FCC Web Documents citing 1.1206

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 07 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2243A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2243A1.pdf
  • the petition, it will release an appropriate order. 18. Other information. Petitions or supplements filed pursuant to CALEA section 107(c) are classified as "permit but disclose" proceedings for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.pdf
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1079A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1079A1.pdf
  • public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or call
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1080A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1080A1.pdf
  • regarding the public reference file for this application, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject application will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or call the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2714A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2714A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates listed on the first page of this Public Notice. All filings related to the Notice should refer to PS Docket No. 07-114 and WC Docket No. 05-196. Comments
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3147A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3147A1.pdf
  • public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or call
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-41A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-41A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before February 26, 2007 and reply comments on or before March 12, 2007. All filings related to this Ninth NPRM should refer to PS Docket No. 06-229 and WT Docket No. 96-86. Comments may
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5008A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5008A1.pdf
  • regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (20) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). To request
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5064A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5064A1.pdf
  • be purchased from BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b) and must
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1159A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1159A1.pdf
  • or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). . . Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b) and must
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1194A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1194A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . See Service Rules for the 698-746, 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands, WT Docket No. 06-150, Implementing a Nationwide, Broadband, Interoperable Public Safety Network in the 700 MHz Band, PS Docket No. 06-229, Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 08-128 (rel. May 14, 2008) (Second Further Notice). Service Rules for the 698-746, 747-762 and 777-792
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-125A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-125A1.pdf
  • information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.pdf
  • For further information regarding the public reference file for the Waiver Request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Waiver Request, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1646A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1646A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2059A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2059A1.pdf
  • regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). To request
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2129A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2129A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. This document contains proposed new information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection requirements contained in this document, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2485A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2485A1.pdf
  • regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). To request
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-289A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-289A1.pdf
  • information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat these cases as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject applications and waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-292A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-292A1.pdf
  • electronic file on the CD-Rom. The label should also include the following phrase "CD-Rom Copy - Not an Original." Each CD-Rom should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send CD-Rom copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. (insert CG Docket No. 08-15 into the proceeding block). . . -FCC- See generally 47 U.S.C. § 225; 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.601 et seq. See Hawk Relay, Request for Expedited Clarification for the Provision
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-607A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-607A1.pdf
  • electronic file on the CD-Rom. The label should also include the following phrase: "CD-Rom Copy - Not an Original." Each CD-Rom should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send CD-Rom copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Waiver Request, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b), 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). To request materials in accessible formats
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-804A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-804A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1055A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1055A1.pdf
  • U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1814A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1814A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1815A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1815A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1819A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1819A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Jeff Cohen, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-0799, jeff.cohen@fcc.gov. -- FCC -- APPENDIX A We seek comment on the following common issues raised by the petitions in order to develop a comprehensive record for consideration by the Commission. The questions in this Appendix should not be construed
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2364A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2364A1.pdf
  • of the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended; Promotion of Spectrum Efficient Technologies on Certain Part 90 Frequencies, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order, Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order, WT Docket No. 99-87, RM-9332, 19 FCC Rcd 25045 (2004). See 47 C.F.R. § 90.209(b)(5). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.203(j)(4), (5), (10), 90.209(b)(6). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2397A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2397A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. This document contains proposed new information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection requirements contained in this document as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2412A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2412A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-249A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-249A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding these proceedings, contact Thomas J. Beers, Chief, Policy Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-0952. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.242. Petition for a Rulemaking to Revise and Update the Travelers Information Service Rules of Highway Information Systems, Inc. (filed July 16, 2008) (HIS Petition). HIS Petition at 9. Id. at
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2549A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2549A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-695A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-695A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-696A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-696A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-802A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-802A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-803A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-803A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-839A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-839A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-901A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-901A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Thomas J. Beers, Chief, Policy Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-0952. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.242. Petition for Rule Making of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (filed March 16, 2009) (AASHTO Petition). Id. at 1. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1227A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1227A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1245A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1245A1.pdf
  • communications providers are reporting completely and accurately? What are the advantages and disadvantages of mandatory reporting and voluntary reporting? What other regulatory alternatives should we consider for interconnected VoIP service provider and broadband ISP outage reporting? Procedural Matters This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1277A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1277A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1556A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1556A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . -FCC- See also, Letter from Henry A. Waxman, Joe Barton, Rick Boucher, and Cliff Stearns, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, to Julius Genachowski, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission (June 30, 2010); Letter from Julius Genachowski, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission to Henry A. Waxman, Chairman, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-458A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-458A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Seeks Comment on Petitions for Waiver to Deploy 700 MHz Public Safety Broadband Networks, DA 09-1819 (rel. Aug. 14, 2009). Letter from Harlin McEwan to Chairman Julius Genachowski, PS Docket No. 06-229, WT Docket No. 06-150 (Dec. 15, 2009). Id. at 1. To date, requests have
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-500A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-500A1.pdf
  • and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). . . Because of the policy implications, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b) and must
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-558A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-558A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-96A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-96A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-974A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-974A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1059A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1059A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before July 5, 2011, and reply comments on or before July 15, 2011. All comments should reference PS Docket No. 06-229. Comments may be filed: (1) using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) through the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. . Paper
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-123A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-123A1.pdf
  • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-175A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-175A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this public notice, contact Jennifer A. Manner, Deputy Bureau Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, at (202)418-3619 or Richard Lee, Associate Bureau Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, at (202) 418-1104. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 0.191(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113,
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-274A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-274A1.pdf
  • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Interested parties may file comments on or before March 14, 2011 and reply comments on or before March 29, 2011 All filings should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT DOCKET NO. 02-55. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-537A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-537A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before April 11, 2011, and reply comments on or before April 21, 2011. All comments should reference PS Docket No. 06-229. Comments may be filed: (1) using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) through the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. . Paper
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270403A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270403A1.pdf
  • 12th Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty).'' This Erratum also amends the Public Notice by adding a paragraph 6 regarding ex parte presentations and the Bureau's determination that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding, pursuant to Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Paragraph 6 has been added to read as follows: ``Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290824A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290824A1.pdf
  • 424 (WTB 2006). See http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-125A1.pdf.'' ``See 47 C.F.R. Part 1.'' 4. Paragraph 3 is corrected to read as follows: ``Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).'' -
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304437A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304437A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . The FCC's web cast is free to the public and does not require pre-registration. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). or by phone: 202-418-7868. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304463A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304463A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . Depending on the volume of questions and time constraints, the panel moderators will work to respond to as many questions as possible during the workshop. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). . See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304719A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304719A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Audio/video coverage of the meeting will be broadcast live with open captioning over the Internet from the FCC's web page at www.fcc.gov/live. The FCC's webcast is free to the public. Those who watch the live video stream of the event may email event-related questions to livequestions@fcc.gov. Depending on the volume of questions and time constraints, the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304749A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304749A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . The FCC's web cast is free to the public and does not require pre-registration. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). or by phone: 202-418-7868. -FCC- See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-105A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-105A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-105A1.txt
  • 24 (personal communications services), Part 27 (wireless communications services), Part 90 (private land mobile radio services), and Part 101 (fixed microwave services) of our Rules. See Forbearance MO&O, 13 FCC Rcd at 6306 ¶ 24. MariTEL Petition at 2. Id. at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(a)(2). Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(a)(1). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-105 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-105 LEGEND: R = REQUIRED DOCUMENTS (((((((( „ ... ° ± „0ý „v „Ð „Ð „`ú � � „Ð � � „0ý „Ð „Ð „€é „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „€é „Ð „Ð „0ý „€é „Ð m n ª ¬ n (c)
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-154A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-154A1.pdf
  • pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.461 of the Commission's rules. Ex Parte Treatment. Petitions filed pursuant to CALEA section 107(c) are classified as "permit but disclose" proceedings for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-160A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-160A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-160A1.txt
  • revisions to 47 C.F.R. §§ 87.263 as set forth in Appendix B hereto. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-but-Disclose Proceeding 20. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, if they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, 1.1206. Regulatory Flexibility Act 21. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis with respect to the Notice is included in Appendix A. Paperwork Reduction Act 22. This Notice contains either a new or modified information collection. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public to comment on the information collection contained in this Notice as
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.txt
  • the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve International Transcription Services (ITS) with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified below for filing comments. C. Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.txt
  • such information and contributing to fluid secondary markets in the use of licensed spectrum. procedural matters Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-63A1.txt
  • of the Commission's Rules to Adopt Regulations for Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems, PR Docket No. 93-61, Second Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 15182, 15194 (1997). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110(b)(4). Part 1 Second Further Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 478 (para. 187). 5 U.S.C. § 603. See Appendix A. Pub. L. No. 104-13. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-148A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-148A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-148A1.txt
  • Act. Paperwork Reduction Analysis. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking does not contain either a proposed or modified information collection. Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Alternative formats. Alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio cassette, and Braille) are available from Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at . This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking can also be downloaded at . Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.txt
  • (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.txt
  • that adoption of the proposed rule changes promote effective spectrum utilization and spectrum efficiency. procedural matters Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-but-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, if they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals suggested in this document. The IRFA is set forth in Appendix B. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-28A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-28A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-28A1.txt
  • the carrier holding the remaining 15 MHz of cellular spectrum in that market could pair with a 30 MHz PCS licensee without triggering the 45 MHz general CMRS spectrum cap. See generally Cellular Disaggregation Order. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.919. See id. § 20.6(e)(4)(A). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See id. § 603(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Id. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.txt
  • Service in the 2 GHz Band, Report and Order, IB Docket 99-81, 15 FCC Rcd 16127, 16155 ¶ 65 (2000), noting that the Aviation Radio Service rules ``must be amended or waived'' to permit operation of AMS(R)S aircraft earth stations in the United States in the 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service frequency bands. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.txt
  • telephones terminated by the terms of the statute August 17, 1991, and we seek comment on the status and the nature of the compliance efforts with that mandate. We seek comment on these issues and any other issues associated with hearing aid compatibility, particularly as it concerns telephones used with wireless services. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding proposing the amendment of the Commission's rule governing hearing aid compatible telephones is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.txt
  • conditional operation of facilities located in the Quiet Zones defined by section 1.924. 47 C.F.R. § 101.31(b)(v). Biennial Review 2000 Comments of Alloy LLC, FCC 00-346, at 8 (filed Oct. 10, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 90.655. Id., § 95.45(b). Id., § 1009. Id., § 1329. 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd 11322, 11326 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.txt
  • § 80.471. Maritel Comments at 13. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 80.3(f). 47 C.F.R. § 20.15(b)(3), (c). See CMRS 2nd R&O, 9 FCC Rcd at 1464 ¶ 126 n.261 (did not propose forbearance for international CMRS), 1481 ¶ 182 n.369 (declined to propose forbearance for international CMRS). See 5 U.S.C. § 601, et. seq. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-366A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-366A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-366A1.txt
  • the Federal Register. Paperwork Reduction Analysis. This Notice does not contain either a proposed or modified information collection requirement. Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Alternative formats. Alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audiocassette, and Braille) are available from Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at . This Notice can also be downloaded at . Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [30 days
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-36A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-36A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-36A1.txt
  • business provisions we propose today are sufficient to promote participation by businesses owned by minorities and women, as well as rural telephone companies. To the extent that commenters propose additional provisions to ensure participation by minority-owned or women-owned businesses, they should address how such provisions should be crafted to meet the relevant standards of judicial review. 17. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding proposing rules for awarding licenses for cellular RSAs for which the tentative selectee has been disqualified is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. 18. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
  • 19079, 19114-26, ¶¶ 96-132 (1997); Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 48-50. Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 6-9, 48-50. See id. at ¶¶ 9, 50. See Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at ¶ 104. See Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 57-58. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. See infra Appendix C. Pub. L. No. 104-13. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.txt
  • of review to a state program based on gender classification). MicroTrax Comments at 18-19. Id. Id. See, e.g., ArrayComm Reply at 8; AeroAstro Reply at 2-3. See 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(4)(D). See 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(2). See BBA Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 22750 ¶ 83. See Pub. L. No. 104-13. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-255A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-255A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-255A1.txt
  • Commenters are also invited to offer proposals in addition to the three identified above. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules - Permit-but-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, if they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by Section 603 of the regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals suggested in this document. The IRFA is set forth in Appendix A. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.txt
  • greater interference risk from guard band licensees than from other 700 MHz band public safety licensees. Id. PRS observes that ``[b]ecause the Commission has replicated these very same technical standards for the 700 MHz Guard Band allocation, the recommendations of PRS would equally apply to FCC Rule Section 27.53.'' PRS Comments at 1. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-281A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-281A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-281A1.txt
  • FCC Rcd 13972 (1999) (modifying license that was authorized to operate on frequency 460.725 MHz in excess of the 20-watt TPO limitation imposed by 47 C.F.R. § 90.35(c)(48)). See also e.g., Black Diamond Asphalt, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 13974 ¶ 8 (1999). Petition at 4, n.10. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1165, 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612 (1980). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.txt
  • 90.350. International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association Comments at 2. TransCore Corporation Comments at 2. See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Petition for Rulemaking Regarding Location and Monitoring Service Rules, Public Notice, RM 10403, DA 02-817 (rel. Apr. 10, 2002). Warren C. Havens and Telesaurus Holdings GB, LLC Comments at 4-5. . See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. Amendment of Parts
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.txt
  • Council of Economic Advisors Report, Economic Impact of Third-Generation Wireless Technology). Adarand Constructors v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (requiring a strict scrutiny standard of review for Congressionally mandated race-conscious measures); United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) (applying an intermediate standard of review to a state program based on gender classification). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Pub. L. No. 104-13. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA).
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-81A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-81A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-81A1.txt
  • to CMRS use. We therefore seek comment on the perceived advantages and disadvantages of PCIA's proposal to merge the Business and Industrial/Land Transportation services into a single pool; or, in the alternative, to lift the freeze on intercategory sharing; and on the issue of CMRS use of 900 MHz PLMR band frequencies. Procedural Matters Ex Parte Rules Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-83A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-83A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-83A1.txt
  • do not propose to expand the language of Section 1.937 to prohibit applications repeating renewal applications that were dismissed without prejudice, as this would bar a licensee whose renewal application was dismissed as late-filed, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.949(a), from seeking a new license to replace the expired license. See ¶ 6, infra. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419 See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-83 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-83 ¯ ¯ �@ˆþÿ
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.txt
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures . Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and six copies of each, and are hereby notified that effective December 18, 2001, the Commission's contractor, Vistronix, Inc., will receive hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at a new location in downtown Washington, DC. The address is
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.txt
  • considerations must the Commission consider in adopting rules and policies to facilitate such flexible use? Procedural matters Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.txt
  • II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C., 20554, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or e-mail at qualexint@aol.com; and (2) Jay Jackson, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., 20554, or e-mail at Jay.Jackson@fcc.gov. , or send an e-mail to access@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
  • Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, MM Docket No. 00-39, Third Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 2703, 2718-2721, ¶¶ 37-44 (2001). The Commission also considered employing a Commission-conducted secondary auction in the 700 MHz bands, but ultimately decided that a privately-organized clearing mechanism would be better in that context. See id. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11,322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
  • § 22.819. 47 C.F.R. § 22.871. 47 C.F.R. § 22.1003. See, e.g., para. 28, supra. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121(1998). See FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). Id. Notice at paras. 7-22, supra. Id.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.txt
  • Rcd at 6707 ¶ 48. See Amendment of Parts 13 and 80 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Second Report and Order, Sixth Report and Order, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket No. 00-48, 19 FCC Rcd 3120, 3150 ¶ 57 (2004). See 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. § 603(b)(3). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.txt
  • Band auction (Auction No. 46), the Commission offered a bidding credit on a nationwide license in the 1670-1675 MHz band to small businesses with average annual revenues not exceeding $40 million and very small businesses with average annual revenues not exceeding $15 million. H.R. Rep. No. 103-111, 103rd Cong., 1st Sess., at 254. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601- 612, have been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-288A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-288A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-288A1.txt
  • in Texas and Oklahoma to assess how the AirCell system would perform in a real-world environment. AirCell, Inc.; Petition, Pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, For a Waiver of the Airborne Cellular Rule, Or, in the Alternative, For a Declaratory Ruling, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 9622, 9650, Appendix (2000). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). 5 U.S.C.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.txt
  • a rule waiver is required, see 47 C.F.R. § 101.31(b)(1)(iii). FWCC/NSMA Waiver Request at 3. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3). FWCC/NSMA Waiver Request at 4. 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(r). 47 C.F.R. § 101.31(b)(1)(iii). As noted by FWCC and NSMA, the FS community relies heavily on conditional authorization. See FWCC/NSMA Waiver Request at 6. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (``CWAA''). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (``SBREFA''). We also note that we could certify this action
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-78A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-78A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-78A1.txt
  • the use of bidding credits). See United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) (applying an intermediate standard of review to a state program based on gender classification); Adarand Constructors v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (requiring a strict scrutiny standard of review for Congressionally mandated race-conscious measures). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11,322 (1998); Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Memorandum Opinion and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 21,517 (1998). See 5 U. S. C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612 has been amended by the Small
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.txt
  • the Federal Register. Paperwork Reduction Analysis. This Notice does not contain either a proposed or modified information collection requirement. Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before June 15, 2004, and reply comments on or before June 30, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. >, and should include the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-123A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-123A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-123A1.txt
  • Pool, PR Docket No. 89-553, Second Order on Reconsideration and Seventh Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 2639, 2679 ¶ 105 (1995); Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253, Ninth Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. 14,769, 14,789-90 ¶ 42 (1996). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105(a)(2)(viii). See generally id. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986, Title II (2004) (codified
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.txt
  • employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [60 days after publication in the Federal Register] and reply comments on or before [75 days after publication in the Federal Register]. >, should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting comments.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-31A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-31A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-31A1.txt
  • (loading criteria for non-SMR trunked systems) of the Commission's rules. See ITA Petition at 3 n.7. See AMDS Letter at 2. See SBT Petition at 2. (Emphasis in original). See NAM/MRFAC Letter at 2. See, e.g., CMRS Third R&O, 9 FCC Rcd at 8047-48 ¶ 108. See Freeze Public Notice at 2 n.7. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-107A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-107A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-107A1.txt
  • Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Comment Period and Procedures >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [30 days after publication in the Federal Register] and reply comments on or before [45 days after publication in the Federal Register]. >, should follow the instructions provided on the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.txt
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WT Docket No. 06-150, CC Docket No.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.txt
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the proposals considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.txt
  • in Section 1.1307(a)(1)-(8) and (b) of the rules requires the preparation of an EA. All other actions are deemed individually and cumulatively to have no significant effect on the quality of the human environment and are categorically excluded from environmental processing. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1306(a). Avatar Report at 5-1. See paras. 36-44, supra. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. We note that the Commission shares jurisdiction over some of the issues addressed in this proceeding with FWS and the FAA, and that presentations by these agencies are therefore exempt from disclosure. 47 C.F.R. § 1.204(a)(5). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-181A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-181A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the proposals considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.txt
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 2. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WT Docket No. 06-49. Comments may
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.txt
  • Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WT Docket Nos. 96-86 and 05-157 (filed Mar. 9, 2006). 47 C.F.R. § 90.529. , supra. See Canada and U.S. Reach Agreement That Will Facilitate Deployment of Public Safety Services Near the U.S.-Canada Border in the 764-776 MHz and 794-806 MHz Frequency Bands, News Release (June 20, 2005). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . 2. Accessible Formats or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0531 (voice), (202) 418-7365 (TTY). 3. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Order and the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.txt
  • Band auction (Auction No. 46), the Commission offered a bidding credit on a nationwide license in the 1670-1675 MHz band to small businesses with average annual revenues not exceeding $40 million and very small businesses with average annual revenues not exceeding $15 million. See 700 MHz Second Report and Order at ¶¶ 535-37. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Pub. L. 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601- 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-17A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-17A1.pdf
  • Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
  • 18, 2008 benchmark. In consideration of the need for certainty, and in order to provide appropriate notification to manufacturers and service providers as regards the hearing aid compatibility obligations, we determine that it is in the public interest to stay enforcement of that particular benchmark for 60 days, until April 18, 2008. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding proposing the amendment of the Commission's rule governing hearing aid compatible telephones is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. Filing Procedures. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.txt
  • 17 FCC Rcd 15040 (2002). SIA Comments at 6. For example, SIA states that, while FiberTower's proposed rule indicates that an applicant can require the small antenna operator to reduce its interference, it gives no guidance as to the procedures. SIA Comments at 6. FiberTower Reply Comments at 5. 47 C.F.R. § 101.103. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107- 198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). Although we are conducting an IRFA at this stage in the process, it
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-4A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-4A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Availability of Documents. Comments, reply comments, and ex parte submissions will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. These documents also will be available via ECFS in Acrobat PDF File Format. Action by the Commission on
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.txt
  • 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before the date indicated on the front page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.txt
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Second Further Notice should refer to WT Docket No. 06-150, PS Docket No. 06-229, and WT Docket No. 96-86. Comments
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Filing Requirements Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments to the FNPRM on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings should refer to PS Docket No. 07-287. Comments may
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-188A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-188A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-188A1.txt
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WT Docket No. 08-166, and WT Docket
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Third Further Notice should refer to WT Docket No. 06-150 and PS Docket No. 06-229. Comments may be filed using:
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.pdf
  • service subject to the provisions of §90.259,'' and Section 90.259 contains provisions for the 1427-1432 MHz band. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Comment and Reply Comment Filing Instructions. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the front page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB Docket No.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-177A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-177A1.pdf
  • (Apr. 2, 2005). T-Mobile Petition at 10. See, e.g., Skype, Product Features (visited August 10, 2010) < http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/features/>; Truphone, Truphone Service Standard Terms and Conditions (visited August 23, 2010) < http://www.truphone.com/about_us/legal.html >. Several major wireless operators are offering their subscribers femtocells for home use. See 14th Mobile Wireless Competition Report, at ¶ 350. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107- 198; see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. §
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-200A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-200A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-203A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-203A1.pdf
  • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-45A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-45A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment and Reply Comment Filing Instructions. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the front page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2)
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.pdf
  • parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419 and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.pdf
  • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Parties wishing to file materials with a claim of confidentiality should follow the procedures set forth in section 0.459 of the Commission's rules. Confidential submissions may not be filed via ECFS but rather should be filed with the Secretary's Office following the procedures set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 0.459. Redacted versions of confidential submissions may
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-6A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-6A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Fourth Further Notice should refer to PS Docket No. 06-229. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. COMMENT PERIOD AND PROCEDURES Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rule Making should refer to PS Docket No.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf
  • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB Docket No.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-15A1.doc
  • FCC Rcd at 14779, ¶ 1. We also reject MMTC's claim that it was not required to serve its petition on other parties to the proceeding simply because the proceeding was designated as permit-but-disclose for ex parte purposes. Although the permit-but-disclose rules permit parties to submit written communications to the Commission without serving other parties, see 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202(b)(1), 1.1206, this does not relieve a petitioner from the obligation to serve a petition for reconsideration on other parties under section 1.106(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(f). Because we deny MMTC's petition, RSS's request that the petition be dismissed on this basis is moot. See RSS Opposition at 2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(h). For the same reason, we
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-51A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-51A1.pdf
  • the Office of General Counsel (OGC) denying DTP's complaint against AT&T, Inc. (AT&T) for violation of the ex parte rules. II. BACKGROUND DTP's complaint is related to the now withdrawn, proposed AT&T/T-Mobile transaction, which was the subject of WT Docket No. 11-65. This matter was designated ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Thus, under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, written ex parte presentations and a summary of oral ex parte presentations had to be filed in the record of the proceeding. DTP's complaint alleged that AT&T failed to make the filings required by the rule. DTP's complaint stated: AT&T has engaged in an all out media campaign in the Washington, D.C. area for the purpose of influencing Federal Communications
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-414A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-414A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-414A1.txt
  • be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 2100 M Street, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, telephone (202) 857-3800. The Commission must obtain authorization from the Director of the Federal Register prior to incorporating by reference the technical standards in Part 95 of our rules. See 1 C.F.R. Part 51. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419 See 5 U.S.C. § 603 See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-%2001-2141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-%2001-2141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-%2001-2141A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1050A1.txt
  • ``shared resources.'' We also seek comment on whether, and to what extent, asymmetrical reciprocal compensation arrangements between wireline carriers and CMRS providers are likely to alter, for better or worse, the competitive balance between these carriers, and to what extent any such effects are relevant under the terms of the Act. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before June 1, 2000; reply comments are due on or before June 13, 2000. To file formally, parties must submit an original and four copies
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1075A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1075A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1075A1.txt
  • Bureau, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Suite 4-A628, Washington, DC 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1091A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1091A1.txt
  • to pforster@fcc.gov. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing with the Commission's Secretary (Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554) and a diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding is a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Copies of this Public Notice in alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio- cassette, and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426 voice, (202) 418-7365 TTY, or at bmillin@fcc.gov.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1092A1.txt
  • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions, and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1120A1.txt
  • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations: (1) the Commission's duplicating contractor,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1138A1.txt
  • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.2000(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1171A1.txt
  • the public reference file for this petition, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this petition, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject petition, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1172A1.txt
  • public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, at (202) 418-0271. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1189A1.txt
  • by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject application will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Jamison Prime of the Policy and Rules Branch of the Public Safety and Private
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1242A1.txt
  • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.2000(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-134A1.txt
  • Accordingly, the period for final ex parte and other presentations on issues in this proceeding other than those issues decided in the First Report and Order will be extended until 7 p.m. on Monday, January 31, 2000. Procedural Matters This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1451A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than July 19, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than July 26, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1456A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1456A1.txt
  • and 1.1208. This proceeding is inextricably intertwined with complex, interrelated legal, technical and policy issues associated with the implementation of DBS systems on varying numbers of channels at various orbital locations. The public interest, therefore, requires that the ex parte procedures be modified for this proceeding. The proceeding shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose, basis. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. Accordingly, effective June 28, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. The adjudicative proceeding affected by this action is: Application to Launch and Operate a Direct Broadcast Satellite Service Space Station (File No. SAT-MOD-2000510-00089). This action
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-145A1.txt
  • Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Rm # 4-A624,Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1471A1.txt
  • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1552A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1552A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1581A1.txt
  • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations: (1) the Commission's duplicating contractor,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1599A1.txt
  • application or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1618A1.txt
  • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Pursuant to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.927(i), ex parte notifications filed by the applicants must be served on all parties to the proceeding. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all pleadings
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1627A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than August 11, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than August 18, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1630A1.txt
  • interrelated legal, technical and policy issues associated with the implementation of DBS systems serving the States of Hawaii and Alaska. There are varying numbers of channels at various orbital locations involved. The public interest, therefore, requires that the ex parte procedures be modified for this proceeding. The proceeding shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose, basis. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. Effective July 21, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in 47 C.F.R. §1.1206 of the Commission's rules. The adjudicative proceeding affected by this action is the captioned Application for Modification. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1634A1.txt
  • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Pursuant to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.927(i), ex parte notifications filed by the applicants must be served on all parties to the proceeding. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all pleadings
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-165A1.txt
  • and copying during normal reference room hours at the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties are reminded that this proceeding has been designated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules.5 As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings.6 In this regard, memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7 Additional rules 4 See Electronic Filing of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1698A1.txt
  • restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of persons not party to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Request for Waiver will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Brian O'Donnell of the Policy
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1699A1.txt
  • by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject application will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact the Jamison Prime of the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division of the Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1748A1.txt
  • the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Michael Ferrante, Room No. 4-C 124, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1749A1.txt
  • the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Michael Ferrante, Room No. 4-C 124, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1750A1.txt
  • the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Michael Ferrante, Room No. 4-C 124, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1763A1.txt
  • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1834A1.txt
  • and copying during normal reference room hours at the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1841A1.txt
  • it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waivers, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). All written ex parte presentations and all written disclosures of oral ex parte presentations should reference PDC's Waiver Requests and DA 00-XXX and be filed with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. A copy of each filing should be sent to International Transcription
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1881A1.txt
  • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Pursuant to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.927(i), ex parte notifications filed by the applicants must be served on all parties to the proceeding. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1893A1.txt
  • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Pursuant to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.927(i), ex parte notifications filed by the applicants must be served on all parties to the proceeding. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's Rules,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-190A1.txt
  • 14 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicant may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex. pane communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit- but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-191A1.txt
  • TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Rm # 4-A624, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-192A1.txt
  • believe that the opportunity for a full discussion throughout the licensing process would be in the public interest. Accordingly, by this public notice, [47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a).] we consider the pending applications as a non-restrictive permit-but-disclose licensing proceeding. Thus, effective February 2, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. [47 C.F.R. § 1.1206.] This action is taken pursuant to the authority in Section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 303 and pursuant to Section 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a). By the Chief, International Bureau Page
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1953A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1953A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1953A1.txt
  • and (4) Paul Murray, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Room 4-B442, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D. C. 20554. By this Public Notice, we announce, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. These procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees, but require that these presentations be disclosed in the record
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-1993A1.txt
  • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2024A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by "permit-but-disclose" ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2048A1.txt
  • diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), Room CY-B400, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Filings and comments are also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Wendy Austrie, Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-1310. -FCC- Revision of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Second
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2066A1.txt
  • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2083A1.txt
  • light of the Commission decisions in response to the Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems petition and the WCA petition, comment is requested on these issues. Interested parties may file comments and reply comments in accordance with the procedures outlined below. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2134A1.txt
  • it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waivers, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). All written ex parte presentations and all written disclosures of oral ex parte presentations should reference Satellite Receivers, Ltd. Waiver Requests and DA 00-2134 and be filed with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. A copy of each filing should be sent to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2155A1.txt
  • Docket No. 00-170. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2167A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.§§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-219A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. QUALCOMM's Petition for Declaratory Ruling is available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., 20554. A copy may also be attained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20036, or by calling (202) 857-3800. For further information, contact Nicole Oden of the Auctions
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-222A1.txt
  • Act (RFA). If commenters believe that the proposals discussed in this Public Notice require additional RFA analysis, they should include a discussion of these issues in their Supplemental Comments. For ex parte purposes, this proceeding continues to be a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact: Chris Murphy, Satellite Policy Branch, (202) 418-2373, or Howard Griboff, Satellite Policy Branch, at (202) 418-0657. Action by the Chief, International Bureau. The Establishment of Policies and Service Rules for the Mobile Satellite Service in the 2 GHz Band, IB Docket No. 99-81, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 4843,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2231A1.txt
  • granted to Voicestream. APCO argues that the grant of the waiver should not have been considered without providing an opportunity for public comment. Additionally, APCO argues that the Voicestream waiver appears to reward non-compliance and may encourage other carriers to seek waivers for alternative methods and schedules for wireless E911 compliance. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Parties interested in filing oppositions may do so on or before October 10, 2000 and replies to oppositions are due on or before October 17, 2000. To file formally, parties must submit an original and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2236A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2236A1.txt
  • treated as permit-but-disclose. For the reasons stated in the March 1999 Public Notice accepting the second-round applicants for filing, we will continue to treat the applications in the second Ka-band processing round as permit but disclose. Accordingly, ex parte presentations relating to either the first or second Ka-band application proceedings, are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241, 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.31, 0.241, 0.261 and 1.1200(a). For further information
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2249A1.txt
  • addition, the Order required MTN to suspend service to several customers within five days of the release date of the Order. Given the complex jurisdictional issues addressed in the Order, and the potential effect on MTN's customers, we modify the ex parte procedures for this proceeding. The proceeding shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose basis. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206, and 1.1208 Note 2. Accordingly, effective October 2, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i),
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2251A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2251A1.txt
  • Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-229A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-230A1.txt
  • 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile and public safety licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Bert Weintraub of the Policy and Rules Branch
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2327A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier and for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2328A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2328A1.txt
  • ex parte rules, effective upon release of this Order. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. For purposes of service and other requirements under those ex parte rules, the parties shall be deemed to be Time Warner, Inc., America Online, Inc., and Disney. For all other purposes, this application proceeding shall continue to be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding governed by section 1.1206 of the ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This Order is issued pursuant to authority delegated under section 0.321 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 0.321. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Deborah Lathen Chief Cable Services Bureau In re Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner, Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30, Order, DA 00-2304 (Oct.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2329A1.txt
  • three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. As set forth in the NOI (paragraph 61), parties are reminded that this proceeding has been designated a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. Parties should consult the NOI for further information concerning the applicable ex parte procedures. For further information, contact: Johanna Mikes or Christopher Libertelli, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2352A1.txt
  • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2366A1.txt
  • 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-C314, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact: Johanna Mikes, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1535 (Domestic 214); Justin Connor, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1476 (International 214); or Wayne McKee, Cable Services Bureau, at (202) 418-2355 (CARS Authorization). - FCC - See Application of Global Crossing Ltd., Transferor, and Citizens Communications Company, Transferee, for Transfer of Control Pursuant to Section 214 of the Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-239A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the applications denying any application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant these applications. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the applications requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than March 3, 2000. All comments should also be served on the applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than March 17, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2402A1.txt
  • WAC points out that despite the promulgation of section 255 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, hearing aid users continue to have little or no access to digital wireless phones. WAC requests that the Commission take action to make digital wireless phone accessible to hearing aid users as quickly as possible. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). . In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, postal service mailing address, and the RM of this proceeding. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2404A1.txt
  • Telecommunications Bureau, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., 4-A628, Washington, DC 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2414A1.txt
  • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2432A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2464A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than November 9, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2493A1.txt
  • Docket No. 00-206. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-24A1.txt
  • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2515A1.txt
  • 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-C314, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact: Johanna Mikes, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1535 (Domestic 214); or Justin Connor, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1476 (International 214). - FCC - See McLeodUSA Inc. and CapRock Telecommunications Corp. and IWL Communications, Inc. d/b/a CapRock Services Corp., Joint Application for Authority Pursuant to Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, to Transfer
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2530A1.txt
  • public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from ITS, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 314-3070. We will continue to treat this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. For further information, contact: Johanna Mikes, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-1535. Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2572A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2572A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2572A1.txt
  • N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800, and Genevieve Augustin, Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room 4-C421, Washington, D.C. 20554. . We believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1, 1200(a), 1,1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Genevieve Augustin
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2582A1.txt
  • request such access pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.461 of the Commission's rules. Petitions filed pursuant to CALEA section 107(c) are classified as "permit but disclose" proceedings for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2584A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2600A1.txt
  • the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Jay Jackson, Room No. 4-C 234, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2617A1.doc
  • served upon each party filing an opposition or comment. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see Sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2622A1.txt
  • for rural areas. In order to end confusion and controversy regarding the status of this offering, Independents request that the Commission clarify that USF requirements and local exchange carrier regulations apply to Western Wireless' BUS offering in Kansas. This matter shall be treated as a "permit but disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex pane rules. 47 C.F.R. §§1.200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2625A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2636A1.doc
  • 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-C314, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Johanna Mikes, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1535. - FCC - See Vista-United Telecommunications, Application For Consent to Transfer of Control of Domestic and International Section 214 Authorizations from Vista-United Telecommunications to Smart City Telecommunications LLC (filed Oct. 25, 2000). Vista-United and Smart City have also filed an application to transfer control of international section 214
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2638A1.txt
  • 14 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit- but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2688A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Marty Schwimmer, mschwimm@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to such proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2694A1.txt
  • to develop a relocation plan should create a strong presumption that a plan developed by the EA licensee based only on publicly available information meets the four-factor comparability test'' under Section 90.699(d) of the Commission's Rules. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2704A1.txt
  • an extension of time would allow it to keep its existing network in operation while evaluating its business options. We seek comment on these waiver requests. Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before January 5, 2001 and reply comments are due on or before January 22, 2001. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). . In completing the transmittal screen, parties should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the docket number of this proceeding. Parties who choose to file by paper must submit an original and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2716A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than December 15, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than December 22, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2717A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than December 8, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than December 15, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2744A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than December 22, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than December 29, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2766A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katie King, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of Roseville Telephone Company for a Limited Waiver of Section 54.309 of the Commission's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-277A1.txt
  • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2792A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2792A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than December 22, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than December 29, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2794A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2809A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2813A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2813A1.txt
  • 14 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicant may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit- but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2823A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status, as an ETC must do so no later than December 29, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than January 5, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2824A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2826A1.txt
  • Docket 99-67. If commenters believe that the proposals discussed in this Public Notice require additional RFA analysis, they may state their reasons for concluding so in their Supplemental Comments. For ex parte purposes, this proceeding continues to be a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact: William Bell, Satellite Policy Branch, (202) 418-0741. Action by the Chief, International Bureau As defined in the Communications Act, ``commercial mobile service'' means communication service provided for profit to users equipped with mobile terminals, by means of radio facilities interconnected with the public switched telephone network, offered to the general public
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2833A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2833A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2833A1.txt
  • be granted. OET seeks comments from interested parties concerning this waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to permit a fuller exchange on the issues under consideration in this proceeding, it should be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties filing comments or oppositions to this petition are invited to do so no later than January 16, 2001. Parties filing replies may do so by January 31, 2001. All filings should be submitted to the Office of the Secretary and must include the above referenced DA number. For further information on this waiver request,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2838A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2852A1.txt
  • 9537. Id. Id. Id Loral Transfer Order, 10 FCC Rcd. at 10476-79. Continental Extension Order, 11 FCC Rcd 1157. Continental Satellite Corp. Request for Declaratory Ruling, 11 FCC Rcd. 5395 (Int'l Bur. 1996). R/L DBS Assignment Order, 12 FCC Rcd. at 21173. This proceeding is a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose proceeding subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Public Notice, International Bureau Satellite Policy Branch Information: Report No. SPB-153, DA 99-2450 (Nov. 4, 1999). Pursuant to this Section, R/L DBS disclosed ex parte contacts with various Commissioners and staff on the following dates: March 22, 2000, March 23, 2000, March 30, 2000, April 19, 2000, April 25, 2000, May 24, 2000, June 1, 2000, June 6, 2000, June
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2856A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2856A1.txt
  • served upon each party filing an opposition or comment. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2869A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice Myles, Trudy Hercules, and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . TTY:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2870A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice Myles, Trudy Hercules, and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . TTY:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2871A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice Myles, Trudy Hercules, and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . TTY:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2872A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice Myles, Trudy Hercules, and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . TTY:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2880A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than January 2, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2914A1.txt
  • Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-C314, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Elizabeth Yockus, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1381 See Communications Design, Inc., Application for Consent to Transfer Control of Domestic Section 214 Authorization from Communications Design, Inc. to TLA Spectrum, LLC (filed Dec. 22, 2000). See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Grants Consent to Transfer Control of F Block Broadband PCS, Cellular, and Microwave Licenses From the Stockholders
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2921A1.txt
  • to be granted. Public comments on this Petition for Waiver must be filed with the Commission by January 22, 2001, and reply comments by January 29, 2001. Such comments should refer to file number NSD-L-00-254. We request that paragraphs be numbered to facilitate reference. Ex parte presentations in this proceeding will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, covering "permit-but-disclose" proceedings. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Suite TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, parties should send two copies to Carmell Weathers, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, 6th floor, 445 12th Street, S.W.,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-318A1.txt
  • Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Steven Weingarten, Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Room # 4-C224, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-320A1.txt
  • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-359A1.txt
  • 2000. All filings should refer to DA 00-359 and File No 0000013536. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 9 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent exparte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose exparte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, and oppositions must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.5 1 (c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 5 1.5 1 (c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-368A1.txt
  • S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the comments and replies should also be provided to José M. Ochoa, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Rm # 4-B544, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda describing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-37A1.txt
  • policy issues involved, section 271 application proceedings initially are classified as permit-but-disclose proceedings.4 Accordingly, ex parte presentations will be permitted, provided they are disclosed in conformance with the Commission's ex parte rules.5 Because of the 90-day statutory timeframe 3 If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. 4 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99- 2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). 5 See 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-397A1.txt
  • address the petitions for reconsideration in light of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 309, 47 C.F.R. § 1.429 and any other public interest considerations. All oppositions and replies should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT 99-168. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-402A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.§§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-403A1_Erratum.doc
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-502A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-502A1.txt
  • individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.2000(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-523A1.txt
  • for filing Oppositions to this waiver request is March 22, 2000. The deadline for filing Replies to any Oppositions is March 29, 2000. As with all other matters associated with the AirCell proceeding, including previous waiver petitions, this waiver request will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, subject to the applicable requirements set forth under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. For further information, contact Wilbert E. Nixon, Jr., Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division at 202-418-0620. See In re AirCell, Inc., Petition, Pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, For a Waiver of the Airborne Cellular Rule, or in the Alternative, For a Declaratory Ruling, Order, DA 98-2590 (Dec. 24,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-55A1.txt
  • Sprint or its affiliates or subsidiaries. A notice establishing a formal pleading cycle will be issued at a later date. Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, it will be treated as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules.1 As a "permit-but- disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.2 Additional rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-592A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-603A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-608A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-608A1.txt
  • applications or other matters, to which the filings pertain. 16484 Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex pane procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose exparte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, hi accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-630A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-679A1.txt
  • exparte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral exparte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206 (b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written exparte presentations or summaries of oral exparte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information, contact
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-71A1.txt
  • these satellites. See, e.g., FCC Grants 16 Earth Station Licenses for Foreign-Licensed Satellite Systems to Operate in the United States Under New Rules Implementing 1997 WTO Agreement, Public Notice, Report No. DS-1864, Public Notice (released July 29, 1998). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-726A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-726A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-726A1.txt
  • Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554) and a diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). It is also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Court Yard Level, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C.or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Dan Grosh or Patrick Forster, (202) 418-1310. - FCC - Revision of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Second
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-760A1.txt
  • the petitions for reconsideration in light of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 309, 47 C.F.R. § 1.429 and any other public interest considerations. All oppositions should reference the docket number of this proceeding, i.e., WT Docket No. 97-82. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-81A1.txt
  • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12lh Street, S.W., Room TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations: (1) the Commission's duplicating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-83A1.txt
  • purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Maurice J. DePont of the Policy and Rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-842A1.txt
  • for filing Oppositions to this waiver request is April 27, 2000. The deadline for filing Replies to any Oppositions is May 4, 2000. As with all other matters associated with the AirCell proceeding, including previous waiver petitions, this waiver request will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, subject to the applicable requirements set forth under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. For further information, contact Wilbert E. Nixon, Jr., Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division at 202-418-0620. See In re AirCell, Inc., Petition, Pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, For a Waiver of the Airborne Cellular Rule, or in the Alternative, For a Declaratory Ruling, Order, DA 98-2590 (Dec. 24,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-856A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-856A1.txt
  • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations: (1) the Commission's duplicating
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-871A1.txt
  • and copying during normal reference room hours at the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-882A1.txt
  • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554) and a diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). Filings and comments are also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Court Yard Level, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Dan Grosh or Patrick Forster, (202) 418-1310. - FCC - Revision of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Second
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-888A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.§§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-953A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-953A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-953A1.txt
  • from ITS, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 857-3800. In addition, the Petition is available electronically as an attachment to the relevant ULS applications, including ULS File No. 0000068471, which pertains to the first-listed market on Attachment 1. Ex parte presentations in this proceeding will be governed by the ``permit but disclose'' procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lauren Kravetz or Michael Samsock, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7240. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 20.6. (...continued) (continued...) - ã å BÚHáDPuÍnuÿ‰PNG É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P²
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1025A1.txt
  • Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-C314, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Bill Dever, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-1580. -FCC- PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov N d Ý ß d e d e +Dðƒ +D`ƒ ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1041A1.txt
  • Communications, Inc., KMC Telecom Inc., Local Telephone and Data Services, Network Telephone Corporation, Network Access Solutions, New Edge Network, Inc., NewSouth Communications, Inc., NuVox Inc., Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., RCN Telecom Services, Inc., US LEC Communications Inc., and WorldCom, Inc., CC Docket No. 96-98 (filed Apr. 19, 2001) (Joint Motion). Joint Motion at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov T U W (R) à á � S T à S T à „Ð ›ëÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1042A1.txt
  • October 1, 2003 on its experience with NSS and E-OTD, including actual deployment and the results of all tests and trials. We seek comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may do on or before May 23, 2001 and reply comments on or before June 7, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1063A1.txt
  • Antitrust Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1067A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1067A1.txt
  • is appropriate because of special circumstances in this case that serve the public interest and is justified because efficiencies resulting from the waiver of section 61.41 outweigh any potential harms that the rule is designed to guard against. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-106A1.txt
  • Energy, One South Station, Boston, MA 02110 and (2) Josh Walls, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1072A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1072A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1072A1.txt
  • five-year deadline was to have taken place. 8. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 9. Comments must be filed on or before May 9, 2001, and reply comments by May 16, 2001. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1077A1.txt
  • be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and include, but may not be limited to, the issue identified in this Order. We may also, by Order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. III. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS 5. This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-109A1.txt
  • the Pegasus application was classified as restricted, but, following Pegasus' inquiry, WTB remedied this discrepancy (assuming one existed) in its public notice reclassifying the Pegasus application as permit-but-disclose. 15. In view of the foregoing, we find that Northpoint's actions in meeting with Commission officials on a ex parte basis regarding its applications and filing notices pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206 were consistent with the ex parte rules. It does not appear, however, that Northpoint fully complied with the Commission's rules in this regard, because Northpoint should have filed copies of those notices that related specifically to Broadwave's applications for inclusion in both the rulemaking and application files. While we admonish Northpoint to conform to this requirement in the future, Northpoint's
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1114A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than May 8, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than May 15, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1129A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1154A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Antoinette Stevens, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 1 In the Matter of Federal State Joint Board on Universal Service, Fourth Order on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1162A1.txt
  • Room CY-A257, Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This document may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., 1231 20th Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036, or by calling (202)857-3800, (202)857-3805 (facsimile). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1168A1.txt
  • reduced from $0.0095 to $0.0055 and be consistent with the directions set forth in the Calls Order seeking to avoid rate churn and customer confusion. The completion of the sales is anticipated during the next tariff year. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1169A1.txt
  • 01-1169). Commenters must file an original and four copies of all comments and reply comments to the Commission's Secretary: Magalie Roman Salas Office of the Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., SW Room TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Ex parte presentations, as defined in the Commission's rules, are any presentations that, if written, are not served on the parties to the proceeding, or, if oral, are made without advance notice to the parties and without opportunity for them to be present. In ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings, persons may make ex parte presentations but must then disclose them to the parties.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1172A1.txt
  • Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554; and (3) ITS, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B400, Washington, DC 20554 (include one diskette copy for ITS). By this Public Notice, we announce, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case, because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1191A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1208A1.txt
  • 28 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicant may file replies within 14 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit- but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-120A1.txt
  • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Pursuant to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.927(i), ex parte notifications filed must be served on all parties to the proceeding. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1211A1.txt
  • Petition of BellSouth, SBC and Verizon, CC Docket No. 96-98, Public Notice, DA 01-911 (rel. Apr. 10, 2001), extension of time granted, Common Carrier Bureau Grants Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Comments and Reply Comments on BOC Joint Motion Regarding Unbundled Network Elements, CC Docket No. 96-98, Public Notice, DA 01-1041 (rel. Apr. 23, 2001). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov & ? A Ú � „Ð Áÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ †]¶' ùš7²ßâ`è²~¯; M u(¨\A€÷ õwåœ(c)ó ° ¼èš 2Àû
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1213A1.txt
  • Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6-A320, Washington, DC 20554. , that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1214A1.txt
  • Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6-A320, Washington, DC 20554. , that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1216A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1216A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1216A2.txt
  • Reference Operations Division, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; and (3) Kathy Harris, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room 4-C236, Washington, D. C. 20554. By this Public Notice, we announce, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. These procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees, but require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-121A1.txt
  • the construction period is not extended, it must order analog equipment in time for it to be assembled, delivered and deployed to provide the required coverage for each MTA by the August 12, 2001 construction deadline. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-122A1.txt
  • will be deemed to have satisfied its substantial service obligations if it is making at least twenty channels available to its customers in each MTA and has made a satisfactory demonstration of service to the public. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1264A1.txt
  • action, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1299A1.doc
  • to Section 1.401 of the Commission's Rules, petitioned the Commission to initiate a rulemaking proceeding revising its policies governing the federally-tariffed charges of incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) for changing the presubscribed interexchange carrier for end-user subscribers. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1313A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1313A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1313A1.txt
  • within 28 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 14 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1316A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1316A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1316A1.txt
  • request such access pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.461 of the Commission's rules. Petitions filed pursuant to CALEA section 107(c) are classified as "permit but disclose" proceedings for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1325A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1336A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1336A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1336A1.txt
  • carry protection. Comments and oppositions to Time Warner's petition are now due on or before June 18, 2001 and reply comments are now due on or before June 28, 2001. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5698-Z. For purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, this proceeding is considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules ("Permit-but-disclose proceeding"). The petition is available for public inspection in the Commission's Reference Information Center: 445 12th Street, S.W. Room CY A-257 Washington, D.C. 20554 202-418-7092 Copies of the Petition and other pleadings are available for purchase from: ITS, Inc. 1231 20th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 202-857-3800 (p) 202-857-3805 (f) http://www/itsdoc.com Media Contact: Michelle Russo
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1348A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1354A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1368A1.txt
  • required and recommended procedures regarding the service of pleadings and comment periods in such proceedings. The RF Procedures Order, which was published in the Federal Register on January 16, 2001, contained an information collection requiring the approval of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act. The RF Procedures Order amended Note 1 to Section 1.1206(a) of the Commission's rules so that the expanded service requirements set forth in that note apply to petitions filed pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) (i.e., petitions for relief from impermissible State and local regulation of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of RF emissions). Thus, petitioners seeking relief under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) must serve a copy of such petitions on those
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1396A1.txt
  • technologies in order for AWS to deploy MNLS in CBW's network as explained more fully in AWS' Request for Waiver. We seek comment on CBW's Amended Waiver Request. Parties interested in filing comments may do on or before July 9, 2001 and reply comments on or before July 23, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1400A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1400A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1400A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Howard Davenport, Auctions Attorney, or Lyle Ishida, Auctions Analyst, at (202) 418-0660; or Lisa Stover, Project Manager, at (717) 338-2888. - FCC- See Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services, Narrowband PCS, GEN Docket No. 90-314,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1422A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1428A1.txt
  • the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but may not be limited to, the issues identified in this Order. We may also, by Order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. III. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS 5. This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1445A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1458A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will continue to be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact: Katie King, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400 or Thomas Buckley, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1462A1.txt
  • the initial report filed on June 11 and the supplement filed on June 18. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments with the Commission within 60 days after the audit report is made available for public inspection. Accordingly, comments are due no later than August 20, 2001. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1463A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Jennifer Gorny, jgorny@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to such proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1486A1.txt
  • Antitrust Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1490A1.txt
  • the event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within 60 days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than July 9, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than July 16, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1491A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1491A1.txt
  • the event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within 60 days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the AFN Finance's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than July 9, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than July 16, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1494A1.txt
  • request such access pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.461 of the Commission's rules. Petitions filed pursuant to CALEA section 107(c) are classified as "permit but disclose" proceedings for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1496A1.txt
  • analysis, they should include a discussion of these issues in their comments. The Commission's Office of Public Affairs, Reference Operations Division, will send a copy of this Public Notice, including this initial certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy will also be published in the Federal Register. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. Action by the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau FCC Report 43-04 ARMIS ACCESS REPORT COMPANY: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX Version STUDY AREA: XXXXXXXXXXXX SUBMISSION XXX PERIOD: From: mm yyyyy To mm yyyyy TABLE I COSA: XXXX PAGE 1 of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1517A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-151A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1520A1.txt
  • wireless carriers, as compared to wireline carriers, with respect to the provision of E911 services. The Petition is available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), this proceeding is designated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding and subject to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible, provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Interested parties may file comments or oppositions responding to the Petition on or before July 30, 2001 and reply comments on or before August 14, 2001. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1525A1.txt
  • reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1527A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions, Francis Gutierrez (202) 418-0660 or e-mail fgutierr@fcc.gov For general auction questions, Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 or e-mail lishida@fcc.gov Barbara Sibert (717) 338-2888 or e-mail bsibert@fcc.gov - FCC- See Amendment of the Commission's Rules Regarding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-152A1.txt
  • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1533A1.txt
  • the event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within 60 days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of UniGrid's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than July 6, 2001. Reply comments must be filed no later than July 13, 2001. All filings concerning any of the matters referenced in this Public Notice should refer to NSD file number ETC-01-11. All comments should
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1534A1.txt
  • the event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within 60 days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of ECP Telecommunications Holdings, LLC's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than July 6, 2001. Reply comments must be filed no later than July 13, 2001. All filings concerning any of the matters referenced in this Public Notice should refer to NSD file number ETC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1535A1.txt
  • the event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within 60 days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of CIC Global, LLC's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than July 6, 2001. Reply comments must be filed no later than July 13, 2001. All filings concerning any of the matters referenced in this Public Notice should refer to NSD file number ETC 01-13.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1541A1.txt
  • the event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within 60 days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of Exelon Communications Holdings, LLC's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than July 12, 2001. Reply comments must be filed no later than July 19, 2001. All filings concerning any of the matters referenced in this Public Notice should refer to NSD file number ETC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1547A1.txt
  • case of WA2XMY, OET now concludes that in order to permit a fuller exchange on the issues under consideration by the Commission, the public interest would be served by classifying the instant experimental radio licensing proceeding as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding for ex parte purposes in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules and subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1555A1.txt
  • paper copy and diskette to Dana Jackson, Disabilities Rights Office, Consumer Information Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Room 4-C746, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20554. Filings and comments are also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Dana Jackson, (202) 418-2247 (voice), (202) 418-7898 (TTY). . Petition for Clarification of WorldCom, Inc, CC Docket. 90-571 (filed Dec. 22, 2001) (WorldCom Petition). The Commission initially sought comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1563A1.txt
  • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but may not be limited to, the issues identified in this Order. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1582A1.txt
  • a wider range of services to consumers. 5. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 6. Comments must be filed on or before July 19, 2001, and reply comments by July 26, 2001. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1596A1.txt
  • at its office at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. One copy must be filed also with the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission 5-A225, 445 12th St., SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and argument presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-15A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1605A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Gene Fullano, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. ¡ ° Ò á „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1619A1.txt
  • Exhibit C. See, e.g., Federal Power Company v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591 (1944). Specifically, the resultant loss figure for 1998 would be $3,085,000 ($5,163,000 less $2,078,000) and for 1999 would be $3,083,000 ($5,061,000 less $1,978,000). See 14 FCC Rcd at 13,229. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-16. AT&T Opposition at 5. Hoxeng Reply at 4-5. 47 C.F.R. at § 1.1206(b)(2). AT&T met with the staff on May 6, May 25, June 29, July 8 and July 16, 1999. See 14 FCC Rcd at 13,227. See AT&T's August 4, 1999, letter at p. 1. Hoxeng Reply to AT&T Stay Opposition at p. 6. The term ``Y2K compliant'' refers to modifications to computer software that were necessary to allow computers to continue
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1623A1.txt
  • and distinct heading designating them as responses to the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. The Commission's Consumer Information Bureau, Reference Information Center, will send a copy of this Public Notice, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act. See 5 U.S.C. §603(a). Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Peter G. Wolfe, (202))418-1310. -FCC- APPENDIX A Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) has prepared this Initial Regulatory
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1628A1.txt
  • any TDMA networks converted to a new air interface are fully compliant with the Phase II requirements from the outset. We seek comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before July 31, 2001 and reply comments on or before August 10, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1645A1.txt
  • basis are all reasons to grant its request for a waiver of the Phase II E-911 rules. We seek comment on PCS One's waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before July 30, 2001 and may file reply comments on or before August 6, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1647A1.txt
  • that parties filed in 1997 are available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Copies can also be obtained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington DC 20036 or by calling ITS at (202) 857-3800 or faxing ITS at (202) 857-3805. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1648A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1648A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1648A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1650A1.txt
  • a request, and 50% and 75% of cell sites within 12 months and 18 months, respectively. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seeks comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may submit their comments on or before July 26, 2001 and reply comments on or before August 6, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the docket number of this proceeding. Parties that choose to file by paper must file an original
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1658A1.txt
  • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and provide to Dennis Johnson, Common Carrier Bureau and ITS, copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information, contact Dennis Johnson, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-2320, e-mail dcjohnso@fcc.gov.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1659A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1674A1.txt
  • Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554; and (3) ITS, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B400, Washington, DC 20554 (include one diskette copy for ITS). By this Public Notice, we announce, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case, because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-169A1.txt
  • if any, co-mingling may generally have on the Commission's unbundling requirements. Parties submitting comments in response to this Public Notice must file initial comments 30 days after publication of the Notice in the Federal Register and reply comments 45 days after such publication. Ex parte presentations in this proceeding continue to be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, covering ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-16A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1705A1.txt
  • hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from International Transcription Services, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Room CY-B400, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 314-3070. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries or the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1790A1.txt
  • STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING This proceeding continues to be "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1791A1.txt
  • e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form ." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. This proceeding has been designated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Interested parties shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1800A1.txt
  • the event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within 60 days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of EEI Telecom Holdings, LLC's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than August 9, 2001. All comments should also be served on Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than August 15, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1805A1.txt
  • 28 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 14 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1816A1.txt
  • interest because the A-GPS Phase II solution will allow for the provision of more accurate information to PSAPs. We seek comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before August 20, 2001 and may file reply comments on or before August 30, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1817A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1817A1.txt
  • granted in the First Ka-band Processing Round, we now conclude that it is in the public interest to redesignate the ex parte status of these modification applications from a restricted to a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Accordingly, ex parte presentations relating to either of the two pending Loral modification applications cited above are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.261, 1.1200(a). For further information, contact the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1836A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1836A1.txt
  • to provide its customers with what it believes is the most accurate location technology as quickly as possible. We seek comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before August 21, 2001 and may file reply comments on or before August 31, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1842A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith or Anita Cheng, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. d/b/a Guamcell Communications Petition for
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1857A1.txt
  • compliance, Sprint submit quarterly reports to the Commission describing the status of its Phase II implementation. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seeks comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may submit their comments on or before August 22, 2001 and reply comments on or before September 1, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the docket number of this proceeding. Parties that choose to file by paper must file an original
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1866A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1866A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1866A1.txt
  • the Commission with quarterly updates on its Phase II compliance efforts as a condition to a grant of the waiver. We seek comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before August 27, 2001 and reply comments on or before September 6, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1872A1.txt
  • appropriate because the CMRS LNP requirements will impose complex technical burdens and expenses that are not justified by tangible economic benefits. We seek comment on Verizon's petition. Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before September 21, 2001 and reply comments on or before October 22, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1875A1.txt
  • event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within sixty (60) days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of KLT TELECOM INC., DTI HOLDINGS, INC., DIGITAL TELEPORT OF VIRGINIA, INC., DIGITAL TELEPORT, INC. AND SIGNAL SITES INC.'s joint application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than August 9, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1880A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1880A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1880A1.txt
  • the event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within 60 days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of NEON Communications, Inc.'s application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than August 22, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than August 29, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1918A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1918A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1918A1.txt
  • event that the Commission issues an order denying the application within sixty (60) days of its receipt, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of AFN Finance Company No. 3, LLC's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than August 27, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than September 3, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1952A1.txt
  • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, D.C. 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1966A1.txt
  • Carmell Weathers, Common Carrier Bureau, Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6-B153, Washington, D.C. 20554. , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1967A1.txt
  • Carmell Weathers, Common Carrier Bureau, Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6-B153, Washington, D.C. 20554. , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1969A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1969A1.txt
  • we encourage all interested individuals to submit written ex parte comments, by October 20, 2001, identifying proposed national outreach guidelines and procedures. Written ex parte comments will aid us in our decision-making with regard to identifying the best means of achieving nationwide outreach on TRS. Interested parties who choose to file ex parte comments by paper in accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206, should file an original and four (4) copies of their comments with the FCC's Office of the Secretary, 445 12th Street, SW, TW-A325, Washington DC, 20554 and should reference CC Docket No. 98-67. In addition, where filings are made prior to August 28, 2001, one (1) copy of those filings should be sent
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1994A1.txt
  • one copy of their comments to International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS), at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2009A1.txt
  • of service unless it is shown that customers or other end users would be unable to receive service or a reasonable substitute from another carrier, or that the public convenience and necessity is otherwise adversely affected. This proceeding is considered a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Comments objecting to this application must be filed with the Commission by September 7, 2001. Such comments should refer to application file number W-P-D-517. Comments should include specific information about the impact of this proposed discontinuance on the commenter, including any inability to acquire reasonable substitute service. Comments should be sent to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2033A1.doc
  • reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2076A1.txt
  • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Howard Davenport (202) 418-0660 or e-mail hdavenpo@fcc.gov For general auction questions: Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 or e-mail lishida@fcc.gov Barbara Sibert (717) 338-2888 or e-mail bsibert@fcc.gov - FCC - For the rules associated with the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2080A1.txt
  • and roamers. Cingular asserts that no other type of technology can supply location information to these three types of callers. We seek comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before September 19, 2001 and reply comments on or before September 26, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-209A1.txt
  • special access and dedicated transport services established in the Access Reform Fifth Report and Order. See Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd 14222 (1999) (Access Reform Fifth Report and Order). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2107A1.txt
  • 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will continue to be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact: Katie King, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400 or Thomas Buckley, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2163A1.txt
  • We now initiate the proceeding described at paragraph 83 of the CALLS Order. We direct price cap LECs to submit the cost information described in that paragraph, and invite interested parties to comment on the cost submissions. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2174A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2187A1.txt
  • network overlay solution, or another solution that complies with the Commission's rules or for which AT&T has previously obtained a waiver. We seek comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may do on or before October 4, 2001 and reply comments on or before October 11, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2200A1.txt
  • the Commission's duplicating contractor, at its office at Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, and one copy with the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-A225, Washington, D.C. 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2243A1.txt
  • the petition, it will release an appropriate order. 18. Other information. Petitions or supplements filed pursuant to CALEA section 107(c) are classified as "permit but disclose" proceedings for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2279A1.txt
  • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicant may file replies within 10 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit- but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2286A1.txt
  • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, D.C. 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2299A1.txt
  • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. For further information, contact Rosalee Chiara at (20) 418-0754 or Selina Khan at (202) 418-7282. 47 C.F.R. § 1.106. Preemption of Local Zoning Regulation of Satellite Earth Stations, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket No. 95-59, 11 FCC Rcd 5809 (1996) (``1996 Antenna Order.'') See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. See 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2308A1.txt
  • regular business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from Qualex International, 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 863-2893. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries or the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2322A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Susan Magnotti, smagnott@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to such proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2323A1.txt
  • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. For further information, contact Rosalee Chiara at (20) 418-0754 or Selina Khan at (202) 418-7282. 47 C.F.R. § 1.106. Preemption of Local Zoning Regulation of Satellite Earth Stations, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket No. 95-59, 11 FCC Rcd 5809 (1996) (``1996 Antenna Order''), consolidated in part with Preemption of Local Zoning Regulation
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2327A1.txt
  • submissions. Comments will be due no later than December 17, 2001, and reply comments are due no later than January 9, 2002. When filing cost information and comments, parties should reference CC Docket Nos. 96-262 and 94-1. This proceeding shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-232A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-232A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. A } „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2361A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and Qualex International with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . -FCC-
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2368A1.txt
  • are filed. Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see Sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2374A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2374A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2374A1.txt
  • get filing instructions for e-mail comments, commenters should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, including ``get form '' in the body of the message. A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, ex parte communications will be governed by section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, the media contact for this proceeding is Michelle Russo at (202) 418-0270. The Cable Services Bureau contacts are Daniel Hodes, Kiran Duwadi, Ava Holly Berland or Andrew Wise at (202) 418-7200, TTY at (202) 418-7365 or (888) 835-5322, or at dhodes@fcc.gov, kduwadi@fcc.gov, hberland@fcc.gov, awise@fcc.gov. -FCC - Implementation of Section 11 of the Cable
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2419A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules.7 As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings.8 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.9 Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2425A1.txt
  • 20554. The duplicating contractor, Qualex International, will provide, for a fee, copies of this document. Qualex International may be contacted at Portals II, 445 12th St., S.W. Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, or by calling (202) 863-2893. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2426A1.txt
  • Washington, DC 20554. The duplicating contractor, Qualex International, will provide, for a fee, copies of this document. Qualex International may be contacted at 445 12th St., S.W. Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, or by calling (202) 863-2893. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-243A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than February 9, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than February 16, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-244A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than February 19, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than February 26, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2469A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Ernestine Creech and Qualex International, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . Action by
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2514A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and Qualex International with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2545A1.txt
  • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning this application are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2546A1.txt
  • provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ken Stanley or Lisa Choi, Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460. Petition for Waiver of the Benchmark Settlement Rate for Guyana, IB Docket No. 96-261, Public Notice, DA 01-1714 (rel. July 17, 2001). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206 Id. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov � „Ð Áÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ †]¶' ùš7²ßâ`è²~¯; M u(¨\A€÷ õwåœ(c)ó ° ¼èš 2Àû 0ïôò îO�Û ÌìúÇ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2547A1.txt
  • Comments will be due no later than January 24, 2002, and reply comments will be due no later than February 14, 2002. When filing cost information and comments, parties should reference CC Docket Nos. 96-262 and 94-1. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2570A1.txt
  • Copies of all filings are available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, SW, telephone 202-857-3800; facsimile 202-857-3805. For ex parte purposes, this proceeding continues to be a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. The Commission's Consumer Information Bureau Reference Information Center shall send a copy of this Notice, Including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. For further information, please contact Rockie Patterson, Satellite Engineering Branch at 202-418-1183. Action by the Chief, International Bureau, November 1, 2001. Initial Regulatory Flexibility
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2580A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2580A1.txt
  • 28 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning this application are permitted subject to the Commission'' rules for the "permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47, C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2602A1.txt
  • Carmell Weathers, Common Carrier Bureau, Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6-B153, Washington, D.C. 20554. , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2605A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Video Services Division: Shaun Maher at (202) 418-1600 Auctions and Industry Analysis Division: Kenneth Burnley, Legal Branch at (202) 418-0660 Linda Sanderson, Operations Branch at (717) 338-2888 Requests for information can also be e-mailed to auctionsinquiry@fcc.gov. -FCC- ATTACHMENT A New Analog Television Station Construction Permits MX Group Location Channel
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2610A1.txt
  • 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B-402, Washington, D.C. 20554. The full text of this ``Motion for Stay'' is available on the ECFS and at the FCC Reference Center, Room TW-A306, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries or the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2618A1.txt
  • incremental cost (TELRIC) based reciprocal compensation rates on a prospective basis only. Interested parties may file comments in response to the issues identified in Sprint PCS's and AT&T's petitions and issues referred to the Commission by the court. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2635A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2636A1.txt
  • parties must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. The original petitions for reconsideration that parties filed in 1996-97 are available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. APPENDIX A PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FIRST REPORT AND ORDER Commenter Date
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-264A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2662A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2665A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see Sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-267A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact William Cox, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Moultrie Independent Telephone Company, Petition for Declaratory Ruling, filed March 29, 2000; 47 C.F.R. §§
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2689A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2689A1.txt
  • Commission, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2722A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2722A1.txt
  • opposition, comment, or reply comment, as appropriate, addressing all issues raised by the three petitions on which they wish to be heard. Oppositions and comments are due December 19, 2001 and reply comments are due January 4, 2002. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2746A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2746A1.txt
  • Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2436 (rel. Oct. 17, 2001). See Public Notice, FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2436 (rel. Oct. 17, 2001). The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2756A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2756A1.txt
  • copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2757A1.txt
  • copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2760A1.txt
  • and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W.. CY-A257, Washington DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2775A1.txt
  • may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To receive filing instructions for e-mail comments, commenters should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to section 1.1206(b) of the commission's rules. . Action by the Chief, Enforcement Bureau. See letter dated October 10, 2001, from Cheryl A. Leanza, Deputy Director, Media Access Project to Bonnie Gay, Technical and Public Safety Division, Federal Communications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2788A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-278A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith or Anita Cheng, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2817A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2817A1.txt
  • 20554. Parties also should send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's duplicating contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th St., SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will continue to be conducted in a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact: Ted Burmeister, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400. Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket Nos. 96-262 and 94-1, Sixth Report and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-281A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b). Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Debbie Byrd and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information, please contact Stephen
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2820A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2820A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2820A1.txt
  • as restricted. Under the Commission's regular practice, the entire proceeding here, if formally opposed, would be treated as restricted. Because this proceeding involves broad issues of public policy, however, it will be treated as non-restricted, i.e., ``permit-but-disclose,'' for purposes of ex parte communications. Accordingly, ex parte presentations in this proceeding will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Communication's rules, that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Ex parte presentations in non-restricted proceedings generally are permitted subject to disclosure. TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF CGN USA See n. 5 of Application under Section 214 and the Cable Landing License Act for Transfer of Control of Concert Global Networks USA L.L.C. and for Assignment of Authority under Cable Landing
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2832A1.txt
  • of $0.0095 per minute to interexchange carriers. Iowa Telecom filed its petition for forbearance pursuant to Section 10 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act), 47 U.S.C. § 160. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2838A1.txt
  • D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. ƒ ¿ „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór�
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2841A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2841A1.txt
  • 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard Smith or Anita Cheng, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Pine Belt Cellular and Pine Belt PCS Petition for Designation as
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2869A1.txt
  • 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith or Anita Cheng, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See IT&E Overseas, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2872A1.txt
  • and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2874A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the FCC's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the FCC's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2885A1.txt
  • the notice and comment requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act and is arbitrary and capricious. The Petitions are available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), this proceeding is designated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding and subject to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible, provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Interested parties may file comments or oppositions responding to the petitions on or before January 18, 2002 and reply comments on or before January 28, 2002. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-290A1.txt
  • served upon each party filing an opposition or comment. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2916A1.txt
  • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-2017. - FCC - Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan for Regulation of Interstate Services of Non-Price Cap Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Access Charge Reform for Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers Subject to Rate-of-Return Regulation, Prescribing the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2932A1.txt
  • parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set forth below, no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(1). Persons making oral ex parte presentations must file a summary of the presentation, as set forth below, and deliver copies to the Commissioners or Commission employees involved with the presentation no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). All ex parte filings must be clearly labeled as such and must reference this Public Notice,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2942A1.pdf
  • other Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers enabling parties to place a page to any customer of a wireless carrier by dialing a single local (seven digit) telephone number anywhere in the wireless carrier's extended service area within a LATA." This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2950A1.txt
  • copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-295A1.txt
  • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2973A1.txt
  • 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, one copy should be sent by U.S. regular mail to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Room 5B-540, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554, or hand delivered to Sheryl Todd at 236 Massachusetts Ave, NE, Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. ``Options for Separations: A Paper Prepared by the State Members of the Separations Joint Board,''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2974A1.txt
  • and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-297A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-297A1.txt
  • Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-C314, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Bill Dever, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1580. See ENTEL-Chile, Application for Consent to Transfer Control of Domestic Section 214 Authorization from ENTEL-Chile to STET (filed Jan. 19, 2001). Applicants have filed separate applications with the Commission's International Bureau to transfer control of Americatel's international section 214 authorization (ITC-T/C-20010119-00047, Report No. TEL-00349S, rel. Feb. 2, 2001)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2989A1.txt
  • within 28 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 14 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Exparte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2990A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 1'' DA 01-2990 ITC^DELTACOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PETITION FOR WAIVER OF SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER CLARIFICATION CC Docket No. 96-98 Released: December 21, 2001 Pursuant to sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, the Petition of ITC^DeltaCom Communications, Inc. for Waiver of Supplemental Order Clarification shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding. See Public Notice, Common Carrier Bureau Seeks Comment on Petition of ITC^DeltaCom Communications, Inc. for Waiver of Supplemental Order Clarification, DA 01-2030 (rel. Aug. 28, 2001). Persons making oral ex parte presentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2994A1.txt
  • computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); see also, e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York, CC Docket No. 99-295, Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3003A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3005A1.txt
  • broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3007A1.txt
  • superseded by a final determination on the merits of the underlying extension request. Petitions filed pursuant to CALEA section 107(c) are classified as "permit but disclose" proceedings for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3019A1.txt
  • the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail at qualexint@aol.com. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-301A1.txt
  • steps IXCs must take either to avoid ordering access service or to cancel service after it has been ordered or constructively ordered. Interested parties may file comments in response to the issues identified in AT&T's and Sprint's petitions. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3020A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-3023A1.txt
  • investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but may not be limited to, the issues identified in this order. We may also identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS With the exception of the issues described below, this investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Any person who makes a presentation in this proceeding
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-332A1.txt
  • policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-341A1..doc
  • two copies to Al McCloud, Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6A-320, Washington, D.C. 20554. , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-341A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-341A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-341A1.txt
  • two copies to Al McCloud, Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6A-320, Washington, D.C. 20554. , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-360A1.txt
  • Counsel to James Kay, P.O Box 33428-Farragut Station, Washington, D.C. 20033; and (2) Gary Schonman, Enforcement Bureau, Room 3-A660, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. By this Public Notice, we announce, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. These procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees, but require that these presentations be disclosed in the record
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-365A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than February 22, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than March 1, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-366A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status, as an ETC must do so no later than February 22, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than March 1, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-38A1.txt
  • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than as a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-407A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice Myles, Trudy Hercules, and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . TTY:
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-409A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-409A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith or Anita Cheng, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. § 54.207. Section 214(e)(5) defines the term ``service area''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-453A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. For further information, contact Ana Curtis or Lynne Milne, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-1520, TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 1.2. AT&T Petition for Declaratory Ruling (filed February 5, 2001) (Petition). See Petition, Attachment 1. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-460A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-466A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-489A1.txt
  • request such access pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.461 of the Commission's rules. Petitions filed pursuant to CALEA section 107(c) are classified as "permit but disclose" proceedings for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-494A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-499A1.txt
  • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-501A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-501A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-501A1.txt
  • Exchange Access Service, CC Docket No. 96-98, Public Notice, DA 01-169 (rel. Jan. 24, 2001). 66 FR 8555 (Feb. 1, 2001). Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Motion for Modification of Comment Schedule (filed Feb. 22, 2001). Id. at 1-2. Id. at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1206. { | +D`ƒ +Dðƒ × × ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv `ññä 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i 0i
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-507A1.txt
  • Commission's rules. See Qwest/Acquiring Companies Public Notice (establishing November 13, 2000, as the deadline for reply comments); 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. In the interest of establishing a complete and comprehensive record on this matter, we believe it is in the public interest to accept these further pleadings and will treat them as ex parte presentations. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See also, In the Matter of Mobile Relay Systems, Order on Further Reconsideration, FCC File No. D100478, DA 01-113, n. 22 (rel. Jan. 16, 2001). 47 C.F.R. § 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-522A1.txt
  • Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Aaron Goldberger, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1580. See TruCom and BridgeCom Joint Application for Consent to Transfer of Control Pursuant to Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934 (filed Feb. 23, 2001). The Applicants also filed a joint application with the Commission's International Bureau to transfer control of TruCom's international section 214 authorization. On
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-53A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than January 10, 2001. Reply comments must be filed no later than January 11, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-54A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status, as an ETC must do so no later than January 10, 2001. Reply Comments must be filed no later than January 11, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-554A1.txt
  • may also be obtained from ITS, 445 12th Street, S.W., room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, tel. +1 (202) 857-3800. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for the purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed b the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-55A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than January 16, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than January 23, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-566A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-570A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status, as an ETC must do so no later than March 9, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than March 16, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-584A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈ Õ7ÐZ±"ÜNzKZߌE‡Ý
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-593A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Erik Salovaara, Auctions Attorney, or Jeff Crooks, Auctions Analyst, at (202) 418-0660; or Lisa Stover, Project Manager, at (717) 338-2888. - FCC - See Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Future Development of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-598A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-598A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-605A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b). Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Ernestine Creech and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information, please contact Mark
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-618A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-620A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-620A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-620A1.txt
  • February 8, 2000, and we therefore seek comment on this development. Parties submitting comments in response to this Public Notice must file initial comments 30 days after publication of the Notice in the Federal Register and reply comments 45 days after such publication. Ex parte presentations in this proceeding continue to be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, covering ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-622A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Letter from Thomas K. Crowe and Tania J. Cho to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-623A1.txt
  • Reference Operations Division, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; and (3) Kathy Harris, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Room 4-C236, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D. C. 20554. By this Public Notice, we announce, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. These procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees, but require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-660A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-660A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-660A1.txt
  • Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-C314, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information contact Bill Dever, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1580. +D`ƒ +Dðƒ ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv `ññä 0i 0i
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-665A1.txt
  • Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; and (3) Paul Murray, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Room 4-B442, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D. C. 20554. By this Public Notice, we announce, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. These procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees, but require that these presentations be disclosed in the record
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-684A1.txt
  • of TELRIC with respect to loop conditioning charges. Interested parties may file comments no later than April 16, 2001. Reply comments may be filed no later than May 7, 2001. When filing comments, please reference CCB/CPD No. 01-06. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-688A1.txt
  • and policies regarding expansions over land. Paging licensees that seek contour expansions over land, or expansions over water on a primary basis, must continue to seek prior Commission approval and request a waiver of the rules. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-68A1.txt
  • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-696A1.txt
  • parties should submit one copy to Barbara Reideler, Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Room 3-B101, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20554. Filings and comments are also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Barbara Reideler, (202) 418-1310. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 /
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-698A1.txt
  • restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to Maritel's request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-712A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-712A1.txt
  • Commission issues an order within sixty days after the date of this public notice, denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than March 30, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-715A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-715A1.txt
  • de minimis percentage of each state's long distance customers. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-722A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-722A1.txt
  • Inc., approved by the Texas Public Utility Commission, into current or future interconnection agreements in Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas, and Missouri. We seek comment on both letters and as to whether there are grounds to waive or modify the relevant MFN conditions. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-728A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-731A1.txt
  • 2001. Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see Sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.txt
  • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-73A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-742A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-742A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status, as an ETC must do so no later than April 6, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than April 13, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-757A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈ Õ7ÐZ±"ÜNzKZߌE‡Ý F‹¸Ò)%3{£Rg*wÒÆ/ÎyDß‚z,•µû](nþ¼2/cmLŒ
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-75A1.doc
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-75A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules.4 As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non- restricted proceedings.5 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.6 Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-764A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-768A1.txt
  • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-76A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-77A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-788A1.txt
  • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . The petitions are also available for public inspection and copying in the Reference Center, Room CY A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the petitions are also available from ITS, Room CY-B400, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554, or by calling (202) 857-3800. , including ``get form to ''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-78A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-79A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-80A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-810A1.txt
  • the Bell Atlantic/NYNEX performance monitoring reports. Verizon's letter is attached to this Public Notice. Pursuant to the instructions below, interested parties should submit comments no later than April 19, 2001. Reply comments should be submitted no later than April 30, 2001. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-814A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-814A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith or Anita Cheng, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. § 54.207. Section 214(e)(5) defines the term ``service area''
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-886A1.txt
  • parties should submit one copy to Wendy Austrie, Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Room 3-B101, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20554. Filings and comments are also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Wendy Austrie, (202) 418-1310. -FCC- See 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(j). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-894A1.txt
  • will provide location accuracy of approximately 250 meters for 67 percent of calls and 750 meters for 95 percent of calls. We seek comment on this waiver request. Parties interested in filing comments may do on or before May 7, 2001 and reply comments on or before May 21, 2001. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-910A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-911A1.txt
  • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-912A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-912A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-912A1.txt
  • reduced from $0.0095 to $0.0055 and be consistent with the directions set forth in the Calls Order seeking to avoid rate churn and customer confusion. The completion of the sales is anticipated during the next tariff year. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-913A1.txt
  • before May 11, 2001 and replies to comments and oppositions on or before May 25, 2001. All filings should reference CS Docket No. 99-251. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING This proceeding has been designated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Interested parties shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-933A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-933A1.txt
  • comments to the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties are also encouraged to file a copy of all pleadings on a 3.5 inch diskette in Word 97 format. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance or the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-948A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than April 18, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than April 20, 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-94A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-94A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-94A1.txt
  • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 -- 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than January 30, 2001. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than February 6 , 2001. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-970A1.txt
  • 24.415(j). Third, Space Data asks the Bureau to clarify that the antenna registration requirements set forth in 47 C.F.R. 17.4, 17.7, and 24.55, do not apply to antennas that are affixed to high-altitude, balloon-borne ``repeater'' transceivers. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-975A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Petition for Reconsideration of Proposed First Quarter 2000 Universal Service Contribution Factor by Greg Weisiger,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-984A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1005A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. d/b/a Saipancell Petition for Designation as an Eligible
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1017A1.txt
  • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1034A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Citizens Telecommunications Company of North Dakota, Red River Telephone Association and Red River
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1044A1.txt
  • Commission's rules regarding resolution of RFI. Cingular maintains that, in order to prevent significant delays in the provision of wireless services resulting from Anne Arundel's regulation of RFI, the Commission should determine that the amendments are preempted. This matter shall be treated as a "permit but disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1070A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1070A1.txt
  • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. The Petition for Rulemaking is available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's Reference Center, Room CY A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the Petition are also available from Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or e-mail at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1100A1.txt
  • deny BellSouth's request to strike and disregard AT&T's petition. We find AT&T's explanation reasonable and note that BellSouth was timely served in its Washington office and able to file a timely reply to the petition. Under these circumstances, we decline to disregard AT&T's petition. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-111A1.txt
  • Task Force, 1401 H St., N.W., Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20530. See Public Notice, FCC Announces New in Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1151A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Corr Wireless Communications, LLC Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1152A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Virginia Cellular LLC Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1165A1.txt
  • 20554. Copies also may be obtained from Qualex International, 445 12th Street, S.W., room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 863-2893. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1167A1.txt
  • to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-116A1.txt
  • copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1171A1.txt
  • 5-A225, Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. . This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-117A1.txt
  • copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1214A1.txt
  • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1245A1.txt
  • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information or a writing containing the nature and source of such information is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This tariff investigation is a ``permit-but-disclose proceeding'' and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1257A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: David Hu (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions: Brian Marenco (202) 418-0838 - FCC - See Amendments to Parts 1, 2, 27
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1259A1.txt
  • 20554. Copies also may be obtained from Qualex International, 445 12th Street, S.W., room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 863-2893. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1292A1.txt
  • SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rule. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentation will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentation are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1296A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1296A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1302A1.txt
  • C.F.R.§ 1.2. NuVox petition requests that the Commission issue a declaratory ruling regarding issues stemming from the Commission's Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Supplemental Order Clarification, 15 FCC Rcd 9587 (2000). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1304A1.txt
  • Rcd 17312 (2001) (``Further Notice''). The Further Notice also examines attribution rules applicable to cable operators and broadcasters. See Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses, Comcast Corporation and AT&T Corp., Transferors, to AT&T Comcast Corporation, Transferee, Public Notice, DA 02-733, MB Docket No. 02-70 (rel. March 29, 2002). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§1.1200-1.1216. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). See Further Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 17371 ¶ 132. See Public Notice, AT&T Corp. and Comcast Corp. Seek FCC Consent for a Proposed Transfer of Control, MB Docket No. 02-70, DA 02-733 (rel. March 29, 2001), as modified by Public Notice, Erratum and Order Extending Filing Deadline, MB Docket No. 02-70, DA 02-70 (rel. May 3, 2002). PUBLIC NOTICE
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1363A1.txt
  • Wireline Competition Bureau, Competition Policy Division, 202-418-1580. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Brent M. Olson Deputy Chief, Competition Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau Qwest Communications International, Inc., Petition for Declaratory Ruling On the Scope of the Duty to File and Obtain Prior Approval of Negotiated Contractual Arrangements Under Section 252(a)(1), DA 02-976 (rel. April 29, 2002). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). Id. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1363 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1363 l t { | Õ Õ F
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A1.txt
  • Enforcement Section, 1401 H St., N.W., Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20530. See Public Notice, FCC Announces New in Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.txt
  • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A1.doc
  • SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A1.txt
  • Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex 3 parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1426A1.txt
  • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1441A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1441A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1441A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Rosemary Cabral at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Roy Knowles at (717) 338-2888 Barbara Sibert at (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions: Bettye Woodward at (202) 418-1345 - FCC - See Revision of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1453A1.txt
  • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, D.C. 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1465A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Cellular South License, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1466A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Smith Bagley, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier for the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1473A1.txt
  • We invite interested parties to comment on whether, and, if so, under what conditions, the structural and nondiscrimination safeguards established in section 272 should be extended by the Commission either generally or with respect to specific states. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1489A1.txt
  • SBC Communications, Inc. (SBC), on behalf of Nevada Bell, filed a petition for forbearance from section 272 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (the Act) in connection with Nevada Bell's provision of nonlocal directory assistance services. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1490A1.txt
  • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1497A1.txt
  • in Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1508A1.txt
  • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments no later than July 29, 2002. Reply comments may be filed no later than August 13, 2002. When filing comments, please reference the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 02-17. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during . 4. An original and four copies of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1533A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1533A1.txt
  • 20002. The filing hours at this location will be 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. . This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1555A1.txt
  • be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in paragraphs 4-6, supra. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1567A1.txt
  • of the Telecommunications Act of Act of 1934, as amended. In the petition Global NAPs requests that the Commission preempt the Virginia State Corporation Commission (Virginia Commission) and arbitrate an interconnection agreement between Global NAPs and Verizon-Virignia, Inc. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1575A1.txt
  • one million numbers the IRM assignment pool, when IRMs are a finite numbering resource where the first number must be a zero (0) or a one (1). We seek comment on the issues raised by the Reconsideration Petition and Stay Request. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), this proceeding is designated a ``permit but disclose'' proceedings and subject to § 1.1206. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved with regard to either the Petition or the Request for Stay will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Pursuant to Section 1.45 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1628A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Francis Gutierrez (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions: Brian Marenco (202) 418-0838 - FCC - 1392-1395 and 1432-1435 MHz, 1390-1392 MHz, 1670-1675
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-164A1.txt
  • ILEC facilities be apportioned according to percent originating use without regard to the location of IPs. @Communications states that the dispute between the parties is limited to the construction of the statute and the Commission's rules and orders. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1654A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1654A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1654A1.txt
  • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-165A1.txt
  • allow KMC to file a formal complaint with the Commission seeking reciprocal compensation for the transport and termination of local telecommunications traffic, including, but not limited to, traffic bound for Internet service providers under the parties' interconnection agreements. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A1.txt
  • Enforcement Section, 1401 H St., N.W., Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20530. See Public Notice, FCC Announces New in Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.txt
  • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-167A1.txt
  • Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743 (Weekdays - 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.) USPS First-Class, Express, and Priority Mail 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1724A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1724A1.txt
  • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicant may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning this application is permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1725A1.txt
  • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1732A1.txt
  • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-173A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1740A1.txt
  • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1741A1.txt
  • Comments due August 12, 2002); Comments Requested on the Application by Qwest Communications Internationa, Inc. for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide in-region, InterLata Service in the States of Montana, Utah, Washington and Wyoming, Public Notice, DA 02-1666 (WCB rel. July 12, 2002) (Comments due August 1, 2002; Reply Comments due August 26, 2002). Id. § 1.1206. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1741 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-1741 Ï Ý � @& - - ! 5
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1772A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1772A1.txt
  • e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form ." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. This proceeding has been designated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Interested parties shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1780A1.txt
  • Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. . . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations, and not merely a one or two sentence description. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). This action is
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1818A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1818A1.txt
  • Commission's rules. In the petition Verizon requests this action in order to allow Verizon's local exchange carriers to provide sent-paid payphone access arrangements for interexchange carriers in those states in which Verizon has authority to provide interLATA service. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1826A1.txt
  • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1827A1.txt
  • beyond its logical limits. i2way claims that the Commission must provide clear notice of its rules and clearly articulate the standard used as the basis of dismissal. Finally, i2way states that the Commission's current interpretation of Section 90.187(e) will not afford i2way sufficient spectrum to make its proposed operations successful and will adversely affect the public interest. Pursuant to Section 1.1206(a)(3), declaratory ruling proceedings are conducted as non-restricted, ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings under the Commission's ex parte rules. In this case, however, i2way's Request for Declaratory Ruling relates directly to the processing of its underlying applications, which initially are treated as restricted proceedings. Under such circumstances, we typically would treat the declaratory ruling proceeding as a restricted proceeding as well. Because i2way's Request
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1847A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1847A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1847A1.txt
  • event that the Commission grants preemptive relief or otherwise determines that action is warranted on ACS's requests for declaratory relief, it will issue a separate public notice seeking comments on the substantive pricing issues raised in ACS's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1853A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1853A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1853A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400. TTY (202) 418-0484. See ACS of Fairbanks, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling and Other Relief, filed July
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A1.txt
  • in Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.txt
  • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1859A1.txt
  • will not preclude us from resolving these other proceedings prior to the completion of the comment cycle in this docket. . , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1878A1.txt
  • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . 4. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve three copies with the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-A361, Washington, D.C. 20554, Attn: Ronald Kaufman. Parties shall also serve one copy with Qualex International, Portals
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1884A1.txt
  • Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1886A1.txt
  • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A1.txt
  • in Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.txt
  • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1925A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1944A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1944A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1944A1.txt
  • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1987A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1987A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1987A1.txt
  • below in the ``Ex Parte Status of this Proceeding'' section. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1989A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1989A1.txt
  • competing with carriers that are able to offer an integrated service platform using their own local and long distance facilities. . , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2005A1.txt
  • petition requests that the Commission issue a declaratory ruling to confirm that requesting carriers are entitled to access ILEC Line Information Database data at cost-based rates when they use such data to provide interexchange and exchange access service. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2006A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2006A1.txt
  • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-200A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Howard Davenport (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Craig Bomberger (202) 418-0660 Kathy Garland (717) 338-2888 - FCC - See Reallocation and Service Rules for the 698-746 Spectrum MHz Band (Television Channels 52-59), GN
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2038A1.txt
  • - 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.) USPS First-Class, Express, and Priority Mail 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 . In addition, comments should be served upon Applicant. . The application will also be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2039A1.txt
  • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2054A1.txt
  • and assume jurisdiction over all unresolved issues and order the parties to mediate in accordance with section 252(a)(2) and if the parties cannot reach an accommodation to hold an arbitration proceeding (i.e. evidentiary hearing) pursuant to section 252(b)(1) This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2055A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2055A1.txt
  • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2064A1.txt
  • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2082A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2082A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2082A1.txt
  • 47 C.F.R. §1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant applications. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission Secretary no later than the next business
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2087A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. § 54.207. Section 214(e)(5) defines the term ``service area'' as a geographic
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2095A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2095A1.txt
  • technology that will continue to be supported, the availability of TDMA TTY-compliant handsets is uncertain. The Petition is available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), this proceeding is designated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding and subject to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible, provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Interested parties may file comments or oppositions responding to the Petition on or before September 26, 2002, and reply comments on or before October 11, 2002. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2136A1.txt
  • on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. . For further information, please contact Andy Firth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-2694 (voice), (202) 418-2224 (TTY), or e-mail at afirth@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Petition for Interim Waiver and Rulemaking,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2140A1.txt
  • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2141A1.txt
  • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-214A1.txt
  • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2200A1.txt
  • Telefonos de Mexico S.A. de C.V., DA 02-1488 (rel. July 2, 2002) (Sprint and SBCS Public Notice); Petition for Waiver of the International Settlement Policy for a Change in Accounting Rate for International Message Telephone Services with Telefonos de Mexico S.A. de C.V. DA 02-1736 (rel. July 29, 2002) (Williams Public Notice). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Id. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 b c F $+Dè, $+Dè, � „Ð ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö ƒA·Û "ƒõ¹\Îív`` � 6› ·Û †uò&iÿ‰PNG o³€"Ö3 \Ê`"}j`àŠ 0ú ¦ °k"\½À�Ý0+`` p8Ï "‚�û\àÔ ÁQµ+Φk':,à ·XÀªŠÀ�D
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2216A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Audio Division: Lisa Scanlan or Edward DeLaHunt at (202) 418-2700 Auctions and Industry Analysis Division: Kenneth Burnley, Legal Branch at (202) 418-0660 Linda Sanderson, Operations Branch at (717) 338-2888 Requests for information can also be e-mailed to auctionsinquiry@fcc.gov. -FCC- ATTACHMENT A AM Construction Permits MX Group Location Frequency (kHz)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2217A1.txt
  • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. * * * * * For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Kenneth Burnley at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2888 Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 For service rule questions: Jay O'Connor or Mike Kleeb at
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2263A1.txt
  • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2266A1.txt
  • not adopt the finding in the BUS Order that BUS meets the statutory definition of mobile service because two of the Commissioners did not support that conclusion. Finally, the Independents' Reconsideration Petition seeks clarification of the BUS Order regarding whether Kansas is prohibited from establishing equal access as a condition of receipt of Kansas universal service funds. Pursuant to Section 1.1206(a)(3), declaratory ruling proceedings are conducted as non-restricted, ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings under the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2283A1.txt
  • be obtained from Qualex. The ArrayComm waiver request is available for public inspection and copying in the Reference Center, Room CY A257, 445 12th St., SW, Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the waiver request are also available from Qualex. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2285A1.txt
  • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2289A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Romanda L. Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Farmers Cellular Telephone, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2290A1.txt
  • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . 4. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve three copies with the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-A361, Washington, D.C. 20554, Attn: Alicia Dunnigan. Parties shall also serve one copy with Qualex International, Portals
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2298A1.txt
  • in an interconnection dispute between MCImetro and New York Telephone Company, d/b/a Bell Atlantic-New York (Verizon) regarding reciprocal compensation; and (2) institute a proceeding to interpret and enforce the agreement. MCImetro requests expedited treatment of its preemption petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2302A1.txt
  • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments no later than October 10, 2002. Reply comments may be filed no later than October 21, 2002. When filing comments, please reference the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 02-26. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2306A1.txt
  • Mail or Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. We remind parties that, pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. Action by the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on ``Consensus Plan'' Filed in The 800 MHz Public Safety
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2317A1.txt
  • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2318A1.txt
  • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2333A1.txt
  • written consultations on the same day as interested parties file comments. . If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A1.txt
  • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, D.C. 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.txt
  • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2381A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2381A1.txt
  • 12th Street S.W., Washington, DC 20054. Copies of the APCC and RBOC Coalition Petitions also may be obtained through the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) by entering the Rulemaking number of this proceeding, RM No. 10568. This proceeding has been designated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2383A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2383A1.txt
  • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition by the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado to Redefine the
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-240A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-240A1.txt
  • documents to the Secretary, to the attention of Nicole McGinnis, Room 4-B105, Policy and Rules Branch, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. . By this Public Notice, we announce, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case, because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subject
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2436A1.txt
  • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A1.txt
  • Enforcement Section, 1401 H St., N.W., Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20530. See Public Notice, FCC Announces New in Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.txt
  • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2444A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2444A1.txt
  • cable landing license. five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. By this notice, we inform the public that submarine cable landing license applications and international section 214 applications that are part of larger transactions involving multiple Commission licenses or authorizations may
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2470A1.txt
  • 14 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2472A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2472A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2472A1.txt
  • Ameritech Transmittal No. 1318 with respect to Indiana and Ohio. The specific issues that will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but may not be limited to, the issues identified in this order. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2476A1.txt
  • D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. . PROCEDURAL MATTERS This proceeding (MB Docket No. 02-277) has been designated ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2485A1.txt
  • pleading electronically or by paper with each of the following: ; facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone (202) 863-2893. Lisa Choi, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; facsimile: (202) 418-2824. . Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Lisa Choi, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1460. FCC a q Dÿÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ †]¶' ùš7²ßâ`è²~¯; M u(¨\A€÷ õwåœ(c)ó ° ¼èš 2Àû 0ïôò îO�Û ÌìúÇ ñ o)0L8HoÀcsTãŒÐ ÌñÐóãÇ‹s! ØYvkÐ�û*ɱ(c)@ƒýí
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2487A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2487A1.txt
    • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Romanda L. Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Highland Cellular, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-248A1.txt
    • parties must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. The original petitions for reconsideration that parties filed in 1996 are available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding is conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Selina Khan, Satellite and Radiocommunication Division, International Bureau at (202) 418-7282. APPENDIX A PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE 1996 ANNTENNA ORDER AlphaStar Television Network, Inc. County of Boulder, State of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2522A1.pdf
    • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2563A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . 4. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve three copies with the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-A361, Washington, D.C. 20554, Attn: Debbie Weber. Parties shall also serve one copy with Qualex International, Portals
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2567A1.txt
    • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2568A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2568A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2568A1.txt
    • modified by Public Notice, Erratum and Order Extending Filing Deadline, DA 02-70 (rel. May 3, 2002). See Mark Bykowsky, Anthony M. Kwasnica and William Sharkey, Federal Communications Commission Office of Plans and Policy, OPP Working Paper No. 35, ``Horizontal Concentration in the Cable Television Industry: An Experimental Analysis,'' (rel. June 3, 2002). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§1.1200-1.1216. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). See Further Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at 17371 ¶ 132. See Public Notice. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 L M } ... (c) ± „Ð ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö ƒA·Û "ƒõ¹\Îív`` �
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2577A1.txt
    • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2583A1.pdf
    • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex prate presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-260A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the following employees of Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0660: For legal questions: Howard Davenport For general auction questions: Craig Bomberger or Martha Stancill For software questions: Karen Wrege - FCC - See Auction of Licenses in the 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands; Auction
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2618A1.txt
    • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning this application is permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2626A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2626A1.txt
    • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. . PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov „Ð ›ëÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'",
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-265A1.txt
    • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Denise Coca (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions: Dwain Livingston (202) 418-1338 - FCC - Rural Service Areas (RSAs) and Metropolitan Statistical
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2663A1.txt
    • these applications within fortyfive (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon fbrther examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. 0 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. By this notice, we inform the public that submarine cable landing license applications and international section 2 14 applications that are part of larger transactions involving multiple Commission licenses or authorizations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2666A1.txt
    • services, and the need for an adaptable regulatory approach. . Interested parties may file comments on the report on or before November 15, 2002, and reply comments on or before December 3, 2002. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, commenters
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2667A1.txt
    • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2723A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lauren Kravetz Patrich or Erin McGrath, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7240. - FCC - CenturyTel Wireless, Inc. Petition for Partial Waiver of Cellular Cross-Interest Rule, CenturyTel Wireless Inc. and CenturyTel Inc. Petition for Waiver of Cellular Cross-Interest Rule (filed Oct. 4, 2002) (``Petition''). 47 C.F.R. § 22.942. See
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-274A1.txt
    • Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743 (Weekdays - 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.) USPS First-Class, Express, and Priority Mail 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2759A1.txt
    • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2760A1.txt
    • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2761A1.txt
    • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2762A1.txt
    • wireless 911 and will help to reduce unintentional 911 calls. Interested parties may file comments on Motorola's request on or before November 6, 2002, and reply comments on or before November 18, 2002. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2786A1.txt
    • Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. . This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance or the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2797A1.txt
    • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Kenneth Burnley (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions: Amal Abdallah, Jay O'Connor or Mike Kleeb at (202) 418-0620 - FCC - Closed
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2821A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2821A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2821A1.txt
    • cable landing license. five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. By this notice, we inform the public that submarine cable landing license applications and international section 214 applications that are part of larger transactions involving multiple Commission licenses or authorizations may
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2822A1.txt
    • Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone: (202) 863-2893. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2845A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2845A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2845A1.txt
    • Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone: (202) 863-2893. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2846A1.txt
    • 14 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning this application is permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2851A1.txt
    • 20554. Copies also may be obtained from Qualex International, 445 12th Street, S.W., room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 863-2893. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2857A1.txt
    • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. -FCC- See Citizens Telecommunications Company of North Dakota, Nemont Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Missouri Valley
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2913A1.txt
    • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2925A1.txt
    • audit be made publicly available. Having resolved certain confidentiality issues concerning the audit report, we now release the attached audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. Accordingly, comments are due no later than December 30, 2002. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2930A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2930A1.txt
    • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning this application is permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here is available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2948A1.txt
    • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2976A1.txt
    • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will continue to be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katie King, Jennifer Schneider, or Narda Jones, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3062A1.txt
    • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3081A1.txt
    • ULS. See supra note 9. See File Nos. 0001053809, 0001053817, 0001053811 (assigning licenses from Lewis and Clark, Royal, and Southwest to AWP); see also Assignment Applications from Third Parties to AWP, supra Section I. 47 C.F.R. § 24.839(a). See id. § 24.839(a)(6). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2111(c), (d). See 47 U.S.C. § 309(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a). See id. § 1.1206. See In the Matter of Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order, FCC 01-345 (rel. Nov. 29, 2001); see also FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3100A1.txt
    • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3152A1.txt
    • interconnection agreement with Verizon pursuant to section 252(b) of the Act. Cavalier specifically requests that the Commission issue a preemption order and assume jurisdiction over all unresolved issues and to arbitrate this matter in accordance with section 252(a)(2). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3155A1.txt
    • states that it will grandfather customers for its IDSL service while trying to move these customers to ISDN or DSL services. Qwest also states that it plans to discontinue the offering of a state-tariffed Complementary Network Service (ScanAlert). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3168A1.txt
    • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenter's must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3184A1.txt
    • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3196A1.txt
    • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-31A1.txt
    • Information'' section. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Because this proceeding involves rule interpretation issues of broad application, the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3234A1.txt
    • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Auctions and Industry Analysis Division: For legal questions: Chris Shields, Legal Branch at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks, Operations Branch at (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover, Operations Branch at (717) 338-2888 Commercial Wireless Division: For service rule questions: JoAnn Epps or Melvin Spann, Licensing and Technical Analysis
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3284A1.txt
    • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3287A1.txt
    • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Howard Davenport (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 Linda Sanderson (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions: Amal Abdallah, Policy and Rules Branch, or Joanne Epps and Melvin Spann, Licensing and
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3303A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments no later than December 30, 2002. Reply comments may be filed no later than January 15, 2003. When filing comments, please reference the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 02-32. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve three
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3334A1.txt
    • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3352A1.txt
    • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3355A1.txt
    • convert its equity into a controlling interest in Genuity, the predicate for these conditions no longer exists. Verizon requests that the Genuity conditions be deemed removed as of July 24, 2002, the date that Verizon relinquished its right. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-337A1.txt
    • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, D.C. 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3393A1.txt
    • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3409A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3409A1.txt
    • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will continue to be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Andy Firth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-2694, TTY (202) 418-0484, e-mail: afirth@fcc.gov. Provision of Improved Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3417A1.txt
    • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3449A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3449A1.txt
    • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. For purposes of this proceeding the state members of the Joint Conference, and well as the federal members, will be considered ``decision makers'' within the meaning of 47 C.F.R. sec. 1.1202(c). Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3463A1.txt
    • modifications needed in light of North American Numbering Plan Administrator decisions, state regulatory decisions, and marketplace changes. BellSouth also states that by this amendment, it modifies the manner in which it will satisfy previously requested ONA related capabilities. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3476A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3476A1.txt
    • 67 Fed Reg 71121 (Nov. 29, 2002). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments (December 12, 2002). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Comments (December 12, 2002), at 1-2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3476 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-3476 : G @& + È È ) €
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3495A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3495A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3495A1.txt
    • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3499A1.txt
    • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3511A1.doc
    • written consultations on the same day as interested parties file comments. . If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3511A1.txt
    • considered part of the record of this proceeding. In light of the statutory deadline for decision, parties are hereby requested to provide courtesy copies of any ex 6 The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. 7 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99- 295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). 8 See 47 C.F.R.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3549A1.txt
    • information regarding the public reference file, please contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3550A1.txt
    • rulemaking proceeding to impose mandatory minimum Customer Account Record Exchange (``CARE'') obligations on all local and interexchange carriers. We are opening a new Consumer & Governmental Affairs docket, CG Docket No. 02-386, to receive comments on those Petitions. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-357A1.txt
    • USPS Express and Priority Mail) 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743 (Weekdays - 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.) USPS First-Class, Express, and Priority Mail 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning this petition are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit- but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. The petition will be available for review and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554, (202) 418-0270. A copy of the petition may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3588A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3588A1.txt
    • the petition, the proposed definition shall not take effect until both the state commission and the Commission agree upon the definition of a rural service area, in accordance with section 214(e)(5) of the Act. Under section 54.207(e) of the Commission's rules, the Commission delegates its authority under section 54.207(c) to the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 54.207(c), for
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-366A1.txt
    • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-371A1.txt
    • reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, subject to the limitation noted below. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-375A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-375A1.txt
    • (8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) Other messenger-delivered documents, including documents sent by overnight mail (other than United States Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743 (8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.) United States Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 . Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Jennifer Schneider, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Ž ' „0ý „Ð TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-376A1.txt
    • D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Paul Garnett of the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-2332, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Letter from Robert W. Quinn, Jr., AT&T, to Magalie Roman Salas, Federal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-399A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments no later than March 7, 2002. Reply comments may be filed no later than March 18, 2002. When filing comments, please reference the internal file number: CCB/CPD 99-36. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-418A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Douglas Slotten, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1572. 47 C.F.R. § 69.606. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Î „Ð
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-419A1.txt
    • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form.'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper should also submit their comments on diskette. These diskettes should be submitted to Ernestine Creech, Accounting Safeguards Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-42A1.txt
    • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-485A1.txt
    • copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-491A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-491A1.txt
    • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-506A1.txt
    • Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, Md. 20743 (8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.) United States Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 . . This proceeding is a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-510A1.txt
    • 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. d/b/a Saipancell Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-512A1.txt
    • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the Acting Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-554A1.txt
    • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-567A1.txt
    • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form.'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper should also submit their comments on diskette. These diskettes should be submitted to Ernestine Creech, Accounting Safeguards Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-570A1.txt
    • 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Paul Garnett of the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Letter from Kristen Neller Verderame, BT North America, Inc., to William F.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-584A1.txt
    • Operational Fixed Microwave Service operations. The parties do not dispute that Northpoint personnel met on several occasions with Commission decisionmakers to discuss the Broadwave and Pegasus applications. At issue is whether Northpoint complied with the ex parte rules applicable to these meetings. This question turns on whether the respective applications were deemed ``restricted'' under Section 1.1208 or ``permit-but-disclose'' under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. If the former, Northpoint was prohibited from meeting with decisionmakers without giving Pegasus advance notice and an opportunity to be present; if the latter, Northpoint need only have filed an appropriate memorandum summarizing the meeting in the record of the proceeding. Northpoint attempted to comply with the permit- but-disclose procedures by filing summaries of discussions it
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-591A1.txt
    • Policy and Planning Division, 202-418-1580. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Jeffrey Carlisle Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Sixty days after Federal Register publication of the Triennial Review NPRM is March 18, 2002 and 105 days after Federal Register publication of the Triennial Review NPRM is April 30, 2002. 67 Fed Reg. 1947 (Jan. 15, 2002). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Federal Communications Commission DA 02-591 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-591 ¨ (c) � 1 X Y o ˜ � ¦ § ¨ 1 X Y o ˜ � ¦ § ¨
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-599A1.txt
    • for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, after the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made on the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-600A1.txt
    • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning this application are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-602A1.txt
    • 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743 (8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.) United States Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 and include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form .'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith or Anita Cheng, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. § 54.207. Section 214(e)(5) defines the term ``service area''
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-603A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments no later than March 25, 2002. Reply comments may be filed no later than April 1, 2002. When filing comments, please reference the internal file number: CCB/CPD 99-01. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-607A1.txt
    • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . The petitions are also available for public inspection and copying in the Reference Center, Room CY A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the petitions are also available from Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or e-mail at qualexint@aol.com.
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-640A1.txt
    • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-641A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments no later than March 29, 2002. Reply comments may be filed no later than April 8, 2002. When filing comments, please reference the internal file number: CCB/CPD 02-05. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.txt
    • Task Force, 1401 H St., N.W., Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20530. See Public Notice, FCC Announces New in Filing Location for Paper Documents, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-696A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Raj Kannan or Paula-Ann Cech, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1540. Double Click Icon Short Form PRICE CAP TRP Double Click Icon Long Form PRICE CAP TRP The price cap ILECs that must file a short form TRP on May 1, 2002, are Aliant Communications Company, Ameritech Operating
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-704A1.txt
    • (March 22, 2002). Inquiry Concerning High-Speed Access to the Internet Over Cable and Other Facilities; Internet Over Cable Declaratory Ruling; Appropriate Regulatory Treatment for Broadband Access to the Internet Over Cable Facilities, GN Docket No. 00-185 and CS Docket No. 02-52, Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 02-77 (rel. March 15, 2002). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). Id. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-704 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-704 ! � ž Å Æ Ü ! � ž ž Å Æ Ü F „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý ž á
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-705A1.txt
    • Jeffrey Carlisle Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau Seventy-five days after Federal Register publication of the ILEC Broadband NPRM is April 1, 2002. 67 Fed Reg. 1945 (Jan. 15, 2002). Review of the Regulatory Requirements for Incumbent LEC Broadband Telecommunications Services: CC Docket No. 01-337, Request for Extension of Reply Comment Period (March 22, 2002). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). Id. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-705 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-705 ) * A B D F S T U V W z { ‹ Ž ¼ ½ ¾ Á Â È É ) A R S U V X z { ‹ Œ � Ž � ¼ ¾ ¿ À Á É Ê Ì Í
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-716A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments no later than April 10, 2002. Reply comments may be filed no later than April 17, 2002. When filing comments, please reference the internal file number: CCB/CPD 00-01. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve with
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-718A1.txt
    • H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, D.C. 20005 or via email to john.lynch@usdoj.gov. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-733A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-733A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-733A1.txt
    • involves broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. Under ``permit but disclose'' procedures, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-746A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-746A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-746A1.txt
    • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See RCC Holdings, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-747A1.txt
    • their entirety, for five months and set them for investigation. The specific issues that will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but may not be limited to, the issues identified in this order. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-768A1.txt
    • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-769A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-769A1.txt
    • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the Acting Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-771A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-771A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-771A1.txt
    • policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as ``permit-but-disclose'' under the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-777A1.txt
    • Response). Review of Unbundled Network Elements, Rates, Terms, and Conditions of Bell Atlantic New Jersey, Inc., Docket No. TO00060356, Decision and Order (rel. March 6, 2002) (Final UNE Rate Order). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). See Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 6923, 6930 (2001). Id. § 1.1206. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-777 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-777 h u ¬ ­ � � @& „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „ðñ j ^ ^
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-783A1.txt
    • Wireline Facilities, Universal Service Obligations of Broadband Providers, Computer III Further Remand Proceedings: Bell Operating Company Provision of Enhanced Services; 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Review of Computer III and ONA Safeguards and Requirements, CC Docket Nos. 02-33, 95-20, 98-10, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 02-42 (rel. Feb. 15, 2002) (Wireline Broadband NPRM). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 02-783 Federal Communications Commission DA 02-783 ã ä � F „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý „0ý e f g ¤ ¥ ¦ .
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-817A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-817A1.txt
    • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. The Petition for Rulemaking is available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's Reference Center, Room CY A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the Petition are also available from Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or e-mail at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-859A1.txt
    • 21 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file numbers shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-879A1.txt
    • Microsoft Network, L.L.C. (MSN) under a contract, Qwest seeks clarification that the ``wholesale'' DSL services Qwest provides to MSN are not considered by the Commission to be ``retail'' services subject to resale under section 251(c)(4) of the Act. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-898A1.txt
    • its entirety, for five months and set it for investigation. The specific issues that will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but may not be limited to, the issues identified in this order. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-899A1.txt
    • parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set forth below, no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(1). Persons making oral ex parte presentations must file a summary of the presentation, as set forth below, and deliver copies to the Commissioners or Commission employees involved with the presentation no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). All ex parte filings must be clearly labeled as such and must reference this Public Notice,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-909A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-909A1.txt
    • 20554, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or e-mail at qualexint@aol.com. In addition, six copies of each filing must be filed with Steve Garner, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., 4-C468, Washington, D.C., 20554, sgarner@fcc.gov. This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, ex parte communications will be governed by section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-914A1.txt
    • § 251(h)(2), and section 51.233(b) of the Commission`s Rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 51.223(b). The Mid-River petition requests the Commission to issue an order declaring that Mid-River shall be treated as an incumbent LEC in the Terry, Montana telephone exchange. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-916A1.txt
    • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-921A1.txt
    • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Nese Guendelsberger, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1530. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 61.45(b)(1)(i). 47 C.F.R. § 61.45(d)(1)(vii). Valor New Mexico comprises two study areas, #1164 and #1193. Valor New Mexico seeks the relief requested in the petition only for its study area #1164. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-922A1.txt
    • broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-924A1.txt
    • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Carmell Weathers, cweather@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-971A1.txt
    • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . The documents are also available for public inspection and copying in the Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the petitions are also available from Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or e-mail at qualexint@aol.com. ,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-976A1.txt
    • interpretation of federal law and to avoid the application of inconsistent requirements to identical agreements and terms in multiple states. Qwest asserts that Commission guidance may also help ensure that Congress's objectives in the Act are not thwarted. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200; 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-993A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-993A1.txt
    • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver petition, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . The
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1009A1.txt
    • of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd 24952 (2002) (Universal Service Contribution Methodology Second Further Notice). Id. at paras. 66-100. See Commission Seeks Comment on Staff Study Regarding Alternative Contribution Methodologies, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, 98-170, Public Notice, FCC 03-31 (rel. Feb. 26, 2003) (Staff Study Public Notice). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1009 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-1009 Draft Internal FCC Use Only � ÿ � -
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-100A1.txt
    • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Howard Davenport (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 Linda Sanderson (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions: Amal Abdallah (202) 418-7307 Evan Baranoff (202) 418-7142 Joanne Epps or Melvin Spann at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A1.txt
    • Section, 1401 H St., N.W., Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20530, email: ryan.harsch@usdoj.gov. If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.txt
    • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1044A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1044A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1044A1.txt
    • to identify all of the applications found to be in violation of the 10-channel limit set forth in Section 90.187(e). Id. at n.1. i2way Request at 1-2. i2way Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 14541 (2002). In the i2way Public Notice, the Commission designated i2way's Request and the applications relevant to Hexagram's Petition as ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings that are governed by Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Id. at 14543. i2way also has a number of applications pending for Commercial Mobile Radio Service authorizations that are not among the twenty-six file numbers listed in the caption of the i2way Request. In the interest of administrative efficiency and minimizing the potential for any confusion among interested parties, and because i2way's applications implicate similar issues,
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1048A1.txt
    • for public comment on the Tier III Coalition's Forbearance Petition. See Public Notice DA 02-3470. The comment cycle closed on February 10, 2003. By this Public Notice and pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding is governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case because this proceeding involves broad public policy and safety issues. Further, we note that this ex parte procedure has been applied in recent forbearance cases. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1064A1.txt
    • with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. § 54.314; Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Waiver of Section 54.314(d) of
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1065A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1065A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1065A1.txt
    • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, WTB For legal questions: Christopher Shields at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2888 For questions about package bidding: Martha Stancill at (202) 418-0660 Craig Bomberger at (202) 418-0660 Commercial Wireless Division, WTB For service rule questions: Amal Abdallah at
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1087A1.txt
    • the Commission forbear from applying the structural separation requirements of section 272 to its international directory assistance services so that it may provide those services on an integrated basis together with its local and nonlocal directory assistance services. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1092A1.txt
    • e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form ." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. This proceeding has been designated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Interested parties shall
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1101A1.txt
    • documents sent by overnight mail (this type excludes USPS Express and Priority Mail) 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743 (Weekdays - 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.) USPS First-Class, Express, and Priority Mail 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Ex Parte Requirements This Public Notice is designated a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1103A1.txt
    • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
  • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1105A1.txt
    • pleading electronically or by paper with each of the following: ; facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone (202) 863-2893. Lisa Choi, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; facsimile: (202) 418-2824. . Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Lisa Choi, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1460. FCC Dÿÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ †]¶' ùš7²ßâ`è²~¯; M u(¨\A€÷ õwåœ(c)ó ° ¼èš 2Àû 0ïôò îO�Û ÌìúÇ ñ o)0L8HoÀcsTãŒÐ ÌñÐóãÇ‹s! ØYvkÐ�û*ɱ(c)@ƒýí
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1128A1.txt
      • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Auctions and Industry Analysis Division: Kenneth Burnley, Legal Branch at (202) 418-0660 Lyle Ishida, Operations Branch at (202) 418-0660 Linda Sanderson, Operations Branch at (717) 338-2888 Audio Division: Lisa Scanlan at (202) 418-2700 Video Division: Shaun Maher at (202) 418-1600 - FCC - The Commission has adopted service and
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1135A1.txt
      • D.C. 20554. The applications and any subsequently filed documents in this matter are also available electronically through the Commission's Electronic Filing System (ECFS) which may be accessed on the Commission's Internet website at http://www.fcc.gov. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these petitions are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For addition information, please contact Lisa Choi, Policy Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460. FCC - $ $ $ $ q ­ É Ê à Ê ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1140A1.txt
      • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1160A1.txt
      • public inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898. This proceeding shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1184A1.txt
      • operator-assisted reverse directory assistance services as part of its petition for forbearance from section 272 for international directory assistance services. Commenters may file combined comments addressing both the request for a CEI waiver and the petition for forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1186A1.txt
      • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Romanda Williams or Greg Lipscomb, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Request for Immediate Relief by the State of Tennessee to
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A1.txt
      • Section, 1401 H St., N.W., Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20530, email: ryan.harsch@usdoj.gov. If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.txt
      • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2.txt
      • Reply Comments at 4. See also Texas RSA 15B2 et al. Ex Parte Comments at 2-5 (supporting CTIA's proposal to streamline the NEPA compliance procedures). We note that Texas RSA 15B2 et al. did not file comments until November 27, 2002, after the comment period had closed. In light of the importance of this proceeding, we will, pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, consider these late-filed comments as an ex parte submission. The Commission's environmental rules require licensees and applicants to evaluate whether proposed facilities may affect properties that are ``listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(a)(4). CTIA Comments at 15 n.33. Sprint Reply Comments at 6-7. See 47
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-129A2_Erratum.doc
      • Reply Comments at 4. See also Texas RSA 15B2 et al. Ex Parte Comments at 2-5 (supporting CTIA's proposal to streamline the NEPA compliance procedures). We note that Texas RSA 15B2 et al. did not file comments until November 27, 2002, after the comment period had closed. In light of the importance of this proceeding, we will, pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, consider these late-filed comments as an ex parte submission. The Commission's environmental rules require licensees and applicants to evaluate whether proposed facilities may affect properties that are ``listed, or are eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(a)(4). CTIA Comments at 15 n.33. Sprint Reply Comments at 6-7. See 47
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1439A1.txt
      • 271(d), unless the Commission extends such three year period by rule or order. On June 30, 2003, it will be three years since SWBT obtained authority under section 271 of the Act to provide interLATA services in Texas. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1442A1.txt
      • released December 5, 2002, the Commission established a pleading cycle for a petition for rulemaking to establish standards of conduct for telecommunications providers. The petition was filed by the Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
    • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1443A1.txt
      • pleading electronically or by paper with each of the following: ; facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone (202) 863-2893. Lisa Choi, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; facsimile: (202) 418-2824. . Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Lisa Choi, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1460. FCC 1 2 H X a -1 2 _ a q Õ ß ï ó Dÿÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ †]¶' ùš7²ßâ`è²~¯; M u(¨\A€÷ õwåœ(c)ó ° ¼èš 2Àû 0ïôò îO�Û ÌìúÇ ñ o)0L8HoÀcsTãŒÐ ÌñÐóãÇ‹s! ØYvkÐ�û*É
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1458A1.txt
        • with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sharon Webber, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Valor Telecommunications of Texas, L.P. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.305 of the
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1484A1.txt
        • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-148A1.txt
        • deadline to July 1, 2003. We seek comment on the issues raised by the Petitions. Interested parties may file comments on or before February 13, 2003. Reply comments are due February 27, 2003. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved with regard to the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. . . . For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Peter Trachtenberg, Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7369
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1511A1.txt
        • has the right to use the facilities on the customer's side of that demarcation point without interference by BellSouth; and (C) §25-4.0345(1)(B)(2) of the Florida Administrative Code is preempted to the extent it conflicts with 47 C.F.R. §68.105(d)(2). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1532A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1532A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1532A1.txt
        • rules and policies. Final action will not be taken on the applications earlier than 31 days following the date of this Public Notice. Pursuant to section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, the ex parte status of this proceeding is designated as "restricted" because the Commission has determined that the proceeding is neither "exempt" under section 1.1204(b) nor "permit-but-disclose" under section 1.1206(a) of the Commission's rules. All filings concerning any or all matters in this Public Notice should refer to IB Docket No. 03-115. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments or petitions to deny on or before June 9, 2003 and oppositions and/or reply comments on or before
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A1.txt
        • written consultations on the same day as interested parties file comments. . If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.txt
        • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-169A1.txt
        • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before February 5, 2003 and reply comments on or before February 18, 2003. Such comments should refer to WC Docket No. 03-18. Comments should include specific information about the impact of this proposed waiver. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), or by filing
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1704A1.txt
        • 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. ; facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone: (202) 863-2893. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1725A1.txt
        • broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-172A1.txt
        • all pleadings and other submissions filed in this matter that pertain generally to the transaction and not to a particular application will be available through this file number. See File Nos. 0001138904, 0001138905, 0001138909. 47 C.F.R. § 24.839(a). See id. § 24.839(a)(6). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2111(c), (d). See 47 U.S.C. § 309(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a). See id. § 1.1206. See In the Matter of Implementation of Interim Electronic Filing Procedures for Certain Commission Filings, Order, FCC 01-345 (rel. Nov. 29, 2001); see also FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg.
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1731A1.pdf
        • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Greg Lipscomb, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Letter from Dr. Cesar Rey Hernandez, Secretary, Puerto Rico Department of Education to Jane
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1753A1.txt
        • Interested parties may file comments on or before June 13, 2003. Reply comments are due June 24, 2003. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments and reply comments should be filed in the docket number, CC Docket No. 95-116. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. . . . For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Jennifer Salhus, Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-1310 (voice) or
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1770A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1770A1.txt
        • of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, we hereby designate these cases as permit-but-disclose proceedings under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject requests will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. All written ex parte presentations and all written disclosures of oral ex parte presentations should reference the relevant Request for Review, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, and DA 03-1770 and be filed with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. A copy of each filing should be
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1881A1.txt
        • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Shannon Lipp, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1882A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1882A1.txt
        • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Shannon Lipp, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1886A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1886A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1886A1.txt
        • providers (PSPs). A summary of the Commission's Further Notice was published in the Federal Register on June 2, 2003, triggering the cycle for comments and reply comments on the Further Notice (68 FR 32720, June 3, 2003). . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1887A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1887A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1887A1.txt
        • provide in-region, interexchange services outside of a separate affiliate. A summary of the Commission's Further Notice was published in the Federal Register on May 29, 2003, triggering the cycle for comments and reply comments on the Further Notice. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1892A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1892A1.txt
        • the top of this item in the appropriate field and hit the query button. We ask that comments specifically address whether the technical requirements are sufficiently detailed, comprehensive, and clear, and whether they adequately describe the duties and scope of the North American Numbering Plan Billing and Collection Agent's responsibilities. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentation that are made with respect to the issues involved in this proceeding will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirement of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1893A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1893A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1893A1.txt
        • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Corr Wireless Communications, LLC Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications, filed May
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1894A1.txt
        • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Advantage Cellular, Inc., Application for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1896A1.txt
        • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
      • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1904A1.txt
        • pleading electronically or by paper with each of the following: ; facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone (202) 863-2893. Lisa Choi, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; facsimile: (202) 418-2824. . Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Lisa Choi, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1460. FCC 1 [ _ Â É Dÿÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ †]¶' ùš7²ßâ`è²~¯; M u(¨\A€÷ õwåœ(c)ó ° ¼èš 2Àû 0ïôò îO�Û ÌìúÇ ñ o)0L8HoÀcsTãŒÐ ÌñÐóãÇ‹s! ØYvkÐ�û*ɱ(c)@ƒýí
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1919A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1919A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1919A1.txt
          • and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This investigation is designated a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1920A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1920A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1920A1.txt
          • and Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) and by section 272 affiliates and other affiliates of the BOCs. The petition also requests that the Commission modify the provisions of the SBC/Ameritech Merger Order that restrict the sharing of OI&M services. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1929A1.txt
          • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). See NPCR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel PartnersPetition for Designation as an
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1939A1.txt
          • on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. . . -FCC- See Petition for Interim Waiver and Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 98-67, filed July 22, 2002. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1948A1.txt
          • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1952A1.txt
          • in the Petition. Interested parties may file comments on or before August 15, 2003. Reply comments are due September 15, 2003. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments and reply comments should be filed in the rulemaking number, RM-10715. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. . . . For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Barbara Reideler or Jared Carlson, Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202)
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1957A1.txt
          • paper also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 54.207(c), for
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1959A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1959A1.txt
          • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Andy Firth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2694, TTY (202) 418-0484, email afirth@fcc.gov. 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). See NPCR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners, Petition for
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A1.txt
          • written consultations on the same day as interested parties file comments. . If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.txt
          • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-203A1.txt
          • Review - Review of the Commission's Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, MM Docket No. 02-277, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (rel. Sep. 23, 2002). See, e.g., Contribution Methodology Order and Second Further Notice, at para. 73. See Contribution Methodology Order and Second Further Notice, at paras.12-32. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-203 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-203 % + � F ê ›
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2061A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2061A1.txt
          • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Application and associated waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2081A1.txt
          • the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. We also strongly encourage parties to track the organization set forth in the FNPRM in order to facilitate our internal review process. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katherine Tofigh or Jonathan Secrest, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No.
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-20A1.txt
          • Interested parties may file comments on or before January 24, 2003. Reply comments are due February 3, 2003. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments and reply comments should be filed in the docket number, CC Docket No. 94-102. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. . . . For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Peter Trachtenberg, Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7369 (voice)
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2109A1.txt
          • radio band (88.1-107.9 MHz). OET concludes that in order to permit a fuller exchange on the important issues raised by this application, the public interest would be served by classifying the instant experimental radio licensing proceeding as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding for ex parte purposes in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules and subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. In order to facilitate full, efficient, and timely consideration of the issues, OET encourages parties with common interests on the issues to work together and file joint submissions to the Commission whenever possible. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2118A1.txt
          • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in paragraphs 4-5, supra. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-211A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-211A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-211A1.txt
          • Interested parties may file comments on or before February 26, 2003. Reply comments are due March 13, 2003. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments and reply comments should be filed in the docket number, CC Docket No. 95-116. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. . . . For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Jennifer Salhus, Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-1310 (voice), Pam
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2188A1.txt
          • COMMISSION Tamara L. Preiss Chief, Pricing Policy Division Wireline Competition Bureau See Pleading Cycle Established for AT&T Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Enhanced Prepaid Calling Card Services, WC Docket No. 03-133, Public Notice, DA 03-1896 (rel. June 5, 2003) (Public Notice). AT&T Corp. Petition for Declaratory Ruling at 1 (filed May 15, 2003). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a) 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (Continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA-03-2188 ; ä �@ˆþÿ ; ä å ç 2; F ñ ñ ñ ñ 2 3 C § (c) ª " ¸ ¹ è ê ë ì î ï ò ò ä ; ò ò 2 3 C F " ­ · ë í î ï ò 2 3 C F "
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2189A1.txt
          • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2193A1.txt
          • 31 days following the date of this Public Notice. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All filings concerning any or all matters in this Public Notice should refer to WC Docket No. 02-215. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments or petitions to deny on or before August 8, 2003 and oppositions and/or reply comments on or before August 18, 2003. Comments
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2194A1.txt
          • Application of ALLTEL Communications, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Virginia, filed May 21, 2003. See 68 Fed Reg. 36548 (Jun. 18, 2003); 68 Fed. Reg. 36549 (Jun. 18, 2003). See ALLTEL Communications, Inc. Motion for Extension of Time, CC Docket No. 96-45, filed July 2, 2003. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2194 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2194 ? M N Q R _ e g `` Ÿ ¡ ¦ ² ´ º F ˜@ š@ ˜@ ˜@ <‚FJ Ù í X ç ù ­
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2206A1.txt
          • of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, we hereby designate these cases as permit-but-disclose proceedings under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject requests will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. All written ex parte presentations and all written disclosures of oral ex parte presentations should reference the relevant Request for Review, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, and DA 03-2206 and be filed with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. A copy of each filing should be
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2223A1.txt
          • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2226A1.txt
          • paper also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of RCC Minnesota, Inc. for Redefinition of Rural Telephone Company Service Areas, CC
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2277A1.txt
          • for public inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center located at 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. -FCC- Media Bureau Contacts: ) (202) 418-2700 ) (202) 418-7200 D.C. Appropriations - FY 2001, Pub. L. No. 106-553, § 632, 114 Stat. 2762, 2762A-111 (2000). Id. Id. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a). Id. § 1.1206(b)(1). Id. § 1.1206(b)(2). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 * / 1 2 4 D P y � ° Ú h h h h h h h ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö ƒA·Û "ƒõ¹\Îív``
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2324A1.txt
          • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2329A1.txt
          • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Elizabeth Yockus, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Nextel Partners of Upstate New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners Petition for Designation
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2330A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2330A1.txt
          • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Elizabeth Yockus, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See NEXTEL Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2333A1.txt
          • (NARUC Petition). Id. Petition for Forbearance From the Current Pricing Rules for the Unbundled Network Element Platform, WC Docket No. 03-157, Opposition of Verizon Telephone Companies to Request for Extension of Time (filed July 11, 2003) (Verizon Opposition). Id. at 1. Id. at 1-2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a) See 47 U.S.C. § 271(d)(3). 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (Continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2333 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2333 �@ˆþÿ �@ˆþÿ �@ˆþÿ 3 4 I Q X Y \ j x y Í Ö ô õ F t¾ ­ Ã
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2340A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2340A1.txt
          • sections 53.203(a)(2) and 53.203(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, which prohibit sharing of operating, installation, and maintenance (OI&M) functions by section 272 affiliates and Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) and by section 272 affiliates and other affiliates of the BOCs. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A1.txt
          • written consultations on the same day interested parties file comments. ; . If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.txt
          • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2362A1.txt
          • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-23A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-23A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-23A1.txt
          • to forbear from applying the structural separation requirements of section 272 of the Act, so as to allow BellSouth to provide international directory assistance service on an integrated basis together with its local and nonlocal directory assistance services. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2425A1.txt
          • its local and nonlocal directory assistance services. On July 21, 2003, Verizon also filed a letter requesting that the Commission grant it a waiver of the Commission's comparably efficient interconnection (CEI) requirements for international reverse directory assistance services. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2426A1.txt
          • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . 4. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve three copies with the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-A361, Washington, D.C. 20554, Attn: Alicia Dunnigan. Parties shall also serve one copy with Qualex International, Portals
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2469A1.txt
          • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katie King or Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Wireline Competition Bureau Seeks Comment on Updating Line Counts and Other
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2596A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2596A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2596A1.txt
          • 1, 2003. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). See, e.g., Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; ALLTEL Communications, Inc., Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Virginia; ALLTEL Communications, Inc., Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Alabama, CC Docket No. 96-45, DA 03-2194, Order (rel. July 3, 2003). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2596 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-2596 - - 6 U p v { ‰ � ` é ê '' á € š@ š@ š@ š@ 8 8 Ó ü ? ? ß á á âN ­
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-25A1.txt
          • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katie King or Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45,
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2621A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2621A1.txt
          • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See NPCR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners, Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2628A1.txt
          • on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. . . . -FCC- See AT&T Petition for Reconsideration, CC Docket 98-67, filed July 30, 2003; Communication Services for the Deaf Petition for Reconsideration, CC Docket 98-67, filed July 30, 2003; Hands On Petition
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2629A1.txt
          • on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. . . . -FCC- Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 98-67, FCC 00-56, 15 FCC
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2631A1.txt
          • and}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 seeks comments from interested parties. OET has concluded that in order to }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid2556170 develop a complete record}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 on the complex issues }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid2556170 presented by this request,}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 this proceeding }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid2556170 will}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 be treated, for }{\i\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 ex parte}{ \fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. \par \par \tab Interested parties filing comments }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid2556170 on}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 this petition are }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid14450110 invited to do so no later than }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid7274533 September 10, 2003}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 . Parties filing replies may do so by }{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid7274533 September 25, 2003}{\fs24\expnd0\expndtw-3\insrsid5994681 . \par \par \tab The full text of the waiver request is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2641A1.txt
          • paper also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission for Agreement to Redefine the Service Areas
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2644A1.txt
          • on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. . . . -FCC- 47 C.F.R. § 64.604(a)(3) (prohibiting communications assistants from refusing calls). See Petition for Limited Waiver and Request for Expedited Relief, CC Docket No. 98-67, filed June 12, 2003. PUBLIC NOTICE
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2665A1.txt
          • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . 4. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve three copies with the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-A361, Washington, D.C. 20554, Attn: Debbie Weber. Parties shall also serve one copy with Qualex International, Portals
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2666A1.txt
          • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2672A1.txt
          • decision can be made. We will treat this proceeding as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2679A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2679A1.txt
          • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2685A1.txt
          • with section 1.49 and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Grande Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver - Expedited Treatment Requested, filed June 30, 2003
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-26A1.txt
          • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 54.207(c), for
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2732A1.txt
          • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2734A1.txt
          • September 26, 2003. Parties interested in submitting reply comments must do so on or before October 14, 2003. All comments should reference the Application, Docket No. WT 02-100 and DA number of this Public Notice, DA 03-2734. This matter has been designated as a "permit but disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2778A1.txt
          • interconnection agreements approved under section 252. A summary of the Commission's Triennial Review Order and FNPRM was published in the Federal Register on September 2, 2003, triggering the cycle for comments and reply comments on the Further Notice. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2779A1.txt
          • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Vickie Byrd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Petition for Preemption, Pursuant to Section 253 of the Communications Act and Common
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A1.txt
          • Section, 1401 H St., N.W., Suite 8000, Washington, D.C. 20530, e-mail: ryan.harsch@usdoj.gov. If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.txt
          • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2827A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2827A1.txt
          • all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.49. We direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. All parties are encouraged to utilize a table of contents, regardless of the length of their submission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Scott A. Mackoul, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. RCC Minnesota, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.313 and 54.314 of the
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2832A1.txt
          • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Erica H. McMahon or Richard D. Smith,
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2859A1.txt
          • the petition, the proposed definition shall not take effect until both the state commission and the Commission agree upon the definition of a rural service area, in accordance with section 214(e)(5) of the Act. Under section 54.207(e) of the Commission's rules, the Commission delegates its authority under section 54.207(c) to the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 54.207(c), for
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-286A1.txt
          • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Brian Carter (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Roy Knowles (717) 338-2888 Barbara Sibert (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions: Jennifer Burton (legal), Michael Pollak (technical) at (202) 418-0680 - FCC - See Amendment
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2884A1.txt
          • Interest Obligations. We request public comment on the issues raised by this filing. We are assigning this proceeding a Commission docket number, MB 03-206, in order facilitate filing public comment. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2897A1.txt
          • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Robert Krinsky (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions, contact the Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as follows: Evan Baranoff, Policy and
        • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2941A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2941A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2941A1.txt
          • pleading electronically or by paper with each of the following: ; facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone (202) 863-2893. Lisa Choi, Policy Division, International Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554; facsimile: (202) 418-2824. . Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Lisa Choi, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1460. FCC r Ö Þ Dÿÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ †]¶' ùš7²ßâ`è²~¯; M u(¨\A€÷ õwåœ(c)ó ° ¼èš 2Àû 0ïôò îO�Û ÌìúÇ ñ o)0L8HoÀcsTãŒÐ ÌñÐóãÇ‹s! ØYvkÐ�û*ɱ(c)@ƒýí
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2948A1.txt
            • thirty-one days following the date of this Public Notice. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All filings concerning any or all matters in this Public Notice should refer to WT Docket No. 03-203. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file petitions to deny or comments on or before October 27, 2003 and oppositions or reply comments on or before November 11, 2003. Comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2952A1.txt
            • Vonage states that preemption is necessary because of the impossibility of separating the Internet, or any service offered over it, into intrastate and interstate components. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Vonage's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2958A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2958A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2958A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2959A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2959A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2960A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2962A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2962A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2963A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2979A1.txt
            • Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (CC Docket No. 01-338), Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (CC Docket No. 96-98), and Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability (CC Docket No. 98-147) Request for Extension of Comment Period (filed Sept. 23, 2003). Id. at 1. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov h¡ $ h¡ tm š d ˆ • - ˜ tm š ð ñ h¡ h¡ h¡ h¡ h¡ FÁ h¡ h¡ h¡ $ ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2986A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2986A1.txt
            • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Mr. John Kuzma, of the Policy and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3014A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7705, TTY (202) 418-0484, or pslipako@fcc.gov. Franklin Telephone Company, Inc. Petition for Waiver, Filed Sept. 24, 2003 (Franklin
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3032A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-B540, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Scott A. Mackoul, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7498, TTY (202) 418-0484, or Scott.Mackoul@fcc.gov. Petition of Cellular Mobile Systems of St. Cloud, LLC for Limited
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3036A1.txt
            • on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. . . . -FCC- See 47 C.F.R. §64.604. See Hamilton, Petition for Waiver Extension, CC Docket No. 98-67, filed September 15, 2003. See 47 C.F.R. §64.603. See Hands On, Petition for Waiver, CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3056A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3056A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3056A1.txt
            • the petition, the proposed definition shall not take effect until both the state commission and the Commission agree upon the definition of a rural service area, in accordance with section 214(e)(5) of the Act. Under section 54.207(e) of the Commission's rules, the Commission delegates its authority under section 54.207(c) to the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of RCC Minnesota, Inc. for Redefinition of Rural Telephone Company Service Areas, CC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3105A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). See NPCR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel PartnersPetition for Designation as an
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3109A1.txt
            • on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. . . . -FCC- See AT&T, AT&T Petition for Limited Reconsideration and for Waiver, CC Docket No. 98-67, CG Docket No. 03-123, filed September 23, 2003. See Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3112A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7386 , TTY (202) 418-0484. Letter from Jerry M. Allen, Valor Telecommunications, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3113A1.txt
            • sections 53.203(a)(2) and 53.203(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, which prohibit sharing of operating, installation, and maintenance (OI&M) functions by section 272 affiliates and Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) and by section 272 affiliates and other affiliates of the BOCs. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3146A1.txt
            • and commercial real estate developers and, ultimately, provides higher quality and more affordable telecommunications services for the consumers and businesses that will occupy these developments. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of BellSouth's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3178A1.txt
            • All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. . For further information regarding the public reference file for the AHA Plan, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. This matter is designated as a "permit but disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3262A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-B540, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. . The TTY number is 202-418-0484. The California Public Utilities Commission and the People of the State of California Petition for Authority to Implement Specialized Overlay Area Codes, filed October 6, 2003 (Petition).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3275A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3275A1.txt
            • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. . PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Ò Ó ô õ ö h< ›ëÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3278A1.txt
            • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-329A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . 4. An original and four copies of all pleadings shall be filed with the Secretary of the Commission. In addition, parties shall serve three copies with the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-A361, Washington, D.C. 20554, Attn: Thad Machcinski. Parties shall also serve one copy with Qualex International, Portals
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-344A1.txt
            • e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form ." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. This proceeding has been designated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Interested parties shall
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3454A1.txt
            • any refunds that may later be necessary. Our accounting order will ensure that GCI and any other Tariff FCC No. 11 customers will be able to receive refunds of any amounts improperly charged should the Commission ultimately determine that Alascom's tariff is unlawful. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-346A1.txt
            • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3508A1.txt
            • documents sent by overnight mail (this type excludes USPS Express and Priority Mail) 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743 (Weekdays - 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.) USPS First-Class, Express, and Priority Mail 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Ex Parte Requirements This Public Notice is designated a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3562A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. By this notice, we inform the public that submarine cable landing license applications and international section 214 applications that are part of larger transactions involving multiple Commission licenses or authorizations may
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3585A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3585A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3594A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3594A1.txt
            • rural telephone companies listed above, MidWest's licensed service area does not cover the entirety of certain of those telephone companies' wire centers. In such instances, the Minnesota Commission proposes to redefine each telephone company's service area by combining into a single service area the portions of the telephone company's service area that Midwest is licensed to serve. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission for Agreement to Redefine the Service Areas
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3608A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3608A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3608A1.txt
            • from applying those section 271 unbundling obligations to the broadband network elements that the Commission already has determined need not be unbundled under section 251. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of SBC's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3669A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3730A1.txt
            • Communications Commission. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. . The TTY number is 202-418-0484. 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). See Public Service Cellular, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Alabama, filed September 12, 2003 (PSC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3731A1.txt
            • Communications Commission. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. . The TTY number is 202-418-0484. 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). See Public Service Cellular, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Georgia, filed September 23, 2003 (Petition).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3742A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3742A1.txt
            • routinely granted, the Bureau finds that there is good cause for an extension in this instance. Accordingly, interested parties may now file comments on or before December 10, 2003 and reply comments on or before December 22, 2003. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3766A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3766A1.txt
            • resolve a dispute between Northland and Verizon New York, Inc. with respect to the effect of the Commission's ISP Remand Order on the reciprocal compensation and change-of-law provisions of their interconnection agreements. Northland requests expedited treatment of its preemption petition. This proceeding shall be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-376A1.txt
            • pay the fees required by its Rights-of-Way Ordinance for Fibertech's aerial network that passes through the Borough on State Highway Department rights-of-way.. Fibertech argues that the ordinance violates section 253 because it is an unlawful barrier to entry. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3779A1.txt
            • for public inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3821A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3821A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3821A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-B540, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. . The TTY number is 202-418-0484. Centennial Cellular Tri-State Operating Partnership and Centennial Claiborne Cellular Corp. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.313(d) of the Commission's Rules, filed November 4, 2003 (Petition). 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3822A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-B540, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. . The TTY number is 202-418-0484. Michiana Metronet Inc., Centennial Michigan RSA 6 Cellular Corp., and Centennial Michigan RSA 6 Cellular Corp. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.314(d) of the Commission's Rules, filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3823A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3823A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3823A1.txt
            • grant it a waiver of the Commission's comparably efficient interconnection requirements for international reverse directory assistance services. The requested waiver would let BellSouth provide international reverse directory assistance services on an integrated basis without complying with those requirements. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3824A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See ALLTEL Communications, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3825A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See ALLTEL Communications, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3832A1.txt
            • on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Vistronix Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. . . . -FCC- See Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection Changes Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; Policies and Rules Concerning Unauthorized Changes of Consumers' Long Distance Carriers, CC Docket No. 94-129,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3876A1.txt
            • paper also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of ALLTEL Communications, Inc. for Consent to Redefine the Service Areas of Rural
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3884A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3895A1.txt
            • Commission. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Natek, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. $ h� Š TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3898A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3898A1.txt
            • presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set forth below, no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1). Persons making oral ex parte presentations must file a summary of the presentation, as set forth below, and deliver copies to the Commissioners or Commission employees involved with the presentation no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). All ex parte filings must be clearly labeled as such and must reference this Public
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-389A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Shannon Lipp, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). See Louisiana Unwired, LLC Petition for Designation as an Eligible
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3903A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3903A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Satellite Division, IB For legal questions: Selina Khan at (202) 418-7282 For technical questions: Kathyrn Medley at (202) 418-1211 Chip Fleming at (202) 418-1247 For ITU questions: Rockie Patterson at (202) 418-1183 ATTACHMENT A In the Matter of SES Americom, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling FCC File No. SAT-PDR-200220425-00071
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-390A1.txt
            • D.C. 20554. The applications and any subsequently filed documents in this matter are also available electronically through the Commission's Electronic Filing System (ECFS) which may be accessed on the Commission's Internet website at http://www.fcc.gov. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these petitions are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For addition information, please contact James Ball or Lisa Choi, Policy Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460. -FCC- $ 6 V g Û +D`ƒ +Dðƒ ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3939A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3939A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3939A1.txt
            • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3943A1.txt
            • 22, 2004, it will be three years since SWBT obtained authority under section 271 of the Act to provide interLATA services in Kansas and Oklahoma. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3949A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-B540, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. . The TTY number is 202-418-0484. NPCR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners Petition for Waiver of Section 54.313(d) of the Commission's Rules - Expedited Treatment Requested, filed October 21, 2003 (Petition). 47 C.F.R. §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3961A1.txt
            • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3984A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 15, 2004, and reply comments on or before January 30, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 03-30. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3985A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 15, 2004, and reply comments on or before January 30, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 03-31. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-3991A1.txt
            • specifying the terms and conditions under which ILECs provide federally tariffed broadband transmission either on its own or as part of a broadband information service intrude on this Commission's exclusive authority over interstate telecommunications and thus are unlawful. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4027A1.txt
            • of this public notice. Reply comments may be filed no later than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register of this public notice. In filing their pleadings, parties should reference the following docket number: CC Docket 96-128. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4028A1.txt
            • Division Wireline Competition Bureau Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Motion for Extension of Time (December 12, 2003) (``Motion''). The current comment and reply comment deadlines are December 19, 2003 and January 5, 2004, respectively. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). Motion at 1-2. CenturyTel states that counsel for Western Wireless fully supports the extension. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-4028 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-4028 hq �@ˆþÿ Z r - ¤ hq @& Ù q ­
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4076A1.txt
            • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4084A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4084A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4084A1.txt
            • ongoing unbundling obligation under section 271 with respect to broadband elements would impose substantial operating and financial burdens on all Bell Operating Companies, including Qwest. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Qwest's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4111A1.txt
            • that State Commissions May Not Regulate Broadband Internet Access Services by Requiring BellSouth to Provide Such Services to CLEC Voice Customers, WC Docket No. 03-251, Public Notice, DA 03-3991 (rel. Dec. 16, 2003). NARUC Motion For Extension of Time, WC Docket No. 03-251 (filed Dec. 23, 2003). Id. at 1. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-4111 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-4111 5 6 I N \ õ .õ ö F 8 E R j � ‚ „ ... ‡ (c) ª º ì î ï ü ý 8 E R j � ‚ „ ‡ (c) º ì î ü ý õ ( ; ; H
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4112A1.txt
            • paper also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of ALLTEL Communications, Inc. for Consent to Redefine the Service Areas of Rural
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-4113A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Karen Franklin, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). See NPCR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners Petition for Designation as
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-434A1.txt
            • 14 days of the date of this public notice, and Applicants may file replies within 7 days thereafter. We request that such comments and replies refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning this application is permitted subject to the Commission's rules for the ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of the application listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. The application listed is subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-436A1.txt
            • with the intent to avoid the payment, either in whole or in part, of any of the Company's tariffed charges by ... [u]sing fraudulent means or devices, tricks, [or] schemes.'' We ask the parties to provide citations to specific sections of the tariff. Ex parte presentations in this proceeding continue to be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, covering ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-439A1.txt
            • for a declaratory ruling that its Free World Dialup, which facilitates point-to-point broadband Internet protocol voice communications, is neither telecommunications nor a telecommunications service as these terms are defined in section 153 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-45A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; RCC Holdings, Inc. Petition for Designation as
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-485A1.txt
            • Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. facsimile: (202) 863-2898; phone: (202) 863-2893. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-486A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-486A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-486A1.txt
            • it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. All written ex parte presentations and all written disclosures of oral ex parte presentations should reference BellSouth, SBC, and Verizon Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 96-45, and DA 03-486 and be filed with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. A copy of each filing should be
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-488A1.txt
            • information and ideas not contained in pleadings, provided that such information, or a writing containing the nature and source of such information, is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. Ex Parte Requirements This proceeding is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-494A1.txt
            • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-57A1.txt
            • Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. . Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-604A1.txt
            • March 24, 2003. Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-622A1.txt
            • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-635A1.txt
            • Petition for Declaratory Ruling on the Assignment of Accounts (Traffic) Without the Associated CSTP II Plans Under AT&T Tariff FCC No. 2, Internal File No. CCB/CPD 96-20 (rel. Feb. 13, 2003) (Public Notice). Id. See Request to FCC for Extension of Time, CCB/CPD 96-20, filed Feb. 28, 2003 (Inga Request). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). See Inga Request. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-635 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-635 : I _ m ã ë ò ó � F é Ï é
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-789A1.txt
            • copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-797A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-797A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-797A1.txt
            • to CC Docket Number 94 -102, which is the general E911 docket. The Certifications and related documents are available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), this proceeding is designated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding and subject to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible, provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Interested parties may file Certifications and related comments by using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System ("ECFS") or by filing paper copies. Certifications and comments filed through the ECFS can be sent via the Internet
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-798A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-798A1.txt
            • regarding the public reference file, please contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, Reference Information Center, 202-418-1350. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-803A1.txt
            • the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, we hereby designate these cases as a permit-but-disclose proceedings under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject requests, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. All written ex parte presentations and all written disclosures of oral ex parte presentations should reference Ysleta and IBM Requests for Review, CC Docket Nos. 96-45 and 97-21, and DA 03-803 and be filed with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. A copy of each filing should
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-859A1.txt
            • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-860A1.txt
            • it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, an ex parte presentation subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-862A1.txt
            • pending completion of the Declaratory Rulings. We are assigning this proceeding a Commission docket number, MB 03-82, in order to facilitate filing public comment. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), this proceeding (including the Petition for Administrative Sanctions) will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 1.1206 . Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-865A1.txt
            • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-866A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-866A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-866A1.txt
            • the Commission's ISP Remand Order on provisions requiring payment of reciprocal compensation and provisions allowing for amendment of interconnection agreements upon a change of law. MFS, Brooks Fiber, and Verizon request expedited treatment of their joint preemption petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-874A1.txt
            • New York Department of Correctional Services to block the long distance service provided by Outside Connection. Interested parties may file comments no later than April 16, 2003. Reply comments may be filed no later than April 28, 2003. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-90A1.txt
            • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-913A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Raj Kannan or Paula-Ann Cech, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1540. Price Cap Tariff Review Plans Approved by OMB 3060-0400 Expires May 13, 2003 See below for information regarding public burden estimate. NOTICE: These Tariff Review Plans (TRPs) contain summary support material that certain local exchange carriers (LECs)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A1.txt
            • written consultations on the same day as interested parties file comments. . If filing on a CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.txt
            • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-943A1.txt
            • the Associated CSTP II Plans Under AT&T Tariff FCC No. 2, Internal File No. CCB/CPD 96-20, Order, DA 03-635 (rel. March 5, 2003) (Order Granting Extension of Time). See Request for Extension of Time to File, Internal File No. CCB/CPD 96-20 (filed March 26, 2003). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). See Order Granting Extension of Time; Public Notice. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 03-943 Federal Communications Commission DA 03-943 ) ? M Ã Ë Ò Ó ü F ` ` àŽ
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-99A1.txt
            • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1007A1.txt
            • presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set forth below, no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1). Persons making oral ex parte presentations must file a summary of the presentation, as set forth below, and deliver copies to the Commissioners or Commission employees involved with the presentation no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). All ex parte filings must be clearly labeled as such and must reference this Public
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1012A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1014A1.txt
            • Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Motion for Acceptance of Late-Filed Pleading filed by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction on March 26, 2004 (Ohio Department Motion). Ohio Department Motion at 1. Ohio Department Motion at 1. Ohio Department Motion at 1. Ohio Department Motion at 2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1014 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-1014 h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i æ ç K L N O Y ^ â ã æ ô õ þ h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i F ˆ .i ­
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1020A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, WTB: For legal questions: Kenneth Burnley at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 or Linda Sanderson at (717) 338-2851 Audio Division, MB: For legal and service rule questions: Lisa Scanlan or Tom Nessinger at (202) 418-2700 -FCC- See Implementation
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1021A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1021A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1034A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before May 17, 2004, and reply comments on or before June 1, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 04-17. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1041A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1041A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1041A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7705, TTY (202) 418-0484, or pslipako@fcc.gov. *** See Letter from Richard E. Wiley, Counsel for NeuStar, Inc. to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1096A1.txt
            • local broadcasting. We request public comment on the issues raised by this Petition. We are assigning this proceeding a Commission docket number, MB 04-160, in order to facilitate filing public comment. Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-122A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1234A1.txt
            • has asked the Commission to issue a declaratory ruling stating that the FCC regulatory fee imposed on cable operators pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 159 is not a franchise fee within the meaning of Section 622(g) of the Communications Act, as amended. For purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 (``permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Comments and oppositions are due within 30 days from the date of this public notice. Please place the case identifier, CSR 6324, on all filings. Comments and oppositions sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and are not part of the official record. In addition, comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1245A1.txt
            • Motion at 2. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(b). See Comments of Warren C. Havens in response to Auction 57 Comment Public Notice at 13 (submitted April 23, 2004). This proceeding has been designated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See Auction 57 Comment Public Notice at 11 (citing 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206). As such, interested parties are permitted to make oral or written ex parte presentations in a manner consistent with Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Messrs. Gurss and Quianzon April 30, 2004 Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 April 30, 2004 y z | ‰ � • £ · „Bž‹kÈ(/YMž¼`鉉ÿ‰PNG ò0ÞÇàeX...•W0f÷"˸ -Ê� ÚD... p-Cœ C\
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1270A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1289A1.txt
            • cycle dates established herein. IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1334A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-138A1.txt
            • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1410A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1410A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1410A1.txt
            • Competition Bureau solicits comments on this recent amendment to the 1997 American Samoa Rate Integration Plan. Interested parties may file comments no later than June 17, 2004. Reply comments may be filed no later than June 28, 2004. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1421A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See ALLTEL Nebraska, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.314 of the Commission's Rules,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1422A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. §54.313. See Qwest Corporation, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.313 of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1443A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sanford Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1508, TTY (202) 418-0484, or sanford.williams@fcc.gov. *** See In the Matter of Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and Order
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1445A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). We note that each of the carriers listed should provide
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-145A1.txt
            • during the relevant window. Comments or oppositions filed before the relevant window opens or after it closes will be returned. Ex Parte Rules - Non-Restricted Proceedings. The consideration of each certification will be considered a non-restricted proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Copies of this Public Notice are available in accessible formats (Braille, large print and audio cassette) by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426 (voice); 418-7365 (TTY). Staff Contacts: Rick Chessen, Susan Mort at (202) 418-7200 Press Inquiries: Michelle Russo at (202) 418-2358 -FCC- Digital Broadcast Content Protection, Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 02-230, FCC No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1499A1.txt
            • and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in the NPRM in order to facilitate our internal review process. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-149A1.txt
            • We find that it would be in the public interest to treat this proceeding as an exempt proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte communications to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible and need not be disclosed, in accordance with section 1.1204(b) of the Commission's Rules. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1586A1.txt
            • the Federal Communications Commission Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1593A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1606A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before July 1, 2004, and reply comments on or before July 16, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 04-21. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Audrey Bashkin (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions, contact the Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as follows: Erin McGrath, (202) 418-0620; JoAnn
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1639A1_Erratum.doc
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Audrey Bashkin (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions, contact the Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as follows: Erin McGrath, (202) 418-0620; JoAnn
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1646A1.txt
            • Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties are also requested to send a courtesy copy of their comments via email to: gina.spade@fcc.gov and thomas.buckley@fcc.gov. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. A copy of this Public Notice will be sent by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the relevant state commissions. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1701A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before July 15, 2004, and reply comments on or before July 30, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 04-22. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1739A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1739A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition for Agreement with Redefinition of Service Area Requirement for Certain Rural Telephone Company
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1822A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See TracFone Wireless, Inc., Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1869A1.txt
            • service providers in the Omaha MSA, it has lost its market power and dominant status and, thus, should be relieved of the relevant regulatory requirements. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Qwest's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1921A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-196A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Howard Davenport (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Roy Knowles (717) 338-2888 Barbara Sibert (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions, contact the Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as follows: Nancy Zaczek or Michael Pollak,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1997A1.txt
            • specific issues that will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified above. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-1A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Jennifer McKee of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1530. - FCC - 47 U.S.C. § 251(g). 47 C.F.R. § 51.701(b). 47 C.F.R. § 69.5(b). Petition for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from Enforcement of 47 U.S.C. § 251(g), Rule 51.701(b)(1), and Rule 69.5(b) (filed Dec. 23, 2003)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2006A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2006A1.txt
            • that the need for its relief is time sensitive as Verizon is nearing deployment of its multi-faceted broadband offering in less than two months. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Verizon's two petitions. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2022A1.txt
            • reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, Reference Information Center, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2026A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2026A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2028A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2028A1.txt
            • that the Commission issue a order declaring that states have no jurisdiction over elements provided pursuant to section 271 and should preempt the TRA's order. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of BellSouth's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2034A1.txt
            • Because this request may implicate broadly applicable policy issues, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Commenters seeking to protect the confidentiality of information produced shall follow the procedures set forth in Commission rule section 0.459. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested persons may file comments on NEC BNS's waiver request on or before July 19, 2004. Reply comments must be filed on or before July 29,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2055A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2055A1.txt
            • Communications Commission Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. The documents may also be purchased from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., telephone 1-800-378-3160. Ex Parte Requirements. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2063A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2063A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2063A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Section 54.207 of the Commission's rules, which implements section 214(e)(5) of the Communications Act
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2067A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2067A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See North Carolina RSA 3 Cellular Telephone Company, Petition for Designation as an Eligible
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2092A1.txt
            • proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we find it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in this proceeding will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. FILING PROCEDURES Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before July 27, 2004, and reply comments on or before August 10, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2093A1.txt
            • proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we find it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in this proceeding will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. FILING PROCEDURES Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before July 27, 2004, and reply comments on or before August 10, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2111A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition for FCC Agreement in Redefining Rural Telephone Company Service Areas in the State
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2116A1.txt
            • for Advanced Services. In the alternative, Verizon requests Commission forbearance to the extent necessary to allow Verizon to exercise pricing flexibility for Advanced Services. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Verizon's two petitions. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2119A1.txt
            • II License Corporation KNLF205 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2144A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sanford Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. § 52.15(g)(2)(i). See SBC IP Communications, Inc. Petition for Limited Waiver of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2191A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition for Agreement with Redefinition of Service Area Requirement for Certain Rural Telephone Company
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2254A1.txt
            • Qwest Wireless, LLC KNLG234 II. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2345A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See TracFone Wireless, Inc., Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2349A1.txt
            • Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. The documents may also be purchased from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, email www.bcpiweb.com. Ex Parte Requirements. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-238A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before March 1, 2004, and reply comments on or before March 17, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing file numbers listed above. Comments may be filed using the Commission's
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-241A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See AT&T Petition for Waiver, filed January 27, 2004. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2451A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Scott A. Mackoul or Audrey Bashkin at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions, contact the Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as follows:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2475A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 1.106. Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, Access Charge Reform, Fourth Report and Order in CC Docket No. 94-1 and Second Report and Order in CC Docket No. 96-262, 12 FCC Rcd 16642 (1997) (1997 Price Cap Review Order), aff'd in part, rev'd in part sub nom.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2478A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before September 7, 2004, and reply comments on or before September 22, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 04-23. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2484A1.txt
            • Autotel requests that the Commission issue an order preempting the jurisdiction of the Nevada Commission for failing to act on a specific request for arbitration of an interconnection agreement with SBC pursuant to section 252(b)(4)(C) of the Act. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2487A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2487A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2487A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Action by the Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. For further information, contact Jon Stover of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0390. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2512A1.txt
            • Commission may grant requests for confidential treatment either conditionally or unconditionally. As such, we note that the Commission has the discretion to release on public interest grounds information that does fall within the scope of a FOIA exemption. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2598A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2598A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2598A1.txt
            • area service between the Montpelier and Greensburg exchanges in the Baton Rouge LATA and the Kentwood, Amite and Independence exchanges in the New Orleans LATA, in the state of Louisiana. All of the exchanges are in Louisiana. . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2599A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2599A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2599A1.txt
            • Wireless PCS, LLC WPWL461 II. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2610A1.txt
            • Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties are also requested to send a courtesy copy of their comments via email to: gina.spade@fcc.gov and thomas.buckley@fcc.gov. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. A copy of this Public Notice will be sent by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the relevant state commissions. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2668A1.txt
            • to Deny Application, File No. ITC-214-20030728-00376 (filed Oct. 28, 2003) (``Reply''). See Joint Petition to Defer, File No. ITC-214-20030728-00376 (filed Dec. 9, 2003) (``Petition to Defer''); see also infra ¶¶ 23-25. See Petition to Adopt Conditions to Authorizations and Licenses, File No. ITC-214-20030728-00376 (filed June 7, 2004) (``Petition to Adopt Conditions''). This is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. The ex parte filings include FLAG's January 14, 2004 ex parte letter referring to a November 24, 2003 letter from the U.S. industry association CompTel/Ascent Alliance to the Indian Ambassador to the United States and the Indian Ministry of Communications & Information Technology about international cable access in India, and updating FLAG's concerns in File No. ITC-214-20030728-00376. See Letter from
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-268A1.txt
            • Motion to Extend Time for Filing Public Comments filed by Evercom Systems, T-NETIX, and Corrections Corp. on January 26, 2004. Joint Motion to Extend Time for Filing Public Comments at 2. Joint Motion to Extend Time for Filing Public Comments at 1. Joint Motion to Extend Time for Filing Public Comments at 5. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-268 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-268 h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i P Q S ¢ ¶ h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i F Œ 0 .i ­
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-269A1.txt
            • Interested parties may file comments on or before February 24, 2004. Reply comments are due March 9, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments and reply comments should be filed in the docket number, CC Docket No. 95-116. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. . Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. Each filing should include
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-26A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2705A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Parties Asked to Refresh Record Regarding Reconsideration of Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers Fourth Report and Order and Access Charge Reform Second Report and Order, CC Docket Nos. 94-1 and 96-262, Public Notice, DA 04-2475 (Wire. Comp. Bur., Aug. 5, 2004). Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-273A1.txt
            • Period, WC Docket No. 04-13 (filed Feb. 2, 2004). Id. at 2. Id. at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). We note that on February 3, 2004, the Applicants filed in opposition to Eschelon's request to extend the pleading cycle. See Joint Opposition to Motion to Extend or Postpone Comment Period, WC Docket 04-13 (filed Feb. 3, 2004). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-273 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-273 F } ~ � ... ª F y Ü é ø y Ü é ø i Í ß ß ì ì v Ù â â ï ï é ø ­
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2750A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See AT&T Corp. Petition for Limited Reconsideration, WC Docket No. 03-109, filed July 21,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2793A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before September 29, 2004, and reply comments on or before October 14, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-27A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Application of Sprint Corporation for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2840A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2842A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before October 4, 2004, and reply comments on or before October 19, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 04-25. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2871A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2871A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2871A1.txt
            • in order to be declared an incumbent LEC in these three exchanges in which Iowa Telecom currently is deemed to be an incumbent LEC. This public notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of South Slope's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2883A1.txt
            • so that SBC's enhanced services operations can share operations, installation, maintenance, and other services in the same manner as other SBC affiliates, without legal risk. This public notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of SBC's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2911A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of RCC Minnesota, Inc. and Wireless Alliance, LLC for Redefinition of Rural Telephone
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2957A1.txt
            • Commission's Triennial Review Remand proceeding for the sole purpose of reviewing the possible correlation between access line density and impairment for unbundled dedicated interoffice transport. This public notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of ALTS's request. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2974A1.txt
            • and Verizon Communications, Inc. remain subject to the unbundling obligations to which they committed as a condition of approval of their respective mergers. This public notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Merger Order Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2979A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2979A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before October 12, 2004, and reply comments on or before October 27, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 04-26. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3020A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3020A1.txt
            • (1998). If multiple docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the caption of a proceeding, however, parties must transmit one electronic copy of the comments to each docket or rulemaking number. If multiple docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the caption of a proceeding, however, parties must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). (Footnote continued on the next page.) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3020 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3020 h hš 1 3 8 = G K \ k n o p ~ õ ö h hxj h( h h h( h( hvB h6Y h6Y gd gd6Y p 0 0 9 + vB DJ 6Y �i xj Tq
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3032A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before October 22, 2004, and reply comments on or before November 8, 2004. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 04-23. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3038A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before October 22, 2004, and reply comments on or before November 8, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3039A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before October 22, 2004, and reply comments on or before November 8, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3040A1.txt
            • See Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). These proceedings include most notice-and-comment rulemakings as well as other major proceedings, such as many mergers, that are classified as permit-but-disclose on a case-by-case basis. In such proceedings, written and oral ex parte presentations are permissible provided that the persons making the presentations comply with the disclosure requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). The disclosure requirements include the following: Any written material shown to Commission personnel during the course of a meeting, even if the materials are not left with the staff, are deemed written presentations and must be filed in accordance with the rule governing written presentations. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202(a), 1.1206(b)(1). Persons orally presenting data or arguments not already reflected
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3127A1.txt
            • will be three years since SWBT obtained authority under section 271 of the Act to provide interLATA services in the states of Arkansas and Missouri. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3137A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of RCC Minnesota, Inc. and Wireless Alliance, LLC for Redefinition of Rural Telephone
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3159A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3185A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclosed proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3186A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclosed proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3187A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclosed proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3191A1.txt
            • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. . PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Pó3w(m·H(R)÷ndÀ� 䡬¥qœ[ãKž�8⋵�¡`¯"o3ßzl[SiwßCù çøVÝÓù²4àªøè>jÊñqñMââ]þnM # TXÆG¯ûÚŸ£(R)Ü}Í Çî"²tma: ‚TU"ç[ÉÙ[(c)Æ} ñ¸va¾ ãg Ò¢µÈÅ7F†‹ø2Tÿ4zŽÂ3àæÛåÂ|‰#º¢A †� ·ó
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3198A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Howard Davenport, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Roy Knowles (717) 338-2888 Barbara Sibert (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions, contact the Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-31A1.txt
            • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3200A1.txt
            • days from the release date of a Public Notice to initiate a proceeding to consider a petition to redefine the service area of a rural telephone company. The Wireline Competition Bureau released a Public Notice seeking comment on this petition on July 8, 2004. The comment cycle established by that Public Notice closed on August 5, 2004. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of CTC Telecom, Inc. for Redefinition of the Service Area of CenturyTel of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3202A1.txt
            • Amend Section 69.104 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 04-259, RM-10603, Joint Motion for Extension of Time (filed Oct. 1, 2004) (Joint Motion). Id. at 1-2. Id. at 2. Because December 12, 2004 is a Sunday, we establish December 13, 2004 as the revised reply comment deadline. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(j). 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a) 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3202 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-3202 � �@ˆþÿ �@ˆþÿ ( ) Þ @0m X+m Þ š@ (@m $¡Úô ­
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3219A1.txt
            • 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160, or via e-mail www.bcpiweb.com. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3262A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. On July 6, 2004, Wavebounce filed an almost identical request for a waiver of Part 15 of the Commission's rules. Comments to the Wavebounce request are being sought under ET Docket No. 04-374. Because of the similarities between these two petitions, we are incorporating the GSSI petition under the same docket number. We also are extending the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3266A1.txt
            • label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. or call 1-800-378-3160. . . -FCC- See Communication Service for the Deaf, Inc. Petition for Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 98-67, filed September 30, 2004. See Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3269A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katie King or Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Forward-Looking Mechanism for High Cost
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-327A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3301A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3301A1.txt
            • days from the release date of a Public Notice to initiate a proceeding to consider a petition to redefine the service area of a rural telephone company. The Wireline Competition Bureau released a Public Notice seeking comment on this petition on July 21, 2004. The comment cycle established by that Public Notice closed on August 18, 2004. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition for Agreement with Redefinition of Service Area Requirement for Certain Rural Telephone Company
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3320A1.txt
            • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). . - FCC - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö ƒA·Û "ƒõ¹\Îív`` � 6› ·Û ­
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3351A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia for FCC Agreement in Redefining
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3352A1.txt
            • label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. or call 1-800-378-3160. . . -FCC- See Telco Group, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling or, in the Alternative, Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 98-67, filed July 26, 2004. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-33A1.txt
            • the Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available. We now release the BellSouth audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. Accordingly, comments are due no later than March 9, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3420A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3420A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 5-B540, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. . The TTY number is 202-418-0484. Petition of the Oklahoma Corporation Commission for Expedited Decision for Delegation of Authority to Implement Additional Number Conservation Measures, October 14, 2004 (Petition). Petition at 4. PUBLIC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3478A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3506A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. Petition for Agreement with Redefinition of Service Areas of Certain
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3507A1.txt
            • and impose costs that inhibit innovation and deployment of broadband. In addition, BellSouth argues that these rules are not imposed on other providers of broadband transmission. This public notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of BellSouth's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3511A1.txt
            • during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., telephone 800 378-3160, facsimile 301 816-0169. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3517A1.txt
            • Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties are also requested to send a courtesy copy of their comments via email to: gina.spade@fcc.gov and thomas.buckley@fcc.gov. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. A copy of this Public Notice will be sent by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the relevant state commissions. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3520A1.txt
            • at incumbent LECs' terminal blocks in MTEs; and (3) this right exists regardless of any state law or regulation that would otherwise limit the right. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Cox's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3536A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See North Carolina RSA #4, Inc., USCOC of North Carolina RSA #7, Inc., North
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3573A1.txt
            • the Fayetteville LATA and the Raleigh exchange in the Raleigh LATA, in the State of North Carolina. All of the exchanges are in North Carolina. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of BellSouth's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3600A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3601A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3602A1.txt
            • by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Qwest intends its petition for forbearance, however, to focus attention on the narrow pricing areas identified, which Qwest argues require expedited relief. This public notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Qwest's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-360A1.txt
            • is not consistent with the public interest. Finally, SBC states that a grant of its petition will not preclude a later Commission determination to subject IP Platform Services to specific requirements pursuant to its ancillary Title I jurisdiction. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3652A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Schlesinger of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353. - FCC - See In the Matter of Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, PrairieWave Telecommunications, Inc. Petition for Waiver, at 2, 9 (filed Nov. 12, 2004) (Waiver Petition). PrairieWave is a facilities-based competitive local exchange carrier (LEC)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3653A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Action by the Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. For further information, contact Jon Stover of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0390. 47 U.S.C. § 276. See also Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-128, Southern Public Communication Association
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3678A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3678A1.txt
            • 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The document may also be purchased from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160, or via e-mail www.bcpiweb.com. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3679A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3679A1.txt
            • 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The document may also be purchased from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160, or via e-mail www.bcpiweb.com. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-36A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7705, TTY (202) 418-0484, or pslipako@fcc.gov. Puerto Rico Telephone Company Petition for Waiver, Filed Nov. 26, 2003 (PRTC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3709A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3709A1.txt
            • label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. or call 1-800-378-3160. . . -FCC- See Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Second Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-377A1.txt
            • Gemini is not providing qualifying services; and (5) the DPUC improperly focused its impairment standard on a single carrier and its business plan. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of SBC Connecticut's Emergency Request. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-378A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-378A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3796A1.txt
            • using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3800A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See TracFone Wireless, Inc., Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3801A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia for FCC Agreement in Redefining
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3835A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclosed proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3836A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3836A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3836A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclosed proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3837A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3837A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclosed proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-384A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. NCPR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners Petition for Waiver - Expedited Treatment Requested, filed Dec.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3851A1.txt
            • 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3859A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3865A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Fred Campbell of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1553. - FCC - Order, Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P., Case No. 4:04CV00319-ERW (E.D. Mo. Jun. 14, 2004) (Referral Order). Petition for Declaratory Ruling of Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., WC Docket No. 04-424 (filed Oct. 27,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3868A1.txt
            • cycle established by that Public Notice closed on October 7, 2004. Pursuant to section 54.207(c)(3) of the Commission's rules, the Bureau has 90 days from the release date of a Public Notice to initiate a proceeding to consider a petition to redefine the service area of a rural telephone company. This notice constitutes initiation of that proceeding. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of RCC Minnesota, Inc. and Wireless Alliance, LLC for Redefinition of Rural Telephone
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3873A1.txt
            • FCC under the GRA. III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3874A1.txt
            • form 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will continue to be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For Further Information . Users of TTY equipment, call (202) 418-0484. Enhanced 911 or E911 refers to the automatic addition of location-specific and call-back information to a traditional 911 call, permitting
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3875A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 10, 2005, and reply comments on or before January 25, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 04-27. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3876A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3876A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3876A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 10, 2005, and reply comments on or before January 25, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 04-28. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3916A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3921A1.txt
            • label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. or call 1-800-378-3160. . . -FCC- See Ultratec, Inc., Sprint Corporation, and Hamilton Relay, Inc., Request for Clarification, CC Docket No. 98-67 and CG Docket No. 03-123, filed December 7, 2004. See The National
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3948A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Letter from Michael K. Kurtis, Counsel for New Florence Telephone Company, to Jeffrey
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3984A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See TracFone Wireless, Inc., Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4048A1.txt
            • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in this paragraph. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. ex parte requirements This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and is subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4049A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-4049A1.txt
            • broadband services offered by Verizon. This petition raises issues similar to those in the petition for forbearance filed by BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. on October 27, 2004. This public notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Verizon's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-404A1.txt
            • stranded capital resulting from certain commingled circuits that require additional equipment to delineate special access segments from UNE segments of multiple segment circuits. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of BellSouth's Petition for Waiver. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-40A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 69.606. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-411A1.txt
            • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-412A1.txt
            • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-413A1.txt
            • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-414A1.txt
            • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-415A1.txt
            • C.F.R. § 1.774(d). Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-545A1.txt
            • On April 16, 2004, it will be three years since Verizon obtained authority under section 271 of the Act to provide interLATA services in Massachusetts. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-565A1.txt
            • Chequamegon Telephone Cooperative, Chibardun Telephone Cooperative, Frontier Communications of Wisconsin, Midway Telephone Company - Wisconsin, Mt. Vernon Telephone Company, Stockbridge & Sherwood Telephone, Telephone USA of Wisconsin LLC, and West Wisconsin Telecom Cooperative (collectively, Rural Telcos). The Wisconsin Commission proposes to redefine each Rural Telco service area into service areas that are coterminous with wire center boundaries. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of ALLTEL Communications, Inc. for Consent to Redefine the Service Areas of Rural
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-567A1.txt
            • comment on the issues raised by these Petitions for Reconsideration and/or Clarification. Interested parties may file comments to the petitions on or before March 29, 2004. Reply comments are due April 13, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved with regard to the petitions will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. Generally, only one
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-584A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-584A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-584A1.txt
            • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-613A1.txt
            • BellSouth's request is virtually identical to the request Verizon filed on October 24, 2003, which the Commission placed on Public Notice on October 27, 2003. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of BellSouth's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-618A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-627A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Jennifer McKee of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1530. - FCC - Petition for Declaratory Ruling that Inflexion Communications' ExtendIP VoIP Service is Exempt from Access Charges at 2 (filed Feb. 27, 2004) (Inflexion Petition). Inflexion Petition at 3. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-672A1.txt
            • be disposed of before entering the building. Permit-but-disclose proceeding. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties hereto, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat all proposals filed in response to this Public Notice as a single, permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to proposals, comments, or other issues involved herein will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-686A1.txt
            • following rural telephone companies: Century Telephone - Midwest, Inc., Century Telephone Company of Northern Michigan, Century Telephone of Michigan, CenturyTel of Upper Michigan, Pigeon Telephone Company, Shiawassee Telephone Company, and Wolverine Telephone Company (collectively, Rural Telcos). The Michigan Commission proposes to redefine each Rural Telco service area into service areas that are coterminous with wire center boundaries. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of ALLTEL Communications, Inc. for Consent to Redefine the Service Areas of Rural
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-689A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-689A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-731A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-747A1.txt
            • as the related pending application proceedings, as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules notwithstanding the existence of related applications and oppositions. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that these proceedings will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-763A1.txt
            • and the date of the filing on each page of their comments' length of their submission. We also strongly encourage that parties track the organization set forth in the NPRM in order to facilitate our internal review process. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-774A1.txt
            • of Time filed by Martha Wright et al. on March 16, 2004 (Extension of Time Motion). Extension of Time Motion at 2. Extension of Time Motion at 2. Letter from Stephanie A. Joyce, Counsel for T-NETIX, Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC (filed March 17, 2004) (T-NETIX Letter). T-NETIX Letter at 1. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 04-774 Federal Communications Commission DA 04-774 h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i ˆ ‰ ) 9 ? ... † · É h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i h.i � F & ' ( ) * ? E ] y z
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-779A1.txt
            • further information regarding the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-77A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-783A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-785A1.txt
            • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-798A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7705, TTY (202) 418-0484, or pslipako@fcc.gov. ***
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-7A1.txt
            • telecommunications market in Puerto Rico, competitive LECs are impaired without the ability to obtain unbundled local switching to provide service to enterprise customers. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Board's waiver petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-800A1.txt
            • and the potential impact of this proceeding on consumers, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the petitions will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. Each filing should include the applicable docket number. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-846A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 Twelve Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Shannon Lipp, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Smith Bagley, Inc. Petition for Expedited Waiver, filed March 19, 2004 (Petition). Federal-State
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-888A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-888A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-888A1.txt
            • on the NPRM (69 FR 16193, March 29, 2004). Pursuant to the deadlines set forth in the NPRM, interested parties may file comments on or before May 28, 2004, and reply comments on or before June 28, 2004. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-897A1.txt
            • video programming services. CAC argues that Cox's requirement violates Section 623(b)(8) and the Commission's rules because the operator requires subscribers to purchase the digital gateway tier in addition to the basic service tier before being able to purchase a la carte programming. For purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 (``permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Comments and oppositions are due within 30 days from the date of this public notice. Please place the case identifier, CSR 6313-B, on all filings. Comments and oppositions sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and are not part of the official record. In addition, comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-92A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Schlesinger of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353. - FCC - See Petition of ASAP Paging, Inc. for Preemption of Public Utility Commission of Texas Concerning Retail Rating of Local Calls to CMRS Carriers, at 9 (filed Dec. 22, 2003) (ASAP Paging Petition). ASAP provides one-way CMRS
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-932A1.txt
            • AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. ITC-214-20011031-00547 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-936A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-936A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-936A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Schlesinger of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353. - FCC - See In the Matter of Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Southeast Telephone, Inc. Petition for Waiver, at 1 (filed Mar. 30, 2004) (Waiver Petition). 47 C.F.R. § 61.26(a)(6). Id. § 61.26(e). Waiver Petition at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-943A1.txt
            • inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Qualex International, telephone (202) 863-2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-954A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-954A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Christopher Shields, (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions, contact the Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as follows: Roberto
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-998A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-998A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. APPENDIX ETC Petitions Date Petition Filed Date Supplement Filed Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-999A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. APPENDIX ETC Petitions Date Filed Smith Bagley, Inc. (Navajo Reservation, UT) 5/24/02 Louisiana Unwired,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1003A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before May 2, 2005, and reply comments on or before May 17, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-21. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-103A1.txt
            • Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1042A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1042A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1042A1.txt
            • to the extent necessary. III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1076A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1076A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Audio Services Division, Media Bureau For service rule questions: Lisa Scanlan or Tom Nessinger at (202) 418-2700 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For legal questions: Howard Davenport at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 or Linda Sanderson at (717) 338-2888 -
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1094A1.txt
            • should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. and gary.seigel@fcc.gov. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. A copy of this Public Notice will be sent by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the relevant state commissions. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1100A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Jon Stover of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0390. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1105A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of Hancock Communications for Redefinition of Rural Telephone Company Service Areas, CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1106A1.txt
            • payphone happens to be connected to the network, the Commission's evolving framework for IP-enabled communications has not yet addressed the regulatory status of IP-enabled calls. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of APCC's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1114A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484, or Mark.Seifert@fcc.gov. Request of the California Public Utilities Commission for an Extension of Time,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-114A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1154A1.txt
            • 445 12th St. SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160, or via e-mail www.bcpiweb.com. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1158A1.txt
            • Specifically, ICO asks that the proceeding be designated as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. ICO filed the above-captioned application and petition for declaratory ruling on January 10, 2005. Both filings were placed on public notice on February 4, 2005. The Boeing Company filed comments on the application and the petition. ICO notes that Section 1.1206(a)(3) of the Commission's rules routinely classifies declaratory ruling proceedings as ``permit-but-disclose,'' while application proceedings are routinely classified as ``restricted'' under Section 1.1208. ICO maintains that it would serve the public interest to designate the proceeding with respect to its modification application as permit-but-disclose in order to harmonize the proceeding's ex parte status with the status of the interrelated declaratory-ruling proceeding
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1175A1.txt
            • The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room, CY-CB402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. , or call 1-800-378-3160. A copy of the submission may also be found by searching on the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) at http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs (insert CC Docket No. 98-67 into the Proceeding block).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1220A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Randy Clarke of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1587. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1267A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Dr. Martha Stancill, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-7015 Dr. Mark Bykowsky, Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis, (202) 418-1695 Dr. William Sharkey, Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis, (202) 418-2743 - FCC - Comments and reply comments in response to this public notice may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1274A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1285A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1288A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0384, TTY (202) 418-0484, or Mika.Savir@fcc.gov. Qwest Communications Corporation Petition for Limited Waiver of Section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1289A1.txt
            • (OET) is reviewing the request and seeks comments from interested parties. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before June 6, 2005, and reply comments on or before June 21, 2005. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1290A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1290A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1290A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0384, TTY (202) 418-0484, or Mika.Savir@fcc.gov. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. Petition for Clarification of the Commission's decision to grant
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1291A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0384, TTY (202) 418-0484, or Mika.Savir@fcc.gov. Missouri Public Service Commission, Request for Delegation of Authority to Implement Additional
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1342A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before June 13, 2005, and reply comments on or before June 28, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-23. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1346A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1347A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1347A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1348A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1389A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Clearwater, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1390A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1390A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Clearwater, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-143A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Southern Communications Services, Inc., d/b/a Southern LINC Petition for Designation as an Eligible
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-146A1.txt
            • Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1543A1.txt
            • three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 5-B540, Washington, DC 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, SW., Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Centennial USVI Operations Corp. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1544A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel at (202) 418-0879, or Katie King at (202) 418-7491. - FCC - See 47 C.F.R. §§ 36.611, 36.612, 54.301(b), 54.314(d), 54.903(a)(3), 69.2(hh) and 69.3(e)(6). See 47 C.F.R. Part 36, App. (defining ``study area''). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1555A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Brian Carter, (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Debbie Smith, Roy Knowles, or Barbara Sibert, (717) 338-2888 For service rules questions, contact the Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as follows: Mindy Littell (legal) or
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1591A1.txt
            • the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1613A1.txt
            • filed February 3, 2005, by the 800 MHz Transition Administrator. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-16. This means that presentations (communications on the merits) to the Commission may be made without serving or giving notice to all of the parties to the proceeding, but copies of written presentations and summaries of oral presentations must be put on the record. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Petitioners stress, however, that they are not questioning the competence of the particular entities comprising the TA. Petition for Reconsideration at 7 n.23. Because, as explained below, we agree in substance with the views expressed in the TA's opposition, we will not separately summarize them. The TA's responsibilities include the following. The TA will ensure that the band reconfiguration proceeds
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1637A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1637A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1637A1.txt
            • Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). For ex parte purposes, this proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. All comments will be available for public inspection. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket [ET
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1650A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1650A1.txt
            • Security considerations, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat the waiver request as a permit-but-disclose proceeding as allowed by the Commission's ex parte rules. Therefore, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Interested parties may file comments on the waiver request on or before June 24, 2005. Verizon Wireless may submit a reply comment on or before June 31, 2005. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. Electronic Filers: Comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1661A1.txt
            • presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set forth below, no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1). Persons making oral ex parte presentations must file a summary of the presentation, as set forth below, and deliver copies to the Commissioners or Commission employees involved with the presentation no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). All ex parte filings must be clearly labeled as such and must reference this Public
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1662A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1665A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1665A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1665A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1670A1.txt
            • approval. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is seeking comment on this waiver request in order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by the request. For ex parte purposes, this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before July 15, 2005 and reply comments on or before August 1, 2005. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1683A1.txt
            • The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room, CY-CB402, Washington, D.C., 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. , or call 1-800-378-3160. A copy of the submission may also be found by searching on the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) at http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs (insert CC Docket No. 87-124 into the Proceeding block).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-168A1.txt
            • Licensee Lead Call Sign II. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1691A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1691A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before July 18, 2005, and reply comments on or before August 2, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-26. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1692A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before July 18, 2005, and reply comments on or before August 2, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-27. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1697A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1697A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1697A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-171A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Howard Davenport, (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Roy Knowles or Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions, contact the Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as follows: Erin McGrath, Keith Harper, or
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1744A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the Mississippi Public Service Commission for Agreement with Redefinition of Service Areas
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-174A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sanford Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1508, TTY (202) 418-0484, or sanford.williams@fcc.gov. See In the Matter of Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and Order and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1767A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1768A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1769A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1769A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1782A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1782A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1816A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1868A1.txt
            • must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484, or Pam.Slipakoff@fcc.gov. See GTA Wireless, LLC Petition for Designation of an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1869A1.txt
            • also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0384, TTY (202) 418-0484, or Mika.Savir@fcc.gov. The following petitions were filed seeking a waiver of section 54.410(c)(2) and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1905A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before August 15, 2005 and reply comments on or before September 12, 2005. All filings related to this NPRM should refer to WC Docket No. 05-196. The Commission has incorporated the comments and ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1916A1.txt
            • the Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available. We now release the Verizon audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. Accordingly, comments are due no later than August 30, 2005. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1930A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1930A1.txt
            • Second Report and Order also directed NCTA and CEA to hold joint status meetings with the Commission to provide updates on the bidirectional negotiations. Second Report and Order, ¶ 34. The Commission will contact the parties to schedule these ex parte meetings, notice of which shall be filed by the parties in CS Docket No. 97-80. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). As of the date of this Public Notice, the Commission fully anticipates receiving OMB approval for the information collections prior to October 1, 2005. If, for any reason, the information collections will not be effective by October 1, 2005, the Commission will issue a public notice announcing a new deadline for the filing of the initial status reports. (...continued from
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1934A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-194A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Howard Davenport, (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Debbie Smith, Roy Knowles or Barbara Sibert, (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions, contact the Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as follows:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1952A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1952A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1952A1.txt
            • must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484, or Pam.Slipakoff@fcc.gov. See New York RSA 2 Cellular Partnership Petition for Designation as an
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1953A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1953A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1953A2.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Katie King at (202) 418-7491. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.719, 54.722; Darien Telephone Company, Inc., CC Docket Nos. 96-45 & 00-256, Request for Review of an Administrator Decision (filed May 2, 2005); Logan Telephone Cooperative, Inc., CC Docket Nos. 96-45 & 00-256, Request for Review of an Administrator Decision (filed May
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1978A1.txt
            • applications raise complex policy issues. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating IBFS Files Nos. SAT-MOD-20050301-0054 and SES-MOD-20050301-00261 as "permit-but-disclose". Accordingly, on July 7, 2005, the Satellite Division, Policy Branch granted the request and designated the applications as "permit-but-disclose." 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. Page 2 of 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2003A1.txt
            • loops (EELs). Third, the XO Coalition seeks forbearance from the UNE eligibility criteria, 47 C.F.R. § 51.318, as applied to EELs. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the XO Coalition's Petition for Forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2033A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2034A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2184A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Letter to Thomas Navin, FCC, from John Nakahata, Counsel for GCI, Request for Clarification
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2261A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before September 6, 2005, and reply comments on or before September 21, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-30. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2266A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. . Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification. The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires that an initial regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice and comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2272A1.txt
            • for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. However, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may modify the applicable ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this application proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2277A1.txt
            • with the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 CFR 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 CFR 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Christi Shewman, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2288A1.txt
            • it applies to competitive local exchange carriers that use unbundled local switching to provide service to residential customers eligible for federal or state Lifeline services. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Fones4All's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2289A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission for Agreement in Redefining the Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2314A1.txt
            • should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. and gary.seigel@fcc.gov. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Gina Spade, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). PUBLIC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2337A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Ron Kaufman of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7148. -FCC- In the Matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Review of Depreciation Requirements for Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers; United States Telephone Association's Petition for Forbearance from Depreciation Regulation of Price Cap Local Exchange Carriers, Report and Order in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2377A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2398A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form .'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2423A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Video Division, Media Bureau For service rule questions: Shaun Maher at (202) 418-2324 or Shaleim Henry at (202) 418-1600 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For legal questions: Lynne Milne at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Debbie Smith or Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2888 - FCC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2514A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2514A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Petition of the SBC ILECs for a Declaratory Ruling That UniPoint Enhanced Services, Inc. d/b/a PointOne and Other Wholesale Transmission Providers Are Liable for Access Charges (filed Sept. 21, 2005) (SBC Petition). This filing corrected and replaced an earlier petition that SBC had filed on September 19, 2005. Southwestern Bell Tel., L.P.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2529A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Randy Clarke of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1587. -FCC- In re: Separation of costs of regulated telephone service from costs of nonregulated activities; Amendment of Part 31, the Uniform System of Accounts for Class A and Class B Telephone Companies to provide for nonregulated activities and to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2670A1.txt
            • from John P. Janka, Counsel for Inmarsat Global Limited, to Donald Abelson, Chief, International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated Oct. 4, 2005. We find that designating the application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-PPL-20050926-00184 as "permit-but-disclose," effective October 5, 2005. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 3 of 3
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2675A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact David Siehl, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0680. -FCC- See Alltel Corporation Petition for Limited Waiver, CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed Sept. 30, 2005) (Alltel Petition). 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(g)(1)(v). See Alltel Petition at 6, 14. See id. at 7-8. See id. at 8-9. See id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2677A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2677A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2677A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact David Siehl, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0680. -FCC- See Sprint Nextel Corporation Request for Limited Waiver, CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed Sept. 29, 2005) (Sprint Nextel Request). 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(g)(1)(v). See Sprint Nextel Request at 6, 37. See id. at 2. See id. at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2678A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2678A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact David Siehl, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0680. -FCC- See Joint Petition of CTIA - The Wireless Association and the Rural Cellular Association for Suspension or Waiver of the Location-Capable Handset Penetration Deadline, CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed June 30, 2005) (CTIA/RCA Petition). 47 C.F.R. §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2680A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2680A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Petition for Declaratory Ruling of Grande Communications, Inc. Regarding Self-Certification of IP-Originated VoIP Traffic (filed Oct. 3, 2005) (Grande Petition). Grande Petition at 25. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11,322 (1998). If multiple docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-268A1.txt
            • Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties are also requested to send a courtesy copy of their comments via email to: gina.spade@fcc.gov and thomas.buckley@fcc.gov. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. A copy of this Public Notice will be sent by the Wireline Competition Bureau to the relevant state commissions. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-269A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Southern Communications Services, Inc., d/b/a Southern LINC Petition for Designation as an Eligible
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2709A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2709A1.txt
            • that competitive market forces in Anchorage will ensure that ACS's retail rates and practices remain just, reasonable and nondiscriminatory and that consumers will be protected. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of ACS's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2711A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2711A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2711A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Amy Bender, Office of the Bureau Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1500, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of RSA 7 Limited Partnership, Iowa 8 - Monona Limited Partnership, and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2712A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2712A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before November 14, 2005 and reply comments on or before December 12, 2005. All filings related to this FNPRM should refer to ET Docket No. 04-295. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2715A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2715A1.txt
            • including the five Intelsat Licensees. ex parte status of this proceeding pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and remind such parties that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2725A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 17, 2006 and reply comments on or before March 1, 2006. All filings related to this NPRM should refer to WC Docket No. 05-271 and need not reference the other docket numbers
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2727A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2727A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2727A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before November 16, 2005, and reply comments on or before December 1, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-33. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2728A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before November 16, 2005, and reply comments on or before December 1, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-34. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2760A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact David Siehl, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0680. -FCC- See Request for Limited Waiver, CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed Oct. 17, 2005) (Verizon Request). 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(g)(1)(v). See Verizon Request at iii, 31. See id. at 11-14. See id. at 17-19. See id. at 19-21.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2761A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact David Siehl, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0680. -FCC- See Petition for Limited Waiver of Nextel Partners, Inc., CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed Oct.17, 2005) (Nextel Partners Petition). 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(g)(1)(v). See Nextel Partners Petition at 4-5. See id. at i-ii. See id. at i,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-278A1.txt
            • specifically requests that the Commission issue a preemption order and assume jurisdiction over all unresolved issues and to arbitrate this matter in accordance with section 252(a)(2). This public notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of KMC's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-282A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-282A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-282A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Letter from E. Ashton Johnson, Counsel for Cass County Telephone Company, LLC, to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2890A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2890A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2890A1.txt
            • East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir , Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the American Cellular Corporation for Agreement in Redefining the Service Area
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2895A1.txt
            • 51.318, to the extent those rules require Qwest and other incumbent LECs to convert the existing special access circuits of SBC/AT&T and Verizon/MCI to UNEs. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Qwest's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2929A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact David Siehl, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0680. -FCC- See Request of Centennial Communications Corp. for Limited Waiver/Extension of Location-Capable Handset Penetration Deadline, CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed Nov. 3, 2005) (Centennial Request). 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(g)(1)(v). See Centennial Request at 4. See id. at 5-6.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2946A1.txt
            • East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. TracFone Wireless, Inc.'s Compliance Plan, CC Docket No. 96-45, filed October 11, 2005. TracFone
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2954A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2954A1.txt
            • Valley exchanges and the Plattsmouth and Murray exchanges served by ALLTEL Corporation (ALLTEL) in the state of Nebraska. All of the exchanges are in Nebraska. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Qwest's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2961A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2961A1.txt
            • electronic file on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. (insert CG Docket No. 03-123 into the proceeding block). . . -FCC- See Self Help for Hard of Hearing, Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, American Academy of Audiology,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2963A1.txt
            • E873954 SES-T/C-20051102-01506 Vyvx, LLC E000352 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and remind such parties that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2967A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact David Siehl, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0680. -FCC- See Petition for Limited Waiver and Brief Extension of Leap Wireless International, Inc., CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed Nov. 11, 2005) (Leap Request). Because November 11, 2005 was a Federal holiday, the Leap Request appears in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2975A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2975A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2975A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2984A1.pdf
            • area service between Qwest's exchanges in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota Metropolitan Calling Area and the Kilkenny, Minnesota exchange served by Frontier Communications of Minnesota, Inc. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Qwest's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2993A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2993A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact David Siehl, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0680. -FCC- See Qwest Wireless, LLC Request for Limited Waiver of Automatic-Location-Information-Capable Handset Penetration Requirements, CC Docket No. 94-102 (filed Nov. 15, 2005) (Qwest Request). 47 C.F.R. § 20.18(g)(1)(v). See Qwest Request at 1, 7. See id. at 2.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3000A1.txt
            • the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be sent to each of the following: ; phone: 1-800-378-3160; ; Gina Spade, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554; e-mail: gina.spade@fcc.gov. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Gina Spade, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7105 or TTY (202) 418-0484 . See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3001A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3001A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3001A1.txt
            • East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. The petitions seek to extend the relief provided by the Commission in Federal-State Joint
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3005A1.txt
            • East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir , Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See AllTell Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3008A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Margaret Dailey, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-2396, or via e-mail margaret.dailey@fcc.gov. - FCC - BellSouth Corporation Petition for Rulemaking to Change the Distribution Methodology for Shared Local Number Portability and Thousands-Block Number Pooling Costs (filed Nov. 3, 2005) (Petition). Petition at 1 (citing 47 C.F.R. §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3032A1.txt
            • 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432(tty). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the Bluegrass Wireless LLC, Kentucky RSA #3 Cellular General Partnership, Kentucky RSA
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3033A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3034A1.txt
            • 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432(tty). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the East Kentucky Network, LLC d/b/a Appalachian Wireless for Agreement with Redefinition
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3035A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3035A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3035A1.txt
            • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3036A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-307A1.txt
            • on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3102A1.txt
            • be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432(tty). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3131A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3142A1.txt
            • for compliance. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) seeks comment on this waiver request in order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by the request. For ex parte purposes, this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 4, 2006 and reply comments on or before January 19, 2006. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3151A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3153A1.txt
            • with the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Carol Simpson, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3158A1.txt
            • East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact James Bachtell, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. South Bay Cities Council of Governments, et al., Petition for Emergency Relief, filed November
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3159A1.txt
            • East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the Wisconsin RSA #4 Limited Partnership, Wausau Cellular Telephone Limited Partnership, Nsighttel
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3163A1.txt
            • they might be applied to Qwest's provision, on an integrated basis, of in-region, interstate domestic interexchange services or international interexchange services after December 12, 2006. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Qwest's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3165A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Petition of Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc. for Declaratory Ruling, 1-5 (filed Nov. 23, 2005) (Frontier Petition). Feature Group A calls require calling parties to input a seven-digit number, obtain dial tone from another carrier's switch, input a personal identification number, and then the telephone number of the called party. Frontier Petition
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3169A1.txt
            • Wireless Wisconsin L.L.C ITC-214-20050819-00333 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3174A1.txt
            • treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3177A1.txt
            • the pleadings filed thus far, OET concludes that in order to permit a fuller exchange on the important issues raised by the applications, the public interest would be served by classifying the instant experimental radio licensing proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" proceedings for ex parte purposes in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules and subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. In order to facilitate full, efficient, and timely consideration of the issues, OET encourages parties with common interests on the issues to work together and file joint submissions to the Commission whenever possible. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3179A1.txt
            • on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3180A1.txt
            • the Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available. We now release the BellSouth audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. Accordingly, comments are due no later than February 13, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3182A1.txt
            • with competitive LECs. Adoption of these practices will allow and encourage continued construction of facilities-based alternatives to ILEC loops by Fibertech and other competitive carriers. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Fibertech's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3185A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Ron Kaufman of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7148. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. § 160. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 32.23, 32.27, 64 Subpart I, 36, and 69 Subparts D and E. 47 U.S.C. § 220(a)(2). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-318A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before March 7, 2005, and reply comments on or before March 22, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing file numbers listed above. Comments in this proceeding may not be
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-319A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before March 7, 2005, and reply comments on or before March 22, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-9. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-320A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before March 7, 2005, and reply comments on or before March 22, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-10. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3216A1.txt
            • telecommunications options. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) seeks comment on this waiver request in order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by the request. For ex parte purposes, this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 17, 2006 and reply comments on or before January 30, 2006. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-323A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - July 1, 2004, Annual Access Charge Tariff Filings, WC Docket No. 04-372, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 04-277 (Nov. 30, 2004), errata, DA 04-4050 (WCB/Pricing, Dec. 23, 2004). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3252A1.txt
            • 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432(tty). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the Midwest Wireless Iowa, L.L.C., Partnership for Agreement with Redefinition of Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3253A1.txt
            • 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432(tty). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Request for Review by Mark Twain Communications Company of Decision of Universal Service Administrator,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3271A1.txt
            • carrier SCL-LIC-19990303-00004 TAT-14 Common carrier EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and remind such parties that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3285A1.txt
            • Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mika Savir, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Farmers Cellular Telephone, Inc. Petition to Amend Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Designated Areas in Alabama,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3288A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Randy Clarke of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1530, or randy.clarke@fcc.gov. - FCC - SMS/800 Client Support Bulletin re New Release 16.3 Features, Bulletin No. RLS-05-01, May 13, 2005. See Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, CC Docket No. 01-92, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-332A1.txt
            • International Enterprise, Inc. ITC-214-20021021-00502 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3339A1.txt
            • (OET) is reviewing the request and seeks comments from interested parties. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 30, 2006, and reply comments on or before February 14, 2006. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3346A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before January 30, 2006, and reply comments on or before February 14, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-36. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-3354A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1572. -FCC- See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 = y ³ Å
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-339A1.txt
            • label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. or call 1-800-378-3160. . . -FCC- See Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities, Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Dockets
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-342A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-342A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-342A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclosed proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or by calling 1-800-378-3160. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice) or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). This Public Notice can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-355A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Choice Communications LLC Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-389A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-389A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-389A1.txt
            • ITC-ASG-20041223-00509 Cingular Wireless LLC ITC-214-20011031-00547 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-389A1_Erratum.doc
            • ITC-ASG-20041223-00509 Cingular Wireless LLC ITC-214-20011031-00547 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-38A1.txt
            • provide extended area service between the Luling, Bastrop, Lockhart, and San Marcos exchanges in the state of Texas All of the exchanges are in Texas. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of BellSouth's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-412A1.txt
            • Filings and comments are also available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy Printing, Inc. 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Sheryl Todd at (202) 418-7386. Joint Petition for Supplemental Federal Universal Service Funds for Customers of Wyoming's Non-Rural Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier, by the Wyoming Public Service Commission
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-463A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 52.33(a)(1). 47 U.S.C. § 160 et seq. Petition of SBC Communications Inc. for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from the Application of the Five-Year Recovery Period for Local Number Portability Costs Under
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-464A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the RCC Minnesota, Inc., for Agreement with Redefinition of Service Areas of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-468A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the Wisconsin RSA #4 Limited Partnership, Wausau Cellular Telephone Limited Partnership, Nsighttel
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-469A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of the N.E. Colorado Cellular, Inc., for Agreement with Redefinition of Service Areas
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-470A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Mark Seifert, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Petition of South Bend Metronet, Inc., Centennial Randolph Cellular, LLC, Mega Comm, LLC and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-478A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-478A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before March 24, 2005, and reply comments on or before April 8, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing file number 05-13. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-488A1.txt
            • Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-490A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. - FCC - Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Price Cap Rules for Services Transferred from VADI to the Verizon Telephone Companies, WCB Pricing File No. 04-16, Order, 19 FCC Rcd 7095 (2004); see also 47 C.F.R. § 61.42(g).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-49A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Action by the Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. For further information, contact Jon Stover of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0390. See Implementation of the Pay Telephone Reclassification and Compensation Provisions Of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No.96-128, Petition of Independent Payphone Associatioin of New York, Inc. for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-502A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-502A1.txt
            • Nextel Communications, Inc. ITC-214-19970723-00428 V. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-506A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For legal questions: Lynne Milne, (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 or Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2888 Video Services Division, Media Bureau For service rule questions: Shaun Maher or Hossein Hashemzadeh at (202) 418-1600 - FCC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-509A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-509A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-509A1.txt
            • label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing (BCPI), Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. or call 1-800-378-3160. . . -FCC- See California Coalition of Agencies Serving the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Interoperability, CC Docket No. 98-67 and CG Docket No. 03-123, filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-535A1.txt
            • Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-548A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before April 4, 2005, and reply comments on or before April 19, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-12. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-593A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Randy Clarke of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1587. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-595A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-595A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Randy Clarke of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1587. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-606A1.txt
            • as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of these proceedings on persons not parties to waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat these cases as permit-but-disclose proceedings under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-617A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before April 7, 2005, and reply comments on or before April 22, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-19. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-618A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before April 7, 2005, and reply comments on or before April 22, 2005. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 05-18. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-656A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-656A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-656A1.txt
            • 0012-EX-TU-2005 AT&T Corp. WD2XIZ WD2XDQ EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-663A1.txt
            • Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sanford Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1508, TTY (202) 418-0484, or sanford.williams@fcc.gov. *** RNK, Inc. Petition for Limited Waiver of Section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-691A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-691A1.txt
            • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Streamlined Contributor
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-700A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-740A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-7353. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774 and 69.701 et seq. See BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Petition for Phase I Pricing Flexibility for Switched Services (filed Mar. 17, 2005). See id. § 1.774(e)(2)(i). Id. § 1.774(e)(2)(ii). Id. § 1.774(d). Id. § 1.774(e)(3). Id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-762A1.txt
            • Communications LLC KCL96, et al. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-79A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 69.606. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-87A1.txt
            • reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, Reference Information Center, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1009A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . By the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- The WCS Coalition is comprised of all but one of the licensees of Wireless Communications Services spectrum in the continental United States. Its members include: AT&T Inc., BellSouth Corporation, Comcast Corporation, NextWave Broadband Inc., NTELOS, Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation, Verizon Laboratories Inc., and WaveTel NC License
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1016A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For service rules questions: Erin McGrath or Michael Connelly (legal) or Keith Harper (technical), at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Roy Knowles or Barbara Sibert at (717) 338-2868
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1022A1.txt
            • subscriber access to video-on-demand and other interactive services. We seek comment on Comcast's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due June 15, 2006. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-7012-Z, and, in addition, to facilitate access to the pleadings filed pursuant to this Public Notice, all comments, oppositions, reply comments, and ex parte memoranda should refer to CS Docket No. 97-80 and must be submitted
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1025A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1025A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before June 12, 2006, and reply comments on or before June 27, 2006. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1048A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Action by the Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2350. - FCC - Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling Concerning Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. Tariff F.C.C. No. 1, WC Docket No. 04-424 (filed Oct. 27, 2004).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1061A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1061A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Action by the Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. For further information, contact Jennifer McKee of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1530. - FCC - Parties Asked to Refresh Record Regarding Reconsideration of Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers Fourth Report and Order and Access Charge Reform Second Report
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1062A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1062A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Action by the Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau. For further information, contact Jennifer McKee of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1530. - FCC - Verizon Telephone Companies Section 63.71 Application to Discontinue Expanded Interconnection Service Through Physical Collocation, WC Docket No. 02-237, Order, 18 FCC Rcd 22737 (2003) (Verizon Physical
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1182A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1184A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ted Burmeister at (202) 418-7389. - FCC - Iowa Telecom Petition for Interim Waiver of the Commission's Universal Service High-Cost Loop Support Mechanism, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed May 8, 2006) (Iowa Telecom Forbearance Petition); Iowa Telecom Petition for Interim Waiver of the Commission's Universal Service High-Cost Loop Support Mechanism, WC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-118A1.txt
            • entry on the Permitted List. ex parte status of this proceeding pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and remind such parties that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1190A1.txt
            • parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-2350. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1192A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel at (202) 418-0879. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. App. (defining ``study area''). See Request for Clarification filed by the National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc., and Petitions for Waiver Filed by Alaska Telephone Company, Ducor Telephone Company, and Kingsgate Telephone, Inc., Concerning the Definition of ``Study Area'' in the Part
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1245A1.txt
            • been assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20050509-00006. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1247A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. However, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may modify the applicable ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1254A1.txt
            • Satellite Ventures WD2XNL Subsidiary LLC EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1263A1.txt
            • relevant product market in the study area, and claims that robust facilities based competition will ensure that ACS's charges and practices are just and reasonable. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of ACS's Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-126A1.txt
            • Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available. We now invite comments on the AT&T audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. Accordingly, comments are due no later than March 27, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1279A1.txt
            • on the Commission's Internet website at http://www.fcc.gov. Permit-but-disclose proceeding. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties hereto, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat all proposals filed in response to this Public Notice as a single, permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to proposals, comments, or other issues involved herein will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-127A1.txt
            • on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1291A1.txt
            • defective and not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1302A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Randy Clarke of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1587. - FCC - Petition of AT&T Inc. for Forbearance, WC Docket No. 06-120 at 1 (filed June 2, 2006) (Petition) (citing 47 U.S.C. § 160(c); 47 C.F.R. § 1.53). Id. at 1; see also id. at 4 (citing 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1384A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureua at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1385A1.txt
            • the Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available. We now release the Qwest audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. Accordingly, comments are due no later than September 1, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS'') or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1394A1.txt
            • advanced services used in the provision of broadband Internet access service. AT&T further requests that this limited, interim waiver be granted on an expedited basis. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-139A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. This action is taken pursuant to Section 1.925(c)(i) of the Commission's Rules. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Borkowski, Assistant Division Chief for Spectrum Access, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 202-418-0626. - FCC - See Request for Waiver, WT Docket No. 05-326, filed May 19, 2005 (ATC Waiver Request). 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1421A1.txt
            • parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-2350. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1422A1.txt
            • Southern Minnesota, LLC KNKN282 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1423A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel at (202) 418-0879. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. Part 36 App. (defining ``study area''). 47 C.F.R. § 69.3(e)(11). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News Media
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1434A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Verizon's Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Rules to Treat Unrecovered Local Number Portability Costs as Exogenous Costs under Section 61.45(d), CC Docket No. 95-116, at 1 (filed July 6, 2006) (Petition) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 61.45(d)). Verizon seeks relief on behalf of ``the regulated, wholly owned subsidiaries of Verizon Communications Inc.''
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1440A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1440A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1440A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. Verizon Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.802(a) of the FCC's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Jul. 6, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1454A1.txt
            • its carriage of those signals. On July 7, 2006, Suddenlink filed an Opposition to Sinclair's Declaratory Ruling. By this Public Notice, we designate Sinclair's Declaratory Ruling as CSR 7039-C. On July 19, 2006, Suddenlink filed an Emergency Request for Designation as ``Permit-But-Disclose'' Proceeding, for Ex Parte Contacts, and Expedited Review (``Emergency Ex Parte Request'') requesting that the Commission designate Section 1.1206 ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte status for its Complaint, rather than ``restricted'' ex parte status pursuant to Section 1.1208 of the Commission's rules. Suddenlink asserts that this ex parte designation will allow informal discussions that will simplify and expedite a timely resolution of its Complaint. Also on July 19, 2006, Sinclair filed an Opposition to Suddenlink's Emergency Ex Parte Request arguing that
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1460A1.txt
            • and 47 C.F.R. § 1.87(a) (requiring such notification). Ex parte. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by the permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and remind such parties that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1461A1.txt
            • it anticipates that use of this number will still be required to provide emergency assistance to victims of hurricanes and other disasters. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the American Red Cross request. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1464A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1464A1.txt
            • Computer Inquiry rules to non-time division multiplex (non-TDM) based broadband transmission services offered by AT&T and other Bell Operating Companies. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Qwest and AT&T petitions for forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1468A1.txt
            • Utah Public Service Commission regarding arbitration of interconnection agreements with Qwest Corporation (Qwest). In its petition, Western Radio requests that the Commission preempt the jurisdiction of the Oregon Public Utility Commission regarding arbitration of interconnection agreements with Qwest. These matters shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1490A1.txt
            • Commission to grant BellSouth and similarly situated carriers forbearance from Title II and the Computer Inquiry rules to certain specified broadband services. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the BellSouth petition for forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1508A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1508A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Gorham Telephone Company, Inc., and Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules, CC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-150A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before February 24, 2006, and reply comments on or before March 13, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing file numbers listed above. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1510A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1510A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353 or Randy Clarke of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1587. - FCC- Letter from Tony Clark, Commissioner and Chair, NARUC Committee on Telecommunications, Ray Baum, Commissioner and Chair, NARUC Task Force, and Larry Landis, Commissioner
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1511A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1535A1.txt
            • exchange is located in the Bluefield, West Virginia Independent Market Area, and United's Bland Exchange is located in the Bristol-Johnson City, Tennessee Independent Marketing Area. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Verizon's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1542A1.txt
            • remain stranded and prolong the life of the 505 NPA. That NPA is projected to exhaust in the first quarter of 2009. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the New Mexico Commission request. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1545A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1545A1.txt
            • the transport component of their broadband services on a stand-alone basis and to take service themselves under the same terms and conditions. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Embarq petition for forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1560A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1561A1.txt
            • the public reference file for these applications, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1593A1.txt
            • 1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant applications. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Office of the Secretary no later than the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-15A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Kim Yee of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0805. -FCC- See RAO Letter 12, 3 FCC Rcd 2454 (Apr. 11, 1988); as revised, 3 FCC Rcd 4401 (July 20, 1988); further revised, 5 FCC Rcd 6783 (Oct. 23, 1990) (``2nd Revised RAO Letter 12''); Errata, DA 90-1507, rel.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1603A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form.'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1615A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1615A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. Universal Service Contribution Methodology, WC Docket Nos. 06-122 and 04-36, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, and 98-170, Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 06-94 (rel. Jun. 27, 2006)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1649A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1649A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1649A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before September 18, 2006, and reply comments on or before October 3, 2006. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1658A1.txt
            • 1-800-RED-CROSS and 1-888-RED-CROSS will ensure that those needing assistance in an emergency are not misdirected if they dial the incorrect number. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the American Red Cross supplemental request. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1664A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . News
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1671A1.txt
            • duplicate arguments previously filed in this docket and we urge commenters to focus their comments solely on issues unique to Frontier's petition. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Frontier petition for forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1692A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1733A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1733A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1733A1.txt
            • as parental controls, video-on-demand and other interactive services. We seek comment on Charter's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due September 18, 2006. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-7049-Z, and CS Docket No. 97-80 and must be submitted in CS Docket No. 97-80. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1734A1.txt
            • of the prohibition also would promote broadband deployment. We seek comment on Verizon's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due September 18, 2006. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-7042-Z, and CS Docket No. 97-80 and must be submitted in CS Docket No. 97-80. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1810A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1810A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1810A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Audio Services Division, Media Bureau For service rules questions: Lisa Scanlan or Tom Nessinger at (202) 418-2700 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For legal questions: Lynne Milne at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 or Linda Sanderson at (717) 338-2868 -
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1867A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before October 16, 2006, and reply comments on or before October 31, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 06-21. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1868A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before October 16, 2006, and reply comments on or before October 31, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 06-22. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1869A1.txt
            • is even more advanced than competition in the Omaha MSA, where the Commission granted in part a forbearance petition Qwest Corporation filed seeking similar relief. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Verizon's Petitions. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1878A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . By the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- APPENDIX A New York State Electric & Gas Corporation Extension Applications File Number Call Sign Radio Service Code Date Filed 0002652309 WPVF298 CP 06/15/2006 0002652310 WPVF314 CP 06/15/2006 0002652311 WPXN900 CP 06/15/2006 0002652312 WPZP559 CP 06/15/2006 0002652313 WPZP560 CP 06/15/2006 0002652314 WPZP561 CP 06/15/2006 0002652315 WPZW633
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1938A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1938A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1938A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before October 30, 2006, and reply comments on or before November 14, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 06-23. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1948A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1948A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1948A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1973A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1982A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1982A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1982A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - Letter from Daryl L. Hammond, Vice-President/Chief Financial Officer, Duo County Telephone Cooperative, Inc., to Albert Lewis, Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division, FCC (filed September 21, 2006). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1984A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 0.131, 0.331, and 27.1162 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.131, 0.331, 27.1162. For further information, contact Mary Woytek, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-2487. By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -FCC- See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Opens Filing Window for Proposals to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2005A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Petition for Waiver of Pricing Flexibility Rules for Advanced Communications Networks Services, WC Docket No. 06-187, Qwest Petition for Waiver to Allow It to Exercise Pricing Flexibility for Advanced Communications Networks Services Where the Commission Has Granted Relief for Other Special Access Services, at 1-2 (filed Sept. 22, 2006) (Petition). Petition at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2032A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before November 13, 2006, and reply comments on or before November 28, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 06-24. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2033A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before November 13, 2006, and reply comments on or before November 28, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 06-25. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2054A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel at 202-418-7400. - FCC - NECA 2007 Modification of the Average Schedule Universal Service High-Cost Loop Formula, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed August 30, 2006). 2007 Average Schedule Company Local Switching Support Formula, Universal Service Administrative Company, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Sept. 22, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2083A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2083A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2083A1.txt
            • dismiss Autotel's request for arbitration of an interconnection agreement with Citizens Utilities Rural Company, Inc. under section 252(b) of the Act as well as Autotel's request for termination of the rural exemption under section 251(f) of the Act. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2102A1.txt
            • expanded to permit operation by any entity eligible for licensing under the Part 90 regulations. In order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before November 24, 2006, and reply comments on or before December 8, 2006. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2247A1.txt
            • FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2257A1.txt
            • argues that waiver would not adversely impact the retail market for digital cable-ready devices. We seek comment on NCTA's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due November 30, 2006. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR 7056-Z, and CS Docket No. 97-80 and must be submitted in CS Docket No. 97-80. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2258A1.txt
            • 76.1204(a)(1) of the Commission's rules for all multichannel video programming distributors (including DBS providers). We seek comment on BendBroadband's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due November 30, 2006. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR 7057-Z, and CS Docket No. 97-80 and must be submitted in CS Docket No. 97-80. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2266A1.txt
            • Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SAT-STA-20061013-00119 XM Radio Inc. Request for Special Temporary Authority for 180 days. The application captioned above is an application for authority under Title III of the Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. In order to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2274A1.txt
            • on Mediacom's systems. In view of this and in order to assure the staff's ability to discuss and obtain the information needed to resolve these issues expeditiously, adoption of modified ex parte procedures is appropriate. We shall therefore treat Mediacom's Complaint and its Request for Interim Carriage as ``permit-but-disclose'' for ex parte purposes subject to the procedural requirements of Section 1.1206. The modified ex parte procedures permit both Mediacom and Sinclair to make ex parte presentations regarding any issue arising under Mediacom's Complaint or Request for Interim Carriage. Two copies of any written ex parte presentation made or, if oral, two copies of a written summary of such oral ex parte presentation, as well as a copy to the person or
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2279A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Petition for Reconsideration or, in the Alternative, Clarification by National LambdaRail, Inc., WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed Oct. 30, 2006) (Petition). Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, WC Docket No. 02-60, Order, FCC 06-144 (rel. Sept. 29, 2006). Id., paras. 2-3. Connection to Internet2 is not required, but may be requested by the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2280A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2280A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. NPCR, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.802(a) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed September 29, 2006). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2283A1.txt
            • treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2298A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For service rules questions: Erin McGrath or Michael Connelly (legal) or Dwain Livingston (technical), at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Roy Knowles or Lisa Stover at (717)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2317A1.txt
            • 20554 DA 06-2317 News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: November 16, 2006 MODIFICATION OF EX PARTE STATUS APPLICATION FILED BY OP LLC, LICENSEE OF WPYQ831 File No. 0002271317 By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau announces that, effective today, presentations in the above captioned proceeding are subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules. On August 9, 2005, OP LLC filed an application and related request seeking waiver of Section 27.50(f)(1), which specifies a peak 2 kW Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP) limit for fixed and base station operations in the 1670-1675 MHz band. OP LLC's application and waiver request are restricted for ex parte purposes under Section
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2322A1.txt
            • See Motion to Designate Proceeding as Permit-But-Disclose, filed by Inmarsat Global Limited (November 14, 2006). No oppositions to the change in status have been filed. The issue raised in this application addresses complex technical, legal, and policy issues. On November 16, 2006, the Satellite Division, Policy Branch, granted Inmarsat's request and designated the application as "permit-but-disclose." 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the merits of this application. SAT-STA-20061107-00132 Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. The application captioned above was accepted for filing in a separate public notice today. As an application for authority under Title III of the Communications Act, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2329A1.txt
            • 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. All ex parte filings and contacts associated with the petitions for exemption listed below in CG Docket No. 06-181 shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings. See id. Further, any petition filed in this docket in the future also will be subject to permit-but-disclose treatment for ex parte purposes. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be permitted but must
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2360A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Deena Shetler of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- Request for Declaratory Rulings, WCB Docket No. 06-210, Internal File No. CCB/CPD 96-20 (filed Sept. 27, 2006). See Request for Declaratory Rulings at 1. Combined Companies, Inc., et al. v. AT&T Corp., No. 95-908 (WGB), Order at 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2367A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. See Petition of Cingular Wireless, LLC for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the Commonwealth of Virginia, CC Docket 96-45, filed November 7, 2006. See also 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). We note that Cingular
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2369A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gina Spade or Alexander Minard, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Petition for the Clarification of Waiver of E-Rate Rules Concerning State Replacement Contracts Under the Schools and Libraries
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2371A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gina Spade or Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Schools and Libraries Universal Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, E-Rate Central Petition for the Clarification or Waiver of E-Rate Rules Concerning the Disposal of Equipment Purchased Under the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2372A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See SRT Communications, Inc., and North Dakota Telephone Company, Petition of Local Exchange Carriers for Waiver of ``Study Area'' Boundaries as defined in Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 in connection with a Proposed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2373A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2373A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-238A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For service rules questions: Peter Corea at (202) 418-2487 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For legal questions: Scott Mackoul at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2888 - FCC - AWS is the collective term used for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2437A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For service rules questions: Allen Barna (legal) at (202) 418-0620 or Gary Devlin (technical), at (717) 338-2618 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Debbie Smith or Barbara Sibert at (717)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2475A1.txt
            • all emissions to the -41.3 dBm/MHz level at 3 meters is met. In order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by the waiver and petition for rulemaking the proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2490A1.txt
            • parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- Verizon's Petition to Treat Unrecovered Local Number Portability Costs as Exogenous Costs under Section 61.45(d) or, in the Alternative, for Limited Waiver of the End-User Common Line Caps in Section 69.152, CC Docket No. 95-116, at 1 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2507A1.txt
            • request, SAMHSA states that it has been informed that the suicide prevention numbers could be disconnected by January 8, 2007, and therefore seeks expedited treatment. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of SAMHSA's request. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2529A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2531A1.txt
            • the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding and/or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance, and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2543A1.txt
            • and human resources from [its] effort to deliver new and improved services'' without furthering the Commission's goals under Section 629. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due January 8, 2007. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-7078-Z, and CS Docket No. 97-80 and must be submitted in CS Docket No. 97-80. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2546A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before January 16, 2007, and reply comments on or before January 31, 2007. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 06-26. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2547A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2547A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2547A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before January 16, 2007, and reply comments on or before January 31, 2007. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 06-27. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2559A1.txt
            • system resources such that the quality of AMPS provided, in terms of geographic coverage and traffic capacity, is fully adequate to satisfy the concurrent need for AMPS availability.'' 47 C.F.R. § 22.901(b)(2). Petition at 10-13. Id. at 18-22. The Petition indicates that ADT is installing approximately 10,000 digital cellular radios each month. Id. at 13. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See ``Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Id. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2565A1.txt
            • assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20061129-00017. V. ex parte status of this proceeding pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and remind such parties that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2575A1.txt
            • Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SAT-STA-20061114-00138 XM Radio Inc. The application captioned above was accepted for filing in a separate public notice today. See Public Notice, Space Station Applications Accepted for Filing (Report No. SAT 00407, released December 22, 2006). As an application for authority under Title III of the Communications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2589A1.txt
            • Fax-On-Demand 202/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Released: December 22, 2006 MODIFICATION OF EX PARTE STATUS WT Docket No. 05-7 File Nos. 0002720030, 0002786879, 0002786917, 0002786920, 0002786925, 0002786933, 0002786940, 0002786969, 0002786981, 0002786987, 0002827513, and 0002851157 By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau announces that, effective today, presentations in the above-captioned proceedings are subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules. On October 13, 2006, the Commission released an order in WT Docket No. 05-7, granting in part and denying in part a request for declaratory ruling filed by QUALCOMM Incorporated (Qualcomm) regarding the interference protection requirements applicable to the 700 MHz Band. Specifically, the Commission declared that Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2617A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-2625A1.txt
            • Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266, Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 4775, 4783 ¶22 (2003) (Second Tribal Lands Order). Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266, Third Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 17652, 17656 ¶8 (2004) (Third Tribal Lands Order).. See www.fcc.gov/indians/. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See ``Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Id. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-26A1.txt
            • provide expanded local calling service between AT&T's Nacogdoches exchange and the Pine Hill exchange served by Eastex Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Both exchanges are in Texas. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-295A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572, or by e-mail at Douglas.Slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - Policy and Rules Concerning the Interstate, Interexchange Marketplace; Implementation of Section 254(g) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, CC Docket No. 96-61, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 9564
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-310A1.txt
            • parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-2350. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-32A1.txt
            • in the record and because the Puerto Rico Board has no legal obligation to maintain PRTC's proposed April 7, 2006 date to effectuate the tariff. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of TLD's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-333A2.txt
            • 12/31/06 3060-0944 Review of Commission Consideration of Applications Under the Cable Landing License Act Pending OMB Approval 3060-0945 Sec. 79.2 01/31/07 3060-0947 Sec. 101.1327 02/28/07 3060-0948 Noncommercial Educational Applicants 06/30/07 3060-0949 FCC 159-W 10/31/06 3060-0950 Extending Wireless Telecommunications Services to Tribal Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266 06/30/07 3060-0951 Service of Petitions for Preemption, 47 CFR Sec. 1.1204(b) Note, and Sec. 1.1206(a) Note 1 01/31/07 3060-0952 Proposed Demographic Information and Notifications, CC Docket Nos. 98-147 and 96-98 01/31/07 3060-0953 Wireless Medical Telemetry Service, ET Docket No. 99-255 04/30/07 3060-0955 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service Reports 02/28/07 3060-0957 Wireless Enhanced 911 Service 11/30/07 3060-0960 Secs. 76.122, 76.123, 76.124 and 76.127 05/31/08 3060-0962 Redesignation of the 18 GHz Frequency Band, Blanket Licensing of Satellite
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-353A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. - FCC - Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Price Cap Rules for Services Transferred from VADI to the Verizon Telephone Companies, WCB Pricing File No. 05-17, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 8900 (2005); see also 47 C.F.R. § 61.42(g).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-376A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact: Auctions and Spectrum Access Division: For legal questions: Brian Carter at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 or Barbara Sibert at (717) 338-2888 -- FCC -- The spectrum consists of an uplink band at 849-851 MHz and a downlink band at 894-896 MHz. 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-377A1.txt
            • permit-but-disclose proceedings. Based on the record, OET concludes that in order to permit a fuller exchange on the important issues raised by the application, the public interest would be served by classifying the instant experimental radio licensing proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for ex parte purposes in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules and subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. In order to facilitate full, efficient, and timely consideration of the issues, OET encourages parties with common interests on the issues to work together and file joint submissions to the Commission whenever possible. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-387A1.txt
            • electronic file on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. (insert CG Docket No. 03-123 into the proceeding block). . . -FCC- See Communication Service for the Deaf, Petition for Clarification on Spanish VRS, CG Docket No. 03-123, filed February 6, 2006. Telecommunications Relay
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-388A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For service rules questions: Erin McGrath or Richard Arsenault (legal) or Dwain Livingston (technical), at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660, or Linda Sanderson
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-3A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For service rules questions: Erin McGrath or Richard Arsenault (legal); or Jay Jackson or Moslem Sawez (technical) at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For legal questions: Brian Carter at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-488A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1572. -FCC- See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 7 B G S
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-49A1.txt
            • and promote broadband access and competition. Further, UPLC avers that the Commission can issue a declaratory ruling based on the existing record in several proceedings. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of UPLC's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-528A1.txt
            • Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). In addition, one courtesy copy of each pleading must be sent to each of the following: ; . Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard Lerner, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-530A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before April 5, 2006, and reply comments on or before April 20, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 06-12. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-531A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before April 5, 2006, and reply comments on or before April 20, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 06-13. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-534A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-534A1.txt
            • LECs. Specifically, TWC argues that competitive LECs selling telecommunications services on a wholesale basis are telecommunications carriers and are entitled to interconnection under Section 251. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of TWC's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-535A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-535A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-535A1.txt
            • the Commission issue an order preempting the South Carolina Public Service Commission's decision and directing it to grant TWC the CPCN for which it applied. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of TWC's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-54A1.txt
            • 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432(tty). Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Amy Bender, Office of the Bureau Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1500, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Petition of RSA 7 Limited Partnership, Iowa 8 - Monona Limited Partnership,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-590A1.txt
            • effectively without regard to section 272, and the Commission's rules governing compliance with section 272, and the Commission's network disclosure rules (47 C.F.R. §§ 51.325-51.335). This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-5A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-5A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-5A1.txt
            • to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be sent to each of the following: ; phone: 1-800-378-3160; ; . Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Gina Spade, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7105 or TTY (202) 418-0484. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-600A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before April 14, 2006 and reply comments on or before May 15, 2006. All filings related to this NPRM should refer to CC Docket No. 96-115. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-618A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Randy Clarke of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1587. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. § 272. See Petition of Verizon For Interim Waiver of Certain Dominant Carrier Regulations for In-Region, Interexchange Service, WC Docket No. 06-56 (filed Feb. 28, 2006). See Petition of Verizon For Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-64A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 /
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-666A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-666A1.txt
            • to provide expanded local calling service between AT&T's Paris exchange and the Talco exchange, served by Peoples Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Both exchanges are in Texas. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-778A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Petition of AT&T Inc. for a Waiver to Treat Certain Local Number Portability Costs as Exogenous Costs Under Section 61.45(d), CC Docket No. 95-116 (filed Mar. 31, 2006) (Petition) at 1 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 61.45(d)). Id. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-780A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Persons making written ex parte presentations may file them using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Written ex parte presentations filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed in a single docket.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-787A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-787A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before May 4, 2006, and reply comments on or before May 19, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 06-16. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-788A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before May 4, 2006, and reply comments on or before May 19, 2006. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing 06-17. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-7A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form .'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-800A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-800A1.txt
            • 47 C.F.R. §1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant applications. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Office of the Secretary no later than the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-808A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-808A1.txt
            • to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Petition, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-811A1.txt
            • asserts that these Commission requirements could inhibit planning for and responding to a disaster on an integrated basis and, therefore, requests that they be waived. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Verizon's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-812A1.txt
            • BellSouth seeks the same relief sought by AT&T in its petition for an STA and waiver of the Commission's rules filed on March 10, 2006. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-81A1.txt
            • Frontier is entitled to begin competing in Ben Lomand Coop's territory pursuant to the terms of an interconnection agreement filed and approved by the TRA. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Frontier's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-825A1.txt
            • time communications links can be restored. Petitioners urge the FCC to modify its rules to promote access to multiple technologies before another widespread emergency arises. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-837A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-837A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353. - FCC - AT&T Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 61.42(g) of the Commission's Rules and Request for Expedited Treatment, WCB/Pricing File No. 06-18, at 1-2 (filed April 7, 2006) (AT&T Waiver petition); see also 47 C.F.R. § 61.42(g).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-839A1.txt
            • from the Pooling Administrator to be used in conjunction with a trial of ENUM technology within the Country Code 1 North American Numbering Plan. This Public Notice establishes the procedural requirements relating to consideration of ENUM LLC's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-854A1.txt
            • Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Gary Remondino, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-C143, Washington, D.C. 20554. His email address is gary.remondino@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-2298. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Mary McManus, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, mary.mcmanus@fcc.gov, (202) 418-1713. See In the Matter of Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-856A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-856A1.txt
            • Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY). In addition, one courtesy copy of each pleading must be sent to each of the following: ; . Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Jeremy Marcus, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. Cellular Network Partnership d/b/a Pioneer Cellular Petition for Waiver of Deadline in 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-859A1.txt
            • policy issues. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Satellite Division concludes that the public interest will be served by designating File Nos. SAT-MOD-20050926-00182 and SAT-MOD-20050927-00186 (Call Sign S2651) as "permit-but-disclose" Accordingly, on April 12, 2006, the Satellite Division, Policy Branch, granted the request and designated the applications as "permit-but-disclose". 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of applications. Page 1 of 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-863A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-863A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2350. - FCC - Hawaiian Telecom Inc. Petition for Waiver of the Price Cap Rules, WCB/Pricing File No. 06-19, at 1-2 (filed April 11, 2006) (HTI Waiver Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g), 61.38, and 61.49. A list
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-902A1.txt
            • disclosure rules. Moreover, Qwest seeks relief from additional statutory and Commission requirements that could inhibit integrated disaster planning and response consistent with the Verizon petition. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Qwest's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-903A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-903A1.txt
            • high capacity loops and transport, and line sharing in Georgia based on the record in the state proceeding the GPSC attached to its petition. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the GPSC's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-904A1.txt
            • Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. KA2XAC EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-906A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-906A1.txt
            • educational entities. We request public comment on the issues raised by this filing. We are assigning this proceeding a Commission docket number, MB 06-92, in order to facilitate filing public comment. Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.§ 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-947A1.txt
            • assigned File No. ISP-PDR 20060404-00005. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-962A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-962A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-964A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-964A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-967A1.txt
            • by phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. We believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1, 1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, please contact Mr.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-968A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-989A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-989A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353. - FCC- Petition of Core Communications, Inc. for Forbearance under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from Rate Regulation Pursuant to § 251(g) and for Forbearance from Rate Averaging and Integration Regulation Pursuant to § 254(g), WC Docket No. 06-100, at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-997A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Audio Services Division, Media Bureau For service rules questions: Lisa Scanlan or Tom Nessinger at (202) 418-2700 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For legal questions: Lynne Milne at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Linda Sanderson or Debbie Smith at (717) 338-2868 - FCC - ``FM
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-99A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Mr. Thomas Eng, Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0019, TTY (202) 418-7233, or via email to Thomas.Eng@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Request for Waiver and 90.545 Engineering Study, dated Oct. 19, 2005, filed by the State of New York on Nov. 1, 2005 (Waiver Request). ``Downstate New York''
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1001A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1001A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1001A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 1.106. Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, CC Docket Nos. 96-262 and 94-1, Sixth Report and Order, Low-Volume Long Distance Users, CC Docket No. 99-249, Report and Order,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-100A1.txt
            • non-U.S.-licensed satellites that have been allowed to enter the U.S. market pursuant to the DISCO II procedure, which includes the public interest analysis, would qualify for removal from the Section 214 Exclusion List under this proposal. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comments: Interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings concerning matters referenced in the Public Notice should refer to DA 07-100 and IB Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-100A1_Erratum.doc
            • non-U.S.-licensed satellites that have been allowed to enter the U.S. market pursuant to the DISCO II procedure, which includes the public interest analysis, would qualify for removal from the Section 214 Exclusion List under this proposal. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comments: Interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings concerning matters referenced in the Public Notice should refer to DA 07-100 and IB Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-102A1.txt
            • Ø DA 07-102 January 18, 2007 MODIFICATION OF EX PARTE STATUS OF PENDING PETITIONS FOR WAIVER OF HEARING AID COMPATIBILITY REQUIREMENTS WT Docket No. 01-309 By this Public Notice, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau announces that, effective today, presentations in connection with the petitions for waiver listed in the attached appendices are subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements set forth in § 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules. These petitions all seek waivers of obligations or deadlines imposed under the Commission's hearing aid compatibility rules. More specifically, the petitions addressed by this Public Notice fall into three categories: (1) Petitions for extension of September 16, 2005 deadline: Eighteen petitions were filed in 2005 seeking an extension of the September 16, 2005 deadline
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-103A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Christina Clearwater or Peter Trachtenberg, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-1310. Letter from Smith and Mendelson, Counsel for Hand Held Products, Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WT Docket No. 01-309, filed Apr. 28, 2006 (Request). Request at 1. Id. Id. Hand Held provides the following description
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1079A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1079A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1079A1.txt
            • public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or call
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1080A1.txt
            • regarding the public reference file for this application, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject application will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or call the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1122A1.txt
            • assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20070130-00002. VII. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1188A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). For further information, please contact Erika Olsen, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Erika.Olsen@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2868. -FCC- See Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, WC Docket No. 02-60, Order, 21 FCC Rcd 11111 (2006) (``Rural Health Care Pilot Program Order''); See also, Order
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-120A1.txt
            • for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed on December 20, 2006. We find that designating the application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20061206-00144 as "permit-but-disclose," effective January 18, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 3 of 3
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1239A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erika Olsen, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Promoting Deployment and Subscribership in Unserved and Underserved Areas, Including Tribal and Insular Areas, CC Docket No. 96-45, Twelfth Report and Order, Memorandum Opinion and Order,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1241A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1241A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1241A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erika Olsen, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Lifeline and Link-Up, WC Docket No. 03-109, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 8302 (2004) (Lifeline/Link-Up Report and Order). Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1242A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- 1995 Annual Access Tariffs, GTE Telephone Operating Companies, GTE System Telephone Operating Companies, Order Designating Issues for Investigation, CC Docket No. 96-5, Transmittal Nos. 963, 146 (CCB rel. Jan. 23, 1996). The Common Carrier Bureau became the Wireline
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-127A1.txt
            • phones, and the impact of the HAC requirements on cochlear implant and middle ear implant users and their ability to use digital wireless phones. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment On Topics To Be Addressed In Hearing Aid Compatibility Report,'' Public Notice, WT 06-203, DA 06-2285, 2006 Westlaw 3245734 (F.C.C.) (WTB rel. Nov. 8, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See ``Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Id. at § 1.1206(b). - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-127A1_Erratum.doc
            • phones, and the impact of the HAC requirements on cochlear implant and middle ear implant users and their ability to use digital wireless phones. See ``Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment On Topics To Be Addressed In Hearing Aid Compatibility Report,'' Public Notice, WT 06-203, DA 06-2285, 2006 Westlaw 3245734 (F.C.C.) (WTB rel. Nov. 8, 2006). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See ``Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Id. at § 1.1206(b). - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1304A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Letter from David Sieradzki, Counsel to Alltel Communications, Inc., to Marlene Dortch, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 97-100 (filed Feb. 21, 2007); see also The Commission Seeks Comment Regarding
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1314A1.txt
            • England Telephone Operations Inc. KCK72 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1327A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erika Olsen, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Genesis Petition for Declaratory Rulings, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 16, 2000) (Petition). Genesis Communications International, Inc. v. Pacific Bell, E-98-20, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 12697 (2000). See NECA
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1376A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353. -FCC- AT&T Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 61.42(g) of the Commission's Rules and Request for Expedited Treatment, WCB/Pricing File No. 07-08, at 1-2 (filed March 12, 2007) (AT&T Waiver Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. § 61.42(g). A copy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1424A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1424A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. See Missouri RSA No. 5 Petition for FCC Agreement to Redefine the Study Area of Four Rural Telephone Companies in Missouri, CC Docket No. 96-45, (filed March 12, 2007). 47 C.F.R. § 54.207(b); see also
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1435A1.txt
            • This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding and/or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance, and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1470A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before May 7, 2007, and reply comments on or before May 21, 2007. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 07-09. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1560A1.txt
            • FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1561A1.txt
            • FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1571A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1571A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. See Northwest Missouri Cellular Limited Partnership Petition for FCC Agreement to Redefine the Study Area of Three Rural Telephone Companies in Missouri, CC Docket No. 96-45, (filed March 19, 2007). 47 C.F.R. § 54.207(b); see
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-158A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition of Cingular Wireless, LLC for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Georgia, CC Docket 96-45, filed December 7, 2006; see also 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). Cingular
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1612A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1612A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - Petition of Fairpoint Communications, Inc., for Waiver of Sections 61.41(b) and (c) of the Commission's Rules (filed Feb. 21, 2007) (Fairpoint Petition). 47 C.F.R. § 61.41(b) and (c) (the all-or-nothing rule would require that Fairpoint convert
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1614A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. - FCC - Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. Petition for a Waiver of Section 61.42(g) of the Commission's Price Cap Rules for Advanced Services Formerly Offered by Verizon Hawaii, Inc., WCB/Pricing File No. 07-12, at 1-2 (filed March 29, 2007)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1651A1.txt
            • Communications Act, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 1 of 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1708A1.txt
            • Communications Act, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 1 of 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1716A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1716A1.txt
            • CTA? Should the Commission consider additional criteria? Does the current level of preemption affect compliance with the CTA and Congressional intent? In what other ways are licensees complying, or not, with the CTA and the Commission's rules related to children's programming? Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1741A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1741A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1741A1.txt
            • or Eliminate Outdated Rules Affecting the Cellular Radiotelephone Service and Other Commercial Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 01-108, Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 18401, 18406 ¶8, and 18409-18412 ¶¶13-17 (2002) (``Analog Sunset Order''), Order on Reconsideration, 19 FCC Rcd 3239 (2004). Analog Sunset Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 18406 ¶8, and 18414-18419 ¶¶22-30. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See ``Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Id. at § 1.1206(b). DA 07-1741 PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 /
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1741A1_Erratum.doc
            • or Eliminate Outdated Rules Affecting the Cellular Radiotelephone Service and Other Commercial Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 01-108, Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 18401, 18406 ¶8, and 18409-18412 ¶¶13-17 (2002) (``Analog Sunset Order''), Order on Reconsideration, 19 FCC Rcd 3239 (2004). Analog Sunset Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 18406 ¶8, and 18414-18419 ¶¶22-30. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See ``Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Id. at § 1.1206(b). DA 07-1741 PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 /
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1791A1.txt
            • application. Upon review of the applications and the pleadings filed, OET concludes that to permit a fuller exchange on the important issues raised by the above filings, the public interest would be served by classifying the instant proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for ex parte purposes in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules and subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1798A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1798A1.txt
            • the local access and transport area (LATA) boundary to provide expanded area service (``EAS'') between its Leesville and Florien exchanges. Both exchanges are in Louisiana. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1846A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Alexander Minard, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. See Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Petition for Clarification and/or Waiver of E-rate Rules Concerning Technology Plan Creation and Approval Under the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1848A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1848A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1848A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition of Alenco Communications, Inc., Big Bend Telephone Company, Dell Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Riviera Telephone Company, Valley Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Texas Statewide Telephone Cooperative, Inc., and Texas Telephone Association for Declaratory
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-18A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. See American Cellular Corporation Petition for Agreement with Redefinition of the Service Area of Certain Rural Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers in the State of Minnesota, CC Docket No. 96-45, (filed Dec. 21, 2006). 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1947A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-1947A1.txt
            • however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant applications. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission Secretary no later than the next business
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2005A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2005A1.txt
            • of their broadcast day. How do home shopping stations meet their public interest obligations? In particular, how do they comply with the requirements of the Children's Television Act of 1990 and licensees' obligation to provide coverage of issues facing their communities? Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2059A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before June 18, 2007, and reply comments on or before July 2, 2007. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 07-14. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2066A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2066A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2066A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. and American Cellular Corporation Petition for Agreement with Redefinition of the Service Areas of Certain Rural Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers in the State of Oklahoma, CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2067A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2067A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2067A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Margaret Dailey of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- Petition for Declaratory Ruling of Interior Telephone Company, Inc., WC Docket No. 07-102 (filed May 3, 2007). Id. (citing 47 C.F.R. § 51.715). See id. at 4-5, 18. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-209A1.txt
            • the two petitions in a consolidated proceeding. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the BridgeCom International, Inc. et al. Petition for Rulemaking and Clarification, and the XO Communications et al. Petition for Rulemaking. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2108A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Thomas Buckley or Gregory Guice, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Eureka Broadband Corporation Petition for Reconsideration of Order Compelling Overpayment of USF Funding Obligation, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Apr. 13, 2007) (Eureka Petition); Value-Added Communications, Inc. Petition for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2110A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gina Spade or Karen Johnson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition for Clarification or, in the Alternative, Waiver of Section 54.514(a) of the Commission's Rules by AT&T Corp., Schools and Libraries Universal Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, State
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2112A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2124A1.txt
            • 47 C.F.R. §1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant applications. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission Secretary no later than the next business
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2143A1.txt
            • presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set forth below, no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1). Persons making oral ex parte presentations must file a summary of the presentation, as set forth below, and deliver copies to the Commissioners or Commission employees involved with the presentation no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). All ex parte filings must be clearly labeled as such and must reference this Public
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2168A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2169A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2170A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2171A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2172A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2173A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2174A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2186A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2187A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2188A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2189A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2192A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2193A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2193A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2193A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2197A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact John Branscome of the Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, at (202) 418-8205. - FCC- APPENDIX Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (the ``RFA''), the Commission has prepared this Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') of the possible significant economic impact of the proposal described
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2257A1.txt
            • ISP-PDR-20070405-00006. IX. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if it finds that the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2291A1.txt
            • over Internet Protocal (VoIP) providers is more advanced than it was in the Omaha MSA in 2005, when the Commission adopted the Omaha Order. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Qwest Petitions. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2320A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. and American Cellular Corporation Petition for Agreement with Redefinition of the Service Areas of Certain Rural Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers in the State of Oklahoma, CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2344A1.txt
            • of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, DA 06-2329 (rel. Nov. 21, 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-235A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-235A1.txt
            • than blocks of ten thousand, would utilize existing numbering resources that would otherwise remain stranded and prolong the life of the 270 NPA. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Kentucky PSC's request. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2518A1.txt
            • order to determine compliance with the general emissions limits in Section 15.209(a). In order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by the waiver and petition for rulemaking the proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2597A1.txt
            • 63-64. Amendment of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, PR Docket No. 92-257, 17 FCC Rcd 227 (2001). See Applications for Equipment Authorization of Universal Shipborne Automatic Identification Systems to be Coordinated with U.S. Coast Guard to Ensure Homeland Security, Public Notice, 17 FCC Rcd 11983 (OET 2002). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2652A1.txt
            • Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any action on this application. S2243 SAT-LOA-19970605-00050 DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, INC. The above-captioned application seeks authority under Title III of the Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2684A1.txt
            • phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this Request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Unless otherwise provided, requests for declaratory ruling of the Commission's Rules are subject to treatment by the Commission as permit-but-disclose proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Accordingly, this Request will be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2698A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Qwest Corporation and El Paso County Telephone, Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Mar.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2699A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Allband Communications Cooperative, Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.611 and 36.612 and Associated Provisions of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Sept. 5, 2006) (Allband Petition); 47 C.F.R. §§
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2700A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, CC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2701A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Thomas Buckley or Gregory Guice, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 U.S.C. § 201(b), 202(b); Petition of Oblio Telecom, Inc. for a Declaratory Ruling that AT&T's Refusal to Honor Oblio Telecom, Inc.'s Proof of Exemption from Pass-Through USF Charges and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2714A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2714A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2714A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates listed on the first page of this Public Notice. All filings related to the Notice should refer to PS Docket No. 07-114 and WC Docket No. 05-196. Comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2760A1.txt
            • 47 C.F.R. §1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant applications. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission Secretary no later than the next business
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-276A1.txt
            • of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, DA 06-2329 (rel. Nov. 21, 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-278A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2794A1.txt
            • subject to streamlined treatment. IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2843A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Centennial Communications Corp. Request for Review and, in the Alternative, Request for Waiver, and Request to Suspend Recovery, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 00-256 (filed May 25, 2007) (Request for Review). Id. at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2862A1.txt
            • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in paragraphs 4-6, supra. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-289A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2916A1.txt
            • 47 C.F. R. § 76.1204(a)(1), CS Docket No. 97-80, CSR 7116-Z (filed March 5, 2007); Comments of the Consumer Electronics Association on RCN Corporation Request for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 76.1204(a)(1), CS Docket No. 97-80, CSR 7113-Z (filed March 5, 2007). We find that CEA has not shown good cause to accept its late-filed comments. Thus, pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, we will treat the comments filed by CEA on March 12, 2007 as an ex parte presentation. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. ACA Comments in CSR-7112-Z at 3, Motorola Comments in CSR-7112-Z at 1-2. ACA Comments in CSR-7112-Z at 5. Motorola Comments in CSR-7112-Z at 4. Id. at 5. CEA ex parte in CSR-7112-Z at 1. Id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2924A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . By the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- APPENDIX A Jamestown Manufacturing Corporation Extension Applications File Number Call Sign Market Code Market Description Channel Block 0003079448 WPVF942 BEA001 Bangor, ME CC 0003079449 WPVF943 BEA001 Bangor, ME CH 0003079450 WPVF944 BEA002 Portland, ME CE 0003079451 WPVF945 BEA002 Portland, ME CN 0003079452 WPVF946 BEA003 Boston-Worcester-Lawrence-Lowell-Brockton, MA-NH-RI-VT
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2978A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Sprint Spectrum L.P. for a Declaratory Ruling that the Kansas Corporation Commission's October 2, 2006 Order in Docket 06-GIMT-446-GIT, violates federal law, WC Docket Nos. 03-109 and 07-138, filed June 8,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2985A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-2985A1.txt
            • also seek factual information beyond that provided in the Request concerning the specific design and operation of each of these Internet sales programs. We are assigning this proceeding a Commission docket number, MB 07-137, in order to facilitate filing public comment. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3068A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3068A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Rural ILECs Petition for Revocation of Sprint/Nextel's ETC Designation in Virginia or, Alternatively, Motion to Show Cause, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed June 4, 2007) (Petition). Id. at 1-2. Id. at 11-15.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-306A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). If multiple docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the caption of a
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3094A1.txt
            • or Eliminate Outdated Rules Affecting the Cellular Radiotelephone Service and Other Commercial Mobile Radio Services, WT Docket No. 01-108, Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 18401, 18406 ¶8, and 18409-18412 ¶¶13-17 (2002) (``Analog Sunset Order''), Order on Reconsideration, 19 FCC Rcd 3239 (2004). Analog Sunset Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 18406 ¶8, and 18414-18419 ¶¶22-30. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See ``Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Id. at § 1.1206(b). - PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3145A1.txt
            • however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant applications. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission Secretary no later than the next business
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3147A1.txt
            • public reference file for this waiver request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1355. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or call
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3190A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before August 15, 2007, and reply comments on or before August 30, 2007. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 07-15. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3191A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before August 15, 2007, and reply comments on or before August 30, 2007. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 07-16. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3194A1.txt
            • parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- Petition for Waiver of Pricing Flexibility Rules for Specialized Network Services at 1-2 (filed July 2, 2007) (Petition). Id. at 2-4. Id. at 2 (citing SBC Communications Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 61.42 of the Commission's Rules,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3285A1.txt
            • Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Gary Remondino, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-C143, Washington, D.C. 20554. His email address is gary.remondino@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-2298. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, marilyn.jones@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2357. See In the Matter of Numbering Resource Optimization, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3332A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Alan Feldman of the Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0940. -FCC- See Petition of AT&T Inc. for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from Enforcement of Certain of the Commission's ARMIS Reporting Requirements, WC Docket No. 07-139 (filed June 8, 2007). The petition seeks relief for the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3359A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3359A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3359A1.txt
            • of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3388A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3388A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3388A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - Letter from Richard D. Adams, Executive Vice President/General Manager, Brazos Telephone Cooperative, Inc., to Albert Lewis, Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Federal Communications Commission (dated May 30, 2007); Jim Whitefield, Executive Vice President & General Manager, Cap
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3404A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3404A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3404A1.txt
            • Cellular Systems, Inc. ITC-214-20031113-00514 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3405A1.txt
            • § 1. 1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant application. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations to be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission's Secretary no later than the next
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3415A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For service rules questions: Erin McGrath (legal) or Keith Harper (technical) at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 or Lisa Stover at (717)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3467A1.txt
            • would offer wholesale access to dedicated facilities on reasonable terms and conditions once released from the legal mandate of section 251(c) has proven incorrect. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the McLeodUSA Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A1.txt
            • Press inquiries should be directed to Mary Diamond, Media Bureau, at (202) 418-2388. TTY: (202) 418-7172 or (888) 835-5322. PROCEDURAL MATTERS This proceeding (MB Docket No. 06-121) has been designated ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3497A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3500A1.txt
            • sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capital Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington D.C. 20554. Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3542A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before September 10, 2007, and reply comments on or before September 24, 2007. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 07-17. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3543A1.txt
            • the Mirando City exchange, served by Valley Telephone Cooperative, Inc., and AT&T's Laredo exchange to provide expanded local calling service. Both exchanges are in Texas. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3544A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Qwest Corporation Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed May 21, 2007) (Petition); 47 C.F.R. Part
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3602A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(6). Petition of NEP Cellcorp, Inc. to Be Designated as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed June 7, 2007). NEP Cellcorp should provide copies of its
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3635A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Pattersonville Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 54.904(d) Carrier Certification for Interstate Common Line Support, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed August 8, 2007). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3639A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Alexander Minard, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, WC Docket Nos. 02-60, 03-109, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 02-6, Order, 20 FCC Rcd 16883 (2005) (Katrina Relief Order). Some of the provisions in the Katrina
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3640A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before September 17, 2007, and reply comments on or before October 1, 2007. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 07-18. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-365A1.txt
            • public interest because it would continue to foster the development of broadband services and provide consumers truly competitive choices in the marketplace. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Lightpath petition for forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3738A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Paperwork Reduction Act This order designating issues for investigation contains no new or modified information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. Law 104-13. ORDERING CLAUSES IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 201(b), 203(c), 204(a), and 403 of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 201(b), 203(c),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3789A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Thomas Buckley or Gregory Guice, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Application for Review by American Cyber Corp., Coleman Enterprises, Inc., Inmark, Inc. d/b/a Preferred Billing, Lotel, Inc. d/b/a Coordinated Billing, and Protel Advantage, Inc. (ACC et al.), CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3790A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Decatur Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of the Section 54.904(d) Interstate Common Line Support Self-Certification Filing Deadline, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed August 23, 2007). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3791A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Triangle Communication System, Inc. Petition for FCC Agreement to Redefine the Study Areas of Two Rural Telephone Companies in Montana, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed August 16, 2007) (Petition). 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3809A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3809A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Thomas Buckley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Jurisdictional Separations and Referral to the Federal-State Joint Board, CC Docket No. 80-286, Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 11382, 11387-88, para. 9. (2001). Jurisdictional Separations and Referral to the Federal-State Joint
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3923A1.txt
            • is critical that the Commission act quickly on Qwest's petition to afford Qwest the same regulatory relief under which Verizon currently operates.'' This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Qwest petition for forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3949A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3949A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Alan Feldman of the Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0940. -FCC- See Petition of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of the Commission's ARMIS and 492A Reporting Requirements Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c), WC Docket No. 07-204 (filed September 13, 2007). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 43.21(a),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3950A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3972A1.txt
            • Corp. ITC-214-19930829-00248, ITC-214-19920318-00117, ITC-MOD-20051007-00445, ITC-214-20051031-00443 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and remind such parties that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-39A1.txt
            • for ports and a correspondingly higher number of cancellations of changes of service. Petitioners argue that this frustrates Congressional and Commission intent by discouraging competition. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of Petitioners' petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4032A1.txt
            • must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20554. Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4086A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4086A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See USCOC of Greater Missouri, Inc. d/b/a U.S. Cellular Petition for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in Missouri, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Sept. 18, 2007)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4093A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Dixie-Net Communications Inc. IAS filing for 289003, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Sept. 10, 2007); see also 47 C.F.R. § 54.802. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4095A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4095A1.txt
            • this forbearance so that it may offer a new enhanced directory assistance service to its wireline customers through an alternative dialing sequence, *ATT (*288). This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the AT&T Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4150A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4173A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Company and Qwest Corporation Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4174A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 (voice) or 202-418-0484 (TTY). - FCC - NECA 2008 Modification of the Average Schedule Universal Service High-Cost Loop Formula, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Aug. 28, 2007). 2008 Average Schedule Company Local Switching Support Formula, Universal Service Administrative Company, CC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4178A1.txt
            • the compact disc. The label should also include the following phrase "Disc Copy - Not an Original." Each compact disc should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send compact disc copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4192A1.txt
            • assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20070928-00012. V. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-41A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before February 26, 2007 and reply comments on or before March 12, 2007. All filings related to this Ninth NPRM should refer to PS Docket No. 06-229 and WT Docket No. 96-86. Comments may
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4212A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4212A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4212A1.txt
            • government functions in expediting the implementation of the GMDSS. The membership includes over 1,500 representatives of government agencies, commercial vessel owners and operators, recreational vessel interests, training institutions, service agents, manufacturers, trade associations and maritime labor organizations. Petition to Request the FCC Adopt New Policies and Procedures Regarding MMSI Assignments (filed May 29, 2007) (Request). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4354A2.txt
            • Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers, Low-Volume Long Distance Users, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service 03/31/10 3060-0943 Sec. 54.809 10/31/09 3060-0944 Review of Commission Consideration of Applications Under the Cable Landing License Act 03/31/09 3060-0949 FCC 159-W 03/31/10 3060-0950 Bidding Credits for Tribal Lands, WT Docket No. 99-266 09/30/10 3060-0951 Sec. 1.1204(b) Note, and Sec. 1.1206(a) Note 1 01/31/10 3060-0952 Proposed Demographic Information and Notifications, CC Docket Nos. 98-147 and 96-98 01/31/10 3060-0953 Wireless Medical Telemetry Service, ET Docket No. 99-255, FCC 00-211 04/30/10 3060-0955 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service Reports 02/28/10 3060-0957 Wireless Enhanced 911 Service 11/30/07 3060-0960 Secs. 76.122, 76.123, 76.124 and 76.127 05/31/08 3060-0962 Redesignation of the 18 GHz Frequency Band, Blanket Licensing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4362A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by United States Cellular Corporation for FCC Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in the State of Nebraska, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Oct. 9, 2007)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4363A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - The Community Cable Television Agency of O'Brien County d/b/a The Community Agency and TCA Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Universal Service Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Oct. 10, 2007); 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4372A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4372A1.txt
            • been assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20071001-00013. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4393A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4393A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-443A1.txt
            • TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4453A1.txt
            • the provisioning of a new mid-span meet point between Autotel's facilities and a central office of Central Telephone Company - Nevada, d/b/a Sprint of Nevada (now, Embarq) pursuant to section 252(b) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. § 252(b). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4540A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4540A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Texas RSA 8 South Limited Partnership d/b/a Westex Wireless Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.307(c)(2), 54.802(a), and 54.903(a), CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Oct. 26, 2007); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.307(c)(2), 54.802(a), and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4575A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Parties making
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4592A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4592A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4592A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 54.209. Saddleback Communications Petition for Waiver to Allow Filing of Supplemental Data Two Days Late, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Oct. 16, 2007). Gila River Telecommunications, Inc. Petition for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4606A1.txt
            • operating room, and that operation typically would never exceed six minutes for any single measurement period. In order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by this waiver request, it will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4617A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Marvin Sacks, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at marvin.sacks@fcc.gov. -FCC- Petition of the Embarq Local Operating Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from the Contract Tariff Filing Requirements of the Pricing Flexibility Rules, WC Docket No. 07-258, at 2 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4686A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. -FCC- COMPTEL Petition for Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 06-125 (filed Nov. 13, 2007) (COMPTEL Petition); see also In the Matters of Petition of AT&T Inc. for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C.§160(c) from Title II
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-470A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before March 5, 2007, and reply comments on or before March 20, 2007. All such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing file numbers listed above. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4710A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4710A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4710A1.txt
            • Holdings Company LLC WPWU948 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4719A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Triangle Communication System, Inc. Petition for FCC Agreement to Redefine the Study Areas of Two Rural Telephone Companies in Montana, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed August 16, 2007) (Petition). 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4739A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4739A1.txt
            • dispatch emergency services. Now, SAMHSA requests that the temporary assignment be made permanent to ensure the continuous operation of these numbers as public resources. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the SAMHSA petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4788A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by Hargray Wireless, LLC For Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Area of a Rural Telephone Company in the State of South Carolina, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 19,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4790A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - CC Cellular Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c)(4) Line Count Certification for CETC Universal Service Funding, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 11, 2007); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.307(c)(4). See Electronic Filing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4873A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Osirus Communications, Inc., Petition for Waivers of the Commission's Rules to Participate in NECA Pools and Tariffs and to Obtain Accelerated USF Support, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Oct. 2, 2007) (Petition).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4884A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4902A1.txt
            • ITC-T/C-20071102-00453 Unicom, Inc. ITC-214-19960116-00009 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4908A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4908A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4908A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. -FCC- Emergency Petition for a Declaratory Ruling of Time Warner Telecom Inc., WC Docket No. 06-125 (filed Nov. 21, 2007) (TWTC Petition); see also In the Matters of Petition of AT&T Inc. for Forbearance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4924A1.txt
            • electronic file on the CD-Rom. The label should also include the following phrase "CD-Rom Copy - Not an Original." Each CD-Rom should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send CD-Rom copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-492A1.txt
            • presentations altogether. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, we find that this proceeding should be treated for purposes of the ex parte rules as a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Therefore, presentations regarding the Application (as well as any additional applications for this spectrum that may be filed in the future) will hereinafter be subject to the provisions of § 1.1206 governing permit-but-disclose proceedings. Specifically, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Application will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b). Parties making oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-493A1.txt
            • of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, DA 06-2329 (rel. Nov. 21, 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with New Life Empowerment Temple's petition for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-494A1.txt
            • of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, DA 06-2329 (rel. Nov. 21, 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with Young Warriors International Inc.'s petition for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4982A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4982A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4982A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - TracFone Wireless, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Delaware for the Limited Purpose of Offering Lifeline Service to Qualified Households, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-4983A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance of Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Dec. 5, 2007) (Virgin Mobile Forbearance Petition); Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-499A1.txt
            • 47 U.S.C. §§ 251(c), 271(c), and from otherwise regulating Qwest as an incumbent local exchange carrier in the Terry, Montana local exchange. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Qwest Petition for Forbearance. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5002A1.txt
            • the assignment of these numbers. In conjunction with this Public Notice, we are adopting an order extending the original reassignment for 90 days. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of KBHC's Application for Review. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5008A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5008A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5008A1.txt
            • regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (20) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). To request
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5022A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Melissa Kirkel, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1580, or via e-mail at Melissa.Kirkel@fcc.gov. -FCC- 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.2010(b), (c), (e), (f). Sprint Nextel Corporation Petition for Limited Waiver, CC Docket No. 96-115, WC Docket No. 04-36 (filed Dec. 3, 2007) (Sprint Nextel Petition); see also Implementation of the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5029A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5029A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. -FCC- Feature Group IP Petition for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from Enforcement of 47 U.S.C. § 251(g), Rule 51.701(b)(1), and Rule 69.5(b), WC Docket No. 07-256 (filed Oct. 23, 2007) (Feature
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5032A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5033A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Alan Feldman of the Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0940. -FCC- See Petition of Embarq Local Operating Companies for Forbearance from Enforcement of the Commission's ARMIS Reporting Requirements Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c), WC Docket No. 07-204 (filed October 19, 2007). Id. at 1 n.2 (``These
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5034A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Alan Feldman of the Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0940. -FCC- See Petition of Verizon for Forbearance from Enforcement Under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) From Enforcement of Certain of the Commission's Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements, WC Docket No. 07-273 (filed November 26, 2007). Id. at Attachment 1.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5050A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5064A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5064A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5064A1.txt
            • be purchased from BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b) and must
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5092A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5092A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5092A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See USCOC of Greater Missouri, LLC d/b/a U.S. Cellular Petition for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in Missouri, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed September 18, 2007)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5093A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Allo Communications Petition for Waiver of Filing Deadline, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 30, 2007); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.802. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-5094A1.txt
            • within Glacier and Pondera Counties. 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110(f)(3)(vii). See Ronan Telephone Company Request for Waiver and Extension of Time of Tribal Land Bidding Credit Construction Requirement for a Lower 700 MHz Band Licensee, Order, WT Docket No. 06-231, 22 FCC Rcd 972 (WTB MD 2007) (Ronan Order). File No. 0003233506 (filed Nov. 16, 2007). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See ``Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-513A1.txt
            • call is handled by a human receptionist or an interactive-voice response (IVR) system. APCC urges the Bureau to dismiss the Petition. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Petition and Motion to Dismiss. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-542A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - Letter from Bill C. Colston, Jr., President/General Manager, Riviera Telephone Company, Inc., to Albert Lewis, Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division, FCC (filed January 17, 2007). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-543A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - Letter from Jamey Wigley, General Manager, Central Texxas Telephone Cooperative, Inc., to Albert Lewis, Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division, FCC (filed January 17, 2007). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-637A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-637A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-637A1.txt
            • the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-642A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. and American Cellular Corporation Petition for Agreement with Redefinition of the Service Areas of Certain Rural Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers in the State of Oklahoma, CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-693A1.txt
            • Communications Act and is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 1 of 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-709A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-709A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-709A1.txt
            • of ``telecommunications carrier'' in the context of a wholesale service provider. Virgin Islands, 198 F.3d at 926 (citing Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 843 (1984)). Nebraska Commission Comments at 7-8. The Nebraska Commission argues that the Petition effectively seeks to preempt state or local regulatory authority. As such, pursuant to Note 1 in section 1.1206(a) of the Commission's rules, the Nebraska Commission asserts that TWC is required to serve the original petition on the state ``the actions of which are specifically cited as a basis for requesting preemption.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a) Note 1 to Paragraph. (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 07-709 Federal Communications Commission DA 07-709 + 6 @ R m · ¹ ½
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-70A1.txt
            • parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-729A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-729A1.txt
            • transmitters, e.g., the transmitters would be available only to law enforcement organizations. In order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by the waiver and petition for rulemaking the proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-730A1.txt
            • 0002892513 Bachow/Coastel LLC KNKA412 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-731A1.txt
            • parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520. - FCC - The affiliates include: Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated, Michigan Bell
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-736A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-736A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-736A1.txt
            • Notice, to the extent that M2Z asks for forbearance to accept the Application for filing, that portion of the Forbearance Petition is moot. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the M2Z Forbearance Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Specifically, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one-or
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-799A1.txt
            • parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Price Cap Rules for Services Transferred from VADI to the Verizon Telephone Companies at 1 (filed Feb. 9, 2007) (Petition). Petition at 3. Petition at 1 (orders cited therein). Petition at 1-2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-812A1.txt
            • of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it would be in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, DA 06-2329 (rel. Nov. 21, 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-819A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-819A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - Letter from Joan Johnson, Chief Financial Officer, Big Bend Telephone Company, Inc., to Albert Lewis, Acting Chief, Pricing Policy Division, FCC (dated January 17, 2007). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-872A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-872A1.txt
            • market in the rest of the United States. We seek comment on Liberty's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due March 19, 2007. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-7124-Z, and, in addition, to facilitate access to the pleadings filed pursuant to this Public Notice, all comments, oppositions, reply comments, and ex parte memoranda should refer to CS Docket No. 97-80 and must be submitted
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1010A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1010A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Ascent Media Group of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 8, 2008) (Request for Review). See Request for Review at Attach. (Letter from
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1027A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact James Brown, Mobility Division,Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (717) 338-2621, or via email at james.brown@fcc.gov. By the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- See Request of Progeny LMS, LLC For Waiver and Limited Extension of Time, filed May 1, 2008 (Waiver Request), Universal Licensing System applications 0003422772 - 0003422999 inclusive and 0003423004
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-102A1.txt
            • land test equipment is the most appropriate description of the MPRT-500. See Aviation Data Systems (Aust) Pty Ltd., Order, 22 FCC Rcd 1603, 1606 ¶ 10 (WTB MD 2007). The instant request is a modification of the previous request, and is intended to address concerns that led to the denial of that request. See id. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1040A1.txt
            • (2008), in which the Court affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part the Commission's 2006 Memorandum Opinion and Order relating to a petition filed by the American Bird Conservancy, the Forest Conservation Council, and the Friends of the Earth. Presentations made in connection with WT Docket No.08-61 will be subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements set forth in § 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules. Specifically, under the Commission's rules, the Commission's proceeding on remand is subject to treatment by the Commission as restricted for ex parte purposes under § 1.1208 of the Commission's rules, unless otherwise provided. Because this proceeding implicates broadly applicable policy issues, we find, pursuant to Note 2 to § 1.1208 and consistent with §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1060A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1060A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1060A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Kansas Corporation Commission Petition for Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 08-55 (filed Apr. 16, 2008) (Petition). Petition at 1 (citing USCOC of Nebraska/Kansas v. Kansas Corp. Commission, Case No. 07-2527-JAR (D. Kan.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1077A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1077A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1077A1.txt
            • C.F.R. §§ 2.106, 90.103(c)(21), 97.303(f). Non-Government radiolocation stations are secondary to both Government radiolocation stations and amateur stations. Commenters supporting the waiver request should address what service and technical rules should be waived, and should also consider whether the proposed operations require a waiver of the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations, 47 C.F.R. § 2.106. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1078A1.txt
            • application must be filed as a Petition to Deny.'' The Infrastructure Coalition further provides, as Appendix A to its petition, its proposed rule changes. We seek comment on the Infrastructure Coalition's Petition for Expedited Rulemaking. We designate the proceeding, for ex parte purposes, as "permit-but-disclose" in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b). Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before the date indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1087A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1087A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1087A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Joseph Levin, Spectrum & Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-0640. See In the Matter of Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Telephones, Petitions for Waiver of Section 20.19 of the Commission's Rules, WT Docket 01-309, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 3352 (2008). The related licensees
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1144A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by Qwest Communications International, Inc. of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 03-109 (filed Apr. 25, 2008) (Qwest Petition). (retrieved Apr. 30, 2008). See Qwest Petition
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1148A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. - FCC - Petition of TON Services, Inc. for Declaratory Ruling on a Primary Jurisdiction Referral, CC Docket No. 96-128, at 1 (filed May 2, 2008). Id. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1159A1.txt
            • or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). . . Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b) and must
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1172A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - iBroadband Networks, Inc., d/b/a Cedar Valley Communications Section 54.314 of the Commissions Rules Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Apr. 29, 2008); 47 C.F.R. § 54.314. HTC Services Inc. Petition
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1173A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Kingsgate Telephone, Inc., Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules (filed Mar. 12, 2008) (ETS Request); M&L Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1174A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Dubois Telephone Exchange, Inc. and Qwest Corporation, Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules (filed Mar. 12, 2008) (Petition); 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1175A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. and Qwest Corporation Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, Sacred Wind Communications, Inc. related
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1194A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . See Service Rules for the 698-746, 747-762 and 777-792 MHz Bands, WT Docket No. 06-150, Implementing a Nationwide, Broadband, Interoperable Public Safety Network in the 700 MHz Band, PS Docket No. 06-229, Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 08-128 (rel. May 14, 2008) (Second Further Notice). Service Rules for the 698-746, 747-762 and 777-792
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1203A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. Petition for Limited Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in North Carolina, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Apr. 29, 2008) (Virgin Mobile North Carolina Petition); Virgin Mobile USA,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1217A1.txt
            • 1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant application. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Office of the Secretary no later than the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-121A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Texas RSA 1 Limited Partnership DBA XIT Wireless Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c)(1) Applicable to the Line Count Submission Applicable to Interstate Common Line Support, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Dec.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1230A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Curt F. Pawlisch, Fort HealthCare - Fort Memorial Hospital, Fort HealthCare - Lake Mills Clinic, and Fort HealthCare - Whitewater Clinic, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1253A1.txt
            • the Commission's rule by establishing placement preferences and height restrictions that prevent the Petitioner from obtaining a signal. Northridge Farms is located in Crestwood, Kentucky. This Public Notice announces the pleading cycle for this Petition during which responses and replies may be filed. For purposes of our ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules (``Permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before July 2, 2008 and replies on or before July 17, 2008. Please place the case identifier, CSR-7925-O, on all filings. An original and two copies of all filings should be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-125A1.txt
            • information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-130A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by United States Cellular Corporation for FCC Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in the State of Nebraska, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Oct. 9, 2007)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1312A1.txt
            • For further information regarding the public reference file for the Waiver Request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Waiver Request, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-131A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.309 and 54.313(d)(vi) of the Commission's Rules (filed Dec. 31, 2007) (Petition). Petition at 1. Id. Id. at 4, 23. See Electronic Filing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1361A1.txt
            • comments on the Verizon/Qwest Request on or before 14 days after publication in the Federal Register and reply comments on or before 24 days after publication in the Federal Register. All pleadings should reference WC Docket No. 07-21. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1365A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Michael O'Connor, Lake Delton Urgent Care, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed May 28, 2008) (Lake Delton Request for Review); Letter from Michael
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-139A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-139A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by Sagebrush Cellular, Inc. for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in the State of North Dakota Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1402A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1402A1.txt
            • published in the Federal Register on June 12, 2008. As a result, comments on the Verizon/Qwest Request are due June 26, 2008, and reply comments are due July 7, 2008. All pleadings should reference WC Docket No. 07-21. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1425A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Northwest Iowa Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 54.301(e)(1) Submission Date For True-Up 2006 Local Switching Support Data, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed June 6, 2008); 47 C.F.R. § 54.301(e)(1). See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-142A1.txt
            • Alaska DigiTel, LLC KNLF297 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1477A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1477A1.txt
            • Holdings, LLC (sublessee) L000000255 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1481A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1481A1.txt
            • assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20080613-00012. V. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1482A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1482A1.txt
            • boundary between the Tilden exchange, served by Valley Telephone Cooperative, Inc., and AT&T's Pleasanton exchange to provide expanded local calling service. Both exchanges are in Texas. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of AT&T's petition. This matter shall be treated as ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-151A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Tim Stelzig, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0942. -FCC- Embarq Petition for Waiver of Deadline, WC Docket No. 07-244, CC Docket No. 95-116 (filed Jan. 11, 2008) (Embarq Petition). See Telephone Number Requirements for IP-Enabled Services Providers; Local Number Portability Porting Interval and Validation Requirements; IP-Enabled Services; Telephone
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1548A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1562A1.txt
            • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in paragraph 3, above. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1567A1.txt
            • 51.223(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 51.223(b). The CIT petition requests that the Commission issue an order and rule declaring that CIT shall be treated as the incumbent LEC in the Channel Islands, California telephone exchange. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1570A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. Petition for Limited Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed June 3, 2008). Id. at 1. See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1574A1.txt
            • complete list of licenses. II. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1578A1.txt
            • persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426 (voice), (202) 418-7365 (TTY), or send an e-mail to access@fcc.gov. For further information, contact Mr. Jim Shaffer of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-0687, james.shaffer@fcc.gov. Action by the Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 80.1011. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1583A1.txt
            • Commission. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Gary Remondino, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-C143, Washington, D.C. 20554. His email address is gary.remondino@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-2298. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, marilyn.jones@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2357. - FCC - Letter to Dana R. Shaffer, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Nancy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1613A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Waiver of the Universal Service Contribution True-Up Methodology of Sage Telecom, Inc. (Filer 499 ID 819036) and Sage Telecom of Texas, L.P. (Filer 499 ID 826362), WC Docket No. 06-122
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1641A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Achieve Telecom Network of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed May 5, 2008) (Request for Review). Id. at Att. A (Letter from Universal Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1646A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1659A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1659A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1659A1.txt
            • ISP-PDR-20080618-00013. IX. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if it finds that the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1694A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1694A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1694A1.txt
            • we will require parties to file ex parte disclosures in CS Docket No. 97-80 and to announce that the Commission will place the above captioned waiver request and the record it has generated to date in CS Docket No. 97-80 as well. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding is treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1715A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1715A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1715A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1725A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1725A1.txt
            • parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg, Attorney Advisor, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520. - FCC - See Petition of AT&T Inc. for Interim Declaratory Ruling and Limited Waivers, WC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1732A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1732A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1732A1.txt
            • the Commission direct the North American Numbering Plan Administrator to assign additional telephone numbers in the 603 area code where Level 3 meets the industry guidelines of 75 percent utilization and six months or less until projected exhaust. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1744A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1744A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of NEP Cellcorp, Inc. to Amend Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Pennsylvania, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed July 17, 2008) (NEP Amendment Petition). High-Cost Universal Service Support,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-178A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-178A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas Alexander, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - TracFone Wireless, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the District of Columbia for the Limited Purpose of Offering Lifeline Service to Qualified Households, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1816A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2357 or Ben Childers, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1418. -FCC- See Letter from John Manning, Director -- NANPA to Dana R. Shaffer, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (June 9, 2008). . See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-181A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by USCOC of Greater Missouri, LLC d/b/a U.S. Cellular for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in the State of Missouri Pursuant to 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1826A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1826A1.txt
            • AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance Order. Comments filed in response to this Public Notice that go beyond its scope, such as comments addressing the merits of granting forbearance relief to AT&T in the first instance, will not be considered. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1839A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by Mid-Communications, Inc. dba HickoryTech of Decision by Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed June 18, 2008). Id. at 1. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1846A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1846A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1846A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Victoria Goldberg, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at victoria.goldberg@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Petition for Waiver of Embarq Local Operating Companies of Sections 61.3 and 61.44-61.48 of the Commission's Rules, and any Associated Rules Necessary to Permit it to Unify Switched Access Charges Between Interstate
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1855A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Greg Guice, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0095 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by IDT Corporation and IDT Telecom, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed June 30, 2008) (IDT Request for Review). Id. at 8-11. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1867A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before September 8, 2008, and reply comments on or before September 23, 2008. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 08-18. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1875A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1875A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1875A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Greg Guice, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Request for Review by InterCall, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, FCC 08-160 (rel. June 30, 2008) (InterCall Order). Petition for Partial Reconsideration and Clarification
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1885A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Emergency Review and Waiver of Airband Communications, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed July 23, 2008) (Request for Review and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1894A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1894A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1894A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of United States Cellular Corporation to Amend Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Tennessee, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Aug. 6, 2008) (U.S. Cellular Amendment Petition). High-Cost Universal
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-18A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. -FCC- Consolidated Communications Petition for Conversion to Price Cap Regulation and for Limited Waiver Relief, WC Docket No. 07-291 (filed Dec. 4, 2007) at 1. Id. Id. at 8. Id. Id. at 9. Id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1901A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1901A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1901A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1913A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1913A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1913A1.txt
            • to Clarify Provisions of Section 332(c)(7)(B) to Ensure Timely Siting Review and to Preempt under Section 253 State and Local Ordinances that Classify All Wireless Siting Proposals as Requiring a Variance, Petition for Declaratory Ruling, WT Docket No. 08-165, filed July 11, 2008 (Petition). 47 U.S.C. § 253(a). Petition at iii. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1924A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1924A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1924A1.txt
            • treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1940A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1940A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1942A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1942A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1942A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Greg Guice, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0095 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Compass Global, Inc. Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator and Request for Initiation of an Investigation into the Policies and Procedures of the Universal Service Administrative Company in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1954A1.pdf
            • H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated August 8, 2008 ("Letter Request"). On August 18, 2008, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated the matter as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. The Satellite Division finds that designating this matter as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the issues raised. See 47 C.F.R. §6 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the Letter Request. Page 1 of 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1970A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1970A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Greg Guice, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0095 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Emergency Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision by Level 3, LLC, ICG Telecom Group, Inc., Looking Glass Networks, Inc., Looking Glass Networks of Virginia, Inc., Progress Telecom, LLC, and Wiltel
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-19A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2018A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Matt Warner or Tim Stelzig, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1580, TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Implementation of the NET 911 Improvement Act of 2008, WC Docket No. 08-171, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 08-195 (rel. Aug. 25, 2008) (NET 911 Act NPRM). 73 Fed. Reg. 50741 (Aug.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2035A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2035A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2035A1.txt
            • timely fashion. Petitioners argue that the Commission failed to take certain facts and arguments into account in the Fifth 706 Report, including that ``nearly all the commercially available broadband services in the U.S. are highly asymmetric one-way technologies.'' This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2038A1.txt
            • the Commission's rules. In its petition, Intrado requests that the Commission preempt jurisdiction of the Virginia State Corporation Commission in order to arbitrate pending interconnection issues between Intrado and Verizon South Inc. and Verizon Virginia Inc. (collectively, Verizon). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2048A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2048A1.txt
            • 403 Inquiry (Sept. 2, 2008). We seek comment on PPMC's petition. Ex parte Information. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Filing Information. Comments are due September 24, 2008 and reply comments are due October 6, 2008. All filings should refer to and must be submitted in MB Docket No. 08-187. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments may
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2059A1.txt
            • regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). To request
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2080A1.txt
            • leased access of cable channels. We seek comment on MAP's Request. Ex parte Information. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Filing Information. Comments are due September 24, 2008 and reply comments are due October 1, 2008. All filings should refer to and must be submitted in MB Docket No. 07-42. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments may
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2089A1.txt
            • On September 12, 2008, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated this matter as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Satellite Division concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose." See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any action on this application. S2764 SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 Skynet Satellite Corporation On September 12, 2008, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated this matter as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Satellite
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2097A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2102A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition for Waiver and Relief of E-Rate Rules on Behalf of Victims of Iowa Storms and Floods, CC Docket No. 02-6 (filed Aug. 22, 2008) (Iowa Petition). Iowa Petition at 3. Id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2103A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0700 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Emergency Review of CTE Telecom, LLC of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Aug. 18, 2008). See id. at 2-9, 11. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2104A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0700 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Timothy K. Bachert, CFO, NextGen Telephone, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket Nos. 96-45and 97-21 (filed Aug. 21, 2008) (Request for Review). See Request for Review
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2105A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0700 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Hayneville Fiber Transport, Inc. d/b/a Camellia Communications Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 08-71 (filed May 5, 2008) (Hayneville Petition). See Hayneville Petition at 5.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2106A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2108A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Elizabeth Valinoti McCarthy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by AT&T Inc. of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 03-109 (filed Aug. 18, 2008) (AT&T Petition). See AT&T Petition at 8-10; see also 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2110A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2110A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2110A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before October 20, 2008, and reply comments on or before November 4, 2008. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 08-19. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2124A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Robert L. Robinson, Executive Director State of Mississippi Division of Medicaid, and Robert Galli, M.D., Chair Emergency Medicine the University of Mississippi Medical Center, to Daniel Johnson, Universal Service Administrative
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2129A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. This document contains proposed new information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection requirements contained in this document, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2133A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Centennial Communications Corp., Request Pursuant to Section 54.722(a) of the Commission's Rules for Review of Universal Service Administrative Company Decision on High Cost Support Mechanism Beneficiary Appeal, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2136A1.txt
            • Verizon/Qwest Cost Assignment Forbearance Order. Comments filed in response to this Public Notice that go beyond its scope, such as comments addressing the merits of granting forbearance relief to Verizon in the first instance, will not be considered. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2168A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Tom Reid, President Reid Consulting Group, to Thomas Buckley, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed Aug. 21, 2008) (Merger Request); Letter filed on behalf of Adena Health Systems
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2169A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Centennial Communications Corp. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.809 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Sept. 18, 2008) (Petition); 47 C.F.R. § 54.809(c). Petition at 2-3. On May 21,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2170A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0700 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Vern Larsen, Larsen Communications, to the Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Aug. 26, 2008). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2175A1.txt
            • Verizon/Qwest Cost Assignment Forbearance Order. Comments filed in response to this Public Notice that go beyond its scope, such as comments addressing the merits of granting forbearance relief to Qwest in the first instance, will not be considered. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2204A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Emergency Request for Review and Request for Waiver of USAC 45-Day Revision Deadline of Progress International, LLC, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Sept. 12, 2008). See id. Progress also filed a motion
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2209A1.txt
            • To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty). . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2221A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2221A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2221A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition for FCC Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in the State of South Dakota Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Sept.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2228A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. -FCC- Petition of the Frontier Local Operating Companies for Limited Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from Enforcement of Rule 69.5(a), 47 U.S.C. § 251(b), and Commission Orders on the ESP Exemption at 16
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2238A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 (voice) or 202-418-0484 (TTY). - FCC - NECA 2009 Modification of the Average Schedule Universal Service High-Cost Loop Formula, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Aug. 29, 2008). 2009 Average Schedule Company Local Switching Support Formula, Universal Service Administrative Company, CC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2239A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2239A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Linh Nguyen, HereUare Communications, Inc., to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Aug. 12, 2008). Letter from Cherie Chen, China Unicom USA Corporation, to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2255A1.txt
            • Plan (NANP) telephone numbers. Specifically, Sorenson seeks to allow its users to continue to receive calls dialed using proxy or alias numbers for a period of one year after the user has received a ten-digit, NANP telephone number. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2340A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2340A1.txt
            • and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex parte status: This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' rulemaking proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Copies of the reports and any subsequently filed documents in this matter may be obtained electronically at http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html, and on paper from BCPI during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center located at 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. Alternate formats of this Public Notice (computer diskette,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2468A1.txt
            • Inc. WPYT730 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will continue to be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2485A1.txt
            • regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the waiver request, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). To request
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2574A1.txt
            • precedent. VIII. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if it finds that the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and remind them that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2575A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by Cellular Properties, Inc. for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in the State of Illinois Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2637A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2637A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2637A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Albert M. Lewis, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, or via e-mail at albert.lewis@fcc.gov. -FCC- Letter from John T. Nakahata, Counsel for Aztek Networks, Harris Wiltshire & Grannis, LLP, to Dana Shaffer, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC at 1 (Oct. 10, 2008) (Nakahata Oct. 10 Letter). See RAO
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2638A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition of Worldcall Interconnect, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of New York, CC Docket 96-45 (filed Oct. 20, 2008) (Worldcall Petition); see also 47 U.S.C.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2639A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2640A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2640A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2640A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - PRWireless Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the FCC's rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Oct. 2, 2008); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2641A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2647A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2647A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2647A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Emergency Request for Review and Request for Waiver of USAC 45-Day Revision Deadline, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 20, 2008) (Request for Review). Id. at 3. Id. at 4. Id. at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2668A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, Amy Goodman, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1549, or via e-mail at amy.goodman@fcc.gov. -FCC- Petition of Tri-County Telephone Association, Inc. for Waiver of Accounting Rules, Feeable Waiver Filing (Fee Code BEA) (filed October 22, 2008) (Petition) at 1 (citing Separation of Costs of Regulated Telephone Service from Costs of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2674A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation's Emergency Petition for Waiver and Temporary Relief, WC Docket No. 08-236 (filed Nov. 21, 2008) (Vitelco Petition). Id. at 1-2. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2681A1.txt
            • Telephone Company of Virginia KZT930 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-269A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2703A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition of Nex-Tech Wireless, LLC for agreement in Redefining Home Telephone's Service Area in Kansas Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Dec. 8, 2008) (Petition); 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2707A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Reconsideration of the Mobex Waterways Order of Maritime Communications/Land Mobile, LLC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Sept. 25, 2008) (Maritime Petition for Reconsideration). See Request for Review by Waterway Communication
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2708A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2708A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Greg Guice, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0095 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Waiver of Wholesale Carrier Services, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Aug. 27, 2008) (Petition). See id. at 1. The first quarter FCC Form 499-Q was due November 1, 2007
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2713A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2713A1.txt
            • Rico License Corp. SCL-LIC-19980101-00036 V. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2731A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2731A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2731A1.txt
            • however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant application. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission Secretary no later than the next business
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2736A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2736A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2736A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-276A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-276A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- SureWest Telephone Petition for Approval to Change Method of Determining Cash Working Capital Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 65.820(d), WCB/Pricing File No. 08-03 (filed Jan. 11, 2008) (SureWest Petition). Id. at 2. Id. at 3. 47 C.F.R. §§
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2772A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2772A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2772A1.txt
            • however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant application. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission Secretary no later than the next business
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2778A1.txt
            • had granted Ronan a one year extension to meet the requirement. See Ronan Telephone Company Request for Waiver and Extension of Time of Tribal Land Bidding Credit Construction Requirement for a Lower 700 MHz Band Licensee, Order, WT Docket No. 06-231, 22 FCC Rcd 972 (WTB MD 2007). File No. 0003656733 (filed Nov. 21, 2007). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See ``Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings,'' Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2779A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Modification of Public Safety Answering Point Certification Condition by TracFone Wireless, Inc., CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 21, 2008) (TracFone Petition). Petition of TracFone Wireless, Inc. for Forbearance from
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2807A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact James Brown, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (717) 338-2621 or via email at James.Brown@fcc.gov. By the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- See FCC File Nos. 0003634433-38; 0003634442-48; 0003634450; 0003634452-54; 0003634456; 0003634458; 0003634459; 0003634461; 0003634463; 0003634465 and 0003634466. PTC-220's Waiver Request is attached to each file number in the Universal
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2813A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2813A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593, or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by Madison River Communications, LLC of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Dec. 12, 2008). See id. at 1. See id. Appendix B at 2.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2814A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2814A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition for FCC Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in the State of South Dakota Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Sept.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-289A1.txt
            • information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat these cases as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject applications and waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-292A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-292A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-292A1.txt
            • electronic file on the CD-Rom. The label should also include the following phrase "CD-Rom Copy - Not an Original." Each CD-Rom should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send CD-Rom copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. (insert CG Docket No. 08-15 into the proceeding block). . . -FCC- See generally 47 U.S.C. § 225; 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.601 et seq. See Hawk Relay, Request for Expedited Clarification for the Provision
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-320A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before March 10, 2008, and reply comments on or before March 25, 2008. All such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing file numbers listed above. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-321A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Alexander Minard, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Thumb Cellular Appeal of USAC's Denial of USF Funding or, Alternatively, Motion for Declaratory Ruling, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 7, 2007). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-350A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-371A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Greg Guice, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-0095 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Intercall, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 1, 2008). Intercall, Inc.'s Petition for Stay of the Decision of the Universal Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-377A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-377A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 54.209. Saddleback Communications Supplemental Data as Required by § 54.209, Protective Petition for Waiver of Section 54.209, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 7, 2008). Gila River Telecommunications, Inc.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-379A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-379A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before March 17, 2008, and reply comments on or before April 1, 2008. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 08-09. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-380A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-380A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before March 17, 2008, and reply comments on or before April 1, 2008. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 08-10. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-382A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-382A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - Frontier Petition for Limited Waiver Relief upon Conversion of Global Valley Networks, Inc, to Price Cap Regulation, WC Docket No. 08-18 (filed Dec. 18, 2007) (Petition). Citizens Communications Company, the parent of the Frontier and Citizens
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-391A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-391A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. -FCC- Petition of the AT&T ILECs for a Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 08-23 (filed Feb. 5, 2008) (AT&T Petition); see AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corporation Application for Transfer of Control, Memorandum Opinion and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-443A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-443A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - ASTAC Wireless LLC Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(b) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Jan. 31, 2008); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(b). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-44A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Melissa Kirkel, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1580, or via e-mail at Melissa.Kirkel@fcc.gov. -FCC- Consolidated Communications, Inc. Petition for Limited Temporary Waiver, CC Docket No. 96-115, WC Docket No. 04-36 (filed Dec. 14, 2007) (Consolidated Petition); see 47 C.F.R. § 64.2010(f). See Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-451A1.txt
            • Commission. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Gary Remondino, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-C143, Washington, D.C. 20554. His email address is gary.remondino@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-2298. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, marilyn.jones@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2357. - FCC - Letter to Dana R. Shaffer, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Nancy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-460A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. @fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau or the Media Bureau, as listed below: Video Division, Media Bureau For service rules questions: Shaun Maher at (202) 418-2324 or Hossein Hashemzadeh at (202) 418-1600 Auctions and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-469A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Tim Stelzig, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0942 or Denise Coca, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0574. See 47 U.S.C. § 160. Petition of the Verizon New England for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in Rhode Island, WC Docket No. 08-24 (filed Feb. 14, 2008)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-479A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of the Micronesian Telecommunications Company for Waiver of Section 54.314 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 8, 2008). Petition of PTI Pacifica Inc. for Waiver of Section
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A1.txt
            • Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-543A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-543A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-543A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For service rule questions: Erin McGrath (legal) or Gabriel Ubieta (technical) at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Roy Knowles or Barbara Sibert at (717) 338-2868 For auctions
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-544A1.txt
            • rules. In its petition, Intrado requests that the Commission preempt jurisdiction of the Virginia State Corporation Commission in order to arbitrate Intrado's interconnection agreement with Central Telephone Company of Virginia and United Telephone - Southeast, Inc. (collectively, Embarq). This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-54A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-57A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer McKee, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - TracFone Wireless, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for the Limited Purpose of Offering Lifeline Service to Qualified Households, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-58A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Qwest Corporation, All West Communications, Inc., Joint Petition for Waivers of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules (Qwest/All West Petition); 47 C.F.R. Part 36
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-600A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Pine Belt Cellular, Inc. Petition for Protective Waiver of Section 54.209 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 29, 2008); 47 C.F.R. § 54.209. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-607A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-607A1.txt
            • electronic file on the CD-Rom. The label should also include the following phrase: "CD-Rom Copy - Not an Original." Each CD-Rom should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send CD-Rom copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-71A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-73A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1572. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b). See National Exchange Carrier Association, Inc.'s 2008 Modification of Average Schedule Formulas, WC Docket No. 07-290, at Summary-1 (filed Dec. 21, 2007). Id. Id. Id. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-747A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-747A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Centennial U.S.V.I Operations Corp. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.314(d)(1) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 28, 2008) (Petition); 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d)(1). Petition at 5-6. In late
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-767A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For broadband PCS service rule questions: Erin McGrath or Michael Connelly (legal) or Keith Harper (technical), at (202) 418-0620 Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For AWS-1 service rule questions: John Spencer at (202) 418-2487 Auctions and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-768A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by USCOC Illinois RSA #1, LLC, USCOC of Illinois RSA #4, LLC, USCOC of Rockford, LLC and USCOC of Central Illinois, LLC for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-774A1.txt
            • Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-775A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . -FCC- Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. Petition for a Waiver of Section 61.42(g) of the Commission's Price Cap Rules for Advanced Services Formerly Offered by Verizon Hawaii, Inc., WCB/Pricing File No. 08-13 (filed March 20, 2008) (HTI Waiver Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. §§ 61.42(g). A list of HTI's advanced services is in Exhibit A of the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-777A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - LBH, L.L.C. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.802(a) of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed March. 20, 2008); 47 C.F.R. § 54.802(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-779A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Qwest Corporation and Pine Telephone System, Inc., Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules (filed Feb. 19, 2008) (Qwest/Pine Petition);
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-781A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353. -FCC- AT&T Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 61.42(g) of the Commission's Rules and Request for Expedited Treatment, WCB/Pricing File No. 08-11, at 1-2 (filed March 18, 2008) (AT&T Waiver Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. § 61.42(g). A copy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-78A1.txt
            • because of the type of speech, or because the party seeking such service is a competitor, is ``unjust and unreasonable discrimination'' in violation of law. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-793A1.txt
            • Because of the policy implications and potential impact of the collective proceedings in CG Docket No. 06-181 on persons not necessarily party to each individual petition for exemption, we have found that it is in the public interest to treat CG Docket No. 06-181 as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206; Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Action: Extension of Comment Period on Petitions for Exemption from Commission's Closed Captioning Rules; Ex Parte Treatment of Filings In Docket, CG Docket No. 06-181, Public Notice, 21 FCC Rcd 13487, 13488 (CGB 2006). All ex parte filings and contacts associated with these petitions for exemption shall comport with the Commission's rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-802A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Waiver Request, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b), 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). To request materials in accessible formats
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-803A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or call
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-804A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-834A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before May 9, 2008, and reply comments on or before May 27, 2008. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 08-12. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-835A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before May 9, 2008, and reply comments on or before May 27, 2008. All such filings shall refer to the internal file number: WCB/Pricing File No. 08-16. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-851A1.txt
            • assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20080208-00005. V. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-855A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by AT&T Inc. of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 03-109 (filed Jan. 7, 2008) (AT&T Petition). (retrieved Apr. 4, 2008). AT&T Petition at 4-7. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-859A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Regina Brown or Karen Johnson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition for Reconsideration, Requests for Review of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrative Company by Caldwell Parish, et al., Schools and Libraries Universal Support Mechanism, Schools and Libraries Universal
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-874A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-874A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Central Atlantic Pennsylvania Payphone Association Petition for Clarification, or in the Alternative Reconsideration, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116, 98-170 (filed Mar. 14, 2008). See Federal-State Joint Board on
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-877A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-877A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - IT&E Overseas, Inc. Petition for Protective Waiver of Section 54.209 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Mar. 25, 2008); IT&E Overseas, Inc. Petition for Protective Waiver of Section 54.209
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-878A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Tim Stelzig, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0942 or Denise Coca, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0574. - FCC - Petition of the Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in Cox's Service Territory in the Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-916A1.txt
            • has taken a position that it is not a telecommunications carrier; and (3) whether Comcast Phone of Vermont, LLC, as a VoIP provider, is a telecommunications carrier and therefore entitled to interconnection pursuant to sections 251 and 252. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-917A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-917A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by Sagebrush Cellular, Inc. for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in the State of North Dakota Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-91A1.txt
            • FCC's Internet Policy Statement'' and that such practices do not meet the Commission's exception for reasonable network management. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Free Press et al. Petition for Declaratory Ruling. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-92A1.txt
            • to block, degrade or unreasonably discriminate against lawful Internet applications, content or technologies'' as used in the Commission's Internet Policy Statement. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Vuze, Inc. Petition for Rulemaking. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-94A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-94A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-94A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. -FCC- Petition of the Embarq Local Operating Companies for Limited Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from Enforcement of Rule 69.5(a), 47 U.S.C. § 251(b), and Commission Orders on the ESP Exemption at 17
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-953A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-953A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-953A1.txt
            • the extent the ex parte comment also discusses issues in the pending rulemaking, this public notice is issued without prejudice to the Commission's ability to address issues pending from the NPRM in the existing rulemaking. We deem the proceeding, for ex parte purposes, as "permit-but-disclose" in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b). Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-957A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-957A1.txt
            • Highland Lakes Board of Trustees (``Villas at Highland'') are preempted by the Commission's rule. The Villas at Highland are located in Westerville, Ohio. This Public Notice announces the pleading cycle for each of these Petitions during which responses and replies may be filed. For purposes of our ex parte rules, these proceedings will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules (``Permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Parties may file responses to the Petitions on or before May 30, 2008 and replies on or before June 16, 2008. Please place the case identifier, CSR-7861-O, on all filings addressing Ponderosa Woods and CSR-7862-O on all filings addressing Villas at Highland. An original and two copies of all filings should be addressed to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-966A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Waiver Request, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). or call
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1011A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Elizabeth Valinoti McCarthy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Rulemaking Regarding the Expansion of Support Available Pursuant to the Fourth Tier of the Universal Service Lifeline Program, RM No. 11529 (filed Mar. 27, 2009) (Smith Bagley Petition). See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1014A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Motion for Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Apr. 3, 2009) (Pennsylvania Petition); Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, TracFone Wireless, Inc., CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 24
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1015A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1015A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1015A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. Compliance Plan, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Apr. 3, 2009) (Compliance Plan). Compliance Plan at 1; see Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. Petition for Forbearance from 47 U.S.C.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1016A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - DTS of CA, Inc., Petition for Waivers of the Commission's Rules to Participate in NECA Pools and Tariffs and to Obtain Accelerated USF Support, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Apr. 1, 2009)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1017A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Charles H. Helein, Attorney, inContact, Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Apr. 13, 2009). Id. at 17. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1018A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Charles E. Giffin, Pennsylvania Mountains Healthcare Resource Development, and Kay Hamilton, Juniata Valley Network, and Ronald M. Cowan, Juniata Valley Network, to Daniel Johnson, USAC, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1021A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1021A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Masergy Communications Inc. Petition for Clarification, or in the Alternative, Application for Review, WC Docket Nos. 06-122, 04-36, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 98-171, 90-571, 92-237, 99-200, 95-116 (filed Mar. 30, 2009) (Masergy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1022A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1022A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1022A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Stephen Wilson, Spectrotel, Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Mar. 24, 2009). Id. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1023A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1023A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1023A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Ad Hoc Coalition of International Telecommunications Companies, Petition for Declaratory Rulings That: (1) Qualifying Downstream Carriers May Choose Either to Accept Supplier Pass-Through Surcharges or Pay Universal Service Fees Directly; and (2)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1055A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1055A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1055A1.txt
            • U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1090A1_Rcd.pdf
            • as restricted proceedings for ex partepurposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parterules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex partepresentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 5686 For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1096A1.txt
            • filing paper copies can be found at http://www.fcc.gov/osec/guidelines.html or by calling the Office of the Secretary at 202-418-0300. For help filing electronically, see Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998) and http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. The Commission's Public Reference Center is located at Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 7 8 � ÿ‰PNG r v
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1096A1_Rcd.pdf
            • CONTACT: Scott Mackoul of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, at (202) 418-7498, scott.mackoul@fcc.gov. All press inquiries should be directed to Matthew Nodine, at (202) 418-1646. Action by the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau -FCC- 12The Commission's Public Reference Center is located at Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. 13See47 C.F.R. §§1.1200, 1.1206. Ex partepresentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 5722
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1127A1.txt
            • and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex parte status: This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' rulemaking proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Copies of the reports and any subsequently filed documents in this matter may be obtained electronically at http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html, and on paper from BCPI during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center located at 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. Alternate formats of this Public Notice (computer diskette,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-11A1.txt
            • allocated to the Federal Government Radiolocation service on a primary basis, and to non-Federal radiolocation on a secondary basis. In addition, the 3100-3300 MHz band is allocated to Federal and non-Federal Earth exploration-satellite and space research on a secondary basis; and the 3300-3500 MHz band is allocated to the amateur service on a secondary basis. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1246A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Albemarle Health is the fiduciary agent for the Albemarle Network Telemedicine Initiative. Albemarle Network Telemedicine Initiative Application, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed May 4, 2007). Letter from J. David Kirby, President, KirbyIMC,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1248A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1249A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - WorldNet Telecommunications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Filing Deadline for Quarterly Interstate Common Line Support Line Count Report Form 525, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed May 14, 2009); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1252A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Waiver and Emergency Request for Expedited Stay and/or Special Relief of TeleQuality Communications, Inc., WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed May 27, 2009) (Petition for Waiver). See 47 C.F.R. § 54.611.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1265A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision by Hospital Networks Management, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Apr. 9, 2009). Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision by Verizon, WC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1266A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Accipiter Communications, Inc., and Qwest Corporation, Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Apr. 30,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1267A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1267A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1267A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Elizabeth Valinoti McCarthy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by AT&T Inc. of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 03-109 (filed Apr. 14, 2009) (AT&T Petition). See id. at 3, 6-8; see also 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1268A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance by i-wireless, LLC, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Apr. 1, 2009) (Petition); 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A). Petition at 1-2. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1269A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Head Start Telecom, Inc., Petition for Forbearance, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed May 15, 2009) (Petition); 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A). See Petition at 1. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1270A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1270A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Alexicon Telecommunications Consulting Petition for Change of Form 499-A Reporting Date, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Apr. 21, 2009) (Alexicon Petition). See id. at 2-3. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1271A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Elizabeth Valinoti McCarthy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - TracFone Wireless, Inc.'s Petition for Waiver of 47 C.F.R. § 54.403(1)(a), WC Docket No. 03-109 (filed May 4, 2009) (TracFone Petition). See 47 C.F.R. § 54.403(1)(a). See TracFone Petition at 1,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1272A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Elizabeth Valinoti McCarthy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Petition of TracFone Wireless, Inc. for Forbearance from 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A) and 47 C.F.R. § 54.201(i), CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 20 FCC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1285A1.txt
            • not subject to streamlined treatment. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1289A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1289A1.txt
            • 0003847304 D&E Systems, Inc. WQJH937 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1289A1_Erratum.doc
            • 0003847304 D&E Systems, Inc. WQJH937 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1306A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1306A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1306A1_Rcd.pdf
            • restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe itwould be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1325A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1325A1.txt
            • remain in effect pending full restoration of AT&T's and Verizon's circuits and services, and Commission action lifting the suspension. Furthermore, we seek comment on whether we should impose a stop payment order on all payments to Digicel. Administrative Matters Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1325A1_Rcd.pdf
            • effect pending full restoration of AT&T's and Verizon's circuits and services, and Commission action lifting the suspension. Furthermore, we seek comment on whether we should impose a stop payment order on all payments to Digicel. IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS A. Ex Parte Rules 49. This proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.127 We direct parties making oral ex partepresentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.128More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.129 Other rules pertaining to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1343A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1343A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1343A1.txt
            • the Evolution Broadband DMS-1002 and DMS-1002-CA. The Media Bureau seeks comment on this certification. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due June 26, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-8176-Z. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1344A1.txt
            • the Evolution Broadband DMS-1002 and DMS-1002-CA. The Media Bureau seeks comment on this certification. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due June 26, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-8175-Z. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1350A1.txt
            • Cellular Corporation ITC-214-19940224-00114 ITC-214-19980401-00220 V. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1350A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Cellco Partnership ITC-214-20010504-00279 ITC-ASG-20090522-00242 Rural Cellular Corporation ITC-214-19940224-00114 ITC-214-19980401-00220 V. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,7the Commission mayadopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed bypermit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.8 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directedto the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibilityin permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.9More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.10Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1353A1.txt
            • the Evolution Broadband DMS-1002 and DMS-1002-CA. The Media Bureau seeks comment on this certification. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due June 29, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-8177-Z. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1354A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1354A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1354A1.txt
            • the Evolution Broadband DMS-1002 and DMS-1002-CA. The Media Bureau seeks comment on this certification. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due June 29, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-8178-Z. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1427A1.txt
            • filing paper copies can be found at http://www.fcc.gov/osec/guidelines.html or by calling the Office of the Secretary at 202-418-0300. For help filing electronically, see Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998) and http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. The Commission's Public Reference Center is located at Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 > ? ¡ ÿ‰PNG r v
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1427A1_Rcd.pdf
            • as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules.22 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Barrett Brick of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Broadband Division, at (202) 418-1065, Barrett.Brick@fcc.gov. Action by the Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- 21The Commission's Public Reference Center is located at Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. 22See47 C.F.R. §§1.1200, 1.1206. Ex partepresentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 8551
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1436A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1436A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1436A1.txt
            • disposed of before entering the building. Commercial and electronic media sent by overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-143A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Douglas Slotten, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1572, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b). See National Exchange Carrier Association, 2009 Modification of Average Schedules at Summary-1, attached to Letter from Richard A. Askoff, Executive Director-Regulatory, NECA, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1452A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1452A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1452A1.txt
            • fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Gary Remondino, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-C143, Washington, D.C. 20554. His e-mail address is gary.remondino@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-2298. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, marilyn.jones@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2357. - FCC - Letter to Julie A. Veach, Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1499A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2277 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by Cellular Properties, Inc. for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Wabash Telephone Cooperative, Inc. in the State of Illinois pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-149A1.txt
            • C.F.R 63.1002(d). EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if it finds that the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1515A1.txt
            • Western Wireless, LLC ITC-214-20010427-00254 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1515A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Western Wireless, LLC ITC-214-20010427-00254 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,4 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 2 Applications of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Atlantis Holdings LLC, WT Docket No. 08-95, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 17444 (2008) ("Verizon-ALLTEL Order"). Specifically, this proposed transaction would fulfill the required divestiture in 26 of the 105 CMAs set forth in the Verizon-ALLTEL Order. 3 This application is the lead application for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1546A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1546A1.txt
            • authorities or entities approved by FAA, and that each application be pre-coordinated with FAA and coordinated with NTIA through the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee process. In addition, NTIA proposes that each license be limited to two hundred aeronautical utility mobile stations, and that the vehicles use frequency 1090 MHz only within the runway movement area. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1546A1_Rcd.pdf
            • airport authorities or entities approved by FAA, and that each application be pre-coordinated with FAA and coordinated with NTIA through the Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee process. In addition, NTIA proposes that each license be limited to two hundred aeronautical utility mobile stations, and that the vehicles use frequency 1090 MHz only within the runway movement area. 5See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 6SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 7See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 9174 Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1550A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1550A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1550A1.txt
            • Notice was adopted, we note that the data-sharing issues raised by section 106(h) of the BDIA clearly fall within the scope of the more general data-sharing issues raised in the further notice, on which we previously received comment. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1554A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance by Consumer Cellular, Inc. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c), CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed June 30, 2009) (Petition); 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A). Petition at 1-2. See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1556A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Charles Penachio, Jr., Clerk, Achilles Networks, to Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed June 8, 2009). See id. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1557A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Wesley Platt, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Although Windy City Cellular, LLC requests ``waiver of the 60 day deadline set forth in 54.307(c),'' the 60-day deadline is actually set forth in section 54.307(d) of the Commission's rules. Windy City
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1558A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Alabama Commercial Mobile Radio Service Emergency Telephone Services Board, Petition for Rejection of Certification and For Revocation of the Limited ETC Status of TracFone Wireless, Inc. In the State of Alabama, CC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1559A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Wesley Platt, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1560A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1560A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Jonathan S. Marashlian, Counsel, BitWise Communications, Inc. a/k/a OmniLEC, to Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed June 23, 2009) (Errata filed June 24, 2009).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1561A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by AT&T Inc. of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Apr. 24, 2009) (AT&T Petition). Id. at 2, 5. Id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1562A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Mobi PCS, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc. Petition Requesting the Federal Communications Commission to Provide Guidance to the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed May 29, 2009) (Petition); 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1563A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Advantage Cellular Systems, Inc., Request for Cost-Based Universal Service Support, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Mar. 27, 2009) (Advantage Request). See High-Cost Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1564A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1564A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1564A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Huron Mountain Communications Co., Petition for Waivers of the Commission's Rules to Participate in NECA Pools and Tariffs and to Obtain Accelerated Universal Service Fund Support, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Apr.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1594A1.txt
            • questions of law and policy are at issue. See Establishment of Rules and Policies for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service in the 2310-2360 MHz Frequency Band, IB Docket No. 97-91, Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcs 22123 (2007). Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-STA-20081027-00210 as "permit-but-disclose," effective July 22, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 2 of 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1594A1_Rcd.pdf
            • questions of law and policy are at issue. See Establishment of Rules and Policies for the Digital Audio Radio Satellite Service in the 2310-2360 MHz Frequency Band, IB Docket No. 97-91, Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcs 22123 (2007). Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-STA-20081027-00210 as "permit-but-disclose," effective July 22, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. 9330
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1622A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at pamela.arluk@fcc.gov. - FCC - Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc., Petition for Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 09-133 (filed June 26, 2009) (Sandwich Isles Petition). Id. at 7. See id. at 4. Id. at 5. See id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1643A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1643A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of UTEX Communications Corporation, Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the Communications Act, for Preemption of the Jurisdiction of the Public Utility Commission of Texas Regarding Interconnection Disputes with
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1646A1.txt
            • the Evolution Broadband DMS-1002 and DMS-1002-CA. The Media Bureau seeks comment on this certification. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due August 7, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-8190-Z. Pleadings sent only via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1653A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Tim Stelzig, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0942 or Denise Coca, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0574. - FCC - Petition of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Phoenix, Arizona Metropolitan Statistical Area, WC Docket No. 09-135 (filed Mar. 24, 2009)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1718A1.txt
            • broadcast antenna to the attic of a townhouse, where, Petitioners allege, they cannot get a good quality signal. Sutton Park is located in Palatine, Illinois. This Public Notice announces the pleading cycle for this Petition during which responses and replies may be filed. For purposes of our ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules (``Permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before August 31, 2009 and replies on or before September 16, 2009. Please place the case identifier, CSR-8192-O, on all filings. An original and two copies of all filings should be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1728A1.txt
            • regulatory parity between Baja Broadband and its satellite-based competitors, DIRECTV and Dish Network. We seek comment on Baja Broadband's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due August 20, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-7111-Z. Pleadings sent only via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1762A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Sanford Williams of the Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1508. -FCC- See Petition of Telcordia Technologies, Inc. to Reform or Strike Amendment 70, to Institute a Competitive Bidding for Number Portability Administration, and to End the NAPM LLC's Interim Role in Number Portability Administration Contract Management (filed May 20,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1764A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1764A1_Rcd.pdf
            • restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1773A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1773A1.txt
            • the issues raised by MusicFIRST in order to develop a more complete factual record. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. All filings must reference [MB Docket No. 09-143]. Comments sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1774A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1774A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Nebraska Public Service Commission and Kansas Corporation Commission for Declaratory Ruling or, in the Alternative, Adoption of Rule Declaring State Universal Service Funds May Assess Nomadic VoIP Intrastate Revenues, WC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1777A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1777A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1777A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Conexions, LLC Petition for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 from the Own Facilities Requirement for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Status, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed July 8, 2009) (Petition); 47 U.S.C.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1778A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Network Enhanced Telecomm, LLP, Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal Service Administrator in a Contributor Appeal, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed June 29, 2009). Id. See Electronic Filing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1779A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Wesley Platt, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - General Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed July 16, 2009); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1780A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1780A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Panora Communications Cooperative and Prairie Telephone Co., Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules (filed July 15, 2009) (Petition);
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1781A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition for Declaratory Ruling of Securus Technologies, Inc. WC Docket No. 09-144, at 1 (filed July 24, 2009). Id. at 1. Id. at 6. Id. at 15. Id. at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1788A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1788A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. - FCC - OLS, Inc. and TeleUno, Inc., Petition for Declaratory Ruling on Application of Sections 201(b) and 203(c) to Carrier Practices and Charges, WC Docket No. 09-28, at 2 (filed Sept. 19, 2008). Id. at 4. Id. at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1789A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1789A1.txt
            • a default IP Relay or VRS provider is unable to provide a geographically appropriate number. Alternatively, Sorenson asks the Commission to grant a temporary waiver of its rule to allow the assignment of temporary ``geographically approximately'' guest numbers. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1793A1.txt
            • 0003888965 Rhinelander Telephone LLC KLF637 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1796A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1796A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1796A1.txt
            • the Tama and Zwirn responses to an Enforcement Bureau letter of inquiry leaving Cherry unable to file a ``meaningful opposition'' to the assignment to the Receiver or to participate fully in the Commission's consideration of the alleged Section 310(d) violation. Cherry contends that his being denied ``notice or opportunity . . . to participate'' is also a violation of Sections 1.1206 and 1.1208 of the ex parte Rules. Finally, Cherry asserts that rather than retaliate against him, the Commission should grant his request for ``an injunction against the transfer by the FCC of any formerly held [Tama] licenses . . . .'' In opposition, the Receiver claims that Cherry's Objection is just one of a ``long, ever-growing list of frivolous'' filings
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1814A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1814A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1815A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1815A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1815A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1816A1.txt
            • rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Claudia Pabo, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1595. - FCC - Petition of the United States Telecom Association for Waiver from Application of the Equal Access
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1819A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1819A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1819A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Jeff Cohen, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-0799, jeff.cohen@fcc.gov. -- FCC -- APPENDIX A We seek comment on the following common issues raised by the petitions in order to develop a comprehensive record for consideration by the Commission. The questions in this Appendix should not be construed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1835A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1835A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1835A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Denise Coca, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0574, or Tim Stelzig, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0942. -FCC- Petitions of Verizon Telephone Companies for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) in the Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Providence and Virginia Beach Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Inc., WC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1842A1.txt
            • should such updates should occur; what criteria should be used to adjust thresholds over time; how modifications over time to the definition will affect the Commission's ability to collect and publish meaningful data on broadband deployment and adoption. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1843A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Doug Slotten or Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov or lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition for Declaratory Ruling to the Iowa Utilities Board and Contingent Petition for Preemption, WC Docket No. 09-152, at 1 (filed Aug. 14, 2009)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1856A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1856A1.txt
            • Trinity Communications Limited ITC-214-20030515-00268 VI. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1856A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Holder Authorization Number ITC-T/C-20090506-00204 Trinity Communications Limited ITC-214-20030515-00268 VI. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,18the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.19 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.20More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.21Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1878A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1878A1.txt
            • rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Claudia Pabo, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1595. - FCC - Level 3 Petition for Declaratory Ruling that Certain Right-of-Way Rents Imposed by the New York
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1879A1.txt
            • is not the default rate for commingled cable and interconnected VoIP services, and that the Telecom Rate is the just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory rate for pole attachments by cable companies that hold themselves out as telephone service providers. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1961A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1961A1.txt
            • Division, on its own motion, designated the following SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC applications to modify its authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective August 21, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090813-00088, SAT-MOD-20090813-00089, and SES-MOD-20090813-00997. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. S2358 SAT-MOD-20090813-00089 SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC On August 21, 2009, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated the following SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1961A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Division, on its own motion, designated the following SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC applications to modify its authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective August 21, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090813-00088, SAT-MOD-20090813-00089, and SES-MOD-20090813-00997. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. S2358 SAT-MOD-20090813-00089 SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC On August 21, 2009, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated the following SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1978A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1978A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1978A1.txt
            • assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20090630-00004. V. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1978A1_Rcd.pdf
            • the Communications Act has been assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20090630-00004. V. EX PARTESTATUSOF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,6the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.7 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing thepublic's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.8More than a one-or two-sentence description ofthe views and arguments presented is generally required.9Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1982A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1982A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1982A1.txt
            • the Evolution Broadband DMS-1002 and DMS-1002-CA. The Media Bureau seeks comment on this certification. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due October 8, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-8206-Z. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-1992A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Ian Dillner of the Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1191. -FCC- See American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009) (Recovery Act). (last visited Aug. 24, 2009). Detailed information about each workshop is available at this website, including presentation materials, video recordings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2017A1.txt
            • used? What type of data will be shared between these devices and the Internet? We welcome analyses that examine the role of broadband requirements for Home Area Networks that manage energy loads or deliver other energy management services. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2018A1.txt
            • to create opportunities for currently underutilized potential segments of the work force such as the elderly, disabled, or family caretakers? What telework programs exist to assist members of disadvantaged and disabled communities to work more effectively and efficiently? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-203A1.txt
            • public, educational and governmental (``PEG'') channels. We seek comment on each of these petitions. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due March 9, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-8126 (ACM et al.), CSR-8127 (City of Lansing, Michigan), and/or CSR-8128 (City of Dearborn, Michigan et al.). All filings should also refer to MB Docket No. 09-13 and must be submitted in MB Docket No. 09-13.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2076A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2076A1.txt
            • authorization and its associated bond waiver and milestone requests were rendered moot. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communication with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-19971222-00222, SAT-LOA-20040322-00234/35/36/37, SAT-MOD-20060511-00057/58/59/60, SAT-AMD-20031030-00317, SAT-AMD-20040719-00141, SAT-AMD-20040322-00057, SAT-AMD-20051118-00243, SAT-MOD-20070924-00130, SAT-AMD-20071215-00176, SAT-MOD-20070924-00132, SAT-AMD-20080505-00100, SAT-AMD-20080505-00096, SAT-AMD-20080505-00099, SAT-MOD-20080813-00155, SAT-AMD-20080930-00195, and SAT-AMD-20080930-00194 as "permit-but-disclose," effective September 17, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. SAT-STA-20090701-00071 Sirius XM Radio Inc. On September 16, 2009, the Policy Branch granted the request of Sirius XM Radio Inc. to designate its application for special temporary authority to operate terrestrial repeaters in Cincinnati, Ohio, as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. See Request for "Permit-But-Disclose" Ex Parte Status, filed by
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2076A1_Rcd.pdf
            • authorization and its associated bond waiver and milestone requests were rendered moot. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communication with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-LOA-19971222-00222, SAT-LOA-20040322-00234/35/36/37, SAT-MOD-20060511-00057/58/59/60, SAT-AMD-20031030-00317, SAT-AMD-20040719-00141, SAT-AMD-20040322-00057, SAT-AMD-20051118-00243, SAT-MOD-20070924-00130, SAT-AMD-20071215-00176, SAT-MOD-20070924-00132, SAT-AMD-20080505-00100, SAT-AMD-20080505-00096, SAT-AMD-20080505-00099, SAT-MOD-20080813-00155, SAT-AMD-20080930-00195, and SAT-AMD-20080930-00194 as "permit-but-disclose," effective September 17, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. SAT-STA-20090701-00071 Sirius XM Radio Inc. On September 16, 2009, the Policy Branch granted the request of Sirius XM Radio Inc. to designate its application for special temporary authority to operate terrestrial repeaters in Cincinnati, Ohio, as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. See Request for "Permit-But-Disclose" Ex Parte Status, filed by
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2080A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2080A1.txt
            • industry consortia and other national and international industry/consumer/government consortia and standards setting groups can play and how effective these efforts are. What role can the disability community, consumer groups, and other non-profits play to promote and ensure accessibility? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2089A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2089A1.txt
            • are advised to review not only ECFS, but also Blogband to ensure that they are aware of all relevant views expressed to the Commission concerning the National Broadband Plan. Further, because all Blogband postings are available for review by the public and we are treating Blogband as a part of the public record in this proceeding, we hereby waive Section 1.1206(b)(1) of our ex parte rules, 47 C.F. R. § 1.1206(b)(1), which would otherwise require that the Blogband postings be submitted to the Commission's Secretary for inclusion in the public record. Specifically, although the National Broadband Plan proceeding has been classified as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the ex parte rules, Blogband postings need not be separately filed for inclusion in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2093A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2093A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2093A1.txt
            • non-governmental entity or via some type of industry/consumer advocacy partnership? What actions, if any, can the FCC and/or the Tribes take to facilitate carrier entry into Tribal areas for the purpose of providing affordable and sustainable broadband service? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2094A1.txt
            • need to buy or rent additional equipment (either a set-top box or a CableCARD) We seek comment on Cablevision's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due October 22, 2009. All filings must be submitted in MB Docket No. 09-168. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2097A1.txt
            • electronic file on the CD-Rom. The label should also include the following phrase "CD-Rom Copy - Not an Original." Each CD-Rom should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send CD-Rom copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2100A1.txt
            • or should be redirected for microwave/backhaul services? What specific mechanisms should be used to facilitate transitions from incumbents? What recommendations should the National Broadband Plan consider including to address middle mile issues through broader availability of wireless links? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2115A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Denise Coca, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0574, or Tim Stelzig, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-0942. -FCC- Petition of STi Prepaid, LLC for Declaratory Ruling, or in the Alternative, Petition for Waiver, CC Docket No. 96-115, WC Docket No. 04-36 at 1 (filed Aug. 4, 2009)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2117A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2117A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Richard A. Belden, Chief Operating Officer, USAC, to Julie Veach, Acting Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Aug. 19, 2009) (USAC Aug. 19, 2009
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2118A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2118A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2118A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of the Ad Hoc Coalition of International Telecommunications Companies for Declaratory Rulings that (1) The Universal Service Administrative Company Lacks Authority to Indirectly Assess Universal Service Fund Fees on International Only
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2120A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Ghanshyam C. Patel, President/CEO, ComScape Telecommunications, to Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Aug. 3, 2009). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2122A1.txt
            • state and local government programs and policies have most effectively encouraged broadband adoption, and why? How can the federal government, especially this Commission, encourage collaboration, partnership, and best practices across all levels of government to support broadband adoption? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2125A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Stratos Government Services, Inc., Petition for Clarification or Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Sept. 15, 2009) (Petition). See Petition at 2; see also 47 C.F.R. §§0.91, 0.291, and 1.2. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2130A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Wesley Platt, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Skylink L.C. Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.307(c) and 54.802(a) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Aug. 17, 2009); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.307(c), 54.802(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2131A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2131A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Wesley Platt, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Columbus Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 54.903(a) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Aug. 20, 2009); 47 C.F.R. § 54.903(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2133A1.txt
            • living in rural areas and people who do not speak English? Comments should include information on improvements to message content, geographic targeting, system security, and speed of message transmission from the alert initiating government agency to the public. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2135A1.txt
            • the Evolution Broadband DMS-1002 and DMS-1002-CA. The Media Bureau seeks comment on this certification. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due October 8, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-8204-Z. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2137A1.txt
            • the growth of SDBs and their use of broadband technology? Please provide specific examples. Should the Commission facilitate creation of public-private partnerships for this purpose? j) What else should the National Broadband Plan include specifically to assist SDBs? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2167A1.txt
            • covered through new appropriations or should the site be funded through some other mechanism such as charging users fees to access some or all of the content? What, if any, retention schedule should be incorporated for contributed data? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2171A1.txt
            • signal beyond 500 feet to 1,000 feet outside of the plant building, given the unique physical structure of nuclear plants. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.7. Including those that provide a supporting service to a nuclear plant owned or operated by the licensee's parent corporation, another subsidiary of the same parent, or the licensee's own subsidiary. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2171A1_Rcd.pdf
            • no effective signal beyond 500 feet to 1,000 feet outside of the plant building, given the uniquephysical structure of nuclear plants. 6See 47 C.F.R. § 90.7. 7Including those that provide a supporting service to a nuclear plant owned or operated by the licensee's parent corporation, another subsidiary of the same parent, or the licensee's own subsidiary. 8See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 9SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 10See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 12388 Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2183A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . Action by the Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau and Deputy Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - See Petition for Rulemaking of the Enterprise Wireless Alliance, filed April 29, 2009 (EWA Petition). 47 C.F.R. § 1.401. The 800 MHz band extends from 806 MHz to 824 MHz paired with 851 MHz to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2183A1_Rcd.pdf
            • the Commission's ex parterules.7Persons making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.8Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.9 For further information, contact Mr. Brian Marenco of the Policy Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau at 202-418-0838 (voice), 202-418-7233 (tty), or via e-mail to Brian.Marenco@fcc.govor Mr. Scot Stone of the Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at 202-418-0638 (voice), 202-418-7233 (tty), or via e-mail to Scot.Stone@fcc.gov. Action by the Deputy Chief, Public Safety and Homeland
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2186A1.txt
            • in this GN Docket 09-51 on October 8, 2009. Parties wishing to file materials with a claim of confidentiality should follow the procedures set forth in 47 CFR ¶ 0.459. Confidential submissions may not be filed via ECFS. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2194A1.txt
            • fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). For further information about this Public Notice, please contact Randy Clarke at (202) 418-1500. -FCC- APPENDIX A: Gates Foundation Cost Model Filed With The Federal Communications Commission October 5, 2009 in GN Docket 09-51. BILL&MELINDA GATESfoundation October5,2009 Ms.MarleneH.Dortch FederalCommunicationsCommission ThePortals,TW-A325 44512thStreetSW Washington,DC20554 Re:NoticeofExPartePresentation-GNDocket09-51, ANationalBroadbandPlanforOurFuture DearMs.Dortch: InaccordancewithSection1.1206(b)oftheCommission'srules,weherebyprovide noticethatonThursday,October1,2009,Imetbyphone,andJohnWindhausen,Coordinatorof theSchools,HealthandLibrariesBroadbandCoalitionmetinperson,withBlairLevin, ExecutiveDirectoroftheCommission'sOmnibusBroadbandInitiative("OBI"),Dr.Carlos Kirjner,SeniorAdvisortotheChairmanonBroadband,andStevenRosenberg,Infrastructure ManagerintheOfficeofStrategicPlanningandPolicy.Wedistributedanddiscussedthe attachedcostmodelthatestimatesthecostsofprovidingfiberopticconnectivitytoanchor institutions.Pleasefeelfreetocontactmewithanyfurtherquestions. Respectfully, r1eputyDirector-U.S.Libraries Bill&MelindaGatesFoundation Cc:. BlairLevin(Blair.Levin@fcc.gov) Dr.CarlosKirjnerCCarlos.Kirjner@fcc.gov) StevenRosenberg(steven.rosenberg@fcc.gov) POBox23350 Stattlt,Washington98102 U.S.A. V 206.709.3100 F 206.709.3180 www.gattsfoundation.org PreliminaryCostEstimatesonConnecf,ngAnchorInstitutionstoFiber September25,2009 1 PRELIMINARYCOSTESTIMATES NotesonAnalysis ·Theattachedanalysisprovidesapreliminarycostestimateforprovidingfiber opticconnectivitytoanchorcommunityinstitutions-specifically,publicschools, publiclibraries,hospitalsandcommunitycolleges.Theseestimates,basedon datacurrentlyavailabletothepublic,arenotdefinitive.Insubmittingthis analysis,weseektoassistfederalagenciesintheireffortstodeploybroadband technologiesmorebroadlyandtoencourageotherswithgreaterexpertiseinthis areatocomeforwardwithadditionaldataandinformationthatcanbeusedto improveuponthispreliminaryassessment. ·Estimatesinthisdocumentarefortransportonlynetworkingandareexclusive ofcostsassociatedwithnetworkmanagementandnetworkintelligence. ·Estimatesareforlastmilefibercoststocommunityinstitutions.Noestimatesof non-lastmileorbackhaulcapacityrequirementsweremade. ·Thisanalysisislimitedtothecostofinstallingfiberconnectionsanddoesnot assessthecostofothernon-fibertechnologyalternatives(e.g.MSOcoax, FTTNorwirelesstechnologies). ·Finally,thisanalysisdoesnotincludesite-specificestimatesforanygivenregion oradetailedunderstandingofnetworktopologytocreateamoreaccurate bottoms-upestimate. 2 PRELIMINARYCOSTESTIMATES Installingfibertoallanchorcommunityinstitutionsmaycost$5-10billion, withrangedrivenbyunknownsite-specificfactorsinfiberdeployment costs Thousandsoflocations $Thousands $Billions Public Institutions Low-end High-end Low-end High-end Population
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2217A1.txt
            • should the Commission give to this study as it develops a National Broadband Plan? Are additional studies needed along the lines of the Berkman study? Please provide any other comments on the Berkman study that you deem relevant. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2224A1.txt
            • granted the motion of SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC to designate the following applications to modify SkyTerra's authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective October 15, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090429-00046, SAT-MOD-20090429-00047, and SES-MOD-20090429-00536. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. Page 1 of 2 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE AMSC-1 SAT-MOD-20090429-00047 SkyTerra
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2224A1_Rcd.pdf
            • granted the motion of SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC to designate the following applications to modify SkyTerra's authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective October 15, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090429-00046, SAT-MOD-20090429-00047, and SES-MOD-20090429-00536. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. 12634 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE AMSC-1 SAT-MOD-20090429-00047 SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC On
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2249A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition for Reconsideration of Integrity Communications, Ltd., CC Docket No. 02-6 (filed Sept. 27, 2009); Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Integrity Communications, Ltd., CC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2250A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2250A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition for Reconsideration of Lazo Technologies, Inc., et al., File Nos. SLD-360412, et al., CC Docket No. 02-6 (filed Sept. 11, 2009); Supplement and Errata to Petition for Reconsideration of Lazo Technologies,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2254A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY 202-418-0484. - FCC - NECA 2010 Modification of the Average Schedule Universal Service High-Cost Loop Formula, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Aug. 27, 2009). 2010 Average Schedule Company Local Switching Support Formula, Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2255A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Michigan Access, Inc., Emergency Petition for Waiver of the Commission's Rules to Designate Michigan Access an Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier in Two Unserved Areas in Northeast Michigan, Petition for Waivers of the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2256A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429, or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision by Via Talk, LLC, WC Docket No. 06-122, 1 (filed Aug. 14, 2009). Id. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2257A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Mitchell F. Brecher, Counsel for TracFone, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 03-109 (filed July 17, 2009) (TracFone Request); Lifeline and Link-Up, WC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2273A1.txt
            • another, violate the Commission's Rule. In addition, the Petitioners challenge the City's requirement that any professional satellite antenna installer have a valid construction business license. This Public Notice announces the pleading cycle for this Petition during which responses and replies may be filed. For purposes of our ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules (``Permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before November 24, 2009 and replies on or before December 11, 2009. Please place the case identifier, CSR- 8232-O, on all filings. An original and two copies of all filings should be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2279A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2279A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2279A1.txt
            • hampered if the waiver is not granted. We seek comment on this proposed waiver. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 09-192. Comments sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-227A1.txt
            • call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Darryl Cooper, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6-C160, Washington, D.C. 20554. His email address is darryl.cooper@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-7131. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Darryl Cooper at the contact information listed above. - FCC - See Letter to Dana Shaffer, Chief, WCB, from David M. Friedman, Vice Commissioner, WC Docket No. 09-15
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2286A1.txt
            • To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty). . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2356A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Waiver and Emergency Request for Expedited Stay and/or Special Relief of Action Communications, Inc., WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed Oct. 13, 2009) (Petition for Waiver); 47 C.F.R. § 54.611. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2362A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Dr. William Pilkington, Director Cabarrus Health Alliance (Program Coordinator for NCTN), to Thomas Buckley, Wireline Competition Bureau, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Oct. 2, 2009). Rural Health Care Support Mechanism,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2364A1.txt
            • of the Communications Act of 1934 as Amended; Promotion of Spectrum Efficient Technologies on Certain Part 90 Frequencies, Third Memorandum Opinion and Order, Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order, WT Docket No. 99-87, RM-9332, 19 FCC Rcd 25045 (2004). See 47 C.F.R. § 90.209(b)(5). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 90.203(j)(4), (5), (10), 90.209(b)(6). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2364A1_Rcd.pdf
            • form." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, commenters must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. 5See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 6SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 7See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 13496 Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first- class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2368A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2368A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Limited Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the States of Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, New Hampshire, North Carolina, New York, Tennessee, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the District of Columbia,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2369A1.txt
            • to communicate with the help of a person trained in understanding people with speech disabilities? Are there barriers to doing so, and if so, what are those barriers, and what are some possible solutions to overcoming those barriers? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2376A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. All comments should refer to GN Docket Nos. 09-47, 09-51, 09-137; CC Docket No. 02-6; and WC Docket No. 05-195. Please title comments and reply comments responsive to this public notice as ``Comments (or Reply Comments)- NPB Public Notice # 15.'' Further, we strongly encourage parties to develop responses to this public notice that adhere to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2387A1.txt
            • electronic file on the CD-Rom. The label should also include the following phrase "CD-Rom Copy - Not an Original." Each CD-Rom should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send CD-Rom copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-238A1.txt
            • Satellite System in the 1.6 GHz Frequency Band, Order of Modifications, FCC 08-248 (rel. Oct. 15, 2008). In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Satellite Division concludes that the public interest will be served by designating matters relating to the spectrum reassignments in Globalstar's 1.6/2.4 GHz license as "permit-but-disclose." See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, and 1.1208 note 2. S2115 SAT-STA-20081215-00231 Globalstar Licensee LLC On February 13, 2009, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated this matter as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. In order to develop a full and complete record in this application proceeding, the Satellite Division concludes that the public interest will be served by
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2396A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2396A1.txt
            • by both parties. In view of this and in order to assure the staff's ability to discuss and obtain the information needed to resolve these issues expeditiously, adoption of modified ex parte procedures is appropriate. We shall therefore treat Mediacom's Complaint and its Petition for Interim Carriage as ``permit-but-disclose'' for ex parte purposes subject to the procedural requirements of Section 1.1206. The modified ex parte procedures permit both Mediacom and Sinclair to make ex parte presentations regarding any issue arising under Mediacom's Complaint or Petition for Interim Carriage. Two copies of any written ex parte presentation made or, if oral, two copies of a written summary of such oral ex parte presentation, as well as a copy to the person or
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2397A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. This document contains proposed new information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection requirements contained in this document as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2399A1.txt
            • consumer flexibility better than the existing IEEE 1394 requirement, at a significant cost savings. We seek comment on Intel's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due November 30, 2009. Petitioner's reply is due December 10, 2009. All filings must be submitted in CS Docket No. 97-80 and CSR-8229-Z. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Interested parties will have access
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2403A1.txt
            • them, either during the program's duration or permanently? What challenges did the program experience? What, if any, consensus is there among existing adoption programs, locally or nationally, on best practices for participant success and for increasing adoption rates? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2412A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2413A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2413A1.txt
            • provide specific data or other information relating to the potential impact of such changes, and estimates of how many additional projects would participate and how much additional universal service support would be disbursed if the modifications were implemented. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2414A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2414A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2414A1.txt
            • be created that would address some of the challenges faced by people who are unemployed? What role and in what form should the federal government play in providing job training and job placement assistance to the American public? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For paging service rule questions: Michael Connelly (legal) or Melvin Spann (technical), at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Roy Knowles or Barbara Sibert at (717) 338-2868 For
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2416A1_Rcd.pdf
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.49 V. CONTACTS 66.For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For paging service rule questions: Michael Connelly (legal) or Melvin Spann (technical), at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Roy Knowles or Barbara Sibert at (717) 338-2868
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2417A1.txt
            • a response to the Petition is extended from November 24, 2009 to on or before December 31, 2009, and the time to file replies is extended to on or before January 19, 2010. Please place the case identifier, CSR- 8232-O, on all filings. For purposes of our ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules (``Permit-but-disclose proceeding''). An original and two copies of all filings should be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Suite TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Attn: Media Bureau, Policy Division. One copy of responses, replies, or other communications must be served on all participants in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2419A1.txt
            • Particularly, how can the Commission protect against waste, fraud, and abuse related to any hardware or devices used in the program? How can the Commission ensure that consumers cannot obtain the same supported service from two different providers? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2422A1.txt
            • pending full restoration of AT&T's and Verizon's circuits and services, and in accordance with the Commission determinations following this Order. Furthermore, we seek comment on AT&T's proposal that we enforce the benchmark rate on all U.S.-Tonga traffic. Administrative Matters Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2422A1_Rcd.pdf
            • restoration of AT&T's and Verizon's circuits and services, and in accordance with the Commission determinations following this Order. Furthermore, we seek comment on AT&T's proposal that we enforce the benchmark rate on all U.S.-Tonga traffic. IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS A. Ex Parte Rules 11. This proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.23 We direct parties making oral ex partepresentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.24More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.25 Other rules pertaining to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2431A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2431A1.txt
            • traveling (such as some elderly or disabled Americans) to engage in the process of self-government? What is the history and current state of play of the relevant technologies with respect to online town halls or online public hearings? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2433A1.txt
            • a coordinated nationwide identity management schema? What are the potential pitfalls of a coordinated nationwide identity management strategy? What specific privacy concerns are there with identity management strategies? What types of personal information should be protected from disclosure? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2434A1.txt
            • broadband infrastructure, the adoption or utilization of broadband infrastructure, the applications that are designed for broadband infrastructure, and use of broadband applications for a number of important purposes specified by Congress (e.g., education, energy, health, and economic development)? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2451A1.txt
            • rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Claudia Pabo, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1595. - FCC - Petition of Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC for Waiver From Application of the Equal Access
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2458A1.txt
            • examine the nature and future of broadband adoption? How much weight should the Commission give to this study as it develops a National Broadband Plan? Please provide any other comments on the CITI study that you deem relevant. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2474A1.txt
            • record for purposes of building a fact base on this subject. All parties with knowledge and interest are encouraged to file. Exhibit 1: Diagram of a Broadband end-to-end network for the purposes of responding to this Public Notice This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-249A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding these proceedings, contact Thomas J. Beers, Chief, Policy Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-0952. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.242. Petition for a Rulemaking to Revise and Update the Travelers Information Service Rules of Highway Information Systems, Inc. (filed July 16, 2008) (HIS Petition). HIS Petition at 9. Id. at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2502A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2502A1.txt
            • call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Jeremy Miller, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B145, Washington, D.C. 20554. His email address is jeremy.miller@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-1507. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Jeremy Miller at the contact information listed above. - FCC - See Letter to Sharon Gillett, Chief, WCB, from Anthony G. Wilhelm, Director, Broadband Technology Opportunities Program, and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2517A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2517A1.txt
            • role of carrier of last resort obligations. In this Public Notice, we seek comment on what policy areas should be understood in considering how best to prepare for the transition from the circuit-switched to the IP-based communications world. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2518A1.txt
            • D. Market Mechanisms for Spectrum Contribution What market-based or other incentive mechanisms should the Commission consider to enable broadcasters to choose whether or not to make any spectrum (excess or otherwise) available for reallocation to wireless broadband use? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2519A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2519A1.txt
            • MVPDs to continue innovating without making navigation devices obsolete when MVPDs adopt incompatible delivery methods? 3. Would a network interface solution address the concerns raised regarding cost and complexity of device certification and approval? Why or why not? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2528A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2528A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2528A1.txt
            • to support broadband services. See A National Broadband Plan for Our Future, GN Docket No. 09-51, Notice of Inquiry, 24 FCC Rcd 4342, 4355-56 ¶ 44 (2009). NPSTC argues that although the spectrum at issue here is not broadband, the same policy considerations (e.g., that spectrum should not be allowed to lie fallow) should apply. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2528A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E., Suite 110, Washington,D.C. 20002. The filing hours at this location are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. 2See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 3SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 4See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 14310 Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2549A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2549A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2549A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2558A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY 202-418-0484. - FCC - See 47 C.F.R § 1.401; National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Reducing Universal Service Support in Geographic Areas that are Experiencing Unsupported Facilities-Based Competition, Petition for Rulemaking, GN Docket No. 09-51 and WC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2566A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Clear World Communications Corporation, Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal Service Administrator in a Contributor Appeal, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Oct. 15, 2009). Id. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2569A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2569A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. This document contains proposed new or modified information collections requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection requirements contained in this document, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2583A1.txt
            • S2115 SAT-MOD-20080904-00165 Globalstar Licensee LLC On December 8, 2009, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20080904-00165 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 8, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 2 of 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2583A1_Rcd.pdf
            • S2115 SAT-MOD-20080904-00165 Globalstar Licensee LLC On December 8, 2009, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20080904-00165 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 8, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 14479
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2590A1.txt
            • as well as to give effect to the just and reasonable rate standard that the Commission has previously determined applies to the Checklist Elements.'' The Coalition requests that the Commission adopt its proposed rules on an expedited basis. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2591A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2591A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2591A1.txt
            • prior deregulatory decisions. Cbeyond claims that with access to hybrid, FTTH and FTTC loops, as opposed to the limited bandwidth of T-1 circuits, it and other applications providers, can develop and deliver ``big business'' applications to small businesses. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2607A1.txt
            • S2796 SAT-LOA-20090807-00085 DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC On December 15, 2009, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20090807-00085 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 15, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 2 of 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2607A1_Rcd.pdf
            • S2796 SAT-LOA-20090807-00085 DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC On December 15, 2009, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20090807-00085 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 15, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 14607
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2609A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2609A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2609A1.txt
            • 17, 2009); Letter from Jeffrey Taylor, Executive Director, Michigan Public Health Institute, to Sharon Gillett, Wireline Competition Bureau, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Nov. 20, 2009); Letter from Kipman Smith, Executive Director, Health Information Exchange of Montana, to Thomas Buckley, Wireline Competition Bureau, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Dec. 4, 2009). See Pilot Program Extension Public Notice; 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 " # Q Z ` � � ` ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh�
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2610A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2610A1.txt
            • on private behavior for different types of support (e.g., one-time grants, ongoing grants, loans, revolving loans, etc.)? Are there new financing vehicles (e.g., loan guarantees) that have not been employed in the broadband context that should be considered? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2614A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Wesley Platt, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - The Georgia Public Service Commission Request for Leave to File an Addendum to its State Certification of Federal Universal Service Support Eligibility Out-Of-Time, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Oct. 21, 2009); 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2615A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2615A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2615A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. and Wellman Cooperative Telephone Association., Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules; Petition for Waiver of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2619A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2619A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2619A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Dan Mack, President, Millennium Telecom, to Office of the Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Nov. 18, 2009). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2629A1.txt
            • 30-day review period. Procedural Matters Interested parties may file oppositions on or before January 22, 2010, and replies on or before February 8, 2010. All filings should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT Docket No. 08-165. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2629A1_Rcd.pdf
            • adopting the 30-day review period. Procedural Matters Interested parties may file oppositions on or before January 22, 2010, and replies on or before February 8, 2010. All filings should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT Docket No. 08-165. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules. See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte 1In the Matter of Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Clarify Provisions of Section 332(c)(7)(B) to Ensure Timely Siting Review and to Preempt under Section 253 State and Local Ordinances that Classify All Wireless Siting Proposals as Requiring a Variance, Petition for Reconsideration or Clarification, WT Docket No. 08-165, filed Dec. 17, 2009 (Petition). 2In the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2633A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology ("OET") is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 15, 2010, and reply comments on or before January 29, 2010. All filings should refer to ET Docket No. 09-234. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System ("ECFS"),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2635A1.txt
            • http://www.bcpiweb.com, by email at fcc@bcpiweb.com, by phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People with
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2635A1_Rcd.pdf
            • web site, http://www.bcpiweb.com, by email at fcc@bcpiweb.com, by phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parterules. SeeSections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex partepresentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People with Disabilities:To
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2638A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Cellco Partnership for Pro Forma Amendment of ETC Designations in the State of Alabama, WC Docket No. 09-197, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Dec. 3, 2009) (Cellco Alabama Petition); Petition
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2639A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2639A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2639A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by Verizon/Alltel Management Trust of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 03-109 (filed Oct. 5, 2009) (Alltel Petition); see also Request for Review by Verizon/Alltel Management
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-422A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-422A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. To request materials in accessible formats (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format) for people with disabilities, send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau or the Media Bureau, as listed below:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-439A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-439A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-439A1.txt
            • We seek comment on CUT FATT's petition for rulemaking and request for declaratory ruling. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due April 27, 2009. All filings should refer to MB Docket No. 09-23 and must be submitted in MB Docket No. 09-23. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-44A1.txt
            • 2. Total number of homes the cable operator currently passes with 36 or more activated channels; 3. Total number of actual subscribers, including all subscribers in MDUs; and 4. Total number of subscribers with 36 or more activated channels. Procedural Matters: Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-467A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-467A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. - FCC - Blue Casa Communications, Petition for Declaratory Ruling That, Pursuant to the Carve-Out Provisions of 47 U.S.C. § 251(g), Interstate Originating Switched Access Charges, Not Reciprocal Compensation Charges, Apply to ISP-Bound Calls That Are Terminated via VNXX-type
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-468A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-468A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-468A1.txt
            • of Engineering and Technology (OET) seeks comment on the Supplemental Request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before March 9, 2009, and reply comments on or before March 19, 2009. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-470A1.txt
            • 2008 Financial Hardship Order''). CEA filed in opposition to Broadstripe's petition for reconsideration on January 27, 2009, 43 days after Broadstripe filed its petition for reconsideration; the Commission's rules require parties to file oppositions ``within 10 days after the petition is filed.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(g). We find no good cause to accept CEA's late-filed opposition. Thus, pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, we will treat the comments filed by CEA on January 27, 2009 as an ex parte presentation. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. See Broadstripe Reply Comments (filed February 6, 2009). See Section 629(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 549(a) (requiring the FCC ``to adopt regulations to assure the commercial availability, to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-529A1.txt
            • how the condition is to be implemented, and afford Sirius XM and potential lessees sufficient time to negotiate and enter into leases, we find it necessary to further extend the Third-Party Access Commitment compliance deadline until May 29, 2009. Procedural Matters Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-531A1.txt
            • be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. This proceeding will continue to be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Filers should follow the instructions provided
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-542A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-542A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-542A1.txt
            • to treatment by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the Petition, this proceeding shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-561A1.txt
            • 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, or via e-mail at fcc@bcpiweb.com. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-570A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-570A1.txt
            • via the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) at http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi. This proceeding is designated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. For further information, contact Charles Mathias, Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-7147 or via email at charles.mathias@fcc.gov. By the Acting Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 g ¢ ¨ " ¬ Î Ï Ð Ò Ó Õ Ö Ø Ù Û Ü â ã ä å æ è é ï ð ñ ò ó õ ÷ g ¡ ¢ ¨ " Î Ï Ñ
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-574A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Leaco Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Petition for Commission Agreement to Redefine the Service Areas of Rural Telephone Companies in New Mexico, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Mar. 4, 2009) (Petition); 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-577A1.txt
            • complete its transition to an all-digital cable system. We seek comment on Massillon's request. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due April 1, 2009. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-7229-Z, and CS Docket No. 97-80 and must be submitted in CS Docket No. 97-80. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-578A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-578A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-578A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from David Pearson, Texas Organization of Rural & Community Hospitals, to William England, Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated December 22, 2008) (TORCH December 22 Letter); Letter from
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-580A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-580A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact James Brown, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (717) 338-2621 or via email at James.Brown@fcc.gov. By the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- See TelAlaska, Inc. Request for Waiver or, in the alternative, for Extension of Twelve-Month Construction Deadline, FCC File Nos. 0003663275 (Call Sign WQIQ306) and 0003663276 (Call Sign WQIQ308),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-581A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Douglas Slotten, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1572, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 61.41 (which requires a rate-of-return carrier that merges with, or becomes affiliated with, a price cap carrier to convert to price cap regulation within one year of consummation of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-623A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - National Telecommunications Cooperative Association Petition for Clarification and/or Waiver of Part 36 Rules, CC Docket No. 80-286 (dated Aug. 29, 2008; filed Oct. 9, 2008) (NTCA Petition); 47 C.F.R. §36.392. See NTCA
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-624A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-624A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Eagle Telephone System, Inc. and Midvale Telephone Exchange, Incorporated, Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' of the Appendix-Glossary of Part 36 of the Commission's Rules (filed Oct. 29,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-625A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Kathleen J. Gerke, Accounting Manager, 10D Telecom, Inc. to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Nov. 13, 2008). Id. Attach. at 1. See Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-626A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-626A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Centennial Communications Corp., Petition for Waiver of the December 31, 2008 Deadline for Submitting to USAC Changes to the Interim High Cost Cap Data of Centennial Communications Corp. and its CETC Subsidiaries
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-627A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - T-Mobile USA, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules (SAC Nos. 639003 and 239005), WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Jan. 15, 2009); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). See Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-628A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from John Nakahata, Counsel for General Communication, Inc., Harris Wiltshire & Grannis, LLP, to Dana Shaffer, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Jan. 26, 2009)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-629A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-629A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Hargray Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 54.301(b) Local Switching Support Reporting Dates for Projected Data Submissions, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Jan. 28, 2009); 47 C.F.R. § 54.301(b). See Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-630A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-630A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429, or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision by Via Talk, LLC, WC Docket No. 06-122, 2-3 (filed Feb. 4, 2009). Id. See id. at 3-4. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-631A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-631A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Mary Loeb, MD, Sunshine Community Health Center, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed Feb. 10, 2009). See id. at 1-2. See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-632A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Midstate Telecom, Inc. Petition for Waiver of FCC Rules Section 54.307(c) and Section 54.802(a), WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Jan. 7, 2009); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.307(c) and 54.802(a). See Electronic Filing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-633A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Larry Scott, CalTel, Inc., to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Jan. 8, 2009) (CalTel Request for Review); Letter from Larry Scott, Cal Tel
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-634A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-634A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-634A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Coalition for Equity in Switching Support, Petition for Clarification, CC Docket Nos. 80-286, 96-45 (filed Jan. 8, 2009) (Petition); 47 C.F.R §§ 36.125(j), 54.301(a)(2)(ii). The members of the Coalition for Equity in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-635A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1593 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Ascent Media Group Petition for Reconsideration, CC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Jan. 14, 2009) (Ascent Petition); see also Universal Service Contribution Methodology Requests for Waiver of Decisions of the Universal Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-668A1.txt
            • Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, or via e-mail at fcc@bcpiweb.com. In the interest of developing a full record that is accessible to the public as well as to Commission staff, this matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-672A1.txt
            • Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426 (voice), (202) 418-7365 (TTY), or send an e-mail to access@fcc.gov. For further information, contact Mr. Ghassan Khalek of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-2771, ghassan.khalek@fcc.gov. Action by the Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-673A1.txt
            • and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY), or send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov. For further information, contact Mr. Ghassan Khalek of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-2771, Ghassan.Khalek@fcc.gov. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. §§ 87.71, 87.73. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-675A1.txt
            • electronic file on the CD-Rom. The label should also include the following phrase "CD-Rom Copy - Not an Original." Each CD-Rom should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send CD-Rom copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-676A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before April 27, 2009, and reply comments on or before May 11, 2009. All filings should refer to ET Docket No. 09-38. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS''),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-678A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-678A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Nina Shafran, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-2781 or via email at Nina.Shafran@fcc.gov. By the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. -FCC- See Waiver Request of Stratophone, LLC and SkyTel Spectrum, LLC, filed Feb. 24, 2009 (``Petition''); 47 C.F.R. §§ 22.815, 22.817. Under section 22.817, ``a carrier must apply for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-685A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-685A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 3. Interested parties may file comments on or before April 27, 2009, and reply comments on or before May 12, 2009. All such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing File No. 09-01. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). 4. Interested parties should file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-687A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-687A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-687A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Minerva Valley Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 54.904(d) Deadline for Annual Interstate Common Line Support Certification, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Mar. 4, 2009); 47 C.F.R. § 54.904(d). See Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-688A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-688A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision by Pelzer Communications Corporation, WC Docket No. 06-122, 1 (filed Jan. 14, 2009). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-695A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-696A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-696A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-696A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-6A1.txt
            • fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Gary Remondino, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-C143, Washington, D.C. 20554. His e-mail address is gary.remondino@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-2298. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, marilyn.jones@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2357. - FCC - Letter to Dana R. Shaffer, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Nancy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-717A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-717A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition to Reject by Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Jan. 29, 2009) (PEMA Petition). See Letter from Mitchell F. Brecher, Counsel for TracFone, to Marlene H. Dortch, Federal
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-718A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Lynn Kay, Project Manager, Ready Telecom, Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 4, 2008). Id. Id. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-730A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Suraz Ibrahim, Kouso Communications, LLC, to Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Mar. 13, 2009). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-749A1.txt
            • the compact disc. The label should also include the following phrase "Disc Copy - Not an Original." Each compact disc should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send compact disc copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-753A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-753A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by Cellular Properties, Inc. for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Wabash Telephone Cooperative, Inc. in the State of Illinois pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-754A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jennifer Prime, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition by Cellular Properties, Inc. for Commission Agreement in Redefining the Service Areas of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company in the State of Illinois pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c), CC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-791A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-791A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-791A1.txt
            • Long Distance Solutions LLC ITC-214-19980820-00614 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-802A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-802A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-803A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-805A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by Corr Wireless Communications, LLC of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, CC Docket 96-45, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Mar. 11, 2009) (Request for Review). See Request for Review
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-839A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-839A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-842A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-842A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before May 6, 2009, and reply comments on or before May 18, 2009. All filings should refer to ET Docket No. 09-55. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS''),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For BRS service rule questions: Nancy Zaczek (legal) or Stephen Zak (technical), at (202) 418-2487 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 or Lisa Stover at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-843A1_Rcd.pdf
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.61 V. CONTACTS 67.For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For BRS service rule questions:Nancy Zaczek (legal) or Stephen Zak (technical), at (202) 418-2487 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions:Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 or Lisa Stover at (717)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-870A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-870A1.txt
            • electronic file on the CD-Rom. The label should also include the following phrase "CD-Rom Copy - Not an Original." Each CD-Rom should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, parties must send CD-Rom copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY- B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-901A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-901A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-901A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing such presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Thomas J. Beers, Chief, Policy Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-0952. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.242. Petition for Rule Making of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (filed March 16, 2009) (AASHTO Petition). Id. at 1. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-904A1.txt
            • and Complete the proposed rulemaking in the Migratory Birds Proceeding to adopt measures to reduce migratory bird deaths in compliance with the MBTA. We seek comment on the Petition for Expedited Rulemaking and Other Relief. We deem the proceeding, for ex parte purposes, as ``permit-but-disclose'' in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b). All comments should refer to WT Docket Nos. 08-61 and 03-187. Comments may be filed using (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS''), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Generally,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-904A1_Rcd.pdf
            • threatened species; and Complete the proposed rulemaking in the Migratory Birds Proceedingto adopt measures to reduce migratory bird deaths in compliance with the MBTA.3 We seek comment on the Petition for Expedited Rulemaking and Other Relief. We deem the proceeding, for ex partepurposes, as "permit-but-disclose" in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b). All comments should refer to WT Docket Nos. 08-61 and 03-187. Comments may be filed using (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System ("ECFS"), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies.4 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.5 Generally,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-910A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. -FCC- Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. Petition for a Waiver of Section 61.42(g) of the Commission's Price Cap Rules for Advanced Services Formerly Offered by Verizon Hawaii, Inc., WCB/Pricing File No. 09-04 (filed April 17,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-911A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7353. -FCC- AT&T Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 61.42(g) of the Commission's Rules and Request for Expedited Treatment, WCB/Pricing File No. 09-05, at 1-2 (filed March 31, 2009) (AT&T Waiver Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. § 61.42(g). A copy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-914A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-914A1.txt
            • subject to streamlined treatment. II. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-996A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-996A1.txt
            • is consistent with Commission action in similar transactions. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if it finds that the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-996A1_Rcd.pdf
            • ex parte treatment is consistent with Commission action in similar transactions.38 Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,39the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if it finds that the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.40 We direct parties making oral ex partepresentations to the Commission's statement re- emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list and Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd. and Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund, L.P., Petition for Expedited Action
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1001A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1001A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1001A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claude Aiken, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by deltathree, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed May 27, 2010). Id. at 1-2. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1012A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Universal Service Contribution Methodology; Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator and Emergency Petition for Stay by U.S. TelePacific Corp. d/b/a TelePacific Communications, WC Docket No. 06-122,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-102A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Anita Cheng or Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-6, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, DA 09-96 (Nov. 5, 2009); Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act, Pub. L.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1040A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1040A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1040A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance of Line Up, LLC Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c), WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed May 27, 2010) (Petition); 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A). Petition at 7. See Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1045A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1045A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism, A National Broadband Plan For Our Future, CC Docket No. 02-6, GN Docket No. 09-51, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 10-83 (rel. May 20, 2010)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1051A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1056A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1056A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1056A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Letter from Candace Harden, Southwest Alabama Mental Health / Mental Retardation Board, Inc., to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated May 7, 2010, filed May
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1078A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1078A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. For further information, contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-2357. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 1.3; CenturyLink Petition for Waiver of Deadline, WC Docket No. 07-244, CC Docket No. 95-116, at 1 (filed June 7, 2010) (CenturyLink Petition). See also Local Number Portability Porting Interval and Validation Requirements; Telephone Number Portability,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1105A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Declaratory Ruling or to Initiate Rulemaking by Thomas M. Lynch, Brennan Lynch LLP, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed June 4, 2010). Id. at 1. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1163A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1163A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claude Aiken, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Application for Review of Order of Wireline Competition Bureau by inContact, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed June 7, 2010) (inContact Application for Review). Universal Service Contribution Methodology; Request for Review by
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1169A1.txt
            • been assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20100603-00010. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-116A1.txt
            • is in support of relief efforts in Haiti. INFORMATIVE S2763 SAT-LOA-20080910-00173 SES Americom, Inc. On January 21, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 21, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2764 SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 SKYNET SATELLITE CORPORATION On January 21, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the motion of Skynet Satellite Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. Accordingly, IBFS File Number SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 is designated as "permit-but-disclose" proceedings under the Commission's ex parte rules, effective January 21, 2010.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-116A1_Rcd.pdf
            • is in support of relief efforts in Haiti. INFORMATIVE S2763 SAT-LOA-20080910-00173 SES Americom, Inc. On January 21, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 21, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2764 SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 SKYNET SATELLITE CORPORATION On January 21, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the motion of Skynet Satellite Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. Accordingly, IBFS File Number SAT-LOA-20080910-00174 is designated as "permit-but-disclose" proceedings under the Commission's ex parte rules, effective January 21, 2010.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1173A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Cricket Communications, Inc. Petition for Forbearance, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Jun. 21, 2010) (Cricket Forbearance Petition). See Cricket Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier, WC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1189A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - . Also included in the scope of the review are all non-mandatory submissions to the Commission, including tariffs, contracts and reports and all data purchased by the Commission. We also seek comment on any data collections not identified in the working inventory. Omnibus Broadband Initiative, Federal Communications Commission, Connecting America: The National
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1195A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Shirley Suggs or Michael Teaney, Media Bureau, at (202) 418-7200, or via e-mail at shirley.suggs@fcc.gov or michael.teaney@fcc.gov. - FCC - . Also included in the scope of the review are all non-mandatory submissions to the Commission, including tariffs, contracts and reports and all data purchased by the Commission. We also seek comment
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Rob Alderfer of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0600, or via email at robert.alderfer@fcc.gov. - FCC - . Also included in the scope of the review are all non-mandatory submissions to the Commission, including tariffs, contracts and reports and all data purchased by the Commission. We also seek comment on any
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1223A1_Rcd.pdf
            • making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.6Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex partepresentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.7 For further information, contact Rob Alderfer of the WirelessTelecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0600, or via email at robert.alderfer@fcc.gov. -FCC - 5 See47 C.F.R. §§1.1200, 1.1206. 6 See47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 7 See id. 8340
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1227A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1227A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1228A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Paula Vrana, Copper River Native Association., to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed June 4, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.603. See Electronic Filing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1245A1.txt
            • communications providers are reporting completely and accurately? What are the advantages and disadvantages of mandatory reporting and voluntary reporting? What other regulatory alternatives should we consider for interconnected VoIP service provider and broadband ISP outage reporting? Procedural Matters This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1253A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. For further information, contact Heather Hendrickson, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7295. - FCC - Purple Petition for Clarification or Waiver, CG Docket No. 10-51, at 1 (filed June 2, 2010) (Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.613(a). A URI specifies both how (the protocol) and where (the address) to access a resource on
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-125A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. @fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the offices listed below: Audio Division, Media Bureau For service rules questions: Lisa Scanlan or Tom Nessinger at (202) 418-2700 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-125A1_Rcd.pdf
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 59. To request materials in accessible formats (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format) for people with disabilities, send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.govor call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). IX. CONTACTS 60. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the offices listed below: Audio Division, Media Bureau For
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1264A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica W. Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Dawn Kosiorowski, BCG, Inc., to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Jun. 2, 2010). Id. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1277A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1277A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1277A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-127A1.txt
            • 15. In order for the Commission to determine if there are sufficient reasons for instituting a rulemaking proceeding, we are treating the Era comment as a petition for rulemaking and seek comment on Era's request. We deem this proceeding, for ex parte purposes, as "permit-but-disclose" in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b). Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1284A1_Rcd.pdf
            • as restricted proceedings for ex partepurposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parterules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex partepresentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-128A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing Ohmart/VEGA's waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, it will treat this proceeding, for ex parte purposes, as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1294A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance of PlatinumTel Communications, LLC, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed July 2, 2010) (Petition); 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.201(d)(l), (i). Petition at 2. See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-129A1.txt
            • Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing the petition for declaratory ruling. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, it will treat this proceeding, for ex parte purposes, as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1350A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1350A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1350A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Theodore Burmeister, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Smith Bagley, Inc. Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal Service Administrator and Request for a Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket Nos. 08-71 and 05-337 (filed July 6, 2010); 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1351A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. @fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the offices listed below: Video Division, Media Bureau For service rules questions: Shaun Maher or Adrienne Denysyk at (202) 418-1600 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1351A1_Rcd.pdf
            • partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presentedis generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 53. To request materials in accessible formats (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format) for people with disabilities, send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.govor call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). VII. CONTACTS 54. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the offices listed below: Video Division, Media Bureau For
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1356A1.txt
            • Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE On July 22, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of Sprint Nextel Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective July 22, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 3 of 3
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1356A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE On July 22, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of Sprint Nextel Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective July 22, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 10062
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1366A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Pine Drive Telephone Company and Qwest Communications, Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed June
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1398A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1398A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1398A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. - FCC - See UTEX Communications Corporation, Petition for Preemption, WC Docket No. 09-134 (filed July 13, 2010) (Renewed Petition). Id. at 1. See In the Matter of Petition of UTEX Communications Corporation,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1423A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. For further information, contact Melissa Kirkel, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7958. . . . See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1454A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Rural Health Care Universal Service Support Mechanism, CC Docket No. 02-60, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 10-125 (rel. Jul. 15, 2010) (Rural Health Care NPRM). Id. at para. 156. 75 Fed Reg.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1455A1.txt
            • hampered if the waiver is not granted. We seek comment on this proposed waiver. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 10-161. Comments sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1462A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1462A1.txt
            • Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 80.375(d). ISO 8729-2, ``Ships and marine technology - Marine radar reflectors - Part 2: Active type,'' (May 2009). ITU-R M.1176, ``Technical parameters of radar target enhancers'' (1995). See SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 19.2.1.7. IMO Resolution MSC.164(78), ``Revised performance standards for Radar Reflectors,'' adopted May 17, 2004. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1462A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties shall send one copy of their comments and reply comments to Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 6See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 7SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 8See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 10697 Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (800) 378-3160, e-mail FCC@BCPIWEB.com. The request, and comments and reply comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1469A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1469A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- See July 1, 2010 Annual Access Charge Tariff Filings, AT&T Corp. Petition for Reconsideration, WCB/Pricing File No. 10-03 (filed July 30, 2010). (AT&T Petition). Id. at 4. Id. at 6. Id. at 2. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-147A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-147A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Mobile Petition for Limited Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Alabama, WC Docket No. 09-197, at 9-10 (filed Jan. 15, 2010). Id. at 1. See id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1492A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of AT&T Mobility LLC for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier and Transfer of the Alltel Pine Ridge Reservation Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Designation, WC Docket No. 09-197, at 5 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1495A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1495A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1495A1.txt
            • 0004296040 Bresnan Communications, LLC KNGQ260 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-14A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Interested parties may file comments on or before February 5, 2010 and reply comments on or before February 22, 2010. All filings should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT Docket No. 10-4. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-14A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Commission's ex parterules.3Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed.4More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.5Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex partepresentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 3See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 4SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 5See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 69 Interested parties may file comments on or before February 5,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1516A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1516A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Letter from Anne Boyle, Commissioner, Nebraska Public Service Commission, to Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed Jul. 26, 2010). Rural Health Care Support Mechanism, WC Docket No. 02-60, Second
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1551A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1551A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1551A1.txt
            • general public. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as "permit-but-disclose" in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b). Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1.txt
            • Verizon Wireless does not raise any trafficking concerns. Ex Parte Status of the Proceeding Background. In the public notice seeking comment on the proposed transaction, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (``Bureau''), pursuant to its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. In its Petition for Reconsideration, Cellular South objects to the ex parte status of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights. Discussion. This is the third time Cellular South has raised
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1554A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Verizon Wireless does not raise any trafficking concerns. E. Ex Parte Status of the Proceeding 85. Background. In the public notice seeking comment on the proposed transaction, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ("Bureau"), pursuant to its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules,269announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules.270 In its Petition for Reconsideration, Cellular South objects to the ex partestatus of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as proceduraland due process rights.271 86. Discussion. This is the third time Cellular South has raised these
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1556A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . -FCC- See also, Letter from Henry A. Waxman, Joe Barton, Rick Boucher, and Cliff Stearns, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, to Julius Genachowski, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission (June 30, 2010); Letter from Julius Genachowski, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission to Henry A. Waxman, Chairman, Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1559A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1559A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Twin Valley Telephone, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Sections 36.612 and 54.305 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No 96-45 (filed August 9, 2010) (Petition); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.305(d)(1) and 36.612(a)(3). See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1574A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1574A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of CAL Communications, Incorporated, for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 from the Own Facilities Requirement for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Status, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed August 6, 2010)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1575A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1575A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1575A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See i-wireless, LLC's Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed July 27, 2010) (Compliance Plan). Id. at 1; see Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Telecommunications Carriers Eligible for Universal Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-157A1.txt
            • the pleading cycle for this Petition during which responses and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before March 1, 2010 and replies on or before March 16, 2010. Please place the case identifier, CSR-8272-O, on all filings. One copy of responses, replies, or other communications must be served on all participants in the case. Parties must file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1600A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1600A1.txt
            • Commission's Office of Engineering and Technology (``OET'') is reviewing the Request for Waiver. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the issues presented by this request, it will treat this proceeding, for ex parte purposes, as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1602A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier; Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. Petition to Redefine Rural Service Areas, WC Docket No. 09-197, Memorandum and Order, DA 10-1601
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1604A1.pdf
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. For further information, contact Michelle Sclater, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-0388. - FCC - See Letter from Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC, to Michael Wade, President, Database Service Management, Inc., Docket No. 95-155, DA 10-1117 (rel. June 25, 2010) (Wireline Competition Bureau June 25, 2010 Letter); see also Letter from Sharon
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1606A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Persons making
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1606A1_Rcd.pdf
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).29Persons making oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1608A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1608A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1608A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - MeetingOne.com Corp. Petition to Stay Decision Pending Commission Review, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Aug. 19, 2010). Id. at 1-2. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1631A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1631A1.txt
            • IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-19961204-00139 for a description of the action taken. S2110 SAT-MOD-19961204-00139 IRIDIUM CONSTELLATION LLC On August 27, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2135 SAT-MOD-20100623-00144 SES Americom, Inc. On August 27, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1631A1_Rcd.pdf
            • IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-19961204-00139 for a description of the action taken. S2110 SAT-MOD-19961204-00139 IRIDIUM CONSTELLATION LLC On August 27, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2135 SAT-MOD-20100623-00144 SES Americom, Inc. On August 27, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 12509
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1645A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from John T. Nakahata, Counsel for General Communications, Inc., to Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed Aug. 23, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.603. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1646A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Yaron Dori, Counsel for Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, to Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed Aug. 23, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.603. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1653A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1653A1.txt
            • http://www.bcpiweb.com, by email at fcc@bcpiweb.com, by phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People with
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1653A1_Rcd.pdf
            • its web site, http://www.bcpiweb.com, by email at fcc@bcpiweb.com, by phone at (202) 488-5300 or(800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parterules. SeeSections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex partepresentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People with Disabilities:To
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1661A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Head Start Telecom, Inc.'s Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Aug. 20, 2010); Consumer Cellular, Inc. Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Aug. 27, 2010); Line Up, LLC's Compliance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1662A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Chin Yoo, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Requests for Review of Decisions of Universal Service Administrator by Airband Communications, Inc. et al. Application for Review of Airband Communications, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Aug.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1667A1.pdf
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. For further information, contact William Kehoe, (202) 418-7122, or John Spencer, (202) 418-2487. -FCC- Preserving the Open Internet; Broadband Industry Practices, GN Docket No. 09-191, WC Docket No. 07-52, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 24 FCC Rcd 13064 (2009) (Open Internet NPRM); see also Appropriate Framework for Broadband Access to the Internet Over Wireline Facilities et al., CC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1669A1.txt
            • Kentucky Data Link, Inc. WLV233 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1676A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1676A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - i-wireless, LLC Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the States of Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, New Hampshire, North Carolina, New York, Tennessee, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the District
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1677A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1677A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1677A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Chin Yoo, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Daniel S. Brown, Partner, Reliable Telephone Company, LLC to Office of the Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Aug. 16, 2010). Id. at 1. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1711A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1711A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1711A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other provisions pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. @fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the offices listed below: Audio Division, Media Bureau For service rules questions: Lisa Scanlan or Tom Nessinger at (202) 418-2700 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1711A1_Rcd.pdf
            • partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other provisions pertaining to oral and written ex partepresentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 54.To request materials in accessible formats (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format) for people with disabilities, send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.govor call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). VI. CONTACTS 55.For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the offices listed below: Audio Division, Media Bureau For service rules
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1720A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1720A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Dixie Net Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Sept. 3, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1735A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1735A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1735A1.txt
            • (C-Group), Anderson, SC; WHQ447 (B-Group), White Stone, SC; WND422 (A-Group), Camden, SC; WND451 (A-Group), Winnsboro, SC; WND452 (A-Group), Pickens, SC; WND532 (G-Group), Marion, SC; WND533 (G-Group), Beaufort, SC; and WND534 (A-Group), Greenwood, SC. Attached to the Waiver Request are maps showing the proposed GSAs SCETV is requesting. Waiver Request at 3. Id. Id. at 4. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1735A1_Rcd.pdf
            • SC; WHR957 (C-Group), Anderson, SC; WHQ447 (B-Group), White Stone, SC; WND422 (A-Group), Camden, SC; WND451 (A-Group), Winnsboro, SC; WND452 (A-Group), Pickens, SC; WND532 (G-Group), Marion, SC; WND533 (G-Group), Beaufort, SC; and WND534 (A-Group), Greenwood, SC. Attached to the Waiver Request are maps showing the proposed GSAs SCETV is requesting. 10Waiver Request at 3. 11Id. 12Id.at 4. 13See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 13102 the subjects discussed.14More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.15 Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. SeeElectronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1743A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1743A1.txt
            • rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Omnibus Broadband Initiative, Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan, GN Docket No. 09-51, at 47-48 (2010) (National Broadband Plan). Id. at 47. This is consistent with the recommendations of the National Broadband Plan that the Commission review its current competition policies regarding business broadband services. See id. at 48. The National Broadband
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1750A1.txt
            • § 25.226(d); see also Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission's Rules to Allocate Spectrum and Adopt Service Rules and Procedures to Govern the Use of Vehicle-Mounted Earth Stations in Certain Frequency Bands Allocated to the Fixed-Satellite Service, Report and Order, IB Docket No. 07-101, 24 FCC Rcd 10414, 10433-34 ¶¶ 58-64 (2009). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1750A1_Rcd.pdf
            • in this proceeding are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.10More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.11 For further information, contact Mr. Tim Maguire of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-2155, tim.maguire@fcc.gov. -FCC - 9See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 10SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 11See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 13169
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1752A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1752A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Wesley Platt of the Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2821. -FCC- Implementation of Section 224 of the Act; a National Broadband Plan for our Future, WC Docket No. 07-245, GN Docket No. 09-51, Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 10-84 (rel. May 20, 2010) (Pole Attachments Order).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1754A1.txt
            • not subject to streamlined treatment. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1762A1.txt
            • Skechers shoes and that the program therefore violates, among other things, the limit on the amount of advertising in children's programming in the CTA and the Commission's rules. Through this Public Notice, we seek comment on CCFC's petition. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Interested parties may file comments on or before October 22, 2010 and reply comments on or before November 8, 2010. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 10-190.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1786A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1786A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1786A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Midwestern Telecom, Inc. Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Sept. 10, 2010). See Telecommunications Carriers Eligible for Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Head Start Petition for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1790A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Theodore Burmeister, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Request for Review of Decision of Universal Service Administrator by Corr Wireless Communications, LLC, WC Docket No. 05-337, CC Docket No. 96-45,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1812A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Chin Yoo, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Requests for Review of Decisions of Universal Service Administrator by Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. and Centennial Communications Corp., Application for Review of Action Taken Pursuant to Delegated Authority of AT&T Inc., WC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1813A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1813A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Chin Yoo, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Requests for Review of Decisions of Universal Service Administrator by Airband Communications, Inc. et al., Petition for Reconsideration of Airnex Communications, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Sept. 8, 2010). Universal Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1815A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1815A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1815A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Chin Yoo, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Form 499 Filer ID No.826216 Petition for Special Relief and Waiver, Application for Review of Compass Global, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Sept. 13, 2010). Universal Service Contribution Methodology; Federal-State Joint
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1837A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1837A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1837A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 54.703(c). See Letter from D. Scott Barash, Acting Chief Executive Officer, USAC, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 97-21 (dated Mar. 15, 2010)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1904A1.txt
            • as moot. See IBFS File No. SAT-STA-20070713-00098. INFORMATIVE S2795 SAT-AMD-20100528-00114 Pegasus Development DBS Corporation On September 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective September 30, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 1 of 2 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE S2795 SAT-LOA-20090807-00084 Pegasus Development DBS Corporation On September 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective September 30, 2010. We find that designating
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1904A1_Rcd.pdf
            • as moot. See IBFS File No. SAT-STA-20070713-00098. INFORMATIVE S2795 SAT-AMD-20100528-00114 Pegasus Development DBS Corporation On September 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective September 30, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 13729 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE S2795 SAT-LOA-20090807-00084 Pegasus Development DBS Corporation On September 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective September 30, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1906A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1906A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of GreatCall, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Alabama, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Sept. 22, 2010); Petition of GreatCall, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1946A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1946A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Timothy Hart, Manitowoc Public Utilities, to Secretary, FCC, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Oct. 1, 2010). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1967A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1967A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY 202-418-0484. - FCC - NECA 2011 Modification of the Average Schedule Universal Service High-Cost Loop Formula, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Aug. 24, 2010). USAC 2011 Average Schedule Company Local Switching Support Formula, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1968A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Islands Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone's Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Sep. 28, 2010); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.719(c), 54.721, and 54.722.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1988A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1988A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Telecommunications Carriers Eligible for Universal Service Support; Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier; Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. Petition to Redefine Rural Service Areas, WC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1989A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1989A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - F&B Communications, Inc. f/k/a Farmers' and Business Men's Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 54.802(a) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Oct. 13, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.802.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1990A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1990A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1990A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Anita Cheng, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Application for Review of Integrity Communications, Ltd., CC Docket No. 02-6 (filed July 30, 2010); Request for Review of a Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Integrity Communications, Ltd., CC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1991A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2357, or Sanford Williams of the Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1508. - FCC - Letter from Gerald J. Kovach, Senior Vice President, External Affairs, Neustar, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau (October 13, 2010) (Neustar 2010 Letter).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1995A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1995A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1995A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2357, or Sanford Williams of the Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1508. - FCC - Letter from Gerald J. Kovach, Senior Vice President, External Affairs, Neustar, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau (October 15, 2010) (Neustar 2010 Letter
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2012A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Matthew Schulman, Regulatory Consultant for IP Telcom Group, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Sept. 30, 2010). Id. at 1. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2013A1.txt
            • cable systems have violated the prohibition on negative option billing. At issue is whether Section 623(f) is satisfied by a subscriber's ``affirmative assent'' and whether TWC's ordering process complies with the negative option billing restriction of Section 623(f). This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Interested parties may file comments on or before November 9, 2010 and reply comments on or before November 19, 2010. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 10-215.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2014A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance of ReCellular, Inc. (``MCA Wireless''), WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Oct. 13, 2010) (Petition). ReCellular requests forbearance from this requirement as set forth in section 214(e)(1)(A) of the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2034A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2034A1.txt
            • WPVE278 CP File Nos. 0004269966, 0004269967, 0004269968, 0004340738, 0004340739, 0004340740, and 0004341204. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.955(a)(3), 22.317, 90.157(a). See File Nos. 0004316492 (Station WPPB889), 0004338881 (Station WPUA857). See File No. 0004411788 (Station WNGE426). See File No. 0004316546 (Station WPVE245). 47 C.F.R. § 20.9(a). See Appendix A for a list of the call signs at issue. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2034A1_Rcd.pdf
            • by commercial overnight courier, or by first- class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, as follows: -Effective December 28, 2009, all hand-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary 8See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 9SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 10See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 14607 must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12thSt., S.W., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-203A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Bayland Communications, LLC Petition for Waiver of Section 54.904(d) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Jan. 25, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.904(d). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2050A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2050A1.txt
            • before entering the building. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are subject to disclosure. The full text of this document and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2073A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2073A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2073A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marvin Sacks of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. - FCC - ATTACHMENT A Voluntary Data Request Filing Specification For Non-ILEC and Out-of-Region ILEC Providers Connections by Location (Question III.B.1) For each location in each Listed Statistical Area to which your company provides a connection that you own
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2100A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Islands Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone's Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Oct. 21, 2010); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.719(c), 54.721, and 54.722.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2101A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Georgia RSA #8 Partnership Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.313, 54.314 and 54.307(d) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Oct. 27, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.313, § 54.314 and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2109A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Heather Hendrickson, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1580 or heather.hendrickson@fcc.gov. - FCC - Telecommunications Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities; E911 Requirements for IP-Enabled Service Providers; Internet-Based Telecommunications Relay Service Numbering, CG Docket No. 03-123, WC Docket No. 05-196, WC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-210A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Douglas Slotten, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1572, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b). See National Exchange Carrier Association, 2010 Modification of Average Schedules at Summary, attached to Letter from Richard A. Askoff, Executive Director-Regulatory, NECA, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2112A1.txt
            • title comments responsive to this Notice as ``PN Comments - Specialized CPE Distribution Program.'' Further, we strongly encourage parties to develop responses to this Notice that adhere to the organization and structure of the questions in this Notice. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2144A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Conexions, LLC Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Oct. 29, 2010). See Telecommunications Carriers Eligible for Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Conexions Petition for Forbearance, WC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2151A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at pamela.arluk@fcc.gov. - FCC - Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No 09-133, Declaratory Ruling, (WCB Bureau Sept. 29, 2010) (Bureau Order). AT&T Inc., Application for Review, WC Docket No. 09-133 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2157A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Ringsted Communications Company Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Oct. 28, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2158A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Allied Wireless Communications Corporation Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.313, 54.314, 54.307(d), 54.809(a), 54.904(a) and 54.904(d ) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Nov. 2, 2010); 47 C.F.R. §§
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2159A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Victoria Goldberg of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at victoria.goldberg@fcc.gov. - FCC - See UTEX Communications Corporation, Petition for Preemption, WC Docket No. 09-134 (filed July 13, 2010) (Renewed Petition). UTEX's original preemption petition was denied on October 9, 2009. See In the Matter
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2171A1.txt
            • and suppliers in government procurement. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2171A1_Rcd.pdf
            • and suppliers in government procurement.18 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,19 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.20 We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re- emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.21 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments 12Id. at 5. The
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2172A1.txt
            • American Samoa Cable, LLC SCL-LIC-20080814-00016 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2172A1_Rcd.pdf
            • American Samoa Cable, LLC SCL-LIC-20080814-00016 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,8 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.9 We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re- emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.10 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.11
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2196A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at pamela.arluk@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Protested Tariff Transmittals Action Taken, WCB/Pricing File No 10-09, Public Notice, DA 10-1917 (rel. Oct. 6, 2010) (Bureau Order). Sprint Communications Company LP, Application for Review, WC Docket No. 10-226,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2203A1.txt
            • automatic rate adjustments in the event of a loss in programming. In this regard, FSN-Ohio notes that the parties' then-effective carriage agreement included no such price adjustment clause. FSN Ohio Reply at 6. In light of our disposition of the Petition, we need not address FSN-Ohio's request that the Commission designate its petition as a permit-but-disclose proceeding pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. See Petition at 23. Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2203 Federal Communications Commission DA 10-2203 { ]„îÿ � � � Û 0 0 ð
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2219A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at pamela.arluk@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Protested Tariff Transmittals Action Taken, WCB/Pricing File No 10-10, Public Notice, DA 10-1970 (rel. Oct. 14, 2010) (Bureau Order). Qwest Communications Company, LLC, Application for Review, WC Docket No. 10-227,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2231A1.txt
            • Wireless PCS, LLC WPZZ711 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2231A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Wireless PCS, LLC WPZZ711 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.4 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.5 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.6 Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2234A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2234A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2234A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Mark Nadel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition by Funds for Learning for Clarification of Confidentiality of Consultant Information Included on New FCC Forms 470 and 471 and Definition of ``Consultant,'' CC Docket No. 02-6 (filed Nov. 12, 2010)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-223A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-223A1.txt
            • Access (SOTDMA) employing Gaussian minimum shift keying; while the GMDSS SART transmits on frequencies in the 9 GHz band with a transmission that is pulsed, and the modulation is a series of twelve sweeps from 9.2 GHz to 9.5 GHz. Also, the AIS-SART's power is 1 watt compared to 400 milliwatts for the GMDSS SART. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-223A1_Rcd.pdf
            • hours at this location are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. PLEASE NOTE: This is the ONLYlocation where hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary will be accepted. The Commission's former filing location at 236 Massachusetts Ave., N.E., is permanently closed. -Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must 5See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 6SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 7See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 1254 be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive,Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2259A1.txt
            • What role should the principal play in a corporation or other business entity to confer eligibility for the preference on the entity? For instance, should the principal be required to have majority equity ownership and a management role? This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2259A1_Rcd.pdf
            • 24Recommendation at 9-10. 25Recommendation at 10. 16858 principal play in a corporation or other business entity to confer eligibility for the preference on the entity?For instance, should the principal be required to have majority equity ownership and a management role? This matter shallbe treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex partepresentations in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2263A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - See Empowering Consumers to Avoid Bill Shock; Consumer Information and Disclosure, CG Docket Nos. 10-207 and 09-158, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 10-180, 2010 WL 4059847 (rel. Oct. 14, 2010) (Notice). 75 Fed. Reg. 72773 (Nov. 26, 2010). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2269A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - East Ascension Telephone Company LLC and EATELCORP, INC. Appeal of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719(c), 54.721, and 54.722 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-226A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-226A1.txt
            • the Evolution Broadband DMS-1002 and DMS-1002-CA. The Media Bureau seeks comment on this certification. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Comments and oppositions are due February 13, 2010. All filings should refer to the case identifier, CSR-8259-Z. Pleadings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments and oppositions filed must indicate that they have been served on Petitioner. All comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2297A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2297A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Don Kelso, Executive Director, Indiana Rural Health Association, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Nov. 17, 2010) (ITN Letter). Rural Health
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2298A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other provisions pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the offices listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For 700 MHz service rule questions: Michael Connelly (legal) or Keith Harper (technical), at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2298A1_Rcd.pdf
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other provisions pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 65. To request materials in accessible formats (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format) for people with disabilities, send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). 42See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, FCC 98-56, 13
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2323A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2323A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance of AirVoice Wireless, LLC, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Dec. 1, 2010) (Petition). AirVoice requests forbearance from this requirement as set forth in section 214(e)(1)(A) of the Communications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2324A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Kimberly Scardino or Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - TracFone Wireless, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 09-197, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Dec. 1, 2010). See id. at 3-18. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2334A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Jeffrey R. Taylor, Ph.D., Executive Director, Michigan Public Health Institute, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Nov. 17, 2010) (MPHI Petition).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2345A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Emergency Request for Review of a Universal Service Administrator Decision and DCIA Interest and Penalty Assessment and Request for Waiver of 45-Day Revision Deadline by American Broadband & Telecommunications, WC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2346A1.txt
            • Street, S.W., Washington D.C. 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty). This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2360A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Rebekah L. Bina, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7931 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - American Public Communications Council Emergency Petition for Interim Relief to Prevent the Disappearance of Payphones, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Dec. 6, 2010) (Petition for Interim Relief); American Public Communications Council
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2369A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Cross Wireless, LLC d/b/a Sprocket Wireless Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Dec. 6, 2010). 47 C.F.R §54.307(c). See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2376A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2376A1.txt
            • United States. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as "permit-but-disclose" in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b). Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2415A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2415A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2415A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Kim Lamb, Executive Director, Oregon Health Network, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Dec. 17, 2010) (OHN Letter). Rural Health Care
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2423A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2423A1.txt
            • to MB Docket No. 10-263 and must be submitted in MB Docket No. 10-263. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. The Commission will make electronic filing available for this proceeding. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 10-263. Filings sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Documents may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-243A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of Beehive Telephone Co., Inc. and Beehive Telephone Co. Inc. Nevada for a Declaratory Ruling that the Commission Does Not Entertain Actions by Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-254A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-264A1.txt
            • Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (Voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-264A1_Rcd.pdf
            • copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents mayalso be purchased from BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. 1432 This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules. See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merelya listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See47 C.F.R.§1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex partepresentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-272A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation For Election of Price Cap Regulation and For Limited Waiver of Pricing and Universal Service Rules, WC Docket No. 10-39, at 1 (filed Feb.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-278A1.txt
            • Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (Voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-278A1_Rcd.pdf
            • copying during business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules. See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex partepresentations in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-283A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at pamela.arluk@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of the United States Telecom Association for Waiver of Rule 61.49(k)'s Non-exogenous Cost Data Requirements for the Short Form Tariff Review Plan and for Waiver of Rule 61.49(k)'s Deadline
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-298A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-298A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. - FCC - Joint Petition for Expedited Declaratory Ruling that the State of Michigan's Statute 2009 PA 182 is Preempted Under Sections 253 and 254 of the Communications Act, WC Docket No. 10-45,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-299A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of China Telephone Company, FairPoint Vermont, Inc., Maine Telephone Company, Northland Telephone Company of Maine, Inc., Sidney Telephone Company, and Standish Telephone Company, Each a Debtor-in-Possession for Conversion to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-300A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Verizon California Inc., Verizon South Inc., and Frontier Communications Corporation, Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules (filed Jan. 10,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-304A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition of Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. to Redefine Rural Service Areas, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Feb. 18, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.207. See 47 C.F.R. § 54.207(d). The Commission has
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-310A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-310A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of the Ad Hoc Coalition of International Telecommunications Companies for Rulemaking to Address Inequities in USAC's Interpretation and Application of the Carrier's Carrier Rule, WC Docket No. 06-122 (Feb. 16,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-319A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Bayou Internet Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Jan. 25, 2010). Id. at 7. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-32A1.txt
            • No. SAT-STA-20091014-00110 (grant stamp, dated December 3, 2009). INFORMATIVE S2790 SAT-AMD-20090604-00064 DISH Operating L.L.C. On January 7, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 7, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2790 SAT-LOA-20090518-00053 DISH Operating L.L.C. On January 7, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 7, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-32A1_Rcd.pdf
            • No. SAT-STA-20091014-00110 (grant stamp, dated December 3, 2009). INFORMATIVE S2790 SAT-AMD-20090604-00064 DISH Operating L.L.C. On January 7, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 7, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2790 SAT-LOA-20090518-00053 DISH Operating L.L.C. On January 7, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 7, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-345A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-345A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-345A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Mobile Petition for Limited Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of Connecticut, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Feb. 17, 2010) (Connecticut Petition); Virgin Mobile Petition for Limited
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-346A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - The Adams County E-911 Emergency Telephone Service Authority et al. Petition for Rejection of TracFone Wireless, Inc.'s Self Certification of Compliance in the State of Colorado, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed January
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-365A1.txt
            • - Letter dated Feb. 17, 2010 from Kristin L. Welsh, Vice President Strategic Initiatives and Business Community Liaison, AHA to Scot Stone, Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC. See 47 C.F.R. § 97.113(a)(3) (emphasis added). See Amateur Service Communications during Government Disaster Drills, Public Notice, 24 FCC Rcd 12872, 12872 (WTB/PSHSB/EB 2009). Id. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-365A1_Rcd.pdf
            • form." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, commenters must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. 5See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 6SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 7See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 2121 Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first- class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-391A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-391A1.txt
            • Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (Voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-391A1_Rcd.pdf
            • D.C. 20554, and via the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) by entering the docket number, WT Docket No. 10-59. The comments may also be purchased from Best Copy and Printing, Inc., telephone (800) 378-3160, facsimile (301) 816-0169, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules. See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the 6Id.at 1-2. 7Id. at 2. 2265 substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-394A1.txt
            • the pleading cycle for this Petition during which responses and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before April 8, 2010 and replies on or before April 23, 2010. Please place the case identifier, CSR-8302-O, on all filings. One copy of responses, replies, or other communications must be served on all participants in the case. Parties must file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-397A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-397A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of Windstream for Limited Waiver Relief, WC Docket No. 10-55 (filed March 2, 2010) (Windstream Petition). Id. at 1. Id. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-39A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-401A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Elizabeth Valinoti McCarthy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Letter from Richard A. Belden, Chief Operating Officer, Universal Service Administrative Company to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (filed Feb. 23, 2010) (USAC Letter). FCC Form
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-405A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-405A1.txt
            • in Puerto Rico, and that application of those requirements to PRT and PRTLD imposes unnecessary costs and creates significant inefficiencies. PRT and PRTLD argue that their continued compliance with those requirements therefore is not in the public interest. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-409A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-409A1.txt
            • been assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20100122-00002. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-410A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-410A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-410A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cindy Spiers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Level 3 Application for Review, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Jan. 25, 2010) (Level 3 Application for Review); see Universal Service Contribution Methodology; Emergency Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-41A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before February 22, 2010, and reply comments on or before March 8, 2010. Such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing File No. 10-01. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). Interested parties should file an original and four copies
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-42A1.txt
            • See A National Broadband Plan For Our Future, GN Docket No. 09-51, Notice of Inquiry, 24 FCC Rcd 4342 (2009) at 4381 ¶ 125. In permit-but-disclose proceedings, written ex parte presentations are permissible but must be disclosed in the record of the proceeding. Oral ex parte presentations containing new data or arguments must also be disclosed. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). but which relate to dockets other than GN Docket No. 09-51 will not be considered in the other dockets, so as to assure fairness to other parties in those dockets. . . PUBLIC NOTICE News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 ) * Á Â ë ì
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-433A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Elizabeth Valinoti McCarthy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Letter from Peter Lurie, Senior Vice President, Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Mar. 4, 2010) (Virgin Mobile Modification Petition).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-434A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-434A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - NTCH, Inc. Petition for Limited Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the States of Alabama and Tennessee, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Mar. 5, 2010) (NTCH ETC Petition); NTCH, Inc.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-43A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Wesley Platt, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - CTC Telecom, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.314(d) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Dec. 17, 2009); 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-44A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Wesley Platt, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Pine Belt Telephone Company, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling and/or Waiver of NECA Requirements, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Dec. 2, 2009). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-457A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-457A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-457A1.txt
            • this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, it will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. We urge parties to use the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-458A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-458A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-458A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Seeks Comment on Petitions for Waiver to Deploy 700 MHz Public Safety Broadband Networks, DA 09-1819 (rel. Aug. 14, 2009). Letter from Harlin McEwan to Chairman Julius Genachowski, PS Docket No. 06-229, WT Docket No. 06-150 (Dec. 15, 2009). Id. at 1. To date, requests have
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-461A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Douglas Slotten of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 1.2; Petition for Declaratory Ruling and Alternative Petition for Preemption of the Pennsylvania, New Hampshire and Maryland State Commissions, WC Docket No. 10-60, at 1 (filed Mar. 5,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-465A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-465A1.txt
            • to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY), or send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov. For further information, contact Mr. Rodney Conway of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-2904, Rodney.Conway@fcc.gov. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 90.267. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.173(i). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-465A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties shall send one copy of their comments and reply comments to Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (800) 378-3160, e-mail 3See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 4SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 5See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 2702 FCC@BCPIWEB.com. Comments filed in response to this Public Noticewill be available for public inspection and copying during business hours in the FCC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-466A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-466A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-466A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Letter from Ben Scott et al., Free Press, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, GN Docket Nos. 09-137, 09-51, 09-191, WC Docket Nos. 07-52, 07-38 (Feb. 22, 2010) at 1 (Free Press Request). Id. Id. Id. Id. at 8, 9. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-473A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lynne Hewitt Engledow of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at lynne.engledow@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Beehive Petition for Declaratory Ruling; Amendment to Petition for Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 10-36 (filed Mar. 13, 2010) (Beehive Amendment). This amendment was filed after the conclusion of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-474A1.txt
            • including dispute resolution mechanisms and mandatory interim carriage. We seek comment on this petition. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Section 1.405(a) of the Commission's rules provides that statements in support of or in opposition to a petition for rulemaking ``shall be accompanied by proof of service upon the petitioner on or prior to the date of filing . . . .'' Section 1.405(b) of the Commission's rules states that replies to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-48A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Smith Bagley, Inc., High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Petition for Waiver, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Dec. 14, 2009) (Petition); High-Cost Universal Service Support; Federal-State Joint Board
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-500A1.txt
            • and Priority mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). . . Because of the policy implications, we believe that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b) and must
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-507A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Midwestern Telecommunications, Incorporated, for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160 from the Own Facilities Requirement for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Status, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Mar. 16, 2010)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-50A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY 202-418-0484. - FCC - See 47 U.S.C. § 160(c); Petition of Partner Communications Cooperative for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c), WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Dec. 2, 2009) (Petition); 47 C.F.R. § 54.305(b) and (d). Partner
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-522A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-522A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-522A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Cingular Wireless became a wholly-owned subsidiary of AT&T Inc. in March 2007, when AT&T acquired BellSouth Corporation. See AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corporation; Application for Transfer of Control, WC Docket No. 06-74,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-530A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-530A1.txt
            • Communications Corp. ITC-214-19970923-00579 ITC-214-20000817-00545 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-530A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Authorization Number ITC-ASG-20100205-00080 Centennial Communications Corp. ITC-214-19970923-00579 ITC-214-20000817-00545 IV. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,4the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-531A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-531A1.txt
            • License Company LLC KNKN636 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-531A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Sign 00038887225 Centennial Southeast License Company LLC KNKN636 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,6the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.7 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.8More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.9Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-53A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Consumer Cellular, Inc. Petition for Limited Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the States of Connecticut, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, and the Commonwealth of Virginia, WC Docket No. 09-197,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-54A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Cricket Communications, Inc. Petition for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier, WC Docket No. 09-197, at 1 (filed Dec. 22, 2009). Id. See id. at 2. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-556A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-556A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-556A1.txt
            • efficiency and flexible use goals. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-556A1_Rcd.pdf
            • the Commission's spectrum efficiency and flexible use goals.21 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,22the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.23 We direct parties making oral ex partepresentations to the Commission's statement re- emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.24More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.25Other rules pertaining to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-558A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-587A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-587A1.txt
            • (space-to-Earth), 12.5-12.75 GHz (space-to-Earth), and 14.00-14.5 GHz (Earth-to-space) frequency bands. INFORMATIVE S2115 SAT-MOD-20091214-00152 Globalstar Licensee LLC On March 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 2 of 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-587A1_Rcd.pdf
            • (space-to-Earth), 12.5-12.75 GHz (space-to-Earth), and 14.00-14.5 GHz (Earth-to-space) frequency bands. INFORMATIVE S2115 SAT-MOD-20091214-00152 Globalstar Licensee LLC On March 30, 2010, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective immediately. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. 3306
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-5A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-5A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-5A1.txt
            • Certified as a Frequency Coordinator for 800/900 MHz Business and Industrial/Land Transportation Frequencies, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 12666 (WTB PSPWD 2001); Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Announces that American Mobile Telecommunications Association, Inc., Is Certified as a Frequency Coordinator for 800/900 MHz Business and Industrial/Land Transportation Frequencies, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 13040 (WTB PSPWD 2001). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-5A1_Rcd.pdf
            • at 445 12thSt., SW, Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be disposed of beforeentering the building. The filing hours at this location are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.PLEASE NOTE: The Commission's former filing location at 236 Massachusetts Avenue, NE is permanently closed. 4See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 5SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 6See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 32 ßCommercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-61A1.txt
            • August 2009, and to provide an opportunity to address matters raised in other parties' comments, we hereby grant MAP's request and establish a period for reply comments. Reply comments should be filed no later than January 27, 2010. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-627A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-627A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-627A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Mark Nadel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-7385. - FCC - Petition by United States Telecom Association and CTIA - The Wireless Association(R) for Declaratory Ruling Clarifying Certain Aspects of the ``Lowest Corresponding Price'' Obligation of the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Program,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-62A1.txt
            • information and privacy in an online, broadband world.3 The Commission seeks public comment on the questions and topics raised by the Center for Democracy and Technology in its letter, available at: http://webapp01.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view.action?id=7020365402, and attached to this Public Notice. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-644A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-644A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-644A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Romanda Williams, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Petition of Allied Wireless for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of North Carolina, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Apr. 13, 2010) (AWCC Petition); see also 47 U.S.C.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-645A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-645A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- AT&T Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 61.42(g) of the Commission's Rules and Request for Expedited Treatment, WCB/Pricing File No. 10-06, at 1-2 (filed Apr. 13, 2010) (AT&T Waiver Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. § 61.42(g). A copy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-667A1.txt
            • RCN Telecom Services, Inc. WLY-679 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-670A1.txt
            • number. The SamKnows test software can also be embedded onto other hardware such as routers, gateways, games consoles, etc. --------- We seek public comments generally on this approach, as well as specifically on the five elements described above. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-691A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-691A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-691A1.txt
            • United States and Cuba. II. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-691A1_Rcd.pdf
            • State Department Letter. 10Id. 4432 II. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,11the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.12 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.13More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.14Other rules pertaining to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-6A1.txt
            • persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426 (voice), (202) 418-7365 (TTY), or send an e-mail to access@fcc.gov. For further information, contact Mr. Jim Shaffer of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-0687, james.shaffer@fcc.gov. Action by the Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 80.123. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202-418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-6A1_Rcd.pdf
            • February 4, 2010. Reply comments are due no later than February 19, 2010. All filings should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT 10- 2. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules.2Parties making oral ex parte presentations in this proceeding are reminded 147 C.F.R. § 80.123. 2See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 34 that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.3More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.4 Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. SeeElectronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-704A1.txt
            • http://www.bcpiweb.com, by email at fcc@bcpiweb.com, by phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People with
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-704A1_Rcd.pdf
            • web site, http://www.bcpiweb.com, by email at fcc@bcpiweb.com, by phone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parterules. SeeSections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex partepresentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People with Disabilities:To
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-71A1.txt
            • fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Gary Remondino, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-C143, Washington, D.C. 20554. His e-mail address is gary.remondino@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-2298. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, marilyn.jones@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2357. - FCC - Letter to Sharon Gillett, Bureau Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Nancy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-757A1.txt
            • c/o Natek, Inc., 236 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E., Suite 110, Washington, D.C. 20002. Other messenger-delivered documents, including documents sent by overnight mail (other than United States Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. All filings must be made in accordance with Section 1.1206(b)(1) of the Commission's rules. In addition, one copy of each ex parte written presentation and memorandum should be delivered to Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th St. S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington D.C.; and David Brown, Video Division, Media Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 2-C828, Washington, D.C. 20554. For further information, contact David Brown at (202) 418-1600.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-768A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-768A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY 202-418-0484. - FCC - See 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.721 and 54.722; Request for Review by PR Wireless, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 05-337 (filed Apr. 5, 2010). PR Wireless has requested, pursuant to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-775A1.txt
            • hampered if the waiver is not granted. We seek comment on this proposed waiver. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 10-89. Comments sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-781A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-781A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-781A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Syringa Wireless, LLC Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed May 4, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-793A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-793A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-793A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - MeetingOne.com Corp. Request for Review of Universal Service Administrator Decision, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed May 3, 2010). Id. at 7-8. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-803A1.txt
            • effectively monitor their usage? We seek comment on these and other issues relevant to whether the Commission should adopt usage control measures that will help consumers to avoid receiving higher than expected bills for their wireless communications services. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-840A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-840A1.txt
            • Times Communications, LLC, Debtor-In-Possession KD26376 IG 0004220437 Los Angeles Times Communications, LLC, Debtor-In-Possession KD26376 IG, YG 0004220445 Orlando Sentinel Communications Company, Debtor-In-Possession KIM936 IG, MG Part 78 Chicagoland Microwave Licensees Assignment of License From: Chicagoland Microwave Licensee, Inc., Debtor-in-Possession To: Chicagoland Microwave Licensee, Inc. CARS License File Number WLY-387 CAR-20100511AA-08 WLY-388 CAR-20100511AB-08 KB-60125 CAR-20200511AC-08 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a). See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(1). 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 i r { } kd› � ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö ƒA·Û "ƒõ¹\Îív`` � 6› ·Û tm š ¶ tm š tm
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For service rule questions: Michael Connelly (legal) or Melvin Spann (technical), at (202) 418-0620 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction questions: Debbie Smith or Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2868 For auctions
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-849A1_Rcd.pdf
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.62 V. CONTACTS 77. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: 60 When ordering documents from BCPI, please provide the appropriate FCC document number (for example, DA 10-849 for this Public Notice). 61 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 62 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 5315 Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-865A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Allo Communications Petition for Waiver of Filing Deadline, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed May 10, 2010) (Petition); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). Allo Communications requests a waiver of ``the filing deadline for the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-86A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - U.S. TelePacific Corp. d/b/a TelePacific Communications Request for Review and Reversal of Universal Service Administrator Decision, WC Docket No. 06-122, at 1 (filed Jan. 8, 2010). U.S. TelePacific Corp. d/b/a TelePacific
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-873A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-873A1.txt
            • more expedited period for replies, as indicated by the Comment and Reply Dates, above. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 10-111. Comments sent via e-mail to the Commission will be considered informal and will not be part of the official record. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-87A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Grande Communications Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Dec. 28, 2009). Id. at 3. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-88A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Standing Rock Telecommunications, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier Pursuant to Section 214(e)(6) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Dec. 18, 2009). Id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-902A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-902A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claude Aiken, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Reliance Communications, Inc. and Reliance Communications International, Inc. Request for Review of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed May 13, 2010). Id. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-910A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-910A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Katie King or Ted Burmeister, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Reconsideration of Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc., WC Docket No. 03-337, CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket No. 03-109 (filed Apr. 27, 2010). High-Cost Universal Service Support,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-94A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-94A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-94A1.txt
            • Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-96A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-96A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-96A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-974A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-988A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-988A1.txt
            • responses, we encourage submission of any data, charts or proposed plans that can be entered into the public record for purposes of building a record on this subject. All parties with knowledge and interest are encouraged to file. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-993A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-993A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-993A1.txt
            • Qwest Communications Company, LLC SCL-LIC-19981117-00025 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-997A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-997A1.txt
            • S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Because of the potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to it, it shall be treated as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the FCC's ex parte rules, which are codified at 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. Therefore, ex parte presentations will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1011A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) orfor which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1012A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1012A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1012A1.txt
            • LLC Cellco Partnership WQEE474 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1012A1_Rcd.pdf
            • LLC Cellco Partnership WQEE474 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,4 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.5 We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.6 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.7 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.8 Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1014A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1014A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1014A1.txt
            • USCOC Nebraska/Kansas, LLC WQDM555 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1014A1_Rcd.pdf
            • U.S.C. § 310(d). 7973 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,2 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.3 We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.4 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.5 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.6 Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1016A1.txt
            • announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will govern any further consideration of Digital Broadcasting's certification application. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make written and oral ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding as provided in 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). An original and one copy of all filings must be submitted with the Commission's Secretary. All filings should be clearly captioned as ex parte presentations and must reference Digital Broadcasting OVS. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1017A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1019A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1019A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1019A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1019A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1027A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1027A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1027A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of TAG Mobile, LLC for Designation as a limited Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia, WC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-103A1.txt
            • documents and other information and to present substantive testimony about those materials. Petitioners also express concern that arbitrators will take similar actions in other proceedings brought pursuant to current or future Commission merger orders that include arbitration conditions. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Interested parties may file comments on or before February 7, 2011 and reply comments on or before February 17, 2011. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 11-14.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1046A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1047A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1047A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1059A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1059A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before July 5, 2011, and reply comments on or before July 15, 2011. All comments should reference PS Docket No. 06-229. Comments may be filed: (1) using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) through the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. . Paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1081A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1081A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1081A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of TerraCom, Inc. for Designation as a limited Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia, WC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1090A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1090A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1090A1.txt
            • of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 386.199 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 451.4 386.449 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.5 373.5 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.5 360.549 Tm 91 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 107.5 342.299 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 329.099 Tm 98 Tz (Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 114.95 329.549 Tm 99 Tz (Wireline Competition Bureau at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1096A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1096A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See 47 C.F.R. § 54.502(b). Certain eligible service entries (e.g., ``Distance Learning and Video Conferencing'' in the Internet access category) and other language has been transferred from certain sections into other appropriate
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-10A1.txt
            • Wireless PCS, LLC WPWV360 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-10A1_Rcd.pdf
            • LLC WPWV360 147 U.S.C. § 310(d). 82 2 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,2the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.3 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.4More thana one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.5Other rules pertaining to oral and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1102A1.txt
            • to customers and serve as an unnecessary barrier to the market for all-digital video recording devices. We seek comment on TiVo's request for waiver of Sections 15.118(b), 15.123(b)(1) and 15.123(c) with respect to its Premiere Elite product. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § § 1.1200, 1.1206. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Interested parties may file comments on or before July 25, 2011 and reply comments on or before August 9, 2011. All filings must reference MB Docket No. 11-105.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1133A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1133A1_Rcd.pdf
            • data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filedconsistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-113A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - DialTone Services, L.P. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Jan. 13, 2011); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). 47 C.F.R § 54.307(c) See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1140A1.txt
            • two sentence description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.45 419.349 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 451.9 419.349 Tm /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 406.599 Tm /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 394.149 Tm 94 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 108.7 375.649 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 362.949 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 289.65
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-114A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Puerto Rico Telephone Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719, 54.721, and 54.722 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1152A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1152A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1152A1.txt
            • Request for Declaratory Ruling that the Commission's Rules Authorize Greater than 25 kHz Bandwidth Operations in the 817-824/862-869 MHz Band, submitted to the Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunication Division, FCC, on filed June 3, 2011 (``Petition''). Id. at 1 n.1. 47 CFR 90.209, 90.691. See Petition at 3. Id. Id. at 4. Petition at 4-5. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1152A1_Rcd.pdf
            • form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and one copy of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, commenters must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. 7Petition at 4-5. 8See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 9SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 10See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 9429 Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first- class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-115A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-115A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-115A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Wildflower Telecommunications, LLC Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.802(a) and 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Jan. 10, 2011); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.802(a) and 54.307(c). 47 C.F.R §54.802(a),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1160A1.txt
            • making oralexpartepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed.More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.6 Other rules pertaining to oral and writtenex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.7 For further information, please contact Chin Yoo, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. -FCC- 547 C.F.R. § 1.1200etseq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 747 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1166A1.txt
            • 0 1 71.25 420.299 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.) Tj 1 0 0 1 268.3 420.049 Tm (Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 451.65 420.049 Tm /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 71 407.599 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.25 395.099 Tm 90 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 107.25 376.349 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.25 363.649 Tm 98 Tz (Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 114.95 363.649 Tm 102 Tz (Wireline Competition Bureau at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1171A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Belinda Nixon of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1520, Belinda.Nixon@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of Pac-West Telecom, Inc. for Declaratory Ruling Regarding Access Charges Assessed on VoIP-Initiated Access Traffic, WC Docket No. 11-115 (filed June 28, 2011) (Pac-West Petition); Petition for Declaratory Ruling, WC Docket No. 11-115 (filed June
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1177A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1182A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1198A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1200A1.txt
            • the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.9 618.25 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.8 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 453.1 617.35 Tm 98 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 605.35 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 593.35 Tm 92 Tz (rules.9) Tj 1 0 0 1 109.9 567.399 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Joseph Cavender, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.4 554.95 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 290.15 516.549
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1204A1.txt
            • of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 276.75 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 451.9 276.549 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.7 264.299 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont1 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 251.6 Tm 92 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 109.2 213.399 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 200.949 Tm (Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 116.6 200.949 Tm (Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-2429 or TTY \(202\)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1206A1.txt
            • description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 226.85 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.95 226.399 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.25 213.899 Tm /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.5 201.649 Tm 91 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.5 137.299 Tm 105 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (447C.F.R. §) Tj 1 0 0 1 132.7 137.299 Tm 110 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (1.l200etseq.) Tj 1 0 0 1 77 115.949 Tm 87 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (See) Tj 1 0
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1210A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1210A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1213A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1213A1.txt
            • 30 meters. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as "permit-but-disclose" in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b). Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed: (1) using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) through the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by submitting
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1219A1.txt
            • FCC 11-31 (rel. March 3, 2011) (Retransmission Consent Proceeding). 47 U.S.C. § 309(d)(1); Astroline Communications Co., Ltd. Partnership v. FCC, 857 F.2d 1556 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (``Astroline''). Gencom, Inc. v. FCC, 832 F.2d 171, 181 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (``Gencom''). Astroline, 857 F.2d at 1561; 47 U.S.C. § 309(e). ``Permit-but-disclose'' ex parte rules already govern the Retransmission Consent Proceeding. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(a)(1). We see no reason to extend the same ex parte status, as requested by ACA, to this adjudicatory proceeding. - Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 - L V � K L TïRΞ&ÿ‰PNG �` �` b``DÐ 4 £&)œ@°-ˆ@Ž@ÿ7 H >˜ôO‡ìà p jóý ¨2£=ÿõk²‡Ñ Ÿ"_­ - J÷Ë, µNt£Rb Ê7�P­÷ÔUÿZS 'ÄýwpˆÖˈ jP˜T{.|Â87w]žgíãyAèÒ¨-¾�=T#ÆO> ·#W páÃí°U­^SŽ ³tÉ''ôTxNt›l Û¦ÆéX6`T{ŠÓÌÿþÓ:ér¶• ÄAÉR\ )]h]eÆM8îIÌŸ`Ì?K^ûòá ?CªôAþUU ˆ3ê¡Ÿ=¼¼A „ \±+í_
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1231A1_Rcd.pdf
            • data or arguments in his orher prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentationsand memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1238A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-123A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1260A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1260A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1260A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - American Broadband and Telecommunications Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed June 30, 2011) (Compliance Plan). Petition for Forbearance of American Broadband & Telecommunications, WC Docket No. 09-197, CC Docket No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1261A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance by North American Local, LLC., WC Docket 09-197 (filed Apr. 28, 2011) (Petition); 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A). Petition at 2. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1264A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1264A1.txt
            • the pleading cycle for this Petition, during which responses and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before August 25, 2011 and replies on or before September 8, 2011. Please place the case identifier, CSR 8507-O, on all filings. One copy of responses, replies, or other communications must be served on all participants in the case. Parties must file an
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1265A1.txt
            • the pleading cycle for this Petition, during which responses and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before August 25, 2011 and replies on or before September 8, 2011. Please place the case identifier, CSR 8508-O, on all filings. One copy of responses, replies, or other communications must be served on all participants in the case. Parties must file an
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-126A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Douglas Slotten, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1572, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b). See National Exchange Carrier Association, 2011 Modification of Average Schedules at Summary, attached to Letter from Richard A. Askoff, Executive Director-Regulatory, NECA, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-127A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before February 24, 2011, and reply comments on or before March 10, 2011. Such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing File No. 11-03. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). Interested parties should file an original and four copies
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-129A1.txt
            • comment on these and any other relevant issues that will allow the Commission to determine whether a price cap on Sirius XM's subscriber rates continues to be necessary and how any extended price cap should operate. Procedural Matters This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1318A1.txt
            • VE proof of identity and proof that he or she held the appropriate license, and sign an affidavit certifying that he or she is the person named in the expired license grant. It also proposes that element credit be given only for licenses that expired, and not for licenses that were surrendered, revoked, or suspended. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1318A1_Rcd.pdf
            • the VE proof of identity and proof that he or she held the appropriate license, and sign an affidavit certifying that he or she is the person named in the expired license grant. It also proposes that element credit be given only for licenses that expired, and not for licenses that were surrendered, revoked, or suspended. 6See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 7SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 8See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 10713 number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions for e- mail comments, commenters should send
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1346A1.txt
            • of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.6 587.049 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.49 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 456.7 586.35 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.15 574.149 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 74.15 562.149 Tm 88 Tz (rules.5°) Tj 1 0 0 1 109.9 542.95 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.9 530.45 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 290.6 474.049
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1348A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Katie King, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484, Daniel Ball, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1520, and Sue McNeil, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0660. - FCC - Connect America Fund; A National Broadband Plan
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1349A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1349A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1349A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Joseph Cavender, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - NE Colorado Cellular, Inc., d/b/a Viaero Wireless, Petition for Commission Agreement in Redefining Certain Service Areas of Rural Incumbent Telephone Companies in the State of Kansas, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed July
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1353A1.txt
            • S2469 SAT-MOD-20110420-00073 Intelsat License LLC On August 4, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20110420-00073 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 4, 2011. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2469 SAT-STA-20110727-00137 Intelsat License LLC On August 4, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-STA-20110727-00137 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 4, 2011. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1353A1_Rcd.pdf
            • S2469 SAT-MOD-20110420-00073 Intelsat License LLC On August 4, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-MOD-20110420-00073 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 4, 2011. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. S2469 SAT-STA-20110727-00137 Intelsat License LLC On August 4, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SAT-STA-20110727-00137 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 4, 2011. See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1357A1.txt
            • Greater Iowa, LLC WQKH493 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1357A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Greater Iowa, LLC WQKH493 147 U.S.C. § 310(d). 11157 2 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,2the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.3We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteproceduresthat are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.4 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.5More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.6Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1358A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WQJQ779 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1358A1_Rcd.pdf
            • this market. See ULS File No. 0004566825. 11160 2 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1365A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1365A1.txt
            • of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 312.299 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 451.65 312.049 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont6 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 299.799 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 287.099 Tm 93 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 108.7 261.899 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 249.149 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 289.199 223.5
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1417A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1417A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Joseph Cavender, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Triangle Communication System, Inc. Petition for FCC Agreement to Redefine the Service Area of a Rural Telephone Company in Montana - Central Montana Communications, Inc., WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Aug. 4,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1450A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1450A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1450A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Michele Levy Berlove, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1477 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of GCB Communications, Inc. d/b/a Pacific Communications and Lake Country Communications, Inc. for a Declaratory Ruling to Clarify Payphone Service Providers' Responsibilities with Respect to the Transmission of Payphone-Specific Coding Digits
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1488A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1488A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1513A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1513A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other provisions pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. @fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the offices listed below: Audio Division, Media Bureau For FM service rules questions: Lisa Scanlan or Tom Nessinger at (202) 418-2700 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1513A1_Rcd.pdf
            • partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other provisions pertaining to oral and written ex partepresentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.38 36SeeElectronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, FCC 98-56, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 3747 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 38The Commission substantially revised its ex parterules in 2011. The effective date of these rule revisions was June 1, 2011. So all Auction 93 commenters must be familiar with these
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1515A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1515A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1515A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request by Baltimore-Washington Telephone Company for Review of a Decision of Universal Service Administrator and Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.711 and 54.713(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1518A1.txt
            • 488-5563. For further information regarding the public reference file for this waiver request, contact Lisa Williams, RIC, (202) 418-1352. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). People
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1526A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1526A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Telenational Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed August 30, 2011); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). 47 C.F.R § 54.307(c). See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1555A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1555A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1557A1_Rcd.pdf
            • comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them 2547 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. 13022 in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1558A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1561A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1561A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Petition of Vaya Telecom, Inc. Regarding LEC-to-LEC VoIP Traffic Exchanges (filed Aug. 26, 2011) (Petition). Id. at 1. Id. Connect America Fund; A National Broadband Plan for Our Future; Establishing Just and Reasonable Rates for Local Exchange Carriers; High-Cost Universal Service Support; Developing an Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime; Federal-State Joint Board on
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1563A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1563A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1576A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1581A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of PlatinumTel Communications, LLC for Designation as n Eligible Telecommunications Carrier for Low Income Support Only, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Aug. 5, 2011) (Petition). Petition at 1. See Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1582A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1582A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1582A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance of Airvoice Wireless, LLC, WC Docket 09-197 (filed Sep. 13, 2011) (Petition); 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A). Petition at ii. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1583A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Budget Prepay, Inc. for Limited Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Florida, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Aug. 1, 2011) (Petition). Petition at 1. See Electronic Filing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1590A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1590A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1593A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1593A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Kimberly Scardino, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - APPENDIX A August 9, 2011 Dana R. Shaffer Deputy Managing Director Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Response to Letter Directing USAC to Develop a Proposal for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1606A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1664A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1664A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1664A1.txt
            • the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.45 288.549 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written cx) Tj 1 0 0 1 462.95 288.049 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 275.799 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 263.1 Tm 92 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 108.2 237.649 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 225.399 Tm (Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY 202-418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 289.199 200.199 Tm 116
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1680A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1680A1.txt
            • the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 418.349 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 447.8 418.599 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (cx parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.4 405.649 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 392.699 Tm 92 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 104.85 374.449 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 361.5 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or YFY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 286.05
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1700A1.txt
            • description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.2 236.199 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.6 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 451.65 235.75 Tm /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 71.75 223.25 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 210.799 Tm 91 Tz (rules.7) Tj 1 0 0 1 72 129.849 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (547) Tj 1 0 0 1 90.7 125.299 Tm 106 Tz /OPBaseFont2 10 Tf (C.F.R. § 1.1200) Tj 1 0 0 1 162.45 125.299 Tm 105 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (etseq.) Tj 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1707A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-172A1.txt
            • Brown, President & CEO, CTN, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Jan. 5, 2011); Letter from Norman H. Okamura, Project Coordinator, Pacific Broadband Telehealth Demonstration Project, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Jan. 21, 2011). See ITN Public Notice; 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1739A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1739A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . Depending on the volume of questions and time constraints, the panel moderators will work to respond to as many questions as possible during the workshop. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). . - FCC - For more news and information about the Federal Communications Commission See Electronic Filing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-175A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this public notice, contact Jennifer A. Manner, Deputy Bureau Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, at (202)418-3619 or Richard Lee, Associate Bureau Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, at (202) 418-1104. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 0.191(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1760A1.txt
            • views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 279.399 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.45 278.949 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 266.699 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 254.199 Tm 93 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 228.5 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 215.799 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-2429 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 286.8 177.149
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1761A1.txt
            • description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 316.599 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.4 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 449.25 316.149 Tm /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.15 303.899 Tm /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.15 291.399 Tm 91 Tz (rules.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 104.4 265.75 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.15 253.25 Tm 99 Tz (Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 112.05 253 Tm (Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1762A1.txt
            • views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 67.9 228.049 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 448.55 227.35 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 67.2 215.1 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 67.4 202.85 Tm 92 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 66.95 138.25 Tm 106 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (447C.F.R. §) Tj 1 0 0 1 128.4 138.25 Tm 111 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (1.l200etseq.) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.7 116.399 Tm 86 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (See) Tj 1 0
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-176A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY 202-418-0484. - FCC - Application for Review, Accipiter Communications, Inc., CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Oct. 1, 2010). See Accipiter Communications, Inc. and Qwest Corporation, Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1782A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1782A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1782A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - ReCellular, Inc. (MCA Wireless) Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Oct. 21, 2011) (Compliance Plan). ReCellular, Inc. Petition for Forbearance, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Oct. 13, 2010) (Petition). Telecommunications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1783A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - NTCH, Inc. Compliance Plan, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed October 17, 2011) (Compliance Plan). NTCH, Inc. Petition for Forbearance, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed June 20, 2011) (Petition); Telecommunications Carriers Eligible
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1784A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1784A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1784A1.txt
            • DC 20554. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty). . . Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1790A1.txt
            • Rules to Permit Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) Technology, Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order, WT Docket No. 11-69, 26 FCC Rcd 6503, 6510-11 ¶ 22 (2011) (granting waiver to permit use of Terrestrial Trunked Radio equipment on certain Industrial/Business Pool spectrum, but not on Public Safety Pool frequencies due to increased concerns about interference). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1790A1_Rcd.pdf
            • the Commission's Rules to Permit TerrestrialTrunked Radio (TETRA) Technology, Notice of Proposed Rule Making and Order, WT Docket No. 11-69, 26 FCC Rcd 6503, 6510-11 ¶ 22 (2011) (granting waiver to permit use of Terrestrial Trunked Radio equipment on certain Industrial/Business Pool spectrum, but not on Public Safety Pool frequencies due to increased concerns about interference). 7See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 8SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 9See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 15142 additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1803A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1803A1.txt
            • views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 206.199 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.7 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.7 206 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 193.25 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 180.75 Tm 91 Tz (rules.8) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 131.049 Tm 102 Tz /OPBaseFont3 10 Tf (647) Tj 1 0 0 1 88.3 126.5 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (C.F.R. § 1.1200) Tj 1 0 0 1 160.05 126.5 Tm /OPBaseFont5 10 Tf (etseq.) Tj 1 0 0
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1804A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1804A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1804A1.txt
            • of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 358.599 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.7 358.399 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 345.899 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 333.149 Tm 92 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.6 314.399 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 301.75 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 287
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1832A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1832A1.txt
            • and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex parte status: This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' rulemaking proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Copies of the reports and any subsequently filed documents in this matter may be obtained electronically at http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html, and in paper form from BCPI during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center located at 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. Alternate formats of this Public Notice (computer
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-183A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-183A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. For further information, contact William Kehoe of the Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1580 or william.kehoe@fcc.gov. -FCC- Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-246, § 6112, 122 Stat. 923, 1966 (2008) (2008 Farm Bill). The 2008 Farm Bill required that the rural broadband strategy include recommendations: (A) to promote interagency coordination of Federal
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1859A1.txt
            • to promote the transition to and funding of Next Generation 911 programs, and if so, what additional provisions? The Bureau also seeks comment on any additional proposals that commenters recommend for consideration by Congress. Comment Filing Procedures This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § § 1.1200, 1.1206. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Interested parties may file comments on or before December 6, 2011 and reply comments on or before January 5, 2012. All filings must reference PS Docket No. 09-14.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1879A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1879A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1884A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1884A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Joseph Cavender, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Triangle Communication System, Inc. Petition for FCC Agreement to Redefine the Service Area of a Rural Telephone Company in Montana - Central Montana Communications, Inc., WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Aug. 4,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1904A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1904A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1904A1.txt
            • description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 385.949 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.7 385 Tm /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 373 Tm /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 361 Tm 92 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.8 341.549 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 329.549 Tm 99 Tz (Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 113 329.099 Tm (Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1905A1.txt
            • views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 385 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.45 384.799 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 372.299 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 359.799 Tm 91 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.35 340.849 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 328.349 Tm 99 Tz (Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 113 328.149 Tm (Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1932A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1932A1.txt
            • the pleading cycle for this Petition, during which responses and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before December 22, 2011 and replies on or before January 6, 2012. Please place the case identifier, CSR-8541-O, on all filings. One copy of responses, replies, or other communications must be served on all participants in the case. Parties must file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1933A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1933A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Chin Yoo, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Bestel USA, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed October 31, 2011). Id. at 1. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1936A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1936A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1936A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1954A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1954A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1966A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1966A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Patrick Halley, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1500 or TTY (202) 418-2825. - FCC - See Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket No. 10-90 et al., Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 11-161, paras. 210-26 (rel. Nov. 18, 2011) (USF/ICC Transformation Order and FNPRM). The National
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1968A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1968A1.txt
            • DC 20554. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty). . . Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these Applications, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, we will allow ex parte presentations that address issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, provided they are disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2000A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2000A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules. (Acrobat). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2002A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2013A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2013A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2013A1.txt
            • description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 330.299 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.2 329.799 Tm /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 317.349 Tm /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 305.099 Tm 91 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 104.85 279.399 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Ernesto Beckford, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 267.199 Tm (Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 112.55 266.699 Tm (Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2016A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2016A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2016A1.txt
            • of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 301 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.4 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.2 300.799 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 288.299 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 275.6 Tm 91 Tz (rules.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.1 250.149 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 237.399 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-2429 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 286.8 198.75
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2017A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2017A1.txt
            • description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 223.25 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.7 223.5 Tm /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 210.5 Tm /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 197.35 Tm 91 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 132.75 Tm 105 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (447C.F.R. §) Tj 1 0 0 1 130.8 133 Tm 117 Tz /OPBaseFont5 10 Tf (l.l200etseq.) Tj 1 0 0 1 75.35 111.399 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (See 47 C.F.R. §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2018A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2018A1.txt
            • LLC Cellco Partnership KNLF376 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2018A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Partnership WPOJ687 0004949598Cricket License Company, LLC Cellco Partnership KNLF376 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,5the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.6We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.7 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.8More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.9Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2021A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2021A1.txt
            • L.P. Cellco Partnership KNKN800 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2021A1_Rcd.pdf
            • 0004957491South Canaan Cellular Communications Company, L.P. Cellco Partnership KNKN800 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2033A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2033A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Citizens Tel Coop Petition for Waiver of Section 54.314(d) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Nov. 23, 2011); 47 C.F.R. § 54.314(d). 47 C.F.R § 54.314(d). See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2038A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2053A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2053A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Petition for Waiver of the National Exchange Carrier Association's (NECA) adjustment period for calculating High Cost Loop Support, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed December 19,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2054A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2054A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2054A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Midcontinent Communications Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed December 14, 2011); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). 47 C.F.R § 54.307(c). See Electronic Filing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-206A1.txt
            • Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 87.139(i)(1). See Letter dated June 2, 2010 from Bruce A. Olcott to James Shaffer, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. On November 29, 2010, EMS clarified its request. See Letter dated Nov. 29, 2010 from Bruce A. Olcott to James Shaffer, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-206A1_Rcd.pdf
            • former filing location at 236 Massachusetts Ave., N.E., is permanently closed. -Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive,Capitol Heights, MD 20743. -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. 3See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 4SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 5See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 1080 Parties shall send one copy of their comments and reply comments to Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2074A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2074A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-2074A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1580 or Marilyn.Jones@fcc.gov. - FCC - RNK, Inc. Petition for Limited Waiver of Section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's Rules Regarding Numbering Resources, filed February 7, 2005 (RNK Petition); Nuvio Corporation Petition for Limited Waiver of Section 52.15(g)(2)(i) of the Commission's Rules
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-244A1.txt
            • Wireless PCS, LLC KNLG319 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-244A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Wireless, LLC New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC KNLG319 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,5the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.6 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.7More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.8Other rules pertaining to oraland
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-24A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Chin Yoo, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by XO Communication Services, Inc., WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Dec. 29, 2010). Id. at iv-viii. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-252A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WPWU989 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-252A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Sign 0004566825 Qualcomm Incorporated AT&T Mobility Spectrum LLC WPWU989 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-256A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2429 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Dale C. Alerson, MD, Project Coordinator, Southwest Telehealth Access Grid, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Jan. 14, 2011) (SWTAG Letter).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-25A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Boomerang Wireless, LLC for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, The District of Columbia, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia, WC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-269A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 225, and 251(e), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 225, and 251(e), and sections 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, and 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.91, 0.141, 0.291, 0.361, 1.3, that this
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-274A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-274A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Interested parties may file comments on or before March 14, 2011 and reply comments on or before March 29, 2011 All filings should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT DOCKET NO. 02-55. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-281A1.txt
            • No. 03-66, Third Report and Order, 25 FCC Rcd 7743 (2010). BRS/EBS 2nd R&O, 21 FCC Rcd at 5720 ¶ 278, citing 47 USC §309(j)(4)(B). Waiver Request at 3-4. Id. at 4. Id. Id. Ex Parte Letter from Cathleen A. Massey, Counsel for Clearwire, to Marlene H. Dortch, Federal Communications Commission (dated Feb. 9, 2011). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-281A1_Rcd.pdf
            • MHz Bands, WT Docket No. 03-66, Third Report and Order, 25 FCC Rcd 7743 (2010). 8BRS/EBS 2ndR&O, 21 FCC Rcdat 5720 ¶ 278, citing 47 USC §309(j)(4)(B). 9Waiver Request at 3-4. 10Id.at 4. 11Id. 12Id. 13Ex Parte Letter from Cathleen A. Massey, Counsel for Clearwire, to Marlene H. Dortch, Federal Communications Commission (dated Feb. 9, 2011). 14See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 1450 the subjects discussed.15More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.16 Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. SeeElectronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-293A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-293A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-293A1.txt
            • Acquisition Company LLC WPSJ791 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-293A1_Rcd.pdf
            • 0004541107Commnet of Florida, LLC Reef Acquisition Company LLC WPSJ791 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-294A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-294A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-294A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WPYU553 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-294A1_Rcd.pdf
            • WQIZ641 0004544869 Whidbey Telephone CompanyAT&T Mobility Spectrum LLC WPYU553 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission'sstatement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6More than a one-ortwo-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-29A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jeremy Miller, Industry Analysis and Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1507. - FCC - The SBDD Program implements the joint purposes of the Recovery Act and the Broadband Data Improvement Act. See American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5, § 6001, 123 Stat. 115, 516
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-311A1.txt
            • the nearest navigable waterways, (c) the magnitude of divergence sought from specific Part 80 technical requirements, (d) a showing that alternative spectrum that could accommodate the proposed PLMR or other land mobile radio service is unavailable or unsuitable for that purpose, and (d) whether grant of the waiver would benefit public safety or homeland security. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). We note that the Commission recently amended the rules governing the content of ex parte notices. See Amendment of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules and Other Procedural Rules, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GC Docket No. 10-43, FCC 11-11, ¶¶
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-311A1_Rcd.pdf
            • communications, (b) the distance of a proposedlandmobileradio operation from the nearest navigable waterways, (c)the magnitude of divergence sought from specific Part80technical requirements, (d) a showing that alternative spectrumthat could accommodate the proposedPLMR or other landmobileradio service is unavailable or unsuitable for that purpose, and (d) whether grant of the waiverwould benefit public safety or homeland security. 6See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 7SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). We notethat the Commission recently amended the rules governing the content of ex parte notices. See Amendment of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules and Other Procedural Rules, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GC Docket No. 10-43, FCC 11-11, ¶¶ 35-36 (rel.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1.txt
            • of divergence sought from specific Part 80 technical requirements, (d) a showing that alternative spectrum that could accommodate the proposed PLMR or other land mobile radio service is unavailable or unsuitable for that purpose, and (d) whether grant of the waiver would benefit public safety or homeland security. Waiver Request at 5. Id. at 7. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). We note that the Commission recently amended the rules governing the content of ex parte notices. See Amendment of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules and Other Procedural Rules, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GC Docket No. 10-43, FCC 11-11, ¶¶
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-322A1_Rcd.pdf
            • the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445 12thSt., S.W., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. The filing hours at this location are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. PLEASE NOTE: This is the 11See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 12SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). We note that the Commission recently amended the rules governing the content of ex parte notices. See Amendment of the Commission's Ex Parte Rules and Other Procedural Rules, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, GC Docket No. 10-43, FCC 11-11, ¶¶ 35-36
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-331A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Regina Brown, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-7385. - FCC - Petition of Funds for Learning, Inc. to Reject the Administrator's Discount Threshold Recommendation for Funding Year 2010, WC Docket No. 02-6 (filed Feb. 11, 2011) (Petition). Funding year 2010 began on July
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-332A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - (last visited February 15, 2011) (describing the use of state master contracts in the universal service schools and libraries program). (last visited February 15, 2011). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-353A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-353A1.txt
            • that Connecticut's CPCN requirement is a form of entry regulation that is prohibited by Section 332(c)(3)(A). The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seeks comment on the Petition. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-353A1_Rcd.pdf
            • declare that Connecticut's CPCN requirement is a form of entry regulation that is prohibited by Section 332(c)(3)(A).3 The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau seeks comment on the Petition. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Petition. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oralex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-357A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Daniel Ball of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at daniel.ball@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of Windstream Corporation for Limited Waiver Relief, WC Docket No. 11-36 (filed February 16, 2011) (``Windstream Petition''). Windstream Petition at 1, citing Windstream Petition for Conversion to Price Cap
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-367A1.txt
            • Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006 LightSquared Subsidiary LLC, Request for Modification of its Authority for an Ancillary Terrestrial Component, Order and Authorization, DA 11-133 (Int'l Bur. rel. Jan. 26, 2011). GPS Council Petition for Clarification at 2. If Commission staff attend a particular meeting, the normal ex parte rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings would apply. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Those rules allow parties to make their ex parte filings jointly with other participants. See, e.g., Robert M. Franklin, Transferor, Inmarsat, plc, Transferee, Consolidated Application for Consent to Transfer of Control of Stratos Global Corporation and Its Subsidiaries from an Irrevocable Trust to Inmarsat, plc, Memorandum Opinion and Order, IB Docket No. 08-143, 24 FCC Rcd 449, 454 n.35 (Int'l
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-367A1_Rcd.pdf
            • concludes that the harmful interference concerns have been resolved.5To that end, the progress reports and final report ­containing both LightSquared's plan for avoiding harmful interference to GPS operations and the respective analyses and recommendations of the parties participating in the 3If Commission staff attend a particular meeting, the normal ex parte rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings would apply. See47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Those rules allowparties to make their ex partefilings jointly with other participants. See, e.g., Robert M. Franklin, Transferor, Inmarsat, plc, Transferee, Consolidated Application for Consent to Transfer of Control of Stratos Global Corporation and Its Subsidiaries from an Irrevocable Trust to Inmarsat, plc,Memorandum Opinion and Order, IB Docket No. 08-143, 24 FCC Rcd 449, 454 n.35 (Int'l Bur., 2009); Reexamination
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-401A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-401A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-401A1.txt
            • See 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(e). See Request for Waiver of to Permit Channel Aggregation by Non-MVPD Users of the 18 GHz Band, BridgeWave Communications, Inc. (filed May 12, 2010) (Waiver Request) at 1. Id. at 2. Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(r)(12). Waiver Request at 3. Id. Id. Id. Id. Waiver Request at 6. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-401A1_Rcd.pdf
            • number of this proceeding, WT Docket No. 11-25. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules.13Parties making oral ex parte presentations in this proceeding are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list 8Id. 9Id. 10Id. 11Id. 12Waiver Request at 6. 13See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 2317 the subjects discussed.14More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.15 Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. SeeElectronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-40A1.txt
            • been assigned File No. ISP-PDR-20101216-00021. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-425A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-425A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-425A1.txt
            • pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission exercises its discretion to suspend the sunshine period to permit such meetings. The content of these meetings will be subject to public disclosure under the provisions of the rules governing permit-but disclose proceedings. . . - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 1.1203. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 h i ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö ƒA·Û "ƒõ¹\Îív`` � 6› ·Û
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-428A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-428A1.txt
            • orientation to the CVAA that will focus on what the CVAA means to consumers with disabilities. The FCC will then conduct an open dialogue on the Act's provisions, providing an opportunity for attendees to express their opinions on ways the FCC can best implement the CVAA. For purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules regarding permit-but-disclose proceedings (47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b) (2)), any comments made at the Town Hall on the implementation of the CVAA that pertain to the Act's provisions on advanced communications services, video description, the deaf-blind equipment distribution program, and TRS contributions by VoIP providers, will be deemed oral ex parte presentations in the pending rulemaking proceedings to which they relate. A written transcript of the Town Hall
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-432A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-432A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Chin Yoo, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Richard A. Belden, Chief Operating Officer, USAC, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 06-122, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Mar. 1, 2011) (USAC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-43A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Cedar-Wapsie Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.904(d) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Dec. 22, 2010); 47 C.F.R. § 54.904(d). 47 C.F.R §54.904(d). See Electronic Filing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-442A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-442A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of OneLink Wireless, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Alabama, New York, North Carolina and Virginia, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Feb. 28, 2011) (OneLink ETC Petition).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-446A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-446A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-446A1.txt
            • due March 25, 2011. Reply comments are due April 4, 2011. All filings should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT Docket No. 11-49. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-446A1_Rcd.pdf
            • the Petition are due March 25, 2011. Reply comments are due April 4, 2011. All filings should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT Docket No. 11-49. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relatingto consideration of the Petition. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules. See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oralex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-454A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-463A1.txt
            • we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will govern our consideration of Massillon's Application for Review. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make written and oral ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding as provided in 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). An original and one copy of all filings must be submitted with the Commission's Secretary. All filings should be clearly captioned as ex parte presentations and must reference CSR-8471-P. Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-474A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-474A1.txt
            • No. 01-92, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Lifeline and Link-Up, WC Docket No. 03-109, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 11-13 (rel. Feb. 9, 2011) (USF/ICC Transformation NPRM). Id. at paras. 603-67. See 76 Fed. Reg. 11632 (Mar. 2, 2011). USF/ICC Transformation NPRM, at paras. 690-98. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206; USF/ICC Transformation NPRM, at para. 690. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö ƒA·Û "ƒõ¹\Îív`` � 6› ·Û ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ (c) 3 J K q � £ ¤
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-484A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Kenneth L. Oakley, PhD, FACHE, Project Coordinator, Western New York Rural Area Health Education Center, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (Feb.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-492A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at pamela.arluk@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of the United States Telecom Association for Waiver of Rule 61.49(k)'s Non-exogenous Cost Data Requirements for the Short Form Tariff Review Plan and for Waiver of Rule 61.49(k)'s Deadline
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-503A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-503A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - NTCH, Inc. Petition for Limited Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in the State of North Carolina, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Mar. 3, 2011) (NTCH ETC Petition). NTCH ETC Petition
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-507A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-507A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-507A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Kenneth Burnley, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Joint Petition for Reconsideration of Cellular South Licenses, Inc. and United States Cellular Corporation, WC Docket No. 03-337, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 28, 2011). High-Cost Universal Service Support, Federal-State Joint
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-518A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-518A1.txt
            • is consistent with Commission action in similar transactions. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if it finds that the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-518A1_Rcd.pdf
            • such ex parte treatment is consistent with Commission action in similar transactions.18 Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,19the Commission mayadopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if it finds that the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.20 We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibilityin permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.21More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.22Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1.txt
            • soon as possible. We find Globalstar's explanation for the timing of the amendment reasonable, and we have no evidence that it deliberately delayed disclosure. We therefore conclude that these circumstances do not raise a substantial question as to Globalstar's basic qualifications to be a Commission licensee. We now turn to Iridium's contentions regarding violation of ex parte notification requirements. Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules states that a person who makes an oral ex parte presentation of information or arguments not presented in a document previously filed by that person in the same proceeding must, within one business day after the presentation, submit a summary memorandum to the Commission's Secretary and provide a copy to each Commission employee who attended the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-520A1_Rcd.pdf
            • soon as possible. We find Globalstar's explanation for the timing of the amendment reasonable, and we have no evidence that it deliberately delayed disclosure. We therefore conclude that these circumstances do not raise a substantial question as to Globalstar's basic qualifications to be a Commission licensee. 17. We now turn to Iridium's contentions regarding violation of ex partenotification requirements. Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules38states that aperson who makes an oral ex partepresentation of information or arguments not presented in a document previously filed by that person in the same proceeding must, within one business day after the presentation, submit a summary memorandum to the Commission's Secretary and provide a copy to each Commission employee who attended the oral ex partepresentation.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-527A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-527A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-527A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Washington RSA No. 8 Limited Partnership; Eastern Sub-RSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Inland Cellular Petition for Waiver of Sections 54.802(a) and 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Mar. 14,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-529A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Eric Brown, President & CEO, California Telehealth Network, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (Mar. 16, 2011) (CTN Letter); Letter from Frank
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-536A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-536A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Letter from D. Scott Barash, Acting Chief Executive Officer, USAC, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, FCC, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 97-21 (dated Feb. 11, 2011) (attaching resignation letter of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-537A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-537A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before April 11, 2011, and reply comments on or before April 21, 2011. All comments should reference PS Docket No. 06-229. Comments may be filed: (1) using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) through the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. . Paper
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-53A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Gary Seigel, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at 202-418-7400 or TTY 202-418-0484. - FCC - Upper Peninsula Telephone Company and Michigan Central Broadband Company, LLC, Joint Petition for Waiver of the Definition of ``Study Area'' Contained in Part 36, Appendix-Glossary of the Commission's Rules (filed Dec. 29, 2010) (Petition);
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-548A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-548A1.txt
            • the pleading cycle for this Petition, during which responses and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before April 26, 2011 and replies on or before May 11, 2011. Please place the case identifier, CSR-8477-O, on all filings. One copy of responses, replies, or other communications must be served on all participants in the case. Parties must file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-555A1.txt
            • to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY), or send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov. For further information, contact Rodney Conway of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Mobility Division, at (202) 418-2904, Rodney.Conway@fcc.gov. Action by the Deputy Chief, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. - FCC - See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-555A1_Rcd.pdf
            • due no later than April 25, 2011. All filings should reference the docket number of this proceeding WT 11-56. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules.1Parties making oral ex parte presentations in this proceeding are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and 1See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 4096 not merely list the subjects discussed.2More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.3 The application and waiver request can be accessed electronically via the Commission's Universal Licensing System, http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls. The request, and comments and reply comments filed in response to this Public Notice, will be available for public inspection and copyingin the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-558A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-558A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures. Interested parties may file comments on or before the date indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-558A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Persons making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures. Interested parties may file comments on or before the date indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-562A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-562A1.txt
            • voluntary agreements to relocate to an alternate channel. We seek comment on this petition. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Section 1.405(a) of the Commission's rules provides that statements in support of or in opposition to a petition for rulemaking ``shall be accompanied by proof of service upon the petitioner on or prior to the date of filing . . . .'' Section 1.405(b) of the Commission's rules states that replies to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-573A1.txt
            • or contribute to the USF. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-573A1_Rcd.pdf
            • file reports for or contribute to the USF. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,7the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.8 We direct parties making oral ex partepresentations to the Commission's statement re- emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings.9Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.10More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.11Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-579A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-579A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-579A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Joe Cavender, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of NTUA Wireless, LLC for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier on the Navajo Nation, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Mar. 3, 2011). Id. at 3. Id. at 20. See Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-580A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-580A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-580A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Line Up, LLC for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, The District of Columbia, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia, WC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-586A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-586A1.txt
            • fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Gary Remondino, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-C143, Washington, D.C. 20554. His e-mail address is gary.remondino@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-2298. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, marilyn.jones@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2357. - FCC - Letter to Sharon Gillett, Bureau Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, from Nancy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-594A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-594A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-594A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information about this Public Notice, please contact Karen Johnson at (202) 418-7706 or Karen.Johnson@fcc.gov. - FCC - Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-243, 105 Stat. 2394 (1991), codified at 47 U.S.C. § 227. The TCPA amended Title II of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-597A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-597A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-597A1.txt
            • interconnection disputes between licensed carriers. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-597A1_Rcd.pdf
            • 18. 24Blue Sky Notification at 22; ASLI Notification at 19. 25Blue Sky Notification at 23; ASLI Notification at 20. 26Blue Sky Notification at 25-28; ASLI Notification at 22-25. 27Blue Sky Notifications at 29-31; ASLI Notification at 25-27. 2847 C.F.R. §1.1200(a). 5052 announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.29 We direct parties making oral ex partepresentations to the Commission's statement re- emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.30More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.31Other rules pertaining to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-604A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-604A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact William Huber, Associate Division Chief, or Stephen Johnson, Attorney Advisor, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0660. - FCC - Improving Communications Services for Native Nations by Promoting Greater Utilization of Spectrum over Tribal Lands, WTB Docket No. 11-40, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 11-29 (rel. Mar.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-604A1_Rcd.pdf
            • ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one ortwo sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.6Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.7 Forfurther information, please contact William Huber, Associate Division Chief, or Stephen Johnson, Attorney Advisor, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0660. -FCC - 547 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. 6See47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 747 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 5078
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-613A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-613A1.txt
            • have sufficient time to consider and address developments in this matter and the extent to which they moot the controversy at issue in the Petition. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Petition. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-613A1_Rcd.pdf
            • parties have sufficient time to consider and address developments in this matter and the extent to which they moot the controversy at issue in the Petition. This Public Notice establishes certain procedural requirements relating to consideration of the Petition. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oralex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-614A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-614A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-614A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Improving Communications Services for Native Nations, CG Docket No. 11-41, Notice of Inquiry, 26 FCC Rcd 2672 (2011). 76 Fed. Reg. 18759 (Apr. 5, 2011). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.49. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-622A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-622A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-622A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . The FCC's webcast is free to the public. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). For further information about the workshop, please contact Nicole McGinnis of the Spectrum and Competition Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-2877, or via e-mail at Nicole.McGinnis@fcc.gov. - FCC - using the proceeding number
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-622A1_Rcd.pdf
            • FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 347 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. 5124 summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.4 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.5 Audio/video coverage of the meeting will be broadcast live with open captioning over the Internet from the FCC's web page at www.fcc.gov/live. The FCC's webcast is free to the public. Reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities are available upon request. Please include a description of the accommodation you will need. Individuals making such requests must include
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-638A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-638A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-638A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - U.S. Satellite Corporation Petition for Declaratory Ruling or, in the Alternative for Waiver, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Mar. 21, 2011). The petition was originally filed in Docket No. 96-45. Id. at
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-641A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-641A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-641A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance of American Broadband & Telecommunications, WC Docket No. 09-197, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 25, 2011) (American Broadband Petition). American Broadband requests forbearance from this requirement as set
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-642A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-642A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Joseph Cavender, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition by NE Colorado Cellular, Inc., d/b/a Viaero Wireless for Commission Agreement in Redefining Certain Service Areas of Incumbent Rural Telephone Companies in the State of Kansas Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-651A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-651A1.txt
            • Order's effective date (i.e., by March 23, 2011), ``evidence intended to show that PRT lacks classical market power in relation to its in-region, interstate and international, long distance services.'' PRT's March 23 filing seeks to provide such evidence. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-661A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-661A1.txt
            • that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206 (b). We note that the division of applications into real time, near real-time, and non-real time can imply performance factors such as latency, jitter, etc., that are not directly addressed by this chart. (continued...) PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 Y Z Û Ü
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-66A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Fulton Telephone Company Request for Review of Decision of the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Dec. 2, 2010); 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.719(c) (Review of decisions issued by the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-673A1.txt
            • limitations or requirements. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that as of the time any Applications are filed, this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations after the Applications are filed are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-673A1_Rcd.pdf
            • limitations or requirements.1 Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,2 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.3 We announce that as of the time any Applications are filed, this proceeding will be governed by permit-but- discloseex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.4 Parties making oral ex parte presentations after the Applications are filed are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.5 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-67A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company, Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company and Consolidated Communications of Texas Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company, WC Docket No. 05-337
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-681A1.txt
            • Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. The documents may also be purchased from BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. . For further information, contact Taft Snowdon at (202) 418-2742. For press inquiries, contact Janice Wise at (202) 418-8165. By: Chief, Media Bureau 47 U.S.C. § 310(d). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a). See id. § 1.1206. Id. § 1.1206(b)(2). Id. Id. § 1.1206(b)(1). Id. § 1.1206(b)(2). Id. § 1.45(c). See id. §§ 1.46(a) and 73.3584(e). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 � ÿ‰PNG r v ‡ƒ"rÕ9 I'6› Ãd³Y›Í†aX Ëåò; Wh� ðX,†aXÞÌÐy¹]\\.W`hÊööva6l! �v"]­VßatÿãäääåË-``````°"m(c)x<ž¼G¼<æææž={-N§•J%tŒ<== ¤"""x Ò�� î ÃÈ(c)Òáá!Š¢'' ¤R)&Ö ƒA·Û "ƒõ¹\Îív`` �
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-68A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Puerto Rico Telephone Company Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719, 54.721, and 54.722 of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-698A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-698A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-698A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2357, or Sanford Williams of the Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1508. - FCC - Letter from Scott Blake Harris, Executive Vice President, Legal and External Affairs, Neustar, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, CC Docket No. 92-237
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-699A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Windstream Communications, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.903(a) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Apr. 13, 2011); 47 C.F.R. § 54.903(a). 47 C.F.R § 54.903(a) See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-700A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Islands Telephone Corp. d/b/a Innovative Telephone Petition for Waiver of Section 54.903(a) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Apr. 14, 2011); 47 C.F.R. § 54.903(a). 47 C.F.R §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-702A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-702A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-702A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 18. For further information, contact Scott A. Mackoul, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0660. -FCC- Universal Service Reform - Mobility Fund, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 25 FCC Rcd 14,716 (2010) (Mobility Fund NPRM). Mobility Fund NPRM, 25 FCC Rcd at 14,727 ¶ 33. For the purposes of this Public Notice, the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-702A1_Rcd.pdf
            • with the ex parterules.15Persons making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.16Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.17 1547 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. 16See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). 1747 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 6001 18. For further information, contact Scott A. Mackoul, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0660. -FCC- 6002
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-703A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-703A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-703A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520. -FCC- AT&T Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 61.42(g) of the Commission's Rules and Request for Expedited Treatment, WCB/Pricing File No. 11-06, at 1-2 (filed Apr. 11, 2011) (AT&T Waiver Petition); see also 47 C.F.R. § 61.42(g). A copy
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-705A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Nat Hall, Copper River Native Association, to Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45 and 97-21 (filed April 13, 2011). 47 C.F.R. § 54.603(b)(3). Cite rule
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-706A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-706A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erica Myers, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Requests for Review and Waiver of Decisions of the Universal Service Administrator by Kodiak Area Native Association, WC Docket No. 02-60 (filed April 8, 2011). Id. at 7-8. See 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-714A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-714A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-714A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. , and should include the following words in the body of the message, ``get form.'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-714A1_Rcd.pdf
            • partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and 147 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. 6076 arguments presented generally is required.2Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.3 Interested parties may file comments using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.4 Comments filed through the ECFS canbe sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. If multiple docket or rulemaking numbers appear in the caption of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-722A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-722A1.txt
            • the transfer of control of the licenses and authorizations held by T-Mobile USA, Inc. (``T-Mobile USA'') and its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries from Deutsche Telekom to AT&T (``Applications''). This public notice provides notice that the Applications have been filed and announces that this proceeding is now governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We note that this public notice does not establish the pleading cycle for the Applications; a future public notice will be issued that will set for the dates for the filing of pleadings once the applications have been determined to be complete and acceptable for filing. We also note that, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-722A1_Rcd.pdf
            • the transfer of control of the licenses and authorizations held by T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile USA") and its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries from Deutsche Telekom to AT&T ("Applications").1 This public notice provides notice that the Applications have been filed and announces that this proceeding is now governed by permit-but- discloseex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.2 We note that this public notice does not establish the pleading cycle for the Applications; a future public notice will be issued that will set for the dates for the filing of pleadings once the applications have been determined to be complete and acceptable for filing. We also note that, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-748A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance by Millennium 2000, Inc., CC Docket No. 96-45, WC Docket 09-197 (filed Apr. 12, 2011) (Petition); 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(1)(A). Petition at 1-2. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-756A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-756A1.txt
            • factors, commenters should provide specific and detailed information. We also offer commenters this opportunity to discuss any other issues we should consider in connection with the economic study and report to Congress required under Section 8 of the LCRA. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission Rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-799A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-799A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-799A1.txt
            • USA, Inc. ITC-214-19960930-00473 EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We have previously announced that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-799A1_Rcd.pdf
            • and Other Procedural Rules, GC Docket No. 10-43, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 11-11 (rel. Feb. 2, 2011). The revised rules are awaiting publication in the Federal Register, and are not yet effective. 6425 previously announced that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7 Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-80A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i) and 251(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), and 251(e), sections 1.3 and 52.111 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.3 and 52.111, and pursuant to authority delegated under sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-814A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-814A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Nexus Communications, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier for Low Income Support Only, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed April 5, 2011) (Petition). Petition at 1. See Electronic
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-815A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-815A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-815A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of Budget PrePay, Inc. for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier in Alabama, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Apr. 18, 2011); Petition of Budget PrePay, Inc. for Designation as an
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-821A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-821A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-821A1.txt
            • the present application seeks authorization to operate on that frequency pair with much higher power. Id. Amoco contends that ``the recent expansions of operations at Texas City as well as scheduled construction and maintenance activities have increased the system load to a burdensome extent necessitating this system upgrade and expansion.'' Id. See Supplement at 1. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See Commission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-821A1_Rcd.pdf
            • NOTE: This is the ONLYlocation where hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary will be accepted. The Commission's former filing location at 236 Massachusetts Ave., N.E., is permanently closed. -Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. 6See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 7SeeCommission Emphasizes the Public's Responsibilities in Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings, Public Notice, 15 FCC Rcd 19945 (2000). 8See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are also set forth in Section 1.1206(b). See47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). 6635 -U.S. Postal Service first-class mail, Express Mail, and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. -All
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-822A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-822A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Joseph Cavender, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Verizon Wireless Petition for Reconsideration of the Bureau's April 1, 2011 Letter to USAC, WC Docket Nos. 05-337, 06-122 (filed May 2, 2011). Letter from Sharon E. Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-838A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-838A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-838A1.txt
            • to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All comments should refer to WT Docket No. 11-79. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS''), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-838A1_Rcd.pdf
            • partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.17More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.18Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well.19 1647 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Filings pertaining to specific railroad industry participants (e.g.,assignment applications and waiver requests) that are already part of adjudicatory proceedings before the Commission and comments regarding such specific requests should be filed in the appropriate docket and not refiled in this proceeding. This Public Notice does not change the ex partestatus of any pending
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-851A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-851A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of the RICA Members for Declaratory Ruling Regarding Imputation of Interstate Revenue, WC Docket Docket No. 06-122 (filed April 26, 2011). Id. at 1, 4-7. Id. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-853A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-853A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-853A1.txt
            • of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 325.1 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 452.85 325.35 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 312.6 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 72.95 299.649 Tm 91 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 109.2 274.449 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 73.2 261.75 Tm (Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 116.85 261.949 Tm (Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-854A1.txt
            • the pleading cycle for this Petition, during which responses and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before June 9, 2011 and replies on or before June 23, 2011. Please place the case identifier, CSR-8487-O, on all filings. One copy of responses, replies, or other communications must be served on all participants in the case. Parties must file an original
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-855A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Joyce Jones, Attorney Advisor, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-1327 or joyce.jones@fcc.gov. - FCC - Amendment of Parts 1, 2, 22, 24, 27, 90, and 95 of the Commission's Rules to Improve Wireless Coverage Through the Use of Signal Boosters, WT Docket No. 10-4, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-855A1_Rcd.pdf
            • ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. Morethan a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.6Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.7 For further information, please contact Joyce Jones, Attorney Advisor, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-1327 or joyce.jones@fcc.gov. -FCC - 547 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. 6See47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 747 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 6750
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-921A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WPZA269 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-921A1_Rcd.pdf
            • this market. See ULS File No. 0004566825. 6976 2 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-922A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WQIZ634 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-922A1_Rcd.pdf
            • this market. See ULS File No. 0004566825. 6979 2 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are remindedthat memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7Other rules pertaining to oral and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-929A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-929A1.txt
            • oral ex parte presentations in this proceeding are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-929A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Commission's ex parterules.17Parties making oral ex parte presentations in this proceeding are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.18More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.19Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex partepresentations in permit- but-disclose proceedings areset forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.20 Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules,21interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies.22All filings
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-93A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition for Forbearance of Zefcom, LLC d/b/a Telispire PCS, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed Jan. 13, 2011) (Petition). Telispire requests forbearance from this requirement as set forth in section 214(e)(1)(A) of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-943A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-943A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-943A1.txt
            • Corp. AT&T Inc. WPWV436 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-943A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Corp. AT&T Inc. WPWV436 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4 We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7 Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-94A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-94A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-94A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition by NE Colorado Cellular, Inc., d/b/a Viaero Wireless for Commission Agreement in Redefining Certain Service Areas of Incumbent Rural Telephone Companies in the State of Kansas Pursuant to 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-955A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-955A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WQJW772 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-955A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WQJW772 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4 We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement reemphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7 Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-95A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jamie Susskind, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from Kipman Smith, Executive Director, Health Information Exchange of Montana, to Sharon Gillett, Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, WC Docket No. 02-60 (dated Dec. 29, 2010) (HIEM Letter). Rural
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-960A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-960A1.txt
            • description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 328.149 Tm (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.45 328.599 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 315.399 Tm /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 302.449 Tm 91 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 107 277.5 Tm 99 Tz (For further information, please contact Divya Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.799 265 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 288.199 226.85
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-973A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-973A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . - FCC - Petition of Verizon and Verizon Wireless for Declaratory Ruling to Assess NPAC Database Intra-Provider Transaction Costs on the Requesting Provider at 1-2 (filed May 20, 2011) (Petition). Id. at 2, 6. ```LNP Type 1 transactions' or `intra-service provider transactions' . . . occur when a service provider generates a transaction to port
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-991A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-991A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WQIZ574 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-991A1_Rcd.pdf
            • File No. 0004566825. 7847 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4 We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7 Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-992A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-998A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-998A1.txt
            • Data Systems, Inc. KNLF394 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-998A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Data Systems, Inc. KNLF394 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3 the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires.4 We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.5 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.6 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.7 Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1002A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1002A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1002A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1007A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1007A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1009A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1009A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1009A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-100A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Pamela Arluk of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at pamela.arluk@fcc.gov. - FCC - See Petition of the United States Telecom Association for Waiver of Rule 61.49(k)'s Non-exogenous Cost Data Requirements for the Short Form Tariff Review Plan and for Waiver of Rule 61.49(k)'s Deadline
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-102A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - The Independent Telephone and Telecommunications Alliance, National Exchange Carrier Association, National Telecommunications Cooperative Association, Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of Small Telecommunications Companies, and Western Telecommunications Alliance Petition for Clarification of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1037A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-1037A1.txt
            • be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but not be limited to, the issues identified in the paragraphs above. We may also, by order, identify additional issues that may require investigation or discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. III. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-sentence or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Iv. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-103A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-103A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-104A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Belinda Nixon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at belinda.nixon@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Petition for Limited Waiver of CenturyLink Inc., CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 96-45; GN Docket No. 09-51; WC Docket Nos. 03-109, 05-337, 07-135, 10-90; WT Docket No. 10-208, at 1 (filed Jan. 23,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-116A1.txt
            • Tf (arguments presented generally is required.'7) Tj 1 0 0 1 292.55 710.899 Tm 111 Tz (Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 502.05 710.45 Tm 109 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 698.2 Tm 103 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 685.75 Tm 95 Tz (rules.'8) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.8 673 Tm 100 Tz (For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Susan Lee, Industry Analysis and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549 660.25 Tm (Technology Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, by telephone) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.549
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-119A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by § 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-121A1_Rcd.pdf
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-127A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - ACS Wireless, Inc. Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719 through 54.725 of the Commission's rules and Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(b)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-135A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition by Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. for Commission Agreement in Redefining Certain Service Areas of Incumbent Rural Incumbent Telephone Companies in the State of Kansas Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 54.207(c),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-137A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Joseph Cavender, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Connect America Fund, WC Docket No. 10-90, et al., Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 11-161, Section VII.C.1 (rel. Nov. 18, 2011) (USF/ICC Transformation Order and FNPRM).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-140A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-141A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-149A1.txt
            • placed on the Commission's Internet site. Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-0531, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at fcc504@fcc.gov. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-156A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-156A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-168A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-168A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-168A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Daniel Ball, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1520 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Jurisdictional Separations and Referral to the Federal-State Joint Board, CC Docket No. 80-286, Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 11382, 11387-88, para. 9. (2001). Jurisdictional Separations and Referral to the Federal-State Joint Board,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-176A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-176A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-190A1.txt
            • USCOC Nebraska/Kansas, LLC WPWV404 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this application will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-190A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Inc. ("TDS"). 247 U.S.C. § 310(d). 1488 2 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this application will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.4 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's ex parterules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.5More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.6Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-191A1.txt
            • North Carolina, LLC WQIZ395 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that these applications will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-191A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Inc. ("TDS"). 247 U.S.C. § 310(d). 1491 2 III. EX PARTESTATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that these applications will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.4 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directed to the Commission's ex parterules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.5More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.6Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-202A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-202A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex partepresentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex partepresentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-203A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Big Bend Telephone Company, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.302 of the Commission's Rules and the Impact of limiting Corporate Operations Expenses on Receipt of High Cost Universal Support, WC Docket
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-204A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Allband Communications Cooperative Petition for Waiver of Section 54.302 of the Commission's Rules and the Framework to Limit Reimbursable Capital and Operating Costs, WC Docket No. 10-90 and WT Docket No. 10-208
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-208A1.txt
            • can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format (PDF) at: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must: (1)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-209A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-209A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-209A1_Rcd.pdf
            • data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data orarguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedingsgoverned by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-210A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-210A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-214A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-214A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-214A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-220A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-229A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-229A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Steelville Telephone Exchange, Inc. Request for Review of a Decision by the Universal Service Administrative Company Pursuant to Sections 54.719 of the Commission's rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Feb. 3, 2012);
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-230A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Cinergy MetroNet, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.307(c) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Feb. 1, 2012); 47 C.F.R. § 54.307(c). 47 C.F.R § 54.307(c). See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-231A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Belinda Nixon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at belinda.nixon@fcc.gov. -FCC- In its petition Verizon notes that the companies participating in this filing are ``the regulated, wholly owned subsidiaries of Verizon Communications Inc., and Verizon Wireless'' (Verizon). Petition for Limited Waiver of Verizon, CC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-233A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-233A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-233A1.txt
            • fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530, (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Parties must also send a courtesy copy of their filing to Gary Remondino, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-C143, Washington, D.C. 20554. His e-mail address is gary.remondino@fcc.gov; his telephone number is (202) 418-2298. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Marilyn Jones, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, marilyn.jones@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2357. - FCC - Letter from Laury Bobbish, Chief, Telecommunications and Media Enforcement Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-242A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by InComm Solutions, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Feb. 6, 2012). Id. Id. at 17. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-24A1.txt
            • and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.1 229.699 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.4 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450 229.25 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont6 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 216.799 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 204.299 Tm 91 Tz (rules.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 104.6 178.6 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 165.899 Tm (Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 orYI'Y \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.6 139.699 Tm
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-256A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-256A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-256A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-273A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Christianna Lewis Barnhart, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-1372 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Section 254 (h)(1)(A) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 directs that telecommunications providers provide telecommunication services that are necessary for the provision of health care services in rural areas at rates
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-295A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-295A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-295A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jonathan Lechter, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization; Lifeline and Link Up; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Emergency Petition for Declaratory Ruling and Interim Relief, WC Dkt. No. 11-42 et al. (Feb.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-304A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-304A1_Rcd.pdf
            • referencethe docket number of this proceeding, WT 12-50. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parterules.4Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written 147 C.F.R. § 22.531. 2Petition for Waiver of 47 CFR 22.531 (filedAug. 7, 2007). 3See 47 C.F.R. § 22.531 introductory paragraph. 4See47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 2163 presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was made, and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-308A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-308A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-308A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by § 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-30A1.txt
            • views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 217 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.6 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 449.75 216.549 Tm 108 Tz /OPBaseFont5 11 Tf (exparte) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 204.049 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 191.549 Tm 91 Tz (rules.7) Tj 1 0 0 1 68.85 144.25 Tm 102 Tz /OPBaseFont5 10 Tf (547) Tj 1 0 0 1 87.35 139.699 Tm 107 Tz /OPBaseFont4 10 Tf (C.F.R. § 1.1200) Tj 1 0 0 1 159.35 139.699 Tm 106 Tz /OPBaseFont5 10 Tf (etseq.) Tj 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-311A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-311A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-314A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization et al, WC Dkt No.11-42 et al., Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 12-11, at paras. 361-381, Appendix A
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-314A1_Rcd.pdf
            • GC Dkt No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 2447 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. 2189 merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.25Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.26 For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. -FCC - 25See47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 2647 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 2190
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-321A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-321A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-321A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Belinda Nixon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at belinda.nixon@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Petition for Limited Waiver of General Communication, Inc., CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 96-45; GN Docket No. 09-51; WC Docket Nos. 03-109, 05-337, 07-135, 10-90; WT Docket No. 10-208 (filed Feb. 27, 2012)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-324A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-324A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Belinda Nixon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at belinda.nixon@fcc.gov. -FCC- NECA Petition for Limited Clarification, CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 96-45; GN Docket No. 09-51; WC Docket Nos. 03-109, 05-337, 07-135, 10-90; WT Docket No. 10-208 (filed Feb. 24, 2012) (Petition). See Connect America
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-32A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-344A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-344A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-344A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Kimberly Scardino, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization, WC Docket No. 11-42, Lifeline and Link Up, WC Docket No. 03-109, Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Advancing Broadband
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-346A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Jean Ann Collins, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-2792. - FCC - Petition of CenturyLink for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §160(c) from Dominant Carrier and Certain Computer Inquiry Requirements on Enterprise Broadband Services, WC Docket No. 12-60 (filed Feb. 23, 2012) (CenturyLink Petition). See 47 U.S.C. §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-34A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Belinda Nixon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at belinda.nixon@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Petition for Limited Waiver of AT&T Inc., CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 96-45; GN Docket No. 09-51; WC Docket Nos. 03-109, 05-337, 07-135, 10-90; WT Docket No. 10-208, at 1 (filed Dec. 29,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-351A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Belinda Nixon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at belinda.nixon@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Petition for Limited Waiver of Hawaiian Telcom Inc. of Call Signaling Rules, CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 96-45; GN Docket No. 09-51; WC Docket Nos. 03-109, 05-337, 07-135, 10-90; WT Docket No. 10-208,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-352A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Gregory Kwan, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1191 or Alex Johns, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1167. - FCC - Petition of USTelecom for Forbearance Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 160(c) from Enforcement of Certain Legacy Telecommunications Regulations, WC Docket No. 12-61 (filed Feb. 16, 2012) (USTelecom
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-35A1.txt
            • notices announcing that fact and setting forth a pleading schedule. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may in its discretion modify the ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that these applications will be governed by the permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that they must file notices of the presentations which must contain, with regard to material already in the written record, either a succinct summary of the matters discussed or a citation to the page or paragraph number in the party's written submission(s) where the matters discussed can be
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-35A1_Rcd.pdf
            • public notice or notices announcing that fact and setting forth a pleading schedule. Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules,3the Commission may in its discretion modify the ex parteprocedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that these applications will be governed by the permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.4 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that they must file notices of the presentations which must contain, with regard to material already in the written record, either a succinct summary of the matters discussed or a citation to the page or paragraph number in the party's written submission(s) where the matters discussed can be found,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-361A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Chillicothe Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 54.301(e) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Mar. 5, 2012); 47 C.F.R. § 54.301(e). 47 C.F.R § 54.301(e). See Electronic Filing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-366A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Hargray Telephone Company and Bluffton Telephone Company. Petition for Waiver of Section 54.301(e) of the Commission's Rules, WC Docket No. 08-71 (filed Feb. 17, 2012); 47 C.F.R. § 54.301(e). 47 C.F.R §
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-375A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-375A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Douglas Slotten, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1572, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Joint Petition of Price Cap Holding Companies for Conversion of Average Schedule Affiliates to Price Cap Regulation and for Limited Waiver Relief, WC Docket No. 12-63 (filed Mar. 1, 2012) (Petition). Id.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-387A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-387A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Jonathan Lechter, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - See Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization et al., Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WC Dkt. Nos. 11-42 et al., CC Dkt. No. 96-45, FCC 12-11 (rel.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-38A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Carol Pomponio, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Request for Review by Equant, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator, WC Docket No. 06-122 (filed Jan. 3, 2012). Id. at 3. Request for Review by InterCall, Inc. of Decision of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-394A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-394A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-394A1.txt
            • are due on March 27, 2012, and replies are due on April 3, 2012. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-44A1.txt
            • petition and announce the pleading cycle during which comments and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-453A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-453A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-453A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Belinda Nixon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at belinda.nixon@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. Petition for Limited Waiver, CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 96-45; GN Docket No. 09-51; WC Docket Nos. 03-109, 05-337, 07-135, 10-90; WT Docket No. 10-208, at 1 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-46A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-46A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-470A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-470A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Vickie S. Robinson, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Letter from James Bradford Ramsay, NARUC, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 97-21 (dated Feb. 24, 2012) (attaching resume of Ronald A. Brisé ) (NARUC Nomination). See
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-494A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Belinda Nixon, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1520, or via e-mail at belinda.nixon@fcc.gov. -FCC- See The Alaska Rural Coalition's Petition for Limited Waiver, CC Docket Nos. 01-92, 96-45; GN Docket No. 09-51; WC Docket Nos. 03-109, 05-337, 07-135, 10-90; WT Docket No. 10-208, at 1 (filed Mar.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-506A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-506A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-506A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-511A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-511A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-523A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-523A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-523A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-523A1_Rcd.pdf
            • data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda,or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oralex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-525A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-525A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Douglas Slotten, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1572, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. -FCC- See Berkshire Telephone Corporation, Big Sandy Telecom, Inc., Bluestem Telephone Company, Chautauqua and Erie Telephone Corporation, Chouteau Telephone Company, Columbine Telecom Company, C-R Telephone Company, The El Paso Telephone Company, Ellensburg Telephone Company,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-544A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-544A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-544A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-555A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-566A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-566A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-573A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-573A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-573A1_Rcd.pdf
            • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filedthrough the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-577A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Sue McNeil, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0660. -FCC- Petition for Waiver of Windy City Cellular, LLC, WC Docket No. 10-90 et al. (filed April 3, 2012); see also Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket No. 10-90 et al., Report and Order and Further Notice
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-577A1_Rcd.pdf
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.4Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.5 For further information, please contact Sue McNeil, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0660. -FCC- 347 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. 4See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2106(b)(2). 547 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 3977
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-581A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-581A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-581A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-583A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-583A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-583A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-602A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-602A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-602A1.txt
            • petition and announce the pleading cycle during which comments and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-609A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-609A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-609A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-633A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-635A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-636A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-662A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-662A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-662A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-663A1.txt
            • the pleading cycle for this Petition, during which responses and replies may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. GENERAL INFORMATION The petition referenced herein has been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing. Interested parties may file comments on or before May 29, 2012, and reply comments on or before June 12, 2012. All filings concerning matters referenced in this Public Notice should refer to DA 12-663. Under
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-672A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-677A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-677A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-677A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-67A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-67A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-67A1.txt
            • to the assignment licenses have been assigned the following file numbers: File No. Licensee Assignee Lead Call Sign 0004993617 SpectrumCo LLC Cellco Partnership WQGA898 0004996680 Cox TMI Wireless, LLC Cellco Partnership WQGA969 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING As previously announced, the Applications will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-67A1_Rcd.pdf
            • for consent to the assignment licenses have been assigned the following file numbers: File No. Licensee Assignee Lead Call Sign 0004993617 SpectrumCo LLC Cellco Partnership WQGA898 0004996680 Cox TMI Wireless, LLC Cellco Partnership WQGA969 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING As previously announced,the Applications will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures12that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.13 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.14 More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.15 Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-681A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-681A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-683A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-683A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-686A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-686A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-686A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-692A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-692A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-692A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-700A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-700A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-701A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-701A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). The Petition as well as the comments and reply comments filed in response to this Public Notice will be available for public inspection and copying during business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554, and via ECFS. The comments may also be purchased from Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-705A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-707A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-707A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-712A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-712A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-718A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-718A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-719A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-723A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-723A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-728A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-728A1.txt
            • pleading cycle for this Petition, during which comments and reply comments may be filed. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-730A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-730A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b), 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules. For further information, please contact Tracey Wilson at (202) 418-1394 or Dennis Johnson at (202) 418-0809. 47 C.F.R § 63.03; see 47 U.S.C. § 214. Applicants also filed an application for transfer of control associated with authorizations for international services. Any action on
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-734A1.txt
            • E.N.M.R. Telephone Cooperative ITC-214-20030912-00436 IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-735A1.doc
            • TTY (202) 488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com. These documents are also available for viewing on the Commission's website at http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these applications, it is in the public interest to treat each waiver request as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, we will allow ex parte presentations that address issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, provided they are disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-759A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-759A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-759A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-75A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-75A1_Rcd.pdf
            • data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or givento Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-760A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-760A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-761A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-761A1.txt
            • T-Mobile License LLC WQNH801 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-762A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-762A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-762A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WPWV421 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-763A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WQIZ548 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-764A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-764A1.txt
            • States Cellular Corporation WQIZ540 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-775A1.txt
            • not provided closed captioning previously imposes significant difficulty to achieve by September 30, 2012.'' This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-776A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-776A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-779A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-779A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-77A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Divya S. Shenoy, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Virgin Mobile Petition for Forbearance, WC Docket No. 09-197 (filed January 13, 2012) (Petition). See Petition at 1-5; 47 U.S.C. § 214(e)(5); 47 C.F.R. § 54.207. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-783A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-783A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-783A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-794A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-794A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-798A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-798A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-798A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-805A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-805A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b), 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules. For further information, please contact Tracey Wilson at (202) 418-1394 or Dennis Johnson at (202) 418-0809. Domestic Section 214 Application for the Transfer of Control of Knology, Inc., and its Subsidiaries to WideOpenWest Finance, LLC, WC Docket No. 12-120 (filed May 1, 2012)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-811A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-811A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-811A1.txt
            • this notice, or by May 31, 2012, and may not exceed 5 pages in length. To facilitate the collection of information, we previously designated PS Docket No. 12-74 as exempt under the ex parte rules. However, we find it to be in the public interest to modify the status of this proceeding and redesignate it as ``permit-but-disclose'' pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules with respect to ex parte presentations made after the date of this notice. We will continue to treat Interoperability Board members as Commission decision-making personnel for purposes of the ex parte rules. Accordingly, they will not be subject to ex parte limitations and reporting requirements that apply to persons who are not decision-making personnel when making
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-818A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-818A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-81A1.txt
            • description of the views and) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 316.849 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.4 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 450.7 316.599 Tm /OPBaseFont4 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.35 304.149 Tm /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 291.649 Tm 91 Tz (rules.5) Tj 1 0 0 1 105.8 266.199 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Abdel Eqab, Telecommunications Access Policy Division,) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.6 253.5 Tm 99 Tz (Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-825A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-825A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-834A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-850A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-850A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-852A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-852A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-852A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-857A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-857A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-865A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-865A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-868A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-87A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information regarding this proceeding, contact Douglas Slotten, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, 202-418-1572, or via e-mail at douglas.slotten@fcc.gov. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 69.606(b). See National Exchange Carrier Association, 2012 Modification of Average Schedules at Summary, attached to Letter from Richard A. Askoff, Executive Director-Regulatory, NECA, to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-881A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-881A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-883A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-883A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-897A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-897A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-897A1.txt
            • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Erik Salovaara, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0660. - FCC - Petition for FCC Agreement to Redefine Study Areas of Five Rural Telephone Companies in Pennsylvania by Keystone Wireless, LLC d/b/a Immix Wireless, WC Docket No. 09-197, WT Docket No. 10-208, AU Docket No. 12-25 (filed
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-905A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-905A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-90A1.txt
            • 20554. or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (tty). . . Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to these applications, it is in the public interest to treat each waiver request as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, we will allow ex parte presentations that address issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, provided they are disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-911A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-911A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-921A1.txt
            • unnecessary regulations. Accordingly, we seek comment on whether we should grant TWC's request to terminate the remaining condition. Procedural Matters This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-922A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-922A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-926A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-926A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-92A1.txt
            • T-Mobile License LLC WQGA864 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-92A1_Rcd.pdf
            • Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 11-11 (rel. Feb. 2, 2011). The revised rules were published in the Federal Register on May 2, 2011, and went into effect June 1, 2011. See76 Fed. Reg. 24376 (May 2, 2011). 436 3 announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteproceduresthat are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.12 Parties making oral ex partepresentations are directedto the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.13More than a one-or two-sentence description of the viewsand arguments presented is generally required.14Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-950A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-950A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-951A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-951A1.txt
            • Mobility Spectrum LLC WPZA246 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-959A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-959A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-959A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-963A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-963A1.txt
            • 22.863 regarding frequency stability. IV. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-971A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-971A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-971A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b), 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules. For further information, please contact Dennis Johnson at (202) 418-0809. 47 C.F.R § 63.03; see 47 U.S.C. § 214. Applicants filed a supplement to their application on June 11, 2012. The following individuals are the remaining members of Ridgemont Partners, who are also
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-974A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-974A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-974A1.txt
            • T-Mobile License LLC WQGA687 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-976A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-976A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-983A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-983A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-984A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-984A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-994A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-994A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-994A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-999A1.txt
            • LLC Cellco Partnership WQGB304 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-99A1.txt
            • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties may file comments on or before February 24, 2012, and reply comments on or before March 12, 2012. Such filings shall refer to the internal WCB/Pricing File No. 12-02. Comments in this proceeding may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). Interested parties should file an original and four copies
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-9A1.txt
            • and) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.299 279.399 Tm 100 Tz (arguments presented generally is required.5 Other rules pertaining to oral and written) Tj 1 0 0 1 451.2 279.399 Tm 99 Tz /OPBaseFont3 11 Tf (ex parte) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 266.699 Tm 100 Tz /OPBaseFont2 11 Tf (presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206\(b\) of the Commission's) Tj 1 0 0 1 70.049 253.75 Tm 91 Tz (rules.6) Tj 1 0 0 1 106.05 228.549 Tm 100 Tz (For further information, please contact Claudia Fox, Telecommunications Access Policy) Tj 1 0 0 1 69.799 215.799 Tm (Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at \(202\) 418-7400 or TTY \(202\) 418-0484.) Tj 1 0 0 1 287.75 190.149
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1135A1.txt
            • the rules, International Settlements Policy and Waivers, 47 C.F.R. § 64.1001. The Commission's ex parte rules are contained in 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200, et seq. The Bureau historically has treated requests for waiver filed under Section 64.1001 of the rules as non-restricted proceedings, in the same manner as Section 214(a) proceedings are treated. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(a)(ll) & § 1.1206(b)(8). Thus, once a waiver request filed under Section 64.1001 is formally opposed, ex parte presentations are permissible, but are subject to the disclosure requirements of Section 1.1206(a). Whether or not a formal opposition has been filed, informal objectors must comply with the disclosure requirements of Section 1.1206 with respect to then- ex parte presentations at all times except where confidentiality
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1309A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1309A1.txt
            • Reply comments must be filed within seven (7) days after the time for filing comments has expired 6. Because of the-public interest issues raised by this Request for Comment, it is non-restricted under the Commission's ex. pane rules. Exparte presentations are permitted, provided that they are disclosed as required by the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). For additional information, please contact Tom Boasberg (202-418-0431) or Suzanne Hutchings (202-418-0762) of the International Bureau. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Donald H. Gip Acting Chief, International Bureau Amendment of the Commission's Regulatory Policies to Allow Non-US.-Licensed Space Stations to Provide Domestic and International Satellite Service in the United States, FCC 96-210 (released May 14, 1996XTHSCO H NPRM"). 9420 US EMB HEX
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-96-1972A1.txt
            • 23, 1996 Released: November 25, 1996 By the Chief, International Bureau: 1. By this Order, we modify the ex pane status of Comsat Corporation's application to participate in the construction of an INTELSAT Ku-band satellite from that of a "restricted" proceeding to a "nonrestricted" proceeding. Accordingly, ex pane presentations will be permitted but subject to disclosure as prescribed by Section 1.1206 of the Commission rules.1 2. Comsat Corporation filed an application to participate in a program for the construction of an INTELSAT Ku-band satellite known as "K-TV" and procurement of associated launch vehicle services to be used for the provision of INTELSAT services. On November 5, 1996, this application proceeding became "restricted" upon the filing of formal oppositions against it by
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-1650A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-97-1650A1.txt
            • restricted proceeding to a permit-but-disciose proceeding. Comsat initiated the proceedings seeking authority to operate PLANET 1 mobile earth station terminals ("PLANET 1 terminals") for use within the national territory of the United States (the "domestic market") in conjunction with Inmarsat-3 satellite space segment capacity.2 Ex parte presentations in these two proceedings shall be subject to the permit-but-disclose requirements of Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules.3 2. On May 24. 1996. Comsat filed an application for a blanket radio station license to operate up to 5,000 PLANET 1 terminals in the domestic market.4 This application proceeding became "restricted" upon the filing of formal oppositions against it by AMSC Subsidiary Corporation ("AMSC") and Motorola Satellite Communications, Inc ("Motorola"). Subsequently, Comsat filed a request
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-210A1.txt
            • special temporary authority during the pendency of the formal COMSAT complaint proceeding. We conclude that "permit-but-disclose" ex parte procedures will sufficiently protect the parties' interest in having the complaint adjudicated in a fair manner and that the public interest will be served by changing the "restricted" status of COMSAT's formal complaint proceeding to the "permit-but-disclose" procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, which are, or have been made, applicable to the other related proceedings. Accordingly, this Public Notice establishes that COMSAT's formal complaint proceeding is a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. All parties making ex parte presentations in this complaint proceeding (File No. E-99-08), the IDB complaint against COMSAT
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-2765A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-2765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-2765A1.txt
            • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.§§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-3036A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-3036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-3036A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-419A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-419A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-99-419A1.txt
            • Inc. (ITS), 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800. The applications and any subsequently filed documents are also available for public inspection and copying during normal hours at the International Bureau Reference Center, located in Room 102, 2000 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. This is a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(5), (6). For additional information, please contact Doug Klein or Troy Tanner, Telecommunications Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1470. - FCC - ' - - š � +D`ƒ +Dðƒ ` ' ` ' ǬŠ`ONÿ‰PNG > æÕ Ìà¨I ²æ `ÓItm <13WéÁ€�£o‰À] ÖÃ"/tm°tm §Xà,Åå <8 Áê4,¼6ï‚Ÿ Á ½Ed,ý áµ�`IøÄ¢‚ Ã"y% `b+ ÖÂ~ ...[|ôj›ãæ  <ï¥wÿô^>àA° #½á Tx ¶ -,S¸ üïËô'{:¼äCY cû0´?‰ Œ‰M´0 ÞßgF²üKUud qa
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201630A1.txt
            • proceeding to be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Commenters must file an original and four copies of all comments and reply comments. The lead file number for this series of applications is File No. SAT-T/C-20000323-00078, and should be referenced on ALL
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201745A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201745A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201769A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201770A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201872A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201873A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-201873A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202029A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202031A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202147A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202149A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202169A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202271A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202329A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202376A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202474A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202475A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202530A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202613A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202802A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202802A1.txt
            • Allow Non-U.S. Licensed Space Stations to Provide Domestic and International Satellite Service in the United States, Order, IB Docket No. 96-111, FCC 99-325 (released Oct. 29, 1999) (DISCO II First Reconsideration Order).] · ANIK F-1 at 107.3° W.L. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202892A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202964A1.txt
            • proceeding to be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Commenters must file an original and four copies of all comments and reply comments. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202989A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202997A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203085A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203085A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203179A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203270A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203365A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203365A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203366A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203521A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203521A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203604A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203883A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203946A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203946A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203947A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-203947A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204047A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204047A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204048A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204048A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204109A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204421A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204422A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204494A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204661A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204661A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204734A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204956A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204956A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-204957A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205060A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205060A1.txt
            • proceeding to be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Commenters must file an original and four copies of all comments and reply comments. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205061A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205062A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205124A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205257A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205396A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205396A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205538A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205538A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205859A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205986A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205988A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-205988A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206036A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206037A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206124A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206159A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206198A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206200A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206288A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206348A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206504A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206504A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206565A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206565A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206565A1.txt
            • issue, parties are asked to specify the bases upon which they believe the Commission can make the findings required to meet the statutory criteria for forbearance. . In addition, this proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Comments are due November 17, 2000. Reply comments are due December 4, 2000. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also can be obtained from International
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206612A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206613A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206613A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206682A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206850A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206956A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206956A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206957A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-206957A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207171A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207256A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207391A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207443A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207444A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207444A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207576A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207717A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207717A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207722A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207722A1.txt
            • No. SPB-132 (released July 29, 1998), the applications and letters of intent filed in the 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service proceeding have been treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose basis for ex parte purposes. The applications and letters of intent, as amended here, will continue to be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose basis for ex parte purposes. 47 CFR §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. Comments may be filed on or before December 14, 2000. Replies may be filed on or before December 26, 2000. For more information concerning this Notice, contact Kathleen Campbell at 202-418-0753 or Howard Griboff at 202-418-0657; TTY 202-418-2555. Page 2 of 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207757A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207757A1.txt
            • proposes amendments to clarify several rules and to eliminate other rules that are no longer necessary. The Commission seeks comment on its proposals and tentative conclusions. . In addition, this proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Comments are due January 24, 2001. Reply comments are due February 27, 2001. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also can be obtained from International
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207856A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207856A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207972A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207973A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-207973A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208215A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208216A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208430A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208529A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208529A1.txt
            • the public interest. COMMENTS may be filed on or before January 23, 2001. REPLIES may be filed on or before February 2, 2001. RESPONSES to replies may be filed on or before February 7, 2001. The Bureau previously determined to treat this matter as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206 (Report No. SAT-00035, February 2, 2000). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208611A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208680A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208681A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208681A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208773A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-208884A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209062A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209157A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209307A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209383A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209384A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209534A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209536A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209714A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209714A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209830A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209951A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-209951A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210376A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210377A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210434A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210557A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210557A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210561A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210561A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210674A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210675A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210825A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-210896A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211037A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211145A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211322A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211322A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211323A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211323A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211516A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211516A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211517A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211541A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211541A1.pdf
            • from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW, 20036, telephone 202-857-3800, facsimile 202-857-3805, TTY 202-293-8810. You may also view the FCC Final Report at http://www.fcc.gov/3G/ and the NTIA Final Report at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/threeg/ This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance or the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211642A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211643A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211643A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211756A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211816A1.txt
            • 3/29 3/29 3/29 Covad Communications Company Massachusetts Department of Telecommunicat-ions and Energy AT&T Verizon Cmsr. Ness Secretary Common Carrier Bureau Secretary Secretary Secretary X X X X X X CC 01-9 3/29 Rural Telecommunicat-ions Group Cmsr. Furchtgott-Roth Cmsr. Tristani Wireless Bureau X X X WT 01-14 Non-Docketed Proceedings 3/28 PacWest Telecomm, Inc. et al. Ofc. of General Counsel X Section 1.1206 3/28 Institute for Public Representation Ofc. of Chairman Powell Cmsr. Ness X X DA 00-2246 3/28 Global Crossing Secretary X DA 00-2366 3/28 Pacific Wireless Technologies, Inc. Wireless Bureau X DA 01-623 3/29 San Carlos Apache Telecommunicat-ions Utility, Inc. Cmsr. Ness Cmsr. Furchtgott-Roth Cmsr. Tristani Common Carrier Bureau Consumer Information Bureau X X X X X DA 00-1018 3/29 Wi-LAN,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211878A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211906A1.txt
            • proceeding to be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Commenters must file an original and four copies of all comments and reply comments. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-211964A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212103A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212143A1.txt
            • e.g., CDT/People For Comments at 3-10 (alleging the unconstitutionality of CIPA and urging the Commission to refuse to promulgate rules implementing the legislation); ACLUF Comments at 1 (alleging facial unconstitutionality of CIPA, but recognizing the Commission's statutory obligations to engage in rulemaking). The ACLUF Comments were untimely filed, but we will nonetheless accept them as ex parte filings under section 1.1206 of our rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. On March 20, 2001, claims were brought in federal court challenging the constitutionality of sections 1712 and 1721 of CIPA. See American Library Ass'n v. United States, No. 01-CV-1303 (E.D. Pa. filed March 20, 2001); Multnomah County Public Library v. United States, No. 01-CV-1322 (E.D. Pa. filed March 20, 2001). See, e.g.,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212165A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212289A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212289A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212357A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212497A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212586A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212586A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212588A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212588A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212701A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212701A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212748A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-212851A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213033A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213034A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213034A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213125A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213156A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213156A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213310A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213310A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213311A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213311A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213377A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213377A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213377A2.txt
            • signals from the studio to the transmitter, or between two points such as a main studio and an auxiliary studio. The service also includes mobile TV pickups, which relay signals from a remote location back to the studio. 13 C.F.R. § 121.201, SIC code 4812. Id. . Id. 5 U.S.C. § 603(c). . See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 , v ¥ Ô , v ¥ Ô & ' ( * + U V p 8p q r t u „ ... Ÿ ¡ £
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213511A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213513A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213513A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213585A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213585A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213585A2.txt
            • charges that result from federal regulatory action: (1) universal service-related fees; (2) subscriber line charges; and (3) local number portability charges. See id. at 7523-25, paras. 51-52. . See also Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Second Recommended Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 24744, 24771-72, paras. 69-70 (Jt. Bd. 1998). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. 47 U.S.C.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213682A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213682A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213850A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213850A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213851A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-213851A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214036A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214036A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214037A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214037A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214197A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214420A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214420A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214708A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214708A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214712A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214910A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214999A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-214999A1.txt
            • with the pending rulemaking regarding rules for SDARS terrestrial repeaters, we find that it is in the public interest to redesignate the ex parte status of these applications from a restricted to a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Accordingly, ex parte presentations relating to either of the two pending STA requests cited above are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.261, 1.1200(a). For further information, contact the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215096A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215099A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215099A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215287A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215491A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215589A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215616A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215616A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215751A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215805A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215805A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215954A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-215955A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216122A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216301A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216301A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216483A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216680A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216680A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216987A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-216987A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217028A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217029A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217190A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217191A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217406A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217576A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217740A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217740A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217905A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217905A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217906A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217984A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-217984A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218068A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218273A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218274A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218274A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218562A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218562A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218629A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218770A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218872A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218872A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218877A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218877A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218878A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218900A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-218900A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219121A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219340A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219474A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219474A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219498A1.txt
            • record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made, we designate the application as "permit but disclose." We conclude that such treatment would best serve the public interest, in light of the intricate legal and technical issues raised by the application. Accordingly, effective today, ex parte presentations in this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. --------------------------------- For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division at 202-418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. Page 2 of 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219646A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219778A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219960A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219960A1.txt
            • record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made, we designate the application as "permit but disclose." We conclude that such treatment would best serve the public interest, in light of the intricate legal and technical issues raised by the application. Accordingly, effective today, ex parte presentations in this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. E020022 SES-LIC-20020111-00075 WSNet Holdings, Inc. "CORRECTION" Public Notice, Report No. SES-00364, Wednesday, February 6, 2002, is corrected to the extent of adding the following statement. The original public notice date (February 6, 2002) is unchanged. Ex parte Status of this Application Proceeding: In order to assist the Commission in developing a complete record
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219965A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219965A1.txt
            • record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made, we designate the application as "permit but disclose." We conclude that such treatment would best serve the public interest, in light of the intricate legal and technical issues raised by the application. Accordingly, effective today, ex parte presentations in this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. E020022 SES-LIC-20020111-00075 WSNet Holdings, Inc. "CORRECTION" Public Notice, Report No. SES-00364, Wednesday, February 6, 2002, is corrected to the extent of adding the following statement. The original public notice date (February 6, 2002) is unchanged. Ex parte Status of this Application Proceeding: In order to assist the Commission in developing a complete record
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219970A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219970A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219983A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-219983A1.txt
            • which a well-reasoned decision can be made, we hereby redesignate this application proceeding as "permit but disclose." We conclude that such treatment would best serve the public interest in light of the complex legal and technical issues raised by the application. Accordingly, effective today, ex parte presentations in this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to the authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.261 and 1.1200 of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.261, and 1.1200. For more information concerning this Notice,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220095A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220204A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220224A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220324A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220324A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220362A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220376A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220376A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220376A2.txt
            • D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Paul Garnett of the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-2332, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Letter from Robert W. Quinn, Jr., AT&T, to Magalie Roman Salas, Federal
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220386A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220563A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220563A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220566A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220676A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220812A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-220861A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221167A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221320A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221383A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221482A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221482A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221483A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221483A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221773A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-221773A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222024A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222024A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222025A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222025A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222098A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222098A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222249A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222252A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222252A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222252A2.txt
            • Commission's rules regarding resolution of RFI. Cingular maintains that, in order to prevent significant delays in the provision of wireless services resulting from Anne Arundel's regulation of RFI, the Commission should determine that the amendments are preempted. This matter shall be treated as a "permit but disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222252A2_Erratum.doc
            • Commission's rules regarding resolution of RFI. Cingular maintains that, in order to prevent significant delays in the provision of wireless services resulting from Anne Arundel's regulation of RFI, the Commission should determine that the amendments are preempted. This matter shall be treated as a "permit but disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222353A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222353A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222625A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222652A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222917A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222962A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-222962A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223139A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223430A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223430A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223546A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223623A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223743A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223840A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-223917A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224266A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224514A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224514A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224700A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224700A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224702A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224702A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224724A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224977A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-224992A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225131A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225131A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225132A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225245A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225366A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225431A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225573A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225573A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225630A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225630A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225744A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225744A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226005A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226252A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226442A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226443A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226882A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226882A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226985A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-226985A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227191A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227280A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227281A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227431A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227533A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227533A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227670A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-227902A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228298A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228298A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228299A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228300A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228401A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228401A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228401A2.txt
            • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Documents filed in this proceeding will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and will be placed on the Commission's Internet site. This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228418A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228518A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228518A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228519A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228755A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228966A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-228966A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229028A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229144A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229145A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229372A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229607A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229607A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229742A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229778A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229778A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229778A1.txt
            • We seek comment on the issues raised by the Declaratory Ruling Petition. Interested parties may file comments to the Petition on or before January 24, 2003. Reply comments are due February 7, 2003. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved with regard to the Petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. Generally, only one
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229817A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229817A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229915A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229915A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229917A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229917A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-229976A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230028A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230028A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230029A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230029A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230089A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230213A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230213A1.txt
            • operate as gateways. (See also File No. SES-T/C-20021226-02209.) The transaction transfers control from one group of shareholders to a different group of shareholders led by Liberty Satellite, LLC, Intelsat USA Sales Corp., and the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative. In addition, Wildblue has requested the Commission to specify that this application will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.1206 governing permit-but-disclose proceedings. This request is still pending. Note: Wildblue is also a party to File No. SAT-T/C-20021023-00221. See Public Notice, Report No. SAT-00130 (December 27, 2002). Page 1 of 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230214A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230214A1.txt
            • operate as gateways. (See also File No. SAT-T/C-20021226-00241.) The transaction transfers control from one group of shareholders to a different group of shareholders led by Liberty Satellite, LLC, Inteslsat USA Sales Corp., and the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative. In addition, Wildblue has requested the Commission to specify that this application will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.1206 governing permit-but-disclose proceedings. This request is still pending. Note: Wildblue is also a party to File No. SAT-T/C-20021023-00221. See Public Notice, Report No. SAT-00130 (December 27, 2002). Page 1 of 1
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230271A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230380A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230381A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230517A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230517A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230617A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230788A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230788A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230789A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230789A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-230933A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231032A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231229A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231361A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231537A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231537A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231626A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231626A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231720A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231822A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-231822A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232148A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232391A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232391A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232392A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232625A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232678A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-232678A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233164A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233375A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233375A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233376A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233376A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-233618A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234049A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234263A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234264A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234601A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234830A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234830A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-234831A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235006A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235196A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235372A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235373A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235373A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235645A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235645A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-235864A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236111A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236113A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236121A1.txt
            • present complex, interrelated legal, technical and policy issues associated with the implementation of direct broadcast satellite systems, and because a change in the ex parte status of these applications would facilitate a transparent resolution of these issues, we hereby modify the status for processing these applications. Both applications shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose basis. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241, 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.31, 0.241, 0.261 and 1.1200(a). We request that parties serve all applicants
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236230A1.txt
            • 1.1202(d) and 1.1208. This proceeding is inextricably intertwined with complex, interrelated legal, technical and policy issues associated with the implementation of direct broadcast satellite systems. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding we hereby modify the status for processing this application. This proceeding shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose, basis. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. § 154(i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.31, 0.241, 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.31, 0.241, 0.261 and 1.1200(a). Modification DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC DBS8804 SAT-MOD-20030613-00121P Page
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236465A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236465A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236623A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236742A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-236999A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237263A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237264A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237434A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-237704A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238097A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238139A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238139A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238502A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238555A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238555A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238555A1.txt
            • interconnection agreements approved under section 252. A summary of the Commission's Triennial Review Order and FNPRM was published in the Federal Register on September 2, 2003, triggering the cycle for comments and reply comments on the Further Notice. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238646A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-238699A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239045A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239053A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239053A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239217A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239218A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239520A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239843A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-239843A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240070A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240070A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240333A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240590A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240590A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240834A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240914A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-240914A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241272A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241492A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241747A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241747A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241748A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241748A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-241906A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242102A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242366A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242367A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242541A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242541A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242775A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242776A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242776A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242977A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-242977A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243176A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243382A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243382A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243424A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243424A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243621A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243621A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243623A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243899A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244113A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244455A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244642A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244683A1.txt
            • its January 23,2004 comments and February 13,2004 reply comments on this Public Notice. In particular, New Skies discussed its view that the best approach for the Commission on DBS orbital spacing is to rely on the existing ITU coordination procedure and to take advantage of the ability to treat different parts of the DBS orbital arc differently. Pursuant to section 1.1206@)(2) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 8 1.1206@)(2), this letter is being filed for inclusion in the public record of the above-referenced proceeding. Sincerely, Stephen J. Behan cc: TomTycz Arthur Lechtman Kathryn Medley Roderick Porter Chip Fleming Job Lucanik Rick Engelman Rockie Patterson Qualex International John Martin Steven Spaeth Robert Nelson Selina Khan
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244892A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244892A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245155A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245263A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245266A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245266A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245266A1.txt
            • as the related pending application proceedings, as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules notwithstanding the existence of related applications and oppositions. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that these proceedings will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245380A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245380A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245571A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245571A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245714A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245714A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245928A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245928A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-245929A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246174A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246393A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246393A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246728A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246728A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246906A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246906A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246981A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-246981A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247004A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247004A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247222A1.txt
            • the U.K. Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and to the Office of Communications (Ofcom) from my Office, seeking immediate discussions with the Isle of Man and that our hope was that the FCC would not grant any assignments at -96.5' WL until these discussions were concluded and the concerns of the Bermuda Government had been addressed. In accordance with Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, an original and one copy of this letter are being filed. Sincerely, 0 William G. Francis, CCP Director of Telecommunications Cc: The Hon. Renee Webb, JP, MP - Minister of Tourism, Telecommunications & eCommerce The Hon. Lany Mussenden - Attorney General Mr. Philip Perinchief - Priacipal Crown Counsel Mr. Donald Abelson - Chief, International Bureau
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247248A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247377A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247623A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247803A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247803A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-247967A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248142A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248145A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248536A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248883A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-248884A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249442A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249442A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249713A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249713A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249953A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249953A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-249955A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250328A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250608A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250608A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-250968A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251149A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251405A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251409A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251409A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251750A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251750A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251750A1.txt
            • Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) is reviewing the waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to develop a complete record on the complex issues presented by this request, this proceeding will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before September 29, 2004, and reply comments on or before October 14, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251763A1.txt
            • Dwayne Jackson, Network Technologies Division, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 7-A226, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send two (2) diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing Copy, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Ex Parte Presentations In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiates a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules.465 Renumber paragraphs 175-178 of the text to 180-183. Revise footnotes 186 and 348 to include the updated FCC Record citation. These footnotes shall
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251774A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-251774A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252000A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252236A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252236A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252239A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252239A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252471A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252800A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252989A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-252989A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253189A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253421A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253795A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253795A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253967A1.txt
            • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-253991A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254185A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254674A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254955A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255192A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255421A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255716A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255718A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255814A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255814A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-255933A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256086A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256086A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256088A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256088A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256145A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256188A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256383A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256383A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256384A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256546A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256546A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256730A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256874A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-256874A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257011A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257011A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257194A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257337A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257356A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257356A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257356A1.txt
            • Filings and comments are also available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy Printing, Inc. 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Greg Lipscomb at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-8200. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257531A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257531A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257628A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257629A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257629A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257936A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257936A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257937A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257937A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258068A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258166A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258270A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258475A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258512A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258512A1.txt
            • Filings and comments are also available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy Printing, Inc. 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Greg Lipscomb at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-8200. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258576A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258576A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258675A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258857A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258857A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258858A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258858A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259026A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259026A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259123A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259124A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259270A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259347A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259347A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259558A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259780A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259780A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259898A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259954A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-259954A1.txt
            • applications raise complex policy issues. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating IBFS Files Nos. SAT-MOD-20050301-0054 and SES-MOD-20050301-00261 as "permit-but-disclose". Accordingly, on July 7, 2005, the Satellite Division, Policy Branch granted the request and designated the applications as "permit-but-disclose." 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. Page 28 of 29 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division at 418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. INFORMATIVE E9049 SES-RWL-19950424-01108 TCI CABLEVISION OF WASHINGTON, INC. Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated June 24, 2005. E859860 SES-RWL-19950705-00741 AT&T BROADBAND
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260017A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260017A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260104A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260334A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260423A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260496A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260520A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260625A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260720A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260841A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260841A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260922A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-260922A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261108A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261225A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261227A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261227A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261320A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261423A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261423A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261431A1.txt
            • reassign the DirecTV 8 satellite from 100.85º W.L. to 100.75º W.L. as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating the application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex technical issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS Files No. SAT-MOD-20050513-00100 as "permit-but-disclose," effective September 30, 2005. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. S2632 SAT-MOD-20050513-00101 DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC On our own motion, we designate the application to reassign the DirecTV 8 satellite from 100.85º W.L. to 100.75º W.L. as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261519A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261519A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261605A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261707A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261707A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261766A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261766A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261870A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261870A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned and/or dismissed if not
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261903A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-261903A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262049A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262049A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262179A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262181A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262218A1.txt
            • Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary, LLC on October 13, 2005 (addressing SES-LFS-20051011-01396 filed by FTMSC US, LLC). We find that designating the earth station applications as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-LFS-20050826-01175, SES-AMD-20050922-01313, and SES-LFS-20050930-01352, SES-LFS-20051011-01396 as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 10, 2005. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. E050249 SES-LFS-20050826-01175 Stratos Communications, Inc. On November 10, 2005, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's requests to designate certain blanket earth station applications that seek authority to operate Mobile Earth Terminals to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262259A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262395A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262395A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262530A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262530A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262610A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262610A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262725A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262902A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262902A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262935A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262935A1.txt
            • SES-MFS-20051122-01614, SES-MFS-20051122-01615, SES-MFS-20051122-01616, SES-MFS-20051122-01617, SES-MFS-20051122-01618, SES-MFS-20051123-01626, SES-MFS-20051123-01627, SES-MFS-20051123-01629, and SES-MFS-20051123-01630). We find that designating the earth station applications as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SES-LFS-20051123-01634, SES-MFS-20051122-01614, SES-MFS-20051122-01615, SES-MFS-20051122-01616, SES-MFS-20051122-01617, SES-MFS-20051122-01618, SES-MFS-20051123-01626, SES-MFS-20051123-01627, SES-MFS-20051123-01629, and SES-MFS-20051123-01630 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 21, 2005. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. SITE ID: 1 1000 Inmarsat Mini-M full-duplex METs in the United States LOCATION: NERA (0.26m(w & h)) 1 0.26 meters ANTENNA ID: WORLDPONE 17.00 dBW MINI-M VOICE, DATA AND FAX O-QPSK 1626.5000 - 1660.5000 MHz 5K00G1E 17.00 dBW SIGNALLING BPSK 1626.5000 -
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262998A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262998A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263095A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263143A1.txt
            • communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary on December 23, 2005. We find that designating the SkyWave earth station STA application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-STA-20051222-01788 as "permit-but-disclose," effective December 29, 2005. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. E020074 SES-STA-20051223-01790 SATAMATICS, INC. On December 29, 2005, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate Satamatics, Inc.'s ("Satamatics") earth station application that seeks special temporary authority ("STA") to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with Inmarsat's
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263182A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263184A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263223A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263223A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263303A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263305A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263406A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263406A1.txt
            • filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary on January 20, 2006. We find that designating these Telenor earth station applications as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SES-MFS-20060118-00050, SES-MFS-20060118-00051, SES-MFS-20060118-00052, SES-MFS-20060118-00053, SES-STA-20060118-00055, SES-STA-20060118-00056, SES-STA-20060118-00057, SES-STA-20060118-00058, and SES-STA-20060119-00064 as "permit-but-disclose," effective January 24, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the applications. E000282 SES-MFS-20060118-00051 Telenor Satellite, Inc. On January 24, 2006, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate Telenor Satellite, Inc.'s ("Telenor") earth station applications that seek authority and special temporary authority ("STA") to provide Mobile Satellite Services in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263463A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263464A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263464A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263611A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263612A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263612A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263704A1.txt
            • parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary on Februar 1, 2006. We find that designating this Telenor earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-LIC-20060130-00175 as "permit-but-disclose," effective January 24, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E930279 SES-RWL-20030206-00139 FALCON VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, LP Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated January 23, 2006. Page 6 of 7 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division at 418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. Page 7 of 7
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263752A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263752A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263753A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263753A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263818A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263818A1.txt
            • communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on February 6, 2006. We find that designating this Telenor earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-MFS-20060130-00172 as "permit-but-disclose," effective February 8, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SURRENDER E020164 SES-LIC-20020606-00954 AUTOMATION SERVICES GROUP, INC. License has been surrendered per letter dated January 25, 2006. Page 13 of 13
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263863A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263863A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-263926A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264010A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264136A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264252A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264326A1.txt
            • See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on March 6, 2006. We find that designating this BT Americas earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-LFS-20060303-00343 as "permit-but-disclose," effective March 8, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E960148 SES-LIC-19960209-01813 NBC Telemundo License Co. Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated March 7, 2006. E960204 SES-LIC-19960327-01529 JONES EARTH SEGMENT, INC. Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated March 2, 2006. E960527 SES-LIC-19960905-00493 Convergent Media Systems Corporation Licensee has surrendered license,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264378A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264449A1.txt
            • Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on March 14, 2006. We find that designating this Stratos application for special temporary authority as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-STA-20060310-00419 as "permit-but-disclose," effective March 16, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E050276 SES-STA-20060313-00430 Telenor Satellite, Inc. On March 16, 2006, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate Telenor Satellite Inc.'s ("Telenor") earth station application that seeks special temporary authority to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264481A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264545A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264545A1.txt
            • See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on March 20, 2006. We find that designating this FTMSC application for special temporary authority as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No.SES-STA-20060314-00438 as "permit-but-disclose," effective March 22, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E060076 SES-STA-20060315-00445 BT Americas Inc. On March 22, 2006, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate BT Americas, Inc.'s ("BT America") earth station application that seeks special temporary authority to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264706A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264706A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264723A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264723A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264829A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264829A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264884A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264884A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264926A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-264926A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265052A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265052A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265147A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265255A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265256A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265256A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265276A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265340A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265340A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265449A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265449A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265540A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265540A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265666A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265666A1.txt
            • See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on May 23, 2006. We find that designating these Thrane & Thrane applications as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos.SES-LFS-20060522-00852 and SES-STA-20060522-00857 as "permit-but-disclose," effective May 30, 2006. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E030055 SES-STA-20060511-00788 SkyWave Mobile Communications, Corp. On May 30, 2006, the Satellite Division granted Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC's request to designate SkyWave Mobile Communications, Inc.'s ("SkyWave") earth station application that seeks special temporary authority to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265743A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265787A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265787A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265864A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265864A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265865A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265955A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265955A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265976A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-265976A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266061A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266061A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266186A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266199A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266286A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266405A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266405A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266512A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266512A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266657A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266657A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266779A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266779A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266865A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266923A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266963A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-266963A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267050A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267050A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267091A1.txt
            • on August 1 1, 2006, the undersigned representative of EchoStar spoke by telephone with Sam Feder, General Counsel. During that conversation, EchoStar discussed processing issues arising from 4.5" spacing between DBS satellites, and pointed out that an evaluation of procedural issues is an important threshold matter that must precede any reduced orbital spacing proposals. As required by 47 C.F.R. 5 1.1206(b)(2), an original and one copy of this letter is being filed with the Secretary. Respectfully submitted, Pantelis Michalopoulos Counsel for EchoStar Satellite L.L. C. cc: Sam Feder, General Counsel, FCC WASHINGTON NEW YORK PHOENIX LOS ANGELES LONDON BRUSSELS . - ____ ~
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267094A1.txt
            • Echostar's technical concerns, or interferes with the full evaluation of Echostar's views in a future rulemaking in connection with 4.5 degree spacing, EchoStar will withdraw the application. WASHINGTON NEW YORK PHOENIX LOS ANCELES LONDON BRUSSELS 7 - v .-- Marlene H. Dortch August 7,2006 Page 2 STEPTO E &_Io H N SO N LIP As required by 47 C.F.R. 4 1.1206(b)( l), an original and two copies of this letter is being filed with the Secretary. Respectfully submitted, Pantelis Michalopoulos Counsel for EchoStar Satellite L.L. C. cc: Emily Willeford, International Advisor to Chairman Martin Fred Campbell, Legal Advisor to Chairman Martin Bruce Gottlieb, International Legal Advisor to Commissioner Copps Barry Ohlson, Senior Legal Advisor to Commissioner Adelstein Aaron Goldberger, Legal Advisor
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267095A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267095A1.txt
            • the undersigned representative of EchoStar spoke by telephone with Barry Ohlson of Commissioner Adelstein's office. At that meeting, EchoStar discussed the technical and processing issues arising from 4.5" spacing between DBS satellites, and pointed out that an evaluation of those issues is an important threshold matter that must precede any reduced orbital spacing proposals. As required by 47 C.F.R. 5 1.1206(b)(2), an original and one copy of this letter is being filed with the Secretary. Respectfully submitted, Pantelis Michalopoulos Counsel for EchoStar Satellite L. L. C. cc: Barry Ohlson, Senior Legal Advisor to Commissioner Adelstein WASHINGTON NEW YORK PHOENIX LOS ANCELES LONDON BRUSSELS -------
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267096A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267096A1.txt
            • August 1, 2006, representatives of EchoStar met with Emily Willeford and Fred Campbell of Chairman Martin's office. At that meeting, EchoStar discussed the technical issues arising from 4.5" spacing between DBS satellites, and pointed out that an evaluation of those issues is an important threshold matter that must precede any reduced orbital spacing proposals. As required by 47 C.F.R. 3 1.1206(b)(2), an original and one copy of this letter is being filed with the Secretary. Respectfully submitted, h Pantelis Michalopoulos Counsel for EchoStar Satellite L. L. C. cc: Emily Willeford, International Advisor to Chairman Martin Fred Campbell, Legal Advisor to Chairman Martin WASHINGTON NEW YORK PHOENIX LOS ANGELES LONDON BRUSSELS ~. I .-.I----- -
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267165A1.pdf
            • to do so, during the two months between the filing of the Associations' reply comments and the issuance of the Commission's decision. Under the agency's liberal ex parte rules EchoStar could have submitted a written presentation at any time during the rulemaking -- even, as Commission counsel said at oral argument, at the "11th hour." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200, 1.1206 (in "permit-but-disclose" proceedings, including informal rulemakings, "ex parte presentations to Commission decision-making personnel are permissible but subject to certain disclosure requirements" until "the proceeding is no longer subject to administrative reconsideration or review or to judicial review"); see also Home Box Office, Inc. v. FCC, 567 F.2d 9, 57 (D.C. Cir. 1977) ("[W]e recognize that informal contacts between agencies and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267167A1.pdf
            • 2006 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. (public notice). Comments were submitted by wireless carriers, the State Utility Regulators, the State Consumer Advocates, and individual consumers. Many consumers submitted brief comments that expressed confusion and dissatisfaction with their monthly telephone bills. After the public comment period closed, during the so-called "permit but disclose" proceedings, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, the Commission received ex parte presentations and letters. On March 3, 2005, the State Utility Regulators provided notice of oral and written ex parte communications with the members of the Commission. Also on March 3, the Vermont Board sent an ex parte letter addressed to the five members of the Commission. On March 4, the permit-but-disclose period closed, and communications
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267201A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267268A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267440A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267440A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267470A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267470A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267551A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267551A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267663A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267790A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267883A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267898A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267898A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267995A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-267995A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268108A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268216A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268328A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268328A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268417A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268417A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268502A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268503A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268503A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268526A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268526A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268617A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268769A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268769A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268858A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268858A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-268867A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269000A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269001A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269001A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269141A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269163A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269163A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269253A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269335A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269335A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269337A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269352A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269463A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269603A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269720A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269720A1.txt
            • rules governing ex parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC on January 10, 2007. We find that designating Horizon's application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate File No. SES-LFS-20070109-00042 as "permit-but-disclose," effective January 18, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SURRENDER E980157 SES-LIC-19980225-00229 Loral Skynet Network Services, Inc. This license is hereby surrendered per Loral Skynet's request. Please see a letter filed by Mr. Nelson De Sousa on December 12, 2006. E2124 SES-RWL-20000505-00753 C-NATIVE EXCHANGE III, LP Licensee has surrendered license, per
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269800A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269800A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270235A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270235A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270403A1.txt
            • 12th Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty).'' This Erratum also amends the Public Notice by adding a paragraph 6 regarding ex parte presentations and the Bureau's determination that it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding, pursuant to Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Paragraph 6 has been added to read as follows: ``Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270412A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270413A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270413A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270460A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270460A1.txt
            • NJ et al. No Code CSR-7119-E Cablevision of Rockland-Rampo, LLC Mahwah, NJ No Code *This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- N N N N N $ „N e f h h g h gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270604A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270604A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270760A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270760A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271018A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271018A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271280A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271484A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271484A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271484A1.txt
            • Code CSR-7131-Z* JetBroadband VA, LLC Virginia and West Virginia No Code JetBroadband WV, LLC *This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N b c e h d e gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271569A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271569A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271570A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271570A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271724A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271724A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271725A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271725A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271968A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271968A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271979A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271979A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271999A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272000A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272000A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272170A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272312A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272312A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272338A1.txt
            • Texas No Code CSR-7185Z* Qwest Communications International Inc. Arizona, Colorado, et al. No Code *This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N $ „N ~  h 4 € � gd  � h hs; ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272477A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272477A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272478A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272711A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272711A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272712A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272809A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272809A1.txt
            • and Extended Ku-Bands to the Vehicle Mounted Earth Station Satellite Service (VMES) on a Shared Primary Basis and to Adopt Licensing and Service Rules for VMES Operations in the Ku- and Extended Ku-Bands, Petition for Rulemaking, RM No. 11336 (filed May 24, 2006). Thus, we designate File No. SES-LIC-20060629-01083 as "permit-but-disclose," effective May 1, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 30 of 30
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272854A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272854A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272854A1.txt
            • CSR-7200-Z* Knology, Inc. Augusta and Columbus, GA and No Code Huntsville, AL et al *This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N ` a c h b c gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272865A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272865A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272995A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272995A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273109A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273117A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273117A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273121A1.txt
            • (WGGN-TV) CSR-7211-M Christian Faith Broadcast, Inc. Cox Communications, Inc. Parma, OH No Code (WGGN-TV) **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N a b d h c d gd hD hD ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273209A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273209A1.txt
            • Television Company filed applications seeking Commission consent to the transfer of control of its licenses and authorizations. On May 23, 2007, the International Bureau issued a Satellite Earth Station Applications Public Notice (Report No. SES-00928) announcing that the applications had been accepted for filing, these applications will be considered under the rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings, pursuant to 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206. Parties seeking to comment or review comments concerning these applications should follow the procedures outlined in the Media Bureau Notice. The period for these applications ends at close of business of June 22, 2007. 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206. Consistent with the Public Notice "Media Bureau Announces Permit-but-Disclose Ex Parte Status for Transfer of Control Applications Filed by Tribune Company," DA
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273281A1.txt
            • Communities in No Code AL, CO, FL, GA, LA. OK, TN, TX, and WY **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N b c e h d e gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273291A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273291A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273368A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273368A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273462A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273462A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273490A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273646A1.txt
            • 2007, Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. filed an application seeking Commission consent to assignment of license and authorization. On June 6, 2007, the International Bureau issued a Satellite Earth Station Application Public Notice (Report No. SES-00933) announcing that the application had been accepted for filing, this application will be considered under the rules for permit-but-disclose proceedings, pursuant to 47 C.F.R Section 1.1206. Parties seeking to comment or review comments concerning this application should follow the procedures outlined in the Media Bureau Notice. The period for this application ends at close of business on July 5, 2007. 47 C.F.R. Section 1.206. Consistent with the Public Notice "Media Bureau Announces Permit-but-Disclose Ex Parte Status for Assignment of License Application filed Clear Channel." DA 07-2124
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-273755A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274170A1.txt
            • Code CSR-7228-Z* XIT Telecommunication & Technology LTD Dalhart, Hereford, and Vega TX No Code **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N b c e h d e gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274240A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274240A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274497A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274729A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274729A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274736A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274736A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274825A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274825A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274896A1.txt
            • Respondent Special Relief Request Communities Code CSR-7297-Z* Northeast Oklahoma IPTV Providers Oklahoma No Code **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N a b d h c d gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274923A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274972A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-274972A1.txt
            • Port St. Lucie, FL No Code CSR-7356-Z* Tekstar Cablevision, Inc. Perham, MN No Code **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N a b d h c d gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275089A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275089A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275172A1.txt
            • Code St. Leon and Greensburg CSR-7364-Z* Panora Cooperative Cablevision Association, Inc. Iowa No Code **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N b c e h d e gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275196A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275231A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275231A1.txt
            • Code CSR-7384-E Comcast Cable Communications, LLC Bertrand, Buchanan, Howard, MI et al No Code **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N b c e h d e gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275379A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275379A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275412A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275412A1.txt
            • CSR-7404-E Time Warner Cable Inc. Amherst, Angola, Arcade, No Code Aurora, NY et al **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N b c e h d e gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275471A1.txt
            • Code CSR-7412-A WTNH Broadcasting, Inc. (WCTX) Bethel, Bridgeport, No Code Brookfield, CT et al. *This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N a b d h c d gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275508A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275508A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275510A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275510A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275559A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275600A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275600A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275743A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275743A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275763A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275763A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275763A1.txt
            • Communications, LLC Beaver, Bell (Clearfield), Big Run, No Code Brady, Canoe, PA et al *This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. REPORT NO: 0221 SPECIAL RELIEF AND SHOW CAUSE PETITIONS August 6, 2006 CSR Number Applicant Community Type Date Code CSR-6537-E/ Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo, Inc./ Montvale, NJ/ Appl for Review 7/26/07 No Code CSR-6670-E/ CSC TKR, Inc. d/b/a Cablevision of Elizabeth, NJ/ CSR-6671-E Elizabeth/Cablevision of Warwick, LLC West Milford,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275883A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275883A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275999A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-275999A1.txt
            • rules governing ex parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Horizon Mobile Communications Inc. on August 7, 2007. We find that designating Horizon's application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate IBFS File No. SES-STA-20070112-00112 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 14, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Points of Communication: E060382 SES-STA-20070709-00908 E Date Effective: 08/10/2007 Class of Station: Grant of Authority Special Temporary Authority HNS License Sub, LLC Special Temporary Authority is GRANTED with condition for a period of 30 days beginning August 14, 2007 and ending September
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276021A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276021A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276208A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276346A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276346A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276346A1.txt
            • Time Warner Cable Inc. Towns of Dorchester, Groton, No Code Lincoln, NH et al **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. REPORT NO: 0 223 SPECIAL RELIEF AND SHOW CAUSE PETITIONS August 31, 2006 CSR Number Applicant Community Type Date Code CSR-7175-S KSTC (TV), LLC Mankato, MN Recon 8/13/07 No Code -FCC- $ „N e f h h g h gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276357A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276478A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276625A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276625A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276625A1.txt
            • CSR-7560-E Time Warner Entertainment Adams, Albion, Alexandria, NY et al No Code Advance/NewHouse Partnership **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N g h j h i j gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276628A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276651A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276651A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276653A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276653A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276768A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276840A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276840A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276967A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276967A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277146A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277147A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277147A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277237A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277276A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277276A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277278A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277280A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277280A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277412A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277412A1.txt
            • parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Inmarsat Ventures Limited on October 1, 2007. We find that designating this Vizada earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective October 9, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E070144 SES-LIC-20070712-00933 iPass Inc. On October 9, 2007, the Satellite Division granted Inmarsat Ventures Limited's request to designate iPass, Inc.'s ("iPass") earth station application that seeks authority to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with Inmarsat's 4F2 satellite, to be located
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277478A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277478A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277511A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277511A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277559A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277577A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277826A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277826A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277861A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277861A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277861A1.txt
            • Communications/Christian Faith Brooklyn Heights, for Stay Broadcast, Inc. Seven Hill, OH et al. (WGGN-TV) **This proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N f g i h h i gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277996A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277996A1.txt
            • ex parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Satamatics, Inc., on October 11, 2007. We find that designating this Satamatics earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective October 31, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E050284 SES-STA-20071017-01429 VIZADA Services LLC On October 31, 2007, the Satellite Division granted the request of VIZADA Services LLC (VIZADA) to designate its earth station application that seeks special temporary authority ("STA") to provide Mobile Satellite Services in the L-band with Inmarsat's
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278057A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278057A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278059A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278059A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278144A1.pdf
            • parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Deere & Company, on November 7, 2007. We find that designating this Deere earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 8, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 5 of 5
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278219A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278326A1.pdf
            • parte communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by Deere & Company, on November 9, 2007. We find that designating this Deere earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 16, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E000282 SES-STA-20070905-01233 Vizada Satellite, Inc. The FCC has taken the administrative action of listing this request as granted. The request sought continuation of operations authorized in File No. SES-STA-20060118-00056. That authorization was for 1000 Inmarsat Mini-M Terminals. The stations operated during the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278358A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278442A1.pdf
            • communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by SkyWave Mobile Communications, Corp., on November 13, 2007. We find that designating this SkyWave earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 21, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SURRENDER E000329 SES-MOD-20070912-01273 CLEAR CHANNEL SATELLITE SERVICES Licensee has surrendered this recently granted modification and request that their call sign E000329 be rolled back to the previous file number SES-MOD-20060420-00696, per letter dated November 15, 2007. E4774 SES-RWL-20020801-01217 CoxCom,Inc Licensee has surrendered
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278587A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278705A1.pdf
            • communications. See Motion to Designate Proceeding as "Permit-But-Disclose," filed by MVS USA, Inc., on November 16, 2007. We find that designating this MVS USA earth station application as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. Thus, we designate the above-captioned earth station application as "permit-but-disclose," effective November 28, 2007. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. SURRENDER E020082 SES-REG-20020322-00471 Cox Communications, Inc Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated December 4, 2007. KN66 SES-RWL-20020118-00041 Cox Communications, Inc Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated December 4, 2007. Page 18 of 19 For more information concerning this Notice, contact
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278759A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278938A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-278939A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279128A1.pdf
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279129A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279149A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279150A1.pdf
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279309A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279414A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279429A1.pdf
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279601A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279706A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279759A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279934A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279935A1.pdf
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279940A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279940A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279940A1.txt
            • City, Brookport City, IL et al CSR-7754-E Comcast Cable Communications, LLC Livingston Town, TN **This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N f g i h h i gd ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280090A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280268A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280396A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280397A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280485A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280485A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280485A1.txt
            • Code CSR-7779-E Time Warner Cable Inc. Archbold, Brady, Bryan, OH et al No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. **Bresnan Communications, LLC filed an amendment to its petition. The Bureau seeks comment on that "First Amended Request for Waiver," which was filed on December 14, 2007. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280544A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280545A1.pdf
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280600A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280684A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280780A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280807A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-280974A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281004A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281004A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281004A1.txt
            • Code CSR-7821-E Time Warner Cable Inc. Adell, Belgium, Cascade, WI et al No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. REPORT NO: 0 244 SPECIAL RELIEF AND SHOW CAUSE PETITIONS March 24, 2008 CSR Number Applicant Community Type Date Code CSR-7133-L Real Estate T.V. LLC New Orleans, LA Appl for Review 8/17/08 No Code -FCC- $ „N e f ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281176A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281300A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281300A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281300A1.txt
            • Eagle County, CO et al CSR-7824-E Comcast Cable Communications, LLC Oakland, CA No Code **This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N d e ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281315A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281473A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281473A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281473A1.txt
            • Carver, MA et al No Code CSR-7853-N WUPW Broadcasting, LLC WJBK Toledo, OH (WUPW) *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. REPORT NO: 0 246 SPECIAL RELIEF AND SHOW CAUSE PETITIONS April 11, 2008 CSR Number Applicant Community Type Date Code CSC-397 KVMD Licensee Co., LLC Los Angeles, CA Petition requesting that the FCC 1/4/08 No Code order DIRECTV to show cause why it should not be required to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281478A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281479A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281480A1.pdf
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281632A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281653A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281729A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281748A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281748A1.pdf
            • The Stakeholder Workshop will run from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. at FCC Headquarters, 445 12th St., SW, Washington, DC. The agenda is attached. Participants will include industry stakeholders, consumer advocates, technical experts, and emergency call handling representatives. The Stakeholder Workshop is open to the public and seating will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. . Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, the Stakeholder Workshop is part of a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte presentations are subject to disclosure. Notice of the Stakeholder Workshop and information on accessing the webcast will be placed in the public record. Reasonable Accommodations or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. For reasonable accommodations: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281774A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281804A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281916A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281916A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281916A1.txt
            • comment on the " Request for Extension,'' which was filed on April 30, 2008. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. *WideOpen West Finance, LLC filed a request for extension of its waiver. The Bureau seeks comment on the " Request for Extension,'' which was filed on May 1, 2008. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281922A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-281949A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282013A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282044A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282046A1.pdf
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282197A1.txt
            • Liberty, IA No Code CSR-7899-Z* Winnebago Cooperative Telephone Association Lake Mills, IA No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N c d ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282218A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282368A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282385A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282385A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282385A1.txt
            • PA CSR-7906-E Comcast Cable Communications, LLC S. Annville and S. Londonderry, PA No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N c d ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282440A1.pdf
            • certified in the Request that the other parties to the proceeding were aware of the Request and had no objection to it. We find that designating this application proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the application. We therefore designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose," effective May 20, 2008. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E060430 SES-AMD-20070907-01253 TerreStar Networks Inc. On May 20, 2008, the Policy Branch granted the request of TerreStar Networks Inc. (TerreStar) to designate the proceeding pertaining to its application for authority for operation of Ancillary Terrestrial Component facilities in portions of the 2
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282453A1.pdf
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282472A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282530A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282571A1.pdf
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282589A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282589A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282589A1.txt
            • MA No Code CSR-7924-E Comcast Cable Communications, LLC Lawrence and Methuen, MA No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. CORRECTION: The petitioner listed on the May 27th Public Notice (Report No. 0251) for CSR-7904-Z should be Tri-County Communications, Inc. and not Tri-Community Communications, Inc. -FCC- $ „N c d ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282725A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282867A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282867A1.txt
            • and seating will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. . Open captioning will be provided for the webcast. For a fee this meeting can be viewed live over George Mason University's Capitol Connection. The Capitol Connection also will carry the meeting live via the Internet. To purchase these services call (703) 993-3100 or go to www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, the hearing is part of a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte presentations are subject to disclosure. For that reason, notice of the hearing, a video recording of the hearing, and information on accessing the webcast will be placed in the public record of docket number 05-194. . Sign language interpreters and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-282938A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283039A1.pdf
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283091A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283091A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283091A1.txt
            • comment on the " Request for Extension,'' which was filed on June 10, 2008. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N d e ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283111A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283295A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283477A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283609A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283785A1.txt
            • seeks comment on the ``Request for Modification'', which was filed on July 10, 2008. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. **This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283802A1.pdf
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283803A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283804A1.pdf
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-283900A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284057A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284268A1.txt
            • on the ``Request for Extension of Waiver'', which was filed on July 1, 2008. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. CORRECTION: We note that for our July 3, 2008 Public Notice (Report No. 0256), there were several petitions listed that referenced the incorrect CSR number due to a computer error that assigned the same file number twice. The correct file numbers for the affected petitions should be the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284274A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284424A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284540A1.pdf
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284573A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284781A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284847A1.pdf
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284903A1.pdf
            • Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, from Paul Moller, VP, Intellicom Technologies, Inc., Consultant to L-3 Communications, dated August 14, 2008. We find that designating this matter as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate the resolution of complex policy issues raised in the application. We, therefore, designate the above captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" effective August 26, 2008. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206, and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. E050284 SES-STA-20080612-00770 VIZADA Services LLC The FCC has taken the administrative action of listing this request as granted. The request sought continuation of operations authorized in File No. SES-STA-20061006-01820. The stations operated during the requested period pursuant to Section 1.62 of the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284999A1.pdf
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285019A1.pdf
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285178A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285178A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285202A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285357A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285492A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285593A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285593A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285595A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285595A1.txt
            • as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. IBFS File Nos. SES-LIC-20080508-00570, SES-AMD-20080619-00826, SES-STA-20080711-00928, SES-STA-20080811-01049, SES-AMD-20080819-01074, SES-AMD-20080829-01117, and SES-STA-20080903-01141. (Call Sign: E080100). In order to develop a full and complete record on these applications, the Satellite Division concludes that the public interest will be served by designating these applications as "permit-but-disclose." See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any action on these applications. E080100 SES-AMD-20080819-01074 Row 44 Inc. On September 19, 2008, the Satellite Division, on its own motion, designated the following applications as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. IBFS File Nos. SES-LIC-20080508-00570, SES-AMD-20080619-00826, SES-STA-20080711-00928, SES-STA-20080811-01049, SES-AMD-20080819-01074, SES-AMD-20080829-01117, and SES-STA-20080903-01141. (Call Sign:
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285668A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285832A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285832A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285991A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285991A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285992A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-285992A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286058A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286058A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286113A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286242A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286242A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286242A1.txt
            • improve safety, we should enable them as well. But failure to do so today because of an uncertain promise about tomorrow certainly does not ``address mobile/nomadic VoIP as soon as possible.'' October 2, 2008 Honorable Kevin J. Martin Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 RE: WC Docket No. 08-171, ex parte communication Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Rules Dear Chairman Martin, On September 9, 2008 NENA and APCO jointly filed comments in response to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) which sought comments concerning regulations implementing the requirements of the New and Emerging Technologies 911 Improvement Act of 2008 (``NET 911 Act''). As we stated in our comments, NENA and APCO believe that VoIP providers
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286244A1.pdf
            • (2) encouraging the development of future technology that may best protect consumers. That is not advocating a right way or a wrong way -- but trying to have it both ways. October 2, 2008 Honorable Kevin J. Martin Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 RE: WC Docket No. 08-171, ex parte communication Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Rules Dear Chairman Martin, On September 9, 2008 NENA and APCO jointly filed comments in response to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) which sought comments concerning regulations implementing the requirements of the New and Emerging Technologies 911 Improvement Act of 2008 (``NET 911 Act''). As we stated in our comments, NENA and APCO believe that VoIP providers
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286264A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286264A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286476A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286476A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286520A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286603A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286603A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286603A1.txt
            • Comcast Cable Communications, LLC Bloomington, Fridley, Helena, No Code Lanesburgh and Sand Creek, MN *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. REPORT NO: 0270 SPECIAL RELIEF AND SHOW CAUSE PETITIONS November 7, 2008 CSR Number Applicant Community Type Date Code CSR-7118-E Subsidiaries of Cablevision Systems Corp. Bernards, Bridewater, NJ et al. Appl for Review 10/31/08 No Code CSR-7119-E CSR-7197-E CSR-7198-E CSR-7597-E CSR-7598-E CSR-7599-E CSR-7604-E CSR-7605-E CSR-7606-E CSR-7607-E CSR-7608-E CSR-7609-E
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286611A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286611A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-286881A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287188A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287433A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287605A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287606A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287693A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287693A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287739A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287739A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287739A1.txt
            • No Code Systems, LLC CSR-7819-Z* Alabama Broadband, LLC Bessemer, AL Recon 1215/08 No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N f g ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287929A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287930A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288164A1.txt
            • Free State Communications, LLC Lawrence, Baldwin, Eudora, KS et al No Code (KTKA-TV) * This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N g h ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288183A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288183A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288184A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288469A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288469A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288712A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-288930A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289161A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289460A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289460A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289574A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289574A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289623A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289816A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289816A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289816A1.txt
            • AFB, CA et al 7078-Z* CAVS Systems Corp. App for Review 2/17/09 No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N d e ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289834A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289834A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-289834A1.txt
            • days unless a different period is specified by the custodian of records. The reply shall be served on all parties that filed a response. In the event that a submitter fails to respond within the time specified, the submitter will be considered to have no objection to disclosure of the information. Note to paragraph (d)(3): Under the ex parte rules, §1.1206(a)(7) of this chapter, a proceeding involving a FOIA request is a permit-but-disclose proceeding, but is subject to the special service rules in this paragraph. We also note that while the FOIA request itself is a permit-but-disclose proceeding, a pleading in a FOIA proceeding may also constitute a presentation in another proceeding if it addresses the merits of that proceeding. (e)(1)
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290010A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290010A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290333A1.txt
            • NY No Code CSR-8156-E Wappingers Falls, Inc. Pomona, Fishkill and No Code Poughkeepsie, NY *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. REPORT NO: 0282 SPECIAL RELIEF AND SHOW CAUSE PETITIONS April 24, 2009 CSR Number Applicant Community Type Date Code CSR-8066-P AT&T Services Inc. & Pacific Bell San Diego, CA App for Review 4/3/09 No Code Telephone Co. d/b/a SBC California d/b/a AT&T California -FCC- $ „N e f
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290339A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290520A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290520A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290560A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290560A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290636A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290824A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290824A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290824A1.txt
            • 424 (WTB 2006). See http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-125A1.pdf.'' ``See 47 C.F.R. Part 1.'' 4. Paragraph 3 is corrected to read as follows: ``Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not party to the Application, it is in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed, but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b).'' -
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290929A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290929A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290930A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-290930A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291175A1.txt
            • Communications Act, it is generally restricted under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. In order to develop a full and complete record in this proceeding, the Bureau concludes that the public interest will be served by designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of the application. Page 32 of 32
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291249A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291250A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291250A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291497A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291867A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291867A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291868A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291868A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291869A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291869A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291949A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291949A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291950A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-291950A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292003A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292003A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292003A1.txt
            • CSR-8187-E Cox Communications Hampton Roads, LLC York County and West Point, VA No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N F G ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292062A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292062A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292080A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292080A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292461A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292461A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292461A1.txt
            • Applicant Community Type Date Code 7902-Z* Evolution Broadband Centennial, CO Recon 7/1609 No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N G H ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292480A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292480A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292481A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292481A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292770A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292770A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293135A1.txt
            • seeks comment on the ``Request for Extension'' which was filed on August 13, 2009. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N H I ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293141A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293232A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293232A1.txt
            • systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. Thus, we designate IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090813-00088, SAT-MOD-20090813-00089, and SES-MOD-20090813-00997 as "permit-but-disclose," effective August 21, 2009. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. SURRENDER E8331 SES-RWL-20050208-00156 SES Americom, Inc. Licensee has surrendered license, per letter dated August 25, 2009. Page 24 of 24
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293268A1.txt
            • WA No Code (KIRO-TV) CSR-8200-Z* Electric Power Board of Chattanooga Chattanooga, TN No Code *This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N J K ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293390A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293390A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293471A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293673A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293712A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293932A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293933A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293933A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294136A1.txt
            • granted the motion of SkyTerra Subsidiary LLC to designate the following applications to modify SkyTerra's authority to operate its current and future mobile satellite service systems using certain frequencies in the L-band as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective October 15, 2009: IBFS File Nos. SAT-MOD-20090429-00046, SAT-MOD-20090429-00047, and SES-MOD-20090429-00536. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. We find that designating these proceedings as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate resolution of the complex policy issues raised by the applications. This action is without prejudice to any determination regarding the processing of these applications. SURRENDER E020159 SES-LIC-20020531-00929 KAZH License, LLC Licensee has surrendered receive only earth station registration per letter dated October 16, 2009. E090075 SES-LIC-20090420-00514
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294191A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294372A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294372A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294536A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294536A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294767A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-294767A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295005A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295005A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295006A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295006A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295440A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295440A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295567A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295585A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295585A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295730A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-295730A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296068A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296206A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296378A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296378A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296548A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296548A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296689A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296689A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296699A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296699A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296699A1.txt
            • letter can be designated as ``Highly Confidential Information'' under the Second Protective Order and it will be afforded the protections from disclosure set forth in that order. Sincerely, Ruth Milkman Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Letter from Jonathan V. Cohen, Counsel for Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc., to Ruth Milkman, Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (Feb. 22, 2010). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Applications of Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc. and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless For Consent To Assign or Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations, Second Protective Order, 24 FCC Rcd 14559 (WTB 2009) (``Second Protective Order''). < D K L O P TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈ Õ7ÐZ±"ÜNzKZߌE‡Ý F‹¸Ò)%3{£Rg*wÒÆ/ÎyDß‚z,•µû](nþ¼2/cmLŒ \A% íœgý@}½û W/ x">46/¿ä^²äãaУR
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296775A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296775A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296775A1.txt
            • respect to the items on the open meeting agenda, the Commission, on its own motion, is waiving the prohibition on ex parte presentations that normally applies during the Sunshine period. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203. Parties that make ex parte presentations that would otherwise be subject to disclosure requirements must continue to disclose them during the Sunshine period. Id. § 1.1206(b). The meeting will include a presentation of the National Broadband Plan. ITEM NO. BUREAU/GROUP SUBJECT 1 WIRELINE COMPETITION TITLE: A National Broadband Plan for Our Future (GN Docket No. 09-51) SUMMARY: The Commission will consider a Broadband Mission Statement containing goals for U.S. broadband policy. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). . .
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296969A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-296969A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297296A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297296A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297496A1.txt
            • seeks comment on the ``Request for Extension'' which was filed on April 2, 2010. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N G H ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297551A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297551A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297642A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297839A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297839A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297910A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297910A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297911A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297911A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298170A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298467A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298467A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298502A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298502A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298751A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298751A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298997A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-298997A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299045A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299045A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299097A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299337A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299683A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-299683A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300148A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300397A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300397A1.txt
            • New DBSD Satellite Services G.P., Debtor-in-Possession On July 22, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of Sprint Nextel Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective July 22, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. E070290 SES-T/C-20091211-01576 New DBSD Satellite Services G.P., Debtor-in-Possession On July 22, 2010, the Satellite Division granted the request of Sprint Nextel Corporation to designate the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective July 22, 2010. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300690A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300690A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300716A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300716A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300718A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300718A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300831A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-300831A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301020A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301135A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301270A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301270A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301305A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301306A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301525A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301525A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301669A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301842A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-301842A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302207A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302381A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302381A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302506A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302506A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302768A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-302768A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303032A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303033A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303033A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303459A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303794A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303794A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303972A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-303972A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304197A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304198A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304275A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304275A1.txt
            • license has been granted on January 25, 2011. INFORMATIVE E100089 SES-AMD-20100914-01163 Panasonic Avionics Corporation On January 25, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 25, 2011. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. E100089 SES-LIC-20100805-00992 Panasonic Avionics Corporation On January 25, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective January 25, 2011. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304437A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304437A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304437A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . The FCC's web cast is free to the public and does not require pre-registration. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). or by phone: 202-418-7868. - FCC - See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304445A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304445A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304445A1.txt
            • The Bureau seeks comment on the ``Request for Extension'' filed on January 11, 2011. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. ** Guam Cablevision, LLC has filed a request for extension of its waiver. The Bureau seeks comment on the ``Request for Waiver Extension'' filed on January 20, 2011. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304456A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304456A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304463A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304463A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304463A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . Depending on the volume of questions and time constraints, the panel moderators will work to respond to as many questions as possible during the workshop. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). . See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304719A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304719A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304719A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Audio/video coverage of the meeting will be broadcast live with open captioning over the Internet from the FCC's web page at www.fcc.gov/live. The FCC's webcast is free to the public. Those who watch the live video stream of the event may email event-related questions to livequestions@fcc.gov. Depending on the volume of questions and time constraints, the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304742A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304742A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304749A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304749A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304749A1.txt
            • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . The FCC's web cast is free to the public and does not require pre-registration. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau: 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY). or by phone: 202-418-7868. -FCC- See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304756A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-304756A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305007A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305007A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305141A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305141A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305254A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305254A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305493A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305765A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305765A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305785A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305785A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305785A1.txt
            • Cable TV filed a request for extension of its waiver on April 4, 2011. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedure set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F. R. § 1.1206. ** James Cable LLC filed a request for extension of its waiver on March 16, 2011. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305790A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305790A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305790A1.txt
            • released a Report and Order (R&O), FCC 11-11, in the above captioned proceeding. This Second Erratum amends the R&O as indicated below: 1. In the Table of Contents, the Ordering Clauses heading is updated to change the paragraph number from 91 to 93. 2. Paragraph 86 is corrected to read as follows: 86. Paperwork Reduction Act. The amendments to Section 1.1206(b) (with the exception of the technical amendment to Section 1.1206(b)(2), as provided at paragraph 76(vi)) and Section 1.1208 contain new or modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. These amendments will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Section 3507(j) of the PRA. OMB, the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305808A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-305808A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306229A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306229A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306387A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306387A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306558A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306558A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306559A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306559A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306878A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-306878A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307443A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307443A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307827A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307827A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307982A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-307982A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308202A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308306A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308306A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308534A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308534A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308909A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308909A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308995A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-308995A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309191A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309307A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309421A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309422A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309422A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309623A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309623A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309623A1.txt
            • No Code CSR-7124-Z** Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico, Ltd Puerto Rico No Code * This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. ** Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico has filed a request for extension of its waiver. The Bureau seeks comment on the ``Request for Extension of Waiver `` filed on September 8, 2011. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309642A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-309642A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310068A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310068A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310151A1.txt
            • may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310377A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310377A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310567A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310567A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310567A1.txt
            • CSR-8532-Z* San Juan Cable d/b/a OneLink San Juan, Puerto Rico No Code Communications * This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N I J ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310710A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310710A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310964A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-310964A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311171A1.txt
            • Consent to Transfer of Control NTELOS MEDIA INC. INFORMATIVE E010011 SES-LIC-20010112-00051 DEERE & COMPANY On November 9, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective November 9, 2011. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. Page 15 of 15
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311185A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311438A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311438A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311624A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311624A1.txt
            • for Consent to Transfer of Control VIZADA, INC. CORRECTIONS E010011 SES-RWL-20110908-01047 Deere & Company On November 9, 2011, the Satellite Division designated the above-captioned proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's rules governing ex parte communications, effective November 9, 2011. We find that designating this proceeding as "permit-but-disclose" will facilitate communications with the parties. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 note 2. This notice corrects a prior informative released on November 23, 2011, which referenced an incorrect file number. See Public Notice, Report No. SES-01400. Dismissal E110165 SES-STA-20111208-01434 NBC Telemundo License LLC STA application has been dismissed as moot, because underlying application SES-LIC-20111104-01327, has been granted. E110161 SES-STA-20111208-01435 NBC Telemundo License LLC STA application has been dismissed as
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311669A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311670A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-311855A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312078A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312078A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312150A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312151A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312273A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312434A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312434A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312529A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312529A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312761A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312761A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312881A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312881A1.txt
            • file number shown below. No application listed below shall be granted by the Commission earlier than the day after the date specified in this public notice for the filing of comments. Unless otherwise specified, ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313032A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313032A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313032A1.txt
            • The Bureau seeks comment on the ``Request for Extension'' filed on March 9, 2012. This proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R § 1.1206. -FCC- $ „N G H ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P² �Èðe D ç_ûˆ pÐ/]b|?¥O� V�¹Jõ tXT€‡ßeè 2)ÀV``þ (c)}ÐlætmE...bÏ¡ gs½>o³óØ(R)"q¤Q ܆ÄëëžD N žä- >ÌürºKp¸´-~i�fƒMÌà z} �¯žé tm¿ž(c)íëcv
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313038A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313038A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313325A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313325A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313566A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313566A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313757A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313757A1.txt
            • these applications within forty-five (45) days after release of this public notice, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing that the application, upon further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Filings relating to this application must be received within 14 days of this notice. Such filings will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street, SW,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313792A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313792A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313859A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313860A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313860A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-313860A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314020A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314020A1.txt
            • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4), to
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314031A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314031A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314031A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314097A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314097A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314097A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314200A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314201A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314201A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314201A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314386A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314479A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314479A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314479A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314497A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314632A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314632A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314632A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314633A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314633A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314633A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314635A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314635A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314635A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314636A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314636A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314636A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314667A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314668A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314668A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314668A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314669A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314669A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314669A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314670A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314670A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314670A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314671A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314671A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314671A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314672A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314672A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314672A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314673A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314674A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314674A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314674A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314675A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314675A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314675A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314806A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314806A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314806A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314807A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314807A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314807A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314813A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314813A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-314813A1.txt
            • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-104A1.pdf
            • pooling should be recovered through an ongoing exogenous adjustment). 600 MCI WorldCom comments at 53. 601 Notice, 14 FCC Rcd at 10407-08. 602 Id. 603 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Repo rt and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1)). 604 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-104 115 Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before May 1, 2000, and reply comments on or before May 16, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.605 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-160A1.doc
            • revisions to 47 C.F.R. §§ 87.263 as set forth in Appendix B hereto. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-but-Disclose Proceeding 20. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, if they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, 1.1206. Regulatory Flexibility Act 21. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis with respect to the Notice is included in Appendix A. Paperwork Reduction Act 22. This Notice contains either a new or modified information collection. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public to comment on the information collection contained in this Notice as
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-186A1.txt
            • must transmit one electronic copy of the comments to each docket or rulemaking number referenced in the caption. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file 45 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 46 See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24, 121 (1998). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-186 13 via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. To file electronic comments, you must use the electronic filing interface available on the FCC's World Wide Web site at http://dettifoss.fcc.gov:8080/cgi-bin/ws.exe/beta/ecfs/upload/hts. Further information on the process of submitting comments electronically is available at that location
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-194A1.doc
            • carriers, a matter that is also the subject of pending petitions for reconsideration filed in the Local Competition proceeding, the Common Carrier Bureau issued a public notice modifying the ex parte rules for this proceeding. The Bureau's Public Notice provided that presentations on policy questions concerning reciprocal compensation to paging carriers would be subject to the permit-but-disclose procedures under section 1.1206. . TSR alleges that U S West violated the ex parte rules with respect to TSR's formal complaint proceeding in connection with a May 26, 1999 meeting and a September 27, 1999 meeting (to which it was not invited) between representatives of U S West and Commission staff. Specifically, TSR claims that U S West made oral and written presentations
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-210A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-210A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-210A1.txt
            • Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 1999, MD Docket No. 98-200, Report and Order, FCC 99-146 (rel. June 18, 1999). 47 U.S.C. § 159(b)(2). 47 U.S.C. § 159(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. § 159(d) (emphasis added). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1166. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1166 (a)-(d). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1166. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-244A1.txt
            • on small entities by the rules, polices and proposed rulemaking adopted in this document. See Appendix B. VI. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below. B. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis The action contained herein has been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and found to impose new or modified reporting and recordkeeping requirements or burdens on the public. Implementation of these new or modified reporting and recordkeeping requirements will be
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-297A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-297A1.txt
            • Appendix C, 14 FCC Rcd at 4843-47, ¶¶ 1-13. 279Advanced Services Order and NPRM, 13 FCC Rcd at 24099, ¶ 198. 280 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 et seq. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-297 59 or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.281 Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. 2. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis 137. Appendix C, part B sets forth the Commission's IRFA regarding the policies and rules proposed in the Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 98-147 and the Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 96-98. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-327A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-327A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-327A1.txt
            • Rcd at 20866-80 (paras. 38-74). See, e.g., Public Notice, ``Commission Announces Details of Technical Roundtable on Implementation of Automatic Location Identification for Enhanced 911 Technologies,'' CC Docket No. 94-102, DA 99-1243 (June 23, 1999) (addressing technical matters regarding 911 Phase II Automatic Location Identification (ALI)). http:// www.fcc.gov//e911. Pub. L. No. 106-81, enacted Oct. 26, 1999. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-33A1.txt
            • of the Small Business Administration in accordance with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding . This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. C. Paperwork Reduction Analysis ments on this Notice of Proposed Rule Making; OMB comments are due 60 days from the date of publication of this Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the Federal Register. Comments should address: cal utility. mates. ty, and clarity of the information collected. nology. ton, D.C. 20503, or via the Internet to vhuth@omb.eop.gov. D. Comment Dates
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-348A1.txt
            • Comments at 9; IACP Comments at 5; NPSTC Comments at 9-10. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.205. See former 47 C.F.R. § 90.283(c) (1997) (limiting transmitter power of Part 90 users sharing VHF public coast spectrum to 50 watts), (removed by the Maritime Third Report and Order at Appendix F). 47 C.F.R. § 80.215(c)(1). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See Development of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements For
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-355A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-355A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-355A1.txt
            • Notice of Inquiry to facilitate our internal review process. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-358A1.txt
            • classified as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. These proceedings include most notice-and-comment rulemakings as well as other major proceedings, such as many mergers, that are classified as permit-but-disclose on a case-by-case basis. In such proceedings, written and oral ex parte presentations are permissible provided that the persons making the presentations comply with the disclosure requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Generally speaking, persons making presentations must file two copies of written presentations and an original and one copy of summaries of new material associated with oral presentations, accompanied by an appropriate cover letter, for inclusion in the record of the proceeding. In addition, Any written material shown to Commission personnel during the course of a meeting, even if the materials
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-361A1.txt
            • the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve International Transcription Services (ITS) with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified below for filing comments. C. Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-364A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-364A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-364A1.txt
            • proceedings such as long-term number portability, interconnection, pole attachments, and collocation without uniform and accurate accounting data. PROCEDURAL ISSUES Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit but disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Notice. The IRFA is set forth as Appendix 7. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments must be
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-366A1_Erratum.pdf
            • marketandonpotentialfurtheractionsthatmaybecomenecessary.Weintendtoactivelymonitor developments,includingtherealestateindustry'sprogressonitscommitmenttodevelopmodelcontracts andbestpractices,andwewillconsidertakingadditionalactionifthecurrentimpedimentstoconsumer choicearenotswiftlyameliorated.Inthisway,webelievethatwebestpromotethepublicinterestin achievingubiquitousavailabilitytoconsumersofcompetitive,diverse,andadvanced telecommunicationsserviceofferings. VII. PROCEDURALMATTERS 177. RegulatoryFlexibilityActAnalysis.AsrequiredbySection603oftheRegulatory FlexibilityAct(RFA),5U.S.c. §603anInitialRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysis(IRFA)wasincorporated Inthe CompetitiveNetworksNPRMinthisproceeding.388TheCommissionsoughtwrittenpublic commentsontheproposalssetforthinthe NPRM,includingtheIRFA.AppendixCofthisFirstReport andOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandum OpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrdercontainsthe Commission'sFinalRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysis(FRFA)incompliancewiththeRFA,asamendedby theContractwithAmerica Actof1996(CWAAA),Pub.L.No.104-121,110Stat.847 (1996).AppendixDofthis FirstReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,Fifth ReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrderand MemorandumOpinionandOrdercontainstheCommission'sInitialRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysis (IRFA)regardingissuesforfurthercomment,incompliancewiththeRFA,asamendedbytheCWAAA). 178. PaperworkReductionActAnalysis.ThisFirstReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeof ProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReport andOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrdercontainsinformationcollections,asdescribedinSection DoftheFinalRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysisinAppendixCinfra.Aspartofourcontinuingeffortto reducepaperworkburdens,weinvitethegeneralpublicandtheOfficeofManagementandBudget (OMB)totakethisopportunitytocommentontheinformationcollectionscontainedinthisFirstReport andOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandum OpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,asrequiredby thePaperworkReductionActof1995,PublicLaw104-13.Commentsfromthepublic,OMB,andother 388 SeeCompetitiveNetworksNPRM,14FCCRedat12723-34. 23058 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC00-366 agenciesontheinformationcollectionscontainedinthisFirstReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeof ProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReport andOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrderaredue60daysfromdateofpublicationoftheitemin theFederalRegister.Commentsshouldaddress:(a)whetherthecollectionofinformationisnecessary fortheproperperformanceofthefunctionsoftheCommission,includingwhethertheinformationshall havepracticalutility;(b)theaccuracyoftheCommission'sburdenestimates;(c)waystoenhancethe quality,utility,andclarityoftheinformationcollected;and(d)waystominimizetheburdenofthe collectionofinformationontherespondents,includingtheuseofautomatedcollectiontechniquesor otherformsofinformationtechnology. 179. ExParteRules.ThisFirstReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposed Rulemaking,FifthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrder andMemorandumOpinionandOrderconstitutea"permit-but-disclose"proceedinginaccordancewith theCommission'sexparterules.389PersonsmakingoralexpartepresentationsrelatingtotheFirst ReportandOrderandFurtherNoticeofProposedRulemaking,FifthReportandOrderand MemorandumOpinionandOrder,andFourthReportandOrderandMemorandumOpinionandOrder areremindedthatmemorandasummarizingthepresentationsmustcontainsummariesofthesubstanceof thepresentationsandnotmerelyalistingofthesubjectsdiscussed.Morethanaoneortwosentence descriptionoftheviewsandargumentspresentedisgenerallyrequired.390Otherrulespertainingtooral andwrittenpresentationsaresetforthinSection1.1206(b)aswell.Interestedpartiesaretofilewiththe Secretary,FCC,andserveInternationalTranscriptionServices(ITS)withcopiesofanywrittenexparte presentationsorsummariesoforalexpartepresentationsintheseproceedingsinthemannerspecified belowforfilingcomments. 180. FilingProcedures.PursuanttoSections1.415and1.419oftheCommission'srules,47 C.F.R.§§1.415and1.419,interestedpartiesmayfilecommentsonorbeforeDecember22,2000,and replycommentsonorbeforeJanuary22,2001.CommentsmaybefiledusingtheCommission's ElectronicCommentFilingSystem(ECFS)orbyfilingpapercopies.SeeElectronicFilingof DocumentsinRulemakingProceedings,63Fed.Reg.24,121(1998). 181. CommentsfiledthroughtheECFScanbesentasanelectronicfileviatheInternetto http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html.Generally,onlyonecopyofanelectronicsubmissionmustbefiled. Incompletingthetransmittalscreen,commentersshouldincludetheirfullname,PostalServicemailing address,andtheapplicabledocketorrulemakingnumber.Partiesmayalsosubmitanelectronic commentbyInternete-mail.Togetfilinginstructionsfore-mailcomments,commentersshouldsendan e-mailtoecfs@fcc.gov,andshouldincludethefollowingwordsinthebodyofthemessage,"getform ."Asampleformanddirectionswillbesentinreply.Partieswhochoosetofile bypapermustfileanoriginalandfourcopiesofeachfiling.Allfilingsmustbesenttothe Commission'sSecretary,MagalieRomanSalas,OfficeoftheSecretary,FederalCommunications Commission,445TwelfthStreet,S.W.,TW-A325,Washington,D.C.20554. 182. Regardlessofwhetherpartieschoosetofileelectronicallyorbypaper,partiesshould alsofileonecopyofanydocumentsfiledinthisdocketwiththeCommission'scopycontractor, InternationalTranscriptionServices,Inc.,445TwelfthStreet,S.W.,RoomCY-B402,Washington,D.C. 389 SeeAmendmentof47C.F.R. §1.1200etseq.ConcerningExPartePresentationsinCommissionProceedings,GC DocketNo.95-21, ReportandOrder,12FCCRcd7348,7356-57,'\l27,citing47C.F.R. §1.1204(b)(1)(1997). 390 See47C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2),asrevised. 23059 Federal 20554.Commentsandreplycommentswillbeavailableforpublicinspectionduringregularbusiness hoursintheFCCReferenceCenter,44512thStreet,S.W.,Washington,D.C.20554. 183. Commentsandreplycommentsmustincludeashortandconcisesummaryofthe substantiveargumentsraisedinthepleading.Commentsandreplycommentsmustalsocomplywith Section1.49,47C.F.R.§1.49,andallotherapplicablesectionsoftheCommission'sRules.Wealso directallinterestedpartiestoincludethenameofthefilingpartyandthedateofthefilingoneachpage oftheircommentsandreplycomments.Allpartiesareencouragedtoutilizeatableofcontents, regardlessofthelengthoftheirsubmission. 184. Writtencommentsbythepublic,OMB,orotheragenciesontheinformationcollections aredueonorbefore60daysafterthedateofpublicationintheFederalRegister.Inadditiontofiling conunentswiththeSecretary,acopyofanycommentsontheinformationcollectionscontainedherein shouldbesubmittedtoJudyBoley,FederalCommunicationsCommission,Room1-C804,44512th Street,SW,Washington,DC20554,orviatheInternettojboley@fcc.govandtoEdwardSpringer, OMBDeskOfficer,Room10236NEOB,72517thStreet,N.W.,Washington,DC20503orviathe Internettoedward.springer@omb.eop.gov. 185. FurtherInformation. Forfurtherinformationaboutthisproceeding,contactJoel Taubenblattat202-418-1513,jtaubenb@fcc.gov,orLaurenVanWazerat202-418-0030, lvanwaze@fcc.gov. YIn.ORDERINGCLAUSES 186. Accordingly,ITISORDERED,pursuanttoSections1,2(a),4(j),4(i),7,201,202,205,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-367A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-369A1.txt
            • within the scope and overall objectives of this proceeding. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. Appendix D to this document contains the analysis required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. § 603. Ex parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Authority. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(I), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-370A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-370A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-370A1.txt
            • are grantable without granting the mutually exclusive applications will we process the non-mutually exclusive applications, provided that the relevant period for filing competing applications has expired. See 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(A), (d); Kessler v. FCC, 326 F.2d 673 (D.C. Cir. 1963). See 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(B), (d)(3). See 5 U.S.C. § 601, et. seq. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA).
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-392A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-392A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-392A1.txt
            • the rule to matters involving carriers, and the rules' coverage extends to the full range of competition issues arising before the Commission. A. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-but Disclose Proceeding 7. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda Period, provided they are disclosed as set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). B. Regulatory Flexibility Certification 8. Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, requires a preliminary regulatory flexibility analysis in a notice and comment rulemaking proceeding unless we certify that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities." 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). We believe that the rule we propose
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-399A1.txt
            • consumers receive only limited information, the market will not function efficiently and consumers likely will not receive the quality they prefer. We hope to facilitate market efficiency by ensuring that consumers have the information they need to make informed buying decisions. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations This is a "permit-but-disclose" rulemaking proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, as revised. Additional rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the policies and rules proposed in
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-402A1.pdf
            • such information and contributing to fluid secondary markets in the use of licensed spectrum. procedural matters Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-403A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-403A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-403A1.txt
            • at ¶¶ 110, 111. 47 U.S.C. § 332; see, e.g., Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Future Development of Paging Systems, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WT Docket No. 96-18, 12 FCC Rcd 2732, 2737 (1997). See supra at ¶ 109. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. This list includes comments and reply comments submitted in response to RM-9405. See 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. The RFA has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (``CWAAA''). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-403A1_Erratum.doc
            • at ¶¶ 110, 111. 47 U.S.C. § 332; see, e.g., Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Future Development of Paging Systems, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WT Docket No. 96-18, 12 FCC Rcd 2732, 2737 (1997). See supra at ¶ 109. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. This list includes comments and reply comments submitted in response to RM-9405. See 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. The RFA has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (``CWAAA''). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-407A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-407A1.txt
            • 63.03 relating to small projects for supplementing of facilities by dominant, domestic interstate and international carriers). 47 C.F.R. § 63.53(b). See International Bureau On-Line Reports and Electronic Filing Pilot Program, Report No. IBFS-99-0001, Public Notice (Feb. 10, 1999). Information about the IBFS may also be found on the Commission's web-site at www.fcc.gov/ib. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-408A1.txt
            • by the Small Business Administration (SBA). The Commission believes, as discussed below, that the rule adopted in this proceeding will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As discussed above in paragraph 12 , the Commission is making one rule change in this Report and Order. Specifically, the Commission amends Note 1 to Section 1.1206(a) of the Commission's rules so that the expanded service requirements set forth in that note apply to petitions filed pursuant to Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) (i.e., petitions for relief from impermissible State and local regulation of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of RF emissions). Thus, petitioners seeking relief under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(v) must serve a copy of such petitions on those
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-418A1.txt
            • Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Broadwave Albany, L.L.C., et al. Requests for Waiver of Part 101 Rules, DA 99-494 (rel. March 11, 1999). 47 C.F.R. §1.1208. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Broadwave Albany, L.L.C., et al. Requests for Waiver of Part 101 Rules, DA 99-494 (rel. March 11, 1999) at 2. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Id. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Sets Permit-but-Disclose Status for PDC Broadband Corporation Requests for Waiver, DA 00-1841 (rel. Aug. 14, 2000). Specifically, Pegasus sought waiver of 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.101, 101.105, 101.107, 101.111, 101.115. 101.139, 101.603. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Sets Permit-but-Disclose Status for PDC Broadband Corporation Requests for Waiver, DA 00-1841 (rel. Aug. 14, 2000). Northpoint Motion
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-421A1.txt
            • already generally provide for penalties when applications are not substantially complete. The proposed rule amendments simply conform our rules to the new FRN requirement. Therefore, the rules will not have a significant economic impact. We invite comments on this tentative conclusion. Ex Parte Matters. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-426A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-426A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-426A1.txt
            • Act (RFA). If commenters believe that the proposals discussed in this Public Notice require additional RFA analysis, they should include a discussion of these issues in their Supplemental Comments. For ex parte purposes, this proceeding continues to be a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information please contact, Selina Khan, International Bureau (202) 418-7282. Action by the Commission on December 4, 2000. See In re Policies and Rules for the Direct Broadcast Satellite Service, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, IB Docket No. 98-21, 13 FCC Rcd. 6907 (1998) (Part 100 Notice). Petition of United States Satellite Broadcasting Company, Inc. for
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-427A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-427A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-427A1.txt
            • D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 CFR Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix A. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-429A1.txt
            • at 7-11; see also 47 C.F.R. § 20.12(B) (requiring CMRS carriers to permit unrestricted resale of its service). See supra section III.F. See supra section III.E. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Repo rt and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24, 121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.49. 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-435A1.txt
            • utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 75 days following publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 105 days following publication in the Federal Register. Comments may
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-448A1.txt
            • of section 54.305 with a new ``safety valve'' mechanism permitting additional support for transferred exchanges if the acquiring rural carrier makes meaningful new investments. See Rural Task Force Recommendation at 47-48; supra, n. 9. We anticipate addressing section 54.305 issues in conjunction with an order implementing intrastate high-cost reform for rural carriers. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i),
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-451A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-451A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-451A1.txt
            • 121.201, SIC code 4812. 1992 Census, Series UC92-S-1, at Table 5, SIC code 4812. Trends in Telephone Service, Table 19.3 (March 2000). See supra, paras. 5-7. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, 27 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1)) (1997). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-451 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-451 _ p „€é „ ï E F E F „Ð � #‹ÿÿ � � X @ 8 ! 1 A Q a q � ñÿ' ¡ ± Á Ñ á ñ ÿÿ ÿÿ n n Ç
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-455A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-455A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-00-455A1.txt
            • in the band 1610-1621.35 MHz for service uplinks and in the band 2483.5-2500 MHz for service downlinks, and is an applicant in the United States for the band 1990-2025 MHz for service uplinks and for the band 2165-2200 MHz for service downlinks. See 47 C.F. R. § 1.407. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21517 (1998); Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-120A1.txt
            • e.g., CDT/People For Comments at 3-10 (alleging the unconstitutionality of CIPA and urging the Commission to refuse to promulgate rules implementing the legislation); ACLUF Comments at 1 (alleging facial unconstitutionality of CIPA, but recognizing the Commission's statutory obligations to engage in rulemaking). The ACLUF Comments were untimely filed, but we will nonetheless accept them as ex parte filings under section 1.1206 of our rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. On March 20, 2001, claims were brought in federal court challenging the constitutionality of sections 1712 and 1721 of CIPA. See American Library Ass'n v. United States, No. 01-CV-1303 (E.D. Pa. filed March 20, 2001); Multnomah County Public Library v. United States, No. 01-CV-1322 (E.D. Pa. filed March 20, 2001). See, e.g.,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-132A1.txt
            • in this NPRM to facilitate our internal review process. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-134A1.txt
            • new NGSO FSS. procedural information Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. The analysis pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. Section 603, is contained in Appendix C. Ex Parte Presentation. This is a permit-but-disclose rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Authority. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before June 18, 2001,
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-145A1.txt
            • charges that result from federal regulatory action: (1) universal service-related fees; (2) subscriber line charges; and (3) local number portability charges. See id. at 7523-25, paras. 51-52. . See also Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Second Recommended Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 24744, 24771-72, paras. 69-70 (Jt. Bd. 1998). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. 47 U.S.C.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-146A1.txt
            • and all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. This proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in this proceeding; it will also allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. We find that it is in the public interest to continue this
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-148A1.txt
            • Act. Paperwork Reduction Analysis. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking does not contain either a proposed or modified information collection. Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Alternative formats. Alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio cassette, and Braille) are available from Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at . This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking can also be downloaded at . Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-153A1.txt
            • (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-157A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-157A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-157A1.txt
            • signals from the studio to the transmitter, or between two points such as a main studio and an auxiliary studio. The service also includes mobile TV pickups, which relay signals from a remote location back to the studio. 13 C.F.R. § 121.201, SIC code 4812. Id. . Id. 5 U.S.C. § 603(c). . See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 # m œ Ë # m œ Ë - ! " L M g 8g h i k l { | - - ˜ š ›
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-158A1.txt
            • in accordance with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1206. C. Authority This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r). D. Comment Dates Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-15A1.txt
            • the adoption of the ITV nondiscrimination regulations and how would the adoption of such rules alleviate the identified harms? Are there any alternatives available to adopting nondiscrimination regulations that would achieve the same goals while using less restrictive means? Administrative matters Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-175A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-175A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-175A1.txt
            • See para. 8, supra. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 47 CFR §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See In re Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd. 11322 (1998) (amending Parts 0 and 1 of the Commission's rules to allow electronic filing of comments and other pleadings). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-175A1_Erratum.doc
            • See para. 8, supra. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 47 CFR §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See In re Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd. 11322 (1998) (amending Parts 0 and 1 of the Commission's rules to allow electronic filing of comments and other pleadings). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-182A1.txt
            • Opinion and Order, DA No. 01-371__ FCC Rcd __ at ¶ 11 (rel., March 12, 2001) (taking an opportunity to ``amplify[ing] what is permitted under the Commission's Part 101 Rules''). See 36-51 GHz Reconsideration Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 1770 (citation omitted). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501-3520. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21517 (1998); Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-199A1.txt
            • that adoption of the proposed rule changes promote effective spectrum utilization and spectrum efficiency. procedural matters Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-but-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, if they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals suggested in this document. The IRFA is set forth in Appendix B. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-19A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-19A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-19A1.txt
            • Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties are requested to send two additional paper copies of their filing to Suzanne McCrary, Industry Analysis Division, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Sixth Floor, Washington, D.C. 20554. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-205A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis Section V sets forth the Commission's IRFA regarding policies and rules proposed in the Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rule Making. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments on the Declaratory Ruling and
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-218A1.txt
            • rule changes that will best address these concerns, while minimizing regulatory burdens, providing incentives for investments and new services, and protecting consumers. procedural issues Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, if disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), requires that an RFA analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that ``the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' The RFA generally defines ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-21A1.txt
            • is necessary to facilitate the efficient and expeditious discharge of the Commission's statutory responsibility in the Virginia arbitration proceeding pursuant to section 252 of the Communications Act. B. Other Procedural Issues 7. Ex Parte Classification. Arbitrations conducted pursuant to section 252(e)(5) are restricted for ex parte purposes, consistent with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 CFR §§ 1.1208, 1.1204(b), 1.1206(a) (1999). Therefore, ex parte presentations are prohibited. Delegated Authority. The Commission's existing arbitration rules contemplate that someone other than the full Commission may serve as arbitrator on behalf of the Commission. See 47 C.F.R. § 51.807(d) (1999). Consistent with that rule, we authorize the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau, to serve as the arbitrator in section 252(e)(5) proceedings, with the assistance
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-224A1.txt
            • MSS at 2010-2025 (for a total reallocation of 30 MHz from MSS), which could be used for relocation or other purposes. See supra note 97. See National Defense Authorization Act for 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-65, 113 Stat. 512 (1999). See, e.g., Comments of Siemens Corporation at 23. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21517 (1998); Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-22A1.txt
            • Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St, S.W., Room 1-0804, Washington, D.C. 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov. For additional information on the proposed information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. B. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-247A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis Appendix A sets forth the Commission's Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IFRA) regarding the policies and rules proposed in the Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 98-147. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-24A1.txt
            • In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
          • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-261A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-261A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-261A1.txt
            • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Section V sets forth the Commission's Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) regarding policies and rules proposed in this NPRM. Comment Filing Procedures , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-262A1.txt
              • send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. . . Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix A. As required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-263A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-263A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-263A1.txt
              • is Michelle Russo at (202) 418-0270. The Cable Services Bureau contacts for this proceeding are Daniel Hodes, Kiran Duwadi, Ava Holly Berland or Andrew Wise at (202) 418-7200, TTY at (202) 418-7365 or (888) 835-5322, or at dhodes@fcc.gov, kduwadi@fcc.gov, hberland@fcc.gov, awise@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-26A1.txt
              • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis Appendix C sets forth the Commission's IRFA regarding the policies and rules proposed in the Third Further Notice. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments on the . The Commission will send a copy
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-285A1.txt
              • this case''); Opposition of Sprint to Joint Motion, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (filed Aug. 10, 2001) at 2 (noting that ``[a]ll three parties to this proceeding have elected to seek judicial review of the [BTI] Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit''). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1202(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1202(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202(c), 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1208, 1.1204. 47 U.S.C. § 208. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1208, 1.1206, 1.1204. See, e.g., Letter from Alexander P. Starr, Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-286A1.txt
              • Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. Additionally, a copy of such comments should be served on QED's counsel, as follows: Steven A. Lerman, Esq. Leventhal, Senter & Lerman PLLC 2000 K Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20006 (Counsel for WQED Pittsburgh) 17. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, we designate this proceeding as permit-but-disclose for ex parte purposes. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-28A1.txt
              • the carrier holding the remaining 15 MHz of cellular spectrum in that market could pair with a 30 MHz PCS licensee without triggering the 45 MHz general CMRS spectrum cap. See generally Cellular Disaggregation Order. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.919. See id. § 20.6(e)(4)(A). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See id. § 603(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Id. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-303A1.txt
              • Service in the 2 GHz Band, Report and Order, IB Docket 99-81, 15 FCC Rcd 16127, 16155 ¶ 65 (2000), noting that the Aviation Radio Service rules ``must be amended or waived'' to permit operation of AMS(R)S aircraft earth stations in the United States in the 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service frequency bands. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA).
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-304A1.txt
              • of Proposed Rulemaking, 7 FCC Rcd 5023, 5030 (1992); MTS and WATS Market Structure, CC Docket No. 78-72, Amendment of Part 67 of the Commission's Rules and Establishment of a Joint Board, CC Docket No. 80-286, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 3 FCC Rcd 4543, 4560 n.108 and accompanying text (1988). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). MAG Notice, 16 FCC Rcd at paras. 25-37. 1998
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-305A1.txt
              • our Part 36 rules, we welcome input from the Federal-State Joint Board on Separations on these issues. PROCEDURAL ISSUES A. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit but disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. B. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis Final Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis. The decision herein has been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13, and found to impose new or modified recordkeeping requirements or burdens on the public. Implementation of these new or modified reporting or recordkeeping requirements will be subject to approval by the Office
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-307A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-307A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-307A1.txt
              • ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. This document is available in alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio cassette, and Braille). Persons who need documents in such formats may contact Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or bmillin@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-320A1.txt
              • telephones terminated by the terms of the statute August 17, 1991, and we seek comment on the status and the nature of the compliance efforts with that mandate. We seek comment on these issues and any other issues associated with hearing aid compatibility, particularly as it concerns telephones used with wireless services. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding proposing the amendment of the Commission's rule governing hearing aid compatible telephones is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-329A1.txt
              • Persons who need documents in such formats may contact Martha Contee at (202) 4810-0260, TTY (202) 418-2555, or mcontee@fcc.gov. 95. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 CFR Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 96. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix B. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-331A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-331A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-331A1.txt
              • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form.'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper should also submit their comments on diskette. These diskettes should be submitted to Janice Myles, Policy & Program Planning
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-332A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-332A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-332A1.txt
              • international subsidiaries for service originating in Massachusetts ``because of extraordinary complexity''). See Submarine Cable NPRM, 15 FCC Rcd at 20812-13, para. 58; 1998 International Biennial Review Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 4913-14, paras. 12, 23. The Commission's ex parte rules will continue to apply to informal communications concerning streamlined applications between outside parties and Commission staff. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206; see also 1998 International Biennial Review Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 4921, para. 26. See WorldCom Comments at 15-17; AT&T Comments at 21; Global Crossing Comments at 29 (asserting that no comments are needed on streamlined applications); Cable & Wireless Comments at 16-17, 19 (asserting that there should be no routine comments on competitive issues for streamlined applications); Viatel Reply
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.txt
              • conditional operation of facilities located in the Quiet Zones defined by section 1.924. 47 C.F.R. § 101.31(b)(v). Biennial Review 2000 Comments of Alloy LLC, FCC 00-346, at 8 (filed Oct. 10, 2000). 47 C.F.R. § 90.655. Id., § 95.45(b). Id., § 1009. Id., § 1329. 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd 11322, 11326 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C.
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-339A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-339A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-339A1.txt
              • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form.'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper should also submit their comments on diskette. These diskettes should be submitted to Janice Myles, Policy & Program Planning
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-351A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-351A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-351A1.txt
              • et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 15 FCC Rcd 17079, 17093, 17103. See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See Pub. L. No. 104-13. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 15 FCC Rcd 17103. 15 FCC Rcd 17093. See
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-352A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-352A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-352A1.txt
              • copies on parties to the proceeding; on the contrary, the definition of an ex parte presentation is ``[a]ny presentation which . . . [i]f written, is not served on the parties to the proceeding.'' 47 C.F.R. § 1.1202(b)(1). NECA complied with the ex parte rule requirements by submitting two copies of the filing to the Commission's secretary. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1). Moultrie Petition at 1. See also Moultrie Independent Telephone Company Motion for Stay of Section 69.605 of the Commission's Rules, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed Feb. 2, 2001) (Motion for Stay) (seeking to preclude NECA from collecting cost information from Moultrie until the Commission rules on the Petition for Declaratory Ruling); Moultrie Independent Telephone Company Amendment to Petition for Declaratory
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-358A1.txt
              • § 80.471. Maritel Comments at 13. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 80.3(f). 47 C.F.R. § 20.15(b)(3), (c). See CMRS 2nd R&O, 9 FCC Rcd at 1464 ¶ 126 n.261 (did not propose forbearance for international CMRS), 1481 ¶ 182 n.369 (declined to propose forbearance for international CMRS). See 5 U.S.C. § 601, et. seq. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA).
            • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-360A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-360A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-360A1.txt
              • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-361A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-361A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-361A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form.'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties that choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each, and are hereby notified that effective December 18, 2001, the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-362A1.txt
                • also NeuStar Inc. Petition for Compensation Adjustment, Request for Approval of Implementation Scehdule and Emergency request of Interim Relief, CC Docket No. 99-200 (June 30, 2001) See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). Numbering Resource Optimization, Second Report and Order, Order on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-363A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-363A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-363A1.txt
                • that effectively protect equal employment opportunity and that are sustainable in court as early as is practicable. V. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 CFR Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Second NPRM, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in the Appendix hereto. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Second NPRM. Written public comments are requested
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-366A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-366A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-366A1.txt
                • the Federal Register. Paperwork Reduction Analysis. This Notice does not contain either a proposed or modified information collection requirement. Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Alternative formats. Alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audiocassette, and Braille) are available from Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at . This Notice can also be downloaded at . Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [30 days
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-36A1.txt
                • business provisions we propose today are sufficient to promote participation by businesses owned by minorities and women, as well as rural telephone companies. To the extent that commenters propose additional provisions to ensure participation by minority-owned or women-owned businesses, they should address how such provisions should be crafted to meet the relevant standards of judicial review. 17. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding proposing rules for awarding licenses for cellular RSAs for which the tentative selectee has been disqualified is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. 18. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-371A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-371A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-371A1.txt
                • of both. Parties responding to this public notice are also encouraged to propose other compensation plans. Procedural Matters Ex Parte Presentations This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) (1994). Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis See Appendix B for the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. Further Notice Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis This Further Notice contains either a proposed or modified information collection. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-384A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-384A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-384A1.txt
                • be reserved for those providers with more than a de minimis share of the DA market? PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Presentations This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) (1994). Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below. Regulatory Flexibility Act As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-39A1.txt
                • of a public notice announcing the filing of its application. Nevertheless, GCI's communication preceded the issuance of the public notice announcing the filing of its application and, in turn, the filing of Alascom's and ATU-LD's comments in this proceeding on October 3, 1997. With the filing of these comments, GCI was required to comply with the disclosure requirements of Section 1.1206. We also find no merit in ANS's allegation that there is no documentation in the public record regarding meetings between GCI and International Bureau staff at which proposed reporting conditions were discussed. ANS generally argues that GCI failed to file summaries of ex parte presentations with the Commission for inclusion in the public record, and specifically asserts that there is
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-47A1.txt
                • at 5-11. See Letter from Andrew Schwartzman to Christopher Wright General Counsel (May 9, 2000); Letter from Andrew Schwartzman et al. to Christopher Wright General Counsel (May 2, 2000). The General Counsel has separately responded to aspects of CU's request not essential to this Order. See Letter from Christopher Wright to Andrew Schwartzman (January 19, 2001). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1206(b)(1),(2); see also AT&T Corp. and MediaOne Group, Inc. Seek FCC Consent for a Proposed Transfer of Control, Public Notice, DA-99-1447, 14 FCC Rcd 11867, 11867-68 (1999). See Merger Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 9894. Id. at 9848 n 220. Id. at 9846-50. CU's petition at 20. Id. at 20-26. AT&T's opposition at 12-13. See n. 6, supra. See Merger Order,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-52A1.txt
                • opinion concerning sensitive matters raised at the ex parte meetings. Discretionary disclosure of these materials at this time ``would actually inhibit candor in the decision-making process.'' We therefore disagree with the requestors that no ``foreseeable harm'' will result in disclosure of the documents. The requestors also maintain that discretionary disclosure is required because our ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), require this material to be made public. Specifically, section 1.1206(b)(2) requires persons making oral ex parte presentations to submit a memorandum summarizing new data or arguments made at the presentation. In a separate complaint, the requestors have argued that the ex parte summaries submitted by AT&T and MediaOne provided insufficient information. The General Counsel, however, has concluded the summaries were
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-60A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-60A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-60A1.txt
                • Commission, Room C-1804, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Edward Springer, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to edward.springer@omb.eop.gov. 51. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-88A1.txt
                • during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, 445 12th St., S.W., Rm. CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(b). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this NPRM, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix C. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the NPRM. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. Comments must
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-89A1.txt
                • the Act and which are acceptable to both carriers and individuals with hearing and speech disabilities. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Presentations This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) (1994). Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules in this Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Written public comments are requested
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-91A1.txt
                • 19079, 19114-26, ¶¶ 96-132 (1997); Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 48-50. Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 6-9, 48-50. See id. at ¶¶ 9, 50. See Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at ¶ 104. See Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 57-58. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. See infra Appendix C. Pub. L. No. 104-13. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-92A1.txt
                • the condition that a local frequency coordinator be notified prior to use and that the device does not cause interference to the reception of TV signals.'' For example, ``Operation is intended only for the production of TV program material and motion pictures.'' See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See, generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. See Pub. L. No. 104-13. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-97A1.txt
                • December 2000, rather than on a count as of December 31, 2000. Adoption of a Mandatory FCC Registration Number, MD Docket No. 00-205, FCC 00-421 (released December 1, 2000). FRN Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at para. 9 FRN Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at para. 23-26. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). 47 CFR 1.1203 and 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. 603. 47 U.S.C. 154(i)-(j), 159, & 303(r). 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-101A1.txt
                • significant economic impact on small entities by the proposals adopted in this document. See Appendix A. V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations 49. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below. B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis 50. The action contained herein has been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and found to impose new or modified reporting and recordkeeping requirements or burdens on the public. Implementation of these new or modified reporting and recordkeeping requirements
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1.txt
                • 16 FCC Rcd 14466 (WTB 2001). See ¶ 13, supra. 47 C.F.R. § 80.1103(b)-(c). See Amendment of Parts 2, 15, 18 and Other Parts of the Commission's Rules to Simplify and Streamline the Equipment Authorization Process for Radio Frequency Equipment, Report and Order, ET Docket No. 97-94, 13 FCC Rcd 11415, 11443 (1998). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). Id. 5 U.S.C. § 601(3). 5 U.S.C. § 632. See ¶ 38, supra. Id. See, e.g., ¶ 42, supra (eliminating unnecessary rules regarding ship radiotelephone and radar installations, and conforming those that remain to the international requirements); ¶ 44, supra (permitting J2B and J2D emissions in the HF band to increase operational
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-102A1_Erratum.doc
                • 16 FCC Rcd 14466 (WTB 2001). See ¶ 13, supra. 47 C.F.R. § 80.1103(b)-(c). See Amendment of Parts 2, 15, 18 and Other Parts of the Commission's Rules to Simplify and Streamline the Equipment Authorization Process for Radio Frequency Equipment, Report and Order, ET Docket No. 97-94, 13 FCC Rcd 11415, 11443 (1998). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). Id. 5 U.S.C. § 601(3). 5 U.S.C. § 632. See ¶ 38, supra. Id. See, e.g., ¶ 42, supra (eliminating unnecessary rules regarding ship radiotelephone and radar installations, and conforming those that remain to the international requirements); ¶ 44, supra (permitting J2B and J2D emissions in the HF band to increase operational
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
                • informally in a rulemaking proceeding may do so by submitting an original and one copy of their comments, without regard to form, provided only that the Docket Number is specified in the heading. Informal comments filed after close of the reply comment period, or, if on reconsideration, the reconsideration reply comment period, should be labeled ``ex parte'' pursuant to section 1.1206(a) of this chapter. Letters submitted to Commissioners or Commission staff will be treated in the same way as informal comments, as set forth above. Also such informal participants who wish the responsible members of the staff and the Commissioners to have personal copies may file an additional 7 copies. The distribution of such copies shall be as follows: Commissioners ........................................................................
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-121A1.txt
                • in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CC Docket No. 96-98, Declaratory Ruling, Inter-Carrier Compensation for ISP-Bound Traffic (Reciprocal Compensation), CC Docket No. 99-68, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 3689, 3695 (1999). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report to Congress, 13 FCC Rcd 11,501, 11,555 (1998). See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-123A1.txt
                • Determining Conformity of non-GSO FSS Networks With Limits Contained in Article S22 of the Radio Regulations.'' The output of the software is represented by continuous curves of cumulative density function (CDF) as a function of percentage of time which will be compared to the single-entry validation limits contained in Article S22, Table S22-1A. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). This Appendix C generally describes the three methodologies recently upgraded to draft new recommendation status by the ITU-R. ITU Draft New Recommendation ITU-R S.[Revision 1 to Doc. 4/62-E], Methodologies for calculating aggregate epfddown produced by multiple non-GSO FSS systems into a GSO FSS network (19 November 2001). See also Preliminary Draft Revision of Recommendation ITU-R S.1503, Functional Description to be
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1.txt
                • that it would serve the public interest to adopt the additional limits on carrier-off emissions and emissions in the 1605-1610 MHz band-segment that we propose in the Further Notice included herein. VI. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations The inquiry initiated by the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking herein is a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (``RFA''), requires preparation of an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') of possible significant economic impact on ``small entities'' from the rules proposed in the Further
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-134A1_Erratum.doc
                • that it would serve the public interest to adopt the additional limits on carrier-off emissions and emissions in the 1605-1610 MHz band-segment that we propose in the Further Notice included herein. VI. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations The inquiry initiated by the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking herein is a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (``RFA''), requires preparation of an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') of possible significant economic impact on ``small entities'' from the rules proposed in the Further
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-148A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), requires that an initial regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rule making proceedings, unless the agency certifies that ``the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' The RFA generally defines the term
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-150A1.txt
                • cassette, and Braille). Persons who need documents in such formats may contact Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or bmillin@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix B. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-15A1.txt
                • of review to a state program based on gender classification). MicroTrax Comments at 18-19. Id. Id. See, e.g., ArrayComm Reply at 8; AeroAstro Reply at 2-3. See 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(4)(D). See 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(2). See BBA Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 22750 ¶ 83. See Pub. L. No. 104-13. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-177A1.txt
                • this proceeding is Margo Domon Davenport at (202) 418- 2949. The Media Bureau contacts for this proceeding are John Norton at (202) 418-7037 or jnorton@fcc.gov, or Wanda Hardy at (202) 418-2129 or whardy@fcc.gov, or TTY at (202) 418-7365 or (888) 835-5322. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-231A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-231A1.txt
                • 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), 403 and 601 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. 12. Ex Parte Rules ­ Non-Restricted Proceeding. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 13. Accessibility Information. Accessible formats of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin, of the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. 14. Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-248A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-248A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-248A1.txt
                • and ensuring ``efficient and intensive use of the electromagnetic spectrum.'' PROCEDURAL MATTERS Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), the Commission may adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. Accordingly, issues related to this Public Notice will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this matter as ``permit but disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to comment on the policy questions concerning the treatment of the funds on deposit. All other matters concerning Auction No. 35 applications that are the subject of NextWave's Petition to Defer and other petitions to deny remain restricted, pending further action by Public Notice. Comments
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-249A1.txt
                • addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. . Ex Parte Provisions Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-255A1.txt
                • Commenters are also invited to offer proposals in addition to the three identified above. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules - Permit-but-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, if they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by Section 603 of the regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals suggested in this document. The IRFA is set forth in Appendix A. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.txt
                • utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 75 days following publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 105 days following publication in the Federal Register. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1_Erratum.doc
                • utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 75 days following publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 105 days following publication in the Federal Register. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-269A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-269A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-269A1.txt
                • equivalent to traditional payphone service provided to non-TRS users. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Alternative Formats for Persons with Disabilities . Ex Parte Presentations This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) (1994). Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the Telecommunications Relay Service and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The Commission sought written public comment on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-272A1.txt
                • greater interference risk from guard band licensees than from other 700 MHz band public safety licensees. Id. PRS observes that ``[b]ecause the Commission has replicated these very same technical standards for the 700 MHz Guard Band allocation, the recommendations of PRS would equally apply to FCC Rule Section 27.53.'' PRS Comments at 1. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6).
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-281A1.txt
                • FCC Rcd 13972 (1999) (modifying license that was authorized to operate on frequency 460.725 MHz in excess of the 20-watt TPO limitation imposed by 47 C.F.R. § 90.35(c)(48)). See also e.g., Black Diamond Asphalt, Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 13974 ¶ 8 (1999). Petition at 4, n.10. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1165, 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612 (1980). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-285A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and actions considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix A. Written public comments are
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-28A1.txt
                • Long Distance Telephone Company comments; Public Service Regulatory Commission of the Republic of Panama comments; Telkom SA Limited comments. See Cable and Wireless comments at 5. See PLDT reply comments at 2; CANTV comments at 5. See Cable and Wireless comments at 5. Public Service Regulatory Commission of the Republic of Panama comments. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of "small-business concern" in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 632). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 601(3), the statutory definition of a small business applies "unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-299A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-299A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-299A1.txt
                • of entities subject to this rule are small entities. Therefore, we propose to certify pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 605(b) that the ``red light rule'' does not require a regulatory flexibility analysis. We invite comments on our initial regulation flexibility certification. Ex Parte Matters. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-302A1.txt
                • 90.350. International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association Comments at 2. TransCore Corporation Comments at 2. See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Petition for Rulemaking Regarding Location and Monitoring Service Rules, Public Notice, RM 10403, DA 02-817 (rel. Apr. 10, 2002). Warren C. Havens and Telesaurus Holdings GB, LLC Comments at 4-5. . See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. Amendment of Parts
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-303A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-303A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-303A1.txt
                • Management and Budget as prescribed by the Act. Ex Parte Rules. With respect to the Third Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Third NPRM), this is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 CFR Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to the Third NPRM, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in the Appendix hereto. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Third NPRM. Written public comments are requested
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-305A1.txt
                • Council of Economic Advisors Report, Economic Impact of Third-Generation Wireless Technology). Adarand Constructors v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (requiring a strict scrutiny standard of review for Congressionally mandated race-conscious measures); United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) (applying an intermediate standard of review to a state program based on gender classification). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Pub. L. No. 104-13. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA).
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-30A1.txt
                • NGSO FSS systems. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification. The certification, pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. Section 603, is contained in Appendix C. Ex Parte Presentation. This is a permit-but-disclose rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Authority. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days after
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-326A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-326A1.txt
                • Maritime 911, available at (visited Oct. 11. 2002). See generally Dale N. Hatfield, A Report on Technical and Operations Issues Impacting the Provision of Wireless Enhanced E911 Services, Public Notice, DA 02-2666 (Hatfield Report). See Comments of NENA, APCO, and NASNA on Hatfield Report at 6. See Pub. L. No. 104-13. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). The Establishment of Policies and Service Rules for the Mobile Satellite Service in the 2 GHz Band, IB Docket No. 99-81, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 4843 (1999) (``2 GHz NPRM''). Not all parties filing comments in response to the 2 GHz NPRM addressed 911 issues. See Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 to Implement the Global Mobile
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-329A1.txt
                • the activities of the agency and publishes such definition in the Federal Register." 15 U.S.C. § 632. . . Id. 5 U.S.C. § 603(c). See generally discussion supra at Part I. See generally discussion supra at Part IV. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1203, and 1.1206. 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq. On March 9, 2001, the Commission modified its rules to base universal service contributions on information reported on quarterly Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet filings, with an annual true-up based on information reported on annual Telecommunications Reporting Worksheets. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Petition for Reconsideration filed by AT&T, CC Docket No. 96-45, FCC 01-85
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-37A1.txt
                • (CC Bur. 1997), app. for review pending. See Integration of Rates and Services, 9 FCC Rcd 3023 at ¶1. In the event such a showing were made, it would be necessary to consider whether detrimental effects could be averted by some regulatory means other than restricting competition. See MTS-WATS Market Structure, 92 FCC 2d 787 ¶162. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 15 U.S.C. § 632. Mid-Tex Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. FERC, 773 F.2d 327, 342-43 (D.C. Cir. 1985). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21,517 (1998); Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11,322 (1998). (...continued
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-39A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . Ordering CLAUSEs Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4(i)-4(j), and 276 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i)-(j), 276, the Petition for Partial Reconsideration and Clarification of the Inmate Calling Services Providers Coalition is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-41A1.txt
                • FCC Rcd at 8889 para. 203. See Rural High Cost Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 11310 para. 168; Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Recommended Decision, FCC 00J-4 para. 21 (Jt. Bd. rel. Dec. 22, 2000). See Rural High Cost Order, 16 FCC Rcd at 11310 para. 169. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-11, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Ninth Report & Order and Eighteenth Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-42A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form.'' A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties that choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each, and are hereby notified that effective December 18, 2001, the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-43A1.txt
                • Rcd at 1688 para. 22. We note that, under section 254(d) of the Act, the Commission may exempt a carrier or class of carriers from contribution requirements if the carrier's contribution would be de minimis. See 47 U.S.C. § 254(d). See Eighth Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 1688-90 paras. 21-26. . See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. See 2001
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-44A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-44A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-44A1.txt
                • send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. . . Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix A. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-45A1.txt
                • Report and Order have been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13, and do not contain new and/or modified information collections subject to Office of Management and Budget review. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 75 days following publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 105 days following publication in the Federal Register. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-46A1.txt
                • commenters may wish to re-file and address additional issues, which will be considered in the new docket. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules-Non-restricted Proceeding This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 CFR 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206 (a). Regulatory Flexibility Act As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities of the proposals addressed in this Notice. The IRFA is set forth in Appendix A. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments must
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-47A1.txt
                • 4940-4965 MHz band respectively. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.143. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.111. ATPC technology employs the minimum amount of power needed to transmit a signal, thereby minimizing interference within adjacent channels. See 47 C.F.R § 101.107. See 47 C.F.R. § 2.106 PSWAC Final Report at 5. See 47 U.S.C. § 151. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). At this time we do not have a sufficient record to address application filing procedures. 47 C.F.R. §§
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-54A1.txt
                • entities that are not regulated by the Commission should be subject to the rule only when deceptive intent is involved. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-but Disclose Proceeding 5. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda Period, provided they are disclosed as set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). B. Regulatory Flexibility Certification 6. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.) requires an initial regulatory flexibility analysis in a notice and comment rulemaking proceeding unless we certify that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities." 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). We
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-57A1.txt
                • in this NOI to facilitate our internal review process. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-73A1.txt
                • such MSAs upon a showing that there are no competing carriers in the applicable geographic area. Procedural MAtters Ex Parte Presentation This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) (1994). Submissions are also limited as discussed in the sections below. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended, (RFA), the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Further
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-77A1.txt
                • and (2) Sarah Whitesell, Cable Services Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., 3-C488, Washington, D.C., 20554, swhitese@fcc.gov. In addition, five copies of each filing must be filed with Linda Senecal, Cable Services Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., 2-C438, Washington, D.C. 20554, lsenecal@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-79A1.txt
                • proxies for the interstate PIC-change service? Is there a weighted average of several rates that would constitute a reasonable proxy? Parties are asked to comment on these options, and submit alternative suggestions for our consideration. procedural matters Ex Parte Requirements This proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-80A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-80A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-80A1.txt
                • DA 02-307 (released February 8, 2002). See supra, ¶ 34. 47 C.F.R. § 25.137 (b). See Appendix B. With respect to Part 97 of the Rules, we also propose to update references to ITU documents contained in the current rules concerning space station notifications, so that those references reflect current ITU documents. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). 1 See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 2 5
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-81A1.txt
                • to CMRS use. We therefore seek comment on the perceived advantages and disadvantages of PCIA's proposal to merge the Business and Industrial/Land Transportation services into a single pool; or, in the alternative, to lift the freeze on intercategory sharing; and on the issue of CMRS use of 900 MHz PLMR band frequencies. Procedural Matters Ex Parte Rules Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-81A1_Erratum.doc
                • to CMRS use. We therefore seek comment on the perceived advantages and disadvantages of PCIA's proposal to merge the Business and Industrial/Land Transportation services into a single pool; or, in the alternative, to lift the freeze on intercategory sharing; and on the issue of CMRS use of 900 MHz PLMR band frequencies. Procedural Matters Ex Parte Rules Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-83A1.txt
                • do not propose to expand the language of Section 1.937 to prohibit applications repeating renewal applications that were dismissed without prejudice, as this would bar a licensee whose renewal application was dismissed as late-filed, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.949(a), from seeking a new license to replace the expired license. See ¶ 6, infra. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419 See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-83 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-83 ¯ ¯ �@ˆþÿ
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-83A1_Erratum.doc
                • do not propose to expand the language of Section 1.937 to prohibit applications repeating renewal applications that were dismissed without prejudice, as this would bar a licensee whose renewal application was dismissed as late-filed, see 47 C.F.R. § 1.949(a), from seeking a new license to replace the expired license. See ¶ 6, infra. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419 See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-83 Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-83 ¯ ¯ �@ˆþÿ
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-92A1.txt
                • by basic annual subscription rate for individual households. Cable system operators may base their count on "a typical day in the last full week" of December 2001, rather than on a count as of December 31, 2001. 66 FR 47890 (September 14, 2001). Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (May 1, 1998). 47 CFR 1.1203 and 1.1206(b). See 5 U.S.C. 603. 47 U.S.C. 154(i)-(j), 159, & 303(r). 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 66 FR 19681
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1.txt
                • these new or modified reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements will be subject to approval by the OMB, as prescribed by the Act, and will go into effect upon announcement in the Federal Register of OMB approval. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-102A1_Erratum.doc
                • these new or modified reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements will be subject to approval by the OMB, as prescribed by the Act, and will go into effect upon announcement in the Federal Register of OMB approval. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-111A1.pdf
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis This Further NPRM may modify an information collection. As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the possible changes in information collection contained in the Further NPRM, as required
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-112A1.txt
                • 21. IP Relay Declaratory Ruling at ¶ 21. IP Relay Declaratory Ruling at ¶ 15. ``[T]he Commission shall ensure that interstate and intrastate telecommunications relay services are available, to the extent possible and in the most efficient manner, to hearing-impaired and speech -impaired individuals in the United States.'' 47 U.S.C. § 225(b)(1). See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 604. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1.txt
                • 110, Washington, D.C. 20002-4913. Electronic media sent by commercial overnight courier should be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. . , or send an e-mail to access@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-113A1_Erratum.doc
                • 110, Washington, D.C. 20002-4913. Electronic media sent by commercial overnight courier should be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. . , or send an e-mail to access@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-119A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments within 21 days after publication of this Further Notice in the Federal Register and may file reply comments within 31 days after publication of this Further Notice in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CC Docket
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-120A1.txt
                • at paras. 29, 30. See id. at para. 46. 47 C.F.R. § 52.33(a)(1)(i)(C). See 47 C.F.R. § 54.401. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 8776, 8951, para. 328 (1997 Universal Service Order). 47 C.F.R. § 54.401(c) (emphasis added). 47 C.F.R. § 36.701(c). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-12 has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 15 FCC Rcd 25257, 25258-29,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures . Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and six copies of each, and are hereby notified that effective December 18, 2001, the Commission's contractor, Vistronix, Inc., will receive hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at a new location in downtown Washington, DC. The address is
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-125A1_Erratum.doc
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures . Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and six copies of each, and are hereby notified that effective December 18, 2001, the Commission's contractor, Vistronix, Inc., will receive hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at a new location in downtown Washington, DC. The address is
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-126A1.txt
                • extension of the current exemption should provide specific, per carrier, pooling cost information to enable the Commission to properly balance the benefits of pooling against the costs to carriers and their customers. Procedural MAtters Ex Parte Presentations This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-127A1.txt
                • 863-2898, or via e-mail at qualexint@aol.com. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0531 (voice), 202-418-7365 (TTY). Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-13A1.txt
                • COMMISSION Marlene H. Dortch Secretary APPENDIX A Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Recommended Decision, FCC 02J-1 Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Recommended Decision, FCC 02J-1 (rel. July 10, 2002) (Recommended Decision). Id. at paras. 9-66, 88. Id. at para. 68. See also 47 U.S.C. § 254(c). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. See 47
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1.txt
                • Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jbHerman@fcc.gov and to Kim A. Johnson, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10236 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to jthornto@mb.eop.gov. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-154A1_Erratum.doc
                • Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jbHerman@fcc.gov and to Kim A. Johnson, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10236 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to jthornto@mb.eop.gov. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 60 days following publication in the Federal Register. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-160A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-160A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-160A1.txt
                • contained in §§ 1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Ex Parte Rules - permit-but-disclose. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Accessibility Information. Accessible formats of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin, of the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-165A1.txt
                • safety use in the New York City area, we believe that we will be providing permanent necessary spectrum capacity to area public safety agencies while continuing to facilitate the increasingly-important interoperability of public safety communications. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS This matter shall be treated as a ``permit -but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.200, 1.1206. Members of the public are advised that ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided under the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203 and 1.1206(a). Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days from the date of publication in
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.txt
                • therefore, decline to consider this portion of the LPTV Petitioners' Petition for Rulemaking. IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit but permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). . Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. If multiple docket or rulemaking numbers are referenced in the caption of the comments, however, commenters must transmit one electronic copy of the comments to each docket or rulemaking number referenced
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-222A1.txt
                • considerations must the Commission consider in adopting rules and policies to facilitate such flexible use? Procedural matters Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-224A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-224A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-224A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments not later than 60 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register and may file reply comments not later than 45 days after the date for filing comments. In order to facilitate review of comments and
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-225A1.txt
                • (j), 303, 403, 601, 624A and 629 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Ex Parte Rules - Non-Restricted Proceeding. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Accessibility Information. Accessible formats of this Second Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin, of the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-238A1.txt
                • Bureau, Federal Communications Commission. 47 C.F.R. § 87.107(a). Federal Aviation Administration, Order, 17 FCC Rcd 13637 (WTB PSPWD 2002). Id. at 13639 ¶ 7. Id. at 13637 ¶ 3. See ¶ 72, supra. 47 C.F.R. § 87.107(a)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 87.107(a)(3). 47 C.F.R. § 87.395. 47 C.F.R. § 87.395(a). 47 C.F.R. § 87.395(b)(1). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of ``small-business concern'' in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-265A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-265A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-265A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis This Notice contains either a proposed or modified information collection. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this Notice, as required by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-272A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-272A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-272A1.txt
                • the Commission's conclusion in the Non-Accounting Safeguards Order that the ``operate independently'' language of section 272(b)(1) imposes separate and independent requirements on section 272 separate affiliates beyond those detailed in section 272(b)(2)-(5). IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Presentations This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.txt
                • 337, 396(k), 403, 601, 614(b) and 624a of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Ex Parte Rules - Non-Restricted Proceeding. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). . Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before January 14, 2004, and reply comments on or before February 13, 2004. All filings should refer to MB Docket No. 02-230. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-284A1.txt
                • a number, setting a due time and date for the port. See Local Number Portability Selection Working Group Final Report and Recommendation to the FCC (rel. April 25, 1997). The NPAC, administered by NeuStar, operates and maintains the centralized databases associated with LNP. Interaction with the NPAC is required for all porting transactions. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612., has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a) See 5 U.S.C. § 603(b)(3). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-286A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and actions considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix B. Written public comments are
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-318A1.txt
                • in Section 101.103(d) when they initiate coordination. Therefore, in this proceeding, we will further modify these rules to more clearly reflect the decision made in the BAS/CARS R&O regarding such flexibility. See BAS/CARS R&O at ¶¶ 62 and Appendix A; see also Appendix A of this Notice. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.105. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See SkyBridge/FWCC Ex Parte Comments in ET Docket No. 98-206, filed
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-319A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-319A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-319A1.txt
                • C.F.R. § 1.935, in light of recent filings. Margaret Snyder, Fourth Supplement to Petition to Deny Transfer of Licenses, Authorizations, and Certifications of WorldCom, Inc. and Request to Inspect Documents, WC Docket No. 02-215 (filed Oct. 15, 2003) (Snyder Fourth Supplement). Fifth, Ms. Snyder supplemented her petition to assert that WorldCom violated Commission's ex parte notification rule, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2) by failing to summarize with sufficient detail its ex parte meetings with FCC staff. Margaret Snyder, Fifth Supplement to Petition to Deny Transfer of Licenses, Authorizations, and Certifications of WorldCom, Inc., WC Docket No. 02-215 (filed Nov. 6, 2003) (Snyder Fifth Supplement). Sixth, Ms. Snyder amended her argument introduced in her Fourth Supplement with facts specific to the settlement agreements
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-326A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-326A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-326A1.txt
                • reporting rules imposes no impact on small entities. We encourage small entities to comment on our proposals and to suggest any other appropriate alternatives. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict with the Proposed Rules None. Ex Parte Presentations This proceeding shall be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-334A1.txt
                • II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C., 20554, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or e-mail at qualexint@aol.com; and (2) Jay Jackson, Mobility Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., 20554, or e-mail at Jay.Jackson@fcc.gov. , or send an e-mail to access@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-337A1.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis This Notice proposes to eliminate or modify in whole or in part certain information collections. As part of a continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.pdf
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments not later than 30 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register and may file reply comments not later than 30 days after the date for filing comments. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-37A1.txt
                • information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Ex Parte - Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Comment Dates Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register and reply comments on or before 45 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-3A1.txt
                • 4(j), 303, 403, 601, 624A and 629 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Ex Parte Rules - Non-Restricted Proceeding. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Accessibility Information. Accessible formats of this Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin, of the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-40A1.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, WTB For legal questions: Brian Carter at (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Jeff Crooks at (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2888 Satellite Division, IB For service rule questions: Selina Khan at (202) 418-7282 Rockie Patterson at (202) 418-1183 Action by the Commission
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-42A1.txt
                • international service is a separate service such that ``interLATA service'' would not encompass both international and state-to-state calls. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1966 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., was amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 87 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). Implementation of the Subscriber Carrier Selection Changes Provisions of the Telecommunications
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-51A1.txt
                • credit to cover adjacent non-tribal areas. We request comment on this analysis. V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This proceeding is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. B. Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis. The Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for this Second Report and Order, as required by Section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. § 604, is set forth in Appendix B. C. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis. The actions taken in the Second Report and Order have been analyzed with respect to the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4.txt
                • Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, MM Docket No. 00-39, Third Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 2703, 2718-2721, ¶¶ 37-44 (2001). The Commission also considered employing a Commission-conducted secondary auction in the 700 MHz bands, but ultimately decided that a privately-organized clearing mechanism would be better in that context. See id. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11,322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-56A4_Erratum.doc
                • Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television, MM Docket No. 00-39, Third Report and Order, 16 FCC Rcd 2703, 2718-2721, ¶¶ 37-44 (2001). The Commission also considered employing a Commission-conducted secondary auction in the 700 MHz bands, but ultimately decided that a privately-organized clearing mechanism would be better in that context. See id. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11,322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-62A1.txt
                • 13-17. NPRM, 17 FCC Rcd at 17487-96, paras. 49-66. See Telemarketing Sales Rule, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Trade Commission, 67 Fed. Reg. 4492 (January 30, 2002) (FTC Notice). NPRM, 17 FCC Rcd at 17497-501, paras. 70-80. See Telemarketing Sales Rule, Final Rule, Federal Trade Commission, 68 Fed. Reg. 4580 (Jan. 29, 2003). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003, H.J. Res. 2, Pub. L. No. 108-7 (2003). See http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/donotcall/index.html. Do-Not-Call Act, Section 3. The Do-Not-Call Act places an identical reporting requirement on the FTC. Do-Not-Call Act, Section 4(a). Do-Not-Call Act, Section 4(b). The annual reporting requirement is in place for fiscal years 2003 to 2007. The Do-Not-Call Act places identical requirements on the FTC to
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-64A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-64A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-64A1.txt
                • charge divided by basic annual subscription rate for individual households. Cable system operators may base their count on "a typical day in the last full week" of December 2002, rather than on a count as of December 31, 2002. See 47 CFR 1.1164. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (May 1, 1998). 47 CFR 1.1203 and 1.1206(b). See 5 U.S.C. 603. 47 U.S.C. 154(i)-(j), 159, & 303(r). 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-89A1.txt
                • contained in §§ 4(i), 303(r), and 629 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Ex Parte Rules - Non-Restricted Proceeding. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Accessibility Information. Accessible formats of this Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin, of the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-8A1.txt
                • satellite stations to apply to ``flash-cut'' on a case-by-case basis. We invite comment on this approach. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). . Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. If multiple docket or rulemaking numbers are referenced in the caption of the comments, however, commenters must transmit one electronic copy of the comments to each docket or rulemaking number referenced
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-95A1.txt
                • § 22.819. 47 C.F.R. § 22.871. 47 C.F.R. § 22.1003. See, e.g., para. 28, supra. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121(1998). See FCC Announces a New Filing Location for Paper Documents and a New Fax Number for General Correspondence, Public Notice, DA 01-2919 (rel. Dec. 14, 2001). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). Id. Notice at paras. 7-22, supra. Id.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-99A1.txt
                • ¶ 63. See Motorola Comments at 13. See APCO Comments at 6; NYC Comments at 5-7. , supra. Second R&O and FNPRM, 17 FCC Rcd at 3982 ¶ 67. See id. at 3983 ¶ 68. Id. DCCTO Comments at 5-6. Atheros Comments at 10. , supra. See Motorola Ex Parte Submission at 3. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 601-612. The RFA has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § § 601-612, has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-103A1.txt
                • and recordkeeping requirements or burdens on the public. Ex Parte Rules. With respect to the Fourth Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Fourth NPRM), this is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 CFR Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before (21 days after publication in the Federal Register) and reply comments on or before (31 days after publication in the Federal Register). Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-122A1.txt
                • Central Partnership, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473, 479-80 (2d Cir. 1999). Second FOIA Response at 2. Application for Review at 2. Ravnitzky, 16 FCC Rcd at 21748, quoting NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 151 (1975). See also Rob Evans, 17 FCC Rcd 15146, 15147 (2002). Ravnitzky, 16 FCC Rcd at 21748. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We note that one of the documents was also submitted in the public record of a Commission proceeding. The other document, containing biographical and other background information, was accompanied by an apparent request for confidentiality that was subsequently rescinded by the submitter. 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(5) and 552(b)(6). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-122 Federal Communications
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-127A1.txt
                • and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 00-256, Fifteenth Report and Order in CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order in CC Docket No. 98-77, Report and Order in CC Docket 98-166, 16 FCC Rcd 19613, 19687-88, para. 176 (2001) (MAG Order); 47 C.F.R. § 54.904(d). 47 C.F.R. § 54.809(c). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 847 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. See 47 U.S.C. § 254(b). Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Order, 17
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-133A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA) requires that a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rule making proceedings, unless the agency certifies that ``the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' The RFA generally defines
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-135A1.txt
                • Comments at 79. See WCA Comments at 74. See WCA Comments at 79-80. See WCA Comments at 80. See WCA Comments at 81. See Sprint Comments at 15-16. See Sprint Comments at 15-16. See Sprint Comments at 15-16. See also WCA Comments at 74-78. See NPRM, 18 FCC Rcd at 6762 ¶ 97. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 601-612. The RFA has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). See 5 U.S.C. §
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-137A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-137A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-137A1.txt
                • of an illegal use' or be `knowingly' involved in such illegal use.'' Id. Commenters may also wish to address how the issue of potential CA liability might affect the adoption of new rules governing the TRS provider's and CA's obligation to handle, or discretion not to handle, all calls regardless of content. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 604. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. Telecommunications Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech Disabilities - Recommended TRS Cost Recovery Guidelines/Request by Hamilton Telephone Company
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-145A1.txt
                • our enforcement process, we do not raise for comment in this proceeding our substantive standards for indecency or any other rules that may be implicated. Any comments beyond the scope of this NPRM will not be considered. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-149A1.txt
                • However, to ensure that carriers subject to the suspended accounting requirements have actual notice of the further deferral before its July 1, 2004 effective date, we are serving those entities by overnight mail. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Requirements This proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-166A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-166A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-166A1.txt
                • increase access to spectrum. As one example, in our Cognitive Radio proceeding, we are exploring, inter alia, possible changes to our rules that would allow certain unlicensed operations in bands in those areas where spectrum occupancy is low, such as in rural areas. See Cognitive Radio NRPM at ¶ 36. See, e.g., supra ¶ 40. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322, 11326 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). Year 2000 Biennial Regulatory
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-167A1.txt
                • 110, Washington, D.C. 20002-4913. Electronic media sent by commercial overnight courier should be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Marlene H. Dortch, Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. . , or send an e-mail to access@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-171A1.txt
                • Rcd at 6707 ¶ 48. See Amendment of Parts 13 and 80 of the Commission's Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, Second Report and Order, Sixth Report and Order, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket No. 00-48, 19 FCC Rcd 3120, 3150 ¶ 57 (2004). See 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. § 603(b)(3). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-173A1.txt
                • the grandfathered LMAs in 2004 or postpone it till the next quadrennial ownership review in 2006. Administrative Matters Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, U.S. Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-174A1.txt
                • is warranted in order to obtain long-term relief. The waiver we grant herein shall therefore expire upon the effectiveness of any order or, if applicable, rule changes, that result from the accompanying rulemaking. procedural matters Ex Parte Requirements This proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-179A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-179A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-179A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments within 21 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register and may file reply comments within 36 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register. All filings should refer to CC Docket No. 01-338
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-188A1.txt
                • Dwayne Jackson, Network Technologies Division, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 7-A226, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send two (2) diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing Copy, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Ex Parte Presentations In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiates a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules. XIII. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, Parts 0, 4, and 63 of the Commission's Rules ARE AMENDED as specified in Appendix
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-189A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. above. The Commission will send a copy of the NPRM, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis. This document contains proposed or modified information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-200A1.txt
                • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Jennifer Schneider or Greg Lipscomb, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Action taken by the Commission on August 12, 2004: Chairman Michael
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-207A1.txt
                • and 332 of the Communications Act - Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services, Second Report and Order, GN Docket No. 93-252, 9 FCC Rcd 1411, 1480-81 ¶ 182 (1994). Any such licensee should, however, have notified the Coast Guard if it was discontinuing a safety watch. 47 C.F.R. § 80.302(a). 47 C.F.R. § 80.371(c). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Id. § 603(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). We note that some comments filed in this proceeding were filed late or otherwise did not comply with the Commission's pleading requirements. Given that we are initiating a Notice of Proposed Rule Making,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-217A1.txt
                • Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Third Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11701, 11725 (1998) (Cost Recovery Order), aff'd, Telephone Number Portability, CC Docket No. 95-116, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration and Order on Application for Review, 17 FCC Rcd 2578 (2002). Cost Recovery Order, 13 FCC Rcd at 11777. See, generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. See NANC Report at 4, 30; supra at para. 10. See supra at para. 10. See supra
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-218A1.txt
                • Band auction (Auction No. 46), the Commission offered a bidding credit on a nationwide license in the 1670-1675 MHz band to small businesses with average annual revenues not exceeding $40 million and very small businesses with average annual revenues not exceeding $15 million. H.R. Rep. No. 103-111, 103rd Cong., 1st Sess., at 254. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601- 612, have been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-221A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-221A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-221A1.txt
                • its potential to teach the nation's children and that broadcasters protect children from over commercialization. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before March 1, 2005, and reply comments on or before April 1, 2005. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-228A1.txt
                • Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). PROCEDURAL PROVISONS Ex Parte Rules - permit-but-disclose. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before November 15, 2004 and reply comments on or before December 6, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS'') or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-252A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-252A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-252A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures . Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally, only one copy of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-253A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-253A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-253A1.txt
                • ``Search by Date Range. (5) In the ``Date received/adopted'' block, in the ``From'' column, enter 07/08/2004; and in the ``To'' column enter the date this Public Notice is published in the Federal Register in the format MM/DD/YYYY. . This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1.txt
                • We note that the Commission did not adopt small business bidding credits for cellular unserved area authorizations, which it found were valued primarily by a discrete group of small businesses. See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding, Ninth Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 14769, 14791 ¶45 (1996). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See supra paras. 79-82. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). Amendment of Part 22 of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-287A1_Erratum.doc
                • We note that the Commission did not adopt small business bidding credits for cellular unserved area authorizations, which it found were valued primarily by a discrete group of small businesses. See Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding, Ninth Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 14769, 14791 ¶45 (1996). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See supra paras. 79-82. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). Amendment of Part 22 of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-288A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-288A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-288A1.txt
                • in Texas and Oklahoma to assess how the AirCell system would perform in a real-world environment. AirCell, Inc.; Petition, Pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, For a Waiver of the Airborne Cellular Rule, Or, in the Alternative, For a Declaratory Ruling, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 9622, 9650, Appendix (2000). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). 5 U.S.C.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-288A1_Erratum.doc
                • in Texas and Oklahoma to assess how the AirCell system would perform in a real-world environment. AirCell, Inc.; Petition, Pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, For a Waiver of the Airborne Cellular Rule, Or, in the Alternative, For a Declaratory Ruling, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 9622, 9650, Appendix (2000). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). 5 U.S.C.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-30A1.txt
                • of their filings to Dwayne Jackson, Network Technologies Division, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street S.W., Room 7-A226, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send two (2) diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Natek Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20054. Ex Parte Presentations In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiates a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules. XIII. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i)-(j), 4(k), 4(o), 218, 219, 230, 256,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-31A1.txt
                • mechanism(s). We seek comment on this tentative conclusion. Parties opposing this approach should indicate how they would harmonize the interrelated considerations arising from mergers or acquisitions between carriers subject to different regulatory regimes. procedural matters Ex Parte Requirements This proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-3A1.txt
                • Proposed Rule Making, WT Docket No. 01-289, 18 FCC Rcd 21432 ¶ 85 (2003) (proposing specifically to remove the reference to the 14000-14400 MHz band in 47 C.F.R. § 87.187(x) and to also remove from the Table of Frequency Allocations, 47 C.F.R. § 2.106, the allocation for radionavigation in the 14000-14200 MHz band). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Id. § 603(a). Id. § 603. Id. § 603(a). Id. § 603. Id. § 603(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-40A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-40A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-40A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA) requires that a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rule making proceedings, unless the agency certifies that ``the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' The RFA generally defines
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-46A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 14. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this NPRM, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix A. As required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the NPRM. Written public comments are requested
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-50A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-50A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-50A1.txt
                • Migration Task Force to address these issues. for further information about the OBF's work in this area. . See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1966 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(b)(3). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of ``small business concern'' in the Small
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-52A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-52A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-52A1.txt
                • savings and loans, companies engaged in the business of insurance, and airlines. They also do not apply to intrastate telemarketing calls. ``Scrubbing'' refers to comparing a do-not-call list to a company's call list and eliminating from the call list the telephone numbers of consumers who have registered a desire not to be called. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-53A1.txt
                • Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 02-239, 17 FCC Rcd 17012 (2002). Parties may also pursue access to the underlying commercial agreement under the Freedom of Information Act. See 47 C.F.R. § 0.461. As rulings on requests for Commission intervention may have broad policy implications, we will consider such proceedings ``permit-but-disclose'' under the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. See AT&T Reply at i; MCI Reply at 8; Letter from Scott Shefferman, Counsel, MCI to Marlene Dortch, Secretary, FCC, IB Docket No. 02-234, 96-261, at 1 (dated Aug. 12, 2003)(MCI Aug. 12, 2003 Ex Parte Letter). AT&T contends that comment periods should be no longer than five days and replies no longer than two days and that the Commission
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-66A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-66A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-66A1.txt
                • basic annual subscription rate for individual households. Operators may base their count on "a typical day in the last full week" of December 2003, rather than on a count as of December 31, 2003. See 47 CFR § 1.1164. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998), available at < http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf>. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1203 and 1.1206(b). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. 47 U.S.C. §§154(i)-(j), 159, & 303(r). 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612 has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-70A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.152 Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 82. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),153 the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and actions considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix A. Written public
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-77A1.txt
                • a rule waiver is required, see 47 C.F.R. § 101.31(b)(1)(iii). FWCC/NSMA Waiver Request at 3. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3). FWCC/NSMA Waiver Request at 4. 47 C.F.R. § 101.147(r). 47 C.F.R. § 101.31(b)(1)(iii). As noted by FWCC and NSMA, the FS community relies heavily on conditional authorization. See FWCC/NSMA Waiver Request at 6. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (``CWAA''). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (``SBREFA''). We also note that we could certify this action
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-78A1.txt
                • the use of bidding credits). See United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996) (applying an intermediate standard of review to a state program based on gender classification); Adarand Constructors v. Peña, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (requiring a strict scrutiny standard of review for Congressionally mandated race-conscious measures). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11,322 (1998); Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Memorandum Opinion and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 21,517 (1998). See 5 U. S. C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612 has been amended by the Small
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-79A1.txt
                • the Federal Register. Paperwork Reduction Analysis. This Notice does not contain either a proposed or modified information collection requirement. Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before June 15, 2004, and reply comments on or before June 30, 2004. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. >, and should include the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-96A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-96A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-96A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), the Commission has prepared this Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this FNPRM. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-99A4.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-99A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-99A4.txt
                • addressed at a later date. These matters are being informally addressed by the Commission's International Bureau at this time. What matters should the International Bureau focus on to expedite the rollout of DAB in the United States? PROCEDURAL MATTERS Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-10A1.txt
                • the new Section 73.3580(e)-(f)-(g)-(h). We seek comment on these proposed changes to our rules. IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 9. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 10. Paperwork Reduction Act. This document contains proposed new or modified information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection requirements contained in this document, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-116A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Order and the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WC Docket
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-120A1.txt
                • the adoption or dismissal of all timely filed proposals and counterproposals and must be agreed to by all parties that have filed timely expressions of interest in any of the proposals or counterproposals in the particular rulemaking docket. 53. Filing Requirements. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-121A1.txt
                • Order section of this action. The FRFA is set forth in Appendix D. Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [21 days after publication in the Federal Register], and reply comments on or before [35 days after publication in the Federal Register]. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-122A1.txt
                • address: . Accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin, of the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at . B. Ex Parte Presentations The Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed pursuant to the Commission's Rules. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rule making proceedings, unless the agency certifies that ``the rule will not, if
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-123A1.txt
                • Pool, PR Docket No. 89-553, Second Order on Reconsideration and Seventh Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 2639, 2679 ¶ 105 (1995); Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding, PP Docket No. 93-253, Ninth Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd. 14,769, 14,789-90 ¶ 42 (1996). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2105(a)(2)(viii). See generally id. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. Commercial Spectrum Enhancement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-494, 118 Stat. 3986, Title II (2004) (codified
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-124A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures , by telephone at (202) 488-5300 or (800) 378-3160, or by facsimile at (202) 488-5563. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS'') or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. If multiple docket or
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-130A1.txt
                • Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we seek specific comment on how we might "further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees." Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments within 30 days after this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is published in the Federal Register and reply comments within 45 days after this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is published in the Federal Register.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-133A1.txt
                • proposed action may also protest the proposed action. Although we are not required to seek additional comment under Section 316, we find in this case that it would be in the public interest to do so. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comments: Interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-134A1.txt
                • made available for reallocation for another service, and if so, which specific frequency bands should be reallocated. Under this third option, the Commission would issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking inviting comment on such a reallocation. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comments: Interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-142A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-142A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-142A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 65. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this NPRM, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), see generally, 5 U.S.C. § 603, is contained in Appendix B. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments on the NPRM specified supra. The Commission will send a copy
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-143A1.txt
                • employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [60 days after publication in the Federal Register] and reply comments on or before [75 days after publication in the Federal Register]. >, should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting comments.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1.txt
                • by using a field strength curve that has been adjusted from the median field strength by such a factor. CTIA ex parte February 7, 2005 at 5. Id. at 6. We note that the Commission's current radiated power rule applies individually to each emission, and not to the combination of several of them. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(A). See 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-144A1_Erratum.doc
                • by using a field strength curve that has been adjusted from the median field strength by such a factor. CTIA ex parte February 7, 2005 at 5. Id. at 6. We note that the Commission's current radiated power rule applies individually to each emission, and not to the combination of several of them. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(A). See 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and actions considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix B. Written public comments are
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-14A1_Erratum.doc
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and actions considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix B. Written public comments are
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-150A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-158A1.txt
                • send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Warren Firschein or Cara Voth, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Action taken by the Commission on August 12, 2005: Chairman Kevin
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-172A1.txt
                • entities of the proposals suggested in this document. The IRFA is set forth in Appendix C. Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Final Paperwork Reduction Analysis. This Eighth Report and Order does not contain new or modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. In addition, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-17A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-17A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-17A1.txt
                • extend the July 1, 2007 date by which all broadcast television receivers include DTV reception capability. Administrative Matters. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). . Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally, only one copy of an electronic submission must be filed. If multiple docket or rulemaking numbers are referenced in the caption of the comments, however, commenters must transmit one electronic copy of the comments to each docket or rulemaking number referenced
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-189A1.txt
                • In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-18A1.txt
                • proceeding. One interim option would be to impose the last productivity factor, 5.3 percent, that was adopted by the Commission and judicially upheld. We seek comment on this and other reasonable interim alternatives. Procedural matters Ex Parte Requirements This proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-191A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-191A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-191A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Order and the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-191A1_Erratum.doc
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Order and the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-192A1.txt
                • for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ; and also to Kristy L. LaLonde, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, or via Internet to Kristy_L._LaLonde@omb.eop.gov, or via fax at 202-395-5167. . Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-196A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is contained in Appendix A. As required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the Notice. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-205A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-206A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-206A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-206A1.txt
                • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Paperwork Reduction Act The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking contains new information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. It will be submitted to the Office of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-24A1.txt
                • for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ; and also to Kristy L. LaLonde, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, or via Internet to Kristy_L._LaLonde@omb.eop.gov, or via fax at 202-395-5167. . Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-29A1.txt
                • Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Paperwork Reduction Act The Report and Order contains new information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. It will be submitted to the Office of Management
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-31A1.txt
                • (loading criteria for non-SMR trunked systems) of the Commission's rules. See ITA Petition at 3 n.7. See AMDS Letter at 2. See SBT Petition at 2. (Emphasis in original). See NAM/MRFAC Letter at 2. See, e.g., CMRS Third R&O, 9 FCC Rcd at 8047-48 ¶ 108. See Freeze Public Notice at 2 n.7. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-35A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-35A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-35A1.txt
                • annual bulk-rate charge divided by basic annual subscription rate for individual households. Operators may base their count on "a typical day in the last full week" of December 2004, rather than on a count as of December 31, 2004. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998), available at < http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf>. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1203 and 1.1206(b). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. 47 U.S.C. §§154(i)-(j), 159, & 303(r). 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612 has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-41A1.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), the Commission has prepared this Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this NPRM. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-49A1.txt
                • therefore, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). C. Ex Parte Rules 11. Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-55A1.txt
                • parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Paperwork Reduction Act The Second Report and Order contains new information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. It will be submitted to the Office of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1.txt
                • with fewer than 25 employees." , or via fax at 202-395-5167. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. Appendix E to this document contains the analysis required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. § 603. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments within 90 days after this Further Notice is published in the Federal Register and reply comments within 120 days after this Further Notice is published in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-62A1_Erratum.doc
                • with fewer than 25 employees." , or via fax at 202-395-5167. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. Appendix E to this document contains the analysis required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. § 603. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Comment. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments within 90 days after this Further Notice is published in the Federal Register and reply comments within 120 days after this Further Notice is published in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
                • 552a. On April 10, 2001, PanAmSat corrected certain minor errors and re-filed its comments. On May 9, 2001, Aloha Networks corrected certain minor errors and re-filed its reply. Although SIA made this oral ex parte presentation to Commission staff on November 19, 2001, it did not file a written summary of its ex parte presentation until December 11, 2001. Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires persons making oral ex parte presentations that include new data or arguments to summarize the new information in writing and file it with the Commission no later than one business day after the ex parte presentation. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). In the Further Notice, the Commission determined that it need not determine what action, if
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1_Erratum.doc
                • 552a. On April 10, 2001, PanAmSat corrected certain minor errors and re-filed its comments. On May 9, 2001, Aloha Networks corrected certain minor errors and re-filed its reply. Although SIA made this oral ex parte presentation to Commission staff on November 19, 2001, it did not file a written summary of its ex parte presentation until December 11, 2001. Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules requires persons making oral ex parte presentations that include new data or arguments to summarize the new information in writing and file it with the Commission no later than one business day after the ex parte presentation. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). In the Further Notice, the Commission determined that it need not determine what action, if
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-71A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis 42. This FNPRM contains modified information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this FNPRM, as required by the Paperwork
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-75A1.txt
                • 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). The Commission will send a copy of this Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in a report to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. C. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-78A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-78A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-78A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures . Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file via the Internet to . Generally, only one copy of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-87A1.txt
                • Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in connection with the Intermodal Order and in determining whether to modify the intermodal porting rules with respect to their application to small entities in light of the requirements of the RFA. For the convenience of commenting parties, we attach the Intermodal Order as Appendix B. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding pursuant to § 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the IRFA will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of § 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-92A1.txt
                • for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ; and also to Kristy L. LaLonde, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, or via Internet to Kristy_L._LaLonde@omb.eop.gov, or via fax at 202-395-5167. . Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-96A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-96A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-96A1.txt
                • total occupied homes in the U.S., and that 84,415,707 occupied homes were passed by cable systems with 36 or more channels. The relevant data sources are discussed in detail in the 11th Annual Report. See id. at 2767-68 ¶ 20 and nn.40-41. See id. at 2767-68 ¶ 20. See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (``SBREFA''), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 847 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). Id. See Implementation of Sections 11 and 13 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-9A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-9A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-9A1.txt
                • leadership, as well keeping adjacent regions apprised of changes in leadership, is a good practice that each region is encouraged to adopt. See First R&O and Third NPRM, 14 FCC Rcd 211 ¶ 131. See also 47 C.F.R. § 90.537 (1998). 47 C.F.R. § 90.537. 47 C.F.R. § 90.537(a). 47 C.F.R. § 90.537(b). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). Development of Operational,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-106A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is contained in the Appendix. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the Notice. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-107A1.txt
                • Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding Ex Parte Rules Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Comment Period and Procedures >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [30 days after publication in the Federal Register] and reply comments on or before [45 days after publication in the Federal Register]. >, should follow the instructions provided on the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-108A1.txt
                • IEC allows for a 12.5 kHz mask, we have received comments indicating that the 12.5 kHz AIS mask apparently has technical problems associated with it, and likely will not be implemented. See Shine Micro, Inc. Comments filed Dec. 16, 2003, in response to Frequency Coordinator PN, at 1. See 47 C.F.R. § 80.211. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See OMB Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review, 70 Fed. Reg. 2664 (Jan. 14, 2005). See n.1, supra; see generally Section III.C. See http://www.fcc.gov/omd/dataquality/peer-agenda.html. See In the Matter of Implementation of Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Pursuant to Section 515 of Public Law No. 105-554, 17 FCC Rcd 19890 (2002) (implementing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-10A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to CC Docket No. 96-115. Comments may be
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-114A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WT Docket No. 06-150, CC Docket No.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-120A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and actions considered in this Notice. The text of the Certification is set forth in Appendix B. Written public comments are requested
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-129A1.txt
                • applicable to all compulsory ships which are not required to comply with subpart W of this part in total or in part because they have received an exemption from all or some of the subpart W provisions.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 80.851. See Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 6759 ¶ 42. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-133A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the proposals considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-148A1.txt
                • certifies such EPIRBs and no longer permits their manufacture, importation or sale in the United States. Use of such EPIRBs must cease after December 31, 2006. See GMDSS Report and Order 17 FCC Rcd at 6761-62 ¶ 47; 47 C.F.R. § 80.1055. See Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 21476 ¶ 93. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Id. § 603(a). Id. § 801(a)(1)(a). Id. U.S.C. § 603. Id. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). Amendment of Part 87 of the Commission's
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-14A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented in generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on this FNPRM within 60 days after publication in the Federal Register and may file reply comments within 90 days after publication in the Federal Register. All filings shall refer to CC Docket No. 99-200. Comments may be
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-150A1.txt
                • does not contain proposed information collection requirements. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-164A1.txt
                • in Section 1.1307(a)(1)-(8) and (b) of the rules requires the preparation of an EA. All other actions are deemed individually and cumulatively to have no significant effect on the quality of the human environment and are categorically excluded from environmental processing. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1306(a). Avatar Report at 5-1. See paras. 36-44, supra. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. We note that the Commission shares jurisdiction over some of the issues addressed in this proceeding with FWS and the FAA, and that presentations by these agencies are therefore exempt from disclosure. 47 C.F.R. § 1.204(a)(5). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-180A1.txt
                • and cable operators from agreeing to more stringent standards. We seek comment on this tentative conclusion. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex Parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment Information. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days after this Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is published in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 45 days of publication. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-181A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the proposals considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-24A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 2. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WT Docket No. 06-49. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-33A1.txt
                • in response to the Order in determining what action to take on reconsideration in this proceeding. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment Information. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-34A1.txt
                • Dortch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, WT Docket Nos. 96-86 and 05-157 (filed Mar. 9, 2006). 47 C.F.R. § 90.529. , supra. See Canada and U.S. Reach Agreement That Will Facilitate Deployment of Public Safety Services Near the U.S.-Canada Border in the 764-776 MHz and 794-806 MHz Frequency Bands, News Release (June 20, 2005). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-38A1.txt
                • of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Completion of the 159 family of forms required by the Commission's regulatory fee payment process is already approved by the Office of Management and Budget under information collections 3060-0589 and 3060-0949. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-51A1.txt
                • Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C., 20554. These documents will also be available via ECFS. Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat. . , (202) 418-1227, of the Office of Engineering and Technology, Electromagnetic Compatibility Division. Ex Parte Presentations. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiates a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . 2. Accessible Formats or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0531 (voice), (202) 418-7365 (TTY). 3. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-57A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. As required by the Regulatory Flexible Act of 1980, the Commission has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the policies and rules addressed in this document. The FRFA is set forth in Appendix. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-58A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is contained in the Appendix. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the Notice. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-83A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.29 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.30 23. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended, 5 U.S.C. § 604, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") for this NPRM, of the possible significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this NPRM. The
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-8A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-8A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-8A1.txt
                • Commission's Competitive Bidding Rules and Procedures, Report and Order, FCC 06-4 (rel. Jan. 24, 2006), at ¶ 45 n.84; see also Celtronix Telemetry, Inc. v. FCC, 272 F.3d 585, 587 (D.C. Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 923 (2002) (affirming Commission application of installment payment rules that were revised after initial grant of license). See generally id. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110. The Commission establishes the definition of a small business on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the proposals considered in this NPRM. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix A. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-90A1_Erratum.doc
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. INITIAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the proposals considered in this NPRM. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix A. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-93A1.txt
                • Review - Review of the Commission's Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules adopted Pursuant to Section 202 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Cross-Ownership of Broadcast Stations and Newspapers, Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple Ownership of Broadcast Stations in Local Markets, Definition of Radio Markets, 17 FCC Rcd 18503, 18558 App. A (2002). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 2002 Biennial Regulatory Review - Review of the Commission's Broadcast Ownership
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.DOC http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-103A1.txt
                • Jan. 31, 2007). AICC also filed a Request for Waiver/Extension of Time to file its opposition because it was not served with the Motion to Dismiss and Petitioners did not find the Motion to Dismiss in the Commission's database until January 30, 2007. Request for Waiver/Extension of Time (filed Jan. 31, 2007). Opposition of AICC at 5-6. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Opposition of AICC at 2-3. Id. at 6. Order on Reconsideration, 19 FCC Rcd at 3247 ¶19; see also 47 U.S.C. § 4(i). Analog Sunset Order, 17 FCC Rcd at 18404 ¶4, n.16, citing, Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC et al., 280 F.3d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (``Nothing in § 202(h) suggests the grounds upon which the Commission may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-108A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-108A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-108A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to PS Docket No.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-109A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Order and the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-114A1.txt
                • however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, permit broader public participation and thereby serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant applications. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission's Secretary no later than the next business
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-119A1.txt
                • the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Information Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Contact Information. For additional information on this proceeding, please contact Rosemary C. Harold, (202) 418-7200, Royce Sherlock, (202) 418-7030, or Marcia Glauberman, (202) 418-7046, of the Media Bureau. ordering clauseS IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 303(r), and 310(d) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C §§ 151, 154(i), 303(r) and 310(d),
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-120A1.txt
                • In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-123A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-123A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-123A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Margaret Dailey of the Pricing Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-2396. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Special Access Rates for Price Cap Local Exchange Carriers, WC Docket No. 05-25, AT&T Corp. Petition for Rulemaking to Reform Regulation of Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier Rates for Interstate Special Access
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-128A1.txt
                • Low Income Federal universal service program, or reporting requirements by 700 MHz auction winners. We seek comment on these and other initiatives that the Commission can and should undertake to educate the public on the DTV transition. procedural matters Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-130A1.txt
                • send three paper copies of their filing to Adrian Wright, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II 445 12th Street, Suite CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Gina Spade, Cara Voth or James Bachtell, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Action taken by the Commission on July 27, 2007:
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-136A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-136A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-136A1.txt
                • Broadcast Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted Pursuant to Section 2020 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Cross-Ownership of Broadcast Stations and Newspapers, Rules and Policies Concerning Multiple Ownership of Radio Broadcast Stations in Local Markets, Definition of Radio Markets, 17 FCC Rcd 18503, 18558, App. A (2002). See 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). This Appendix is a verbatim copy of Appendix B to MMTC's Motion for Withdrawal, except that this Appendix reflects minor typographical corrections and the omission of a non-substantive footnote. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-138A1.txt
                • does not contain proposed information collection requirements. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-140A1.txt
                • Review Act Analysis The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in a report to be sent to Congress and the General Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(A). Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This is as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-143A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-143A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-143A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before 60 days after publication of the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register and reply comments regarding the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking may be filed on or before 90 days after publication
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-144A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-144A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-144A1.txt
                • burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' and also to Kristy L. LaLonde, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, or via Internet to Kristy_L._LaLonde@omb.eop.gov, or via fax at 202-395-5167. . Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-145A1.txt
                • is found in 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 152(a), 154(i) and (j), 301, 303(g) and (r), 308(b), and 309(j). Ex Parte Restrictions. This proceeding (MM Docket No. 95-31) has been designated ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-164A1.txt
                • Band auction (Auction No. 46), the Commission offered a bidding credit on a nationwide license in the 1670-1675 MHz band to small businesses with average annual revenues not exceeding $40 million and very small businesses with average annual revenues not exceeding $15 million. See 700 MHz Second Report and Order at ¶¶ 535-37. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Pub. L. 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601- 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-169A1.txt
                • its final order resolving the complaint or resolving damages, adjustments to its remedies that make the terms of the new agreement between the parties retroactive to the expiration date of the previous agreement. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-170A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-170A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-170A1.txt
                • does not contain proposed information collection requirements. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission Rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-176A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-176A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-176A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WC Docket No.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-17A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-17A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-17A1.txt
                • Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-187A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-187A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-187A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WC Docket No. 07-245. Comments may be
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-188A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WC Docket No. 07-243 or WC Docket
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-189A1.txt
                • access arrangements in that most customers would be dissuaded from switching video providers? The Commission will conclude this rulemaking and release an order within six months of publication of this Order. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-18A1.txt
                • should the Commission employ in reviewing an arbitration decision if arbitration is required or otherwise used? AdMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Ex Parte Rules This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment Information Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-192A1.txt
                • 18, 2008 benchmark. In consideration of the need for certainty, and in order to provide appropriate notification to manufacturers and service providers as regards the hearing aid compatibility obligations, we determine that it is in the public interest to stay enforcement of that particular benchmark for 60 days, until April 18, 2008. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding proposing the amendment of the Commission's rule governing hearing aid compatible telephones is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. Filing Procedures. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-194A1.txt
                • Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Rules, Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-202A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-202A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-202A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WC Docket No. 07-267. Comments may be
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-203A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to CG Docket No.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-204A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-204A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-204A1.txt
                • stations or other Commission licensees. To further these goals, we also recommend to Congress that it remove the requirement that LPFM stations protect full-power stations operating on third adjacent channels. Administrative matters Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-208A1.txt
                • capacity is used to sell products directly to customers, and all other programming. These programming categories were intended to reflect the different economies faced by the different types of programmers. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``FNPRM'') in this proceeding will be treated as ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-215A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification and Analysis With respect to WCS licensees, Appendix A to this document contains the analysis required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. § 603. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification of the possible significant economic impact
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-216A1.txt
                • in equity....''). See, e.g., First Complaint at 8. See FCC Seeks Comment on Research Studies on Media Ownership, Public Notice, DA 07-3470 (rel. July 31, 2007). The disclaimer states: ``The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Communications Commission.'' See http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/studies.html . See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Free Press claims that the peer review reports on third-party quantitative studies were released too late for the authors of those studies to incorporate the suggestions into their comments during the formal comment period. Along similar lines, Free Press claims that because the Commission released revised versions and additional peer reviews of the 10 studies on the last day of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-217A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-217A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-217A1.txt
                • our proposals and new measures. We ask commenters to buttress their comments with economic and other evidence so that any further action can be based on a rigorous and thorough record. procedural matters Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-218A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-218A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-218A1.txt
                • 336(f)(2). The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA''), Pub. L. No. 104-13, 109 Stat 163 (1995) (codified in Chapter 35 of Title 44 U.S.C.). The Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002 (``SBPRA''), Pub. L. No. 107-198, 116 Stat 729 (2002) (codified in Chapter 35 of Title 44 U.S.C.); see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See id. §§ 1.415, 1419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. Broadcast
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-219A1.txt
                • this Fourth Report and Order. The SFRFA is set forth in Appendix B. Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-22A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to CC Docket No. 96-115 and WC
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-32A1.txt
                • In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-33A1.txt
                • alert over the EAS. We note that the Commission currently is considering issues related to the Emergency Alert System, including transmission of state EAS alerts, in its ongoing EAS proceeding. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-38A1.txt
                • 17 FCC Rcd 15040 (2002). SIA Comments at 6. For example, SIA states that, while FiberTower's proposed rule indicates that an applicant can require the small antenna operator to reduce its interference, it gives no guidance as to the procedures. SIA Comments at 6. FiberTower Reply Comments at 5. 47 C.F.R. § 101.103. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107- 198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). Although we are conducting an IRFA at this stage in the process, it
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-4A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Availability of Documents. Comments, reply comments, and ex parte submissions will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. These documents also will be available via ECFS in Acrobat PDF File Format. Action by the Commission on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-55A1.txt
                • of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Completion of the 159 family of forms required by the Commission's regulatory fee payment process is already approved by the Office of Management and Budget under information collections 3060-0589 and 3060-0949. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-70A1.txt
                • pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, we seek specific comment on how we might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' , or via fax at 202-395-5167. . Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-71A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-71A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-71A1.txt
                • the prospect of not being able to view the signals of must-carry stations unless they possess the necessary equipment (i.e., a Digital-Cable-Ready television set or a digital cable set-top box). Nevertheless, we seek comment on this issue. procedural matters Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before 21 days after publication of the Further Notice in the Federal Register and reply comments regarding the Further Notice may be filed on or before 28 days after publication of the Further Notice in the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-72A1_Erratum.doc
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before 21 days after publication of the Further Notice in the Federal Register and reply comments regarding the Further Notice may be filed on or before 28 days after publication of the Further Notice in the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-76A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated into the NPRM. The Commission sought written public comments on the possible significant economic impact of the proposed policies and rules on small entities in the NPRM, including comments on the IRFA. No one commented
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-7A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-7A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-7A1.txt
                • recent mergers? Commenters that favor these alternative procedures should address the Commission's authority to adopt them. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment Information. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-85A1.txt
                • 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before the date indicated on the front page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-86A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA''), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and actions considered in this Notice. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix C. Written public comments are
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-88A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments 14 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register, and reply comments 21 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS),
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-119A1.txt
                • of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In addition, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, we seek specific comment on how we might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees." Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission Rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-11A1.txt
                • broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. In this proceeding, numerous ex parte comments were received after the deadline for the filing of formal comments. It was not until after the Commission issued its decision, some nine months after the release of the Public Notice, that NHMC first complained in its Petition for Reconsideration that the permit-but-disclose status was
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-126A1.txt
                • small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198. The forms already required by the Commission's regulatory fee process have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under information collection 3060-0589. Ex Parte Rules This is as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-128A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Second Further Notice should refer to WT Docket No. 06-150, PS Docket No. 06-229, and WT Docket No. 96-86. Comments
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-149A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Regulatory Flexibility Certification. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the policies and rules addressed in this document. The certification is set forth in Appendix. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis. This document does
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-151A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Regulatory Flexibility Certifications. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), the Commission has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification in which it concludes that, under the terms of the RFA, there is no significant economic impact on small entities of the policies and rules addressed in this document. The certification is set forth
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-155A1.txt
                • Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the Commission seeks specific comment on how it might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' C. Ex Parte Rules 21. Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-158A1.txt
                • GHz and 2.1 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02-353, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 19263 (2004) (AWS-2 NPRM). Service Rules for Advanced Wireless Services in the 2155-2175 MHz Band, WT Docket No. 07-195, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 22 FCC Rcd 17035 (2007) (AWS-3 NPRM). See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. §§ 27.53(c)(1)(2), 27.53(h). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 603. Pub. L. 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA),
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-164A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Filing Requirements Comments and Reply Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments to the FNPRM on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings should refer to PS Docket No. 07-287. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-173A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-173A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-173A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures We invite comment on the issues and questions set forth in the NPRM and IRFA contained herein. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on this NPRM within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register and may file reply comments within 45 days after
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-180A1.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Gina Spade, Cara Voth or James Bachtell, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Action taken by the Commission on July 31, 2008: Chairman Kevin J. Martin, and Commissioners Michael J. Copps, Jonathan S. Adelstein, Deborah Taylor Tate and Robert M. McDowell. FCC - Schools &
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-182A1.txt
                • with fewer than 25 employees.'' Congressional Review Act Analysis The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the General Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1)(A). Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This is as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-188A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-188A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-188A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WT Docket No. 08-166, and WT Docket
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-189A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-189A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-189A1.txt
                • to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA''), Public Law 104-13. This NOI does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198. Ex Parte Rules This is as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-195A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-195A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-195A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WC Docket No. 08-171. Commenters
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-203A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-228A1.txt
                • Our actions today, made possible by the support and contributions of a broad coalition of technical experts and broadcasters, represents a significant step forward in modernizing our AM licensing procedures. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Comment Information Ex Parte Rules. The Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-22A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments 30 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register, and reply comments 60 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS),
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-230A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Third Further Notice should refer to WT Docket No. 06-150 and PS Docket No. 06-229. Comments may be filed using:
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-237A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-237A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-237A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WC Docket No. 04-347. Comments may be
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-249A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-249A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-249A1.txt
                • improve safety, we should enable them as well. But failure to do so today because of an uncertain promise about tomorrow certainly does not ``address mobile/nomadic VoIP as soon as possible.'' October 2, 2008 Honorable Kevin J. Martin Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 RE: WC Docket No. 08-171, ex parte communication Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Rules Dear Chairman Martin, On September 9, 2008 NENA and APCO jointly filed comments in response to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) which sought comments concerning regulations implementing the requirements of the New and Emerging Technologies 911 Improvement Act of 2008 (``NET 911 Act''). As we stated in our comments, NENA and APCO believe that VoIP providers
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-249A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-249A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-249A2.txt
                • improve safety, we should enable them as well. But failure to do so today because of an uncertain promise about tomorrow certainly does not ``address mobile/nomadic VoIP as soon as possible.'' October 2, 2008 Honorable Kevin J. Martin Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 RE: WC Docket No. 08-171, ex parte communication Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Rules Dear Chairman Martin, On September 9, 2008 NENA and APCO jointly filed comments in response to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) which sought comments concerning regulations implementing the requirements of the New and Emerging Technologies 911 Improvement Act of 2008 (``NET 911 Act''). As we stated in our comments, NENA and APCO believe that VoIP providers
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-255A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-255A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-255A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Regulatory Flexibility Certifications. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), the Commission has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification in which it concludes that, under the terms of the RFA, there is no significant economic impact on small entities of the policies and rules addressed in this document. The certification is set forth
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-258A1.txt
                • the applications without prejudice as suggested by Cellular South. Ex Parte Status of Proceeding. In the June 25, 2008 Public Notice seeking comment on the proposed transaction, the Commission, pursuant to its authority under Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, announced that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. On September 24, 2008, Cellular South filed a letter asserting that on August 11, 2008, when Cellular South filed its petition to deny, the proceeding automatically became restricted. It claims that once the petitions to deny are filed, the Commission is required ``to make its public interest determination `on the basis of the application, the pleadings
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-262A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Further Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings should refer to CC Docket Nos. 96-45, 96-98, 99-68, 99-200, 01-92 and WC Docket Nos. 03-109,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-278A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-278A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-278A1.txt
                • Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the Commission will also seek specific comment on how it might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees." Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-281A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-281A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-281A1.txt
                • Congressional mandate can result in harm to TV stations, and, in turn, to their viewers. For additional information concerning the PRA proposed information collection requirements contained in this Notice, contact Cathy Williams at 202-418-2918, or via the Internet to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-4A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-4A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-4A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal; or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-5A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-5A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-5A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments 30 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register, and reply comments 60 days after publication of this Notice in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS),
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-68A1.txt
                • that RIM offered only one CDMA device); Section 68.4(a) of the Commission's Rules Governing Hearing Aid Compatibility Telephones, WT Docket 01-309, Hearing Aid Compatibility Compliance Efforts Status Report #7 Submitted by the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) on behalf of the ATIS Incubator Solutions Program #4, filed Nov. 19, 2007, Attach. A (RIM Status Report). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. See Notice, 22 FCC Rcd at 19687 ¶ 49. Id. See, e.g., Nokia Comments at 9; Nokia Reply Comments at 5; RIM Comments at 7-9. See, e.g., AT&T Comments at 3; HLAA/TDI Comments at 2; Gallaudet/RERC Comments at 5-6. Wireless RERC Comments at 5. HIA Comments at 2 n.2 Gallaudet/RERC Comments at 6; see also infra para. 117. See also
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-73A1.txt
                • BAS receivers still may occur, although it is unlikely. We seek comment on the likelihood and extent of interference between MSS and BAS if we were to adopt a market-by-market approach. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-83A1.txt
                • 47 C.F.R. § 27.1201 for EBS eligibility requirements. 47 C.F.R. § 1.9020(d)(2), 1.9030(d)(2). See 47 C.F.R. 90.529(a)(1); Public Safety 700 MHz Band-State License Option to Apply Runs Through December 31, 2001, Public Notice, 16 FCC Rcd 3547 (2001). 47 C.F.R. § 27.14(e) (all EBS licensees must demonstrate substantial service by May 1, 2011). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 601-612. The RFA has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-86A1.txt
                • does not contain proposed information collection requirements. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission Rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-89A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-102A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-102A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-102A1.txt
                • and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register.'' See 15 U.S.C. § 632. See 47 C.F.R. § 97.113(a)(2)-(3). See Amendment of the Amateur Service Rules to Establish Station Call Sign Administrators for Club and Military Recreation Stations, Order, 8 FCC Rcd 3594, 3595 ¶ 9 (1993). See 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). See id. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-102 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-102 0 Þ ß � � � � U
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-104A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-104A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-104A1.txt
                • not subject to streamlined treatment. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. We direct parties making oral ex parte presentations to the Commission's statement re-emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-105A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the federal government's eRulemaking Portal; or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-112A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-112A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-112A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the further notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings should refer to WC Docket No. 05-337. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-11A1.txt
                • and still fulfill our statutory mandate to take such actions as are necessary or appropriate to implement the DTV Delay Act and accomplish its purposes within 30 days of the Act's enactment, or no later than March 13, 2009. Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-24A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal; or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-28A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.430, 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. Electronic Filers: Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-29A1.txt
                • service subject to the provisions of §90.259,'' and Section 90.259 contains provisions for the 1427-1432 MHz band. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Comment and Reply Comment Filing Instructions. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the front page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-30A1.txt
                • preclude the use of alternate contour prediction methods for NCE FM stations in the reserved band. We invite comment on this proposal, or on any modifications to, additions to, or substitutions for these guidelines. III. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS A. Filing Requirements. 51. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-31A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. It is the intent of the Commission that contacts with the Commission pursuant to this Notice of Inquiry also comply with the March 20, 2009 White House Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Agencies: Ensuring Responsible Spending of Recovery Act Funds (``Memorandum''). Under the Memorandum, an executive department or agency official shall not consider the view
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-33A1.txt
                • this data from LPFM licensees, we seek comment on whether LPFM licensees should be required to file Form 323-E or another shorter form that only seeks minority and gender ownership information. procedural matters Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-38A1.txt
                • note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' Ex Parte Rules This is as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-39A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-39A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-39A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to the NPRM portion of this item, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is contained in the Appendix. As required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the Notice. Written public
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-41A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Further Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WC Docket No. 07-244 and
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-49A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-49A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-49A1.txt
                • its market is so heavily used that there is no other available channel or that circumstances beyond the incumbent's control have prevented the incumbent from completing the transition by the deadline. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1.txt
                • Parts 1, 2, 21, and 94 of the Rules to Establish a New Part 101 Governing Terrestrial Microwave Fixed Radio Services, WT Docket No. 94-148, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 13449, 13461-13462 ¶¶ 26-27 (1996). Waiver Request. 47 C.F.R. § 1.925(b)(3). FWCC 6 GHz Petition at 4. See 47 C.F.R. § 101.31(b)(3). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107- 198; see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). Fixed
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-58A1_Rcd.pdf
                • Parties may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing instructions, filers should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include the following words in the body of the message, "get form." A sample form and directions will be sent in response. 73FWCC 6 GHz Petition at 4. 74See47 C.F.R. § 101.31(b)(3). 75See generally47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 9630 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-58 28.Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. Filings can be sent by hand or
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-68A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Filing of Comments and Reply Comments Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. When filing comments, please reference CG Docket No. 158, CC Docket
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1.txt
                • applies to Educational Broadband Service (EBS) licensees. We will address the performance requirements applicable to EBS licenses granted in the future in the proceeding addressing the licensing of unassigned EBS spectrum. See BRS/EBS Third MO&O, 21 FCC Rcd at 5727-5728 ¶ 292. See BRS/EBS Fourth MO&O, 23 FCC Rcd at 6047-6048 ¶¶ 144-145. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of ``small-business concern'' in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 632). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 601(3), the statutory definition of a small business applies ``unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public comment,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-70A1_Rcd.pdf
                • also applies to Educational Broadband Service (EBS) licensees. We will address the performance requirements applicable to EBS licenses granted in the future in the proceeding addressing the licensing of unassigned EBS spectrum. 99See BRS/EBS Third MO&O, 21 FCC Rcd at 5727-5728 ¶ 292. 100See BRS/EBS Fourth MO&O, 23 FCC Rcd at 6047-6048 ¶¶ 144-145. 101See generally47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 12270 Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-70 32.Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or rulemaking number. Filings can be sent by hand or
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-73A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-73A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-73A1.txt
                • parte rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Further, it is the intent of the Commission that contacts with the Commission pursuant to this NOI also comply with the March 20, 2009 White House Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Agencies: Ensuring Responsible Spending of Recovery Act Funds (``Memorandum''). Under the Memorandum, an executive department or agency official shall not consider the view of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-73A1_Rcd.pdf
                • accordance with the Commission's ex parterules.3Personsmaking oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.4Other requirements pertaining to presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.5 Further, it is the intent of the Commission that contacts with the Commission pursuant to this NOI also 1Fostering Innovation and Investment in the Wireless Communications Market, GN Docket No. 09-157, A National Broadband Plan For Our Future, GN Docket No. 09-51, Notice of Inquiry, FCC 09-66 (rel. Aug. 27, 2009) (NOI). 2SeeNOIat ¶ 69. 347
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-84A1.txt
                • 1998), reported at 1998 WL 306795; 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204 (implementing regulation). Additionally, 47 C.F.R. § 76.640 requires cable systems to support unidirectional (i.e., non-SDV) cable products. EB is investigating whether Cox's deployment of SDV made certain channels inaccessible without a Cox set top receiver and thus inaccessible by non-Cox unidirectional products such as CableCARD. These include 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, which requires separate charges for services and equipment, and the more general requirements regarding customer charges set forth in 47 C.F.R. §§ 76.980 and 76.984. See 47 C.F.R. § 76.1603 (requiring written notice of service changes). See Request at 1. Wein had obtained a copy of a supplemental response to the LOI when that document was mistakenly made publicly available.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-89A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-89A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-89A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal; or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-92A1.txt
                • If information on nonattributable media holdings is omitted, as suggested by NAB, would the Commission lack sufficient information to accurately determine the universe of minority and female ownership in broadcasting? procedural matters A. Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-93A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Filers should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting comments. ECFS filers must transmit one electronic copy of the comments for GN Docket No. 09-191, WC Docket No. 07-52. In completing the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-96A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-96A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-96A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the NPRM on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings should refer to CC Docket No. 02-6. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1.txt
                • agreements, ``even when the agreements have been filed with the Commission.'' Ex-Parte Status of Proceeding In the public notice seeking comment on the proposed transaction, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (``Bureau''), pursuant to its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. On January 15, 2009, Cellular South filed a petition for reconsideration objecting to the ex parte status of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and Section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights. We disagree. In what otherwise would
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-97A1_Rcd.pdf
                • settlement agreements, "even when the agreements have been filed with the Commission."511 F. Ex-ParteStatus of Proceeding 153. In the public notice seeking comment on the proposed transaction, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau ("Bureau"), pursuant to its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules,512announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules.513 On January 15, 2009, Cellular South filed a petition for reconsideration objecting to the ex partestatus of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and Section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights.514 154. We disagree. In what otherwise would
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-99A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-99A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-99A1.txt
                • specificity why the examples effectively require variances in all instances. See Petition at 36 (briefly describing ordinances of communities in Vermont and New Hampshire). 47 U.S.C. §§ 332(c)(7), 253. See, e.g., Coalition for Local Zoning Authority Comments at 2-4; NATOA et al. Comments at 21; Greater Metro Telecom. Consortium and City of Boulder, CO Comments at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a), Note 1. We note that the Petitioner did belatedly serve the two local governments whose ordinances were described in the Petition as requiring variances; however, as discussed above, we deny Petitioner's request to preempt ordinances that require variances. See Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Clarify Provisions of Section 332(c)(7)(B) to Ensure Timely Siting Review and to Preempt under Section 253
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-99A1_Rcd.pdf
                • to demonstrate with any specificity why the examples effectively require variances in all instances. SeePetition at 36 (briefly describing ordinances of communities in Vermont and NewHampshire). 20747 U.S.C. §§ 332(c)(7), 253. 208See,e.g.,Coalition for Local Zoning Authority Comments at 2-4; NATOA et al. Comments at 21; Greater Metro Telecom. Consortium and City of Boulder, CO Comments at 2-3. 20947 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a), Note 1. 210We note that the Petitioner did belatedly serve the two local governments whose ordinances were described in the Petition as requiring variances; however, as discussed above, we deny Petitioner's request to preempt ordinances that require variances. SeePetition for Declaratory Ruling to Clarify Provisions of Section 332(c)(7)(B) to Ensure Timely Siting Review and to Preempt under Section 253 State
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1.txt
                • at 1-2; Teaze WT Docket No. 98-182 Comments at 3. See MURS MO&O, 17 FCC Rcd at 9850 ¶ 40; see also 47 C.F.R. § 95.1317. See PRSG Petition at 4. See id. See id.; accord Brody WT Docket No. 98-182 Comments at 2. See Dakota WT Docket No. 98-182 Comments at 2. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GN Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA).
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-106A1_Rcd.pdf
                • Docket No. 98-182 Comments at 1-2; Teaze WT Docket No. 98-182 Comments at 3. 192See MURS MO&O, 17 FCC Rcd at 9850 ¶ 40; see also 47 C.F.R. § 95.1317. 193SeePRSG Petition at 4. 194See id. 195See id.; accordBrody WT Docket No. 98-182 Comments at 2. 196SeeDakota WT Docket No. 98-182 Comments at 2. 197See generally47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 7680 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-106 B. Comment Period and Procedures 78.Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules,198interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments and reply comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the Federal
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-111A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-111A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-111A1.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Paperwork Reduction Act. This Notice does not propose any information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). This Notice, therefore, does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. ORDERING CLAUSE Accordingly, IT
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-114A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-114A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-114A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments and reply comments may be filed: (1) using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) using the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1.txt
                • licenses from Verizon Wireless to AT&T does not raise any trafficking concerns. Ex Parte Status of Proceeding Background. In the public notice seeking comment on the proposed transaction, the Bureau, pursuant to its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. On July 20, 2009, Cellular South filed a petition for expedited reconsideration objecting to the ex parte status of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights. Discussion. The Commission has recently
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-116A1_Rcd.pdf
                • and PCS licenses535from Verizon Wireless to AT&T does not raise any trafficking concerns. H. Ex ParteStatus of Proceeding 154. Background. In the public notice seeking comment on the proposed transaction, the Bureau, pursuant to its authority under section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules,536announced that this proceeding would be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parteprocedures that are applicable to proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules.537On July 20, 2009, Cellular South filed a petition for expedited reconsideration objecting to the ex partestatus of the proceeding, asserting that the Bureau's decision was a violation of section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules and section 309(d) of the Communications Act, as well as procedural and due process rights.538 155. Discussion. The Commission has recently addressed
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-11A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB Docket No.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-125A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-125A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-125A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures We invite comment on the issues and questions set forth in the NPRM and IRFA contained herein. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on this NPRM within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register and may file reply comments within 45 days after
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-126A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-126A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-126A1.txt
                • providing MSS in all three bands, or can we meet future needs with less allocated spectrum in some or all of the bands? If so, which band(s) are best suited for MSS? Procedural matters Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-127A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. B. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WC Docket
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-130A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-130A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-130A1.txt
                • any new or modified information collection requirements. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-133A1.txt
                • Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-145A1_Rcd.pdf
                • ¶ 31. 80Notice, 22 FCC Rcd at 19701-02 ¶ 85. 81SeeGallaudet/RERCComments at 13-14; HLAA/TDI Comments at 6. 82SeeFirst Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 3435 ¶ 72. The Commission also codified the principle that the de minimis exception applies on a per-air interface basis. Id. 83First Report and Order, 23 FCC Rcd at 3435-36 ¶ 73; see47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. 11181 Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-145 39. In general, handset manufacturers oppose any change to the current rule. They contend that the de minimisrule allows new entrants to the handset manufacturing marketplace to develop innovative handsets.84Industry associations share the viewpoint of handset manufacturers.85TIA states that the exception is "critical to industry's ability to promote innovation through new technologies."86On the other
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-146A1.txt
                • ET Docket Nos. 04-186 and 02-380 (filed Mar. 19, 2009). In addition to permanent networks, we note that temporary microwave networks are sometimes needed to support special events. While our rules allow for temporary authorizations (see 47 C.F.R. Sec. 101.31(a)), our inquiry concerning barriers to obtaining spectrum includes barriers to obtaining temporary authorizations. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107- 198; see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-148A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-148A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-148A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, interested persons may file comments and replies regarding the Inquiry on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Inquiry should refer to GN Docket No. 10-159. Comments may be filed using: (1)
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-154A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-154A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-154A1.txt
                • comment on how we might further reduce the ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [30 days after publication in the Federal Register] and reply comments [45 days after publication in the Federal Register]. >, should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting comments. Commenters who chose
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-155A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal; or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-155A1_Rcd.pdf
                • Commission's ex parterules.59Persons making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.60Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentationsare set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.61 54See 47 C.F.R. § 54.709(a)(3) ("The Commission reserves the right to set projections of demand and administrative expenses at amounts the Commission determines will serve the public interest at any time within the fourteen-day period following release of the Commission's public notice."). 55Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-13, 109 Stat. 163 (1995). 56Small
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-161A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the further notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings should refer to WC Docket No. 10-191. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-16A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-172A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-172A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-172A1.txt
                • for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' ; and also to Kristy L. LaLonde, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10234 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, or via Internet to Kristy_L._LaLonde@omb.eop.gov, or via fax at 202-395-5167. . Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-177A1.txt
                • (Apr. 2, 2005). T-Mobile Petition at 10. See, e.g., Skype, Product Features (visited August 10, 2010) < http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/features/>; Truphone, Truphone Service Standard Terms and Conditions (visited August 23, 2010) < http://www.truphone.com/about_us/legal.html >. Several major wireless operators are offering their subscribers femtocells for home use. See 14th Mobile Wireless Competition Report, at ¶ 350. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. Public Law 107- 198; see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 - 612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. §
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-180A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-180A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-180A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Filing of Comments and Reply Comments Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. When filing comments or reply comments, please reference CG Docket No. 10-207. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-182A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-182A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-182A1.txt
                • documents and information. This delegation of authority to both bureaus would authorize modification, as necessary, of existing FCC forms and the creation, if necessary, of new FCC forms to implement the rules we adopt in this proceeding. Procedural matters Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. This NPRM will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1.txt
                • use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. The Commission will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in a report to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. C. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-186A1_Rcd.pdf
                • respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 58.The Commission will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemakingin a report to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act.95 C.Ex Parte Rules 59.Permit-But-Disclose.This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.96 Ex partepresentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parteor otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-18A1.txt
                • the implementation period for the express written consent requirement. Finally, we seek comment on an appropriate implementation period for the proposed change to our call abandonment rules discussed in section III.B above. Procedural matters Ex Parte Presentations description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Filing of Comments and Reply Comments Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. When filing comments or reply comments, please reference CG Docket No. 02-278. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-192A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-192A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-192A1.txt
                • this ICR as shown in the Supplementary Information section below (or its title if there is no OMB control number) and then click on the ICR Reference Number. A copy of the FCC submission to OMB will be displayed. C. Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-194A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-194A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-194A1.txt
                • Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-196A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-196A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-196A1.txt
                • burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' or via fax at (202) 395-5167. Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comments. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-197A1.txt
                • have proposed in either this text or the accompanying rules should provide specific information detailing how their proposals fit into our overall goals of providing more flexibility for innovation and providing clear, concise experimental guidelines to the public. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of our rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-200A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-203A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-203A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-203A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA) requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for rulemaking proceedings unless the agency certifies that ``the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.'' The RFA generally defines the term ``small entity'' as
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-21A1_Rcd.pdf
                • Commission's ex parterules.22Persons making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.23Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 10. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA)24requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for rulemaking proceedings unless the agency certifies that "the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities."25The RFA generally defines the term "small entity" as referring
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-24A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-24A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-24A1.txt
                • Commission will send a copy of this First Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. B. Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making 1. Filing Requirements. 74. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission Rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-31A1.txt
                • are already reflected in prior written filings and provides specific references (including page or paragraph numbers) to the presenter's prior filings containing the data and arguments presented. As under the current rule, the ex parte notice would have to contain a summary of any new data or arguments presented at the ex parte meeting. The proposed revised language of rule 1.1206 would provide that: A person who makes an oral ex parte presentation subject to this section shall submit a memorandum that summarizes all data presented and arguments made during the oral ex parte presentation. If the oral ex parte presentation consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in that person's written comments,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-32A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). Regulatory Flexibility Act. Our action does not require notice and comment, and therefore falls outside of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended. We nonetheless note that we anticipate that the rules we propose today will not have a significant economic impact
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-33A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-33A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-33A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the federal government's eRulemaking Portal; or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-36A1.txt
                • 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [30 days after publication in the Federal Register] and reply comments on or before [45 days after publication in the Federal Register]. >, should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting comments.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-37A1.txt
                • 7752 ¶ 10. These requirements already apply to RLT Maintenance Test Facilities, which the MPRT-500 most closely resembles. Id. at 7750 ¶ 3, 7752 ¶ 10 (citing 47 C.F.R. § 87.475(a)). Id. at 7753 ¶ 12. See Part 87 Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 21467 ¶ 74. 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. §
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-38A1.txt
                • 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). Ex Parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). >. Comment Dates. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before [30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] and reply comments on or before [45 days after date of publication in the Federal Register]. >, should follow the instructions provided on the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-45A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-45A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-45A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment and Reply Comment Filing Instructions. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the front page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2)
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the policies and rules proposed in this Public Notice.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-46A1_Rcd.pdf
                • ex parterules.7Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two- sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.8Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.9 11.Accessible Formats.To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.govor call the Consumer & Governmental AffairsBureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (tty). 12.Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA),10the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-47A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-47A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-47A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal; or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-51A1.txt
                • is already approved by the Office of Management and Budget under information collections 3060-0589 and 3060-0949. Congressional Review Act Analysis The Commission will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. Ex Parte Rules This is as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-53A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WT Docket No. 10-88. Comments may be
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-57A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal; or (3) by
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-58A1.txt
                • 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-13, 109 Stat. 163 (1995). 140 Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-198, 116 Stat. 729 (2002); 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). 141 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-58 27 views and arguments presented is generally required.142 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.143 D. Comment Filing Procedures 66. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules,144 interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the NOI and NPRM on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS); (2) the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-61A1.txt
                • Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. In addition, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, we seek specific comment on how we might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-63A1.txt
                • parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419 and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, 1.430, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-76A1.txt
                • the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding, This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed pursuant to the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3) by filing paper
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-77A1.txt
                • the 1920-1930 MHz band from the Private Operational-Fixed Microwave Service (OFS) operating under Part 101 of Chapter 47 C.F.R. to UPCS operations. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.307(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 15.307(a), (b), and (f). See 47 C.F.R. § 15.311. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.303(b), (e). , supra. See 47 C.F.R. § 15.303(i). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. -612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). Id. at § 603(b)(3). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of ``small business concern'' in 15 U.S.C. § 632). Pursuant to the RFA, the statutory definition of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-83A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-83A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-83A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures We invite comment on the issues and questions set forth in the NPRM and IRFA contained herein. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on this NPRM within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register and may file reply comments within 45 days after
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-84A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. D. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All pleadings are to reference WC Docket No. 07-245 and GN Docket No. 09-51. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b). With respect to the pending renewal applications and related competing mutually exclusive applications, pursuant to section 1.1200(a), we hereby modify their ex parte status from ``restricted'' to ``permit-but-disclose.'' Thus, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed pursuant to the Commission's rules. As with the rulemaking itself, persons making oral ex parte presentations
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-86A1_Rcd.pdf
                • rules.315Persons making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required.316 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b).317 115. With respect to the pending renewal applications and related competing mutually exclusive applications, pursuant to section 1.1200(a),318we hereby modify their ex partestatus from (Continued from previous page) Snapline applications, and stating that at the September 5, 2007 meeting only NextWave's renewal applications were discussed). The Commission's Office of General Counsel concluded that "NextWave violated the ex parte rules, and
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-88A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-88A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-88A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. The interim rule adopted in this Order is being adopted without notice and comment, and therefore are not subject to Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis under 5 U.S.C. § 604(a). We will perform appropriate regulatory flexibility analyses for any permanent rules we adopt at a later date. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification. With respect
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-92A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-92A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-92A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. B. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10J-2A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10J-2A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10J-2A1.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Kay Marinos, Oregon PUC Utility Program, at (503) 378-6730, or Elizabeth Valinoti McCarthy, FCC Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. Action taken by the Commission on June 15, 2010: Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-101A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-101A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-101A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-105A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-105A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-105A1.txt
                • original application cap and the limitation on cross-service translators? Should the Commission modify this exclusion to enable translator and AM station licensees to better meet the needs of their communities? We seek comment on these issues. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS A. Filing Requirements. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-106A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-106A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-106A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-107A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-119A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-119A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-119A1.txt
                • Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. In addition, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, we seek specific comment on how we might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-120A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-121A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-121A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-121A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-121A1_Rcd.pdf
                • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-124A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-124A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-124A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-133A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-134A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-134A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-134A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-138A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-13A1.txt
                • any change of law provisions in these commercial arrangements, or to commercial negotiations among the parties, or, alternatively, if we should provide an opportunity for re-negotiation of affected commercial agreements in light of comprehensive intercarrier compensation reform. procedural matters Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. This Notice will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-14A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-14A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-14A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All pleadings are to reference WC Docket No. 11-10. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-151A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-155A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-155A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-155A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-159A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-159A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-159A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-15A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All pleadings are to reference CC Docket Nos. 95-20, 98-10 and WC Docket No. 10-132. Comments may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-161A1.txt
                • to, or instead of, notice and comment procedures''). 47 C.F.R. Part 65; Rate of Return Streamlined Rules R&O, 10 FCC Rcd at 6812-15, paras. 51-57. 47 C.F.R. § 1.3; see also WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Northeast Cellular Tel. Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). 47 C.F.R. § 65.103(d). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2)(i); Amendment of Certain of the Commission's Part 1 Rules of Practice and Procedure and Part 0 Rules of Commission Organization, Report and Order, 26 FCC Rcd 1594, 1596 para. 6 (2011) (encouraging the migration to electronic filing). Our rules already designate rate prescription proceedings under section 205 as permit-but-disclose for ex parte purposes. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(10). 47 C.F.R. §§
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-162A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-162A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-162A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-169A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-169A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-169A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-16A1.txt
                • informally in a rulemaking proceeding may do so by submitting an original and one copy of their comments, without regard to form, provided only that the Docket Number is specified in the heading. Informal comments filed after close of the reply comment period, or, if on reconsideration, the reconsideration reply comment period, should be labeled ``ex parte'' pursuant to § 1.1206(a). Letters submitted to Commissioners or Commission staff will be treated in the same way as informal comments, as set forth above. Also, to the extent that an informal participant wishes to submit to each Commissioner a personal copy of a comment and has not submitted or cannot submit the comment by electronic mail, the participant may file an additional 5
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-184A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-185A1_Rcd.pdf
                • or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-186A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-20A1.txt
                • such devices. For purposes of the ex parte rules, ET Docket No. 04-186 is classified as a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Thus, ex parte presentations to decision-making personnel are permitted but must be disclosed on the record in accordance with the rules. Marcus has engaged in an extensive correspondence with OGC criticizing MSTV's compliance with the reporting requirement of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), which reads in relevant part: (2) Oral presentations. A person who makes an oral ex parte presentation subject to this section that presents data or arguments not already reflected in that person's written comments, memoranda or other filings in that proceeding shall, no later than the next business day after the presentation, submit to the Commission's Secretary, an original and
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-25A1.txt
                • Docket No. 10-88, 25 FCC Rcd 3982, 3984-85 ¶ 3 (2010). See 47 C.F.R. § 17.51(a). See 47 C.F.R. § 17.51(b). See Petition at 17. See Melissa McCarthy, Letter, 25 FCC Rcd 7118, 7118-19 (WTB SCPD 2010). See 47 C.F.R. § 17.47(a)(1). See Petition at 4-5, Appendix at 1-2 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, GC Docket No. 97-113, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. §
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-27A1.txt
                • Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 Twelfth Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. . 6. Ex Parte Presentations. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200 et seq. Requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0432 (tty). ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, that, pursuant to Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), and 8 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), and 158, the rule changes specified herein ARE ADOPTED and the Schedule of Application
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-28A1.txt
                • will send a copy of this Second Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. B. Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making 1. Filing Requirements. 70. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission Rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-29A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-29A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-29A1.txt
                • to provide service on the qualifying tribal land; and, (3) the tribal government will permit the applicant to site facilities and provide service on the tribal land. The tribal government will also be required to certify that the telephone penetration rate is equal to or less than 85%. 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110(f)(3)(ii)(A)-(C). Id. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601- 612 has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). Id. Policies to Promote Rural Radio Service and to Streamline Allotment and Assignment Procedures,
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-30A1.txt
                • See National Broadband Plan at Section 9.5. Id. See generally A Giant Leap at 6. COAT comments at 7. Id. at 20. Tribal Policy Statement, 16 FCC Rcd at 4081-82. National Broadband Plan at 184, Chapter 9.7. Id. See supra section H of this NOI. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216 47 C.F.R. § 1.206(b)(2). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. < M ^ } Ž Ÿ Ê Û ì ; < > ? L M O P ] ^ ` a | }  € � Ž � ` ž Ÿ ¡ ¢ É Ê Ì Í Ú Û Ý Þ ë ì î ï � - ˜ � � ¦ È æ í |
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-31A1.txt
                • Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. In addition, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, we seek specific comment on how we might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-32A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-34A1.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Paperwork Reduction Act. This Notice does not propose any information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). This Notice, therefore, does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-36A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-36A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-36A1.txt
                • Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. In addition, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, we seek specific comment on how we might ``further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.'' Ex Parte Rules Permit-But-Disclose. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-38A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-38A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-38A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the NPRM on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS):
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-3A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-3A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-3A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the NPRM on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. . Filers should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting comments. For ECFS filers, in completing the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-41A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-41A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-41A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All pleadings are to reference WC Docket No. 11-39. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-51A1.txt
                • parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. It is generally required to have more than a one or two sentence description of the presented views and arguments. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415, 1.419, and 1.430 of the Commission's rules, interested persons may file comments and replies regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice should refer to WC Docket No. 11-59. Comments may be filed using: (1)
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-53A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the Notice on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to WT Docket No. 10-4. Comments may be
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-54A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the FNPRM on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. . Filers should follow the instructions provided on the website for submitting comments. For ECFS filers, in completing the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-55A1.txt
                • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Parties wishing to file materials with a claim of confidentiality should follow the procedures set forth in section 0.459 of the Commission's rules. Confidential submissions may not be filed via ECFS but rather should be filed with the Secretary's Office following the procedures set forth in 47 C.F.R. § 0.459. Redacted versions of confidential submissions may
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-62A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-62A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-62A1.txt
                • ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments regarding the NPRM on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings must reference CG Docket Nos. 10-51 and 03-123. . Filers should follow the instructions provided on the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-68A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-68A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-68A1.txt
                • the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506 (c) (4). Congressional Review Act Analysis The Commission will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. Ex Parte Rules This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission Rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-6A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-6A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-6A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Fourth Further Notice should refer to PS Docket No. 06-229. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-74A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. COMMENT PERIOD AND PROCEDURES Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Notice of Proposed Rule Making should refer to PS Docket No.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-75A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-75A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-75A1.txt
                • Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the proposals considered in this NPRM. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix B. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-75A1_Rcd.pdf
                • Commission's ex parterules.133Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one-or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.134Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. B. Initial RegulatoryFlexibility Analysis 62. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),135the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the proposals considered in this NPRM. The text of the IRFA is set forth in Appendix B. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of our rules as well. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Report and Order Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and actions taken in the First Report and Order. The text of the FRFA is set forth in Appendix A.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-76A1_Rcd.pdf
                • ex parterules.285Persons making oral ex partepresentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.286Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of our rules as well. B. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Report and Order 145. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act,287we have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and actions taken in the First Report and Order. The text of the FRFA is set forth in Appendix
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-77A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-77A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-77A1.txt
                • at 2-3. See AFR at 2. See 098 Request at 2-3. website, much less that the construction of the website (as distinct from the Commission's substantive open Internet policy) is a matter of ``wide public attention.'' AFR at 2. Judicial Watch III, 185 F. Supp. 2d at 60. 47 C.F.R. § 0.470(e). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. See id. §§ 1.1206 (permit-but-disclose proceedings), 1.1208 (restricted proceedings); see also id. § 1.1204 (proceedings exempt from ex parte filing requirements). Id. § 0.470(e). See Letter from Kenneth F. Boehm, Chairman to Joel Kaufman, Associate General Counsel (Apr. 7, 2010) (Contingent AFR). We refer to NLPC's application for review as ``contingent'' because, as we explain infra, it is expressly contingent on whether the decisions
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-79A1.txt
                • (ERM); Short Range Devices; Road Transport and Traffic Telematics (RTTT); Radar equipment operating in the 76 GHz to 77 GHz range; Part 1: Technical characteristics and test methods for radar equipment operating in the 76 GHz to 77 GHz range'', EN 301 091 Ver. 1.3.3 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1307(b), 2.1091 and 2.1093. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. -612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). 5 U.S.C. § 604(a)(3). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C. § 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of ``small-business concern'' in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 632). Pursuant
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-81A1.txt
                • BAS would receive sufficient adjacent band interference protection under the proposed rule change. For example, establishing a fixed limit of 55 + 10 log(p) dB at and below 2490.5 MHz (5.5 megahertz from 2496 MHz, the bottom of the BRS/EBS band) would provide much of the protection provided for under the current rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603(b)(3). 5 U.S.C. § 601(6). 5 U.S.C.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-82A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB Docket No.
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-84A1.txt
                • presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Additional rules pertaining to oral and written presentations in ``permit-but-disclose'' proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Filing Requirements Comments and Replies. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (``ECFS''), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking Portal, or (3)
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-15A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-15A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-15A1.txt
                • FCC Rcd at 14779, ¶ 1. We also reject MMTC's claim that it was not required to serve its petition on other parties to the proceeding simply because the proceeding was designated as permit-but-disclose for ex parte purposes. Although the permit-but-disclose rules permit parties to submit written communications to the Commission without serving other parties, see 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202(b)(1), 1.1206, this does not relieve a petitioner from the obligation to serve a petition for reconsideration on other parties under section 1.106(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(f). Because we deny MMTC's petition, RSS's request that the petition be dismissed on this basis is moot. See RSS Opposition at 2. 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(h). For the same reason, we
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-18A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-20A1_Rcd.pdf
                • data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given toCommission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex partepresentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b).182In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f)183or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,.doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-21A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-21A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-21A1.txt
                • and convincing evidence' of the receipt of prior express consent from the called party, even when consent has been obtained orally, we seek comment on the extent to which our adoption of a written consent requirement would add to the compliance burden associated with this existing requirement.''). See supra para. 40. See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206 (discussing ex parte filings in permit-but-disclose proceedings). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L. No. 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, CC Docket No. 92-90, Notice of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-25A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-25A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-25A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-27A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-27A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-27A1.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Paperwork Reduction Act. This Further Notice does not propose any information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). This Further Notice, therefore, does not contain any new or modified ``information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002. Initial Regulatory
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-28A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-28A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-28A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-30A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-30A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-30A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-31A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-31A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-31A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-32A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-34A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-42A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-42A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-42A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-43A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-43A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-43A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-46A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-48A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-48A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-48A1.txt
                • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Additional rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Filing Requirements Comments and Replies. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using: (1) the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-51A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-51A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-51A1.txt
                • the Office of General Counsel (OGC) denying DTP's complaint against AT&T, Inc. (AT&T) for violation of the ex parte rules. II. BACKGROUND DTP's complaint is related to the now withdrawn, proposed AT&T/T-Mobile transaction, which was the subject of WT Docket No. 11-65. This matter was designated ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Thus, under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, written ex parte presentations and a summary of oral ex parte presentations had to be filed in the record of the proceeding. DTP's complaint alleged that AT&T failed to make the filings required by the rule. DTP's complaint stated: AT&T has engaged in an all out media campaign in the Washington, D.C. area for the purpose of influencing Federal Communications
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-53A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-54A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-56A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-56A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-56A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-61A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-61A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-61A1.txt
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-96-259A1.txt
                • Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, Section 1.1208 detailing the ex parte procedures for adjudicatory proceedings is waived. The entire proceeding both, rulemaking and adjudication, shall be treated as "non-restricted" for ex parte purposes in order to assist the Commission in developing a more complete record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made. 47 C.F. R. §§ 1.1200(a) and 1.1206. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). The Sunshine Agenda period is the period of time that commences with the release of public notice that a matter has been placed on the Sunshine Agenda and terminates when
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-149A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-149A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-149A1.txt
                • conclude that the measures proposed herein will benefit consumers and will create significant processing and operational efficiencies for the Commission. A. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1990, 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, (RFA) as amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847, requires an initial regulatory flexibility analysis in notice-and-comment rulemaking proceedings, unless we certify that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-190A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-190A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-190A1.txt
                • raised in the petitions for reconsideration of the Flexibility Order in light of the recent changes in our rules and the proposals detailed above. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Certification The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that an initial regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities." The RFA generally defines "small entity" as having the same meaning as the terms "small business," "small organization,"
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-26A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-26A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-98-26A1.txt
                • and proposals, and encourage all interested parties to participate in the resolution of this matter. V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations This is a non-restricted (i.e., permit-but-disclose) notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1990, 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, (RFA) as amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847, the Commission's Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis with respect to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is as follows: 1. Reason for Action: This Notice of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-333A1.pdf
                • ("Competitive Bidding Second Memorandum Opinion and Order"). Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding, Fifth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 403 (1994). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 27.210(b)(1)(2), 101.1209(b)(1(i). See 47 C.F.R.§ 1.2110(e)(2)(iii). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110(e)(2)(ii). See 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(3)(B). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998); Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21517 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 13 C.F.R. § 121.201, Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code 4812. U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1992 Census of
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-37A1.txt
                • imposing an undue burden on our licensees. In addition, we seek comment on whether we should impose E-9-1-1 requirements on GMPCS terminals. We request comment on all our proposals and welcome any other suggestions commenters may have in this proceeding. V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations 100. This is a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. 101. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis of the possible
              • http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-70A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-99-70A1.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.50 Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice Myles and International Transcription Services (ITS) with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified below for filing comments. 48 Id. 49 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98068.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98068.wp
                • Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov. For additional information on the proposed information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. C. Ex Parte Rules 31. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98153.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98153.wp
                • to jboley@fcc.gov. For additional information on the proposed information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. 102. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis. The regulatory flexibility analysis is found in Appendix A, attached. 103. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98302.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98302.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98302.wp
                • to fain_t@al.eop.gov. For additional information on the proposed information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. 46. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis. The regulatory flexibility analysis is found in Appendix A, attached. 47. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00004.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00004.txt
                • ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. B. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01015.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01015.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01015.txt
                • the adoption of the ITV nondiscrimination regulations and how would the adoption of such rules alleviate the identified harms? Are there any alternatives available to adopting nondiscrimination regulations that would achieve the same goals while using less restrictive means? Administrative matters Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01263.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01263.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01263.txt
                • is Michelle Russo at (202) 418-0270. The Cable Services Bureau contacts for this proceeding are Daniel Hodes, Kiran Duwadi, Ava Holly Berland or Andrew Wise at (202) 418-7200, TTY at (202) 418-7365 or (888) 835-5322, or at dhodes@fcc.gov, kduwadi@fcc.gov, hberland@fcc.gov, awise@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.txt
                • Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St, S.W., Room 1-0804, Washington, D.C. 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov. For additional information on the proposed information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. B. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/airtouch/atouchpn.html
                • should be clearly labelled with the party's name, proceeding (WTB/Pol 97-1), type of pleading (comment or reply comment) and date of submission. Copies of Air Touch's petition are available for public inspection and copying in the Policy Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 2025 M Street, N.W., Room 5202, Washington, D.C. Copies also are available from ITS. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a non-restricted proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted but subject to disclosure. For further information contact Rita McDonald at (202) 418-1310. - FCC -
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.wp
                • Commission. We seek comment on these tentative conclusions. E. Consumer Disclosure 22. The new distinction between primary and secondary residential lines may cause customer confusion. We seek comment, therefore, on whether the Commission should require carriers to provide consumers with a uniform disclosure statement describing this distinction. We Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-316 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 60 14 tentatively conclude that such a disclosure requirement would be consistent with applicable First Amendment standards and invite comment on that conclusion. We seek comment on whether, for example, all local exchange carriers that charge a SLC should be required to make the following statement: The subscriber line charge is a fee collected by your local telephone company to
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.wp
                • amend the rule by adding "or" after option (a). We find the correction of this inadvertent 182 183 omission to be good cause for amending the rule; hence, we adopt this rule change without prior notice pursuant to our authority under Section 1.412(c) of our rules. 184 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-248 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. 185 5 U.S.C. § 603. 186 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). 187 35 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations 71. This Further Notice is a permit-but-disclose rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, in accordance with the Commission rules, provided that they are disclosed as required. 185 B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 72. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.wp
                • this tentative conclusion. F. Federal Rules that Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With Proposed Rules 89. None. VI. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations 90. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below.192 B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis 91. This Notice contains proposed information collections. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
                • Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 87-313, 3 FCC Rcd 3195, 3437 (para. 449) (1988) (AT&T Price Cap Further Notice). 33 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348 (para. 27) (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1)). 34 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 9 formula for IXC PCIs spelled out in Section 61.44(b), "as further explained in § 61.44(e), (f), (g), and (h)." Section 61.44(e) requires price cap carriers calculating "w" to apportion "access costs" among price cap baskets using the methodology specified in Section 61.44(d).32 Proposed Section 61.45(b)(2) is intended to incorporate the requirements of current Section 61.44(d) into Section
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.wp
                • central office switch line card and digital facility channel unit components. See Analysis of -12 dBm Power Limit. As indicated, however, we also seek comment on other potential harmful effects. 23 We certainly want to avoid making minor improvements for PCM modems at the expense of far more advanced consumer technologies. 24 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 6 crosstalk, or other network detriment.22 In particular, we seek comment on the potential detrimental effects of the proposed power increase on advanced communications services, such as asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL), and other digital subscriber line (e.g., xDSL) services.23 We seek comment on whether the proposed rule change will allow consumers who access the Internet or other online services
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.wp
                • required.65 62 See Anti-Cramming Best Practices Guidelines at 13; NARUC White Paper at 3; National Consumers League Testimony at 7. 63 See 47 U.S.C. § 201(b). 64 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, 27 (citing 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(b)(1)) (1997). 65 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis 36. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this Notice, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-13.66 Public
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf
                • comments as responses to the IRFA. The Office of Public Affairs, Reference Operations Division, will send a copy of this NPRM and Notice of Inquiry, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. C. Ex Parte Presentations 68. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceedings subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, as revised.123 Additional rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206.124 D. Comment Filing Procedures 69. General. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on before October 30, 1998, and reply comments on or before November 16, 1998.
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98282.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98282.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98282.wp
                • 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the "Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996" (SBREFA). 65 B. Ex Parte 147. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a)(1), and 1.1206(b). C. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 148. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),250 the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the expected significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules suggested in this Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (CALEA Further NPRM). Written public comments
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.wp
                • LEC resold services. Is there a legal or policy basis for concluding that Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-70 49 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, para. 27 citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 50 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 51 Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 16143-79. 52 Id. at 16161-64, paras. 1374-83. 18 the inability to obtain access to combinations of network elements could impair a requesting carrier's ability to provide service to residential customers, but not business customers? 44. Parties should submit the text of any proposed rules they urge the
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.wp
                • for purposes of applying criterion D. 254. As noted above, states apply the definition of rural telephone company in Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-120 450 47 U.S.C. §§ 214(e)(2), 251(f)(1). 451 Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8936, para. 294. 452 Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8936, para. 294. 453 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 100 determining whether a rural telephone company is entitled to an exemption under section 251(f)(1) of the Act and in determining, under section 214(e)(2) of the Act, whether to designate more than one carrier as an eligible telecommunications carrier in an area served by a rural telephone company.450 Although the Commission used the rural telephone company definition to distinguish between
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
                • than they need, which would, at the same time, be unavailable to wireline carriers that need them. Therefore, we seek Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 402 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(b)(1)). 403 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 109 comment on whether technology-specific or service-specific overlays should only be implemented on an expanded or regional basis. 260.We also seek comment on the relationship between technology-specific or service- specific overlays and other numbering resource optimization methods discussed above, such as number pooling. For example, if we were to adopt pooling requirements for LNP-capable carriers, should we consider
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.wp
                • lead docket number in the proceeding (CC Docket No. 96-45), type of pleading (comment or reply comment), date of submission, and the name of the electronic file on the diskette. The label should also include the following phrase (Disk Copy ­ Not an Original.") Each diskette should contain only one party's 288 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 289 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419. 290 See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-204 63 pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters should sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th St. NW, Washington DC 20037. C. Initial Regulatory
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.txt
                • in this NPRM to facilitate our internal review process. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.txt
                • charges that result from federal regulatory action: (1) universal service-related fees; (2) subscriber line charges; and (3) local number portability charges. See id. at 7523-25, paras. 51-52. . See also Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Second Recommended Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 24744, 24771-72, paras. 69-70 (Jt. Bd. 1998). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. 47 U.S.C.
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97051.pdf
                • that a summary be included with all comments and reply comments, although a summary that does not exceed three pages will not count towards the 75 page limit for comments or the 35 page limit for reply comments. The summary may be paginated separately from the rest of the pleading (e.g., as "i, ii"). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.49. 43 1.1206. Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below.235 2. Regulatory Flexibility Act 77. See Appendix F, infra for the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. F. Comment Filing Procedures 78. General Requirements. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before March
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
                • for them to be present. The first category of proceedings established by the 1987 Ex Parte Order are those for 30 which there are no ex parte restrictions. In these "exempt" proceedings, parties and Commission decision-makers may communicate freely, without regard to the prohibitions and disclosure Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-387 _____________________________________________________________________________ Id. at § 1.1204. 31 Id. at § 1.1206. 32 Id. at § 1.1206(a). 33 Id. at § 1.1208. 34 Id. at § 1.1206(b). 35 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208(c)(1)(ii)(B). 36 Id. at § 1.1202(b). 37 7 requirements in the rules. The second category are those proceedings classified as "non-restricted" 31 or "permit but disclose." In non-restricted proceedings, parties and Commission decision-makers are permitted to engage in ex parte communications
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98278.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98278.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98278.wp
                • 17, 1997. 112 We note that, in the initial rulemaking proceeding, the California PUC advocated that business users not be allowed any local usage as part of the basic package, because business users can recover their costs through the price of their goods. California PUC comments at 5, filed Oct. 17, 1997. 113 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 114 See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the 30 53. We also seek comment on how we should determine what constitutes local usage. We note
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.wp
                • with the delivery of such traffic. This Commission is mindful of concerns that our jurisdictional analysis may result in allocation to Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-38 98 See Letter from James Bradford Ramsay, Assistant General Counsel, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC (December 14, 1998). 99 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. 100 See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 22 different jurisdictions of the costs and revenues
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
                • proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules.227 Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-48 228 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 53 views and arguments presented is generally required.228 Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. 2. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis 109.The Further NPRM contains either a proposed or modified information collection. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf
                • contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-238 233 524. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject of the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.1038 Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Person making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
                • all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. That this proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in this proceeding; it will also allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. We find that it is in the public interest to continue this
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis Section V sets forth the Commission's IRFA regarding policies and rules proposed in the Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rule Making. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments on the Declaratory Ruling and
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
                • affidavits or other supporting documentation. 10. See Application of Ameritech Michigan Pursuant to Section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 97-298, at 51 (rel. Aug. 19, 1997). 11. 47 C.F.R. 1.45. 12. See 47 C.F.R. 1.4(h). 13. See id. at 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 14. See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(b). 15. See id. at 1.1204(a)(6). 16. Cf. 1.1200(a); 1.1203. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_6_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_7_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_8_ 11. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_9_ 12. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_10_ 13. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_11_ 14. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_12_ 15. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_13_ 16. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_14_ 17. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_15_ 18. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_16_
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980762.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980762.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980762.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980762.wp
                • comments on this motion on or before May 20, 1998, and reply comments on or before June 5, 1998. For ex parte purposes, this is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Pursuant to procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 222, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies of the petitions, comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.wp
                • Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Three copies also should be sent to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, 2100 M Street, N.W., 8th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies of documents filed with the Commission may be obtained from the International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, 22 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. 5 N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800. Such documents are also available for review and copying at the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Parties may also file informal comments or an exact copy of formal comments electronically via the Internet at: . Only one copy of an electronic
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.wp
                • (Fourth Order on Reconsideration). 4. Fourth Order on Reconsideration, FCC 97-420, at para. 205. 5. Fourth Order on Reconsideration, FCC 97-420, at para. 206. 6. Kentucky Department of Education, Petition for Waiver (filed June 3, 1998) (Kentucky Petition). 7. Kentucky Petition at 2. 8. Kentucky Petition at 4. 9. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.415, 1.419. 10. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.wp 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.txt 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_6_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_7_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_8_ 11. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_9_ 12. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_10_
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.wp
                • these tentative conclusions. The Commission will publish this Public Notice in the Federal Register. In addition, the Commission's Office of Public Affairs Reference Operations Division, will send a copy of this 37 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 9 Public Notice, including this certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.37 Ex Parte Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but- disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Deadlines and Instructions for Filing Comments Interested parties may file comments in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed plan of reorganization on or before August 5, 1998 and reply comments on or before August 12. All filings should
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.wp
                • Myles (202) 418-1580. - FCC - __________________________________________ 1. See Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, FCC 97-330 (rel. Sept. 19, 1997) (OMB Control No. 3060-0756). 2. See Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, supra. 3. ^3 See id. at 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 4. ^4 See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(b). 5. Cf. 1.1200(a)-(b); 1.1203. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.wp 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.txt 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da981362.html 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_2_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_3_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_4_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_5_
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981492.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981492.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981492.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981492.wp
                • public policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings.[7]^(2) Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982433.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982433.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982433.wp
                • Commision's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Commission Secretary and serve Ceci Stephens, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, Room 544, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and ITS, 2131 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, with copies
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982504.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982504.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982504.wp
                • Commision's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Commission Secretary at Secretary, FCC, at 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 or at 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, from 4:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. and serve Ceci Stephens, Policy and Program
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990296.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990296.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990296.wp
                • to this Notice. 1. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings.[10]^(7) Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991170.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991170.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991170.wp
                • in making in-person presentations should send an e-mail expressing their interest, a brief summary of their proposed in-person presentation, their title, and their biographical data to [8]hnankin@fcc.gov (e-mail) and [9]gkennedy@fcc.gov (e-mail). Those parties selected to make in-person presentations must submit to the Commission written ex parte comments containing or summarizing their presentations by August 1, 1999, in compliance with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1206 (permit-but-disclose) and in the manner described below. While time constraints may limit the number of individuals that can make in-person presentations at the forum, we encourage all individuals to submit written ex parte comments by this same date. Written ex parte comments will help us focus the agenda for the public forum and
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991853.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991853.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991853.txt
                • the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or by calling ITS at (202) 857-3800 or faxing ITS at (202) 857-3805. We will continue to treat this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Common Carrier Bureau contact: Staci Pies, (202) 418-1580. See Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, CC Docket No. 98-147 et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 13 FCC Rcd 15280 (1998). See U S WEST Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, No. 98-1410 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 25, 1999) (order granting motion for remand). +D`ƒ
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
                • only in affidavits or other supporting documentation. See Application of Ameritech Michigan Pursuant to Section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, para. 15 (1997). 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See id. at §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See id. at §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See id. at § 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. §§ 1.1200(a); 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov „Ð � ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000037.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000037.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000037.txt
                • (1) Katherine Farroba, Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701 N. Congress Ave., PO Box 13326, Austin, TX 78711-3326; and (2) Jamie Heisler, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000165.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000165.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000165.txt
                • and copying during normal reference room hours at the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties are reminded that this proceeding has been designated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings. In this regard, memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Additional rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000335.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000335.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000335.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000335.txt
                • policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000750.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000750.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000750.txt
                • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000959.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000959.pdf
                • examination, it is determined to be defective and not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. EX PARTE STATUS Parties are reminded that this proceeding has been designated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings. In this regard, memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Additional rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001028.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001028.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001028.txt
                • due on or before June 9, 2000. Parties that wish to meet to discuss transition procedures and issues are requested to schedule meetings with the Competitive Pricing Division prior to the close of the comment period. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002159.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002159.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002159.txt
                • Energy, One South Station, Boston, MA 02110 and (2) Josh Walls, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002329.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002329.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002329.txt
                • three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. As set forth in the NOI (paragraph 61), parties are reminded that this proceeding has been designated a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. Parties should consult the NOI for further information concerning the applicable ex parte procedures. For further information, contact: Johanna Mikes or Christopher Libertelli, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002414.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002414.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002414.txt
                • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002530.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002530.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002530.txt
                • public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from ITS, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 314-3070. We will continue to treat this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. For further information, contact: Johanna Mikes, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-1535. Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da012746.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da012746.txt
                • filing ex parte submissions are requested to provide Verizon with a copy of each ex parte submission within 24 hours by fax, messenger, or overnight delivery.10 For purposes of this proceeding, any oral ex parte presentations from the Department of Justice and the Rhode Island Commission are deemed to be exempt ex parte presentations.11 To 8 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In- region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). 9 See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97245.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97245.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97245.wp
                • metropolitanareaswhereadditionalspectrumforpublicsafetyismostneeded,andwhichare precludedbythe1987TVfreeze?Consistentwiththisapproach,wealsoseekcommenton whetherweshouldprovidethesepartiesanopportunitytoamendtheirapplicationsorpetition proposalstoobtainanalogorDTVchannelsbelowchannel60.Weinvitecommenterstoaddress alltheseissues,andtosuggestothermethodsofdealingwithpendingapplicationsandpetitions. 23. InternationalCoordination.Inadditiontoprotectingservicesinadjacent frequencybandsfromharmfulinterference,weareobligatedtoconsidertheeffectsofU.S. operationsonneighboringcountries.Forthisreason,weproposetoapplytheinternational coordinationrequirementsofSection27.57ofourrulestofixed,mobile,andbroadcasting licenseesinthisspectrum.31Wewilladdressinternationalcoordinationrequirementsforthe publicsafetyspectruminasubsequentproceeding.32 24. MinorChangestotheTableofFrequencyAllocations.Finally,therearecurrently threefootnotestotheTableofFrequencyAllocationsthatpermittheoperationofnon-TV servicesinthe746-806MHzbandinallorpartoftheUnitedStates.33The716-890MHzband isalsocurrentlyavailableonaninterimbasisthroughfootnoteNG30tostationsinthe internationalfixedpublicradiocommunicationservice34southofMiami,Florida,onthecondition thatharmfulinterferenceisnotcausedtothebroadcastingserviceofanycountry.35Footnote NG30wasaninterimmeasurewhichisnolongerneeded.The800-830MHzbandisalso currentlyavailablethroughfootnoteNG43tofixedstationsintheCommonCarrierFixedPoint- 31See47C.F.R.§27.57. 32CoordinationofpublicsafetyandotherlandmobilefrequencieswithCanadaandMexicoaregovernedby specialrules.See,e.g.,47C.F.R.§90.619. 33See47C.F.R.§2.106. 34See47C.F.R.Part23. 35Specifically,footnoteNG30reads:Stationsintheinternationalfixedpublicradiocommunicationservicein Florida,southof25o30'northlatitude,maybeauthorizedtousefrequenciesintheband716-890MHzonthecondi- tionthatharmfulinterferencewillnotbecausedtothebroadcastingserviceofanycountry.Thisisaninterim allocationtheterminationofwhichwilllaterbespecifiedbytheCommissionwhenitisdeterminedthatequipments aregenerallyavailableforuseinbandsallocatedinternationallytothefixedservices. 11 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC97-245 to-PointMicrowaveService36inthesoutheasterncornerofAlaskaontheconditionthatharmful interferenceisnotcausedtothebroadcastingserviceofanycountry.37Wehavereviewedour recordsanddeterminedthattherearenolicenseesoperatingunderfootnoteNG43.Forthese reasons,andtoprovidepublicsafetylicenseeswithspectrumasfreeofotherusersaspossible, weproposetodeletefootnotesNG30andNG43.Additionally,theTVbroadcastbandsare allocatedtotheFixedServicetopermitsubscriptionTVoperations.38Weproposetodeletethis allocationforthe746-806MHzband.ThiswouldensurethatnosubscriptionTVoperations wouldbepermittedinthepublicsafetyportionoftheband.Atthesametime,becausethenon- publicsafetyportionofthebandisbeingreallocatedtothefixedandmobileservices,aswell asthebroadcastingservice,thisallocationbyfootnoteisnolongerneededtoallowsubscription TVoperationsinthenon-publicsafetyportionoftheband.Weinvitecommentonourproposal toeliminatefootnotesNG30andNG43,andmodifyfootnoteNG149toeliminatethe746-806 MHzbandfromitsprovisions. PROCEDURALMATTERS 25. ThisactionistakenpursuanttoSections4(i),303(c),303(f),303(g),and303(r) oftheCommunicationsActof1934,asamended,47U.S.C.§§154(i),303(c),303(f),303(g), and303(r). 26. InitialRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysis:Aninitialregulatoryflexibilityanalysisis containedinAppendixC. 27. ExPartePresentations.TherulemakingproposalsinthisSecondNoticeof ProposedRuleMakingconstituteanon-restrictednoticeandcommentrulemakingproceeding. Expartepresentationsarepermitted,exceptduringtheSunshineAgendaperiod,providedthey aredisclosedasprovidedinCommissionrules.Seegenerally47C.F.R.§§1.1202,1.1203,and 1.1206(a). 28. Comments.PursuanttoapplicableproceduressetforthinSections1.415and1.419 oftheCommission'sRules,interestedpartiesmayfilecommentsonorbefore[45daysafter 36MostoftheservicesintheDomesticPublicFixedRadioServicewererecentlymergedintoPart101,Fixed MicrowaveServices.TherulesfortheCommonCarrierFixedPoint-to-PointMicrowaveServiceareat47C.F.R. §101,SubpartI. 37Specifically,footnoteNG43reads:FixedstationsinthedomesticpublicradioservicesinAlaska,southof 56onorthlatitudeandeastof134owestlongitude,maybeauthorizedtousefrequenciesintheband800-830MHz, ontheconditionthatharmfulinterferencewillnotbecausedtothebroadcastingserviceofanycountry. 38Specifically,footnoteNG149reads:Thefrequencybands54-72MHz,76-88MHz,174-216MHz,470-512 MHz,512-608MHz,and614-806MHzarealsoallocatedtotheFixedServicetopermitsubscriptionTVoperations inaccordancewithPart73oftherules. 12 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC97-245 FederalRegisterpublication],andreplycommentsonorbefore[75daysafterFederal Registerpublication].AllrelevantandtimelycommentwillbeconsideredbytheCommission beforefinalactionistakeninthisproceeding.CommentsrelevanttothePublicSafety Proceedingandcommentsrelevanttoanysubsequentproceedingtoestablishservicerulesfor spectruminthe746-806MHzbandwillbeincorporatedintotherecordinthoseproceedings,and consideredbeforefinalactionistaken.Tofileformallyinthisproceeding,participantsmustfile anoriginalandfourcopiesofallcomments,replycomments,andsupportingcomments.If participantswanteachCommissionertoreceiveapersonalcopyoftheircomments,anoriginal plusninecopiesmustbefiled.CommentsandreplycommentsshouldbesenttoOfficeofthe Secretary,FederalCommunicationsCommission,Washington,D.C.20554.Commentsandreply commentswillbeavailableforpublicinspectionduringregularbusinesshoursintheFCC ReferenceCenter(Room239)oftheFederalCommunicationsCommission,1919M.Street, N.W.,Washington,D.C.20554. 29. ForfurtherinformationconcerningthisrulemakingcontactSeanWhiteat(202) 418-2453ore-mailswhite@fcc.gov,OfficeofEngineeringandTechnology,Federal CommunicationsCommission,Washington,D.C.20554. FEDERALCOMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION WilliamF.Caton ActingSecretary 13 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC97-245 APPENDIXA ProposedRules Part2oftitle47oftheCodeofFederalRegulationsisproposedtobeamendedasfollows: PART2--FREQUENCYALLOCATIONSANDRADIOTREATYMATTERS; GENERALRULESANDREGULATIONS 1.Theauthoritycitationforpart2continuestoreadasfollows: AUTHORITY:Sections4,302,303,and307oftheCommunicationsActof1934,as amended,47U.S.C.sections154,302,303and307,unlessotherwisenoted. 2.Section2.106,theTableofFrequencyAllocations,isamendedasfollows: a.Removetheexistingentriesfor614-790MHzand790-806MHz. b.Addentriesinnumericalorderfor614-746MHz,746-790MHzand790-806MHz. c.IntheInternationalFootnotesunderheadingI.,addfootnotesS5.293,S5.296,S5.300, S5.309,S5.310,S5.311,S5.312,S5.313,S5.314,S5.315,andS5.316innumericalorder. d.RemovefootnotesNG30andNG43. Therevisionsandadditionsreadasfollows: §2.106TableofFrequencyAllocations. ***** 14 Internationaltable UnitedStatestable FCCusedesignators Region1--allocationMHz
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.wp
                • accordance with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings 26. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1206. C. Authority 27. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(f), 303(r), 303(v), 303(x), and 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 303(f), 303(r), 303(v), 303(x), and 330(c). D. Comment Dates 28. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419,
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.wp
                • Comments should must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments on this NPRM provided in paragraph 50, infra. 48. Ex Parte Presentation. This is a permit-but-disclose rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 49. Authority. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). The Commission's Office of Public Affairs, Reference Operations Division, will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification and
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.txt
                • in the band 1610-1621.35 MHz for service uplinks and in the band 2483.5-2500 MHz for service downlinks, and is an applicant in the United States for the band 1990-2025 MHz for service uplinks and for the band 2165-2200 MHz for service downlinks. See 47 C.F. R. § 1.407. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21517 (1998); Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
                • 19079, 19114-26, ¶¶ 96-132 (1997); Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 48-50. Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 6-9, 48-50. See id. at ¶¶ 9, 50. See Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at ¶ 104. See Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 57-58. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. See infra Appendix C. Pub. L. No. 104-13. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
                • in accordance with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1206. C. Authority This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r). D. Comment Dates Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
                • accordance with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceedings 157. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 158. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making on or before October 9, 1997, and reply comments on or before October 24, 1997. To file formally in this proceeding, you must
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
                • Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Broadwave Albany, L.L.C., et al. Requests for Waiver of Part 101 Rules, DA 99-494 (rel. March 11, 1999). 47 C.F.R. §1.1208. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Broadwave Albany, L.L.C., et al. Requests for Waiver of Part 101 Rules, DA 99-494 (rel. March 11, 1999) at 2. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Id. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Sets Permit-but-Disclose Status for PDC Broadband Corporation Requests for Waiver, DA 00-1841 (rel. Aug. 14, 2000). Specifically, Pegasus sought waiver of 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.101, 101.105, 101.107, 101.111, 101.115. 101.139, 101.603. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Sets Permit-but-Disclose Status for PDC Broadband Corporation Requests for Waiver, DA 00-1841 (rel. Aug. 14, 2000). Northpoint Motion
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
                • MSS at 2010-2025 (for a total reallocation of 30 MHz from MSS), which could be used for relocation or other purposes. See supra note 97. See National Defense Authorization Act for 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-65, 113 Stat. 512 (1999). See, e.g., Comments of Siemens Corporation at 23. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21517 (1998); Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/da010786.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/da010786.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/da010786.txt
                • from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW, 20036, telephone 202-857-3800, facsimile 202-857-3805, TTY 202-293-8810. You may also view the FCC Final Report at http://www.fcc.gov/3G/ and the NTIA Final Report at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/threeg/ This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance or the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/News_Releases/2000/nrin0017.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/News_Releases/2000/nrin0017.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/News_Releases/2000/nrin0017.txt
                • issue, parties are asked to specify the bases upon which they believe the Commission can make the findings required to meet the statutory criteria for forbearance. . In addition, this proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Comments are due November 17, 2000. Reply comments are due December 4, 2000. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also can be obtained from International
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98190.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98190.wp
                • the activities of the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register." 71 Id. 21 IV. Procedural Issues A. Ex Parte Presentations 52. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification 53. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)65 requires that an initial regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities."66 The RFA generally defines "small entity" as having the same meaning as the
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98235.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98235.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98235.wp
                • Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov. D. Ex Parte Presentations 89. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. E. Contacts 90. For further information concerning this rulemaking proceeding, contact Charles Magnuson (202) 418-2150, International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 91. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 301, 303, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j),
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.wp
                • in the Federal Register (IB Docket No. 98-60) and reply comments within 10 days thereafter. 190.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that IB Docket No. 98-60 is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(b). 191. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Commission's Office of Public Affairs, Reference Operations Division, SHALL SEND a copy of this Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-78 93 Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. 192.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that PanAmSat Corporation petitions, motion and
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.wp
                • power.45 Accordingly, we will accept petitions for declaratory ruling that a foreign carrier lacks sufficient market power to affect competition adversely in the U.S. market. A declaratory ruling issued by the Commission may be cited in an applicant's Section 214 application for the purpose of establishing its eligibility for streamlined authorization on the affiliated route. 42 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206 (1997). 43 See MCI Comments at 4; see also WorldCom Reply Comments at 1 (limiting the blanket authorization to unaffiliated routes "would create a clear, simple, bright-line standard"). Contra BellSouth Reply Comments at 4; SBC Reply Comments at 11­12. 44 See, e.g., SBC Comments at 4­5; SBC Reply Comments at 5­6; see also Cable & Wireless Comments at 4 (asserting
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002251.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002251.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002251.txt
                • Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97296.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97296.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97296.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97296.wp
                • of 1995 Analysis. We have not proposed in this proceeding any proposed or modified information collection requirement. 27. Ex Parte Rules. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 28. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix A. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. In
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98057.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98057.wp
                • Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 - 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to fain_t@al.eop.gov. 92. Ex parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.wp
                • Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 - 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to fain_t@al.eop.gov. 77. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98305.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98305.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98305.wp
                • 98-305 33 Commission, Room C-1804, 445 12th St., S.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 - 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to fain_t@al.eop.gov. 101.Ex parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99257.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99257.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99257.wp
                • copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W.; CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. 75. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 76. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix A. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. In
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99327.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99327.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99327.txt
                • an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. . . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99353.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99353.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99353.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99353.txt
                • In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00083.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00083.txt
                • Original.'' Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.txt
                • In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00213.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00213.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00213.txt
                • In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00344.pdf
                • copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W.; CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. 44. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 45. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix B. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00345.pdf
                • Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. 41. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
                • Persons who need documents in such formats may contact Martha Contee at (202) 4810-0260, TTY (202) 418-2555, or mcontee@fcc.gov. 95. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 CFR Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 96. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix B. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98231.pdf
                • to interference resolution. 5. This proceeding was commenced in response to a petition for rulemaking filed by a group of over one hundred participants in the wireless cable industry,7 including wireless cable system operators, MDS and ITFS licensees, equipment manufacturers and consultants, (collectively "Petitioners"),8 who requested that Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-231 disclose" ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Those comments were due by July 2, 1998. See Establishment of Period to Comment on Ex Parte Presentations, Public Notice, MM Docket No. 97-217, DA 98-1119 (rel. June 12, 1998). A list of parties filing comments (the "July 2 Comments") in response to that Public Notice is also contained in Exhibit A. 9 WebCel Communications, Inc. ("WebCel"), an LMDS operator,
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00016.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00016.txt
                • diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.txt
                • from members of the public and others concerning this proceeding. Insofar as these presentations directly and primarily relate to the general policy question of appropriate standards for evaluating programming proposals for reserved noncommercial educational television channels, while incidentally mentioning the captioned application proceeding, they will be governed by the Commission's permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures as set forth in 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b) and placed in a file associated with the record concerning the captioned applications. Any similar communications received in the future will be treated in the same manner. All persons are reminded, however, that the matter involving the captioned applications remains a restricted proceeding under 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, until such time as the proceeding on the assignment applications is formally terminated
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00343.pdf
                • copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W.; CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. 33. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 34. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix C. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Further Notice. Written public comments are
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00360.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00360.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00360.txt
                • an Original.'' Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, parties must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.txt
                • Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. 122. This document is available in alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio cassette, and Braille). Persons who need documents in such formats may contact Martha Contee at (202) 4810-0260, TTY (202) 418-2555, or mcontee@fcc.gov. 123. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01262.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01262.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01262.txt
                • send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. . . Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix A. As required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da011264.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da011264.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da011264.txt
                • action, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission,
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.txt
                • Notice of Inquiry to facilitate our internal review process. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
                • to Revise the Experimental Radio Service Regulations, 11 FCC Rcd 20130, 20133 (1997) (proposing a new section 5.57(e) to accommodate signatures on electronically filed OET applications). 35 See Procedures for Electronic Filing of Applications in the Private Radio Services, 9 FCC Rcd 174 (1994). 36 SBC Comments at 5, 10. 37 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Comments at 2. 38 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 7 by counsel or by any party not represented by counsel must be signed.30 For example, in rulemaking proceedings, petitions for reconsideration, oppositions, and replies must conform to section 1.52.31 One commenter asserted that filing electronically results in the lack of a traceable signature.32 The only other parties commenting on this question simply referred to electronic signatures as part of
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.txt
                • December 2000, rather than on a count as of December 31, 2000. Adoption of a Mandatory FCC Registration Number, MD Docket No. 00-205, FCC 00-421 (released December 1, 2000). FRN Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at para. 9 FRN Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at para. 23-26. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). 47 CFR 1.1203 and 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. 603. 47 U.S.C. 154(i)-(j), 159, & 303(r). 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.txt
                • ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. C. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
                • Business Administration in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceedings 97. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 98. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments to the NPRM on or before [30 days after publication in the Federal Register] and reply comments on or before [45 days after publication in the Federal Register]. To file
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
                • with America Advancement Act of 1996 regarding the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, we ask a number of questions in our IRFA regarding the prevalence of small businesses in the affected industries. Comments must be filed in accordance with the same filing deadlines as comments filed in this Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 202 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 203 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. PAGE 50 proceeding, but they must have a separate and distinct heading designating them as responses to the IRFA. B.Paperwork Reduction Analysis 102. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking contains either a proposed or modified information collection. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, the Commission invites the general public to take
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99137.pdf
                • to establish asymmetrical rates for compensation.186 Fourth, there are questions regarding how to resolve questions of customer notification, and rates to calling parties that potentially would result in answers different from those for CPP offerings. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-137 187 5 U.S.C. § 603. 188 The IRFA is attached as Appendix B. 189 See generally Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 190 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. PAGE 37 74. Thus, we invite parties generally to comment on these and any other issues relating to the possible provision of CPP-like service by CMRS carriers wanting to use an interconnection approach. We also seek comment on the impact of such an approach
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
                • the Federal Register.214 B. Ex Parte Rules. 88. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiate and constitute a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules.215 Persons making oral ex parte presentations relating to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-141 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 216 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 217 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1). 48 Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.216 Other rules pertaining
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99205.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99205.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99205.txt
                • encourage the deployment of telecommunication services to tribal lands and other unserved areas. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This proceeding is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals suggested in this Notice. The IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments must
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.txt
                • such information and contributing to fluid secondary markets in the use of licensed spectrum. procedural matters Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2001/fcc01028.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2001/fcc01028.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2001/fcc01028.txt
                • the carrier holding the remaining 15 MHz of cellular spectrum in that market could pair with a 30 MHz PCS licensee without triggering the 45 MHz general CMRS spectrum cap. See generally Cellular Disaggregation Order. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.919. See id. § 20.6(e)(4)(A). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See id. § 603(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Id. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.wp
                • On May 29, 1998, the Commission sent letters, to the Chairs of the fifty-five Regional Planning Committees. The letter asked that the Chairs provide information to the Commission on their Year 2000 compliance initiatives. To date, the Commission has received little information in response to the letters. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FCC 98-191 543 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 93 206. Accordingly, we conclude that it is important to increase our efforts to alert the public safety communications community to the nature and seriousness of the Year 2000 problem and to ascertain both the current state of Y2K readiness and the progress and range of compliance initiatives in that community. When we refer to compliance initiatives, we mean efforts
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00327.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00327.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00327.txt
                • Rcd at 20866-80 (paras. 38-74). See, e.g., Public Notice, ``Commission Announces Details of Technical Roundtable on Implementation of Automatic Location Identification for Enhanced 911 Technologies,'' CC Docket No. 94-102, DA 99-1243 (June 23, 1999) (addressing technical matters regarding 911 Phase II Automatic Location Identification (ALI)). http:// www.fcc.gov//e911. Pub. L. No. 106-81, enacted Oct. 26, 1999. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
                • and Memorandum Opinion and Order are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve International Transcription Services (ITS) with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified below for filing comments. Filing Procedures. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991458.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991458.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991458.wp
                • laws. Issues concern whether the award of monetary damages can be construed as state rate regulation as proscribed by section 332(c)(3)(A) of the Communications Act. Interested parties may file comments and reply comments in accordance with the procedures outlined below. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000031.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000031.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000031.txt
                • such frequency coordination take? As another example, should such equipment in the guard band be subject to higher OOBE limits than required of equipment operating in the 30 MHz spectrum? If so, would frequency coordination be necessary? Procedural Matters This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.txt
                • Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Steven Weingarten, Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Room # 4-C224, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.txt
                • Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554) and a diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). It is also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Court Yard Level, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C.or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Dan Grosh or Patrick Forster, (202) 418-1310. - FCC - Revision of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Second
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0202/FCC-12-15A1.pdf
                • 25 FCC Rcd at 14779, ¶ 1. 33We also reject MMTC's claim that it was not required to serve its petitionon other parties to the proceeding simply because the proceeding was designated as permit-but-disclose for ex parte purposes. Although the permit- but-disclose rules permit parties to submit written communications to the Commission without serving other parties, see47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202(b)(1), 1.1206, this does not relieve a petitioner from the obligation to serve a petition for reconsideration on other parties under section 1.106(f) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.106(f). Because we deny MMTC's petition, RSS's request that the petition be dismissed on this basis is moot. SeeRSS Opposition at 2. 3447 C.F.R. § 1.106(h). For the same reason, we dismiss
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0620/DA-12-974A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0620/DA-12-974A1.pdf
                • T-Mobile License LLC WQGA687 III. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the Commission may adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires. We announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's revised ex parte rules. Parties are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/e911.doc
                • to pforster@fcc.gov. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing with the Commission's Secretary (Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554) and a diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding is a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Copies of this Public Notice in alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio- cassette, and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426 voice, (202) 418-7365 TTY, or at bmillin@fcc.gov.
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01088.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01088.html
                • during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, 445 12th St., S.W., Rm. CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(b). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this NPRM, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix C. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the NPRM. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. Comments must
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.pdf
                • this case''); Opposition of Sprint to Joint Motion, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (filed Aug. 10, 2001) at 2 (noting that ``[a]ll three parties to this proceeding have elected to seek judicial review of the [BTI] Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit''). 11 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(b). 13 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(c), 1.1206. 14 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1204. 15 47 U.S.C. 208. 16 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1206, 1.1204. 17 See, e.g., Letter from Alexander P. Starr, Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01- MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). 18 47
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-189A1.html
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.100 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 55. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this NPRM, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is contained in Appendix A. As required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the NPRM. Written public comments are requested
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05-191A1.html
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.230 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. V.B. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Order and the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-83A1.html
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.^29 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.^30 4. 23. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended, 5 U.S.C. S 604, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") for this NPRM, of the possible significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this NPRM.
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2034A1.html
                • provided.4 Because this request may implicate broadly applicable policy issues, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules.5 Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.6 Commenters seeking to protect the confidentiality of information produced shall follow the procedures set forth in Commission rule section 0.459.7 Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested persons may file comments on NEC BNS's waiver request on or before July 19, 2004.8 Reply comments must be filed on or before July 29,
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2092A1.html
                • proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we find it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules.4 Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in this proceeding will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.5 FILING PROCEDURES Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before July 27, 2004, and reply comments on or before August 10, 2004.6 Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2093A1.html
                • proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we find it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules.4 Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in this proceeding will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.5 FILING PROCEDURES Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before July 27, 2004, and reply comments on or before August 10, 2004.6 Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-33A1.html
                • Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available.4 We now release the BellSouth audit report. 5 In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 6 Accordingly, comments are due no later than March 9, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit?but?disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure.7 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.8 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-05-1916A1.html
                • Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available.4 We now release the Verizon audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 5 Accordingly, comments are due no later than August 30, 2005. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit?but?disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure.6 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.7 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-05-3180A1.html
                • Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available.4 We now release the BellSouth audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 5 Accordingly, comments are due no later than February 13, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit?but?disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure.6 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.7 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-06-126A1.html
                • requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available.5 We now invite comments on the AT&T audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 6 Accordingly, comments are due no later than March 27, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit?but?disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure.7 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.8 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-06-1385A1.html
                • the Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available. We now release the Qwest audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. Accordingly, comments are due no later than September 1, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System ("ECFS") or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012775.html http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/da012775.pdf
                • may also submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To receive filing instructions for e-mail comments, commenters should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and should include the following words in the body of the message, "get form 1.1206 of the Commission's rules.[11][10] Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to section 1.1206(b) of the commission's rules.[12][11] The full text of the comments is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington,
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/otherinfo/fcc97218.html
                • Flexibility Analysis is discussed fully in Appendix C of this Report and Order. B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding 55. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided, they are disclosed as outlined in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. '' 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 56. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 303(r) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. '' 151, 154(i), 303(r), 503(b), Part 1, Subpart A, Section 1.80(b), 47 C.F.R. ' 1.80(b), is amended to incorporate as a note the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement, and the Guidelines
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1513A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1513A1.pdf
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other provisions pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. @fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-0432 (TTY). Contacts For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the offices listed below: Audio Division, Media Bureau For FM service rules questions: Lisa Scanlan or Tom Nessinger at (202) 418-2700 Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau For general auction
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-105A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-11-105A1.pdf
                • original application cap and the limitation on cross-service translators? Should the Commission modify this exclusion to enable translator and AM station licensees to better meet the needs of their communities? We seek comment on these issues. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS A. Filing Requirements. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-28A1.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-28A1.pdf
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. In proceedings governed by Section 1.49(f) of the rules or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00c/releases/fc000063.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/00c/releases/fc000063.pdf
                • of the Commission's Rules to Adopt Regulations for Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems, PR Docket No. 93-61, Second Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 15182, 15194 (1997). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110(b)(4). Part 1 Second Further Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 478 (para. 187). 5 U.S.C. § 603. See Appendix A. Pub. L. No. 104-13. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc980228.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc980228.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/fc980228.wp
                • that the spectrum at 218-219 MHz provides the greatest benefit to the public. VIII. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Rules - Non-Restricted Proceeding 59.This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex Parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 60.As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, as amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847, 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible impact on small entities
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/smo96330.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/smo96330.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/02/releases/smo96330.wp
                • paragraph 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1981). 83. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 84. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 15 days from publication of notice in the Federal Register and reply comments on or before 7 days from the deadline for comments. To file formally in this proceeding you
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/fcc96287.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/fcc96287.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/04/releases/fcc96287.wp
                • Flexibility Act. Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1981). B. Ex Parte Rules--Non-Restricted Proceeding 68. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 69. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 21 days after date of publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 36 days after date of publication in the Federal Register. To
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da000368.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da000368.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/da000368.txt
                • S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the comments and replies should also be provided to José M. Ochoa, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Rm # 4-B544, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda describing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/fc970342.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/fc970342.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/05/releases/fc970342.wp
                • AUTHORITY to prescribe and set forth procedures for the implementation of the provisions adopted herein. E. Ex Parte Presentations 113. The Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is a permit but disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 50 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 51 F. Comments 114. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, interested parties may file comments on or before November 13, 1997, and reply comments on or before November 24, 1997. In addition, a courtesy copy should be delivered to Mark
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/fc970342.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/fc970342.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/fc970342.wp
                • AUTHORITY to prescribe and set forth procedures for the implementation of the provisions adopted herein. E. Ex Parte Presentations 113. The Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is a permit but disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 50 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 51 F. Comments 114. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, interested parties may file comments on or before November 13, 1997, and reply comments on or before November 24, 1997. In addition, a courtesy copy should be delivered to Mark
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/fcc96287.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/fcc96287.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/10/releases/fcc96287.wp
                • Flexibility Act. Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1981). B. Ex Parte Rules--Non-Restricted Proceeding 68. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 69. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 21 days after date of publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 36 days after date of publication in the Federal Register. To
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/fc970342.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/fc970342.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/fc970342.wp
                • AUTHORITY to prescribe and set forth procedures for the implementation of the provisions adopted herein. E. Ex Parte Presentations 113. The Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is a permit but disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 50 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 51 F. Comments 114. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, interested parties may file comments on or before November 13, 1997, and reply comments on or before November 24, 1997. In addition, a courtesy copy should be delivered to Mark
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/fcc96287.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/fcc96287.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/11/releases/fcc96287.wp
                • Flexibility Act. Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1981). B. Ex Parte Rules--Non-Restricted Proceeding 68. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 69. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 21 days after date of publication in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 36 days after date of publication in the Federal Register. To
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/fc970070.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/fc970070.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/15/releases/fc970070.wp
                • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN and COMMENT IS SOUGHT regarding the proposals, discussion, and statement of issues in the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 183.This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitte, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.202, 1.203, and 1.1206(a). 184.We certify that the proposed rules relating to the authorization of terrestrial repeaters will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 315 These rules, if adopted, would permit but not require the use of such repeaters to assist in providing higher quality service and should not significantly increase the cost of the systems. 185.Pursuant
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da991431.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da991431.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/16/releases/da991431.wp
                • copies of each filing should be sent to Gary D. Michaels, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, and Ramona Melson, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. A copy of each filing should also be sent to International See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. 14 3 Transcription Services, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B400, Washington, DC 20554. Copies of comments and reply comments will be available for inspection and duplication during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies also may be obtained from International Transcription Services, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W.,
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc960311.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc960311.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc960311.wp
                • has 41 is a multifaceted problem. We believe that the antenna silo performance Andrew claims to fix is only one aspect of the sharing problem and alone does not permit us to determine that co-frequency sharing is feasible. See Petition for Supplemental Comments of QualComm, Incorporated CC Docket No. 92-297, (filed Feb. 28, 42 1996). See generally, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. 43 See Third NPRM at ¶¶ 36-38. 44 Comments of CellularVision at 5. 45 In the Matter of Parts 2, 15, and 97 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Use of Radio Frequencies Above 40 46 GHz for New Radio Applications, (NPRM), 9 F.C.C. Rcd. 7078 (ET Docket No. 94-124). Reply Comments of CellularVision at 15. 47 13 demonstrated the
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc970082.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc970082.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/fc970082.wp
                • 429 or 430, supra, should address: Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility. The accuracy of the Commission's burden estimates. Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-82 47 CFR §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 635 47 CFR §§ 1.1415, 1.419. 636 PAGE 172 Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 432. In addition to filing the comments specified in paragraph 429, supra, with the Secre- tary, a copy of any such comments on the information
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/17/releases/lmdsbp_e.pdf
                • information collections contained herein should be submitted to Dorothy Conway, and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 - 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503 or via the Internet at fain_t@al.eop.gov. For additional information regarding the informa- tion collections contained herein, contact Dorothy Conway. C. Ex Parte Presentations Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-82 47 CFR §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 635 47 CFR §§ 1.1415, 1.419. 636 433. The Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules.635 D. Pleading Dates 434. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.1415
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/220_e.pdf
                • similar to those adopted for broadband PCS for calculating the amount of the unjust enrichment payments that Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-57 Partitioning Report and Order at paras. 34-35. 604 Section 90.709(d) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 90.709(d). 605 See Section 90.153 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 90.153. 606 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 607 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. 608 must be paid in such circumstances, and we seek comment on this proposal.604 H. LICENSING ISSUES 345. Section 90.709(d) of our Rules currently forbids partial assignment of Phase I 220 MHz licenses. However, since there are existing partial assignment rules for commercial mobile 605 radio stations in Part 90, we propose utilizing partial
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/18/releases/fc970057.wp
                • seek comment on this proposal.604 H. LICENSING ISSUES 345. Section 90.709(d) of our Rules currently forbids partial assignment of Phase I 220 MHz licenses. However, since there are existing partial assignment rules for commercial mobile 605 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-57 See Section 90.153 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 90.153. 606 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 607 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. 608 PAGE 144 radio stations in Part 90, we propose utilizing partial assignment procedures, similar to those 606 adopted for broadband PCS, to review 220 MHz partitioning and disaggregation transactions. Partial assignment applications would be placed on public notice and subject to petitions to deny. The parties would be required to submit an FCC
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/20/releases/fc970217.wp
                • L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq. (1981). C. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceeding 137. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-217 71 D. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis 138. This Second Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making does not contain either a proposed or modified information collection. E. Comment Dates 139. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/fc970305.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/fc970305.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/fc970305.wp
                • LMS systems without significant disruption to their operations. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-305 29 VI. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 80. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceeding. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 81. Regulatory Flexibility. The Initial and Final Regulatory Flexibility Analyses for this Memorandum Opinion and Order, as required by Sections 603 and 604, respectively, of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. §§ 603-604, is set forth in Appendix B and Appendix C. 82. The Secretary shall send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, including the Final
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/21/releases/lmsbp_g.pdf
                • LMS systems without significant disruption to their operations. Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-305 29 VI. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 80. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceeding. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 81. Regulatory Flexibility. The Initial and Final Regulatory Flexibility Analyses for this Memorandum Opinion and Order, as required by Sections 603 and 604, respectively, of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. §§ 603-604, is set forth in Appendix B and Appendix C. 82. The Secretary shall send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, including the Final
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/22/releases/pcsbipg.pdf
                • AUTHORITY to prescribe and set forth procedures for the implementation of the provisions adopted herein. E. Ex Parte Presentations 113. The Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is a permit but disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 50 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 51 F. Comments 114. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, interested parties may file comments on or before November 13, 1997, and reply comments on or before November 24, 1997. In addition, a courtesy copy should be delivered to Mark
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/da991103.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/da991103.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/da991103.txt
                • FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. For further information concerning this proceeding, contact Lisa Hartigan or Anne Napoli, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0660, or Bob Reagle, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (717) 338-2801. This is a permit-but-disclose proceeding pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. - FCC - The Commission recently modified and clarified the Paging service and competitive bidding rules. See Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Future Development of Paging Systems, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration and Third Report and Order, FCC 99-98 (rel. May 24, 1999). ("Reconsideration Order"). See Reconsideration Order, FCC 99-98, ¶¶
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc970059.wp
                • non- mutually exclusive paging applications filed as of the adoption date of this Order. B. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceeding 228. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 229. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments to the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on or before April 17, 1997, and reply comments on or before May 1, 1997. To file formally in this proceeding, you must
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/26/releases/fc990098.wp
                • With regard to our competitive bidding rules for the paging service, we direct the Bureau, consistent with the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, to seek further comment on: the license groupings and sequence of the paging auctions; an appropriate stopping rule for the paging auctions; and what information, Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-98 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 563 5 U.S.C. § 604. 564 Id. § 601 et seq. 565 86 such as bidder identities, should be disclosed to bidders during the paging auctions. We decline to require that bidders specify each individual license on which they will bid and submit an upfront payment for each license; permit bid withdrawal without monetary liability; or modify our anti-collusion rule
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/fc970391.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/fc970391.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/30/releases/fc970391.wp
                • Flexibility Act. Pub. L. No. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1981). B. Ex Parte Rules--Non-Restricted Proceeding 173. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commissio n Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 174. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days after the date o f publication of this Second Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the Federal Register, and reply comments on or before 45
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000219.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000219.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da000219.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. QUALCOMM's Petition for Declaratory Ruling is available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., 20554. A copy may also be attained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20036, or by calling (202) 857-3800. For further information, contact Nicole Oden of the Auctions
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da001075.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da001075.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da001075.txt
                • Bureau, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Suite 4-A628, Washington, DC 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da002404.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da002404.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da002404.txt
                • Telecommunications Bureau, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., 4-A628, Washington, DC 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010788.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010788.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da010788.txt
                • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. . The petitions are also available for public inspection and copying in the Reference Center, Room CY A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the petitions are also available from ITS, Room CY-B400, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554, or by calling (202) 857-3800. , including ``get form to ''
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020260.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020260.txt
                • presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.32 Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.33 For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the following employees of Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0660: For legal questions: Howard Davenport For general auction questions:Craig Bomberger or Martha Stancill For software questions: Karen Wrege ­ FCC ­ 30 Comments and reply comments in response to this Public Notice may not
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020971.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/31/releases/da020971.txt
                • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.8 Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.9 Parties may obtain copies of the WTB Letter at the WTB website, http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/releases2002_1.html , and the Application for Review at the FCC website, http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. The documents are also available for public inspection and copying in the Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the petitions are also available from Qualex
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000031.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000031.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000031.txt
                • such frequency coordination take? As another example, should such equipment in the guard band be subject to higher OOBE limits than required of equipment operating in the 30 MHz spectrum? If so, would frequency coordination be necessary? Procedural Matters This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000134.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000134.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/33/releases/da000134.txt
                • Accordingly, the period for final ex parte and other presentations on issues in this proceeding other than those issues decided in the First Report and Order will be extended until 7 p.m. on Monday, January 31, 2000. Procedural Matters This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001913.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001913.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/34/releases/da001913.txt
                • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and poltential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Karen Franklin of the Policy and Rules
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000145.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000145.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000145.txt
                • Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Rm # 4-A624,Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000191.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000191.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000191.txt
                • TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Rm # 4-A624, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000318.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000318.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000318.txt
                • Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Steven Weingarten, Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Room # 4-C224, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000760.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000760.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/da000760.txt
                • the petitions for reconsideration in light of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 309, 47 C.F.R. § 1.429 and any other public interest considerations. All oppositions should reference the docket number of this proceeding, i.e., WT Docket No. 97-82. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/fc000197.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/fc000197.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/35/releases/fc000197.txt
                • and F block rules for the benefit of consumers and the economy. Procedural matters and ordering clauses Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed pursuant to the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA''), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals and tentative conclusions set forth in the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``Notice'') in WT Docket No. 97-82. The IRFA is set forth as Appendix A. Written public
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/fc000159.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/fc000159.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/fc000159.txt
                • Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for the Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is contained in Appendix D. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment Dates Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before July 5, 2000, and reply comments on or before July 20, 2000. All relevant and timely comments will be considered by the Commission before final action is taken in this
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/fc970140.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/fc970140.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/41/releases/fc970140.wp
                • Small Business Administration in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act. See 47 U.S.C. 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceeding 107. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis 108. This Further Notice contains either a proposed or modified information collection. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this Report and Order and
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/fc990101.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/fc990101.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/42/releases/fc990101.wp
                • market entry through streamlined licensing procedures, and promote technological innovation by eliminating unnecessary regulatory burdens. VI. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding 33. This is a permit-but-disclose rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 34. With respect to this present Further Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), see generally 5 U.S.C. 603, is contained in Appendix A. The IRFA addresses the expected impact on small entities of the proposals made in this document, and requests written comments on these proposals. To fulfill the mandate of the Contract with
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020200.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020200.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.25 Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.26 For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Howard Davenport (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Craig Bomberger (202) 418-0660 Kathy Garland (717) 338-2888 - FCC - 23 Comments and reply comments in response to this Public Notice may not be filed
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020607.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/44/releases/da020607.txt
                • oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.9 Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.10 Parties may obtain copies of the Report and Order and petitions for reconsideration at the FCC website, http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. The petitions are also available for public inspection and copying in the Reference Center, Room CY A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the petitions are also available from Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020265.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/45/releases/da020265.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.24 Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.25 22 Comments should not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System. 23 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 24 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 25 Id. 10 For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Denise Coca (202) 418-0660 For general
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021257.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021257.txt
                • or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.29 Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte 27 Comments and reply comments in response to this Public Notice may not be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System, which is used for the Commission's docketed rule making proceedings. 28 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 29 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 12 presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.30 For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: David Hu (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions: Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021628.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/da021628.txt
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.10 Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.11 For further information concerning this proceeding, contact the Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, as listed below: For legal questions: Francis Gutierrez (202) 418-0660 For general auction questions:Lyle Ishida (202) 418-0660 Lisa Stover (717) 338-2888 For service rule questions: Brian Marenco (202) 418-0838 - FCC - Electronic Comment Filing System, which is used for
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020015.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/46/releases/fc020015.txt
                • address>." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. 158. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, at the Federal Communica- tions Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies of comments and reply 342 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 343 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. 344 See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-15 56 comments are available through the Commission's duplicating contractor: Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202-863-2893, facsimile 202-863-2898, or via e-mail qualexint@aol.com. E. Further Information 159.
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/53/releases/fc000418.txt
                • Bureau Seeks Comment on Broadwave Albany, L.L.C., et al. Requests for Waiver of Part 101 Rules, DA 99-494 (rel. March 11, 1999). 645 47 C.F.R. §1.1208. 646 Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Broadwave Albany, L.L.C., et al. Requests for Waiver of Part 101 Rules, DA 99-494 (rel. March 11, 1999) at 2. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 647 Id. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Sets Permit-but-Disclose Status for PDC Broadband Corporation Requests for Waiver, DA 00-1841 (rel. Aug. 14, 2000). 648 Specifically, Pegasus sought waiver of 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.101, 101.105, 101.107, 101.111, 101.115. 101.139, 101.603. 649 Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Sets Permit-but-Disclose Status for PDC Broadband Corporation Requests for Waiver, DA 00-1841 (rel. Aug. 14,
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da012605.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/82/releases/da012605.txt
                • 82 Filing Window Public Notice"). 24 See FCC Announces Changes in Filing Procedures, Public Notice, DA 01-2430 (rel. Oct. 17. 2001); FCC Announces Change in Filing Location for Paper Documents, Public Notice, DA 01-2436 (rel. Oct. 17, 2001); Clarification on FCC's Announced Changes in Filing Procedures, Public Notice, DA 01-2451 (rel. Oct. 18, 2001). 25 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 12 arguments presented is generally required.26 Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.27 For further information concerning this proceeding, contact: Video Services Division: Shaun Maher at (202) 418-1600 Auctions and Industry Analysis Division: Kenneth Burnley, Legal Branch at (202) 418-0660 Linda Sanderson, Operations Branch
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc000209.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc000209.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc000209.txt
                • sanctions should be applied in the event of non-compliance with those terms and conditions. Procedural Matters Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This proceeding is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Commission has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for the Report and Order, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act. See Appendix C. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act. See Appendix D. Comment Dates
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc000403.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc000403.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc000403.txt
                • at ¶¶ 110, 111. 47 U.S.C. § 332; see, e.g., Revision of Part 22 and Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to Facilitate Future Development of Paging Systems, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, WT Docket No. 96-18, 12 FCC Rcd 2732, 2737 (1997). See supra at ¶ 109. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 604. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. This list includes comments and reply comments submitted in response to RM-9405. See 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. The RFA has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (``CWAAA''). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc970060.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc970060.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc970060.wp
                • that the petitions for reconsideration of the Competitive Bidding Fifth Memorandum Opinion and Order, to the extent that they are addressed herein, ARE DENIED. 108. Ex Parte Presentations. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 109. Authority. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 5(b), 5(c)(1), 303(r), and 309 (j) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 155(b), 156(c)(1), 303(r), and 309(j). 110. Comment. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, interested parties may file comments on or before March 27,
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc970413.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc970413.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/general/releases/fc970413.wp
                • 1164, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1981). Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-413 110 B. Ex Parte Presentations 198. This Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is a permit but disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comments 199. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, interested parties may file comments on or before February 6, 1998, and reply comments on or before February 17, 1998. In addition, a courtesy copy should be delivered to Josh Roland and Ken Burnley, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011114-hearing.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011114-hearing.txt
                • the terms of the statute August 17, 1991, and we seek comment on the status and the nature of the compliance efforts with that mandate.103 We seek comment on these issues and any other issues associated with hearing aid compatibility, particularly as it concerns telephones used with wireless services. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Rules 36. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's ex parte rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this rulemaking proceeding proposing the amendment of the Commission's rule governing hearing aid compatible telephones is a permit-but-disclose proceeding. Provided they are disclosed in accordance with the Commission's rules, ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period. B. Filing Procedures 37. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da012722.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da012722.txt
                • opposition, comment, or reply comment, as appropriate, addressing all issues raised by the three petitions on which they wish to be heard. Oppositions and comments are due December 19, 2001 and reply comments are due January 4, 2002. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da012885.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/da012885.txt
                • the notice and comment requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act and is arbitrary and capricious.7 The Petitions are available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), this proceeding is designated as a "permit but disclose" proceeding and subject to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules.8 Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible, provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Interested parties may file comments or oppositions responding to the petitions on or before January 11, 2002 and reply comments on or before January 28, 2002. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc00-348.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc00-348.pdf
                • Comments at 9; IACP Comments at 5; NPSTC Comments at 9-10. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.205. See former 47 C.F.R. § 90.283(c) (1997) (limiting transmitter power of Part 90 users sharing VHF public coast spectrum to 50 watts), (removed by the Maritime Third Report and Order at Appendix F). 47 C.F.R. § 80.215(c)(1). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See Development of Operational, Technical and Spectrum Requirements For
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc01-351.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/fcc01-351.txt
                • 4(j), 7, 10, 201, 202, 208, 214, 251(e)(3), 301, 303, 308, 309(j), and 310 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j), 157, 160, 210, 202, 208, 214, 251(e), 301, 303, 308, 309(j), and 310, the FIRST REPORT AND ORDER in WT Docket No. 00-110 is hereby ADOPTED. 169 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-351 27 72. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Fourth Report and Order, in CC Docket No. 92-105, filed by Maritel, Inc. on September 28, 2000, IS GRANTED to the extent described herein. 73. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that authority is hereby delegated to the Chiefs of the Common
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/brsebs/releases/fcc97360.txt
                • We also solicit alternative solutions for maintaining the accountability of ITFS licensees. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS . For purposes of this nonrestricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding, members of the public are advised that ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed under the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203 and 1.1206(a). . Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before December 9, 1997 and reply comments on or before January 8, 1998. All relevant and timely comments will be considered by the Commission before final action is taken in this proceeding. To file formally in this proceeding, participants
              • http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da010970.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da010970.pdf
                • 24.415(j). Third, Space Data asks the Bureau to clarify that the antenna registration requirements set forth in 47 C.F.R. 17.4, 17.7, and 24.55, do not apply to antennas that are affixed to high-altitude, balloon-borne ``repeater'' transceivers. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98068.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98068.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98068.wp
                • Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov. For additional information on the proposed information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. C. Ex Parte Rules 31. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98153.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98153.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98153.wp
                • to jboley@fcc.gov. For additional information on the proposed information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. 102. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis. The regulatory flexibility analysis is found in Appendix A, attached. 103. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98302.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98302.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1998/fcc98302.wp
                • to fain_t@al.eop.gov. For additional information on the proposed information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. 46. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis. The regulatory flexibility analysis is found in Appendix A, attached. 47. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/1999/fcc99406.doc
                • to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. B. Ex Parte Rules 30. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/da000012.doc
                • Paperwork Reduction Act Statement 15. The requirements proposed in this Notice have been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork reduction Act of 1995 (the "1995 Act") and do not impose new or modified information collection requirements on the public. C. Ex Parte Rules 16. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00004.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00004.txt
                • ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. B. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00165.doc
                • 50. Federal Rules that May Overlap, Duplicate, or Conflict with the Proposed Rules: None. B. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceedings 51. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1201, 1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 52. Pursuant Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 & 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before 30 days after publication in the Federal Register and reply comments on or before 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2000/fcc00195.doc
                • ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. B. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01015.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01015.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01015.txt
                • the adoption of the ITV nondiscrimination regulations and how would the adoption of such rules alleviate the identified harms? Are there any alternatives available to adopting nondiscrimination regulations that would achieve the same goals while using less restrictive means? Administrative matters Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01263.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01263.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Notices/2001/fcc01263.txt
                • is Michelle Russo at (202) 418-0270. The Cable Services Bureau contacts for this proceeding are Daniel Hodes, Kiran Duwadi, Ava Holly Berland or Andrew Wise at (202) 418-7200, TTY at (202) 418-7365 or (888) 835-5322, or at dhodes@fcc.gov, kduwadi@fcc.gov, hberland@fcc.gov, awise@fcc.gov. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/fcc00162.doc
                • Federal Communications Commission, Room 1-C804, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov. For additional information on the information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. B. Ex Parte Rules 16. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.txt
                • Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St, S.W., Room 1-0804, Washington, D.C. 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov. For additional information on the proposed information collection requirements, contact Judy Boley at 202-418-0214 or via the Internet at the above address. B. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97034.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97034.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97034.wp
                • in the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street N.W., Washington D.C. 20554. 10. This proceeding will be treated as a non-restricted notice and comment proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 11. Accordingly, notice is hereby given of the Commission's consideration of the voluntary ratings proposal submitted by NAB, NCTA and MPAA, and comment is sought regarding such proposal. Action by the Commission, February 6, 1997, by Public Notice (FCC 97-34), Chairman Hundt, Commissioners Quello, Ness and Chong. Chairman Hundt issuing a separate statement. -FCC- APPENDIX January 17, 1997 Mr. William
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97321.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97321.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97321.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97321.wp
                • post electronic mail submissions in their entirety on its Internet site. All formal and informal comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street N.W., Washington D.C. 20554. 11. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/1999/da992661.doc
                • with Commission staff should call Sunil Daluvoy, Cable Services Bureau, at (202) 418-1032. The public is reminded that this proceeding is being treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da000196.doc
                • Petition alleges that the Dumont Oaks covenants violate the Commission's rule preempting restrictions that impair installation, maintenance or use of over-the-air reception devices (satellite dishes and antennas) by requiring prior approval and restricting placement. The Palatine in Potomac is located in Potomac, Maryland. For purposes of our ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules (``Permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before March 6, 2000 and replies on or before March 21, 2000. Please place the case identifier, CSR-5503-O, on all filings. The Petition is available for public inspection in the Commission's Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level: 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 (202)
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da000258.doc
                • Commissioners of Citrus County, Florida (`Citrus County'). Citrus County asks whether a group of homes within an unincorporated subdivision of the county would be considered a multiple dwelling unit (`MDU') that is exempt from the uniform rate requirement pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §76.984(c)(2). For purposes of our ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules ("Permit-but-disclose proceeding"). Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before February 25, 2000, and replies on or before March 3, 2000. Please place the case identifier, CSR-5514, on all filings. The petition is available for public inspection in the Commission's Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level: 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 (202)
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da000434.doc
                • of over-the-air reception devices (satellite dishes and antennas) by adding an unreasonable expense to the installation, by limiting the color of the dish, by requiring screening of the dish, and by restricting its height and placement. The Plantation is located in Leesburg, Florida. For purposes of our ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules (``Permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before March 30, 2000 and replies on or before April 14, 2000. Please place the case identifier, CSR-5507-O, on all filings. The Petition is available for public inspection in the Commission's Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level: 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 (202)
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da000670.doc
                • (collectively ``Gemstar'') filed a petition for special relief asking the Commission to order Time Warner Cable (``Time Warner'') to discontinue removing data provided by Gemstar in the vertical blanking interval (VBI) of local broadcast television stations carried on Time Warner's cable systems. For purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules ("Permit-but-disclose proceeding") Comments and oppositions to Gemstar's petition must be filed within 20 days of the release of this public notice. Replies are due 10 days thereafter. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5528-Z. The petition is available for public inspection in the Commission's Reference Information Center: 445 12th Street,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da000689.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da000689.txt
                • the Cable Services Bureau will treat the proceeding as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da000719.doc
                • Canada Vista's covenants violate the Commission's rule preempting restrictions that impair installation, maintenance or use of over-the-air reception devices (satellite dishes and antennas) by imposing antenna screening requirements that add an unreasonable expense to the installation. Canada Vista is located in Scottsdale, Arizona. For purposes of our ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules (``Permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Parties may file responses to the Petition on or before May 1, 2000 and replies on or before May 16, 2000. Please place the case identifier, CSR-5531-0, on all filings. The Petition is available for public inspection in the Commission's Reference Information Center, Court Yard Level: 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 (202)
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Public_Notices/2000/da001406.doc
                • that a new DTV-only television station which seeks carriage of only a single channel of video programming is entitled to mandatory carriage of such programming, subject to other applicable existing requirements of the Communications Act and Part 76 of the Commission's rules. For purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules, this proceeding will be considered as non-restricted pursuant to Section 1.1206 (``permit-but-disclose proceeding''). Comments and oppositions to WHDT's petition must be filed by August 4, 2000. Replies are due August 18, 2000. All filings should reference the case identifier assigned to this proceeding, CSR 5562-Z. The petition is available for public inspection in the Commission's Reference Information Center: 445 12th Street, S.W. Room CY A-257 Washington, D.C. 20554 202-418-7092 Copies of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Comments/airtouch/atouchpn.html
                • should be clearly labelled with the party's name, proceeding (WTB/Pol 97-1), type of pleading (comment or reply comment) and date of submission. Copies of Air Touch's petition are available for public inspection and copying in the Policy Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 2025 M Street, N.W., Room 5202, Washington, D.C. Copies also are available from ITS. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a non-restricted proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted but subject to disclosure. For further information contact Rita McDonald at (202) 418-1310. - FCC -
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1995/fcc95419.html
                • comment on the questions and proposals set forth above and encourage participation by interested parties. VII. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte 59. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 60. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals suggested in this document. The IRFA is set forth in Appendix A. Written public comments are requested in the IRFA. These comments must be
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/cor97316.wp
                • Commission. We seek comment on these tentative conclusions. E. Consumer Disclosure 22. The new distinction between primary and secondary residential lines may cause customer confusion. We seek comment, therefore, on whether the Commission should require carriers to provide consumers with a uniform disclosure statement describing this distinction. We Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-316 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 60 14 tentatively conclude that such a disclosure requirement would be consistent with applicable First Amendment standards and invite comment on that conclusion. We seek comment on whether, for example, all local exchange carriers that charge a SLC should be required to make the following statement: The subscriber line charge is a fee collected by your local telephone company to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97248.wp
                • amend the rule by adding "or" after option (a). We find the correction of this inadvertent 182 183 omission to be good cause for amending the rule; hence, we adopt this rule change without prior notice pursuant to our authority under Section 1.412(c) of our rules. 184 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-248 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. 185 5 U.S.C. § 603. 186 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). 187 35 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations 71. This Further Notice is a permit-but-disclose rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, in accordance with the Commission rules, provided that they are disclosed as required. 185 B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 72. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97316.pdf
                • Commission. We seek comment on these tentative conclusions. E. Consumer Disclosure 22. The new distinction between primary and secondary residential lines may cause customer confusion. We seek comment, therefore, on whether the Commission should require carriers to provide consumers with a uniform disclosure statement describing this distinction. We Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-316 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 60 14 tentatively conclude that such a disclosure requirement would be consistent with applicable First Amendment standards and invite comment on that conclusion. We seek comment on whether, for example, all local exchange carriers that charge a SLC should be required to make the following statement: The subscriber line charge is a fee collected by your local telephone company to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97317.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97317.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1997/fcc97317.wp
                • access lines of Lifeline customers electing toll-blocking services, Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-317 47 U.S.C. § 254(d) (stating that all telecommunications carriers that provide interstate telecommunications 13 services shall contribute to universal service). See 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (requiring the Commission to consider the impact of its policies on small entities). 14 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206, 1.1210-1216. 15 See 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. The RFA was amended by the "Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 16 Act of 1996" (SBREFA), Title II of the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). 4 although we are not aware of any. We recognize that non-IXCs might suggest that
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98090.wp
                • this tentative conclusion. F. Federal Rules that Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With Proposed Rules 89. None. VI. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations 90. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below.192 B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis 91. This Notice contains proposed information collections. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98164.wp
                • Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 87-313, 3 FCC Rcd 3195, 3437 (para. 449) (1988) (AT&T Price Cap Further Notice). 33 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348 (para. 27) (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1)). 34 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 9 formula for IXC PCIs spelled out in Section 61.44(b), "as further explained in § 61.44(e), (f), (g), and (h)." Section 61.44(e) requires price cap carriers calculating "w" to apportion "access costs" among price cap baskets using the methodology specified in Section 61.44(d).32 Proposed Section 61.45(b)(2) is intended to incorporate the requirements of current Section 61.44(d) into Section
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98221.wp
                • central office switch line card and digital facility channel unit components. See Analysis of -12 dBm Power Limit. As indicated, however, we also seek comment on other potential harmful effects. 23 We certainly want to avoid making minor improvements for PCM modems at the expense of far more advanced consumer technologies. 24 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 6 crosstalk, or other network detriment.22 In particular, we seek comment on the potential detrimental effects of the proposed power increase on advanced communications services, such as asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL), and other digital subscriber line (e.g., xDSL) services.23 We seek comment on whether the proposed rule change will allow consumers who access the Internet or other online services
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98232.wp
                • required.65 62 See Anti-Cramming Best Practices Guidelines at 13; NARUC White Paper at 3; National Consumers League Testimony at 7. 63 See 47 U.S.C. § 201(b). 64 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, 27 (citing 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(b)(1)) (1997). 65 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis 36. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to take this opportunity to comment on the information collections contained in this Notice, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-13.66 Public
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98233.wp
                • comments as responses to the IRFA. The Office of Public Affairs, Reference Operations Division, will send a copy of this NPRM and Notice of Inquiry, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. C. Ex Parte Presentations 68. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceedings subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, as revised.123 Additional rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206.124 D. Comment Filing Procedures 69. General. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on before October 30, 1998, and reply comments on or before November 16, 1998.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98282.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98282.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98282.wp
                • 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the "Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996" (SBREFA). 65 B. Ex Parte 147. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a)(1), and 1.1206(b). C. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 148. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),250 the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the expected significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules suggested in this Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (CALEA Further NPRM). Written public comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1998/fcc98294.pdf
                • section 10 of the Act, we should forbear from applying section 212 of the Act. We seek comment on these tentative conclusions. With respect to each issue, parties should specify the bases on which they believe we can make the findings required to meet the statutory criteria for forbearance. Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-294 ______________________________________________________________________________ 60 See generally id. § 1.1206(a). 61 See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 62 See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). 63 See
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99070.wp
                • LEC resold services. Is there a legal or policy basis for concluding that Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-70 49 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, para. 27 citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 50 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 51 Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 16143-79. 52 Id. at 16161-64, paras. 1374-83. 18 the inability to obtain access to combinations of network elements could impair a requesting carrier's ability to provide service to residential customers, but not business customers? 44. Parties should submit the text of any proposed rules they urge the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99120.wp
                • for purposes of applying criterion D. 254. As noted above, states apply the definition of rural telephone company in Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-120 450 47 U.S.C. §§ 214(e)(2), 251(f)(1). 451 Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8936, para. 294. 452 Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8936, para. 294. 453 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 100 determining whether a rural telephone company is entitled to an exemption under section 251(f)(1) of the Act and in determining, under section 214(e)(2) of the Act, whether to designate more than one carrier as an eligible telecommunications carrier in an area served by a rural telephone company.450 Although the Commission used the rural telephone company definition to distinguish between
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
                • than they need, which would, at the same time, be unavailable to wireline carriers that need them. Therefore, we seek Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-122 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 402 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. 1.1204(b)(1)). 403 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 109 comment on whether technology-specific or service-specific overlays should only be implemented on an expanded or regional basis. 260.We also seek comment on the relationship between technology-specific or service- specific overlays and other numbering resource optimization methods discussed above, such as number pooling. For example, if we were to adopt pooling requirements for LNP-capable carriers, should we consider
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99204.wp
                • APD No. 98-2, DA 98-1299 (released June 30, 1998). First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8998. First Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 8998-99, 9001 (stating that this additional time will allow the Commission to evaluate business decisions regarding the geographic scope of the toll-free services that they purchase). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA).
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99235.doc
                • U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (1996 Act). See 47 U.S.C. § 254(k). Low-Volume Long-Distance Users, CC Docket No. 99-249, Notice of Inquiry, FCC 99-168 (rel. July 20, 1999). Access Charge Reform, CC Docket No. 96-262, Fifth Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 99-206, ¶¶ 207-225 (rel. Aug. 27, 1999). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. §
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99345.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99345.txt
                • capacity charges. We seek comment on whether replacing per-minute charges with capacity charges affects future growth in LEC productivity. We seek comment on whether any prospective adjustment to our X-factor is required and on how we would quantify this adjustment. VI. PROCEDURAL ISSUES A. Ex Parte Presentations This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission Rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99379.doc
                • Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 50. The Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) for this proceeding is set out in Appendix B. B. Ex Parte Presentations 51. This NPRM is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the ``Sunshine Agenda'' period, provided they are disclosed under the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). C. Pleading Dates 52. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, interested parties may file comments on or before January 21, 2000 and reply comments on or before February 11, 2000. Comments and reply comments should be filed in CC Docket No. 92-297. All relevant and timely comments will be considered by the Commission before final action
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00119.doc
                • portion of a carrier's investment provides a legitimate basis to terminate the CPR audits. IV. PROCEDURAL ISSUES A. Ex Parte Presentations 16. This is a permit but disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. B. Supplemental Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 17. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that an initial regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities." The RFA generally defines "small entity" as having the same meaning as
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00171.doc
                • Disabilities, CC Docket No. 98-67, FCC 00-56, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, -- FCC Rcd. --- (rel. Mar. 6, 2000). See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Report & Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, para. 27, citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.49. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00359.doc
                • fixed surcharge on end users. Universal Service Order, 12 FCC Rcd at 9210-11, para. 853. See Operator Communications, Inc., d/b/a Oncor Communications, Inc., Petition for Forbearance in Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed November 22, 1999) (Oncor petition). 47 C.F.R. § 54.709, 54.711. 47 U.S.C. § 160(c). Id. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. 47 U.S.C.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00364.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2000/fcc00364.txt
                • proceedings such as long-term number portability, interconnection, pole attachments, and collocation without uniform and accurate accounting data. PROCEDURAL ISSUES Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit but disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Notice. The IRFA is set forth as Appendix 7. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments must be
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01008.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01008.txt
                • adjustment''? As currently proposed, the index year expense adjustment would be the study area's high-cost loop support expense adjustment calculated at the end of the acquiring company's first year of operations. See id. at para. 16, n. 47. Id. at para. 17. See id. at para. 18. See id. at para. 19. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. 47 U.S.C.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01132.txt
                • in this NPRM to facilitate our internal review process. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/2001/fcc01145.txt
                • charges that result from federal regulatory action: (1) universal service-related fees; (2) subscriber line charges; and (3) local number portability charges. See id. at 7523-25, paras. 51-52. . See also Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Second Recommended Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 24744, 24771-72, paras. 69-70 (Jt. Bd. 1998). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). See 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See id. 47 U.S.C.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97051.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97051.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97051.wp
                • that a summary be included with all comments and reply comments, although a summary that does not exceed three pages will not count towards the 75 page limit for comments or the 35 page limit for reply comments. The summary may be paginated separately from the rest of the pleading (e.g., as "i, ii"). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.49. 43 1.1206. Written submissions, however, will be limited as discussed below.235 2. Regulatory Flexibility Act 77. See Appendix F, infra for the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. F. Comment Filing Procedures 78. General Requirements. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before March
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97292.wp
                • 1996). In the Regulatory Fees proceeding, the Commission amended section 64.604(c)(4)(iii)(I) to permit the TRS Administrator to use TRS Fund revenue data for the purpose of calculating the regulatory fees of interstate common carriers, and aggregating such fee payments for submission to the Commission. Id. at para. 67. 41. 47 C.F.R. 54.711(b) 42. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.203, and 1.1206. 43. 5 U.S.C. 603. 44. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). 45. 5 U.S.C. 601(3). 46. 15 U.S.C. 632(a). 47. See 47 C.F.R. 69.601, 69.603. NECA subsequently assumed responsibility for administering the existing universal service fund (47 C.F.R. 69.116, 69.603), the Lifeline Assistance program (47 C.F.R. 69.117, 69.603), the LTS program (47 C.F.R. 69.2(y), 69.612); and TRS Fund (47 C.F.R. 64.604(c)(4)(iii). 48. 5
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1997/fcc97387.wp
                • for them to be present. The first category of proceedings established by the 1987 Ex Parte Order are those for 30 which there are no ex parte restrictions. In these "exempt" proceedings, parties and Commission decision-makers may communicate freely, without regard to the prohibitions and disclosure Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-387 _____________________________________________________________________________ Id. at § 1.1204. 31 Id. at § 1.1206. 32 Id. at § 1.1206(a). 33 Id. at § 1.1208. 34 Id. at § 1.1206(b). 35 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208(c)(1)(ii)(B). 36 Id. at § 1.1202(b). 37 7 requirements in the rules. The second category are those proceedings classified as "non-restricted" 31 or "permit but disclose." In non-restricted proceedings, parties and Commission decision-makers are permitted to engage in ex parte communications
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98188.wp
                • affiliates, rather than by the BOCs. VII. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Presentations Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-188 369 See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, GC Docket No. 95-21, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57, ¶ 27 citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 370 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 87 197.The matter in Docket No. 98-147, initiated by the NPRM portion of this item, shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules.369 Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98278.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98278.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/fcc98278.wp
                • 17, 1997. 112 We note that, in the initial rulemaking proceeding, the California PUC advocated that business users not be allowed any local usage as part of the basic package, because business users can recover their costs through the price of their goods. California PUC comments at 5, filed Oct. 17, 1997. 113 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 114 See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the 30 53. We also seek comment on how we should determine what constitutes local usage. We note
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/da992966.doc
                • the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but may not be limited to, the issues identified in this Order. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. III. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS 5. This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99038.wp
                • with the delivery of such traffic. This Commission is mindful of concerns that our jurisdictional analysis may result in allocation to Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-38 98 See Letter from James Bradford Ramsay, Assistant General Counsel, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, FCC (December 14, 1998). 99 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1202, 1.1204, 1.1206. 100 See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 22 different jurisdictions of the costs and revenues
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99048.wp
                • proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules.227 Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-48 228 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 53 views and arguments presented is generally required.228 Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. 2. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis 109.The Further NPRM contains either a proposed or modified information collection. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite the general public and the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.txt
                • - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject of the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Person making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000347.doc
                • DC 20554. Parties must also deliver one copy of such documents to ITS, Inc., the Commission's duplicating contractor, at its office at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036. The documents should reference CCB/CPD No. 00-1. 15. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding and subject to the ``permit but disclose'' requirements under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000431.doc
                • not contained in pleadings, provided that such information or a writing containing the nature and source of such information is placed in the public file, and provided that the fact of reliance on such information is noted in the order. B. Ex Parte Requirements 29. This tariff investigation is a "permit-but-disclose proceeding" and subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001487.doc
                • will be the subject of the investigation will be identified in an upcoming designation order and may include, but may not be limited to, the issues identified in this Order. We may also, by order, identify discrete issues that do not warrant further investigation. EX PARTE REQUIREMENTS This investigation is a permit-but-disclose proceeding and subject to the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00056.txt
                • for text telephony in the PSTN.'' See CTIA Comments at 5. CTIA Comments at 2-3; TDI Comments at 4-5; GTE Reply Comments at 5. 47 C.F.R. § 64.604 (b) (1). See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentation in Commission Proceedings, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (citing 47 C.F.R. §1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2), as revised. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.49. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, See U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). Notice, 13 FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00104.txt
                • that ongoing costs of number pooling should be recovered through an ongoing exogenous adjustment). MCI WorldCom comments at 53. Notice, 14 FCC Rcd at 10407-08. Id. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Repo rt and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24, 121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.49. 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00297.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00297.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis Appendix C, part B sets forth the Commission's IRFA regarding the policies and rules proposed in the Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 98-147 and the Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in CC Docket No. 96-98. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/fcc00429.txt
                • at 7-11; see also 47 C.F.R. § 20.12(B) (requiring CMRS carriers to permit unrestricted resale of its service). See supra section III.F. See supra section III.E. See Amendment of 47 C.F.R. 1.1200 et seq. Concerning Ex Parte Presentations in Commission Proceedings, Repo rt and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 7348, 7356-57 (1997) (citing 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1)). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24, 121 (1998). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.49. 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/da010507.txt
                • Commission's rules. See Qwest/Acquiring Companies Public Notice (establishing November 13, 2000, as the deadline for reply comments); 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. In the interest of establishing a complete and comprehensive record on this matter, we believe it is in the public interest to accept these further pleadings and will treat them as ex parte presentations. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See also, In the Matter of Mobile Relay Systems, Order on Further Reconsideration, FCC File No. D100478, DA 01-113, n. 22 (rel. Jan. 16, 2001). 47 C.F.R. § 1.3. WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153, 1159 (D.C. Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1027 (1972). Northeast Cellular Telephone Co. v. FCC, 897 F.2d 1164, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 1990). WAIT
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01026.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01026.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01026.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis Appendix C sets forth the Commission's IRFA regarding the policies and rules proposed in the Third Further Notice. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments on the . The Commission will send a copy
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01120.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01120.txt
                • e.g., CDT/People For Comments at 3-10 (alleging the unconstitutionality of CIPA and urging the Commission to refuse to promulgate rules implementing the legislation); ACLUF Comments at 1 (alleging facial unconstitutionality of CIPA, but recognizing the Commission's statutory obligations to engage in rulemaking). The ACLUF Comments were untimely filed, but we will nonetheless accept them as ex parte filings under section 1.1206 of our rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. On March 20, 2001, claims were brought in federal court challenging the constitutionality of sections 1712 and 1721 of CIPA. See American Library Ass'n v. United States, No. 01-CV-1303 (E.D. Pa. filed March 20, 2001); Multnomah County Public Library v. United States, No. 01-CV-1322 (E.D. Pa. filed March 20, 2001). See, e.g.,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01146.txt
                • all other applicable sections of the Commission's rules. We also direct all interested parties to include the name of the filing party and the date of the filing on each page of their comments and reply comments. That this proceeding will continue to be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in this proceeding; it will also allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. We find that it is in the public interest to continue this
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01157.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01157.txt
                • signals from the studio to the transmitter, or between two points such as a main studio and an auxiliary studio. The service also includes mobile TV pickups, which relay signals from a remote location back to the studio. 13 C.F.R. § 121.201, SIC code 4812. Id. . Id. 5 U.S.C. § 603(c). . See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 (04/15/01)(04/19/01) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-157 ± H t ¯ ± Ë H t ¯ ± Ë � � � � � U U � � � � , å æ
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2001/fcc01205.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis Section V sets forth the Commission's IRFA regarding policies and rules proposed in the Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rule Making. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments on the Declaratory Ruling and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.wp
                • 3. ^3 See id. at 1.49. 4. ^4 Item (g) is obviously the core item of the Brief in Support, and may be quite lengthy. It may help to divide it, therefore, into three subsections, one corresponding to each of the three requirements set forth in section 271(d)(3). 5. ^5 See 47 C.F.R. 1.743. 6. ^6 See id. at 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 7. ^7 See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(a). 8. ^8 See id. at 1.1206(a). 9. ^9 Cf. 1.1200(a)-(b); 1.1203. 10. ^10 On this last point, we note that the notice and comment and effective date provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act are not applicable to these procedural requirements and policies. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b), (d). References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.wp 3.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.wp
                • Waksman and Brent Olson (202) 418-1580. - FCC - 1. See Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, FCC 96-469 (rel. Dec. 6, 1996) (OMB Control No. 3060-0756). 2. See Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, supra. 3. ^3 See 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 4. ^4 See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(a). 5. ^5 See id. at 1.1206(a). 6. ^6 Cf. 1.1200(a)-(b); 1.1203. References 1. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.txt 2. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970004.html#N_6_
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.wp
                • authority for SBLD to provide in-region, interLATA services in Oklahoma. 2. See Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, FCC 96-469 (rel. Dec. 6, 1996) (OMB Control No. 3060-0756). 3. See Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, supra. 4. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 5. See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(a). 6. See id. at 1.1206(a). 7. Cf. 1.1200(a)-(b); 1.1203. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.pdf 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.html#N_1_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.html#N_2_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.html#N_3_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.html#N_4_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.html#N_5_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.html#N_6_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970753.html#N_7_
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970916.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970916.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da970916.wp
                • Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies of comments and reply comments will also be available from ITS, at 2100 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, or by calling (202) 875-3800. We will continue to treat this proceeding as a non-restricted rulemaking for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. For further information contact Steven Teplitz or Kyle Dixon, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1580. By the Chief, Common Carrier Bureau News Media contact: Rochelle Cohen (202) 418-1500. - FCC - __________________________________________________________________ 1. Telephone Number Portability, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 11 FCC Rcd 8352 (1996) (First Report & Order).
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.wp
                • Melissa Waksman and Brent Olson (202) 418-1580. - FCC - 1. See Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, FCC 96-469 (rel. Dec. 6, 1996) (OMB Control No. 3060-0756). 2. See Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, supra. 3. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 4. See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(a). 5. See id. at 1.1206(a). 6. Cf. 1.1200(a)-(b); 1.1203. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971072.html#N_6_
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971957.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971957.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da971957.wp
                • N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties should send eight copies of their comments to Sheryl Todd, Universal Service Branch, Accounts and Audits Division, Federal Communications Commission, 2100 M. St, N.W., 8th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties should send one copy of their comments to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact: Richard D. Smith or Lori Wright, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400. -FCC- _____________________ 1. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Report and Order, CC Docket No. 96-45, FCC 97-157
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.wp
                • Michael Pryor (202) 418-1580. - FCC - _____________________ 1. See Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, FCC 97-330 (rel. Sept. 19, 1997) (OMB Control No. 3060-0756). 2. See Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, supra. 3. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 4. See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(a). 5. Cf. 1.1200(a)-(b); 1.1203. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/da972112.html#N_5_
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
                • affidavits or other supporting documentation. 10. See Application of Ameritech Michigan Pursuant to Section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 97-298, at 51 (rel. Aug. 19, 1997). 11. 47 C.F.R. 1.45. 12. See 47 C.F.R. 1.4(h). 13. See id. at 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 14. See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(b). 15. See id. at 1.1204(a)(6). 16. Cf. 1.1200(a); 1.1203. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_6_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_7_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_8_ 11. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_9_ 12. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_10_ 13. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_11_ 14. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_12_ 15. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_13_ 16. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_14_ 17. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_15_ 18. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html#N_16_
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980056.html
                • ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Commission Secretary, and serve Janice Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. We also require all
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.wp
                • Designation as Eligible Telecommunications Carriers (filed Dec. 18, 1997). 4. Fort Mojave Telecommunications, Inc., Gila River Telecommunications, Inc., San Carlos Telecommunications, Inc., and Tohono O'odham Utility Authority Supplement to Petition for Designation as Eligible Telecommunications Carriers Pursuant to Section 214(e)(6) of the Communications Act (filed Jan. 28, 1998). 5. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.415, 1.419. 6. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.txt 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.wp 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_5_ 8. http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980181.html#N_6_
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980185.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980185.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980185.wp
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies of documents filed with the Commission, including the petitions, may be obtained from the International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800. Documents are also available for review and copying at the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Linda P. Armstrong, Universal Service Branch, Accounting and Audits Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or via e-mail: larmstro@fcc.gov. -- Action by Chief, Accounting and Audits Division, Common Carrier
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980580.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980580.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980580.wp
                • mechanisms. 48. This section will report data filed by price cap companies pursuant to the ARMIS 43-07 reporting requirements. Past Monitoring Reports have published infrastructure data on a 59 See Establishment of a Program to Monitor the Impact of Joint Board Decisions, 2 FCC Rcd 5266. 60 For 1996 this threshold was $107 million. 61 See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 17 holding company basis, but we seek comment on whether it is desirable to publish the data in a disaggregated form, i.e., on a study area basis, as opposed to an aggregated form. As with the other ARMIS-based data, we propose to publish the Infrastructure section in the winter report. k.Revenues, Expenses, and Investment 49. Previous Monitoring Reports have included
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980762.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980762.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980762.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980762.wp
                • comments on this motion on or before May 20, 1998, and reply comments on or before June 5, 1998. For ex parte purposes, this is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Pursuant to procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 222, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies of the petitions, comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980839.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980839.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980839.wp
                • presentation, storage, and electronic filing. 29. Part 42 of the Commission's rules governs record keeping by common carriers. We seek comment on whether instructions to be developed for the local competition survey should specify particular information or records that should be retained to support or supplement carrier data submissions. IV. PROCEDURAL ISSUES A. Ex Parte Presentations 30. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure. B. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis 31. This Public Notice contains either a proposed or modified information collection. As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, we invite
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980848.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980848.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980848.wp
                • 222, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties should send three copies of their comments to Sheryl Todd, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 2100 M. St, N.W., 8th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties should send one copy of their comments to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact: Brad Wimmer, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400. Action by the Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980865.pdf
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies of documents filed with the Commission, including the petitions, may be obtained from the International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800. Documents are also available for review and copying at the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Linda P. Armstrong, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or via e-mail: larmstro@fcc.gov. -- Action by Accounting Policy Division --
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980872.wp
                • Roman Salas, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Three copies also should be sent to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, 2100 M Street, N.W., 8th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies of documents filed with the Commission may be obtained from the International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, 22 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. 5 N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800. Such documents are also available for review and copying at the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Parties may also file informal comments or an exact copy of formal comments electronically via the Internet at: . Only one copy of an electronic
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da980949.pdf
                • 20036. Copies of documents filed with the Commission, including the Request for Waiver, may be obtained from the International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800. Documents are also available for review and copying at the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Linda P. Armstrong, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or via e-mail: larmstro@fcc.gov. -- Action by Accounting Policy Division --
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981098.pdf
                • 20036. Copies of documents filed with the Commission, including the Request for Waiver, may be obtained from the International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800. Documents are also available for review and copying at the FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Linda P. Armstrong, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or via e-mail: larmstro@fcc.gov. -- Action by Accounting Policy Division --
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.wp
                • (Fourth Order on Reconsideration). 4. Fourth Order on Reconsideration, FCC 97-420, at para. 205. 5. Fourth Order on Reconsideration, FCC 97-420, at para. 206. 6. Kentucky Department of Education, Petition for Waiver (filed June 3, 1998) (Kentucky Petition). 7. Kentucky Petition at 2. 8. Kentucky Petition at 4. 9. See, e.g., 47 C.F.R. 1.49, 1.415, 1.419. 10. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.wp 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.txt 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_2_ 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_3_ 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_4_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_5_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_6_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_7_ 10. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_8_ 11. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_9_ 12. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981334.html#N_10_
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981336.wp
                • these tentative conclusions. The Commission will publish this Public Notice in the Federal Register. In addition, the Commission's Office of Public Affairs Reference Operations Division, will send a copy of this 37 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 9 Public Notice, including this certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.37 Ex Parte Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but- disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Deadlines and Instructions for Filing Comments Interested parties may file comments in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed plan of reorganization on or before August 5, 1998 and reply comments on or before August 12. All filings should
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.wp
                • Myles (202) 418-1580. - FCC - __________________________________________ 1. See Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, Public Notice, FCC 97-330 (rel. Sept. 19, 1997) (OMB Control No. 3060-0756). 2. See Revised Procedures for Bell Operating Company Applications Under New Section 271 of the Communications Act, supra. 3. ^3 See id. at 1.1200(a), 1.1206. 4. ^4 See id. at 1.1202, 1.1206(b). 5. Cf. 1.1200(a)-(b); 1.1203. References 1. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.wp 2. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.txt 3. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_1_ 4. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html 5. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da981362.html 6. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_2_ 7. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_3_ 8. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_4_ 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981364.html#N_5_
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981421.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981421.wp
                • type of pleading (comment or reply comment), date of submission, and the name of the electronic file on the diskette. Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, parties must send copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. 3 Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information contact Sharon Webber, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400. --Action by Chief, Accounting Policy Division--
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981492.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981492.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981492.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981492.wp
                • public policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings.[7]^(2) Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981587.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981587.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981587.wp
                • Windows or compatible software. The diskette should be submitted in "read only" mode. The diskette should be clearly labelled with the party's name, proceeding, type of pleading (comment or reply comments) and date of submission. Each diskette should contain only one party's comments in a single electronic file. The diskette should be accompanied by a cover letter. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Chuck Keller or Jeff Prisbrey, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400. - Action by the Acting Chief, Common Carrier Bureau -
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981871.pdf
                • 96-45, type of pleading (comment or reply comment)), date of submission, and the name of the electronic file on the diskette. Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, parties must send copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sheryl Todd or Linda P. Armstrong, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484, or via e-mail: stodd@fcc.gov or larmstro@fcc.gov. -- Action by Accounting Policy
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981872.pdf
                • 96-45, type of pleading (comment or reply comment)), date of submission, and the name of the electronic file on the diskette. Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, parties must send copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. 3 For further information, contact Sheryl Todd or Linda P. Armstrong, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484, or via e-mail: stodd@fcc.gov or larmstro@fcc.gov. -- Action by Accounting
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981999.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981999.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da981999.wp
                • to applicable procedures set forth in sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments in support of or in opposition to Pacific's Petition for Expedited Waiver on or before October 26, 1998, and may file reply comments on or before November 5, 1998. All filings 3 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. 2 should refer to Pacific Bell Petition for Expedited Waiver, CC Docket No. 96-45, DA 98-1999. One original and six copies of all comments and reply comments must be sent to Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 222, Washington, D.C. 20554. Three copies also should be sent to Sheryl Todd, Accounting
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982433.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982433.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982433.wp
                • Commision's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Commission Secretary and serve Ceci Stephens, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, Room 544, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, and ITS, 2131 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, with copies
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982504.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982504.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1998/da982504.wp
                • Commision's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Commission Secretary at Secretary, FCC, at 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 or at 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20554, from 4:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. and serve Ceci Stephens, Policy and Program
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990296.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990296.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da990296.wp
                • to this Notice. 1. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings.[10]^(7) Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991170.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991170.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991170.wp
                • in making in-person presentations should send an e-mail expressing their interest, a brief summary of their proposed in-person presentation, their title, and their biographical data to [8]hnankin@fcc.gov (e-mail) and [9]gkennedy@fcc.gov (e-mail). Those parties selected to make in-person presentations must submit to the Commission written ex parte comments containing or summarizing their presentations by August 1, 1999, in compliance with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. 1.1206 (permit-but-disclose) and in the manner described below. While time constraints may limit the number of individuals that can make in-person presentations at the forum, we encourage all individuals to submit written ex parte comments by this same date. Written ex parte comments will help us focus the agenda for the public forum and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991609.doc
                • Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A523, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katherine Schroder, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991775.doc
                • Docket No. 99-272. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991847.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991847.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Western Wireless Corporation Petition for ETC Designation and Related Waivers (filed August 4, 1999)(Petition)
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991853.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991853.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991853.txt
                • the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or by calling ITS at (202) 857-3800 or faxing ITS at (202) 857-3805. We will continue to treat this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Common Carrier Bureau contact: Staci Pies, (202) 418-1580. See Deployment of Wireline Services Offering Advanced Telecommunications Capability, CC Docket No. 98-147 et al., Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 13 FCC Rcd 15280 (1998). See U S WEST Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, No. 98-1410 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 25, 1999) (order granting motion for remand). +D`ƒ
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
                • only in affidavits or other supporting documentation. See Application of Ameritech Michigan Pursuant to Section 271 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Services in Michigan, CC Docket No. 97-137, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 12 FCC Rcd 20543, para. 15 (1997). 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See id. at §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See id. at §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See id. at § 1.1204(a)(6). Cf. §§ 1.1200(a); 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov „Ð � ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992014.doc
                • 418-1500. FCC Common Carrier Bureau contact: Andrea Kearney (202) 418-1580. See Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, DA 99-1994, Public Notice (rel. September 28, 1999) (September 28, 1999 Public Notice). If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. See id. at §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See id at §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See id.at § 1.1206(a). Cf. §§ 1.1200(a)-(b); 1.1203. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov % & ' L O c ƒ & & ' ;& ' ÂöÃÿ‰PNG > É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼%
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992065.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . i k
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992105.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Debbie Byrd and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information, please
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992149.doc
                • FCC Common Carrier Bureau contact: CeCi Stephens 202/418-1588. - FCC - Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization Under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-Region, Interlata Service in the State of New York, Public Notice, CC Docket No. 99-295, DA 99-2014, (rel. September 29, 1999) (September 29, 1999 Public Notice). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See id at §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b); Updated Filing Requirements for Bell Operating Company Applications Under Section 271 of the Communications Act, CC Docket No. 99-295, DA 99-1994, (rel. September 28, 1999);.September 29, 1999, Public Notice. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE News media information 202/418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 20/418-2830 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov Ø à ç è
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992281.doc
                • to this petition. Comments on this Petition for Waiver must be filed with the Commission by November 19, 1999 and reply comments by December 3, 1999. It is requested that such comments refer to file number NSD-L-99-81. Paragraphs should be numbered to facilitate reference. Ex parte presentations in this proceeding will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, the section applicable to permit-but-disclose proceedings. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with the Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Suite TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, parties should send two copies to Al McCloud, Network Services Division, Common Carrier Bureau, FCC, 6th floor, 445
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992345.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992360.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the ASCOM application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than November 12, 1999. All comments should also be served on the applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than November 19, 1999. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992400.doc
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992455.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992455.txt
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992456.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992456.txt
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992509.doc
                • (ITS), the Commission's duplicating contractor, at its office at 1231 20th Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036. One copy must also be filed with the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, 445 - 12th Street S.W., Room 5-A225, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding is a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992511.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Western Wireless Corporation, Petition for ETC Designation, CC Docket No. 96-45 (filed September 29,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992544.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katherine Schroder, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Procedures for FCC Designation of Eligible Telecommunications Carriers Pursuant to Section (e)(6) of the Communications
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992556.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992658.doc
                • Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6A320, Washington, DC 20554. , that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.12606. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992669.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. " - Ò „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992675.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992675.txt
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992676.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992676.txt
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992677.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992677.txt
                • Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties should also send paper copies of their filings to the individuals listed in the attached Service List. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. . SERVICE LIST The Honorable William E. Kennard, Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20554 The Honorable Susan Ness, Commissioner Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20554 The Honorable Michael
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992697.doc
                • joint meetings between December 7, 1999, and December 22, 1999. Parties who wish to schedule meetings on this subject should call Dennis Johnson, Network Services Division, at (202) 418-0809 (voice), (202) 418-0484 (TTY). This proceeding is being treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that they must file memoranda that summarize their presentations. These summaries must reflect the substance of the presentations and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992736.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992736.txt
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992770.doc
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992808.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992845.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992845.txt
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992846.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992846.txt
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992847.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992847.txt
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992848.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992848.txt
                • or by filing paper copies. After filing your comments electronically, please email Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992951.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the VPSC application requesting status as a ETC, must do so no later than January 14, 2000. All comments should also be served on the applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than January 21, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992963.doc
                • it is required to convert to price cap regulation, granting an extension of time to file the annual price cap tariff, to be effective July 1, 2000, will provide administrative ease and synchronization of PRTC price cap filings. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992985.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992985.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katie King, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Petition for Reconsideration of the North Dakota Public Service Commission, Petition for Reconsideration of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000037.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000037.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000037.txt
                • (1) Katherine Farroba, Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701 N. Congress Ave., PO Box 13326, Austin, TX 78711-3326; and (2) Jamie Heisler, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000050.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000051.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the SCI application requesting status as a ETC, must do so no later than February 3, 2000. All comments should also be served on the applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than February 10, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000055.doc
                • by Sprint or its affiliates or subsidiaries. A notice establishing a formal pleading cycle will be issued at a later date. Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, it will be treated as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Additional rules pertaining
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000121.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000121.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Accent Communications, Inc., Armour Independent Telephone Company, Bridgewater-Canistota Independent Telephone Company, James Valley Cooperative Telephone
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000127.doc
                • reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an email to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, stating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000154.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the SCI application requesting status as a ETC, must do so no later than February 18, 2000. All comments should also be served on the applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than March 3, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000155.doc
                • reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000165.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000165.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000165.txt
                • and copying during normal reference room hours at the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties are reminded that this proceeding has been designated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings. In this regard, memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Additional rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000185.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the AFT application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than February 22, 2000. All comments should also be served on the applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than March 7, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000229.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000229.txt
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000237.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000237.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Praveen Goyal, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. AMSC Subsidiary Corporation, Emergency Petition for Clarification of 47 C.F.R. §§ 54.601(c), 54.506, filed November
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000239.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the applications denying any application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant these applications. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the applications requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than March 3, 2000. All comments should also be served on the applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than March 17, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000281.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000281.txt
                • sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000282.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000282.txt
                • reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000295.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000295.txt
                • reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000335.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000335.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000335.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000335.txt
                • policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000346.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b). Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Debbie Byrd and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information, please contact George
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000350.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the SPC application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than March 16, 2000. All comments should also be served on the applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than March 30, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000403.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000404.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. m | ž ¬ „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000411.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than March 17, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than March 31, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000417.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Pioneer Telephone Cooperative, Inc, Panhandle Telephone Cooperative, Inc., and EagleNet, Inc. Joint Petition for Waiver
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000441.doc
                • that section 61.41(c) of the Commission's rules should be waived in order to allow them to operate the Alaska exchanges subject to rate of return regulation in spite of their previous operation by GTEA under price cap regulation. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000567.doc
                • (ITS), the Commission's duplicating contractor, at its office at 1231 20th Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036. One copy must also be filed with the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, 445 - 12th Street S.W., Room 5-A225, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding is a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000575.doc
                • reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000592.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000592.txt
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000603.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000608.doc
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000630.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000631.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000677.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000678.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000679.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000727.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than April 21, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than May 5, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000735.doc
                • normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also can be obtained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800 (voice), (202) 857-3805 (fax). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000743.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000743.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Œ È „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000750.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000750.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000750.txt
                • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000778.doc
                • normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also can be obtained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800 (voice), (202) 857-3805 (fax). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000823.doc
                • (ITS), the Commission's duplicating contractor, at its office at 1231 20th Street N.W., Washington, DC 20036. One copy must also be filed with the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, 445 - 12th Street S.W., Room 5-A225, Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding is a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000843.doc
                • normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also can be obtained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, (202) 857-3800 (voice), (202) 857-3805 (fax). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000874.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000874.txt
                • routers out of region complies with section 271; and whether any on-going Qwest business concern raises section 271 issues. The Commission also welcomes comment on whether the Applicants have any affiliation that implicates section 271. GENERAL INFORMATION Parties are reminded that this proceeding is governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000915.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. / ; ¯ ë „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000959.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000959.pdf
                • examination, it is determined to be defective and not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. EX PARTE STATUS Parties are reminded that this proceeding has been designated as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings. In this regard, memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Additional rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000962.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the applications denying any application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant these applications. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the applications requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than May 22, 2000. All comments should also be served on the applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than June 5, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments with
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000963.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than May 22, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than June 5, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000968.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant these applications. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than May 23, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than June 6, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da000969.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant these applications. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than May 23, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than June 6, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001014.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. `` Ï „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001015.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001018.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001019.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001028.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001028.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001028.txt
                • due on or before June 9, 2000. Parties that wish to meet to discuss transition procedures and issues are requested to schedule meetings with the Competitive Pricing Division prior to the close of the comment period. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001037.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than May 31, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than June 7, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001038.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than May 31, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than June 7, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001068.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001068.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001076.doc
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001093.doc
                • we seek additional comment on whether this proposal would create a significant threat of CIC exhaustion, and whether modifications to existing Commission policy restricting CIC assignments may be necessary to accommodate the assignment of CICs to resellers. Filing Procedures This will continue to be a permit-but-disclose proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Pursuant to sections 1.1200 and 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206, interested parties may file supplemental filings on or before June 6, 2000, and replies to supplemental filings on or before June 13, 2000. Rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Such filings
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001094.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001094.txt
                • reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001119.doc
                • order to prevent ALLTEL from circumventing the purpose of the Commission's rules in sections 61.41(c) and (d), the Commission also required the merged company to seek prior Commission approval if it ever decided to elect price cap regulation. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More that a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001137.doc
                • normal business hours in FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. Copies also can be obtained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, telephone 202-857-3800, facsimile 202-857-3805. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001141.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001152.doc
                • form ." A sample form and directions will be sent in reply. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Additional Information: The full text of the Supplemental Joint Submission is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001168.doc
                • Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6A320, Washington, DC 20554. , that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.12606. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001194.doc
                • The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. This document may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, telephone 202-857-3800, facsimile 202-857-3805. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact Linda Chang, Federal Communications Commission, Accounting Policy Division, 202-418-7400. Request for Review of the Decision of the Universal Service Administrator by Copan Public Schools, Copan, Oklahoma; Federal-State Joint
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001268.doc
                • (5) precludes the use of the filed rate doctrine to nullify contractual arrangements; (6) reduces the administrative burden on the Commission of maintaining tariffs; and (7) reduces the economic burden on the non-ILECs of filing tariffs. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001274.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than July 3, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than July 10, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001310.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. (R) " Ý ê „0ý - ! - ! TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý)
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001493.doc
                • Division, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-C314, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Johanna Mikes, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-1535 (Domestic) or Justin Connor, International Bureau, Telecommunications Division at (202) 418-1476 (International). - FCC - See Letter from W. Kenneth Ferree, Counsel for TXU Energy Industries Company and TXU Communications Ventures Company, to Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary, FCC (filed June 26, 2000). (...continued)
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001508.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001508.txt
                • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001536.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Bill Scher, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Recommended Decision, FCC 00J-1
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001597.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than August 8, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicant. Reply comments must be filed no later than August 15, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001626.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001626.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001713.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001713.txt
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than August 15, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than August 22, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001714.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than August 22, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than August 29, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001752.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than August 24, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than August 31, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001806.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001806.txt
                • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001807.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard Smith, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Access Charge Reform, Price Cap Performance Review for Local
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001824.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Valor has entered into an agreement with GTE to acquire GTE's entire New Mexico study
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001825.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001827.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Citizens is in the process of purchasing eight Idaho exchanges from Qwest, which comprise a
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001864.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001865.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001865.txt
                • the attached Service List. Parties must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001882.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Katie King, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Forward-Looking Mechanism for High Cost Support for Non-Rural
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001946.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicant's application requesting status as an ETC must do so no later than September 22, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than September 29, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001967.doc
                • are filed. Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see Sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001977.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001978.doc
                • filed. Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see Sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001982.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001982.txt
                • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001989.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than September 20, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than September 27, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001990.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than September 20, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than September 27, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001991.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than September 20, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than September 27, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001995.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da001995.txt
                • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the FCC's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the FCC's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002011.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002011.txt
                • two copies to Al McCloud, Network Services Division, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Suite 6A-207, Washington D.C. 20554. , indicating that comments have been filed. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding for purposes of the FCC ex parte rules. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the FCC's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely list the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002022.doc
                • pleadings on a 3.5-inch diskette in Word 97 format. , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance or the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002024.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002024.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002034.doc
                • are filed. Any such reply must be filed through ETFS. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see Sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002040.doc
                • duplicating contractor, at its office at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036. One copy must be filed also with the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division, Common Carrier Bureau, 445 - 12th Street, S.W., Room 5-A225, Washington, DC 20554. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002052.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002086.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than October 3, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than October 10, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002087.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than October 3, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than October 10, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002131.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002131.txt
                • collocation requirements contained in the ``safe harbor'' provisions. WorldCom also seeks a rebuttable presumption that any circuit that terminates at one of its ``Class 5'' local switches is a local circuit subject to the terms of the waiver. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002155.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002155.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002155.txt
                • Docket No. 00-170. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002159.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002159.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002159.txt
                • Energy, One South Station, Boston, MA 02110 and (2) Josh Walls, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002175.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002175.txt
                • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002176.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002176.txt
                • and directions will be sent in reply. After filing your comments electronically, please send an e-mail to Al McCloud, amccloud@fcc.gov, indicating that comments have been filed. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002177.doc
                • that the Commission issues an order within 60 days of receipt of the application denying the application, the Secretary will so notify the SEC. Otherwise, the Commission will take no further action to grant this application. This proceeding is considered a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1200 - 1.1206. Persons wishing to file comments, regarding the adequacy or accuracy of the Applicants' application requesting status as an ETC, must do so no later than September 10, 2000. All comments should also be served on the Applicants. Reply comments must be filed no later than September 16, 2000. Interested parties should file an original and four copies of their comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002189.doc
                • parties to file comments on the Coalition's proposal. Initial comments may be filed no later than October 20, 2000. Reply comments may be filed no later than October 31, 2000. When filing comments, reference CC Docket No. 96-128. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002216.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002306.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. „0ý TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002329.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002329.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002329.txt
                • three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. As set forth in the NOI (paragraph 61), parties are reminded that this proceeding has been designated a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. Parties should consult the NOI for further information concerning the applicable ex parte procedures. For further information, contact: Johanna Mikes or Christopher Libertelli, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002339.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002342.doc
                • e-mail. To obtain filing instructions for e-mail comments, , and should include the following words in the body of the message: ``get form 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance or the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002349.doc
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Adrian Wright, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Carbon/Emery, Hanksville, and UBET are newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiaries of existing, small local exchange companies operating
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002354.doc
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Debbie Byrd and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. For further information, please
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002366.doc
                • 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-C314, Washington, D.C. 20554. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact: Johanna Mikes, Common Carrier Bureau, at (202) 418-1535 (Domestic 214); Justin Connor, International Bureau, at (202) 418-1476 (International 214); or Wayne McKee, Cable Services Bureau, at (202) 418-2355 (CARS Authorization). - FCC - See Application of Global Crossing Ltd., Transferor, and Citizens Communications Company, Transferee, for Transfer of Control Pursuant to Section 214 of the Communications
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002377.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002377.txt
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002414.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002414.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002414.txt
                • Division, Telecommunications Task Force, 1401 H St., NW, Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20005. If filing on CD-ROM is not possible, applicants may file on a 3.5 inch computer diskette. The rules relating to public information and the inspection of records are set forth at sections 0.441 through 0.470 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.441-0.470. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In-region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002433.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002433.txt
                • the attached Service List. Parties must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002493.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002493.txt
                • Docket No. 00-206. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002530.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002530.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002530.txt
                • public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from ITS, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 314-3070. We will continue to treat this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. For further information, contact: Johanna Mikes, Policy and Program Planning Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-1535. Implementation of the Non-Accounting Safeguards of Sections 271 and 272 of the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002617.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002617.txt
                • served upon each party filing an opposition or comment. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see Sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002856.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/da002856.txt
                • served upon each party filing an opposition or comment. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.774(e)(3). For additional information about the filing and service of comments and replies, see sections 1.774(c)-(e) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.774(c)-(e). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/fcc00154.doc
                • pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.461 of the Commission's rules. Ex Parte Treatment. Petitions filed pursuant to CALEA section 107(c) are classified as "permit but disclose" proceedings for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2000/fcc00227.doc
                • comment regarding any new or innovative inter-carrier compensation arrangements for ISP-bound traffic that parties may be considering or may have entered into, either voluntarily or at the direction of a state commission, during the pendency of this proceeding. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010622.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010622.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Letter from Thomas K. Crowe and Tania J. Cho to Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.txt
                • of the BOC with the requirements of section 271). Like the due dates for comments and reply comments, the specific due dates of these written consultations will be set forth in the Initial Public Notice, and may vary depending on the circumstances of the individual application. 47 C.F.R. § 1.45. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.4(h). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1206(b). See Bell Atlantic New York Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 3970, paras. 41-42 (discussing ex parte submissions and the Commission's discretion to request additional information in order to further its deliberative process). We commend applicants in prior section 271 proceedings for making available ex parte letters on their web sites and, in return, have
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010757.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010757.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. TŠ£û7fµ`;8gK¬Èbâÿ‰PNG (c)|)QÛÞ@0ƒ·³Óû Ä~.ÿ í å-c�ßÁ"Pgñ ¼c)¢0O§Ý) b�"cúº €Á-ô Ž!|} 2 ×ñèøun‚''...›�¥ }^¯;uòóöŒˆ³.l åñ¬jX·÷FÇDór� qvWæCÑ`±œK]LÐÓßËqÙÎÞb##}J@j!-ÆÑ‹pç=܈ Õ7ÐZ±"ÜNzKZߌE‡Ý F‹¸Ò)%3{£Rg*wÒÆ/ÎyDß‚z,•µû](nþ¼2/cmLŒ
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010911.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010911.txt
                • rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve Janice M. Myles and ITS, with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified above. . - FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010975.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010975.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact the Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Petition for Reconsideration of Proposed First Quarter 2000 Universal Service Contribution Factor by Greg Weisiger,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011041.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011041.txt
                • Communications, Inc., KMC Telecom Inc., Local Telephone and Data Services, Network Telephone Corporation, Network Access Solutions, New Edge Network, Inc., NewSouth Communications, Inc., NuVox Inc., Pac-West Telecomm, Inc., RCN Telecom Services, Inc., US LEC Communications Inc., and WorldCom, Inc., CC Docket No. 96-98 (filed Apr. 19, 2001) (Joint Motion). Joint Motion at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 1.46(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov T U W (R) à á � S T à S T à „Ð ›ëÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011211.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011211.txt
                • Petition of BellSouth, SBC and Verizon, CC Docket No. 96-98, Public Notice, DA 01-911 (rel. Apr. 10, 2001), extension of time granted, Common Carrier Bureau Grants Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Comments and Reply Comments on BOC Joint Motion Regarding Unbundled Network Elements, CC Docket No. 96-98, Public Notice, DA 01-1041 (rel. Apr. 23, 2001). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov & ? A Ú � „Ð ›ëÿ‰PNG RRµ~Rªnð |ƒoð |ƒoð X*¶Nô*K ã ~j0tm@"Iuÿã °2~ú˜y=ªÇbðÒ"ºÆÁ05 Xš ?''z[˜'';: ''@Ú/'", §Z!ú g$!‡þÄH (c)þ À .[â'' šŒ †]¶' ùš7²ßâ`è²~¯; M u(¨\A€÷ õwåœ(c)ó ° ¼èš 2Àû
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011458.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011458.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-A422, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will continue to be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, please contact: Katie King, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400 or Thomas Buckley, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, (202) 418-7400. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011647.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011647.txt
                • that parties filed in 1997 are available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Copies can also be obtained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington DC 20036 or by calling ITS at (202) 857-3800 or faxing ITS at (202) 857-3805. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45, Report and Order, 12 FCC
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011842.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da011842.txt
                • Washington, D.C. 20554. Parties also must send three paper copies of their filing to Sheryl Todd, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street S.W., Room 5-B540, Washington, D.C. 20554. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Richard D. Smith or Anita Cheng, Accounting Policy Division, Common Carrier Bureau at (202) 418-7400, TTY (202) 418-0484. See Guam Cellular and Paging, Inc. d/b/a Guamcell Communications Petition for
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da012746.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da012746.txt
                • filing ex parte submissions are requested to provide Verizon with a copy of each ex parte submission within 24 hours by fax, messenger, or overnight delivery.10 For purposes of this proceeding, any oral ex parte presentations from the Department of Justice and the Rhode Island Commission are deemed to be exempt ex parte presentations.11 To 8 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(13) (added by 64 FR 68946, 68946 (1999) (effective Jan. 10, 2000)); e.g., Comments Requested on Application by Bell Atlantic for Authorization under Section 271 of the Communications Act to Provide In- region, InterLATA Service in the State of New York (CC Docket No. 99-295), Public Notice, DA 99-2014, 1999 WL 770903 (CCB rel. Sept. 29, 1999). 9 See 47 C.F.R.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1997/fcc97218.txt
                • Flexibility Analysis is discussed fully in Appendix C of this Report and Order. B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding 55. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided, they are disclosed as outlined in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. (( 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 56. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 303(r) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. (( 151, 154(i), 303(r), 503(b), Part 1, Subpart A, Section 1.80(b), 47 C.F.R. ( 1.80(b), is amended to incorporate as a note the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement, and the Guidelines
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Compliance/Orders/1999/fcc99326.doc
                • the IRFA. This present Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) conforms to the RFA. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit but Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the sunshine agenda period provided they are disclosed as outlined in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203 and 1.1206(a) V. ORDERING CLAUSES ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 4(j), 7(a), 302, 303(b), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i), 154(j), 157(a), 302a, 303(b), 303(f), 303(g), 303(r), Part 2, Subpart K, Sections 2.1204(a)(5), 2.1205(a), 47 C.F.R. §§ 2.1204(a)(5) and 2.1205(a) are amended as set
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Consumer_Information/Public_Notices/2000/pnci0025.doc
                • waiving the filing requirements' deadlines established in accordance with 47 CFR Section 1.106(g) and (h). However, all other requirements established in 47 CFR Section 1.106 are applicable. In addition, this proceeding will continue to be a non-restricted proceeding in which ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed in conformance with Commission ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1202 and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.1202, 1.1206(a)). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------- Subject: In the Matter of Application by New York Telephone Company (d/b/a Bell Atlantic-New York), Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., NYNEX Long Distance Company, and Bell Atlantic Global Networks, Inc., for Authorization To Provide In-Region, InterLATA Service (CC Docket No. 99-295) Filed By - J.G. Harrington For CloseCall America, Inc. on
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1996/fcc96317.pdf
                • 303 and 307 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157, 301, 302, 303 and 307. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 CFR Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 104. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility 104 Analysis (IRFA) of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals suggested in this document. The IRFA is set forth in Appendix C. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments must be
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97245.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97245.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97245.wp
                • metropolitanareaswhereadditionalspectrumforpublicsafetyismostneeded,andwhichare precludedbythe1987TVfreeze?Consistentwiththisapproach,wealsoseekcommenton whetherweshouldprovidethesepartiesanopportunitytoamendtheirapplicationsorpetition proposalstoobtainanalogorDTVchannelsbelowchannel60.Weinvitecommenterstoaddress alltheseissues,andtosuggestothermethodsofdealingwithpendingapplicationsandpetitions. 23. InternationalCoordination.Inadditiontoprotectingservicesinadjacent frequencybandsfromharmfulinterference,weareobligatedtoconsidertheeffectsofU.S. operationsonneighboringcountries.Forthisreason,weproposetoapplytheinternational coordinationrequirementsofSection27.57ofourrulestofixed,mobile,andbroadcasting licenseesinthisspectrum.31Wewilladdressinternationalcoordinationrequirementsforthe publicsafetyspectruminasubsequentproceeding.32 24. MinorChangestotheTableofFrequencyAllocations.Finally,therearecurrently threefootnotestotheTableofFrequencyAllocationsthatpermittheoperationofnon-TV servicesinthe746-806MHzbandinallorpartoftheUnitedStates.33The716-890MHzband isalsocurrentlyavailableonaninterimbasisthroughfootnoteNG30tostationsinthe internationalfixedpublicradiocommunicationservice34southofMiami,Florida,onthecondition thatharmfulinterferenceisnotcausedtothebroadcastingserviceofanycountry.35Footnote NG30wasaninterimmeasurewhichisnolongerneeded.The800-830MHzbandisalso currentlyavailablethroughfootnoteNG43tofixedstationsintheCommonCarrierFixedPoint- 31See47C.F.R.§27.57. 32CoordinationofpublicsafetyandotherlandmobilefrequencieswithCanadaandMexicoaregovernedby specialrules.See,e.g.,47C.F.R.§90.619. 33See47C.F.R.§2.106. 34See47C.F.R.Part23. 35Specifically,footnoteNG30reads:Stationsintheinternationalfixedpublicradiocommunicationservicein Florida,southof25o30'northlatitude,maybeauthorizedtousefrequenciesintheband716-890MHzonthecondi- tionthatharmfulinterferencewillnotbecausedtothebroadcastingserviceofanycountry.Thisisaninterim allocationtheterminationofwhichwilllaterbespecifiedbytheCommissionwhenitisdeterminedthatequipments aregenerallyavailableforuseinbandsallocatedinternationallytothefixedservices. 11 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC97-245 to-PointMicrowaveService36inthesoutheasterncornerofAlaskaontheconditionthatharmful interferenceisnotcausedtothebroadcastingserviceofanycountry.37Wehavereviewedour recordsanddeterminedthattherearenolicenseesoperatingunderfootnoteNG43.Forthese reasons,andtoprovidepublicsafetylicenseeswithspectrumasfreeofotherusersaspossible, weproposetodeletefootnotesNG30andNG43.Additionally,theTVbroadcastbandsare allocatedtotheFixedServicetopermitsubscriptionTVoperations.38Weproposetodeletethis allocationforthe746-806MHzband.ThiswouldensurethatnosubscriptionTVoperations wouldbepermittedinthepublicsafetyportionoftheband.Atthesametime,becausethenon- publicsafetyportionofthebandisbeingreallocatedtothefixedandmobileservices,aswell asthebroadcastingservice,thisallocationbyfootnoteisnolongerneededtoallowsubscription TVoperationsinthenon-publicsafetyportionoftheband.Weinvitecommentonourproposal toeliminatefootnotesNG30andNG43,andmodifyfootnoteNG149toeliminatethe746-806 MHzbandfromitsprovisions. PROCEDURALMATTERS 25. ThisactionistakenpursuanttoSections4(i),303(c),303(f),303(g),and303(r) oftheCommunicationsActof1934,asamended,47U.S.C.§§154(i),303(c),303(f),303(g), and303(r). 26. InitialRegulatoryFlexibilityAnalysis:Aninitialregulatoryflexibilityanalysisis containedinAppendixC. 27. ExPartePresentations.TherulemakingproposalsinthisSecondNoticeof ProposedRuleMakingconstituteanon-restrictednoticeandcommentrulemakingproceeding. Expartepresentationsarepermitted,exceptduringtheSunshineAgendaperiod,providedthey aredisclosedasprovidedinCommissionrules.Seegenerally47C.F.R.§§1.1202,1.1203,and 1.1206(a). 28. Comments.PursuanttoapplicableproceduressetforthinSections1.415and1.419 oftheCommission'sRules,interestedpartiesmayfilecommentsonorbefore[45daysafter 36MostoftheservicesintheDomesticPublicFixedRadioServicewererecentlymergedintoPart101,Fixed MicrowaveServices.TherulesfortheCommonCarrierFixedPoint-to-PointMicrowaveServiceareat47C.F.R. §101,SubpartI. 37Specifically,footnoteNG43reads:FixedstationsinthedomesticpublicradioservicesinAlaska,southof 56onorthlatitudeandeastof134owestlongitude,maybeauthorizedtousefrequenciesintheband800-830MHz, ontheconditionthatharmfulinterferencewillnotbecausedtothebroadcastingserviceofanycountry. 38Specifically,footnoteNG149reads:Thefrequencybands54-72MHz,76-88MHz,174-216MHz,470-512 MHz,512-608MHz,and614-806MHzarealsoallocatedtotheFixedServicetopermitsubscriptionTVoperations inaccordancewithPart73oftherules. 12 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC97-245 FederalRegisterpublication],andreplycommentsonorbefore[75daysafterFederal Registerpublication].AllrelevantandtimelycommentwillbeconsideredbytheCommission beforefinalactionistakeninthisproceeding.CommentsrelevanttothePublicSafety Proceedingandcommentsrelevanttoanysubsequentproceedingtoestablishservicerulesfor spectruminthe746-806MHzbandwillbeincorporatedintotherecordinthoseproceedings,and consideredbeforefinalactionistaken.Tofileformallyinthisproceeding,participantsmustfile anoriginalandfourcopiesofallcomments,replycomments,andsupportingcomments.If participantswanteachCommissionertoreceiveapersonalcopyoftheircomments,anoriginal plusninecopiesmustbefiled.CommentsandreplycommentsshouldbesenttoOfficeofthe Secretary,FederalCommunicationsCommission,Washington,D.C.20554.Commentsandreply commentswillbeavailableforpublicinspectionduringregularbusinesshoursintheFCC ReferenceCenter(Room239)oftheFederalCommunicationsCommission,1919M.Street, N.W.,Washington,D.C.20554. 29. ForfurtherinformationconcerningthisrulemakingcontactSeanWhiteat(202) 418-2453ore-mailswhite@fcc.gov,OfficeofEngineeringandTechnology,Federal CommunicationsCommission,Washington,D.C.20554. FEDERALCOMMUNICATIONSCOMMISSION WilliamF.Caton ActingSecretary 13 FederalCommunicationsCommission FCC97-245 APPENDIXA ProposedRules Part2oftitle47oftheCodeofFederalRegulationsisproposedtobeamendedasfollows: PART2--FREQUENCYALLOCATIONSANDRADIOTREATYMATTERS; GENERALRULESANDREGULATIONS 1.Theauthoritycitationforpart2continuestoreadasfollows: AUTHORITY:Sections4,302,303,and307oftheCommunicationsActof1934,as amended,47U.S.C.sections154,302,303and307,unlessotherwisenoted. 2.Section2.106,theTableofFrequencyAllocations,isamendedasfollows: a.Removetheexistingentriesfor614-790MHzand790-806MHz. b.Addentriesinnumericalorderfor614-746MHz,746-790MHzand790-806MHz. c.IntheInternationalFootnotesunderheadingI.,addfootnotesS5.293,S5.296,S5.300, S5.309,S5.310,S5.311,S5.312,S5.313,S5.314,S5.315,andS5.316innumericalorder. d.RemovefootnotesNG30andNG43. Therevisionsandadditionsreadasfollows: §2.106TableofFrequencyAllocations. ***** 14 Internationaltable UnitedStatestable FCCusedesignators Region1--allocationMHz
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1997/fcc97340.wp
                • accordance with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings 26. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1206. C. Authority 27. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 303(f), 303(r), 303(v), 303(x), and 330(c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 303(f), 303(r), 303(v), 303(x), and 330(c). D. Comment Dates 28. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/1998/fcc98119.wp
                • Comments should must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed by the deadlines for comments on this NPRM provided in paragraph 50, infra. 48. Ex Parte Presentation. This is a permit-but-disclose rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 49. Authority. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). The Commission's Office of Public Affairs, Reference Operations Division, will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00017.doc
                • will send a copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including this initial certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy will also be published in the Federal Register. See 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). 20. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2000/fcc00455.txt
                • in the band 1610-1621.35 MHz for service uplinks and in the band 2483.5-2500 MHz for service downlinks, and is an applicant in the United States for the band 1990-2025 MHz for service uplinks and for the band 2165-2200 MHz for service downlinks. See 47 C.F. R. § 1.407. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21517 (1998); Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01091.txt
                • 19079, 19114-26, ¶¶ 96-132 (1997); Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 48-50. Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 6-9, 48-50. See id. at ¶¶ 9, 50. See Upper 700 MHz MO&O and FNPRM at ¶ 104. See Upper 700 MHz Third Report and Order at ¶¶ 57-58. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 5 U.S.C. § 603. See infra Appendix C. Pub. L. No. 104-13. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Notices/2001/fcc01158.txt
                • in accordance with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceedings This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during any Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, and 1.1206. C. Authority This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), and 303(r). D. Comment Dates Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/1997/fcc97303.wp
                • accordance with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceedings 157. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 158. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments to the Notice of Proposed Rule Making on or before October 9, 1997, and reply comments on or before October 24, 1997. To file formally in this proceeding, you must
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00363.doc
                • 96-18, First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 16570, 16581 (¶ 19) (1996) ("Paging Order"). See Notice and Order, 14 FCC Rcd at 1305-06 (¶ 13). See Paging Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 16580-81 (¶ 18). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1203(a). See 5 U.S.C. § 603 et seq. See Pub. L. No. 104-13. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et.seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2000/fcc00418.txt
                • Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Broadwave Albany, L.L.C., et al. Requests for Waiver of Part 101 Rules, DA 99-494 (rel. March 11, 1999). 47 C.F.R. §1.1208. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Seeks Comment on Broadwave Albany, L.L.C., et al. Requests for Waiver of Part 101 Rules, DA 99-494 (rel. March 11, 1999) at 2. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Id. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Sets Permit-but-Disclose Status for PDC Broadband Corporation Requests for Waiver, DA 00-1841 (rel. Aug. 14, 2000). Specifically, Pegasus sought waiver of 47 C.F.R. §§ 101.101, 101.105, 101.107, 101.111, 101.115. 101.139, 101.603. Public Notice, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Sets Permit-but-Disclose Status for PDC Broadband Corporation Requests for Waiver, DA 00-1841 (rel. Aug. 14, 2000). Northpoint Motion
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Orders/2001/fcc01224.txt
                • MSS at 2010-2025 (for a total reallocation of 30 MHz from MSS), which could be used for relocation or other purposes. See supra note 97. See National Defense Authorization Act for 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-65, 113 Stat. 512 (1999). See, e.g., Comments of Siemens Corporation at 23. See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, GC Docket No. 97-113, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, 13 FCC Rcd 21517 (1998); Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/1999/da991838.doc
                • order to permit a fuller exchange on the issues under consideration by the Commission, the public interest would be served by also classifying the proceedings for experimental Station WA2XMY, including both the Texas and Washington, D.C. locations, as "permit-but-disclose" proceedings for ex parte purposes in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules and subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). Other rules pertaining
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/1999/da992225.doc
                • be granted. OET seeks comments from interested parties concerning this request. OET has concluded that in order to permit a fuller exchange on the complex issues under consideration in this proceeding, it should be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Interested parties filing comments or oppositions to this petition are invited to do so no later than November 19, 1999. Parties filing replies may do so not later than December 6, 1999. The full text of the waiver request is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in OET, 7th floor, 445 12th Street, S.W.,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/1999/da992733.doc
                • issues are addressed in Section 3.1.3. In addition, we are submitting the entire text of Chapter 3 of the CPM Report in this docket. For ex parte purposes this proceeding, as well as any additional comments filed, continues to be a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. . In completing the transmittal screen, parties responding should include their full name, mailing address, and the applicable docket number, ET Docket 98-206. For further information, contact Tom Derenge, (202) 418-2451; or Harry Ng, (202) 418-0752. ¦ (R) � +Daƒ +Daƒ ¡ ¢ „Ð „Ð ¢ „Ð „Ð Á ¢ Á Á & - Š ` Ã
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/1999/da993008.doc
                • would assume certain obligations, described in the agreement, that would protect the FS from interference in the ``growth zones.'' For ex parte purposes, this proceeding, as well as any comments filed in response to this Public Notice, continues to be a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties are invited to file comments no later than January 12, 2000. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed.Reg. 24121 (1998). Comments filed through the ECFS
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da002061.doc
                • be granted. OET seeks comments from interested parties concerning this waiver request. OET has concluded that in order to permit a fuller exchange on the issues under consideration in this proceeding, it should be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Interested parties filing comments or oppositions to this petition are invited to do so no later than October 9, 2000. Parties filing replies may do so by October 26, 2000. All filings should be submitted to the Office of the Secretary and must include the above referenced DA number. For further information on this waiver request,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2000/da002317.doc
                • This document may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW, 20036, telephone 202-857-3800, facsimile 202-857-3805, TTY 202-293-8810. For ex parte purposes any comments filed in response to this Public Notice shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 CFR §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. For further information on the Wi-LAN Petition, contact Raymond LaForge, Laboratory Division, Office of Engineering and Technology, 301-362-3041. PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 TTY 202 / 418-2555 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov ftp.fcc.gov L N R Õ Ù 4 M N O P Q R y
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/da010786.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/da010786.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/2001/da010786.txt
                • from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW, 20036, telephone 202-857-3800, facsimile 202-857-3805, TTY 202-293-8810. You may also view the FCC Final Report at http://www.fcc.gov/3G/ and the NTIA Final Report at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/threeg/ This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200 and 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance or the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/News_Releases/2000/nrin0017.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/News_Releases/2000/nrin0017.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/News_Releases/2000/nrin0017.txt
                • issue, parties are asked to specify the bases upon which they believe the Commission can make the findings required to meet the statutory criteria for forbearance. . In addition, this proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Comments are due November 17, 2000. Reply comments are due December 4, 2000. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also can be obtained from International
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98149.pdf
                • proposed herein will benefit consumers and will create significant processing and operational efficiencies for the Commission. V. Procedural Matters A. Ex Parte Presentations 47. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 48. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1990, 5 U.S.C. §§ 601­612, (RFA) as amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847, requires an initial regulatory flexibility analysis in notice-and-comment rulemaking proceedings, unless we certify that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98190.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98190.wp
                • the activities of the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register." 71 Id. 21 IV. Procedural Issues A. Ex Parte Presentations 52. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification 53. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)65 requires that an initial regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities."66 The RFA generally defines "small entity" as having the same meaning as the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98235.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98235.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/1998/fcc98235.wp
                • Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov. D. Ex Parte Presentations 89. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. E. Contacts 90. For further information concerning this rulemaking proceeding, contact Charles Magnuson (202) 418-2150, International Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. V. ORDERING CLAUSES 91. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 301, 303, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151, 154(i), 154(j),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00186.pdf
                • must transmit one electronic copy of the comments to each docket or rulemaking number referenced in the caption. In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the applicable docket or rulemaking number. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic file 45 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 46 See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24, 121 (1998). Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-186 13 via the Internet to http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html. To file electronic comments, you must use the electronic filing interface available on the FCC's World Wide Web site at http://dettifoss.fcc.gov:8080/cgi-bin/ws.exe/beta/ecfs/upload/hts. Further information on the process of submitting comments electronically is available at that location
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00367.txt
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules as well. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Notices/2000/fcc00369.doc
                • within the scope and overall objectives of this proceeding. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. Appendix D to this document contains the analysis required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. § 603. Ex parte Presentations. This is a permit-but-disclose rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Authority. This action is taken pursuant to Sections 4(I), 7(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Sections 154(i), 157(a), 303(c), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r). Comment. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1998/fcc98078.wp
                • in the Federal Register (IB Docket No. 98-60) and reply comments within 10 days thereafter. 190.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that IB Docket No. 98-60 is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(b). 191. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Commission's Office of Public Affairs, Reference Operations Division, SHALL SEND a copy of this Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-78 93 Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. 192.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that PanAmSat Corporation petitions, motion and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Orders/1999/fcc99051.wp
                • power.45 Accordingly, we will accept petitions for declaratory ruling that a foreign carrier lacks sufficient market power to affect competition adversely in the U.S. market. A declaratory ruling issued by the Commission may be cited in an applicant's Section 214 application for the purpose of establishing its eligibility for streamlined authorization on the affiliated route. 42 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206 (1997). 43 See MCI Comments at 4; see also WorldCom Reply Comments at 1 (limiting the blanket authorization to unaffiliated routes "would create a clear, simple, bright-line standard"). Contra BellSouth Reply Comments at 4; SBC Reply Comments at 11­12. 44 See, e.g., SBC Comments at 4­5; SBC Reply Comments at 5­6; see also Cable & Wireless Comments at 4 (asserting
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1998/da980833.wp
                • it essential that the Commission obtain the most current information available, subject to appropriate procedural safeguards. In order to assist the Commission in developing a complete record on which a well-reasoned decision can be made, the ex parte procedures for the Skybridge application are hereby modified. The Skybridge application shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose, basis. 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208 Note 2. Moreover, many of the legal and policy issues in the Skybridge application and the Petition are interrelated. Thus, to reduce possible confusion and ensure that consistent rules apply in these two proceedings, we also hereby modify the ex parte procedures for the Skybridge Petition. The Petition will also be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose basis for
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/da991807.pdf
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations: (1) the Commission's duplicating
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/da992837.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/da992837.txt
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/da992981.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/da992981.txt
                • 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS, , 445 12th Street, S.W., room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 857-3800. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9046.pdf
                • modification of that authorization to permit it to use the Ku-band capacity available on that satellite. CORRECTION: In Public Notice, Report No. SPB-148 (released February 16, 1999), the last sentence of in the second paragraph should read as follows: Accordingly, effective February 16, 1999, ex parte presentations in this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. ___________________ Page 1 of 2 For more information concerning this Notice, contact the Satellite and Radiocommunication Division at 418-0719; TTY 202-418-2555. Page 2 of 2
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9052.pdf
                • that such treatment would best serve the public interest, in light of the intricate legal and technical issues raised by the Applications and the interrelated technical sharing issues the International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Sector's Joint Task Group 4-9-11 is currently studying. Accordingly, effective today, ex parte presentations in this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154 (i) and 303; and pursuant to Sections 0.51, 0.241, 0.261 and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.51, 0.241, 0.261 and 1.1200(a). Copies of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9060.pdf
                • in the Applications on the one hand, and the Commission's NGSO/GSO Sharing NPRM, which is a "permit but disclose" proceeding, are interrelated. Thus, to reduce possible confusion and ensure that consistent ex parte rules apply in these two proceedings, we redesignate the above applications as "permit but disclose" pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206 and 1.1208, Note 2. We conclude that such treatment would best serve the public interest. Accordingly, effective today, ex parte presentations in this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9104.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9111.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9112.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9116.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9117.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9120.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9128.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9129.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9133.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9134.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9135.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9136.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9137.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9141.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9142.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9143.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9147.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9156.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9159.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9161.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9162.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9170.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9173.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9177.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9178.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9181.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9191.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9192.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9198.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9201.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9202.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9205.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9211.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9214.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9216.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9222.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9224.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9234.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9241.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9242.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9250.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9251.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9252.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/1999/pnin9259.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da000071.pdf
                • these satellites. See, e.g., FCC Grants 16 Earth Station Licenses for Foreign-Licensed Satellite Systems to Operate in the United States Under New Rules Implementing 1997 WTO Agreement, Public Notice, Report No. DS-1864, Public Notice (released July 29, 1998). This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da000192.pdf
                • believe that the opportunity for a full discussion throughout the licensing process would be in the public interest. Accordingly, by this public notice, [47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a).] we consider the pending applications as a non-restrictive permit-but-disclose licensing proceeding. Thus, effective February 2, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. [47 C.F.R. § 1.1206.] This action is taken pursuant to the authority in Section 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i) and 303 and pursuant to Section 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.51, 0.261, and 1.1200(a). By the Chief, International Bureau Page
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da000222.doc
                • Act (RFA). If commenters believe that the proposals discussed in this Public Notice require additional RFA analysis, they should include a discussion of these issues in their Supplemental Comments. For ex parte purposes, this proceeding continues to be a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, in accordance with Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, and is subject to the requirements set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact: Chris Murphy, Satellite Policy Branch, (202) 418-2373, or Howard Griboff, Satellite Policy Branch, at (202) 418-0657. Action by the Chief, International Bureau. The Establishment of Policies and Service Rules for the Mobile Satellite Service in the 2 GHz Band, IB Docket No. 99-81, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 14 FCC Rcd 4843,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da000856.doc
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations: (1) the Commission's duplicating
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da000871.doc
                • and copying during normal reference room hours at the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da000919.doc
                • Docket No. 99-272 and issued an order stating that Qwest may close its pending merger with US West, Inc. See Memorandum Opinion and Order, CC Docket No. 99-272, FCC 00-91, para. 69 (released March 10, 2000). Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. ITC-T/C-20000317-00185 TELEDISTANCE, INC. Transfer of Control Current Licensee: TELEDISTANCE, INC. From: Qwest Communications International Inc. To: Touch America, Inc. Application for Consent
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001763.doc
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001834.doc
                • and copying during normal reference room hours at the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. This is a "permit but disclose" proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da001993.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002066.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002249.doc
                • addition, the Order required MTN to suspend service to several customers within five days of the release date of the Order. Given the complex jurisdictional issues addressed in the Order, and the potential effect on MTN's customers, we modify the ex parte procedures for this proceeding. The proceeding shall be treated on a non-restricted, permit-but-disclose basis. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206, and 1.1208 Note 2. Accordingly, effective October 2, 2000, ex parte presentations relating to this proceeding are subject to the disclosure requirements set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1206. This action is taken pursuant to authority found in Sections 4(i) and 303 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. §§ 154(i),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002251.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002251.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da002251.txt
                • Because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues, the Bureau will treat the proceeding as ``permit but disclose'' for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. Should circumstances warrant, the Bureau may designate this proceeding and all interrelated proceedings as restricted. As a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one- or two-sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/da993036.doc
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for ``permit-but-disclose proceedings.'' See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0009.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0010.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0013.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0014.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0018.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0023.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0024.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0030.pdf
                • List. [International Bureau Announced Process for Providing Service Under Global International Section 214 Authorizations Using Approved Non-U.S.-Licensed Satellite Systems Listed on the Permitted Space Station List, Public Notice, DA 99-2844 (released Dec. 17, 1999).] Page 2 of 3 This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0031.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0037.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0039.pdf
                • to deny may be filed on or before March 17, 2000. Reply comments or oppositions to petitions to deny may be filed on or before March 27, 2000. Responses may be filed on or before April 3, 2000. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0042.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0043.pdf
                • List. [International Bureau Announced Process for Providing Service Under Global International Section 214 Authorizations Using Approved Non-U.S.-Licensed Satellite Systems Listed on the Permitted Space Station List, Public Notice, DA 99-2844 (released Dec. 17, 1999).] Page 1 of 2 This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0044.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0045.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0054.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0056.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0060.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0061.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0065.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0066.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0073.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0074.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0079.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0080.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0081.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0082.pdf
                • proceeding to be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Commenters must file an original and four copies of all comments and reply comments. The lead file number for this series of applications is File No. SAT-T/C-20000323-00078, and should be referenced on ALL
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0085.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0087.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0091.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0092.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0096.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0097.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0104.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0105.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0107.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0112.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0114.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0117.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0118.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0119.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0123.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0124.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0125.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0126.pdf
                • Allow Non-U.S. Licensed Space Stations to Provide Domestic and International Satellite Service in the United States, Order, IB Docket No. 96-111, FCC 99-325 (released Oct. 29, 1999) (DISCO II First Reconsideration Order).] · ANIK F-1 at 107.3° W.L. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0130.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0131.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0134.pdf
                • proceeding to be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Commenters must file an original and four copies of all comments and reply comments. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0137.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0138.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0140.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0142.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0150.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0151.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0158.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0167.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0168.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0169.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0173.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0182.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0183.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0184.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0187.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0188.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0192.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0194.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0195.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0197.pdf
                • proceeding to be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Commenters must file an original and four copies of all comments and reply comments. All filings must be sent to the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0198.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0199.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0200.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0203.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0204.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0209.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0212.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0215.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0218.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0219.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0220.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0223.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0224.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0228.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0231.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0239.pdf
                • specified, interested parties may file comments with respect to these applications within 28 days of the date of this public notice. We request that such comments refer to the application file number shown below. Ex parte communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Copies of all applications listed here are available for public inspection in the FCC Office of Public Affairs Reference and Information Center, located in room CY-A257 at the Portals 2 building, 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554. The center can be contacted at (202) 418-0270. All applications listed are subject to further consideration and review, and may be returned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0240.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/International/Public_Notices/2000/pnin0241.pdf
                • on the 15th day, unless the Commission has informed the applicant in writing, within 14 days after the date of this public notice, that the application, on further examination, has been deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. Communications between outside parties and Commission staff concerning these applications are permitted subject to the Commission's rules for "permit-but-disclose proceedings." See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An application can be removed from streamlined processing only in the sound discretion of Commission staff. The filing of comments or a petition to deny will not necessarily result in an application being deemed ineligible for streamlined processing. The petitions for declaratory ruling listed below are (1) for authority under Section 310(b)(4) of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 310(b)(4),
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97296.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97296.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97296.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97296.wp
                • of 1995 Analysis. We have not proposed in this proceeding any proposed or modified information collection requirement. 27. Ex Parte Rules. This is a non-restricted notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 28. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix A. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. In
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1997/fcc97360.pdf
                • We also solicit alternative solutions for maintaining the accountability of ITFS licensees. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 90. For purposes of this nonrestricted notice and comment rulemaking proceeding, members of the public are advised that ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed under the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203 and 1.1206(a). 63 Digital Declaratory Ruling, 11 FCC Rcd at 18868. 40 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-360 91. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before December 9, 1997 and reply comments on or before January 8, 1998.64 All relevant and timely comments will be considered by the Commission
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98057.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98057.wp
                • Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 - 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to fain_t@al.eop.gov. 92. Ex parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98117.wp
                • Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 - 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to fain_t@al.eop.gov. 77. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98305.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98305.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1998/fcc98305.wp
                • 98-305 33 Commission, Room C-1804, 445 12th St., S.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 - 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to fain_t@al.eop.gov. 101.Ex parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99126.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99126.txt
                • Commission, Room C-1804, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to fain_t@al.eop.gov. 51. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99257.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99257.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99257.wp
                • copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W.; CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. 75. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 76. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix A. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. In
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99327.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99327.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99327.txt
                • an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. . . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99353.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99353.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99353.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/1999/fcc99353.txt
                • In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00083.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00083.txt
                • Original.'' Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00093.doc
                • copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W.; CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). . Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix A. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. In
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00203.txt
                • In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00213.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00213.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00213.txt
                • In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00344.pdf
                • copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W.; CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. 44. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 45. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix B. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00345.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00345.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2000/fcc00345.txt
                • an Original.'' Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Notices/2001/fcc01329.txt
                • Persons who need documents in such formats may contact Martha Contee at (202) 4810-0260, TTY (202) 418-2555, or mcontee@fcc.gov. 95. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 CFR Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 96. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix B. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/1998/fcc98231.pdf
                • to interference resolution. 5. This proceeding was commenced in response to a petition for rulemaking filed by a group of over one hundred participants in the wireless cable industry,7 including wireless cable system operators, MDS and ITFS licensees, equipment manufacturers and consultants, (collectively "Petitioners"),8 who requested that Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-231 disclose" ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Those comments were due by July 2, 1998. See Establishment of Period to Comment on Ex Parte Presentations, Public Notice, MM Docket No. 97-217, DA 98-1119 (rel. June 12, 1998). A list of parties filing comments (the "July 2 Comments") in response to that Public Notice is also contained in Exhibit A. 9 WebCel Communications, Inc. ("WebCel"), an LMDS operator,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00016.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00016.txt
                • diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00025.txt
                • from members of the public and others concerning this proceeding. Insofar as these presentations directly and primarily relate to the general policy question of appropriate standards for evaluating programming proposals for reserved noncommercial educational television channels, while incidentally mentioning the captioned application proceeding, they will be governed by the Commission's permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures as set forth in 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b) and placed in a file associated with the record concerning the captioned applications. Any similar communications received in the future will be treated in the same manner. All persons are reminded, however, that the matter involving the captioned applications remains a restricted proceeding under 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, until such time as the proceeding on the assignment applications is formally terminated
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00343.pdf
                • copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W.; CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. 33. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 34. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix C. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Further Notice. Written public comments are
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00360.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00360.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2000/fcc00360.txt
                • an Original.'' Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, parties must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01024.txt
                • In addition, commenters must sent diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01060.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01060.txt
                • Commission, Room C-1804, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Edward Springer, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to edward.springer@omb.eop.gov. 51. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01262.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01262.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Orders/2001/fcc01262.txt
                • send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. . . Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix A. As required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/MDS_Notices/da001256.doc
                • postponement. The Commission requests comments on the petitions. Comments to the petitions must be filed no later than June 19, 2000. Replies to comments will not be considered. This proceeding will be treated as "permit-but-disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. As a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Office of the Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c)(2). In addition, it is requested that a courtesy copy
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da002246.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da002246.txt
                • Commission, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da011264.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da011264.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da011264.txt
                • action, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da992724.doc
                • we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Public_Notices/da992741.doc
                • we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Notices/2000/fcc00355.txt
                • Notice of Inquiry to facilitate our internal review process. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Designating this proceeding as ``permit-but-disclose'' will provide an opportunity for all interested parties to receive notice of the various technical, legal, and policy issues raised in ex parte presentations made to the Commission in the course of this proceeding. This will allow interested parties to file responses or rebuttals to proposals made on the record in this proceeding. Accordingly, we
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Notices/1997/fcc97113.wp
                • this Notice, so that our electronic filing initiative may be implemented in the most effective manner. VI. PROCEDURAL ISSUES A. Ex Parte Presentations 24. This is a non-restricted notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. '' 1.1202, 1.1203 and 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 25. Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, requires an initial regulatory flexibility analysis in notice and comment rulemaking proceedings, unless we certify that "the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a significant number of small entities." Our purpose in granting electronically filed comments comparable legal treatment to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1998/fcc98056.wp
                • to Revise the Experimental Radio Service Regulations, 11 FCC Rcd 20130, 20133 (1997) (proposing a new section 5.57(e) to accommodate signatures on electronically filed OET applications). 35 See Procedures for Electronic Filing of Applications in the Private Radio Services, 9 FCC Rcd 174 (1994). 36 SBC Comments at 5, 10. 37 Bell Atlantic/NYNEX Comments at 2. 38 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 7 by counsel or by any party not represented by counsel must be signed.30 For example, in rulemaking proceedings, petitions for reconsideration, oppositions, and replies must conform to section 1.52.31 One commenter asserted that filing electronically results in the lack of a traceable signature.32 The only other parties commenting on this question simply referred to electronic signatures as part of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OGC/Orders/1999/fcc99322.doc
                • before the colon preceding subsection (1). The latter provision contains the superfluous phrase: "and circulation period," which should be deleted. The text of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208 inadvertently omits the phrase "to or from Commission decision-making personnel" immediately before the phrase "are prohibited in all proceedings," consistent with the rule prior to amendment. Additionally, the text of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a)(10)(iii) inadvertently omits the phrase "of any new written information elicited from such request or a summary of any new oral information elicited from such request" immediately after the word "disclosure" and before the phrase "must be made," consistent with subsection (a)(ii). 36. We next turn to the clarifications. The provisions of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(a)(5) classify as exempt presentations by
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OMD/Notices/fcc01097.txt
                • December 2000, rather than on a count as of December 31, 2000. Adoption of a Mandatory FCC Registration Number, MD Docket No. 00-205, FCC 00-421 (released December 1, 2000). FRN Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at para. 9 FRN Notice of Proposed Rulemaking at para. 23-26. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998). 47 CFR 1.1203 and 1.1206(a). See 5 U.S.C. 603. 47 U.S.C. 154(i)-(j), 159, & 303(r). 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA). 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.txt
                • ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. C. Ex Parte Rules This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
                • Business Administration in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603(a). B. Ex Parte Rules -- Non-Restricted Proceedings 97. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1201, 1203, and 1.1206(a). C. Comment Dates 98. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may file comments to the NPRM on or before [30 days after publication in the Federal Register] and reply comments on or before [45 days after publication in the Federal Register]. To file
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98282.pdf
                • 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the "Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996" (SBREFA). 65 B. Ex Parte 147. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. sections 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a)(1), and 1.1206(b). C. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 148. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),250 the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the expected significant economic impact on small entities by the policies and rules suggested in this Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (CALEA Further NPRM). Written public comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99097.wp
                • with America Advancement Act of 1996 regarding the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, we ask a number of questions in our IRFA regarding the prevalence of small businesses in the affected industries. Comments must be filed in accordance with the same filing deadlines as comments filed in this Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-97 202 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 203 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. PAGE 50 proceeding, but they must have a separate and distinct heading designating them as responses to the IRFA. B.Paperwork Reduction Analysis 102. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking contains either a proposed or modified information collection. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, the Commission invites the general public to take
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99137.pdf
                • to establish asymmetrical rates for compensation.186 Fourth, there are questions regarding how to resolve questions of customer notification, and rates to calling parties that potentially would result in answers different from those for CPP offerings. Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-137 187 5 U.S.C. § 603. 188 The IRFA is attached as Appendix B. 189 See generally Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 190 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. PAGE 37 74. Thus, we invite parties generally to comment on these and any other issues relating to the possible provision of CPP-like service by CMRS carriers wanting to use an interconnection approach. We also seek comment on the impact of such an approach
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99141.pdf
                • the Federal Register.214 B. Ex Parte Rules. 88. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking initiate and constitute a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules.215 Persons making oral ex parte presentations relating to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Federal Communications Commission FCC 99-141 1.1204(b)(1) (1997). 216 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), as revised. 217 See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1204(b)(1). 48 Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.216 Other rules pertaining
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99205.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99205.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99205.txt
                • encourage the deployment of telecommunication services to tribal lands and other unserved areas. PROCEDURAL MATTERS A. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This proceeding is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. B. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals suggested in this Notice. The IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments must
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99333.doc
                • ("Competitive Bidding Second Memorandum Opinion and Order"). Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act - Competitive Bidding, Fifth Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 403 (1994). See 47 C.F.R. §§ 27.210(b)(1)(2), 101.1209(b)(1(i). See 47 C.F.R.§ 1.2110(e)(2)(iii). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110(e)(2)(ii). See 47 U.S.C. § 309(j)(3)(B). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 11322 (1998); Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 21517 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 13 C.F.R. § 121.201, Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code 4812. U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1992 Census of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1999/fcc99384.doc
                • conduct currently prohibited by Section 1.2105(c)(1) that do not impact the integrity of the Commission's auction process. We seek comment regarding any changes in our rules that would eliminate this possible overinclusiveness. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but- disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00063.doc
                • of the Commission's Rules to Adopt Regulations for Automatic Vehicle Monitoring Systems, PR Docket No. 93-61, Second Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 15182, 15194 (1997). 47 C.F.R. § 1.2110(b)(4). Part 1 Second Further Notice, 13 FCC Rcd at 478 (para. 187). 5 U.S.C. § 603. See Appendix A. Pub. L. No. 104-13. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAA). Title II of the CWAA is the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00105.doc
                • 24 (personal communications services), Part 27 (wireless communications services), Part 90 (private land mobile radio services), and Part 101 (fixed microwave services) of our Rules. See Forbearance MO&O, 13 FCC Rcd at 6306 ¶ 24. MariTEL Petition at 2. Id. at 2-3. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(a)(2). Id. Id. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(a)(1). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 5 U.S.C. § 603. 5 U.S.C. § 605(b). (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-105 Federal Communications Commission FCC 00-105 LEGEND: R = REQUIRED DOCUMENTS (((((((( � f - Õ ö Y I K > I |¦ |¦ |¦ |¦ @& Ô � ÿÿ � ÿÿ : ` / : ; ‚ ƒ › œ § ¨ ¿ À 0 €ƒ
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00160.doc
                • revisions to 47 C.F.R. §§ 87.263 as set forth in Appendix B hereto. IV. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-but-Disclose Proceeding 20. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, if they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1203, 1.1206. Regulatory Flexibility Act 21. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis with respect to the Notice is included in Appendix A. Paperwork Reduction Act 22. This Notice contains either a new or modified information collection. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public to comment on the information collection contained in this Notice as
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00197.doc
                • and F block rules for the benefit of consumers and the economy. Procedural matters and ordering clauses Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed pursuant to the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA''), the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals and tentative conclusions set forth in the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``Notice'') in WT Docket No. 97-82. The IRFA is set forth as Appendix A. Written public
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00361.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00361.txt
                • the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve International Transcription Services (ITS) with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified below for filing comments. C. Filing Procedures Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc00402.txt
                • such information and contributing to fluid secondary markets in the use of licensed spectrum. procedural matters Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible impact on small entities of the proposals in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The IRFA is set forth in the Appendix. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. These comments
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2000/fcc99414.doc
                • be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 2100 M Street, Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, telephone (202) 857-3800. The Commission must obtain authorization from the Director of the Federal Register prior to incorporating by reference the technical standards in Part 95 of our rules. See 1 C.F.R. Part 51. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419 See 5 U.S.C. § 603 See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2001/fcc01028.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2001/fcc01028.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/2001/fcc01028.txt
                • the carrier holding the remaining 15 MHz of cellular spectrum in that market could pair with a 30 MHz PCS licensee without triggering the 45 MHz general CMRS spectrum cap. See generally Cellular Disaggregation Order. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.919. See id. § 20.6(e)(4)(A). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See id. § 603(a). See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. Id. §§ 1.415, 1.419. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. § 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract With America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1997/fcc97342.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1997/fcc97342.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1997/fcc97342.wp
                • AUTHORITY to prescribe and set forth procedures for the implementation of the provisions adopted herein. E. Ex Parte Presentations 113. The Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is a permit but disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 51 Federal Communications Commission FCC 97-342 52 F. Comments 114. Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's Rules, interested parties may file comments on or before November 13, 1997, and reply comments on or before November 24, 1997. In addition, a courtesy copy should be delivered to Mark
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1998/fcc98191.wp
                • On May 29, 1998, the Commission sent letters, to the Chairs of the fifty-five Regional Planning Committees. The letter asked that the Chairs provide information to the Commission on their Year 2000 compliance initiatives. To date, the Commission has received little information in response to the letters. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FCC 98-191 543 See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. 93 206. Accordingly, we conclude that it is important to increase our efforts to alert the public safety communications community to the nature and seriousness of the Year 2000 problem and to ascertain both the current state of Y2K readiness and the progress and range of compliance initiatives in that community. When we refer to compliance initiatives, we mean efforts
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/da992504.doc
                • 309(b) (specifically, applications for broadcast and common carrier services stations, industrial radio positioning stations granted on an exclusive basis, aeronautical enroute stations, aeronautical advisory stations, airdrome control stations, aeronautical fixed stations, and such others as the Commission shall prescribe by rule). 47 U.S.C. § 309(b), (d). See 47 C.F.R. § 1.41. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1202. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. See 47 C.F.R. § 90.173. Since 1973, the Commission has authorized the use of frequencies offset 12.5 kHz from regularly assignable channels on a secondary, non-interference basis. Initially, such use was limited to the Business Radio Service. See Amendment of Parts 2 and 91 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Medical Telemetry and Other Low Power Uses of Offset Frequencies
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00033.doc
                • of the Small Business Administration in accordance with Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding . This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. C. Paperwork Reduction Analysis ments on this Notice of Proposed Rule Making; OMB comments are due 60 days from the date of publication of this Notice of Proposed Rule Making in the Federal Register. Comments should address: cal utility. mates. ty, and clarity of the information collected. nology. ton, D.C. 20503, or via the Internet to vhuth@omb.eop.gov. D. Comment Dates
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00159.doc
                • Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for the Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making is contained in Appendix D. Ex Parte Presentations This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Comment Dates Pursuant to applicable procedures set forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on or before July 5, 2000, and reply comments on or before July 20, 2000. All relevant and timely comments will be considered by the Commission before final action is taken in this
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00209.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00209.txt
                • sanctions should be applied in the event of non-compliance with those terms and conditions. Procedural Matters Ex Parte Rules - Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding This proceeding is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Commission has prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for the Report and Order, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act. See Appendix C. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis The Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act. See Appendix D. Comment Dates
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00327.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00327.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00327.txt
                • Rcd at 20866-80 (paras. 38-74). See, e.g., Public Notice, ``Commission Announces Details of Technical Roundtable on Implementation of Automatic Location Identification for Enhanced 911 Technologies,'' CC Docket No. 94-102, DA 99-1243 (June 23, 1999) (addressing technical matters regarding 911 Phase II Automatic Location Identification (ALI)). http:// www.fcc.gov//e911. Pub. L. No. 106-81, enacted Oct. 26, 1999. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415, 1.419. Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 Fed. Reg. 24,121 (1998). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601 et. seq., has been amended by the Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996) (CWAAA). Title II of the CWAAA is the Small
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/fcc00366.txt
                • and Memorandum Opinion and Order are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) as well. Interested parties are to file with the Secretary, FCC, and serve International Transcription Services (ITS) with copies of any written ex parte presentations or summaries of oral ex parte presentations in these proceedings in the manner specified below for filing comments. Filing Procedures. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1998/da981687.pdf
                • include the following phrase "Disk Copy - Not an Original." Each diskette should contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic file. In addition, commenters must send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. Because the ULS and Wireless Forbearance proceedings are permit-but-disclose proceedings pursuant to Section 1.1206(a) of the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR § 1.1206(a), ex parte communications related to this Public Notice are permitted but must be disclosed in both dockets in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Jeffrey Steinberg, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, (202) 418-0620. This Public Notice is issued by the Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. 4 ATTACHMENT
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da990920.pdf
                • reference specific file numbers of the individual applications. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non- restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. SECTION 310 APPLICATIONS Part 22 ­ Cellular Radiotelephone Service File Nos. Licensee Call Signs 0000012444 Chicago SMSA L.P. KNKA200 KNKA269 KNKA495 KNKA549 KNKA594 KNKN603 0000012446 Illinois SMSA L.P. KNKA469 KNKA630 KNKA777 KNKA778 KNKQ278 KNKQ307 0000012447 Illinois RSA 6 & 7 L.P. KNKN996 KNKN997 0000012448 CyberTel Cellular KNKA234 Telephone Co. 0000012449 CyberTel RSA Cellular KNKN377 Limited Partnership KNKN379 KNKN551 KNKN568 0000012611
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da990921.pdf
                • and reference specific file numbers of the individual applications. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. SECTION 310 APPLICATIONS Part 22 - Paging and Radiotelephone Service File Nos. Licensee (Lead) Call Sign 0000011152 Frontier Communications of Georgia, Inc. KWA654 0000011154 Frontier Communications of Michigan, Inc. KQK716 0000011489 Frontier Communications of Mondovi, Inc. WXS416 0000011508 Frontier Communications - St. Croix, Inc. KNKB566 0000011155 Frontier Communications of Viroqua, Inc. KRS673 0000011158 Frontier Communications of Wisconsin, Inc KSJ805 0000011288
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991458.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991458.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991458.wp
                • laws. Issues concern whether the award of monetary damages can be construed as state rate regulation as proscribed by section 332(c)(3)(A) of the Communications Act. Interested parties may file comments and reply comments in accordance with the procedures outlined below. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991806.doc
                • individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991876.doc
                • individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da991986.doc
                • it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waivers, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Pam Slipakoff of the Policy and Rules Branch of the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division at (202) 418-0680. By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division. See Section 1.200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.200(a), 1.1206. $ ` c $ $ ÂöÃÿ‰PNG
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992102.pdf
                • had been accepted for filing and establishing a pleading cycle to permit interested parties an opportunity to comment on the proposed transaction.1 By this Public Notice and pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. Further, we note that this ex parte procedure has been applied in the majority of recent merger cases. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992451.doc
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992502.doc
                • 1999, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) issued a Public Notice announcing that these applications had been accepted for filing. By this Public Notice and pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that all of the above-mentioned proceedings will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in these cases because these proceedings involve broad public policy issues. Further, we note that the above-referenced matters are related to the pending acquisition of BCP CommNet's interest in various licenses by VAT, to which permit-but-disclose procedures
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992508.pdf
                • copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). The text of the Nokia filing will be posted on ECFS. It is also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Court Yard Level, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C.or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Dan Grosh or Ron Netro, WTB, (202) 418-1310. - FCC -
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992542.doc
                • individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992737.doc
                • individual application or other matters to which the filing pertains. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny and oppositions must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations:
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992767.doc
                • Rule Waiver and comments are available for inspection and duplication during regular business hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from ITS, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 857-3800. Ex parte presentations in this proceeding will be governed by the procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact John Branscome, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7240. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 20.6. In the Matter of Pioneer Telephone Association, Inc., et. al., Order, DA 99-1823 (released Sept. 8, 1999). In the Matter of 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review - Spectrum Aggregation Limits for Wireless Telecommunications Carriers, Report
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992775.doc
                • this Public Notice should refer to both this Public Notice, DA 99-2775 and DA 99-2542, as well as the specific file numbers of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Further, the public is reminded that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da992809.doc
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da993001.doc
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, and oppositions must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da993012.doc
                • to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). The text of the Ericsson filing will be posted on ECFS. It is also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Court Yard Level, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Dan Grosh or Ron Netro, WTB, (202) 418-1310. Revision of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Second Report and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da993028.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/da993028.txt
                • 12th Street, S.W., Room 4-A163, Washington, D.C. 20554. . Ex Parte status: Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. For further information, contact Lauren Kravetz or Pieter van Leeuwen, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division at (202) 418-7240 (Parts 22 and 24); Ramona Melson, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division at (202) 418-0680 (Parts 90 and 101); or Jeanette Spriggs, International Bureau, Satellite Division at (202) 418-0719 (Part 25). - FCC - In addition, Arch has
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000024.doc
                • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000031.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000031.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000031.txt
                • such frequency coordination take? As another example, should such equipment in the guard band be subject to higher OOBE limits than required of equipment operating in the 30 MHz spectrum? If so, would frequency coordination be necessary? Procedural Matters This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000083.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000083.txt
                • purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Maurice J. DePont of the Policy and Rules
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000134.doc
                • Accordingly, the period for final ex parte and other presentations on issues in this proceeding other than those issues decided in the First Report and Order will be extended until 7 p.m. on Monday, January 31, 2000. Procedural Matters This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000145.doc
                • Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Rm # 4-A624,Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000191.doc
                • TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Amy Zoslov, Chief, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Rm # 4-A624, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000219.doc
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. QUALCOMM's Petition for Declaratory Ruling is available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's Reference Center, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., 20554. A copy may also be attained from ITS at 1231 20th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20036, or by calling (202) 857-3800. For further information, contact Nicole Oden of the Auctions
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000230.doc
                • 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile and public safety licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Bert Weintraub of the Policy and Rules Branch
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000277.doc
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000318.txt
                • Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Steven Weingarten, Chief, Commercial Wireless Division, Room # 4-C224, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000320.doc
                • the public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000368.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000368.txt
                • S.W. Washington, DC 20554. Copies of the comments and replies should also be provided to José M. Ochoa, Auctions and Industry Analysis Division, Rm # 4-B544, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W. Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda describing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000397.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000397.txt
                • address the petitions for reconsideration in light of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 309, 47 C.F.R. § 1.429 and any other public interest considerations. All oppositions and replies should reference the docket number of this proceeding, WT 99-168. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000402.doc
                • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.§§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000502.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000502.txt
                • individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.2000(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000523.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000523.txt
                • for filing Oppositions to this waiver request is March 22, 2000. The deadline for filing Replies to any Oppositions is March 29, 2000. As with all other matters associated with the AirCell proceeding, including previous waiver petitions, this waiver request will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, subject to the applicable requirements set forth under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. For further information, contact Wilbert E. Nixon, Jr., Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division at 202-418-0620. See In re AirCell, Inc., Petition, Pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, For a Waiver of the Airborne Cellular Rule, or in the Alternative, For a Declaratory Ruling, Order, DA 98-2590 (Dec. 24,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000726.txt
                • Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554) and a diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). It is also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Court Yard Level, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C.or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Dan Grosh or Patrick Forster, (202) 418-1310. - FCC - Revision of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Second
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000760.doc
                • the petitions for reconsideration in light of the requirements of 47 U.S.C. § 309, 47 C.F.R. § 1.429 and any other public interest considerations. All oppositions should reference the docket number of this proceeding, i.e., WT Docket No. 97-82. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000842.doc
                • for filing Oppositions to this waiver request is April 27, 2000. The deadline for filing Replies to any Oppositions is May 4, 2000. As with all other matters associated with the AirCell proceeding, including previous waiver petitions, this waiver request will be treated, for ex parte purposes, as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, subject to the applicable requirements set forth under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. For further information, contact Wilbert E. Nixon, Jr., Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division at 202-418-0620. See In re AirCell, Inc., Petition, Pursuant to Section 7 of the Act, For a Waiver of the Airborne Cellular Rule, or in the Alternative, For a Declaratory Ruling, Order, DA 98-2590 (Dec. 24,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000882.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000882.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000882.txt
                • Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554) and a diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). Filings and comments are also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Court Yard Level, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Dan Grosh or Patrick Forster, (202) 418-1310. - FCC - Revision of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Second
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000888.doc
                • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.§§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000953.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da000953.txt
                • from ITS, 445 12th Street, S.W., CY-B402, Washington, D.C. 20554, (202) 857-3800. In addition, the Petition is available electronically as an attachment to the relevant ULS applications, including ULS File No. 0000068471, which pertains to the first-listed market on Attachment 1. Ex parte presentations in this proceeding will be governed by the ``permit but disclose'' procedures set forth in section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. For further information, contact Lauren Kravetz or Michael Samsock, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-7240. - FCC - 47 C.F.R. § 20.6. (...continued) (continued...) - é ê BÚHáDPuÍnuÿ‰PNG É!´R>^ÒïS›Sß¿†"KækÆý˜÷¯‡er4 ÐJùdM¿O­O ° ˜,I TV¨Û5 0Žz̪ƒ§ ×õ£ %âo� ²Š í Ëa¼% Tf(c) U~íðUyÈÓšî�o=‚cŒ {ýYAD ÒÙÔZv¦}²YAD e/‰,Ê-Ê%E9 ^1ŽJ 2‹Ð bʆPh=f 8H‡]}¢È`£Ö2@ ¸áí'ÿßäÅXÂt‹p¤O À �þ$‰�>ÉûŸ -¦mË``›Q(q P²
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001050.doc
                • ``shared resources.'' We also seek comment on whether, and to what extent, asymmetrical reciprocal compensation arrangements between wireline carriers and CMRS providers are likely to alter, for better or worse, the competitive balance between these carriers, and to what extent any such effects are relevant under the terms of the Act. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before June 1, 2000; reply comments are due on or before June 13, 2000. To file formally, parties must submit an original and four copies
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001075.doc
                • Bureau, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Suite 4-A628, Washington, DC 20554. Comments and reply comments will be available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001091.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001091.txt
                • to pforster@fcc.gov. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing with the Commission's Secretary (Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554) and a diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding is a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Copies of this Public Notice in alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio- cassette, and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426 voice, (202) 418-7365 TTY, or at bmillin@fcc.gov.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001092.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001092.txt
                • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions, and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001098.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001098.txt
                • of these wireless telephones create a public safety concern that should be further considered. Accordingly, the Public Safety Entities request that the Commission seek additional comment concerning call back capabilities for non-serviced initialized handsets and address whether further Commission action, such as technical solutions or educational programs, is needed or appropriate. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before June 19, 2000; reply comments are due on or before July 5, 2000. To file formally, parties must submit an original and four copies
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001120.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001120.txt
                • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations: (1) the Commission's duplicating contractor,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001132.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001132.txt
                • should refer to DA 00-1132 and File No. 0000053807. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, and oppositions must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001138.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001138.txt
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.2000(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001171.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001171.txt
                • the public reference file for this petition, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, (202) 418-1350. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this petition, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject petition, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001172.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001172.txt
                • public reference file for this request, contact Maria Ringold, Chief, Wireless Branch, RIC, at (202) 418-0271. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001189.doc
                • by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject application will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Jamison Prime of the Policy and Rules Branch of the Public Safety and Private
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001242.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001242.txt
                • applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.2000(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001405.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001405.txt
                • purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on land mobile licensees not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Request for Waiver will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Maurice J. DePont of the Policy
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001581.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001581.txt
                • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations: (1) the Commission's duplicating contractor,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001599.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001599.txt
                • application or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001618.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001618.txt
                • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Pursuant to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.927(i), ex parte notifications filed by the applicants must be served on all parties to the proceeding. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all pleadings
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001634.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001634.txt
                • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Pursuant to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.927(i), ex parte notifications filed by the applicants must be served on all parties to the proceeding. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all pleadings
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001698.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001698.txt
                • restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of persons not party to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Request for Waiver will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Brian O'Donnell of the Policy
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001699.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001699.txt
                • by the Commission as restricted proceedings for ex parte purposes under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the application, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject application will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact the Jamison Prime of the Public Safety and Private Wireless Division of the Wireless
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001748.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001748.txt
                • the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Michael Ferrante, Room No. 4-C 124, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001749.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001749.txt
                • the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Michael Ferrante, Room No. 4-C 124, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001750.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001750.txt
                • the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, TW B204, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. Comments also should be provided to Michael Ferrante, Room No. 4-C 124, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th St. S.W., Washington, DC 20554. This proceeding has been designated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001773.doc
                • the Texas Commission on State Emergency Communications filed an Emergency Petition for FCC Compliance Oversight and Conditional Petition for Maximum Sanctions, requesting emergency Commission oversight to facilitate wireless carrier compliance with the Commission's wireless Enhanced 911 Phase I service rules. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), this proceeding is designated as a a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding and subject to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). The Texas Commission on State Emergency Communications petition is available for public inspection during regular business hours in the FCC Public Reference Room, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Requests should reference:
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001841.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001841.txt
                • it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waivers, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). All written ex parte presentations and all written disclosures of oral ex parte presentations should reference PDC's Waiver Requests and DA 00-XXX and be filed with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. A copy of each filing should be sent to International Transcription
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001875.doc
                • of wireless Phase I technologies? What is the division of costs between LECs and PSAPs in the provision of wireline E911 networks? Although the Commission has not imposed special obligations on LECs in implementing wireless E911, whether certain costs associated with Phase I technologies should be borne or shared by LECs? This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before September 18, 2000 and reply comments are due on or before October 11, 2000. To file formally, parties must submit an original and four
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001881.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001881.txt
                • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Pursuant to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.927(i), ex parte notifications filed by the applicants must be served on all parties to the proceeding. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's Rules,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001893.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001893.txt
                • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Pursuant to the requirements of 47 C.F.R. § 1.927(i), ex parte notifications filed by the applicants must be served on all parties to the proceeding. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's Rules,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001913.doc
                • ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and poltential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject Waiver Request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information, contact Karen Franklin of the Policy and Rules
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001953.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da001953.txt
                • and (4) Paul Murray, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Room 4-B442, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Washington, D. C. 20554. By this Public Notice, we announce, pursuant to section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. We believe the public interest will best be served by applying permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures in this case because this proceeding involves broad public policy issues. These procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees, but require that these presentations be disclosed in the record
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002048.doc
                • diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), Room CY-B400, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554. Filings and comments are also available for inspection and copying in the Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20554 or may be purchased from ITS. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. For further information, contact Wendy Austrie, Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-1310. -FCC- Revision of the Commission's Rules To Ensure Compatibility With Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling Systems, CC Docket No. 94-102, Second
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002083.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002083.txt
                • light of the Commission decisions in response to the Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems petition and the WCA petition, comment is requested on these issues. Interested parties may file comments and reply comments in accordance with the procedures outlined below. This matter shall be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002134.doc
                • it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waivers, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). All written ex parte presentations and all written disclosures of oral ex parte presentations should reference Satellite Receivers, Ltd. Waiver Requests and DA 00-2134 and be filed with the Office of Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554. A copy of each filing should be sent to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002167.doc
                • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver requests, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.§§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver requests will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). For further information,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002231.doc
                • granted to Voicestream. APCO argues that the grant of the waiver should not have been considered without providing an opportunity for public comment. Additionally, APCO argues that the Voicestream waiver appears to reward non-compliance and may encourage other carriers to seek waivers for alternative methods and schedules for wireless E911 compliance. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). Parties interested in filing oppositions may do so on or before October 10, 2000 and replies to oppositions are due on or before October 17, 2000. To file formally, parties must submit an original and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002352.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002352.txt
                • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002402.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002402.txt
                • WAC points out that despite the promulgation of section 255 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, hearing aid users continue to have little or no access to digital wireless phones. WAC requests that the Commission take action to make digital wireless phone accessible to hearing aid users as quickly as possible. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). . In completing the transmittal screen, commenters should include their full name, postal service mailing address, and the RM of this proceeding. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002704.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da002704.txt
                • an extension of time would allow it to keep its existing network in operation while evaluating its business options. We seek comment on these waiver requests. Parties interested in filing comments may do so on or before January 5, 2001 and reply comments are due on or before January 22, 2001. This is a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding pursuant to §1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. Presentations to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible provided that ex parte presentations are disclosed pursuant to 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b). . In completing the transmittal screen, parties should include their full name, Postal Service mailing address, and the docket number of this proceeding. Parties who choose to file by paper must submit an original and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2000/da992765.doc
                • proceedings for ex parte purposes under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to the waiver request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules. See Sections 1.1200(a), 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R.§§ 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Therefore, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject waiver request will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). . By the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010121.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010121.txt
                • the construction period is not extended, it must order analog equipment in time for it to be assembled, delivered and deployed to provide the required coverage for each MTA by the August 12, 2001 construction deadline. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010122.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010122.txt
                • will be deemed to have satisfied its substantial service obligations if it is making at least twenty channels available to its customers in each MTA and has made a satisfactory demonstration of service to the public. This matter shall be treated as a ``permit but disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200(a) & 1.1206. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010151.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010151.txt
                • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010152.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010152.txt
                • 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies also may be obtained from ITS. Because of the policy implications and potential impact of this proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this matter as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules, see Sections 1.1200(a) and 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), 1.1206, rather than a restricted proceeding under Section 1.1208 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1208. Therefore, any ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the subject request, subsequent to the release of this Public Notice, will be permissible but must be disclosed in accordance
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010499.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/2001/da010499.txt
                • of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
              • http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/1996/dd961126.html
                • November 22, 1996. by O & A. (DA No. 96-1962). IB COMSAT CORPORATION APPLICATION RE: INTELSAT. Modified the ex parte status of COMSAT Corporation's application to participate in the construction of an INTELSAT Ku-band satellite from that of a "restricted" proceeding to a "nonrestricted" proceeding. Accordingly, ex parte presentations will be permitted but subject to disclosure as prescribed by Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Action by Chief, International Bureau. Adopted: November 23, 1996. by Order. (DA No. 96-1972). IB COMSAT CORPORATION'S APPLICATION RE: INMARSAT. Granted COMSAT Corporation's application for authority to interconnect its INMARSAT satellite communications facilities with the facilities of commercial Internet service providers. Action by Chief, International Bureau. Adopted: November 22, 1996. by Order. (DA No. 96-1961). IB
              • http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/e911.doc
                • to pforster@fcc.gov. Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and four copies of each filing with the Commission's Secretary (Magalie Roman Salas, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554) and a diskette copy to the Commission's copy contractor (International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), CY-B400, (202) 857-3800). Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, this proceeding is a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted subject to disclosure. Copies of this Public Notice in alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio- cassette, and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418-7426 voice, (202) 418-7365 TTY, or at bmillin@fcc.gov.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/voip911order.pdf
                • 1.200 et seq. Federal Communications Commission FCC 05-116 36 summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.184 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. B. Comment Filing Procedures 65. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R §§ 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Order and the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01088.doc http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01088.html
                • during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, 445 12th St., S.W., Rm. CY-A257, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(b). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this NPRM, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix C. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the NPRM. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA. Comments must
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.html http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2001/fcc01285.pdf
                • this case''); Opposition of Sprint to Joint Motion, File Nos. EB-01-MD-001, 002 (filed Aug. 10, 2001) at 2 (noting that ``[a]ll three parties to this proceeding have elected to seek judicial review of the [BTI] Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit''). 11 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(a). 12 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(b). 13 47 C.F.R. 1.1202(c), 1.1206. 14 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1204. 15 47 U.S.C. 208. 16 47 C.F.R. 1.1208, 1.1206, 1.1204. 17 See, e.g., Letter from Alexander P. Starr, Chief, Market Disputes Resolution Division, Enforcement Bureau, to James F. Bendernagel, Counsel for AT&T, Jonathan E. Canis, Counsel for BTI, and Cheryl A. Tritt, Counsel for Sprint, File Nos. EB-01- MD-001, 002 (Jan. 18, 2001). 18 47
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/FCC-04-189A1.html
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.100 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. 55. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this NPRM, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) is contained in Appendix A. As required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the expected impact on small entities of the proposals contained in the NPRM. Written public comments are requested
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2005/FCC-05-191A1.html
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.230 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. V.B. Comment Filing Procedures Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this document. All filings related to this Order and the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking should refer to EB
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2006/FCC-06-83A1.html
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.^29 Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.^30 4. 23. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended, 5 U.S.C. S 604, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") for this NPRM, of the possible significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules proposed in this NPRM.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2034A1.html
                • provided.4 Because this request may implicate broadly applicable policy issues, we believe it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the ex parte rules.5 Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in the petition will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.6 Commenters seeking to protect the confidentiality of information produced shall follow the procedures set forth in Commission rule section 0.459.7 Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested persons may file comments on NEC BNS's waiver request on or before July 19, 2004.8 Reply comments must be filed on or before July 29,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2092A1.html
                • proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we find it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules.4 Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in this proceeding will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.5 FILING PROCEDURES Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before July 27, 2004, and reply comments on or before August 10, 2004.6 Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-2093A1.html
                • proceeding on persons not parties to this request, we find it would be in the public interest to treat this case as a permit-but-disclose proceeding under the Commission's ex parte rules.4 Ex parte presentations that are made with respect to the issues involved in this proceeding will be allowed but must be disclosed in accordance with the requirements of section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.5 FILING PROCEDURES Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on or before July 27, 2004, and reply comments on or before August 10, 2004.6 Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of Documents in Rulemaking
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-04-33A1.html
                • Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available.4 We now release the BellSouth audit report. 5 In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 6 Accordingly, comments are due no later than March 9, 2004. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit?but?disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure.7 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.8 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-05-1916A1.html
                • Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available.4 We now release the Verizon audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 5 Accordingly, comments are due no later than August 30, 2005. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit?but?disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure.6 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.7 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-05-3180A1.html
                • Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available.4 We now release the BellSouth audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 5 Accordingly, comments are due no later than February 13, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit?but?disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure.6 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.7 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-06-126A1.html
                • requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available.5 We now invite comments on the AT&T audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. 6 Accordingly, comments are due no later than March 27, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit?but?disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permissible but subject to disclosure.7 FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS) or by filing paper copies.8 Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Public_Notices/DA-06-1385A1.html
                • the Communications Act requires that the results of the audit be made publicly available. We now release the Qwest audit report. In accordance with section 53.213(d) of the Commission's rules, interested parties may file comments on the report with the Commission within 60 days. Accordingly, comments are due no later than September 1, 2006. EX PARTE PRESENTATIONS Pursuant to section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, this proceeding will be conducted as a permit-but-disclose proceeding in which ex parte communications are permitted but subject to disclosure. FILING PROCEDURES Interested parties may file comments on the biennial audit report using the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System ("ECFS") or by filing paper copies. Comments filed through the ECFS can be sent as an electronic
              • http://www.fcc.gov/eb/otherinfo/fcc97218.html
                • Flexibility Analysis is discussed fully in Appendix C of this Report and Order. B. Ex Parte Rules -- Permit-But-Disclose Proceeding 55. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rule making proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided, they are disclosed as outlined in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. '' 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). VI. ORDERING CLAUSES 56. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in Sections 4(i), 303(r) and 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. '' 151, 154(i), 303(r), 503(b), Part 1, Subpart A, Section 1.80(b), 47 C.F.R. ' 1.80(b), is amended to incorporate as a note the Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement, and the Guidelines
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-02-899A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-02-899A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-02-899A1.txt
                • parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set forth below, no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(1). Persons making oral ex parte presentations must file a summary of the presentation, as set forth below, and deliver copies to the Commissioners or Commission employees involved with the presentation no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. §1.1206(b)(2). All ex parte filings must be clearly labeled as such and must reference this Public Notice,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-1007A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-1007A1.pdf
                • presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission, as set forth below, no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1). Persons making oral ex parte presentations must file a summary of the presentation, as set forth below, and deliver copies to the Commissioners or Commission employees involved with the presentation no later than the next business day after the presentation. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). All ex parte filings must be clearly labeled as such and must reference this Public
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1593A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-06-1593A1.pdf
                • 1.1208. We have concluded, however, that classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose would, in this case, serve the public interest. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), we announce that the ex parte procedures applicable to nonrestricted proceedings will govern our consideration of the instant applications. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Office of the Secretary no later than the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1796A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-09-1796A1.pdf
                • the Tama and Zwirn responses to an Enforcement Bureau letter of inquiry leaving Cherry unable to file a ``meaningful opposition'' to the assignment to the Receiver or to participate fully in the Commission's consideration of the alleged Section 310(d) violation. Cherry contends that his being denied ``notice or opportunity . . . to participate'' is also a violation of Sections 1.1206 and 1.1208 of the ex parte Rules. Finally, Cherry asserts that rather than retaliate against him, the Commission should grant his request for ``an injunction against the transfer by the FCC of any formerly held [Tama] licenses . . . .'' In opposition, the Receiver claims that Cherry's Objection is just one of a ``long, ever-growing list of frivolous'' filings
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-310A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-10-310A1.pdf
                • are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented generally is required. Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. For further information, please contact Nicholas A. Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 418-7400 or TTY (202) 418-0484. - FCC - Petition of the Ad Hoc Coalition of International Telecommunications Companies for Rulemaking to Address Inequities in USAC's Interpretation and Application of the Carrier's Carrier Rule, WC Docket No. 06-122 (Feb. 16,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1832A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-11-1832A1.pdf
                • and Priority Mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Ex parte status: This is a ``permit-but-disclose'' rulemaking proceeding for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200-1.1216. As a result of the permit-but-disclose status of this proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Copies of the reports and any subsequently filed documents in this matter may be obtained electronically at http://www.fcc.gov/e-file/ecfs.html, and in paper form from BCPI during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Information Center located at 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC, 20554. Alternate formats of this Public Notice (computer
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-00-427A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-00-427A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-00-427A1.txt
                • D.C. 20554. . Comments and reply comments are available electronically in ASCII text, Word 97, and Adobe Acrobat. . Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 CFR Sections 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ("IRFA") is contained in Appendix A. As required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-44A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-44A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-02-44A1.txt
                • send diskette copies to the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. . . Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice-and-comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206(a). Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. With respect to this Notice, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA'') is contained in Appendix A. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 603, the Commission has prepared an IRFA of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of the proposals contained in this Notice. Written public comments are requested on
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-125A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-125A1.pdf
                • making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. Other requirements pertaining to oral and written presentations are set forth in Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Comment Filing Procedures . Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and six copies of each, and are hereby notified that effective December 18, 2001, the Commission's contractor, Vistronix, Inc., will receive hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at a new location in downtown Washington, DC. The address is
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-127A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-127A1.pdf
                • 863-2898, or via e-mail at qualexint@aol.com. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0531 (voice), 202-418-7365 (TTY). Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding, subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the subjects
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-160A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-03-160A1.pdf
                • contained in §§ 1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Ex Parte Rules - permit-but-disclose. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). Accessibility Information. Accessible formats of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording and Braille) are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Brian Millin, of the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418-7426, TTY (202) 418-7365, or at bmillin@fcc.gov. Comment Information. Pursuant to Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-99A4.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-04-99A4.pdf
                • addressed at a later date. These matters are being informally addressed by the Commission's International Bureau at this time. What matters should the International Bureau focus on to expedite the rollout of DAB in the United States? PROCEDURAL MATTERS Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-05-10A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-05-10A1.pdf
                • the new Section 73.3580(e)-(f)-(g)-(h). We seek comment on these proposed changes to our rules. IV. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 9. Ex Parte Rules. This is a permit-but-disclose notice and comment rulemaking proceeding. Ex parte presentations are permitted, except during the Sunshine Agenda period, provided that they are disclosed as provided in the Commission's Rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, and 1.1206(a). 10. Paperwork Reduction Act. This document contains proposed new or modified information collection requirements. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection requirements contained in this document, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-05-120A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-05-120A1.pdf
                • the adoption or dismissal of all timely filed proposals and counterproposals and must be agreed to by all parties that have filed timely expressions of interest in any of the proposals or counterproposals in the particular rulemaking docket. 53. Filing Requirements. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-164A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-06-164A1.pdf
                • in Section 1.1307(a)(1)-(8) and (b) of the rules requires the preparation of an EA. All other actions are deemed individually and cumulatively to have no significant effect on the quality of the human environment and are categorically excluded from environmental processing. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1306(a). Avatar Report at 5-1. See paras. 36-44, supra. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1202, 1.1203, 1.1206. We note that the Commission shares jurisdiction over some of the issues addressed in this proceeding with FWS and the FAA, and that presentations by these agencies are therefore exempt from disclosure. 47 C.F.R. § 1.204(a)(5). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. See 44 U.S.C. § 3506(c)(4). See 5 U.S.C. § 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-612, has been
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-204A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-07-204A1.pdf
                • stations or other Commission licensees. To further these goals, we also recommend to Congress that it remove the requirement that LPFM stations protect full-power stations operating on third adjacent channels. Administrative matters Filing Requirements Ex Parte Rules. The Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose'' subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the Rules. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-43A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/FCC-12-43A1.pdf
                • arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable
              • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/01-60.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/01-60.pdf
                • Commission, Room C-1804, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Edward Springer, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to edward.springer@omb.eop.gov. 51. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b). 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely
              • http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/98-57.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/98-57.pdf
                • Federal Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov and to Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725 - 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to fain_t@al.eop.gov. Ex parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under Section 1.1206(b) of the rules. 47 C.F.R. ( 1.1206(b), as revised. Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation
              • http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/pdf/fr03au05-37.pdf
                • Inc., 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. The full text may also be downloaded at: http:// hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/ attachmatch/FCC­05­120.pdf. Alternative formats are available to persons with disabilities by contacting Martha Contee at (202) 418­0260 or TTY (202) 418­2555. 13. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a ``permit-but- disclose'' proceeding subject to the ``permit-but-disclose'' requirements under §1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.1206(b)). Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or otherwise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not
              • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/filings/2004/BrandX.pet.app.final.pdf
                • (2) Sarah Whitesell, Cable Services Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., 3-C488, Washington, D.C., 20554, swhitese@ fcc.gov. In addition, five copies of each filing must be filed with Linda Senecal, Cable Services Bureau, 445 12th Street, S.W., 2-C438, Washington, D.C. 20554, lsenecal@fcc.gov. 128.Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding will be treated as a "permit-but-disclose" proceeding, subject to the "permit-but-disclose" requirements under section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules.424 Ex parte presentations are permissible if disclosed in accordance with Commission rules, except during the Sunshine Agenda period when presentations, ex parte or other- wise, are generally prohibited. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that a memorandum summarizing a presentation must contain a summary of the substance and not merely a listing of the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1998/timewrn2.html http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/1998/timewrn2.wp
                • Co. v. FCC, 56 F.3d 151 (D.C. Cir. 1995), said nothing on the subject, and for good reason. We usually do not pronounce on questions no one has presented. After we remanded the case, Time Warner could have placed its claim and its supporting arguments before the Commission. Time Warner surely knew of the rules allowing this. See 47 C.F.R. 1.1206 (1995). Yet during the ensuing eighteen months, while the case remained pending before the Commission, Time Warner chose to do nothing. We have held time and again, in cases involving this and other administrative agencies, that if a party does not raise and argue an issue before the agency, the court will not consider it. See, e.g., the cases cited
              • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-60434.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2001/00-60434.html
                • id. at 799. The Petitioners fail to meet this burden. We also reject the Petitioners' speculative and perhaps sinister scenario imputed to the ex parte communication between the FCC and the interested parties. The APA permits ex parte contact between an agency and private parties as long as the agency adequately gives notice of such contact. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(a) (stating that "ex parte presentations . . . to or from Commission decision-making personnel are permissible . . . provided that [they] . . . are disclosed"). The Petitioners initially charged the FCC of failing to file such notices, but later retracted that accusation. The record reflects that the FCC properly disclosed the ex parte contacts. Generally, ex parte contact
              • http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/documents/opinions/2004/03-1396-071604.pdf
                • the Triennial Review Order in United States Telecom Ass'n v. FCC, 359 F.3d 554, 585 (D.C. Cir. 2004). On October 24, 2003, one business day before expiration of the 90­day extension of the time for the Commission to act upon Verizon's July 2002 petition, Verizon submitted an ex parte letter to the Commission, as authorized by 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200, 1.1206. The letter stated: [A]lthough Verizon's petition originally requested for- bearance with respect to all elements that do not have to be unbundled under section 251, the broadband issue is sufficiently urgent that we hereby withdraw our request for forbearance with respect to any narrowband elements that do not have to be unbundled under section 251. Specifically, the portion of the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol-tw_exparte120500.pdf
                • S.W.-The Portals TW-B204 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL") and Time Warner Inc. ("Time Warner") (collectively, the "Applicants"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On December 4, 2000, representatives of the Applicants met with members of the Commission's staff to discuss the issue of instant messaging ("IM"). A list of attendees is attached. The parties discussed concerns raised in this
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol-tw_exparte121200.pdf
                • S.W.-The Portals TW-B204 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL") and Time Warner Inc. ("Time Warner") (collectively, the "Applicants"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On December 11, 2000, representatives of AOL met with members of the Commission's staff to review certain issues raised in this proceeding. Participating on behalf of AOL were George Vradenburg III, Senior Vice President, Global and Strategic
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol2_exparte091800.pdf
                • Street, S.W. --- The Portals TW-B204 Washington, DC 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL") and Time Warner Inc. ("Time Warner"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On September 15, 2000, George Vradenburg, III, Senior Vice President, AOL Global and Strategic Policy; Steven N. Teplitz, AOL Vice President-Telecommunications Policy; Peter D. Ross of this firm on behalf of AOL; and Catherine R. Nolan,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol2_exparte101900.pdf
                • Street, S.W.-The Portals TW-B204 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL") and Time Warner Inc. ("Time Warner" and, together with AOL, the "Applicants"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On October 18, 2000, representatives of AOL and Time Warner met with Deborah Lathen, Chief, Cable Services Bureau; Michelle Ellison, FCC Deputy General Counsel; and James Bird, FCC Assistant General Counsel, to review a range of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_exparte073100.pdf
                • 31, 2000 Ms. Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W.-The Portals TW-B204 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules is an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-cited proceeding. On July 28, 2000, Commissioner Michael K. Powell and members of his staff-Peter A. Tenhula, Senior Legal Advisor; Kyle D. Dixon, Legal Advisor; Susan Eid, Legal Advisor; Antonia McGowan, Confidential Assistant; and a group of summer
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_exparte080100.pdf
                • 445 12th Street, S.W.-The Portals TW-B204 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL") and Time Warner Inc. ("Time Warner"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On July 31, 2000, representatives of AOL and Time Warner met with members of the Commission's staff, at their request, as a follow-up to the July 13, 2000 ex parte demonstration of the AOLTV service. Attending
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_exparte101900.pdf
                • Street, S.W.-The Portals TW-B204 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL") and Time Warner Inc. ("Time Warner" and, together with AOL, the "Applicants"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On October 18, 2000, representatives of AOL and Time Warner met with Deborah Lathen, Chief, Cable Services Bureau; Michelle Ellison, FCC Deputy General Counsel; and James Bird, FCC Assistant General Counsel, to review a range of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_exparte120700.pdf
                • Street, S.W. ­ The Portals TW-B204 Washington, DC 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL") and Time Warner Inc. ("Time Warner"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On December 6, 2000, Steve Case, Chairman and CEO of AOL; George Vradenburg III, Senior Vice President, Global and Strategic Policy, AOL; Steven N. Teplitz, Vice President, Telecommunications Policy, AOL; and Richard E. Wiley and the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_exparte120800.pdf
                • Ms. Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. --- The Portals TW-B204 Washington, DC 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On December 7, 2000, Steven Teplitz, Vice President, Telecommunications Policy of AOL had a telephone conversation with David Goodfriend of Commissioner Ness's office. Mr. Teplitz discussed recent meetings regarding instant messaging between AOL, Time Warner Inc.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_exparte121900.pdf
                • Ms. Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. --- The Portals TW-B204 Washington, DC 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules are an original and one copy of this notice regarding permitted oral ex parte presentations in the above-referenced proceeding. On December 18, 2000, Steven N. Teplitz, Vice President, Telecommunications Policy of AOL had separate conversations with Karen Edwards Onyeije of Chairman Kennard's office, David Goodfriend of Commissioner Ness's office, Kyle D. Dixon of Commissioner Powell's office,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aol_exparte122000.pdf
                • Ms. Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. --- The Portals TW-B204 Washington, DC 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On December 19, 2000, Geroge Vradenburg III, Senior Vice President, Global and Strategic Policy and Steven N. Teplitz, Vice President, Telecommunications Policy of AOL along with the undersigned participated in a meeting with other interested parties
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/aoltw_exparte091900.pdf
                • 445 12th Street, S.W.-The Portals TW-B204 Washington, DC 20554 Re: America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Applications of America Online, Inc. and Time Warner Inc. for Transfers of Control, CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: On behalf of America Online, Inc. ("AOL") and Time Warner Inc. ("Time Warner"), submitted herewith pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, are an original and one copy of this notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On September 18, 2000, George Vradenburg, III, Senior Vice President, AOL Global and Strategic Policy; Steven N. Teplitz, AOL Vice President-Telecommunications Policy; Peter D. Ross of this firm on behalf of AOL; and Catherine R. Nolan,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/consumersunion_exparte101000.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit October 10, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re:Notice of Ex Parte presentation in CS Docket No. 00-30 Application for Merger of AOL and Time Warner Dear Ms. Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter memorializes a meeting held on October 5, 2000, between Harold Feld, Associate Director, Media Access Project (MAP), Jeffrey Chester, Executive Director, Center for Media Education, and William Jay Freedman, Senior Legal Advisor to Commissioner Tristani. Due to the intervening Jewish religious holiday, this notice was unfortunately filed late. Mr. Feld and Mr. Chester urged
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu2_comment100300.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 October 3, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 CS Docket No. 99-251 Notice of Ex Parte Presentation AOL-Time Warner Merger Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter memorializes a meeting on Septmber 29, 2000, of Media Access Project (MAP) President Andrew Jay Schwartzman and Jeffrey Chester of the Center for Media Education with Commissioner Harold Furchtgott-Roth, his legal advisor Helgy Walker, and two other members of his staff, Julie Dunne and Deena Margolies. Mr. Schwartzman addressed the scope of the Commission's
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu2_exparte010301.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 January 3, 2001 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a January 3, 2000 oral ex parte presentation by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project in a telephone conversation with Karen Edwards Onyeije, Legal Advisory to the Chairman. Mr. Schwartzman suggested that in light of the Commission's December 21, 2000 order determining that AT&T had definitively elected to divest its
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu2_exparte010901.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 January 9, 2001 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a January 8, 2001 oral ex parte presentation by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project in a telephone conversation with William J. Friedman, Legal Assitant to Commissioner Tristani. Mr. Schwartzman reiterated the priority his clients placed on assuring that any order granting the AOL/ Time Warner applications should be conditioned
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu2_exparte122000.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 December 20, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a December 19, 2000 oral ex parte presentation to Commissioner Tristani, her Senior Legal Advisor William Jay Friedman, and Ann Chavez of Commissioner Tristani's staff by Gene Kimmelman of Consumers Union and the undersigned. Messrs. Kimmelman and Schwartzman reviewed issues surrounding AT&T's letter of December 15, 2000 purporting to elect a
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu2_exparte122200.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 December 22, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a December 21, 2000 oral ex parte presentation to Chief of Staff Kathryn Brown by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project and Gene Kimmelman of Consumers Union. Messrs. Kimmelman and Schwartzman reviewed issues surrounding AT&T's December 19, 2000 "clarification" of its December 15, 2000 letter purporting to elect a spin-off
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu3_comment100300.pdf
                • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 October 3, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 CS Docket No. 99-251 Notice of Ex Parte Presentation AOL-Time Warner Merger AT&T - MediaOne Merger Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter memorializes a meeting on Septmber 29, 2000, of Media Access Project (MAP) President Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Jeffrey Chester of the Center for Media Education, Mark Cooper Consumer Federation of America Research Director and Gene Kimmelman, Co-Director of Consumers Union's Washington Office with William J. Friedman, Senior Legal Advisor to Commissioner Tristani. During this meeting,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu3_exparte010301.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 January 3, 2001 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a January 2, 2000 oral ex parte presentation by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project in a telephone voicemail message left for Chief of Staff Kathryn Brown. Mr. Schwartzman suggested that in light of the Commission's December 21, 2000 order determining that AT&T had definitively elected to divest its partnership
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu3_exparte010901.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 January 9, 2001 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a January 7, 2001 oral ex parte presentation by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project in a telephone conversation with David Goodfriend, Legal Assitant to Commissioner Ness. Mr. Schwartzman urged that the Commission should direct that any order granting the AOL/ Time Warner applications should be conditioned on assurances that
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu3_exparte122000.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 December 20, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 Written Ex Parte Presentation AOL-Time Warner Merger Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, the attached letter is submitted here for inclusion in Docket 00-30. Respectfully submitted, Andrew Jay Schwartzman Counsel for CU, et al. 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 December 20, 2000 Chairman William E. Kennard Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 RE: AT&T/MediaOne Merger (Docket 99-251) Dear Mr.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu4_comment100300.pdf
                • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 October 3, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 CS Docket No. 99-251 Notice of Ex Parte Presentation AOL-Time Warner Merger AT&T - MediaOne Merger Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter memorializes a meeting on Septmber 29, 2000, of Media Access Project (MAP) President Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Jeffrey Chester of the Center for Media Education, Mark Cooper Consumer Federation of America Research Director and Gene Kimmelman, Co-Director of Consumers Union's Washington Office with Kyle D. Dixon, Legal Advisor to Commissioner Powell. During this meeting, the
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu4_exparte010301.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 January 3, 2001 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a January 2, 2000 oral ex parte presentation by Gene Kimmelman of Consumers Union in a telephone conversation with Chief of Staff Kathryn Brown. Mr. Kimmelman reiterated the importance of assuring interoperability in provision of instant messaging services. He stressed that affording access to but a single additional instant messaging providing
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_comment092900.pdf
                • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 September 29, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 CS Docket No. 99-251 Notice of Ex Parte Presentation AOL-Time Warner Merger AT&T - MediaOne Merger Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter memorializes a meeting on Septmber 29, 2000, of Andrew Jay Schwartzman and Harold Feld of the Media Access Project (MAP) and Gene Kimmelman, Co-Director of Consumers Union's Washington Office and James Bird of the Office of General Counsel. During this meeting, Mr. Schwartzman and Mr. Kimmelman raised the following issues pertaining to the above
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_comment100300.pdf
                • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 October 3, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 CS Docket No. 99-251 Notice of Ex Parte Presentation AOL-Time Warner Merger AT&T - MediaOne Merger Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter memorializes a meeting on Septmber 29, 2000, of Media Access Project (MAP) President Andrew Jay Schwartzman, Jeffrey Chester of the Center for Media Education, Mark Cooper Consumer Federation of America Research Director and Gene Kimmelman, Co-Director of Consumers Union's Washington Office with Kathryn Brown, Chief of Staff and Karen Edwards Onyeije, the Chairman's Legal
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_exparte010301.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 January 3, 2001 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a January 3, 2000 oral ex parte presentation by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project in a telephone conversation with William J. Friedman Legal Advisor to the Chairman. Mr. Schwartzman urged that the Commission should direct that any order granting the AOL/ Time Warner applications should be conditioned on assurances
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_exparte010801.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 January 8, 2001 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a January 5, 2001 oral ex parte presentation by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project in a telephone conversation with Commissioner Tristani. Mr. Schwartzman urged that the Commission should direct that any order granting the AOL/ Time Warner applications should be conditioned on assurances that local and regional ISP's be
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_exparte010901.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 January 9, 2001 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a January 8, 2001 oral ex parte presentation by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project and Gene Kimmelman of Consumers Union in a telephone conference call with Chief of Staff Kathryn Brown. Mr. Schwartzman reiterated the priority his clients placed on assuring that any order granting the AOL/ Time Warner
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_exparte062600.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 June 26, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 Notice of Ex Parte Presentation AOL-Time Warner Merger Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter memorializes a meeting held on June 23, 2000, between Harold Feld, Associate Director, Media Access Project (MAP), Jeffrey Chester, Executive Director, Center for Media Education, and Carl E. Kandutsch, Attorney, Cable Services Bureau (CSB). Mr. Feld and Mr. Chester discussed the significance of the Ninth Circuit ruling in AT&T v. City of Portland. They
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_exparte122000.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 December 20, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a December 19, 2000 oral ex parte presentation to Kathryn Brown, Chief of Staff. Messrs. Kimmelman and Schwartzman reviewed issues surrounding AT&T's letter of December 15, 2000 purporting to elect a spin-off of Liberty Media to comply with the June, 2000 AT&T/MediaOne decision. They argued that the staff letter of December
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_exparte122100.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 December 21, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a December 20, 2000 oral ex parte presentation to Commissioner Ness by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project and Gene Kimmelman of Consumers Union. Messrs. Kimmelman and Schwartzman reviewed issues surrounding AT&T's letter of December 15, 2000 purporting to elect a spin-off of Liberty Media to comply with the June,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_exparte122200.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 December 22, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 AOL-Time Warner Merger CS Docket No. 99-251 AT&T/MediaOne Merger Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, this letter provides notice of a December 21, 2000 oral ex parte presentation to Commissioner Powell and his Legal Assistant Kyle Pope by Andrew Jay Schwartzman of Media Access Project and Gene Kimmelman of Consumers Union. Messrs. Kimmelman and Schwartzman reviewed issues surrounding AT&T's December 19, 2000 "clarification" of its December 15, 2000 letter purporting to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/cu_motion121800.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 December 18, 2000 Magalie Roman-Salas Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: CS Docket No. 00-30 Written Ex Parte Presentation AOL-Time Warner Merger Dear Ms. Roman-Salas: Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(1) of the Commission's rules, the attached Emergency Motion for Expedited Declaratory Ruling and to Waive Procedural Rules as filed in Docket 99- 251 is submitted here for inclusion in Docket 00-30. Respectfully submitted, Andrew Jay Schwartzman Counsel for CU, et al. 950 18TH ST., NW SUITE 220 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 PHONE: (202) 232-4300 FACSIMILE: (202) 466-7656 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/nbc2_comment092900.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit September 29, 2000 Ms. Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: National Broadcasting Company, Inc. ("NBC"), pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, submits an original and one copy of a notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On September 28, 2000, Richard Cotton, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, NBC, and Diane Zipursky, Vice President, Washington Law and Policy, met with Commissioner Powell and Kyle Dixon, to discuss NBC's concerns regarding the proposed
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/exparte/nbc_comment092900.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit September 29, 2000 Ms. Magalie Roman Salas Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Notice of Ex Parte Presentation CS Docket No. 00-30 Dear Ms. Salas: National Broadcasting Company, Inc. ("NBC"), pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, submits an original and one copy of a notice regarding a permitted oral ex parte presentation in the above-referenced proceeding. On September 28, 2000, Richard Cotton, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, NBC, and Diane Zipursky, Vice President, Washington Law and Policy, met with Kathryn Brown, FCC Chief of Staff and Robert Pepper, Chief, Office of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_exparte052902.pdf
                • to deny and the accompanying economic and other testimony filed on May 21, a comprehensive response to the numerous issues raised by other parties. In addition, we affirmed the merger applicants' continuing desire to work with the Commission to provide such additional information as may be required in the course of the Commission's public interest analysis. 2 Pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter is being filed electronically with the Office of the Secretary. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, /s/ A. Richard Metzger, Jr. A. Richard Metzger, Jr. cc: W. Kenneth Ferree Sarah Whitesell Royce Sherlock Roger Holberg Erin Dozier John Scott James R. Bird Nandan Joshi Neil Dellar David Sappington Don
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_exparte053102.pdf
                • compliance with all applicable Commission rules (focusing especially on cable ownership 2 issues), and (3) the absence of competitive harms (focusing especially on programming, set-top boxes, and Internet issues). As to each of these issues, the presentations were drawn directly from materials already filed on the public record and did not include new facts, analysis, or argumentation. Pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter is being filed electronically with the Office of the Secretary. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, /s/ A. Richard Metzger, Jr. A. Richard Metzger, Jr. cc: Sarah Whitesell Royce Sherlock Roger Holberg Erin Dozier James R. Bird David Sappington Donald Stockdale William Dever Cynthia Bryant Jeff Tobias Susan Eid
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_exparte060602.pdf
                • the Office of General Counsel regarding the Quarterly Income Preferred Securities ("QUIPS") exchange agreement ("QUIPS Exchange Agreement"), which was attached as Appendix 5 to the application filed by Comcast and AT&T in the above-referenced docket. During that call, Messrs. Taylor and Williams described the background to the QUIPS Exchange Agreement and discussed terms of the agreement. 2 Pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter is being filed electronically with the Office of the Secretary. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, /s/ A. Renée Callahan A. Renée Callahan cc: Royce Sherlock Roger Holberg Erin Dozier James R. Bird Neil A. Dellar William Dever Jeff Tobias David Sappington Donald Stockdale Cynthia Bryant Qualex International
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_exparte062702.pdf
                • cannot be assured that the registration rights process will lead to a complete disposition of AT&T's interests in TWE before the closing of the merger between AT&T Broadband and Comcast, he has asked representatives of Comcast and AT&T to meet with FCC staff in the next several days to discuss a plan for the complete disposition. 2 Pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter is being filed electronically with the Office of the Secretary. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, /s/ A. Richard Metzger, Jr. A. Richard Metzger, Jr. cc: Chairman Michael Powell Susan M. Eid W. Kenneth Ferree Roger Holberg Erin Dozier David Sappington James R. Bird Donald Stockdale William Dever Cynthia
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_exparte071002.pdf
                • the contractual registration rights process under the TWE partnership agreement as well as the possible duration of the trust. On July 9, 2002, James R. Coltharp, Senior Director, Public Policy of Comcast, also spoke by telephone with Ms. Eid regarding the trust proposal. That conversation covered the same topics discussed by Ms. Eid and Mr. Block. 2 Pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter is being filed electronically with the Office of the Secretary. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, /s/ A. Richard Metzger, Jr. A. Richard Metzger, Jr. cc: W. Kenneth Ferree Susan Eid Royce Sherlock Roger Holberg Erin Dozier James R. Bird David Sappington Donald Stockdale William Dever Cynthia Bryant Jeff
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_exparte071702.pdf
                • involved is not a controlling interest, and that ownership of the interest that would be placed in trust would not violate any law or regulation. Each of these considerations warrants a more flexible approach to the trust than might be needed in other situations. MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. July 17, 2002 Page 2 Pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commissionís rules, an original and one copy of this letter are being filed with the Office of the Secretary. Copies of this letter are also being sent to Messrs. Ferree, Ratcliffe, Bird, and Dellar, Ms. Sherlock, Ms. Berland, and Ms. Kravetz. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, James L. Casserly cc: W. Kenneth Ferree
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_exparte080102.pdf
                • and the court in Time Warner Entm't Co. v. FCC, 240 F.3d 1126 (D.C. Cir. 2001), cert. denied sub nom. Consumer Fed'n of Am. v. FCC, 12 S. Ct. 644 (2111), reversed and remanded the Commission's cable horizontal ownership rules. MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. August 1, 2002 Page 3 This letter is submitted pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commissionís rules. Copies of this letter are also being sent to all of the FCC employees who participated in the meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, James L. Casserly cc: James R. Bird, FCC - Office of General Counsel William P. Cox, FCC - Media Bureau Erin Dozier, FCC - Media Bureau Michael
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_exparte080202.pdf
                • Comcast representatives also emphasized that AT&T and Comcast are contemplating a trust proposal in addition to insulation of the TWE interest, not in lieu of insulation, that the interest involved is not a controlling interest in TWE, and that ownership of the interest that would be placed in trust would not violate any law or regulation. 2 Pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commission's rules, this letter is being filed electronically with the Office of the Secretary. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, /s/ A. Richard Metzger, Jr. A. Richard Metzger, Jr. cc: W. Kenneth Ferree Paul Gallant Roger Holberg Erin Dozier James R. Bird David Sappington Donald Stockdale William Dever Cynthia Bryant Jeff Tobias Qualex
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/comcast_press072602.pdf
                • with this letter to give context to the July 19 release.) These releases are pertinent to the pending merger because, as reflected in the Public Interest Statement filed February 28, Comcast intends to introduce or expand phone services in the Philadelphia and Detroit areas after closing of its pending merger with AT&T Broadband. This letter is submitted pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(1) of the Commissionís rules. Courtesy copies will be sent to the staff assigned to the merger. Sincerely, James L. Casserly Attachments Press Release COMCAST ANNOUNCES ADDITIONAL DETAILS FOR VOICE SERVICE PLANS Broadband Provider Lists Additional Vendors for Internet Protocol Phone Service Friday, July 19, 2002 Philadelphia, PA - Comcast Corporation today announced additional vendors for its previously released plans for
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/qwest_exparte062102.pdf
                • and Royce Sherlock of the Media Bureau, David Sappington of the Office of Plans and Policy, James Bird and Kimberly Reindl of the Office of General Counsel and Patrick Webre of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. The purpose of the discussion was to reiterate the consequences of a merger between AT&T and Comcast. In accordance with Commission rule 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2), this ex parte is being filed electronically via the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System for inclusion in the public record of the above-referenced docket. Respectfully, /s/ Melissa E. Newman cc: Kenneth Ferree (via email: kferree@fcc.gov) Roger Holberg (via email: rholberg@fcc.gov) Royce Sherlock (via email: rsherloc@fcc.gov) David Sappington (via email: dsapping@fcc.gov) James Bird (via email: jbird@fcc.gov) Kimberly Reindl (via email: kreindl@fcc.gov)
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/rcn_exparte070302.pdf
                • YORK OFFICE THE CHRYSLER BUILDING 405 LEXINGTON AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10174 TEL.(212) 973-0111 FAX (212) 891-9598 July 3, 2002 ELECTRONICALLY FILED Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, SW Washington, DC 20024 Re: Notice of Ex Parte Presentation by RCN Telecom Services, Inc., for Filing in MB Docket 02-70. Dear Secretary Dortch: Pursuant to section 1.1206(b)(2) of the Commissionís Rules, RCN Telecom Services, Inc., by its attorneys, submits for filing in the above-captioned docket this notice of an ex parte meeting on July 2, 2002, to discuss the pending license transfer applications of AT&T Broadband and Comcast Corporation. Scott Burnside, Senior Vice President for Regulatory and Government Affairs, and John Murawski, Director of Programming, both with
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-comcast/smctc_exparte042602.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission 828 I Street, Room 527 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 874-6661 April 26, 2002 VIA ECFS Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Office of the Secretary Federal Communications Commission Dear Ms. Dortch: Re: Notice of Ex Parte Presentation CS Docket No. 02-52 MB Docket No. 02-70 In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß 1.1206, the Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission submits this notice of ex parte presentation. Sacramento discussed matters including the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regarding The Appropriate Regulatory Treatment for Broadband Access to the Internet Over Cable Facilities, CS Docket No. 02-52, and AT&T Corp., and Comcast Corp. Seek FCC Consent for a Proposed
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/att-tmobile.html
                • the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau granted the Applicants' request to withdraw the applications. In view of the Applicants' publicly stated plan to continue to pursue the proposed transaction, however, the Bureau did not close the docket. All interested parties are reminded that this proceeding is still governed by the permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules. Timeline 11/29/11 - Day 178 [47]Timeclock History | [48]Transaction Timeline Description - green indicates timeline clock is running: red indicates timeline clock is stopped - Click for History - [49]STATUS: Clock is Stopped - click for details [50]Pre-Public Notice - Application [51]Public Comment Period Public Comment Period Public Comment Period Public Comment Period Public Comment Period
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/attcomcast.html
                • proceeding involves broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as permit but disclose for purposes of the Commissions ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. Under permit but disclose procedures, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commissions rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Contacts For further information, contact Roger Holberg (202) 418-2134 or Linda Senecal (202) 418-7044 of the Media Bureau. last reviewed/updated on 11/5/03 __________________________________________________________________ [387]Skip Bottom FCC Navigation Links and Contact Info [388]FCC Home | [389]Search | [390]RSS | [391]Updates | [392]E-Filing | [393]Initiatives | [394]Consumers | [395]Find People __________________________________________________________________ [396]Skip FCC Footer
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/chorus-tds/DA-01-715A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/chorus-tds/DA-01-715A1.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/chorus-tds/DA-01-715A1.txt
                • de minimis percentage of each state's long distance customers. EX PARTE STATUS OF THIS PROCEEDING Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by ``permit-but-disclose'' ex parte procedures under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. Parties making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain a summary of the substance of the presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and arguments presented is generally required. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.206(b)(2), as revised. Other rules pertaining to
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/da001581.doc http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/da001581.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/da001581.txt
                • not in conformance with the Commission's rules or policies. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified or more stringent ex parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206. An original and four copies of all pleadings must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 Twelfth Street, S.W., TW-A325, Washington, D.C. 20554, in accordance with Section 1.51(c) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.51(c). In addition, one copy of each pleading must be delivered to each of the following locations: (1) the Commission's duplicating contractor,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv.html
                • involves broad public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as permit but disclose for purposes of the Commissions ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. 1.1200-1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a permit but disclose proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commissions rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings. Contacts For further information, contact Marcia Glauberman (202) 418-7046 or Linda Senecal (202) 418-7044 of the Media Bureau. last reviewed/updated on 12/11/06 __________________________________________________________________ [208]Skip Bottom FCC Navigation Links and Contact Info [209]FCC Home | [210]Search | [211]RSS | [212]Updates | [213]E-Filing | [214]Initiatives | [215]Consumers | [216]Find People __________________________________________________________________ [217]Skip FCC Footer
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/cablevision2_exparte030702.pdf
                • Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., met with Commissioner Kathleen Q. Abernathy. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the issues presented by R/L DBS Company, LLC in its reply comments, filed on February 25, 2002 in the above-referenced proceeding. A copy of the additional material presented at the meeting is attached to this letter. Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Commissionís rules as well as the Public Notice establishing this proceeding (DA 01-3005, rel. Dec. 21, 2001), an electronic copy of this letter is being filed with the Office of the Secretary through the Electronic Comment Filing System (ìECFSî). Copies of this letter are also being served, via electronic mail, on the Commission personnel who participated
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/cablevision3_exparte030702.pdf
                • Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., participated in a conference call with Commissioner Kevin J. Martin, and two of his legal advisors, Catherine Bohigian and Daniel Gonzalez. The purpose of the conference call was to discuss the issues presented by R/L DBS Company, LLC in its reply comments, filed on February 25, 2002 in the above-referenced proceeding. Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Commissionís rules as well as the Public Notice establishing this proceeding (DA 01-3005, rel. Dec. 21, 2001), an electronic copy of this letter is being filed with the Office of the Secretary through the Electronic Comment Filing System (ìECFSî). Copies of this letter are also being served, via electronic mail, on the Commission personnel who participated
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/cablevision_exparte030102.pdf
                • and Popeo, P.C., met with W. Kenneth Ferree, Chief of the Cable Services Bureau and leader of the Commissionís intra-agency team reviewing the proposed transaction in the above-referenced proceeding. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the issues presented by R/L DBS Company, LLC in its reply comments, filed on February 25, 2002 in this proceeding. Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Commissionís rules as well as the Public Notice establishing this proceeding (DA 01-3005, rel. Dec. 21, 2001), an electronic copy of this letter is being filed with the Office of the Secretary through the Electronic Comment Filing System (ìECFSî). Copies of this letter are also being served, via electronic mail, on the Commission personnel who participated
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/cablevision_exparte030702.pdf
                • Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., participated in a conference call with Commissioner Kevin J. Martin, and two of his legal advisors, Catherine Bohigian and Daniel Gonzalez. The purpose of the conference call was to discuss the issues presented by R/L DBS Company, LLC in its reply comments, filed on February 25, 2002 in the above-referenced proceeding. Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Commissionís rules as well as the Public Notice establishing this proceeding (DA 01-3005, rel. Dec. 21, 2001), an electronic copy of this letter is being filed with the Office of the Secretary through the Electronic Comment Filing System (ìECFSî). Copies of this letter are also being served, via electronic mail, on the Commission personnel who participated
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/cablevision_exparte071102.pdf
                • Stockdale, Marilyn Simon, and Neil Dellar from the Commission. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss issues related to the use of the channels at 61.5 W.L. orbital location for the Direct Broadcast Satellite service that are relevant to the above-referenced proceeding. A copy of the material presented at the meeting is attached to this letter. Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1-2) of the Commissionís rules and the Public Notice establishing this proceeding (DA 01-3005, rel. Dec. 21, 2001), an electronic copy of this letter is being filed with the Office of the Secretary through the Electronic Comment Filing System. Copies of this letter are also being served, via electronic mail, on the Commission personnel who participated in this meeting and who
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/da013005.pdf
                • public policy issues, the proceeding will be treated as "permit but disclose" for purposes of the Commission's ex parte rules. See generally 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1200- 1.1216. Should circumstances warrant, this proceeding or any related proceeding may be designated as restricted. As a "permit but disclose" proceeding, ex parte presentations will be governed by the procedures set forth in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules applicable to non-restricted proceedings.1 Parties making oral ex parte presentations are directed to the Commission's statement re- emphasizing the public's responsibility in permit-but-disclose proceedings and are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must contain the presentation's substance and not merely list the subjects discussed.2 More than a one or two sentence description of the views and
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/dominion_exparte072302.pdf
                • 2002 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING MARVIN ROSENBERG 202-457-7147 mrosenbe@hklaw.com Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission Office of the Secretary 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Ex-parte Written Presentation Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer of Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to Section 1.1206 (b)(1) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß1.1206(b)(1), the attached letter on behalf of Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., which is to be included in the public record in CS Docket No. 01-348, was sent on this date to the following members of the Commission's staff: W. Kenneth Ferree, Marcia Glauberman, JoAnn Lucanik, Rosalee Chiara, Royce Sherlock, Barbara Esbin, Julius Knapp,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/dominionexparte070902.pdf
                • 2002 MARVIN ROSENBERG 202-457-7147 mrosenbe@hklaw.com VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission Office of the Secretary 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Ex-parte Written Presentation Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer of Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to Section 1.1206 (b)(1) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß1.1206(b)(1), the attached letter on behalf of Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., which is to be included in the public record in CS Docket No. 01-348, was sent on this date to members of the intra-agency team reviewing the above referenced application. Should any additional information be desired, please contact the undersigned. Very truly
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/domvideo_exparte043002.pdf
                • West Palm Beach S o Paulo Tel Aviv* Tokyo *Representative Offices April 30, 2002 MARVIN ROSENBERG 202-457-7146 Internet Address: mrosenberg@hklaw.com VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Esq. Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Room TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte Presentation by Dominion Video Satellite, Inc. CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, transmitted herewith on behalf of Dominion Video Satellite, Inc. (ìDominion") is the following Ex Parte disclosure: On April 29, 2002, Robert W. Johnson, Kathy Johnson, Stephen A. Bogorad and the undersigned, on behalf of Dominion Video Satellite, Inc., met with the following Commission staff members: Marcia Glauberman, Barbara Esbin, Neal Dellar, Ken Ferree, Julius Knapp, Marilyn
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/duke_exparte041802.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Box 90362 Law and Communications Policy Seminar Durham, NC 27708-0362 at (919) 613-7145 April 17, 2002 Via Electronic Filing William F. Caton Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, SW TW-A325 Washington, DC, 20554 Re: Ex Parte Notice, CS Docket 01-348 Dear Mr. Caton: In accordance with ß1.1206 of the Commissionís rules, we hereby submit this letter to report that on April 16, 2002, Anna Sumner, Morgan Streetman, Gregory Manter, Sara Lester and Aaron Futch of the Law and Communications Policy Seminar at Duke Law (ìthe Seminar studentsî) and Professor William J. Freedman, supervisor to the Seminar students, met with: Susan Eid (Legal Advisor to Chairman Powell) Jordan
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/echostar2_exparte030503.pdf
                • 202.429.6494 pmichalo@steptoe.com March 5, 2002 BY HAND DELIVERY Mr. William F. Caton Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, SW ­ Room TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte Notice ­ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Mr. Caton: In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, EchoStar Communications Corporation ("EchoStar") submits this letter to report that, on February 21, 2002, David Goodfriend of EchoStar Communications Corporation, Pantelis Michalopoulos and Tim Walsh of Steptoe & Johnson LLP, counsel for EchoStar Communications Corporation, William Slowey of General Motors Corporation (telephonically) and Gary Epstein and Alex Hoehn-Saric of Latham & Watkins,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/echostar_exparte032802.pdf
                • text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit March 28, 2002 ELECTRONICALLY FILED Mr. William F. Caton Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, SW ­ Room TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte Notice ­ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Mr. Caton: In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, 1 EchoStar Communications Corporation submits this letter to report that, on March 27, 2002, David R. Goodfriend and the undersigned, representatives of EchoStar Communications Corporation ("EchoStar"), and Gary M. Epstein, James H. Barker, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Bart Epstein, counsel for General Motors Corporation ("General Motors") and Hughes Electronics Corporation ("Hughes"), had a
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/echostar_exparte061302.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit June 13, 2002 Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW ñ Room TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte Notice ñ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß1.1206, EchoStar Communications Corporation (ìEchoStarî), Hughes Electronics Corporation (ìHughesî) and General Motors Corporation (ìGMî), Applicants in the above-referenced merger proceeding, submit this letter to report that representatives of the Applicants met with members of the Commission staff on June 12, 2002. Representatives of the Applicants present at the meeting included Mark Jackson, David Moskowitz,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/echostar_exparte062602.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit June 26, 2002 Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW ñ Room TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte Notice ñ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: In accord with Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß1.1206, EchoStar Communications Corporation (ìEchoStarî), Hughes Electronics Corporation (ìHughesî) and General Motors Corporation (ìGMî), Applicants in the above-referenced merger proceeding, submit this letter to report that representatives of the Applicants had a telephone conference with members of the Commission staff on June 25, 2002. Representatives of the Applicants on the call were Robin Rogers,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/echostar_extltr030502.pdf
                • comply with the Information Request, the parties received and responded to well over 100 petitions and comments in this proceeding. That response required input from several key individuals whose contribution is also crucial in the context of the Initial Information and Data Request. Ms. Magalie Roman Salas March 5, 2002 Page 2 Pursuant to the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, please treat this letter as an ex parte presentation. An original and two copies of this letter are submitted for inclusion in the above-captioned docket. If you have any questions concerning the above, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Pantelis Michalopoulos Counsel for EchoStar Communications Corporation Gary M. Epstein Counsel for General Motors Corporation and Hughes
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/echostar_resp030502.pdf
                • 5, 2002 BY HAND DELIVERY Mr. William F. Caton Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, SW ­ Room TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte Notice ­ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Mr. Caton: Pursuant to the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, attached hereto please find a letter from the undersigned counsel for EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation, to W. Kenneth Ferree, Chief, Cable Services Bureau, filed today in connection with the above- captioned proceeding. An original and two copies of this letter and the attached letter are submitted for inclusion in the above-captioned docket. If you
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/fccextensionletter030702.pdf
                • approval was sent concurrent with the request for an extension of time, a day before the required response date.2 We further note that your ex parte notice regarding the February 21, 2002, meeting was filed with the Commission on March 5, 2002. Your delay in filing this notice is contrary to Commission's rules.3 You are reminded that, pursuant to Section 1.1206(b)(2), you are required to file written notice of an oral presentation to Commission staff no later than the next business day following the presentation. Under Section 1.1216, violations of the ex parte rules may result in sanctions, including forfeitures. We admonish the Applicants to comply with the ex parte requirements on a going-forward basis, and caution that future violations will
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/hubbard_exparte020502.pdf
                • Petersburg Tallahassee Tampa West Palm Beach Rio de Janeiro Sao Paulo Tel Aviv* Tokyo February 5, 2002 MARVIN ROSENBERG 202-457-7147 Internet Address: mrosenbe@hklaw.com Mr. William Caton Acting Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Room TW-A325 Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte Presentation by Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. Re: CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Mr. Caton: In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, transmitted herewith on behalf of Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. (ìHBI") is the following Ex Parte disclosure: On February 1, 2002, Gerry Sikorski and David A. Jones were speakers at Communications Horizons sponsored by the Minnesota Institute of Legal Education in Bloomington, Minnesota. Both Mr. Sikorski and Mr. Jones made statements supportive of the proposed merger between EchoStar
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/hughes_exparte042502.pdf
                • (202) 637-220I April 25, 2002 ELECTRONICALLY FILED Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission Office of the Secretary 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20054 Re: Ex Parte Notice ñ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, Hughes Electronics Corporation, and General Motors Corporation for Authority to Transfer of Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commissions Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß 1.1206, Applicants General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation (ìHughesî) submit this letter to report that at the Commissionís request, representatives from Hughes had a telephone conference with representatives from the Commission on April 24, 2002. Participants on the call included counsel for Hughes, two DIRECTV employees with responsibility for DIRECTV marketing initiatives,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/hughes_exparte053102.pdf
                • (202) 637-220I May 31, 2002 ELECTRONICALLY FILED Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission Office of the Secretary 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20054 Re: Ex Parte Notice ñ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, Hughes Electronics Corporation, and General Motors Corporation for Authority to Transfer of Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß 1.1206, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation (ìHughesî) submit this letter to report that, at the Commissionís request, representatives from Hughes had a telephone conference with representatives from the Commission on May 30, 2002. Participants included Steven Cox, Executive Vice President of Sales and Distribution, DIRECTV, Inc.; Merrill Spiegel, Vice President of
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/hughes_exparte062802.pdf
                • (202) 637-220I June 28, 2002 ELECTRONICALLY FILED Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission Office of the Secretary 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20054 Re: Ex Parte Notice ñ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, Hughes Electronics Corporation, and General Motors Corporation for Authority to Transfer of Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß 1.1206, General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation (ìHughesî) submit this letter to report that representatives of Hughes had a telephone conference with representatives from the Commission on June 27, 2002. Participants for Hughes included, Merrill Spiegel, Vice President of Government Affairs, DIRECTV, Inc., Robin Rogers, Vice President and Associate General Counsel, DIRECTV,
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nrtc_exparte061702.pdf
                • and EchoStar Communications Corporation, Transferee, For Authority to Transfer Control (the "Merger"); CS Docket Number 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: On behalf of our client, the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (NRTC), the attached two documents, which were individually filed today in separate Commission proceedings, are being submitted electronically for consideration in the above referenced proceeding in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules. First, NRTC filed a Petition to Deny (NRTC Petition) in response to a modification application (Extension Request) filed by EchoStar's VisionStar Incorporated (VisionStar).l EchoStar requests an extension of its construction and launch milestones due to an alleged lack of available financing for Ka-band projects.z In the NRTC Petition, NRTC argues that the Extension Request is nothing
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nrtc_exparte070302.pdf
                • Transferor; and EchoStar Communications Corporation, Transferee, For Authority to Transfer Control; CS Docket Number 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: On behalf of our client, the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (NRTC), the attached Reply (NRTC Reply), which was filed today in a separate Commission proceeding, is being submitted electronically for consideration in the above referenced proceeding in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules. The NRTC Reply was filed in response to a request by EchoStar's VisionStar Incorporated (Echo Star)! to extend its Ka-band construction and launch milestones2 due to an alleged lack of available financing for Ka-band projects. In NRTC's view, EchoStar consciously determined not to fund the VisionStar satellite for the simple reason that launching aKa-band satellite at
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nrtc_exparte072902.pdf
                • Electronics Corporation, Transferor; and EchoStar Communications Corporation, Transferee, For Authority to Transfer Control; CS Docket Number 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: On behalf of our client, the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (NRTC), the attached comment, which was filed today in a separate Commission proceeding, is being submitted electronically for consideration in the above referenced proceeding in accordance with 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules. Should you have any questions or require any additional infonnation, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Enclosure cc: Jim Bird C. Anthony Bush Neil A. Dellar Barbara Esbin W. Kenneth Ferree Marcia Glauberman J uli us Knapp WASHINGTON. D.C BRUSSELS SAN FaANC"CO Rlc 434- rds@ hards 4210 khlaw.1 JoAnn Lucanik Royce Dickens Sherlock Douglas Webbink
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nrtc_objection031402.pdf
                • DOJ may consider appropriate for purposes of its antitrust review. Indeed, the Commission decided this very matter when it established the appropriate areas of inquiry in its Information Request. The Applicants are not at their liberty to disregard the 4 Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar Communications, to William F. Caton, Secretary (March 12, 2002). 5 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2) (emphasis added). 6 See Letter from W. Kenneth Ferree, Chief, Cable Services Bureau, to Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar Communications, and Gary M. Epstein, Counsel for General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation (March 7, 2002) (Admonition Letter). Page 2 express requirements of the Information Request and to dictate to the Commission that they will provide documents only upon terms
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/nrtc_response040402.pdf
                • with the proposed Merger. 13 March 22 Letter, n.2. 14 Letter from Alex Hoehm-Saric, Counsel for General Motors and Hughes Electronics Corporation, to William F. Caton, Acting Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (February 25, 2002). Even if the Applicants had submitted their notice on February 23, 2002, it would have been one day late under the Commission's rules. 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b)(2). 15 Letter from Pantelis Michalopoulos, Counsel for EchoStar Communications Corportion, to William F. Caton, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission (March 12, 2002), p.2. 16 February 25 Letter, p.1. 17 Any ex parte notice disclosing an oral presentation to the Commission "must contain a summary of the substance of the ex parte presentation and not merely a listing of the subjects discussed.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/rainbow_exparte080202.pdf
                • to its construction authorization. The technical specifications for the satellite as discussed by Mr. Hildebrand are filed as a Technical Annex in Rainbow DBSís Application for Minor Modification to Direct Broadcast Satellite Authorization, for Issuance of Authority to Launch and for Authority to Operate Rainbow 1 (USABBS-17) (File Nos. SES-MOD-20020408-00062, DBS8701, accepted for filing May 17, 2002). Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1-2) of the Commissionís rules and the Public Notice establishing this proceeding (DA 01-3005, rel. Dec. 21, 2001), an electronic copy of this letter is being filed with the Office of the Secretary through the Electronic Comment Filing System. Copies of this letter are also being served, via electronic mail, on the Commission personnel who MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/rldbs2_exparte030702.pdf
                • Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., met with Commissioner Kathleen Q. Abernathy. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the issues presented by R/L DBS Company, LLC in its reply comments, filed on February 25, 2002 in the above-referenced proceeding. A copy of the additional material presented at the meeting is attached to this letter. Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Commissionís rules as well as the Public Notice establishing this proceeding (DA 01-3005, rel. Dec. 21, 2001), an electronic copy of this letter is being filed with the Office of the Secretary through the Electronic Comment Filing System (ìECFSî). Copies of this letter are also being served, via electronic mail, on the Commission personnel who participated
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/rldbs3_exparte030702.pdf
                • and the Commissionís intra-agency team reviewing the proposed transaction in the above-referenced proceeding. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the issues presented by R/L DBS Company, LLC in its reply comments, filed on February 25, 2002 in the above-referenced proceeding. A copy of the additional material presented at the meeting is attached to this letter. Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Commissionís rules as well as the Public Notice establishing this proceeding (DA 01-3005, rel. Dec. 21, 2001), an electronic copy of this letter is being filed with the Office of the Secretary through the Electronic Comment Filing System (ìECFSî). Copies of this letter are also being served, via electronic mail, on the Commission personnel who participated
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/rldbs4_exparte030702.pdf
                • Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., participated in a conference call with Commissioner Kevin J. Martin, and two of his legal advisors, Catherine Bohigian and Daniel Gonzalez. The purpose of the conference call was to discuss the issues presented by R/L DBS Company, LLC in its reply comments, filed on February 25, 2002 in the above-referenced proceeding. Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Commissionís rules as well as the Public Notice establishing this proceeding (DA 01-3005, rel. Dec. 21, 2001), an electronic copy of this letter is being filed with the Office of the Secretary through the Electronic Comment Filing System (ìECFSî). Copies of this letter are also being served, via electronic mail, on the Commission personnel who participated
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/rldbs_exparte030702.pdf
                • No. 98-21, we expressed the view that there should be no cable cross-ownership restrictions or restrictions on foreign ownership of subscription DBS service providers. We also expressed the view that new geographic service requirements should be imposed other than those currently in the rules. We also discussed the process for assigning DBS channels that currently are vacant. Pursuant to sections 1.1206(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Commissionís rules, an original and one copy of this letter are being filed with the Office of the Secretary. Copies of this letter are also being served on the Commission personnel who participated in these meetings via electronic mail. Any questions concerning this submission should be addressed to the undersigned. Sincerely, Christopher R. Bjornson cc: Ms.
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/wsn_exparte041202.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit April 12, 2002 Filed Electronically William Caton Acting Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte Filing ñ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation, and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Mr. Caton: Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß 1.1206, and Public Notice DA 01-3005 (released December 21, 2001), World Satellite Network, Inc. (ìWSNetî) submits this letter to disclose a meeting that representatives of WSNet had with W. Kenneth Ferree, Chief of the Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission (the ìCommissionî). On behalf of WSNet, I, Jared Abbruzzese, and Amy Mehlman met with
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/wsnet_exparte050302.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit May 3, 2002 Filed Electronically Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte ñ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation, and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß 1.1206, and Public Notice DA 01-3005 (released December 21, 2001), World Satellite Network, Inc. (ìWSNetî) submits this ex parte written presentation. As discussed in detail in its comments submitted on February 4, 2002, WSNet supports the proposed transaction because it will provide for heightened competition against the dominant cable companies in the larger
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/wsnet_exparte051002.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit May 10, 2002 Filed Electronically Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte ñ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation, and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß 1.1206, and Public Notice DA 01-3005 (released December 21, 2001), World Satellite Network, Inc. (ìWSNetî) submits this letter to disclose a meeting that representatives of WSNet had with the following personnel of the Federal Communications Commission (the ìCommissionî or ìFCCî): Barbara Esbin (Media Bureau); David Sappington (Office of Plans and Policy); Jim Bird
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/echostar-directv/wsnet_exparte052802.pdf
                • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit May 28, 2002 Filed Electronically Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Ex Parte ñ Consolidated Application of EchoStar Communications Corporation, General Motors Corporation, and Hughes Electronics Corporation for Authority to Transfer Control, CS Docket No. 01-348 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commissionís Rules, 47 C.F.R. ß 1.1206, and Public Notice DA 01-3005 (released December 21, 2001), World Satellite Network, Inc. (ìWSNetî) submits this ex parte written presentation. As discussed in detail in its comments submitted on February 4, 2002, WSNet supports the proposed transaction because it will provide for heightened competition against the dominant cable companies in the larger
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nbc-telemundo/da012689.pdf
                • Commission, we have concluded that the public interest would be served by classifying this proceeding as permit-but-disclose under the ex parte rules. Accordingly, by this Public Notice, and pursuant to Section 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1200(a), we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures that are applicable to nonrestricted proceedings under Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. §1.1206. Permit-but-disclose ex parte procedures permit interested parties to make ex parte presentations to the Commissioners and Commission employees and require that these presentations be disclosed in the record of the relevant proceeding. Persons making a written ex parte presentation to the Commissioners or Commission employees must file the written presentation with the Commission
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/da002352.pdf
                • numbers of the individual applications or other matters to which the filings pertain. Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. 4 1.1200(a), which permits the Commission to adopt modified ex -parte procedures in particular proceedings if the public interest so requires, we announce that this proceeding will be governed by permit-but-disclose exparte procedures that are applicable to non-restricted proceedings under 47 C.F.R. 4 1.1206. All documents filed in this proceeding should indicate in the caption that this matter is before the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Commercial Wireless Division, Policy and Rules Branch. An original and four copies of all comments, petitions to deny, oppositions and replies must be filed with the Commission's Secretary, Magalie Roman Salas, 445 12th Street, S.W., TW-B204, Washington, D.C. 20554, in
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/motorola_exparte012601.pdf
                • Secretary Federal Communications Commission The Portals, 455 Twelfth Street, S.W. Room TW-A325 Washington D.C. 20554 January 26,200l JAN 2 6 2001 --TloMsc(M#IIcI ORlcEbFwE~ Via Hand Delivery Re: Notice of Oral Ex Parte Presentation - Motorola, hc., et al., Applications for Consent to Assign 900 MHz SMR Licenses to FCI 900, Inc., DA 00-2352 Dear Ms. Salas: In accordance with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. 0 1.1206, notice is hereby given of an oral exparte presentation regarding the above-captioned proceeding. On January 26,2001, Mary Brooner and Ron Barky of Motorola, Laura Holloway of Nextel, and I met with members of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau and the Office of General Counsel to discuss the above-mentioned transaction. The specific Commission staff
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/motorola_motstrike011801.pdf
                • reasons, Motorola urges the Commission to dismiss Southern LINC's January 9, 2001, Reply without consideration. Respectfully submitted, Motorola, Inc. By: #&u&&&w Director, Telecommunications Strategy and Regulation Motorola, Inc. 1350 I Street, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 371-6900 Dated: January 18,200l 5 Motorola notes that Southern LINC's Reply was not submitted as a written exparte in accordance with Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's Rules. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Robin Walker, hereby certify that on this 18th day of January, 2001, I caused a true copy of the foregoing "Motion to Strike" to be delivered to the following persons via first class, postage prepaid mail: - International Transcription Services, Inc.* 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Room CY-B402 Washington, D.C. 20554 Mr. Michael
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/nextel_suppl022201.pdf
                • Motorola 900 MHz Licenses to Nextel Notice of Written Ex Parte Communication Dear Ms. Salas: I am writing to inform you that on Thursday, February 22, 2001, Nextel Communications, Inc. submitted the attached letter to Ms. Lauren Kravetz, with copies to Ms. Monica Desai, Ms. Susan Singer and Mr. John Branscome, all of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Pursuant to Section 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, an original and one copy of this letter are being submitted to the Secretary's office for the above-captioned docket and a copy of this letter is being provided to the recipients of the submission.Should there be any questions regarding this tiling, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, ss- To-Quyen Truong Counsel for Nextel Communications, Inc. Attachment
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/southern_exparte010901.pdf
                • filings. No additional written materials were provided during the meeting. There was also a short discussion of the relationship between Motorola and Nextel in the 700 MHz guardband auction as disclosed in their Foml 175 filing as it relates to Nextel's spectrum concentration. I TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP Magalie R. Salas, Esq. January 10, 2001 - Page 2 Consistent with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules, a copy of this notice is being provided to the participants in the meeting. Sincerely, Carolyn Tatum Roddy cc: Lauren H. Kravetz John Branscome Joel A. Rabinovitz N&l A. Dellar Susan Singer Monica Desai 0043053.01
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/southern_exparte032001.pdf
                • Baumann and Siwek in response to Commission staff questions concerning possible areas for trunked dispatch growth using 220 MI-Iz, 450 MHz, 700 MHz, 1.9 GI-Iz, AMTS, BVLTspectrum or traditional dispatch service. ko. oi Copies rw'd &f / LktABCDE_ ANCHORAGE l DALLAS l DENVER l NORTHERN VIRGINIA l WASHINGTON, DC Ms. Magalie Roman Salas March 20,2001 Page 2 Consistent with Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules and Public Notice DA OO- 2352, released October 19,2000, a copy of this notice is being provided to ex parte presentation participants and other parties to this matter. Please call me at the number above if you have any questions regarding the information herein. Sincerely, Enclosure Supplemental Affidavit of Michael G. Baumann and Stephen E. Siwek
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-motorola/southern_response012501.pdf
                • Notice does not provide for subsequent responsive pleadings"3and "Southern did not request leave to tile its unauthorized pleading nor provide any justification for it."4 Motorola makes a similar argument."5Nextel and Motorola note further that Southern's Reply presents no new facts or evidence to the Commission." Finally, Nextel asserts that Southern violated the Commission's ex parte disclosure requirements prescribed in Section 1.1206 of the Commission's rules because it was required to fully explain in an ex parte submission the matters it discussed with the Bureau staff but that the ex parte notice filed by Southern stated only that there was a "short discussion of the relationship between Motorola and Nextel in the 700 MHz guardband auction as disclosed in their Form 175
              • http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/voicestream-deutsche/voicestream_exparte042001.pdf
                • Commissioner Susan Ness related to VoiceStream's applications in the docket referenced above. In both conversations, Mr. Stanton urged the Commission to give expeditious consideration to the pending applications. Mr. Stanton also raised the possible interaction of a delay in the FCC's decisionmaking on the review by the inter- agency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. Pursuant to Section 1.1206 of the Commission's Rules, two copies of this letter have been filed with your office. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, /s/ Louis Gurman /s/ John T. Nakahata Cheryl A. Tritt John T. Nakahata Louis Gurman Karen L. Gulick Doane F. Kiechel Samuel L. Feder Christa M. Parker HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP MORRISON &