FCC Web Documents citing 1.10

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Country Austria 8.36 2.00 1.91 8.36 2.00 1.91 9.24 2.63 2.52 Belgium 3.05 1.23 1.12 3.05 2.33 1.89 3.98 3.26 2.69 Denmark 1.08 1.09 0.98 2.00 2.02 1.75 2.44 2.46 2.00 Finland 1.99 1.58 1.50 1.99 1.58 1.50 4.61 3.12 3.44 France 0.78 0.78 0.64 1.90 1.90 1.57 2.80 2.80 2.34 Germany 1.10 1.10 1.06 1.88 1.88 1.81 2.87 2.86 2.76 Greece n/a 2.01 n/a n/a 2.01 n/a n/a 2.87 n/a Italy 1.69 1.68 1.05 2.77 2.74 1.68 n/a n/a 2.41 Ireland n/a 2.44 1.05 n/a 4.60 1.68 n/a 5.75 2.37 Luxembourg n/a 2.23 2.36 n/a 2.23 2.36 n/a 2.23 2.36 Netherlands 2.20 1.30 1.05 2.20 1.78 1.48 2.77 2.29 1.78 Portugal n/a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • on non-SOLAS vessels through rule-makings for specific classes of vessels and equipment certification requirements. This agenda item would review the requirements included in S13 with the expectation of time-phased deletion of some of the non-GMDSS requirements. (February 7, 2001) U.S. VIEW: Radio Conference Subcommittee (RCS) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences DRAFT UNITED STATES PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-03 WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.10.1: to consider the results of studies, and take necessary actions, relating to exhaustion of the maritime mobile service identity numbering resource (Resolution 344 (WRC-97)); ISSUE: Presently Maritime mobile service identities (MMSIs) are required for many shipboard communications equipment (e.g., DSC, mobile earth stations). As the number of vessels carrying these systems increase, the availability of MMSIs have decreased. This is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2168A1.txt
  • but succeeded in adding the provision "to the extent required as a consequence of changes made in Article S25." U.S. VIEW: The U.S. believes there is no need to modify Article S25, except under agenda item 1.7.1 (Article S25.5). (April 10, 2001) 14 Radio Conference Subcommittee (RCS) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEW FOR WRC-03 WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.10.1: to consider the results of studies, and take necessary actions, relating to exhaustion of the maritime mobile service identity numbering resource (Resolution 344 (WRC-97)); ISSUE: Resolution 344 is on the agenda so that WRC-2003 may assess the status of MMSI assignments to administrations and determine whether there is an impending exhaustion of the MMSI numbering resource. BACKGROUND: Presently Maritime mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2216A1.txt
  • a fixed 10 percent bid increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a construction permit will be approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the construction permit. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the fixed percentage - i.e., (standing high bid) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedure for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. As stated above, until a bid has been placed on a construction permit, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • are evaluated on the basis of the overall equivalent protection margin, which includes the combined downlink and feeder-link contributions. In Region 2, an overall equivalent protection margin of 0 dB, or greater, indicates that the individual protection ratios have been met for the co-channel, the adjacent channels and the second adjacent channels. 1 The definitions in §§ 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10 and 1.11 of the Annex apply to these calculations. USA/xx/10 MOD 3.9.4 The guardbands at both the lower and upper edges may be used for transmission in the space operation service to provide space operations functions in accordance with No. 1.23 in support of thte operation of geostationary-satellite networks in the broadcasting-satellite service. USA/xx/11 NOC ANNEX 7 (WRC-2000) Orbital position
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • by X0 in the U.S. after the date this Agreement is executed by all parties only if the DOJ or the FBI find that the terms of this Agreement are inadequate to address national security, law enforcement or public safety concerns presented by that acquisition and the necessary modifications to this Agreement cannot be reached pursuant to Section 8.8 below. 1.10 "Domestic Communications Infrastructure" means (a) transmission and switching equipment (including software and upgrades) subject to control by a Domestic Communications Company and in use to provide, process, direct, control, supervise or manage Domestic VA01/GRlFJ/20093.12 4 Communications, and (b) facilities and equipment in use by or on behalf of a Domestic Communications Company that are physically located in the United States;
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2623A1.txt
  • increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a construction permit will be approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the construction permit. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the fixed percentage - i.e., minimum acceptable bid amount = (standing high bid) * (1.10){rounded}. We will round the result using our standard rounding procedure for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. At the start of the auction and until a bid has been placed on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2755A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2755A1.txt
  • the survey results should exceed a 3 percent share of total viewing hours and a net weekly circulation of 25 percent, by at least one standard error. The February 2000 reported results for KXLY-TV, with one standard error added, are 1.46 percent share of total viewing hours and a 15.67 percent net weekly circulation; for May 2000 the shares are 1.10 percent share of total viewing hours and a net weekly circulation of 18.30 percent. For February 2001, the reported results for KXLY-TV with the standard errors added are .95 percent share of total viewing hours and a net weekly circulation of 7.12 percent; for May 2001, the shares are 1.75 percent share of total viewing hours and a net weekly
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A2.txt
  • Attachment A-7 Objective VIII, Procedure 3 7 Performance Measurement No. 5 Mean time to clear network/average duration of trouble (Measured in hours) DS0 DS1 Texas Period BOC & Affiliates Non-Affiliates Variance Period BOC & Affiliates Non-AffiliatesVariance July 2000 2.96 4.36 (1.40) July 2000 2.28 4.24 (1.96) August 2000 2.17 4.18 (2.01) August 2000 2.49 3.03 (0.54) September 2000 2.70 3.80 (1.10) September 2000 2.16 2.92 (0.76) October 2000 3.43 3.38 0.05 October 2000 2.52 3.40 (0.88) November 2000 4.95 3.94 1.01 November 2000 2.52 3.14 (0.62) December 2000 3.03 4.74 (1.71) December 2000 2.88 3.87 (0.99) January 2001 2.33 4.15 (1.82) January 2001 2.54 3.56 (1.02) February 2001 3.25 3.74 (0.49) February 2001 2.42 3.13 (0.71) March 2001 3.42 3.36 0.06
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3071A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3071A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3071A1.txt
  • further studies to consider detailed requirements and ensure that the interests of existing services are taken into consideration in these studies, and to enable WRC-07 to review these requirementsany necessary action to be taken by WRC-06. II. Draft Proposals Approved by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/156(31.10.02) Agenda Item 1.10.1: to consider the results of studies, and take necessary actions, relating to exhaustion of the maritime mobile service identity numbering resource (Resolution 344 (WRC-97)); Background Information: This agenda item addresses the potential of an impending exhaustion of the Maritime Mobile Service Identities (MMSI) numbering resource. Resolution 344 instructs the Radiocommunication Bureau to monitor the status of the MMSI resource and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1128A1.txt
  • use a 10 percent bid increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a construction permit will be approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the construction permit. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the increment percentage - i.e., (standing high bid) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedure for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. As stated above, until a bid has been placed on a construction permit, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1547A1.txt
  • use a 10 percent bid increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a construction permit will be approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the construction permit. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the increment percentage - i.e., (standing high bid) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedure for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. As stated above, until a bid has been placed on a construction permit, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2738A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2738A2.txt
  • Block_Divide_Factor 1 Cluster_Algorithm 4 Optimization_Method 1000 Maximum_populated_cells 1 Use_hcpm.mdb 1 True-up_line_counts Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2738 APPENDIX G MSM Loop Input Modifications ­ HCPM Inputs 15 Feeder / Distribution Inputs Value Variable Name Comments 0.5 max_drop_length 0.5 user_lambda 12 copper_gauge_xover 12 max_copper_distance 1.25 MaxCopperPenalty 12 copper_t1_xover 0 t1_fiber_xover 1.25 t1_redundancy_factor 24 copper_placement_depth 36 fiber_placement_depth 3 CriticalWaterDepth 1.3 WaterFactor 12 MinSlopeTrigger 1.10 MinSlopeFactor 30 MaxSlopeTrigger 1.05 MaxSlopeFactor 1.20 CombSlopeFactor 0.0000% pct_ds1 0.00% pct_lsa 24 ChannelsPerT1System 2 PairsPerT1System 4 FibersPerTerminal 2016 CapacityF2016 1344 CapacityF1344 672 CapacityF672 96 CapacityF96 24 CapacityF24 96 CapacityT96 24 CapacityT24 10 lines_per_bus 1.00 DistRoadFactor 1.00 FiberFillFactor 1 DistanceType 1.00 FeederRoadFactor 2 Max_SAIsMaximum number of SAI's placed in a cluster Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2738 APPENDIX G MSM Loop Input
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A1.txt
  • of the United States and in no manner controls land-based transport network(s) or their associated systems in the Untied States. See id. at Art. 1.11. A ``domestic communications company'' means a subsidiary or other component of New GX, or any entity over which New GX has de facto or de jure control, that provides domestic communications. See id. at Art. 1.10. Domestic communications is wire communications or electronic communications, whether stored or not, from one U.S. location to another U.S. location as well as the U.S. portion of a wire or electronic communication that originates or terminates in the United States. See id. at Art. 1.9. See id. at Art. 3.3. See id. at Art. 3 (including provisions, inter alia, on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • means the US. Department of Defense. 1.8. ``m' means the US. Department of Justice. 1.9. "Domestic Communications" means (i) Wire Communications or Electronic Communications (whether stored or not) from one US. location to another U.S. location and (ii) the U.S. portion of a Wire Communication or Electronic Communication (whether stored or not) that originates or terminates in the United States. 1.10. "Domestic Communications Company" means all those subsidiaries, divisions, departments, branches, other components of New GX and any other entity over which New GX has de facto or de jure control that provide Domestic Communications. If any subsidiary, division, department, branch, other component of New GX or any other entity over which New GX has de facto or de jure control
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1020A1.txt
  • use a 10 percent bid increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a construction permit will be approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the construction permit. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the increment percentage - i.e., (standing high bid) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedure for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. As stated above, until a bid has been placed on a construction permit, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.txt
  • to the Radio Regulations, and without the imposition of any additional or particular constraints on the FSS or the use of the FSS bands. One of the FSS allocations is the bands covered by the Allotment Plan in Appendix 30B. The United States supports the use of the Appendix 30B bands for this particular application. The use of agenda item 1.10 and changes to the regulatory procedures and technical criteria in Appendix 30B to make these bands more useful is supported, but replanning of the allotment Plan is neither necessary nor supported. DRAFT UNITED STATES PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.21: to consider the results of studies regarding the compatibility between the radio astronomy service and the active space
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1_Erratum.doc
  • to the Radio Regulations, and without the imposition of any additional or particular constraints on the FSS or the use of the FSS bands. One of the FSS allocations is the bands covered by the Allotment Plan in Appendix 30B. The United States supports the use of the Appendix 30B bands for this particular application. The use of agenda item 1.10 and changes to the regulatory procedures and technical criteria in Appendix 30B to make these bands more useful is supported, but replanning of the allotment Plan is neither necessary nor supported. DRAFT UNITED STATES PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.21: to consider the results of studies regarding the compatibility between the radio astronomy service and the active space
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1699A1.txt
  • use a 10 percent bid increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a construction permit will be approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the construction permit. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the increment percentage - i.e., (standing high bid) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedure for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. At the start of the auction and until a bid has been placed on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 1.8 ``DOJ'' means the U.S. Department of Justice. 1.9 ``Domestic Communications'' means (a) Wire Communications or Electronic Communications (whether stored or not) from one U.S. location to another U.S. location and (b) the U.S. portion of a Wire Communication or Electronic Communication (whether stored or not) that originates or terminates in the United States. 1.10 ``Domestic Communications Infrastructure'' means (a) transmission, switching, bridging and routing equipment (including software and upgrades) used by or on behalf of VSNL America to provide, process, direct, control, supervise or manage Domestic Communications;(b) facilities and equipment used by or on behalf of VSNL America that are physically located in the United States; and (c) facilities used by or on behalf
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-278A1.txt
  • Commission proposed the use of a 10 percent bid increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a license is approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the license. The minimum acceptable bid amount is calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the increment percentage - i.e., (standing high bid) * (1.10). The result is rounded using the Bureau's standard rounding procedures for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. The Commission further proposed that the Bureau retain the discretion to change the minimum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3198A1.txt
  • proposes to use a 10 percent bid increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the license. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the increment percentage - i.e., (standing high bid) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. As stated above, until a bid has been placed on a license, the minimum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.txt
  • ATC Application at 22. Letter with attachments from Lon C, Levin to the FCC Secretary dated Sept. 22, 2004. See MSV ATC Application, Appendix D. See ATC Report and Order, Appendix C2 § 3.1, and Comments of TMI, Motient, and MSV filed on Oct. 22, 2001 in Docket No. 01-185, at 7-11. See ATC Report and Order, Appendix C2 § 1.10. The calculation assumes that 30% of active mobile terminals are operating outdoors with full-rate duty-cycles, 30% are operating in vehicles at quarter-rate duty cycle, and 40% are operating in buildings with an average 18% duty cycle. ATC Report and Order, Appendix C2 § 1.10. Since the carrier to noise density ratio required to send digital data through a radio communication
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3985A1.txt
  • proposed to use a 10 percent bid increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the license. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the increment percentage - i.e., (standing high bid) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bids and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1047A1.txt
  • times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded - e.g., if the bid increment percentage is 5 percent, then the next bid amount will equal (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.05, rounded, the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.15, rounded, etc. We will begin the auction with a bid increment percentage of 5%. Note that the bid increment percentage need not be the same as the minimum acceptable bid
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1076A1.txt
  • be equal to the amount of the provisionally winning bid plus an additional amount. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage - e.g., if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. The nine acceptable bid amounts for each construction permit consist of the minimum acceptable bid amount and additional amounts calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and the bid increment percentage. We will round the results using our standard rounding procedures. The first additional acceptable bid amount equals the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1337A1.txt
  • 10 percent. This means that the minimum acceptable bid amount for a construction permit will be approximately 10 percent greater than the provisionally winning bid amount for the construction permit. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage - i.e., (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bid amounts and bid increments amounts if it determines that circumstances so dictate. We received no comment on this issue. We adopt our proposal and will begin the auction with a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10%. In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1555A1.txt
  • e.g., if the bid increment percentage is 5 percent, the calculation is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.05), rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.05, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times the sum of one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times the sum of one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.15, rounded; etc. Note that the bid increment percentage need not be the same as the minimum acceptable bid percentage. In the case of a license for which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1598A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1598A1.txt
  • 10 percent. This means that the minimum acceptable bid amount for a construction permit will be approximately 10 percent greater than the provisionally winning bid amount for the construction permit. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage - i.e., (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bid amounts and bid increments amounts if we determine that circumstances so dictate. One commenter suggests reducing the minimum bid increment to five percent after ten rounds or once the high bid exceeds $100,000, arguing that the ten
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-171A1.txt
  • for that license will be equal to the amount of the provisionally winning bid plus an additional amount. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus an increment percentage - e.g., if the increment percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. For Auction No. 60, the Bureau proposes to use a bid increment of 10 percent. This means that the minimum acceptable bid amount for a license will be approximately 10 percent greater than the provisionally winning bid amount for the license. The nine acceptable bid amounts for each license
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-194A1.txt
  • percentage, rounded - e.g., if the bid increment percentage is 5 percent, the calculation is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.05), rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.05, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.15, rounded; etc. Note that the bid increment percentage need not be the same as the minimum acceptable bid percentage. In the case of a license for which the provisionally winning
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2188A1.txt
  • times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded - e.g., if the bid increment percentage is 5 percent, then the next bid amount will equal (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.05, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.15, rounded; etc. We will begin the auction with a bid increment percentage of 5 percent. Note that the bid increment percentage need not be the same as the minimum acceptable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2423A1.txt
  • bid amount for each construction permit are calculated using a bid increment percentage. The first additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded - e.g., if the increment percentage is 10 percent, the calculation is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.10), rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.20, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2481A1.txt
  • networks in the band 620-790 MHz, sharing studies underway in the ITU-R need to demonstrate that BSS deployment in this band will not negatively impact the current and future use of this band by terrestrial services. US interests should participate in these ITU-R studies. INFORMAL WORKING GROUP 5 (IWG-5) Regulatory Issues Document WAC/071(14.09.05): Preliminary Views on WRC-07 WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.10 to review the regulatory procedures and associated technical criteria of Appendix 30B without any action on the allotments, the existing systems or the assignments in the List of Appendix 30B. 1) General Views on Agenda Item 1.10 Issue Appendix 30B delineates allotments within portions of C-band and Ku-band for each country; each allotment provides for national coverage under specific technical
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2987A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2987A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2987A1.txt
  • bid amount for each construction permit are calculated using a bid increment percentage. The first additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded - e.g., if the increment percentage is 10 percent, the calculation is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.10), rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.20, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-506A1.txt
  • be equal to the amount of the provisionally winning bid plus an additional amount. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage - e.g., if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. The nine acceptable bid amounts for each construction permit consist of the minimum acceptable bid amount and additional amounts calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and the bid increment percentage. We will round the results using our standard rounding procedures. The first additional acceptable bid amount equals the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-737A1_Erratum.pdf
  • amount for the license. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage ­ e.g., if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount calculation is (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1 + 0.10), rounded or (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures.108 We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bid amounts and bid increments amounts if it determines that circumstances so dictate.109 We received no comment on this issue. We will begin the auction with a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10%. In each round, each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1810A1.txt
  • the construction permit. After there is a provisionally winning bid for a construction permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage, which need not be the same as the percentage used to calculate the minimum acceptable bid amount. The first additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded. If, for example, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1949A1.txt
  • 10 percent. This means that the minimum acceptable bid amount for a construction permit will be approximately 10 percent greater than the provisionally winning bid amount for the construction permit. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage - i.e., (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. We further proposed to retain the discretion to change the minimum acceptable bid amounts and bid increments amounts if we determine that circumstances so dictate. Mullaney asserts that our proposed bid increments are too low. We reject Mullaney's suggestion that bid increments be increased to two, three, four, and five
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2248A1.txt
  • for the construction permit. After there is a provisionally winning bid for a permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. In the Auction No. 70 Comment Public Notice, we proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. The Bureaus did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in the previous FM auctions assures us that a bid increment percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.txt
  • acceptable bid amount for each license are calculated using a bid increment percentage. The first additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded - e.g., if the increment percentage is 10 percent, the calculation is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.10), rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.20, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-299A1.txt
  • percentage, rounded. For example, if the bid increment percentage is 5 percent, the calculation is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.05), rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.05, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.15, rounded; etc. Note that the bid increment percentage need not be the same as the minimum acceptable bid percentage. In the Auction No. 65 Comment Public Notice, we proposed to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-388A1.txt
  • percentage, rounded. If, for example, the bid increment percentage is 5 percent, the calculation is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.05), rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.05, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.15, rounded; etc. We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures. For Auction No. 67, the Bureau proposes to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. This
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-3A1.txt
  • e.g., if the bid increment percentage is five percent, the calculation is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.05), rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.05, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times the sum of one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times the sum of one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.15, rounded; etc. Note that the bid increment percentage need not be the same as the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For Auction No. 65, the Bureau proposes to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • charter to provide to the FCC ``proposals for WRC 07'' It is proposed that: IWG-4 report to the WAC that there is widespread support, with the dissenting view of the broadcasters, for ``no new spectrum allocations'' and the suppression of 544. INFORMAL WORKING GROUP 5 (IWG-5) Regulatory Issues DOCUMENT WAC/106(27.04.06): DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.10: to review the regulatory procedures and associated technical criteria of Appendix 30B without any action on the allotments, the existing systems or the assignments in the List of Appendix 30B. Background Information: As stated in § 1.1 of Appendix 30B the objective of the Plan ``is to guarantee in practice, for all countries, equitable access to the geostationary-satellite orbit in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-997A1.txt
  • the construction permit. After there is a provisionally winning bid for a construction permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage, which need not be the same as the percentage used to calculate the minimum acceptable bid amount. The first additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded. If, for example, the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • Source Relative to That With Baseline Generator (ATSC997) D/U Ratio Relative to Baseline (dB) Channel Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -1.37 -0.01 -1.54 -1.42 -1.39 -1.96 -1.29 -6.29 -1.28 0.60 N-4 -1.15 -0.11 -1.00 -1.44 -1.16 -1.51 -1.03 -5.16 -1.06 0.46 N-3 -1.03 -0.88 -0.98 -0.57 -1.10 -1.50 -1.06 -5.70 -1.02 0.28 N-2 -1.21 -0.56 -0.96 -1.63 -1.14 -1.42 -0.90 -4.82 -1.12 0.35 N+2 -1.28 -1.50 -1.27 -1.44 -0.75 -1.30 -1.12 -4.49 -1.24 0.25 Mean -1.21 -0.61 -1.15 -1.30 -1.11 -1.54 -1.08 -5.29 -1.14 Std Dev 0.13 0.61 0.25 0.42 0.23 0.25 0.14 0.72 0.40 Note: The overall means and standard deviations (lower right corner of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • Population Aged 45 to 64 0.12 0.31 0.22 0.22 0.02 Percent of Market Population Aged 65 or over 0.03 0.35 0.13 0.13 0.03 Percent of College Graduates in Market Population 0.10 0.55 0.28 0.27 0.08 Noncommercial (1=yes) 0 1 0.22 0.17 0.41 In Arbitron Metro (1=yes) 0 1 0.70 0.64 0.46 Segments Aired in Morning Drive 0 5 0.97 0.97 1.10 Segments Aired in Evening Drive 0 6 0.91 0.93 1.00 Band (1=FM) 0 1 0.58 0.65 0.49 N=1,013 Table II-6 - ZINB Regression Results: News Dependent Variable Independent Variables P-value Factor E[y|x] P-value Factor Pr(y=0|z) In-Market Stations Owned by Parent -0.0410 0.1630 0.9598 -0.0966 0.1060 0.9080 -6.45 Out-of-Market Stations Owned by Parent -0.0001 0.2220 0.9999 -0.0007** 0.0260 0.9993 -0.01 Distance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 0.26 0.09 0.00 1.00 281 Percent Live, Evening 0.65 0.78 0.00 1.00 281 Percent Advertisements, Evening 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.48 281 Percent Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.93 281 Percent Music, Evening 0.51 0.69 0.00 1.00 281 Percent News, Evening 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.61 281 Percent Sports, Evening 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.93 281 Average Block, Advertisements, AM Drive 1.42 1.10 0.00 10.75 255 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, AM Drive 2.11 1.00 0.00 17.63 255 Average Block, Music, AM Drive 1.89 2.22 0.00 8.44 255 Average Block, News, AM Drive 0.76 0.58 0.00 7.42 255 Average Block, Sports, AM Drive 0.59 0.00 0.00 7.29 255 Average Block, Advertisements, Evening 1.20 1.00 0.00 7.50 281 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, Evening 0.82 0.18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 43 Table 11: Total State and Local Poll Coverage (in seconds) Independent variables (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Local station ownership Cross-owned newspaper 3.3 (1.41) 2.3 (0.57) 0.1 (0.04) 0.4 (0.13) -0.5 (0.17) Cross-owned radio station -10.9 (1.63) -9.6 (1.44) -10.7 (1.44) -11.0 (1.44) Cross-owned radio and newspaper 9.7 (1.10) 10.9 (1.30) 11.5 (1.39) 13.1 (1.58) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 0.3 (1.55) 0.4 (1.50) 0.4 (1.55) Network owned and operated -10.2* (1.83) -9.9 (1.28) -9.7 (1.30) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC 3.3 (0.51) -7.1 (0.96) CBS -4.5 (0.87) -15.3** (2.07) FOX 0.2 (0.03) -0.4 (0.06) NBC -3.3 (0.57) -13.9* (1.75) Other control variables Time
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1944A1.txt
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. In the Auction 85 Comment Public Notice, we proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. The Bureaus did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in the previous broadcast auctions assures us that a bid increment percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, we will begin the auction with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-448A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-448A2.txt
  • 12/5/05 1359 6.00 18 13.00 12/5/05 1354 5.20 19 15.00 12/5/05 1350 3.30 Figure 1 Sheet 2 of 7 Valcom AM Broadcast Antenna (85 foot with Valcosphere) Operating Frequency: 1200 kHz 40 Degree Radial Point Distance Time Field Strength Desig. (km) Date (local) (mV/m) 1 0.25 11/28/05 1601 470 2 0.50 11/28/05 1610 195 3 0.75 11/28/05 1618 140 4 1.10 11/28/05 1625 100 5 1.48 11/28/05 1353 64.0 6 1.76 11/28/05 1520 54.0 7 2.00 11/28/05 1345 50.5 8 3.00 11/28/05 1339 24.5 9 4.00 11/28/05 1335 17.0 10 5.00 11/28/05 1331 10.0 11 6.00 11/28/05 1328 7.50 12 7.00 11/28/05 1324 5.40 13 9.10 11/28/05 1319 4.00 14 11.00 11/28/05 1312 3.10 15 13.00 11/28/05 1306 2.00 16 14.70
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-460A1.txt
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage, which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A1.txt
  • license, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. In the case of a license for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the license. For Auction 87, the Bureau proposes to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. This means that the minimum acceptable bid amount for a license will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 03-1836, 18 FCC Rcd 11,154 (WTB 2003). 29 Bidders must have sufficient eligibility to place a bid on the particular license. See Section III.C.1. "Upfront Payments and Bidding Eligibility," above. 6164 plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.30 In the case of a license for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the license.31 43.For Auction 87, the Bureau proposes to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. This means that the minimum acceptable bid amount for a license will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2588A1.txt
  • of 2010. Accordingly, the projected demand and expenses are as follows: ($ millions) Program Demand Projected Program Support Admin. Expenses Application Of Interest Income Application of Periodic True-Ups & Prior Period Adjustment Total Program Collection Schools and Libraries 544.31 18.19 (4.01) 36.48 594.97 Rural Health Care 51.76 2.59 (0.31) 3.17 57.21 High-Cost 1,106.31 7.61 (0.26) (15.55) 1,098.11 Low Income 309.97 1.10 (0.05) 45.23 356.25 TOTAL 2,012.35 29.49 (4.63) 69.33 2,106.54 USAC Projections of Industry Revenues USAC submitted projected collected end-user telecommunications revenues for January through March 2010 based on information contained in the First Quarter 2010 Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-Q). The amount is as follows: Total Projected Collected Interstate and International End-User Telecommunications Revenues for First Quarter 2010: $17.254235
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-422A1.txt
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage, which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.txt
  • and Information Administration (NTIA), on behalf of the Executive Branch Agencies, approved the release of two additional draft Executive Branch preliminary views for the 2011 World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-11). These draft preliminary view considers the Federal agency inputs toward the development of the U.S. Proposals for WRC-11. The enclosure contains draft preliminary views that address WRC-11 Agenda Items 1.9 and 1.10. These preliminary views are forwarded for your consideration and review by your WRC-11 Advisory Committee. Darlene Drazenovich of my staff is the primary contact for NTIA. Sincerely, (Original Signed January 21, 2009) Karl B. Nebbia Associate Administrator Office of Spectrum Management Enclosure 24 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-11 AGENDA ITEM 1.9: to revise frequencies and channeling
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-810A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-810A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-810A2.txt
  • a permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. In the Auction 79 Comment Public Notice, we proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. The Bureaus did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a bid increment percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, we will begin the auction with a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-810A2_Rcd.pdf
  • a permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.176 144.In the Auction 79 Comment Public Notice, we proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. The Bureaus did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a bid increment percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, we will begin the auctionwith a minimum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-125A1.txt
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage, which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-125A1_Rcd.pdf
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.31If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit.32 39. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage, which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1351A1.txt
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage, which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1351A1_Rcd.pdf
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.27If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit.28 32. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage,which need
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A2.txt
  • Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations USA/AI 1.4/1 NOC Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 5 010-5 030 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) (space-to-space) 5.328B 5.443B 5.367 Reason: To ensure protection of RNSS systems. ____________________ 22 DOCUMENT WAC/086(28.07.10) WAC Informal Working Group (IWG)-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DRAFT PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.10: to examine the frequency allocation requirements with regard to operation of safety systems for ships and ports and associated regulatory provisions, in accordance with Resolution 357 (WRC-07) Background Information: Simplex Use of Duplex Channels The Radio Regulations Board approved a Rule of Procedure after WRC-07 regarding simplex use in Appendix 18, effectively implementing this part of the enclosed proposal. WRC-07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A2_Rcd.pdf
  • Frequency Allocations Section IV ­ Table of Frequency Allocations USA/AI 1.4/1 NOC Allocation to services Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 5010-5030 AERONAUTICAL RADIONAVIGATION RADIONAVIGATION-SATELLITE (space-to-Earth) (space-to-space) 5.328B 5.443B 5.367 Reason: To ensure protection of RNSS systems. ____________________ 10240 DOCUMENT WAC/086(28.07.10) WAC Informal Working Group (IWG)-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DRAFT PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.10: to examine the frequency allocation requirements with regard to operation of safety systems for ships and ports and associated regulatory provisions, in accordance with Resolution 357 (WRC-07) Background Information: Simplex Use of Duplex Channels The Radio Regulations Board approved a Rule of Procedure after WRC-07 regarding simplex use in Appendix 18, effectively implementing this part of the enclosed proposal. WRC-07
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3.txt
  • Administration: 2 Document WAC/068(28.07.10) Ms. Mindel De La Torre Chief of the International Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Dear Ms. De La Torre: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) on behalf of the Executive Branch agencies, approves the release of two draft Executive Branch proposals for WRC-12 agenda items 1.6 (Resolution 950) and 1.10. For agenda item 1.6 (Resolution 950), NTIA proposes to modify No. 5.565 to update the list of use of 275 ­ 3 000 GHz by the passive services. NTIA also proposes a mobile-satellite service (Earth-to-space) allocation for Appendix 18 Channels 75 and 76 to improve satellite detection of the Automatic Identification System under agenda item 1.10. NTIA considered the Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1408A3_Rcd.pdf
  • Administration: 10259 Document WAC/068(28.07.10) Ms. Mindel De La Torre Chief of the International Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Dear Ms. De La Torre: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) on behalf of the Executive Branch agencies, approves the release of two draft Executive Branch proposals for WRC-12 agenda items 1.6 (Resolution 950) and 1.10. For agenda item 1.6 (Resolution 950), NTIA proposes to modify No. 5.565 to update the list of use of 275 ­ 3 000 GHz by the passive services. NTIA also proposes a mobile-satellite service (Earth-to-space) allocation for Appendix 18 Channels 75 and 76 to improve satellite detection of the Automatic Identification System under agenda item 1.10. NTIA considered the Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1711A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1711A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1711A1.txt
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit. The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage, which
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1711A1_Rcd.pdf
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.25If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit.26 34.The eight additional bid amounts are calculated using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment percentage, which need
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1747A1.txt
  • in the Schedule B of the application and the average EIRP density calculated from other parameters. Specifically, for the 1M10G7W emission, DTS indicates the maximum EIRP density per carrier for the ESV is -24.9 dBW/4kHz (Question E49). However, we calculate an average value of +12.2 dBW/4kHz as derived from the maximum EIRP per carrier of 36.6 dBW (Question E48) and 1.10 megahertz necessary bandwidth (Question E47). Similarly, for the 1M76G7W emission, DTS indicates that the maximum EIRP density per carrier for the ESV is -24.9 dBW/4kHz (Question E49). This value is less than the average value of +10.5 dBW/4kHz as derived from the maximum EIRP per carrier of 36.9 dBW (Question E48) and 1.76 megahertz necessary bandwidth (Question E47). Furthermore, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1747A1_Rcd.pdf
  • in the Schedule B of the application and the average EIRP density calculated from other parameters. Specifically, for the 1M10G7W emission, DTS indicates the maximum EIRP density per carrier for the ESV is -24.9 dBW/4kHz (Question E49). However, we calculate an average value of +12.2 dBW/4kHz as derived from the maximum EIRP per carrier of 36.6 dBW (Question E48) and 1.10 megahertz necessary bandwidth (Question E47). Similarly, for the 1M76G7W emission, DTS indicates that the maximum EIRP density per carrier for the ESV is -24.9 dBW/4kHz (Question E49). This value is less than the average value of +10.5 dBW/4kHz as derived from the maximum EIRP per carrier of 36.9 dBW (Question E48) and 1.76 megahertz necessary bandwidth (Question E47). Furthermore, for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-18A1.txt
  • a license, the minimum acceptable bid will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. In the case of a license for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the license. For Auction 87, the Bureau proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. This means that the minimum acceptable bid amount for a license will be
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-18A1_Rcd.pdf
  • a license, the minimum acceptable bid will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.187 In the case of a license for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the license.188 175. For Auction 87, the Bureau proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. This means that the minimum acceptable bid amount for a license will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2008A1.txt
  • a permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. In the Auction 90 Comment Public Notice, the Bureaus proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. The Bureaus did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, the Bureaus will begin the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2008A1_Rcd.pdf
  • a permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.170 136. In the Auction 90 Comment Public Notice, the Bureaus proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. The Bureaus did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, the Bureaus will begin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2060A3_Rcd.pdf
  • the National Telecommunications and Information Administration: 18619 Document WAC/088(26.10.10) Ms. Mindel De La Torre Chief of the International Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Dear Ms. De La Torre: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), on behalf of the Executive Branch agencies, approves the release of draft Executive Branch proposals for WRC-12 agenda items 1.10 (Resolution 357) and 1.14. NTIA considered the Federal agencies' input toward the development of U.S. proposals for WRC-12. NTIA forwards this package for consideration and review by your WRC-12 Advisory Committee. Dr. Darlene Drazenovich is the primary contact from my staff. Sincerely, (Original Signed August 10, 2010) Karl B. Nebbia Associate Administrator Office of Spectrum Management 18620 UNITED STATES OF
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2253A1.txt
  • a permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. In the Auction 91 Comment Public Notice, the Bureaus proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. The Bureaus did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, the Bureaus will begin the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2253A1_Rcd.pdf
  • a permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.182 147. In the Auction 91 Comment Public Notice, the Bureaus proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. The Bureaus did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, the Bureaus will begin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • and approved within the National Telecommunications and Information Administration: 2 Document WAC/055(02.03.10) Mr. Roderick Porter Acting Chief of the International Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Dear Mr. Porter: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) on behalf of the Executive Branch agencies, approves the release of draft Executive Branch proposals for WRC-12 agenda item 1.10. NTIA proposes an exclusive allocation to the maritime mobile service in 495-505 kHz, and a primary allocation to the maritime mobile service for Region 2 in 510-525 kHz. NTIA also proposes exclusive allocations to the maritime mobile, aeronautical mobile (OR) and mobile-satellite (Earth-to-space) services in the 161.9625-161.9875 MHz and 162.0125-162.0375 MHz bands restricted to automatic identification system emissions operating in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • and approved within the National Telecommunications and Information Administration: 2183 Document WAC/055(02.03.10) Mr. Roderick Porter Acting Chief of the International Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Dear Mr. Porter: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) on behalf of the Executive Branch agencies, approves the release of draft Executive Branch proposals for WRC-12 agenda item 1.10. NTIA proposes an exclusive allocation to the maritime mobile service in 495-505 kHz, and a primary allocation to the maritime mobile service for Region 2 in 510-525 kHz. NTIA also proposes exclusive allocations to the maritime mobile, aeronautical mobile (OR) and mobile-satellite (Earth-to-space) services in the 161.9625-161.9875 MHz and 162.0125-162.0375 MHz bands restricted to automatic identification system emissions operating in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-524A1.txt
  • a permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. In the Auction 88 Comment Public Notice, the Bureaus proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. The Bureaus did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, the Bureaus will begin the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1513A1.txt
  • the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the FCC will calculate the minimum acceptable bid amount by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit. The FCC will calculate the eight additional bid amounts using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1513A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the FCC will calculate the minimum acceptable bid amount by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.23If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally 20See, e.g., Auction of 800 MHz SMR Upper 10 MHz Band, Minimum Opening Bids or Reserve Prices, Order, 12 FCC Rcd 16354, DA 97-2147 (WTB 1997); Auction of the Phase II 220 MHz Service Licenses, Auction Notice and Filing Requirements for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1525A1.txt
  • and any attempted assignment or transfer in violation of this provision is void. Severability and Survival of Obligations. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement will not be affected thereby, and each remaining provision of this Agreement will be valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. Sections 1.1 - 1.10, 2, 4, 5, and 6 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with Federal law. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the Supplemental Protective Order constitute the parties' entire understanding with regard to the matters herein, and there are no other understandings, either written or unwritten, with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1845A1.txt
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. In the Auction 93 Comment Public Notice, we proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. We did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, we will begin the auction with a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1845A1_Rcd.pdf
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded.172 136. In the Auction 93 Comment Public Notice, we proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. We didnot receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, we will begin the auction with a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • 0.64 $29.77 0.66 2008 412 $44.91 0.45 $32.08 0.40 $29.47 0.40 408 $25.84 0.61 $30.07 0.62 Second operator subgroup (all) 2009 140 $43.58 0.82 $33.43 0.74 $31.98 0.73 137 $32.46 1.15 $30.48 0.94 2008 140 $46.03 0.64 $33.46 0.75 $30.41 0.85 137 $33.72 1.14 $33.56 1.01 Second operator subgroup (incumbents) 2009 70 $43.10 0.86 $36.34 0.74 $35.38 0.82 70 $30.87 1.10 $34.77 1.08 2008 70 $45.87 0.61 $36.27 0.75 $33.54 0.98 70 $34.34 1.25 $38.07 1.13 Second operator subgroup (rivals) 2009 70 $45.84 2.37 $19.69 2.41 $15.97 1.59 67 $40.25 4.06 $9.36 1.54 2008 70 $46.76 2.33 $20.18 2.38 $15.63 1.55 67 $30.68 2.75 $11.36 2.19 DBS subgroup 2009 207 $44.47 1.01 $33.79 0.89 $32.28 0.90 207 $23.21 0.85 $29.27 0.91
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2.txt
  • analysis shows that e-Navigation would require global harmonization of data communications systems. IMO technical bodies have identified that countries could not deploy e-Navigation without an ITU review of the Radio Regulations, to accommodate advanced maritime communication systems. This proposal does not prejudice United States proposals for the work of WRC-07 affecting the maritime services, including, without limitation, Agenda Items 1.9, 1.10, and 1.23. Proposal: MOD USA/8.2 /1 RESOLUTION 806 (REV. WRC-0712) Preliminary aAgenda for the 2015 World Radiocommunication Conference The World Radiocommunication Conference (Geneva, 20072012), Reasons: To modify the agenda for WRC-15 to add a new item. ADD USA/8.2/2 2.XYZ to consider regulatory changes to support implementation of e-Navigation within the maritime mobile service and any possible regulatory action, as necessary,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A2_Rcd.pdf
  • analysis shows that e-Navigation would require global harmonization of data communications systems. IMO technical bodies have identified that countries could not deploy e-Navigation without an ITU review of the Radio Regulations, to accommodate advanced maritime communication systems. This proposal does not prejudice United States proposals for the work of WRC-07 affecting the maritime services, including, without limitation, Agenda Items 1.9, 1.10, and 1.23. Proposal: MOD USA/8.2 /1 RESOLUTION 806 (REV. WRC-0712) Preliminary aAgenda for the 2015 World Radiocommunication Conference The World Radiocommunication Conference (Geneva, 20072012), Reasons: To modify the agenda for WRC-15 to add a new item. ADD USA/8.2/2 2.XYZ to consider regulatory changes to support implementation of e-Navigation within the maritime mobile service and any possible regulatory action, as necessary,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.txt
  • (Rev.WRC-07) Transition to the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) NOC RES 339 (Rev.WRC-03) Coordination of NAVTEX services NOC ATTACHMENT 15 RESOLUTION FCC NTIA Comments WRC-12 Agenda Item RES 342 (Rev.WRC-2000) New technologies to provide improved efficiency in the use of the band 156-174 MHz by stations in the maritime mobile service NOC May require suppression as consequence of AI1.10 action. RES 343 (WRC-97) Maritime certification for personnel of ship stations and ship earth stations for which a radio installation is not compulsory NOC ANNEX Examination syllabus for radio operator's certificates appropriate to vessels using the frequencies and techniques of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System on a non-compulsory basis NOC RES 344 (Rev.WRC-03) Management of the maritime mobile
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3_Rcd.pdf
  • cations NOC RES 356 (WRC-07 ) ITU ma ritim e se rvice in form atio n registration NOC RES 357 (WRC-07 ) Co nsid eration of reg ulatory prov ision s an d spectrum allocations for use by enha nce d m aritim e safety syste ms for s hips and ports MOD Consequential revision. Linked with RES.342 and RES.351. 1.10 RES 405 Relating to t he use of freque ncies of the a eronautical mobile (R) service NOC RES 413 (Rev. WR C-07) U se of the band 108- 117. 975 MH z by aerona utical mobile (R) service MOD Consequential revision. This Resolution is referred to in No. 5.19 7A. 1.4 RES 416 (WRC-07 ) Use of the b
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-732A3.txt
  • 967677 960088 952982 69.20 68.75 68.41 68.03 67.76 11350.19 11434.57 1251441 1236690 1223238 94.98 94.29 93.56 92.63 92.06 13721.87 14092.27 1525317 1514020 1502409 87.11 86.72 86.26 85.72 85.40 16431.33 16556.88 1342231 1334506 1325527 74.03 73.67 73.34 72.99 72.78 15376.12 15525.86 307672 315459 319368 2.86 2.92 2.99 3.05 3.11 9857.70 10362.71 196161 201585 176.46 179.44 183.77 188.13 193.33 116711 118171 1.08 1.10 1.14 1.15 1.16 4312526 4401335 4450030 58.29 59.59 61.05 62.42 63.06 148232.82 160448.91 1153796 1179280 1199297 33.83 34.65 35.52 36.34 36.74 27414.11 29321.14 3158730 3222055 3250733 82.17 83.94 85.98 87.90 88.77 120818.70 131127.67 59131287 59619290 60045068 193.06 194.49 195.60 197.04 197.85 1594653.551649437.67 4352828 4401266 4432571 172.98 174.42 174.87 176.07 173.26 130348.72 134552.22 124812 125979 127065 37.82 38.10 38.41 38.72 38.61
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-187A2_Rcd.pdf
  • 335 179 38 118,273 48,413 20.35 2,440.41 79,412.07 3,310.03 8.84 15.51 2.58 5,033.73 17.70 UT 10,413 91 60 28 8 5,248 22,989 72.18 729.09 23,766.92 3,006.67 10.18 66.09 0.00 385.11 0.90 VA 10,336 431 236 85 22 65,386 3,499 20.10 788.86 6,641.23 2,992.35 0.92 2.40 0.00 985.47 146.08 VT 4,503 173 90 14 3 37,538 1,655 4.81 442.30 2,659.01 163.53 1.10 0.05 0.00 341.63 12.16 WA 15,349 315 160 37 17 57,162 24,267 5.68 1,088.31 44,466.89 4,603.23 2.38 427.15 1.70 1,059.48 152.85 WI 6,850 292 158 50 16 27,384 4,935 1.26 828.75 5,976.03 405.64 0.11 166.33 0.09 625.55 54.03 WV 34,010 585 227 51 12 239,292 9,955 25.67 1,763.05 21,508.00 2,114.20 5.07 0.62 2.27 1,674.70 7.30 WY 12,227 79 49 23
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-2A1.txt
  • in 2005, the market with the most LPFM stations only had 6, by 2009, this same market, Gainesville, had 11 LPFM stations. Table 2 Average Number of LPFM Stations in a Market by Size of the Arbitron Metro Markets Ranked by Size 2005 2007 2009 1 - 10 1.70 2.40 2.60 11 - 20 1.60 1.40 1.70 21 - 30 1.10 2.00 2.10 31 - 40 1.20 1.40 1.50 41 - 50 1.20 1.80 1.80 51 - 60 1.40 2.00 2.40 61 - 70 1.40 1.50 1.40 71 - 80 0.50 0.80 2.10 81 - 90 1.70 2.70 1.90 91 - 100 0.80 1.10 1.40 1 - 100 1.26 1.71 1.89 101 - 110 1.60 2.10 2.20 111 - 120 1.40
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-2191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-2191A1.txt
  • submissionsforlaunchandoperationinaccordancewiththeproceduresoftheInternational TelecommunicationUnion(lTU)RadioRegulationsand,specifically,thisauthorizationissubjectto completionofcoordinationbetweentheSatelliteCDRadioSatelliteDigitalAudioRadioService systemandaffectedradiocommunicationsystemsofotherAdministrations 57. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthisauthorizationissubjecttocertificationby SatelliteCDRadioCorporationthatitsfinalreceiverdesignisinteroperablewithrespecttothe AmericanMobileRadioCorporation'sSatelliteDigitalAudioRadioServicesystemfinalreceiver design. 58. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatSatelliteCDRadiospecifythevalueofthe maximum(peak)PowerFluxDensityattheEarth'ssurfacefromitsSatelliteDigitalAudioRadio Servicesystem. 59. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthePetitionstoDenyfiledbyPrimosphereLimited Partnership,AerospaceandFlightTestRadioCoordinatingCouncil,BSBBCommunications,Emmis BroadcastingCorporation,JointParties,KSJB,KTFA92.5FMRadio,KVSTRadio,TheNational AssociationofBroadcasters,andSouthwestFloridaCommunityRadio,Inc.AREDENIED. 60. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthelicensetermforeachspacestationiseightyears andwillbeginonthedateSatelliteCDRadio,Inc.certifiestotheCommissionthatitsfirstsatellite hasbeensuccessfullyplacedintoorbitandthatitsoperationsfullyconformtothetermsand conditionsofthisauthorization. 61. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatSatelliteCDRadioisaffordedthirtydaysfromthe dateofthereleaseofthisOrderandauthorizationtodeclinethisauthorizationasconditioned. Failuretorespondwithinthatperiod 'willconstituteformalacceptanceoftheauthorizationas conditioned. 62. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatSatelliteCDRadio'sauthorizationisconditioned upontimelycompletionoftheSatelliteDigitalAudioRadiomilestones.ThesatelliteDARS milestonesarebasedonSatelliteCDRadio'sdateofauthorization.SatelliteCDRadioisrequiredto completecontractingforconstructionofitsfirstspacestationorbeginconstructionofitsfirstspace stationwithinoneyear.Itisrequiredtocompletecontractingforconstructionofitssecondspace stationorbeginconstructionofitssecondspacestationwithintwoyears.SatelliteCDRadiois requiredtolaunchandbeginoperatingatleastonespacestationwithinfouryears,and/orbeinfull operationofitssatellitesystemwithinsixyearsoflicensegrant.See §25.144(b).Thisauthorization 7995 FederalCommunicationsCommission DA97-2191 shallbecomeNULLANDVOIDintheeventeachspacestationisnotconstructed.launched.and successfullyplacedintooperationinaccordancewiththetechnicalparametersandtermsand conditionsoftheauthorizations bythefollowingdates: Firstsatellite Secondsatellite FullOperation Construction Commenced October1998 October1999 Launch October2001 October2003 63. ThisOrderisissuedpursuanttoSection0.261oftheCommissionsrulesondelegated authority,47C.F.R.§0.261.'andiseffectiveuponrelease.Petitionsforreconsiderationunder Section1.106orapplicationsforreviewunderSection1.115oftheCommission'srules.47C.F.R. §§1.10"6,and1.115,maybefiledwithin30daysofthedateofpublicno'ticeofthisOrder See47 C.F.R §1.4(b)(2). FEDERALCOMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION (. /'./( f(een«;::z: -:f .- Chief,InternationalBureau 7996
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205130A1.txt
  • ROAD, WEXFORD, CADILLAC, MI 85 ° 22 ' 30.20 " W LONG. LOCATION: AFC 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: 5 M DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8F Points of Communication: E000478 SES-REG-20000728-01355 FOX BROADCASTING CORPORATION Registration Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 40 ° 28 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 2714 E. LINCOLN STREET, MCLEAN, BLOOMINGTON, IL 88 ° 57 ' 5.20 " W LONG. LOCATION: AFC 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: 5 M DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8F Points of Communication: Page 28 of 31 E000479 SES-REG-20000728-01356 FOX BROADCASTING CORPORATION Registration Class of Station:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205321A1.txt
  • VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000384 SES-REG-20000728-01255 FOX BROADCASTING CORPORATION Registration Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 41 ° 15 ' 26.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 4625 FARNUM STREET, DOUGLAS, OMAHA, NE 95 ° 59 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: AFC 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: 5 M DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000385 SES-REG-20000728-01256 FOX BROADCASTING CORPORATION Registration Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Page 7 of 20 42 ° 27 '
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208620A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208620A1.txt
  • T-609 The certificate for 366-CX-2001 will be sent to the following address: COMPATIBLE ELECTRONICA, INC. 114 OLINDA DRIVE BREA CA 92823 366-CX-2001 8145325-1 REGISTRANT: PROCESS INFORMATIK GMBH MANUFACTURER: PROCESS INFORMATIK GMBH TYPE OF FILING: ORIGINAL REGISTRATION REG. NO: IMKGER-40255-MM-E REG. CLASS: TERMINAL DEVICE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT: DATA/FAX MODEMS EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: FAX MODEM TRADE NAME: PROCESS INFORMATIK GMBH MODEL: FB PI-MODEM V1.10 The certificate for 367-CX-2001 will be sent to the following address: MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC CORP. OF AMERICA ONE PANASONIC WAY, PANAZIP 4B-8 SECAUCUS NJ 07094 367-CX-2001 8145324-1 REGISTRANT: MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO LTD MANUFACTURER: MANUFACTURED IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS TYPE OF FILING: ORIGINAL REGISTRATION REG. NO: ACJMUL-40256-WI-E REG. CLASS: TERMINAL DEVICE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT: ISM BAND SPREAD-SPECTRUM CORDLESS PHONES EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: 1-LINE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211286A1.txt
  • 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 24M0G7D Points of Communication: Hub - ALSAT - (ALSAT) REMOTE 74CM - GALAXY IIIR - (95 W.L.) E960227 SES-MOD-20010223-00392 WISDOM MEDIA GROUP, INC. Application for Modification Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service "MOD" to add new emission designator and related service, and to relocate fixed station. 37 ° 17 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 RT. 290 @ I 77, BLUEFIELD, WV 81 ° 8 ' 0.00 " W LONG. LOCATION: VERTEX COMMUNICATIONS 1 9 meters ANTENNA ID: KPC 85.00 dBW 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 36M0F8W 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8W ANALOG VIDEO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F3F DIGITAL CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 51K2G7D- DIGITAL CARRIER 3700.0000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212700A1.txt
  • for telephony, facsimile and data. 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 36M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E010119 SES-LIC-20010406-00813 KENT STATE UNIVERSITY Application for Authority Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 41 ° 8 ' 25.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 1613 E. SUMMIT STREET, PORTAGE, KENT, OH 81 ° 20 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN A 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 1251 DIGITAL DATA, 192 KPBS, 1/2 FEC, AUDIO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 230KG7W 52.80 dBW DIGITAL DATA, 192 KPBS, 1/2 FEC, AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 230KG7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E010112 SES-LIC-20010417-00772 PANAMSAT LICENSEE CORP. Application for Authority Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • the multiline business SLC and PICC rates, are multiplied by five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1/ Rates Effective from 7/1/01-12/31/01 Year 2000 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00¢ 0.00¢ 0.36¢ 0.18¢ 1.10¢ 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226838A8.txt
  • '00 Int News Use '00 Chg. AQH List '94-'98 0.3922 0.1176 -0.7387 -0.2400 -0.8745 (0.78) (0.29) (0.68) (0.61) (0.72) Chg. Daily Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 0.0377 0.1188 0.0054 0.0065 -0.1676 0.0271 -0.0074 (0.35) (0.51) (0.29) (0.51) (2.01)* (0.10) (0.05) Chg. Weekly Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 0.0083 0.0166 -0.0048 0.0010 -0.0376 0.1299 0.0619 (0.21) (0.51) (0.68) (0.21) (1.19) (1.33) (1.10) Chg. Cable Use '94-'00 0.2905 -0.1809 -0.2903 -0.0119 -0.0017 0.2656 0.1563 (2.66)** (2.01)* (1.19) (0.61) (0.13) (0.98) (1.02) Int Use '00 0.0126 0.0030 0.1042 -0.0045 0.0276 (0.35) (0.10) (1.33) (0.72) (0.98) Chg. HUT Viewing '95-'00 0.0251 0.0396 0.0121 -0.0117 0.1794 0.0749 -0.1268 (0.35) (0.21) (0.78) (1.14) (2.66)** (0.35) (1.03) Int News Use '00 -0.0073 (1.01) Chg. AQH Inside News List
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228584A3.txt
  • 1.80 2.14 4.53 5 North and Central America 214,624 469,207 19,937 703,768 672,205 0.44 0.35 0.81 1.15 6 South America 12,404 44,384 19,053 75,841 108,177 0.20 0.19 0.36 0.85 7 Asia 33,735 392,079 22,035 447,849 289,436 0.08 0.12 0.24 0.67 8 Oceania 8,851 51,077 52,915 112,843 53,450 0.09 0.11 0.17 0.73 9 Eastern Europe 5,094 4,705 0 9,799 1,393 1.08 1.10 1.21 2.78 10 Other Regions 0 598 0 598 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total for all International Points 383,640 1,839,256 181,810 2,404,706 3,110,969 0.19 0.18 0.42 0.79 Page 33 TABLE 7 - Trans-Ocean Fiber Optic Cable Capacity 64 Kbps Circuits CABLES Class*Cost $M 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Est.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230272A1.txt
  • Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations KENT STATE UNIVERSITY E030001 SES-REG-20021231-02169E Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Page 17 of 18 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division at 418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. 41 ° 8 ' 25.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 1613 E. SUMMIT ST. (WKSU-FM), PORTAGE, KENT, OH 81 ° 20 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMTECH ANTENNA SY 1 3.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 934D0015-G2 SCPC DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA, 1/2 FEC 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 400KG7D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Special Temporary Authority Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Harris Maritime Communication Services, Inc. SES-STA-20030113-00044E Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Harris Maritime Communication Services, Inc., respectfully requests an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231722A1.txt
  • Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Registration 12/31/2002 - 12/31/2017 Date Effective: 03/03/2003 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority KENT STATE UNIVERSITY E030001 SES-REG-20021231-02169E Page 12 of 19 Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 41 ° 8 ' 25.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 1613 E. SUMMIT ST. (WKSU-FM), PORTAGE, KENT, OH 81 ° 20 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMTECH ANTENNA SYSTEM 1 3.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 934D0015-G2 SCPC DIGITAL AUDIO/DATA, 1/2 FEC 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 400KG7D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) Renewal 04/15/2003 - 04/15/2018 Date Effective: 03/04/2003 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority CC VIII OPERATING LLC E5464 SES-RWL-20030211-00153E Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 45
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239124A1.txt
  • 53.20 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 128KF1D 54.40 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 168KF1D 54.90 dBW 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 192KF1D Page 6 of 9 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 192KF1D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) SANTA MONICA COLLEGE E030199 SES-REG-20030915-01248E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Registration Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 34 ° 1 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 1900 PICO BLVD. (KCRW-FM), LOS ANGELES, SANTA MONICA, CA 118 ° 28 ' 10.60 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMTECH ANTENNA SY 3.8 M 3.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 3.8 METER PF DIGITAL BROADCAST RADIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M3G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240772A1.txt
  • (330.5 E.L.) 1 - INTELSAT AOR - (332.5 E.L.) 1 - INTELSAT AOR - (335.5 E.L.) 1 - INTELSAT AOR - (342.0 E.L.) 1 - NSS-5 - (183 E.L.) SANTA MONICA COLLEGE E030199 SES-REG-20030915-01248E Date Effective: 10/30/2003 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 09/15/2003 - 09/15/2018 Registration Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 34 ° 1 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 1900 PICO BLVD. (KCRW-FM), LOS ANGELES, SANTA MONICA, CA 118 ° 28 ' 10.60 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMTECH ANTENNA SYSTEMS 3.8 M 3.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 3.8 METER PF DIGITAL BROADCAST RADIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M3G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242532A8.txt
  • 1.80 2.14 5 North and Central America 213,206 399,536 27,214 639,956 983,965 0.50 0.44 0.35 0.81 6 South America 19,357 43,284 20,814 83,455 108,394 0.30 0.20 0.19 0.36 7 Asia 45,743 379,571 134,060 559,374 763,014 0.09 0.08 0.12 0.24 8 Oceania 13,148 51,650 59,657 124,455 45,277 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.17 9 Eastern Europe 5,359 3,119 1 8,479 1,248 1.72 1.08 1.10 1.21 10 Other Regions 0 334 359 693 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total for all International Points 448,6701,984,728 411,4642,844,8623,900,202 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.42* Page 32
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246882A1.txt
  • ID: 1 3213 W. Kennedy Blvd., Hillsborough, TaMPA, FL LOCATION: Andrew 1 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: SNG 76.50 dBW Digital and analog video 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 36M0G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) COMCAST OF COLORADO II, LLC E040186 SES-REG-20040420-00567E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Registration Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 40 ° 10 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 434 KIMBARK DR., BOULDER, LONGMONT, CO 105 ° 6 ' 1.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC. 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: 8008B 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY E040189 SES-REG-20040422-00572E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Registration Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248147A1.txt
  • ID: 136-750 DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M3G7W DIGITAL BROADCAST AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) COMCAST OF COLORADO II, LLC E040186 SES-REG-20040420-00567E Date Effective: 06/08/2004 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 04/20/2004 - 04/20/2019 Registration Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 40 ° 10 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 434 KIMBARK DR., BOULDER, LONGMONT, CO 105 ° 6 ' 1.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC. 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: 8008B 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY E040189 SES-REG-20040422-00572E Date Effective: 06/08/2004 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248493A1.txt
  • 1.18 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/021(08.06.04) 2 1.19 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/023(08.06.04) 2 1.21 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/024(08.06.04) 2 1.8 (Resolution 145) Comments on NTIA Draft Preliminary View WAC/020(08.06.04) 2 1.18 Comments on NTIA Draft Preliminary View WAC/022(08.06.04) 3 1.4 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/016(08.06.04) 4 1.15 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/015(08.06.04) 5 1.10 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/012(08.06.04) 5 1.12 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/013(08.06.04) 5 2 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/014(08.06.04) If there are any questions concerning the above table, please contact Don Weiland at 202-418-2220. - FCC - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254023A1.pdf
  • 418-0500 News media information REPORT NO.45858 APPLICANT AND LOCATION CALL LETTERS N A T U R E O F A P P L I C A T I O N FILE NUMBER STATE E/P 11/04/2004 Actions of: FM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT GRANTED , HUBBARD LAKE 88.1 MHZ P MI CP for a new FM noncommercial edicational station. 1.10 kW (V) ERP, 112 meters HAAT, 44 54 20 NL, 83 32 10 WL Granted 11/4/2004 GREAT LAKES COMMUNITY BROADCASTING, INC. 990806MB 93998 BPED-19990806MB MI FM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR CHANGE TO A LICENSED FACILITY GRANTED , STOCKTON 91.3 MHZ P CA Minor change in licensed facilities UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC KUOP 69157 BPED-20020327ABV CA , HAZLET 89.3 MHZ E
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260058A1.txt
  • 36M0F3F COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E050212 SES-REG-20050713-00899E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Registration LIBCO, INC. Page 17 of 19 Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 30 ° 23 ' 36.70 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 208 DEBUYS ROAD (WLOX), JACKSON, BILOXI, MS 89 ° 0 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW CORPORATION 4.5M. 4.5 meters ANTENNA ID: ESA45-46A COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F STANDARD ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F3F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E050213 SES-REG-20050713-00900E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Registration KATC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 30 ° 11 ' 25.70 "
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260688A1.txt
  • Page 21 of 28 Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E050212 SES-REG-20050713-00899E Date Effective: 08/22/2005 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 07/13/2005 - 07/13/2020 Registration LIBCO, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 30 ° 23 ' 36.70 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 208 DEBUYS ROAD (WLOX), JACKSON, BILOXI, MS 89 ° 0 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: ANDREW CORPORATION 4.5M. 4.5 meters ANTENNA ID: ESA45-46A COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F STANDARD ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F3F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E050213 SES-REG-20050713-00900E Date Effective: 08/22/2005 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 07/13/2005 - 07/13/2020 Registration KATC COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Nature of Service:Domestic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ................... Table 3.19 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area .............................. Table 3.33 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A13.txt
  • (47) 81 (128) 272.34 Verizon - New Jersey NJ 48,929 49,429 (500) (1.02) Sprint - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ (958) (738) (220) 22.96 Subject to 11 - 21 Table 11.10 Total Non-Operating Items - Continued ($000) - 2004 Study Area State Subject to Percent Code Separations Intrastate Interstate Interstate Qwest - New Mexico NM (15,763) (15,590) (173) 1.10 % Valor - New Mexico 1 NM (261) (261) 0 0.00 Valor - New Mexico 2 NM (44) (44) 0 0.00 Citizens - Red Hook NY 0 0 0 0.00 Citizens - Upstate NY 0 0 0 0.00 Citizens - Western Counties NY 0 0 0 0.00 Verizon New York Telephone NY (14,515) (11,794) (2,721) 18.75 Citizens - Frontier of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ................... Table 3.19 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area .............................. Table 3.33 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • resulted in numerous consumer complaints. The Commission twice changed the universal service contribution methodology to ensure that markups matched contributions. The first change, adopted in February 2002 and implemented in the third quarter of 2002, reduced each carrier's contribution base by the amount that the carrier paid into USF during the prior quarter.14 The line item "Circularity Adjustment" in Table 1.10 accounts for this change. The "Circularity Adjustment" represents the industry's actual contributions during the prior quarter as reported by USAC. This eliminated circularity as a reason for carriers to inflate pass-through charges. After this first change, some service providers continued to impose pass-through charges in excess of the published contribution factor. In December 2002, the Commission adopted additional changes to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 2004 3 - 27 Alabama $0.52 $0.01 $1.32 $0.12 $0.33 $0.58 $0.20 $3.09 Alaska 7.24 0.04 0.00 1.42 3.55 0.00 2.15 14.41 American Samoa 6.01 0.00 0.00 1.07 4.09 0.00 4.16 15.33 Arizona 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.21 0.49 0.22 1.96 Arkansas 3.56 0.01 0.00 0.36 2.07 0.93 0.47 7.41 California 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.11 0.02 0.35 Colorado 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.37 0.61 0.16 2.47 Connecticut 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.08 Delaware 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04 Dist. of Columbia 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Florida 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.45 0.03 0.64 Georgia 0.71 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.46 0.27 0.26 1.87 Guam 3.41 0.00 0.00 0.65 1.10
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265808A1.txt
  • MHz 36M0F3F COMPRESSED DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060190 SES-REG-20060525-00888E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Registration WYPR LICENSE HOLDING, LLC Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 39 ° 18 ' 53.40 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 2216 NORTH CHARLES STREET (WYPR), M, BALTIMORE, MD 76 ° 37 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMTECH ANTENNA SYSTEMS 3.8 M. 3.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 3.8 METER PF DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M3G7W DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060191 SES-REG-20060525-00889E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Registration MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 43 °
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266472A1.txt
  • 36M0G7F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060190 SES-REG-20060525-00888E Date Effective: 07/14/2006 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 05/25/2006 - 05/25/2021 Registration WYPR LICENSE HOLDING, LLC Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 39 ° 18 ' 53.40 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 2216 NORTH CHARLES STREET (WYPR), M, BALTIMORE, MD 76 ° 37 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMTECH ANTENNA SYSTEMS 3.8 M. 3.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 3.8 METER PF DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 10M3G7W DIGITAL AUDIO CARRIER 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 30K0F1D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060200 SES-REG-20060531-00906E Date Effective: 07/18/2006 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 05/31/2006 - 05/31/2021 Registration RGV EDUCATIONAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • Rates (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.7 Lifeline and Link-Up Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2005 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1994-2005 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1994-2005 Table 1.13 Standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268388A1.txt
  • DIGITAL TV AND AUDIO QPSK MODULATION 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M50G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060129 SES-MOD-20061102-01935E Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Modification SCIENTIFIC GAMES RACING, L.L.C. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service "MOD" to change its existing C-band earth station license from temporary-fixed to a fixed earth station. 40 ° 55 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 810 CENTRAL AVENUE, WESTCHESTER, YONKERS, NY 73 ° 51 ' 40.50 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMTECH ANTENNA SYSTEMS TRUCK 17 4.1 meters ANTENNA ID: 5 METER OFFSAT Page 8 of 12 69.88 dBW DIGITAL TV AND AUDIO QPSK MODULATION 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M50G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060125 SES-MOD-20061102-01936E
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268942A1.txt
  • ANTENNA ID: 5 METER OFFSAT 69.88 dBW DIGITAL TV AND AUDIO QPSK MODULATION 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M50G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060129 SES-MOD-20061102-01935E Date Effective: 12/11/2006 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 05/22/2006 - 05/22/2021 Application for Modification SCIENTIFIC GAMES RACING, L.L.C. Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 40 ° 55 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 810 CENTRAL AVENUE, WESTCHESTER, YONKERS, NY 73 ° 51 ' 40.50 " W LONG. LOCATION: COMTECH ANTENNA SYSTEMS TRUCK 17 4.1 meters ANTENNA ID: 5 METER OFFSAT 69.88 dBW DIGITAL TV AND AUDIO QPSK MODULATION 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 4M50G7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E060125 SES-MOD-20061102-01936E Date Effective: 12/11/2006 Class
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • 11 - 13 Table 11.6 Average Net Investment ($000) - 2005 Study Area State Code Subject to Separations Interstate Intrastate Percent Interstate Percent Rate of Return Verizon New England - New Hampshire NH $580,105 $384,274 $192,630 33.21 (0.74) Verizon New Jersey NJ 1,328,879 484,647 1,001,017 75.33 2.88 Sprint - United Telephone Company of New Jersey NJ 147,847 117,161 33,799 22.86 1.10 Qwest - New Mexico NM 508,452 382,363 135,549 26.66 5.42 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - New Mexico 1 NM 38,446 23,092 15,663 40.74 22.16 Valor Telecommunications of Texas - New Mexico 2 NM 46,639 30,429 16,505 35.39 15.01 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Red Hook NY 22,075 10,217 11,861 53.73 80.75 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Upstate NY
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • resulted in numerous consumer complaints. The Commission twice changed the universal service contribution methodology to ensure that markups matched contributions. The first change, adopted in February 2002 and implemented in the third quarter of 2002, reduced each carrier's contribution base by the amount that the carrier paid into USF during the prior quarter. The line item "Circularity Adjustment" in Table 1.10 accounts for this change. The "Circularity Adjustment" represents the industry's actual contributions during the prior quarter as reported by USAC. This eliminated circularity as a reason for carriers to inflate pass-through charges. After this first change, some service providers continued to impose pass-through charges in excess of the published contribution factor. In December 2002, the Commission adopted additional changes to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • -8.46 -4.93 -3.71 0.00 FLORIDA 3.72 -3.75 7.76 17.84 GEORGIA 3.74 -3.96 8.02 10.72 GUAM 0.81 -0.32 1.13 -10.06 HAWAII 7.02 -3.22 10.58 67.17 IDAHO -6.18 -1.58 -4.68 -7.69 ILLINOIS -2.19 -4.38 2.28 21.00 INDIANA -2.13 -3.54 1.46 30.43 IOWA -1.04 -4.22 3.32 25.76 KANSAS -2.87 -7.00 4.45 4.98 KENTUCKY -1.87 -3.96 2.17 -3.57 LOUISIANA -0.01 -5.02 5.27 -2.15 MAINE 1.10 -4.82 6.22 15.59 MARYLAND -0.77 -3.61 2.94 52.89 MASSACHUSETTS -1.46 -5.16 3.90 -59.52 MICHIGAN -2.05 -4.60 2.68 -1.32 MINNESOTA -1.63 -5.10 3.65 12.83 MISSISSIPPI 1.88 -3.48 5.55 5.94 MISSOURI -3.03 -4.12 1.13 1.29 MONTANA -0.16 -3.19 3.13 -9.75 NEBRASKA -0.66 -4.14 3.64 4.96 NEVADA -2.10 -3.54 1.49 9.52 NEW HAMPSHIRE 0.80 -3.82 4.80 -62.82 NEW JERSEY 0.27 -5.45 6.04 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • International Calls Calls 1/ All Goods Restated All Goods Restated Net of and Services in 2004 and Services in 2004 Access and (1982-1984 Dollars (1982-1984 Dollars Universal = 100) = 100) Service Cost 1930 16.7 $0.27 $3.11 1970 38.8 $0.23 $1.12 $2.43 $0.20 1931 15.2 0.27 3.35 1971 40.5 0.25 1.14 2.35 0.22 1932 13.7 0.26 3.62 1972 41.8 0.24 1.10 2.31 0.21 1933 13.0 0.28 4.00 1973 44.4 0.25 1.08 2.29 0.22 1934 13.4 0.27 3.84 1974 49.3 0.26 0.98 2.25 0.22 1935 13.7 0.27 3.66 1975 53.8 0.27 0.96 2.23 0.24 1936 13.9 0.25 3.41 1976 56.9 0.29 0.95 2.20 0.25 1937 14.4 0.22 2.84 1977 60.6 0.28 0.89 2.18 0.25 1938 14.1 0.21 2.87 1978 65.2 0.29 0.83
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • on customers' bills, and the Commission would use these revenue totals along with total estimated program requirement to calculate the contribution factor.18 The elimination of circularity was implemented in the third quarter of 2002, and reduced each carrier's contribution base by the amount that the carrier paid into USF during the prior quarter. The line item "Circularity Adjustment" in Table 1.10 accounts for this change. The "Circularity Adjustment" represents the industry's actual contributions during the prior quarter as reported by USAC. This eliminated circularity as a reason for carriers to inflate pass through charges. In December 2002, the Commission adopted an order that changed the basis for contribution assessments from historic gross-billed revenues to projected collected revenues.19 This change addressed the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • -4.12 -6.19 2.22 12.93 NEVADA 4.14 -1.50 5.73 -4.73 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.43 -4.63 7.40 87.43 NEW JERSEY -1.56 -6.78 5.60 0.00 NEW MEXICO -0.57 -3.30 2.82 2.28 NEW YORK 51.89 -9.34 67.54 -16.38 NORTH CAROLINA 0.75 -5.08 6.15 21.71 NORTH DAKOTA 2.00 -4.33 6.61 11.35 NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS 16.00 -6.99 24.71 0.00 OHIO -2.41 -7.61 5.63 -6.81 OKLAHOMA -4.57 -5.60 1.10 4.12 OREGON 0.77 -4.06 5.03 0.66 PENNSYLVANIA 1.21 -4.24 5.69 -10.86 PUERTO RICO -5.42 -1.85 -3.64 -61.87 RHODE ISLAND -4.26 -12.23 9.09 0.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 2.11 -4.65 7.09 0.08 SOUTH DAKOTA 1.97 -4.14 6.37 10.35 TENNESSEE 0.97 -3.18 4.28 5.94 TEXAS -1.05 -5.56 4.78 11.23 UTAH -1.90 -3.20 1.34 -11.61 VERMONT -2.12 -2.36 0.25 -2.94 VIRGIN ISLANDS 4.85 -0.68 5.56
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 5,092 8,558 2.87 North Dakota 180 312 492 89 65 153 269 376 645 0.22 N. Mariana Islands 13 22 35 5 4 9 18 26 45 0.01 Ohio 2,786 5,732 8,518 1,150 1,068 2,218 3,936 6,800 10,736 3.60 Oklahoma 894 1,627 2,521 405 259 664 1,299 1,886 3,185 1.07 Oregon 980 1,600 2,580 432 280 712 1,412 1,879 3,292 1.10 Pennsylvania 3,396 6,128 9,524 1,483 1,158 2,641 4,879 7,286 12,166 4.08 Puerto Rico 699 1,396 2,095 255 187 442 954 1,583 2,537 0.85 Rhode Island 264 517 782 104 77 181 369 594 963 0.32 South Carolina 1,175 2,228 3,403 505 399 904 1,680 2,627 4,306 1.45 South Dakota 201 345 546 89 77 166 290 422 712 0.24 Tennessee
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • Residential Telephone Line in the Sample Cities, 1993-2007 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Lifeline and Link-Up Rates Table 1.7 Lifeline and Link-Up Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas, 1989-2007 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line, 1994-2007 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities, 1994-2007 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.14 Historical Standard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A13.pdf
  • - Alabama AL 174,526 116,606 57,603 33.01 Verizon California - Contel - Arizona AZ 879 560 155 17.63 Qwest - Arizona AZ 162,305 12,309 149,997 92.42 AT&T - Southwestern Bell - Arkansas AR 93,296 47,363 45,294 48.55 Verizon California - Contel - California CA 53,370 18,805 34,462 64.57 Citizens Telecom. of California - Shasta - California CA 25,249 24,970 279 1.10 Verizon - Northwest - West Coast California CA 388 475 (88) (22.68) Verizon California - GTE - California CA 328,185 107,277 220,276 67.12 AT&T - Pacific Telesis - Pacific Bell - California CA 1,047,474 478,250 568,752 54.30 Qwest - Colorado CO 135,606 (1,381) 136,987 101.02 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 165,358 75,472 87,652 53.01 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • on customers' bills, and the Commission would use these revenue totals along with total estimated program requirement to calculate the contribution factor.18 The elimination of circularity was implemented in the third quarter of 2002, and reduced each carrier's contribution base by the amount that the carrier paid into USF during the prior quarter. The line item "Circularity Adjustment" in Table 1.10 accounts for this change. The "Circularity Adjustment" represents the industry's actual contributions during the prior quarter as reported by USAC. This eliminated circularity as a reason for carriers to inflate pass through charges. In December 2002, the Commission adopted an order that changed the basis for contribution assessments from historic gross-billed revenues to projected collected revenues.19 This change addressed 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 2.58 -2.53 5.25 43.17 HAWAII -6.34 -7.10 0.81 23.40 IDAHO -18.04 -3.05 -15.46 -7.24 ILLINOIS -1.70 -6.92 5.61 7.05 INDIANA -1.07 -7.44 6.88 21.50 IOWA -4.93 -5.86 0.99 5.68 KANSAS -1.13 -7.23 6.58 0.83 KENTUCKY 0.16 -4.85 5.26 21.17 LOUISIANA -1.50 -4.89 3.57 4.29 MAINE -4.90 -4.90 0.00 9.25 MARYLAND 0.74 -5.82 6.97 -22.11 MASSACHUSETTS 0.10 -8.42 9.30 INFINITE MICHIGAN -1.10 -8.24 7.79 -4.91 MINNESOTA -8.54 -5.49 -3.23 1.53 MISSISSIPPI -4.83 -4.80 -0.03 -6.91 MISSOURI 3.11 -5.00 8.54 10.40 MONTANA -5.00 -6.60 1.72 -0.28 NEBRASKA -8.03 -5.93 -2.23 4.22 NEVADA 1.99 -5.16 7.54 -14.57 NEW HAMPSHIRE 2.53 -6.44 9.59 14.06 NEW JERSEY -5.22 -9.49 4.71 0.00 NEW MEXICO -4.90 -4.35 -0.58 -2.23 NEW YORK -4.91 -10.23 5.92 -10.57 NORTH CAROLINA -3.32
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ................................................... Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier .............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2007................................... ................... Table 1.14 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 5 Index of Tables and Charts Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • ............................................. Table 1.2 Telecommunications Industry Revenues - Total ................................................... Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier .............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2007................................... ................... Table 1.14 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 5 Index of Tables and Charts Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • on customers' bills, and the Commission would use these revenue totals along with total estimated program requirement to calculate the contribution factor.18 The elimination of circularity was implemented in the third quarter of 2002, and reduced each carrier's contribution base by the amount that the carrier paid into USF during the prior quarter. The line item "Circularity Adjustment" in Table 1.10 accounts for this change. The "Circularity Adjustment" represents the industry's actual contributions during the prior quarter as reported by USAC. This eliminated circularity as a reason for carriers to inflate pass through charges. In December 2002, the Commission adopted an order that changed the basis for contribution assessments from historic gross-billed revenues to projected collected revenues.19 This change addressed 15
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • -3.53 -36.85 361475 A RUNESTONE TEL. ASSN. -10.31 -3.73 -6.84 -43.01 361476 A SACRED HEART TEL. CO. -10.35 -2.45 -8.10 -44.60 361479 A SCOTT RICE TEL. CO. DBA INTEGRA TELECOM 4.37 -7.32 12.62 0.00 361482 C SHERBURNE COUNTY RURAL TEL. CO. 1.20 -2.95 4.28 -2.28 361483 C SLEEPY EYE TEL. CO. 2.37 -3.96 6.59 87.21 361485 A SPRING GROVE COMMUNICATIONS -1.10 -0.99 -0.12 -31.54 361487 A STARBUCK TEL. CO. 0.95 -6.13 7.55 73.12 361491 C TWIN VALLEY-ULEN TEL CO INC. -8.22 -0.91 -7.37 -25.84 361494 A UPSALA COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE ASSN. -0.25 -4.17 4.10 -15.20 361495 A VALLEY TEL. CO.-MN -11.55 1.58 -12.92 -48.36 361499 A CROSSLAKE TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.56 -1.44 11.16 INFINITE 361500 A NORTHERN TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MN -14.89 8.33
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296239A1.txt
  • 18 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed High-Speed Connections to Tract Households as of December 31, 2008 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.400.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 >=2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.55 Ratio of Residential Fixed High-Speed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission High-Speed Services for Internet Access: Status as of December 31, 2008 26 19 Table 12 Distribution of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296778A1.txt
  • Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000024 SES-RWL-20100224-00259 E Date Effective: 03/03/2010 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 03/06/2010 - 03/06/2025 Renewal DynCorp Information Systems LLC Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 25 ° 45 ' 16.40 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 11691 S.W. 17TH STREET, DADE, MIAMI, FL 80 ° 23 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: Page 31 of 43 PRODELIN CORP. 1 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 2.4 32.32 dBW DIGITAL DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 21K0G7D DIGITAL DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 21K0G7D ANDREW CORP. 2 4.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 4.5 DIGITAL DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 759KG7D DIGITAL DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M52G7D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301294A1.txt
  • 17 Chart 17 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households as of June 30, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.56 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2009 22 18 Table 12 Distribution of Census Tracts by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301516A1.txt
  • appears to be complete. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325 through 51.335. Specific network change information can be obtained on the Internet at: http://www.att.com/gen/public-affairs?pid=3137 The incumbent LEC's certification(s) refer(s) to the change(s) identified below: Number Type of Change(s) Planned Location of Change(s) ATT20100308L.1 AT&T Southeast - Place a MESA-4 cabinet on new easement along Collins Hill Rd. Cabinet sized per CLR 1.10.05. Turn up a SONET multiplexer, metallic DISCS systems, and CNX5+ DSL solution. Place approximately 400 ft of buried 24g 600 pr copper cable and terminate the new NPG pairs into existing 1200 SAI located at 955 Collins Hill Rd. A detailed cost analysis determined it was more cost effective to place fiber and DLC then perform cutover that to replace
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • 20,465 6.83 North Carolina 2,450 4,652 7,102 997 658 1,655 3,447 5,309 8,757 2.92 North Dakota 172 323 495 92 54 147 265 377 642 0.21 N. Mariana Islands 12 22 34 6 3 9 18 25 43 0.01 Ohio 2,835 5,808 8,643 1,250 896 2,146 4,085 6,704 10,789 3.60 Oklahoma 878 1,752 2,630 439 228 667 1,317 1,980 3,297 1.10 Oregon 981 1,746 2,728 476 252 728 1,457 1,999 3,456 1.15 Pennsylvania 3,359 6,330 9,689 1,604 967 2,571 4,963 7,296 12,260 4.09 Puerto Rico 731 1,383 2,113 287 138 425 1,018 1,520 2,538 0.85 Rhode Island 277 579 856 120 71 191 397 650 1,047 0.35 South Carolina 1,196 2,289 3,484 495 335 830 1,690 2,624 4,314 1.44 South Dakota
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303405A1.txt
  • Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2009 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.57 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2009 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by Provider - 2008..................... . Table 1.14 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by State ........................................... Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate and International - by Provider - 2008 Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate - by Provider - 2008 ....................... Table 1.15 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors - 2010 ............Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments - 2009 ... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - 2008 and 2009 ........................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State - 2009 ..............................Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ............ Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ...................... Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by Provider - 2008..................... . Table 1.14 Telecommunications Revenues - End User - by State ........................................... Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate and International - by Provider - 2008 Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate - by Provider - 2008 ....................... Table 1.15 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors - 2010 ............Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments - 2009 ... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - 2008 and 2009 ........................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State - 2009 ..............................Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ............ Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ...................... Table
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • 1 -7 double assessment, providers would frequently inflate their reported USF pass through surcharges (reported on Line 403) about the contribution factor. The elimination of circularity was implemented in the third quarter of 2002. It reduced each provider's contribution base by the amount that the provider paid into USF during the prior quarter. The line item "Circularity Adjustment" in Table 1.10 accounts for this change. This eliminated circularity as a reason for providers to inflate pass through charges. In December 2002, the Commission adopted an order that changed the basis for contribution assessments from historic gross-billed revenues to projected collected revenues.19 This change addressed the reason given by service providers with declining revenue for marking up their pass through charges. These
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • C FRONTIER COMM-SOUTH -14.22 -4.74 -9.94 0.00 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL CO -0.78 -5.45 4.94 -50.84 259788 C CENTURYTEL-AL-SOUTH -2.63 -10.41 8.69 INFINITE 259789 C CENTURYTEL-AL-NORTH -0.78 -4.89 4.32 0.00 TOTAL ALASKA -3.63 -7.97 4.71 -6.48 610989 C ADAK TEL UTILITY -0.46 -12.21 13.38 -0.21 613000 C ACS OF ANCHORAGE 0.29 -9.75 11.12 INFINITE 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL 1.10 -5.95 7.50 0.59 613001A C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL -1.22 -3.85 2.74 0.00 613002 C BETTLES TEL CO INC -7.13 -0.50 -6.67 0.00 613003 C BRISTOL BAY TEL COOP -0.56 -0.74 0.18 -7.50 613004 C BUSH-TEL INC. 8.88 0.20 8.67 9.36 613005 A CIRCLE TEL & ELEC 87.74 48.89 26.10 162.62 613006 C COPPER VALLEY TEL 8.05 -3.67 12.17 9.04 613007
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304276A1.txt
  • 29 ' 52.40 " N LAT. SITE ID: Remote 6 Pouch 34-0099, North Slope Borough, Prudhoe Bay -Oliktok, AK 149 ° 53 ' 24.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: General Dynamics Oliktok 4.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 4.8M Page 2 of 8 Digital Data 3762.0000 - 3782.0000 MHz 853KG7D 55.00 dBW Digital Data 5987.0000 - 6007.0000 MHz 853KG7D 65 ° 34 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: Remote 7 PO Box TNC, Nome Borough, Nome (Tin City), AK 167 ° 58 ' 29.70 " W LONG. LOCATION: General Dynamics Tin City 4.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 4.8M Digital Data 3762.0000 - 3782.0000 MHz 853KG7D 55.00 dBW Digital Data 5987.0000 - 6007.0000 MHz 853KG7D 68 ° 52 ' 17.40 " N LAT. SITE ID:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305212A1.txt
  • of 77 70 ° 29 ' 52.40 " N LAT. SITE ID: Remote 6 Pouch 34-0099, North Slope Borough, Prudhoe Bay -Oliktok, AK 149 ° 53 ' 24.40 " W LONG. LOCATION: General Dynamics Oliktok 4.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 4.8M Digital Data 3762.0000 - 3782.0000 MHz 853KG7D 55.00 dBW Digital Data 5987.0000 - 6007.0000 MHz 853KG7D 65 ° 34 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: Remote 7 PO Box TNC, Nome Borough, Nome (Tin City), AK 167 ° 58 ' 29.70 " W LONG. LOCATION: General Dynamics Tin City 4.8 meters ANTENNA ID: 4.8M Digital Data 3762.0000 - 3782.0000 MHz 853KG7D 55.00 dBW Digital Data 5987.0000 - 6007.0000 MHz 853KG7D 68 ° 52 ' 17.40 " N LAT. SITE ID:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305296A1.txt
  • Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.58 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2010 53 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305981A1.txt
  • 13M9G1D Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E010119 SES-RWL-20110415-00458 E Date Effective: 04/19/2011 Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Grant of Authority 07/03/2011 - 07/03/2026 Renewal Kent State University Nature of Service: Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 41 ° 8 ' 25.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 1613 E. SUMMIT STREET, PORTAGE, KENT, OH 81 ° 20 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: PRODELIN A 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 1251 52.80 dBW DIGITAL DATA, 192 KPBS, 1/2 FEC, AUDIO 14000.0000 - 14500.0000 MHz 230KG7W DIGITAL DATA, 192 KPBS, 1/2 FEC, AUDIO 11700.0000 - 12200.0000 MHz 230KG7W Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E980127 SES-STA-20110328-00370 E Date Effective: 04/18/2011 Class of Station: Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310261A1.txt
  • Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of December 31, 2010 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2010 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.200.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.901.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.601.70 1.80 1.90 Max 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.60 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of December 31, 2010 54 38 Table 26 Distribution of Census Tracts by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • Telecommunications and Interconnected VoIP Service Provided for Resale: 2009 Table 1.6 Report Table 1.6 Revenues from Telecommunications and Interconnected VoIP Service Provided to End Users: 2009 Table 1.7 Report Table 1.7 Total Revenues: 2009 Table 1.8 Report Table 1.8 Revenues by Type of Provider: 2009 Table 1.9 Report Table 1.9 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q: 2009-2011 Table 1.10 Report Table 1.10 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors for 2010-2011 Table 1.11 Report Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms: 2009 & 2010 Chart 1.1 Report Chart 1.1 Distribution of Universal Service Payments: 2010 Table 1.12 Report Table 1.12 Universal Service Support Mechanisms by State: 2010 Tables 1.13 - 1.18Website Table 2.1 Report Table 2.1 Lifeline Subscribers and Link
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-12A1.doc
  • not impede the freedom of speech does not disable the government from taking steps to ensure that private interests not restrict, through physical control of a critical pathway of communication, the free flow of information and ideas.''). WorldCom-MCI Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 9822 ¶ 12; SBC-Ameritech Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 3170 ¶ 51. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.10; WorldCom-MCI Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 18031-32 ¶ 10. 47 U.S.C. § 214(c). See WorldCom-MCI Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 18031-32 ¶ 10; Bell Atlantic-NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20002 ¶ 30 n.59 (citing Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. v. FCC, 59 F.3d 1384, 1389-90 (D.C. Cir. 1995). 47 U.S.C. § 303(5). See WorldCom-MCI Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 18032 ¶
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-130A1.txt
  • trouble reports. See, e.g., Letter from Dee May, Executive Director Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 01-9 (filed March 13, 2001) (Verizon March 13 Ex Parte Letter). A 4 month average of Verizon's data for resold 2-wire xDSL under the PR 6-01 submetric from September through December 2000 reduces the disparity to 1.10 percent, which is not competitively significant. In December 2000, the percentage of installation troubles reported within 30 days for 2-wire digital services (not including xDSL services) where no trouble was found on the network (PR 6-03) was 4.74 percent for competing carriers versus 2.06 percent for VADI; the overall trouble report rate within 30 days (PR 6-01) for the same
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • Interface Response Times MR-1-01 Create Trouble 6.67 5.39 6.97 5.72 6.61 6.42 6.57 6.79 MR-1-02 Status Trouble 4.52 2.38 4.63 2.78 4.60 3.34 4.62 3.83 MR-1-03 Modify Trouble 6.67 5.26 6.97 5.94 6.61 6.33 6.57 6.40 1c,2b,3c,4c MR-1-04 Request Cancellation of Trouble 7.80 6.25 8.12 6.51 7.79 8.08 7.75 7.50 MR-1-05 Trouble Report History (by TN/Circuit) 0.82 1.02 1.49 2.04 1.10 2.74 0.57 3.42 MR-1-06 Test Trouble (POTS Only) 58.24 57.97 57.23 49.32 57.60 49.36 57.74 48.51 Change Management, Billing, OS/DA Change Management Notices PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Emergency Maint. 100 100 100 100 1a,2a,3a,4a PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Regulatory NA NA NA 100 4b PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Industry Standard NA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A3.txt
  • Interface Response Times MR-1-01 Create Trouble 6.67 5.39 6.97 5.72 6.61 6.42 6.57 6.79 MR-1-02 Status Trouble 4.52 2.38 4.63 2.78 4.60 3.34 4.62 3.83 MR-1-03 Modify Trouble 6.67 5.26 6.97 5.94 6.61 6.33 6.57 6.40 1c,2b,3c,4c MR-1-04 Request Cancellation of Trouble 7.80 6.25 8.12 6.51 7.79 8.08 7.75 7.50 MR-1-05 Trouble Report History (by TN/Circuit) 0.82 1.02 1.49 2.04 1.10 2.74 0.57 3.42 MR-1-06 Test Trouble (POTS Only) 58.24 57.97 57.23 49.32 57.60 49.36 57.74 48.51 Change Management, Billing, OS/DA Change Management Notices PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Emergency Maint. 100 100 100 100 1a,2a,3a,4a PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Regulatory NA NA NA 100 4b PO-4-01 % Notices Sent on Time - Industry Standard NA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
  • direct, control, supervise or manage Domestic Communications, and (b) facilities and equipment in use by or on behalf of Telenor that are physically located in the United States, and (c) facilities in use by or on behalf of Telenor USA to control the equipment described in (a) and (b). 1.9 "Effective Date" has the meaning given it in the Preamble. 1.10 "Electronic Communication" has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(12). 1.11 "Electronic Surveillance" means (i) the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510(1), (2), (4) and (12), respectively, and electronic surveillance as defined in 50 U.S.C. § 1801(f); (ii) access to stored wire or electronic communications, as referred to in 18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • B-2 AVERAGE MONTHLY RATES, COMPETITIVE GROUP BY STRATA Cable Service Wireline Overbuild DBS Overbuild Local Exchange Carrier (LEC) Low Penetration Municipal July 1, 2001 BST $15.09 $11.01 $11.45 $15.42 $12.77 Standard error 0.99 0.39 0.42 0.79 1.28 Major CPST $16.04 $23.31 $19.85 $17.01 $9.50 Standard error 1.52 1.07 0.57 0.97 2.10 Programming total $31.13 $34.32 $31.30 $32.43 $22.27 Standard error 1.10 0.84 0.46 0.54 1.12 Equipment $2.90 $2.81 $3.73 $1.87 $2.08 Standard error 0.27 0.24 0.14 0.19 0.52 Programming and equipment $34.03 $37.13 $35.03 $34.30 $24.35 Standard error 1.22 1.00 0.51 0.55 1.31 Number of channels 55.98 53.26 65.32 52.94 51.38 Standard error 2.42 2.63 0.88 1.74 3.02 Rate per channel † $0.587 $0.727 $0.489 $0.663 $0.447 Standard error 0.03 0.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-116A1.txt
  • the elevation angle of the DBS receive antenna. Table 1 Table 2 Rain (inches/month) Elevation (km) Rain Rate* (mm/hr) Baseline Outage** (min) Reno, NV Allentown, PA Year January August January August 2001 0.18 0.00 2.37 2.50 Denver 1.58 30.29 50.0 2000 2.14 0.79 1.99 5.22 San Francisco 0.03 33.63 225.3 1999 0.76 0.82 5.44 3.81 Miami 0.00 95.76 550.4 1998 1.10 0.00 3.42 3.12 * Rain rate exceeded 0.01% of time in an average year. 1997 3.32 0.00 3.38 5.12 1996 1.33 0.16 7.32 0.91 ** For the satellite at 101o W longitude. 1995 3.31 0.00 3.49 0.76 1994 0.06 0.00 5.69 6.18 1993 2.42 0.00 1.98 5.39 1992 0.13 0.28 1.73 4.08 1991 0.01 0.24 2.77 2.54 1990 0.62 0.21
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-24A1.txt
  • capacity of the satellite space segment and receiving station. Manual preemption on board ship is elementary. Additionally, priority calls to a ship from search and rescue (``SAR'') authorities should be able to be made. This would involve the ability of LES to break into a call in progress but is still under study by the ITU. See WRC-03 Agenda item 1.10.3 (Res. 348). See AMSC Subsidiary Corp., 1995 WL 109123 (F.C.C., Mar 13, 1995)(DA 95-482). The proposed language of these two requirements was as follows: LES No. 9 ``An LES with a requirement to handle maritime distress and safety communications shall have the capability within the station to automatically preempt lower precedence traffic.'' LES No. 10 ``Each LES shall be capable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (%) 0.62% 0.00% 0.74% 5.56% 0.91% 0.00% 0.66% 0.00% 0.86% 0.00% 3,5 A.2.12.6.2.1ISDN/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 0.00% 5 A.2.12.6.2.2ISDN/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (%) 0.00% 0.00% 1.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1,4,5 Average Completion Notice Interval - Mechanized A.2.14.1.1.1Residence/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 4.11 0.51 3.97 1.26 6.97 0.48 6.23 0.29 5.25 0.04 A.2.14.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.94 0.79 1.10 0.86 1.27 0.78 1.02 0.72 0.92 0.73 A.2.14.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.51 0.27 2.57 2.03 4.42 1.75 4.10 0.14 1.74 0.02 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.14.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.00 1.07 5.32 0.76 5.18 0.43 3.97 0.40 3.92 0.03 A.2.14.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.35 0.78 2.54 0.91 1.67 0.83 1.37 0.79 1.27 0.78 B - 11 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • 10927 (2000); 14 FCC Rcd 8331 (1999); 12 FCC Rcd 22756 (1997); and 12 FCC Rcd 3239 (1997). ATTACHMENT 4 Competitive Group, by Strata Element Wireline Overbuild DBS Overbuild LEC Low Penetration Municipal July 2002 BST $16.37 $17.05 $12.33 $16.59 $14.35 Standard error † 1.22 1.12 0.46 0.79 1.60 CPST $18.00 $17.23 $22.08 $17.89 $10.34 Standard error 1.77 1.91 0.65 1.10 2.33 Programming total $34.37 $34.28 $34.41 $34.48 $24.69 Standard error 1.29 1.32 0.54 0.60 1.35 Equipment $3.24 $2.77 $4.07 $2.08 $0.79 Standard error 0.33 0.35 0.18 0.24 0.42 Programming & equipment $37.61 $37.05 $38.48 $36.56 $25.48 Standard error 1.45 1.59 0.62 0.70 1.52 Channels 60.9 53.9 67.6 53.4 50.4 Standard error 2.7 3.2 1.0 1.8 3.6 Rate per channel $0.646
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
  • is assumed that two of the three carriers will be transmitting in the same time slot, the voice activation factor will be 1.8 dB. In our analysis, a voice activation factor of 1 dB is used for an aggregation of MTs, 4 dB is used for an aggregation of BS and 1.8 dB is used for a single BS sector. 1.10 Voice Encoder (Vocoder) Factor MSV contends that use of voice encoders, or vocoders, will reduce the amount of power from the MTs that would potentially interfere with the Inmarsat satellites. MSV maintains that a 7.4 dB reduction in interfering power could be associated with its use of a 2.4 kbps vocoder and that it is possible for some of its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
  • is assumed that two of the three carriers will be transmitting in the same time slot, the voice activation factor will be 1.8 dB. In our analysis, a voice activation factor of 1 dB is used for an aggregation of MTs, 4 dB is used for an aggregation of BS and 1.8 dB is used for a single BS sector. 1.10 Voice Encoder (Vocoder) Factor MSV contends that use of voice encoders, or vocoders, will reduce the amount of power from the MTs that would potentially interfere with the Inmarsat satellites. MSV maintains that a 7.4 dB reduction in interfering power could be associated with its use of a 2.4 kbps vocoder and that it is possible for some of its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.txt
  • technology introduced into the Referenced Technology, the Compliance Rules or the Robustness Rules pursuant to changes made in accordance with Section 6; or (e) any claims other than those that are necessarily infringed by those portions of Unidirectional Digital Cable Products that implement the inventions claimed in US Patent 4,860,353, even if contained in the same patent as such claim(s). 1.10 "Intellectual Property Rights" means all intellectual property rights arising under statutory law, common law or by contract, and whether or not perfected, including, without limitation, all (a) patents, patent applications and patent rights, (b) rights associated with works of authorship including copyrights, copyright applications, copyright registrations, mask work rights, mask work applications, mask work registrations, and derivative works of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-40A1.txt
  • proposes to use a 10 percent bid increment. This means that the minimum acceptable bid for a license will be approximately 10 percent greater than the previous standing high bid received on the license. The minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the standing high bid times one plus the increment percentage - i.e., (standing high bid) * (1.10). We will round the result using our standard rounding procedures for minimum acceptable bid calculations: results above $10,000 are rounded to the nearest $1,000; results below $10,000 but above $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $100; and results below $1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10. As stated above, until a bid has been placed on a license, the minimum
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.txt
  • it is expressed as a percentage. Also the result of 22.6 minutes/year differs from the previously stated 22.5 minutes/year. This difference can be attributed to rounding as various calculations have been made. ). Rain (inches/month) Reno, NV Allentown, PA Year January August January August 2001 0.18 0.00 2.37 2.50 2000 2.14 0.79 1.99 5.22 1999 0.76 0.82 5.44 3.81 1998 1.10 0.00 3.42 3.12 1997 3.32 0.00 3.38 5.12 1996 1.33 0.16 7.32 0.91 1995 3.31 0.00 3.49 0.76 1994 0.06 0.00 5.69 6.18 1993 2.42 0.00 1.98 5.39 1992 0.13 0.28 1.73 4.08 1991 0.01 0.24 2.77 2.54 1990 0.62 0.21 4.57 6.47 dish10-q.html for more details. For technical details of the new satellite see also Application of EchoStar Satellite
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-105A1.txt
  • served nationally by the cable system owner, as well as the number of networks with which the cable system owner is vertically integrated, as excluded instruments. We perform estimation using the generalized method of moments. Results Table A-1 DBS Penetration and RSN Access Independent Variables Dependent Variable: LN DBS PENETRATION Coefficient z-statistic LN CABLE PRICE 2.37* 2.32 LN CABLE CHANNELS -1.10* -2.56 PHILLY -0.52* -6.47 SANDIEGO -0.41* -4.90 CHARLOTTE -0.23 -1.57 KEYDMA 0.13* 2.30 DBSOVERAIR -0.08 -1.31 CABLECOMP 0.34 1.41 HDTV -0.13 -1.64 INTERNET -0.09 -0.76 LN INCOME -0.36* -2.91 LN MULTIDWELL -0.39* -10.40 LN LATITUDE -0.03 -0.17 CONSTANT -0.92 -0.33 Observations 676 Centered R-Squared 0.22 F-Statistic (13, 662) 40.57 Hansen J Statistic 24.56 * - significant at 95% confidence level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
  • in Arms Regulations (``ITAR''), 22 C.F.R. Chapter I, Subchapter M, or the Export Administration Regulations (``EAR''), 15 C.F.R., Chapter VII, Subchapter C. 1.6. ``DCM'' means NTT DoCoMo, Inc. 1.7. ``DCMG'' means DoCoMo Guam Holdings, Inc. 1.8. ``De facto'' and ``de jure'' control have the meanings provided in 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110. 1.9. ``DHS'' means the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 1.10. ``DOJ'' means the U.S. Department of Justice. 1.11. ``Domestic Communications'' means (i) Wire Communications or Electronic Communications (whether stored or not) from one U.S. location to another U.S. location and (ii) the U.S. portion of a Wire Communication or Electronic Communication (whether stored or not) that originates or terminates in the United States. 1.12. ``Domestic Communications Company'' means all those
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-47A1.txt
  • acceptable bid amount for each license are calculated using a bid increment percentage. The first additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus the bid increment percentage, rounded - e.g., if the increment percentage is 10 percent, the calculation is (minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1 + 0.10), rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.10, rounded; the second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.20, rounded; the third additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid amount times one plus three times the bid increment percentage, rounded, or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.30,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.txt
  • Cable Network 5 $ 0.01 $ 0.016 Cable Network 6 $ 0.04 $ 0.065 Cable Network 7 $ 0.05 $ 0.082 Cable Network 8 $ 0.27 $ 0.442 Cable Network 9 $ 0.00 $ 0.000 Cable Network 10 $ 0.10 $ 0.164 Cable Network 11 $ 0.48 $ 0.785 Cable Network 12 $ 2.19 $ 3.582 Cable Network 13 $ 1.10 $ 1.799 Cable Network 14 $ 0.57 $ 0.932 Cable Network 15 $ 0.15 $ 0.245 Cable Network 16 $ 0.41 $ 0.671 Cable Network 17 $ 0.19 $ 0.311 Cable Network 18 $ 0.06 $ 0.098 Cable Network 19 $ 0.21 $ 0.343 Cable Network 20 $ 0.11 $ 0.180 Cable Network 21 $ 0.62 $ 1.014 Step 1:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
  • one or more Domestic Companies in connection with Hosting Services (including data storage and provisioning, control, maintenance, management, security, selling, billing, or monitoring of Hosting Services), and (b) equipment hosted by the Domestic Companies that is leased or owned by a Hosting Services customer. 1.9. "De facto" and "de jure" control have the meanings provided in 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110. 1.10. "Domestic Communications" means (i) Wire Communications or Electronic Communications (whether stored or not) from one U.S. location to another U.S. location and (ii) the U.S. portion of a Wire Communication or Electronic Communication (whether stored or not) that originates or terminates in the United States. 1.11. "Domestic Communications Infrastructure" means (i) transmission, switching, bridging and routing equipment (including software and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-129A7.txt
  • 18 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed High-Speed Connections to Tract Households as of December 31, 2008 Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2009 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. Note: Ratios over 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. 0 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.400.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 >=2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Perc ent age of T rac ts Number of Tracts 66,287 Median 0.55 Ratio of Residential Fixed High-Speed Connections to Tract Households U.S. Federal Communications Commission High-Speed Services for Internet Access: Status as of December 31, 2008 26 19 Table 12 Distribution of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.txt
  • 121-24. The $210 billion is the sum of interstate, international, and intrastate revenues for all filers in calendar year 2010 -- without deducting exempt LIRE and de minimis revenues. This information was calculated based on a review of the Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets filed in April 2011. In 2010, program demand and administrative expenses were $8.4 billion. 2011 Monitoring Report, Table 1.10. Multiplying 4 percent times $210 billion equals $8.4 billion. During 2010, the quarterly contribution factor ranged from 12.9 percent to 15.3 percent. Percentages based on actual revenue information filed with USAC on FCC Form 499-A for 2004 through 2011. See Appendix C for supporting data. Revenue information for 2011 is preliminary and may be adjusted. We note that based on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
  • -10.0% 0.06 0.1% -33.3% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.19 0.3% 0.0% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 0.09 - 1.22 - 1255.6% 1.20 - -1.6% Total 60.83 - 62.43 - 2.6% 64.44 - 3.2% Sys. w/30+ channels 59.64 98.2% 60.08 98.2% 0.7% 62.5 98.8% 4.0% Sys. w/less than 30 1.10 1.8% 1.13 1.8% 2.7% 0.8 1.2% -32.7% Note: Figures are as of October 1, 1996, October 1, 1997, and October 30, 1998. Note: All "Percentage of Systems" calculation excludes "not available" data, (this includes the percentage tabulations in the categories of "Systems with 30+ channels" and "Systems with less than 30 channels.") Sources: ! !1996: Warren Publishing, Inc., Channel Capacity
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • comments at 4-5; NASUCA comments at 4; PageNet comments at 10-11; Teligent comments at 3; Vanguard comments at 5 (stating that rate center consolidation can reduce CLEC consumption of NXX codes by 75% or more). Rate center consolidation, however, does not supply any additional NXX codes nor does it allow for code sharing between service providers. NANC Report at § 1.10. 177 NANC Report at §§ 1.5.1 and 1.10.2; ALTS comments at 7; GTE comments at 8-9; PrimeCo comments at 3-4; Sprint comments at summary iv. 178 NANC Report at §§ 1.1 and 1.10; NASUCA comments at 4; RCN comments at 2; Vanguard comments at 2. 179 NANC Report at § 1.3. See also ALTS comments at 7; MediaOne comments at
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • find for non-dispatch resale orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch Resale Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 0.96 1.90 -0.94* 1.01 1.59 -0.58* 1.06 1.58 -0.52* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 0.96 0.86 0.10 1.01 1.10 -0.09 1.06 1.15 -0.09 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.07 +0.19 +0.10 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 0.96 0.93 0.03 1.01 1.29 -0.28* 1.06 1.25 -0.19* As evidenced by the bottom line of this table, the differences in Average Completed Intervals for resale orders between competing carriers and Bell Atlantic's retail customers are much smaller
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256485A1.html
  • gravity of the violation, and with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, and any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require.14 Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80, and the statutory factors, we conclude that Lazer is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $8,000. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 1.10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Lazer Broadcasting Corporation is hereby NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for violating Section 11.35 of the Commission's Rules.15 1.11. IT IS FURTHER
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
  • at KCEC-FM for a period of over 15 months and, consequently, numerous RMTs and RWTs were not received or transmitted. Therefore, Farmworkers' violation is repeated. Based on the evidence before us, we find that Farmworkers Educational Radio Network, Inc., apparently repeatedly violated Section 11.35 of the Rules, by failing to ensure the operational readiness of the EAS equipment at KCEC-FM. 1.10. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines (``Forfeiture Policy Statement'') and Section 1.80(b)(4) of the Rules sets forth the base forfeiture amounts for various violations of the Commission's Rules. The base forfeiture for EAS equipment not installed or operational is $8,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262295A1.html
  • week at random days and times.12 The requirement that stations monitor, receive and retransmit the required EAS tests ensures the operational integrity of the EAS system in the event of an actual disaster. Appropriate entries must be made in the broadcast station log as specified in Sections 73.1820 and 73.1840, indicating reasons why any tests were not received or transmitted.13 1.10. Section 11.51(j) of the Rules states that broadcast stations that are co-owned and co-located with a combined studio or control facility may provide EAS for the combined stations with one EAS encoder.14 Section 11.51(j), however, does not contemplate stations that are co-located, but not co-owned, sharing EAS equipment.15 In the present case, KBSZ(AM) and KSWG(FM) are not currently co-owned or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263779A1.html
  • operational so that the monitoring and transmitting functions are available during the times the station is in operation. Broadcast stations must also determine the cause of any failure to receive required monthly and weekly EAS tests, and must indicate in the station's log why any required tests were not received and when defective equipment is removed and restored to service.9 1.10. Section 11.61(a)(1) and (2) of the Rules requires broadcast stations to (a) receive monthly EAS tests from designated local primary EAS sources and retransmit the monthly test within 60 minutes of its receipt and (b) conduct tests of the EAS header and EOM codes at least once a week at random days and times.10 The requirement that stations monitor, receive
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1513A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1513A1.pdf
  • the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the FCC will calculate the minimum acceptable bid amount by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. If bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the construction permit. The FCC will calculate the eight additional bid amounts using the minimum acceptable bid amount and a bid increment
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.pdf
  • proceedings to amend the FM table of allotments, and it ensures that proposed community of license changes receive the consideration warranted by their significance under Section 307(b). Given the important statutory and policy issues raised by proposed community of license changes, we conclude that it would be inappropriate to reclassify them as minor changes for AM and NCE FM stations. 1.10 "Warehousing" concerns. With regard to the spectrum "warehousing" concerns expressed by some commenters, we are not persuaded that additional safeguards are necessary. The commenters' stated fears of widespread warehousing and other abuses have not come to pass in the commercial FM service, notwithstanding size and resource disparities among broadcasters. Mechanisms for preventing abuse will continue to exist under the new
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • '00 Int News Use '00 Chg. AQH List '94-'98 0.3922 0.1176 -0.7387 -0.2400 -0.8745 (0.78) (0.29) (0.68) (0.61) (0.72) Chg. Daily Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 0.0377 0.1188 0.0054 0.0065 -0.1676 0.0271 -0.0074 (0.35) (0.51) (0.29) (0.51) (2.01)* (0.10) (0.05) Chg. Weekly Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 0.0083 0.0166 -0.0048 0.0010 -0.0376 0.1299 0.0619 (0.21) (0.51) (0.68) (0.21) (1.19) (1.33) (1.10) Chg. Cable Use '94-'00 0.2905 -0.1809 -0.2903 -0.0119 -0.0017 0.2656 0.1563 (2.66)** (2.01)* (1.19) (0.61) (0.13) (0.98) (1.02) Int Use '00 0.0126 0.0030 0.1042 -0.0045 0.0276 (0.35) (0.10) (1.33) (0.72) (0.98) Chg. HUT Viewing '95-'00 0.0251 0.0396 0.0121 -0.0117 0.1794 0.0749 -0.1268 (0.35) (0.21) (0.78) (1.14) (2.66)** (0.35) (1.03) Int News Use '00 -0.0073 (1.01) Chg. AQH Inside News List
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc020116.pdf
  • that the freeze-frame182 threshold is the correct value to (...continued from previous page)Table 1 Table 2 Rain (inches/month) Reno, NV Allentown, PA Elevation (km) Rain Rate* (mm/hr) Baseline Outage** (min) YearJanuaryAugustJanuaryAugust 2001 0.18 0.00 2.37 2.50 Denver 1.58 30.29 50.0 2000 2.14 0.79 1.99 5.22 San Francisco 0.03 33.63 225.3 1999 0.76 0.82 5.44 3.81 Miami 0.00 95.76 550.4 1998 1.10 0.00 3.42 3.12 1997 3.32 0.00 3.38 5.12 *Rain rate exceeded 0.01% of time in an average year. 1996 1.33 0.16 7.32 0.91 **For the satellite at 101o W longitude. 1995 3.31 0.00 3.49 0.76 1994 0.06 0.00 5.69 6.18 1993 2.42 0.00 1.98 5.39 1992 0.13 0.28 1.73 4.08 1991 0.01 0.24 2.77 2.54 1990 0.62 0.21 4.57 6.47
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/hazlett.pdf
  • TV (San Francisco) 7/94 1.40 Bay News 9 n.a. 0.75 ChicagoLand Television News 1/93 1.50 New York 1 News (New York City) 7/92 1.97 News 12 Connecticut (Fairfield & Bridgeport) 6/95 0.21 News 12 The Bronx n.a. 0.25 News 12 Long Island 12/86 0.75 News 12 New Jersey 3/96 1.25 News 12 Westchester 11/95 0.32 NewsChannel 8 (Washington, D.C.) 10/91 1.10 NorthWest Cable News (Seattle & Northwest) 12/95 2.10 Orange County (California) NewsChannel 9/90 0.52 45 Table 9 Regional News and Public Affairs Services on Cable TV, continued Network Launch Date Subscribers (millions) Pittsburgh Cable News Channel 1/94 0.64 Cable TV Network of New Jersey (financial news) 7/83 1.80 Washington Television n.a n.a. New York Channel n.a. n.a. California Channel 2/91
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=65
  • commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three alternative band configurations. Licenses in only one of these mutually incompatible band configurations will be awarded. Qualified Bidders: 9 Rounds Completed: 48 Bidding Days: 7 Results for Round 48 Gross Revenue: $32,558,000.00 - Dollar Change: 59000.00 - % Change: 0.18 Net Revenue: $32,558,000.00 - Dollar Change: 354000.00 - % Change: 1.10 New Bids: 2 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 0 Licenses with PWBs*: 2 FCC Held Licenses: 0 Eligible Bidders: 4 (of 9 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=65M on, 22 May 2006 21:15:00 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 65 will offer nationwide commercial licenses in the 800 MHz band in the three
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=70
  • 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70M on, 19 Mar 2007 19:05:01 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 42 Bidding Days: 9 Results for Round 42 Gross Revenue: $24,128,100.00 - Dollar Change: $66,400.00 - % Change: 0.28 Net Revenue: $21,007,215.00 - Dollar Change: $228,690.00 - % Change: 1.10 New Bids: 11 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 1 Permits with PWBs*: 111 FCC Held Permits: 9 Eligible Bidders: 61 (of 114 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=70M on, 19 Mar 2007 19:55:02 GMT Summary Permits: 120 construction permits in the FM broadcast service Qualified Bidders: 114 Rounds Completed: 43 Bidding Days:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01012.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01012.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01012.txt
  • not impede the freedom of speech does not disable the government from taking steps to ensure that private interests not restrict, through physical control of a critical pathway of communication, the free flow of information and ideas.''). WorldCom-MCI Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 9822 ¶ 12; SBC-Ameritech Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 3170 ¶ 51. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.10; WorldCom-MCI Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 18031-32 ¶ 10. 47 U.S.C. § 214(c). See WorldCom-MCI Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 18031-32 ¶ 10; Bell Atlantic-NYNEX Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20002 ¶ 30 n.59 (citing Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. v. FCC, 59 F.3d 1384, 1389-90 (D.C. Cir. 1995). 47 U.S.C. § 303(5). See WorldCom-MCI Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 18032 ¶
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Reports/fcc98335.txt
  • -10.0% 0.06 0.1% -33.3% 6 to 12 0.19 0.3% 0.19 0.3% 0.0% 0.09 0.1% -52.6% 5 or less 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% 0.00 0.0% 0.0% Not Avail. 0.09 - 1.22 - 1255.6% 1.20 - -1.6% Total 60.83 - 62.43 - 2.6% 64.44 - 3.2% Sys. w/30+ channels 59.64 98.2% 60.08 98.2% 0.7% 62.5 98.8% 4.0% Sys. w/less than 30 1.10 1.8% 1.13 1.8% 2.7% 0.8 1.2% -32.7% Note: Figures are as of October 1, 1996, October 1, 1997, and October 30, 1998. Note: All "Percentage of Systems" calculation excludes "not available" data, (this includes the percentage tabulations in the categories of "Systems with 30+ channels" and "Systems with less than 30 channels.") Sources: ! !1996: Warren Publishing, Inc., Channel Capacity
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/News_Releases/2000/nrcc0002.pdf
  • column shows the total support payment of all existing high-cost support mechanisms for non-rural carriers and is the sum of the first three columns of this table. Column 5 shows estimated contributions by state. The sixth column shows, for each state, the difference between high-cost support to non-rural carriers and contributions. I. High-Cost Support per Loop 1. Rural Carriers Table 1.10 summarizes high-cost support payments for rural carriers on a per rural-carrier, per-loop, per-month basis. The first column expresses the HCL payments. The second column 16 The sum of rural carriers and non-rural carriers high-cost support payment reported in Tables 1.8 and 1.9 do not equal total high-cost support reported in Tables 1.5. The total support in Table 1.5 includes a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • comments at 4-5; NASUCA comments at 4; PageNet comments at 10-11; Teligent comments at 3; Vanguard comments at 5 (stating that rate center consolidation can reduce CLEC consumption of NXX codes by 75% or more). Rate center consolidation, however, does not supply any additional NXX codes nor does it allow for code sharing between service providers. NANC Report at § 1.10. 177 NANC Report at §§ 1.5.1 and 1.10.2; ALTS comments at 7; GTE comments at 8-9; PrimeCo comments at 3-4; Sprint comments at summary iv. 178 NANC Report at §§ 1.1 and 1.10; NASUCA comments at 4; RCN comments at 2; Vanguard comments at 2. 179 NANC Report at § 1.3. See also ALTS comments at 7; MediaOne comments at
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • find for non-dispatch resale orders (measured in days), are summarized in the Table below. Estimated Difference in Average Completed Intervals for Non-dispatch Resale Orders June July August BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff BA CLEC Diff Carrier to carrier metrics data 0.96 1.90 -0.94* 1.01 1.59 -0.58* 1.06 1.58 -0.52* Using properly "W" coded CLEC orders 0.96 0.86 0.10 1.01 1.10 -0.09 1.06 1.15 -0.09 Adjustment to CLEC data for difference in standard intervals +0.07 +0.19 +0.10 CLEC data revised for alleged biases 0.96 0.93 0.03 1.01 1.29 -0.28* 1.06 1.25 -0.19* As evidenced by the bottom line of this table, the differences in Average Completed Intervals for resale orders between competing carriers and Bell Atlantic's retail customers are much smaller
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01130.txt
  • trouble reports. See, e.g., Letter from Dee May, Executive Director Federal Regulatory, Verizon, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 01-9 (filed March 13, 2001) (Verizon March 13 Ex Parte Letter). A 4 month average of Verizon's data for resold 2-wire xDSL under the PR 6-01 submetric from September through December 2000 reduces the disparity to 1.10 percent, which is not competitively significant. In December 2000, the percentage of installation troubles reported within 30 days for 2-wire digital services (not including xDSL services) where no trouble was found on the network (PR 6-03) was 4.74 percent for competing carriers versus 2.06 percent for VADI; the overall trouble report rate within 30 days (PR 6-01) for the same
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (%) 0.62% 0.00% 0.74% 5.56% 0.91% 0.00% 0.66% 0.00% 0.86% 0.00% 3,5 A.2.12.6.2.1ISDN/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.63% 0.00% 5 A.2.12.6.2.2ISDN/>=10 circuits/Non-Dispatch/FL (%) 0.00% 0.00% 1.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1,4,5 Average Completion Notice Interval - Mechanized A.2.14.1.1.1Residence/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 4.11 0.51 3.97 1.26 6.97 0.48 6.23 0.29 5.25 0.04 A.2.14.1.1.2Residence/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 0.94 0.79 1.10 0.86 1.27 0.78 1.02 0.72 0.92 0.73 A.2.14.1.2.1Residence/>=10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.51 0.27 2.57 2.03 4.42 1.75 4.10 0.14 1.74 0.02 1,2,3,4,5 A.2.14.2.1.1Business/<10 circuits/Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.00 1.07 5.32 0.76 5.18 0.43 3.97 0.40 3.92 0.03 A.2.14.2.1.2Business/<10 circuits/Non- Dispatch/FL (hours) 3.35 0.78 2.54 0.91 1.67 0.83 1.37 0.79 1.27 0.78 B - 11 Metric Metric Name [SQM Number] May June July August
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Fiber/infra98.pdf
  • of the nation's telephone lines. The data are generally filed at the study area level, which typically consists of a company's operations within a state. The state- by-state data are available from the Commission's ARMIS web page at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/armis/db/ on the World Wide Web. The information summarized in this report is organized into two sets of tables: Tables 1.1 through 1.10 show switching system data and gross plant expenditures covering all types of plant. Tables 2.1 through 2.10 show transmission system data. Each set of tables contain segments for each of the five regional Bell operating companies (corresponding to the seven original regional BOCs), one for the companies owned by GTE, and two that summarize data for the BOCs and all
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ldrpt101.pdf
  • YearPeriod High-Cost & Low-Income Support All Support High-Cost & Low-Income Support All Support 1998First Quarter 3.19% 3.91% 0.00% 0.72% Second Quarter 3.14 3.90 0.00 0.76 Third Quarter 3.14 3.89 0.00 0.75 Fourth Quarter 3.18 3.93 0.00 0.75 1999First Quarter 3.18 3.76 0.00 0.58 Second Quarter 3.05 3.62 0.00 0.57 Third Quarter 2.94 3.93 0.00 0.99 Fourth Quarter 2.89 3.99 0.00 1.10 2000First Quarter 3.27 5.88 0.00 0.00 Second Quarter 3.21 5.71 0.00 0.00 Third Quarter 3.77 5.54 0.00 0.00 Fourth Quarter 3.88 5.67 0.00 0.00 2001First Quarter 4.07 6.68 0.00 0.00 * These factors do not include any assessments for the Telecommunications Relay Service or administration of the North American Numbering Plan. Factors for Intrastate End-User Revenues Factors for Interstate End-User
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • October 15, 2001)....................12 Table 1.7 Lifeline and LinkUp Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2001)..............................13 3. Business Rates....................................................................................................15 Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2001).....................16 Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2001...................17 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2001).....................18 Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................20 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001...............22 Table 1.13 Average
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • Rates (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.7 Lifeline and LinkUp Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2002 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.13 Average
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • Rates (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.7 Lifeline and Link-Up Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2003 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1993-2003 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1993-2003 Table 1.13 Standard
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • Rates (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.7 Lifeline and Link-Up Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2004 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1994-2004 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1994-2004 Table 1.13 Standard
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • from 1986 to 1996 33%41%43%19%24%25%10%15%16%-4% 0% 1%-10%-6%-5%-5%-1% 0%-8%-6%-6%-10%-9%-9%-16%-15%-15% 158 Appendix 9 Comparison of Basic Schedule Rates as of December 31 Residence Night Rates for 10 Minute calls 5 Mile Call 16 Mile Call 39 Mile Call 90 Mile Call 200 Mile Call 334 Mile Call 678 Mile Call1418 Mile Call 2455 Mile Call AT&TMCISprintAT&TMCISprintAT&TMCISprintAT&TMCISprintAT&TMCISprintAT&TMCISprintAT&TMCISprintAT&TMCISprintAT&TMCISprint 1980$0.40 $0.56 $0.94 $1.26$0.71$0.92$1.46$0.77$1.00$1.49$0.84$1.08$1.50$0.97$1.16$1.58$1.08$1.28$1.66$1.15$1.32 19810.45 0.65 1.10 1.461.011.071.621.121.161.741.211.251.751.211.351.841.271.481.921.331.53 19820.70$0.51$0.360.95$0.69$0.501.20$0.87$0.801.561.141.001.631.201.191.741.281.201.791.311.271.841.351.292.061.501.31 19830.700.610.590.950.840.791.201.080.991.561.251.201.631.321.301.741.411.331.671.451.401.841.481.482.061.661.56 19840.660.600.640.900.810.861.111.021.071.471.341.361.541.440.151.621.501.581.581.601.611.711.631.641.931.821.81 19850.790.730.921.030.961.051.201.141.151.391.321.361.461.391.451.541.441.521.511.551.561.621.601.591.771.711.73 19860.770.720.620.990.930.931.131.071.061.291.231.221.381.311.301.461.341.331.381.481.571.551.541.521.661.621.61 19870.690.670.680.880.870.860.980.950.951.111.091.041.201.181.041.291.271.051.261.371.371.391.371.381.441.421.43 19880.700.660.680.850.860.860.950.950.951.031.061.041.121.171.041.161.251.051.261.351.361.261.361.361.321.411.42 19890.970.920.851.101.050.951.201.151.051.201.151.151.211.151.151.221.151.151.261.221.221.301.251.251.321.251.25 19900.970.920.951.101.051.101.201.151.201.201.151.201.211.151.201.221.151.201.261.221.251.301.251.301.321.251.30 19911.051.001.001.131.101.101.201.201.201.201.201.201.221.201.201.251.201.201.301.301.301.331.301.301.351.301.30 19921.101.091.101.201.171.201.201.171.201.201.201.201.301.181.301.301.251.301.301.251.301.301.251.351.301.251.30 19931.101.101.101.201.171.201.201.171.201.201.171.201.301.181.301.301.291.301.301.291.301.301.291.301.301.291.30 19941.201.201.201.301.301.301.301.301.301.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.501.501.50 19951.201.201.201.301.301.301.301.301.301.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.401.501.501.50 19961.301.301.301.301.301.301.301.301.301.501.501.501.501.501.501.501.501.501.601.601.601.601.601.601.601.601.60 Percent Changes from 1986 to 1996 69%81%109%31%39%40%15%21%22%16%22%23% 9%15%15% 3%12%13%16% 8% 2% 3% 4% 5%-4%-1%-1% 159 Appendix 9 Comparison of Basic Schedule Rates as of December 31 Business Day Rates for 10 Minute calls 5 Mile Call 16 Mile Call 39 Mile Call 90 Mile
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • for Low-Income Households..........................11 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Subsidized Rates.........................12 Table 1.7 Lifeline and Link-up Rates in the Sample Cities as of October 15, 1997.........13 3. Business Rates.........................................15 Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line as of October 15, 1997..........16 Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line, 1989-1997...................17 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line as of October 15, 1997.........................18 Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line, 1990-1997...20 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities, 1990-1997..........22 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • for Low-Income Households.......................11 Table 1.6 Comparison of Standard Local Rates to Subsidized Rates.......................12 Table 1.7 Lifeline and Link-up Rates in the Sample Cities as of October 15, 1998........13 3. Business Rates.....................................15 Table 1.8 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line as of October 15, 1998.........16 Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line, 1989-1998.................17 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line as of October 15, 1998.......................18 Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line, 1990-1998..20 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities, 1990-1998.........22 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • 5NEW YORK TELEPHONE 11.59 10.04 9.00 15.03 (8.70) 12.38 13.35 6NEVADA BELL 13.72 12.45 14.67 13.66 (114.08) 19.38 15.43 7PACIFIC BELL 12.70 11.61 12.83 14.14 76.94 14.40 14.39 8SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY 11.73 12.04 12.44 13.55 (10.90) 9.46 10.96 9U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 12.75 12.04 13.25 13.28 (98.11) 14.00 13.40 10CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF FLORIDA 10.86 11.89 9.38 19.90 (136.70) (1.10) 9.60 11CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS 12.07 16.36 0.94 10.94 17.80 11.73 12CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF IOWA 12.37 11.40 7.12 11.70 36.75 15.16 13CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA 13.12 11.16 9.63 16.05 7.33 17.31 14CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF NEVADA 12.37 11.03 8.07 13.60 23,893.87 15.93 14.81 15CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA 12.42 12.06 12.65 16.12 (9.74) 7.41 13.04 16CENTRAL
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • 1.08 ILLINOIS 97.43 1.03 INDIANA 95.62 1.05 IOWA 83.83 1.19 KANSAS 84.00 1.19 KENTUCKY 76.44 1.31 LOUISIANA 92.83 1.08 MAINE 83.80 1.19 MARYLAND 99.81 1.00 MASSACHUSETTS 99.91 1.00 MICHIGAN 96.70 1.03 MINNESOTA 75.47 1.33 MISSISSIPPI 93.75 1.07 MISSOURI 93.36 1.07 MONTANA 69.54 1.44 NEBRASKA 87.24 1.15 NEVADA 31.46 3.18 NEW HAMPSHIRE 93.98 1.06 NEW JERSEY 99.85 1.00 NEW MEXICO 90.92 1.10 NEW YORK 96.82 1.03 NORTH CAROLINA 83.60 1.20 NORTH DAKOTA 70.80 1.41 OHIO 86.60 1.15 OKLAHOMA 88.72 1.13 OREGON 91.84 1.09 PENNSYLVANIA 94.80 1.05 RHODE ISLAND 100.00 1.00 SOUTH CAROLINA 74.74 1.34 SOUTH DAKOTA 77.77 1.29 TENNESSEE 87.77 1.14 TEXAS 93.88 1.07 UTAH 95.56 1.05 VERMONT 84.27 1.19 VIRGINIA 97.38 1.03 WASHINGTON 91.13 1.10 WEST VIRGINIA 83.52 1.20 WISCONSIN 81.43
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-96.pdf
  • (0.61) 0.91 (0.61) 0.01 RHODE ISLAND 0.24 1.02 (0.78) 1.11 (0.87) (0.10) SOUTH CAROLINA 1.98 0.94 1.04 1.06 0.91 (0.13) SOUTH DAKOTA 3.94 0.95 3.00 1.24 2.70 (0.29) TENNESSEE 0.75 0.96 (0.21) 0.98 (0.23) (0.02) TEXAS 0.96 0.91 0.05 0.82 0.14 0.09 UTAH 0.78 1.00 (0.22) 1.13 (0.35) (0.13) VERMONT 2.88 1.01 1.87 1.30 1.58 (0.29) VIRGINIA 0.30 0.98 (0.68) 1.10 (0.80) (0.12) WASHINGTON 1.21 0.98 0.23 1.03 0.18 (0.05) WEST VIRGINIA 1.90 0.95 0.95 1.01 0.89 (0.06) WISCONSIN 1.37 0.89 0.48 0.79 0.58 0.09 WYOMING 6.49 1.08 5.42 1.39 5.10 (0.31) UNITED STATES $0.87 0.95 (0.08) 0.95 (0.08) 0.00 GUAM 1.33 0.00 1.33 0.95 0.39 (0.95) N. MARIANA ISL. 21.68 0.93 20.76 0.42 21.26 0.51 PUERTO RICO 10.21 0.63 9.58
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • (8,379) 0.00 1.32 (1.31) DIST. OF COLUMBIA 0 11,656 (11,656) 0.00 1.06 (1.06) FLORIDA 31,833 142,655 (110,822) 0.25 1.13 (0.88) GEORGIA 78,176 69,394 8,782 1.37 1.21 0.15 HAWAII 1,318 8,773 (7,455) 0.16 1.03 (0.88) IDAHO 29,126 10,927 18,199 3.56 1.34 2.23 ILLINOIS 24,721 93,298 (68,577) 0.26 0.97 (0.72) INDIANA 16,870 39,727 (22,857) 0.41 0.95 (0.55) IOWA 29,192 20,885 8,307 1.53 1.10 0.44 KANSAS 58,496 21,004 37,492 3.08 1.10 1.97 KENTUCKY 25,555 26,778 (1,224) 1.03 1.08 (0.05) LOUISIANA 67,156 29,098 38,058 2.30 1.00 1.30 MAINE 22,370 9,648 12,722 2.31 0.99 1.31 MARYLAND 910 47,296 (46,386) 0.02 1.13 (1.11) MASSACHUSETTS 12,015 59,637 (47,621) 0.22 1.11 (0.89) MICHIGAN 41,458 59,843 (18,385) 0.55 0.80 (0.24) MINNESOTA 41,770 37,072 4,698 1.21 1.07 0.14 MISSISSIPPI 28,343 17,587
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-98.pdf
  • column shows the total support payment of all existing high-cost support mechanisms for non-rural carriers and is the sum of the first three columns of this table. Column 5 shows estimated contributions by state. The sixth column shows, for each state, the difference between high-cost support to non-rural carriers and contributions. I. High-Cost Support per Loop 1. Rural Carriers Table 1.10 summarizes high-cost support payments for rural carriers on a per rural-carrier, per-loop, per-month basis. The first column expresses the HCL payments. The second column 16 The sum of rural carriers and non-rural carriers high-cost support payment reported in Tables 1.8 and 1.9 do not equal total high-cost support reported in Tables 1.5. The total support in Table 1.5 includes a
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • 76.49 23.07 99.56 Mississippi 40.20 4.90 10.16 31.37 1.74 0.76 89.12 21.66 110.78 Missouri 28.33 4.63 12.87 27.38 1.33 0.83 75.38 23.37 98.75 Montana 30.45 5.15 13.69 38.12 0.86 1.03 89.29 20.47 109.76 Nebraska 35.14 4.99 12.61 32.54 1.07 1.02 87.37 26.15 113.52 Nevada 23.08 4.39 5.16 37.54 0.94 0.71 71.81 26.01 97.82 New Hampshire 24.32 4.91 12.69 41.16 1.02 1.10 85.20 14.64 99.84 New Jersey 20.52 4.76 19.12 33.48 1.02 0.75 79.64 15.49 95.13 New Mexico 30.10 5.49 10.22 38.43 0.94 1.01 86.20 17.41 103.61 New York 36.37 4.82 11.32 28.41 3.96 0.87 85.75 17.22 102.97 North Carolina 31.29 4.76 13.18 30.04 1.39 0.77 81.43 22.74 104.17 North Dakota 24.73 5.10 15.26 35.62 0.86 1.07 82.65 20.45 103.10 Ohio 28.33
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.37 2.35 59,929 83,560 146,562 U S WEST 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.24 2.02 20,659 38,380 59,227 RBOCs 0.04 0.00 0.75 0.30 2.19 151,779 259,180 415,679 Aliant (AllTel) 0.00 0.00 1.39 0.35 3.58 248 512 764 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.17 1.85 1,077 2,031 3,110 Citizens 2.41 0.68 1.64 0.89 8.45 1,267 1,357 2,626 Frontier 1.01 0.00 1.10 0.48 4.32 757 1,723 2,483 GTE 1.75 0.35 0.87 0.24 4.50 19,333 32,376 51,982 Sprint Local 0.73 0.07 1.01 0.22 3.38 8,444 13,871 22,420 Independent Price Caps 1.41 0.26 0.94 0.26 4.23 31,126 51,869 83,385 All Price Caps 0.27 0.04 0.78 0.29 2.54 182,905 311,049 499,064 NECA**** 1.00 1.33 3.66 0.17 10.31 12,885 14,715 14,782 All Price Caps And NECA
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 1.30 1958 0.24 0.22 28.9 1.38 1.27 1959 0.24 0.22 29.1 1.38 1.26 1960 0.24 0.22 29.6 1.36 1.24 1961 0.25 0.22 29.9 1.39 1.23 1962 0.25 0.22 30.2 1.40 1.21 1963 0.25 0.22 30.6 1.35 1.20 1964 0.25 0.22 31.0 1.34 1.18 1965 0.24 0.22 31.5 1.27 1.16 1966 0.24 0.22 32.4 1.25 1.13 1967 0.24 0.22 33.4 1.21 1.10 1968 0.24 0.22 34.8 1.13 1.05 1969 0.24 0.22 36.7 1.09 1.00 1/ Estimates for 1930 through 1981 are based on information in AT&T Long Lines Statistics, 1930-1963, 1946-1970, and 1960-1981, and appear to represent data for the conterminous U.S. only. Data prior to 1946 may not be comparable. Data for 1982 and 1983 were estimated using BLS price index
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • the multiline business SLC and PICC rates, are multiplied by five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1/ Rates Effective from 01/01/02-06/30/02 Year 2000 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00¢ 0.00¢ 0.36¢ 0.18¢ 1.10¢ 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 2 (Thousands) Company ResidentialNon-Primary Multiline ResidentialNon-PrimaryMultiline Centrex ResidentialNon-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL - Nebraska $4.96 $4.96 $5.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 206 13 70 BellSouth 6.50 7.00 7.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,428 2,214 5,594 CenturyTel 3 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 2.06 1.10 763 40 143 Cincinnati Bell 5.32 5.32 5.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 649 75 279 Citizens 6.12 6.44 9.20 0.00 0.00 3.81 0.60 1,686 167 485 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.82 207 15 43 Qwest 6.11 6.36 6.76 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 9,761 1,762 4,064 SBC 5.00 4.92 4.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,792 6,117 16,064
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • 20,626 7.09 North Carolina 2,402 4,197 6,599 1,028 681 1,709 3,430 4,878 8,308 2.85 North Dakota 181 308 488 97 55 151 277 362 640 0.22 N. Mariana Islands 14 21 35 6 3 10 20 24 44 0.02 Ohio 2,714 5,589 8,304 1,150 948 2,098 3,865 6,537 10,402 3.57 Oklahoma 897 1,656 2,553 413 239 652 1,310 1,895 3,204 1.10 Oregon 998 1,594 2,592 467 267 735 1,465 1,861 3,326 1.14 Pennsylvania 3,357 6,067 9,424 1,477 1,168 2,645 4,834 7,235 12,069 4.15 Puerto Rico 592 1,444 2,036 222 195 416 814 1,639 2,453 0.84 Rhode Island 285 502 788 112 64 176 398 566 963 0.33 South Carolina 1,160 2,194 3,354 491 335 826 1,651 2,528 4,180 1.44 South Dakota
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • the multiline business SLC and PICC rates, are multiplied by five and added to multiline business counts. 1 - 7 Table 1.4 Interstate Per-Minute Access Charges by Carrier (In Cents per Minute) 1/ Rates Effective from 7/1/01-12/31/01 Year 2000 Minutes of Use Carrier (Millions) Common Line per Company Originating Access CCL CCL Local Minute OriginatingTerminatingSwitching BellSouth 0.00¢ 0.00¢ 0.36¢ 0.18¢ 1.10¢ 27,845 57,012 83,187 Cincinnati Bell 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.21 1.49 1,042 2,162 3,215 Citizens 0.57 0.00 0.87 0.65 3.69 2,747 2,865 5,680 Global Crossing 0.05 0.00 0.61 0.41 2.15 575 1,583 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Mbps, even though some frame relay service speeds may be faster. Other Service Unknown 2 Broadband 2 200K to 1.49Mb or Speed 1.5Mb 199K 19 - 8 Year 1998First Quarter 3.19 % 0.72% Second Quarter 3.14 0.76 Third Quarter 3.14 0.75 Fourth Quarter 3.18 0.75 1999First Quarter 3.18 0.58 Second Quarter 3.05 0.57 Third Quarter 2.94 0.99 Fourth Quarter 2.887 1.10 5.89952 2000First Quarter 5.8770 Second Quarter 5.7101 Third Quarter 5.5360 Fourth Quarter 5.6688 2001First Quarter 6.6827 Second Quarter 6.8823 Third Quarter 6.8941 Fourth Quarter 6.9187 2002First Quarter 6.8086 Second Quarter 7.2805 Third Quarter 3 7.2805 Fourth Quarter 7.2805 2003First Quarter 7.2805 Second Quarter 4 9.1 Third Quarter 9.5 4 Beginning with the second quarter of 2003, carriers contribute based on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 273 601 303 298 197 207 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 1.61 1967 2/ 40 114 55 60 23 32 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46 127 62 65 28 40 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 65 172 83 89 38 52 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81 197 99 98 51 60 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 101 237 121 117 68 75 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 127 292 148 144 92 99 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159 365 184 180 112 120 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 191 429 217 212 142 152 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219 490 247 243 167 177 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 273 601 303 298 197 207 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/m96-indx.pdf
  • Table 3.5 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State ................................................ Table 3.7 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Company ......................................... Table 3.13 Other Operating Income or Loss ......................................................................... Table 6.8 Penetration - Households .................................................................................... Chart 1.1 Penetration - Individuals ..................................................................................... Chart 1.8 Penetration by Household Size ........................................................................... Table 1.5 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ................................................ Table 1.10 Penetration by Household Size - 1995 ................................................................ Chart 1.5 Penetration by Householder's Age ...................................................................... Table 1.6 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ........................................... Table 1.11 Penetration by Householder's Age - 1995 .......................................................... Chart 1.6 Penetration by Income ........................................................................................ Table 1.4 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ............................................................. Table 1.9 Penetration by Income - 1995 ............................................................................. Chart 1.4 Penetration by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • describe this situation. As a result of circularity and other reasons, carriers imposed markups greater than the adopted factors. To address this issue, the Commission twice changed the universal service contribution methodology. The first change reduced each carrier's contribution base by the amount that that carrier paid into Universal Service the prior quarter.14 The line item "Circularity Adjustment" in Table 1.10 accounts for this change, starting with the third quarter of 2002, when it was first implemented. From the third quarter of 2002 through the first quarter of 2003, the "Circularity Adjustment" represents the industry's actual contributions during the prior quarter as reported by USAC. This eliminated circularity as a reason for carriers to inflate pass-through charges. After this first change,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • further adjustment. 2 - 79 State or Jurisdiction Lifeline LinkUp TLS Total Non-Tribal Tribal Non-Tribal Tribal Alabama $1.07 $0.00 $0.01 $0.00 $0.00 $1.08 Alaska 2.97 2.07 0.11 0.07 0.14 5.36 American Samoa 5.45 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 5.57 Arizona 1.53 2.03 0.02 0.10 0.06 3.73 Arkansas 0.61 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.69 California 12.51 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.11 13.41 Colorado 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.11 Connecticut 2.23 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 2.28 Delaware 0.38 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.41 District of Columbia 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.32 Florida 1.34 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 1.37 Georgia 1.41 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 1.43 Guam 4.32 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.02 4.67 Hawaii 1.70 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 1.89 Idaho 3.94 0.02 0.02
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 0.00 0.03 0.11 0.63 Minnesota 0.68 0.00 0.37 0.11 0.24 0.52 1.93 Mississippi 1.34 6.71 0.35 0.96 0.13 0.24 9.73 Missouri 1.07 0.00 0.25 0.36 0.19 0.17 2.04 Montana 4.31 1.64 1.56 0.10 0.62 1.31 9.54 Nebraska 0.96 0.00 0.35 0.22 0.36 0.93 2.81 Nevada 0.43 0.00 0.06 0.55 0.07 0.43 1.53 New Hampshire 0.10 0.00 0.15 0.34 0.05 0.47 1.10 New Jersey 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.05 New Mexico 1.66 0.00 0.53 0.64 0.19 0.75 3.77 New York 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.13 0.01 0.11 0.37 North Carolina 0.27 0.00 0.20 0.38 0.06 0.09 0.99 North Dakota 2.72 0.00 1.32 0.14 0.92 1.97 7.08 N. Mariana Islands 12.70 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.00 3.38 17.04 Ohio 0.09 0.00 0.06 0.18
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • Industry Revenues - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................ Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2001................................... ................... Table 1.14 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Disbursements ........................... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ..................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Jurisdiction ....... Table 3.19 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ........ Table 3.33 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Jurisdiction .................
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • describe this situation. As a result of circularity and other reasons, carriers imposed markups greater than the adopted factors. To address this issue, the Commission twice changed the universal service contribution methodology. The first change reduced each carrier's contribution base by the amount that the carrier paid into USF during the prior quarter.15 The line item "Circularity Adjustment" in Table 1.10 accounts 14 47 C.F.R. §54.711(b). 15 See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Service, North American Numbering Plan, Local Number Portability, and Universal Service Support Mechanisms, Telecommunications Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Administration of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • 11.16 New York 1.80 -3.79 5.81 -1.36 North Carolina -0.31 -2.11 1.83 14.70 North Dakota 0.91 -0.79 1.71 -2.52 Northern Mariana Islands -11.06 3.18 -13.81 -100.00 Ohio 0.98 -2.31 3.36 -3.07 Oklahoma -4.60 -5.03 0.45 5.02 Oregon 1.31 -4.04 5.58 -2.48 Pennsylvania 0.00 -3.61 3.75 14.96 Puerto Rico -4.17 -3.59 -0.60 -100.00 Rhode Island -3.65 -7.22 3.84 0.00 South Carolina 1.10 -2.30 3.48 4.39 South Dakota 3.23 -4.17 7.72 9.37 Tennessee 1.60 -2.82 4.54 7.11 Texas -4.26 -3.30 -0.99 3.74 Utah 1.16 -4.78 6.25 4.71 Vermont -2.18 -0.96 -1.24 -11.03 Virgin Islands -4.72 0.80 -5.48 -15.51 Virginia -2.06 -2.55 0.51 -36.58 Washington 1.25 -3.38 4.80 -9.48 West Virginia -2.73 -1.35 -1.40 -8.92 Wisconsin -2.51 -4.63 2.22 12.04 Wyoming 0.21 -2.62 2.90
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • Residential Non-Primary Multiline Residential Non-Primary Multiline Centrex Residential Non-Primary Multiline and Residential Business and Residential Business and Residential Business Single-Line and Single-Line Single-Line and Business Centrex Business Business Centrex ALLTEL - Nebraska 4.96 4.96 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 206 13 70 BellSouth 6.50 7.00 7.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,428 2,214 5,594 CenturyTel 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 2.06 1.10 763 40 143 Cincinnati Bell 5.32 5.32 5.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 649 75 279 Citizens 6.12 6.44 9.20 0.00 0.00 3.81 0.60 1,686 167 485 Iowa Telecom 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.82 207 15 43 Qwest 6.11 6.36 6.76 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 9,761 1,762 4,064 SBC 5.00 4.92 4.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,792 6,117 16,064
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • of Carrier ..............................................Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues - Interstate ........................................................ Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate ........................................................ Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ................... Table 3.18 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area .............................. Table 3.32 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-0.pdf
  • - 1996 .......................................................... Chart 1.7 Penetration by State ............................................................................................ Table 1.4 Penetration by State - Changes - 1984 to 1996 .................................................. Table 1.2 Penetration by State - Changes - 1984 to 1996 - Map ....................................... Chart 1.3 Penetration by State - Changes - States With and Without Lifeline Programs ... Table 1.3 Penetration by State - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 1.10 Penetration by State - 1996 - Map ...................................................................... Chart 1.2 Pool - NECA - Common Line ............................................................................ Table 7.1 Pool - NECA - Common Line - Revenue Sources ............................................. Chart 7.1 Pool - NECA - Traffic Sensitive ........................................................................ Table 7.2 Price Indexes - Annual Changes ......................................................................... Table 5.2 Price Indexes - Local Service - Annual Changes ................................................ Table 5.3 4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
  • statistics for various geographic and demographic characteristics. The charts and the first three tables present summaries of the available information. Tables 1.4 through 1.9 present more detailed information. In Tables 1.4 through 1.8, only the annual averages are included for the years 1984 through 1993. March, July, and November data for those years are available in previous Monitoring Reports. Tables 1.10 through 1.15 provide information necessary to determine the statistical significance of changes in the penetration rates over time. Table 1.1 summarizes the telephone penetration for the United States, combining information on the number of households with the penetration rates. Chart 1.1 depicts the nationwide penetration rates for households graphically over time. Table 1.2 summarizes the telephone penetration rates by state,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • per 1,000 Access Lines 698.2 350.2 4,184.5 3,484.5 530.2 3,134.6 1,275.9 2,058.5 5,756.6 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 45 32 65 32 55 207 143 12 8 Events per Hundred Switches 3.1 2.3 3.9 2.5 6.8 12.2 9.9 0.3 0.5 Events per Million Access Lines 2.21 1.50 2.82 1.74 2.47 13.52 8.86 0.66 1.10 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.3 3.6 4.6 5.3 11.6 2.6 3.1 21.8 6.4 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 10.6 32.8 31.4 45.3 37.2 8.7 11.3 8.2 35.7 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 33.2 116.6 138.3 243.4 458.6 23.3 40.1 67.6 159.1 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 73.5 174.6 389.5 424.7 1,133.6 315.4 355.9 44.3 174.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
  • per 1,000 Access Lines 698.2 283.3 4,184.5 3,484.5 687.7 3,134.6 1,275.9 2,034.2 5,756.6 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 45 25 65 32 55 207 143 11 8 Events per Hundred Switches 3.1 2.2 3.9 2.5 6.8 12.2 9.9 0.2 0.5 Events per Million Access Lines 2.21 1.39 2.82 1.74 3.21 13.52 8.86 0.60 1.10 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.3 3.7 4.6 5.3 11.6 2.6 3.1 23.2 6.4 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 10.6 33.1 31.4 45.3 37.2 8.7 11.3 9.0 35.7 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 33.2 122.6 138.3 243.4 458.6 23.3 40.1 73.6 159.1 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 73.5 169.9 389.5 424.7 1,470.5 315.4 355.9 44.3 174.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 6.25 27.44 351266 A ORAN MUTUAL TEL. CO. 18.11 6.09 11.32 68.42 351269 A PALO COOP. TEL. ASSN. 17.72 6.81 10.22 77.03 351270 A PALMER MUTUAL TEL. CO. 16.30 2.88 13.04 81.13 351271 A PANORA COOP. TEL. ASSN., INC. 6.68 6.22 0.43 0.00 351273 A PEOPLES TEL. CO.-IA 3.09 -0.44 3.55 28.04 351274 A CENTURYTEL OF POSTVILLE, INC. 2.76 3.90 -1.10 0.00 351275 A PRAIRIEBURG TEL. CO., INC. 5.09 1.84 3.19 10.53 351276 A PRESTON TEL. CO. 11.74 2.86 8.63 67.64 351277 A RADCLIFFE TEL. CO., INC. 13.92 3.91 9.63 72.37 351278 A READLYN TEL. CO. 9.16 5.31 3.66 31.92 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 13.60 2.21 11.14 75.24 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 15.39 2.26 12.84 79.36 351283 A
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • - Total ...................................................Table 1.1 Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Carrier ............................................. Table 1.3 Telecommunications Revenues ­ Interstate ........................................................Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues ­ Intrastate ........................................................Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues ­ Total ­ by State ................................................ Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues Used to Allocate Revenues by State ................... Table 1.14 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Disbursements ........................... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ..................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Jurisdiction ....... Table 3.22 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ........ Table 3.34 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Jurisdiction .................
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
  • per 1,000 Access Lines 698.2 283.3 4,184.5 3,484.5 687.7 3,134.6 1,275.9 2,034.2 5,756.6 For Scheduled Downtime More than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 45 25 65 32 55 207 143 11 8 Events per Hundred Switches 3.1 2.2 3.9 2.5 6.8 12.2 9.9 0.2 0.5 Events per Million Access Lines 2.21 1.39 2.82 1.74 3.21 13.52 8.86 0.60 1.10 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 3.3 3.7 4.6 5.3 11.6 2.6 3.1 23.2 6.4 Avg. Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 10.6 33.1 31.4 45.3 37.2 8.7 11.3 9.0 35.7 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 33.2 122.6 138.3 243.4 458.6 23.3 40.1 73.6 159.1 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 73.5 169.9 389.5 424.7 1,470.5 315.4 355.9 44.3 174.5
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • 1.27 1.14 1.03 0.85 0.65 0.60 0.38 0.38 Canada 10/ 0.42 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 China 3.43 3.72 3.48 3.37 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.72 0.70 Colombia 1.85 1.75 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 Dominican Republic 10/ 1.45 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.95 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 El Salvador 1.50 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 France 10/ 1.58 1.71 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 Germany 1.58 1.71 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • 1.27 1.14 1.03 0.85 0.65 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 Canada 10/ 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 China 3.72 3.48 3.37 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.71 0.40 0.40 Colombia 1.75 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 0.38 Dominican Republic 10/ 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 0.46 El Salvador 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 France 10/ 1.71 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.19 Germany 1.71 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • 0.85 0.65 0.45 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 Canada 8/ 9/ 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 China 3.48 3.37 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.72 0.40 0.36 0.36 Colombia 9/ 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 0.38 0.38 Dominican Republic 8/ 9/ 1.39 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Egypt 9/ 1.80 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 0.46 0.46 0.46 El Salvador 9/ 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 0.38 0.38 France 9/ 1.43 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.21 Germany 9/ 1.43 1.10 0.83 0.51
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Australia $0.83 $0.76 $0.59 $0.59 $0.45 Brazil 1.50 1.40 1.27 1.14 1.03 $0.85 $0.65 $0.60 $0.38 Canada 0.28 0.28 China 3.37 2.93 2.91 2.67 2.13 1.69 1.40 1.01 0.72 $0.40 $0.36 $0.36 Colombia 1.55 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.25 1.00 0.80 0.65 0.55 0.38 Dominican Republic 1.36 1.29 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.38 0.38 Egypt 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.30 1.30 1.10 0.70 El Salvador 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.10 0.88 0.77 0.60 0.48 0.38 France 0.96 0.97 0.62 0.54 0.35 0.26 Germany 1.10 0.83 0.51 0.39 0.23 0.20 Greece 1.66 1.55 1.41 1.26 1.01 0.86 0.55 0.30 Guatemala 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.18 1.00 0.90 0.77 0.64 0.51
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 65.2 CA COLORADO 220.8 52.4 168.3 122.1 46.2 16.20 11.26 7.53 34.99 11.2 CO CONNECTICUT 211.4 211.4 184.8 26.6 0.09 0.63 0.22 0.94 25.7 CT DELAWARE 43.3 39.2 4.2 1.9 2.3 (0.07) (0.12) 0.00 (0.19) 2.5 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 132.5 64.1 68.5 44.3 24.2 3.77 6.12 10.76 20.65 3.5 DC FLORIDA 776.5 268.0 508.5 458.7 49.8 0.60 (2.03) 0.33 (1.10) 50.9 FL GEORGIA 196.2 72.6 123.7 111.9 11.7 (0.49) 0.19 (0.36) (0.66) 12.4 GA HAWAII 110.6 62.5 48.2 42.6 5.6 0.48 (0.10) 0.27 0.65 4.9 HI IDAHO 5.7 9.5 (3.8) (3.7) (0.1) (1.99) (1.23) (0.64) (3.85) 3.8 ID ILLINOIS 388.1 199.7 188.4 155.9 32.5 (0.92) 0.87 0.76 0.71 31.8 IL INDIANA 257.5 124.4 133.1 118.3 14.8 1.14 (0.12) 0.51 1.54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 2.60 2.01PHILIPPINES 2.17 1.46 COLOMBIA 1.86 1.36POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.57 1.27 COSTA RICA 1.65 1.23PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES 1.65 1.07 DENMARK 1.46 0.96 AND MADEIRA ISLANDS) DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 1.58 1.32SAUDI ARABIA 2.10 1.65 ECUADOR 1.85 1.52SINGAPORE, REPUBLIC OF 1.65 1.09 EGYPT, ARAB REPUBLIC OF 2.17 1.75SOUTH AFRICA, REPUBLIC OF 1.75 1.31 EL SALVADOR 1.74 1.42SPAIN (INCLUDING BALEARIC 1.62 1.10 FRANCE 1.33 0.86 ISLANDS, CANARY ISLANDS, GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 1.25 0.82 CEUTA AND MELILLA) (INCLUDING FORMER GERMAN SWEDEN 1.31 0.86 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC) SWITZERLAND 1.41 0.88 GREECE 1.95 1.30TAIWAN 1.99 1.21 GUAM 2.19 1.07THAILAND 2.01 1.27 GUATEMALA 1.76 1.41TRINIDAD & TOBAGO, REPUBLIC OF 1.62 1.28 HAITI 1.75 1.49TURKEY 1.84 1.31 HONDURAS 1.91 1.41UNITED KINGDOM (INCLUDING THE 1.09 0.79 HONG KONG
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 0.26 2.9 DE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 168.6 54.7 113.9 74.6 39.3 7.79 9.77 17.19 34.74 4.5 DC FLORIDA 682.7 383.9 298.8 250.8 48.0 0.73 (1.09) 0.89 0.53 47.4 FL GEORGIA 169.1 124.6 44.5 46.7 (2.3) (2.94) 0.13 (12.74) (15.55) 13.3 GA HAWAII 131.3 84.4 46.9 40.0 6.9 0.89 (0.08) 0.55 1.36 5.6 HI IDAHO 12.1 15.3 (3.2) (3.2) (0.0) (2.18) (1.10) (0.76) (4.03) 4.0 ID ILLINOIS 480.8 339.1 141.7 115.4 26.3 (0.86) (0.61) 0.11 (1.36) 27.7 IL INDIANA 267.2 191.5 75.7 58.1 17.6 2.21 0.33 0.71 3.25 14.3 IN IOWA 24.3 31.3 (7.0) (6.0) (1.0) (3.15) (1.80) (1.74) (6.69) 5.6 IA KANSAS 98.8 67.8 31.0 26.2 4.8 (0.40) (0.03) 0.01 (0.42) 5.3 KS KENTUCKY 89.8 48.3 41.4 34.6 6.9 0.48 (0.16)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • INCLUDING REAL TIME RATED CALLS AND ALL COLLECT CALLS. 229 STATISTICS OF COMMUNICATIONS COMMON CARRIERS TABLE 5.6-AT&T RATES FOR LONG DISTANCE MESSAGE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE UNITED STATES-OVERSEAS DIAL STATION DIAL STATION COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY COUNTRY STANDARD ECONOMY ARGENTINA $2.30 $1.58 JAMAICA $1.90 $1.56 AUSTRALIA 1.80 1.24 JAPAN (INCLUDING OKINAWA) 1.73 1.25 AUSTRIA 1.72 1.23 KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 2.16 1.52 BAHAMAS 1.37 1.10 NETHERLANDS 1.57 1.02 BELGIUM 1.84 1.18 NIGERIA, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF 2.33 1.84 BERMUDA 1.48 1.23 PAKISTAN 4.92 3.23 BRAZIL 2.19 1.60 PANAMA, REPUBLIC OF 2.09 1.60 CHILE 2.08 1.63 PERU 2.37 1.66 CHINA, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 3.10 2.40 PHILIPPINES 2.59 1.74 COLOMBIA 2.22 1.62 POLAND, REPUBLIC OF 1.88 1.51 COSTA RICA 1.96 1.46 PORTUGAL (INCLUDING AZORES 1.96 1.27 DENMARK 1.74
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • Sensitive Interexchange All Reporting Cos. $12,138.8 $7,340.2 $4,798.6$3,577.2$1,221.4 $127.1 $65.4 $111.2 $303.7 $917.7 Bell Operating Cos. 8,642.7 5,009.3 3,633.3 2,641.8 991.5 102.6 73.4 100.3 276.3 715.2 All Other Cos. 3,496.2 2,330.9 1,165.3 935.4 229.8 24.5 (8.0) 10.9 27.3 202.5 Alabama 139.6 76.9 62.7 51.6 11.1 0.88 0.13 0.36 1.37 9.7 AL Arizona 159.0 109.3 49.7 36.4 13.2 (1.28) 0.05 0.13 (1.10) 14.3 AZ Arkansas 105.2 67.4 37.7 30.4 7.3 (0.19) 0.06 (0.13) 7.4AR California 1,584.9 910.3 674.7 580.0 94.7 4.39 0.16 2.72 7.27 87.4CA Colorado 346.8 116.3 230.5 171.2 59.3 25.21 8.08 9.85 43.14 16.2CO Connecticut 57.3 (0.0) 57.3 37.3 19.9 3.24 3.44 2.18 8.85 11.1CT Delaware 29.3 16.6 12.7 6.1 6.6 0.76 0.76 0.36 1.88 4.7DE District of Columbia 202.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • California 871.6 871.5 871.8 (0.30) (0.3)CA Colorado 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CO Connecticut 182.6 182.6 177.0 5.60 5.6 CT Delaware 13.0 13.0 8.5 4.50 0.8 1.6 0.0 2.4 2.1 DE District of Columbia 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.00 0.4 0.7 0.0 1.1 1.0 DC Florida 142.3 142.3 141.8 0.50 0.5 FL Georgia 74.9 74.9 73.8 1.10 1.1 GA Hawaii 6.7 6.7 6.7 HI Idaho 1.7 0.0 1.7 1.5 0.10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 ID Illinois 352.5 352.5 334.2 18.20 18.2 IL Indiana 101.7 101.7 90.9 10.90 10.9 IN Iowa 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IA Kansas 31.9 31.9 21.3 10.50 10.5 KS Kentucky 19.0 0.3 18.8 18.5 0.30 0.3 KY
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/scard97.pdf
  • (6) Future Telephone Communications 2.28 249 109 (3) GE Capital Communications 1.08 118 109 (3) Great Lakes Telecommunications Corporation 1.63 178 109 (3) Heartline Communications, Inc. 9.02 983 109 (3) Home Owners Long Distance 1.33 145 109 (3) Integrated Tele Services 1.38 150 109 (3) Integretel 4.04 1,565 388 (4) Intellicall Operator Services 0.65 50 77 (8) Inter Continental Telephone 1.10 120 109 (3) International Telemedia Associates, Inc. 978 (7) International Telnet 66 JTK Technologies 75 L.D. Services, Inc. 2.76 301 109 (3) LCI International Worldwide Telecommunications 0.23 252 1,103 (6) LDM Systems Inc. 8.63 246 29 (9) Long Distance Services (Virginia) 7.26 791 109 (3) Long Distance Services, Inc. (Michigan) 4.14 451 109 (3) Matrix Telecom 1.38 150 109 (3)
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/staterev.doc
  • payments to non-rural carriers in 1999. The fourth column shows the total support payment of all existing high-cost support mechanisms for non-rural carriers and is the sum of the first three columns of this table. Column 5 shows estimated contributions by state. The sixth column shows, for each state, the difference between high-cost support to non-rural carriers and contributions. Table 1.10 summarizes high-cost support payments for rural carriers on a per rural-carrier, per-loop, per-month basis. The first column expresses the HCL payments. The second column expresses the LTS payments. The third column expresses the LSS payments. The fourth column expresses total high-cost support payments of rural carriers. Table 1.11 summarizes high-cost support payments for non-rural carriers on a per non-rural-carrier, per
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0021.pdf
  • 4200.0000 MHz 1M52G7D DIGITAL DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000024 SES-LIC-20000107-00020 DYNCORP INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Application for Authority Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 25 ° 45 ' 16.40 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 11691 S.W. 17TH STREET, DADE, MIAMI, FL 80 ° 23 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: 2.4 PRODELIN CORP. 1 2.4 meters ANTENNA ID: 21K0G7D 32.32 dBW DIGITAL DATA 5925.0000 - 6425.0000 MHz 21K0G7D DIGITAL DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 4.5 ANDREW CORP. 2 4.5 meters ANTENNA ID: 759KG7D DIGITAL DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 1M52G7D DIGITAL DATA 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000025 SES-LIC-20000107-00021
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0193.pdf
  • ROAD, WEXFORD, CADILLAC, MI 85 ° 22 ' 30.20 " W LONG. LOCATION: AFC 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: 5 M DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8F Points of Communication: E000478 SES-REG-20000728-01355 FOX BROADCASTING CORPORATION Registration Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 40 ° 28 ' 1.10 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 2714 E. LINCOLN STREET, MCLEAN, BLOOMINGTON, IL 88 ° 57 ' 5.20 " W LONG. LOCATION: AFC 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: 5 M DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8F Points of Communication: Page 28 of 31 E000479 SES-REG-20000728-01356 FOX BROADCASTING CORPORATION Registration Class of Station:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0201.pdf
  • VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000384 SES-REG-20000728-01255 FOX BROADCASTING CORPORATION Registration Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service 41 ° 15 ' 26.00 " N LAT. SITE ID: 1 4625 FARNUM STREET, DOUGLAS, OMAHA, NE 95 ° 59 ' 1.10 " W LONG. LOCATION: AFC 1 5 meters ANTENNA ID: 5 M DIGITAL VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0G7F ANALOG VIDEO 3700.0000 - 4200.0000 MHz 36M0F8F Points of Communication: 1 - ALSAT - (ALSAT) E000385 SES-REG-20000728-01256 FOX BROADCASTING CORPORATION Registration Class of Station: Fixed Earth Stations Nature of Service:Domestic Fixed Satellite Service Page 7 of 20 42 ° 27 '
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-250390A1.html
  • Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Farmworker Educational Radio Network Inc., is hereby NOTIFIED of their APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violating Section 73.1125(a) and (e) of the Commission's Rules.15 1.10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Farmworker Educational Radio Network, Inc., shall pay the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or shall file a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. 1.11. Payment of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256120A1.html
  • or money order may be mailed to Forfeiture Collection Section, Finance Branch, Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 73482, Chicago, Illinois 60673-7482. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to Bank One/LB 73482, 525 West Monroe, 8th Floor Mailroom, Chicago, IL 60661. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 071000013, receiving bank Bank One, and account number 1165259. 1.10. The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Western Region, Seattle Office, 11410 NE 122nd Way, STE 312, Seattle, Washington 98034 and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption. 1.11. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits:
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256485A1.html
  • gravity of the violation, and with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, and any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require.14 Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80, and the statutory factors, we conclude that Lazer is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of $8,000. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 1.10. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Lazer Broadcasting Corporation is hereby NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for violating Section 11.35 of the Commission's Rules.15 1.11. IT IS FURTHER
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
  • at KCEC-FM for a period of over 15 months and, consequently, numerous RMTs and RWTs were not received or transmitted. Therefore, Farmworkers' violation is repeated. Based on the evidence before us, we find that Farmworkers Educational Radio Network, Inc., apparently repeatedly violated Section 11.35 of the Rules, by failing to ensure the operational readiness of the EAS equipment at KCEC-FM. 1.10. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines (``Forfeiture Policy Statement'') and Section 1.80(b)(4) of the Rules sets forth the base forfeiture amounts for various violations of the Commission's Rules. The base forfeiture for EAS equipment not installed or operational is $8,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262295A1.html
  • week at random days and times.12 The requirement that stations monitor, receive and retransmit the required EAS tests ensures the operational integrity of the EAS system in the event of an actual disaster. Appropriate entries must be made in the broadcast station log as specified in Sections 73.1820 and 73.1840, indicating reasons why any tests were not received or transmitted.13 1.10. Section 11.51(j) of the Rules states that broadcast stations that are co-owned and co-located with a combined studio or control facility may provide EAS for the combined stations with one EAS encoder.14 Section 11.51(j), however, does not contemplate stations that are co-located, but not co-owned, sharing EAS equipment.15 In the present case, KBSZ(AM) and KSWG(FM) are not currently co-owned or
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263779A1.html
  • operational so that the monitoring and transmitting functions are available during the times the station is in operation. Broadcast stations must also determine the cause of any failure to receive required monthly and weekly EAS tests, and must indicate in the station's log why any required tests were not received and when defective equipment is removed and restored to service.9 1.10. Section 11.61(a)(1) and (2) of the Rules requires broadcast stations to (a) receive monthly EAS tests from designated local primary EAS sources and retransmit the monthly test within 60 minutes of its receipt and (b) conduct tests of the EAS header and EOM codes at least once a week at random days and times.10 The requirement that stations monitor, receive
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1845A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1845A1.pdf
  • permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher. That is, the minimum acceptable bid amount will be calculated by multiplying the provisionally winning bid amount times one plus the minimum acceptable bid percentage. For example, if the minimum acceptable bid percentage is 10 percent, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal (provisionally winning bid amount) * (1.10), rounded. In the Auction 93 Comment Public Notice, we proposed to use a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent. We did not receive any comments on this proposal. Our experience in previous broadcast auctions assures us that a minimum acceptable bid percentage of 10 percent is sufficient to ensure active bidding. Therefore, we will begin the auction with a
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-12-2A1.pdf
  • in 2005, the market with the most LPFM stations only had 6, by 2009, this same market, Gainesville, had 11 LPFM stations. Table 2 Average Number of LPFM Stations in a Market by Size of the Arbitron Metro Markets Ranked by Size 2005 2007 2009 1 - 10 1.70 2.40 2.60 11 - 20 1.60 1.40 1.70 21 - 30 1.10 2.00 2.10 31 - 40 1.20 1.40 1.50 41 - 50 1.20 1.80 1.80 51 - 60 1.40 2.00 2.40 61 - 70 1.40 1.50 1.40 71 - 80 0.50 0.80 2.10 81 - 90 1.70 2.70 1.90 91 - 100 0.80 1.10 1.40 1 - 100 1.26 1.71 1.89 101 - 110 1.60 2.10 2.20 111 - 120 1.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/TABALL02.pdf
  • 1.80 2.14 5 North and Central America 213,206 399,536 27,214 639,956 983,965 0.50 0.44 0.35 0.81 6 South America 19,357 43,284 20,814 83,455 108,394 0.30 0.20 0.19 0.36 7 Asia 45,743 379,571 134,060 559,374 763,014 0.09 0.08 0.12 0.24 8 Oceania 13,148 51,650 59,657 124,455 45,277 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.17 9 Eastern Europe 5,359 3,119 1 8,479 1,248 1.72 1.08 1.10 1.21 10 Other Regions 0 334 359 693 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total for all International Points 448,6701,984,728 411,4642,844,8623,900,202 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.42* Page 32 TABLE 7 - Trans-Ocean Fiber Optic Cable Capacity 64 Kbps Circuits CABLES Class* Cost $M 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Est. 2004 Est. TRANS - ATLANTIC (T-A) - Operational :
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/fmbc.pdf
  • 100.00 109 56 26 100.00 112 07 02 55.00 112 28 45 6.00 112 07 01 45.00 112 18 56 50.00 1.12 32 00 3.70 114 13 59 3.00 109 45 30 100.00 110 44 25 6.00 112 03 47 100.00 110 01 49 25.00 109 56 26 100.00 110 16 29 3.00 110 13 57 3.00 109 16 10 1.10 109 35 06 100.00 112 17 31 2.50 112 03 53 100.00 109 19 23 50.00 111 05 52 3.00 110 42 54 12.50 110 42 56 .34 111 06 59 93.00 111 06 57 94.00 111 06 59 100.00 111 06 59 100.00 111 06 59 93.00 111 01 06 3.00 110 42 56 14.50 109 57 39 .63
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 1.59 1.61 1967 39.7 114.2 54.6 59.6 23.4 31.8 2.88 1.38 1.50 1.36 1.45 1968 46.4 126.9 61.5 65.4 28.2 40.0 2.73 1.33 1.41 1.42 1.41 1969 64.6 172.0 82.7 89.4 38.3 51.6 2.66 1.28 1.38 1.35 1.37 1970 81.1 196.6 98.9 97.7 51.0 59.8 2.43 1.22 1.21 1.17 1.19 1971 100.9 237.4 120.7 116.6 68.4 75.1 2.35 1.20 1.16 1.10 1.13 1972 126.5 291.8 148.2 143.6 91.7 98.6 2.31 1.17 1.14 1.08 1.11 1973 159.3 364.9 184.4 180.5 111.5 120.2 2.29 1.16 1.13 1.08 1.11 1974 190.7 428.7 216.6 212.1 142.0 152.2 2.25 1.14 1.11 1.07 1.09 1975 219.4 490.2 247.4 242.9 167.0 176.9 2.23 1.13 1.11 1.06 1.09 1976 272.7 601.1 303.0 298.1 197.2 207.2 2.20 1.11 1.09 1.05
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/minutes01.pdf
  • agenda was approved. The Chair reviewed the agenda items associated with IWG 5 and identified possible interested parties. There was some discussion on whether or not Agenda item 1.8 belonged in IWG 5 or IWG 3. The meeting decided to treat the item, assigning drafting of the preliminary view to Boeing or Teledesic. Neither company was present. Agenda items 1.9, 1.10, and 1.14 were discussed and it was decided that the Coast Guard had the most interest in them. Since these items and item 1.17 address bands that are only occupied by the government, the meeting decided to wait for a view from RCS. PanAmSat was assigned the drafting of Agenda item 1.24 dealing with 13.75 ­ 14.0 GHz and Resolution
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/minutes02.pdf
  • was noted by Darlene Drazenovich, and later again by Jim Carroll of SFA, that at the next meeting of the RCS (Thursday, April 5th), all of the PVs would be subject to revision as the RCS tries to approve all of their draft PVs. Richard Swanson addressed WRC-03 Agenda Items 1.9 (Appendix S13 and Resolution 331 related to GMDSS) and 1.10 (and subparts, related to maritime mobile issues). He indicated that discussion between NTIA and FCC was on going. IWG-5 agreed that they would endorse whatever NTIA and FCC adopted, as there was apparently little private sector interest in these two agenda items. Richard Swanson discussed Agenda Item 1.14, dealing with Resolution 207 and 347 (WRC-97). There was no private sector
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/minutes06.pdf
  • 90% complete, two approaches considered 1) Primary allocation or 2) Primary allocation plus a footnote to protect aeronautical navigation ii. Agenda Item 1.28 ­ Still under consideration on the most appropriate approach for resolution via CPM text. Further work is required between ICAO and Administrations to reach agreement on how to best satisfy the agenda item. iii. Agenda Item 1.9, 1.10 ­ Progress has been made on the Maritime issues but further work is required before proposals can be prepared. c. RCS, D. Drazenovich reported: i. Agenda Item 1.17 ­ RCS should have proposal to upgrade to primary with footnote to protect aeronautical navigation. ii. Agenda Item 1.28 ­ RCS may have proposal. iii. Agenda Item 1.9, 1.10 - RCS will
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/wrc-03/files/docs/meeting/iwg/iwg_5/wrc03_iwg_5_tor.pdf
  • into account the results of ITU-R studies; 1.9 to consider Appendix S13 and Resolution 331 (Rev. WRC-97) with a view to their deletion and if appropriate, to consider related changes to Chapter SVII and other provisions of the Radio Regulations, as necessary, taking into account the continued transition to and introduction of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS); 1.10 to consider the results of studies, and take necessary actions, relating to: 1.10.1exhaustion of the maritime mobile service identity numbering resource (Resolution 344 (WRC-97)); 1.10.2shore-to-ship distress communication priorities (Resolution 348 (WRC-97)); 1.14 to consider measures to address harmful interference in the bands allocated ot the maritime mobile and aeronautical mobile (R) services, taking into account Resolutions 207 (Rev. WRC-2000) and
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prlpfm_rpt_economic_study.pdf
  • LPFM presence. While in 2005, the market with the most LPFM stations only had 6, by 2009, this same market, Gainesville, had 11 LPFM stations. Table 2 Average Number of LPFM Stations in a Market by Size of the Arbitron Metro Markets Ranked by Size 2005 2007 2009 1 -10 1.70 2.40 2.60 11 -20 1.60 1.40 1.70 21 -30 1.10 2.00 2.10 31 -40 1.20 1.40 1.50 41 -50 1.20 1.80 1.80 51 -60 1.40 2.00 2.40 61 -70 1.40 1.50 1.40 71 -80 0.50 0.80 2.10 81 -90 1.70 2.70 1.90 91 -100 0.80 1.10 1.40 1 -100 1.26 1.71 1.89 101 -110 1.60 2.10 2.20 111 -120 1.40 1.50 1.50 121 -130 0.70 0.90 0.80 131 -140 1.20
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • for the information that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, including both FCC and non- FCC information systems, please skip to Question 1.15.
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
  • the information that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: 7 Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, including both FCC and non- FCC information systems, please skip to Question 1.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
  • for the information that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, including both FCC and non- FCC information systems, please skip to Question 1.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
  • concerning individuals who are or have been subjects of OIG criminal investigations. Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: PII concerning individuals who are or have been subjects of OIG criminal investigations. Other sources: PII concerning individuals working for international companies or who are themselves not U.S. citizens, who are or have been subjects of OIG criminal investigations. 8 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: As noted in Question 1.6, the Criminal Investigative Files information system is a "stand alone" information system except that information is collected, used, and stored from
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
  • entities: EmCon contacts in communications industry Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: EmCon contacts from hospitals, schools, and emergency preparedness organizations, e.g., Red Cross, rescue squads, etc. Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: EmCon contacts Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: EmCon contacts Other sources: Miscellaneous EmCon contact data from FCC volunteers 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: This information system may obtain data on the "points of contact" at Federal, state, and local/tribal governments, emergency preparedness organizations, e.g., Red Cross, and hospitals, schools,
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
  • who may include their PII with their comments. Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Individuals, e.g., self- employed, consultants, etc., who submit comments via the FCC's Data Quality Comment process, who may include their PII with their comments. Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Data Quality Comments information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no links with any other FCC or non-FCC information systems. If the
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
  • non-profit entities: Individuals who have filed comments relative to FCC rulemakings and docketed proceedings or other matters arising under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and who may include their personally identifiable information (PII) as part of their filing(s). Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no links to any other FCC or non-FCC information systems.
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
  • information. Non-personal information from farms: Individuals who send or receive e-mails from the FCC's computer users. This e-mail correspondence may include personally identifiable information. Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: Individuals who send or receive e-mails from the FCC's computer users. This e-mail correspondence may include personally identifiable information. 8 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Inter-Office and Remote Access Internet E-mail information system is connected to the Internet, but it functions as a conduit through which users can transit and
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
  • and STAs, who may have included personally identifiable information (PII) in their filings. Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Individuals who file FCC Forms 159, 405, 442, 702, and/or 703, and STAs, who may have included personally identifiable information (PII) in their filings. 8 Other sources: International experimental radio station license holders. 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Experimental Radio Station License Files information system has a link to the following: (1) FCC's Commission Registration System (CORES) through which individuals (and other entities,
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
  • members who represent businesses and for-profits. Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: FACA committee members who represent institutions and non-profits. Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: FACA committee members who are Federal employees. Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: FACA committee members who are state, local, or tribal government employees. Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g., personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Federal Advisory Committee Membership File (FACA) information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no links to other FCC or non-FCC information systems.
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
  • for payments, etc. Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Institutions and non-profit entities (e.g. universities) Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: National Finance Center (NFC), and U.S. Department of Treasury Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Institutions and non-profit entities (e.g. universities) . Other sources: Foreign entities - International Telecommunication Settlements (ITS) 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: FAIS maintains personally identifiable information for travel and to make payments. If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, please skip
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
  • entities: Institutions and other non-profit entities that are subject to the FCC's regulatory actions, etc. Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Federal agencies that are subject to the FCC's regulatory actions, etc. Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: State, local, or tribal governments that are subject to the FCC's regulatory actions, etc. Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, please skip to Question 1.15 1.11 If the information system uses information about
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
  • PII concerning individuals who are or have been subjects of OIG general investigations. Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: PII concerning individuals who are or have been subjects of OIG general investigations. Other sources: PII concerning individuals working for international companies or who are themselves not U.S. citizens, who are or have been subjects of OIG general investigations. 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No 8 Please explain your response: As noted in Question 1.6, the General Investigative Files information system is a "stand alone" information system, except that information is collected, used, and stored
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
  • from FCC contractors: Contractors who have been given permission by their COTRs to use the FCC library. Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Integrated Library System (ILS) Records information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no links with any other FCC or non-FCC information systems.
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
  • identifiable information (PII) in their complaints. Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Consultants and other self-employed individuals who have filed complaints against FCC licensees and regulatees, and who may have included personally identifiable information (PII) in their complaints. Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Investigations and Hearings information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no links with any other FCC or non-FCC information systems. 8 If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
  • Personal information from FCC employees: including both current and former Commission employees. Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Labor and Employee Relations Case Files information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no links to any other FCC or non-FCC information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
  • for the information that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, including both FCC and non- FCC information systems, please skip to Question 1.15.
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
  • for the information that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, including both FCC and non- FCC information systems, please skip to Question 1.15.
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
  • businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Finance Center's (NFC) Payroll/Personnel System, Internal Revenue Service (IRS), state income tax/revenue agencies, and National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), etc. 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No 8 Please explain your response: The Pay, Leave, and Garnishment Records information system, including the personally identifiable information covered by FCC/OMD-14, "Pay, Leave, and Garnishment Records" SORN, has links to
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
  • to satisfy the background investigation criteria requirements. Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: PII sufficient to satisfy the background investigation criteria requirements. Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: 8 Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The PII covered by FCC/OMD-16, "Personal Security Files," SORN may included all relevant data, from both FCC and non-FCC sources, etc., including Federal, state, local and
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
  • System requirements. Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Personal data sufficient to satisfy the Physical Access Control System requirements. Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Company name and/or self-employment. Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, please skip to Question 1.15 8 1.11 If the information system uses information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
  • and part- time Commission employees, student interns, co-op students, and temporary hires). Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Reasonable Accommodations Requests information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no electronic links to any other FCC or non-FCC information systems. If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
  • the system. This information is publicly available to the public through the FCCour I internet webpage at. Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No 7 Please explain your response: This information system has no links to other FCC information systems. The Remedy Ticket System (Service Center) information system contains only information concerning the Commission's
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
  • for the information that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, including both FCC and non- FCC information systems, please skip to Question 1.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
  • tribal governments: Some individuals who participate as part of the small, minority, and/or women-owned businesses, etc., may include personally identifiable information (PII) in the information that they provide to OCBO. Other sources: Some individuals who participate as part of the small, minority, and/or women-owned businesses, etc., may include personally identifiable information (PII) in the information that they provide to OCBO. 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Small Business Contacts List information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no links with any other FCC or non-FCC information systems. If
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
  • use FCC telephones or receive calls from FCC employees, staff, and/or contractors. 8 Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: GSA provides telephone calling data, calling charges and associated fees, etc.. Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Telephone Call Detail information system contains information concerning the Commission's telephone calls (wireline and cellular) that are placed by, received by, charged by FCC employees,
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
  • purposes. Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: carpool/vanpool riders must provide personally idenifiable information for parking permit purposes, and handicap status (as applicable). Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc., information about individuals, e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The transit benefits information system is a "stand alone" database, e.g., it is not linked to any other FCC or non-FCC information systems. It stores information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
  • other non-profit entities: WTB applicants may submit personally identifiable information as part of their application(s). Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: International agencies, i.e., International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and/or foreign governments may provide information, i.e., Canadian and Mexican government agencies coordinating cross border telecommunications coordination, etc. 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The ULS information systems, including the personally identifiable information covered by FCC/WTB-1, "Wireless Services Licensing Records (ULS)" SORN, are linked to other FCC information systems, i.e.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
  • as part of the enforcement actions. Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Individuals who are subjects of FCC field enforcement actions whose PII is included as part of the enforcement actions. Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Individuals who are subjects of FCC field enforcement actions, whose PII is included as part of the enforcement actions. Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The Violators Files information system, including the personally identifiable information (PII) covered by FCC/EB-1, "Violators Files" SORN, is linked to the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau's
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
  • for the information that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.10 Will the information system obtain, use, store, analyze, etc. information about individuals e.g, personally identifiable information (PII), from other information systems, including both FCC and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: If the information system does not use any PII from other information systems, including both FCC and non- FCC information systems, please skip to Question 1.15.
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • "Broadband Dead Zone Report and Consumer Broadband Test" information system is a "stand alone" information system with no electronic links to other FCC or non-FCC information systems. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.12. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks, etc. Birth date/Age Place
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-ccd.pdf
  • Please explain your response: The PSHSB Comment Card Database is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it has no links to other FCC and/or non-FCC information systems. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks, etc. Birth date/Age Place
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-clarity.pdf
  • application "Documentum" as a data storage capability. The information is stored at the aggregate level, e.g., no individual PII is being identified in the measurement analysis. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.12. 7 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): Not applicable Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks, etc. Birth
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-core-financial.pdf
  • your response: At this time the Financial Systems Operations Group (FSOG) staff in OMD-FO believes that the CSFR will handle information for travel from OMD-FO's E-2 System. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): National Finance Center (NFC), Procurement Desktop (PD), and Budget Execution and Accounting Management Systems (BEAMS). 8 Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-lmts.pdf
  • and non-FCC information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: LMTS is a stand alone system. It has no links to other FCC or non-FCC information systems. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): Individual's name 9 Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks, etc. Birth date/Age
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-pams.pdf
  • information systems? Yes No Please explain your response: The PAMS information system is a "stand alone" information system. It has no links to other FCC information systems. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks, etc. 8 Birth date/Age Place of birth
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-rmis.pdf
  • individuals (PII) from other FCC financial and licensing information systems and from federal agencies, i.e., Treasury Department and the Justice Department as required by Congressional regulations. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.13. 8 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): FCC information systems, i.e., ROSIE and CORES, and non-FCC information systems administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and U.S. Department of Justice, etc. Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Taxpayer Identification Number may
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/materials/already-released/consumer090002.pdf
  • '00 Int News Use '00 Chg. AQH List '94-'98 0.3922 0.1176 -0.7387 -0.2400 -0.8745 (0.78) (0.29) (0.68) (0.61) (0.72) Chg. Daily Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 0.0377 0.1188 0.0054 0.0065 -0.1676 0.0271 -0.0074 (0.35) (0.51) (0.29) (0.51) (2.01)* (0.10) (0.05) Chg. Weekly Paper Circ. per cap '93-'99 0.0083 0.0166 -0.0048 0.0010 -0.0376 0.1299 0.0619 (0.21) (0.51) (0.68) (0.21) (1.19) (1.33) (1.10) Chg. Cable Use '94-'00 0.2905 -0.1809 -0.2903 -0.0119 -0.0017 0.2656 0.1563 (2.66)** (2.01)* (1.19) (0.61) (0.13) (0.98) (1.02) Int Use '00 0.0126 0.0030 0.1042 -0.0045 0.0276 (0.35) (0.10) (1.33) (0.72) (0.98) Chg. HUT Viewing '95-'00 0.0251 0.0396 0.0121 -0.0117 0.1794 0.0749 -0.1268 (0.35) (0.21) (0.78) (1.14) (2.66)** (0.35) (1.03) Int News Use '00 -0.0073 (1.01) Chg. AQH Inside News List
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/disaster/disaster_manual.pdf
  • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS) User Manual Version 2 March 9, 2009 ii Table of Contents 1 Using the System...............................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................1 1.2 Accessing the Disaster Information Reporting System......................................1 1.3 Security Banner..................................................................................................1 1.4 DIRS Login........................................................................................................2 1.5 Screen for New Users.........................................................................................3 1.6 Screen for Forgotten Password Request.............................................................5 1.7 User Main Menu Screen.....................................................................................5 1.8 Display/Update Reports.....................................................................................7 1.9 Modify Password................................................................................................8 1.10 Modify User Profile............................................................................................9 1.11 Modify Company ID..........................................................................................9 1.12 Manage User.....................................................................................................10 1.13 Upload Tab Delimited File...............................................................................11 1.14 Download Excel File........................................................................................11 2 Wireline Switch...............................................................................................12 3 Wireline Digital Loop Carrier (DLC)..........................................................16 4 Wireline PSAP................................................................................................19 5 Interoffice Facilities ­ Point to Point............................................................22 6 Interoffice Facilities - Rings...........................................................................24 7 IXC Blocking...................................................................................................26 9 Wireless Cell Site by County.........................................................................31 10 Broadcast.........................................................................................................34 11 CATV...............................................................................................................37 1 Using the System
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs-best/imel-wireless03.pdf
  • KHz channels occupied all the time by (3) users. F1 F2 F3 Frequency 10 10 10 30 KHz Figure 6-21. Frequency Division Muliple Access (FDMA) Amplitude (3) time slots used alternately taking up the 30 KHz channel T1 T2 T3 Time t1 t2 t3 Figure 6-22. Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) Chapter 6 3 1995 ARRL Handbook, 72nd Edition, P. 1.10, Newington, CT: American Radio Relay League. -63- Two types of systems are used: frequency hopping and direct sequence. Both systems use vocoders to digitize the signal. Frequency hopping. The frequency hopping concept is easy to visualize. The transmitter changes frequency every few milliseconds in a prescribed manner as it transmits information. A perfectly synchronized receiver follows the frequency change sequences
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/University_of_Washington_Emergency_Response_Management_Plan_4-2009.pdf
  • iv Basic Plan Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1.1 Relationship with other University Groups 1.2 Laws and Authorities 1.3 Disaster Coordination with Local, County and State Agencies (Figure 1) 1.4 Planning Assumptions (Situation) 1.5 Concept of Operations 1.5 Plan Objectives 1.6 Levels of Emergency and Activation 1.8 Emergency Authority 1.9 (President's) Emergency Policy Council 1.9 UW Campus Emergency Operations Center 1.10 UW Campus EOC Activation Process (Figure 2) 1.11 Plan Usage 1.12 Plan Content and Format 1.12 Tabs and Pages (Figure 3) 1.14 Table 1 - Crosscheck Matrix 1.15 E EM ME ER RG GE EN NC CY Y R REESSPPO ON NS SE E M MAANNAAG GE EM ME EN NTT P PLLAANN Table of Contents April 2009 Page Section
• http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/E&UWGFinalReport.doc http://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/E&UWGFinalReport.pdf
  • based on Consumer Electronic Association (CEA) data, presently in use in the US: Product Penetration Number per Household Total Installed Base (millions) Cordless Phones 81.0% 1.50 130.01 Garage Door Openers 40.8% 1.29 56.26 Wireless Routers NA NA 1.14 Remote Control Toys 19.5% 2.61 54.47 Toy Walkie-talkies (not FRS) 15.1% 1.85 29.81 Baby Monitors 10.5% 1.38 15.52 Home Security Systems 18.0% 1.10 21.21 Keyless Entry Systems for Cars 26.5% 1.40 39.71 Source: CEA Comments, Docket 02-135, September 30, 2002 The growing popularity of computer networking has stimulated a heightened interest in unlicensed technology and one of the fastest growing applications of unlicensed devices is for wireless local area networks (WLANS). Because most businesses and many homes now have multiple computers, users often
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
  • direct, control, supervise or manage Domestic Communications, and (b) facilities and equipment in use by or on behalf of Telenor that are physically located in the United States, and (c) facilities in use by or on behalf of Telenor USA to control the equipment described in (a) and (b). 1.9 "Effective Date" has the meaning given it in the Preamble. 1.10 "Electronic Communication" has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(12). 1.11 "Electronic Surveillance" means (i) the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510(1), (2), (4) and (12), respectively, and electronic surveillance as defined in 50 U.S.C. § 1801(f); (ii) access to stored wire or electronic communications, as referred to in 18
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/ltrfromaoltw062600.doc http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/ltrfromaoltw062600.pdf
  • Road Runner and Time Warner Cable that restrict the ability to provide multiple ISPs. Second, Time Warner has committed, as set forth in the MOU, to negotiate with multiple ISPs towards arrangements whereby consumers will have additional options in obtaining cable modem service. Time Warner firmly believes that a multiple ISP model will lead to higher overall cable modem penetration. 1.10 Please provide all documents relating to the high-speed Internet access plans discussed in your response to request 1.9. As noted above, the parties are providing documents in response to this request under separate cover letter. 1.11 Describe Time Warner's roll-out plans and (if applicable) its actual roll-out of digital cable television services for the following periods: a. pre-merger (i.e., from