section 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1), by Alcatel USA, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. 29. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000389.doc
  • provided under contract by US West and Advanced Technologies to MediaOne and covers the period from June 12, 1998, to April 1, 1999. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, 218-220, and 254(k) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 201-205, 218-220, and 254(k), and Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27 of the Commissions rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, 1.106, 32.18, and 32.27, that the Petition for Waiver filed by US West, Inc. IS GRANTED to the extent described above in paragraph 7. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division Common Carrier Bureau US West, Inc. is the holding company
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000424.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000424.txt
  • because Holcomb SD has appeals pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Holcomb SD's Letter of Appeals to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decisions on Holcomb SD's appeal, Holcomb SD may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letters of Appeal filed on December 6, 1999, and December 13, 1999, by Holcomb Unified School District, Holcomb, Kansas, ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letters of Appeal of Randy Ackerman, Holcomb Unified School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000425.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000425.txt
  • this case, because Kasson-Mantorville has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Kasson-Mantorville's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Kasson-Mantorville's initial appeal, Kasson-Mantorville may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on January 10, 2000 by Kasson-Mantorville Schools, Kasson, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of James Turner, Kasson-Mantorville Schools, to Federal Communications Commission (filed January 10,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000426.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000426.txt
  • appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Sacred Heart School's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Sacred Heart School's initial appeal, Sacred Heart School may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on November 26, 1999 by Sacred Heart School, Mount Holly, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Ronald J. Maniglia, Principal, Sacred Heart School, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000427.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000427.txt
  • SD has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss McFarland SD's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on McFarland SD's initial appeal, McFarland SD may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on January 11, 2000 by School District of McFarland, McFarland, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Scott R. Brown, Director of Business Service, McFarland School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000428.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000428.txt
  • an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Spring Cove SD's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Spring Cove SD's appeal, Spring Cove SD may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on December 9, 1999 by Spring Cove School District of Roaring Spring, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Nathaniel Hawthorne, Attorney, to Federal Communications Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000431.doc
  • approval by the Office of Management and Budget, in accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. §§ 3506 et seq. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 31. IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), 205, and 403, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the issues set forth in this Order ARE DESIGNATED FOR INVESTIGATION. 32. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that GTE Telephone Operating Companies and GTE Systems Telephone Companies SHALL INCLUDE, in their direct case(s), a response to each request for information that they are required to answer in this Order. FEDERAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000477.doc
  • activated until such time as the fourth planned area code overlay is activated, but in no event later than April 1, 2001. In all other respects, the Waiver Petition is denied. V. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1.3 and 52.19 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.3 and 52.19, and by authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Illinois Commerce Commission may delay, temporarily, implementing ten-digit dialing in all areas where overlay area codes have been activated until such time as the fourth area code overlay is activated, but in no event later than April 1, 2001. 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000479.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. V. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of BellSouth for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-99-91, IS APPROVED. This LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS between points in the specific exchanges
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000497.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000497.txt
  • Administrator. In this case, because Albany has appeals pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Albany's Letters of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Albany's appeals, Albany may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeals are warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letters of Appeal filed on December 9, 1999, and January 14, 1999, by City School District of Albany, Albany, New York, ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letters of Appeal of Lonnie E. Palmer,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000528.doc
  • for either of the limited exceptions for existing contracts under section 54.604(a) of the Commission's rules. Because Northern Arizona signed the contract with US WEST within the 28-day posting period, we conclude that Northern Arizona failed to satisfy the Commission's competitive bidding rules, and RHCD properly denied Northern Arizona's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed on November 24, 1999 by Northern Arizona Regional Behavioral Health Authority IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, from Catherine P. Romeo-Wolff, Northern Arizona Regional Behavioral
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000529.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000529.txt
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 30, 1999, by Newman Grove Public Schools, Newman Grove, Nebraska, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -529
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000530.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000530.txt
  • Western has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss South Western's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on South Western's initial appeal, South Western may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on November 16, 1999 by South Western School District, Hanover, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Dr. Barbara Rupp, Superintendent, to Office of the Secretary,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000560.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000560.txt
  • Union County has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Union County's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Union County's appeal, Union County may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on November 1, 1999 by Union County Public Schools, Morganfield, Kentucky, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Michael S. Pruitt, District Technology Coordinator, to Office of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000563.doc
  • of NYNEX Telephone Companies' New Virtual Expanded Interconnection Offerings. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Bell Atlantic's Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 1 and 11, filed under Transmittal No. 1256, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket Nos. 94-97 and 98-240. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000588.doc
  • to ensure that individual companies serving the smallest exchanges will not experience unreasonable reductions in per loop support in 2000 compared with their 1999 amounts. The requested submission does not preclude NECA from beginning payments to average schedule companies, under the modified formula, at the next regular payment cycle. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the average schedule formula proposed by the National Exchange Carriers Association, Inc. on October 1, 1998, for USF expense adjustment IS DENIED. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that NECA shall retain the current
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000610.doc
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed January 10, 2000, by the MeritCare Clinic Bemidji, Bemidji, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -610
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000611.doc
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed January 10, 2000, by the MeritCare Clinic Detroit Lakes, Detroit Lakes, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -611
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000612.doc
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed January 10, 2000, by the MeritCare Clinic Hillsboro, Hillsboro, North Dakota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -612
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000613.doc
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed January 10, 2000, by the MeritCare Clinic Jamestown, Jamestown, North Dakota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -613
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000614.doc
  • of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. 2. ACCORDINGLY IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed January 10, 2000, by the MeritCare Clinic Mayville, Mayville, North Dakota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -614
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000618.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Ameritech for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing, two-way, non-optional flat-rated ELCS at the specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-11, IS APPROVED. This LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing two-way, non-optional flat-rated ELCS between points in the specific
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000620.doc
  • The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon Sprint's provision of the customer notification and complaint resolution services described above and further detailed in its petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the waiver request filed by Sprint Communications Company L.P. on February 16, 2000, and supplemented on March 16, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000625.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000625.txt
  • rule is intended to provide a fair and uniform period applicable to all schools and libraries seeking discounts for eligible services to permit competitive bidding by all potential bidders for those services. Currituck has not presented any arguments or unique circumstances that would warrant granting a waiver of this rule. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on July 2, 1999, by Currituck County Schools, Currituck, North Carolina, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jesse Stallings, Currituck County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 2, 1999 (Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000732.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000732.txt
  • this case, because Lamont has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Lamont's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Lamont's initial appeal, Lamont may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Lamont School District, Lamont, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dave Beckman, Lamont School District, to Federal Communications Commission (filed January 6, 2000) (Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000742.doc
  • conditioned upon IECOM's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in its Waiver Petition and Amended Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258, of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the waiver request filed by International Exchange Communications, Inc. on December 14, 1999, and amended on January 19, 2000, IS GRANTED for the transfer of assets associated with FiberTel, Advantage Telecommunications Corp., and NOSVA Limited Partnership, to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000746.doc
  • the effective date of these rule provisions also has the potential to provide partial relief to many petitioners. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(j), section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the petitions, specified in the Order, that seek limited or temporary waiver from compliance with any of the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 64.2401 by April 1, 2000, are hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon adoption. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Lawrence E.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000761.doc
  • failure to waive the 30-day filing deadline would cause it hardship because it will not receive its requested discounts for Internet access and telecommunications services. We find that Amelia has not demonstrated special circumstances that warrant a waiver of the 30-day filing requirement, and, therefore, Amelia's waiver request is denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Amelia County Public Schools, Amelia, Virginia, on November 24, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Janet H. Ashman, Amelia County Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed November 24, 1999. Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000762.doc
  • West County is asking us to review a decision of the Administrator. The appeals process was established as the method by which applicants could seek review of an Administrator decision and West County has provided no basis for us to depart from that process. West County's appeal, therefore, is denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by West County School District R-IV, Leadwood, Missouri, on January 7, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ron Yarbro, West County School District R-IV, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000771.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000771.txt
  • must provide this service for at least 60 days after the 500 and 700 services are discontinued. (3) AT&T must notify its customers of the discontinuances, in writing, 60 days in advance of the discontinuances, informing them of the discontinuances and of the benefits of these conditions. III. ORDERING CLAUSES 21. IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the applications to discontinue AT&T EasyReach 700 Service and AT&T 500 Personal Number Service, ARE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS CERTIFICATE AND ORDER. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION L. Charles Keller Chief, Network Services Division Common Carrier Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 214(a). 47 C.F.R. § 63.71. AT&T
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000773.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000773.txt
  • Count Information. Effect of Interim Protective Order. This Interim Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between every Reviewing Party executing the attached Declaration, and every Submitting Party. Authority. This Interim Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), (j), and 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 0.457(d). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ATTACHMENT A: DECLARATION In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96-45). I, ____________________, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the Interim Protective Order that has been entered by the Common Carrier Bureau in this docket, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000837.doc
  • Boarding has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Dennehotso Boarding's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Dennehotso Boarding's initial appeal, Dennehotso Boarding may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Dennehotso Boarding School, Dennehotso, Arizona, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Velma D. Eisenberger, Principal, United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000838.doc
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed March 28, 2000, by Elk Grove Village Public Library, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -838
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000844.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Inc. for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-09, ARE APPROVED. These LATA boundaries are modified solely for the purpose of providing flat-rated, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000845.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the requests of Bell Atlantic for LATA modifications for the limited purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional ELCS at specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-10, ARE APPROVED. These LATA boundaries are modified solely for the purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points in the specific
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000851.doc
  • days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. 47 C.F.R. § 1.7. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 1, 1999, by Highland Community School District of Ainsworth - Riverside, Riverside, Iowa, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ##-#### -851
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000852.doc
  • it concerns the October 5 funding commitment decision letters, relating to application numbers 142293, 123302, and 124574. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Vancouver's initial appeal with respect to these issues, Vancouver may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed January 28, 2000, by Vancouver Public Schools, Vancouver, Washington, with respect to the funding commitment letter regarding application number 119796, IS DENIED. FURTHER, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000893.doc
  • the effective date of these rule provisions also has the potential to provide partial relief to many petitioners. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 4(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(j), section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the petitions, specified in this Order, that seek limited or temporary waiver from compliance with any of the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 64.2401 by April 1, 2000, are hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon adoption. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000956.doc
  • interest to require the District commission to expend resources to deaverage rates. Consequently, we find good cause to grant the District a permanent waiver. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 251, 303(r), and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201, 251, 303(r), and 405, and Sections 0.91, 0.201-03, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.201-03, and 0.291, that the waiver petitions are GRANTED to the extent described above. Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See 47 U.S.C. § 51.507(f). See In re Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Report and Order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000961.doc
  • Suspension Order), and the Virtual Collocation Tariff Suspension Order. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions regarding collocation services to Bell Atlantic's Tariff F.C.C. No.1, filed under Transmittal No. 1273, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket Nos. 96-165 and 94-97. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000980.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Ameritech for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional ELCS at the specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-99-73, IS APPROVED. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to section 416(a) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 416(a), the Secretary SHALL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000981.doc
  • conditions of the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Lucent Technologies, Ramp Networks, Telocity, Diamond Multimedia, CIS Technology, Analog & Digital Devices, Arescom, Digicom Systems, Sumitomo Electric Industries, and Askey
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000985.doc
  • is conditioned upon IECOM's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in its Waiver Petition and supplement thereto. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258, of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the waiver request filed by International Exchange Communications, Inc. on December 14, 1999, amended on January 19, 2000, and supplemented on March 17, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000986.doc
  • is conditioned upon Access Point's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in its Waiver Petition and supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the waiver request filed by Access Point, Inc. on March 14, 2000, and supplemented on March 31, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001003.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001003.txt
  • be received without complying with the Commission's competitive bidding process. Parties may not, however, extend other contractual provisions beyond the dates established by the Commission's rules without complying with the competitive bidding process. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the Waiver is GRANTED. 10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the use of nonrecurring services in the second funding year of the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism for all applicants is extended from June 30, 2000 to September 30, 2000. FEDERAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001009.doc
  • of NYNEX Telephone Companies' New Virtual Expanded Interconnection Offerings. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Bell Atlantic's Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 1 and 11, filed under Transmittal No. 1277, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket Nos. 94-097, 96-165, and 98-240. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001032.doc
  • of Citizens Telecommunications Companies Revisions to Tariff F.C.C. No.1. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Citizens' Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 1 applicable to Expanded Interconnection Serice offferings filed under Transmittal No. 75, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket No. 97-240. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001042.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001042.txt
  • Two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand Archbishop Quigley's application to SLD, and direct SLD to reconsider Archbishop Quigley's FCC Form 471 and, if warranted, to issue a new funding commitment decision letter providing discounts for all appropriate Priority One services requested by Archbishop Quigley. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Archbishop Quigley Preparatory Seminary, Chicago, Illinois, on April 1, 1999, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001043.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001043.txt
  • One and Priority Two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand Atlanta's application to SLD, and direct SLD to reconsider Atlanta's FCC Form 471 and, if warranted, to issue a new funding commitment decision letter providing discounts for all appropriate Priority One services request by Atlanta. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Atlanta C-3 School District, Atlanta, Missouri, on May 18, 1999, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001044.txt
  • Two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand Bonner Springs' application to SLD, and direct SLD to reconsider Bonner Springs' FCC Form 471 and, if warranted, to issue a new funding commitment decision letter providing discounts for all appropriate Priority One services requested by Bonner Springs. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Bonner Springs Unified School District #204, Bonner Springs, Kansas on July 2, 1999 IS GRANTED to the extent described herein and is otherwise DENIED. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001045.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001045.txt
  • 471 was not signed until March 31, 1999, two days after Cochrane's allowable contract date. In submitting its FCC Form 470 for posting on the SLD website, as well as complying with the 28-day waiting period, Cochrane adhered to all applicable requirements with respect to the Commission's competitive bidding policy. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Cochrane-Fountain City School District, Fountain City, Wisconsin on October 12, 1999 IS GRANTED and that Cochrane's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001046.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001046.txt
  • there is evidence in the original file to support the correct item, [it] would grant the appeal.'' Accordingly, based on SLD's discovery of the reference to the second, posted Form 470 in Methacton's Form 471, we conclude that it is appropriate to remand this matter to SLD for further review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Methacton School District, Norristown, Pennsylvania, on October 22, 1999 IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert F. Holly, Methacton School District, to Secretary,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001058.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001058.txt
  • monthly costs associated with the support requested, assuming twelve months of service, and does not include other factors, such as the length of the contract for which support is requested. Because SLD correctly determined the funding commitment based on the materials submitted by Call-A-Teen, Call-A-Teen's request for review is denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed February 14, 2000, by Arizona Call-A-Teen Center, Phoenix, Arizona, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ralph Weinberg, Arizona Call-A-Teen Center, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed February 14, 2000 (Letter of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001059.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001059.txt
  • an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Central Intermediate's Letter of Appeal regarding Application Number 138244 to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on this appeal, Central Intermediate may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed February 14, 2999, by Central Intermediate Unit 10, West Decatur, Pennsylvania, as it relates to Application Number 108215, IS DISMISSED as untimely. FURTHER, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001097.doc
  • is conditioned upon Tech Valley's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Tech Valley Communications, Inc. and GFC Communications, Inc. on April 5, 2000, and supplemented on April 18, 2000, and April 26, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. FEDERAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001101.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of U S WEST for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional flat-rated, measured and message-rated ELCS at the specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-24, IS APPROVED. This LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001102.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of U S WEST for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional ELCS at the specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-24, IS APPROVED. This LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional flat-rated, measured and message-rated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001105.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Bell Atlantic for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional ELCS at the specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-27, IS APPROVED. This LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing traditional, two-way, non-optional ELCS between points in the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001113.doc
  • the provision of notice of the account changes to the affected customers, following completion of the transfer, through a billing message in the next billing cycle. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by GTE Service Corporation, GTE North Incorporated, and GTE Communications Corporation on April 10, 2000, and supplemented on April 18, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. Carol E. Mattey
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001114.doc
  • of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in their Supplemental Waiver Petition and Second Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Touch America, Inc. and Qwest Communications International, Inc. on March 17, 2000, and supplemented on April 12, 2000 and May 3, 2000, IS GRANTED subject to the conditions, and to the extent, indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001131.doc
  • Period (July 16, 1998). For this reason, we also reject the argument that the reference to November 1, 1998, in the attachments, reflects the date that PHS selected the carrier. Consequently, we conclude that PHS violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules, and that RHCD properly denied the PHS applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed on December 17, 1999 by Presbyterian Healthcare Services on behalf of Espanola Hospital, Lincoln County Medical Center, PRMG - Clovis, Moreno Valley clinic, Socorro General Hospital, Dan C. Trigg Hospital, and Artesia General Hospital IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001133.doc
  • the eight conditions specified in the Reconsideration Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.312(i), by Telephone Equipment Supply, Inc., Casio Communications Inc., Tandy Corporation, Atlinks USA, Inc., Matsushita Electric Corporation of America, Vtech Communications Limited, and Cidco
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001160.doc
  • described above and further detailed in their Waiver Petition and Supplement. ORDERING CLAUSES 11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 091, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by PowerNet Global, Inc. and America One Communications, Inc. on March 17, 2000, and supplemented on May 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001183.doc
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by 3Com Corporation, Intel Corporation, Multi-Tech Systems, Inc., Xircom, Inc., GlobeSpan, Inc., Telocity, Inc., Askey Computer Corporation, and Aztech Systems, Ltd. ARE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001233.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001233.txt
  • filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Flora failed to file an appeal of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Flora's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Flora Community School District 35, Flora, Illinois, on March 6, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gerald Klein, Flora Community School District 35, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001249.doc
  • do not routinely grant extensions of time, we are persuaded that the grant of Roseville's request is warranted. We find merit in Roseville's request. An extension of time will cause no harm to the public interest. We, therefore, grant Roseville an extension of time until October 10, 2000 to file its initial CAM. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, that Roseville's request for an extension of time until October 10, 2000, to file its initial cost allocation manual IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division 47 C.F.R. §64.903(a). Among other reasons, Roseville requested the initial extension of time because it had
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001277.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001277.txt
  • Blessed Sacrament has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Blessed Sacrament's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Blessed Sacrament's appeal, Blessed Sacrament may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed April 17, 2000, by Blessed Sacrament School, Washington, DC, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan Walsh, Blessed Sacrament School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17, 2000 (Letter of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001278.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001278.txt
  • for the SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Brevard County's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on February 8, 2000, by Brevard County School District, Viera, Florida, IS DISMISSED, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001279.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001279.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on February 29, 2000, by Calallen Independent School District, Corpus Christi, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William C.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001280.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001280.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed February 23, 2000, by Casa Grande Union High School District, Casa Grande, Arizona, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Steven R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001281.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001281.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed March 27, 2000, by Covina-Valley Unified School District, Covina, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Ray Harder, Covina-Valley Unified
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001282.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001282.txt
  • must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on February 28, 2000, by the Enlarged City School District of Troy, Troy, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001283.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001283.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 1, 2000, by Kerkhoven-Murdock-Sunburg Independent School District No. 775, Kerkhoven, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Kim Hippen,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001284.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001284.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 14, 1999, by Milwaukee Jewish Day School, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Jenny Ettenheim, Milwaukee Jewish Day
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001285.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001285.txt
  • Chicago has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss North Chicago's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on North Chicago's initial appeal, North Chicago may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by North Chicago Community Unit School District #187, Chicago, Illinois, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tyrone Pipkin, North Chicago Community Unit School District #187, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001365.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001365.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed March 22, 2000, by Austin Public Library, Austin, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Bob Gaines, Central
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001366.txt
  • 170032 was timely. Because B. F. Jones filed an appeal of the August 9, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we grant the instant Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to consider B. F. Jones' request for review of SLD's decision to deny FRN 170032. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by B. F. Jones Memorial Library, Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, IS GRANTED and B.F. Jones' request for discounts for internal connections, FRN 170032, is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001367.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001367.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 7, 2000, by Des Moines Independent School District, Des Moines, Iowa, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Ron
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001369.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001369.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 7, 2000, by Gridley Unified School District, Gridley, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Sally Mitchell, Gridley
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001370.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001370.txt
  • filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Madison failed to file an appeal of the Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Madison's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Madison District Schools, Madison Heights, Michigan, on March 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jackie Keene, Madison District Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001371.doc
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 5, 2000, by Nicolet Distance Education Network, Rhinelander, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Penny Kuckkahn, Nicolet
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001372.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001372.txt
  • review filed by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Pinellas failed to file appeals of the Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decisions to dismiss Pinellas' appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letters of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letters of Appeal filed by Pinellas County Schools, Largo, Florida on March 10, 2000, and March 13, 2000, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Norman Kelton, Pinellas County Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001373.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001373.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because Queen of Peace failed to file an appeal of the November 16, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Queen of Peace's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Queen of Peace High School, Burbank, Illinois on March 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Irene Halko, Queen of Peace High School, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001374.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001374.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Red Wing failed to file an appeal of the August 3, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Red Wing's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by El Monte Union High School DistrictRed Wing Public Schools, Red Wing, Minnesota on April 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kathryn C. Leitz, Independent School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001375.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001375.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 19, 2000, by St. Cecilia School, Ames, Iowa, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Bryan Bradley, St.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001376.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001376.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 19, 2000, by St. Paul's School, Wilmington, Delaware, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Karen Bolte, St.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001377.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001377.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed February 14, 2000, by Algonquin Regional High School, Northboro, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Lincoln D. Lynch,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001378.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001378.txt
  • St. Michael has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss St. Michael's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on St. Michael's appeal, St. Michael may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by St. Michael School, Brooklyn, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Margaret Ford, St. Michael School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March 24, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001380.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001380.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 30, 2000, Talmud Torah Siach Yitzchok, Far Rockaway, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Moshe
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001402.doc
  • above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon CenturyTel's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by CenturyTel Communications, Inc. on April 19, 2000, and supplemented on June 5, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001426.doc
  • is conditioned upon TTI National and MRP's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by grant MCI WorldCom, Inc. and its subsidiary, TTI National, Inc., on April 11, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001427.doc
  • waiver is conditioned upon Talk.com's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Talk.com, Inc. and Talk.com Holding Corp. on April 19, 2000, and supplemented on May 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001430.doc
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Westell Technologies Inc., GVC Corporation, Ambit Microsystems Corporation, Xpeed Inc., Askey Computer Corporation, Arescom Inc., Motorola Inc., and Cayman Systems, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001434.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001434.txt
  • CenturyTel a waiver of section 69.3(g)(2) because NECA's common line pool will not be adversely affected, and there will be no significant increase in LTS obligations. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by CenturyTel of Northwest Arkansas, LLC, CenturyTel of Central Arkansas, LLC, GTE Arkansas Incorporated, GTE Midwest Incorporated, and GTE Southwest Incorporated, on January 28, 2000, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001487.doc
  • and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b), as well. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the revised tariff rates for the traffic sensitive and trunking baskets filed by all price cap local exchange carriers, listed in Appendix A, ARE SUSPENDED for one day and an investigation IS INSTITUTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001509.doc
  • upon TXU Communications' provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition, Supplement, and Further Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by TXU Communications Telecom Services Company dba TXU Communications on April 14, 2000, and supplemented on June 6, 2000, and June 8, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001510.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001510.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Battle Lake failed to file an appeal of the August 24, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Battle Lake's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Battle Lake School, Battle Lake, Minnesota on April 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rick Bleichner, Battle Lake School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001511.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001511.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Dearborn failed to file an appeal of the October 19, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Dearborn's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Dearborn Public Schools, Dearborn, Michigan on April 3, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Janeen Sharpe, Dearborn Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 3,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001512.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001512.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Minneapolis failed to file an appeal of the November 16, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Minneapolis' request to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Minneapolis School District 1, Minneapolis, Minnesota on March 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Daniel T. Cincoski, Armstrong, Torseth, Skold & Rydeen, Inc., to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001513.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001513.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Our Lady failed to file an appeal of the September 8, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Our Lady's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Our Lady Help of Christians Parish School, Allentown, Pennsylvania on April 11, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sister Charlene Verbetich, Our Lady Help of Christians
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001514.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001514.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Oxford Hills failed to file an appeal of the September 28, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Oxford Hills' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Oxford Hills School District M.S.A.D #17, Oxford, Maine on April 12, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mark Eastman, Oxford Hills School District M.S.A.D. #17, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001515.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001515.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed April 11, 2000, by Wathena Unified School District 406, Wathena, Kansas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Leslie Rullman, Wathena Unified School District 406, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001516.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001516.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because York County failed to file an appeal of the August 24, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss York County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by York County Public Library, Yorktown, Virginia on April 14, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kevin Smith, York County Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001517.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001517.txt
  • applicants shall not be permitted to amend completed Form 471s to remove ineligible service requests after the closure of the filing window deadline. If applicants were permitted to make such corrections, SLD would face significant additional administrative burdens. Therefore, we cannot permit Ubly to amend its FCC Form 471. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed February 28, 2000, by Ubly Community Schools, Ubly, Michigan, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Evelyn Smaglinsli, Ubly Community Schools, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed February 28, 2000 (Letter of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001546.doc
  • Because the Administrator's decision regarding FRN 232503 may have dealt with matters that were not addressed in the instant appeal to the Commission, Eastland may request review of the March 27, 2000 denial of Eastland's request for reconsideration of FRN 232503 within 30 days of the release of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91., 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed February 3, 2000, by Eastland Independent School District, Eastland, Texas, IS DENIED with respect to Funding Request Numbers 232501 and 232509. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Letter of Appeal filed February 3, 2000, by Eastland Independent School District, Eastland,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001547.doc
  • Angeles's appeal to SLD. Because the Administrator's decision may have dealt with matters that were not addressed in the instant appeal to the Commission, Los Angeles may request review of the June 15, 2000 denial of Los Angeles's request for reconsideration within 30 days of the release of this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James Konantz, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001548.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001548.txt
  • area waivers involving the sale of exchanges operated by carriers subject to price cap regulation. We, therefore, require U S WEST to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of North Dakota and U S WEST Communications, Inc. on February 16, 2000, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001563.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001563.txt
  • do not qualify for either of the limited exceptions for existing contracts under section 54.604(a) of the Commission's rules. Thus, we also conclude that RHCD properly refused to approve Good Samaritan's request for support from the first day of the funding year (January 1, 1998) based upon an existing contract. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed on March 8, 2000 by the Good Samaritan Health Systems Foundation of Kearney, Nebraska on behalf of the following four consortium members of the Mid-Nebraska Telemedicine Network: Cozad Community Hospital, Callaway District Hospital, Jennie M. Melham Memorial Medical Center, and Cambridge Memorial
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001566.doc
  • short extension from the May 1, 2000, deadline. Thus, we grant the Iowa Board a limited waiver of section 51.507(f) until December 31, 2000. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 251, 303(r), and 405 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201, 251, 303(r), and 405, and Sections 0.91, 0.201-03, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.201-03, and 0.291, that the waiver petition is GRANTED to the extent described above. Federal Communications Commission Lawrence E. Strickling Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See 47 U.S.C. § 51.507(f). See In re Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Report
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001583.doc
  • above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon Citizen's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Citizens Utilities Company on April 14, 2000, and supplemented on May 26, 2000 and June 12, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001584.doc
  • The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon the petitioners' provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request jointly filed by Citizens Utilities Company and U S WEST Communications, Inc. on April 7, 2000, and supplemented on July 6, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001585.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001585.txt
  • S WEST to make a downward adjustment to its price cap indices to reflect the removal of the 94 access lines from its Colorado study area. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Rye Telephone Company, Inc. and U S WEST Communications, Inc., on October 15, 1999, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001612.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001612.txt
  • submit competitive bids for the services requested in the FCC Form 470. By completing and signing the FCC Form 471 before the waiting period expired, Minor indicated that it had ceased consideration of competitive bids, thereby undermining the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. The Bureau, therefore, denies Minor's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on April 21, 2000, by Minor High School, Adamsville, Alabama, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Van Phillips, Minor High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 21, 2000 (Letter of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001613.doc
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Lucent Technologies, ECI Telecom, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Multi-Tech Systems, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., TelGen, Inc., Integrated Telecom Express, Inc., Shark
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001616.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001616.txt
  • numbering resources necessary to continue to provide service to their prospective customers. We are encouraged by these states' willingness to work in conjunction with the FCC to achieve our numbering resource optimization goals. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Arizona Corporation Commission's Petition for Delegated Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures is GRANTED IN PART to the extent described herein; the Colorado Public Utilities Commission Petition for Additional Delegated Authority to Implement Number Resource Optimization Measures is GRANTED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001620.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001620.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed March 22, 2000, by Carle Place School District, Carle Place, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001621.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001621.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Cerebral Palsy failed to file an appeal of the November 23, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Cerebral Palsy's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Cerebral Palsy Center School, Belleville, New Jersey on March 2, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rose Kline, Cerebral Palsy Center School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001624.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001624.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed February 14, 2000, by Northboro Public Schools, Northboro, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Lincoln D. Lynch, III,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001625.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001625.txt
  • Spectra a waiver of section 69.3(e)(9) because NECA's common line pool will not be adversely affected, and there will be no significant increase in LTS obligations. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Spectra Communications Group, LLC and GTE Midwest Incorporated, on March 17, 2000, IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001653.doc
  • the customer feel that the carrier has acted improperly. Second, we encourage parties to monitor the performance of these ADSL, RADSL, and G.LITE modems and the networks that serve them, and to gather and share with us information that might be relevant to general harm to the PSTN or cross-talk problems. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. sections 0.91, 0.291, and section 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. section 1.3, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for waiver of section 68.308(e)(1) of the Commission's rules 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1), by Paradyne Corporation, IS GRANTED to the extent discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Certification and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001670.doc
  • deemed to have elected to have their rate levels for interstate access charges determined in accordance with the specific terms of the CALLS Proposal, as approved by the Commission. III. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended 47 U.S.C. section 154(i) and through authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Citizens Communications Company's request for an extension is GRANTED for a period of 45 days from July 31, 2000. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended 47 U.S.C. section 154(i) and through authority delegated pursuant to sections 0.91
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001677.doc
  • above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon CenturyTel's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC on May 11, 2000, and supplemented on June 14, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001678.doc
  • above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon Spectra's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Spectra Communications Group, LLC on May 11, 2000, and supplemented on June 14, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001679.doc
  • The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon Telephone USA's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Telephone USA of Wisconsin, LLC on May 11, 2000, and supplemented on June 14, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001686.doc
  • under Part 64.904 of the commission's rules, we require SWBT to direct its independent auditor to conduct additional procedures to test and review the TASS process. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 202, and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201, 202, and 220, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's July 10, 2000, cost allocation manual revisions pertaining to Section VII, Time Reporting ARE APPROVED and effective August 1, 2000, subject to the conditions in paragraphs 5 and 6 above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division SBC is the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001687.doc
  • the amount of reduction taken by the other price cap LECs. Thus, if any price cap LEC's ATS rates would need to be recalculated in this investigation, they would all need to be recalculated. 3. In this Order, on our own motion, we reconsider our decision in the 2000 Annual Access Tariff Suspension Order. II. DISCUSSION 4. Pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.108, we reconsider on our own motion our decision in the 2000 Annual Access Tariff Suspension Order to suspend and investigate: 1) the rates for the traffic sensitive and trunking baskets of all price cap LECs; 2) the rates for the CMT basket filed by Ameritech, Citizens, GSTC,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001690.doc
  • this waiver is conditioned upon U S WEST's and Rye's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by U S WEST Communications, Inc. and The Rye Telephone Company on March 24, 2000, and supplemented on May 17, 2000 and June 2, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001696.doc
  • herein, we note that, once ADSL equipment is registered, further petitions for waiver are not required for addition of models, addition of manufacturers, or modification of equipment. Of course, an application to register these devices is required which should reference the waiver grant to facilitate staff review. ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Arescom Inc., Askey Computer Corp., CIS Technology Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., 2WIRE, INC., Efficient Networks, Inc., and Turbocomm Tech. Inc. ARE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001718.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001718.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by Carmichaels Area School District, Carmichaels, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Vincent
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001719.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001719.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 24, 2000, by Caroline County School District, Bowling Green, Virginia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative, Co., to Clota
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001720.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001720.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by Carteret Public Schools, Carteret, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Robert
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001721.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001721.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 18, 2000, by City of Boston, Department of Neighborhood Development, Boston, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001722.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001722.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 8, 2000, by Columbia Borough School District, Columbia, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Laura E. McGill,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001723.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001723.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by Homer-Center School District, Homer City, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Beverly
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001724.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001724.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by Lakeville School District, Lakeville, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Lonnie Smith,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001725.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001725.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by Learning Community Charter School, Jersey City, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webebr Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001726.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001726.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Ringwood failed to file an appeal of the September 28, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Ringwood's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Ringwood Public Schools, Mercer, Oklahoma on April 7, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Steve Walker, Ringwood Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 7,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001727.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001727.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 16, 2000, by Roxbury Library Association, Roxbury, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Eugene
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001728.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001728.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 23, 2000, by Savanna Elementary School, Savanna, Oklahoma, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Angelia Wilson, Savanna
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001729.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001729.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by Seattle Hebrew Academy, Seattle, Washington, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Marc Maislen,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001730.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001730.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by St. Anthony of Padua Catholic School, Greenville, South Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001731.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001731.txt
  • Vernon Parish has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Vernon Parish's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Vernon Parish's appeal, Vernon Parish may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 25, 2000, by Vernon Parish School Board, Leesville, Louisiana, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Don Gallemore, Vernon Parish School Board,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001732.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001732.txt
  • be granted based on information that could have been provided by the applicant at the time the application was filed. We conclude that, on the basis of the forms and supporting documents submitted by Metropolitan, SLD properly denied Metropolitan's request for a Y2K upgrade. The Bureau, therefore, denies Metropolitan's appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Metropolitan School District of Pike Township, Indianapolis, Indiana, on November 9, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Koch, Metropolitan School District of Pike Township, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001733.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001733.txt
  • Orchard View has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Orchard View's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Orchard View's appeal, Orchard View may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 2, 2000 by Orchard View Schools, Muskegon, Michigan, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dr. Shari Peters-Kitchen, Orchard View Schools, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001734.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001734.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Patton failed to file an appeal of the October 19, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Patton's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by General George S. Patton School District 133, Riverdale, Illinois on May 4, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Essie M. Harris, General George S. Patton School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001751.doc
  • intraLATA service will apply. Other types of service between the specified exchanges will remain interLATA, and the provisions of the Act governing interLATA service will apply. VI. CONCLUSION AND ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of U S WEST for LATA modification for the limited purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS at the specific location, identified in File No. NSD-L-00-69, IS APPROVED. This LATA boundary is modified solely for the purpose of providing two-way, flat-rated, non-optional ELCS between points in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001761.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001761.txt
  • we remove all remaining individual caps on high-cost loop support. We deny the additional relief requested by Interstate and its co-petitioners, Western, and Vtel. ordering clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 5, 201, 202, 219-220, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154, 155, 201, 202, 219-220, 254, and sections 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291, that the petitioners' requests for removal of individual caps on high-cost loop support imposed as part of the grant of study area waivers ARE GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4, 5, 201, 202, 219-220, and 254 of the Communications Act of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001772.doc
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon Stratos' provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Stratos Telecom, Inc. and Stratos Offshore Services Company on May 10, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Irene M. Flannery Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001801.doc
  • the eight conditions specified in the Reconsideration Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.312(i), by ATLINKS USA, Inc., VTECH Communications Ltd., Matsushita Electric Corporation of America, and CIDCO Incorporated ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001819.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001819.txt
  • previously has denied requests for waiver of its competitive bidding requirements when the applicant asserted the need for a waiver based on its own error or misunderstanding of the Commission's rules or SLD's procedures. Because Guadalupe offers no further basis for considering its request, the Division denies Guadalupe's waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the May 23, 2000, Letter of Appeal filed by Our Lady of Guadalupe School, Houston, Texas, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Christina Skowronek, Our Lady of Guadalupe School, to the Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001820.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001820.txt
  • denied requests for waiver of its competitive bidding requirements when the applicant asserted the need for a waiver based on its own error or misunderstanding of the Commission's rules or SLD's procedures. Because St. Pius offers no further basis for considering its request, the Division denies St. Pius's waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the March 29, 2000, Letter of Appeal filed by St. Pius X High School, Kansas City, Missouri, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from L. Michael Smithmier, St. Pius X High School, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001821.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001821.txt
  • previously has denied requests for waiver of its competitive bidding requirements when the applicant asserted the need for a waiver based on its own error or misunderstanding of the Commission's rules or SLD's procedures. Because Wilmington offers no further basis for considering its request, the Division denies Wilmington's waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the April 14, 2000, Letter of Appeal filed by Wilmington CUSD #209-U, Wilmington, Illinois, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Linda Phifer, Wilmington CUSD #209-U, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed April 14,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001822.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001822.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by Children's Home of Burlington County, Newtown, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001823.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001823.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by Kerman Unified School District, Kerman, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Larry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001851.doc
  • tribal authorities in this process. For these reasons, we grant Western Wireless' request for an extension of time in order to consult with the new leadership of the Crow tribe. ordering clause IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 254, and sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46, the Request for Extension of Time to Supplement the Record filed by Western Wireless is GRANTED as stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog R. Varma Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ronnie London, Counsel for Western Wireless, to Magalie Roman Salas, FCC, dated August 9,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001856.doc
  • Unified has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Hayward Unified's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Hayward Unified's initial appeal, Hayward Unified may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 2, 2000 by Hayward Unified School District, Hayward, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from James Ogami, Hayward Unified School District,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001857.doc
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Huron's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Huron City School District, Huron, Ohio, on May 24, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Donald Pflieger, Huron City Schools, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 24,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001858.doc
  • Lake County has appeals pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Lake County's Letters of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Lake County's initial appeals, Lake County may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 4, 2000 by Lake County Schools, Hayward, Florida, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from David Coggshall, Lake County Schools, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001859.doc
  • wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Maple Valley's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Maple Valley Public School District #4, Tower City, North Dakota, on April 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ron Stahlecker, Maple Valley Public School District #4, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001860.doc
  • regarding Orleans/Niagara's application, SLD issued a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter that granted Orleans/Niagara's funding requests at its requested discount level. Because the Division finds that the errors asserted by Orleans/Niagara in its Letter of Appeal have been corrected by SLD, the Division dismisses Orleans/Niagara's Letter of Appeal as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Orleans/Niagara Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Medina, New York, on November 12, 1999 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Clark J. Godshall, Orleans/Niagara Board of Cooperative Educational
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001861.doc
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Wayne's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Wayne Community Schools, Corydon, Iowa, on May, 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Mason, Wayne Community Schools, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 18, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001862.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001862.txt
  • USA a waiver of section 69.3(e)(9) because NECA's common line pool will not be adversely affected, and there will be no significant increase in LTS obligations. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Telephone USA of Wisconsin, LLC and GTE North Incorporated, on April 7, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001863.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001863.txt
  • CenturyTel a waiver of section 69.3(g)(2) because NECA's common line pool will not be adversely affected, and there will be no significant increase in LTS obligations. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC and GTE North Incorporated, on April 7, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001883.doc
  • involved in our decision granting the Maine Waiver, and to our decisions in other cases involving sales of exchanges by price cap carriers to small rate of return carriers. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 15. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 201 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 201, and sections 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3, 0.91, and 0.291, that ATEAC, Inc.'s, Alaska Telephone Company's, Arctic Slope Telephone Association Cooperative, Inc.'s, Interior Telephone Company, Inc.'s, Mukluk Telephone Company, Inc.'s, and United-KUC, Inc.'s request for waiver of sections 61.41(c) and (d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.41(c) and (d), IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mary
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001886.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001886.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Medford's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Medford Township Board of Education, Medford, New Jersey, on May 16, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ronald K. MacClay, Educational Consortium for Telecommunications Savings (on behalf Medford
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001887.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001887.txt
  • year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. Merced Union's unfamiliarity or misunderstanding of Commission policies provides no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.201, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Merced Union High School District, Merced, California on April 6, 1999 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Terry Silva, Merced Union High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 6, 1999 (Letter of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001888.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001888.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Metuchen's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Metuchen School District, Metuchen, New Jersey, on May 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ronald K. MacClay, Educational Consortium for Telecommunications Savings (on behalf Metuchen School District),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001890.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001890.txt
  • wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies New Prague's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by New Prague School District No. 721, New Prague, Minnesota, on May 16, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tim Rybak, New Prague School District No. 721, to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001891.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001891.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Whiting failed to file an appeal of the October 19, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Whiting's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by School City of Whiting, Whiting, Indiana on April 13, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sandra Martinez, School City of Whiting, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001892.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001892.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Whitehall City failed to file an appeal of the September 8, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Whitehall City's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Whitehall City School District, Whitehall, Ohio on April 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joseph R. Schiska, Whitehall City School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001894.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001894.txt
  • will increase the complexity of administering the LTS program. We, therefore, conclude that there is good cause to grant Sully Buttes a waiver of section 69.3(e)(11). ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Sully Buttes Telephone Cooperative, Inc. and Qwest Corporation, on June 2, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001903.doc
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon PNG's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by PNG Telecommunications, Inc. d/b/a PowerNet Global Communications on June 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Division Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001908.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001908.txt
  • cap carriers to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require GTE to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Valor Telecommunications of Texas, LP and GTE Southwest Incorporated on April 20, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001909.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001909.txt
  • website resulted in Council Bluffs' failure to file its application within the Year 1 filing window, the Bureau believes that a waiver of the filing window deadline is warranted. Under these circumstances, we remand Council Bluffs' application to SLD for processing and the issuance of an appropriate Funding Commitment Letter. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Council Bluffs Community Schools, Council Bluffs, Iowa, on March 9, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and that Council Bluffs' application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Yog
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001910.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001910.txt
  • dismiss Rockdale Independent's appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal with respect to those four Funding Commitment Decision Letters. We dismiss as moot Rockdale Independent's Letter of Appeal to the extent it addresses the funding commitment decision (SLD-146830) that SLD resolved in Rockdale Independent's favor. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Rockdale Independent School District, Rockdale, Texas on April 24, 2000, IS DENIED, with respect to SLD-139132, SLD-139138, SLD-152287, SLD-146833, and IS DISMISSED, with respect to SLD-146830. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001911.doc
  • be issued in the near future. During the suspension of the enforcement of the coin sent-paid requirement, we direct carriers and TRS providers to continue to make payphones accessible to TRS users under the terms of the Alternative Plan, as modified and set forth in the 1997 Suspension Order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 0.91, 0.204, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91(a), 0.204, 0.291, 1.3, that enforcement of the requirement that telecommunications relay services be capable of handling coin sent-paid calls, as required by 47 C.F.R. § 64.604(a)(3), IS SUSPENDED until May 26, 2001, or until such time as the Commission adopts final rules governing TRS users' access to payphones,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001917.doc
  • with Bell Atlantic-NY to transport calls originating from Frontier customers in the Genesee, Shinglehouse, and Millport exchanges and terminating in the Bell Atlantic-PA exchanges of Coudersport and Ulysses. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 3(25) and 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(25), 154(i), and authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, that the request of Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania to transport Frontier Communications calls across a LATA for the limited purpose of extending the local calling area of Frontier customers to the specific locations, identified in File No. NSD-L-99-84, IS APPROVED. 11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to section 416(a) of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001918.doc
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 24, 2000, by Community Consolidated School District 93, Carol Stream, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001919.doc
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 7, 2000, by Milton Public Library, Milton, Vermont, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Fran Ferro,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001923.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001923.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 15, 2000, by Bethlehem Central School District, Delmar, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001924.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001924.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 8, 2000, by Bishop Hannan High School, Scranton, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Christine
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001925.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001925.txt
  • appropriate for the SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Catoosa's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on April 12, 2000, by Catoosa Public Schools, Catoosa, Oklahoma, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001926.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001926.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because De Valls Bluff failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss De Valls Bluff's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by De Valls Bluff School District, De Valls Bluff, Arizona on June 8, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Betty Medford, De Valls Bluff School District, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001927.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001927.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Duluth failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Duluth's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Duluth School District 709, Duluth, Minnesota on June 8, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Wayne V. Aune, Duluth School District 709, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001928.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001928.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 9, 2000, by Egg Harbor City Public Schools, Egg Harbor City, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001929.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001929.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Fairfield Township failed to file an appeal of the September 14, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Fairfield Township's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Fairfield Township Public Schools, Bridgeton, New Jersey on April 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Pamela A. Gatto, Fairfield Township Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001930.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001930.txt
  • by the Administrator. Because Folsom Cordova failed to file an appeal of the October 5, 1999 and October 12, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Folsom Cordova's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Folsom Cordova Unified School District, Folsom, California on May 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kelly J. Calhoun, Folsom Cordova Unified School District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001931.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001931.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 5, 2000, by Franklin Lakes Public Schools, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001932.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001932.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 30, 2000, Granville Village School, Granville, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Paul Petit, Granville Village
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001933.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001933.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 19, 2000, by Oskaloosa School for Christian Instruction, Oskaloosa, Iowa, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Ron Halma,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001934.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001934.txt
  • SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Our Lady of Grace's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on April 17, 2000, by Our Lady of Grace School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001935.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001935.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 23, 2000, by Paradise Unified School District, Paradise, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Midge
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001936.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001936.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Racine failed to file an appeal of the August 17, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Racine's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Racine Unified School District, Racine, Wisconsin on May 10, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael S. Dingman, Racine Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001937.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001937.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Rockwell-Swaledale failed to file an appeal of the April 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Rockwell-Swaledale's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Rockwell-Swaledale Community School District, Rockwell, Iowa on June 8, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Linda Foell, Rockwell-Swaledale Community School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001938.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001938.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 6, 2000, by Sault Ste. Marie Area Public Schools, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001939.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001939.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Smithtown failed to file an appeal of the April 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Smithtown's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by The Smithtown Library, Smithtown, New York, on June 26, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Peter Ward, The Smithtown Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001940.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001940.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Solon Springs failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Solon Springs' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Solon Springs School District, Ashland, Wisconsin on June 26, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David W. Johnson, Solon Springs School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001941.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001941.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Springfield failed to file an appeal of the August 3, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Springfield's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Springfield Public Schools, Springfield, Massachusetts on April 3, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Peter J. Negroni, Springfield Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001942.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001942.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Warren County failed to file an appeal of the August 24, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Warren County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Warren County Vocational School District, Washington, New Jersey on May 22, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John H. Bolil, Warren County Technical School District, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001965.doc
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Cisco Systems, Integrated Telecom Express Inc., Nokia Networks, Lucent Technologies Inc., Taicom Data Systems Co., Ltd., E-Tech, Inc., GVC Corporation, Efficient
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001966.doc
  • the eight conditions specified in the Reconsideration Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.312(i), by Lionda Technology Company Limited, North American Foreign Trading Corporation, and ATLINKS USA, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001986.doc
  • waiver is conditioned upon ACS and LDX's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by ACS Systems, Inc. and LD Exchange.com on July 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Division Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002000.doc
  • above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon Jordan's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Jordan-Soldier Valley Telephone Company on June 12, 2000, and supplemented on July 17, 2000 and August 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002001.doc
  • the provision by FCA and GCTI of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Frontier Communications of America, Inc. on June 19, 2000, and supplemented by Frontier Communications of America, Inc. and Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. on August 18, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002006.doc
  • of the Commission and an agreement between the Reviewing Party, executing the attached Declaration, and the Submitting Party. Authority. This Protective Order is issued pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and (j), Section 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d), and through the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jane E. Jackson Chief, Competitive Pricing Division Common Carrier Bureau Attachment A to Protective Order DECLARATION In the Matter of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.'s Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Special Access and Dedicated Transport Services BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.'s Petition for Pricing Flexibility for Switched Access Services
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002007.doc
  • of Citizens Telecommunications Companies Revisions to Tariff F.C.C. No.1. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Citizens' Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 1 applicable to Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal No. 81, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket No. 97-240. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002010.doc
  • of the 30-day period after the issuance of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on May 14, 2000, a holiday, Gulfport's May 15, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Gulfport's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Gulfport's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Gulfport School District, Gulfport, Mississippi on June 5, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Weber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Terri Burnham, Gulfport School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 5,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002012.doc
  • waiver is conditioned upon Zone's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the emergency waiver request filed by Zone Telecom, Inc. on August 7, 2000, and supplemented on August 9, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Division Chief, Accounting
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002043.doc
  • to the school district. We conclude, however, that these factors should not have precluded Ann Arbor from filing a timely appeal and, accordingly, that Ann Arbor has not presented the special circumstances necessary to warrant relief from the filing deadline. We therefore deny Ann Arbor's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on April 4, 2000, by Ann Arbor Public Schools, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002044.txt
  • have been treated as a timely appeal of SLD's letter informing Dolton that its request for telecommunications services did not meet minimum processing standards. Accordingly, we grant Dolton's request for review. We direct SLD to review Dolton's appeal regarding the decision to deny Dolton's request for funding for telecommunications services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Dolton School District 148, Riverdale, Illinois, on March 17, 2000, IS GRANTED as provided herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Administrator IS DIRECTED to implement the decision herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002046.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002046.txt
  • contracts, SLD did not post Jenks' request for services to SLD's website. The contract for which Jenks seeks support, however, did not meet either of the limited exceptions for existing, binding contracts permitted by the Commission's rules. Accordingly, consistent with prior Bureau decisions, SLD correctly denied Jenks' request for support. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the May 2, 2000, Letter of Appeal filed by Jenks Public Schools, Jenks, Oklahoma, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joyce S. Friske, Jenks Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 2,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002047.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002047.txt
  • not estopped from enforcing its rules in a manner that is inconsistent with the advice provided by the employee, particularly when the relief requested would be contrary to an applicable statute or rule. Because Richmond offers no further basis for considering its request, the Bureau denies Richmond's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the May 4, 2000, Letter of Appeal filed by Richmond County Public Schools, Hamlet, North Carolina, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Suzanne W. Griffin, Richmond County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002049.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002049.txt
  • the majority of the $4,250 monthly charge labeled as ``recurring costs'' was for hardware costs alone. Because SLD incorrectly determined that the funding request from Franklin County was for ineligible services or products, Franklin County's request for review is granted, and SLD is directed to reconsider Franklin County's funding request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed February 25, 2000, by Franklin County Public Schools, Rocky Mount, Virginia, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Leonard A. Gereau, Superintendent, Franklin County Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002063.doc
  • waiver is conditioned upon IEComm's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by International Exchange Communications, Inc. on May 4, 2000, and supplemented on August 31, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002071.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002071.txt
  • of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding the Commission's rules and procedures and carefully and accurately completing the relevant FCC Forms. The Division, therefore, denies the Hawaii Schools' Letters of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the above-captioned appeals filed by Aikahi Elementary School, Kailua, Hawaii, Enchanted Lake Elementary School, Kailua, Hawaii, Kane'ohe Elementary School, Kaneohe, Hawaii, Keolu Elementary School, Kailua, Hawaii, Niu Valley Intermediate School, Honolulu, Hawaii, and Waikiki Elementary School, Honolulu, Hawaii, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002072.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002072.txt
  • Bureau previously has denied requests for waiver of its competitive bidding requirements when the applicant asserted a need for waiver based on its own error or misunderstanding of the schools and libraries program's rules. Because Anderson offers no further basis for considering its request, the Division denies Anderson's waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the April 28, 2000, Request for Review filed by Anderson Community School Corporation, Anderson, Indiana, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review by Anderson Community School Corporation of the Decision of the Universal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002073.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002073.txt
  • period after the issuance of the May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on June 4, 2000, a holiday, Corpus Christi's June 5, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Corpus Christi's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Corpus Christi's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Corpus Christi Independent School District, Corpus Christi, Texas on June 16, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Susan R. Utter, Corpus Christi Independent School District, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002074.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002074.txt
  • not fully funded. Educational Service bears the burden of carefully reviewing items sent to and received from SLD for errors. Accordingly, we conclude that Educational Service has not presented the special circumstances necessary to warrant relief from the filing deadline. We therefore deny Educational Service's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on April 7, 2000, by Educational Service Unit #6, Milford, Nebraska, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002075.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002075.txt
  • wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Iowa City's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Iowa City Community School District, Iowa City, Iowa, on May 10, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lane Plugge, Iowa City Community School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002076.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002076.txt
  • the 30-day period after the issuance of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on June 11, 2000, a holiday, Newton's June 12, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Newton County's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Newton's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Newton County School District, Decatur, Mississippi on June 27, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bob Strebeck, Newton County School District,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002081.doc
  • described above. The grant of this waiver is conditioned upon Broadwing Local's provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Broadwing Local Services Inc. on August 17, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau Implementation of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002082.doc
  • of this waiver is conditioned upon Qwest's and Sully Buttes' provision of customer notification, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91,0.291, 1.3, the joint waiver request filed by Qwest Corporation and Sully Buttes Telephone Cooperative, Inc. on July 25, 2000, and supplemented on September 6, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002084.doc
  • of the Cordova's initial FCC Form 471 supports Cordova's assertion that its application bore an original signature, the Bureau concludes that SLD erroneously rejected Cordova's application. The Bureau, therefore, grants Cordova's request for review and instructs SLD to process Cordova's application according to its original April 13, 1998 filing date. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Cordova Public Schools, Cordova, Alaska, on March 6, 2000, IS GRANTED and that Cordova's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002085.doc
  • significant portion of the requests included support for ineligible entities. Because SLD's denial of Washington DIS's funding requests resulted from SLD's failure to make the requested corrections to Washington DIS's FCC Form 471, the Bureau grants Washington DIS's Request for Review and remands its application to SLD for further processing. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the State of Washington Department of Information Services on June 13, 2000, IS GRANTED and that its application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002093.doc
  • waiver is conditioned upon INET's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by INET Interactive Network System, Inc. on July 27, 2000, and supplemented on September 7, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief, Accounting
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002097.doc
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 17, 2000, by Penns Grove Carneys Point Regional School District, Penns Grove, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002098.doc
  • Parish has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Vernon Parish's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Vernon Parish's initial appeal, Vernon Parish may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on June 12, 2000 by Vernon Parish School District, Leesville, Louisiana, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Don S. Gallemore, Vernon Parish School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002133.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002133.txt
  • Confidential Line Count Information. Effect of Interim Protective Order. This Interim Protective Order constitutes an Order of the Commission and an agreement between every Reviewing Party executing the attached Declaration, and every Submitting Party. Authority. This Interim Protective Order is issued pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of the Communications Act as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), (j), and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 0.457(d) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 0.457(d). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau ATTACHMENT A: DECLARATION In the Matters of Access Charge Reform (CC Docket No. 96-242) Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers (CC Docket No. 94-1) Low-Volume Long-Distance Users (CC Docket No. 99-249) Federal-State Joint
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002151.doc
  • waiver is conditioned upon McLeodUSA's provision of customer notification and handling of customer complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplement. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by McLeodUSA Telecommunications Services, Inc. on July 21, 2000, and supplemented on September 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon release. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION K. Michele Walters Associate Chief Accounting Policy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002173.doc
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by ASUSTeK COMPUTER, INC., Turbocomm Tech. Inc., MAC System Co., Ltd., Dataquest Technology, Inc., Lucent Technologies Inc., 3Com Corporation, and Eicon Technology
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002174.doc
  • the eight conditions specified in the Reconsideration Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in that order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.312(i) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.312(i), by Vtech Communications Limited, Kyushu Matsushita Electric Co., Ltd., and ATLINKS USA, Inc. ARE GRANTED to the extent stated herein. 10. IT IS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002181.doc
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Carbondale failed to file an appeal of the April 27, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Carbondale's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Carbondale Public Library, Carbondale, Pennsylvania on May 4, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Anne Muldoon, Carbondale Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 4,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002182.doc
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Coffee County failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Coffee County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Coffee County Board of Education, Elba, Alabama on June 12, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rodger Bowden and Golda Donaldson, Coffee County Board of Education,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002183.doc
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 11, 2000, by Spartanburg County School District 6, Spartanburg, South Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002188.doc
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 19, 2000, by Utica Community Schools, Sterling Heights, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company, to Sharon Petty, Utica
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002221.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002221.txt
  • cap carriers to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Iowa and Qwest Corporation on June 20, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002222.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002222.txt
  • cap carriers to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require Qwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Nebraska and Qwest Corporation on June 16, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002264.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002264.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Carl Schurz failed to file an appeal of the August 17, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Carl Schurz's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Carl Schurz High School, Chicago, Illinois on April 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan M. Harris, Carl Schurz High School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002265.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002265.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 23, 2000, by Central Agency for Jewish Education, Miami, Florida, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002266.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002266.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 5, 2000, by Clifton Independent School District, Clifton, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Brenda
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002267.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002267.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Colonial failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Colonial's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Colonial School District, East Concord, New York on June 1, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from R. F. Thompson, Thompson Communications Company, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002268.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002268.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Eastern Plains failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Eastern Plains' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Eastern Plains Instructional Television Consortium, Logan, New Mexico on July 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Becky Rowley, Clovis community College, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002269.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002269.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Garden Grove failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Garden Grove's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Garden Grove Unified School District, Garden Grove, California on June 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cung Nguyen, Garden Grove Unified School District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002270.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002270.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed April 13, 2000, by Judge Memorial Catholic High School, Salt Lake City, Utah, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002271.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002271.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Kanawha County failed to file an appeal of the April 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Kanawha County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Kanawha County School District, Charleston, West Virginia on June 27, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from J. Patrick Law, Kanawha County School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002272.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002272.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 18, 2000, by Marion School District 54, Marion, Montana, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Ron
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002273.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002273.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Newburgh failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Newburgh's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Newburgh Enlarged City School District, Newburgh, New York on July 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Laval S. Wilson, Newburgh Enlarged City School District, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002274.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002274.txt
  • issued by the Administrator. Because New Castle cannot show that it filed a timely appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss New Castle's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by New Castle Community Schools, New Castle, Indiana on June 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Larry Koby, New Castle Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002275.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002275.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because Oscoda failed to file an appeal of the December 1, 1998 and February 18, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Oscoda's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Oscoda Area Schools, Oscoda, Michigan on May 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from W.C. Bill Martin, Oscoda Area Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002276.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002276.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 2, 2000, by Pace School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Kai S. Hoke,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002277.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002277.txt
  • ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: October 6, 2000 Released: October 10, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 20, 1999, by Pinckneyville District #50, Pinckneyville, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Tim O'Leary,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002278.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002278.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 28, 2000, by Racine Unified School District of Racine, Wisconsin, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002279.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002279.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Saint Andrew failed to file an appeal of the April 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Saint Andrew's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Saint Andrew School, Chicago, Illinois on June 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jack Percival, Saint Andrew School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 28,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002280.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002280.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because San Juan failed to file an appeal of the October 19, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss San Juan's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by San Juan Unified School District, Carmichael, California on May 25, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tim McCarty, San Juan Unified School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002281.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002281.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Scotch Plains failed to file appeals of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decisions dismissing Scotch Plains' appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letters of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letters of Appeal filed by Scotch Plains-Farnwood Public Schools, Scotch Plains, New Jersey on May 30, 2000, and May 31, 2000, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Donald L. Williams, Scotch Plains-Farnwood
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002403.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002403.txt
  • for which you seek discounts.'' Bancroft prematurely filed its FCC Form 471, and should not have requested support for that contracted service until March 9, 1999. Therefore, we find no merit in Bancroft's appeal. Again, for the program to run efficiently, it is critical that applicants follow the Commission's rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on February 9, 2000, by Bancroft-Rosalie Community Schools, Bancroft, Nebraska, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. Jon Cerny, Bancroft Rosalie Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 9, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002407.doc
  • specified in the Alcatel Waiver Order. Thus, we conclude, for the same reasons as in the Alcatel Waiver Order, that Petitioners have shown good cause for granting the requested waivers. Applications to register these devices under Part 68 of our rules may be submitted with this waiver. ORDERING CLAUSES 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated in Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and Section 1.3 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.3, that the requests for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) ) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 68.308(e)(1) by Actiontec Electronics, Inc., Broadxent, Inc., Askey Computer Corp., Netopia, Inc., ORCKIT communications Ltd., Telocity, Inc., Coppercom, Inc., CIS Technology Inc., Lectron
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002445.doc
  • waiver is conditioned upon the Petitioners' provision of customer notification and handling of complaints, as described above and further detailed in the Waiver Petition and Supplements. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in Sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by OnePoint Communications Corp., Talk.Com, Inc., and Talk.Com Holding Corp., d/b/a The Phone Company, on September 8, 2000, and supplemented on October 25, 2000 and October 30, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002446.doc
  • of Citizens Telecommunications Companies Revisions to Tariff F.C.C. No.1. Any rates proposed in this transmittal will be subject to an accounting order to facilitate any refunds that may later prove necessary. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 204(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 204(a), and the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Citizens' Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 1 applicable to Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal No. 87, ARE SUSPENDED for one day from the effective date and an investigation of the referenced transmittal is instituted and incorporated within CC Docket No. 97-240. 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002473.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002473.txt
  • previously granted waivers of section 69.605(c) to similarly-sized carriers. We, therefore, find that Jordan-Soldier's request waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission rules should be granted. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Jordan-Soldier Valley Telephone Company and Alpine Communications, L.C. on June 15, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002496.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002496.txt
  • Brown has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Arvin Brown's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Arvin Brown's initial appeal, Arvin Brown may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on August 8, 2000 by Arvin A. Brown Library, Richford, Vermont, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Annette Goyne, Arvin A. Brown Library,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002497.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002497.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Ballinger failed to file an appeal of the May 19, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Ballinger's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Ballinger I.S.D., Ballinger, Texas on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Laura Strube, Ballinger I.S.D., to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 15, 2000 (Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002498.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002498.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Big Rapids failed to file an appeal of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Big Rapids' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Big Rapids Public Schools, Big Rapids, Michigan on July 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joseph A. Bouman, Big Rapids Public Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002499.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002499.txt
  • a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Caledonia North failed to file an appeal of the Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Caledonia North's appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Caledonia North Supervisory Union, Lyndonville, Vermont on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary Ann Riggie, Caledonia North Supervisory Union, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002500.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002500.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Douglas failed to file an appeal of the February 24, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Douglas' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Douglas Public Library, Douglas, Arizona on July 21, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Glenda Bavier, Douglas Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 21,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002501.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002501.txt
  • ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: November 7, 2000 Released: November 8, 2000 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed May 19, 2000, by Egg Harbor City Public Schools, Egg Harbor City, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002502.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002502.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Elgin failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Elgin's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Elgin Independent School District 16, Elgin, Oklahoma on August 22, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Doris Wilson, Elgin Independent School District 16, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002503.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002503.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Holy Family failed to file an appeal of the June 6, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Holy Family's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Holy Family School, Sioux City, Iowa on August 4, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cindy Spenner, Holy Family School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002504.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002504.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Jefferson failed to file an appeal of the April 7, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Jefferson's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Jefferson County School District, Fayette, Mississippi on July 3, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John E. Dickey, Jefferson County School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002505.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002505.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Jefferson failed to file an appeal of the September 14, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Jefferson's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by The Jefferson School, Jefferson, Maryland on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Paul Thewsuvat, The Jefferson School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 15,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002506.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002506.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Granite failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Granite's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Granite School District, Salt Lake City, Utah on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dr. James Henderson, Granite School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002507.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed August 10, 2000, by Lexington Public Schools, Lexington, Nebraska, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Larry Steinberger,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002508.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002508.txt
  • period after the issuance of the June 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on June 25, 2000, a weekend, Mt. Diablo's June 26, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Mt. Diablo's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Mt. Diablo's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Concord, California on July 31, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Perry W. Polk, Mt. Diablo Unified School District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002509.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002509.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed August 15, 2000, by Oregon Trail School District, Sandy, Oregon, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Miriam
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002510.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002510.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Southeastern failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Southeastern's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Southeastern Ohio Voluntary Education Cooperative, Athens, Ohio on August 11, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert L. Lindsey, Southeastern Ohio Voluntary Education Cooperative, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002511.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002511.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Southwick-Tolland failed to file an appeal of the June 2, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Southwick-Tolland's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Southwick-Tolland Regional School District, Southwick, Massachusetts on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Paul R. Petit, Southwick-Tolland Regional School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002512.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002512.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Anthony failed to file an appeal of the May 19, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Anthony's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by St. Anthony School, New York, New York on August 21, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tess A. Alviar, St. Anthony School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002513.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002513.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Rita failed to file an appeal of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Rita's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by St. Rita School, New Orleans, Louisiana on August 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sr. Annette Baxley, St. Rita School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002514.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002514.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed August 30, 2000, by Yeshiva Schools, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Rabbi Green, Yeshiva
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002531.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002531.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Austin failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Austin's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Austin Public School 492, Austin, Minnesota on July 27, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lori Volz, Austin Public School 492, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002532.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002532.txt
  • of the 30-day period after the issuance of the May 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on June 25, 2000, a holiday, Bloomfield's June 26, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Bloomfield's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Bloomfield's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Bloomfield Public Library, Bloomfield, Iowa on July 18, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Regina Gooden, Bloomfield Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 18,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002533.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002533.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Cumberland failed to file an appeal of the April 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Cumberland's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Cumberland County School District, Burkesville, Kentucky on July 10, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robin Sharp, Cumberland County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002534.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002534.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed April 13, 2000, by Eastern Plains Instructional Television Consortium, Logan, New Mexico, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002535.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002535.txt
  • by the Administrator. Because Florence Carlton failed to file an appeal of the April 28, 2000 and May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Florence Carlton's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Florence Carlton School District 15-6, Florence, Montana on July 19, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Elaine Huseby, Florence Carlton School District 15-6, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002536.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002536.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Florence failed to file an appeal of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Florence's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Florence City School District, Florence, Alabama on July 19, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Edison D. Barney, Florence City School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002537.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002537.txt
  • this case, because Lincoln has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Lincoln's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Lincoln's initial appeal, Lincoln may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 8, 2000 by Lincoln School District 156, Calumet City, Illinois, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Dr. Kenneth Jandes, Lincoln School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002538.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002538.txt
  • period after the issuance of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on July 9, 2000, a holiday, Moon Area's July 10, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Moon Area's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Moon Area's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Moon Area School District, Moon Township, Pennsylvania on July 31, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Daniel H. Vogel, Moon Area School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002539.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002539.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because North Attleborough failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss North Attleborough's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by North Attleborough School District, North Attleborough, Massachusetts on July 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Roland Denault, North Attleborough School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002540.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002540.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Gildford failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Gildford's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by North Gildford School, Gildford, Montana on June 19, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from George Stahl, North Gildford School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 19,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002541.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002541.txt
  • 30-day period after the issuance of the June 30, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on July 30, 2000, a weekend, Roosevelt Elementary's July 31, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Roosevelt Elementary's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Roosevelt's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Roosevelt Elementary School District 66, Phoenix, Arizona on August 22, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John Harris, Roosevelt Elementary School District 66, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002542.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002542.txt
  • County has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Simpson County's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Simpson County's initial appeal, Simpson County may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on June 23, 2000 by Simpson County School District, Mendenhall, Mississippi, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kay Berry, Simpson County School District,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002543.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002543.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because South Heart failed to file an appeal of the May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss South Heart's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by South Heart School, South Heart, North Dakota on July 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Paula Lengowski, South Heart School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002544.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002544.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because Peter & Paul failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Peter & Paul's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by SS. Peter & Paul School, Cary, Illinois on July 25, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sr. Katrina Lamkin, SS. Peter & Paul School, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002545.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002545.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Patrick failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Patrick's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by St. Patrick's School, Dickinson, North Dakota on July 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Brenda L. Selinger, St. Patrick's School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002546.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002546.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Swift River failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Swift River's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Swift River Elementary School, New Salem, Massachusetts on July 12, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol S. Holzberg, Swift River Elementary School, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002547.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002547.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Vacaville failed to file an appeal of the May 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Vacaville's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Vacaville Unified School District, Vacaville, California on July 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Terry D. Beckham, Vacaville Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002548.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002548.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because AECSD failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss AECSD's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Auburn Enlarged City School District, Fairport, New York on July 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Matthew Crider, ECC Technologies, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002550.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002550.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Colton failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Colton's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Colton Joint Unified School District, Upland, California on September 1, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gary Kendrick, Colton Joint Unified School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002551.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002551.txt
  • of the 30-day period after the issuance of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on June 11, 2000, a holiday, Durham's May 12, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Durham's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Durham's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Durham Unified School District, Durham, California on July 11, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Christy R. Patterson, Durham Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002552.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002552.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed July 17, 2000, by Elko County School District, Elko, Nevada, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002553.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002553.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Girard failed to file an appeal of the May 19, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Girard's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Girard City School District, Girard, Ohio on July 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Anthony D. Ambrosio, Girard City School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002554.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002554.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because McIntosh failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss McIntosh's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by McIntosh County Schools, Darien, Georgia on July 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Debby Richardson, McIntosh County Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 28,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002555.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002555.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed July 17, 2000, by Northeast Educational Services Cooperative, Hayti, South Dakota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002556.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002556.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Ryan failed to file an appeal of the June 16, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Ryan's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Ryan Public School, Ryan, Oklahoma on August 23, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Don A. Bogard, Ryan Public School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002557.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002557.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed July 11, 2000, by Traverse City Area Public Schools, Traverse City, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002558.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002558.txt
  • of the 30-day period after the issuance of the July 7, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on August 6, 2000, a holiday, Xavier's August 7, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Xavier's Letter of Appeal and direct SLD to review Xavier's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Xavier High School, Cedar Rapids, Iowa on August 29, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeff Henderson, Xavier High School, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002559.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002559.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because ESU No. 6 failed to file an appeal of the October 26, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss ESU No. 6's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Educational Service Unit No. 06, Omaha, Nebraska on August 30, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Don Ferneding, Educational Service Unit No. 06, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002574.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002574.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Eatonville's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Eatonville School District, Eatonville, Washington, on May 9, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Raymond F. Arment, III, Eatonville School District, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002575.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002575.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Delta/Greely failed to file an appeal of the February 28, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Delta/Greely's appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Delta/Greely School District, Delta Junction, Alaska on July 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kim Johnson, Delta/Greely School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002586.doc
  • for which the customer and carrier do not have an underlying contractual relationship because of the unique technological concerns with dial-around services that are not conducive to the establishment of a written contract. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority specifically delegated to the Common Carrier Bureau in the Second Report and Order, and under Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, the deadline for detariffing mass-market consumer services IS EXTENDED from January 31, 2001 to April 30, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the authority delegated under Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, Econobill Corporation's Motion to Accept Late-Filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002630.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002630.txt
  • understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. The program's rules state repeatedly that universal service funds support only eligible services. Anderson should have been aware that it was seeking discounts for ineligible internal connections. We conclude SLD appropriately applied its 30 percent policy based upon the facts of this case. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed May 30, 2000, by Anderson School, Staatsburg, New York, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau In the Matter of Request for Review by Anderson School, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 30,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002631.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002631.txt
  • letter from Interstate stated that the lesser quotes were for ``the remaining schools,'' implying that these were separate quotes. Because SLD incorrectly determined that the funding request from Winterset was for ineligible services or products, Winterset's request for review is granted, and SLD is directed to reconsider Winterset's funding request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed April 13, 2000, by Winterset Community School District, Winterset, Iowa, IS GRANTED to the extent stated herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ivan T. Webber, on behalf of Winterset School District, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002640.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002640.txt
  • cap carriers to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require USQwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Idaho, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on July 11, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002642.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002642.txt
  • styled the letter an ``inquiry,'' rather than an appeal. Because Houston Independent filed the letter within 30 days of SLD's June 16, 2000, Funding Commitment Decision Letter, it was timely filed. Accordingly, we grant in part Houston Independent's Letters of Appeal and direct SLD to review Houston Independent's initial appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letters of Appeal filed by Houston Independent School District, Houston, Texas on August 18, 2000 and August 21, 2000, ARE GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Daryl Ann
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002650.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002650.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Bryn Athyn failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Bryn Athyn's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Bryn Athyn Church School, Bryn Athyn, Pennsylvania on September 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melodie Greer, Bryn Athyn Church School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002651.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002651.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because EDmin failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss EDmin's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by EDmin Open Systems, Inc., San Diego, California on September 26, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Greg Shorts, EDmin Open Systems, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002652.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002652.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 8, 2000, by James Ward Elementary School, Chicago, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Larry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002653.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002653.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Madera failed to file an appeal of the July 7, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Madera's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Madera Unified School District, Madera, California on September 25, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Steve Imrie, Madera Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002654.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002654.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 11, 2000, by Norwell Public Schools, Norwell, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Richard F.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002655.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002655.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Richland Colfax failed to file an appeal of the May 26, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Richland Colfax's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Richland Colfax No. 1, Richland, Nebraska on September 6, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Judith Kabourek, Richland Colfax No. 1, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002656.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002656.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Santa Rosa failed to file an appeal of the June 30, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Santa Rosa's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Santa Rosa Consolidated Schools, Santa Rosa, New Mexico on September 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Daniel Flores, Santa Rosa Consolidated Schools, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002657.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002657.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Santa Ynez failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Santa Ynez's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District, Santa Ynez, California on September 12, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Fred Van Leuven, Santa Ynez Valley Union
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002658.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002658.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 28, 2000, by Saint John Bosco High School, Bellflower, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002659.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002659.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed June 23, 2000, by South Brunswick Township School District, Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002660.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002660.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 2, 2000, by Westbrook High School, Westbrook, Connecticut, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Robert Vale,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002662.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002662.txt
  • to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require USthe Verizon companies to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Illinois, GTE North Incorporated and GTE South Incorporated on September 8, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002699.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002699.txt
  • appropriate for the SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Northwestern's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on September 15, 2000, by Northwestern School District 56-3, Mellette, South Dakota, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002700.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002700.txt
  • the 30-day period after the issuance of the July 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters fell on August 27, 2000, a holiday, Western Heights' August 28, 2000 appeals should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Western Heights' appeals and direct SLD to review Western Heights' appeals to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Western Heights School District I-41, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on September 28, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review by Western Heights School District
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002701.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002701.txt
  • Philadelphia Library's request contravenes the Commission's policy that applicants shall not be permitted to amend completed FCC Forms 471 to remove ineligible service requests after the closure of the filing window deadline. If applicants were permitted to make such corrections, SLD and the Commission would face significant additional administrative burdens. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 28, 2000 by Free Library of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from H.E. Broadbent, Free Library of Philadelphia, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed, March 28,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002722.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002722.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies YCS' Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Youth Consultation Services, Newark, New Jersey, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kathleen M. Bravo, Youth Consultation Service, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 10, 2000 (Letter of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002729.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002729.txt
  • Protective Order previously adopted in this proceeding. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1-4, 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 303(r), 403, and 410 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154, 201-205, 214, 218-220, 254, 303(r), 403, and 410, and section 1.108 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91(f), this ORDER IS ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket 96-45, Ninth Report and Order and Eighteenth Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 20432 (1999) (Ninth Report and Order); Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Forward-Looking Mechanism for High Cost Support for Non-Rural LECs, Tenth Report and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002784.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002784.txt
  • subsequently granted Chichester's appeal concerning the other application, stating that ``[y]our appeal has been granted because it is not clear who was contacted initially for the missing documentation. . . .'' Because these two decisions based on the same circumstances are inconsistent, we shall remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Chichester School District, Boothwyn, Pennsylvania on May 10, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Chichester's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002793.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002793.txt
  • the relevant state authority that has jurisdiction over such matters. In addition, our grant of pricing flexibility in no way prejudges whether BellSouth complies with the requirements of section 271 of the Communications Act. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES. 25. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 1.774 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.774, and the authority delegated by Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, and the Access Reform Fifth Report and Order, that the petition filed by BellSouth IS GRANTED to the extent detailed herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14221 (1999), petition
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002806.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002806.txt
  • with routers deemed eligible for support by SLD. Consistent with Terral School District 3, and in the absence of an explanation by SLD of the basis for its decision, we conclude that the record does not support SLD's finding of ineligibility. Accordingly, we shall remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the Caddo Independent School District 5, Caddo, Oklahoma, on May 1, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Caddo's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002807.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002807.txt
  • with routers deemed eligible for support by SLD. Consistent with Terral School District 3, and in the absence of an explanation by SLD of the basis for its decision, we conclude that the record does not support SLD's finding of ineligibility. Accordingly, we shall remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the Canute Independent School District 11, Canute, Oklahoma, on May 1, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Canute's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002808.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002808.txt
  • after the issuance of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter fell on August 20, 2000, a holiday, Soille San Diego's August 21, 2000 appeal should have been considered timely filed. Accordingly, we grant Soille San Diego's appeal and direct SLD to review Soille San Diego's appeal to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Soille San Diego Hebrew Day School, San Diego, California on September 15, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rabbi Simcha Weiser, Soille San
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002818.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002818.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed September 6, 2000, by Lyman School District No. 42-1, Presho, South Dakota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002841.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002841.txt
  • the 28-day posting requirement. The critical issue is when Sackets Harbor signed a contract with the service provider, not when it mailed the Form 471. Based on the record before us, Sackets Harbor signed a contract before anyone ever had an opportunity to submit a competitive bid for the project. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Sackets Harbor Central School District, Sackets Harbor, New York on May 5, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Anne B. Spaziani, Sackets Harbor Central School District 56, to Office of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002851.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002851.txt
  • this docket withdrawing its application. As such, we hereby terminate this docket. Verizon further expressed its intention to ``shortly file to initiate a new application'' and to incorporate the existing record in this docket into the new application. We will consider such a request once Verizon files a new application. Accordingly IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the proceeding in CC Docket 00-176 IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Michael E. Glover, Senior Vice President & Deputy General Counsel, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 00-176 (filed Dec. 18, 2000).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002896.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002896.txt
  • the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Western Wireless has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6), and the authority delegated in sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, Western Wireless Corporation IS DESIGNATED AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER for designated service areas in Wyoming, as discussed herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted by the Common Carrier Bureau to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002899.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002899.txt
  • only speed the verification process, but it will also diminish the burden on Bell Atlantic and Lifeline customers without imposing any significant costs. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania on December 22, 1999 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE transmitted to the Universal Service Administrative Company. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002900.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002900.txt
  • the Year 2 deadline to September 30, 2001. Applicants eligible for the extension, therefore, may extend their existing contracts for non-recurring services voluntarily until September 30, 2001, without having to comply with the Commission's competitive bidding process. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, this Order is ADOPTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, DA 00-2444 (Common Carrier Bur., rel. November 1, 2000) (November 2000 Extension Order). The Commission's rules require schools and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002908.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002908.txt
  • a review of a decision by the Universal Service Administrator to withhold funds allegedly due and payable to Ames under the schools and libraries support mechanisms. On July 31, 2000, Ames filed a Motion to Withdraw its appeal. The Division grants Ames' Motion to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismisses Ames' appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion to Withdraw filed by the Ames Business & Learning Environments, Inc., Chandler, Arizona on July 31, 2000 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002909.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002909.txt
  • the Year One funding implementation deadline for the schools and libraries support mechanism so that it can receive the full amount of funding that it requested. Our review of the record, however, finds that Franklin has received all funds requested. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Franklin's Letter of Appeal as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the Franklin County School District, Carnesville, Georgia on December 30, 1999 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Sharon L. Webber Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Alicia A. Frey, Franklin County Schools, to the Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00113.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00113.txt
  • were concerned, as evidenced by our rules. Accordingly, we conclude that based on the record before us, a modification of our rules is not warranted here and we deny Washington DIS's petition for reconsideration. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 13. It is THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to section 4(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the State of Washington Department of Information Services request for waiver IS GRANTED and the petition for reconsideration IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 8776,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010024.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Columbia failed to file an appeal of the June 2, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Columbia's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Columbia Public Library, Columbia, Pennsylvania on October 4, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert V. McCarthy, Columbia Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010025.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 10, 2000, by Lake Havasu Unified School District, Lake Havasu City, Arizona, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010026.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010026.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Lakeview failed to file an appeal of the May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Lakeview's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Lakeview Community Schools, Columbus, Nebraska on December 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kurt Harrison, Lakeview Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 5,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010027.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010027.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Matawan-Aberdeen failed to file an appeal of the May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Matawan-Aberdeen's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Matawan-Aberdeen Regional School District, Matawan, New Jersey on November 28, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Roland R. Pare, Ed.D, Matawan-Aberdeen Regional School District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010028.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010028.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 17, 2000, by Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Concord, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010029.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010029.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 16, 2000, by New Brighton Area School District, New Brighton, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010030.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010030.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because New Hampshire School failed to file an appeal of the July 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss New Hampshire School's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by New Hampshire School Administrative Unit No. 53, Pembroke, New Hampshire on June 20, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary I. Rubega, New Hampshire School Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010031.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010031.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 30, 2000, by Newport Public School District, Newport, Rhode Island, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010032.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010032.txt
  • this case, because Sanger has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Sanger's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Sanger's initial appeal, Sanger may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Sanger Unified School District, Sanger, California, on October 23, 2000, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from Kim Jacobsen, Sanger Unified School District,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010033.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010033.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Santa Ana failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Santa Ana's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Santa Ana Unified School District, Santa Ana, California on October 6, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Karen Aeppli, Santa Ana Unified School District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010034.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010034.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Tuckahoe Union failed to file an appeal of the September 15, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Tuckahoe Union's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Tuckahoe Union Free School District, Eastchester, New York on October 31, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael V. Yazurlo, Ed.D, Tuckahoe Union Free School District,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010044.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010044.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Austin's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Austin Independent School District, Austin, Texas, on May 12, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Pascal D. Forgione, Austin Independent School District, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010045.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010045.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Baldwin's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Baldwin Public Library, Baldwin, New York, on May 31, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Hopkins, Baldwin Public Library, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 31,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010046.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010046.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Lakeside's Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Lakeside Youth Services, Ft. Washington, Pennsylvania, on June 22, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ronald K. MacClay, Educational Consortium for Telecommunications Savings (on behalf Lakeside Youth Services),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010047.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010047.txt
  • not post Oak Harbor's request for services to SLD's website. The contracts for which Oak Harbor seeks support, however, do not meet either of the limited exceptions for existing, binding contracts permitted by the Commission's rules. Accordingly, consistent with prior Bureau decisions, SLD correctly denied Oak Harbor's requests for support. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the July 13, 2000, Letter of Appeal filed by Oak Harbor School District No. 201, Oak Harbor, Washington, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bruce E. Worley, Oak Harbor School District No. 201,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010048.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010048.txt
  • to wait 28 days before entering into an agreement with a service provider and therefore violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Common Carrier Bureau has consistently denied requests for review by applicants that had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. The Division, therefore, denies Wells' Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Wells Public Library, Wells, Maine, on June 9, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sandra Broomfield, Wells Public Library, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed June 9, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010065.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010065.txt
  • the program that applicants provide accurate information regarding funding requests. The Administrator must be able to reasonably estimate the total demand for support submitted by applicants during each filing period in order to make determinations regarding the availability of funding. We therefore conclude that SLD correctly denied Carl Schurz's appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Carl Schurz High School on May 23, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan M. Harris, Carl Schurz High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 23, 2000 (Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010101.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010101.txt
  • these representations, and the statements of the Alaska Commission, we conclude that the Petitioners have demonstrated that grant of this waiver request serves the public interest. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by ATEAC, Inc., Alaska Telephone Company, Arctic Slope Telephone Association Cooperative, Inc., Interior Telephone Company, Inc., Mukluk Telephone Company, Inc., and United-KUC, Inc., on September 22, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010129.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010129.txt
  • loop support amounts are necessary. Payments for periods subsequent to December 2002 shall be based on the conventional historic data in accordance with the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Mescalero Apache Telecom, Inc., GTE Southwest Incorporated, and Valor Telecommunications of New Mexico, LLC on June 30, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010145.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010145.txt
  • this case, because Colchester has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Colchester's Letter of Appeal to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Colchester's initial appeal, Colchester may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Colchester School District, Colchester, Vermont, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal from John C. Gifford, Colchester School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010146.txt
  • staffing difficulties and other priorities. These arguments do not rise to the level of good cause necessary to justify waiving our rules. Accordingly, we conclude that Newburgh has not presented the special circumstances necessary to warrant relief from the filing deadline. We therefore deny Newburgh's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on July 10, 2000, by Newburgh Enlarged City School District, Newburgh, New York, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010147.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010147.txt
  • signed on Sept. 10, 1997 and June 5, 1998. None of these requests were subject to existing, binding agreements as defined by the Commission's rules for Year 2 and were thus subject to the competitive bidding requirement. Accordingly, consistent with prior Bureau decisions, SLD correctly denied Raytown's requests for support. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the April 14, 2000, Letter of Appeal filed by Raytown Quality Schools, Raytown, Missouri, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from R.G. Kirby, Raytown Quality Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 14, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010148.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010148.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 9, 2000, by Sutton School, CNSU, Lyndonville, Vermont, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Mary Ann
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010175.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010175.txt
  • Side Union bears the burden of carefully reviewing all documents sent to and received from SLD for accuracy. Accordingly, we conclude that East Side Union has not presented the special circumstances necessary to warrant relief from the filing deadline. We therefore deny East Side Union's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on April 11, 2000, by East Side Union High School District, San Jose, California, and the request to waive the 30-day time limit in which to file appeals ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010200.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010200.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Atlantic County failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Atlantic County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Atlantic County Library System, Mays Landing, New Jersey on December 4, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Alyce J. Bowers, Atlantic County Library System, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010201.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010201.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Clearview failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Clearview's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Clearview Local School District, Lorain, Ohio on December 8, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kent R. Zeman, Clearview Local School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010202.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 12, 2000, by Granville Public Schools, Granville, North Dakota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Judith
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010203.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010203.txt
  • ) Federal-State Joint Board on ) CC Docket No. 96-45 Universal Service ) ) Changes to the Board of Directors of the ) CC Docket No. 97-21 National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc. ) order Adopted: January 26, 2001 Released: January 29, 2001 By the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau: ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 20, 2000, by Leon County Schools, Tallahassee, Florida, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William D.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010204.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010204.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed November 28, 2000, by Levittown Union Free School District, Levittown, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010205.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010205.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Letter of Appeal was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed December 13, 2000, by Pluralistic School, Santa Monica, California, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Kathleen Lenihan,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010206.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010206.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Solon failed to file an appeal of the September 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Solon's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Solon City Schools, Solon, Ohio on December 5, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kirk B. Miller, Solon City Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010207.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010207.txt
  • affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because neither Scanlon or MetroCon filed an appeal of the February 18, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss MetroCon's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by MetroCon Communications, New York, New York on June 22, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Al Garcia, MetroCon Communications, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 22,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010212.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010212.txt
  • priority two services (internal connections) being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand NAFC's application to SLD, and direct SLD to reconsider NAFC's FCC Form 471 and, if warranted, to issue a new funding commitment decision letter providing discounts for all appropriate priority one services requested by NAFC. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corporation on November 1, 1999 to reconsider the dismissal of the Appeal it filed on April 26, 2000 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that the Appeal filed by New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010213.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010213.txt
  • Soille, we conclude that the SLD correctly determined that only 72 of Soille's students were eligible for the national school lunch program under the federal income eligibility guidelines. Thus, SLD properly found Soille eligible for a 50 percent discount for internal connections, and we find no merit in Solle's appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on June 9, 2000 by Soille San Diego Hebrew Day School, San Diego, California, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rabbi Simcha Weiser, Soille San Diego Hebrew Day School, to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010285.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010285.txt
  • SLD failed to specify what additional information was required for the application. We have reviewed the record, and we conclude that the record does not show that SLD adequately communicated the nature of the requested information to St. Stanislaus. Accordingly, we remand St. Stanislaus' application to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the St. Stanislaus Kostka School, Chicago, Illinois on May 15, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review St. Stanislaus' funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010314.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010314.txt
  • the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. Given Yeshiva's failure to certify the Form 471 subsequent to the required posting period, SLD properly denied the application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Yeshiva Ahavas Torah, Brooklyn, New York, filed April 11, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Alter Obermeister, Yeshiva Ahavas Torah, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010315.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010315.txt
  • with Bell Atlantic was for tariffed services, such services must be re-bid every year because they do not fall under the limited exemptions from competitive bidding. Therefore, because Thomas Crane did not seek competitive bids for Funding Year 2, we find that SLD correctly denied Thomas Crane's request for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the April 10, 2000 Request for Review filed by Thomas Crane Public Library, Quincy, Massachusetts, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jody Parsley, Thomas Crane Public Library, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed April 17, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010316.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010316.txt
  • administratively appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Accordingly, we believe that waivers of these deadlines should not be routinely granted. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Ashby's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on January 4, 2001, by Ashby Public Schools, Ashby, Minnesota IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Renee Melby, Ashby Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010317.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010317.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss California Youth Authority's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on California Youth Authority's initial request, California Youth Authority may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 1, 2001, by California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, Sacramento, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010318.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010318.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed October 13, 2000, by Daingerfield-Lone Star Independent School District, Daingerfield, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010319.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010319.txt
  • of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission or SLD only upon receipt. Because Hawthorn failed to timely appeal the April 14, 2000 decision to either the Commission or SLD, the Requests for Review will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed November 17, 2000, and December 4, 2000, by Hawthorn School District 73 District, Hawthorn, Illinois, ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010320.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010320.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 7, 1999, by Peach Public Libraries, Fort Valley, Georgia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Billy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010321.doc
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Windham failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Windham's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Windham Public Schools, Windham, Connecticut on January 3, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Millie C. Wheeler, Windham Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed January
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010324.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010324.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 22, 2000, by Half Hollow Hills School District, Dix Hills, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010350.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010350.txt
  • request were ineligible. In other instances where SLD has failed to provide an explanation for its determination of ineligibility, the Bureau has remanded the application to SLD for further consideration. We believe that such action is also appropriate here and shall remand Adams Twelve's application to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Adams Twelve Five Star Schools, Northglenn, Colorado, on April 26, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Adams Twelve's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010351.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010351.txt
  • errors and fraud. Furthermore, if applicants were permitted to amend their requests after the window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. Therefore, we cannot permit Cheney to amend its FCC Form 471. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 16, 2000, by Cheney Public Schools, Cheney, Washington, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau In the Matter of Request for Review by Cheney School District No. 360, filed May 16, 2000 (Request
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010352.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010352.txt
  • application on appeal. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Flour Bluff Independent School District, Corpus Christi, Texas, April 13, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Darrell Earwood, Flour Bluff Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010353.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010353.txt
  • with priority one and priority two services being considered separately on their own merits. We, therefore, remand Pioneerland's application to SLD, and direct SLD to reconsider Pioneerland's FCC Form 471 and, if warranted, to issue a new funding commitment decision letter providing discounts for all appropriate priority one services requested by Pioneerland. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), section 1.113 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.113, IS WAIVED to the extent described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to section 54.722 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.722(a), the Request for Review filed by Pioneerland Library System, Willmar, Minnesota, on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010355.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010355.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Dietrich failed to file an appeal of the May 5, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Dietrich's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Dietrich School District No. 314, Dietrich, Idaho on January 11, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Peter M. Bolz, Sr., Dietrich School District No. 314, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010356.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010356.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Grant County failed to file an appeal of the August 31, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Grant County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Grant County Education Service District, Canyon City, Oregon on May 15, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Don Coffey, Grant County Education Service District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010357.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010357.txt
  • Christian has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Highway Christian's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Highway Christian's initial request, Highway Christian may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Highway Christian Academy, New York City, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Darren Page, Highway Christian Academy, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010358.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010358.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Pius V failed to file an appeal of the October 5, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Pius V's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Pius V Parish School, Jacksonville, Florida on January 26, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sister Elise Kennedy, St. Pius V Parish School, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010373.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010373.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because USD failed to file an appeal of the May 12, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss USD's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Unified School District #214, Ulysses, Kansas on February 5, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joe Breeden, Unified School District #214, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010386.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010386.txt
  • numbering resources necessary to continue to provide service to their prospective customers. We are encouraged by these states' willingness to work in conjunction with the FCC to achieve our numbering resource optimization goals. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Petition of the Louisiana Public Service Commission for Expedited Decision for Delegated Authority to Implement Numbering Conservation Measures is GRANTED IN PART to the extent described herein; Petition of the Maryland Public Service Commission for Additional Delegated Authority to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010410.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010410.txt
  • cap carriers to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require USQwest to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Telecommunications Company of Wyoming and Qwest Corporation on August 21, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010411.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010411.txt
  • provide remote access. In light of our decision in White Sulphur Springs, we conclude that it is appropriate to remand Acadia Parish's application to SLD for further review. We direct SLD to review Acadia Parish's use of its remote access router to determine whether such use is eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Acadia Parish School Board 5, Crowley, Louisiana, on May 26, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Acadia Parish's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010412.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010412.txt
  • the limited exceptions for existing, binding contracts permitted by the Commission's rules. Antioch seeks support for tariffed services and for contracts entered into in April and July of 1999. Accordingly, consistent with prior Bureau decisions, SLD correctly denied Antioch's requests for support. The Division, therefore, denies Antioch's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by Antioch Unified School District, Antioch, California, on August 21, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael Gudjohnsen, Director of Purchasing, Antioch Unified School District Purchasing Department, to the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010420.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010420.txt
  • appropriate to remand Buffalo and Erie's application to SLD for further review. We direct SLD to review Buffalo and Erie's use of its remote access routers to determine whether such use is eligible for discounts, and consequently, whether maintenance and memory upgrades of such routers are also eligible for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Buffalo and Erie County Public Library on May 19, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Administrator to review Buffalo's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010433.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010433.txt
  • of agreement; it only asserts that service will commence on or after the date of the letter. Consequently, we find Livingston Parish's argument unpersuasive and in the absence of other evidence in the record we find that the Applicant violated the 28-day waiting period with regard to the Com-Net vendor. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Livingston Parish School District, Livingston Louisiana, on May 26, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from J. Rogers Pope, Livingston Parish School District, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010434.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010434.txt
  • whose FCC Forms 471 were rejected as untimely because of the server failure. In accordance with that Order, SLD has notified the above-captioned applicants individually that it would consider their late-filed applications as having been filed inside the filing window. Therefore, the Division dismisses these Requests for Waiver as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the above-captioned Requests for Waiver are DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sara Ginsberg, Chabad Academy of Myrtle Beach, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed July 3, 2000; Letter from Beverly I. White, Greenville County
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010435.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010435.txt
  • multiple instructional buildings that comprise a single school would generally be considered internal connections rather than part of a WAN. Nothing in the record before us indicates whether the other building is an instructional building comprising part of the same school. Accordingly, we shall remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the appeal filed by the Solomon Schechter School of Greater Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, on May 4, 2000 IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Solomon Schechter's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010463.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010463.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Los Angeles Unified's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Los Angeles Unified's initial request, Los Angeles Unified may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Catherine Banker, Los Angeles Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010464.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010464.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 19, 2000, by Salem County Vocational Technical Schools, Woodstown, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010480.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010480.txt
  • encourage commenters to discuss this issue in response to the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 3. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-4, 201, 202, 251-254, 256, 271, and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 153, 154, 201-205, 251, 252, 256, 271, 303(r), and authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Commission clarifies the Line Sharing Reconsideration Order as set out above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability and Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Third Report and Order
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010506.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010506.txt
  • responsible for clearly and accurately describing its funding request and for understanding all applicable program rules. The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies program rules, which limit universal service mechanism funds to eligible services only. For that reason, Petersburg's Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Petersburg City Public Schools, dated June 6, 2000, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Herbert H. Morris, Petersburg Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 6, 2000 (Request for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.txt
  • in any disadvantage to other tariff participants." We, therefore, conclude that good cause exists to grant a waiver of section 69.3(e)(11) to the Acquiring Companies. VI. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by All West Communications, Inc., Carbon/Emery Telecom, Inc., Central Utah Telephone, Inc., Hanksville Telecom, Inc., Manti Telephone Company, Skyline Telecom, UBET Telecom, Inc., and the Qwest Corporation on October 18, 2000, IS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010509.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010509.txt
  • waste, and abuse. By extending this deadline, we provide the independent auditor with more time to complete its work, thereby ensuring a complete and accurate draft audit report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 1, 4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 254 and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, the waiver request filed by the Universal Service Administrative Company on July 26, 2000 is GRANTED to the extent indicated herein to allow submission of the draft audit report for the year 2000 on or before April 15, 2001. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010516.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010516.txt
  • application is otherwise substantially complete.'' Upon review of the record in each of the Requests for Review, we conclude that each presents circumstances factually similar to those in Naperville and meets the standards articulated in Naperville. Accordingly, we remand the applications to SLD for processing pursuant to the Commission's rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by the named parties to this Order ARE REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division for further consideration as provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Paul A. Mulder, Allendale Public Schools,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010523.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010523.txt
  • applicable statute or rule. Caribou's misunderstanding of program rules provides no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and procedures. Here, we find no grounds for relieving Caribou from having to comply with our policies regarding ineligible services. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 18, 2000 by Caribou School District, Caribou, Maine, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lynn McNeal, Caribou Regional School District, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 18, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010524.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010524.txt
  • can properly be funded. Given the volume of applications that SLD reviews every year, it is critical that applicants follow instructions and seek support only for eligible services, so that the program can effectively target funds to those services that can be supported. Ultimately, this benefits deserving schools and libraries. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the April 7, 2000, Request for Review filed by Maine School Administrative District #49, Fairfield, Maine, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review by Maine School Administrative District #49 of the Decision of the Universal Service
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010525.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010525.txt
  • for ineligible services. Because ineligible equipment constituted more than thirty percent of St. Landry's original funding request, and in light of the prohibition against allowing applicants to amend their applications once the filing window has closed, we affirm SLD's decision to reject St. Landry's funding request in its entirety. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 28, 2000, by St. Landry Parish School District, Opelousas, Louisiana IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lanny Moreau, St. Landry Parish School District, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010585.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010585.txt
  • rules. The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies program rules, which limit universal service mechanism funds to eligible services only. Allowing applicants who fail to follow program rules to amend their applications prejudices other applicants who properly completed their applications and sought only eligible services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 12, 1999, by Caddo Parish School Board, Shreveport, Louisiana, IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010586.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010586.txt
  • Team, computer center employees, grounds/maintenance workers, and food service/warehouse workers, which are clearly ineligible for funding under the program rules because they fail to serve an educational purpose. We decline to overturn SLD's decision when the applicant effectively revises its application on appeal. We, therefore, deny Rockwood's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 12, 2000, by Rockwood School District R 6, Eureka, Missouri, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Steve Wester, Rockwood School District R 6, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 12,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010587.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010587.txt
  • where SLD has failed to provide an explanation for its determination of ineligibility, the Bureau has remanded the application to SLD for further consideration. We believe that such action is also appropriate here and shall remand Springfield's application to SLD for further consideration under applicable program rules and policies. 8. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed on May 18, 2000 by Springfield Public Schools, Springfield, Massachusetts, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Springfield's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010588.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010588.txt
  • find that Western Heights' Request for Review seeking to use this method must be denied. In addition, we reject Western Heights' assertion that this appeal raises a novel issue of policy which must be considered by the full Commission, because as noted above, the Commission has already addressed the issue. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Western Heights School District, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on July 31, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Request For Review by John D. Harrington, Funds for Learning, on behalf of Western Heights
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010648.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010648.txt
  • ineligible maintenance costs in its application, we find that the ineligible services requested in FRN 264664 totals less than 30 percent of the total request. We therefore remand Boston Public Library's application to SLD for further consideration and to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter consistent with this order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Boston Public Library, Boston, Massachusetts, on June 5, 2000 IS GRANTED IN PART to the extent described herein, and is otherwise DENIED. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Boston Public Library's funding application and to issue
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010649.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010649.txt
  • is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing sufficient information in its FCC Form 471 to enable SLD to determine whether the requested services are eligible. In the absence of such information, we believe that SLD was justified in concluding that this request should be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Boston Public Library on May 30, 2000 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as discussed herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Boston Public Library's funding application and to issue a revised Funding Commitment
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010650.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010650.txt
  • our decision in Buffalo and Erie I directly applies and on remand, SLD should review the capabilities and actual use of the Cisco 2501 routers in question to determine whether these routers are discount eligible and consequently, whether the requested operating system and memory upgrades are also eligible for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Buffalo and Erie Public Library on July 11, 2000 is GRANTED to the extent provided herein, and this application is remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010651.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010651.txt
  • AND ORDERING CLAUSES 14. Based on the foregoing, we direct the NANPA to release an area code for the purpose of relieving the 716 NPA in accordance with the area code relief plan adopted by the NYDPS. 15. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 251, and section 0.91 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.91, IT IS ORDERED, that the request of the State of New York Department of Public Service for the release of a new area code is granted. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Lawrence G. Malone, General Counsel, NYDPS, to Lawrence E. Strickling, Chief, Common Carrier
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010652.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010652.txt
  • for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies program rules, which limit universal service mechanism funds to eligible services only. We therefore deny Paducah's Request for Review. 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 7, 2000, by Paducah Public Schools, Paducah, Kentucky, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeff Nelson, Paducah Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 7, 2000 (Request for Review).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010653.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010653.txt
  • each funding year, administrative necessity requires that each applicant be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. The applicant must ensure that its request for discounts satisfies program rules, which limit universal service funds to eligible services only. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the May 12, 2000 Request for Review filed by Pike County School District, Troy, Alabama, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sherry A. Key and Dr. John R. Key, Pike County School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010654.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010654.txt
  • year, administrative necessity requires that each applicant be responsible for clearly and accurately describing its funding request and for understanding all applicable program rules. We decline to overturn SLD's decision when the applicant effectively revises its application on appeal. We, therefore, affirm SLD's decision to deny Portland's request for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Portland Public Schools, Portland, Oregon, on February 22, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Chris Bronsema, Portland Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 22, 2000 (Request for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010655.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010655.txt
  • it may have otherwise been entitled, and because there is no evidence in SLD's records that Visitation attempted to correct this error at any time prior to approval, we conclude that SLD correctly affirmed its funding commitment based on the total pre-discount cost reported in the applicant's FCC Form 471. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Visitation Academy, dated May 24, 2000, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John H. Leaman, Visitation Academy, Bay City, Michigan, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed May 24, 2000 (Request
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010656.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010656.txt
  • resources necessary to continue to provide service to their prospective customers. We are encouraged by these states' willingness to work with the FCC and the Bureau to achieve national numbering resource optimization goals. Accordingly, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), and 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251, and pursuant to sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.1 and 52.9(b), IT IS ORDERED that the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's Petition for Additional Delegated Authority to Implement Number Optimization Measures and Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's Request for Expedited Ruling and Second Supplement to Petition for Additional Delegated Authority to Implement Number Conservation Measures are GRANTED
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010736.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010736.txt
  • representative of a service provider taking part in the bidding process, SLD reasonably determined that the Commission's competitive bidding rules were violated under the precedent established in Mastermind. Therefore, SLD properly removed the relevant Forms 470 off its web-site and denied the funding requests in the associated Form 471 applications. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by A. R. Carethers SDA School on August 25, 2000 IS DENIED, the Request for Review filed by Applegate Adventist Academy on August 25, 2000 IS DENIED, the Request for Review filed by Berean SDA School on August 25, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010773.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010773.txt
  • to the FCC Form 471 filing deadline. The record shows that Audrey Pack complied with the program's requirements in providing additional information to SLD on December 13, 2000. Thus, the untimely posting of the FCC Form 470 is not attributable to Audrey Pack. We therefore grant Audrey Pack's waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Audrey Pack Memorial Library, Spring City, Tennessee on July 3, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein. We direct SLD to process Audrey Pack's FCC Form 471 as timely filed within the filing window. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010774.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010774.txt
  • Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Company (Administrator), pursuant to which SLD denied Bibb's request to change service providers. On March 12, 2001, Bibb filed a Motion to Withdraw its Request for Review. The Division grants Bibb's Motion to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismisses Bibb's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion to Withdraw filed by Bibb County Board of Education, Centreville, Alabama, on March 12, 2001 IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010775.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010775.txt
  • for a contract that includes both eligible and ineligible products. Given Commission rules and precedent, SLD properly denied Fairfax's entire funding request. Therefore, SLD clearly has authority, under these limited circumstances, to deny funding requests that include both eligible and ineligible services, and we reject Fairfax's claims to the contrary. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 22, 2000 by Fairfax County Public Schools, Fairfax, Virginia, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review by Fairfax County Public Library, of Decision of Universal Service
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010776.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010776.txt
  • purchased.'' The letter also emphasized that ``your response on [the Item 22 Review] worksheets should represent the total of all of the resources available in all of the eligible entities covered by your request.'' Because CMCC failed to comply with these clear directives, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Central Minnesota Computing Center, filed October 13, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael T. Bauer, Central Minnesota Computer Center, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010777.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010777.txt
  • would face significant additional administrative burdens. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, administrative necessity requires that each applicant be responsible for clearly and accurately describing its funding request and for understanding all applicable program rules. We therefore deny St. John's request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. John the Baptist School, Petersburg, Nebraska on May 23, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jean Reicks, St. John the Baptist School, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010778.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010778.txt
  • that as a general matter, an applicant who submits an FCC Form 471 funding request prior to entering into a legally binding agreement with a service provider will be denied funding on that request. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the Request for Review filed on March 24, 2000 is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that SLD adjust its funding commitment in accordance with this order and the procedures established in the Commitment Adjustment Order II. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010793.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010793.txt
  • under program rules. Therefore, we disagree with SLD's assessment that well over 30 % of the funding request is ineligible under program rules. Accordingly, we grant Chelmsford's request for review and remand its application to SLD, and direct SLD to reconsider this FRN consistent with program rules. V. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 22, 2000, by Chelmsford Public School District, North Chelmsford, Massachusetts, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and remanded to the Schools and Libraries Division. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Chelmsford's funding application and to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010794.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010794.txt
  • a budget of only $18,000. The information provided by CVA indicates that CVA's available technological and budgetary resources were inadequate, thus CVA failed to demonstrate that it possessed the necessary resources to make effective use of the services for which it requested support. We, therefore, deny CVA's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed October 26, 2000, by the Children's Village Academy, Kinston, North Carolina, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Monte Nardy, Children's Village Academy, Kinston, North Carolina, to the Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010795.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010795.txt
  • but SLD failed to post them to its web site in a timely manner causing the waiting period to extend past the filing window deadline. In this instance, however, Henderson's defective Form 470, not SLD, caused the posting delay. Therefore, a waiver of the Commission's rules is not warranted. 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by North Country Library System, Watertown, New York, on behalf of Henderson Free Library, Henderson, New York, on June 9, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Yvonne
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010796.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010796.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Little Miami failed to file an appeal of the August 10, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Little Miami's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Little Miami Local School District, Morrow, Ohio on May 18, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from George Long, Little Miami Local School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010797.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010797.txt
  • public address system, it assigned a ``$0'' amount to the ``[i]nstallation of telephone wiring'' identified in an attachment to its FCC Form 471. Manhasset's application supports SLD's determination that wiring costs included in Manhattan's FCC Form 471 are attributable to an ineligible product rather than to eligible telephone wiring. 11. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 3, 2000, by Manhasset Union Free School District, Westbury, New York IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Winston E. Himsworth, E-Rate Central, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010798.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010798.txt
  • rules. The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies the Commission's policies as well as program rules. Here, New Albany's misunderstanding of program rules provides no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corporation, New Albany, Indiana, on May 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dennis A. Cahill, New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010833.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010833.txt
  • remote access functions. In light of our decision in White Sulphur Springs, we conclude that it is appropriate to remand Hood River's application to SLD for further review. We direct SLD to review Hood River's use of its remote access routers to determine whether such use is eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Hood River County School District on May 25, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Administrator to review Hood River's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance with
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010834.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010834.txt
  • for services provided pursuant to existing, binding contracts. Accordingly, SLD posted those services on its website for competitive bidding. Mobile did not wait 28 days before renewing an agreement with a service provider, and did not satisfy the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. The Division, therefore, denies Mobile's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mobile County Public School System, Mobile, Alabama, on August 3, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Margaret Blake, Mobile County Public School System, to the Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010852.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010852.txt
  • BTCS with more than five times as many computer ports as available computers. We find that neither BTCS nor Total Communications USA demonstrated to SLD that BTCS possessed the necessary resources to make effective use of the services for which it requested support. We, therefore, deny BTCS's request for review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bethlehem Temple Christian School, Duquesne, Pennsylvania, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Benjamin J. Aron, Schwaninger & Associates, to Federal Communications Commission, filed December 8, 1999 (Request for Review). 47
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010854.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010854.txt
  • have presented these contracts for bidding, we must reject Mercer County's argument that this form has satisfied its competitive bidding obligations on the relevant requests. Instead, we find that on the record before it, SLD correctly denied funding to Mercer County for failure to comply with the competitive bidding rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mercer County School District on June 7, 2000 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Esq., on behalf of Mercer County School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 7,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010855.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010855.txt
  • cannot be construed as a waiver of the 30-day rule, because SLD has no authority to make such a waiver. Since Mass. DOE is not entitled to relief even when the merits are considered, we need not decide whether it would be appropriate to grant a waiver of section 54.720. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on October 5, 2000 by Massachusetts Department of Education, Malden, Massachusetts, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from John Fuller, Massachusetts Department of Education, to Federal Communications Commission, filed October 5, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010873.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010873.txt
  • the Commission's rules governing the calculation of discount rates. As in Hamilton County School Board, SLD has properly applied the Commission's rules and the program's procedures. These applicants' challenge to the fairness of the rules is properly initiated by filing a petition for rulemaking, rather than a Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Calhoun County School District on August 10, 2000; by Craig City School District on May 17, 2000; by Holmes County School District on May 8, 2000; by Jackson County School Board on May 12, 2000; by Lake County Schools
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010876.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010876.txt
  • use the weighted average discount method described in Hamilton's Request for Review for those discounts. The method described in Hamilton's Request for Review applies only for services shared by multiple schools and only those schools sharing the services-as opposed to all schools in the school district-are included in that calculation. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Hamilton County School Board, Jasper, Florida, on May 9, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patricia Parks, Hamilton County School Board, filed May 9, 2000 (Request for Review).
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010877.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010877.txt
  • properly evaluate Kerman's funding request. Given the phrasing of SLD's request for information on individual hardware costs, we conclude that it was reasonable for Kerman to interpret SLD's inquiry as not requesting information relating to other costs, such as labor. Accordingly, we remand Kerman's application to SLD for further review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 12, 2000, by Kerman Unified School District, Kerman, California, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Library Division to review Kerman's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010891.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010891.txt
  • request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss California Youth Authority's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on California Youth Authority's initial request, California Youth Authority may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on January 29, 2001, by California Youth Authority/California Education Authority, Sacramento, California, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Request for Review from David Marson, California Youth Authority/California
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010892.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010892.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 14, 2001, by Rome City School District, Rome, Georgia, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to David
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010918.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010918.txt
  • unable to determine which components of the Dukane SmartSystem were deemed ineligible for funding by SLD. Accordingly, we cannot ascertain whether the 30 percent policy was correctly applied in this case. For that reason, we remand Delano Union's application and direct SLD to review the eligibility of the requested services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 9, 2000, by Delano Union, Delano, California, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. We direct SLD to review Delano Union's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance with the above-stated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010919.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010919.txt
  • SchoolNet has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Ohio SchoolNet's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Ohio SchoolNet's initial appeal, Ohio SchoolNet may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 22, 2000, by Ohio SchoolNet Commission, Columbus, Ohio, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Bloxam, Ohio SchoolNet Commission, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010920.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010920.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Lemoore failed to file an appeal of the April 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Lemoore's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Lemoore Union High School District, Hanford, California on February 26, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ellen Kimbriel, Lemoore Union High School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010921.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010921.txt
  • Christopher-Ottilie has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss St. Christopher-Ottilie's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on St. Christopher-Ottilie's initial request, St. Christopher-Ottilie may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on February 12, 2001, by St. Christopher-Ottilie, Glen Cove, New York, on behalf of Theresa Paplin School, Glen Cove, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011034.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011034.txt
  • Marion was not provided with an effective ``opportunity to make corrections'' to its FCC Form 471. In an effort to provide applicants with an effective opportunity to make such corrections after the issuance of RALs, SLD now includes both the monthly and annual pre-discount cost of funding requests in RALs. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on May 18, 2000 by Marion County Public Schools, Ocala, Florida, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Marion's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011035.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011035.txt
  • Commission's rule before signing its contracts and submitting its FCC Form 471. SLD should have been able to determine that Joliet complied with the 28-day posting rule. Accordingly, we remand Joliet's application and direct SLD to reconsider Joliet's application and, if warranted, to issue a new funding commitment decision letter. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Joliet Grade School, Springfield, Illinois on June 8, 2000 IS GRANTED, to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Danielle Gustafson, Joliet Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011036.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011036.txt
  • it had a qualified existing contract, using other information provided, SLD could have reasonably determined the exact nature of the telecommunication services requested. We, therefore, remand Tomahawk's application and direct SLD to issue a new funding commitment decision letter based on the originally submitted FCC Form 471 and its attachments. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Letter of Appeal filed by Tomahawk School District, Tomahawk, Wisconsin filed on June 26, 2000, IS GRANTED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Lin Kautza, Tomahawk School District, Tomahawk, Wisconsin, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 26,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011037.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011037.txt
  • answer to Item 17 would not have been reasonably apparent to SLD. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each funding year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding and complying with all the relevant programs and procedures. 19 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Olympia, Washington, on June 2, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Clare Donahue, Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011050.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011050.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 7, 2001, by Amherst Independent School District, Amherst, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Michael
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011051.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011051.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 3, 2001, by Harlandale Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011052.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011052.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Jefferson failed to file an appeal of the July 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Jefferson's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Jefferson Independent School District, Jefferson, Texas on March 26, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mike Wood, Jefferson Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011053.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011053.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Montgomery County failed to file an appeal of the June 23, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Montgomery County's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Montgomery County School District, Montgomery, Alabama on January 29, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol A. Doucet, Ed.D, Montgomery County School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011055.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011055.txt
  • affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because District 4 failed to file an appeal of the June 16, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss its appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Superintendent of Schools School Administrative District #4, Guilford, Maine on February 6, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael P. Cyr, Superintendent of Schools School Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011056.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011056.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 30, 2001, by Tyrone Area School District, Tyrone, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Victoria
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011090.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011090.txt
  • completed their applications and accurately described their funding requests. Moreover, permitting applicants to amend their requests after the window closed could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. We therefore deny Old Town's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 2, 2000, by Old Town School District, Old Town Maine, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Richard M. Beaudoin, Old Town School Department, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 1,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011091.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011091.txt
  • SLD. The Bureau remanded SLD's decision, finding no support in the record for SLD's conclusion in light of the integration of eligible services with the rejected components. Here, SLD has not adequately justified its conclusion that this equipment should be deemed eligible. We therefore remand to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Philadelphia School District, on August 25, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Philadelphia's application, and if warranted, to issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance with
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011117.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011117.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Calhan failed to file an appeal of the October 26, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Calhan's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Calhan School District RJ-1, Calhan, Colorado on April 12, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sharon A. Olyejar, Calhan School District RJ-1, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011118.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011118.txt
  • submitted its FCC Form 471 on April 26, 1999, only 18 days after posting its FCC Form 470, demonstrates conclusively that it did not wait at least 28 days from the date of posting its service needs before entering into a service agreement and thus violated the competitive bidding requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the July 25, 2000 Request for Review filed by Cynthiana-Harrison County Public Library, Cynthiana, Kentucky, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from E. Susan Ellis, Cynthiana-Harrison County Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011119.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011119.txt
  • and, thus, Homer is subject to the funding priorities set forth in Section 54.507(c). We conclude that the particular facts of this case do rise to the level of special circumstances required for a deviation from the general rule. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Homer Community Consolidated School District 33C, Lockport, Illinois, on July 6, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from John Lavelle, Homer Community Consolidated School District 33C, Lockport, Illinois, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011120.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011120.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, ICS fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We, therefore, find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Immaculate Conception School, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York, on July 24, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Louise Frangella, Immaculate Conception School, Irvington-on-Hudson, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011121.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011121.txt
  • supply it, our view of the merits of Wetzel's Request for Review might be different. Instead, SLD re-construed the request without giving Wetzel notice and opportunity to support its claim. This was an error which warrants granting Wetzel's Request for Review and remanding this matter to SLD for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 15, 2000, by Wetzel County School District, New Martinsville, West Virginia, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and that Wetzel's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011165.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011165.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because North Babylon failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss North Babylon's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by North Babylon Union Free School District, North Babylon, New York on April 30, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rosanne Sweeney, North Babylon Union Free School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011179.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011179.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 24, 2001, by Beth Chana Elementary and High School for Girls, Beth Chana, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011180.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011180.txt
  • a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for waiver of our rules. Moreover, because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 12, 2001, by Ellenville Central School District, Ellenville, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011181.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011181.txt
  • Berkshire has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Northern Berkshire's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Northern Berkshire's initial request, Northern Berkshire may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, North Adams, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011182.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011182.txt
  • this case, because Sayreville has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Sayreville's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Sayreville's initial request, Sayreville may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sayreville District Schools, Sayreville, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from James Dougherty, Sayreville District Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011202.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011202.txt
  • 30, 2000. Richland requests that the Commission order SLD to process its FCC Form 471. Based on the information before us, the USCN provided to SLD on Richland's FCC Form 471 matches the USCN indicated on Richland's FCC Form 470. Accordingly, we remand Richland's application to SLD for further determination. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Appeal filed August 17, 2000, by the Richland School District, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and we REMAND this matter to the Administrator for further processing consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011230.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011230.txt
  • this case, because ESoft has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss ESoft's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on ESoft's initial request, ESoft may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Esoft, Inc., Broomfield, Colorado, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Jackie Johnson, Esoft, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 27, 2001. Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011231.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011231.txt
  • permit SLD to consider Seward's request. Seward subsequently filed the instant Request for Review with the Commission. We have since learned that on August 4, 2000, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter approving Seward's request for discounted services. Therefore, we dismiss Seward's Request for Review because it is moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Seward Community Library, Seward, Arkansas on June 30, 2000, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patricia Linville, Seward Community Library, to Federal Communications Commission, filed June 30,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011248.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011248.txt
  • Street has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Bank Street's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Bank Street's initial request, Bank Street may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bank Street School for Children, New York, New York, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Frank Nuara, Bank Street School for Children, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011249.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011249.txt
  • Olmstead filed a timely appeal with the Administrator. Consistent with this analysis we therefore remand this matter to SLD. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Olmstead's timely May 8, 2000 appeal, Olmstead may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 5, 2001, by Olmstead Falls City Schools, Olmstead Falls, Ohio, is GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the Administrator for further consideration consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011251.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011251.txt
  • for the actions of those employees to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Danbury fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Danbury Public Schools, Danbury, Connecticut, on July 25, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melanie C. Schroeder, Danbury Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011252.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011252.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Dummerston fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Dummerston Elementary School, Dummerston, Vermont, on August 24, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Betsy Whittaker, Dummerston Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011253.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011253.txt
  • 30, 2001, SLD reconsidered its earlier denial and granted Weskan's request, mailing the decision to both Weskan and the service provider. Because the Division finds that the errors asserted by Weskan in its Request for Review have been corrected by SLD, the Division dismisses the Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Weskan Unified School District #242, Weskan, Kansas, on July 17, 2000 IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Greg Robinson, Weskan Unified School District #242, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011294.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011294.txt
  • SLD. Moreover, Ocean Beach acknowledges that it received its April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter at the Long Beach, Washington address. Merely stating that a letter was not received at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 30, 2001, by Ocean Beach School District No. 101, Long Beach, Washington, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011295.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011295.txt
  • Further, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal on April 16, 2001 approving NJ State Library's appeal which requested corrections to the billed entity information on its SLD application 169943. Because SLD has approved NJ State Library appeal, we dismiss NJ State Library's Request for Review because it is moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New Jersey State Library, Trenton, New Jersey on June 30, 2000, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Linda Kay, New Jersey State Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011327.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011327.txt
  • that the public interest would be served by such a waiver. Accordingly, we grant South Slope's request for waiver of section 69.605(c) of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by South Slope Cooperative Telephone Company, Amana Colonies Telephone Company, d/b/a HickoryTech and Heartland Telecommunications Company of Iowa on December 13, 2000, IS GRANTED, as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011328.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011328.txt
  • requested, or that seek services not initially requested. This administrative practice enables SLD to apply our funding priority rules properly in situations where demand exceeds the annual funding cap. Thus, we do not believe the application should be modified to include a funding request for Internet connections from Merit Network. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722 (a), that the Request for Review filed by Genesee Intermediate School District on July 31, 2000 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Beverly Knox-Pipes, Genesee Intermediate School District, Flint, Michigan, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011329.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011329.txt
  • in the library's files, HAFPL demonstrates that it failed to comply with a program mandate. By filing late, HAFPL ran the risk of not receiving any funding. Because we find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline, HAFPL is subject to the funding priorities set forth in section 54.507(c). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Holland-Alexandria Free Public Library, Milford, New Jersey, on August 16, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sylvia Gidwani, Holland-Alexandria Free Public Library, Milford New Jersey, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011330.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011330.txt
  • In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. We find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline, we therefore, deny Powhatan's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Powhatan School, Boyce, Virginia, on July 25, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sister Elizabeth, Powhatan School, Boyce, Virginia, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 25, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011352.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011352.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 18, 2001, by First Baptist Academy, Universal City, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to C.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011358.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011358.txt
  • fraud. Furthermore, if applicants were permitted to amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. Therefore, we conclude that SLD properly denied Dallas ISD's request for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Dallas Independent School District on February, 12, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Ruben Bohuchot, Dallas Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 12,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011360.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011360.txt
  • We have reviewed Madison's Request for Review and conclude that SLD properly denied the Madison's application. Madison has raised no new issues on appeal. Further, Madison has failed to demonstrate that SLD incorrectly applied our rules concerning funding priorities. Accordingly, we uphold SLD's decision and deny Madison's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Madison School District, Madison, Heights, Michigan, on February 13, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Diane McCord, Madison District Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011361.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011361.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed December 29, 2000, by Project Interconnect, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to William R.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011362.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011362.txt
  • statute or rule. Redondo Beach's misunderstanding of program rules provides no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for understanding program rules and procedures. Here, we find no grounds for relieving Redondo Beach from having to comply with our policies regarding competitive bidding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Redondo Beach Unified School District, Redondo Beach, California, on September 7, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patricia Hosken, Redondo Beach Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011363.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011363.txt
  • had similarly violated the Commission's competitive bidding rules. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for carefully following program rules. The Division, therefore, denies Ouray's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Ouray School District R-1, Ouray, Colorado, on March 13, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Heidi McDuffie, Ouray School District R-1, to the Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011397.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011397.txt
  • connections pursuant to the schools and libraries universal service support mechanism. On April 27, 2001, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter granting discounts that are-with respect to all eligible services-identical to those requested in the application at issue here. Therefore, we dismiss as moot Fort Osage's Request for Review. Accordingly, it is ordered pursuant to authority delegated under section 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Fort Osage R-1 School District, Independence, Missouri, on March 1, 2000, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator By
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011398.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011398.txt
  • In this case, because Missoula has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Missoula's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Missoula's request, Missoula may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on January 31, 2001 by Missoula Public Library, Missoula, Montana, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bette Ammon, Missoula Public Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011399.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011399.txt
  • by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because ONC failed to file an appeal of the July 5, 2000 Administrator Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss ONC's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Otsego Northern Catskills BOCES, Stamford, New York on May 3, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rodger Oesterle, Otsego Northern Catskills BOCES, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011402.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011402.txt
  • this docket withdrawing its application. As such, we hereby terminate this docket. SBC further expressed its intention to ``shortly file to initiate a new application'' and to incorporate the existing record in this docket into the new application. We will consider such a request once SBC files a new application. Accordingly IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91 and 0.291, that the proceeding in CC Docket 01-88 IS TERMINATED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Priscilla Hill-Ardoin , Senior Vice President , SBC Telecommunications, Inc., to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 01-88 (filed June 7, 2001). (continued....)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011404.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Bnos Zion failed to file an appeal of the September 1, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Bnos Zion's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bnos Zion of Bobov School, Brooklyn, New York on May 15, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rabbi Jacov Zucker, Bnos Zion of Bobov School, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011412.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011412.txt
  • established deadline if the applicant wishes to be considered with other in-window applicants. Thus, by filing late, Flint ran the risk of not receiving any funding. Because we find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline, Flint is subject to the funding priorities set forth in Section 54.507(g). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Flint Memorial Library, North Reading, Massachusetts, on August 16, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nancy Sheehan, Flint Memorial Library, North Reading, Massachusetts, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011504.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011504.txt
  • the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Fair Lawn has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 22, 2000 by Fair Lawn Board of Education, Fair Lawn, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey, Deputy Chief Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bruce Watson, Fair Lawn Board of Education, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011506.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011506.txt
  • filed its Forms 471 after the filing window closed. Altoona's exemption from the 28-day posting requirement did not relieve it of its obligation under program rules to file its Forms 471 prior to the close of the application window, and we uphold SLD's denial of funding on that grounds. 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Altoona Area School District, Altoona, Pennsylvania, on February 7, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dean G. Wilt, Altoona Area School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011507.txt
  • it administratively appropriate for SLD to require applicants to adhere strictly to its filing deadlines. Chabad has failed to demonstrate good cause for waiving the filing deadline. For these reasons, we find that the circumstances here do not warrant relief and, therefore, we deny Chabad's request to waive section 54.720(b). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed on April 9, 2001, by Chabad Hebrew School, Wayne, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter of Appeal from Rabbi Michel Gurkov, Chabad Hebrew School, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011508.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011508.txt
  • Commission. Connect2 then filed the instant Request for Review. The record shows that on September 15, 2000 and November 17, 2000, SLD issued Funding Commitment Decision Letters regarding requests for discounted services to Epiphany Lutheran School and Clara Muhammad School, respectively. Therefore, we dismiss Connect2's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Connect2 Internet Networks, Inc., Staten Island, New York on January 24, 2000 and March 16, 2000, ARE DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letters from John Angelides, Connect2 Internet Networks,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011509.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011509.txt
  • The applicant must act to ensure that its request for discounts satisfies the Commission's policies as well as program rules. Under the circumstances in this case, we find no basis for deviating from the Commission's policy of placing on the applicant the responsibility for complying with program rules and procedures. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the August 31, 2000, Request for Review filed by Evesham Township Public Schools, Marlton, New Jersey, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Frank Summers, Evesham Township Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011510.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011510.txt
  • established deadline if the applicant wishes to be considered with other in-window applicants. Thus, by filing late, Marshall ran the risk of not receiving any funding. Because we find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline, Marshall is subject to the funding priorities set forth in Section 54.507(c). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Marshall County Board of Education, Guntersville, Alabama, July 3, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joan Noel, Marshall County Board of Education, Guntersville, Alabama, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011512.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011512.txt
  • by a party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Petoskey failed to file an appeal of the January 30, 2001 Rejection Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Petoskey's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Petosky High School, Petoskey, Michigan on May 17, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gregory Czarnecki, Petosky High School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed May 17,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011513.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011513.txt
  • the importance of competitive bidding in all situations except where an applicant has a pre-existing contract. Given that SLD had no evidence of such a contract, we find that on the record before it, SLD correctly denied funding to Rib Lake for failure to comply with the competitive bidding rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the June 2, 2000 Request for Review filed by Rib Lake School District, Rib Lake, Wisconsin, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Anderson and Dan Boxx, Rib Lake School District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011514.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011514.txt
  • to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form. Furthermore, if applicants were permitted to amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Santa Ana Unified School District, Santa Ana, California on March 13, 2001 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Karen Aeppli, Santa Ana Unified School District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011515.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011515.txt
  • light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. Because we find no basis for waiver of the filing window deadline, we deny St. Marys' Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Marys Public Library, St. Marys, Pennsylvania, on July 6, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joseph Petrick, St. Marys Public Library, St. Marys, Pennsylvania, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011536.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011536.txt
  • to make adjustments to their price cap indices to reflect cost changes resulting from rule waivers. We require USQwest and Citizens to make such an adjustment. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, and 202 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, and 202, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by Citizens Utilities Rural Company, Inc. and Qwest Corporation on December 20, 2000, IS DENIED AS FILED AND GRANTED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c),
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011558.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011558.txt
  • request was owned by the consortium. Further, there is nothing in the record, including the copy of the agreement with DDS submitted to SLD by SEOVEC, that indicates to the contrary. Thus, the maintenance and support of this equipment were properly characterized as internal connections, and funding was correctly denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on March 16, 2001 by Southeastern Ohio Voluntary Education Cooperative, Athens, Ohio is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and this application is remanded to SLD for further consideration of FRN 381223 consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011559.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011559.txt
  • must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 31, 2000, by St. Mary School, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Gary Campione,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011560.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011560.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 20, 2000, by West Shore Community College, Scottville, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Remittance Statement from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., dated May
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011571.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011571.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 19, 2001, by New Kensington-Arnold School District, New Kensington, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Jim
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011572.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011572.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 27, 2001, by Sampson-Clinton Public Library, Clinton, North Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Robin Hollingsworth,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011573.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011573.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Arizona Agribusiness failed to file an appeal of the June 30, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Arizona Agribusiness's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Arizona Agribusiness and Equine Center, Inc., Phoenix, Arizona on April 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Katherine L. Schroder Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Linda Proctor Downing, Arizona Agribusiness and Equine Center, Inc., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011620.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011620.txt
  • applications to SLD for further review. In doing so, we make no determination as to whether the remaining members of the consortium are ultimately entitled to discounts, beyond our finding that they should not be denied on grounds that Project Interconnect lacks authority to make the applications on their behalf. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Project Interconnect on October 16, 2000, IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and these applications are remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011625.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011625.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 5, 2000, by Saint Thomas Aquinas School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Stephanie
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011697.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011697.txt
  • that the applicant's appeal to SLD should be considered as timely. The record shows that SLD received the SLD Appeal Letter on September 13, 2000, 29 days after the Minimum Processing Standards Letter was mailed. Therefore, Praxis' appeal should be considered as timely and we remand this matter to SLD. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 9, 2001 by the Praxis Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, IS GRANTED and this matter is REMANDED to the Administrator for further consideration consistent with this Order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Jasper
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011698.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011698.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 1, 2001, by Rice Independent School District, Rice, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Larry
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011699.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011699.txt
  • must be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision of which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed May 30, 2001, by Scott County School District, Forest, Mississippi, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Tim
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011700.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011700.txt
  • Schools and Libraries Division (SLD) of the Universal Service Company (Administrator), pursuant to which SLD denied Torah's request for telecommunication services. On June 20, 2001, Torah filed a Motion to Withdraw its Request for Review. The Division grants Torah's Motion to Withdraw and, accordingly, dismisses Torah's Request for Review. 2. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Motion to Withdraw filed by Torah High School of Long Beach, Long Beach, New York, on June 20, 2001, IS GRANTED. 3. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011701.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011701.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Yeshivas Boyan failed to file an appeal of the June 9, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Yeshivas Boyan's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Yeshivas Boyan Tiferes Mordechai Shlomo, Brooklyn, New York on January 25, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rabbi David Endzweig, Yeshivas Boyan Tiferes Mordechai Shlomo, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011718.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011718.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Pomona failed to file its appeals of the April 27, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Pomona's appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Pomona Unified School District, Pomona, California on July 2, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Jaramillo, Pomona Unified School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011725.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011725.txt
  • Because the delay in posting Saint Jo's FCC Form 470 was solely attributable to USAC, we believe that a waiver of the Commission's competitive bidding requirement is warranted in this case. Therefore, we remand Saint Jo's application to SLD for reprocessing and the issuance of an appropriate Funding Commitment Letter. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Jo Independent School District, Saint Jo, Texas IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein and that Saint Jo Independent School District's application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011806.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011806.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed July 6, 2001, by Bristol Bay Borough School District, Naknek, Alaska, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011808.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011808.txt
  • with its FCC Form 471. Based on this record, we affirm SLD's conclusion that the request was for a tariff service unsupported by a multi-year written contract, and that Goshen's failure to file a new FCC Form 470 in Funding Year 3 supporting the request warranted denial of the request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Goshen Community Schools, Goshen, Indiana, on March 26, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Steven Clason, Goshen Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, dated March 26, 2001 (Request for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011819.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011819.txt
  • regulations, which clearly state that ``the level of poverty [by which discounts are determined] shall be measured by the percentage of their student enrollment that is eligible for a free or reduced price lunch . . . .'' Thus, assuming BJA's allegations are accurate, they do not warrant granting relief. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Baltimore Junior Academy, Baltimore, Maryland, on April 9, 2001 is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Paul Jean-Pierre, Baltimore Junior Academy, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 9, 2001 (Request for
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011820.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011820.txt
  • because the shared discount percentage for their application was below the funded discount percentage for Internal connections. Because Egg Harbor's appeal is appropriately denied on these grounds, we need not address the question of whether SLD's application of the 30% policy to Egg Harbor's application was consistent with program rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 20, 2001, by Egg Harbor City Public Schools, Egg Harbor City, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Alfred Savio, Jr., Egg Harbor City Public Schools, Egg Harbor City,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011821.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011821.txt
  • to modify the SPIN for the remaining items of FRN 179922. Therefore, it was inappropriate for SLD to modify the SPIN to Extel for a funding commitment decision that did not contain ``Cat 5/6 wiring, long run portion.'' We find that the SPIN for FRN 179922 should remain Edumedia, Inc. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under section 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by LEAP Academy Charter Schools on August 7, 2000 is GRANTED and is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Clinton J. Boyd,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011822.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011822.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Salem failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Salem's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Salem School District, Salem, New Hampshire on June 18, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Linda L. MacDonald, Salem School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011823.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011823.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed March 26, 2001, by the Washington Parish School District, Franklinton, Louisiana, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011824.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011824.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 20, 2001, by Zeeland Public Schools, Zeeland, Michigan, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Stephen Braunius,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011825.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011825.txt
  • obtaining appropriate assistance. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for providing complete and accurate information in its FCC Form 471 upon which its ultimate funding is dependent. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 7, 1999, by ACCEPT Educational Collaborative, Framingham, Massachusetts, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Michael J. Palladino, Accept Educational Collaborative, to Federal Communications Commission, dated April 7, 1999 (Request
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011826.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011826.txt
  • as SLD calculated. However, we also note that FRN 368140 includes a $4.00 charge for an Unpublished Number, which is also an ineligible service. The total ineligible service cost is thus at least $147.50, or 30.5 percent of the $483.00 per month request. We therefore deny the Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Bloomfield Community Schools, Bloomfield, Nebraska on February 26, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Gary Marks, Bloomfield Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February 26, 2001
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011827.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011827.txt
  • we have learned that on May 29, 2001, SLD issued an Administrator's Decision on Appeal indicating that [South Carolina OIR's] appeal has brought forward persuasive information that [South Carolina OIR's] application should be data entered and considered for funding. Therefore, we dismiss South Carolina OIR's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by South Carolina Budget and Control Board Office of Information Resources, Columbia, South Carolina, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from R. Brian Johnson, South Carolina Budget
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011834.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011834.txt
  • good cause for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules. Consequently, San Carlos's request for accelerated high-cost loop support is denied. ordering clause Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 5(c), 201, 202, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 155(c), 201, 202, and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291 and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition of San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, Inc. for waiver of sections 36.611 and 36.612 of the Commission's rules IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Petition of San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, Inc., for Waiver of Sections
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011877.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011877.txt
  • that constitute internal connections. Because Fort Wayne commingled its requests for discounts for telecommunications services and internal connections within a single funding request, SLD correctly placed the application into the internal connections category for Funding Year 3 funding in order to avoid treating Priority Two services as Priority One services. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Fort Wayne Community School District on July 1, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter of Appeal of Fort Wayne Community School District to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011878.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011878.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Gallatin failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Gallatin's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Gallatin R-V School District, Gallatin, Missouri on November 7, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeanette Sprague, Gallatin R-V School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011879.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011879.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Mamaroneck failed to file an appeal of the July 21, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Mamaroneck's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mamaroneck Union Free District, Mamaroneck, New York on December 6, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Sarah Tate, Mamaroneck Union Free District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011881.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011881.txt
  • the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Chapel Hill has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver, filed June 22, 2000 by Chapel Hill Independent School District, Tyler, Texas IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rita Simpson, Chapel Hill Independent School District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011883.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011883.txt
  • service substitution request, SLD should have construed it as a service substitution request notwithstanding how the applicant captioned the pleading. As such, SLD should have reviewed the service substitution request on its merits. The Division's reversal of SLD's decision and remanding for further consideration of the request was therefore appropriate. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.113 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.113, 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mercer County Area Vocational - Technical School, Mercer, Pennsylvania, on June 1, 2000 is GRANTED for the reasons discussed herein, and REMANDED to the Schools and Libraries Division for further consideration consisted with this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011897.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011897.txt
  • bear a date-stamp, we cannot determine its exact filing date. Due to this administrative error, we look at the date of the Petition, which is June 6, 2001. Even using this date as the filing date, the Petition was still filed 41 days after public notice and hence is untimely. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.106(a)(1), that the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Amherst Independent School District, Amherst, Texas, dated June 6, 2001 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Joe Rackley, Amherst Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, dated
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011898.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011898.txt
  • to the close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that Henry-Senachwine has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Waiver must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed June 23, 2000 by Henry-Senachwine Community Unit District #5, Henry, Illinois IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Beverly Privratsky, Henry-Senachwine Community Unit District 5, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011899.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011899.txt
  • for a request made on behalf of Knox County Public Library, funding request number (FRN) 454127. Upon our review of the record, however, we find that SLD approved funding for FRN 454127 and such funds were not revoked or suspended. Accordingly, the Division dismisses Intelenet's Request for Review as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 9, 2001 by Indiana Intelenet Commission, Indianapolis, Indiana, IS DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Bob G. Carnel, Indiana Intelenet Commission, Indianapolis, Indiana, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011900.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011900.txt
  • decision issued by the Administrator. Because Monessen failed to file an appeal of the June 21, 2000 and June 28, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Monessen's appeals to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Letter of Appeal. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by School District of the City of Monessen, Monessen, Pennsylvania on January 22, 2001, ARE DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Richard Fantauzzi, School District of the City of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011911.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011911.txt
  • consistent with our mandate to ensure that consumers in all regions of the Nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, have access to telecommunications and information services. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1-4, and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 U.S.C. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3, that the petition for waiver of section 54.809(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 54.809(c), filed by Smith Bagley, Inc. on July 16, 2001, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Smith Bagley, Inc.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011914.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011914.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011914.txt
  • transaction(s) contemplated in the Joint Applications will not violate 47 C.F.R. §§ 24.709 or 24.839. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the grant of these applications is subject to the condition that Applicants seek further approval before making material revisions to their Trust Agreement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 0.131, and 0.331. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.103. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ATTACHMENT DIVESTITURE TRUST AGREEMENT See Chorus Communications, Ltd. and Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Application to Transfer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011936.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011936.txt
  • specifically noted as an example of an improper request the case of an eligible file server which is also ``built to provide storage functions to supplement personal computers on the network.'' That is precisely the case here, and accordingly, under the Universal Service Order, the entire request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on November 13, 2000 by Cleveland Municipal School District, seeking review of FRN 421840, is DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Esq., on behalf of Cleveland Municipal School District, Cleveland Ohio,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011943.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011943.txt
  • this case, because Novell has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Novell's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Novell's initial request, Novell may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Novell, Inc., Provo, Utah, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Teri Olsen, Novell, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 31, 2001. Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011944.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011944.txt
  • amply demonstrates that Mater Dei's FCC Form 471 was filed outside the filing window. The only relief that Mater Dei could have sought was a waiver of the Commission's rules. Having reviewed the merits of Mater Dei's Waiver Request, we find no basis for waiver of our filing window rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Mater Dei High School, New Monmouth, New Jersey on March 8, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Nancy Giotta, Mater Dei High School, New Monmouth, New Jersey,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011972.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011972.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 15, 2001, by Fairland Public School District I-31, Fairland, Oklahoma, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011973.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011973.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed February 20, 2001, by New Plymouth School District No. 372, New Plymouth, Idaho, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011974.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011974.txt
  • light of our decision in White Sulphur Springs and the revised eligible services list, we conclude that it is appropriate to remand Pinellas' application to SLD for further review. We direct SLD to review Pinellas' use of its remote access routers to determine whether such use is eligible for discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Pinellas County Schools on June 1, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Administrator to review Pinellas' funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter in accordance with the above-stated decision.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011975.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011975.txt
  • FCC Form 471 before the allowable contract date. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD must review and process each year, we find that it is administratively necessary to require an applicant to be responsible for carefully following program rules. The Division, therefore, denies Preston's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Preston Town County Library, on April 6, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jean Patton, Preston Town County Library, Hot Springs, Montana, to the Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011976.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011976.txt
  • Bede has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Saint Bede's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Saint Bede's initial request, Saint Bede may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Saint Bede The Venerable, Holland, Pennsylvania, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from Mary Boland, Saint Bede The Venerable, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011977.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011977.txt
  • of the filing window deadline is warranted. We therefore grant WASD's Waiver Request. We direct SLD to process WASD's FCC Form 471 as timely filed, and if otherwise appropriate, to issue an appropriate Funding Commitment Letter. However, we make no determination as to whether WASD is ultimately entitled to discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Allegheny School District, Imperial, Pennsylvania on June 30, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and WASD's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011980.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011980.txt
  • internal connections, because it is not ``necessary to transport information all the way to individual classrooms.'' In sum, network monitoring is not an eligible service under program rules. Thus, SLD properly applied the 30% rule in denying Little River's funding request. We, therefore, deny Little River's Request for Review. 9. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by the Little River Unified School District 444, Little River, Kansas, on January 29, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Milt Dougherty, Little River Unified School District,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011981.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da011981.txt
  • correct information, SLD will grant the appeal so long as the applicant points out the mistake, and demonstrates how SLD could have reasonably ascertained the true nature of the information. Because those facts are evident here, we find it appropriate to reverse SLD and remand Brockton's application for further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the May 22, 2000, Request for Review filed by Brockton Public Schools, Brockton, Massachusetts, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review Brockton's funding application and, if warranted, issue a revised Funding Commitment Decision Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012016.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012016.txt
  • the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, New Paltz fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by New Paltz Central School District, New Paltz, New York, on February 29, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Deborah Brush, New Paltz Central School District,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012017.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012017.txt
  • actions of those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Painesville fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Painesville City Schools, Painesville, Ohio, on February 28, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from James R. Fodor, Painesville City Local Schools, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012018.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012018.txt
  • portion may be funded so long as the ineligible portion is less than 30% of the total. We therefore remand to SLD to determine, in light of Richland Parish's information on appeal and consistent with this decision, what portion of the request is ineligible and to process the request appropriately. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Richland Parish School District, Rayville, Louisiana, on May 10, 2000 is GRANTED and this application is remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012019.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012019.txt
  • those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, St. Ignatius Loyola fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Ignatius Loyola Academy, Baltimore, Maryland, on September 27, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jeffrey R. Sindler, Saint Ignatius Loyola Academy, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012020.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012020.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Stephen/Argyle fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Stephen/Argyle Central School District, Stephen, Minnesota, on February 26, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Melanie K. Stark, Stephen/Argyle Central School District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012021.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012021.txt
  • and fraud. Furthermore, if applicants were permitted to amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. Therefore, we conclude that SLD properly denied Wishek's request for funding. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91., 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Wishek Public School, Wishek, North Dakota, on March 16, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Brian Duchscherer, Wishek Public School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012022.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012022.txt
  • window on January 19, 2000. Yet it is incumbent upon applicants to allow sufficient time to submit their FCC Forms 470, complete the 28-day competitive bidding period, and then submit their FCC Forms 471 within the filing window. For these reasons, the Division denies Yeshiva of Brooklyn's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Yeshiva of Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York, on April 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Heshy Arem, Yeshiva of Brooklyn, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012023.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012023.txt
  • actions of those employees or agents to whom it gives responsibility for submitting timely and proper requests for discounts on its behalf. Here, Winchendon fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Winchendon School, Winchendon, Massachusetts, on June 30, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from C. Jackson Blair, the Winchendon School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012024.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Ballard fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Ballard Community School District, Huxley, Iowa, on February 20, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Connie Marker, Ballard Community School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012025.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Elgin fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Elgin Independent School District, Elgin, Texas, on November 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Barbara Allbright, Elgin Independent School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012026.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012026.txt
  • supports the FRN and cites that correct Form 470 in its appeal to SLD. Because this procedure is applicable here, we find that SLD should have granted the appeal. We therefore reverse and remand Service Co-op's application for further consideration of FRN 171379 in light of Form 470 USCN 390330000120972. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on April 14, 2000 by Reg 6 & 8 Sw/Ctrl/W Srvc Co-op, Marshall, Minnesota, is GRANTED and this application is remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012027.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012027.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Renaissance fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Renaissance Charter School, Moscow, Idaho on March 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Carol Kampenhout, Renaissance Charter School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed March
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012028.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012028.txt
  • Number (SPIN) change request. We are informed by SLD personnel that on March 28, 2001, SLD made the SPIN-change which Cleveland Municipal is seeking here. Because the Division finds that Cleveland Municipal has already received the relief that it is requesting, Cleveland Municipal's Request for Review is dismissed as moot. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Cleveland Municipal School District on November 13, 2000, seeking review of FRN 418921, is DISMISSED as moot. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Letter from Nathaniel Hawthorne, Esq., on behalf of Cleveland Municipal School District, Cleveland
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012037.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012037.txt
  • response to the RAL on August 23, 1999. Therefore, SLD received the request for corrections 10 days after Hysham received the RAL. As a result, we find that Hysham's request for corrections to the RAL was timely because the corrections were received within two weeks of receipt of the RAL. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the request for review filed by Hysham Public Schools on August 3, 2000, IS GRANTED and that its application IS REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012038.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012038.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed August 15, 2001, by East Greenbush Central Schools, East Greenbush, New York, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012063.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012063.txt
  • 471 considered an "in window" application. On February 2, 2001, SLD issued a Funding Commitment Decision Letter to SEED School regarding the requests for discounts at issue in this Request for Review. Thus, upon review of the record, we find it is appropriate to dismiss SEED School's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by SEED School, Washington, DC on April 21, 2000, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Thomas J. Downey, SEED School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed April 21, 2000
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012065.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012065.txt
  • and demonstrates how SLD could have reasonably ascertained the true nature of the information. Because those facts are evident here, we remand to SLD for a determination of whether DeKalb had a pre-existing contract governing the FRNs at issue, and is eligible for discounts for those FRNs under program rules. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed on June 22, 2000, by DeKalb County School System, Decatur, Georgia, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to the extent provided herein. We direct the Schools and Libraries Division to review DeKalb's funding application and, if warranted, to issue a revised Funding
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012085.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012085.txt
  • Funding Commitment Decision Letter, whether because of SLD's error or the applicant's, SLD will correct the SPIN upon written request and verification. Here, a written request was made, and we therefore remand this application to SLD to obtain verification and process the SPIN correction in accordance with its procedures. 7. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Trussville Public Library, Birmingham, Alabama, on December 14, 1999, IS GRANTED, and this application is remanded to SLD for further action consistent with this order. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012086.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012086.txt
  • this case, because Chimes has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Chimes' Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Chimes' initial appeal, Chimes may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Chimes School, Baltimore, Marlyand, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Martin Lampner, Chimes School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July 25, 2000. See Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012087.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012087.txt
  • applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, St. Jean Vianney fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by St. Jean Vianney School, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on October 31, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Patrice A. Robinson, St. Jean Vianney School, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012098.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012098.txt
  • Berkshire has a request pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Northern Berkshire's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Northern Berkshire's initial request, Northern Berkshire may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District, North Adams, Massachusetts, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Request for Review from James J. Brosnan, Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012129.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012129.txt
  • at the address provided to SLD and to which prior correspondence had been successfully mailed is insufficient grounds for reconsideration. Because the record demonstrates that Bnos Yaakov received mail from SLD at the same address listed in the more detailed letter, we find no reason to deviate from this standard. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed June 28, 2000, by Congregation Bnos Yaakov, Lakewood, New Jersey, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Rabbi
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012130.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because DeKalb failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss DeKalb's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by DeKalb Independent School District, DeKalb, Texas on September 4, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Timothy Williams, DeKalb Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012131.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012131.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Estelline failed to file an appeal of the April 14, 2000 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Estelline's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Estelline School District 28-2, Estelline, South Dakota on August 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Kristina Atyeo, Estelline School District 28-2, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012137.txt
  • grant E-Rate Central's request for a retroactive waiver of the 30-day appeal deadline for Funding Year 1 applicants who filed untimely appeals, E-Rate Central's request that we also authorize new appeal funding procedures for these applicants is moot. We therefore dismiss this part of the Request for Waiver as well. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed E-Rate Central, Plandome, New York, on August 12, 1999, is DENIED-IN-PART AND DISMISSED-IN-PART. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Winston E. Himsworth, E-Rate Central, to Federal Communications Commission, filed August 12,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012185.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012185.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Watonwan fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Watonwan County Library, St. James, Minnesota, on July 11, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Cheryl Bjoin, Watonwan County Library, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012219.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012219.txt
  • Year 3, SLD received over 36,000 applications. It is impractical, if not impossible, for SLD to review each application and notify applicants of errors prior to the close of the filing window. The Division, therefore, finds that the applicant violated the 28-day waiting period and denies Washington's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Washington Local Schools, Toledo, Ohio, on April 20, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David L. Bringman, Washington Local Schools, Toledo, Ohio, to the Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012226.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012226.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 11, 2001, by City of Cameron, Cameron, Texas, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Janet Sheguit,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012227.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012227.txt
  • party affected by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Sealy failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Sealy's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sealy Independent School District, Sealy, Texas on September 10, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Rosa Ojeda, Sealy Independent School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012228.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012228.txt
  • be filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision as to which review is sought. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 7, 2001, by Shelby City Schools, Shelby, Ohio, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Keith Rittenhouse,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012229.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012229.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because St. Cecelia failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss St. Cecelia's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by St. Cecelia School, Clearwater, Florida on September 12, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary Ellen Patrick, St. Cecelia School, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012230.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012230.txt
  • determine whether Clackamus, through the Tech Centers, had actual authority to act on behalf of the school districts listed in the consortium. We, therefore, remand Clackamas' application to SLD for further fact-finding. However, we make no determination has to whether any members of the consortium are ultimately entitled to discounts. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Clackamas Education Service District, Marylhurst, Oregon, on October 13, 2000, IS REMANDED to SLD for further review consistent with this opinion. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Carol E. Mattey Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Clackamas Education Service District, Marylhurst,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012241.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012241.txt
  • amend their requests after the filing window closed, it could jeopardize SLD's ability to accurately apply the rules of priority in years where requests for funding exceed the annual funding cap. Therefore, we conclude that SLD properly denied Haslett's request for funding and we therefore deny Haslett's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Haslett Public Schools, Haslett, Michigan, on February 28, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Martell, Haslett Public Schools, Haslett, Michigan, to Federal Communications Commission, filed February
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012275.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012275.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Sacred Heart failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Sacred Heart's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Sacred Heart Elementary School, San Francisco, California on September 11, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Savita Sahi, Sacred Heart Elementary School, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012276.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012276.txt
  • regard to application number 127047 because the record shows that Sperry failed to complete this application. Because there is no completed FCC Form 471 for application number 127045, and because Sperry has failed to demonstrate special circumstances that would so necessitate, a waiver of the filing window is not warranted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed by Sperry Public Schools, Sperry, Oklahoma, on October 7, 1999 IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from David Jobe, Sperry Public Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012290.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012290.txt
  • code, we conclude that SLD could have determined the city name of the billed entity. As a result, in these particular circumstances, we do not believe that the omission of the city of the billed entity in Block 1, item 4a should have prevented SLD from data entering AEPPR's application. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed April 9, 2001 by Asociacion de Educacion Privada de Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, IS GRANTED and REMANDED to the extent provided herein. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012292.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012292.txt
  • the filing requirements, including the 28-day competitive bidding requirements. In light of the thousands of applications that SLD reviews and processes each year, it is administratively necessary to place on the applicant the responsibility of understanding all relevant program rules and procedures. The Division, therefore, denies NYMA's Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91. 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by New York Military Academy, Hudson, New York, on April 30, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau APPENDIX A FUNDING YEAR 2 DATE EVENT January 7, 1999 File FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012328.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012328.txt
  • the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Bear Lake fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Bear Lake County Library District, Montpelier, Idaho, on November 3, 2000 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Mary Nate, Bear Lake County Library District, to Federal
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012329.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012329.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Mississippi DOE failed to file an appeal of the July 8, 1999 Funding Commitment Decision Letters within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Mississippi DOE's appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Mississippi Department of Education, Mississippi DOE, Mississippi on April 17, 2000, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Amory School District, Greenwood Springs, MS; Coahoma County School District, Clarksdale, MS;
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012330.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012330.txt
  • posted on the SLD website was incorrect. Thus, we find that SLD's posting of an incorrect zip code contributed to the untimely filing by West Las Vegas of its FCC Form 471. We therefore conclude that West Las Vegas has demonstrated special circumstances upon which to grant its waiver request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3 and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by West Las Vegas Schools, Las Vegas, New Mexico, on June 26, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein. We direct SLD to process West Las Vegas's FCC Form 471 as timely filed within the filing window. FEDERAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012331.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012331.txt
  • of all of the requests in Henry County's FCC Form 471 only posted a request for telecommunications services. The FRN at issue, FRN 276939, requests discounted internal connections. Because Henry County failed to post the service for which it seeks discounts, it did not satisfy the Commission's competitive bidding requirements. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Henry County Board of Education, Abbeville, Alabama, on October 25, 1999, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Neil Dodson, Henry County Board of Education, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012332.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012332.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Midland fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Midland School District, Pleasant Plains, Arkansas, on February 15, 2001 IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Jim LaRue, Midland School District, to Federal Communications Commission,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012333.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012333.txt
  • efficiently, the applicant must assume responsibility for timely submission of its application materials if it wishes to be considered within the window. Here, Montville fails to present good cause as to why it could not timely file its application. We therefore find no basis for waiving the filing window deadline. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by the Montville Township Public Schools, Montville, New Jersey, on March 23, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Dominic J. Butler, Montville Township Public Schools, to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012362.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012362.txt
  • Center SD has an appeal pending before the Administrator, we dismiss Center SD's Request for Review to the Commission without prejudice. Once the Administrator has issued its decision on Center SD's initial appeal, it may then appeal to the Commission if it believes such appeal is warranted at that time. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Center School District, Kansas City, Missouri, on July 31, 2000 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from Bruce Rehmer, Center School District, to Federal Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012372.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012372.txt
  • of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Elkhart has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Request for Review must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review, filed July 10, 2000 by Elkhart Community Schools, Elkhart, Indiana IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Robert Woods, Elkhart Community Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed July
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012398.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012398.txt
  • by a decision issued by the Administrator. Because Belt Schools failed to file an appeal of the July 23, 2001 Funding Commitment Decision Letter within the requisite 30-day appeal period, we affirm SLD's decision to dismiss Belt Schools' appeal to SLD as untimely and deny the instant Request for Review. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed by Belt Schools, Great Falls, Montana on September 25, 2001, IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Tom Glover, Belt Schools, to Federal Communications Commission, filed September 25, 2001.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012399.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012399.txt
  • close of the filing window. Instead, the burden of ensuring that complete and accurate information is provided on the correct forms properly rests with applicants themselves. We therefore conclude that, under these circumstances, Garfield has failed to make a showing warranting relief and, therefore, its Waiver Request must be denied. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Waiver filed April 17, 2000 by Garfield School District, Garfield, New Jersey IS DENIED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert, Deputy Chief Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau Letter from Raymond Hryczyk, Garfield School District, to Federal Communications Commission, filed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012400.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012400.txt
  • filed within 30 days of the issuance of the decision that the party seeks to have reviewed. Documents are considered to be filed with the Commission only upon receipt. Because the instant Request for Review was not filed within the specified 30-day period, it will be dismissed without further consideration. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Request for Review filed September 28, 2001, by Hazelwood School District, Florissant, Missouri, IS DISMISSED. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G. Seifert Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division Common Carrier Bureau See Letter from the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Co., to Robert J.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012401.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da012401.txt
  • Jensen's FCC Form 470, SLD should have notified Lettie Jensen of the signature deficiency in the form in time for Lettie Jensen to submit an in-window FCC Form 471 that complied with the competitive bidding rules. We therefore further find that good cause exists to grant Lettie Jensen's Waiver Request. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 54.722(a), that the Waiver Request filed by Lettie W. Jensen Library, Amherst, Wisconsin, on February 26, 2001 IS GRANTED to the extent provide herein, and Lettie Jensen's application is REMANDED to SLD for further consideration in light of this decision. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Mark G.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 4.11 0.51 3.97 1.26 6.97 0.48 6.23 0.29 5.25 0.04 A.2.14.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.94 0.79 1.10 0.86 1.27 0.78 1.02 0.72 0.92 0.73 A.2.14.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.51 0.27 2.57 2.03 4.42 1.75 4.10 0.14 1.74 0.02 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.14.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.00 1.07 5.32 0.76 5.18 0.43 3.97 0.40 3.92 0.03 A.2.14.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.35 0.78 2.54 0.91 1.67 0.83 1.37 0.79 1.27 0.78 B - 11 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August September Number and Disaggregation BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC BST CLEC Notes Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-331 Florida Performance Metric Data A.2.14.2.2.1Business/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 10.13 0.40 16.62 4.07 7.39 0.43 4.31 0.03 4.27 0.02 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.14.3.1.1Design (Specials)/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt103.pdf
  • 1947 0.19 1.52 1987 0.25 0.38 1948 0.19 1.37 1988 0.23 0.35 1949 0.19 1.40 1989 0.22 0.31 1950 0.19 1.42 1990 0.20 0.27 1951 0.20 1.37 1991 0.20 0.26 1952 0.20 1.35 1992 0.19 0.24 $1.01 $0.15 1953 0.21 1.38 1993 0.19 0.24 1.02 0.15 1954 0.22 1.47 1994 0.18 0.21 0.93 0.14 1955 0.23 1.52 1995 0.17 0.20 0.91 0.12 1956 0.23 1.52 1996 0.16 0.18 0.76 0.12 1957 0.24 1.50 1997 0.15 0.16 0.69 0.11 1958 0.24 1.46 1998 0.14 0.16 0.58 0.11 1959 0.24 1.47 1999 0.14 0.15 0.54 0.11 1960 0.24 1.44 2000 0.12 0.12 0.52 0.09 1961 0.25 1.47 2001 0.10 0.10 0.35 0.08 1962 0.25 1.48 1963 0.25 1.44 1964 0.25 1.42 1965 0.24
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 2.89 2.73 2.69 1985 1.18 1.10 1.12 1.55 1.44 1.32 1.80 1.71 1.45 2.08 1.98 2.05 2.19 2.09 2.13 2.31 2.14 2.25 2.38 2.32 2.30 2.44 2.40 2.36 2.65 2.59 2.56 1986 1.05 0.99 0.98 1.35 1.29 1.28 1.54 1.48 1.46 1.77 1.70 1.68 1.88 1.80 1.79 1.99 1.91 1.90 2.06 2.03 2.02 2.12 2.09 2.08 2.27 2.24 2.23 1987 0.91 0.86 0.90 1.17 1.10 1.16 1.29 1.25 1.28 1.47 1.43 1.45 1.58 1.44 1.56 1.70 1.45 1.68 1.82 1.80 1.81 1.83 1.81 1.82 1.90 1.89 1.89 1988 0.98 0.86 0.90 1.19 1.08 1.15 1.32 1.24 1.28 1.44 1.37 1.40 1.56 1.44 1.56 1.62 1.44 1.63 1.76 1.75 1.77 1.76 1.77 1.78 1.84 1.85 1.86 1989 1.14 1.12 1.12 1.34 1.31
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 0.52 0.41 0.31 0.72 0.52 0.38 1.24 0.95 0.75 1.98 1.10 1.05 2.48 1.60 1.46 2.79 1.60 1.55 3.60 2.05 1.55 4.29 2.50 2.05 4.67 2.60 2.15 March 9, 1975 0.70 0.45 0.27 1.02 0.66 0.40 1.95 1.26 0.78 2.75 1.78 1.10 3.15 2.04 1.26 3.35 2.17 1.34 3.65 2.37 1.45 3.96 2.57 1.58 4.16 2.70 1.66 February 29, 1976 0.91 0.59 0.36 1.40 0.91 0.56 2.15 1.39 0.86 2.95 1.91 1.18 3.25 2.11 1.30 3.45 2.24 1.38 3.56 2.31 1.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 September 13, 1977 1.00 0.65 0.40 1.31 0.85 0.52 2.24 1.45 0.89 3.04 1.97 1.21 3.34 2.17 1.33 3.54 2.30 1.41 3.56 2.31 1.42 3.76 2.44 1.50 3.96 2.57 1.58 June 6, 1980 1.01
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • forwarders and related services 41,670 21 0.05 0.01 66 Communications, except radio and TV 384,486 63,517 16.52 16.28 67 Radio and television broadcasting 5,928 272 4.59 0.07 68A Electric services (utilities) 230,976 1,323 0.57 0.34 68B Gas production and distribution (utilties) 101,547 184 0.18 0.05 68C Water and sanitary services 72,083 478 0.66 0.12 69A Wholesale trade 883,029 3,570 0.40 0.91 69B Retail trade 796,357 135 0.02 0.03 70A Finance 761,040 4,304 0.57 1.10 70B Insurance 356,818 794 0.22 0.20 71A Owner-occupied dwellings 673,525 0.00 0.00 71B Real estate and royalties 855,883 8,016 0.94 2.05 72A Hotels and lodging places 88,331 1,390 1.57 0.36 72B Personal and repair services 134,522 3,021 2.25 0.77 73A Computer and data processing services 419,702 6,835
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • forwarders and related services 41,670 21 0.05 0.01 66 Communications, except radio and TV 384,486 63,517 16.52 16.28 67 Radio and television broadcasting 5,928 272 4.59 0.07 68A Electric services (utilities) 230,976 1,323 0.57 0.34 68B Gas production and distribution (utilties) 101,547 184 0.18 0.05 68C Water and sanitary services 72,083 478 0.66 0.12 69A Wholesale trade 883,029 3,570 0.40 0.91 69B Retail trade 796,357 135 0.02 0.03 70A Finance 761,040 4,304 0.57 1.10 70B Insurance 356,818 794 0.22 0.20 71A Owner-occupied dwellings 673,525 0.00 0.00 71B Real estate and royalties 855,883 8,016 0.94 2.05 72A Hotels and lodging places 88,331 1,390 1.57 0.36 72B Personal and repair services 134,522 3,021 2.25 0.77 73A Computer and data processing services 419,702 6,835
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 18.6618.7018.9419.0719.49 Additional monthly charge for touch-tone service 1.57 1.52 1.54 1.52 1.47 1.17 1.08 1.04 0.74 0.49 (including tax) Total for touch-tone service 17.7018.1818.1119.0519.26 19.8319.7819.9819.8119.98 Lowest generally available monthly rate 5.96 5.81 5.67 5.67 5.68 6.18 6.22 6.43 6.47 6.68 Federal and state SLCs 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 Taxes and 911 charges 0.84 0.94 0.91 1.03 1.15 1.28 1.31 1.45 1.50 1.56 Total for rotary service 8.84 9.41 9.2510.2310.38 11.0211.0811.4311.5211.79 # of cities in the sample offering measured service n.a. 76 77 79 82 85 86 86 87 88 Monthly cost including 50 five-minute daytime calls n.a. 8.57 8.47 8.48 8.52 8.94 9.32 9.63 9.61 9.82 Federal and state SLCs n.a. 2.69 2.67 3.53 3.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • 0.50 2.15 4.55 5.76 9.0%10.0% 9.5% 0.06 1971 0.50 2.10 4.50 6.04 9.0%10.0% 9.5% 0.06 1972 0.52 2.34 4.50 6.38 9.0%10.0% 9.5% 0.08 1973 0.52 2.34 4.50 6.69 8.1% 9.0% 8.5% 0.08 1974 0.52 2.48 4.67 7.08 7.2% 8.0% 7.6% 0.08 1975 0.52 2.48 4.67 7.32 6.3% 7.0% 6.6% 0.10 1976 0.70 3.15 4.16 7.81 5.4% 6.0% 5.7% 0.13 1977 0.91 3.25 3.96 8.07 4.5% 5.0% 4.8% 0.13 1978 1.00 3.34 3.96 8.31 3.6% 4.0% 3.8% 0.13 1979 1.00 3.34 3.96 8.40 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.15 1980 1.00 3.34 3.96 8.61 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 0.15 1981 1.01 3.54 4.17 9.16 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 0.15 1982 1.13 4.07 4.80 10.18 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 0.20 1983 1.76 4.09 5.15 11.38 $10.50 2.7% 3.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • 0.50 2.15 4.55 5.76 9.0%10.0% 9.5% 0.06 1971 0.50 2.10 4.50 6.04 9.0%10.0% 9.5% 0.06 1972 0.52 2.34 4.50 6.38 9.0%10.0% 9.5% 0.08 1973 0.52 2.34 4.50 6.69 8.1% 9.0% 8.5% 0.08 1974 0.52 2.48 4.67 7.08 7.2% 8.0% 7.6% 0.08 1975 0.52 2.48 4.67 7.32 6.3% 7.0% 6.6% 0.10 1976 0.70 3.15 4.16 7.81 5.4% 6.0% 5.7% 0.13 1977 0.91 3.25 3.96 8.07 4.5% 5.0% 4.8% 0.13 1978 1.00 3.34 3.96 8.31 3.6% 4.0% 3.8% 0.13 1979 1.00 3.34 3.96 8.40 2.7% 3.0% 2.9% 0.15 1980 1.00 3.34 3.96 8.61 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 0.15 1981 1.01 3.54 4.17 9.16 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 0.15 1982 1.13 4.07 4.80 10.18 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 0.20 1983 1.76 4.09 5.15 11.38 $10.50 2.7% 3.0%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror02.pdf
  • 26Fort Bend Telephone Co. dba TXU Communications 12.38 12.65 15.54 13.01 4.70 11.01 27Fort Mill Telephone Company 13.80 11.92 21.93 3.91 49.78 18.83 28Gallatin River Communications, LLC 13.64 11.31 9.58 24.56 15.09 22.17 29Gulf Telephone Company 13.31 11.39 15.73 11.68 17.13 15.16 30Hargray Telephone Company 9.23 14.30 6.94 (0.03) 9.25 5.09 31Home Telephone Company, Inc 9.63 11.77 14.97 (0.21) 6.17 0.91 32Horry Telephone Cooperative, Inc 10.83 11.80 14.90 9.39 6.68 7.77 33Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company 23.60 9.37 10.77 6.80 30.67 23.49 34Lancaster Telephone Company 8.97 12.10 (1.64) 8.74 1.23 7.58 35Moultrie Independent Telephone Company (13.34) 13.35 (36.72) (27.70) 71.70 (3.17) 36Odin Telephone Exchange, Inc. 17.25 67.94 1.26 39.19 5.84 37Puerto Rico Telephone Company 9.67 8.59 54.33 16.14 (52.54) 5.54 7.98 38Rock
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 1,641.15 23.82 15.80 52CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA 12.40 12.44 18.14 8.44 175.72 22.29 11.04 53CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - MINNESOTA 13.72 12.43 18.31 15.26 (1,403.35) 19.76 14.74 54CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - NEVADA 12.69 12.43 18.41 12.87 154.81 10.72 12.51 55CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - NORTH CAROLINA 12.11 12.44 4.71 12.56 22.48 14.24 13.09 56CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.23 11.89 9.10 10.70 (0.91) 14.42 11.68 57CITIZENS TELEPHONE COMPANY OF HIGGINSVILLE 5.74 6.39 23.95 (1.41) - 20.70 3.31 58CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF ARKANSAS 17.67 12.42 27.93 32.10 (91.33) 29.52 31.00 59CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF CA-ARIZONA 12.89 12.42 6.65 12.13 206.99 17.82 15.74 60CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF CA-CALIFORNIA 13.29 12.42 8.17 7.04 (47.04) 29.31 16.25 61CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CO. OF CA-NEVADA 14.76 12.42 3.43 14.54 805.53
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • Monthly Monthly Monthly Montlhy Monthly Support Contributions Support Contributions Support Net Difference Payments Old System Less New System Less New System Contributions Contributions Less Old System New System Old System ALABAMA $1.42 $0.94 $0.47 $0.92 $0.49 $0.02 ALASKA 13.89 0.75 13.13 1.11 12.77 (0.36) ARIZONA 0.97 1.01 (0.04) 1.20 (0.24) (0.19) ARKANSAS 4.48 0.94 3.54 0.98 3.50 (0.04) CALIFORNIA 0.47 0.91 (0.44) 0.73 (0.26) 0.18 COLORADO 1.56 1.03 0.52 1.23 0.32 (0.20) CONNECTICUT 0.18 1.08 (0.90) 1.24 (1.06) (0.16) DELAWARE 0.00 1.03 (1.02) 1.20 (1.20) (0.18) DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0.03 0.96 (0.93) 0.99 (0.96) (0.04) FLORIDA 0.23 0.99 (0.75) 1.03 (0.79) (0.04) GEORGIA 1.39 0.97 0.42 1.14 0.25 (0.17) HAWAII 0.14 0.92 (0.79) 0.93 (0.80) (0.01) IDAHO 3.72 1.01 2.71 1.24
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • $831,030 $0.40 $0 $0.00 15 Table 3 Long Term Support (LTS): 1998 Annual Monthly Annual Monthly Annual Payments Monthly Payments Payment Payment Contribution Contribution Less Less (Thousand) Per Loop (Thousands) Per Loop Contributions Contributions (Thousands) Per Loop ALABAMA $6,813 $0.24 $6,429 $0.22 $383 $0.01 ALASKA 16,288 3.41 1,237 0.26 15,051 3.15 ARIZONA 2,996 0.09 9,395 0.29 (6,399) (0.20) ARKANSAS 14,974 0.91 3,887 0.24 11,088 0.68 CALIFORNIA 15,252 0.06 45,087 0.17 (29,835) (0.12) COLORADO 12,480 0.39 9,459 0.30 3,022 0.10 CONNECTICUT 174 0.01 7,776 0.30 (7,602) (0.29) DELAWARE 0 0.00 1,834 0.29 (1,834) (0.29) DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 0.00 2,546 0.23 (2,546) (0.23) FLORIDA 6,216 0.05 31,158 0.25 (24,942) (0.20) GEORGIA 17,469 0.31 15,156 0.26 2,313 0.04 HAWAII 254 0.03 1,916 0.23
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 575 1,597 3,636 4,842 8,479 3.16 Hawaii 311 487 799 136 74 210 448 561 1,009 0.38 Idaho 407 445 852 172 67 240 579 513 1,092 0.41 Illinois 3,571 6,307 9,878 1,233 872 2,105 4,804 7,179 11,983 4.46 Indiana 1,481 2,556 4,037 568 494 1,061 2,049 3,050 5,099 1.90 Iowa 786 1,135 1,921 295 225 520 1,081 1,360 2,441 0.91 Kansas 813 1,274 2,086 298 203 501 1,111 1,477 2,588 0.96 Kentucky 1,011 1,704 2,715 406 305 711 1,416 2,010 3,426 1.28 Louisiana 1,115 2,100 3,215 405 293 698 1,519 2,393 3,913 1.46 Maine 362 590 951 157 86 243 519 675 1,195 0.44 Maryland 1,762 2,498 4,259 577 340 917 2,339 2,837 5,176 1.93 Massachusetts 2,169 3,186 5,355 834
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 SOURCE: INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, MONITORING REPORT AND ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. These average rates are
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 12/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. Non-Traffic Sensitive Per Switched Minute 2/ Traffic Sensitive Per Switched Minute Minute 1/ Carrier Common Line Per Terminating
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 SOURCE: FEDERAL-STATE JOINT BOARD MONITORING REPORT, MAY 1997, FILINGS MADE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1997, JANUARY 1, 1998, AND JULY 1, 1998, AND ARMIS 43-01 REPORTS FILED AT THE COMMISSION. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/014/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some companies made adjustments
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 07/01/03 06/30/04 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.22 1.44
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004/ 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/02 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. 4/ Although the charges took effect on July 1, 2000, some
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 06/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/91 06/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/92 06/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/93 06/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/94 06/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/95 06/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/96 06/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/97 12/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/98 06/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/98 12/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/99 06/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/99 12/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/00 06/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/00 06/31/004 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 07/01/01 12/31/01 0.15 0.07 0.48 0.24 1.71 01/01/02 06/30/02 0.15 0.07 0.47 0.24 1.69 07/01/02 06/30/03 0.02 0.01 0.48 0.22 1.46 Source: Access tariff filings. Rates in Effect
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 273 601 303 298 197 207 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08 1977 341 744 375 369 253 260 2.18 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.06 1978 456 954 496 458 346 315 2.09 1.09 1.01 0.91 0.96 1979 646 1,138 693 445 410 475 1.76 1.07 0.69 1.16 0.87 1980 811 1,605 834 772 486 567 1.98 1.03 0.95 1.17 1.03 1981 995 1,623 992 632 677 619 1.63 1.00 0.63 0.91 0.75 1982 1,253 1,719 1,257 461 819 756 1.37 1.00 0.37 0.92 0.59 1983 1,598 2,148 1,594 553 939 877 1.34 1.00 0.35 0.93
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 273 601 303 298 197 207 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08 1977 341 744 375 369 253 260 2.18 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.06 1978 456 954 496 458 346 315 2.09 1.09 1.01 0.91 0.96 1979 646 1,138 693 445 410 475 1.76 1.07 0.69 1.16 0.87 1980 811 1,605 834 772 486 567 1.98 1.03 0.95 1.17 1.03 1981 995 1,623 992 632 677 619 1.63 1.00 0.63 0.91 0.75 1982 1,253 1,719 1,257 461 819 756 1.37 1.00 0.37 0.92 0.59 1983 1,598 2,148 1,594 553 939 877 1.34 1.00 0.35 0.93
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08 1977 341.3 744.3 374.9 369.3 253.0 259.6 2.18 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.06 1978 455.6 954.4 496.2 458.2 346.0 314.8 2.09 1.09 1.01 0.91 0.96 1979 646.4 1,138.2 692.7 445.4 409.8 475.1 1.76 1.07 0.69 1.16 0.87 1980 1,569.2 2,097.2 1,063.1 1,034.1 1,162.4 715.9 1.34 0.68 0.66 0.62 0.64 1981 1,857.2 2,239.4 1,329.6 909.8 1,436.6 798.6 1.21 0.72 0.49 0.56 0.52 1982 2,186.6 2,382.1 1,673.6 708.5 1,612.7 961.4 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60 0.44 1983 2,649.7 2,876.1 2,035.5 840.5 1,808.3 1,085.9 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08 1977 341.3 744.3 374.9 369.3 253.0 259.6 2.18 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.06 1978 455.6 954.4 496.2 458.2 346.0 314.8 2.09 1.09 1.01 0.91 0.96 1979 646.4 1,138.2 692.7 445.4 409.8 475.1 1.76 1.07 0.69 1.16 0.87 1980 1,569.2 2,097.2 1,063.1 1,034.1 1,162.4 715.9 1.34 0.68 0.66 0.62 0.64 1981 1,857.2 2,239.4 1,329.6 909.8 1,436.6 798.6 1.21 0.72 0.49 0.56 0.52 1982 2,186.6 2,382.1 1,673.6 708.5 1,612.7 961.4 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60 0.44 1983 2,649.7 2,876.1 2,035.5 840.5 1,808.3 1,085.9 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 2.60 11.98 66.26 361433 C MID STATE TELEPHONE COMPANY 5.05 -2.08 7.28 24.38 361437 A MINNESOTA LAKE TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.18 3.07 11.75 60.15 361439 A MINNESOTA VALLEY TEL. CO. INC. 6.07 0.27 5.78 11.01 361440 A CANNON VALLEY TELECOM, INC. 11.49 0.30 11.15 46.69 361442 C NEW ULM TELECOM, INC. 11.61 -1.53 13.35 128.97 361443 A LORETEL SYSTEMS, INC. 14.22 0.91 13.19 334.65 361445 C CENTURYTEL OF MINNESOTA, INC. 3.32 0.50 2.81 1.79 361448 A OSAKIS TELEPHONE COMPANY 15.32 2.50 12.51 INFINITE 361450 A PARK REGION MUTUAL TEL. CO. 18.00 5.58 11.77 74.37 361451 C PAUL BUNYAN RURAL TEL. COOP. 37.52 4.91 31.08 134.05 361453 C PEOPLES TELEPHONE COMPANY - MN 2.49 2.54 -0.04 0.07 361454 C PINE ISLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • ServicesSwitched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 NA - Not available. Note: Data for some prior years have been revised. Sources: AT&T information provided by AT&T. Other estimates from Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 868 New Mexico 634,924 0.28 0.71 0.38 63 76 New York 20,459,492 8.87 4.43 7.76 1,273 1,525 North Carolina 6,112,492 2.65 3.18 2.78 456 547 North Dakota 387,152 0.17 0.34 0.21 35 42 N. Mariana Islands NA NA NA NA NA NA Ohio 9,536,280 4.14 4.42 4.21 690 826 Oklahoma 1,825,623 0.79 0.66 0.76 125 149 Oregon 1,883,751 0.82 1.19 0.91 149 179 Pennsylvania 13,632,028 5.91 5.94 5.92 971 1,163 Puerto Rico 0 0.00 1.17 0.29 48 57 Rhode Island 763,974 0.33 0.09 0.27 44 53 South Carolina 2,440,109 1.06 1.23 1.10 180 216 South Dakota 309,166 0.13 0.39 0.20 32 39 Tennessee 2,776,868 1.20 0.56 1.04 171 205 Texas 14,920,108 6.47 8.36 6.94 1,138 1,364 Utah 760,202 0.33 0.49 0.37
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-11.pdf
  • (15,384) 88 (0.58) BellSouth - Louisiana LA (16,485) (16,821) 336 (2.04) Verizon - New England - Maine ME (14,967) (14,755) (211) 1.41 Verizon - Maryland MD 28,531 29,411 (881) (3.09) Verizon - New England - Massachusetts MA 41,198 42,327 (1,129) (2.74) Verizon - North - Michigan MI (19,470) (19,448) (22) 0.11 SBC - Ameritech - Michigan MI 24,113 24,332 (219) (0.91) Qwest - Minnesota MN 14,323 14,668 (361) (2.52) BellSouth - Mississippi MS (26,747) (26,844) 97 (0.36) SBC - Southwestern Bell - Missouri MO 42,009 42,109 (100) (0.24) Sprint - United Telephone Company of Missouri MO 2,660 2,692 (32) (1.20) Qwest - Montana MT (4,935) (4,872) (71) 1.44 Aliant Telecommunications - Nebraska NE (54) (40) (14) 25.93 Qwest - Nebraska NE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 535,5362,236,497,762 2,609,3452,603,937,395 16,766,9912,893,563,683 55,744,7443,156,402,360 123,751,2943,215,738,018 243,957,915 Table 3.14 Total High-Cost Support Payment Projections By State or Jurisdiction - ILECs and CLECs (Dollars) 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 3 - 27 Alabama $0.65 $0.01 $1.46 $0.26 $0.20 $0.73 $0.25 $3.56 Alaska 7.18 0.03 0.00 3.33 2.03 0.00 2.75 15.32 American Samoa 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.22 0.73 0.00 4.28 7.23 Arizona 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.17 0.52 0.33 2.03 Arkansas 2.73 0.01 0.00 0.81 1.34 0.34 0.46 5.70 California 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.12 0.02 0.34 Colorado 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.14 0.55 0.14 2.27 Connecticut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.08 Delaware 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 Dist. of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • ServicesSwitched Services 1984 $0.32 NA NA NA 1985 0.31 NA NA NA 1986 0.28 NA NA NA 1987 0.25 NA NA NA 1988 0.23 NA NA NA 1989 0.22 NA NA NA 1990 0.20 NA NA NA 1991 0.20 NA NA NA 1992 0.19 $0.19 $1.01 $0.15 1993 0.19 0.19 1.02 0.15 1994 0.18 0.18 0.93 0.14 1995 NA 0.17 0.91 0.12 1996 NA 0.16 0.76 0.12 1997 NA 0.15 0.69 0.11 1998 NA 0.14 0.58 0.11 1999 NA 0.14 0.54 0.11 2000 NA 0.12 0.52 0.09 2001 NA 0.10 0.35 0.08 2002 NA 0.09 0.28 0.07 NA - Not available. Note: Data for some prior years have been revised. Sources: AT&T information provided by AT&T. Other estimates from Industry Analysis
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-5.pdf
  • 1.36 1.51 1.56 1.58 1.70 1.85 2.00 2.03 2.17 2.24 2.34 2.34 Total 11.5813.3514.5416.1316.6616.5717.5317.7918.6618.7018.9419.0719.5019.58 Lowest Generally Available Monthly Rate 5.37 5.62 5.75 5.96 5.81 5.67 5.67 5.68 6.18 6.22 6.43 6.47 6.68 7.06 Subscriber Line Charges * 0.00 0.00 1.01 2.04 2.66 2.67 3.53 3.55 3.56 3.55 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.54 Taxes, including 911 charges 0.56 0.58 0.70 0.84 0.94 0.91 1.03 1.15 1.28 1.31 1.45 1.50 1.56 1.62 Total 5.93 6.20 7.46 8.84 9.41 9.2510.2310.3811.0211.0811.4311.5211.7812.22 Connection Charge 35.0143.7144.3245.6344.0442.9442.7143.0642.0041.5241.3841.2640.9141.08 Taxes 1.75 2.19 2.22 2.28 2.20 2.11 2.24 2.32 2.19 2.18 2.21 2.27 2.42 2.35 Total 36.7645.9046.5447.9146.2445.0544.9545.3844.1943.7043.5943.5343.3343.42 * Includes both Federal and State subscriber line charges. $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. These average rates are calculated differently from those published previously in the TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE, January 1998. In the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • (Continued) Restated in 1998 Dollars Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate and International Calls * AT&T Charge per Minute for a 10-Minute Day Rate 200-Mile Call (Basic Rates) Consumer Price Index: All Goods and Services Revenue per Minute 200-Mile Call Charge per Minute 1970 23¢ 22¢ 38.8 0.97 0.90 1971 25 21 40.5 0.99 0.85 1972 24 23 41.8 0.95 0.91 1973 25 23 44.4 0.93 0.86 1974 26 25 49.3 0.85 0.82 1975 27 25 53.8 0.83 0.75 1976 29 32 56.9 0.82 0.90 1977 28 33 60.6 0.77 0.87 1978 29 33 65.2 0.72 0.84 1979 29 33 72.6 0.65 0.75 1980 30 33 82.4 0.59 0.66 1981 33 35 90.9 0.59 0.63 1982 34 41 96.5 0.58 0.69
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 SOURCE: INDUSTRY ANALYSIS DIVISION, TRENDS IN TELEPHONE SERVICE AND ACCESS TARIFF FILINGS. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. These average
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 1.00 1.53 2.50 7.78 07/01/9012/31/90 1.00 1.23 2.50 7.48 01/01/9106/30/91 1.00 1.14 2.40 7.18 07/01/9106/30/92 0.88 1.06 2.40 6.97 07/01/9206/30/93 0.79 0.95 2.40 6.76 07/01/9306/30/94 0.88 1.16 2.20 6.66 07/01/9406/30/95 0.84 1.08 2.10 0.28¢ 6.89 07/01/9506/30/96 0.74 0.89 1.96 0.21 6.16 07/01/9606/30/97 0.72 0.89 1.95 0.17 6.04 07/01/9712/31/97 0.64 0.84 1.63 0.14 5.18 01/01/9806/30/98 0.68 0.23 1.29 0.21 4.04 07/01/9812/31/98 0.91 0.20 0.99 0.30 3.82 01/01/9906/30/99 0.82 0.16 0.98 0.32 3.71 07/01/9912/31/99 0.37 0.10 0.86 0.28 2.82 01/01/0006/30/00 0.32 0.10 0.86 0.31 2.85 08/11/0012/31/00 0.23 0.07 0.52 0.26 1.91 Source: Industry Analysis Division, Monitoring Report and access tariff filings. * This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • Hampshire 8,544 0.81 14,283 1.36 -5,739 -0.55 New Jersey 3,504 0.04 91,976 1.14 -88,472 -1.09 New Mexico 37,701 3.29 14,957 1.31 22,744 1.99 New York 53,021 0.34 159,144 1.03 -106,123 -0.69 North Carolina 34,304 0.56 65,191 1.07 -30,887 -0.51 North Dakota 24,969 4.98 6,150 1.23 18,819 3.75 Northern Mariana Islands 3,310 11.06 250 0.84 3,060 10.22 Ohio 19,587 0.23 76,233 0.91 -56,646 -0.67 Oklahoma 65,942 2.63 24,417 0.98 41,525 1.66 Oregon 46,888 1.84 28,937 1.13 17,951 0.70 Pennsylvania 28,812 0.28 92,121 0.91 -63,309 -0.62 Puerto Rico 143,591 9.24 12,891 0.83 130,701 8.41 Rhode Island 25 0.00 9,839 1.21 -9,814 -1.21 South Carolina 50,342 1.80 32,039 1.15 18,303 0.65 South Dakota 20,953 4.07 6,826 1.32 14,128 2.74 Tennessee 34,352 0.83 42,893 1.04
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 10.33 404.87 190249 C ROANOKE & BOTETOURT TEL. CO. -11.86 -2.85 -9.27 -36.12 190250 A SHENANDOAH TEL. CO. 5.36 3.25 2.04 0.00 190253 A VIRGINIA TEL. CO. 7.56 4.33 3.10 0.00 190254 C CENTRAL TEL. CO. OF VA -3.27 1.31 -4.52 -23.72 190479 C VERIZON SOUTH INC.-VA (GTE) 3.04 1.50 1.52 INFINITE 190567 C UNITED INTER-MOUNTAIN TEL. CO.-VA 2.27 1.34 0.91 0.00 193029 C NEW CASTLE TEL. CO. 1.07 0.97 0.10 6.63 195040 C VERIZON VIRGINIA INC. (C & P) 4.22 1.41 2.77 0.00 TOTAL: WASHINGTON 6.68 2.14 4.45 31.15 522400 C UNITED TELEPHONE CO OF THE NW - WA 6.53 0.77 5.72 0.00 522404 C ASOTIN TELEPHONE COMPANY - WA -3.12 4.72 -7.49 -11.96 522408 C CENTURYTEL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.85 Israel 10/ 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.15 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 Jamaica 1.75 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.76 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.26 Korea, Rep. 2.36 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.89 0.791 0.75 0.715 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.29 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.75 Netherlands 1.45 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.85 0.85 Israel 10/ 2.40 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 2.14 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 Jamaica 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 Japan 10/ 1.91 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.27 Korea, Rep. 2.10 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 Mexico 11/ 0.79 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.56 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.76 0.77 0.76 Netherlands 1.56 1.29 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 0.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 8/ 9/ 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 9/ 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.22 Jamaica 8/ 9/ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 9/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 9/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 10/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 9/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 9/ 1.29 0.69 0.69
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.00 0.92 0.70 0.60 0.46 Hong Kong 1.60 1.20 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.79 0.72 India 2.00 1.90 1.80 1.80 1.60 1.42 1.28 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 Italy 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 Jamaica 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 Japan 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 Korea, Rep. 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 Mexico 7/ 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.485 0.395 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 Netherlands 0.69 0.69 0.59 0.37 0.36 0.27 Nigeria 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.15 0.77 0.51 Pakistan 2.30 2.30 2.30 2.30
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 81.4 32.676 48.7 48.8 (0.08) (0.08) HI IDAHO 71.3 1.236 70.1 67.5 2.60 2.60 ID ILLINOIS 289.8 11.895 277.9 233.6 44.23 44.23 IL INDIANA 228.7 9.197 219.5 199.3 20.16 20.16 IN IOWA 115.6 0.809 114.8 110.4 4.35 4.35 IA KANSAS 135.7 1.463 134.2 130.1 4.09 4.09 KS KENTUCKY 119.7 1.896 117.8 115.2 2.58 2.58 KY LOUISIANA 55.2 0.006 55.2 54.3 0.91 0.91 LA MAINE 137.8 137.8 137.8 ME MARYLAND 107.6 (0.324) 108.0 91.1 16.88 1.9 3.6 5.6 11.29 MD MASSACHUSETTS 371.8 371.8 371.8 MA MICHIGAN 824.3 0.100 824.2 822.1 2.11 2.11 MI MINNESOTA 94.9 0.618 94.3 91.7 2.57 2.57 MN MISSISSIPPI 98.3 0.022 98.2 97.6 0.66 0.66 MS MISSOURI 248.0 14.913 233.1 215.1 17.96 17.96 MO MONTANA 51.6 0.027 51.6 51.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 1.67 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1973 11/ 2.37 4.67 1.35 2.60 1.15 2.15 1.85 3.60 1.05 2.05 0.80 1.55 0.94 1.79 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1974 2.37 4.67 1.35 2.60 1.15 2.15 1.85 3.60 1.05 2.05 0.80 1.55 0.94 1.79 0.60 1.10 0.55 1.05 1975 12/ 2.16 4.16 1.40 2.70 0.86 1.66 1.90 3.65 1.24 2.37 0.76 1.46 1.40 2.65 0.91 1.72 0.56 1.06 1976 13/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.55 2.95 1.01 1.92 0.62 1.18 1977 14/ 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98 0.64 1.22 1978 2.06 3.96 1.34 2.57 0.82 1.58 1.86 3.56 1.21 2.31 0.74 1.42 1.59 3.04 1.03 1.98
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 7.2 172.9 56.3 90.7 25.9 172.9 NH NEW JERSEY 1,125.5 9.38 1,116.1 210.0 906.2 404.3 299.7 199.5 903.5 2.674 NJ NEW MEXICO 208.1 2.21 205.9 45.1 160.8 64.9 67.1 28.7 160.8 NM NEW YORK 2,492.9 6.06 2,486.9 424.0 2,062.9 802.5 888.2 372.2 2,062.9 NY NORTH CAROLINA 949.9 5.47 944.5 317.2 627.3 335.7 187.0 103.6 626.3 1.041 NC NORTH DAKOTA 65.2 (0.91) 66.2 20.4 45.8 15.2 18.2 12.3 45.8 ND OHIO 1,226.1 44.40 1,181.7 347.5 834.3 393.9 279.1 160.6 833.6 0.657 OH OKLAHOMA 290.3 (1.60) 291.9 44.8 247.1 118.5 80.4 48.3 247.2 (0.030)OK OREGON 416.9 1.64 415.3 98.4 316.9 136.9 121.5 58.5 316.9 OR PENNSYLVANIA 579.8 6.82 1,289.7 352.0 937.6 457.5 292.9 185.6 935.9 1.705 PA RHODE ISLAND 123.2 0.09 123.2 4.6
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 71.8 2.58 2.58 IA KANSAS 99.7 99.7 95.5 4.24 4.24 KS KENTUCKY 58.0 0.782 57.3 56.2 1.09 1.09 KY LOUISIANA 46.6 46.6 46.2 0.41 0.41 LA MAINE 128.9 128.9 128.9 (0.02) (0.02)ME MARYLAND 92.3 92.3 73.3 19.02 2.1 4.0 6.1 12.89 MD MASSACHUSETTS 362.7 362.7 362.8 (0.03) (0.03)MA MICHIGAN 773.4 0.058 773.4 773.4 (0.01) (0.01)MI MINNESOTA 40.0 0.187 39.8 38.9 0.91 0.91 MN MISSISSIPPI 83.7 83.7 83.3 0.44 0.44 MS MISSOURI 222.7 222.7 200.6 22.10 22.10 MO MONTANA 27.4 0.018 27.4 27.3 0.07 0.07 MT NEBRASKA 44.6 0.382 44.2 42.2 2.03 2.03 NE NEVADA 15.8 0.001 15.8 16.3 (0.51) (0.51)NV NEW HAMPSHIRE 71.0 71.0 71.0 (0.01) (0.01)NH NEW JERSEY 535.3 535.3 520.2 15.08 2.0 3.8 5.8 9.29 NJ NEW MEXICO 41.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • 580.0 94.7 4.39 0.16 2.72 7.27 87.4CA Colorado 346.8 116.3 230.5 171.2 59.3 25.21 8.08 9.85 43.14 16.2CO Connecticut 57.3 (0.0) 57.3 37.3 19.9 3.24 3.44 2.18 8.85 11.1CT Delaware 29.3 16.6 12.7 6.1 6.6 0.76 0.76 0.36 1.88 4.7DE District of Columbia 202.4 56.7 145.7 90.4 55.3 11.36 12.65 23.80 47.81 7.5DC Florida 965.8 600.9 364.9 291.5 73.4 6.58 (0.91) 2.41 8.08 65.3 FL Georgia 280.4 171.9 108.5 83.0 25.5 3.17 0.58 0.59 4.34 21.2GA Hawaii 137.2 86.0 51.3 44.8 6.5 0.70 (1.06) 0.46 0.09 6.4 HI Idaho 25.3 21.5 3.8 1.7 2.2 (1.26) (0.69) (0.41) (2.36) 4.5 ID Illinois 483.7 333.9 149.8 116.6 33.1 1.23 0.54 0.59 2.36 30.8 IL Indiana 273.5 195.8 77.8 59.1 18.7 2.02 (0.37) 0.81
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • 1.08 0.85 0.68 0.46 0.46 Israel 8/ 10/ 2.40 2.28 2.16 2.16 1.90 1.18 0.70 0.59 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 Italy 10/ 2.04 1.65 1.51 1.22 0.71 0.52 0.33 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.22 Jamaica 8/ 10/ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.05 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Japan 8/ 10/ 1.62 1.31 1.04 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.86 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.29 Korea, Rep. 8/ 10/ 1.90 1.60 1.44 1.41 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.71 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.38 Mexico 8/ 9/ 0.75 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.40 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 Morocco 10/ 3.58 3.03 3.04 3.27 1.78 1.45 1.09 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.38 0.40 0.41 Netherlands 10/ 1.29 0.69 0.69
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard97.pdf
  • Telnet 66 JTK Technologies 75 L.D. Services, Inc. 2.76 301 109 (3) LCI International Worldwide Telecommunications 0.23 252 1,103 (6) LDM Systems Inc. 8.63 246 29 (9) Long Distance Services (Virginia) 7.26 791 109 (3) Long Distance Services, Inc. (Michigan) 4.14 451 109 (3) Matrix Telecom 1.38 150 109 (3) MCI Telecommunications Corporation 0.17 2,815 16,372 (6) Midcom Communications, Inc. 0.91 136 149 (6) National Accounts Long Distance, Inc. 3.23 352 109 (3) National Telecom, USA 1.37 149 109 (3) National Telephone And Communications, Inc. 54 Nationwide Long Distance, Inc. 3.55 387 109 (3) Network Service Center 1.73 189 109 (3) OAN Services, Inc. 2.13 1,396 655 (4) Omega Telecommunications 63 One -2- One Communications 88 Operator Communications, Inc. 10.16 1,107
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • 78 Mexico NY Fox, Craig 1996 Jul-96 250 0 0 A WSIV AM Christian Syracuse, NY 78 E. Syracuse NY Fox, Craig 1955 Sep-96 100 0 0 B WOLF FM Children Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Fox, Craig 1990 Sep-97 0 0.4 0 A WKRL FM Modern Rock Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1972 Feb-94 1600 4.4 0.91 A WTLA AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 N. Syracuse NY Galaxy Communications 1959 Feb-94 200 1 0.36 B WTKW FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78 Bridgeport NY Galaxy Communications 1992 Aug-94 1800 3.5 1.23 A WSGO AM Adlt Stndrd Syracuse, NY 78 Oswego NY Galaxy Communications 1960 Dec-95 0 0 0 B WTKV FM Clsc Rock Syracuse, NY 78
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990326.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990326.wp
  • area code conservation measures in the 508, 617, 781, and 978 area codes in eastern Massachusetts. Comments due April 5; replies April 19. Contact: Al McCloud, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2320; TTY: (202) 418-0404. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990402.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990402.wp
  • area code conservation measures in the 508, 617, 781, and 978 area codes in eastern Massachusetts. Comments due April 5; replies April 19. Contact: Al McCloud, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2320; TTY: (202) 418-0404. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990409.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990409.wp
  • area code conservation measures in the 508, 617, 781, and 978 area codes in eastern Massachusetts. Comments due April 5*; replies April 19. Contact: Al McCloud, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2320; TTY: (202) 418-0404. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990416.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990416.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990416.wp
  • area code conservation measures in the 508, 617, 781, and 978 area codes in eastern Massachusetts. Comments due April 5*; replies April 19. Contact: Al McCloud, Network Services Division at (202) 418-2320; TTY: (202) 418-0404. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990507.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990507.wp
  • of Public Hearings on Telephone Service for Indians on Reservations; Set for March 23 in Chandler Arizona. Comment period closes May 28, 1999. Contact: Eric Jensen at (202) 418-0990 or Belford Lawson at (202) 418-7264. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990514.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990514.wp
  • of Public Hearings on Telephone Service for Indians on Reservations; Set for March 23 in Chandler Arizona. Comment period closes May 28, 1999. Contact: Eric Jensen at (202) 418-0990 or Belford Lawson at (202) 418-7264. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990521.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Open_Proceedings/op990521.wp
  • of Public Hearings on Telephone Service for Indians on Reservations; Set for March 23 in Chandler Arizona. Comment period closes May 28, 1999. Contact: Eric Jensen at (202) 418-0990 or Belford Lawson at (202) 418-7264. Order 3/5/99 (adopted 3/5/99); DA 99-463 Comsat Mobil Communications Request for Extension of Time for Filing Cost Allocation Manual Audit Report Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's Rules CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. CC 97-172; Order 3/8/99 (adopted 3/8/99); DA 99-468 Petition of US West Communications, Inc. for Forbearance Extended to June 9, 1999, the date on which the petition seeking forbearance filed by US West
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Public_Notices/Exparte/1999/exparsbc.txt
  • M H meas ATTACHMENT A-5b SBC/AMERITECH MEASUREMENT LIST (CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA) ATTACHMENT A-6 YEAR 1 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 4.16 $ 0.35 California $ 79.01 $ 6.58 Connecticut $ 9.56 $ 0.80 Illinois $ 30.41 $ 2.53 Indiana $ 9.71 $ 0.81 Kansas $ 5.89 $ 0.49 Michigan $ 23.55 $ 1.96 Missouri $ 10.87 $ 0.91 Nevada $ 1.54 $ 0.13 Ohio $ 17.81 $ 1.48 Oklahoma $ 7.05 $ 0.59 Texas $ 40.99 $ 3.41 Wisconsin $ 9.45 $ 0.79 $250.00 $ 20.83 ATTACHMENT A-6 (cont'd) YEAR 2 CIPP CAPS ($M) State Annual Monthly Arkansas $ 6.24 $ 0.52 California $ 118.51 $ 9.88 Connecticut $ 14.34 $ 1.20 Illinois $ 45.62 $ 3.80 Indiana
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99136.pdf
  • 21.82 21 218.18 26 21.55 21 General Wireless 20.38 20.38 22 509.38 18 20.38 22 Comcast (6) 8.26 9.91 18.17 23 305.53 21 11.56 28 Rivgam Comm. 17.32 17.32 24 173.22 29 17.32 23 Telecorp PCS (8) 9.89 4.94 14.83 25 247.15 23 14.83 24 Cook Inlet/WW (SEC) (7) 2.98 9.83 12.81 26 142.95 32 12.81 25 Triton PCS (8) 0.91 11.01 11.92 27 242.90 24 11.92 26 Mercury PCS (PK) 2.50 9.16 11.65 28 129.03 34 11.65 27 Centennial Cellular 7.00 3.77 10.77 29 288.06 22 10.77 29 Dobson Comm. (SEC) 5.58 4.20 9.78 30 181.39 28 9.78 30 Devon Mobile (PK) 0.95 8.54 9.49 31 99.70 40 9.49 31 Urban Comm. PCS (PK) 3.47 4.42 7.89 32 148.28 31
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001113.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001113.txt
  • the provision of notice of the account changes to the affected customers, following completion of the transfer, through a billing message in the next billing cycle. III. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1, 4, and 258 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154, 258, and the authority delegated under sections 0.91, 0.291, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, the waiver request filed by GTE Service Corporation, GTE North Incorporated, and GTE Communications Corporation on April 10, 2000, and supplemented on April 18, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent indicated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is effective upon its release. Carol E. Mattey
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • NA NA NA 89 NA 30 NA 6 NA PR-4-03-2200 % Missed Appointment ­ Customer 8.33 0 44.44 0 42.5 50 0 0 PR-4-08-2200 % Missed Appt. ­ Customer ­ Due to Late Order Conf. 0 0 0 0 0 a,b,c,d,e PR-6- Installation Quality PR-6-01-2200 % Installation Troubles reported within 30 Days 0.59 0 0.36 0 2.09 0 12 0 0.91 0 a,b,c,d PR-6-03-2200 % Inst. Troubles reported w/ in 30 Days - FOK/TOK/CPE 2.35 0 0.24 0 0.52 0 0 9.09 a,b,c,d PR-8 - Open Orders in a Hold Status PR-8-01-2200 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 30 Days 12.5 0 11.11 0 2.5 0 0 0 0 0 a,b,c,d,e PR-8-02-2200 Open Orders in a Hold Status > 90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1999/dd990309.html
  • Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: March 8, 1999. by Recon. of Decision. (DA No. 99-475). CCB Internet URL: [10]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da990475.wp ADDENDA: The following items, released March 5, 1999, did not appear in Digest No. 43: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- COMSAT MOBIL COMMUNICATIONS REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING COST ALLOCATION MANUAL AUDIT REPORT. Granted pursuant to Sections 0.91, 0291, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 0.91, 0.291, and 1.46 CMC's request for an extension of time until June 1, 1999, to file its independent cost allocation manual audit report. Action by Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: March 5, 1999. by Order. (DA No. 99-463). CCB Internet URL: [11]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da990463.wp DEER LODGE, HAMILTON AND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1999/dd990415.html
  • TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU SITE-BY-SITE ACTION. Internet URL: [20]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9090.pd f Report No: 202. Released: April 14, 1999. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU MARKET-BASED APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. Internet URL: [21]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/pnwl9089.pd f ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- LOCAL NUMBER PORTABILITY TARIFF FILINGS OF GTE SYSTEMS TELEPHONE COMPANIES/GTE TELEPHONE OPERATING COMPANIES. Ordered pursuant to section 205 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. Section 205, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 0.91, 0.291, Transmittal No. 275, filed by GTE Systems Telephone Companies is subject to investigation in CC Docket No. 99-35. Dkt No.: CC-99-35. Action by Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: April 14, 1999. by MO&O. (DA No. 99-714). CCB Internet URL: [22]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da990714.txt BISHOP CLARKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, DOCTOR'S HOSPITAL,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2000/dd000628.html
  • NORTHWEST ARKANSAS, LLC/CENTURYTEL OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, LLC AND GTE ARKANSAS INCORPORATED/GTE MIDWEST INCORPORATED/GTE SOUTHWEST INCORPORATED. Granted the petition for waiver of Part 36, Appendix-Glossary, of the Commission's rules, filed by CenturyTel of Northwest Arkansas, LLC, CenturyTel of Central Arkansas, LLC, GTE Arkansas Incorporated and the petition for waiver of sections 61.41(c) and 69.3(g)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 0.91, 0.291, 1.3, and 61.43. Action by Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: June 27, 2000. by MO&O. (DA No. 00-1434). CCB Internet URL: [20]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001434.doc ADDENDA: The following items, released June 26, 2000, did not appear in Digest No. 121: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- GTE CORPORATION, VODAFONE AIRTOUCH PLC , AND BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION. Granted the Applications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2000/dd000905.html
  • Honorable G. Nanette Thompson, Chair of the Regulatory Commission of Alaska to the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service. Dkt No.: CC-96-45. Action by the Commission. Adopted: August 31, 2000. by Order. (FCC No. 00-334). CCB Internet URL: [19]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00334.doc EXPANDED INTERCONNECTION SERVICES/CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES REVISION TO TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 1. Suspended for one day the authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 0.91, 0.291, the revisions to Citizens' Tariff F.C.C. Nos. 1 applicable to Expanded Interconnection Service offerings filed under Transmittal No. 81. Dkt No.: CC-97-240. Action by Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: August 31, 2000. by Order. (DA No. 00-2007). CCB Internet URL: [20]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002007.doc SHAREHOLDERS OF AMFM, INC. AND
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2002/dd020321.html
  • 03/20/2002. AUCTION OF LICENSES N THE 698-746 MHZ BAND SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 19, 2002; NOTICE AND FILING REQUIREMENTS, MINIMUM OPENING BIDS, UPFRONT PAYMENTS AND OTHER AUCTION PROCEDURES. (DA No. 02-563). WTB. Contact: Howard Davenport - 418-0585 [54]DA-02-563A1.doc [55]DA-02-563A2.xls [56]DA-02-563A1.pdf [57]DA-02-563A2.pdf [58]DA-02-563A1.txt [59]DA-02-563A2.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC.'S SECTION 271 APPLICATION PROCEEDING. Terminated authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules. DA 02-667. (Dkt No. 01-347). Action by: Chief, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: 03/19/2002 by ORDER. CCB [60]DOC-221032A1.doc [61]DOC-221032A1.pdf [62]DOC-221032A1.txt References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221010A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221010A1.txt 3. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221045A1.doc 4. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221045A1.pdf 5. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221045A1.txt 6. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221039A1.pdf 7. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221039A1.txt 8. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221040A1.txt 9. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221041A1.txt 10. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221037A1.pdf 11. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221037A1.txt 12. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221036A1.pdf 13. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221036A1.txt 14. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221028A1.doc 15. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221028A1.pdf 16. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221028A1.txt 17. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-671A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/broadband_network_management/022508/yoo.pdf
  • Bandwidth on the Network (June 18, 2007), at http://www.ellacoya.com/news/pdf/ 2007/NXTcommEllacoyamediaalert.pdf. 34 See Bret Swanson, The Coming Exaflood, WALL ST. J., Feb. 20, 2007, at A11. 35 See Swanson & Gilder, supra note 1, at 12-14. 36 See Ellacoya Networks, supra note 33. 37 See William B. Norton, Video Internet: The Next Wave of Massive Disruption to the U.S. Peering Ecosystem (v0.91) at 2 (Sept. 29, 2006), available at http://www-tc.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/media/ InternetVideo0.91.pdf 12 D. Differences Among Transmission Technologies in the Ways Congestion Can Arise Not only must network owners must base their investment plans on their projections of the magnitude and the shape of the traffic that will have to support. Although all of the technologies are subject to congestion in content/application servers,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1270A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1270A1.pdf
  • public interest. For the foregoing reasons, we deny the Request for Review and remand the relevant applications to USAC to continue the commitment adjustment recovery actions. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority delegated under sections 1-4 and 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151-154 and 254, and pursuant to authority delegated in sections 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, and 54.722(a), that the Requests for Review filed by Send Technologies, L.L.C., on January 19, 2004 and March 22, 2004 ARE DENIED and the underlying applications ARE REMANDED to USAC for further processing consistent with this Order. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to authority contained in sections 1-
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • of similar format AM stations in market 0.001 (0.32) 0.001 (0.38) 0.001 (0.36) Number of similar format FM stations in market -0.001 (0.75) -0.001 (0.89) -0.001 (0.78) Number of similar format non-commercial stations in market -0.002 (0.40) -0.001 (0.26) -0.002 (0.36) Number of commercial TV stations in market -0.003 (0.27) -0.005 (0.49) -0.004 (0.37) Digital radio stations in market 0.001 (0.91) 0.001 (0.59) 0.001 (0.78) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.44) -0.000 (0.62) -0.000 (0.52) Population density of market 0.000 (0.53) 0.000 (0.50) 0.000 (0.48) Constant -0.035 (7.99)** -0.036 (8.32)** -0.035 (8.17)** * - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** - estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/circuit.pdf
  • 6 7 1France 3,142 3,314 199 6,655 5,531 0.95 0.99 2.80 12% 17% 17% 35% 8 9 15 7Korea, South 2,246 3,788 7 6,041 3,934 0.59 0.98 2.31 51% 149% 100% -2% 9 15 29 1Sweden 1,036 3,468 170 4,674 1,805 0.30 0.60 36.00 25% 152% 108% 61% 10 10 13 7Hong Kong 1,273 3,060 41 4,374 1,855 0.42 0.52 0.91 26% 59% 49% 121% 11 11 11 6Brazil 1,595 2,485 1 4,081 1,026 0.64 1.24 3.07 4% 102% 48% 23% 12 14 9 7Philippines 2,835 826 3 3,664 1,599 3.43 5.05 12.29 42% 108% 53% -6% 13 8 10 1Netherlands 1,179 2,028 66 3,273 3,006 0.58 0.56 1.84 10% 7% 8% 78% 14 13 8 4Dominican Republic 2,156 695 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
  • 1.77 2.14 4.53 5.50 5 North and Central America 159,007 377,566 57,023 593,596 672,364 0.37 0.95 1.15 1.29 6 South America 10,553 57,437 1,967 69,957 34,311 0.18 0.35 0.85 1.06 7 Asia 117,712 243,718 7,698 369,128 57,183 0.47 0.24 0.67 0.85 8 Oceania 13,441 52,250 1,406 67,097 6,248 0.25 0.16 0.73 1.03 9 Eastern Europe 5,525 6,065 0 11,590 1,677 0.91 1.21 2.78 2.27 10 Other Regions 0 801 142 943 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total for all International Points 464,152 1,610,276 104,498 2,178,926 1,692,073 0.27 0.46 0.79 1.11 Page 33 TABLE 7 - Trans-Ocean Fiber Optic Cable Capacity 64 Kbps Circuits CABLES Class*Cost $M 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Est.
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05 1.08 1977 341.3 744.3 374.9 369.3 253.0 259.6 2.18 1.10 1.08 1.03 1.06 1978 455.6 954.4 496.2 458.2 346.0 314.8 2.09 1.09 1.01 0.91 0.96 1979 646.4 1,138.2 692.7 445.4 409.8 475.1 1.76 1.07 0.69 1.16 0.87 19801,569.2 2,097.2 1,063.1 1,034.1 1,162.4 715.9 1.34 0.68 0.66 0.62 0.64 19811,857.2 2,239.4 1,329.6 909.8 1,436.6 798.6 1.21 0.72 0.49 0.56 0.52 19822,186.6 2,382.1 1,673.6 708.5 1,612.7 961.4 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60 0.44 19832,649.7 2,876.1 2,035.5 840.5 1,808.3 1,085.9 1.09 0.77 0.32 0.60 0.43 19843,037.0 3,197.0 2,268.8
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • similar format AM stations in market 0.001 (0.32) 0.001 (0.38) 0.001 (0.36) Number of similar format FM stations in market -0.001 (0.75) -0.001 (0.89) -0.001 (0.78) Number of similar format non- commercial stations in market -0.002 (0.40) -0.001 (0.26) -0.002 (0.36) Number of commercial TV stations in market -0.003 (0.27) -0.005 (0.49) -0.004 (0.37) Digital radio stations in market 0.001 (0.91) 0.001 (0.59) 0.001 (0.78) Retail expenditures in market -0.000 (0.44) -0.000 (0.62) -0.000 (0.52) Population density of market 0.000 (0.53) 0.000 (0.50) 0.000 (0.48) Constant -0.035 (7.99)** -0.036 (8.32)** -0.035 (8.17)** * -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 95 percent level of confidence. ** -estimated regression coefficient is different from zero at the 99 percent level of
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4.pdf
  • 49.25 VHF Channel 30.78 * 16.34 Dummy2003 -35.42 47.42 -6.31 5.93 Dummy2004 158.40 ** 65.99 13.51 11.27 Dummy2005 78.81 85.64 16.42 16.55 Dummy2003*NonCommercial 2.09 17.12 Dummy2004*NonCommercial 79.51 *** 21.01 Dummy2005*NonCommercial -29.30 22.86 Dummy2003*TV-Newspaper_Crossown 22.28 19.99 Dummy2004*TV-Newspaper_Crossown 12.61 22.44 Dummy2005*TV-Newspaper_Crossown -3.90 30.43 Additional Dummy Variables Used: Every Market Every Station (not shown in table) No. Observations 6,703 6,703 Adj. R2 0.49 0.91 Key ownership variables are bolded. Robust standard errors adjusted for clustering at the market level. *** indicates significance at the 1 percent level ** indicates significance at the 5 percent level * indicates significance at the 10 percent level 12 Table I.10R Group Fixed Effects Model Controlling for Market-Year and Network, for News and Public Affairs Minutes N4: News Minutes
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4b.pdf
  • of Market Population Aged 35 to 44 0.16 0.16 Percent of Market Population Aged 45 to 64 0.22 0.23 Percent of Market Population Aged 65 or over 0.13 0.14 Percent of College Graduates in Market Population 0.28 0.24 Noncommercial (1=yes) 0.22 0.25 In Arbitron Metro (1=yes) 0.70 0.46 Segments Aired in Morning Drive 0.97 -- Segments Aired in Evening Drive 0.91 -- Band (1=FM) 0.58 0.37 Stations 1,013 89 There were also 89 station observations of the original 1,128 sampled that were excluded from the analysis because they were not recorded by EMR. For these stations, we obviously don't have any information about their airplay, but for all but the five LPFM stations in this group, BIA data are available. All
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/richman.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1997/richman.wp
  • Inc. v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co., 953 F.2d 1431 (1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1230 (1992). Richman then duly applied to the FCC for a declaratory judgment that the provision of the tariff limiting Sprint's liability is not a defense to its state law action. The Common Carrier Bureau of the FCC, acting pursuant to delegated authority, see 47 C.F.R. 0.91 (1996), rejected Richman's arguments and denied its petition. Without asking the Commission to review that decision Richman filed a petition for review in this court. We conclude that 5(c)(7) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. 155(c)(7), precludes the court from exercising jurisdiction over Richman's petition. That section makes the filing of an application for review by the Commission "a condition
• http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/intltele.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1999/intltele.wp
  • 1998, by the Chief of the FCC's Common Carrier Bureau, Implementation of the Payphone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Order No. DA 98-481, 13 FCC Rcd 4998 (Com. Car. Bur. 1998). The order was issued pursuant to authority delegated by the full Commission to the Common Carrier Bureau Chief. See 47 U.S.C. 155(c)(1); 47 C.F.R. 0.91 & 0.291. In April 1998, petitioners filed an application for full Commission review of the March 9 order, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 155(c)(1) (orders issued on authority delegated by the Commission "may be adopted, amended, or rescinded only by a vote of the majority of the members of the Commission then holding office"). Petitioners filed a petition for judicial review
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • (8) Chg. HUT Viewing '95- '00 Chg. Daily Paper Circ. per cap '93- '99 Chg. Weekly Paper Circ. per cap '93- '99 Chg. AQH List '94-'98 Chg. AQH News List '93-'97 Chg. Cable Use '94-'00 Int Use '00 Int News Use '00 Chg. TV Stns. '94-'00 0.6104 -0.0157 0.1023 0.0779 -0.0259 -0.3002 -0.7365 -0.6838 (1.84) (0.07) (0.14) (1.33) (0.78) (1.06) (0.91) (1.49) Chg. Inside Radio Stns '93-'97 -0.0898 -0.1078 -0.1958 0.0091 -0.1842 -0.1856 (1.01) (1.67) (1.02) (0.56) (2.43)* (0.85) Chg. Daily Papers '93-'99 -0.2157 1.4125 -0.1983 -0.0929 0.0028 -0.2911 1.3533 0.8029 (0.63) (5.72)** (0.27) (1.56) (0.08) (1.00) (1.62) (1.70) Chg. Weekly Papers '93-'99 0.0075 0.0203 0.0444 -0.0033 0.0024 0.0180 0.0504 0.0198 (0.39) (1.48) (1.09) (1.01) (1.24) (1.11) (1.08) (0.75) Chg. Inside
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • MSA White Pop ( 1) 0.0086 0.0085 0.0116 0.0085 0.0136 0.0095 0.0059 0.0093 (5.68)** (5.06)** (2.57)* (4.91)** (3.63)** (2.44)* (3.30)** (2.26)* MSA Black Pop ( 2) 0.0025 -0.0004 0.0156 -0.0005 0.0133 0.0264 0.0106 0.0259 (0.32) (0.05) (0.74) (0.06) (0.71) (1.32) (1.18) (1.22) Zip Black Fr. -0.1367 -0.1120 -0.0931 -0.1990 -0.1556 -0.0942 -0.1068 -0.1014 (19.45)** (15.44)** (5.91)** (6.16)** (9.82)** (6.00)** (15.11)** (0.91) Zip Black Fr.* White Pop ( 1- 1) -0.0426 -0.0419 -0.0712 -0.0397 -0.0687 -0.0726 -0.0397 -0.0665 (6.11)** (5.95)** (3.58)** (4.54)** (3.17)** (3.44)** (5.81)** (2.34)* Zip Black Fr.* Black Pop ( 2- 2) 0.1505 0.1221 0.1724 0.1172 0.2258 0.1791 0.1075 0.1755 (4.99)** (4.05)** (1.84) (3.18)** (2.21)* (1.80) (3.70)** (1.24) MSA Median Inc. (000) 0.002 -0.0009 (2.04)* (1.97)* MSA Fr. College Degree
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/citizens-global/DA-01-961A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/citizens-global/DA-01-961A1.txt
  • 18. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition to Impose Conditions of the Communications Workers of America IS DENIED. 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.103. 20. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.291, 0.101, 0.321, 0.51, 0.261, 0.331 and 0.131. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Deborah Lathen Chief, Cable Services Bureau Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau Thomas J. Sugrue Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/worldcom-intermedia/IntermediaOrderJan17.doc
  • Separate Stipulation and Order referred to herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that AT&T's ``Petition to Deny,'' filed in this proceeding IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Memorandum Opinion and Order SHALL BE EFFECTIVE upon release in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.103. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, 0.331. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Dorothy T. Attwood Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Donald Abelson Chief, International Bureau James D. Schlichting, Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau See In re Applications of Intermedia Communications, Inc., and WorldCom, Inc., Transferee, for Consent to Transfer Control of Corporations
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/worldcom-intermedia/da012727.pdf
  • media information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov DA 01-2727 Released: November 20, 2001 COMMON CARRIER, INTERNATIONAL, AND WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAUS MODIFY WORLDCOM-INTERMEDIA MERGER CONDITIONS CC Docket No. 00-206 Pursuant to sections 214 and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 214 and 310(d), and sections 63.01, 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 63.01, 0.51, 0.91, 0.131, 0.261, 0.291, and 0.331, the Common Carrier, Wireless Telecommunications, and International Bureaus (the Bureaus) grant WorldCom, Inc.'s (WorldCom's) request to modify a condition imposed in a January 17, 2001, Bureau-level Memorandum Opinion and Order (WorldCom-Intermedia Merger Order),1 which approved the transfer of control of