FCC Web Documents citing 1.1204

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2502A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2502A1.pdf
  • announcing that, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), presentations to the Advisory Committee will be treated as exempt presentations for ex parte purposes. This treatment is appropriate since presentations to the Advisory Committee, like comments on a Notice of Inquiry, will not directly result in the promulgation of new rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (exempt treatment of Notices of Inquiry). We recognize, however, that there is presently pending a docket entitled In the Matter of the Review of the Emergency Alert System, EB Docket 04-296 (``EAS Rulemaking Proceeding''), which is considering several issues to be addressed by the Advisory Committee. The Commission will not rely in EB Docket 04-296 on any information submitted to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2534A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2534A1.pdf
  • we are announcing that, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), presentations to the CSRIC will be treated as exempt presentations for ex parte purposes. This treatment is appropriate since presentations to the Council, like comments on a Notice of Inquiry, will not directly result in the promulgation of new rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (exempt treatment of Notices of Inquiry). We recognize, however, that there are a number of presently pending dockets which are considering several issues that may be addressed by the Council. The Commission will not rely in these dockets on any information submitted to the Council, or to any of its subcommittees or working groups, unless that information is first placed
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1104A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1104A1.pdf
  • section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), presentations to and from members of the Committee will be treated as exempt presentations for ex parte purposes. This treatment is appropriate since presentations to and from the Committee, like comments on a Notice of Inquiry, will not directly result in the promulgation of new rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (exempt treatment of Notices of Inquiry). We recognize, however, that there are pending dockets that are considering several issues that may be addressed by the Committee. The Commission will not rely in these dockets on any information submitted to or obtained from the Committee unless that information is first placed in the record of the relevant rulemaking proceeding. For further
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.pdf
  • through the IBFS as soon as possible. In this filing, operators should note in the first description field on the electronic STA form that this is a ``Hurricane Irene related STA request'' and the date the initial request was granted. Ex Parte Rules. The International Bureau views presentations relating to pending Hurricane Irene related STAs as falling under the Section 1.1204(a)(3) exemption from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(3) and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, Hurricane Irene related STAs will be subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' procedures once a third party makes a presentation on a Hurricane Irene related STA. . The Bureau will handle all STA requests as expeditiously as possible. To
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.txt
  • authorized services. These devices must also accept interference received from authorized services. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.5. But see, the ``NTCA 2002 Wireless Survey Report'' at 8, in which survey respondents cite interference/congestion as a problem with using unlicensed spectrum. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 02-307 (rel. Nov. 8, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.459. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-325 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-325 v w � � x - � � X � � F ; � ' � � �� �� Z K M
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-327A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-327A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-327A1.txt
  • Id., at 13062. Id., at 13062-63. Id. See Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps To Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Third Report, 17 FCC Rcd 2844 (2002). See Seventh Report, at 13070-73, for a discussion. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). (...continued from previous page) (Continue....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-327 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-327 j k � j k � j� jt j ( ) =) * + - . H I J c d e g h i j k l m � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-327A2.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-327A2.txt
  • submit, as part of 111 See Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps To Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Third Report, 17 FCC Rcd 2844 (2002). 112 See Seventh Report, at 13070-73, for a discussion. 113 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-327 28 their comments, map files in response to requests in �� 11-14, � 56, or � 86, supra, should submit a CD (compact disc) containing one copy of the maps of their service areas, with the various distinctions described above, in a format, either MapInfo table (.tab) or Tagged Image Format (.TIF), that will allow
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1308, 1.1311. Id.. �� 1.1200-1.1216. See Id. � 1.1206(b)(2). See Id. � 1.1206(b). Under the Council's rules, the Council and Conference must be parties to the Nationwide Agreement. Therefore, for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, in this proceeding we shall treat presentations from these entities and their staffs as exempt presentations under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(5). See Id. � 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.48. See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). See Pub. L. No. 104-13. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-125 Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-125 h� h� gd� h� h� h� h� h� % 4 F G H
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-205A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-205A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-205A1.txt
  • guidelines. Therefore, all parties with a potential interest may not have had the opportunity to participate in the development of the guidelines and present their own relevant scientific data. As noted above, the Commission is not required to enter into an MOU with FWS under Executive Order 13,186 with respect to migratory birds. See supra note 30. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (May 1,1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-205 � j� � " � 0 0 � � �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.txt
  • Rcd at 14831, � 102. See Eighth Report, 18 FCC Rcd at 14831, � 102. See Eighth Report, 18 FCC Rcd at 14832, � 103. Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd. 23,697 (2003). See Eighth Report, 18 FCC Rcd at 14867-75, �� 192-215. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Implementation of Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 19993, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions with Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, Eighth Report, 18 FCC Rcd 14783, para. 5 (2003). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-38 Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-38 hx) L � * + , E F G I
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-31A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-31A1.pdf
  • Order, Attach. (Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Michael J. Copps). The Policy Statement did not contain rules. See Policy Statement, 20 FCC Rcd at 14988, para. 5 n.15. The principles announced in the Commission's Policy Statement were ``subject to reasonable network management.'' Policy Statement, 20 FCC Rcd at 14988, para. 5 n.15. 47 U.S.C. � 157 nt. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Tim Berners-Lee ``Neutrality of the Net'', Decentralized Information Group (May 2, 2006). See Broadband Reality Check II, Free Press, Consumers Union, Consumer Federation of America (rel. Aug. 2006). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-31 Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-31  � � � h�{ � � � � � � F � '0 '0 '0 �{
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-95A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-95A1.pdf
  • the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International, Inc. Request for Declaratory Ruling, 911 Requirements for IP-Enabled Service Providers, PS Docket No. 07-114, CC Docket No. 94-102, WC Docket No. 05-196, Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 20105 (2007) (Location Accuracy Order). Id. at 20105 � 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-95 Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-95 x � � x � � �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.pdf
  • to "sniff and steal" a MAC address already programmed into the router, for Internet access. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 & 1.1206. Although a Notice of Inquiry proceeding is generally exempt from the ex parte rules, we find that the public interest is best served by treating this critical cyber security matter as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. ��1.1200(a), 1.1204(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-63 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-63 8 N O P ] - ! " , 7 8 : ; J M N P � � � � � � ~ ~  � ? � �  � � 0 � 0 ~ = { � �
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.pdf
  • FCC 11-16, __ FCC Rcd ____ (2011). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 & 1.1206. Although a Notice of Inquiry proceeding is generally exempt from the ex parte rules, we find that the public interest is best served by treating this matter of critical importance to the reliability of our Nation's communications networks as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. ��1.1200(a), 1.1204(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 47 CFR �� 1.415, 1.419, 1.430. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-55 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-55 � � � � � � � � � J � x y 0 x y 0 �c ^�c
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-452A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-452A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-452A1.txt
  • other parties an opportunity to review these facts, and then assess Motorola's request in light of the facts and relevant law. DISCUSSION We disagree with Petitioners' claim that Bureau staff violated the agency's ex parte rules. Section 1.1208 of our rules prohibits ex parte presentations, to or from Commission staff, in restricted proceedings, unless the presentation is exempt under Section 1.1204(b). Pursuant to Section 1.1204(b)(7), in force at the time the application was filed, ex parte communications by the Commission or staff requesting information to clarify or adduce evidence or to resolve issues were exempt from the ex parte prohibition. The party responding to the request needed only file any oral or written response on the other parties to the proceeding.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-113A1.txt
  • conceal AAA's comments from MRA. In addition, MRA argues that NSTN's application was defective because AAA was prohibited from coordinating it until after the license for Station KXK710 was deleted from the licensing data base. III. Discussion 8. Alleged ex parte rules violation. The March 9, 1998, AAA letter to the Division concerned the coordination of frequency assignments. Under Section 1.1204(a)(7) of the Commission's Rules, presentations between Commission staff and an advisory coordinating committee member with respect to the coordination of frequency assignments to stations in the private land mobile services or fixed services are exempt from the prohibitions against ex parte contacts. The AAA is a FCC-certified advisory coordinating committee for private land mobile radio stations. Further, the March 9,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D �� C D �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D �� C D �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D C D �� �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D C D �� �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D C D �� �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D C D �� �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D C D �� �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-523A1.txt
  • elements. The focus of the inquiry will be on the future of wireless E911 deployment, including any obstacles to deployment and steps that might be taken to overcome or minimize them. At the conclusion of his investigation, Mr. Hatfield will prepare a report of his findings that the Commission expects will be released for public comment. Procedures Pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(10) of the Commission's Rules, this inquiry is designated as exempt from the Commission's ex parte rules. The Commission has opened a separate docket for this inquiry, however, and parties may file relevant information to assist Mr. Hatfield in this inquiry. Comments and information submitted in the proceeding will be available to the public unless confidential treatment is sought and granted,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission DA 02-685 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov U V �' +D`� +D�� < W X < W X X � D U �p� �p� �p� �p� �p� �p� �� �� �� � � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D �� C D �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D �� C D �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1532A1.txt
  • in conformance with the Commission's rules and policies. Final action will not be taken on the applications earlier than 31 days following the date of this Public Notice. Pursuant to section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, the ex parte status of this proceeding is designated as "restricted" because the Commission has determined that the proceeding is neither "exempt" under section 1.1204(b) nor "permit-but-disclose" under section 1.1206(a) of the Commission's rules. All filings concerning any or all matters in this Public Notice should refer to IB Docket No. 03-115. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments or petitions to deny on or before June 9, 2003 and oppositions and/or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D �� C D �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov $ �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-384A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DA 03-384 Released: February 7, 2003 EX PARTE STATUS OF SPECTRUM POLICY TASK FORCE REPORT ET Docket No. 02-135 On November 15, 2002, the Commission issued a Public Notice, seeking comment on the Spectrum Policy Task Force Report. Pursuant to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a) and 1.1204(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, this proceeding is deemed an exempt proceeding, comparable to a notice of inquiry proceeding. Ex parte presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed. For further information, contact Fred Thomas, at 202-418-7783 (SPTF) or SPTFINFO@FCC.GOV. Action by the Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology, February 7, 2003. Public Notice, ET
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-636A1.txt
  • 16 FCC Rcd. at 18876-77, �� 7-9. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.2105(a)(2), 1.2112. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1205(c)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1205(b)(2). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2107(c). See also 47 C.F.R. � 22.213 (filing of long-form application following an auction for paging geographic area authorizations). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1207(b). See also 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(g) (procedures for calculating default penalties). 9 47 C.F.R. � 22.213. Section 22.213 also provides that ``parties seeking partitioned authorizations pursuant to agreements with auction winners under � 22.221 of [Part 22]'' may file applications. Id. Section 22.221 sets forth the procedures for seeking a license partitioned from a paging authorization won at auction. 47 C.F.R. � 22.221. As discussed infra
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D �� C D �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-149A1.txt
  • later than March 26XX, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS We find that it would be in the public interest to treat this proceeding as an exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte communications to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed, in accordance with section 1.1204(b) of the Commission's Rules. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1933A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1933A1.txt
  • later than August 30, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS We find that it would be in the public interest to treat this proceeding as an exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte communications to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed, in accordance with section 1.1204(b) of the Commission's rules. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS'') or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2019A1.txt
  • the supplemental petition until April 8, 2004. Supplement to Environmental Assessment (EA Supplement), dated April 8, 2004. HFC Reply to Opposition, dated April 27, 2004. Lamb's Knoll Compliance Report, Addendum, EHT Traceries, March 2004, EA Supplement, Attachment 19. Letter from Rodney Little, MDSHPO, to Ellis Kitchen, dated April 8, 2004 (April 8 Letter), EA Supplement, Attachment 24. Id. 47 C.F.R. �1.1204(a)(3) (exempting from the Commission's ex parte rules a presentation when the presentation relates to an emergency, provided a summary of the presentation is promptly placed in the record and disclosed to other parties). See Letter from Ed Ryan, Maryland DBM, to Jeffrey Steinberg, Deputy Chief, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, dated May 18, 2004. Letter from Pamela Underhill, NPS Park
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2990A1.txt
  • 1.1307(a)(4). 8 36 C.F.R. Part 800. 9 Public Notice, Application for Antenna Structure Registration Accepted for Filing, dated January 13, 2004. 10 Opposition to Petition to Deny, filed by the State, dated March 5, 2004. The State and Forest/ABC had previously agreed to an extension of time. 11 Forest/ABC Reply to Opposition, dated March 18, 2004. 12 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204. 13 See Memorandum from David Northrup, Esq. to Don Johnson, Esq., staff attorney, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, dated August 10, 2004; see also Letter from Aaron Goldschmidt, Assistant Chief, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, to John Talberth, Esq., dated September 7, 2004. 14 16 U.S.C. � 1538 et seq. 15 See Petition at 2-4. 16 See 47 C.F.R. ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1524A1.txt
  • exempt ex parte presentations and proceedings as they relate to new factual information that becomes available in presentations made to the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission involving telecommunications competition matters. Need: These rules provide guidance on what types of ex parte presentations are exempt. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C 154(i), 154(i)(j), and 303(r). Section Number and Title: 1.1204 Exempt ex parte presentations and proceedings. SUBPART Q -- COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEEDINGS Brief Description: These rules provide competitive bidding procedures to choose from among two or more mutually exclusive applications for an initial license. Need: The subpart Q rules establish a uniform set of competitive bidding rules and procedures for use in licensing of all services that are subject to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1613A1.txt
  • schedule and resolve any schedule delays and coordinate with adjoining regions to ensure that interference is not being caused. In addition, the TA will facilitate, by proposed decision, mediation, or other means, the resolution of disputes over such matters as the accuracy of cost estimates for reconfiguring systems. See 19 FCC Rcd at 15070-73 �� 190-96. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(12) (granting exemptions to the administrator of the interstate telecommunications relay services fund, the North American Numbering Plan Administrator, the Universal Service Administrative Company, and the Number Portability Administrator). Additionally, presentations by advisory coordinating committee members with respect to the coordination of frequency assignments are exempt. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(7). � � � � � h h . " '
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-169A1.txt
  • on the ability of rural cable operators to compete with DBS in the provision of digital broadcast television signals to consumers. In addition, the Bureau requests recommendations for statutory changes regarding these four rules affecting competition in the MVPD market. Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Comments Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties must file comments on or before March 1, 2005 and reply comments on or before March 16, 2005. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2515A1.txt
  • to contact the International Bureau as soon as possible to initiate such a request for additional authority. As with the initial STA request, an extension may also be submitted through the IBFS system, by letter, e-mail, or, if necessary, by telephone. Ex Parte Rules. The International Bureau views presentations relating to pending Hurricane related STAs as falling under the Section 1.1204(a)(3) exemption from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(3) and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, Hurricane related STAs will be subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' procedures once a third party makes a presentation on a Hurricane related STA. >. The Bureau will handle all STA requests as expeditiously as possible. To ensure that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2763A1.txt
  • to contact the International Bureau as soon as possible to initiate such a request for additional authority. As with the initial STA request, an extension may also be submitted through the IBFS system, by letter, e-mail, or, if necessary, by telephone. Ex Parte Rules. The International Bureau views presentations relating to pending Hurricane related STAs as falling under the Section 1.1204(a)(3) exemption from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(3) and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, Hurricane related STAs will be subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' procedures once a third party makes a presentation on a Hurricane related STA. >. The Bureau will handle all STA requests as expeditiously as possible. To ensure that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1333A1.txt
  • of the ex parte allegations in this NAL with the Commission's Office of the General Counsel. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. Amendments filed October 19, 2004 and November 9, 2004. These amendments were filed electronically and were available for viewing through the Commission's CDBS Public Access system. See Note 16, supra. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(1). See Association for Community Education, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 12682 (2004). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(d) (definition of a ``presentation''). 47 U.S.C. � 309(k)(1). The renewal standard was amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation of Sections 204(a) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1549A1.txt
  • an opposition on January 26, 2006, and an Erratum to the opposition on February 23, 2006. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). Id.; 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Alex's failure to serve a copy of the pleading did not violate the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq., because Alex is exempt as a listener pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). The opposition states that the applicant obtained a copy of the pleading after learning about the pleading in a public notice. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. 47 U.S.C. �309(k)(1). The renewal standard was amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation of Sections 204(a) and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2087A1.txt
  • Media Bureau cc: Alabama A & M University WJAB(FM) filed an opposition on November 11, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). Id.; 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Williams' failure to serve a copy of the pleading did not violate the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq., because Williams is exempt as a listener pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). The opposition states that the applicant received a copy of the pleading from Commission staff after inquiring about the status of its renewal application. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. 47 U.S.C. � 309(k)(1). The renewal standard was amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Order,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2255A1.txt
  • WC Docket No. 06-74, which was included in the Commission's Sunshine Agenda by Public Notice released October 5, 2006 and removed from the Sunshine Agenda by Public Notice released October 13, 2006. Accordingly, under Section 1.1212 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212, presentations received during the Sunshine Period and not within an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a), shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in WC Docket No. 06-74. ). Action by Office of General Counsel, Administrative Law Division PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 ; < & ( 5 9 : I J P f
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2502A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2502A1.txt
  • announcing that, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), presentations to the Advisory Committee will be treated as exempt presentations for ex parte purposes. This treatment is appropriate since presentations to the Advisory Committee, like comments on a Notice of Inquiry, will not directly result in the promulgation of new rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (exempt treatment of Notices of Inquiry). We recognize, however, that there is presently pending a docket entitled In the Matter of the Review of the Emergency Alert System, EB Docket 04-296 (``EAS Rulemaking Proceeding''), which is considering several issues to be addressed by the Advisory Committee. The Commission will not rely in EB Docket 04-296 on any information submitted to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.txt
  • 03/31/07 3060-0943 Sec. 54.809 12/31/06 3060-0944 Review of Commission Consideration of Applications Under the Cable Landing License Act Pending OMB Approval 3060-0945 Sec. 79.2 01/31/07 3060-0947 Sec. 101.1327 02/28/07 3060-0948 Noncommercial Educational Applicants 06/30/07 3060-0949 FCC 159-W 10/31/06 3060-0950 Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266 06/30/07 3060-0951 Service of Petitions for Preemption, 47 CFR Sec. 1.1204(b) Note, and Sec. 1.1206(a) Note 1 01/31/07 3060-0952 Proposed Demographic Information and Notifications, CC Docket Nos. 98-147 and 96-98 01/31/07 3060-0953 Wireless Medical Telemetry Service, ET Docket No. 99-255 04/30/07 3060-0955 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service Reports 02/28/07 3060-0957 Wireless Enhanced 911 Service 11/30/07 3060-0960 Secs. 76.122, 76.123, 76.124 and 76.127 05/31/08 3060-0962 Redesignation of the 18 GHz Frequency Band,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-608A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-608A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-608A1.txt
  • forfeiture against Saga. Northeast asserts that Saga's violation is especially egregious since Saga previously accused Northeast of a ex parte violation and was therefore well aware of the ex parte rules. 4. Saga responds that Northeast's complaint is without basis. Saga maintains that the ex parte rules do not require it to serve applications on Northeast because 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(1) exempts from the restrictions of the ex parte rules the filing of ``required forms.'' Saga asserts that an application for modification is a ``required form.'' In addition, Saga observes that Northeast provides no specific basis for alleging that Saga lobbied the Commission. Saga thus urges that Northeast's complaint should be stricken as false and a sham and that Northeast should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-92A1.txt
  • parte contact. Under these circumstances, we are justified in drawing an inference adverse to Stu-Comm. 11. We also find that Stu-Comm violated section 1.1210 with respect to its solicitation of public comment with respect to CUCB's application. In this regard, we find that the public comment solicited by Stu-Comm did not fall within the viewer/listener exemption set forth in section 1.1204(a)(8) of the Commission's rules. Section 1.1204(a)(8) classifies as exempt a presentation that: is a written presentation made by a listener or viewer of a broadcast station who is not a party . . . and the presentation relates to a pending application that has not been designated for hearing for a new or modified broadcast station or license, for renewal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1240A1.txt
  • the Commission's staff relative to the broadcast of indecent material. It states that, ``once it [WJZD] raised these matters before the Commission, Capstar/Clear Channel could not speak to any members of the Commission's decision making authorities on the merits without WJZD or its counsel present.'' Accordingly, it asserts that a hearing is required. WJZD's arguments are without legal merit. Section 1.1204(a)(10) of the Commission's Rules specifically exempts from the ex parte prohibitions those presentations ``requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction of evidence, or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement, subject to'' certain limitations not present here. Any discussions that led to the consent decree with Clear Channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-129A1.txt
  • WGFT(AM), Campbell, Ohio (File No. BR-20040601ASV) ARE GRANTED. Sincerely, Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau The Commission also received objections to the above-captioned assignment applications from 577 listeners, who did not serve their objections on the applicants. Their submissions are exempt under the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq., pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). Their informal comments are addressed herein. Stop Riverbend Licenses, LLC filed a Motion for Extension of Time on September 23, 2004, and an Opposition on November 2, 2004. Litton filed a Reply on December 6, 2004. SRL DIP filed an Opposition to and/or Motion to Dismiss Petition to Deny on April 20, 2006, and Bernard filed an Opposition on April
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-146A1.txt
  • WC Docket No. 06-74, which was included in the Commission's Sunshine Agenda by Public Notice released October 27, 2006 and removed from the Sunshine Agenda by Public Notice released November 2, 2006. Accordingly, under Section 1.1212 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212, presentations received during the Sunshine Period and not within an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a), shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in WC Docket No. 06-74. ). Action by Office of General Counsel, Administrative Law Division. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 = > ( * 7 ; < K L R h
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1650A1.txt
  • Ohio IS GRANTED. Sincerely, Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau cc: Kenneth C. Howard, Jr., Esq. The Commission received objections to the above-captioned assignment application from 24 listeners, who did not serve their objections on the applicants. Their submissions are exempt under the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq., pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). Their informal comments are addressed herein. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. . Note that Section 326 of the Act expressly prohibits the Commission from interfering with the right of free speech of broadcasters. 47 U.S.C. � 326. FCC v. WNCN Listener's Guild, 450 U.S. 582, 585 (1981). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3580. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 April 6, 2007
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2382A1.txt
  • Mr. Crawley but that the copy that it served on Mr. Hensley inadvertently was unsigned, but was identical to what it filed with the Commission, but for the inclusion of the signature. Licensee Response at 4. Because the EEO LOI did not direct the Licensee to so serve Hoosier, it had no obligation to do so. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10) (responses to Commission inquiries in non-hearing proceedings are generally exempt from the ex parte rules. Even assuming arguendo that the Licensee was required to serve Hensley with its Response, he was not prejudiced by the Licensee's delay in doing so. Hensley ultimately received a copy of the LOI Response, and his comments on that Response were provided to the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3136A1.txt
  • Regulatory Affairs, Mediacom Communications Corporation, et al (Feb. 23, 2007) (``February 23rd Letter''). See id. at 1. See id. at 2. Letter from Frederick E. Ellrod, III, Miller and Van Eaton, Counsel to the City of Dubuque, Iowa, to Steven Broeckaert at 2 (Apr. 16, 2007) (``City Letter of April 16, 2007''). Id. at 3. Id. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10)(ii). Section 1.1204(a)(10)(ii) of the Commission's rules provides that ``The following types of presentations are exempt from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings . . . The presentation is requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction evidence, or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement, subject to the following limitations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3867A1.txt
  • dockets, which were included in the Commission's Sunshine Agenda by Public Notice released July 24, 2007 and were the subject of a Second Report and Order, released August 10, 2007 (FCC 07-132). Accordingly, under Section 1.1212 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212, presentations received during the Sunshine Period and not within an exceptions provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a), shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings. ). Action by Office of General Counsel, Administrative Law Division. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 K U V ] j k p � � � � h
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
  • Order 11/30/07 3060-0942 Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, Low-Volume Long Distance Users, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service 03/31/10 3060-0943 Sec. 54.809 10/31/09 3060-0944 Review of Commission Consideration of Applications Under the Cable Landing License Act 03/31/09 3060-0949 FCC 159-W 03/31/10 3060-0950 Bidding Credits for Tribal Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266 09/30/10 3060-0951 Sec. 1.1204(b) Note, and Sec. 1.1206(a) Note 1 01/31/10 3060-0952 Proposed Demographic Information and Notifications, CC Docket Nos. 98-147 and 96-98 01/31/10 3060-0953 Wireless Medical Telemetry Service, ET Docket No. 99-255, FCC 00-211 04/30/10 3060-0955 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service Reports 02/28/10 3060-0957 Wireless Enhanced 911 Service 11/30/07 3060-0960 Secs. 76.122, 76.123, 76.124 and 76.127 05/31/08 3060-0962 Redesignation of the 18 GHz
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4367A1.txt
  • $205,500 has already been deducted from the upfront payment it deposited with the Commission to participate in Auction No. 37, it owes no further payment to the Commission. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and 309(j), and Sections 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1), that the Request for Waiver filed by Advance Acquisitions, Inc., on November 20, 2006, IS GRANTED, and the Amended Request for Waiver filed by Advance Acquisitions, Inc., on May 22, 2007, IS GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4926A1.txt
  • 5043, 5052 (1987), aff'd sub nom. Syracuse Peace Council v. FCC, 867 F.2d 654 (D.C. Cir. 1989), cert. denied 493 U.S. 1019 (1990). In re Repeal or Modification of the Personal Attack and Political Editorial Rules, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 20697 (2000). Radio-Television News Directors Association v. FCC, 229 F.3d 269 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 11, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10) (presentations related to settlement are classified as exempt ex parte presentations). 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283. __________________________Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4926 __________________________Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4926 � � } ~  � � � � � # P / � $
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1232A1.txt
  • Mr. Mickey Clayton Mr. Todd G. Crump Rev. James McAdams Also before us are one electronic mail and three letter comments on the proposal from WNOW-FM listeners who wish the station to remain in Gaffney. These comments were not served on GBI or its counsel. We believe it appropriate to treat these as comments of individual listeners pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(8) of the Rules. The authors of these comments do not become parties to this proceeding by virtue of their comments. See Note 4 to Paragraph (d) of Section 1.1202 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202. Clay filed the First Objection on April 17, 2007. After submitting a Motion for Extension of Time to which Clay did not object, GBI
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1272A1.txt
  • 27, 2007). We have also received dozens of electronic mail communications from local residents objecting to the Application. These e-mail comments were addressed directly to a member of the Media Bureau staff and were not served on S-R or its counsel. We believe it appropriate to treat these e-mails as the comments of individual listeners pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). The authors of these e-mails do not become parties to this proceeding by virtue of their comments. See Note 4 to Paragraph (d) of Section 1.1202 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202. These e-mails add nothing substantive to the existing record in this proceeding. Accordingly, they need not and will not be considered. See, e.g., the essentially identical Letter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1372A1.txt
  • 2008, and CVN filed a Reply to Opposition on April 2, 2008. The Coleman Objection does not appear to have been served on the Assignors, and no opposition has been received. Because the Coleman Objection is a written presentation submitted by listeners of the Assigned Stations, it is exempt from the Commission's prohibition against ex parte presentations. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). File No. BNPH-20070423AAS. Coosa Valley News, Inc. and Mr. Howard C. Toole, Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 18600 (MB 2007), petition for recon. pending (``Toole Decision''). Objection at 2. Id. Id. Opposition at 3-4. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15464 (1996) (``Greater Muskegon Broadcasters''). Id. at 15472 (emphasis added). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 309(d); 47 C.F.R. �� 1.17,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1443A1.txt
  • from listeners of KDRT-LP supporting the continued operation of Davis Community and generally objecting to grant of the captioned KMJE(FM) application on the ground that it would force KDRT-LP off the air. These comments were not served on the applicants or their counsel. We believe it appropriate to treat these comments as informal objections of individual listeners pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(8) of the Rules. The authors of these comments do not become parties to this proceeding by virtue of their comments. See Note 4 to Paragraph (d) of Section 1.1202 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202. 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3517, 73.3573(g). See Modification of FM and TV Authorizations to Specify a New Community of License (``Community of License''), Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1581A1.txt
  • date of this Order, transfer the full amount of the outstanding debt to the United States Department of Treasury for debt collection and other administrative or judicial action. Ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and 309(j), and Sections 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1), that the request for reduction of bid withdrawal payments filed on behalf of Barry P. Lunderville, Connoisseur Media, LLC, College Creek Broadcasting, Inc., Cumulus Licensing LLC, and Kemp Communications, Inc., on November 20, 2006, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2050A1.txt
  • Sunshine Agenda by Public Notice released July 25, 2008. The matter was the subject of a Memorandum Opinion and Order (FCC 08-183), which was released on August 20, 2008. Accordingly, under Section 1.1212(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212(d), which provides that presentations received during the Sunshine Period and not within an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a), shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings, the presentations here will be associated with, but not made part of the record in WC Docket No. 07-52. ). Action by Office of General Counsel, Administrative Law Division. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2478A1.txt
  • the merits of WT Docket No. 08-95, which was included in the Commission's Sunshine Agenda by Public Notice released October 28, 2008 to be considered at the agenda meeting of November 4, 2008. Under Section 1.1212(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212(d), presentations received during the Sunshine Period and not within an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a), shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings. In accordance with this rule, the presentations here will be associated with, but not made part of the record in WT Docket No. 08-95. The full texts of these presentations are available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2652A1.txt
  • until October 31, 2008. The matter was the subject of a Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order (FCC 08-260), which was released on November 14, 2008. Accordingly, under Section 1.1212(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212(d), which provides that presentations received during the Sunshine Period and not within an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a), shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings, the presentations here will be associated with, but not made part of the record in ET Docket No. 04-186. The full texts of these presentations are available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2710A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2710A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2710A1.txt
  • et al, which were included in the Commission's Sunshine Agenda by Public Notice released October 28, 2008 and deleted from the Sunshine Agenda by Public Notice dated November 3, 2008. Under Section 1.1212(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212(d), presentations that are received during the Sunshine Period and do not meet an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a) shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings. In accordance with this rule, the presentations here will be associated with, but not made part of the record in WC Docket No. 05-337 et al. The full texts of these presentations are available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-348A1.txt
  • U.S.C. � 309(k)(1). The renewal standard was amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation of Sections 204(a) and 204(c) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Broadcast License Renewal Procedures), Order, 11 FCC Rcd 6363 (1996). 47 U.S.C. �� 309(k)(2), 309(k)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). It is true that, as argued by Infinity, Pennino does not state specifically that he is a listener of the station. However, because his objection clearly is based on his perception of a deficiency in the station's programming, we do not believe his failure to serve Infinity with his objection violates the Commission's ex parte rules. See Letter to Richard
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-971A1.txt
  • the matter is the subject of a Report and Order (FCC 08-99), which was adopted by circulation and released on April 9, 2008, after receipt of the prohibited presentation. Accordingly, under Section 1.1212(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212(d), which provides that presentations received during the Sunshine Period and not within an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a), shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings, the presentation here will be associated with, but not made part of the record in PS Docket No. 07-287. ). Action by Office of General Counsel, Administrative Law Division. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1257A1.txt
  • Petition for Rulemaking to Establish Standards for Determining the Standing of a Party to Petition to Deny a Broadcast Application, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 82 FCC 2d 89 (1980); see also Infinity Broadcasting Corp. of California, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 9504 (1995); Niles Broadcasting Company, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 5959 (1992). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8); see also Henry Goldberg, Esq., Edward Hayes, Jr., Letter, 12 FCC Rcd 15242 (MMB 1997). See Broadcast Applications, Public Notice, Report No. 26874 (rel. Dec. 2, 2008); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.939(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 U.S.C. � 309(e). 47 U.S.C. � 309(a). See, e.g., WWOR-TV, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2402A1.txt
  • 22, 2009 open Commission meeting. This matter was the subject of a notice of proposed rulemaking released October 22, 2009. See Preserving the Open Internet, FCC 09-93 (October 22, 2009). Under Section 1.1212(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212(d), presentations that are received during the Sunshine Period and do not meet an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a) or a Commission waiver shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings. In this regard, the prohibited presentations here were not made through the Open Internet Blog, as to which the Commission waived the ex parte rules in the revised sunshine public notice. In accordance with the rule, the presentations here will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2534A1.txt
  • we are announcing that, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), presentations to the CSRIC will be treated as exempt presentations for ex parte purposes. This treatment is appropriate since presentations to the Council, like comments on a Notice of Inquiry, will not directly result in the promulgation of new rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (exempt treatment of Notices of Inquiry). We recognize, however, that there are a number of presently pending dockets which are considering several issues that may be addressed by the Council. The Commission will not rely in these dockets on any information submitted to the Council, or to any of its subcommittees or working groups, unless that information is first placed
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-893A1.txt
  • (WTB rel. Apr. 6, 2005) (``If the FCC does not receive either a notification of consummation or a request for an extension of time to consummate on or before the consummation deadline, the application will be dismissed and a dismissal letter will be sent to the parties involved with the application.''). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. �� 1.47, 1.106(f)-(h), 1.115(f), 1.939(c), 1.1204(a)(10)(ii). ACL suggests that it filed its notice of consummation before the Division processed the withdrawal request, because ``ACL did not see any grant of the Withdrawal Request when filing the Notice of Consummation on ULS.'' First Petition at 2 n.1; Second Petition at 4 n.5. We note, however, that processing actions taken during the business day generally are not viewable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-893A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Control Applications, Public Notice, DA 05-689 (WTB rel. Apr. 6, 2005) ("If the FCC does not receive either a notificationof consummationor a request for an extension of time to consummate on or before theconsummation deadline, the application will be dismissedand a dismissalletter will be sent to the parties involved with the application."). 19See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. ��1.47, 1.106(f)-(h), 1.115(f), 1.939(c), 1.1204(a)(10)(ii). 20ACL suggests that it filedits notice of consummation before the Division processed the withdrawal request, because "ACL did not see any grant of the Withdrawal Request when filing the Notice of Consummation on ULS." First Petition at 2 n.1; Second Petition at 4 n.5. We note, however, that processing actions taken during the business (continued....) 4851 Federal Communications Commission DA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-100A1.txt
  • Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 18503, 18505 (2002). See 47 U.S.C. �151. See 47 U.S.C. �307(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a) (giving the Commission and its staff discretion to determine the ex parte procedures in a particular proceeding). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). PUBLIC NOTICE News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 � � � � � ���7�W�>=} ���ן~ ����O/���O� ��/�����tm��r �B�v�w�xF� b-����Q7�� 1,m� � �B���\z�``o�- ��w-|GVm�zv�"�v�|�tQ� v��W���W���W��v��M�Z-�9_��| | ��0���A|g4`�\''���a�� (�6%� �c��v� �k}.0�f `�EG'��TF��n�]�(��O''�B-� _�}MG-��@�<]\�}��'�|!-�� ��-� �H"V`` 4����n9k�o0�k��}qM� !`%O6�� B,1c` L� I�c� p-_(� A(�...�S�"'' �� h�Y�,�� ��� �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1104A1.txt
  • section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), presentations to and from members of the Committee will be treated as exempt presentations for ex parte purposes. This treatment is appropriate since presentations to and from the Committee, like comments on a Notice of Inquiry, will not directly result in the promulgation of new rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (exempt treatment of Notices of Inquiry). We recognize, however, that there are pending dockets that are considering several issues that may be addressed by the Committee. The Commission will not rely in these dockets on any information submitted to or obtained from the Committee unless that information is first placed in the record of the relevant rulemaking proceeding. For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2227A1.txt
  • communities within a broadcast television station's local market or exclude communities from a station's local market. We seek comment on whether and how our market modification rules could be used to provide more households with in-state broadcast programming. General Information Ex Parte Information. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Comment Information. Interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-95A1.txt
  • electronic version submitted through the IBFS as soon as possible. In this filing, operators should note in the first description field on the electronic STA form that this is an "earthquake-related STA request" and the date the initial request was granted. Ex Parte Rules. The International Bureau views presentations relating to pending earthquake related STAs as falling under the Section 1.1204(a)(3) exemption from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(3) and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, earthquake related STAs will be subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' procedures once a third party makes a presentation on an earthquake related STA. >. The Bureau will handle all STA requests as expeditiously as possible. To ensure that
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-95A1_Rcd.pdf
  • electronic version submitted through the IBFS as soon as possible. In this filing, operators should note in the first description field on the electronic STA form that this is an "earthquake-related STA request" and the date the initial request was granted. Ex Parte Rules. The International Bureau views presentations relating to pending earthquake related STAs as falling under the Section 1.1204(a)(3) exemption from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings. See47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3).1Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(3) and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, earthquake related STAs will be subject to the "permit-but-disclose" procedures once a third party makes a presentation on an earthquake related STA.2 Special Temporary Authority (International 214s): Emergency requests for special temporary authority (STA) related to the earthquake maybe
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1077A1.txt
  • against Comcast shall refer to MB Docket No. 11-104. Submissions in this matter may be filed electronically (i.e., through the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS)) or by filing paper copies. Parties are strongly encouraged to file electronically. This proceeding is ``restricted'' for purposes of the ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations (other than ex parte presentations exempt under Section 1.1204(a)) to or from Commission decision-making personnel are prohibited until the proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. Documents may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1.txt
  • through the IBFS as soon as possible. In this filing, operators should note in the first description field on the electronic STA form that this is a ``Hurricane Irene related STA request'' and the date the initial request was granted. Ex Parte Rules. The International Bureau views presentations relating to pending Hurricane Irene related STAs as falling under the Section 1.1204(a)(3) exemption from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(3) and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, Hurricane Irene related STAs will be subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' procedures once a third party makes a presentation on a Hurricane Irene related STA. . The Bureau will handle all STA requests as expeditiously as possible. To
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1465A1_Rcd.pdf
  • through the IBFS as soon as possible. In this filing, operators should note in the first description field on the electronic STA form that this is a "Hurricane Irene related STA request" and the date the initial request was granted. Ex Parte Rules. The International Bureau views presentations relating to pending Hurricane Irene related STAs as falling under the Section 1.1204(a)(3) exemption from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings. See47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(3).1Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(3) and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, Hurricane Irene related STAs will be subject to the "permit-but-disclose" procedures once a third party makes a presentationon a Hurricane Irene related STA.2 1Section 1.1204(a)(3) provides, in pertinent part, that the following types of presentations are exempt from the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1596A1.txt
  • of its subcommittees or working groups, unless that information is first placed in the record of the relevant proceeding. . FCC Announces Meeting of the Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council Scheduled for September 23, 2011 at FCC Headquarters, Public Notice, DA 11-1486, rel. Aug. 31, 2011. See 5 U.S.C. App. 2. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)(exempt treatment of presentations regarding a Notice of Inquiry). PUBLIC NOTICE News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� ��
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1818A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1818A1.txt
  • - Pub. L. No. 111-260, as amended by technical amendments contained in Pub. L. No. 111-265 (``Pub. L. No. 111-260``). See Emergency Access Advisory Committee Announcement of Members and Co-Chairpersons, Public Notice, DA 10-2318 (CGB rel. Dec. 7, 2010). Pub. L. No. 111-260 � 106(a). Pub. L. No. 111-260 � 106(c). . 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (exempt treatment of Notices of Inquiry). PUBLIC NOTICE News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 l m � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� D D D D D E )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1981A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1981A1.txt
  • instructions to submit a comment. Ex Parte Status. The Bureau seeks to facilitate communications regarding 700 MHz construction notifications between Commission staff and interested parties. We find that, consistent with section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the public interest will be served by designating staff review of 700 MHz construction notifications and any related public comments as ``exempt'' under section 1.1204 of the Commission's rules. Failure to Meet Interim 700 MHz Construction Benchmarks In the 700 MHz Second Report and Order, the Commission adopted performance requirements that include geographic build-out benchmarks for Lower 700 MHz A, B, and E Block licenses (Blocks A and E are licensed on an EA basis, Block B is licensed on a CMA basis) and population
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1981A1_Rcd.pdf
  • follow the subsequent instructions to submit a comment. Ex ParteStatus.The Bureau seeks to facilitate communications regarding 700 MHz construction notifications between Commission staff and interested parties. We find that, consistent with section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,11the public interest will be served by designating staff review of 700 MHz construction notifications and any related public comments as "exempt" under section 1.1204 of the Commission's rules.12 Failure to Meet Interim 700 MHz Construction Benchmarks In the 700 MHz Second Report and Order,13the Commission adopted performance requirements that include geographic build-out benchmarks for Lower 700 MHz A, B, and E Block licenses (Blocks A and E are licensed on an EA basis, Block B is licensed on a CMA basis) and population build-out
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2009A1.txt
  • 2011 for consideration at the October 27, 2011 open Commission meeting. The Commission released a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on November 18, 2011 (FCC 11-161). Under Section 1.1212(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212(d), presentations that are received during the Sunshine Period and do not meet an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a) or a Commission waiver shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings. In accordance with the rule, the presentation here will be associated with, but not made part of the record in the above-referenced proceedings. In addition to being available through ECFS, the full texts of these presentations are available for public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-49A1.txt
  • Public Notice released December 14, 2010 for consideration at the December 21, 2010 open Commission meeting. The Commission released a report and order regarding this matter on December 23, 2010. Under Section 1.1212(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212(d), presentations that are received during the Sunshine Period and do not meet an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a) or a Commission waiver shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings. In accordance with the rule, the presentations here will be associated with, but not made part of the record in GN Docket No. 09-191and WC Docket No. 07-52. ). Action by Office of General Counsel, Administrative Law Division. Appendix Name
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-697A1.txt
  • based on the 2010 Census will soon be available. If the City believes that effective competition is no longer present within its franchise area, it may file a petition for recertification pursuant to Section 76.916 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. � 76.916. Ellrod Letter at 1. Horvitz Letter. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a), citing � 1.1208. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10)(ii). Section 1.1204(a)(10)(ii) of the Commission's rules provides that ``The following types of presentations are exempt from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings . . . The presentation is requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction evidence, or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement, subject to the following limitations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-857A1.txt
  • Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). . -FCC- . . . See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a) (giving the Commission and its staff discretion to determine the ex parte procedures in a particular proceeding). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). PUBLIC NOTICE News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 ; � $ � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� �� � ^�� [,�D
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-857A1_Rcd.pdf
  • Nicole McGinnis of the Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Christina Clearwater can be reached at 202-418-1893 or by email at Christina.Clearwater@fcc.gov; Nicole McGinnis can be reached at 202-418-2877 or by email at Nicole.McGinnis@fcc.gov. -FCC- 5See47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a) (giving the Commission and its staff discretion to determine the ex parteprocedures in a particular proceeding). 6See47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). 6759
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-507A1.txt
  • The pending Sky Angel complaint is a ``restricted'' proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. Because the issues raised in this Public Notice are intertwined with the Sky Angel complaint, we also designate the proceeding initiated by this Public Notice as ``restricted'' for purposes of the ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations (other than ex parte presentations exempt under Section 1.1204(a)) to or from Commission decision-making personnel are prohibited until the proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or judicial review. Commenters will not become Parties to the Sky Angel complaint proceeding by virtue of filing a written submission in this docket that is responsive to the questions presented in this Public Notice. Although written submissions in a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-748A1.txt
  • 20, 2012 for consideration at the April 27, 2012 open Commission meeting. The Commission released a Second Report and Order relating to this matter on April 27, 2012 (FCC 12-44). Under Section 1.1212(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R � 1.1212(d), presentations that are received during the Sunshine Period and do not meet an exception provided by 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a) or a Commission waiver shall be associated with, but not made a part of, the record in the relevant proceedings. In accordance with the rule, the presentation here will be associated with, but not made part of the record in the above-referenced proceedings. . Action by Office of General Counsel, Administrative Law Division APPENDIX Name of Filer Date Received J.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-972A1.txt
  • the interference concern, the path in question should be considered successfully coordinated. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11,322 (1998). To the extent this Public Notice commences a proceeding, we believe it is analogous to a notice of inquiry, which is an exempt proceeding under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � � � � ��PNG r v ��"r�9 I'6� �d�Y�͆aX ���; Wh� �X,�aX���y�]\\.W`h���va6l! �v"]�V�at�������-``````�"m(c)x<��G�<���={-N��J%t�<== �"""x ҍ� � ��(c)���!��'' �R)&� �A�� "���\��v`` � 6� �� � � l @ @ 8 > 8 ? ; > 8 >
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1135A1.txt
  • Section 64.1001 of the rules, International Settlements Policy and Waivers, 47 C.F.R. � 64.1001. The Commission's ex parte rules are contained in 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200, et seq. The Bureau historically has treated requests for waiver filed under Section 64.1001 of the rules as non-restricted proceedings, in the same manner as Section 214(a) proceedings are treated. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(ll) & � 1.1206(b)(8). Thus, once a waiver request filed under Section 64.1001 is formally opposed, ex parte presentations are permissible, but are subject to the disclosure requirements of Section 1.1206(a). Whether or not a formal opposition has been filed, informal objectors must comply with the disclosure requirements of Section 1.1206 with respect to then- ex parte presentations at all times
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208652A1.txt
  • GSO and Terrestrial Systems in the Ku-Band. Permitted non-geostationary satellite orbit fixed-satellite service providers to operate in certain segment of the Ku-band and adopted rules and policies to govern operations. Comments due 45 days and replies 60 days after Fed. Reg. publication. Contact: Tom Mooring at (202) 418-2450 OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL NPRM (adopted 10/30/00); FCC 00-392 Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules. The Commission proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of Ex Parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after Federal Register publication. Contact: David Senzel at (202) 418-1760 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 96-86; Fourth NPRM 8/2/00 (adopted 7/25/00); FCC 00-271 The Development of Operational, Technical and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209180A1.txt
  • Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHZ for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services Including Third Generation Wireless Systems. Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless Systems. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days from Fed. Reg. publication. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL NPRM 12/15/00 (adopted 10/30/00); FCC 00-392 Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules. The Commission proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of Ex Parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after Federal Register publication. Contact: David Senzel at (202) 418-1720 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 96-86; Fourth NPRM 8/2/00 (adopted 7/25/00); FCC 00-271 The Development of Operational, Technical and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209693A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209693A1.txt
  • Matter of Verizon Wireless Request for Postponement of Auction of Licenses in the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands (DA 01-143). Comments - The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International, Inc., Paxson Communications Corporation, Cingular Wireless, LLC, The Rural Telecommunications Group, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., Equity Broadcasting Corporation, Shop at Home Network. January 25 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules (GC Docket No. 00-219). Comments - Vodafone Group. In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.622(b), Table of Allotments, DTV Broadcast Stations (Orono, Maine)(MM Docket No. 00-243/RM 9981). Comments - Maine Public Broadcasting Corporation. In the Matter of Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of Allotments, FM Broadcast Stations (Sauk Centre & Alexandria, Minnesota)(MM Docket
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209983A1.txt
  • Information Administration released two reports containing analyses of data it collected regarding the potential for ultra-wideband transmission systems to cause harmful interference to U.S. Government radio operations between 400 MHz and 6000 MHz. Comments due February 23; replies due March 12. Contact: John Reed at (202) 418-2455. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL NPRM 12/15/00 (adopted 10/30/00); FCC 00-392 Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules. The Commission proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of Ex Parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: David Senzel at (202) 418-1720 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 96-86; Fourth NPRM 8/2/00 (adopted 7/25/00); FCC 00-271 The Development of Operational,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210260A1.txt
  • and 6000 MHz. Comments due February 23; replies due March 12. Contact: John Reed at (202) 418-2455. ET 00-221; PN 01/24/01; DA 01-172 FCC Encourages Comment on NTIA Proposed Reimbursement Rules The Commission is seeking comment on the above caption proceeding. Contact: Ira Keltz at (202) 418-0616. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL NPRM 12/15/00 (adopted 10/30/00); FCC 00-392 Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules. The Commission proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of Ex Parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: David Senzel at (202) 418-1720 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 96-86; Fourth NPRM 8/2/00 (adopted 7/25/00); FCC 00-271 The Development of Operational,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210459A1.txt
  • (adopted 2/15/01) DA 01-451 Reallocation 27 MHZ of Spectrum. The Commission granted an extension of time to file comments in the above captioned proceeding to 60 days the comment filing deadline and by 30 days the reply comment deadline. Comments due March 8; replies due April 9. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL NPRM 12/15/00 (adopted 10/30/00); FCC 00-392 Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules. The Commission proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of Ex Parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: David Senzel at (202) 418-1720 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 96-86; Fourth NPRM 8/2/00 (adopted 7/25/00); FCC 00-271 The Development of Operational,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210737A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210737A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210737A1.txt
  • (adopted 2/15/01) DA 01-451 Reallocation 27 MHZ of Spectrum. The Commission granted an extension of time to file comments in the above captioned proceeding to 60 days the comment filing deadline and by 30 days the reply comment deadline. Comments due March 8; replies due April 9. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL NPRM 12/15/00 (adopted 10/30/00); FCC 00-392 Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules. The Commission proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of Ex Parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: David Senzel at (202) 418-1720 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 96-86; 4th R&O and 5th NPRM 01/17/01 (adopted 01/11/01) FCC 01-10 In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210936A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210936A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210936A1.txt
  • (adopted 2/15/01) DA 01-451 Reallocation 27 MHz of Spectrum. The Commission granted an extension of time to file comments in the above captioned proceeding to 60 days the comment filing deadline and by 30 days the reply comment deadline. Comments due March 8*; replies due April 9. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL NPRM 12/15/00 (adopted 10/30/00); FCC 00-392 Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules. The Commission proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of Ex Parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: David Senzel at (202) 418-1720 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 96-86; 4th R&O and 5th NPRM 01/17/01 (adopted 01/11/01) FCC 01-10 In
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211601A1.txt
  • Potential Interference from Ultra-Wideband Transmission Systems The Commission is requesting comments on five reports it has received regarding the potential for ultra-wideband transmission systems to cause harmful interference to other radio operations. Comments due April 25; replies due May 10. Contact: John A. Reed at (202) 418-2455. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL NPRM 12/15/00 (adopted 10/30/00); FCC 00-392 Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules. The Commission proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of Ex Parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: David Senzel at (202) 418-1720 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU WT 99-87; R&O and FNPRM 11/20/00 (adopted 11/09/00; FCC 00-403 Implementation of Sections
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211840A1.txt
  • DA 01-786 FCC Releases Staff Final Report "Spectrum Study of 2500-2690 MHZ Band: The Potential for Accommodating. Third Generation Mobile Systems" Seeks Comment on Final Report in Pending Spectrum Allocation Proceeding. Comments due April 16. Contact: Geraldine Matise at (202) 418-2322 or Rodney Small at (202) 418-2452. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL NPRM 12/15/00 (adopted 10/30/00); FCC 00-392 Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules. The Commission proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of Ex Parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. Contact: David Senzel at (202) 418-1720 OFFICE OF MANAGING DIRECTOR MD 01-76; NPRM 03/29/01 (adopted 03/19/01); FCC 01-97 Assessment and Collection of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247351A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247351A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247351A2.txt
  • the caption of this proceeding, commenters must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. ion and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room Y-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating . This is an exempt proceeding pursuant to � 1.1204(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). Ex parte presentations are permitted. For further information regarding this proceeding, please contact: Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: Jeffrey Tignor, (202) 418-0774, Jeffrey.Tignor@fcc.gov Enforcement Bureau: Suzanne Tetreault, (202) 418-7450, Suzanne.Tetreault@fcc.gov International Bureau: David Krech, (202) 418-7443, David.Krech@fcc.gov Office of Engineering & Technology: Karen Rackley, (202) 418-2431, Karen.Rackley@fcc.gov Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: Harry Wingo,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308022A1.txt
  • 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). . -FCC- See ``FCC Staff To Host Forum Aimed at Helping Consumers Navigate Location-Based Services,'' Public Notice, DA 11-857, WT Docket No. 11-84 (rel. May 17, 2011) (Privacy Public Notice). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200(a) (giving the Commission and its staff discretion to determine the ex parte procedures in a particular proceeding). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554 This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-104A1.pdf
  • (stating that ongoing costs of number pooling should be recovered through an ongoing exogenous adjustment). 600 MCI WorldCom comments at 53. 601 Notice, 14 FCC Rcd at 10407-08. 602 Id. 603 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Repo rt and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)). 604 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-104 115 Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. ��1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before May 1, 2000, and reply comments on or before May 16, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.605 Comments filed through the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-366A1_Erratum.pdf
  • DoftheFinalRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysisinAppendixCinfra.Aspartofourcontinuingeffortto reducepaperworkburdens,weinvitethegeneralpublicandtheOfficeofManagementandBudget (OMB)totakethisopportunitytocommentontheinformationcollectionscontainedinthisFirstReport andOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandum OpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,asrequiredby thePaperworkReductionActof1995,PublicLaw104-13.Commentsfromthepublic,OMB,andother 388 SeeCompetitiveNetworksNPRM,14FCCRedat12723-34. 23058 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 agenciesontheinformationcollectionscontainedinthisFirstReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeof ProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReport andOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrderaredue60daysfromdateofpublicationoftheitemin theFederalRegister.Commentsshouldaddress:(a)whetherthecollectionofinformationisnecessary fortheproperperformanceofthefunctionsoftheCommission,includingwhethertheinformationshall havepracticalutility;(b)theaccuracyoftheCommission'sburdenestimates;(c)waystoenhancethe quality,utility,andclarityoftheinformationcollected;and(d)waystominimizetheburdenofthe collectionofinformationontherespondents,includingtheuseofautomatedcollectiontechniquesor otherformsofinformationtechnology. 179. ExParteRules.ThisFirstReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposed Rulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrder andMemorandumOpinionandOrderconstitutea"permit-but-disclose"proceedinginaccordancewith theCommission'sexparterules.389PersonsmakingoralexpartepresentationsrelatingtotheFirst ReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderand MemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder areremindedthatmemorandasummarizingthepresentationsmustcontainsummariesofthesubstanceof thepresentationsandnotmerelyalistingofthesubjectsdiscussed.Morethanaoneortwosentence descriptionoftheviewsandargumentspresentedisgenerallyrequired.390Otherrulespertainingtooral andwrittenpresentationsaresetforthinSection1.1206(b)aswell.Interestedpartiesaretofilewiththe Secretary,FCC,andserveInternationalTranscriptionServices(ITS)withcopiesofanywrittenexparte presentationsorsummariesoforalexpartepresentationsintheseproceedingsinthemannerspecified belowforfilingcomments. 180. FilingProcedures.PursuanttoSections1.415and1.419oftheCommission'srules,47 C.F.R.��1.415and1.419,interestedpartiesmayfilecommentsonorbeforeDecember22,2000,and replycommentsonorbeforeJanuary22,2001.CommentsmaybefiledusingtheCommission's ElectronicCommentFilingSystem(ECFS)orbyfilingpapercopies.SeeElectronicFilingof DocumentsinRulemakingProceedings,63Fed.Reg.24,121(1998). 181. CommentsfiledthroughtheECFScanbesentasanelectronicfileviatheInternetto http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.Generally,onlyonecopyofanelectronicsubmissionmustbefiled. Incompletingthetransmittalscreen,commentersshouldincludetheirfullname,PostalServicemailing address,andtheapplicabledocketorrulemakingnumber.Partiesmayalsosubmitanelectronic commentbyInternete-mail.Togetfilinginstructionsfore-mailcomments,commentersshouldsendan e-mailtoecfs@fcc.gov,andshouldincludethefollowingwordsinthebodyofthemessage,"getform ."Asampleformanddirectionswillbesentinreply.Partieswhochoosetofile bypapermustfileanoriginalandfourcopiesofeachfiling.Allfilingsmustbesenttothe Commission'sSecretary,MagalieRomanSalas,OfficeoftheSecretary,FederalCommunications Commission,445TwelfthStreet,S.W.,TW-A325,Washington,D.C.20554. 182. Regardlessofwhetherpartieschoosetofileelectronicallyorbypaper,partiesshould alsofileonecopyofanydocumentsfiledinthisdocketwiththeCommission'scopycontractor, InternationalTranscriptionServices,Inc.,445TwelfthStreet,S.W.,RoomCY-B402,Washington,D.C. 389 SeeAmendmentof47C.F.R. �1.1200etseq.ConcerningExPartePresentationsinCommissionProceedings,GC DocketNo.95-21, ReportandOrder,12FCCRcd7348,7356-57,'\l27,citing47C.F.R. �1.1204(b)(1)(1997). 390 See47C.F.R. �1.1206(b)(2),asrevised. 23059 Federal 20554.Commentsandreplycommentswillbeavailableforpublicinspectionduringregularbusiness hoursintheFCCReferenceCenter,44512thStreet,S.W.,Washington,D.C.20554. 183. Commentsandreplycommentsmustincludeashortandconcisesummaryofthe substantiveargumentsraisedinthepleading.Commentsandreplycommentsmustalsocomplywith Section1.49,47C.F.R.�1.49,andallotherapplicablesectionsoftheCommission'sRules.Wealso directallinterestedpartiestoincludethenameofthefilingpartyandthedateofthefilingoneachpage oftheircommentsandreplycomments.Allpartiesareencouragedtoutilizeatableofcontents, regardlessofthelengthoftheirsubmission. 184. Writtencommentsbythepublic,OMB,orotheragenciesontheinformationcollections aredueonorbefore60daysafterthedateofpublicationintheFederalRegister.Inadditiontofiling conunentswiththeSecretary,acopyofanycommentsontheinformationcollectionscontainedherein shouldbesubmittedtoJudyBoley,FederalCommunicationsCommission,Room1-C804,44512th Street,SW,Washington,DC20554,orviatheInternettojboley@fcc.govandtoEdwardSpringer, OMBDeskOfficer,Room10236NEOB,72517thStreet,N.W.,Washington,DC20503orviathe Internettoedward.springer@omb.eop.gov. 185. FurtherInformation. Forfurtherinformationaboutthisproceeding,contactJoel Taubenblattat202-418-1513,jtaubenb@fcc.gov,orLaurenVanWazerat202-418-0030, lvanwaze@fcc.gov. YIn.ORDERINGCLAUSES 186. Accordingly,ITISORDERED,pursuanttoSections1,2(a),4(j),4(i),7,201,202,205, 221,224,251,303,and405oftheCommunicationsActof1934,asamended,47U.S.c.��151,152(a), 154(i),154(j),157,201,202,205,221,224,251,303,and405,thatthisFirstReportandOrderand FurtherNoticeofProposedRulemakinginWTDocketNo.99-217,FifthReportandOrderand MemorandumOpinionandOrderinCCDocketNo.96-98,andFourthReportandOrderand MemorandumOpinionandOrderinCCDocketNo.88-57andtheamendmentstotheCommission's rulessetforthinAppendixBareADOPTED.. 187. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatnewSections64.2500,64.2501,and64.2502ofthe Commission'srules,47C.F.R.��64.2500,64.2501,and64.2502,setforthinAppendixB,SHALL BECOMEEFFECTIVE60daysafterpublicationintheFederalRegister. 188. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthattherevisionstoSection1.4000oftheCommission's rules,47C.F.R.�1.4000,setforthinAppendixB,andtherevisionstoSection68.3oftheCommission's rules,47C.F.R.�68.3,setforthinAppendixB,SHALLBECOMEEFFECTIVE120daysafter publicationintheFederalRegister,pendingOMBapproval. 189. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthemotionstosubmitFurtherReplyCommentsfiled byConcernedCommunitiesandOrganizationsandtheWirelessCommunicationsAssociation InternationalAREGRANTED. 190. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthePetitionforClarificationandReconsiderationof the1997DemarcationPointOrderfiledbyBellAtlanticISGRANTED,asdiscussedinSectionIV.C. 191. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthePetitionforClarificationandReconsiderationof the1997DemarcationPointOrderfiledbyBellSouthISDENIED,asdiscussedinSectionIV.C. 23060 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 192. ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatthePetitionforReconsiderationoftheLocal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-385A1.txt
  • above-captioned proceedings related to Ameritech Corporation's acquisition of the alarm monitoring services assets of five unaffiliated entities in 1996. With respect to four of the acquisitions, the Commission previously found that Ameritech violated section 275(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, by obtaining financial control of unaffiliated alarm monitoring service entities prior to February 2001. Pursuant to section 1.1204(b)(10) of the Commission's rules, the Commission and SBC Communications, Inc. (SBC) have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the above-captioned proceedings related to Ameritech's acquisitions. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and is incorporated by reference. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated the facts before us. We believe
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-392A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit � � � � � � � � � � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Section 1.1204 of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GC Docket No. 00-219 Adopted: October 30, 2000 Released: December 15, 2000 Comment Date: [30 days after Federal Register publication] Reply Date: [45 days after Federal Register publication] By the Commission: 1. By this notice of proposed rulemaking, we propose to modify 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-395A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-395A1.txt
  • of this paragraph, which procedures shall include a process for resolving any differences that arise regarding estimates of relocation or modification costs under this paragraph. NDAA-99, � 1064(c)(3) (codified at 47 U.S.C. � 923(g)(1)(E)). See NTIA Organization Act, Section 113 (g) (1) (A). See NTIA Organization Act, Section 113 (g) (1) (B). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a). See 47 CFR �1.1204(z)(5) of the Commission's rules on shared jurisdiction. NTIA and the FCC share jurisdiction over spectrum. See 47 USC, �� 301-303, 305, and 902. NTIA chairs the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee (IRAC) which is an interagency committee of Federal radio frequency managers that advises the executive branch on the Federal Government's use of the spectrum. Classified Government stations are those whose
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.txt
  • Comments at 5; PCIA Comments at 7-11; see also 47 C.F.R. � 20.12(B) (requiring CMRS carriers to permit unrestricted resale of its service). See supra section III.F. See supra section III.E. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Repo rt and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24, 121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-451A1.txt
  • (February 19, 1999). 13 CFR � 121.201, SIC code 4812. 1992 Census, Series UC92-S-1, at Table 5, SIC code 4812. Trends in Telephone Service, Table 19.3 (March 2000). See supra, paras. 5-7. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, 27 (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)) (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-451 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-451 _ p ��� � � E F E F �� � #��� � � X @ 8 ! 1 A Q a q � ��' � � � � � � �� �� n n �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-191A1.txt
  • be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20554. The Cable Services Bureau contact for this proceeding is Marcia Glauberman at (202) 418-7200, TTY (202) 418-7172, or at mglauber@fcc.gov. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), � 628(g), 47 U.S.C. � 548(g). Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, CS Docket No. 00-132, Seventh Annual Report, FCC 01-1 (rel. Jan. 8, 2001) (``2000 Report''). See also Reports, 1994-1999: Implementation of Section 19
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-21A1.txt
  • change is necessary to facilitate the efficient and expeditious discharge of the Commission's statutory responsibility in the Virginia arbitration proceeding pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act. B. Other Procedural Issues 7. Ex Parte Classification. Arbitrations conducted pursuant to section 252(e)(5) are restricted for ex parte purposes, consistent with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 CFR �� 1.1208, 1.1204(b), 1.1206(a) (1999). Therefore, ex parte presentations are prohibited. Delegated Authority. The Commission's existing arbitration rules contemplate that someone other than the full Commission may serve as arbitrator on behalf of the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. � 51.807(d) (1999). Consistent with that rule, we authorize the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, to serve as the arbitrator in section 252(e)(5) proceedings, with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-223A1.txt
  • in another proceeding, they must provide in their comments in this proceeding a complete recitation of the pertinent information and also attach a copy of the filing to which they refer. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Because many of the matters on which we request comment in this Notice may call on parties to disclose proprietary information such as market research and business plans, we suggest that parties consult 47 C.F.R. � 0.459 about the submission of confidential information. For additional information regarding this proceeding, contact Ellen Blackler, Special Assistant to the Bureau Chief, Common Carrier
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-285A1.txt
  • to Joint Motion, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (filed Aug. 10, 2001) at 2 (noting that ``[a]ll three parties to this proceeding have elected to seek judicial review of the [BTI] Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit''). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(a). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(c), 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208, 1.1204. 47 U.S.C. � 208. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1208, 1.1206, 1.1204. See, e.g., Letter from Alexander P. Starr, Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202, 1.1208. See, e.g., Letter from
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-343A1.txt
  • Review at 24. See Letter from Jim Vorhies, NTIA, to Harry Ng, International Bureau, FCC (Dec. 29, 1997) (``Vorhies Letter''); e-mail from Frank Eng, NOAA, to David McGinnis, NTIA (Dec. 4. 1997) (attached to Vorhies Letter); e-mail from Frank Eng, NOAA, to David McGinnis, NTIA (Dec. 15. 1997) (attached to Vorhies Letter). Application for Review at 24. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(5). See Amendment of Subpart H, Part 1 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations Concerning Ex Parte Communications and Presentations in Commission Proceedings, 2 FCC Rcd. 3011, 3018 (1987); Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, 12 FCC Rcd. 7348, 7367 (1997). Application for Review at 23-24. See Application for Review at 24
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.txt
  • at 369, para. 151. See also NeuStar Inc. Petition for Compensation Adjustment, Request for Approval of Implementation Scehdule and Emergency request of Interim Relief, CC Docket No. 99-200 (June 30, 2001) See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). Numbering Resource Optimization, Second
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • determines are necessary in the public interest: * * * * * 56. Section 1.1202 is revised by amending paragraph (d)(6) note 4 to read as follows: Subpart H - Ex Parte Communications � 1.1202 Definitions. * * * * * (d)(6) NOTE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (d): Individual listeners or viewers submitting comments regarding a pending broadcast application pursuant to �1.1204(a)(8) will not become parties simply by service of the comments. The Media Bureau may, in its discretion, make such a commenter a party, if doing so would be conducive to the Commission's consideration of the application or would otherwise be appropriate. * * * * * 57. Section 1.4000 is amended by revising paragraph (g) to read as follows: �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-121A1.txt
  • Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Declaratory Ruling, Inter-Carrier Compensation for ISP-Bound Traffic (Reciprocal Compensation), CC Docket No. 99-68, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 3689, 3695 (1999). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report to Congress, 13 FCC Rcd 11,501, 11,555 (1998). See generally, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. 5 U.S.C. � 605(b). The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-178A1.txt
  • Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. The Media Bureau contact for this proceeding is Anne Levine at (202) 418-7027, or alevine@fcc.gov. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Communications Act''), � 628(g), 47 U.S.C. � 548(g). Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, 17 FCC Rcd 1244 (2002) (``2001 Report''). See also Reports, 1994-2000: Implementation of Section 19 of the 1992 Cable Act (Annual Assessment of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-325A1.txt
  • authorized services. These devices must also accept interference received from authorized services. See 47 C.F.R. � 15.5. But see, the ``NTCA 2002 Wireless Survey Report'' at 8, in which survey respondents cite interference/congestion as a problem with using unlicensed spectrum. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 02-307 (rel. Nov. 8, 2002). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 0.459. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-325 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-325 v w � � x - � � X � � F ; � ' � � �� �� Z K M
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-327A1.txt
  • Id., at 13062. Id., at 13062-63. Id. See Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps To Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Third Report, 17 FCC Rcd 2844 (2002). See Seventh Report, at 13070-73, for a discussion. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). (...continued from previous page) (Continue....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-327 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-327 j k � j k � j� jt j ( ) =) * + - . H I J c d e g h i j k l m � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-328A1.txt
  • other bands where unlicensed operation with minimal rules could be permitted without causing interference to authorized services? What other bands should we consider? What are the advantages of each? PROCEDURAL MATTERS This is an exempt notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1204(b). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on before [75 days after publication in the Federal Register], and reply comments on or before [105 days after publication in the Federal Register]. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.txt
  • March 11, 2003 and in response to questions from the staff. Because of the nexus between the formal complaints and the Investigation, the Bureau treated the Investigation as a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208. As a result, the Bureau included Touch America in correspondence between Qwest and the Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1204(a)(10) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10), the Commission and Qwest conducted bi-lateral settlement discussions. All of the information provided by Qwest during those settlement discussions ``relat[ed] to how a proceeding should or could be settled, as opposed to new information regarding the merits.'' See 47 C.F.R. 1204(a)(10)(ii). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FCC 03-107 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FCC 03-107 #
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-112A1.txt
  • � 21. IP Relay Declaratory Ruling at � 21. IP Relay Declaratory Ruling at � 15. ``[T]he Commission shall ensure that interstate and intrastate telecommunications relay services are available, to the extent possible and in the most efficient manner, to hearing-impaired and speech -impaired individuals in the United States.'' 47 U.S.C. � 225(b)(1). See generally, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. �� 604. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. �� 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. �� 601-612, has been amended by the Small
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1308, 1.1311. Id.. �� 1.1200-1.1216. See Id. � 1.1206(b)(2). See Id. � 1.1206(b). Under the Council's rules, the Council and Conference must be parties to the Nationwide Agreement. Therefore, for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, in this proceeding we shall treat presentations from these entities and their staffs as exempt presentations under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(5). See Id. � 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.48. See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). See Pub. L. No. 104-13. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-125 Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-125 h� h� gd� h� h� h� h� h� % 4 F G H
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1_Erratum.doc
  • 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1308, 1.1311. Id.. �� 1.1200-1.1216. See Id. � 1.1206(b)(2). See Id. � 1.1206(b). Under the Council's rules, the Council and Conference must be parties to the Nationwide Agreement. Therefore, for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, in this proceeding we shall treat presentations from these entities and their staffs as exempt presentations under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(5). See Id. � 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.48. See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). See Pub. L. No. 104-13. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-125 Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-125 h� h� gd� h� h� h� h� h� % 4 F G H
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-185A1.txt
  • instructive as to the efficiency of market structures and regulations within the United States. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Authority. This Notice is issued pursuant to authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403, and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before September 11, 2003, and reply comments on or before September 26, 2003. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-205A1.txt
  • guidelines. Therefore, all parties with a potential interest may not have had the opportunity to participate in the development of the guidelines and present their own relevant scientific data. As noted above, the Commission is not required to enter into an MOU with FWS under Executive Order 13,186 with respect to migratory birds. See supra note 30. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (May 1,1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-205 � j� � " � 0 0 � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-289A1.txt
  • with the same filing deadlines as comments filed in this Notice of Proposed Rule Making (``Notice''). Comments must have a separate and distinct heading designating them as responses to the IRFA. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1204(b). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 or 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on before 75 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-54A6.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-54A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-54A6.txt
  • or services involving security of the public or national security. In the event such an action were determined to be necessary, what would be an appropriate phase-in time period? PROCEDURAL MATTERS This is an exempt notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1204(b). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on before 75 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-105A1.txt
  • ular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room Y-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail at qualexint@aol.com. This is an exempt proceeding pursuant to � 1.1204(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). Ex parte presentations are permitted. For further information regarding this proceeding, please contact: Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: Jeffrey Tignor, (202) 418-0774, Jeffrey.Tignor@fcc.gov Enforcement Bureau: Suzanne Tetreault, (202) 418-7450, Suzanne.Tetreault@fcc.gov International Bureau: David Krech, (202) 418-7443, David.Krech@fcc.gov Office of Engineering & Technology: Karen Rackley, (202) 418-2431, Karen.Rackley@fcc.gov Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: Harry Wingo,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-129A1.txt
  • proceeding to begin a dialogue with the public on how the Commission can best ensure that broadcasters fulfill their obligations to serve their communities of license through particular rules or policies. Although we have identified above particular subjects of interest to us, we welcome comment on any ideas relevant to that end. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. Pursuant to section 1.1204(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1), this is an exempt proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, and need not be disclosed. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0531 (voice), 202-418-7365 (tty). , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form .'' A sample form and directions will
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-136A1.txt
  • advanced services in various foreign markets? PROCEDURAL MATTERs Authority. This Notice is issued pursuant to authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403, and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 403, and 548(g). Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before July 23, 2004, and reply comments on or before August 25, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-137A1.txt
  • notice of an illegal use' or be `knowingly' involved in such illegal use.'' Id. Commenters may also wish to address how the issue of potential CA liability might affect the adoption of new rules governing the TRS provider's and CA's obligation to handle, or discretion not to handle, all calls regardless of content. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. �� 604. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. �� 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. Telecommunications Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities - Recommended TRS Cost Recovery Guidelines/Request by Hamilton Telephone
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-155A1.txt
  • other filing seeking affirmative relief.'' The Bureau correctly held that SMCCD did not become a party to this proceeding until after it had filed its informal objection on October 13, 1999, nearly two months after the filing of the 1999 Modification Application. Accordingly, the Association was under no obligation to file a copy of its application with SMCCD. Moreover, Section 1.1204(a)(1) of the ex parte rules classifies among ``exempt presentations'' those in which ``[t]he presentation . . . involves the filing of required forms.'' Requests for technical modification of FM translator authorizations, and the amendment filed by the Association converting the 1998 Modification Application to a minor change, must be filed on FCC Form 349. Accordingly, the Association had no obligation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-175A1.txt
  • television programming that we should be aware of? What broadcast or non-broadcast services carry such material? How are parents made aware that such programming is available? We seek comment on what actions Congress or the Commission may take to encourage more programming choices that have a positive effect on children's development. iv. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. Pursuant to section 1.1204(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1), this is an exempt proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, and need not be disclosed. Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties must file comments on or before September 15, 2004, and reply comments on or before October
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.txt
  • Extension of time for Re-issuance of Proposed Rules and Data Requests, filed June 3, 2004. See discussion in ��65-68, supra. See ARRL, Motion for Recusal of Chairman Michael K. Powell from the BPL proceeding, filed October 12, 2004. See also, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203. See Letter from the FCC to ARRL, dated October 14, 2004. See also, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. � 604. 5 U.S.C. � 604(a)(3). 5 U.S.C. � 601(6). 5 U.S.C. � 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-247A1.txt
  • U.S. customers in 2002 was approximately 9.4 billion dollars. See 2002 International Telecommunications Data (43.61 Annual Report). Commenters that wish confidential treatment of their submissions should request that their submission, or specific part thereof, be withheld from public inspection. 47 C.F.R. � 0.459 (2003). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (2003). Member countries of the European Union (EU) are marked with an asterisk symbol (*). The decisions to regulate mobile termination rates by national regulatory authorities in the European Union (EU) are influenced by a number of Directives enacted by the European Commission (EC) in 1997 and 2002 to spur competition in the telecommunications markets. The 1997 Directives generally limit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-38A1.txt
  • Rcd at 14831, � 102. See Eighth Report, 18 FCC Rcd at 14831, � 102. See Eighth Report, 18 FCC Rcd at 14832, � 103. Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Memorandum Opinion and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd. 23,697 (2003). See Eighth Report, 18 FCC Rcd at 14867-75, �� 192-215. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Implementation of Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 19993, Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions with Respect to Commercial Mobile Services, Eighth Report, 18 FCC Rcd 14783, para. 5 (2003). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-38 Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-38 hx) L � * + , E F G I
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-152A1.txt
  • on calls from Jamaica in an amount commensurate with the charges imposed by their foreign fixed correspondents. Commenters that wish confidential treatment of their submissions should request that their submission, or specific part thereof, be withheld from public inspection. 47 C.F.R. � 0.459 (2003). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (2003). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-152 Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-152 � �@��� �@��� �@��� �@��� h1 �@��� �@��� h1 gd1 % & 3 8 i q � � � � � � hm h}k h}k h}k h h h h h h h h h h h h h � h h h h
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-155A1.txt
  • regulatory approaches affect their business models? PROCEDURAL MATTERs Authority. This Notice is issued pursuant to authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403, and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 403, and 548(g). Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on the Notice of Inquiry, MB Docket No. 05-155, on or before September 19, 2005, and reply comments on or before October 3, 2005. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-84A1.txt
  • the Commission may impose, we note that the criminal penalty for violation of the disclosure requirements of Section 507 of the Act is a fine of up to $10,000, imprisonment of not more than a year, or both. Procedural Rules Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Comments Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties must file comments on or before June 22, 2005 and reply comments on or before July 22, 2005. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-115A1.txt
  • proceeding will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room Y-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). This is an exempt proceeding pursuant to � 1.1204(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). Ex parte presentations are permitted. For further information regarding this proceeding, please contact: Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: Michael Jacobs, 202-418-2859, michael.jacobs@fcc.gov Enforcement Bureau: Michael Carowitz, 202-418-0026, michael.carowitz@fcc.gov International Bureau: Narda Jones, 202-418-2489, narda.jones@fcc.gov Office of Engineering & Technology: Bruce Romano, 202-418-2124, bruce.romano@fcc.gov Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: Peter Corea, 202-418-7931, peter.corea@fcc.gov Wireline Competition
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-11A1.txt
  • United States Senate. Accessible Formats. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on paragraphs 31-36 in MB Docket No. 05-255 on or before April 3, 2006, and reply comments on or before April 18, 2006. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-124A1.txt
  • Communications Commission, dated January 13, 2006. Hammond requests dismissal of the informal objection as repetitive and also alleges that Rushing's failure to serve him with the objection violates the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Hammond is incorrect that Rushing's failure to serve him constitutes a violation of the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a) (8) (presentations exempt from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings include those made by a listener of a broadcast station who is not a party under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202(d)(1) relating to an application for renewal of a station's license that is not designated for hearing at the time that the presentation is made). In addition, two individual listeners filed Petitions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-152A1.txt
  • ex parte rules lacks merit. Petition at 3-4. The settlement discussions fall within the exception to the general prohibition of ex parte communications in restricted proceedings for communications ``requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction of evidence or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10); see NY State Dep't of Law, 984 F.2d at 1217-18. Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 16004, � 4. See Stockholders of Infinity Broadcasting Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 5012, 5057 n.1 (1996) (challenges to the applicant's character qualifications based on past apparent indecency violations were moot where the Commission previously determined that such violations were not disqualifying
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-153A1.txt
  • Commission's ex parte rules lacks merit. Petition at 10-13. Those discussions fall within the exception to the general prohibition of ex parte communications in restricted proceedings for communications ``requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction of evidence or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement.'' 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(10); see New York State Department of Law v. F.C.C., 984 F.2d 1209, 1217-18 (D.C.Cir.1993). See Petition at 9-10. Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 23103, � 4. See Infinity Broadcasting Corp., 12 FCC Rcd at 5057, n.1 (challenges to the applicant's character qualifications based on past apparent indecency violations were moot where the Commission previously determined that such violations were not
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-154A1.txt
  • regulatory approaches affect their business models? PROCEDURAL MATTERs Authority. This Notice is issued pursuant to authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403, and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 403, and 548(g). Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on the Notice of Inquiry, MB Docket No. 06-189 on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-207A1.txt
  • particular that the Commission should examine. PROCEDURAL MATTERs Authority. This Notice is issued pursuant to authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403, and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 403, and 548(g). Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b) (1). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on the Notice of Inquiry, MB Docket No. 07-269, on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS''), (2) the Federal Government's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-21A1.txt
  • U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, Pub. No. 2007-020, Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994 - 2005 (Nov. 2006). Id. at 4. Id. Id. at 5. See � 706(a) of the 1996 Act. See � 706(b) of the 1996 Act. GAO Broadband Report at GAO Highlights (unnumbered page following report cover). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-21 Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-21 M Q � h� h� h� h� � $ H R _ � � � � Z 0 0 �� ^�� D � � � " � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-31A1.txt
  • Order, Attach. (Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Michael J. Copps). The Policy Statement did not contain rules. See Policy Statement, 20 FCC Rcd at 14988, para. 5 n.15. The principles announced in the Commission's Policy Statement were ``subject to reasonable network management.'' Policy Statement, 20 FCC Rcd at 14988, para. 5 n.15. 47 U.S.C. � 157 nt. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Tim Berners-Lee ``Neutrality of the Net'', Decentralized Information Group (May 2, 2006). See Broadband Reality Check II, Free Press, Consumers Union, Consumer Federation of America (rel. Aug. 2006). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-31 Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-31  � � � h�{ � � � � � � F � '0 '0 '0 �{
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-196A1.txt
  • those that are not currently subscribed.''). See 47 C.F.R. � 25.144(a)(3)(ii) (requiring each SDARS licensee to ``certify that its satellite DARS system includes a receiver that will permit end users to access all licensed satellite DARS systems that are operational or under construction''); see also SDARS Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 5797-98, � 106. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-196 Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-196 � � � O � � � � � � � 0 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-201A1.txt
  • proceeding will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room Y-A257, Washington, DC 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). This is an exempt proceeding pursuant to � 1.1204(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). Ex parte presentations are permitted. For further information regarding this proceeding, please contact: Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: Pam Slipakoff, 202-418-7705, pam.slipakoff@fcc.gov Enforcement Bureau: Michael Carowitz, 202-418-0026, michael.carowitz@fcc.gov International Bureau: Narda Jones, 202-418-2489, narda.jones@fcc.gov Office of Engineering & Technology: Bruce Romano, 202-418-2124, bruce.romano@fcc.gov Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau: Tim Peterson, 202-418-1575,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-257A1.txt
  • Google Airwaves Inc. Reply to Opposition of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (filed May 16, 2008) (``Reply''). CMA551 New Jersey 2-Ocean is comprised of a single county. See Letter from John T. Scott, III, Vice President & Deputy General Counsel Regulatory Law, Verizon Wireless, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (dated Oct. 14, 2008). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10). See, e.g., Application of AKD Holdings, LLC, Alaska DigiTel, LLC, and GCI, Inc. For Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations, WT Docket No. 08-10, Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 08-1882, at � 14 (WTB rel. Aug. 8, 2008) (``GCI-Alaska DigiTel II Order''); Applications of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Rural Cellular Corporation For Consent To Transfer Control
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-95A1.txt
  • the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International, Inc. Request for Declaratory Ruling, 911 Requirements for IP-Enabled Service Providers, PS Docket No. 07-114, CC Docket No. 94-102, WC Docket No. 05-196, Report and Order, 22 FCC Rcd 20105 (2007) (Location Accuracy Order). Id. at 20105 � 1. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-95 Federal Communications Commission FCC 08-95 x � � x � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-14A1.txt
  • challenges to parents' ability to supervise how their children use the media. Through this proceeding we will examine the existence and availability of advanced blocking technologies across a range of communications devices and platforms. As directed by the Child Safe Viewing Act, we will submit a report to Congress detailing our findings. administrative matters Ex Parte Rules. Pursuant to section 1.1204(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1), this is an exempt proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, and need not be disclosed. Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on the Notice of Inquiry, MB Docket No. 09-26 , on or before
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-32A1.txt
  • and technology within the United States. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Authority. This Notice is issued pursuant to authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403, and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 154(j), 403, and 548(g). Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on the Supplemental Notice of Inquiry, MB Docket No. 07-269, on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS''), (2) the Federal Government's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-43A1.txt
  • Group; CBS Radio Inc.; Citadel Broadcasting Corp.; Emmis Communications; Entercom Communications Corp.; Greater Media, Inc.; Lincoln Financial Media Co.; and Megamedia Group. But see note 1, supra. Arbitron Inc., PPM Encoding Handbook for Radio (2008) at 2, 5, available at http://www.arbitron.com/downloads/ppm_encoding_handbook.pdf. Id. at 2. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-43 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-43 $ & � � � B*_H � � � � � � � � : � W 0 � 0 0 � �x� �x� �x� �x� �x� �x� �x� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y� y�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-66A1_Rcd.pdf
  • 09-157 and GN Docket No. 09-51. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. SeeElectronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). Commenters desiring confidential treatment of their submissions should request that their submission, or specific parts 7847 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)(2008). 7947 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419 (2008). 11344 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-66 thereof, be withheld from public inspection pursuant to the Commission's rules.80 Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Filers should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting comments. ECFS filers must transmit
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-67A1_Rcd.pdf
  • mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20554. Parties should send a copy of their filings to Chelsea Fallon, Spectrum & Competition Policy 3747 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). 3847 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419. 11368 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-67 Division, Wireless Telecommunnications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Room 5-C140, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, or by e-mail to Chelsea.Fallon@fcc.gov. Parties shall also serve one copy with the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-84A1.txt
  • ``navigation devices'' (such as set top boxes, remote control units, and other equipment) that are commercially available from sources other than the system operator. See Commission Adopts ``Navigation Devices'' Rules Creating Consumer Market for Set Top Boxes and Other Equipment Used With Video Programming Systems, Rep. No. CS 98-11 (Jun. 11, 1998), reported at 1998 WL 306795; 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204 (implementing regulation). Additionally, 47 C.F.R. � 76.640 requires cable systems to support unidirectional (i.e., non-SDV) cable products. EB is investigating whether Cox's deployment of SDV made certain channels inaccessible without a Cox set top receiver and thus inaccessible by non-Cox unidirectional products such as CableCARD. These include 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206, which requires separate charges for services and equipment, and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-94A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-94A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-94A1.txt
  • http://www.projectsafechildhood.gov/; A Parent's Guide to the Internet, http://www.fbi.gov/publications/pguide/pguidee.htm. See The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-248, � 629, 120 Stat. 587, 640 (2006). See id. at � 630, 120 Stat. at 640-41. See 15 U.S.C. �� 6501-6506; 16 C.F.R. pt. 312. About Us - OnGuard Online (available at http://www.onguardonline.gov/about-us/overview.aspx). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). Commission Seeks Comment on the Status of Children's Television Programming, MM Docket No. 00-167, Public Notice, 22 FCC Rcd 7267 (MB 2007). Children's Television Obligations of Digital Television Broadcasters, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 22943 (2004); Sponsorship Identification Rules and Embedded
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-148A1.txt
  • Action Agenda at 3-5; see also Broadband Action Items Chart. See Broadband Action Agenda at 1-3, 5-7. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. Although a Notice of Inquiry proceeding is generally exempt from the ex parte rules, we find that the public interest is best served by treating this important matter as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1204(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, 1.430. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-148 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-148 ) ) D K � � B � � � � U � � 0 � 0 � 0
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-204A1.txt
  • 20554. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). This is an exempt proceeding pursuant to � 1.1204(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). Ex parte presentations are permitted. For further information regarding this proceeding, please contact: Action by the Commission December 29, 2010: By Chairman Julius Genachowski, and Commissioners Michael J. Copps, Robert McDowell, Mignon L. Clyburn, and Meredith A. Baker. - FCC - ATTACHMENT RULE PARTS CONTAINING REGULATIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE CONSUMER & GOVERNMENTAL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.txt
  • for an ex parte presentation ``for the clarification or adduction of evidence, or for the resolution of issues.'' We also seek comment on whether it is practical and consistent with having a ``period of repose'' to allow replies to presentations made pursuant to a Sunshine period exception. We seek comment on other possible resolutions. While the settlement exception in section 1.1204(a)(10) of the rules serves an important function, we also seek comment on whether it is susceptible to misuse apart from its impact during the Sunshine period. For example, we seek comment on whether reliance on the provision of the rule exempting from disclosure ``information relating to how a proceeding should or could be settled, as opposed to new information regarding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-60A1.txt
  • in CS Docket No. 97-80 at 43 (filed Aug. 24, 2007) Melcher v. FCC, 134 F.3d 1143, 1152-3 (D.C. Cir. 1998). See General Instrument Corp. v. FCC, 213 F.3d 724, 731-2 (DC Cir. 2000); Charter Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 460 F.3d 31, 40-41 (DC Cir. 2006); Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 526 F.3d 763, 766-7 (DC Cir. 2008). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). - � � � � F � � � � Letter from Neal M. Goldberg, Vice President and General Counsel, National Cable & Telecommunications Association, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CS Docket No. 97-80, at 14 (December 22, 2009). Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-60 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-60 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-60 �r��PNG � "
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.txt
  • to "sniff and steal" a MAC address already programmed into the router, for Internet access. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 & 1.1206. Although a Notice of Inquiry proceeding is generally exempt from the ex parte rules, we find that the public interest is best served by treating this critical cyber security matter as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. ��1.1200(a), 1.1204(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-63 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-63 8 N O P ] - ! " , 7 8 : ; J M N P � � � � � � ~ ~  � ? � �  � � 0 � 0 ~ = { � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-51A1.txt
  • amount of confusion.''). National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services, 545 U.S. 967 (2005). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Although a Notice of Inquiry proceeding is generally exempt from the ex parte rules, we find that the public interest is best served by treating this important matter as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1204(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, 1.430. The nationwide effect of this order is limited. For example, the Commission can only exert jurisdiction over pole attachment issues in areas where these access issues are not regulated by a state. See 47 U.S.C. � 224(c). Also, pole attachment arrangements that involve cooperatives are
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.txt
  • FCC 11-16, __ FCC Rcd ____ (2011). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 & 1.1206. Although a Notice of Inquiry proceeding is generally exempt from the ex parte rules, we find that the public interest is best served by treating this matter of critical importance to the reliability of our Nation's communications networks as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. ��1.1200(a), 1.1204(b)(1). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 47 CFR �� 1.415, 1.419, 1.430. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-55 Federal Communications Commission FCC 11-55 � � � � � � � � � J � x y 0 x y 0 �c ^�c
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-65A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-65A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-65A1.txt
  • providers (e.g., price, quantity, quality)? PROCEDURAL MATTERS Authority. This Further Notice is issued pursuant to authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 403, and 628(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C �� 154(i), 154(j), 403, and 548(g). Ex Parte Rules. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Comment Information. Interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-77A1.txt
  • 2-3. website, much less that the construction of the website (as distinct from the Commission's substantive open Internet policy) is a matter of ``wide public attention.'' AFR at 2. Judicial Watch III, 185 F. Supp. 2d at 60. 47 C.F.R. � 0.470(e). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200-1.1216. See id. �� 1.1206 (permit-but-disclose proceedings), 1.1208 (restricted proceedings); see also id. � 1.1204 (proceedings exempt from ex parte filing requirements). Id. � 0.470(e). See Letter from Kenneth F. Boehm, Chairman to Joel Kaufman, Associate General Counsel (Apr. 7, 2010) (Contingent AFR). We refer to NLPC's application for review as ``contingent'' because, as we explain infra, it is expressly contingent on whether the decisions below are construed as denials of NLPC's fee waiver requests.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.txt
  • Radiocommunication Services Along the Common Border (June 1994). 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq. Although a Notice of Inquiry proceeding is generally exempt from the ex parte rules, we find that the public interest is best served by treating this matter of critical importance to the reliability of our Nation's communications networks as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. ��1.1200(a), 1.1204(b)(1). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 12-53 Federal Communications Commission FCC 12-53 � � � � � 0 0 0 �c ^�c
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-70A1.txt
  • any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified below for filing comments. 48 Id. 49 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, para. 27 citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 50 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-70 21 B. Supplemental Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 1.1.46 In the Local Competition First Report and Order, the Commission prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) addressing the impact of the local competition rules on small businesses,51 including section 51.319.52 In AT&T v. Iowa Utils. Bd. the
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.wp
  • we amend the rule by adding "or" after option (a). We find the correction of this inadvertent 182 183 omission to be good cause for amending the rule; hence, we adopt this rule change without prior notice pursuant to our authority under Section 1.412(c) of our rules. 184 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-248 See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. 185 5 U.S.C. � 603. 186 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). 187 35 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations 71. This Further Notice is a permit-but-disclose rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, in accordance with the Commission rules, provided that they are disclosed as required. 185 B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 72. As required by the Regulatory
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.wp
  • Commission should permit firms engaged in limited market trials to exempt any associated revenue from the computation of end user telecommunications revenues, i.e., the total revenues on which the firms' contributions to the universal service fund are based.74 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-118 75 47 U.S.C. � 157. 76 1996 Act, � 706. 77 Id. 78 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). 19 IV. CONCLUSION 33. We believe that deregulatory initiatives that result in promoting experiments involving new technology will benefit all consumers of telecommunications services. Congress has directly addressed our public interest considerations in section 7 of the Communications Act, which establishes the policy of the United States "to encourage the provision of new technologies to the public."75 Congress has reaffirmed
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • for Dominant Carriers, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 87-313, 3 FCC Rcd 3195, 3437 (para. 449) (1988) (AT&T Price Cap Further Notice). 33 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348 (para. 27) (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)). 34 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 9 formula for IXC PCIs spelled out in Section 61.44(b), "as further explained in � 61.44(e), (f), (g), and (h)." Section 61.44(e) requires price cap carriers calculating "w" to apportion "access costs" among price cap baskets using the methodology specified in Section 61.44(d).32 Proposed Section 61.45(b)(2) is intended to incorporate the requirements
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.wp
  • views and arguments presented is generally required.65 62 See Anti-Cramming Best Practices Guidelines at 13; NARUC White Paper at 3; National Consumers League Testimony at 7. 63 See 47 U.S.C. � 201(b). 64 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, 27 (citing 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(b)(1)) (1997). 65 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis 36. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this Notice, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.wp
  • in light of the availability of incumbent LEC resold services. Is there a legal or policy basis for concluding that Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-70 49 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, para. 27 citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 50 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 51 Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 16143-79. 52 Id. at 16161-64, paras. 1374-83. 18 the inability to obtain access to combinations of network elements could impair a requesting carrier's ability to provide service to residential customers, but not business customers? 44. Parties should submit the text
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • area with many more NXX codes than they need, which would, at the same time, be unavailable to wireline carriers that need them. Therefore, we seek Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 402 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(b)(1)). 403 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 109 comment on whether technology-specific or service-specific overlays should only be implemented on an expanded or regional basis. 260.We also seek comment on the relationship between technology-specific or service- specific overlays and other numbering resource optimization methods discussed above, such as number pooling. For example, if we were to adopt pooling requirements
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.wp
  • Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Counter TWA 325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Filings are no longer accepted at the Commission's facilities located at 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). For additional information regarding this proceeding, contact Neil Fried at (202) 418-1530; TTY: (202) 418-0484. V. ORDERING CLAUSE 30.Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-05, 208, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-05, 208, 254, and 403, this Notice of Inquiry IS ADOPTED. Federal Communications Commission Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Federal Communications Commission FCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00057.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00057.txt
  • in another proceeding, they must provide in their comments in this proceeding a complete recitation of the pertinent information and also attach a copy of the filing to which they refer. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Because many of the matters on which we request comment in this Notice may call on parties to disclose proprietary information such as market research and business plans, we suggest that parties consult 47 C.F.R. � 0.459 about the submission of confidential information. . It would be appreciated if parties filing comments or reply comments would deliver to John W.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
  • the proceeding and without opportunity for them to be present. The first category of proceedings established by the 1987 Ex Parte Order are those for 30 which there are no ex parte restrictions. In these "exempt" proceedings, parties and Commission decision-makers may communicate freely, without regard to the prohibitions and disclosure Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-387 _____________________________________________________________________________ Id. at � 1.1204. 31 Id. at � 1.1206. 32 Id. at � 1.1206(a). 33 Id. at � 1.1208. 34 Id. at � 1.1206(b). 35 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208(c)(1)(ii)(B). 36 Id. at � 1.1202(b). 37 7 requirements in the rules. The second category are those proceedings classified as "non-restricted" 31 or "permit but disclose." In non-restricted proceedings, parties and Commission decision-makers are permitted to
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.wp
  • associated with the delivery of such traffic. This Commission is mindful of concerns that our jurisdictional analysis may result in allocation to Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-38 98 See Letter from James Bradford Ramsay, Assistant General Counsel, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC (December 14, 1998). 99 See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. 100 See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 22 different jurisdictions of the costs and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • as a "price squeeze," may result in the competitive LEC's cost for the xDSL-capable loop being greater that the incumbent LEC's charge for xDSL-based services. 227 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, para. 27 citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 52 106.Economic, Pricing, and Cost Allocation Issues. We also seek comment on the economic, pricing, and cost allocation issues that may arise from line sharing. For example, how might line sharing affect federal and state access charge regimes and universal service mechanisms? What are the pricing consequences of requiring line sharing (e.g., what consequences will line sharing have on
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • most accessibility-related informal complaints filed pursuant to section 255 will be resolved promptly by manufacturers and service providers, without the need for significant Commission involvement. We emphasize, however, that to the extent that compliance issues or problems requiring regulatory intervention are perceived by the staff during the processing of an accessibility-related informal complaint or are otherwise brought 334 See section 1.1204 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1204. 335 We note that our ex parte rules specifically authorize the Commission or its staff to apply different ex parte procedures in particular cases if med in the public interest. For example, the staff could designate an informal complaint as either "restricted" (which would mean that ex parte munications would be strictly prohibited) or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • Dec. 10 Ex Parte Letter). Sept.19 Public Notice at Section H. Section H of the Public Notice establishes page limitations for ex partes, subject to certain exceptions. See Letter from Dee May, Director, Federal Regulatory Group, Bell Atlantic to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 99-295 at 2 (filed Dec. 16, 1999). Id. Consistent with section 1.1204(a)(b), responses to Commission inquiries will generally be placed in the record. 47 C.F.R � 1.204(a)(b). Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20599. 47 U.S.C. � 271(c)(1)(B)(i), (ii). Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20618-19. Id. Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20619 n.345. See supra paras. 44-46. Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20567-68; Second BellSouth
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.txt
  • Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 36; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20575. Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 37; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20573-74. Sept. 19 Public Notice at Section H (establishing page limitations for ex partes, subject to certain exceptions). Id. Consistent with section 1.1204(a)(b) of our rules, responses to Commission inquiries will generally be placed in the record. 47 C.F.R � 1.204(a)(b). Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3971, para. 44; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20599. 47 U.S.C. � 271(c)(1)(B)(i), (ii). Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3971, para. 44; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
  • Pursuant to Section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 97-298, at 51 (rel. Aug. 19, 1997). 11. 47 C.F.R. 1.45. 12. See 47 C.F.R. 1.4(h). 13. See id. at 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 14. See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(b). 15. See id. at 1.1204(a)(6). 16. Cf. 1.1200(a); 1.1203. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_6_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_7_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_8_ 11. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_9_ 12. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_10_ 13. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_11_ 14. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_12_ 15. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_13_ 16. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_14_ 17. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_15_ 18. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_16_
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990117.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990117.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990117.wp
  • e-mail comments, commenters should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, including "get form " in the body of the message. A sample form and directions will be sent in reply.Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.32 This proceeding is considered exempt for ex parte purposes. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1204(b). Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth St., S.W., Room TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, parties should send two copies to Jeannie Grimes, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, Suite 235, 2000 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and one copy to ITS, at 1231
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
  • Michigan Pursuant to Section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, para. 15 (1997). 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(h). See id. at �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See id. at �� 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See id. at � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. �� 1.1200(a); 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e�
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00184.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00184.txt
  • be supported with a sound technical justification. Additionally, we seek comment on an alternative DTV standard for purposes of determining eligibility pursuant to SHVA. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Status of Proceeding. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning ``Sunshine Period'' prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Filing of Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before June 27, 2000, and reply comments on or before July 12, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00395.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00395.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00395.txt
  • of this paragraph, which procedures shall include a process for resolving any differences that arise regarding estimates of relocation or modification costs under this paragraph. NDAA-99, � 1064(c)(3) (codified at 47 U.S.C. � 923(g)(1)(E)). See NTIA Organization Act, Section 113 (g) (1) (A). See NTIA Organization Act, Section 113 (g) (1) (B). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a). See 47 CFR �1.1204(z)(5) of the Commission's rules on shared jurisdiction. NTIA and the FCC share jurisdiction over spectrum. See 47 USC, �� 301-303, 305, and 902. NTIA chairs the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee (IRAC) which is an interagency committee of Federal radio frequency managers that advises the executive branch on the Federal Government's use of the spectrum. Classified Government stations are those whose
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.wp
  • be obtained through the Commission's contract copier, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036. ITS can also be reached at (202)857-3800 or by facsimile at (202)857-3805. 61. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). 62. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4, 11, 303, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154, 161, 303, and 403, and Section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, this Notice of Inquiry IS ADOPTED. 63. Additional Information: For additional information regarding this proceeding, contact Roger
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99390.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99390.txt
  • party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. Pursuant to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) this is an exempt proceeding. Ex parte presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed. Additional Information. For additional information on this proceeding, please contact Eric Bash in the Mass Media Bureau, Policy & Rules Division, (202) 418-2130, TTY (202) 418-1169. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99393.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99393.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99393.txt
  • C.F.R. � 1.1210 (1998). It appears, however, based upon the materials submitted by WQED, that Alliance's webpage is meant to inform interested persons of the proposed assignment of WQEX(TV) and the Commission's processes, and urge Pittsburgh area residents to make their views known to the Commission, a presentation which is exempt from the prohibitions of restricted proceedings pursuant to Section 1.1204(8) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(8). Accordingly, we see no reason for further inquiry. Section 399B prohibits noncommercial educational stations from broadcasting advertisements, and defines an advertisement as "any message or other programming material which is broadcast or otherwise transmitted in exchange for any remuneration, and which is intended -- (1) to promote any service, facility, or
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • permit-but-disclose rulemaking,38 it may do so electronically or on paper. In proceedings in which electronic filing is permitted, paper filings will also be scanned into the system. The summaries of ex parte presentations will be available to all Commissioners and Commission staff via the FCC's Intranet. FCC 98-56 Federal Communications Commission 39 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 40 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). 41 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Comments at 8. 42 12 FCC Rcd at 5155-56. 43 Compare Edgewood Comments at 2-3; NECA Comments at 4-5; FCBA Comments at 1-2; PCIA Comments at 2-3; Crawford Comments at 2-3; Ameritech Comments at 2; OCC Comments at 3-4; AT&T Comments at 4-5 and Reply Comments at 3; SBC Comments at 10; CBT Comments at 5-6; and
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
  • a record as possible before making a decision. We believe that additional information is needed before we arrive at a final decision with respect to this matter. Therefore, we seek comment Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 135 NTIA's submission is exempt from the ex parte rules otherwise applicable to submissions received after Commission issuance of a Sunshine Agenda. See Section 1.1204(a)(5) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(5). 136 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Pub. L. 105-85, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1629). 137 H.R. Conf. Rep. 105-746, 105th Cong., 2d Sess. 1998. 138 Commercial Space Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-303, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2843). 139 For purposes of NTIA's analysis, wideband interference was
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
  • (or summaries thereof), will be published in the Federal Register.214 B. Ex Parte Rules. 88. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiate and constitute a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules.215 Persons making oral ex parte presentations relating to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-141 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 216 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 217 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). 48 Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
  • Rcd at 12710, � 68. ICTA Comments at 7. 47 C.F.R. � 76.802. CAI Comments at 40. See Competitive Networks NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 12723-34. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, � 27, citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et. Seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). Promotion
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.pdf
  • to Joint Motion, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (filed Aug. 10, 2001) at 2 (noting that ``[a]ll three parties to this proceeding have elected to seek judicial review of the [BTI] Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit''). 11 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(b). 13 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(c), 1.1206. 14 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1204. 15 47 U.S.C. 208. 16 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1206, 1.1204. 17 See, e.g., Letter from Alexander P. Starr, Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01- MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). 18 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.1208. See, e.g.,
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-107A1.html
  • March 11, 2003 and in response to questions from the staff. 15 Because of the nexus between the formal complaints and the Investigation, the Bureau treated the Investigation as a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1208. As a result, the Bureau included Touch America in correspondence between Qwest and the Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1204(a)(10) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(a)(10), the Commission and Qwest conducted bi-lateral settlement discussions. All of the information provided by Qwest during those settlement discussions ``relat[ed] to how a proceeding should or could be settled, as opposed to new information regarding the merits.'' See 47 C.F.R. 1204(a)(10)(ii). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.doc
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-124A1.html
  • Communications Commission, dated January 13, 2006. Hammond requests dismissal of the informal objection as repetitive and also alleges that Rushing's failure to serve him with the objection violates the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.1200 et seq. Hammond is incorrect that Rushing's failure to serve him constitutes a violation of the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1204(a) (8) (presentations exempt from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings include those made by a listener of a broadcast station who is not a party under 47 C.F.R. S 1.1202(d)(1) relating to an application for renewal of a station's license that is not designated for hearing at the time that the presentation is made). In addition, two individual listeners filed Petitions
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-152A1.html
  • ex parte rules lacks merit. Petition at 3-4. The settlement discussions fall within the exception to the general prohibition of ex parte communications in restricted proceedings for communications "requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction of evidence or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement." 47 C.F.R. S 1.1204(a)(10); see NY State Dep't of Law, 984 F.2d at 1217-18. Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 16004, P 4. See Stockholders of Infinity Broadcasting Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 5012, 5057 n.1 (1996) (challenges to the applicant's character qualifications based on past apparent indecency violations were moot where the Commission previously determined that such violations were not disqualifying
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-153A1.html
  • Commission's ex parte rules lacks merit. Petition at 10-13. Those discussions fall within the exception to the general prohibition of ex parte communications in restricted proceedings for communications "requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction of evidence or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement." 47 C.F.R. S 1.1204(10); see New York State Department of Law v. F.C.C., 984 F.2d 1209, 1217-18 (D.C.Cir.1993). See Petition at 9-10. Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 23103, P 4. See Infinity Broadcasting Corp., 12 FCC Rcd at 5057, n.1 (challenges to the applicant's character qualifications based on past apparent indecency violations were moot where the Commission previously determined that such violations were not
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00385.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00385.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00385.txt
  • above-captioned proceedings related to Ameritech Corporation's acquisition of the alarm monitoring services assets of five unaffiliated entities in 1996. With respect to four of the acquisitions, the Commission previously found that Ameritech violated section 275(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, by obtaining financial control of unaffiliated alarm monitoring service entities prior to February 2001. Pursuant to section 1.1204(b)(10) of the Commission's rules, the Commission and SBC Communications, Inc. (SBC) have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the above-captioned proceedings related to Ameritech's acquisitions. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and is incorporated by reference. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated the facts before us. We believe
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-149A1.html
  • later than March 26, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS We find that it would be in the public interest to treat this proceeding as an exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules.6 Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte communications to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed, in accordance with section 1.1204(b) of the Commission's Rules.7 8 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.9 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html>. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-1933A1.html
  • later than August 30, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS We find that it would be in the public interest to treat this proceeding as an exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules.7 Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte communications to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed, in accordance with section 1.1204(b) of the Commission's rules.8 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS'') or by filing paper copies.9 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html>. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00270.doc
  • be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20554. The Cable Services Bureau contact for this proceeding is Donnajean Ward at (202) 418-7200, TTY (202) 418-7172, or at dward@fcc.gov. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Communications Act") � 628(g), 47 U.S.C. � 548(g). Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming, CS Docket No. 99-230, Sixth Annual Report, 15 FCC Rcd 978 (2000) (``1999 Competition Report''). See Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00341.doc
  • of release of this Order a report on the status of the DFAST license, including a final version of a completed DFAST license agreement. Procedural Matters Ex Parte Status of Proceeding. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning ``Sunshine Period'' prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), contained in Appendix A, of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da000327.doc
  • in another proceeding, they must provide in their comments in this proceeding a complete recitation of the pertinent information and also attach a copy of the filing to which they refer. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Because many of the matters on which we request comment in this Notice may call on parties to disclose proprietary information such as market research and business plans, we suggest that parties consult 47 C.F.R. � 0.459 about the submission of confidential information. For additional information regarding this proceeding, contact John W. Berresford, Senior Antitrust Attorney, Industry Analysis Division, Common
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.wp
  • we amend the rule by adding "or" after option (a). We find the correction of this inadvertent 182 183 omission to be good cause for amending the rule; hence, we adopt this rule change without prior notice pursuant to our authority under Section 1.412(c) of our rules. 184 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-248 See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. 185 5 U.S.C. � 603. 186 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). 187 35 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations 71. This Further Notice is a permit-but-disclose rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, in accordance with the Commission rules, provided that they are disclosed as required. 185 B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 72. As required by the Regulatory
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98118.wp
  • Commission should permit firms engaged in limited market trials to exempt any associated revenue from the computation of end user telecommunications revenues, i.e., the total revenues on which the firms' contributions to the universal service fund are based.74 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-118 75 47 U.S.C. � 157. 76 1996 Act, � 706. 77 Id. 78 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). 19 IV. CONCLUSION 33. We believe that deregulatory initiatives that result in promoting experiments involving new technology will benefit all consumers of telecommunications services. Congress has directly addressed our public interest considerations in section 7 of the Communications Act, which establishes the policy of the United States "to encourage the provision of new technologies to the public."75 Congress has reaffirmed
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
  • for Dominant Carriers, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 87-313, 3 FCC Rcd 3195, 3437 (para. 449) (1988) (AT&T Price Cap Further Notice). 33 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348 (para. 27) (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)). 34 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 9 formula for IXC PCIs spelled out in Section 61.44(b), "as further explained in � 61.44(e), (f), (g), and (h)." Section 61.44(e) requires price cap carriers calculating "w" to apportion "access costs" among price cap baskets using the methodology specified in Section 61.44(d).32 Proposed Section 61.45(b)(2) is intended to incorporate the requirements
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98187.pdf
  • another proceeding, they must provide in their comments to this proceeding a complete recitation of the pertinent information and also attach a copy of the document to which they refer. 90. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Because many of the matters on which we request comment in this NOI may call on parties to disclose proprietary information such as market research and business plans, we suggest that parties consult 47 C.F.R. � 0.459 about the submission of confidential information. 91. For additional information regarding this proceeding, contact John W. Berresford, Senior Antitrust Attorney, Industry Analysis Division,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.wp
  • views and arguments presented is generally required.65 62 See Anti-Cramming Best Practices Guidelines at 13; NARUC White Paper at 3; National Consumers League Testimony at 7. 63 See 47 U.S.C. � 201(b). 64 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, 27 (citing 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(b)(1)) (1997). 65 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis 36. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this Notice, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.wp
  • in light of the availability of incumbent LEC resold services. Is there a legal or policy basis for concluding that Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-70 49 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, para. 27 citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 50 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 51 Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 16143-79. 52 Id. at 16161-64, paras. 1374-83. 18 the inability to obtain access to combinations of network elements could impair a requesting carrier's ability to provide service to residential customers, but not business customers? 44. Parties should submit the text
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • area with many more NXX codes than they need, which would, at the same time, be unavailable to wireline carriers that need them. Therefore, we seek Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 402 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(b)(1)). 403 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 109 comment on whether technology-specific or service-specific overlays should only be implemented on an expanded or regional basis. 260.We also seek comment on the relationship between technology-specific or service- specific overlays and other numbering resource optimization methods discussed above, such as number pooling. For example, if we were to adopt pooling requirements
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99168.wp
  • Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Counter TWA 325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Filings are no longer accepted at the Commission's facilities located at 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). For additional information regarding this proceeding, contact Neil Fried at (202) 418-1530; TTY: (202) 418-0484. V. ORDERING CLAUSE 30.Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 201-05, 208, 254, and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. �� 201-05, 208, 254, and 403, this Notice of Inquiry IS ADOPTED. Federal Communications Commission Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Federal Communications Commission FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00057.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00057.txt
  • in another proceeding, they must provide in their comments in this proceeding a complete recitation of the pertinent information and also attach a copy of the filing to which they refer. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Because many of the matters on which we request comment in this Notice may call on parties to disclose proprietary information such as market research and business plans, we suggest that parties consult 47 C.F.R. � 0.459 about the submission of confidential information. . It would be appreciated if parties filing comments or reply comments would deliver to John W.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
  • for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, CC Docket No. 98-67, FCC 00-56, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, -- FCC Rcd. --- (rel. Mar. 6, 2000). See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report & Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, para. 27, citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01223.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01223.txt
  • in another proceeding, they must provide in their comments in this proceeding a complete recitation of the pertinent information and also attach a copy of the filing to which they refer. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Because many of the matters on which we request comment in this Notice may call on parties to disclose proprietary information such as market research and business plans, we suggest that parties consult 47 C.F.R. � 0.459 about the submission of confidential information. For additional information regarding this proceeding, contact Ellen Blackler, Special Assistant to the Bureau Chief, Common Carrier
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
  • the proceeding and without opportunity for them to be present. The first category of proceedings established by the 1987 Ex Parte Order are those for 30 which there are no ex parte restrictions. In these "exempt" proceedings, parties and Commission decision-makers may communicate freely, without regard to the prohibitions and disclosure Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-387 _____________________________________________________________________________ Id. at � 1.1204. 31 Id. at � 1.1206. 32 Id. at � 1.1206(a). 33 Id. at � 1.1208. 34 Id. at � 1.1206(b). 35 47 C.F.R. � 1.1208(c)(1)(ii)(B). 36 Id. at � 1.1202(b). 37 7 requirements in the rules. The second category are those proceedings classified as "non-restricted" 31 or "permit but disclose." In non-restricted proceedings, parties and Commission decision-makers are permitted to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.wp
  • they are provided by BOC advanced services affiliates, rather than by the BOCs. VII. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-188 369 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, � 27 citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 370 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 87 197.The matter in Docket No. 98-147, initiated by the NPRM portion of this item, shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules.369 Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.wp
  • associated with the delivery of such traffic. This Commission is mindful of concerns that our jurisdictional analysis may result in allocation to Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-38 98 See Letter from James Bradford Ramsay, Assistant General Counsel, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC (December 14, 1998). 99 See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. 100 See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 22 different jurisdictions of the costs and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
  • as a "price squeeze," may result in the competitive LEC's cost for the xDSL-capable loop being greater that the incumbent LEC's charge for xDSL-based services. 227 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, para. 27 citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 52 106.Economic, Pricing, and Cost Allocation Issues. We also seek comment on the economic, pricing, and cost allocation issues that may arise from line sharing. For example, how might line sharing affect federal and state access charge regimes and universal service mechanisms? What are the pricing consequences of requiring line sharing (e.g., what consequences will line sharing have on
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • most accessibility-related informal complaints filed pursuant to section 255 will be resolved promptly by manufacturers and service providers, without the need for significant Commission involvement. We emphasize, however, that to the extent that compliance issues or problems requiring regulatory intervention are perceived by the staff during the processing of an accessibility-related informal complaint or are otherwise brought 334 See section 1.1204 of the rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1204. 335 We note that our ex parte rules specifically authorize the Commission or its staff to apply different ex parte procedures in particular cases if med in the public interest. For example, the staff could designate an informal complaint as either "restricted" (which would mean that ex parte munications would be strictly prohibited) or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99404.txt
  • Dec. 10 Ex Parte Letter). Sept.19 Public Notice at Section H. Section H of the Public Notice establishes page limitations for ex partes, subject to certain exceptions. See Letter from Dee May, Director, Federal Regulatory Group, Bell Atlantic to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 99-295 at 2 (filed Dec. 16, 1999). Id. Consistent with section 1.1204(a)(b), responses to Commission inquiries will generally be placed in the record. 47 C.F.R � 1.204(a)(b). Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20599. 47 U.S.C. � 271(c)(1)(B)(i), (ii). Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20618-19. Id. Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20619 n.345. See supra paras. 44-46. Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20567-68; Second BellSouth
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.txt
  • computers to be used for text telephony in the PSTN.'' See CTIA Comments at 5. CTIA Comments at 2-3; TDI Comments at 4-5; GTE Reply Comments at 5. 47 C.F.R. � 64.604 (b) (1). See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentation in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (citing 47 C.F.R. �1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. �1.1206(b)(2), as revised. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, See U.S.C. � 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.txt
  • West comments at 34 (stating that ongoing costs of number pooling should be recovered through an ongoing exogenous adjustment). MCI WorldCom comments at 53. Notice, 14 FCC Rcd at 10407-08. Id. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Repo rt and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24, 121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00238.txt
  • Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 36; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20575. Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3969, para. 37; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20573-74. Sept. 19 Public Notice at Section H (establishing page limitations for ex partes, subject to certain exceptions). Id. Consistent with section 1.1204(a)(b) of our rules, responses to Commission inquiries will generally be placed in the record. 47 C.F.R � 1.204(a)(b). Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3971, para. 44; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 20599. 47 U.S.C. � 271(c)(1)(B)(i), (ii). Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3971, para. 44; Ameritech Michigan Order, 12 FCC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.txt
  • Comments at 5; PCIA Comments at 7-11; see also 47 C.F.R. � 20.12(B) (requiring CMRS carriers to permit unrestricted resale of its service). See supra section III.F. See supra section III.E. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Repo rt and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24, 121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.49. 5 U.S.C. � 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
  • Pursuant to Section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 97-298, at 51 (rel. Aug. 19, 1997). 11. 47 C.F.R. 1.45. 12. See 47 C.F.R. 1.4(h). 13. See id. at 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 14. See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(b). 15. See id. at 1.1204(a)(6). 16. Cf. 1.1200(a); 1.1203. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_6_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_7_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_8_ 11. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_9_ 12. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_10_ 13. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_11_ 14. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_12_ 15. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_13_ 16. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_14_ 17. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_15_ 18. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_16_
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990117.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990117.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990117.wp
  • e-mail comments, commenters should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, including "get form " in the body of the message. A sample form and directions will be sent in reply.Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.32 This proceeding is considered exempt for ex parte purposes. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1204(b). Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth St., S.W., Room TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, parties should send two copies to Jeannie Grimes, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, Suite 235, 2000 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and one copy to ITS, at 1231
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
  • Michigan Pursuant to Section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, para. 15 (1997). 47 C.F.R. � 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.4(h). See id. at �� 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See id. at �� 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See id. at � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. �� 1.1200(a); 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>��� -�m�``�Q(q P� ���e D �_�� p�/]b|?�O� V��Jõ tXT���e�
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992652.doc
  • Ex Parte Status for United States Telephone Association's Petition for Forbearance from Depreciation Regulation or Price Cap Carriers, ASD 98-91, DA 99-1226 (Jun. 23, 1999). The June 23, 1999, Public Notice, however, did not deal with notices of ex parte contacts that were filed before the proceeding was reclassified. As to those notices, we hereby waive, in accordance with section 1.1204(10)(ii) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(10)(ii), the requirement that parties serve the notices of ex parte pleadings on other parties to the proceeding. Because the parties in the depreciation forbearance proceeding are numerous, we find that requiring parties to serve notices of ex parte proceedings would be unduly burdensome. The ex parte presentations filed in this proceeding are
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.txt
  • Verizon New England, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 01-9, Public Notice, DA 01-106 (rel. January 16, 2001). The procedures for filing confidential materials as part of the initial application, comments or replies is covered above in Section A.4. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov C D �� C D �� �� � �����PNG > �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J 2�� bʆPh=f 8H�]}��`��2@ ���'����X�t�p�O � ��$��>���
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Enforcement/Orders/2000/fcc00385.doc
  • above-captioned proceedings related to Ameritech Corporation's acquisition of the alarm monitoring services assets of five unaffiliated entities in 1996. With respect to four of the acquisitions, the Commission previously found that Ameritech violated section 275(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, by obtaining financial control of unaffiliated alarm monitoring service entities prior to February 2001. Pursuant to section 1.1204(b)(10) of the Commission's rules, the Commission and SBC Communications, Inc. (SBC) have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the above-captioned proceedings related to Ameritech's acquisitions. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and is incorporated by reference. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated the facts before us. We believe
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00103.doc
  • how we would enforce any new rules for software defined radios. Accordingly, comments are invited on any other matters or issues that may be pertinent to software defined radios. PROCEDURAL MATTERS This is an exempt notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1204(b). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on before [75 days after publication in the Federal Register], and reply comments on or before [105 days after publication in the Federal Register]. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00184.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00184.txt
  • be supported with a sound technical justification. Additionally, we seek comment on an alternative DTV standard for purposes of determining eligibility pursuant to SHVA. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Status of Proceeding. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning ``Sunshine Period'' prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). Filing of Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to Sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments on or before June 27, 2000, and reply comments on or before July 12, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00395.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00395.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00395.txt
  • of this paragraph, which procedures shall include a process for resolving any differences that arise regarding estimates of relocation or modification costs under this paragraph. NDAA-99, � 1064(c)(3) (codified at 47 U.S.C. � 923(g)(1)(E)). See NTIA Organization Act, Section 113 (g) (1) (A). See NTIA Organization Act, Section 113 (g) (1) (B). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2105(a). See 47 CFR �1.1204(z)(5) of the Commission's rules on shared jurisdiction. NTIA and the FCC share jurisdiction over spectrum. See 47 USC, �� 301-303, 305, and 902. NTIA chairs the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee (IRAC) which is an interagency committee of Federal radio frequency managers that advises the executive branch on the Federal Government's use of the spectrum. Classified Government stations are those whose
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00029.doc
  • Office of Engineering and Technology. I believe pre-circulation consultation with NTIA is perfectly appropriate and necessary based on their statutory responsibility for government owned spectrum pursuant to 47 U.S.C. � 902. However, I am not convinced that it is necessary to share actual item drafts. The staff believes that the sharing of drafts is legally permissible pursuant to 47 CFR 1.1204(a)(5) and the Commission decision In re Amendment of Support H, Part 1 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations Concerning Ex Parte Communications and Presentations in Commission Proceedings, 2 FCC Rcd 3031, n. 37 (emphasizing that the prohibition against disclosure of information contained in agenda items and other staff papers with outside parties is inapplicable to ``presentations...[that] are made to other
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/1999/da992130.doc
  • elements that should be taken into account or incorporated into a test procedure. Submission Instructions In order for the Commission to develop a test procedure in a timely manner, we ask that responses to this request for information be submitted no later than October 29, 1999. This inquiry is exempt from the Commission's ex parte rules (see Sections 1.1 and 1.1204(b)(1) of the Commission's rules), but all information will be available to the public unless confidential treatment is sought and granted. (Marty Liebman, WTB). To respond through the ECFS, send as an electronic file via the Internet to . In completing the transmittal screen, parties responding should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket number, ET
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.wp
  • released the Skybridge application and Petition for public comment, and oppositions were filed regarding both by various parties. In as much as the Skybridge application is an adjudicative licensing proceeding, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. The Petition, however, is a exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1204. The Skybridge application raises complex technical, legal and policy issues, making it essential that the Commission obtain the most current information available, subject to appropriate procedural safeguards. In order to assist the Commission in developing a complete record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made, the ex parte procedures for the Skybridge application are hereby modified. The Skybridge application
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98037.wp
  • be obtained through the Commission's contract copier, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036. ITS can also be reached at (202)857-3800 or by facsimile at (202)857-3805. 61. Subject to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1203 concerning "Sunshine Period" prohibitions, this proceeding is exempt from ex parte restraints and disclosure requirements pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). 62. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4, 11, 303, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154, 161, 303, and 403, and Section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, this Notice of Inquiry IS ADOPTED. 63. Additional Information: For additional information regarding this proceeding, contact Roger
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99390.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99390.txt
  • party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. Pursuant to the provisions of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) this is an exempt proceeding. Ex parte presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed. Additional Information. For additional information on this proceeding, please contact Eric Bash in the Mass Media Bureau, Policy & Rules Division, (202) 418-2130, TTY (202) 418-1169. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99328.doc
  • addressed in that separate proceeding. Accordingly, we will grant Urban's Request for Clarification and dismiss as moot its Partial Petition for Reconsideration. Roy M. Speer, 11 FCC Rcd 14147 (1996) (Speer I). Roy M. Speer, 11 FCC Rcd 14684 (1996) (Speer II). Id. at 14687. Id. Urban Telecommunications Corp., 7 FCC Rcd 3867 (1992). See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(b)(1) and 1.1204(b)(1). Speer III, 11 FCC Rcd at 18413. Id. Id. at 18418-9, 18426. In Speer III, the Commission assessed monetary forfeitures against Urban and Silver King for the unauthorized control of station WTMW(TV). Id. at 18429-30. The forfeiture assessed against Urban was rescinded in Speer IV, 13 FCC Rcd at 19921, and Silver King paid the forfeiture assessed against it. Id.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99393.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99393.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1999/fcc99393.txt
  • C.F.R. � 1.1210 (1998). It appears, however, based upon the materials submitted by WQED, that Alliance's webpage is meant to inform interested persons of the proposed assignment of WQEX(TV) and the Commission's processes, and urge Pittsburgh area residents to make their views known to the Commission, a presentation which is exempt from the prohibitions of restricted proceedings pursuant to Section 1.1204(8) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(8). Accordingly, we see no reason for further inquiry. Section 399B prohibits noncommercial educational stations from broadcasting advertisements, and defines an advertisement as "any message or other programming material which is broadcast or otherwise transmitted in exchange for any remuneration, and which is intended -- (1) to promote any service, facility, or
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
  • permit-but-disclose rulemaking,38 it may do so electronically or on paper. In proceedings in which electronic filing is permitted, paper filings will also be scanned into the system. The summaries of ex parte presentations will be available to all Commissioners and Commission staff via the FCC's Intranet. FCC 98-56 Federal Communications Commission 39 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2). 40 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b). 41 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Comments at 8. 42 12 FCC Rcd at 5155-56. 43 Compare Edgewood Comments at 2-3; NECA Comments at 4-5; FCBA Comments at 1-2; PCIA Comments at 2-3; Crawford Comments at 2-3; Ameritech Comments at 2; OCC Comments at 3-4; AT&T Comments at 4-5 and Reply Comments at 3; SBC Comments at 10; CBT Comments at 5-6; and
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1999/fcc99322.doc
  • Commission's rules specify procedures for both informal section 208 complaints (47 C.F.R. � 1.716 et seq.) and formal section 208 complaints (47 C.F.R. � 1.720 et seq.). In revising the ex parte rules, the Commission ruled that it would continue to treat informal section 208 complaints as exempt and formal section 208 complaints as restricted. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1202(d)(2), 1.1204(b)(5), 1.208; 12 FCC Rcd at 7354-55 �� 20-22. 11. LMNG contends that informal complaint proceedings should be treated as restricted. LMNG notes that, although informal complaints are intended to provide a simple and fast means of resolving disputes, there are no restrictions on the issues that can be raised by informal complaint. Thus, according to LMNG, a carrier's competitors have
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
  • a record as possible before making a decision. We believe that additional information is needed before we arrive at a final decision with respect to this matter. Therefore, we seek comment Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 135 NTIA's submission is exempt from the ex parte rules otherwise applicable to submissions received after Commission issuance of a Sunshine Agenda. See Section 1.1204(a)(5) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(5). 136 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Pub. L. 105-85, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1629). 137 H.R. Conf. Rep. 105-746, 105th Cong., 2d Sess. 1998. 138 Commercial Space Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-303, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2843). 139 For purposes of NTIA's analysis, wideband interference was
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
  • (or summaries thereof), will be published in the Federal Register.214 B. Ex Parte Rules. 88. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiate and constitute a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules.215 Persons making oral ex parte presentations relating to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-141 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 216 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 217 See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). 48 Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/fcc96382.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/fcc96382.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/fcc96382.wp
  • Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 42. This Notice can be ordered in large print, audio cassette or on disk, through the FCC's copy contractor, ITS at (202) 857-3800. An unofficial version of the item is available on the FCC's Internet home page at http://www.fcc.gov. 43. There are no ex parte or disclosure requirements applicable to this proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(a)(4). VI. CONCLUSION; ORDERING CLAUSES 44. We believe that our action today constitutes a significant first step toward implementing the provisions of Section 255 and related sections of the 1996 Act regarding the accessibility of telecommunications equipment and services to persons with disabilities. In seeking comment from a broad spectrum of affected parties, we hope to ensure that persons with disabilities,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000452.doc
  • other parties an opportunity to review these facts, and then assess Motorola's request in light of the facts and relevant law. DISCUSSION We disagree with Petitioners' claim that Bureau staff violated the agency's ex parte rules. Section 1.1208 of our rules prohibits ex parte presentations, to or from Commission staff, in restricted proceedings, unless the presentation is exempt under Section 1.1204(b). Pursuant to Section 1.1204(b)(7), in force at the time the application was filed, ex parte communications by the Commission or staff requesting information to clarify or adduce evidence or to resolve issues were exempt from the ex parte prohibition. The party responding to the request needed only file any oral or written response on the other parties to the proceeding.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
  • Rcd at 12710, � 68. ICTA Comments at 7. 47 C.F.R. � 76.802. CAI Comments at 40. See Competitive Networks NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd at 12723-34. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, � 27, citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. See 5 U.S.C. � 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. � 601 et. Seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). Promotion
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2000/dd001215.html
  • MA. Proposed amending license of KRTV Communications, Inc., licensee of station KRTV(TV), NTSC Channel 3, Great Falls, Montana. KRTV requested the substitution of DTV Channel 7 for its assigned DTV Channel 44.. Action by: Chief, Video Services Division, MMB. Comments Due: 02/05/2001. Reply Comments Due: 02/20/2001. Adopted: 12/14/2000 by NPRM. (DA No. 00-2791). MMB [51]DA-00-2791A1.pdf [52]DA-00-2791A1.doc [53]DA-00-2791A1.txt AMENDMENT OF SECTION 1.1204 OF THE COMMISSION'S EX PARTE RULES. Proposed modifying one of the rules governing the permissibility of ex parte presentations in FCC proceedings. Comments due 30 days and replies 45 days after Federal Register publication.. (Dkt No. 00-219). Action by: The Commission. Comments Due: 01/25/2001. Reply Comments Due: 02/09/2001. Adopted: 10/30/2000 by NPRM. (FCC No. 00-392). OGC. Contact David Senzel [54]FCC-00-392A1.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.pdf
  • to Joint Motion, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (filed Aug. 10, 2001) at 2 (noting that ``[a]ll three parties to this proceeding have elected to seek judicial review of the [BTI] Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit''). 11 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(b). 13 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(c), 1.1206. 14 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1204. 15 47 U.S.C. 208. 16 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1206, 1.1204. 17 See, e.g., Letter from Alexander P. Starr, Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01- MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). 18 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.1208. See, e.g.,
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/FCC-03-107A1.html
  • March 11, 2003 and in response to questions from the staff. 15 Because of the nexus between the formal complaints and the Investigation, the Bureau treated the Investigation as a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1208. As a result, the Bureau included Touch America in correspondence between Qwest and the Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1204(a)(10) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(a)(10), the Commission and Qwest conducted bi-lateral settlement discussions. All of the information provided by Qwest during those settlement discussions ``relat[ed] to how a proceeding should or could be settled, as opposed to new information regarding the merits.'' See 47 C.F.R. 1204(a)(10)(ii). References 1. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.pdf 2. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-107A1.doc
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-124A1.html
  • Communications Commission, dated January 13, 2006. Hammond requests dismissal of the informal objection as repetitive and also alleges that Rushing's failure to serve him with the objection violates the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. S 1.1200 et seq. Hammond is incorrect that Rushing's failure to serve him constitutes a violation of the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1204(a) (8) (presentations exempt from the prohibitions in restricted proceedings include those made by a listener of a broadcast station who is not a party under 47 C.F.R. S 1.1202(d)(1) relating to an application for renewal of a station's license that is not designated for hearing at the time that the presentation is made). In addition, two individual listeners filed Petitions
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-152A1.html
  • ex parte rules lacks merit. Petition at 3-4. The settlement discussions fall within the exception to the general prohibition of ex parte communications in restricted proceedings for communications "requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction of evidence or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement." 47 C.F.R. S 1.1204(a)(10); see NY State Dep't of Law, 984 F.2d at 1217-18. Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 16004, P 4. See Stockholders of Infinity Broadcasting Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 5012, 5057 n.1 (1996) (challenges to the applicant's character qualifications based on past apparent indecency violations were moot where the Commission previously determined that such violations were not disqualifying
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-153A1.html
  • Commission's ex parte rules lacks merit. Petition at 10-13. Those discussions fall within the exception to the general prohibition of ex parte communications in restricted proceedings for communications "requested by (or made with the advance approval of) the Commission or staff for the clarification or adduction of evidence or for the resolution of issues, including possible settlement." 47 C.F.R. S 1.1204(10); see New York State Department of Law v. F.C.C., 984 F.2d 1209, 1217-18 (D.C.Cir.1993). See Petition at 9-10. Order, 19 FCC Rcd at 23103, P 4. See Infinity Broadcasting Corp., 12 FCC Rcd at 5057, n.1 (challenges to the applicant's character qualifications based on past apparent indecency violations were moot where the Commission previously determined that such violations were not
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00385.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00385.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/fcc00385.txt
  • above-captioned proceedings related to Ameritech Corporation's acquisition of the alarm monitoring services assets of five unaffiliated entities in 1996. With respect to four of the acquisitions, the Commission previously found that Ameritech violated section 275(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, by obtaining financial control of unaffiliated alarm monitoring service entities prior to February 2001. Pursuant to section 1.1204(b)(10) of the Commission's rules, the Commission and SBC Communications, Inc. (SBC) have negotiated the terms of a Consent Decree that would terminate the above-captioned proceedings related to Ameritech's acquisitions. A copy of the Consent Decree is attached hereto and is incorporated by reference. We have reviewed the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluated the facts before us. We believe
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-149A1.html
  • later than March 26, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS We find that it would be in the public interest to treat this proceeding as an exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules.6 Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte communications to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed, in accordance with section 1.1204(b) of the Commission's Rules.7 8 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.9 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html>. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-1933A1.html
  • later than August 30, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS We find that it would be in the public interest to treat this proceeding as an exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules.7 Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte communications to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed, in accordance with section 1.1204(b) of the Commission's rules.8 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS'') or by filing paper copies.9 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html>. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1549A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1549A1.pdf
  • an opposition on January 26, 2006, and an Erratum to the opposition on February 23, 2006. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). Id.; 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Alex's failure to serve a copy of the pleading did not violate the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq., because Alex is exempt as a listener pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). The opposition states that the applicant obtained a copy of the pleading after learning about the pleading in a public notice. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. 47 U.S.C. �309(k)(1). The renewal standard was amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation of Sections 204(a) and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2087A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-2087A1.pdf
  • Media Bureau cc: Alabama A & M University WJAB(FM) filed an opposition on November 11, 2004. 47 U.S.C. � 309(d)(1). Id.; 47 C.F.R. � 1.47. Williams' failure to serve a copy of the pleading did not violate the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1200 et seq., because Williams is exempt as a listener pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). The opposition states that the applicant received a copy of the pleading from Commission staff after inquiring about the status of its renewal application. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. 47 U.S.C. � 309(k)(1). The renewal standard was amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Order,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-129A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-129A1.pdf
  • WGFT(AM), Campbell, Ohio (File No. BR-20040601ASV) ARE GRANTED. Sincerely, Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau The Commission also received objections to the above-captioned assignment applications from 577 listeners, who did not serve their objections on the applicants. Their submissions are exempt under the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq., pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). Their informal comments are addressed herein. Stop Riverbend Licenses, LLC filed a Motion for Extension of Time on September 23, 2004, and an Opposition on November 2, 2004. Litton filed a Reply on December 6, 2004. SRL DIP filed an Opposition to and/or Motion to Dismiss Petition to Deny on April 20, 2006, and Bernard filed an Opposition on April
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1650A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-1650A1.pdf
  • Ohio IS GRANTED. Sincerely, Peter H. Doyle Chief, Audio Division Media Bureau cc: Kenneth C. Howard, Jr., Esq. The Commission received objections to the above-captioned assignment application from 24 listeners, who did not serve their objections on the applicants. Their submissions are exempt under the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200 et seq., pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). Their informal comments are addressed herein. 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. . Note that Section 326 of the Act expressly prohibits the Commission from interfering with the right of free speech of broadcasters. 47 U.S.C. � 326. FCC v. WNCN Listener's Guild, 450 U.S. 582, 585 (1981). See 47 C.F.R. � 73.3580. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 April 6, 2007
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2382A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-2382A1.pdf
  • Mr. Crawley but that the copy that it served on Mr. Hensley inadvertently was unsigned, but was identical to what it filed with the Commission, but for the inclusion of the signature. Licensee Response at 4. Because the EEO LOI did not direct the Licensee to so serve Hoosier, it had no obligation to do so. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10) (responses to Commission inquiries in non-hearing proceedings are generally exempt from the ex parte rules. Even assuming arguendo that the Licensee was required to serve Hensley with its Response, he was not prejudiced by the Licensee's delay in doing so. Hensley ultimately received a copy of the LOI Response, and his comments on that Response were provided to the Commission
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4367A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4367A1.pdf
  • $205,500 has already been deducted from the upfront payment it deposited with the Commission to participate in Auction No. 37, it owes no further payment to the Commission. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and 309(j), and Sections 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1), that the Request for Waiver filed by Advance Acquisitions, Inc., on November 20, 2006, IS GRANTED, and the Amended Request for Waiver filed by Advance Acquisitions, Inc., on May 22, 2007, IS GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4926A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-07-4926A1.pdf
  • 5043, 5052 (1987), aff'd sub nom. Syracuse Peace Council v. FCC, 867 F.2d 654 (D.C. Cir. 1989), cert. denied 493 U.S. 1019 (1990). In re Repeal or Modification of the Personal Attack and Political Editorial Rules, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 20697 (2000). Radio-Television News Directors Association v. FCC, 229 F.3d 269 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 11, 2000). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(10) (presentations related to settlement are classified as exempt ex parte presentations). 47 U.S.C. � 154(i). 47 C.F.R. �� 0.61, 0.283. __________________________Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4926 __________________________Federal Communications Commission DA 07-4926 � � } ~  � � � � � # P / � $
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1232A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1232A1.pdf
  • Mr. Mickey Clayton Mr. Todd G. Crump Rev. James McAdams Also before us are one electronic mail and three letter comments on the proposal from WNOW-FM listeners who wish the station to remain in Gaffney. These comments were not served on GBI or its counsel. We believe it appropriate to treat these as comments of individual listeners pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(8) of the Rules. The authors of these comments do not become parties to this proceeding by virtue of their comments. See Note 4 to Paragraph (d) of Section 1.1202 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202. Clay filed the First Objection on April 17, 2007. After submitting a Motion for Extension of Time to which Clay did not object, GBI
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1272A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1272A1.pdf
  • 27, 2007). We have also received dozens of electronic mail communications from local residents objecting to the Application. These e-mail comments were addressed directly to a member of the Media Bureau staff and were not served on S-R or its counsel. We believe it appropriate to treat these e-mails as the comments of individual listeners pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). The authors of these e-mails do not become parties to this proceeding by virtue of their comments. See Note 4 to Paragraph (d) of Section 1.1202 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202. These e-mails add nothing substantive to the existing record in this proceeding. Accordingly, they need not and will not be considered. See, e.g., the essentially identical Letter
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1372A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1372A1.pdf
  • 2008, and CVN filed a Reply to Opposition on April 2, 2008. The Coleman Objection does not appear to have been served on the Assignors, and no opposition has been received. Because the Coleman Objection is a written presentation submitted by listeners of the Assigned Stations, it is exempt from the Commission's prohibition against ex parte presentations. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). File No. BNPH-20070423AAS. Coosa Valley News, Inc. and Mr. Howard C. Toole, Letter, 22 FCC Rcd 18600 (MB 2007), petition for recon. pending (``Toole Decision''). Objection at 2. Id. Id. Opposition at 3-4. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 15464 (1996) (``Greater Muskegon Broadcasters''). Id. at 15472 (emphasis added). See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. � 309(d); 47 C.F.R. �� 1.17,
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1443A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1443A1.pdf
  • from listeners of KDRT-LP supporting the continued operation of Davis Community and generally objecting to grant of the captioned KMJE(FM) application on the ground that it would force KDRT-LP off the air. These comments were not served on the applicants or their counsel. We believe it appropriate to treat these comments as informal objections of individual listeners pursuant to Section 1.1204(a)(8) of the Rules. The authors of these comments do not become parties to this proceeding by virtue of their comments. See Note 4 to Paragraph (d) of Section 1.1202 of the Rules, 47 C.F.R. � 1.1202. 47 C.F.R. �� 73.3517, 73.3573(g). See Modification of FM and TV Authorizations to Specify a New Community of License (``Community of License''), Report and
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1581A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-1581A1.pdf
  • date of this Order, transfer the full amount of the outstanding debt to the United States Department of Treasury for debt collection and other administrative or judicial action. Ordering clauseS Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 303(r), and 309(j), and Sections 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.3 and 1.1204(g)(1), that the request for reduction of bid withdrawal payments filed on behalf of Barry P. Lunderville, Connoisseur Media, LLC, College Creek Broadcasting, Inc., Cumulus Licensing LLC, and Kemp Communications, Inc., on November 20, 2006, IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(r), and 309(j) of the Communications
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-348A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-08-348A1.pdf
  • U.S.C. � 309(k)(1). The renewal standard was amended to read as described by Section 204(a) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). See Implementation of Sections 204(a) and 204(c) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Broadcast License Renewal Procedures), Order, 11 FCC Rcd 6363 (1996). 47 U.S.C. �� 309(k)(2), 309(k)(3). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8). It is true that, as argued by Infinity, Pennino does not state specifically that he is a listener of the station. However, because his objection clearly is based on his perception of a deficiency in the station's programming, we do not believe his failure to serve Infinity with his objection violates the Commission's ex parte rules. See Letter to Richard
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1257A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1257A1.pdf
  • Petition for Rulemaking to Establish Standards for Determining the Standing of a Party to Petition to Deny a Broadcast Application, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 82 FCC 2d 89 (1980); see also Infinity Broadcasting Corp. of California, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 9504 (1995); Niles Broadcasting Company, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 7 FCC Rcd 5959 (1992). 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(8); see also Henry Goldberg, Esq., Edward Hayes, Jr., Letter, 12 FCC Rcd 15242 (MMB 1997). See Broadcast Applications, Public Notice, Report No. 26874 (rel. Dec. 2, 2008); see also 47 C.F.R. � 1.939(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. � 73.3587. 47 U.S.C. � 310(d). 47 U.S.C. � 309(e). 47 U.S.C. � 309(a). See, e.g., WWOR-TV, Inc., Memorandum Opinion and Order, 6 FCC Rcd
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-125A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-125A1.pdf
  • 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1308, 1.1311. Id.. �� 1.1200-1.1216. See Id. � 1.1206(b)(2). See Id. � 1.1206(b). Under the Council's rules, the Council and Conference must be parties to the Nationwide Agreement. Therefore, for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, in this proceeding we shall treat presentations from these entities and their staffs as exempt presentations under 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(a)(5). See Id. � 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.48. See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). See Pub. L. No. 104-13. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-125 Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-125 h� h� gd� h� h� h� h� h� % 4 F G H
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-205A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-205A1.pdf
  • guidelines. Therefore, all parties with a potential interest may not have had the opportunity to participate in the development of the guidelines and present their own relevant scientific data. As noted above, the Commission is not required to enter into an MOU with FWS under Executive Order 13,186 with respect to migratory birds. See supra note 30. 47 C.F.R. � 1.1204(b)(1). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (May 1,1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-205 � j� � " � 0 0 � � �
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-54A6.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-54A6.pdf
  • or services involving security of the public or national security. In the event such an action were determined to be necessary, what would be an appropriate phase-in time period? PROCEDURAL MATTERS This is an exempt notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period. See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1204(b). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. �� 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on before 75 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 105 days after publication in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper
• http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-155A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-155A1.pdf
  • other filing seeking affirmative relief.'' The Bureau correctly held that SMCCD did not become a party to this proceeding until after it had filed its informal objection on October 13, 1999, nearly two months after the filing of the 1999 Modification Application. Accordingly, the Association was under no obligation to file a copy of its application with SMCCD. Moreover, Section 1.1204(a)(1) of the ex parte rules classifies among ``exempt presentations'' those in which ``[t]he presentation . . . involves the filing of required forms.'' Requests for technical modification of FM translator authorizations, and the amendment filed by the Association converting the 1998 Modification Application to a minor change, must be filed on FCC Form 349. Accordingly, the Association had no obligation
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/aoltw/fccwaiv.doc http://www.fcc.gov/mb/aoltw/fccwaiv.txt
  • of the merger reviews by the FTC and the FCC. We have agreed to the FCC's requests, on the understanding that, except as noted below, the FCC will treat the H-S-R Materials as confidential documents pursuant to Section 0.459 of the FCC's rules and that the discussions with the FTC will be treated as exempt ex parte presentations under Section 1.1204(a)(6) of the FCC's rules. With respect to discussions between representatives of the FCC and the FTC, the Applicants have sent a letter to the FTC setting forth a limited waiver of the confidentiality provisions of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, the Antitrust Civil Process Act, and any applicable confidentiality provisions governing the H-S-R Materials in order to permit discussions between representatives of
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/aoltw/ftcwaiv.doc http://www.fcc.gov/mb/aoltw/ftcwaiv.txt
  • the FCC's review of the merger between the Applicants. This limited waiver also permits the FTC to allow inspection by the FCC of the H-S-R Materials in the FTC's possession. As noted in the enclosed letter to the FCC, this waiver is based on the Applicants' understanding that the discussions will be treated as exempt ex parte presentations under Section 1.1204 (a)(6) of the FCC Rules (47 C.F.R. �1.204 (a)(6)) and will not be disclosed, except as required under that Section. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned persons if you have any questions regarding any of the foregoing. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Peter D. Ross Arthur H. Harding Wiley Rein & Fielding Fleischman and Walsh, L.L.P. 1776 K Street,
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/pdf/fr03au05-37.pdf
  • Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contacts. For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Radio, Radio broadcasting. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications VerDate jul<14>2003 15:21 Aug 02, 2005Jkt 205001PO 00000Frm 00018Fmt 4702Sfmt 4702E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM03AUP1
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/cu_comment020402.pdf
  • determine whether they violate the law and the Commission's rules. If the Commission leaves EchoStar in a position to select programmers for the set-aside, the Commission should create a confidential feedback or complaint system for non-commercial programmers. This system could be based on the Commission's current ex parte rules allowing for confidential submissions when a party fears reprisal. 47 C.F.R. �1.1204(a)(9). This would allow the Commission to, at a minimum, monitor compliance without endangering the carriage of worthy non-commercial programmers. 21 E. Despite the Potential Harms of This Merger, the Commission Would Better Meet its Public Interest Obligations by Conditioning, Rather Than Blocking This Merger. Unless the Commission imposes conditions on this merger to mitigate the public interest harms of the
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/cu_errata020502.pdf
  • whether they violate the law and the Commission's rules. If the Commission leaves EchoStar in a position to select programmers for the set-aside, the Commission should create a confidential feedback or complaint system for non-commercial programmers. This system could be based on the Commission's current ex parte rules allowing for confidential submissions when a party fears reprisal. 47 21 C.F.R. �1.1204(a)(9). This would allow the Commission to, at a minimum, monitor compliance without endangering the carriage of worthy non-commercial programmers. E. Despite the Potential Harms of This Merger, the Commission Would Better Meet its Public Interest Obligations by Conditioning, Rather Than Blocking This Merger. Unless the Commission imposes conditions on this merger to mitigate the public interest harms of the transaction,
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/motorola_ltr020501.pdf
  • them with the Department, the Commission desires to place any of the Protected Materials in the public record. the Commission and the Applicants have agreed that the Commission will request that the Applicants submit those selected Protected Materials directly to the Commission. This waiver is based on the understanding that the discussions will be treated as exempt exparte presentations underSection 1.1204(a)(6) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 9 1.1204(a)(6) and will not be disclosed, except as required under that section. Sincerely. Mary E. Brooner Director Telecommunications Strategy & Regulation Motorola, Inc. cc:Laura Holloway, Nextel Neil Deller, FCC OGC
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/nextel_ltr020601.pdf
  • of the Protected Materials in the public record, the Commission and the Applicants have ageed that the Commission will request that the Applicants submit those selected Protected Materials directly to the Commission. Mr. Donald J. Russell February 6,2001 Page 2 of2 This waiver is based on the understanding that the discussions will be treated as exempt exparre presentations under Section 1.1204(a)(6) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. $ 1.1204(a)(6) and will not be disclosed, except as required under that section. Sincerely, - cc: Neil A. Dellar, FCC Office of General Counsel (via Federal Express) Mary Brooner, Motorola (via U.S. Mail)