FCC Web Documents citing 1.12

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf
  • Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2 GHz bands. We initiated an investigation and on May 13, 2008, we sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Spy Camera. In your June 9, 2008 response to our LOI, you admit marketing wireless video transmitters beginning in early 2006 on your web site, www.spycameras.com, to end users and resellers. You admit that these wireless video transmitters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-87A5.txt
  • Sweden 1.68 1.14 0.86 2.15 1.77 1.16 2.98 2.41 1.59 U.K. 0.64 0.61 0.62 0.91 0.87 0.90 1.74 1.69 1.27 Attachment 4 EU interconnection rates U.S. Cents per minute at peak rates Local Single Transit Double Transit 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 Country Austria 8.36 2.00 1.91 8.36 2.00 1.91 9.24 2.63 2.52 Belgium 3.05 1.23 1.12 3.05 2.33 1.89 3.98 3.26 2.69 Denmark 1.08 1.09 0.98 2.00 2.02 1.75 2.44 2.46 2.00 Finland 1.99 1.58 1.50 1.99 1.58 1.50 4.61 3.12 3.44 France 0.78 0.78 0.64 1.90 1.90 1.57 2.80 2.80 2.34 Germany 1.10 1.10 1.06 1.88 1.88 1.81 2.87 2.86 2.76 Greece n/a 2.01 n/a n/a 2.01 n/a n/a 2.87 n/a Italy 1.69 1.68 1.05
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1092A1.txt
  • distress case, the shore-based search and rescue authorities were unable to contact a vessel because of on-going routine traffic to the vessel. This inability to preempt lower priority traffic hindered the overall search and rescue operation. (February 6, 2001) U.S. VIEW: Radio Conference Subcommittee (RCS) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences DRAFT UNITED STATES PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-03 WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.12a: to consider allocations and regulatory issues related to the space science services in accordance with Resolution 723 (Rev.WRC-2000) and to review all Earth exploration-satellite service and space research service allocations between 35 and 38 GHz, taking into account Resolution 730 [COM5/1] (WRC-2000); ISSUE: Resolution 723 (Rev.WRC-2000) resolves to recommend that WRC-03 consider the provision of up to 3 MHz of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2168A1.txt
  • are also taken from Recommendation ITU­R SM. [BOUNDARY]. · Studies regarding the frequencies to which the Section II limits for primary radar apply will not be completed in time for WRC­2003. This text is similar to that of Annex 8, § 5 of Recommendation ITU­R SM.[OOB]. 40 United States of America PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.12 (b): to consider allocations and regulatory issues related to the space science services in accordance with Resolution 723 (Rev. WRC-2000) and to review all Earth exploration- satellite service and space research service allocations between 35 and 38 GHz, taking into account Resolution 730(WRC-2000); Background Information: The 7 145-7 235 MHz band is allocated by footnote S5.460 on a primary basis
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2482A1.txt
  • as follows: Class A Shareholder Economic Interest (%) Voting Interest (%) Voting Power (%) Dresdner Bank Luxembourg S.A. 3.07 2.46 2.57 Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. 2.68 2.14 2.24 Luxempart S.A. 2.27 1.81 1.90 TITA S.A. 2.03 1.62 1.70 Loran Telecommunications S.A. 1.78 1.42 1.49 Trufidee S.A. 1.70 1.36 1.42 Compagnie de Financement C.E.F. 1.70 1.36 1.42 Audiolux S.A. 1.34 1.07 1.12 Aachener & Münchener BG AG 1.34 1.07 1.12 Banque Générale du Luxembourg S.A. 1.05 0.84 0.88 Space Equipment S.A. 0.74 0.59 0.62 BGL Investment Partners S.A. 0.59 0.47 0.50 Other A Shareholders (57 unnamed individuals and companies) 0.35 0.28 0.29 Fiduciary Depositary Receipts 18.83 15.06 15.77 The Applicants explain that the above listed Class A shareholders will receive SES Global
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1415A1.txt
  • MHz, ground-based radars used for meteorological purposes are authorized to operate on a basis of equality with stations of the maritime radionavigation service. Reasons: Many administrations use the band 5 600 - 5 650 MHz for these meteorological radars and this usage should be preserved. DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Included in Doc. WAC/108(04.06.02) WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.12 (c): to consider allocations and regulatory issues related to the space science services in accordance with Resolution 723 (Rev. WRC-2000) and to review all Earth exploration-satellite service and space research service allocations between 35 and 38 GHz, taking into account Resolution 730 (WRC-2000); Background Information: Resolution 723 (Rev. WRC-2000) resolves 4, recommends that WRC-03 consider a review of existing allocations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1779A1.txt
  • to cover spectrum options can be noted in the text of the Recommendation. USA/ /3 SUP RESOLUTION 645 (WRC-2000) Reasons: It is possible to conclude this agenda item at WRC-03 on the basis that the necessary regulatory requirements have been met. Resolution 645 (WRC-2000) should be suppressed. DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/124(22.07.02) WRC-03 Agenda Item 1.12a: to consider allocations and regulatory issues related to the space science services in accordance with Resolution 723 (Rev. WRC-2000); Background Information: ITU-R Recommendation SA.363-5 recommends that frequencies below 1 GHz are technically suitable for telecommand of satellites in the space science services operating below an altitude of 2000 km. A deficiency in telecommand (uplink) frequency allocations has been previously identified,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2361A1.txt
  • modifications to the Region 2 Plan and the Regions 1 and 3 List may differ from the technical data presented herein. (WRC-2000) The definitions in §§ 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.10 and 1.11 of the Annex apply to these calculations. 18 With respect to § 3 the limit specified relates to the overall equivalent protection margin calculated in accordance with § 1.12 of Annex 3. See Annex for minority view on this resolves 2 19.35.1 In no circumstances may an administration claim more MIDs than the total number of its ship stations shown in the ITU List of Ship Stations (List V) divided by 1000. 2 19.36.1 In no circumstances may an administration claim more MIDs than the total number of its
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2512A2.txt
  • content that are (0 accessible using the communications services of Domestic Communications Companies, and (ii) available in substantially similar form and on commercially reasonable terms through communications services of companies other than Domestic Communications Companies. 1.11 "Effective Date" means the date on which the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement are consummated and Telmex acquires the stock of X0. 1.12 "Electronic Communication" has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. $ 2510(12). 1.13 "Electronic Surveillance" means (a) the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. $6 2510(l), (2), (4) and (12), respectively, and electronic surveillance as defined in 50 U.S.C. 5 1801(f); (b) access to stored wire or electronic communications, as referredto in 18 U.S.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2755A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2755A1.txt
  • in noncable homes in Kalispell falls below the required 3 percent minimum, within one standard error, as shown in the table below: Survey Households Share Standard Net Standard Year Studied Viewing Error Weekly Error Hours Circulation Feb. 00 41 .93 .53 10.18 5.49 May 00 40 .80 .36 12.70 5.60 Feb. 01 54 .51 .44 4.45 2.67 May 01 29 1.12 .63 7.11 4.11 We find that, as required by the Commission, KTMF has provided two sets of community-specific survey results for the community of Kalispell, Montana, for each year surveyed. Section 76.5(i) of the Commission's rules requires that for network stations to be considered significantly viewed, the survey results should exceed a 3 percent share of total viewing hours and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3154A1.txt
  • Newsweek filed reply comments. 2. Cox, Post-Newsweek and Media General (collectively, ``Objectors'') oppose the proposed channel substitution. They argue that a grant of FMBC's proposal will cause interference to: WPLG's co-channel DTV service in Miami (new interference to 25,947 people or 0.66 percent of WPLG's DTV service population); WFTV's co-channel analog service in Orlando (new interference to 28,055 people or 1.12 percent within WFTV's Grade B service population); WFLA-TV adjacent channel analog service in Tampa (new interference to 30,785 people or 0.96 percent of WFLA-TV's analog service population). Objectors assert that while the Commission's interference methodology shows a loss of full power service to more than 82,000 persons, the significantly better propagation characteristics of Florida (i.e., the ``super refraction'' phenomenon) suggest
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-885A1.txt
  • suppressed. MOD ARTICLE S23.12 Double side band and single side band t tTransmitting stations operating in the HF bands allocated exclusively to the Broadcasting Service shall meet the system specifications contained in Appendix S11. II. Draft Proposals Approved by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Included in Doc. WAC/099(04.04.02) Agenda Item 1.12c: to consider allocations and regulatory issues related to the space science services in accordance with Resolution 723 (Rev. WRC-2000) and to review all Earth exploration-satellite service and space research service allocations between 35 and 38 GHz, taking into account Resolution 730 (WRC-2000); Background Information: Resolution 723 (Rev. WRC-2000) resolves 4, recommends that WRC-03 consider a review of existing allocations to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3121A3.txt
  • services of companies other than Domestic Communications Companies. (6) Domestic Communications Infrastructure does not include equipment dedicated to the termination of international undersea cables, provided that such equipment is utilized solely to effectuate the operation of undersea transport network(s) outside of the United States and in no manner controls land-based transport network@) or their associated systems in the United states. 1.12. Purchase Agreement are consummated. "Effective Date" means the date on which the transactions contemplated by the 1.13. "Electronic Communication" has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. 0 2510(12). 1.14. "Electronic Surveillance" means: (a) the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. $0 2510(4), (I), (2), and (12), respectively, and electronic surveillance as defined in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3563A1.txt
  • notice of the proposed appointment of an individual as a security director, the Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Defense, or Department of Homeland Security may object to the appointment, requiring rescission of the appointment and appointment of another candidate. See id. at Art. 3.16. See also id. at Art. 1.5 (defining ``data centers'') and at Art. 1.12 (defining ``domestic communications infrastructure''). See id. at Art. 5.2. See also id. at Art. 1.3 (which defines ``control'' to include the power to reach certain decisions as well as de facto and de jure control). See Foreign Participation Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 23919-21, ¶¶ 61-66. See id. at 23919, ¶ 62. See id. at 23920-21, ¶ 65. See Petition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3947A1.txt
  • had proposed to include and which we find Verizon's billing systems do not support. Similarly, we do not adopt Cavalier's proposed sections 6.3.9, which would require Verizon to provide SS7 signaling streams instead of the currently-provided billing tapes. Arbitrator's Adopted Contract Language With respect to Issue C3, and in accordance with the foregoing discussion, the Arbitrator adopts the following language: 1.12(b) - ``Carrier Identification Code'' or ``CIC'' is a numeric code assigned by the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) Administrator for the provisioning of selected switched services. The numeric code is unique to each entity and issued to route the call to the trunk group designated by the entity to which the code is assigned. 1.48 - ``Local Routing Number'' or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1.txt
  • Appendix 30B, as it considers this offers the greatest opportunity for improvements that can yield cost-effective access to satellite broadband services. The U.S. considers that the bands subject to Appendix 30B should be among those considered for the global broadband satellite systems serving Internet applications addressed under agenda item 1.19 UNITED STATES DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.12: to consider possible changes in response to Resolution 86 (Rev. Marrakesh, 2002) of the Plenipotentiary Conference: ``Advance publication, coordination, notification and recording procedures for frequency assignments pertaining to satellite networks'' in accordance with Resolution 86 (WRC-03). ISSUE: Resolves 1 of Resolution 86 (WRC-03) reflects part of the scope and criteria of this agenda item as determined by the Plenipotentiary Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1698A1_Erratum.doc
  • Appendix 30B, as it considers this offers the greatest opportunity for improvements that can yield cost-effective access to satellite broadband services. The U.S. considers that the bands subject to Appendix 30B should be among those considered for the global broadband satellite systems serving Internet applications addressed under agenda item 1.19 UNITED STATES DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.12: to consider possible changes in response to Resolution 86 (Rev. Marrakesh, 2002) of the Plenipotentiary Conference: ``Advance publication, coordination, notification and recording procedures for frequency assignments pertaining to satellite networks'' in accordance with Resolution 86 (WRC-03). ISSUE: Resolves 1 of Resolution 86 (WRC-03) reflects part of the scope and criteria of this agenda item as determined by the Plenipotentiary Conference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A2.txt
  • the termination of international undersea cables, provided that such equipment is utilized solely to effectuate the operation of undersea transport network(s) outside of the United States and in no manner controls land-based transport network(s) or their associated systems in the United States. 1.11 ``Effective Date'' means the date on which the FCC grants the application in FCC File No. ITC-214-20030728-00376. 1.12 ``Electronic Communication'' has the meaning given it in 18 U.S.C. § 2510(12). 1.13 ``Electronic Surveillance'' means (a) the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications as defined in 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510(1), (2), (4) and (12), respectively, and electronic surveillance as defined in 50 U.S.C. § 1801(f); (b) access to stored wire or electronic communications, as referred to in 18
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3553A1.txt
  • Table 2.1.1.A. Letter from Lon C. Levin to FCC Secretary dated Oct. 4, 2004. See ATC Report and Order, Appendix C2 § 1.14. See Section III.C.10, infra. See Petition for Reconsideration and Clarification of Inmarsat Ventures PLC filed in IB Docket No. 01-185 on July 7, 2003 at 13. See ATC Report and Order., ¶¶ 158-161 and Appendix C2 §§ 1.12 and 2.2.3. MSV ATC Application at 23. Id., Appendix L. Inmarsat Opposition at 57-60. Receiver overload occurs when a high-amplitude signal at the input of a receiver's amplifier causes the amplifier to attempt to exceed its maximum possible output level, consequently distorting the output signal. If a strong signal from a nearby ATC base station overloads the amplifier in an
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3580A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3580A1.txt
  • were received from affected countries. U.S. VIEW: In dealing with this agenda item, WRC-07 should continue to follow the precepts of Resolution 26 (Rev.WRC-97), which encourages countries to delete their names from country footnotes, and should adopt the approach used for this agenda item at WRC-03 and previous conferences. (6.28.04) Document WAC/035(10.11.04): DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.12: to consider possible changes in response to Resolution 86 (Rev. Marrakesh, 2002) of the Plenipotentiary Conference: ``Advance publication, coordination, notification and recording procedures for frequency assignments pertaining to satellite networks'' in accordance with Resolution 86 (WRC-03). ISSUE: ``Rationalization and Clarification of Articles 9 and 11'' In addition to Resolution 86 (WRC-03) itself, WRC-03 adopted Resolution 88 that addresses potential rationalization
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1011A1.txt
  • on the compliance with the limits contained in Article 21 of a highly-inclined orbit non-GSO FSS system for which complete advance publication information has not been received prior to 5 July 2003. INFORMAL WORKING GROUP 5 (IWG-5) Regulatory Procedures Issues Document WAC/050(04.04.05): Recommended revisions to the preliminary views from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) on WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.12: Editoral note: In the following revision, each of the several views listed under ``U.S. VIEWS'' at the end of the NTIA document (Document WAC/046(04.04.05) in Section II of this public notice) has seen moved so that each appears under its respective topic in the ``Issues'' section. DRAFT PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-07 WRC-07 Agenda Item 1.12: to consider possible changes in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1774A1.txt
  • 6-A865, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554; e-mail: WRC07@fcc.gov. Comments should refer to IB Docket No. 04-286 and to specific recommendations by document number. The deadline for comments on the recommendations is July 15, 2005. Draft proposals on WRC-07 Agenda Items received from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA): Document WAC/059(22.06.05) - WRC-07 Agenda Items 1.5, 1.6, and 1.12: DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.5: to consider spectrum requirements and possible additional spectrum allocations for aeronautical telecommand and high bit-rate aeronautical telemetry, in accordance with Resolution 230 (WRC-03); Background Information: 1. During the meeting of ITU-R Working Party 8B held in September 2004, one Administration presented a paper (Document 8B/30) which proposed the adoption
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2013A1.txt
  • (resulting in adoption of Recommendation ITU-R S.1715), and that no further WRC action is needed or contemplated. IWG-2 members will be encouraged to look at additional resolutions and recommendations to see if there are any additional candidates for suppression, and bring any proposals on this subject into IWG-2's November/December meeting. 2. Doc. IWG-2/066 (Exec. Branch Agencies proposals for Agenda Item 1.12, Mod to 9.14 and Mod to Appendix 5). IWG-2 had the following comments on the two proposals from the Exec. Branch agencies on Agenda Item 1.12: Mod to 9.14: IWG-2 endorsed and supported this proposal. Mod to Appendix 5: After discussion, IWG-2 participants had several unresolved questions about aspects of the proposal, its intentions, and whether the resulting text may
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-202A1.txt
  • Resolution to the attention of ICAO. USA/ /6 NOC RESOLUTION 413 (WRC-03) Use of the band 108-117.975 MHz by Aeronautical Service INFORMAL WORKING GROUP 5 (IWG-5) Regulatory Issues Document WAC/084(25.01.06): DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Modifications to Appendix 4 Advance publication of a non-geostationary-satellite network not subject to coordination under Section II of Article 9 Agenda Item 1.12: to consider possible changes in response to Resolution 86 (Rev. Marrakesh, 2002) of the Plenipotentiary Conference: ``Advance publication, coordination, notification and recording procedures for frequency assignments pertaining to satellite networks'' in accordance with Resolution 86 (WRC-03); Background information: Resolution 86 (Rev. Marrakesh, 2002) requested that WRC-03 and subsequent Conferences review the regulatory procedures associated with the advance publication, coordination, notification
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-203A1.txt
  • 23, 2005). Notwithstanding that the letter apparently was mailed by the staff, as discussed below, Creative's counsel claims never to have received this letter. It did, however, seek a timely extension of the technical STA on January 28, 2005. Letter to Marlene Dortch from Dan J. Alpert (Jan. 28, 2005). That extension request remains pending. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.12, Creative's counsel should have been served with a copy of any decision pertaining to KXXA(AM). See Conway and Vilonia, Arkansas, 18 FCC Rcd 25634 (MB 2003). Creative filed an application to implement the rule making on May 10, 2004 (File No. BPH-20040510AAN, granted on November 9, 2004), and it recently filed a covering license application for KASR(FM). See File No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-960A1.txt
  • Deletion of invites 4 is made recognizing the retention of old resolves 4, now resolves 3. Changes to invites administrations are proposed to clarify that administrations are to supply technical details of their systems along with an indication of their intention to implement HAPS in these frequency bands. Document WAC/099(27.04.06): DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.12: to consider possible changes in response to Resolution 86 (Rev. Marrakesh, 2002) of the Plenipotentiary Conference: ``Advance publication, coordination, notification and recording procedures for frequency assignments pertaining to satellite networks'' in accordance with Resolution 86 (WRC-03); Coordination of the radionavigation-satellite service (space-to-space) in the bands 1 215-1 300 MHz and 1 559-1 610 MHz Background Information: The scope and criteria
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1564A2.txt
  • Offset A3 D3 I1 J1 M1 N1 O1 G4 Mean (dB) (Excluding G4) Standard Deviation (dB) (Excluding G4) N-6 -1.37 -0.01 -1.54 -1.42 -1.39 -1.96 -1.29 -6.29 -1.28 0.60 N-4 -1.15 -0.11 -1.00 -1.44 -1.16 -1.51 -1.03 -5.16 -1.06 0.46 N-3 -1.03 -0.88 -0.98 -0.57 -1.10 -1.50 -1.06 -5.70 -1.02 0.28 N-2 -1.21 -0.56 -0.96 -1.63 -1.14 -1.42 -0.90 -4.82 -1.12 0.35 N+2 -1.28 -1.50 -1.27 -1.44 -0.75 -1.30 -1.12 -4.49 -1.24 0.25 Mean -1.21 -0.61 -1.15 -1.30 -1.11 -1.54 -1.08 -5.29 -1.14 Std Dev 0.13 0.61 0.25 0.42 0.23 0.25 0.14 0.72 0.40 Note: The overall means and standard deviations (lower right corner of the chart) omitted data for receiver G4 for reasons discussed in the text. Overall, the SFU
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A5.txt
  • ln(miles)) -0.0290 0.3280 0.9714 0.1145* 0.0520 1.1213 -14.81* Waived Prohibition on In-Market Newspaper Cross- ownership (1=yes) 0.1461 0.5530 1.1573 -18.5571***0.0000 0.0000 128.05 Cross-owned with TV Station in DMA (1=yes) 0.4642***0.0020 1.5908 0.5755 0.1080 1.7781 109.52* Percentage of Other Market Stations with News Format -0.0136***0.0000 0.9865 -0.0177 0.2200 0.9824 -2.95** Total Stations in the Market 0.0045* 0.1000 1.0045 0.0030 0.6260 1.0031 1.12 Market Median Commute Time -0.0080 0.5760 0.9920 -0.0104 0.7790 0.9897 -1.75 Percentage of Market Population Male 0.0851 0.1780 1.0889 -0.0252 0.8120 0.9751 26.04 Percentage of Market Population Black or African American 0.0023 0.6310 1.0024 0.0067 0.5390 1.0067 0.30 Percentage of Market Population Hispanic or Latino -0.0010 0.8310 0.9990 0.0147 0.1010 1.0148 -1.10 Percentage of Market Population Aged 18 to 24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A6.txt
  • 97% 83 52% 65% 0% 99% 86 Percent News, Evening 3% 0% 0% 45% 83 3% 0% 0% 21% 86 Percent Sports, Evening 11% 0% 0% 93% 83 12% 0% 0% 81% 86 Average Block, Advertisements, AM Drive 1.41 1.16 0.00 5.58 82 1.30 1.02 0.00 5.58 83 Average Block, Entertainment/Leisure/DJ Banter, AM Drive 2.22 1.64 0.00 15.50 82 2.14 1.12 0.00 17.63 83 Average Block, Music, AM Drive 1.97 2.05 0.00 8.44 82 1.85 2.00 0.00 4.97 83 Average Block, News, AM Drive 0.72 0.57 0.00 3.10 82 0.75 0.63 0.00 2.90 83 Average Block, Sports, AM Drive 0.63 0.00 0.00 7.29 82 0.65 0.00 0.00 7.00 83 Average Block, Advertisements, Evening 1.14 1.06 0.06 3.60 83 1.21 1.03 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A7.txt
  • radio and newspaper -6.2 (0.58) -5.2 (0.48) -8.3 (0.82) -13.9 (1.34) Parent company coverage of all television households (%) 0.2 (0.78) 0.3 (0.73) -0.0 (0.11) Network owned and operated 3.8 (0.47) -4.8 (0.58) -0.8 (0.09) Network affiliation (omitted category is CW\MyNetwork) ABC -0.8 (0.14) 3.8 (0.43) CBS -1.5 (0.27) 4.5 (0.45) FOX 20.4*** (3.92) 17.5** (2.57) NBC 5.6 (0.96) 11.2 (1.12) Other control variables Time and length of broadcast fixed effects No No No No Yes DMA and date fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Adjusted R-squared .10 .13 .13 .17 .17 Notes: Absolute values of t-statistics in parentheses (using heteroscedastic-consistent standard errors corrected for clustering by television station); ***p<.01, **p<.05 and *p<.10. 41 Table 9: Total State and Local
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1.txt
  • relevant product market has been defined as the smallest group of competing products for which a hypothetical monopoly provider of the products would profitably impose at least a ```small but significant and nontransitory' increase in price.'' Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, (Apr. 2, 1992, revised Apr. 8, 1997) §§ 1.11, 1.12 (DOJ/FTC Guidelines); see also AT&T/BellSouth Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 5675, para. 24 n.85. A relevant geographic market has been defined ``as the region where a hypothetical monopolist that is the only producer of the relevant product in the region would profitably impose at least a `small but significant and nontransitory' increase in the price of the relevant product, assuming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1054A1_Rcd.pdf
  • relevant product market has been defined as the smallest group of competing products for which a hypothetical monopoly provider of the products would profitably impose at least a "`small but significant and nontransitory' increase in price." Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, (Apr. 2, 1992, revised Apr. 8, 1997) §§ 1.11, 1.12 (DOJ/FTC Guidelines); see also AT&T/BellSouth Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 5675, para. 24 n.85. 82A relevant geographicmarket has been defined "as the region where a hypothetical monopolist that is the only producer of the relevant product in the region would profitably impose at least a `small but significant and nontransitory' increase in the price of the relevant product, assuming that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2623A1.txt
  • Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules''). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau (``Division'') received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2 GHz bands. We initiated an investigation and on May 13, 2008, we sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Spy Camera. In your June 9, 2008 response to our LOI, you admit marketing wireless video transmitters beginning in early 2006 on your web site, www.spycameras.com, to end users and resellers. You admit that these wireless video transmitters
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-45A1.txt
  • consist of two (2) segments of digital fiber-optic cable. The first segment will connect Keawaula, on the island of Oahu in Hawaii, with Iliili, American Samoa. The second segment will connect Iliili with Apia, Samoa. On the Hawaii-American Samoa segment, the ASHC System will consist of two (2) optical fiber pairs, with a design capacity and initial configuration capacity of 1.12 Gbps. On the American Samoa-Samoa segment, the ASHC System will consist of two (2) optical fiber pairs, with a design capacity of 160 Gbps but an initial capacity of 2.5 Gbps. To construct the ASHC System, the Applicants will remove a section of the former PAC Rim East cable system between New Zealand and Hawaii and reinstall that section to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • 24, 2004.507 183. Wireless number porting activity since the advent of porting has been significant. Overall, approximately 43.93 million wireless subscribers ported their numbers to another wireless carrier from December 2003 through December 2007.508 About 30 percent of this intramodal porting activity, or approximately 13.3 million wireless-to-wireless ports, took place in 2007.509 Monthly rates of intramodal porting activity averaged about 1.12 million ports during 2007, up from a monthly average of about 856,000 ports in 2006 and the highest monthly average for intramodal porting activity since the advent of porting.510 184. Another 2.98 million subscribers ported their numbers from a wireline carrier to a wireless carrier from December 2003 through December 2007, with about 896,000 of these intermodal ports taking place
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A2.txt
  • show that new digital technologies protect existing distress and safety frequencies, and take into account the commercial communication aspect of the HF band use, the United States supports the revision of RR Appendix 17 to accommodate new digital technologies for the maritime mobile service. 9 Document WAC/016(31.03.09) WAC Informal Working Group (IWG)-1 Modifications to NTIA's Preliminary View on Agenda Item 1.12 (see WAC/007(13.01.09)) Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRELIMINARY VIEWS ON WRC-11 AGENDA ITEM 1.12: to protect the primary services in the band 37-38 GHz from interference resulting from aeronautical mobile service operations, taking into account the results of ITU-R studies in accordance with Resolution 754 (WRC-07) ISSUE: Resolution 754 (WRC-07), "Consideration of modification of the aeronautical
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-763A3.txt
  • (Resolutions 731 (WRC-2000) and 732 (WRC-2000) ­ Consideration of the progress of ITU-R studies concerning the technical and regulatory issues relative to the fixed service in the bands between 71 GHz and 238 GHz, taking into account Resolutions 731 (WRC-2000) and 732 (WRC-2000); d) Agenda Item 1.11 (Space Research Service (Earth-to-space) systems within the band 22.55-23.15 GHz); e) Agenda Item 1.12 (Resolution 754 (WRC-07) ­ Consideration of modification of the aeronautical component of the mobile service allocation in the 37-38 GHz band for protection of other primary services in the band); f) Agenda Item 1.13 (Resolution 551 (WRC-07) ­ Use of the band 21.4-22 GHz for broadcasting-satellite service and associated feeder-link bands in Regions 1 and 3); g) Agenda Item 1.19
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 1 ATTACHMENT 1 to FCC Public Notice DA 10-372 Recommendations approved at 2 March 2010 Meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 2012 World Radiocommunication Conference 2 Maritime Aeronautical and Radar Services 3 DOCUMENT WAC/063(02.03.10) WAC Informal Working Group (IWG)-1 Modifications to NTIA's Proposal on Agenda Item 1.12 Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DRAFT PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.12: to protect the primary services in the band 37-38 GHz from interference resulting from aeronautical mobile service operations, taking into account the results of ITU-R studies, in accordance with Resolution 754 (WRC-07) Background Information: AdministrationsCountries are implementing space research service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A2_Rcd.pdf
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ATTACHMENT 1 to FCC Public Notice DA 10-372 Recommendations approved at 2 March 2010 Meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 2012 World Radiocommunication Conference 2152 Maritime Aeronautical and Radar Services 2153 DOCUMENT WAC/063(02.03.10) WAC Informal Working Group (IWG)-1 Modifications to NTIA's Proposal on Agenda Item 1.12 Preparation for ITU Radiocommunication Conferences UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DRAFT PROPOSALS FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Agenda Item 1.12:to protect the primary services in the band 37-38 GHz from interference resulting from aeronautical mobile service operations, taking into account the results of ITU-R studies, in accordance with Resolution 754(WRC-07) Background Information:AdministrationsCountries are implementing space research service (SRS) earth station
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3.txt
  • more readily available. 12 Document WAC/059(02.03.10) Ms. Mindel De La Torre Chief of the International Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Dear Ms. De La Torre: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), on behalf of the Executive Branch agencies, approves the release of two draft Executive Branch proposals for WRC-12 agenda items 1.11 and 1.12. For agenda item 1.11, NTIA proposes a primary allocation to the space research service (Earth- to-space) in the band 22.55-23.15 GHz to support manned and unmanned missions. NTIA also proposes a power flux-density limit for aircraft stations in the 37-38 GHz band to protect services under agenda item 1.12. NTIA considered the Federal agencies' input toward the development of U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-372A3_Rcd.pdf
  • more readily available. 2193 Document WAC/059(02.03.10) Ms. Mindel De La Torre Chief of the International Bureau Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Dear Ms. De La Torre: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), on behalf of the Executive Branch agencies, approves the release of two draft Executive Branch proposals for WRC-12 agenda items 1.11 and 1.12. For agenda item 1.11, NTIA proposes a primary allocation to the space research service (Earth- to-space) in the band 22.55-23.15 GHz to support manned and unmanned missions. NTIA also proposes a power flux-density limit for aircraft stations in the 37-38 GHz band to protect services under agenda item 1.12. NTIA considered the Federal agencies' input toward the development of U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-535A1.txt
  • the purpose of our analysis here, it is useful to examine MSS as they are defined and used in the day-to-day business dealings of the MSS industry. As discussed above,133 MSS 126 See http://www.terrestar.com/about.php. 127 See http://www.ico.com/about/tech/mim.php. 128 http://www.orbcomm.com/about/companyInfo.htm. 129 See XM-Sirius Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 12367-68. 130 See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. 41552, §§ 1.11, 1.12 (Sept. 10, 1992), revised, 4 Trade Reg. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 13104 (Apr. 8, 1997) (Guidelines). The Guidelines similarly define the relevant geographic market as "a region such that a hypothetical monopolist that was the only present or future producer of the relevant product at locations in that region would profitably impose at least a `small but significant and nontransitory' increase
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-535A1_Rcd.pdf
  • same purposes."132 38.We believe that for the purpose of our analysis here, it is useful to examine MSS as they are defined and used in the day-to-day business dealings of the MSS industry. As discussed above,133 MSS 126Seehttp://www.terrestar.com/about.php. 127See http://www.ico.com/about/tech/mim.php. 128 http://www.orbcomm.com/about/companyInfo.htm. 129SeeXM-Sirius Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 12367-68. 130See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. 41552, §§ 1.11, 1.12 (Sept. 10, 1992), revised, 4 Trade Reg. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 13104 (Apr. 8, 1997) (Guidelines). The Guidelines similarlydefine the relevant geographicmarket as "a region such that a hypothetical monopolist that was the only present or future producer of the relevant product at locations in that region would profitably impose at least a `small but significant and nontransitory' increase in price,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-60A1_Rcd.pdf
  • and 17.7. 1047 C.F.R. § 25.149(b)(1)-(4). 229 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-60 million MSS mobile earth terminals in the United States, which would communicate via TerreStar-1.11In a subsequent amendment to the application, TerreStar also requested authority for U.S. operation of ATC base stations and dual-mode mobile transceivers that could be used to communicate either via the base stations or via TerreStar-1.12In July 2007, TerreStar informed the Commission that foreign ownership in its parent corporation might have risen above 25 per cent as a result of recent transactions and that TerreStar might therefore file a petition for declaratory ruling under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act13after ascertaining the relevant facts.14In February 2008 TerreStar amended the blanket-license application to report increased foreign ownership
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-647A1.txt
  • the Commission to use a traditional market power approach in its forbearance analysis). A key element of the Guidelines, as they relate to product market definition, includes an inquiry into whether a hypothetical monopoly provider of a service profitably could impose a ``small but significant and nontransitory'' increase in the price of such service. FTC-DOJ Horizontal Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. See Pleading Cycle Established for Comments on Qwest Corporation's Petition For Forbearance in the Phoenix, Arizona Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 09-135, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 9470, 9471-73 (2009). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-647A1_Rcd.pdf
  • the Commission to use a traditional market power approach in its forbearance analysis). 4A key element of the Guidelines, as they relate to product market definition, includes an inquiry into whether a hypothetical monopoly provider of a service profitably could impose a "small but significant and nontransitory" increase in the price of such service. FTC-DOJ Horizontal Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. 5SeePleading Cycle Established for Comments on Qwest Corporation's Petition For Forbearance in the Phoenix, Arizona Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 09-135, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 9470, 9471- 73 (2009). 3721
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1372A1.txt
  • OH1273 22.00 1,823 401 South Euclid City OH0778 17.15 8,913 1,529 Waite Hill Village OH0891 27.46 193 53 *CPR = Percent of competitive DBS penetration rate. ATTACHMENT B CSRs 8489-E, 8490-E COMMUNITIES SERVED BY TIME WARNER CABLE INC. Communities CUIDs Franchise Area Households Cable Subscribers Penetration Percentage CSR 8489-E Canaan Township OH2473 1,800 84 4.67 Cass Township OH2009 535 6 1.12 Homer Township OH1382 451 87 19.29 Hubbard Township OH0310 5,749 474 8.24 Mechanic Township OH2050 889 225 25.31 Mifflin Township OH2187 452 31 6.86 Nelson Township OH1592 1,167 23 1.97 Richland Township OH0061 459 1 .22 Ridgefield Township OH0463 875 38 4.34 Ripley Township OH1255 346 41 11.85 Smith Township OH0558 1,808 35 1.94 Springfield Township OH1690 OH1808 4,386 78
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-284A1.txt
  • 391 106.73 0.74 400 29.8% 0.4 33.3% 0.5 Triple play package 380 142.49 0.96 400 26.0% 0.5 28.8% 0.5 Second operator subgroup (all) All Services 135 110.32 1.45 128 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 123 66.15 0.58 128 26.0% 0.8 27.2% 0.8 Double play package 122 114.50 1.10 128 27.6% 0.8 29.5% 0.9 Triple play package 120 145.21 1.12 128 39.4% 1.0 43.3% 1.1 Second operator subgroup (incumbents) All Services 70 110.14 1.55 70 100.0% 0.0 100.0% 0.0 Video service only 70 66.57 0.63 70 28.5% 0.8 29.6% 0.8 Double play package 70 115.61 1.15 70 29.7% 0.8 31.5% 1.0 Triple play package 70 147.68 0.95 70 37.0% 1.1 38.8% 1.1 Second operator subgroup (rivals) All Services 65 111.25
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3.txt
  • Sharing criteria in the band 36-37 GHz NOC RES 753 (WRC-07) Use of the band 22.55 ­ 23.15 GHz by the space research service SUP Consequential Suppression 1.11 RES 754 (WRC-07) Consideration of modification of the aeronautical component of the mobile service allocation in the 37-38 GHz band for protection of other primary services in the band SUP Consequential Suppression 1.12 RES 804 (WRC-07) Principles for establishing agendas for world radiocommunication conferences NOC ANNEX 1 Principles for establishing agendas for WRCs NOC ANNEX 2 Template for the submission of proposals for agenda items NOC RES 805 (WRC-07) Agenda for the 2011 World Radiocommunication Conference SUP Consequential Suppression RES 806 (WRC-07) Preliminary agenda for the 2015 World Radiocommunication Conference NOC A new
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-447A3_Rcd.pdf
  • GHz b y th e space researc h service SUP Conse quential Suppressi on 1.11 RES 754 (WRC- 07) Consi deration of m odification of the aerona utical com ponent of the mobile service allocation in the 37- 38 G Hz band f or pr otection of other prim ary services in t he band SUP Conse quential Suppressi on 1.12 RES 804 (WRC-07) Principles for establishing agendas for world radi ocom munication c onfe rences NOC AN NE X 1 Pr inciples f or est ablishing a gen das for WRCs NOC ANNEX 2 Te mplate for the subm ission of proposals for a genda item s NOC RES 805 (WRC-07 ) Ag end a fo r th e 20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215526A1.txt
  • 4.79 4.87 4.99 4.97 5.03 5.04 Total Monthly Charge $41.25 $41.21 $42.12 $42.29 $42.57 $41.64 $41.80 $41.81 $41.67 $41.27 $41.21 $41.80 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 Touch-Tone Service 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $43.71 $44.07 $44.91 $44.94 $45.81 $44.57 $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 54 54
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248493A1.txt
  • 1.19 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/023(08.06.04) 2 1.21 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/024(08.06.04) 2 1.8 (Resolution 145) Comments on NTIA Draft Preliminary View WAC/020(08.06.04) 2 1.18 Comments on NTIA Draft Preliminary View WAC/022(08.06.04) 3 1.4 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/016(08.06.04) 4 1.15 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/015(08.06.04) 5 1.10 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/012(08.06.04) 5 1.12 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/013(08.06.04) 5 2 Draft Preliminary View on WRC-07 WAC/014(08.06.04) If there are any questions concerning the above table, please contact Don Weiland at 202-418-2220. - FCC - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 - 4 F F G I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249262A1.txt
  • 0.32 -64.1 Mexico 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.85 0.74 0.67 0.60 0.50 0.52 0.29 0.27 -59.5 Morocco 1.36 1.33 1.23 1.35 1.19 1.27 0.84 0.73 0.62 0.43 0.24 -81.5 Netherlands 1.03 1.02 0.86 0.78 0.57 0.50 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.38 0.21 -58.4 Nigeria 1.14 1.17 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 -61.5 Pakistan 1.77 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 -74.2 Peru 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 -77.5 Philippines 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 -73.4 Poland 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 -65.2 Russia 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 -79.6 Saudi Arabia
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255869A1.txt
  • explanatory power. 27 For this specification, the Shea partial R-Squared equals the standard partial R-Squared, because the estimation includes only one endogenous variable. See Baum, Schaeffer, and Stillman (2003). 17 TABLE 2 SECOND SPECIFICATION: DBS PENETRATION AND STRATIFIED QUALITY-ADJUSTED CABLE PRICE THE FULL MODEL REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS (t-statistics in parentheses) Variable Estimated Coefficient t Statistic PLUSTENDROP -1.12 (0.32) NEG10TO10 0.91 (0.58) PLUS10RISE 14.21** (2.10) LPREM 0.06 (0.30) CABINT 0.15 (0.51) CABREGSPORT -0.36 (1.37) CABFOREIGN 0.19 (0.75) CABHIDEF -0.51* (1.82) LNOVERAIR -0.19 (0.83) LNLAT -1.54** (2.29) LPOVERTY -0.22** (2.15) LMULTDWELL -0.15 (1.30) DBSOVERAIR 0.41* (1.74) Constant 4.89* (1.88) Observations 525 F-Statistic 2.05** Hansen J Statistic 6.97* ** - significant at 95% confidence level, * - significant at 90%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261024A2.txt
  • 0.32 0.25 -68.8 Mexico 1.00 0.93 0.85 0.74 0.67 0.60 0.50 0.52 0.29 0.27 0.12 -79.6 Morocco 1.33 1.23 1.35 1.19 1.27 0.84 0.73 0.62 0.43 0.24 0.28 -66.3 Netherlands 1.02 0.86 0.78 0.57 0.50 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.38 0.21 0.22 -43.4 Nigeria 1.17 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 0.27 -60.7 Pakistan 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 0.20 -79.4 Peru 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 0.12 -84.9 Philippines 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 0.16 -78.4 Poland 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 0.13 -77.6 Russia 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 0.24 -65.4 Saudi
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262086A1.txt
  • 4.61 4.79 4.87 4.99 4.97 5.03 5.04 5.45 5.47 5.55 5.62 Total Monthly Charge $41.64 $41.80 $41.81 $41.67 $41.27 $41.21 $41.80 $42.43 $41.95 $41.96 $43.75 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 $32.02 $32.92 $33.17 $32.81 Subscriber Line Charges $3.70 $3.69 $3.61 $3.61 $3.56 $3.50 $4.35 $4.77 $5.77 $6.03 $5.84 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 4 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 4 4 4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.57 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $44.57 $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 $43.15 $46.85 $47.12 $46.21 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 53 53 53 53 54 54 54 54 52 52
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ................... Table 3.19 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area .............................. Table 3.33 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction ........Table 3.21 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area .................. Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket No. 98-202 2005 Introduction
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A2.txt
  • Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ................... Table 3.19 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area .............................. Table 3.33 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction ........Table 3.21 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area .................. Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket No. 98-202 2005 Introduction
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A3.txt
  • 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003) disbursements were used for these two mechanisms for 2003, and Funding Year 2003 (July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004) disbursements were used for 2004. The bulk of a funding year disbursements for these two mechanisms are made in the second half of the funding year. Chart 1.1 shows the same information graphically. Table 1.12 shows, on a state-by-state basis, the total amount of funding disbursements for each of the universal service mechanisms, estimated contributions towards universal service, and the net estimated dollar flow (disbursements less estimated contributions) for 2003 and 2004.17 15 See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • VALLEY TELEPHONE COMPANY -9.54 0.96 -10.41 -27.25 542322 C HORNITOS TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.54 -1.35 3.94 2.17 542323 C WINTERHAVEN TELEPHONE COMPANY -0.15 0.30 -0.44 -7.55 542324 C KERMAN TELEPHONE COMPANY 21.92 0.81 20.94 41.53 542332 C THE PONDEROSA TELEPHONE COMPANY 3.60 -0.25 3.86 3.40 542334 C SUREWEST TELEPHONE (ROSEVILLE TEL.) 2.07 -0.49 2.57 -16.67 542338 C SIERRA TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -1.12 -2.32 1.22 -3.95 542339 C THE SISKIYOU TELEPHONE CO. -4.40 -0.10 -4.31 -9.36 542343 C VOLCANO TELEPHONE COMPANY 12.11 -0.54 12.72 20.06 542344 C VERIZON WEST COAST INC.-CA 0.05 -1.18 1.25 0.00 542346 C PINNACLES TELEPHONE COMPANY 1.13 4.33 -3.06 -0.52 543402 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF GOLDEN ST DBA FRONTIER COM 3.40 -2.11 5.62 7.31 544342 C CITIZENS TEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A9.txt
  • 4.99 4.97 5.03 5.04 5.45 5.47 5.55 5.62 Total Monthly Charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.67 41.27 41.21 41.80 42.43 41.95 41.96 43.75 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04$33.29$34.12$34.06$34.85$34.39$34.45$34.42$34.68$34.39$33.73$33.45$32.02$32.92$33.17$32.81 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 6.03 5.84 Extra for Touch-Tone**** 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 **** **** **** Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.57 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.39 44.07 43.20 43.90 43.15 46.85 47.12 46.21 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266857A1.txt
  • 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2005 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1994-2005 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1994-2005 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2005) Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) ii Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A13.txt
  • - Kansas KS 1,463 1,529 (66) (4.51) Kentucky ALLTEL - London KY (59) (45) (14) 23.73 Kentucky ALLTEL - Lexington KY (398) (296) (102) 25.63 Cincinnati Bell Telephone - Kentucky KY (39) (30) (17) 43.59 BellSouth - Kentucky KY (22,597) (22,663) 66 (0.29) BellSouth - Louisiana LA (37,496) (37,752) 256 (0.68) Verizon New England - Maine ME (7,063) (6,984) (79) 1.12 Verizon Maryland MD 39,451 41,901 (2,451) (6.21) Verizon New England - Massachusetts MA (22,925) (20,087) (2,838) 12.38 Verizon North - Michigan MI (14,698) (14,693) (5) 0.03 AT&T - Ameritech - Michigan Bell MI (90,202) (89,863) (339) 0.38 Qwest - Minnesota MN 19,139 19,406 (266) (1.39) BellSouth - Mississippi MS (34,770) (34,809) 39 (0.11) CenturyTel of Missouri - Central Missouri MO
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A2.txt
  • Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A3.txt
  • income, and periodic true-ups. The table also shows the revenue base and contribution factors for each quarter. As explained above, the contribution base is 1% less than reported revenues to reflect the fact that some contribution assessments may prove uncollectible. Table 1.11 shows universal service disbursements on a mechanism-by-mechanism basis for 2005.18 Chart 1.1 shows the same information graphically. Table 1.12 shows, on a state-by-state basis, the total amount of funding disbursements for each of the universal service mechanisms, estimated contributions towards universal service, and the net estimated dollar flow (disbursements less estimated contributions) for 2005.19 Technical Appendix Carrier revenue information is not reported on a state-by-state basis. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate revenues per state in order to derive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2003 to 2004 by Study Area Study Area Code Type Study Area Name Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* IOWA (CONT.) 351280 A RINGSTED TEL. CO. 7.53 -1.00 8.62 20.36 351282 A ROCKWELL COOP. TEL. ASSN. 7.84 -1.12 9.07 20.78 351283 A ROYAL TEL. CO. 2.98 -5.63 9.12 18.37 351284 A RUTHVEN TEL. EXCH. CO. 6.18 0.60 5.55 11.65 351285 A SAC COUNTY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 4.91 -2.82 7.96 18.88 351291 A SCHALLER TEL. CO. 7.79 -0.34 8.15 20.11 351292 A SEARSBORO TEL. CO. (+ 351407 KILLDUFF) -23.44 -32.22 12.95 -8.84 351293 A SHARON TEL. CO. 3.79 -2.75
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A9.txt
  • 5.04 5.45 5.47 5.55 5.67 5.74 Total Monthly Charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.67 41.27 41.21 41.80 42.43 41.95 41.96 43.49 43.94 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04$33.29$34.12$34.06$34.85$34.39$34.45$34.42$34.68$34.39$33.73$33.45$32.02$32.92$33.17$34.20$34.15 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 6.03 6.01 6.04 Extra for Touch-Tone**** 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 **** **** **** **** Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.53 7.71 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.39 44.07 43.20 43.90 43.15 46.85 47.12 47.74 47.90 Number of Sample Cities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269749A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Released: January 25, 2007 Revised Table 1.12 for Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket No. 98-202 On December 29, 2006, the staff of the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service released its most recent Monitoring Report on Universal Service. Attached to this Public Notice is a new table 1.12 that replaces the version of table 1.12 that appeared in the released report. . Members of the public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • $41.27 $41.21 $41.80 $42.43 $41.95 $41.97 $43.49 $43.94 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 $32.02 $32.92 $33.17 $34.20 $34.15 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 6.03 6.01 6.04 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 4 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 4 4 4 4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.53 7.71 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $43.71 $44.07 $44.91 $44.94 $45.81 $44.57 $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 $43.15 $46.85 $47.12 $47.74 $47.90 Number of Sample Cities
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277103A6.txt
  • Sample Occurrences Size X N Other 1 1 Assertion D.1: Form 507, 508, 509 Submission Non-Compliance: Causes* Observed Sample Occurrences Size X N D.1.1 - Imprecise FCC Rule/s 2 14 D.1.7 - Inadequate Documentation Retention 3 14 D.1.8 - Inadequate Auditee Processes and/or Polices and Procedures 2 14 D.1..9 - Inadequate Systems for Collecting, Reporting, and/or Monitoring Data 2 14 D.1.12 - Applicant/Auditee Weak Internal Controls 3 14 D.1.13 - Applicant/Auditee Data Entry Error 1 14 D.1.16 - Service Provider Error (other) 3 14 Other 1 1 Assertion D.2: Common Line Annual Certification Non-Compliance: Causes* Observed Sample Occurrences Size X N D.2.12 - Applicant/Auditee Weak Internal Controls 1 1 Other 1 1 Assertion E.1 Calculation of Safety Net Additive Non-Compliance: Causes*
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A11.txt
  • 5.0 469.8 For Unscheduled Events Over 2 Minutes 1.6 11.5 2.5 3.7 58.3 81.9 91.4 4.8 462.1 For Unscheduled Downtime More Than 2 Minutes Number of Occurrences or Events 7 8 6 3 2 19 6 9 71 Events per Hundred Switches 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.2 1.2 1.5 0.5 0.7 2.9 Events per Million Access Lines 0.47 0.43 0.41 0.25 1.12 1.57 0.46 0.51 5.38 Average Outage Duration in Minutes 5.4 38.7 5.3 33.7 81.1 94.2 329.6 11.9 261.3 Average Lines Affected per Event in Thousands 16.4 14.5 39.0 5.3 6.9 1.7 9.4 10.8 1.7 Outage Line-Minutes per Event in Thousands 73.4 87.7 215.0 40.9 550.8 81.8 779.8 165.6 309.9 Outage Line-Minutes per 1,000 Access Lines 34.7 38.1 87.3 10.1 616.6
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A2.txt
  • Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A3.txt
  • income, and periodic true-ups. The table also shows the revenue base and contribution factors for each quarter. As explained above, the contribution base is 1% less than reported revenues to reflect the fact that some contribution assessments may prove uncollectible. Table 1.11 shows universal service disbursements on a mechanism-by-mechanism basis for 2006.21 Chart 1.1 shows the same information graphically. Table 1.12 shows, on a state-by-state basis, the total amount of funding disbursements for each of the universal service mechanisms, estimated contributions towards universal service, and the net estimated dollar flow (disbursements less estimated contributions) for 2006.22 Technical Appendix Carrier revenue information is not reported on a state-by-state basis. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate revenues per state in order to derive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • C MIDVALE TEL. EXCH. INC. -20.94 -0.97 -20.16 -31.78 472227 A MUD LAKE TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSN. INC. 14.86 -3.04 18.47 48.15 472230 C POTLATCH TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. -0.54 -1.13 0.60 -8.28 472231 C PROJECT MUTUAL TEL. COOP. ASSN. -4.99 -3.14 -1.91 -19.19 472232 C DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS ROCKLAND, INC. 6.65 0.07 6.57 8.26 472233 C RURAL TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 4.39 1.12 3.24 4.33 472295 C SILVER STAR TEL. CO. INC.-ID 4.73 0.41 4.30 5.12 472416 C VERIZON NORTHWEST INC.-ID 5.99 -1.90 8.04 134.85 472423 C INLAND TELEPHONE COMPANY - ID 9.79 -0.48 10.32 13.70 474427 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF ID DBA FRONTIER COMM OF ID -9.69 -0.87 -8.90 -32.05 475103 C QWEST CORPORATION - ID -1.83 -3.29 1.50 0.00 475162
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • 5.55 5.67 5.83 5.87 Total Monthly Charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.67 41.27 41.21 41.80 42.43 41.95 41.96 43.49 43.75 45.31 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04$33.29$34.12$34.06$34.85$34.39$34.45$34.42$34.68$34.39$33.73$33.45$32.02$32.92$33.17$34.20$34.19$34.56 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 6.03 6.01 6.03 6.14 Extra for Touch-Tone**** 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 **** **** **** a4 a4 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.53 7.77 7.67 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.39 44.07 43.20 43.90 43.15 46.85 47.12 47.74 47.99 48.37 Number
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279991A1.pdf
  • 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 ­ Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21 IWG-3 ­ International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 ­ Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 ­ Regulatory Issues 1.1, 1.0, 1.12, 2, 3, 5, 6, & 7.1 Satellite Digital Audio Radio Service Subscribers 0.69 2.10 4.42 6.90 8.25 0.48 1.81 4.68 7.14 0.11 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2nd Quarter 20032nd Quarter 20042nd Quarter 20052nd Quarter 20062nd Quarter 2007 XM Sirius 30 Means and Strategies for Accomplishing Performance SPECTRUM Processes Skills Technology Auctions Rulemaking Enforce the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • $43.49 $43.94 $45.06 $48.14 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 $32.02 $32.92 $33.17 $34.20 $34.15 $34.60 $35.22 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 6.03 6.01 6.04 6.15 6.15 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 4 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 4 4 4 4 4 4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.53 7.71 7.69 7.36 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $43.71 $44.07 $44.91 $44.94 $45.81 $44.57 $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 $43.15 $46.85 $47.12 $47.74 $47.90
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284934A1.txt
  • Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas, 1989-2007 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line, 1994-2007 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities, 1994-2007 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll Service Calls II. Expenditures on Telephone Service......................................................II-1 A. Residential Expenditures..................................................................II-2 B. Business Expenditures.....................................................................II-2 C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285019A1.pdf
  • consist of two (2) segments of digital fiber-optic cable. The first segment will connect Keawaula, on the island of Oahu in Hawaii, with Iliili, American Samoa. The second segment will connect Iliili with Apia, Samoa. On the Hawaii-American Samoa segment, the ASHC System will consist of two (2) optical fiber pairs, with a design capacity and initial configuration capacity of 1.12 Gbps. On the American Samoa-Samoa segment, the ASHC System will consist of two (2) optical fiber pairs, with a design capacity of 160 Gbps but an initial capacity of 2.5 Gbps. PPR will construct and initially own the wet link portion of the ASHC System, including the Hawaii, American Samoa, and the Samoa shore-end portions of the ASHC System. Upon
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf
  • Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A13.pdf
  • 36.36 Windstream/Valor Telecom. of Texas - New Mexico 2 NM (34) (23) (11) 32.35 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Red Hook NY 282 282 0 0.00 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Upstate NY 4,666 4,666 0 0.00 Citizens Telecom. of New York - Western Counties NY 484 484 0 0.00 Verizon New York Telephone NY (508,417) (502,739) (5,678) 1.12 Citizens - Frontier Cos. - Rochester Telephone NY (16,735) (14,637) (2,098) 12.54 Windstream North Carolina NC (361) (257) (105) 29.09 Embarq - Central Telephone - North Carolina NC (86) (67) (19) 22.09 Verizon South - Contel - North Carolina NC (4,874) (4,864) (10) 0.21 Verizon South - North Carolina NC (9,887) (9,876) (11) 0.11 AT&T - BellSouth - North Carolina
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A2.pdf
  • Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf
  • and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952 (2002). 20 47 C.F.R. §54.712. 21 See Letter from the FCC Managing Director to D. Scott Barash, USAC Acting CEO, dated February 29, 2008. 1 -8 Table 1.11 shows universal service disbursements on a mechanism-by-mechanism basis for 2006. and 2007. 22 Chart 1.1 shows the 2007 information graphically. Table 1.12 shows, on a state-by-state basis, the total amount of funding disbursements for each of the universal service mechanisms, estimated contributions towards universal service, and the net estimated dollar flow (disbursements less estimated contributions) for 2007.23 22 Figures in Table 1.11 are lower than those in Table 1.10 due to the difference between projected demand and actual disbursements. The figures used
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf
  • 2.66 4.02 -1.31 -0.91 452174 C SOUTHWESTERN TEL. CO. 0.78 -2.74 3.62 2.92 452176 C VALLEY TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE INC-AZ -2.65 -6.44 4.05 -2.18 452179 C GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 26.38 1.01 25.12 42.14 452191 C ACCIPITER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -2.48 -1.95 -0.53 -2.69 452200 C FORT MOJAVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 17.80 1.44 16.12 27.98 452226 C MIDVALE TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, INC.-ARIZONA 3.38 4.55 -1.12 1.63 452302 C VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. - AZ 4.42 -5.56 10.57 67.79 453334 C TABLE TOP TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. -4.37 -2.68 -1.74 -9.28 Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment 3 - 165 Table 3.32 ILEC High-Cost Loop Support Data Percentage Changes from 2005 to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A9.pdf
  • $43.49 $43.75 $45.32 $48.17 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 $32.02 $32.92 $33.17 $34.20 34.19 $34.56 $35.17 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 6.03 6.01 6.03 6.16 6.16 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 4 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.53 7.77 7.68 7.35 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $43.71 $44.07 $44.91 $44.94 $45.81 $44.57 $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 $43.15 $46.85 $47.12 $47.74 $47.99
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289308A1.txt
  • 1,880.0 2,760.0 2,860.0 2,860.0 Trans-Pacific Express Cable System (TPE) NC 15,482,880 15,482,880 15,482,880 0.0 1,280.0 1,280.0 1,280.0 Sydney-Hawaii Cable System NC 967,680 967,680 967,680 0.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 Planned : Asia America Gateway Consortium (AAG) NC 6,531,840 6,531,840 0.0 0.0 540.0 540.0 PPC 1 NC 1,693,440 1,693,440 0.0 0.0 140.0 140.0 American Samoa Hawaii Cable NC 13,548 13,548 0.0 0.0 1.12 1.12 FLAG NGN (Pacific) System NC 30,965,760 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,560.0 Tahiti-Hawaii Cable C 3,870,720 0.0 0.0 0.0 320.0 Unity Cable System NC 58,060,800 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,800.0 (1) Total T-P 92,610 334,530 334,530 576,4502,572,290 4,749,57011,765,25011,765,25022,160,250 29,831,760 29,831,760 31,767,120 46,992,960 95,195,520108,182,028201,079,308 3,885.0 7,870.0 8,943.6 16,623.6 Growth (%) 261.22% 0.00% 72.32% 346.23% 84.64% 147.71% 0.00% 88.35% 34.62% 0.00% 6.49% 47.93% 102.57%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A1.txt
  • Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2007................................... ................... Table 1.14 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 5 Index of Tables and Charts Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A2.txt
  • Revenues - Total - by State ................................................. Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2007................................... ................... Table 1.14 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 5 Index of Tables and Charts Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction .......... Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ..................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A3.txt
  • USAC Acting CEO, dated February 29, 2008. 1 -8 wireless services unless such requests were supported by actual cost analyses.22 The first installment of this voluntary commitment appears in the fourth quarter of 2009 of Table 1.10. Table 1.11 shows universal service disbursements on a mechanism-by-mechanism basis for 2007. and 2008. 23 Chart 1.1 shows the 2008 information graphically. Table 1.12 shows, on a state-by-state basis, the total amount of funding disbursements for each of the universal service mechanisms, estimated contributions towards universal service, and the net estimated dollar flow (disbursements less estimated contributions) for 2008.24 22 See Applications of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Atlantis Holdings LLC For Conc=sent to Transfer Control of Licenses, Authorizations, and Spectrum Manager and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295442A5.txt
  • 1.49 Utah 0.38 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.17 0.28 1.49 Vermont 0.92 0.08 0.00 1.58 0.00 1.40 0.22 0.58 4.77 Virgin Islands 10.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.12 0.00 0.00 24.58 Virginia 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.88 0.08 1.15 Washington 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 (0.03) 0.13 1.21 West Virginia 0.49 0.00 0.00 1.68 0.00 0.19 1.12 0.19 3.67 Wisconsin 0.71 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 1.67 0.00 0.52 2.99 Wyoming 3.83 0.04 0.00 2.93 0.03 3.30 1.21 1.87 13.22 Industry $0.67 $0.02 $0.00 $0.16 $0.00 $0.74 $0.27 $0.19 $2.05 Based on 2008 support payments and reported loops or lines from USAC filing for the Fourth Quarter 2008. Table 3.16 Monthly Support per Loop for High-Cost Support Mechanisms:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295981A1.txt
  • LONG. LOCATION: Micro Ant 1 0.85 meters ANTENNA ID: PAS3351R 17.70 dBW BPSK Modulation, BPSK PN calibration signal 2000.0000 - 2010.0000 MHz 62K5G7W BPSK Modulation, Walsh code scrambled by a PN code 2190.0000 - 2200.0000 MHz 50K0G7W 38 ° 3 ' 2.26 " N LAT. SITE ID: CES 7 I-15 & Frontage Rd., Iron, Paragohan, UT 112 ° 42 ' 1.12 " W LONG. LOCATION: Micro Ant 1 0.85 meters ANTENNA ID: PAS3351R 17.70 dBW BPSK Modulation, BPSK PN calibration signal 2000.0000 - 2010.0000 MHz 62K5G7W BPSK Modulation, Walsh code scrambled by a PN code 2190.0000 - 2200.0000 MHz 50K0G7W 32 ° 36 ' 55.78 " N LAT. SITE ID: CES 8 86281 E. Webb Court, Pinal, San Manuel, AZ 110
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296921A1.txt
  • LONG. LOCATION: Micro Ant 1 0.85 meters ANTENNA ID: PAS3351R 17.70 dBW BPSK Modulation, BPSK PN calibration signal 2000.0000 - 2010.0000 MHz 62K5G7W BPSK Modulation, Walsh code scrambled by a PN code 2190.0000 - 2200.0000 MHz 50K0G7W 38 ° 3 ' 2.26 " N LAT. SITE ID: CES 7 I-15 & Frontage Rd., Iron, Paragohan, UT 112 ° 42 ' 1.12 " W LONG. LOCATION: Micro Ant 1 0.85 meters ANTENNA ID: PAS3351R Page 5 of 20 17.70 dBW BPSK Modulation, BPSK PN calibration signal 2000.0000 - 2010.0000 MHz 62K5G7W BPSK Modulation, Walsh code scrambled by a PN code 2190.0000 - 2200.0000 MHz 50K0G7W 32 ° 36 ' 55.78 " N LAT. SITE ID: CES 8 86281 E. Webb Court, Pinal,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297270A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297270A2.txt
  • NC 15,482,880 15,482,880 15,482,880 15,482,880 0.0 1,280.0 1,280.0 1,280.0 1,280.0 Telestra Endeavour (formerly Sydney-Hawaii ) NC 967,680 967,680 1,935,360 1,935,360 0.0 80.0 80.0 160.0 160.0 Asia America Gateway Consortium (AAG) NC 6,531,840 6,531,840 6,531,840 0.0 0.0 540.0 540.0 540.0 PPC 1 NC 1,693,440 1,693,440 1,693,440 0.0 0.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 American Samoa Hawaii Cable NC 13,548 13,548 13,548 0.0 0.0 1.12 1.12 1.12 Planned: Tahiti-Hawaii Cable C 3,870,720 3,870,720 0.0 0.0 0.0 320.0 320.0 Unity Cable System NC 58,060,800 58,060,800 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,800.0 4,800.0 (1) Total T-P 334,530 576,4502,572,290 4,749,57011,765,25011,765,25022,160,250 29,831,760 29,831,760 31,767,120 46,992,960 95,195,520 114,744,108183,449,388188,771,628 3,885.0 7,870.0 9,486.115,166.115,606.1 Growth (%) 72.32% 346.23% 84.64% 147.71% 0.00% 88.35% 34.62% 0.00% 6.49% 47.93% 102.57% 20.54% 59.88% 2.90% (2) Regions 7,8 active circuits
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301823A1.txt
  • Access and (1982-1984 Dollars (1982-1984 Dollars Universal = 100) = 100) Service Cost 1930 16.7 $0.27 $3.54 1970 38.8 $0.23 $1.28 $2.43 $0.20 1931 15.2 0.27 3.81 1971 40.5 0.25 1.30 2.35 0.22 1932 13.7 0.26 4.12 1972 41.8 0.24 1.26 2.31 0.21 1933 13.0 0.28 4.56 1973 44.4 0.25 1.23 2.29 0.22 1934 13.4 0.27 4.37 1974 49.3 0.26 1.12 2.25 0.22 1935 13.7 0.27 4.17 1975 53.8 0.27 1.09 2.23 0.24 1936 13.9 0.25 3.89 1976 56.9 0.29 1.08 2.20 0.25 1937 14.4 0.22 3.24 1977 60.6 0.28 1.01 2.18 0.25 1938 14.1 0.21 3.27 1978 65.2 0.29 0.95 2.09 0.25 1939 13.9 0.22 3.34 1979 72.6 0.29 0.86 1.76 0.26 1940 14.0 0.21 3.23 1980 82.4 0.30 0.79
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303712A1.txt
  • 22,740,480 33,384,960 37,981,440 37,981,440 40,158,720 42,577,920 1,880.0 2,760.0 3,140.0 3,140.0 3,320.0 3,520.0 15,482,880 15,482,880 22,619,520 22,619,520 22,619,520 0.0 1,280.0 1,280.0 1,870.0 1,870.0 1,870.0 967,680 967,680 1,935,360 1,935,360 1,935,360 0.0 80.0 80.0 160.0 160.0 160.0 6,531,840 6,531,840 16,329,600 16,329,600 0.0 0.0 540.0 540.0 1,350.0 1,350.0 1,693,440 1,693,440 1,693,440 1,693,440 0.0 0.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 13,548 13,548 13,548 13,548 0.0 0.0 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 483,840 483,840 483,840 0.0 0.0 0.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 58,060,800 58,060,800 58,060,800 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,800.0 4,800.0 4,800.0 241,920 241,920 241,920 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 7,560 7,560 7,560 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17,010 17,010 17,010 17,010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A1.txt
  • Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate - by Provider - 2008 ....................... Table 1.15 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors - 2010 ............Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments - 2009 ... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - 2008 and 2009 ........................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State - 2009 ..............................Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ............ Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ...................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 5 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A2.txt
  • Table 1.16 Telecommunications Revenues - Intrastate - by Provider - 2008 ....................... Table 1.15 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors - 2010 ............Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments - 2009 ... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - 2008 and 2009 ........................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State - 2009 ..............................Table 1.12 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ............ Table 3.19 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ...................... Table 3.33 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction Table 3.21 Unseparated ILEC NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area ......... Table 3.35 5 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A3.txt
  • Verizon Wireless, in separate transactions in 2008, each committed to surrender their high cost universal service support over five years.21 The first installment of this voluntary commitment appears in the fourth quarter of 2009 of Table 1.10. Table 1.11 shows universal service disbursements on a mechanism-by-mechanism basis for 2008 and 2009. 22 Chart 1.1 shows the 2009 information graphically. Table 1.12 shows, on a state-by-state basis, the total amount of funding disbursements for each of the universal service mechanisms, estimated contributions towards universal service, and the net estimated dollar flow (disbursements less estimated contributions) for 2009.23 21 See Applications of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Atlantis Holdings LLC For Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses, Authorizations, and Spectrum Manager and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303886A5.txt
  • -6.60 7.33 2.47 TENNESSEE -0.69 -7.24 7.06 -9.91 TEXAS -1.35 -7.50 6.66 9.07 UTAH -3.46 -11.46 9.03 -0.28 VERMONT -8.07 -5.92 -2.29 -35.57 VIRGIN ISLANDS -4.85 -6.97 2.28 -24.94 VIRGINIA 9.37 -7.47 18.19 1.69 WASHINGTON -2.32 -12.36 11.45 -3.48 WEST VIRGINIA -18.52 -9.99 -9.47 -59.66 WISCONSIN -3.63 -7.75 4.47 11.03 WYOMING 0.57 -9.71 11.39 30.32 GRAND TOTAL -0.45 -9.77 10.34 1.12 * Percentage changes from 2010 to 2011. Note: AT&T did not report 2008 and 2009 cost data. Source: Calculated from National Exchange Carrier Association data. Requirement Loops per Loop Later Year* NTS Revenue of Requirement Projections in Unseparated High Cost Loop Unseparated Number NTS Revenue Support Payment 3 - 32 State or Jurisdiction 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 ALABAMA 796,366,033
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311775A1.txt
  • Table 1.8 Revenues by Type of Provider: 2009 Table 1.9 Report Table 1.9 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues Reported on FCC Form 499-Q: 2009-2011 Table 1.10 Report Table 1.10 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors for 2010-2011 Table 1.11 Report Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms: 2009 & 2010 Chart 1.1 Report Chart 1.1 Distribution of Universal Service Payments: 2010 Table 1.12 Report Table 1.12 Universal Service Support Mechanisms by State: 2010 Tables 1.13 - 1.18Website Table 2.1 Report Table 2.1 Lifeline Subscribers and Link Up Beneficiaries Table 2.2 Report Table 2.2 Low-Income Support Payments Chart 2.1 Deleted Table 2.3 Report Table 2.3 Average Lifeline Monthly Support by ILEC Status and by State (December 2010) Table 2.4 Report Table 2.6 Low-Income Support
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313337A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313337A2.txt
  • 3,140.0 3,820.0 5,170.0 15,482,880 15,482,880 22,619,520 22,619,520 25,885,440 25,885,440 0.0 1,280.0 1,280.0 1,870.0 1,870.0 2,140.0 2,140.0 967,680 967,680 1,935,360 1,935,360 3,386,880 3,386,880 0.0 80.0 80.0 160.0 160.0 280.0 280.0 6,531,840 6,531,840 7,015,680 18,627,840 18,627,840 0.0 0.0 540.0 540.0 580.0 1,540.0 1,540.0 1,693,440 1,693,440 1,693,440 1,693,440 1,693,440 0.0 0.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 140.0 13,548 13,548 13,548 13,548 13,548 0.0 0.0 1.12 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 483,840 483,840 483,840 483,840 0.0 0.0 0.00 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 28,788,480 28,788,480 38,465,280 38,465,280 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,380.0 2,380.0 3,180.0 3,180.0 241,920 241,920 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 241,920 241,920 7,560 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17,010 17,010 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-208A2.txt
  • 3.65 0.10 3.51 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - EDI 0.10 0.25 1.53 0.64 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - CORBA 0.12 0.36 0.40 0.12 PO-1-08 OSS Interface - % Timeouts - Web GUI 0.54 0.21 0.37 PO-1-09 Parsed CSR - EDI 2.75 3.17 2.76 4.12 2.69 2.36 2.70 2.41 PO-1-09 Parsed CSR - CORBA 2.75 1.47 2.76 1.12 2.69 0.47 2.70 0.46 PO-8-01 Avg Response Time - Manual Loop Qualification UD UD UD UD PO-8-02 Avg Response Time - Engineering Record Request UD UD NA NA OSS Interface Availability PO-2-01 Total - EDI 99.96 99.77 99.88 99.66 PO-2-01 Total - CORBA 100.00 99.79 99.95 99.83 PO-2-01 Total - Maintenance Web GUI (RETAS) 99.36 99.00 98.61 99.14 PO-2-01 Total
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.txt
  • that would have been reserved for Inmarsat Horizons. Ten megahertz of this spectrum could be reallocated for advanced wireless services, and four megahertz could be retained for MSS system expansion or made available for other purposes, as set forth below. Another approach would be to use the segment of the 2 GHz MSS spectrum set aside for system expansion, plus 1.12 megahertz of MSS spectrum from each direction of transmission, to make ten megahertz (five megahertz in each direction) of spectrum available for reallocation to other services, and to distribute the remaining 60 MHz of spectrum among the MSS proponents. Under this scenario, the following formula would express the amount of spectrum available for each MSS system, in each direction of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.txt
  • SC Root Communications Group LP 1947 Jul-97 250 3.2 0.7 B WJMX FM CHR Florence, SC 204Cheraw SC Root Communications Group LP 1979 Jul-97 1650 7.4 1.44 C2 WPFM AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Darlington SC Root Communications Group LP 1955 Jul-97 150 0 0 B WSQN FM Oldies Florence, SC 204Scranton SC Root Communications Group LP 1991 Jul-97 525 3.7 1.12 A WDSC AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root Communications Group LP 1946 Oct-97 25 0 0 B WEGX FM Country Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root Communications Group LP 1954 Oct-97 1400 6.5 2.11 C WGSS FM Gospel Florence, SC 204Kingstree SC Root Communications Group LP 1998 50 1.4 0.52 A WPDT FM CHR Florence, SC 204Johnsonville SC Waccamaw Neck
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-369A1.txt
  • in 18 U.S.C. § 3121 et seq. and 50 U.S.C. § 1841 et seq.; (iv) acquisition of location-related information concerning a service subscriber; (v) preservation of any of the above information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f); and (vi) access to, or acquisition or interception of, communications or information as described in (i) through (v) above and comparable State laws. 1.12 "Foreign" where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, means non-U.S. 1.13 "Governmental Authority" or "Governmental Authorities" mean any government, any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau or political subdivision and any court, tribunal, judicial or arbitral body. 1.14 "Intercept" or "Intercepted" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. §2510(4). 1.15 "Lawful U.S.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-107A1.txt
  • COMPETITIVE GROUP BY STRATA Cable Service Wireline Overbuild DBS Overbuild Local Exchange Carrier (LEC) Low Penetration Municipal July 1, 2001 BST $15.09 $11.01 $11.45 $15.42 $12.77 Standard error 0.99 0.39 0.42 0.79 1.28 Major CPST $16.04 $23.31 $19.85 $17.01 $9.50 Standard error 1.52 1.07 0.57 0.97 2.10 Programming total $31.13 $34.32 $31.30 $32.43 $22.27 Standard error 1.10 0.84 0.46 0.54 1.12 Equipment $2.90 $2.81 $3.73 $1.87 $2.08 Standard error 0.27 0.24 0.14 0.19 0.52 Programming and equipment $34.03 $37.13 $35.03 $34.30 $24.35 Standard error 1.22 1.00 0.51 0.55 1.31 Number of channels 55.98 53.26 65.32 52.94 51.38 Standard error 2.42 2.63 0.88 1.74 3.02 Rate per channel † $0.587 $0.727 $0.489 $0.663 $0.447 Standard error 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.02 No.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-145A1.txt
  • Analysis is based partially on information and conversations with officers of Nassau and Millennium. BIA Economic Analysis (attached as Exhibit B to Millennium Feb. 22, 2002 Response) at 5. Nassau Mar. 5, 2002 Comments at 8. See, e.g., Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, April 2, 1992, revised April 8, 1997, §§ 1.1, 1.12 (``Horizontal Merger Guidelines''). Millennium Feb. 22, 2002 Response at 17. Id. and BIA Economic Analysis at 9. We note that Monmouth County is considered by Arbitron to be in the Monmouth-Ocean metro market as well as the New York metro market. Millennium Feb. 22, 2002 Response at 18 and DataWorld contour study (attached as Exhibit C to Millennium Feb. 22,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-147A1.txt
  • No. SQM No. Metric Name RESALE Ordering A.1.1 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Mechanized A.1.2 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Partially Mechanized A.1.3 O-7 % Rejected Service Requests - Non-Mechanized A.1.4 O-8 Reject Interval - Mechanized A.1.7 O-8 Reject Interval - Partially Mechanized - 10 hours A.1.8 O-8 Reject Interval - Non-Mechanized A.1.9 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Mechanized A.1.12 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Partially Mechanized - 10 hours A.1.13 O-9 FOC Timeliness - Non-Mechanized A.1.14 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Mechanized A.1.15 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Partially Mechanized A.1.16 O-11 FOC & Reject Response Completeness - Non-Mechanized Provisioning A.2.1 P-4 Order Completion Interval A.2.2 P-1 Held Orders A.2.4 P-2 % Jeopardies - Mechanized A.2.5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-166A1.txt
  • Notice of Proposed Rule Making, In the Matter of Definition of Radio Markets, 15 FCC Rcd 25077 (2000) (``Definition of Radio Markets''). 47 C.F.R. § 73.3555(a)(1). Local Radio Ownership NPRM, 16 FCC Rcd at 19895 ¶ 86. See e.g. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, April 2, 1992, revised April 8, 1997, § 1.12 (``Horizontal Merger Guidelines''). Staff and DOJ analysis of radio transactions suggests that existing buyers of radio advertising differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other media in response to a ``small but significant and non-transitory'' price increase for radio advertising. Clear Channel Response at 2. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 1.22. Clear Channel Response at 2. Id. Id. Id.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-193A1.txt
  • McDonald's, Burger King, Van's Heating and Cooling, Verizon Wireless, Cellcom, Van Vreede's Furniture and Appliance, Gerondale's Home Furnishings, and Gateway as advertisers who use multiple media platforms in the Green Bay metro. Id. See, e.g., Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, April 2, 1992, revised April 8, 1997 (``Horizontal Merger Guidelines''), §§ 1.1, 1.12. See id. § 1.12. Staff and DOJ analysis of radio transactions suggests that existing buyers of radio advertising differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other media in response to a ``small but significant and non-transitory'' price increase for radio advertising. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 1.2. See Cumulus Response at 5. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 1.22. Our
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-212A1.txt
  • Radio Ownership NPRM, 16 FCC Rcd at 19895 ¶ 86. Productions Response at 6-7. Id. See Great Scott Broadcasting, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 02-52, at ¶ 20-21 (rel. Mar. 19, 1992). See, e.g., Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by the U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, Apr. 2, 1992, revised Apr. 8, 1997 (``Horizontal Merger Guidelines'') §§ 1.1, 1.12. As used here, in-market stations are radio stations whose ``home market,'' as reported by BIA, is the Arbitron metro at issue. Out-of-market stations are radio stations that BIA reports as having a listening share in a particular Arbitron metro, but that have a ``home market'' in another Arbitron metro or in a county that is not part of an Arbitron
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-245A1.txt
  • Arbitron market appears to be fairly accurate."47 We find, in any event, no reason to vary from the presumption in our interim policy that the Parkersburg metro represents the appropriate geographic market. 43 See, e.g., Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, April 2, 1992, revised April 8, 1997 ("Horizontal Merger Guidelines"), §§ 1.1, 1.12. 44 See id. § 1.12. Staff and DOJ analysis of radio transactions suggests that existing buyers of radio advertising differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other media in response to a "small but significant and non- transitory" price increase for radio advertising. 45 The Horizontal Merger Guidelines at §1.12 state: "If a hypothetical monopolist can identify and price
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-251A1.txt
  • and argues that Ann Arbor is part of the larger Detroit market, it offers no specific evidence that advertisers desiring to reach listeners only in the Ann Arbor metro would use Detroit or other out-of- 36 See, e.g., Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, April 2, 1992, revised April 8, 1997, §§ 1.1, 1.12 ("Horizontal Merger Guidelines"). Staff and the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") analysis of radio transactions suggests that existing buyers of radio advertising differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other media in response to a "small but significant and non-transitory" price increase for radio advertising. 37 Clear Channel Response at 2. 38 Id. 39 See Horizontal Merger Guidelines
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-261A1.txt
  • charged particles in the interplanetary regions. The improved link performance in this band enables increased data transmission rates, thus increasing the efficiency of deep space operations. Surfsat, the Mars Global Surveyor, and the large international Cassini spacecraft have data return links in the 32 GHz band. See United States Preliminary Views for WRC-03 (as of February 21, 2002, Agenda Item 1.12D, p. 21. , above, we proposed to allocate the band 35.5-36 GHz to the EESS (active) and SRS (active). See 47 C.F.R. § 2.106, footnote US360. Currently footnote US252 reads as follows: "The bands 2110-2120 and 7145-7190 MHz, and 34.2-34.7 GHz are also allocated for Earth-to-space transmissions in the space research service, limited to deep space communications at Goldstone, California."
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-284A1.txt
  • the efficiency defense is ``inappropriate in this particular case, in which the acquisition would generate undue market share and increase concentration''). IV Areeda ¶932 at 160. Structural merger analysis, as the name suggests, considers structural characteristics of the merging firms and the relevant markets to make predictions about the likely competitive effects of a proposed merger. DOJ/FTC Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. 351 U.S. 377, 395 (1956) (The relevant product market is composed of products that have reasonable interchangeability); see also United States v. Microsoft, 253 F.3d 34, 52 (D.C. Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 350 (2001) (in determining reasonable substitutes, the court excluded ``middleware'' software from the definition of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-310A1.txt
  • Delaware limited partnership which owns and operates cable systems in Indiana, and serves approximately 1.3 million subscribers. As general partner, Insight Communications manages the business of the partnership, although certain matters require the approval of AT&T. Another AT&T non-consolidated interest is Texas Cable Partners (``TCP''), a Delaware limited partnership that owns and operates cable systems in Texas, and serves approximately 1.12 million customers. The remaining 50% partnership interest is owned by Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership, approximately two-thirds of which is owned by TWE. The general manager of Texas Cable Partners is TWE, although certain governance matters require approval of a management committee, on which AT&T and Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership have equal representation. AT&T also owns a 50% interest in Kansas
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 1.07 0.65 1.19 0.97 1.14 0.82 1.07 0.17 0.96 19 - 1991900Resale CTX 0.65 0.30 0.45 0.28 0.47 0.28 0.34 0.29 0.44 0.26 19 - 1992000Resale PBX 0.10 0.13 0.05 0.12 0.05 0.14 0.08 0.12 0.11 0.10 19 - 1992200Resale DS1 0.00 3.77 2.22 3.28 2.27 3.44 0.00 3.79 0.00 3.29 19 - 1992400Resale VGPL/DS0 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.92 14.29 1.12 0.00 0.88 0.00 1.05abcde 19 - 1992603UNE lp 8db and 5.5db 2/4 w 0.36 0.44 0.33 0.40 0.34 0.47 0.35 0.44 0.35 0.44 19 - 1992702UNE lp 2 w Dig ISDN cap 0.25 0.34 0.19 0.42 0.47 0.42 0.23 0.91 0.35 0.86 19 - 1992801UNE lp 2 w Dig xDSL cap 0.81 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.73
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-331A1.txt
  • para. 209; Verizon Pennsylvania Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 17475, para. 101; SWBT Kansas/Oklahoma Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 6355, para. 230; SWBT Texas Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 18366-67, paras. 22-27. 268 See Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Design Specials); Florida/Tennessee A.1.12.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Partially Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.12.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Partially Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Design Specials); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized Loop and Port Combinations); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.14 (FOC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-51A1.txt
  • - Affidavit of Dr. Stephen Stockum (``Stockum Aff.'') at ¶ 11. Id. at ¶ 12. Id. at ¶ 13. Id. at ¶¶ 6, 8. T&W Communications Letter at 6. Id. T&W Communications Letter, Declaration of Terry Fulton (``Fulton Decl.'') at ¶ 4. Stockum Aff. at ¶ 9. See Horizontal Merger Guidelines, U.S. Dept. of Justice and Federal Trade Comm'n. § 1.12 (1992, revised 1997). Id. Stockum Aff. at ¶ 8. Cumulus Letter at 6-7. T&W Communications Letter at 7-8. Id. Id. Cumulus Letter at 6-7. Stockum Aff. at ¶ 17. Id. at ¶ 21. Cumulus Letter at 8. BIA is a communications and information technology investment banking, consulting, and research firm. BIA provides strategic funding, consulting and financial services to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-52A1.txt
  • ownership analysis. Id. § 73.3555 note 2(k). Local Radio Ownership NPRM, 16 FCC Rcd at 19895 ¶ 86. Nassau Dec. 6, 2001 Response at 19. Id. 2001 BIA Special Study (attached as Exhibit 1 to Nassau Dec. 6, 2001 Response) at 4-5. Stockum Affidavit at 2-4. See, e.g., U.S. Dep't of Justice & FTC, 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, §§ 1.1, 1.12 (revised 1997) (``1997 Merger Guidelines''). Stockum Affidavit at 3-4. Id. at 4. Because radio advertising rates are negotiated individually, a station group can price discriminate such that only advertisers with fewer media options pay a higher price. As a result, radio stations can minimize the loss of advertisers and diversion of advertising volume by selectively increasing the price of advertising
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.txt
  • of local media markets). See UCC Comments at 11-13. Caribbean Comments at 27-35. Caribbean reports that such cross-ownership has created a situation where one owner (with two daily newspapers) garners 43% of the advertising revenues for traditional media outlets in Puerto Rico. CFA Comments at 96-121; see also Mid-West Comments at 5-6; UCC Comments at 13. DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines § 1.12 explains: ``Existing buyers sometimes will differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other products in response to a small but significant and non-transitory price increase. If a hypothetical monopolist can identify and price differently to those buyers (``targeted buyers'') who would not defeat the targeted price increase by substituting to other products in response to a `small but significant
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-136A1.txt
  • Surveys. See 17 FCC Rcd 6301 (2002); 16 FCC Rcd 4346 (2001); 15 FCC Rcd 10927 (2000); 14 FCC Rcd 8331 (1999); 12 FCC Rcd 22756 (1997); and 12 FCC Rcd 3239 (1997). ATTACHMENT 4 Competitive Group, by Strata Element Wireline Overbuild DBS Overbuild LEC Low Penetration Municipal July 2002 BST $16.37 $17.05 $12.33 $16.59 $14.35 Standard error † 1.22 1.12 0.46 0.79 1.60 CPST $18.00 $17.23 $22.08 $17.89 $10.34 Standard error 1.77 1.91 0.65 1.10 2.33 Programming total $34.37 $34.28 $34.41 $34.48 $24.69 Standard error 1.29 1.32 0.54 0.60 1.35 Equipment $3.24 $2.77 $4.07 $2.08 $0.79 Standard error 0.33 0.35 0.18 0.24 0.42 Programming & equipment $37.61 $37.05 $38.48 $36.56 $25.48 Standard error 1.45 1.59 0.62 0.70 1.52 Channels 60.9
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4.txt
  • MSV's MSS. Only the antenna beams that can operate co-frequency with the MSV MSS interference are candidates for operating co-frequency with ATC. Therefore, the minimum Inmarsat discrimination towards MSV ATC coverage considered in co-frequency ATC analyses is 25 dB. Figure 1.11 A Inmarsat Gain Roll-Off For Selected Inmarsat-4 Antenna Beam Figure 1.11.B Gain Discrimination Regions for Selected Inmarsat-4 Antenna Beam 1.12 Saturation levels in Inmarsat Receivers Inmarsat contends that a saturation value of -90 dBm should be used for its receivers. MSV contends that it has made measurements on an Inmarsat Mini-M receiver that showed that saturation did not occur until the input power reached about -45 dBm, some 45 dB higher than -90 dBm. Additionally, some parties have quoted the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-15A4_Erratum.doc
  • MSV's MSS. Only the antenna beams that can operate co-frequency with the MSV MSS interference are candidates for operating co-frequency with ATC. Therefore, the minimum Inmarsat discrimination towards MSV ATC coverage considered in co-frequency ATC analyses is 25 dB. Figure 1.11 A Inmarsat Gain Roll-Off For Selected Inmarsat-4 Antenna Beam Figure 1.11.B Gain Discrimination Regions for Selected Inmarsat-4 Antenna Beam 1.12 Saturation levels in Inmarsat Receivers Inmarsat contends that a saturation value of -90 dBm should be used for its receivers. MSV contends that it has made measurements on an Inmarsat Mini-M receiver that showed that saturation did not occur until the input power reached about -45 dBm, some 45 dB higher than -90 dBm. Additionally, some parties have quoted the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-313A1.txt
  • 10 points to timing considerations, it must assign at least 11 points to price. This is how SLD has interpreted our requirements, which we find to be a reasonable administrative implementation of our rules. See IBM Request for Review at 29. See IBM Request for Review at 7, 30; Id. at 30. IBM Request for Review at 30; RFP § 1.12. Ysleta Request for Review at 29; General Contract § 10.01; IBM Request for Review at 32-33. IBM Request for Review at 32; IBM White Paper at 20; Ysleta Request for Review at 25-32. IBM Request for Review at 31-32; Ysleta Request for Review at 30. See IBM Request for Review at 29. See IBM Bid at 3.7.6. IBM Bid at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A2.txt
  • and service mark rights, whether or not registered and (e) divisions, continuations, continuations in part, renewals, reissues and extensions of the foregoing (as and to the extent applicable) now existing, hereafter filed, issued or acquired. - 3 - 159012_1.DOC 1.11 "Licensed Components" means component products which utilize the DFAST Technology and are designed for incorporation into Unidirectional Digital Cable Products. 1.12 "Licensed Know-How" means all know-how, associated technology, trade secrets, copyrighted works, reference source code implementations, shared secret keys, Diffie- Hellman system parameters, encryption and decryption keys, software development tools, methodologies, processes, technologies or algorithms, test data sets and test cases and other implementations of technology that CableLabs shall deliver to Licensee to assist in incorporating the DFAST Technology into Licensed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-76A1.txt
  • 2002 letter. Application for Review at 3. See Juan Galiano et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 6442 ¶ 7 (1990). See Denver MDS Co., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 2 FCC Rcd 643 (1987). In light of our acceptance of EagleView's representation, we find it unnecessary to address the merits of EagleView's allegations that the Division violated Section 1.12 of the Commission's Rules 47 C.F.R. § 1.12, in the context of this proceeding. Section 1.12 states that when an attorney has submitted a document on behalf of or has been other wise been designated by a person or entity concerning a matter pending before the Commission, any notice or written communication pertaining to that matter will be communicated to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-88A1.txt
  • from BCR to Radio South (FCC Form 314) (File No. BAL-20011228AAE), dated Dec. 28, 2001, Exh. 14. Local Radio Ownership NPRM, 16 FCC Rcd at 19895 ¶ 86. Radio South Response at 2. See, e.g., Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, April 2, 1992, revised April 8, 1997 (``Horizontal Merger Guidelines''), §§ 1.1, 1.12. See id. § 1.12. Staff and DOJ analysis of radio transactions suggests that existing buyers of radio advertising differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other media in response to a ``small but significant and non-transitory'' price increase for radio advertising. The Horizontal Merger Guidelines at § 1.12 state: ``If a hypothetical monopolist can identify and price differently to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-255A1.txt
  • and Facilities Authorizations Therefor, Fourth Report and Order, 95 FCC 2d 554, 558 ¶ 7-8 (1983) (``Competitive Carrier Fourth Report and Order''), vacated on other grounds, AT&T v. FCC, F.2d 727 (D.C. Cir. 1992), cert. denied, MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AT&T, 113 S. Ct. 3020 (1993). DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines § 0.1, n.6. Id. § 1.0. DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. See also Gregory Werden, The 1982 Merger Guidelines and the Ascent of the Hypothetical Monopolist Paradigm, 71 Antitrust L.J. 253 (2003). United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377, 395 (1956); see also United States v. Microsoft, 253 F.3d 34, 52 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 350 (2001) (in determining what is a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-74A1.txt
  • the fixed and mobile services and No. 5.43A does not apply.'' ITU Radio Regulation No. 5.43A states that if a service may operate in a specific frequency band subject to not claiming protection from another service, this means also that the service shall not cause harmful interference to the other service. See U.S. Proposals for WRC-03, Proposal B (Agenda Item 1.12) at page 50-51. Cross support means that space agencies share resources. For example, there are orbits in which a satellite is not visible from a space agency's own earth stations, but which are visible to another agency's earth stations. By sharing resources, space agencies do not have to store data onboard the satellite, and instead have immediate access to the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-138A1.txt
  • market because of its present non-interchangeability with Windows, despite its future long-term potential); Wireless Telephone Services Antitrust Litigation, No. 02 Civ. 2637(DLC), 2003 WL 21912603, at 9 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2003) (relevant product market ``consists of products that have reasonable interchangeability for the purposes for which they are produced - price, use and qualities considered.''). DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. See also Gregory Werden, The 1982 Merger Guidelines and the Ascent of the Hypothetical Monopolist Paradigm, 71 Antitrust L.J. 253 (2003). See Application, Exhibit 1 at 8-9. Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd. at 21558 ¶ 74. See id. at 21588, 21560 ¶¶ 74, 77, 79. Interconnected mobile voice consists of all commercially available two-way mobile voice services providing access
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-148A1.txt
  • See Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21557 ¶ 71; Applications of Western Wireless Corp. and ALLTEL Corp., WT Docket No. 05-50, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 05-138, 2005 WL 1693557, ¶¶ 60-64 (rel. July 19, 2005) (``ALLTEL-Western Wireless Order''). See Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21557 ¶ 71 & n.259 (citing DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12 and Gregory Werden, The 1982 Merger Guidelines and the Ascent of the Hypothetical Monopolist Paradigm, 71 Antitrust L.J. 253 (2003)). See Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21558 ¶ 73; DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11. Application, Public Interest Statement at 68. Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21558 ¶ 74. See id. at 21588, 21559-60, 21560 ¶¶ 74,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.txt
  • such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register.'' 15 U.S.C. § 632. MSS Flexibility Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 15,532 at 15,565-67, ¶¶ 85-93. MSS Flexibility R&O, 18 FCC Rcd 1962 at 2214-15, Appendix D, ¶ 2. See 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(A). See MSS Flexibility R&O at Appendix C2, ¶ 1.12. Receiver overload occurs when a signal at the input of a receiver's amplifier reaches an amplitude sufficient to cause the amplifier to attempt to exceed its maximum possible output level, consequently distorting the output signal waveform. If a strong signal from a nearby ATC base station overloads the amplifier in an Inmarsat terminal receiver, the amplifier will distort the waveforms
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-70A1.txt
  • the band 7125-7235 MHz and that administrations should bear in mind the needs of the EESS (passive) and the SRS (passive) in their future planning of the band 7125-7250 MHz. 47 C.F.R. § 2.106, footnotes 5.458 and 5.460. See Appendix A, Section 2.106, footnote 5.460. 47 C.F.R. § 2.106, footnote US252. See U.S. Proposals for WRC-03, Proposal C (Agenda Item 1.12), at pages 51-52. TDRSS, which is a communication signal relay system that provides tracking and data acquisition services between low earth orbiting (LEO) spacecraft and NASA/customer control and/or data processing facilities, is the principle SRS use of the band 14.8-15.35 GHz. In the United States, the band 14.8-15.35 GHz is primarily allocated for Federal operations with only limited non-Federal use
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-167A1.txt
  • the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 1.10. ``DOJ'' means the U.S. Department of Justice. 1.11. ``Domestic Communications'' means (i) Wire Communications or Electronic Communications (whether stored or not) from one U.S. location to another U.S. location and (ii) the U.S. portion of a Wire Communication or Electronic Communication (whether stored or not) that originates or terminates in the United States. 1.12. ``Domestic Communications Company'' means all those subsidiaries, divisions, departments, branches and other components of DCMG, and any other entity over which DCMG has de facto or de jure control, that provide Domestic Communications, including GC. If any subsidiary, division, department, branch or other component of DCMG, or any other entity over which DCMG has de facto or de jure control,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-85A1.txt
  • the likely competitive effects of a proposed merger. 83 A relevant product market has been defined as the smallest group of competing products for which a hypothetical monopoly provider of the products would profitably impose at least a "`small but significant and nontransitory' increase in price." Horizontal Merger Guidelines, U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, §§ 1.11, 1.12 (issued Apr. 2, 1992, revised Apr. 8, 1997) ("DOJ/FTC Guidelines"), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/horiz_book/toc.html (visited Feb. 24, 2006); see also EchoStar- DirecTV HDO, 17 FCC Rcd at 20605-6, ¶ 106. A relevant geographic market has been defined "as the region where a hypothetical monopolist that is the only producer of the relevant product in the region would profitably impose at least
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-13A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd at 15802-04, paras. 83-85. A relevant product market has been defined as the smallest group of competing products for which a hypothetical monopoly provider of the products would profitably impose at least a ```small but significant and nontransitory' increase in price.'' Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, §§ 1.11, 1.12 (Apr. 2, 1992, revised Apr. 8, 1997) (DOJ/FTC Guidelines); see also Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation, and Hughes Electronics Corporation, CS Docket No. 01-348, Hearing Designation Order, 17 FCC Rcd 20559, 20605-06, para. 106 (2002) (EchoStar/DirecTV Order). A relevant geographic market has been defined ``as the region where a hypothetical monopolist that is the only producer of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-159A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd at 15802-04, paras. 83-85. A relevant product market has been defined as the smallest group of competing products for which a hypothetical monopoly provider of the products would profitably impose at least a ```small but significant and nontransitory' increase in price.'' Horizontal Merger Guidelines, issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, §§ 1.11, 1.12 (Apr. 2, 1992, revised Apr. 8, 1997) (DOJ/FTC Guidelines); see also Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation, and Hughes Electronics Corporation, CS Docket No. 01-348, Hearing Designation Order, 17 FCC Rcd 20559, 20605-06, para. 106 (2002) (EchoStar/DirecTV Order). A relevant geographic market has been defined ``as the region where a hypothetical monopolist that is the only producer of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.txt
  • alternative programming has a significantly different and lesser audience appeal.''); United States v. Microsoft, 253 F.3d 34, 52 (D.C. Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 952 (2001) (in determining reasonable substitutes, the court excluded "middleware" software from the description of the relevant product market because of its present non-interchangeability with Windows notwithstanding its long-term future potential). Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. Id. § 1.21. United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 359 (1963); Tampa Elec. Co. v. Nashville Coal Co., 365 U.S. 320, 327 (1961); Spirit Airlines, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 431 F.3d 917, 932-33 (6th Cir. 2005). Id. §§ 1.0, 1.31. In our reviews of several previous mergers of major incumbent LECs, our competitive analysis focused on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-43A1.txt
  • international undersea cables, provided that such equipment is utilized solely to effectuate the operation of undersea transport network(s) outside of the United States and in no manner controls land-based transport network(s) or their associated systems in the United States, nor does it include facilities and equipment intended and capable solely of performing billing, customer management, business management or marketing functions. 1.12. "Domestic Companies" means TELPRI and all existing and post-Agreement subsidiaries, divisions, departments, branches and other components of TELPRI, or any other entity over which TELPRI has de facto or de jure control, that (i) provide Domestic Communications, or (ii) engage in provisioning, control, maintenance, management, security, selling, billing, or monitoring of Hosting Services, or data. 1.13. "Effective Date" means the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-178A1.txt
  • 192 (3d ed. 2000) (``Viscusi, et al.''). See Viscusi, et al. at 233. A merging of the firms, however, is not required for a vertical relationship to exist. Exclusive dealing arrangements between upstream and downstream firms, referred to as ``vertical restraints,'' can accomplish the objectives of vertical integration. Id. See DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 57 Fed. Reg. 41552, §§ 1.11, 1.12 (Sept. 10, 1992), revised, 4 Trade Reg. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 13104 (Apr. 8, 1997). The Guidelines similarly define the relevant geographic market as ``a region such that a hypothetical monopolist that was the only present or future producer of the relevant product at locations in that region would profitably impose at least a `small but significant and nontransitory' increase in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-181A1.txt
  • Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21563 ¶ 89. See also Twelfth Competition Report, 23 FCC Rcd at 2331-32 ¶ 174 (indicating that the average person shops for mobile telephony services in markets that include place of work, place of residence, and surrounding areas that are economically related; such areas generally are larger than counties). DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. See Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21562 ¶ 88. See id. at 21560-61 ¶ 81; see also AT&T-Dobson Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 20311 ¶ 26; GCI-Alaska DigiTel Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 14877 ¶ 28; DoCoMo-Guam Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 13595 ¶ 21; ALLTEL-Midwest Wireless Order, 21 FCC Rcd at 11543 ¶ 31; Sprint-Nextel Order, 20
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.txt
  • Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21563 ¶ 89. See also Twelfth Competition Report, 23 FCC Rcd at 2331-32 ¶ 174 (indicating that the average person shops for mobile communications services in markets that include place of work, place of residence, and surrounding areas that are economically related; such areas generally are larger than counties). DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. Verizon Wireless-RCC Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 12485 ¶ 41; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21562 ¶ 88. See Verizon Wireless-RCC Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 12489 ¶ 51; AT&T-Dobson Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 20311 ¶ 26; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21560-61 ¶ 81; see also ALLTEL-Midwest Wireless Order, 21 FCC Rcd 11543 ¶
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-259A1.txt
  • Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21563 ¶ 89. See also Twelfth Competition Report, 23 FCC Rcd at 2331-2332 ¶ 174 (indicating that the average person shops for mobile telephony services in markets that include place of work, place of residence, and surrounding areas that are economically related; such areas generally are larger than counties). See DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. See AT&T-Dobson Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 20311 ¶ 27. See AT&T-Dobson Order, 22 FCC Rcd at 20311 ¶¶ 27-30. See Id. See Id., 22 FCC Rcd at 20314-20315 ¶¶ 33-34. See Id., 22 FCC Rcd at 20314 ¶ 32. Id., 22 FCC Rcd at 20315 ¶ 35. See Sprint Nextel Clearwire Joint Opposition at 21-35. See Sprint Nextel Clearwire
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.txt
  • with Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, WT Docket No. 08-27, Thirteenth Report, 24 FCC Rcd 6185, 6285 ¶ 212 (WTB 2009) (indicating that the average person shops for mobile communications services in markets that include place of work, place of residence, and surrounding areas that are economically related; such areas generally are larger than counties). DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. Application, Public Interest Statement at 28. See, e.g., Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17472 ¶ 52; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17591 ¶ 52; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21562 ¶ 88. Puerto Rico is comprised of 12 CMAs and 2 CEAs. The U.S. Virgin Islands is comprised of 2 CMAs and 1 CEA.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Market Conditions with Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, WT Docket No. 08-27, Thirteenth Report, 24 FCC Rcd 6185,6285 ¶ 212 (WTB 2009) (indicating that the average person shops for mobile communications services in markets that include place of work, place of residence, and surrounding areas that are economically related; such areas generally are larger than counties). 162DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines§§ 1.11, 1.12. 163Application, Public Interest Statement at 28. 164See, e.g., Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17472 ¶ 52; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17591 ¶ 52; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21562 ¶ 88. 165Puerto Rico is comprised of 12 CMAs and 2 CEAs. The U.S. Virgin Islands is comprised of 2 CMAs and 1 CEA.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-113A1.txt
  • cannot say the FCC was unreasonable in taking another tack here, tailoring the forbearance inquiry to the situation at hand''). A relevant product market has been defined as a group of competing products for which a hypothetical monopoly provider of the products would profitably impose at least a ```small but significant and nontransitory' increase in price.'' DOJ/FTC Guidelines, §§ 1.11, 1.12; see also EchoStar/DirecTV Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 20605-06, para. 106. A relevant geographic market has been defined ``as the region where a hypothetical monopolist that is the only producer of the relevant product in the region would profitably impose at least a `small but significant and nontransitory' increase in the price of the relevant product, assuming that the prices
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.txt
  • with Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, WT Docket No. 08-27, Thirteenth Report, 24 FCC Rcd 6185, 6285 ¶ 212 (WTB 2009) (indicating that the average person shops for mobile communications services in markets that include place of work, place of residence, and surrounding areas that are economically related; such areas generally are larger than counties). DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines §§ 1.11, 1.12. Application, Public Interest Statement at 22-23. See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13934 ¶ 41; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17472 ¶ 52; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17591 ¶ 52; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21562 ¶ 88. See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13934 ¶ 41; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Market Conditions with Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, WT Docket No. 08-27, Thirteenth Report, 24 FCC Rcd 6185,6285 ¶ 212 (WTB 2009) (indicating that the average person shops for mobile communications services in markets that include place of work, place of residence, and surrounding areas that are economically related; such areas generally are larger than counties). 136DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines§§ 1.11, 1.12. 137Application, Public Interest Statement at 22-23. 138See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcd at 13934 ¶ 41; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17472 ¶ 52; Sprint Nextel-Clearwire Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 17591 ¶ 52; Cingular-AT&T Wireless Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 21562 ¶ 88. 139See, e.g., AT&T-Centennial Order, 24 FCC Rcdat 13934 ¶ 41; Verizon Wireless-ALLTEL Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.txt
  • Inc., No. 08-1391 (D.C. Cir. filed Mar. 6, 2009). In light of the parties' agreement, the D.C. Circuit held the mandamus case in abeyance, directing the parties to file motions to govern further proceedings by May 17, 2010. Order, In re Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc., No. 08-1391 (D.C. Cir. issued Apr. 8, 2009). 2009 Universal Service Monitoring Report, Table 1.12. PRTC's embedded cost-based high-cost loop support was phased down from approximately $48 million in 1998 to zero by 2004, while its forward-looking costs (as measured by the model upheld in Qwest I) are not high enough to qualify for non-rural high-cost model support. 2009 Universal Service Monitoring Report, Table 3.6. At the same time, however, PRTC has continued to receive
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-66A1.txt
  • Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 9010, 9014 ¶ 13 (2008); Hillebrand Broadcasting, Inc., Order, 1 FCC Rcd 419, 420 n.6 (1986). We offer no opinion on any issues concerning potential liability between Petitioners, Sprint, and counsel who prepared the petition for reconsideration of the BRS/EBS R&O in the name of Petitioners. See Dismissal Letters. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.12 (``In any matter pending before the Commission in which an attorney has appeared for, submitted a document on behalf of or been otherwise designated by a person, any notice or other written communication pertaining to that matter issued by the Commission and which is required or permitted to be furnished to the person will be communicated to the attorney, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-66A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 32SeeRoyce International Broadcasting Company, Memorandum Opinion and Order,23 FCC Rcd 9010, 9014 ¶ 13 (2008); Hillebrand Broadcasting, Inc., Order, 1 FCC Rcd 419, 420 n.6 (1986). 33We offer no opinion on any issues concerning potential liability between Petitioners, Sprint, and counsel who prepared the petition for reconsideration of the BRS/EBS R&Oin the name of Petitioners. 34SeeDismissal Letters. 35See47 C.F.R. § 1.12 ("In any matter pending before the Commission in which an attorney has appeared for, submitted a document on behalf of or been otherwise designated by a person, any notice or other written communication pertaining to that matter issued by the Commission and which is required or permitted to be furnished to the person will be communicated to the attorney, or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
  • 4 0.125** 0.181** 0.197*** 0.321 (4.75) (3.07) (2.03) (2.23) (1.05) (2.73) (3.18) (0.12) (3.08) (3.00) ( 4.47) (1.96) Land_Area_uc 0.0226 0.0142 -0.0659 0.0955 -0.214 -0.0018 0.0815 0.153 -0 .0904 -0.114 -0.128 -0.269 (0.33) (0.12) (-0.23) (0.29) (-1.45) (-0.01) (0.53) (0.65) (-1.06) (-0. 87) (-0.91) (-0.77) Land_Area_ua -0.107 0.108 0.524 -0.0237 0.140 -0.242 0.0972 0.190 -0.110 0.263 -0.413** -0.476 (-1.59) (0.51) (1.12) (-0.04) (0.56) (-1.95) (0.38) (0.50) (-0.84) (0.9 7) (-3.12) (-0.79) Percent_Water 0.905** -0.0899 -0.825 -1.349 0.167 -0.260 0.654 1.685* 0.375 -0.762 -0 .166 0.131 (3.00) (-0.21) (-0.73) (-0.94) (0.20) (-0.59) (0.84) (2.08) (0.76) (-1. 19) (-0.21) (0.07) Census_Blocs_nu 0.178** 0.192* 0.301 0.232 0.0850 0.126 -0.107 0.192 0.1 40 0.0200 0.0809 -0.352 (2.95) (1.99) (1.71) (0.98) (0.82) (1.17) (-0.75) (1.02) (1.63)
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • that would have been reserved for Inmarsat Horizons. Ten megahertz of this spectrum could be reallocated for advanced wireless services, and four megahertz could be retained for MSS system expansion or made available for other purposes, as set forth below. Another approach would be to use the segment of the 2 GHz MSS spectrum set aside for system expansion, plus 1.12 megahertz of MSS spectrum from each direction of transmission, to make ten megahertz (five megahertz in each direction) of spectrum available for reallocation to other services, and to distribute the remaining 60 MHz of spectrum among the MSS proponents. Under this scenario, the following formula would express the amount of spectrum available for each MSS system, in each direction of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • SC Root Communications Group LP 1947 Jul-97 250 3.2 0.7 B WJMX FM CHR Florence, SC 204Cheraw SC Root Communications Group LP 1979 Jul-97 1650 7.4 1.44 C2 WPFM AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Darlington SC Root Communications Group LP 1955 Jul-97 150 0 0 B WSQN FM Oldies Florence, SC 204Scranton SC Root Communications Group LP 1991 Jul-97 525 3.7 1.12 A WDSC AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root Communications Group LP 1946 Oct-97 25 0 0 B WEGX FM Country Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root Communications Group LP 1954 Oct-97 1400 6.5 2.11 C WGSS FM Gospel Florence, SC 204Kingstree SC Root Communications Group LP 1998 50 1.4 0.52 A WPDT FM CHR Florence, SC 204Johnsonville SC Waccamaw Neck
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 2.81 2.78 0.88 0 0.16 0 0 0 0 0 RESALE (MAINTENANCE) POTS ­ Maintenance MR-2 ­ Trouble Report Rate Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-15 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C MR-2-02- 2100 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Loop 1.12 0.39 1.02 0.37 0.8 0.34 0.91 0.3 0.84 0.33 MR-2-03- 2100 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.08 0.04 0.09 0.06 MR-2-04- 2100 % Subsequent Reports 18.33 4.92 17.13 5.96 15.06 8.72 7.67 6.86 MR-2-05- 2100 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.92 0.36 0.83 0.32 0.65 0.29 0.27 0.3 MR-3 ­ Missed Repair
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/fcc2008budget_complete.pdf
  • 1.16, & 1.20 IWG-2 ­ Satellite Services including those related to High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) 1.6 (Resolution 415), 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 1.18, 1.19, & 1.21) IWG-3 ­ International Mobile Telephone (IMT-2000) & 2.5 GHz 1.4 & 1.9 IWG-4 ­ Broadcasting and Amateur Services 1.6 (Resolution 414), 1.11, 1.13, 1.15, & 7.1 (Recommendation 952) IWG-5 ­ Regulatory Issues 1.1, 1.0, 1.12, 2, 3, 5, 6, & 7.1) MEDIA At the end of FY 2006, a total of 1,586 of 1,687 licensed DTV stations (94%) were on the air with DTV operations. Of these, 1,041 are licensed digital facilities or facilities with program test authority and 545 are operating pursuant to Special Temporary Authority. Wi-Fi Infrastructure Hardware Revnue in the United States
• http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5006314259.pdf
  • "call the number on your screen," and commercials with no voiceovers as well as programming that have long periods of silence or sound effects with no dialogue audio discription is critical to the enjoyment and understanding of the programs. I hope that we in the blind community can get MM99-339 passed in to law. Sincerely Russell Schermer KAGVUC Net-Tamer V 1.12 Beta - Test Drive Anne Fesh From: Sent: Janis Stanger Ljstanger@usor.state.ut.us] Thursday, March 16, 2000 IO:37 AM To: Subject: info@acb.org I support video description I am legally blind. As a child, I would sit two or three feet from the n/ and I could see all the things in the world that others with much better vision could see by
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256485A1.html
  • 11.35 of the Commission's Rules.15 1.11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Lazer Broadcasting Corporation, SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. 1.12. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Forfeiture Collection Section, Finance Branch, Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 73482, Chicago, Illinois 60673-7482. Payment by overnight
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
  • CLAUSES 1.11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Farmworkers Educational Radio Network Inc. is hereby NOTIFIED of their APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for violating Section 11.35 of the Commission's Rules.13 1.12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Farmworkers Educational Radio Network Inc., SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. 1.13. Payment of the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262295A1.html
  • Petersons purchased the station. Therefore, the Petersons' violation is willful. The violation occurred on more than one day, therefore, it is repeated. Based on the evidence before us, we find that Richard A. & Joann R. Peterson, Joint Tenants, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 11.35 of the Rules, by failing to ensure the operational readiness of KBSZ(AM)'s EAS equipment. 1.12. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines (``Forfeiture Policy Statement'') and Section 1.80(b)(4) of the Rules sets forth the base forfeiture amounts for various violations of the Commission's Rules. The base forfeiture for EAS equipment not installed or operational is $8,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263779A1.html
  • staff that KPAL-LP was required to have operational EAS equipment. Therefore, KPAL's violation was willful. The violation occurred on more than one day, therefore, it is repeated. Based on the evidence before us, we find that KPAL Television Inc., apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 11.35(a) of the Rules, by failing to ensure the operational readiness of KPAL's EAS equipment. 1.12. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines (``Forfeiture Policy Statement'') and Section 1.80(b)(4) of the Rules sets forth the base forfeiture amounts for various violations of the Commission's Rules. The base forfeiture for EAS equipment not installed or operational is $8,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2 GHz bands. We initiated an investigation and on May 13, 2008, we sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Spy Camera. In your June 9, 2008 response to our LOI, you admit marketing wireless video transmitters beginning in early 2006 on your web site, www.spycameras.com, to end users and resellers. You admit that these wireless video transmitters
• http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-99-55A1.pdf
  • wait for the grant of the second station's covering license application before filing a construction permit application. This rule effectively requires stations to undertake "coordinated" facility improvements through a series of application and construction cycles, a risky, lengthy and sometimes infeasible procedure, particularly where a station downgrade or facility relocation is required to permit expanded service by a second station. 1.12 In the Notice we proposed to permit on a limited basis the filing of contingent applications. Specifically, we proposed to amend the rules to allow parties to submit up to four "related" minor change FM construction permit applications, including one-step upgrade and downgrade applications. We asked whether a different number of applications should be permitted where stations are under common
• http://transition.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • stations in the market, first without, then with additional controls. Controls include group population and its square, as well as the total 21 number of stations and the total number of formats. Using either the 1993 or 1997 cross section, the coefficients on the number of minority-owned stations tend to be quite large (between 0.69 and 1.31 for blacks, between 1.12 and 2.56 for Hispanics). These results imply that each additional minority-owned station begets roughly one additional net source of minority-targeted programming, suggesting that minority-owned stations do not simply replace white-owned, minority targeted stations. Results are virtually identical when we use inside stations as the dependent variable and treat outside stations as an additional explanatory variable. TABLE 9 ABOUT HERE While
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=66
  • Auction No. 66 will offer 1,122 licenses: 36 Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) licenses, 352 Economic Area (EA) licenses, and 734 Cellular Market Area (CMA) licenses. Qualified Bidders: 168 Rounds Completed: 27 Bidding Days: 8 Results for Round 27 Gross Revenue: $11,425,512,900.00 - Dollar Change: 108646000.00 - % Change: 0.96 Net Revenue: $11,240,518,200.00 - Dollar Change: 124864500.00 - % Change: 1.12 New Bids: 285 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 6 Licenses with PWBs*: 871 FCC Held Licenses: 251 Eligible Bidders: 137 (of 168 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=66F ri, 18 Aug 2006 19:05:01 GMT Summary Licenses: Auction No. 66 will offer 1,122 licenses: 36 Regional Economic Area Grouping (REAG) licenses, 352 Economic
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/rss/index.htm?job=ainf&id=91
  • 1 Permits with PWBs*: 106 FCC Held Permits: 38 Eligible Bidders: 73 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91W ed, 04 May 2011 18:35:01 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM Broadcast Qualified Bidders: 117 Rounds Completed: 27 Bidding Days: 6 Results for Round 27 Gross Revenue: $10,281,100.00 - Dollar Change: $113,500.00 - % Change: 1.12 Net Revenue: $8,297,230.00 - Dollar Change: $102,125.00 - % Change: 1.25 New Bids: 20 Withdrawn Bids: 0 Proactive Waivers: 0 Bidders that Reduced Eligibility: 3 Permits with PWBs*: 106 FCC Held Permits: 38 Eligible Bidders: 71 (of 117 qualified bidders) * PWBs = Provisionally Winning Bidders http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=auction_summary&id=91W ed, 04 May 2011 19:50:02 GMT Summary Permits: 144 construction permits for FM
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2002/fcc02331.pdf
  • para. 209; Verizon Pennsylvania Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 17475, para. 101; SWBT Kansas/Oklahoma Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 6355, para. 230; SWBT Texas Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 18366-67, paras. 22-27. 268 See Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.9.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized ­ Design Specials); Florida/Tennessee A.1.12.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Partially Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.12.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Partially Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.1 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Residence); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.2 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Business); Florida/Tennessee A.1.13.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Non - Mechanized ­ Design Specials); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.3 (FOC Timeliness ­ Mechanized Loop and Port Combinations); Florida/Tennessee B.1.9.14 (FOC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref02.pdf
  • 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2001...................17 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2001).....................18 Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1990-2001...........................................20 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2001...............22 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2001).....................24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2001...........25 Table 1.15 Monthly Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref03.pdf
  • 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2002 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1990-2002 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15, 2002) Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key-System Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2002 Table 1.15 Monthly Telephone
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref04.pdf
  • 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2003 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1993-2003 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1993-2003 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2003) Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) ii Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref05.pdf
  • 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line in Urban Areas (As of October 15), 1989-2004 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line (As of October 15), 1994-2004 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities (As of October 15), 1994-2004 Table 1.13 Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15, 2004) Table 1.14 Historical Standard Deviation Analysis of Residential Rates in the Sample Cities (As of October 15) ii Table 1.15 Average Revenue per Minute for Interstate Toll
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref97.pdf
  • 4.42 4.57 4.63 4.61 4.77 Total monthly charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.77 Number of cities in the sample offering Unlimited Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 Unlimited Service base rate 33.04 33.29 34.12 34.06 34.85 34.39 34.48 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 Extra for Touch-tone 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 Tax including 911 charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.51 Total monthly charge 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.68 Number of cities in the sample offering Measured Service 83 83 84 84 84 87 87 Measured Service base rate 16.18 16.17 16.76 16.55 16.60 16.74 17.11 200 five minute business day calls 16.11 16.19 16.70 17.23 17.57
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref98.pdf
  • Businesses with a Single Line as of October 15, 1997..........16 Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line, 1989-1997...................17 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line as of October 15, 1997.........................18 Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line, 1990-1997...20 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities, 1990-1997..........22 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key System Line as of October 15, 1997......24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key System Line, 1989-1997...............25 Table 1.15 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key System Line,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ref99.pdf
  • Businesses with a Single Line as of October 15, 1998.........16 Table 1.9 Average Local Rates for Businesses with a Single Line, 1989-1998.................17 Table 1.10 Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line as of October 15, 1998.......................18 Table 1.11 Monthly Telephone Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Single Line, 1990-1998..20 Table 1.12 Connection Charges for a Single Business Line in the Sample Cities, 1990-1998.........22 Table 1.13 Average Local rates for a Business with a Key System Line as of October 15, 1998.....24 Table 1.14 Average Local Rates for a Business with a Key System Line, 1989-1998.............25 Table 1.15 Monthly Rates in the Sample Cities for a Business with a Key System Line,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • ILLINOIS 12.22 10.95 25.49 10.26 14.21 11.97 33GTE NORTH INCORPORATED - INDIANA 12.19 10.93 13.96 12.51 13.99 12.95 34GTE NORTH INCORPORATED - IOWA/MINNESOTA 10.25 10.94 19.67 10.76 4.25 8.31 35GTE NORTH INCORPORATED - MICHIGAN 12.52 10.97 25.91 14.14 13.02 13.39 36GTE NORTH INCORPORATED - MISSOURI 12.04 10.94 12.51 17.87 3.66 13.62 37GTE NORTH INCORPORATED - NEBRASKA 10.47 10.95 30.99 10.85 (1.12) 6.61 38GTE NORTH INCORPORATED - OHIO 12.09 10.94 22.79 10.78 14.17 12.00 39GTE NORTH INCORPORATED - PENNSYLVANIA 9.95 10.95 14.13 9.03 (6,966.01) 6.51 7.72 40GTE NORTH INCORPORATED - WISCONSIN 12.76 10.95 13.49 13.51 17.91 15.14 41GTE NORTHWEST INCORPORATED - ID/MT 11.30 10.94 6.00 10.27 3.82 14.18 12.56 42GTE NORTHWEST INCORPORATED - WA/OR/CA(WC) 12.41 10.94 11.07 13.62 333.72 14.92 14.37 43GTE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-95.pdf
  • NEBRASKA 400 688 1,088 0.65 NEVADA 1,710 1,113 2,823 1.69 NEW HAMPSHIRE 421 419 840 0.50 NEW JERSEY 2,844 3,345 6,189 3.70 NEW MEXICO 448 513 962 0.58 NEW YORK 4,964 8,298 13,262 7.94 NORTH CAROLINA 1,781 2,932 4,713 2.82 NORTH DAKOTA 177 233 410 0.25 OHIO 2,391 4,791 7,183 4.30 OKLAHOMA 725 1,033 1,758 1.05 OREGON 820 1,051 1,871 1.12 PENNSYLVANIA 2,831 4,171 7,002 4.19 RHODE ISLAND 289 311 600 0.36 SOUTH CAROLINA 893 1,429 2,322 1.39 SOUTH DAKOTA 192 221 414 0.25 TENNESSEE 1,257 1,817 3,074 1.84 TEXAS 3,743 6,873 10,616 6.35 UTAH 457 505 961 0.58 VERMONT 199 193 391 0.23 VIRGINIA 1,871 2,473 4,343 2.60 WASHINGTON 1,416 2,004 3,419 2.05 WEST VIRGINIA 384 606 990 0.59 WISCONSIN
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-97.pdf
  • (6,148) 0.47 1.25 (0.78) SOUTH CAROLINA 48,401 30,665 17,736 1.88 1.19 0.69 SOUTH DAKOTA 18,528 6,493 12,035 3.80 1.33 2.47 TENNESSEE 29,570 42,866 (13,296) 0.75 1.09 (0.34) TEXAS 140,741 132,137 8,604 0.98 0.92 0.06 UTAH 10,730 16,331 (5,601) 0.81 1.24 (0.42) VERMONT 14,397 6,326 8,071 3.04 1.34 1.71 VIRGINIA 14,446 63,675 (49,229) 0.27 1.21 (0.94) WASHINGTON 46,739 47,008 (269) 1.11 1.12 (0.01) WEST VIRGINIA 21,633 12,495 9,138 1.88 1.09 0.79 WISCONSIN 54,808 34,631 20,177 1.39 0.88 0.51 WYOMING 21,204 5,168 16,036 6.22 1.52 4.70 UNITED STATES $1,995,313 2,148,933 (153,620) 0.96 1.04 (0.07) GUAM 1,056 910 146 1.20 1.04 0.17 N. MARIANA ISL. 4,939 117 4,822 19.94 0.47 19.47 PUERTO RICO 143,159 9,597 133,562 9.49 0.64 8.86 VIRGIN ISLANDS 16,300 1,210 15,090
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/strev-99.pdf
  • -0.21 New Hampshire 1,147 0 1,147 0.11 5,570 0.53 -4,423 -0.42 New Jersey 0 0 0 0.00 35,865 0.44 -35,865 -0.44 New Mexico 16,235 2,341 18,576 1.62 5,832 0.51 12,744 1.11 New York 14,992 0 14,992 0.10 62,056 0.40 -47,065 -0.31 North Carolina 6,570 4,007 10,577 0.17 25,420 0.42 -14,844 -0.24 North Dakota 7,991 0 7,991 1.59 2,398 0.48 5,593 1.12 Ohio 5,822 0 5,822 0.07 29,726 0.35 -23,904 -0.28 Oklahoma 32,186 771 32,957 1.32 9,521 0.38 23,436 0.94 Oregon 22,444 0 22,444 0.88 11,284 0.44 11,161 0.44 Pennsylvania 1,095 0 1,095 0.01 35,921 0.35 -34,826 -0.34 Rhode Island 0 0 0 0.00 3,836 0.47 -3,836 -0.47 South Carolina 15,833 4,349 20,182 0.72 12,493 0.45 7,689 0.28 South Dakota 5,946 0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend100.pdf
  • 2,179 5,248 1,396 SBC 3.50 5.49 5.88 0.96 0.48 0.58 0.11 30,852 6,387 13,107 5,493 U S WEST 3.50 6.07 7.85 1.04 2.53 3.42 0.38 10,232 1,539 4,014 888 RBOCs 3.50 5.78 6.79 1.01 1.61 2.36 0.30 78,393 14,205 30,257 11,952 Aliant (AllTel) 3.50 6.07 6.75 0.92 0.16 0.16 0.05 182 16 47 30 Cincinnati Bell 3.50 6.07 6.26 1.04 1.12 1.12 0.13 645 79 213 72 Citizens 3.50 5.98 9.09 1.04 2.37 4.21 1.02 727 42 123 56 Frontier 3.50 5.56 5.87 1.04 1.08 1.46 0.25 648 70 171 81 GTE 3.50 6.07 8.59 1.04 2.53 4.31 0.81 12,645 1,457 3,293 1,237 Sprint Local 3.50 5.82 7.37 0.99 2.03 3.72 0.52 5,018 618 1,238 451 Independent Price Caps 3.50 5.99
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend199.pdf
  • 0.32 Econophone, Inc. 10,125,790 22,299,197 12,491,437 0.30 El Paso Long Distance Company 21,000,516 28,209,780 16,004,840 0.39 Excel Communications, Inc. 23,366,255 198,105,367 169,560,070 4.12 Frontier Corporation 40,655,981 157,968,312 131,060,079 3.19 GTE 8,566,375 17,478,710 57,154,315 1.39 IDT Corporation 53,878,829 300,520,618 124,247,373 3.02 Intermedia Communications, Inc. 3,852,668 26,968,678 17,619,883 0.43 IXC Communications, Inc. 11,544,707 40,406,474 20,728,521 0.50 Justice Technology Corporation 26,694,815 85,013,908 45,898,956 1.12 LCI International Telecom Corp. 54,730,379 297,052,768 161,375,265 3.93 L.D. Services, Inc. 2,090,770 13,393,573 12,353,883 0.30 MATRIX Telecom 2,777,470 18,801,998 15,261,264 0.37 MCI Telecommunications Corporation 7,163,714 34,796,179 39,011,713 0.95 National Telephone & Communications, Inc. 8,360,650 66,637,239 45,995,533 1.12 One Call Communications Inc., d/b/a Opticom 2,081,561 7,392,373 12,923,263 0.31 Pacific Gateway Exchange, Inc. 45,975,622 208,959,734 99,670,985 2.42 Primus Telecommunications, Inc. (incl. TresCom
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend200.pdf
  • 2.43 2.35 1.84 1.71 1.67 1.21 0.97 0.82 0.38 0.32 0.25 4.21 4.32 4.42 4.57 4.63 4.61 4.79 4.87 4.99 4.97 5.01 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.67 41.29 41.00 $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.84 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.52 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.56 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.39 44.07 43.29 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 54 $16.18 $16.17 $16.76 $16.55 $16.60 $16.74 $17.06 $17.26 $17.28 $17.16 $17.12 16.11 16.19 16.70 17.23 17.57 17.38 17.15 17.10 17.18 17.14 17.06
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend298.pdf
  • 2.43 2.35 1.84 1.71 1.67 1.21 0.97 0.82 0.44 Tax including 911 Charges 4.21 4.32 4.42 4.57 4.63 4.61 4.79 4.87 4.99 Total Monthly Charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.65 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $33.04$33.29$34.12$34.06$34.85$34.39$34.45$34.42$34.55 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 Extra for Touch-tone 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.58 Tax including 911 Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.59 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.33 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $16.18$16.17$16.76$16.55$16.60$16.74$17.06$17.26$17.39 200 Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Calls 16.11 16.19 16.70 17.23 17.57 17.38 17.15 17.1 17.03 Subscriber Line Charges 3.54 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.55 3.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend299.pdf
  • 0.32 Econophone, Inc. 10,125,790 22,299,197 12,491,437 0.30 El Paso Long Distance Company 21,000,516 28,209,780 16,004,840 0.39 Excel Communications, Inc. 23,366,255 198,105,367 169,560,070 4.12 Frontier Corporation 40,655,981 157,968,312 131,060,079 3.19 GTE 8,566,375 17,478,710 57,154,315 1.39 IDT Corporation 53,878,829 300,520,618 124,247,373 3.02 Intermedia Communications, Inc. 3,852,668 26,968,678 17,619,883 0.43 IXC Communications, Inc. 11,544,707 40,406,474 20,728,521 0.50 Justice Technology Corporation 26,694,815 85,013,908 45,898,956 1.12 LCI International Telecom Corp. 54,730,379 297,052,768 161,375,265 3.93 L.D. Services, Inc. 2,090,770 13,393,573 12,353,883 0.30 MATRIX Telecom 2,777,470 18,801,998 15,261,264 0.37 MCI Telecommunications Corporation 7,163,714 34,796,179 39,011,713 0.95 National Telephone & Communications, Inc. 8,360,650 66,637,239 45,995,533 1.12 One Call Communications Inc., d/b/a Opticom 2,081,561 7,392,373 12,923,263 0.31 Pacific Gateway Exchange, Inc. 45,975,622 208,959,734 99,670,985 2.42 Primus Telecommunications, Inc. (incl. TresCom
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend502.pdf
  • 2,160 Iowa Telecom 0.81 0.00 0.84 0.15 2.90 134 185 331 Qwest 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.18 1.47 21,018 39,686 61,107 SBC 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.21 1.30 64,610 92,623 158,985 Sprint 0.03 0.00 0.63 0.17 1.68 10,375 15,681 26,235 Verizon 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.21 1.54 58,300 131,143 190,087 Price Caps 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.21 1.42 186,646 342,940 530,987 NECA 1.00 1.50 1.12 1.43 7.75 16,085 17,824 17,354 All Price Caps and NECA 0.15˘ 0.07˘ 0.47˘ 0.24˘ 1.69˘ 202,731 360,764 548,341 Source: Access tariff filings. 1/ This table shows average rates (weighted by minutes of use) for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and all LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. Rates are
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • Charge $41.25 $41.21 $42.12 $42.29 $42.57 $41.64 $41.80 $41.81 $41.67 $41.27 $41.21 $41.80 $42.43 $43.59 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 $32.02 $33.34 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.73 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 0.30 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 6.88 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $43.71 $44.07 $44.91 $44.94 $45.81 $44.57 $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 $43.15 $46.25 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend605.pdf
  • $41.80 $41.81 $41.67 $41.27 $41.21 $41.80 $42.43 $41.95 $41.97 $43.75 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 $32.02 $32.92 $33.17 $32.81 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 6.03 5.84 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 4 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 4 4 4 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 7.91 7.57 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $43.71 $44.07 $44.91 $44.94 $45.81 $44.57 $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 $43.15 $46.85 $47.12 $46.21 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend801.pdf
  • 4.79 4.87 4.99 4.97 5.03 5.04 Total Monthly Charge $41.25 $41.21 $42.12 $42.29 $42.57 $41.64 $41.80 $41.81 $41.67 $41.27 $41.21 $41.80 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 Touch-Tone Service 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $43.71 $44.07 $44.91 $44.94 $45.81 $44.57 $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 54 54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • Charge $41.25 $41.21 $42.12 $42.29 $42.57 $41.64 $41.80 $41.81 $41.67 $41.27 $41.21 $41.80 $42.43 $43.59 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 $33.73 $33.45 $32.02 $33.34 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.73 Extra for Touch-Tone Service 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 0.30 Taxes, 911, and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 6.88 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $43.71 $44.07 $44.91 $44.94 $45.81 $44.57 $44.71 $44.47 $44.39 $44.07 $43.20 $43.90 $43.15 $46.25 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.3 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.34 SDR 0.26 SDR 0.16 SDR 0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Greece N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 1.53 SDR 1.21 SDR 1.12 SDR .95 SDR .85 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.55 SDR Guatemala N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.84 Hong Kong $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $2.60 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.35 $2.20 $1.90 $1.60 $1.20 $1.00 $1.00 .65 SDR .58 SDR .52 SDR India N/A N/A N/A N/A
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • 0.15 SDR Germany 1.6 SDR 1.6 SDR 1.3 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.34 SDR0.26 SDR0.16 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR Greece N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 5.0 GF 1.53 SDR 1.21 SDR 1.12 SDR .95 SDR .85 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.25 SDR Guatemala N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.77 $0.68 Hong Kong $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $2.60 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.35 $2.20 $1.90 $1.60 $1.20 $1.00 $1.00.65 SDR .58 SDR .52 SDR .1 SDR India
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • 1.01 1.00 0.84 0.89 0.77 0.65 Dominican Republic 1.02 1.07 0.99 0.97 0.98 0.83 0.84 0.70 0.57 0.45 0.30 Egypt 1.28 1.31 1.34 1.33 1.35 1.27 1.25 1.04 1.03 0.97 0.81 El Salvador 1.07 1.13 1.15 1.19 1.24 1.20 1.23 1.17 1.08 0.81 0.69 France 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.04 0.99 0.91 0.81 0.62 0.63 0.50 0.35 Germany 15/ 1.06 1.08 1.12 1.08 1.05 0.95 0.88 0.65 0.50 0.40 0.37 Greece 1.09 1.12 1.17 1.17 1.14 1.07 1.10 0.99 0.97 0.80 0.61 Guatemala 1.05 1.08 1.11 1.18 1.19 1.15 1.17 1.07 1.00 0.83 0.67 Haiti 1.06 1.13 1.15 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.18 0.99 0.81 0.72 0.57 Hong Kong 1.40 1.43 1.48 1.46 1.37 1.08 0.90 0.59 0.47 0.35 0.54 India 2.37 2.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd01.pdf
  • 0.32 -64.1 Mexico 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.85 0.74 0.67 0.60 0.50 0.52 0.29 0.27 -59.5 Morocco 1.36 1.33 1.23 1.35 1.19 1.27 0.84 0.73 0.62 0.43 0.24 -81.5 Netherlands 1.03 1.02 0.86 0.78 0.57 0.50 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.38 0.21 -58.4 Nigeria 1.14 1.17 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 -61.5 Pakistan 1.77 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 -74.2 Peru 1.14 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 -77.5 Philippines 1.52 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 -73.4 Poland 1.10 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 -65.2 Russia 1.99 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 -79.6 Saudi Arabia
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/m96-indx.pdf
  • Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ........................................... Table 1.11 Penetration by Householder's Age - 1995 .......................................................... Chart 1.6 Penetration by Income ........................................................................................ Table 1.4 Penetration by Income - Critical Values ............................................................. Table 1.9 Penetration by Income - 1995 ............................................................................. Chart 1.4 Penetration by Labor Force Status ...................................................................... Table 1.7 Penetration by Labor Force Status - Critical Values ........................................... Table 1.12 Penetration by Labor Force Status - 1995 .......................................................... Chart 1.7 Penetration by State ............................................................................................ Table 1.3 Penetration by State - Changes - 1984 to 1995 .................................................. Table 1.2 Penetration by State - Changes - 1984 to 1995 - Map ....................................... Chart 1.3 Penetration by State - Critical Values ................................................................. Table 1.8 Penetration by State - 1995 - Map ...................................................................... Chart
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-1.pdf
  • mechanism operate on a school-year basis rather than a calendar-year basis, so for the purposes of Table 1.11, Funding Year 2001 (July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002) disbursements were used for these two mechanisms. For these two mechanisms, the bulk of Funding Year 2001 disbursements were made in calendar year 2002. Chart 1.1 shows the same information graphically. Table 1.12 shows, on a state-by-state basis, the total amount of funding disbursements for each of the universal service mechanisms, estimated contributions towards universal service, and the 15 See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Streamlined Contributor Reporting Requirements Associated with Administration of Telecommunications Relay Service, North American Numbering Plan, Local Number Portability, and Universal Service Support
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • Mexico 5.25 7.75 7.68 0.00 3.50 3.33 0.00 1.75 1.66 5.25 9.50 9.35 5.25 13.00 12.68 New York 6.44 7.75 7.67 0.00 3.50 3.19 0.00 1.75 1.60 6.44 9.50 9.27 6.44 13.00 12.46 North Carolina 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 North Dakota 5.25 7.75 7.72 0.00 3.50 2.25 0.00 1.75 1.12 5.25 9.50 8.84 5.25 13.00 11.09 N. Marianna Islands 6.75 6.75 6.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Ohio 6.94 7.75 7.27 0.00 3.50 0.96 0.00 1.75 0.48 6.94 9.50 7.75 6.94 13.00 8.71 Oklahoma 5.25 7.75 7.15 0.00 1.16 1.13 0.00 0.58 0.57 5.25 8.33 7.72 5.25 9.49 8.85 Oregon 7.75 7.75 7.75
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • -0.54 0.32 0.00 Florida 4.59 -1.46 6.14 10.47 Georgia 6.39 -2.60 9.23 -2.49 Guam -9.34 0.00 -9.34 0.00 Hawaii 10.84 -0.31 11.19 217.38 Idaho 2.95 -0.88 3.87 3.72 Illinois -1.64 -2.42 0.80 24.24 Indiana 0.20 2.54 -2.28 8.39 Iowa 1.25 -1.41 2.70 33.47 Kansas 0.95 -3.83 4.96 14.79 Kentucky 2.14 -0.84 3.00 -2.35 Louisiana 4.89 -1.44 6.42 0.06 Maine 8.09 1.12 6.89 -5.41 Maryland 2.28 0.21 2.06 -1.49 Massachusetts 10.32 -2.67 13.34 -26.18 Michigan 0.18 -5.08 5.54 -9.16 Minnesota 2.96 -2.08 5.15 6.50 Mississippi 9.19 -0.70 9.96 54.13 Missouri 10.18 -1.78 12.18 9.37 Montana 0.83 -1.08 1.93 -3.45 Nebraska 2.88 -5.82 9.24 24.10 Nevada 3.90 0.94 2.93 1.73 New Hampshire -0.14 -0.60 0.47 -11.14 New Jersey 1.99 -0.06 2.05 0.00 New
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • 4.42 4.57 4.63 4.61 4.79 4.87 4.99 4.97 5.03 5.04 5.45 5.95 Total Monthly Charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.67 41.27 41.21 41.80 42.43 43.59 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04$33.29$34.12$34.06$34.85$34.39$34.45$34.42$34.68$34.39$33.73$33.45$32.02$33.34 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.73 Extra for Touch-Tone 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 0.30 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 6.88 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.39 44.07 43.20 43.90 43.15 46.25 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • Table 1.15 Telecommunications Revenues - Total - by State ................................................ Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues - 2001................................... ................... Table 1.14 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Disbursements ........................... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ..................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Jurisdiction ....... Table 3.19 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ........ Table 3.33 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Jurisdiction ................. Table 3.21 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area .................. Table 3.35 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket No. 98-202 2003 Introduction and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-1.pdf
  • 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002) disbursements were used for these two mechanisms for 2002, and Funding Year 2002 (July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003) disbursements were used for 2003. For these two mechanisms, the bulk of a funding year disbursements are made in the second half of the funding year. Chart 1.1 shows the same information graphically. Table 1.12 shows, on a state-by-state basis, the total amount of funding disbursements for each of the universal service mechanisms, estimated contributions towards universal service, and the net estimated dollar flow (disbursements less estimated contributions) for 2002 and 2003.18 Technical Appendix Carrier revenue information is not reported on a state-by-state basis. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate revenues per state in order
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • INC. 1.00 -2.02 3.09 -26.80 250318 C FRONTIER COMM. OF THE SOUTH, INC. -16.04 -1.01 -15.18 -60.90 250322 A UNION SPRINGS TEL. CO. 8.53 -2.31 11.09 75.72 255181 C SOUTH CENTRAL BELL-AL 3.51 -3.57 7.34 0.00 259788 C CENTURYTEL OF ALABAMA, LLC (SOUTHERN) (VERIZON SOUTH) 7.70 -2.84 10.84 0.00 259789 C CENTURYTEL OF ALABAMA, LLC (NORTHERN) (VERIZON S-CONTEL) -2.92 -1.81 -1.12 0.00 ALASKA Total 9.28 -2.44 12.01 9.80 613000 C ACS OF ANCHORAGE, INC. 21.64 -5.35 28.51 0.00 613001 C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 7.98 3.39 4.44 8.19 613001A C ARCTIC SLOPE TEL. ASSOCIATION COOP.INC. 25.94 14.19 10.29 65.18 613002 C BETTLES TELEPHONE CO. INC. 7.20 1.01 6.13 9.80 613003 C BRISTOL BAY TELEPHONE COOP. INC. 2.61 -8.04 11.58 9.46
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-7.pdf
  • 4.61 4.79 4.87 4.99 4.97 5.03 5.04 5.45 5.47 5.72 Total Monthly Charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.67 41.27 41.21 41.80 42.43 41.95 42.40 Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service $33.04$33.29$34.12$34.06$34.85$34.39$34.45$34.42$34.68$34.39$33.73$33.45$32.02$32.92$32.36 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.50 4.35 4.77 5.77 5.88 Extra for Touch-Tone**** 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.39 **** **** Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.49 5.68 5.98 8.16 8.19 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-Rate Service 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.39 44.07 43.20 43.90 43.15 46.85 46.43 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-Rate Service 59 56 54
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-intro.pdf
  • Revenues - 2002................................... ................... Table 1.14 Telephone Calls and Billed Access Minutes of Large ILECs ...........................Table 8.3 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Contribution Factors ..................... Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Universal Service Payments ............ Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ....................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by State or Jurisdiction ................... Table 3.18 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement - by Study Area .............................. Table 3.32 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State or Jurisdiction ........Table 3.20 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area .................. Table 3.34 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket No. 98-202 2004 Introduction
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-0.pdf
  • 3.5 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by State ................................................ Table 3.7 NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Company ......................................... Table 3.13 Other Operating Income or Loss ......................................................................... Table 6.8 Penetration - Households .................................................................................... Chart 1.1 Penetration - Individual Adults ........................................................................... Chart 1.8 Penetration by Household Size ........................................................................... Table 1.6 Penetration by Household Size - Critical Values ................................................ Table 1.12 Penetration by Household Size - 1996 ................................................................ Chart 1.5 Penetration by Householder's Age ...................................................................... Table 1.7 Penetration by Householder's Age - Critical Values ........................................... Table 1.13 Penetration by Householder's Age - 1996 .......................................................... Chart 1.6 Penetration by Income ........................................................................................ Table 1.5 Penetration by Income - Adjusted for Inflation .................................................. Chart 1.9 Penetration by Income by State - Adjusted for Inflation
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr97-1.pdf
  • 1.6% 10.9% 9.4% 21.8% 19.6% $30,000 - $34,999 2.0% 1.8% 2.0% 1.7% 12.5% 10.7% 24.5% 21.9% $35,000 - $39,999 2.4% 2.1% 2.4% 2.0% 15.4% 13.2% 28.4% 25.4% $40,000 - $49,999 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 1.8% 15.1% 12.8% 28.7% 25.6% $50,000 - $74,999 2.3% 1.9% 2.2% 1.9% 16.3% 13.8% 32.3% 28.7% $75,000 + 3.5% 3.0% 3.3% 2.8% 44.6% 37.9% 54.5% 48.7% TABLE 1.12 CRITICAL VALUES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BY HOUSEHOLD SIZE HISPANIC TOTAL WHITE BLACK ORIGIN In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable In UnitAvailable TOTAL 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 2.2% 2.0% 4.9% 4.5% 1 PERSON 1.1% 1.0% 1.1% 1.0% 4.1% 3.7% 11.6% 10.9% 2 - 3 0.8% 0.7% 0.8% 0.7% 3.5% 3.0% 7.7% 7.0% 4 - 5 1.1% 1.0% 1.2% 1.0% 4.7%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • 2.43 2.35 1.84 1.71 1.67 1.21 0.97 0.82 0.44 Tax including 911 Charges 4.21 4.32 4.42 4.57 4.63 4.61 4.79 4.87 4.99 Total Monthly Charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.65 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $33.04$33.29$34.12$34.06$34.85$34.39$34.45$34.42$34.55 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 Extra for Touch-tone 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.58 Tax including 911 Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.59 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.33 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $16.18$16.17$16.76$16.55$16.60$16.74$17.06$17.26$17.39 200 Five-minute Business-day Same-zone Calls 16.11 16.19 16.70 17.23 17.57 17.38 17.15 17.1 17.03 Subscriber Line Charges 3.54 3.55 3.55 3.54 3.55 3.55
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-7.pdf
  • Evening 1.44 0.80 -44.4 1.44 1.82 26.2 Night & Weekend 0.96 0.65 -32.3 0.96 1.82 89.3 1911 - 3000Day 2.70 $1.40 -48.1 2.70 1.82 -32.7 Evening 1.62 0.80 -50.6 1.62 1.82 12.2 Night & Weekend 1.08 0.65 -39.8 1.08 1.82 68.3 3001 - 4250Day 2.80 $1.40 -50.0 2.80 1.82 -35.1 Evening 1.68 0.80 -52.4 1.68 1.82 8.2 Night & Weekend 1.12 0.65 -42.0 1.12 1.82 62.3 4251 - 5750Day 2.91 $1.40 -51.9 2.91 1.82 -37.5 Evening 1.74 0.80 -54.0 1.74 1.82 4.5 Night & Weekend 1.16 0.65 -44.0 1.16 1.82 56.7 Source: AT&T tariffs and Industry Analysis Division, Reference Book of Rates, Price Indices, and Household Expenditures for Telephone Service. * AT&T initiated a new rate structure for residential customers on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • Payments 4.21 4.32 4.42 4.57 4.63 4.61 4.79 4.87 4.99 4.97 Total Monthly Charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.67 41.27 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $33.04 $33.29 $34.12 $34.06 $34.85 $34.39 $34.45 $34.42 $34.68 $34.39 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 Extra for Touch-tone 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 Other Mandatory Payments 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.39 44.07 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message Service $16.18 $16.17 $16.76 $16.55 $16.60
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 0.32 0.25 Taxes, 911 and Other Charges 4.21 4.32 4.42 4.57 4.63 4.61 4.79 4.87 4.99 4.97 5.01 Total Monthly Charge 41.25 41.21 42.12 42.29 42.57 41.64 41.80 41.81 41.67 41.27 41.00 Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service $33.04$33.29$34.12$34.06$34.85$34.39$34.45$34.42$34.68$34.39$33.84 Subscriber Line Charges 3.65 3.69 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.69 3.61 3.61 3.56 3.52 Extra for Touch-tone 2.12 2.11 1.87 1.84 1.76 1.12 1.00 0.89 0.53 0.49 0.47 Taxes, 911 and other Charges 4.90 4.98 5.22 5.34 5.50 5.36 5.58 5.55 5.58 5.63 5.56 Total Monthly Charge for Flat-rate Service 43.71 44.07 44.91 44.94 45.81 44.57 44.71 44.47 44.39 44.07 43.39 Number of Sample Cities with Flat-rate Service 59 56 54 54 54 53 53 53 53 54 54 Monthly Charge for Measured/Message
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 4.69 0 0.00 591 4.69 Arizona 35,414 0.99 45,121 1.27 -9,707 -0.27 Arkansas 72,887 4.05 18,486 1.03 54,401 3.02 California 65,692 0.24 207,379 0.76 -141,687 -0.52 Colorado 52,369 1.52 45,422 1.32 6,947 0.20 Connecticut 886 0.03 35,817 1.23 -34,932 -1.20 Delaware 195 0.03 9,069 1.30 -8,874 -1.27 District of Columbia 0 0.00 12,867 1.16 -12,867 -1.16 Florida 50,466 0.37 151,631 1.12 -101,164 -0.75 Georgia 79,527 1.27 72,363 1.16 7,165 0.11 Guam 3,266 3.51 672 0.72 2,594 2.79 Hawaii 2,055 0.24 8,618 0.99 -6,564 -0.76 Idaho 35,850 4.07 11,256 1.28 24,595 2.79 Illinois 31,393 0.31 98,842 0.99 -67,450 -0.67 Indiana 30,731 0.70 40,996 0.93 -10,264 -0.23 Iowa 30,431 1.51 21,750 1.08 8,681 0.43 Kansas 67,243 3.26 22,494 1.09 44,749 2.17 Kentucky 29,606
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • ­ Total ­ by State ................................................ Table 1.13 Telecommunications Revenues Used to Allocate Revenues by State ................... Table 1.14 Transmission Systems ............................................................................................. Table 10.2 Universal Service Program Requirements and Fund Factors ................................. Table 1.10 Universal Service Support - Distribution of Disbursements ........................... Chart 1.1 Universal Service Support Mechanisms ................................................... Table 1.11 Universal Service Support Mechanisms - by State ..................................... Table 1.12 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Jurisdiction ....... Table 3.22 Unseparated Non-Trafffic Sensitive Revenue Requirement - by Study Area ........ Table 3.34 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Jurisdiction ................. Table 3.24 Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop - by Study Area .................. Table 3.36 6 Universal Service Monitoring Report CC Docket No. 98-202 Summer 2002 Introduction
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/00socc.pdf
  • (0.27) (0.38) (1.03) 2.0MT Nebraska 114.5 48.7 65.8 47.5 18.2 5.79 2.96 5.22 13.97 4.3NE Nevada 119.3 77.8 41.4 31.6 9.9 0.56 0.24 0.15 0.94 8.9NV New Hampshire 40.6 17.8 22.7 10.6 12.2 2.16 0.93 1.67 4.76 7.4NH New Jersey 387.5 202.6 184.9 70.7 114.2 18.04 36.01 12.69 66.74 47.5NJ New Mexico 43.8 32.6 11.2 5.8 5.4 0.99 0.09 0.04 1.12 4.3NM New York 1,165.0 335.0 830.1 533.1 297.0 82.64 26.52 116.26 225.42 71.6NY North Carolina 437.6 317.6 120.0 87.3 32.7 7.61 1.13 2.87 11.62 21.1NC North Dakota 12.3 5.3 7.0 4.9 2.1 1.04 0.11 (0.31) 0.84 1.3ND Ohio 446.1 359.1 87.0 57.4 29.6 1.42 1.54 0.95 3.91 25.7OH Oklahoma 169.0 158.8 10.2 4.0 6.2 (0.95) 0.03 (0.00) (0.92) 7.1OK Oregon
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/01socc.pdf
  • $0.46 El Salvador $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.77 $0.60 $0.48 $0.38 $0.38 France 10/ 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.7 SDR0.42 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.19 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Germany 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR0.34 SDR0.26 SDR0.16 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Greece 5.0 GF 1.53 SDR1.21 SDR1.12 SDR .95 SDR .85 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.22 SDR0.2 SDR0.2 SDR 0.2 SDR Guatemala $1.50 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.77 $0.64 $0.51 $0.38 $0.38 Haiti $1.45 $1.40 $1.35 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.00 $0.92 $0.70 $0.70 Hong Kong $2.20 $1.90 $1.60 $1.20 $1.00 $1.00.65 SDR .58 SDR .52 SDR 0.1 SDR
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/02socc.pdf
  • $0.46 $0.46 El Salvador 9/ $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.77 $0.60 $0.48 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 France 9/ 1.0 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.7 SDR0.42 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.19 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Germany 9/ 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR0.34 SDR0.26 SDR0.16 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Greece 9/ 1.53 SDR1.21 SDR1.12 SDR .95 SDR .85 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.22 SDR0.2 SDR0.2 SDR0.2 SDR 0.2 SDR Guatemala 9/ $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.77 $0.64 $0.51 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 Haiti $1.40 $1.35 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.00 $0.92 $0.70 $0.60 $0.46 Hong Kong 9/ $1.90 $1.60 $1.20 $1.00 $1.00.65 SDR .58 SDR .52 SDR
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/03socc.pdf
  • $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.00 $0.80 $0.65 $0.55 $0.38 Dominican Republic $1.36 $1.29 $1.30 $1.10 $0.90 $0.70 $0.60 $0.38 $0.38 Egypt $1.70 $1.60 $1.50 $1.40 $1.40 $1.30 $1.30 $1.10 $0.70 El Salvador $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.77 $0.60 $0.48 $0.38 France 0.7 SDR0.7 SDR0.42 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.19 SDR Germany 0.8 SDR0.6 SDR0.34 SDR0.26 SDR0.16 SDR0.15 SDR Greece 1.21 SDR1.12 SDR0.95 SDR0.85 SDR0.7 SDR0.63 SDR0.4 SDR0.22 SDR Guatemala $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.77 $0.64 $0.51 Haiti $1.35 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.00 $0.92 $0.70 $0.60 $0.46 Hong Kong $1.60 $1.20 $1.00 $1.000.65 SDR0.58 SDR0.52 SDR India $2.00 $1.90 $1.80 $1.80 $1.60 $1.42 $1.28 $1.08 $0.85 $0.68 $0.46 $0.46 Israel $2.28 $2.16 $2.16 $1.90 $1.18 $0.70 $0.59
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/95socc.pdf
  • 15,782 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 7,837 106,000 1,624 50,367 65,800 48,889 SELECTED SBC SPRINT U S WEST, FINANCIAL COMM. INC. CORP. INC. DATA 4/ REVENUES 9,653 12,765 11,746 COSTS & EXPENSES 8,828 10,931 9,101 INTEREST EXPENSE 515 261 527 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ (337) (644) 24 INCOME TAXES 903 534 825 NET INCOME (930) 395 1,317 EARNINGS PER SHARE (1.53) 1.12 2.79 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 1.65 1.00 2.14 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 609 350 471 TOTAL ASSETS 22,003 15,196 25,071 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 12,988 9,716 14,677 LONG-TERM DEBT 5,672 3,253 6,954 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 6,256 4,643 7,948 OPERATING DATA: CUSTOMER LINES (THOUS.) 14,223 6,700 14,847 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 59,300 48,268 61,047 SOURCE: COMPANY ANNUAL REPORTS TO SHAREHOLDERS AND ANNUAL REPORTS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • NH NEW JERSEY 550.5 449.7 100.8 53.0 47.8 7.23 5.04 6.63 18.89 28.9 NJ NEW MEXICO 36.2 18.3 18.0 11.9 6.1 0.50 0.60 0.30 1.39 4.7 NM NEW YORK 666.6 203.4 463.2 388.4 74.8 9.85 10.33 4.40 24.58 50.2 NY NORTH CAROLINA 377.0 233.5 143.6 121.0 22.5 3.51 1.39 0.89 5.79 16.7 NC NORTH DAKOTA (1.1) 3.9 (5.0) (4.4) (0.6) (1.12) (0.57) (0.61) (2.30) 1.7 ND OHIO 376.9 270.3 106.6 74.5 32.1 (0.32) 1.06 0.63 1.37 30.7 OH OKLAHOMA 79.6 57.1 22.5 15.6 6.9 (0.09) (0.04) 0.08 (0.05) 7.0 OK OREGON 70.4 53.6 16.7 12.6 4.1 (3.05) (1.08) (0.62) (4.75) 8.9 OR PENNSYLVANIA 690.1 496.2 180.5 138.3 38.1 7.25 0.96 3.09 11.30 26.8 PA RHODE ISLAND 37.9 9.1 28.8 24.6 4.2
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/97socc.pdf
  • 30,194 20,561 1,394 COSTS & EXPENSES 2,517 12,199 1/ 44,351 24,852 15,185 1,378 INTEREST EXPENSE 130 505 191 1,230 761 109 OTHER INCOME & ADJUSTMENTS 2/ 212 390 582 (128) 797 116 INCOME TAXES 321 1,388 2,721 1,529 2,151 7 NET INCOME 508 2,296 4,638 2,455 3,261 16 EARNINGS PER SHARE 2.72 2.09 2.85 3.16 3.29 0.06 DIVIDENDS PER SHARE 1.12 1.15 1.32 3.02 1.44 0 AVG. SHARES OUTSTANDING (MIL.) 186 1,099 1,630 776 992 253 TOTAL ASSETS 5,633 25,339 58,635 53,964 36,301 4,873 PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIP. (NET) 3,190 13,873 22,710 35,039 22,861 3,668 LONG-TERM DEBT 1,874 4,610 6,826 13,265 7,348 1,707 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 2,209 8,308 22,647 12,789 15,165 1,679 OPERATING DATA: CUSTOMER LINES (THOUS.) 1,789 20,544 - 38,300 23,201
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/98SOCC.PDF
  • 1.63 8.6 KY LOUISIANA 126.1 58.2 67.9 59.1 8.8 (0.27) (0.08) 0.05 (0.30) 9.1 LA MAINE 39.8 11.9 27.9 19.8 8.1 1.05 0.37 0.31 1.73 6.4 ME MARYLAND 236.3 115.8 120.5 74.1 46.4 6.91 3.16 5.15 15.21 31.2 MD MASSACHUSETTS 306.4 100.9 205.5 150.5 55.0 7.36 4.71 5.70 17.77 37.3 MA MICHIGAN 293.2 232.3 60.9 40.8 20.2 (1.79) 0.43 0.23 (1.12) 21.3 MI MINNESOTA 80.3 59.3 21.0 13.5 7.5 (0.22) (0.33) 0.05 (0.50) 8.0 MN MISSISSIPPI 51.8 26.3 25.5 18.2 7.3 0.11 0.05 0.07 0.23 7.1 MS MISSOURI 315.6 259.5 56.1 38.9 17.2 0.39 (0.38) 0.28 0.30 16.9 MO MONTANA 4.8 8.2 (3.4) (2.8) (0.6) (1.29) (0.62) (0.44) (2.35) 1.8 MT NEBRASKA 127.7 48.2 79.5 60.9 18.6 5.53 3.28 4.73 13.53
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.77 $0.60 $0.60 France 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.42 SDR 0.36 SDR 0.24 SDR 0.19 SDR 0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Germany 1.2 SDR 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR 0.34 SDR 0.26 SDR 0.16 SDR 0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Greece 5.0 GF 1.53 SDR 1.21 SDR 1.12 SDR .95 SDR .85 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.22 SDR 0.22 SDR Guatemala $1.50 $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.77 $0.64 $0.58 Hong Kong $2.20 $1.90 $1.60 $1.20 $1.00 $1.00 .65 SDR .58 SDR .52 SDR 0.1 SDR 0.1 SDR India $2.25 $2.25 $2.00 $1.90 $1.80 $1.80 $1.60 $1.42 $1.28 $1.08 $1.08 Israel $2.40 $2.40
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/prelim02socc.pdf
  • $0.46 $0.46 El Salvador 10/ $1.40 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.10 $0.88 $0.77 $0.60 $0.48 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 France 10/ 1.0 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.7 SDR0.42 SDR0.36 SDR0.24 SDR0.19 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Germany 10/ 1.0 SDR 0.8 SDR 0.6 SDR0.34 SDR0.26 SDR0.16 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR0.15 SDR 0.15 SDR Greece 10/ 1.53 SDR1.21 SDR1.12 SDR .95 SDR .85 SDR 0.7 SDR 0.63 SDR 0.4 SDR 0.22 SDR0.2 SDR0.2 SDR0.2 SDR 0.2 SDR Guatemala 10/ $1.50 $1.40 $1.30 $1.20 $1.18 $1.00 $0.90 $0.77 $0.64 $0.51 $0.38 $0.38 $0.38 Haiti $1.40 $1.35 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.20 $1.00 $0.92 $0.70 $0.60 $0.46 Hong Kong 10/ $1.90 $1.60 $1.20 $1.00 $1.00.65 SDR .58 SDR .52 SDR
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
  • that would have been reserved for Inmarsat Horizons. Ten megahertz of this spectrum could be reallocated for advanced wireless services, and four megahertz could be retained for MSS system expansion or made available for other purposes, as set forth below. Another approach would be to use the segment of the 2 GHz MSS spectrum set aside for system expansion, plus 1.12 megahertz of MSS spectrum from each direction of transmission, to make ten megahertz (five megahertz in each direction) of spectrum available for reallocation to other services, and to distribute the remaining 60 MHz of spectrum among the MSS proponents. Under this scenario, the following formula would express the amount of spectrum available for each MSS system, in each direction of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
  • SC Root Communications Group LP 1947 Jul-97 250 3.2 0.7 B WJMX FM CHR Florence, SC 204Cheraw SC Root Communications Group LP 1979 Jul-97 1650 7.4 1.44 C2 WPFM AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Darlington SC Root Communications Group LP 1955 Jul-97 150 0 0 B WSQN FM Oldies Florence, SC 204Scranton SC Root Communications Group LP 1991 Jul-97 525 3.7 1.12 A WDSC AM Gospel Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root Communications Group LP 1946 Oct-97 25 0 0 B WEGX FM Country Florence, SC 204Dillon SC Root Communications Group LP 1954 Oct-97 1400 6.5 2.11 C WGSS FM Gospel Florence, SC 204Kingstree SC Root Communications Group LP 1998 50 1.4 0.52 A WPDT FM CHR Florence, SC 204Johnsonville SC Waccamaw Neck
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp29pdf.html
  • have Acrobat Reader software installed on your computer and configured as a "helper" or "plug-in" application in your browser. If not, you need to [2]download, install, and configure the free Adobe Acrobat Reader Software . If you already have the Reader installed and configured, select one of the following options: * [3]Complete paper with all text and graphics (98 pages, 1.12 MB) * [4]Paper Without Figures (87 pages, 307 KB) * [5]Figures Only (11 pages, 844 KB) [ [6]News Release | [7]WordPerfect Version | [8]Text Version ] __________________________________________________________________ last updated 4/1/97 References 1. LYNXIMGMAP:http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp29pdf.html#fccnavbarmap 2. http://www.fcc.gov/pdf_ref.html 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp29.pdf 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/29nofigs.pdf 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/wp29figs.pdf 6. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/News_Releases/1997/nrmc7020.html 7. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp29.wp 8. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp29.txt [USEMAP] http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/working_papers/oppwp29pdf.html#fccnavbarmap 1. http://www.fcc.gov/ 2. http://www.fcc.gov/search/ 3. http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners.html 4. http://www.fcc.gov/bureaus.html 5. http://www.fcc.gov/getinfo.html
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2001/da012482.pdf
  • be held as follows:5 Class A Shareholder Economic Interest (%)6Voting Interest (%)7Voting Power (%)8 Dresdner Bank Luxembourg S.A. 3.07 2.46 2.57 Deutsche Bank Luxembourg S.A. 2.68 2.14 2.24 Luxempart S.A. 2.27 1.81 1.90 TITA S.A. 2.03 1.62 1.70 Loran Telecommunications S.A. 1.78 1.42 1.49 Trufidee S.A. 1.70 1.36 1.42 Compagnie de Financement C.E.F. 1.70 1.36 1.42 Audiolux S.A. 1.34 1.07 1.12 Aachener & Münchener BG AG 1.34 1.07 1.12 Banque Générale du Luxembourg S.A. 1.05 0.84 0.88 Space Equipment S.A. 0.74 0.59 0.62 BGL Investment Partners S.A. 0.59 0.47 0.50 Other A Shareholders (57 unnamed individuals and companies) 0.35 0.28 0.29 Fiduciary Depositary Receipts 18.83 15.06 15.77 3. The Applicants explain that the above listed Class A shareholders will receive SES
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireline_Competition/Orders/2002/fcc02118.pdf
  • 2.81 2.78 0.88 0 0.16 0 0 0 0 0 RESALE (MAINTENANCE) POTS ­ Maintenance MR-2 ­ Trouble Report Rate Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-118 C-15 Metric Metric September October November December January Notes Number Full Name VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C VZ CLE C MR-2-02- 2100 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Loop 1.12 0.39 1.02 0.37 0.8 0.34 0.91 0.3 0.84 0.33 MR-2-03- 2100 Network Trouble Report Rate ­ Central Office 0.1 0.05 0.1 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.08 0.04 0.09 0.06 MR-2-04- 2100 % Subsequent Reports 18.33 4.92 17.13 5.96 15.06 8.72 7.67 6.86 MR-2-05- 2100 % CPE/TOK/FOK Trouble Report Rate 0.92 0.36 0.83 0.32 0.65 0.29 0.27 0.3 MR-3 ­ Missed Repair
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2007/dd070125.html
  • IB. Contact: Tom Polzin at (202) 418-2148, email: tpolzin@fcc.gov, TTY: (202) 418-2555 [3]DOC-269737A1.pdf [4]DOC-269737A1.txt Report No: 46409 Released: 01/25/2007. BROADCAST ACTIONS. MB [5]DOC-269719A2.txt [6]DOC-269719A1.pdf Report No: 26409 Released: 01/25/2007. BROADCAST APPLICATIONS. MB [7]DOC-269717A2.txt [8]DOC-269717A1.pdf Released: 01/25/2007. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS AND POST-REPLY COMMENT PERIOD FILING IN PERMIT-BUT-DISCLOSURE PROCEEDINGS. OMD. Contact: Jason Brown at (202) 418-0310 [9]DOC-269731A1.pdf [10]DOC-269731A1.txt Released: 01/25/2007. REVISED TABLE 1.12 FOR UNIVERSAL SERVICE MONITORING REPORT. (Dkt No 98-202). WCB. Contact: James Eisner at (202) 418-0940 [11]DOC-269749A1.doc [12]DOC-269749A1.pdf [13]DOC-269749A2.pdf [14]DOC-269749A1.txt [15]DOC-269749A2.txt ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- TEXTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- MMK LICENSE LLC. Denied WNKY's waiver request. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 01/24/2007 by MO&O. (DA No. 07-194). MB [16]DA-07-194A1.doc [17]DA-07-194A1.pdf [18]DA-07-194A1.txt CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS. Granted Charter Communications Petition for Determination of
• http://www.fcc.gov/DiversityFAC/041004/SimonWilkie.pdf
  • the harm caused to consumers by the DE eligibility restrictions if they are applied in Auction 58. 22 Several empirical studies provide different estimates of the own-price elasticity of demand for wireless services. For example, using data on wireless consumption between 1999 and 2001, Ingraham and Sidak have found that the own-price elasticity of demand for wireless services is between -1.12 and -1.29. Okada and Hatta compute own-price elasticities for the Japanese market ranging from -1.4 (fixed-line telephone services) to -3.96 (mobile services). Using panel data on mobile telephony for 56 countries, Maden, Coble- Neal and Dalzell estimate an own-price elasticity of -0.53 for high-income countries. See Ingraham, Allan and Sidak, J. Gregory, (2003) "Do States Tax Wireless Services Inefficiently? Evidence
• http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/comments/99339/5006314259.pdf
  • "call the number on your screen," and commercials with no voiceovers as well as programming that have long periods of silence or sound effects with no dialogue audio discription is critical to the enjoyment and understanding of the programs. I hope that we in the blind community can get MM99-339 passed in to law. Sincerely Russell Schermer KAGVUC Net-Tamer V 1.12 Beta - Test Drive Anne Fesh From: Sent: Janis Stanger Ljstanger@usor.state.ut.us] Thursday, March 16, 2000 IO:37 AM To: Subject: info@acb.org I support video description I am legally blind. As a child, I would sit two or three feet from the n/ and I could see all the things in the world that others with much better vision could see by
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-250390A1.html
  • the proposed forfeiture. 1.11. Payment of the forfeiture may be made by mailing a check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission, to the Forfeiture Collection Section, Finance Branch, Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 73482, Chicago, Illinois 60673-7482. The payment must include the FCC Registration Number (FRN) and the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption. 1.12. The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Western Region, San Diego Office, 4542 Ruffner Street - Suite 370, San Diego, California 92111 and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption. 1.13. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256120A1.html
  • petitioner submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting practices (``GAAP''); or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. 1.12. Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture under an installment plan should be sent to: Chief, Revenue and Receivable Operation Group, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554.15 1.13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-256485A1.html
  • 11.35 of the Commission's Rules.15 1.11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Lazer Broadcasting Corporation, SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. 1.12. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Forfeiture Collection Section, Finance Branch, Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 73482, Chicago, Illinois 60673-7482. Payment by overnight
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-260117A1.html
  • CLAUSES 1.11. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Farmworkers Educational Radio Network Inc. is hereby NOTIFIED of their APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) for violating Section 11.35 of the Commission's Rules.13 1.12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Farmworkers Educational Radio Network Inc., SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. 1.13. Payment of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-262295A1.html
  • Petersons purchased the station. Therefore, the Petersons' violation is willful. The violation occurred on more than one day, therefore, it is repeated. Based on the evidence before us, we find that Richard A. & Joann R. Peterson, Joint Tenants, apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 11.35 of the Rules, by failing to ensure the operational readiness of KBSZ(AM)'s EAS equipment. 1.12. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines (``Forfeiture Policy Statement'') and Section 1.80(b)(4) of the Rules sets forth the base forfeiture amounts for various violations of the Commission's Rules. The base forfeiture for EAS equipment not installed or operational is $8,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-263779A1.html
  • staff that KPAL-LP was required to have operational EAS equipment. Therefore, KPAL's violation was willful. The violation occurred on more than one day, therefore, it is repeated. Based on the evidence before us, we find that KPAL Television Inc., apparently willfully and repeatedly violated Section 11.35(a) of the Rules, by failing to ensure the operational readiness of KPAL's EAS equipment. 1.12. The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines (``Forfeiture Policy Statement'') and Section 1.80(b)(4) of the Rules sets forth the base forfeiture amounts for various violations of the Commission's Rules. The base forfeiture for EAS equipment not installed or operational is $8,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2010/DA-09-2623A1.html
  • Act, and Sections 2.803 and 15.205(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules"). As explained below, future violations of the Commission's rules in this regard may subject your company to monetary forfeitures. In March 2008, the Spectrum Enforcement Division of the Enforcement Bureau ("Division") received a complaint alleging that Spy Camera was marketing unauthorized wireless video transmitters that operate in the 1.08, 1.12, 1.16 and 1.2 GHz bands. We initiated an investigation and on May 13, 2008, we sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Spy Camera. In your June 9, 2008 response to our LOI, you admit marketing wireless video transmitters beginning in early 2006 on your web site, www.spycameras.com, to end users and resellers. You admit that these wireless video transmitters
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-127A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-127A1.pdf
  • of local media markets). See UCC Comments at 11-13. Caribbean Comments at 27-35. Caribbean reports that such cross-ownership has created a situation where one owner (with two daily newspapers) garners 43% of the advertising revenues for traditional media outlets in Puerto Rico. CFA Comments at 96-121; see also Mid-West Comments at 5-6; UCC Comments at 13. DOJ/FTC Merger Guidelines § 1.12 explains: ``Existing buyers sometimes will differ significantly in their likelihood of switching to other products in response to a small but significant and non-transitory price increase. If a hypothetical monopolist can identify and price differently to those buyers (``targeted buyers'') who would not defeat the targeted price increase by substituting to other products in response to a `small but significant
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/pd/pf/csreport_2000.pdf
  • Reg 2000 1999 1998 1997 Total Total Total Total Total + Others) + Others) + Others) + Others) CodeRank Rank Rank Rank Country Ckts Ckts Ckts Ckts Ckts Split Split Split Split 1 1 1 2 3United Kingdom 102,577 635,794 22,519 760,890 844,254 0.16 0.22 0.32 0.77 5 2 2 1 1Canada 80,874 278,591 55,673 415,138 436,238 0.24 0.66 1.02 1.12 7 3 4 4 4Japan 95,889 115,526 2,710 214,125 48,294 0.81 0.16 0.51 0.61 5 4 3 3 2Mexico 75,377 92,217 1,260 168,854 235,010 0.81 1.62 1.38 1.57 1 5 5 5 5Germany 11,315 92,373 541 104,229 14,904 0.12 0.37 0.76 0.63 1 6 6 8 13Netherlands 3,401 60,297 4,770 68,468 30,622 0.05 0.09 0.34 0.56 8 7 7 7
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/am.pdf
  • to Section 4.6) . A station intended to provide coverage over extensive prlrnary and secondary service areas and which is protected against objectionable fnterference, accordingly. L.LL Class B station A station lntended to provide coverage over ooe or more population centers and the contiguous rural areas located Ln Fts primary service area and which is protected against objectionable interfereace, accordingly. 1.12 Class C station A station intended to provide coverageover a city or tom and the contiguous suburban areas located in its primary service area and which is protected against objectionable interference, accordingly. 1.13 Daytime operatioa . Operatioa betueen the times of local sunrise and local sunset. I.14 Nighttime operation Operation between the times of local sunset and local sunrise. 1.15
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/agree/files/mex-bc/fmbc.pdf
  • 112 03 53 .09 112 03 44 2.80 112 03 53 100.00 112 03 42 100.00 112 03 39 100.00 112 03 36 100.00 112 03 48 100.00 112 03 40 100.00 112 03 46 100.00 112 03 53 100.00 109 56 26 100.00 112 07 02 55.00 112 28 45 6.00 112 07 01 45.00 112 18 56 50.00 1.12 32 00 3.70 114 13 59 3.00 109 45 30 100.00 110 44 25 6.00 112 03 47 100.00 110 01 49 25.00 109 56 26 100.00 110 16 29 3.00 110 13 57 3.00 109 16 10 1.10 109 35 06 100.00 112 17 31 2.50 112 03 53 100.00 109 19 23 50.00 111 05 52 3.00 110
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files/ITRND01.pdf
  • 0.32 0.25 -68.8 Mexico 1.00 0.93 0.85 0.74 0.67 0.60 0.50 0.52 0.29 0.27 0.12 -79.6 Morocco 1.33 1.23 1.35 1.19 1.27 0.84 0.73 0.62 0.43 0.24 0.28 -66.3 Netherlands 1.02 0.86 0.78 0.57 0.50 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.38 0.21 0.22 -43.4 Nigeria 1.17 1.09 1.08 0.86 0.79 0.68 0.67 0.42 0.41 0.31 0.27 -60.7 Pakistan 1.70 1.56 1.53 1.24 1.12 0.99 0.74 0.67 0.46 0.29 0.20 -79.4 Peru 1.07 1.03 1.03 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.67 0.49 0.31 0.20 0.12 -84.9 Philippines 1.41 1.29 1.29 1.08 0.96 0.76 0.62 0.47 0.31 0.26 0.16 -78.4 Poland 1.06 0.90 0.85 0.73 0.76 0.57 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.26 0.13 -77.6 Russia 1.94 1.82 1.57 1.28 1.17 0.69 0.62 0.43 0.27 0.24 0.24 -65.4 Saudi
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/peer_review/prrespstudy4.pdf
  • not ideal, and adds some noise to the regressions, because it is based on the nationwide average of the percentage of households watching television, for which data was available, and not the specific number of people watching each station (i.e., the station's rating) or watching TV in each market, for each particular time period. The results are provided in Table 1.12R. They are quite similar to the results in Tables 1.6R and 1.8R, in sign and statistical significance of coefficients, with individual regressors having smaller coefficients because the minutes have been multiplied by a number less than one. The only major differences for the news are that parent size is not statistically significant for the weighted data. Meanwhile, for public affairs
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) 9 Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ccd.pdf
  • or partial SSN Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 9 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-core-financial.pdf
  • or partial SSN Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 9 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-criminal-investigative-files.pdf
  • or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 10 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: This
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-crisis.pdf
  • Business/corporate purpose(s) Job description Professional affiliations Partial SSN Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) 9 Race/Ethnicity Gender Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-dqc.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ecfs.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-email.pdf
  • or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 10 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-experimental-radio.pdf
  • or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 10 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-faca.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Website navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-financial.pdf
  • Business/corporate purpose(s) Job description Professional affiliations Partial SSN Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Race/Ethnicity Gender Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations 8 Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-foia.pdf
  • Business/corporate purpose(s) Job description Professional affiliations Partial SSN Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Race/Ethnicity Gender Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 9 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-general-investigative-files.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: This
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-ils.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-investigations-hearings.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-labor-employee-relations.pdf
  • or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) 9 Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-lmts.pdf
  • or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits 9 Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that are being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pams.pdf
  • or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) 9 Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-pay-leave-garnish.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 10
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-personal-security-files.pdf
  • or partial SSN Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 10 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that are being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: The
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-physical-access.pdf
  • Gender Full/Partial SSN Business/corporate purpose(s) 9 Other business/employment/job descriptions Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that are being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-reasonable-accommodation-requests.pdf
  • or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations 9 Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-remedy.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 9
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-rmis.pdf
  • or partial SSN Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 9 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-small-business-contacts.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-telephone-call-details.pdf
  • or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits 10 Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: When
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-transit.pdf
  • representative Business/corporate purpose(s) Job description Professional affiliations Partial SSN Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Race/Ethnicity Gender Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-uls.pdf
  • collocate antennas on an existing communications tower or non-tower structure, must include the resume or curriculum vitae of principal investigators or other researchers who contributed to the filing. An applicant who is a non-US citizen and/or who represents a foreign government or business must acknowledge such status. An applicant must also acknowledge any prior FCC license revocation or felony convictions. 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: Information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pia-violators.pdf
  • SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: FCC license callsign. 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: The
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pshsb-coop-plan.pdf
  • Full or partial SSN: Business/corporate purpose(s) Other business/employment/job description(s) Professional affiliations Intra-business office address (office or workstation) Business telephone number(s) Business cell phone number(s) Business fax number(s) Business e-mail address(es) Bill payee name Bank routing number(s) Income/Assets Web navigation habits Commercially obtained credit history data Commercially obtained buying habits Personal clubs and affiliations Credit card number(s) Bank account(s) Other information: 1.12 Will this information system derive new information, records, or data, or create previously unavailable information, records, or data, through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected via this link to the other system, including information, records, or data, that is being shared or transferred from the other information system(s)? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-broadband-dead-zone-report.pdf
  • The "Broadband Dead Zone Report and Consumer Broadband Test" information system is a "stand alone" information system with no electronic links to other FCC or non-FCC information systems. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.12. 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks, etc. Birth date/Age
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-ccd.pdf
  • information system(s) that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: 10 Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.12 Will the information system derive new information or create previously unavailable information through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected, including information that is being shared or transferred from another information system? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system; (b) in a linked information system;
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-clarity.pdf
  • the FCC application "Documentum" as a data storage capability. The information is stored at the aggregate level, e.g., no individual PII is being identified in the measurement analysis. If this information system is a "stand alone" information system, e.g., it does not use information from another system, and/or it is not linked to another information system, please skip to Question 1.12. 7 1.10 If the system uses information, including information about individuals (PII), from other information systems, what information will be used? Information system name(s): Not applicable Individual's name Other names, i.e., maiden name, etc. SSN: Race/Ethnicity Gender U.S. Citizenship Non-U.S. Citizenship Biometric data Finger prints Voice prints Retina scan/prints Photographs Other physical information, i.e., hair color, eye color, identifying marks,
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-core-financial.pdf
  • information system(s) that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 10 1.12 Will the information system derive new information or create previously unavailable information through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected, including information that is being shared or transferred from another information system? Yes No Please explain your response: At this time the FSOG staff in OMD-FO believes that the CFSR will not derive new information, create
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-lmts.pdf
  • other information system(s) that you are collecting: Personal information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.12 Will the information system derive new information or create previously unavailable information through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected, including information that is being shared or transferred from another information system? Yes No Please explain your response: 11 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system; (b) in a linked information
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-pams.pdf
  • information from FCC employees: Personal information from FCC contractors: Personal information from non-FCC individuals and/or households: Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Frequency approval is received from NTIA. Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Universities Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: FAA Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: Other sources: 1.12 Will the information system derive new information or create previously unavailable information through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected, including information that is being shared or transferred from another information system? Yes No Please explain your response: 1.13 Can the information, whether it is: (a) in the information system; (b) in a linked information system;
• http://www.fcc.gov/omd/privacyact/System_of_records/pta-rmis.pdf
  • regulatory fees and/or to conduct other financial transactions, apply or or renew licenses, etc., with the FCC. Non-personal information from businesses and other for-profit entities: Non-personal information from institutions and other non-profit entities: Non-personal information from farms: Non-personal information from Federal Government agencies: Treasury Department and Justice Department, etc. Non-personal information from state, local, or tribal governments: 10 Other sources: 1.12 Will the information system derive new information or create previously unavailable information through aggregation or consolidation from the information that will now be collected, including information that is being shared or transferred from another information system? Yes No Please explain your response: The RMIS's personally identifiable information (PII), which is covered by the new system of records notice, FCC/OMD-25, "Revenue
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-c.pdf
  • stations in the market, first without, then with additional controls. Controls include group population and its square, as well as the total 21 number of stations and the total number of formats. Using either the 1993 or 1997 cross section, the coefficients on the number of minority-owned stations tend to be quite large (between 0.69 and 1.31 for blacks, between 1.12 and 2.56 for Hispanics). These results imply that each additional minority-owned station begets roughly one additional net source of minority-targeted programming, suggesting that minority-owned stations do not simply replace white-owned, minority targeted stations. Results are virtually identical when we use inside stations as the dependent variable and treat outside stations as an additional explanatory variable. TABLE 9 ABOUT HERE While
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/disaster/disaster_manual.pdf
  • User Manual Version 2 March 9, 2009 ii Table of Contents 1 Using the System...............................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................1 1.2 Accessing the Disaster Information Reporting System......................................1 1.3 Security Banner..................................................................................................1 1.4 DIRS Login........................................................................................................2 1.5 Screen for New Users.........................................................................................3 1.6 Screen for Forgotten Password Request.............................................................5 1.7 User Main Menu Screen.....................................................................................5 1.8 Display/Update Reports.....................................................................................7 1.9 Modify Password................................................................................................8 1.10 Modify User Profile............................................................................................9 1.11 Modify Company ID..........................................................................................9 1.12 Manage User.....................................................................................................10 1.13 Upload Tab Delimited File...............................................................................11 1.14 Download Excel File........................................................................................11 2 Wireline Switch...............................................................................................12 3 Wireline Digital Loop Carrier (DLC)..........................................................16 4 Wireline PSAP................................................................................................19 5 Interoffice Facilities ­ Point to Point............................................................22 6 Interoffice Facilities - Rings...........................................................................24 7 IXC Blocking...................................................................................................26 9 Wireless Cell Site by County.........................................................................31 10 Broadcast.........................................................................................................34 11 CATV...............................................................................................................37 1 Using the System 1.1 Introduction The Disaster Information Reporting System (DIRS)
• http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/docs/clearinghouse/plans/University_of_Washington_Emergency_Response_Management_Plan_4-2009.pdf
  • other University Groups 1.2 Laws and Authorities 1.3 Disaster Coordination with Local, County and State Agencies (Figure 1) 1.4 Planning Assumptions (Situation) 1.5 Concept of Operations 1.5 Plan Objectives 1.6 Levels of Emergency and Activation 1.8 Emergency Authority 1.9 (President's) Emergency Policy Council 1.9 UW Campus Emergency Operations Center 1.10 UW Campus EOC Activation Process (Figure 2) 1.11 Plan Usage 1.12 Plan Content and Format 1.12 Tabs and Pages (Figure 3) 1.14 Table 1 - Crosscheck Matrix 1.15 E EM ME ER RG GE EN NC CY Y R REESSPPO ON NS SE E M MAANNAAG GE EM ME EN NTT P PLLAANN Table of Contents April 2009 Page Section 2 UW Campus EOC Organization, Position Responsibilities and Assignments 2.1 Emergency
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/jtconsumer_reply060502.pdf
  • .76% .76% 33% .81 .80 .79 .78 .77 50% .86 .84 .83 .81 .79 100% .99 .95 .93 .89 .88 10 PERCENT PRICE INCREASE MSO PROGRAM SERVICE CABLE OWNERSHIP OF MVPD SUBSCRIBERS OWNERSHIP PERCENTAGE 30% 35% 40% 50% 60% 25% .83% .81% .80% .77% .76% 33% .88 .85 .83 .80 .78 50% .98 .94 .91 .86 .83 100% 1.26 1.18 1.12 1.04 .98 Besen, Stanley M. 2002. "Declaration" attached to "Application and Public Interest Statement," In the Matter of Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses Comcast Corporation and AT&T Corp., Transferors, To AT&T Comcast Corporation, Transferee, February 28. p. 19. 64 EXHIBIT V-3: % OF A NETWORK'S AUDIENCE THAT MUST DROP CABLE TO MAKE A 10 PERCENT
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/comsat-telenor/fcc01-369.pdf
  • in 18 U.S.C. § 3121 et seq. and 50 U.S.C. § 1841 et seq.; (iv) acquisition of location-related information concerning a service subscriber; (v) preservation of any of the above information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f); and (vi) access to, or acquisition or interception of, communications or information as described in (i) through (v) above and comparable State laws. 1.12 "Foreign" where used in this Agreement, whether capitalized or lower case, means non- U.S. 1.13 "Governmental Authority" or "Governmental Authorities" mean any government, any governmental, administrative, or regulatory entity, authority, commission, board, agency, instrumentality, bureau or political subdivision and any court, tribunal, judicial or arbitral body. 1.14 "Intercept" or "Intercepted" has the meaning defined in 18 U.S.C. §2510(4). 1.15 "Lawful
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/ltrfromaoltw062600.doc http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/ltrfromaoltw062600.pdf
  • and manufacture by third parties of advanced set-top boxes in connection with its AOL TV project. Time Warner anticipates that, once the merger is completed and AOL and TWC are able to combine their resources, particularly their cumulative expertise with respect to set-top box design and functionality, the pace of deployment of digital cable service by TWC will be accelerated. 1.12 Please provide all documents relating to the digital cable rollout plans discussed in your response to request 1.11. As noted above, the parties are providing documents in response to this request under separate cover letter. 1.13 According to commenters, AOL originally pledged to work with the instant messaging (``IM'') industry to create an interoperability standard, but has since ceased participation
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/archives/whatsnewarchive06.html
  • | [38]Acrobat McDowell Statement: [39]Word | [40]Acrobat 12/29/2006 Federal-State Joint Board Staff Releases Monitoring Report. Commission staff releases its most recent Monitoring Report. This report reflects information on the telephone industry filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) through May 2006. Docket No. CC 98-202. News Release: [41]Word | [42]Acrobat Full Report: Available on the [43]Monitoring Reports Page. Revised Table 1.12: [44]Word | [45]Acrobat 12/28/2006 FCC GRANTS ACS OF ANCHORAGE, INC. FORBEARANCE RELIEF IN THE ANCHORAGE, ALASKA STUDY AREA. WC Docket No. 05-281. News Release: [46]Word | [47]Acrobat 12/27/2006 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF DOMESTIC SECTION 214 APPLICATION FROM STREAMLINED TREATMENT. WC Docket No. 06-215. Public Notice: [48]Word | [49]Acrobat 12/26/2006 NOTICE OF DOMESTIC SECTION 214 AUTHORIZATIONS GRANTED. WC Docket Nos. 06-202,
• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/archives/whatsnewarchive07.html
  • ON THE KENTUCKY PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION'S PETITION FOR ADDITIONAL DELEGATED AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT NUMBER CONSERVATION MEASURES. CC Docket Nos. 96-98, 99-200. Public Notice: [805]Word | [806]Acrobat 01/25/2007 Domestic Section 214 Application filed for the transfer of control of OPEX Communications, Inc. to Total Call International, Inc. WC Docket No. 07-7. Public Notice: [807]Word | [808]Acrobat 01/25/2007 Wireline Competition Bureaurevises Table 1.12 for Universal Service Monitoring Report. CC Docket No. 98-202. Public Notice: [809]Word | [810]Acrobat Revised Table 1.12: [811]Word | [812]Acrobat 01/25/2007 Petitions of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 160(c) in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Wireline Competition Bureau adopts a further Protective Order (Second Protective Order) to